User login
Key clinical point: Maintenance therapy with tipifarnib did not prolong survival in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in remission.
Major finding: The median disease-free survival for tipifarnib vs. observation arms was 8.9 vs. 5.3 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.70; P = .026), which did not meet the prespecified limit to call a positive effect. The median overall survival was not significantly different between tipifarnib vs. observation arms (16.4 vs. 9.3 months; HR 0.74; P = .056).
Study details: Findings are from the phase 3 E2902 trial including 144 adult patients with non-M3 AML in remission and who were randomly assigned to tipifarnib or observation arms.
Disclosures: This study was supported by the US National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health. No disclosures were reported.
Source: Luger SM et al. Leuk Res. 2021;111:106736 (Oct 28). Doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2021.106736.
Key clinical point: Maintenance therapy with tipifarnib did not prolong survival in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in remission.
Major finding: The median disease-free survival for tipifarnib vs. observation arms was 8.9 vs. 5.3 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.70; P = .026), which did not meet the prespecified limit to call a positive effect. The median overall survival was not significantly different between tipifarnib vs. observation arms (16.4 vs. 9.3 months; HR 0.74; P = .056).
Study details: Findings are from the phase 3 E2902 trial including 144 adult patients with non-M3 AML in remission and who were randomly assigned to tipifarnib or observation arms.
Disclosures: This study was supported by the US National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health. No disclosures were reported.
Source: Luger SM et al. Leuk Res. 2021;111:106736 (Oct 28). Doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2021.106736.
Key clinical point: Maintenance therapy with tipifarnib did not prolong survival in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in remission.
Major finding: The median disease-free survival for tipifarnib vs. observation arms was 8.9 vs. 5.3 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.70; P = .026), which did not meet the prespecified limit to call a positive effect. The median overall survival was not significantly different between tipifarnib vs. observation arms (16.4 vs. 9.3 months; HR 0.74; P = .056).
Study details: Findings are from the phase 3 E2902 trial including 144 adult patients with non-M3 AML in remission and who were randomly assigned to tipifarnib or observation arms.
Disclosures: This study was supported by the US National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health. No disclosures were reported.
Source: Luger SM et al. Leuk Res. 2021;111:106736 (Oct 28). Doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2021.106736.