User login
New research suggests postmarket safety events are common for therapeutics approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Researchers evaluated more than 200 pharmaceuticals and biologics approved by the FDA from 2001 through 2010 and found that nearly a third of these products were affected by a postmarket safety event.
Most of the events were boxed warnings or safety communications, but there were a few products withdrawn from the market due to safety issues.
Joseph S. Ross, MD, of the Yale University School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut, and his colleagues reported these findings in JAMA.
The researchers noted that most pivotal trials that form the basis for FDA approval enroll fewer than 1000 patients and have follow-up of 6 months or less.
Therefore, uncommon or long-term serious safety risks may only become evident after approval, when new therapeutics are used in larger patient populations and for longer periods of time.
With this in mind, Dr Ross and his colleagues examined postmarket safety events for all novel therapeutics approved by the FDA between January 2001 and December 2010 (followed-up through February 2017).
Safety events included withdrawals due to safety concerns, FDA issuance of incremental boxed warnings added in the postmarket period, and FDA issuance of safety communications.
From 2001 through 2010, the FDA approved 222 novel therapeutics—183 pharmaceuticals and 39 biologics.
During a median follow-up of 11.7 years, there were 123 postmarket safety events—3 withdrawals, 61 boxed warnings, and 59 safety communications.
“The fact that the FDA is issuing safety communications means it is doing a good job of following newly approved drugs and evaluating their safety up in the postmarket period,” Dr Ross said.
The 123 safety events identified affected 71 (32%) of the 222 therapeutics.
The median time from FDA approval to the first postmarket safety event was 4.2 years. And 31% of the therapeutics were still affected by a postmarket safety event at 10 years.
The researchers found that postmarket safety events were significantly more frequent in biologics (P=0.03), drugs used to treat psychiatric disease (P<0.001), products approved near their regulatory deadline (P=0.008), and therapeutics granted accelerated approval (P=0.02).
“[The accelerated approval finding] shows that there is the potential for compromising patient safety when drug evaluation is persistently sped up,” Dr Ross said.
On the other hand, the researchers also found that postmarket safety events were significantly less frequent in therapeutics the FDA reviewed in less than 200 days (P=0.02).
The researchers said these findings should be interpreted cautiously, but they can be used to inform ongoing surveillance efforts. 
New research suggests postmarket safety events are common for therapeutics approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Researchers evaluated more than 200 pharmaceuticals and biologics approved by the FDA from 2001 through 2010 and found that nearly a third of these products were affected by a postmarket safety event.
Most of the events were boxed warnings or safety communications, but there were a few products withdrawn from the market due to safety issues.
Joseph S. Ross, MD, of the Yale University School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut, and his colleagues reported these findings in JAMA.
The researchers noted that most pivotal trials that form the basis for FDA approval enroll fewer than 1000 patients and have follow-up of 6 months or less.
Therefore, uncommon or long-term serious safety risks may only become evident after approval, when new therapeutics are used in larger patient populations and for longer periods of time.
With this in mind, Dr Ross and his colleagues examined postmarket safety events for all novel therapeutics approved by the FDA between January 2001 and December 2010 (followed-up through February 2017).
Safety events included withdrawals due to safety concerns, FDA issuance of incremental boxed warnings added in the postmarket period, and FDA issuance of safety communications.
From 2001 through 2010, the FDA approved 222 novel therapeutics—183 pharmaceuticals and 39 biologics.
During a median follow-up of 11.7 years, there were 123 postmarket safety events—3 withdrawals, 61 boxed warnings, and 59 safety communications.
“The fact that the FDA is issuing safety communications means it is doing a good job of following newly approved drugs and evaluating their safety up in the postmarket period,” Dr Ross said.
The 123 safety events identified affected 71 (32%) of the 222 therapeutics.
The median time from FDA approval to the first postmarket safety event was 4.2 years. And 31% of the therapeutics were still affected by a postmarket safety event at 10 years.
The researchers found that postmarket safety events were significantly more frequent in biologics (P=0.03), drugs used to treat psychiatric disease (P<0.001), products approved near their regulatory deadline (P=0.008), and therapeutics granted accelerated approval (P=0.02).
“[The accelerated approval finding] shows that there is the potential for compromising patient safety when drug evaluation is persistently sped up,” Dr Ross said.
On the other hand, the researchers also found that postmarket safety events were significantly less frequent in therapeutics the FDA reviewed in less than 200 days (P=0.02).
The researchers said these findings should be interpreted cautiously, but they can be used to inform ongoing surveillance efforts.
New research suggests postmarket safety events are common for therapeutics approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Researchers evaluated more than 200 pharmaceuticals and biologics approved by the FDA from 2001 through 2010 and found that nearly a third of these products were affected by a postmarket safety event.
Most of the events were boxed warnings or safety communications, but there were a few products withdrawn from the market due to safety issues.
Joseph S. Ross, MD, of the Yale University School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut, and his colleagues reported these findings in JAMA.
The researchers noted that most pivotal trials that form the basis for FDA approval enroll fewer than 1000 patients and have follow-up of 6 months or less.
Therefore, uncommon or long-term serious safety risks may only become evident after approval, when new therapeutics are used in larger patient populations and for longer periods of time.
With this in mind, Dr Ross and his colleagues examined postmarket safety events for all novel therapeutics approved by the FDA between January 2001 and December 2010 (followed-up through February 2017).
Safety events included withdrawals due to safety concerns, FDA issuance of incremental boxed warnings added in the postmarket period, and FDA issuance of safety communications.
From 2001 through 2010, the FDA approved 222 novel therapeutics—183 pharmaceuticals and 39 biologics.
During a median follow-up of 11.7 years, there were 123 postmarket safety events—3 withdrawals, 61 boxed warnings, and 59 safety communications.
“The fact that the FDA is issuing safety communications means it is doing a good job of following newly approved drugs and evaluating their safety up in the postmarket period,” Dr Ross said.
The 123 safety events identified affected 71 (32%) of the 222 therapeutics.
The median time from FDA approval to the first postmarket safety event was 4.2 years. And 31% of the therapeutics were still affected by a postmarket safety event at 10 years.
The researchers found that postmarket safety events were significantly more frequent in biologics (P=0.03), drugs used to treat psychiatric disease (P<0.001), products approved near their regulatory deadline (P=0.008), and therapeutics granted accelerated approval (P=0.02).
“[The accelerated approval finding] shows that there is the potential for compromising patient safety when drug evaluation is persistently sped up,” Dr Ross said.
On the other hand, the researchers also found that postmarket safety events were significantly less frequent in therapeutics the FDA reviewed in less than 200 days (P=0.02).
The researchers said these findings should be interpreted cautiously, but they can be used to inform ongoing surveillance efforts.