User login
An “early and aggressive” approach to massive blood transfusion can save lives in military combat zones and may provide the same benefit in civilian trauma care as well, according to an article published in the AANA Journal.
The article describes 2 patients who required massive transfusions due to multiple gunshot wounds sustained while in combat zones.
One patient received an inadequate amount of blood products and ultimately died.
But the other patient benefitted from a protocol change to ensure an adequate amount of blood products was delivered quickly.
David Gaskin, CRNA, of Huntsville Memorial Hospital in Texas, and his colleagues described these cases in the journal.
The authors noted that, while providing care in a combat zone, the transfusion of packed red blood cells (PRBC) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) is performed in a 1:1 ratio. However, the packaging and thawing techniques of the plasma can delay the delivery of blood products and prevent a patient from receiving enough blood.
Another issue in a military environment is the challenge of effectively communicating with live donors on site, which can cause delays in obtaining fresh blood supplies. Both of these issues can have life-threatening consequences for patients.
This is what happened with the first patient described in the article. The 38-year-old man sustained multiple gunshot wounds to the left side of the chest, left side of the back, and flank.
The surgical team was unable to maintain a high ratio of PRBCs to plasma and to infuse an adequate quantity of fresh whole blood (FWB) into this patient. He received 26 units of PRBCs, 5 units of FFP, 3 units of FWB, and 1 unit of cryoprecipitate.
The patient experienced trauma-induced coagulopathy, acidosis, and hypothermia. He died within 2 hours of presentation.
Because of this death, the team identified and implemented a protocol to keep 4 FFP units thawed and ready for immediate use at all times. They also identified and prescreened additional blood donors and implemented a phone roster and base-wide overhead system to enable rapid notification of these donors.
The second patient described in the article benefitted from these changes. This 23-year-old male sustained a gunshot wound to the left lower aspect of the abdomen and multiple gunshot wounds to bilateral lower extremities.
The “early and aggressive” use of FWB and plasma provided the necessary endogenous clotting factors and platelets to promote hemostasis in this patient. He received 18 units of PRBCs, 18 units of FFP, 2 units of cryoprecipitate, and 24 units of FWB.
Gaskin and his colleagues said these results suggest that efforts to incorporate a similar resuscitation strategy into civilian practice may improve outcomes, but it warrants continued study. 
An “early and aggressive” approach to massive blood transfusion can save lives in military combat zones and may provide the same benefit in civilian trauma care as well, according to an article published in the AANA Journal.
The article describes 2 patients who required massive transfusions due to multiple gunshot wounds sustained while in combat zones.
One patient received an inadequate amount of blood products and ultimately died.
But the other patient benefitted from a protocol change to ensure an adequate amount of blood products was delivered quickly.
David Gaskin, CRNA, of Huntsville Memorial Hospital in Texas, and his colleagues described these cases in the journal.
The authors noted that, while providing care in a combat zone, the transfusion of packed red blood cells (PRBC) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) is performed in a 1:1 ratio. However, the packaging and thawing techniques of the plasma can delay the delivery of blood products and prevent a patient from receiving enough blood.
Another issue in a military environment is the challenge of effectively communicating with live donors on site, which can cause delays in obtaining fresh blood supplies. Both of these issues can have life-threatening consequences for patients.
This is what happened with the first patient described in the article. The 38-year-old man sustained multiple gunshot wounds to the left side of the chest, left side of the back, and flank.
The surgical team was unable to maintain a high ratio of PRBCs to plasma and to infuse an adequate quantity of fresh whole blood (FWB) into this patient. He received 26 units of PRBCs, 5 units of FFP, 3 units of FWB, and 1 unit of cryoprecipitate.
The patient experienced trauma-induced coagulopathy, acidosis, and hypothermia. He died within 2 hours of presentation.
Because of this death, the team identified and implemented a protocol to keep 4 FFP units thawed and ready for immediate use at all times. They also identified and prescreened additional blood donors and implemented a phone roster and base-wide overhead system to enable rapid notification of these donors.
The second patient described in the article benefitted from these changes. This 23-year-old male sustained a gunshot wound to the left lower aspect of the abdomen and multiple gunshot wounds to bilateral lower extremities.
The “early and aggressive” use of FWB and plasma provided the necessary endogenous clotting factors and platelets to promote hemostasis in this patient. He received 18 units of PRBCs, 18 units of FFP, 2 units of cryoprecipitate, and 24 units of FWB.
Gaskin and his colleagues said these results suggest that efforts to incorporate a similar resuscitation strategy into civilian practice may improve outcomes, but it warrants continued study.
An “early and aggressive” approach to massive blood transfusion can save lives in military combat zones and may provide the same benefit in civilian trauma care as well, according to an article published in the AANA Journal.
The article describes 2 patients who required massive transfusions due to multiple gunshot wounds sustained while in combat zones.
One patient received an inadequate amount of blood products and ultimately died.
But the other patient benefitted from a protocol change to ensure an adequate amount of blood products was delivered quickly.
David Gaskin, CRNA, of Huntsville Memorial Hospital in Texas, and his colleagues described these cases in the journal.
The authors noted that, while providing care in a combat zone, the transfusion of packed red blood cells (PRBC) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) is performed in a 1:1 ratio. However, the packaging and thawing techniques of the plasma can delay the delivery of blood products and prevent a patient from receiving enough blood.
Another issue in a military environment is the challenge of effectively communicating with live donors on site, which can cause delays in obtaining fresh blood supplies. Both of these issues can have life-threatening consequences for patients.
This is what happened with the first patient described in the article. The 38-year-old man sustained multiple gunshot wounds to the left side of the chest, left side of the back, and flank.
The surgical team was unable to maintain a high ratio of PRBCs to plasma and to infuse an adequate quantity of fresh whole blood (FWB) into this patient. He received 26 units of PRBCs, 5 units of FFP, 3 units of FWB, and 1 unit of cryoprecipitate.
The patient experienced trauma-induced coagulopathy, acidosis, and hypothermia. He died within 2 hours of presentation.
Because of this death, the team identified and implemented a protocol to keep 4 FFP units thawed and ready for immediate use at all times. They also identified and prescreened additional blood donors and implemented a phone roster and base-wide overhead system to enable rapid notification of these donors.
The second patient described in the article benefitted from these changes. This 23-year-old male sustained a gunshot wound to the left lower aspect of the abdomen and multiple gunshot wounds to bilateral lower extremities.
The “early and aggressive” use of FWB and plasma provided the necessary endogenous clotting factors and platelets to promote hemostasis in this patient. He received 18 units of PRBCs, 18 units of FFP, 2 units of cryoprecipitate, and 24 units of FWB.
Gaskin and his colleagues said these results suggest that efforts to incorporate a similar resuscitation strategy into civilian practice may improve outcomes, but it warrants continued study.