VIDEO: Pediatric outcomes reassuring after cancer treatment during pregnancy

VIENNA – Children whose mothers had cancer while pregnant had similar cognitive, cardiac, and general development in early childhood as did those born to women without cancer, according to results presented at the European Cancer Congress and simultaneously published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The case-control study found no significant differences in mental development among children exposed to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery alone, or no treatment. In addition, the number of chemotherapy cycles during pregnancy, which ranged from 1 to 10, also had no impact on mental development when measured at 18 months and 3 years, Dr. Frédéric Amant, a gynecologic oncologist at University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium and at Antoni van Leeuwenhoek in Amsterdam, said during a press briefing.

Chemotherapy was given in only the second and third trimesters, he noted.

During pregnancy, 96 of the 129 children were exposed to chemotherapy alone or in combination with other treatments, 11 to radiotherapy alone or in combination with other treatments, 13 to surgery alone, 2 to other drugs therapies, and 14 to no treatment. The 129 controls were born to healthy mothers after uncomplicated pregnancies and deliveries (N Engl J Med. Sep 28, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1508913.).

More than 60% of children with perinatal cancer exposure were born premature, but their development at a median age of 22 months was normal for their gestational age at birth.

The incidence of prematurity is high, but in most cases the children were born prematurely because of a medical decision to induce preterm so the mother could continue cancer therapy after delivery, Dr. Amant said in an interview.

Children with a birthweight below the 10th percentile were born more often to mothers with cancer during pregnancy than were children in the control group, but the difference was not significantly different (22% vs. 15.2%; P = .16).

“Overall, these data should be reassuring to women who are facing a new diagnosis of cancer during pregnancy and to their families,” Dr. Michael Greene, chief of obstetrics at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, and Dr. Dan Longo, an oncologist from the Dana Farber Cancer Institute, also in Boston, wrote in an accompanying editorial (N Engl J Med. Sep 28, doi:10.1056/NEJMe1512188.).

“Prudence continues to suggest avoiding cancer treatment in the first trimester, however, treatment in the second and third trimester is likely to be best for both mothers and their offspring,” they stated.

Dr. Peter Naredi, European CanCer Organization scientific cochair of the Congress, said that “while further follow-up of these children is required, the important message at this stage seems to be that doctors should not only start cancer treatment immediately, but should also try to maintain the pregnancy to as near full term as possible.”

The study was funded by the Belgian National Cancer Plan, Research Fund Flanders, Stichting tegen Kanker, Katholieke University Leuven, and Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven. Dr. Amant reported having no financial disclosures. Dr. Greene and Dr. Longo reported that they are editors for the New England Journal of Medicine.

[email protected]

On Twitter @pwendl

VIENNA – Children whose mothers had cancer while pregnant had similar cognitive, cardiac, and general development in early childhood as did those born to women without cancer, according to results presented at the European Cancer Congress and simultaneously published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The case-control study found no significant differences in mental development among children exposed to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery alone, or no treatment. In addition, the number of chemotherapy cycles during pregnancy, which ranged from 1 to 10, also had no impact on mental development when measured at 18 months and 3 years, Dr. Frédéric Amant, a gynecologic oncologist at University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium and at Antoni van Leeuwenhoek in Amsterdam, said during a press briefing.

Chemotherapy was given in only the second and third trimesters, he noted.

During pregnancy, 96 of the 129 children were exposed to chemotherapy alone or in combination with other treatments, 11 to radiotherapy alone or in combination with other treatments, 13 to surgery alone, 2 to other drugs therapies, and 14 to no treatment. The 129 controls were born to healthy mothers after uncomplicated pregnancies and deliveries (N Engl J Med. Sep 28, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1508913.).

More than 60% of children with perinatal cancer exposure were born premature, but their development at a median age of 22 months was normal for their gestational age at birth.

The incidence of prematurity is high, but in most cases the children were born prematurely because of a medical decision to induce preterm so the mother could continue cancer therapy after delivery, Dr. Amant said in an interview.

Children with a birthweight below the 10th percentile were born more often to mothers with cancer during pregnancy than were children in the control group, but the difference was not significantly different (22% vs. 15.2%; P = .16).

“Overall, these data should be reassuring to women who are facing a new diagnosis of cancer during pregnancy and to their families,” Dr. Michael Greene, chief of obstetrics at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, and Dr. Dan Longo, an oncologist from the Dana Farber Cancer Institute, also in Boston, wrote in an accompanying editorial (N Engl J Med. Sep 28, doi:10.1056/NEJMe1512188.).

“Prudence continues to suggest avoiding cancer treatment in the first trimester, however, treatment in the second and third trimester is likely to be best for both mothers and their offspring,” they stated.

Dr. Peter Naredi, European CanCer Organization scientific cochair of the Congress, said that “while further follow-up of these children is required, the important message at this stage seems to be that doctors should not only start cancer treatment immediately, but should also try to maintain the pregnancy to as near full term as possible.”

The study was funded by the Belgian National Cancer Plan, Research Fund Flanders, Stichting tegen Kanker, Katholieke University Leuven, and Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven. Dr. Amant reported having no financial disclosures. Dr. Greene and Dr. Longo reported that they are editors for the New England Journal of Medicine.

[email protected]

On Twitter @pwendl

VIENNA – Children whose mothers had cancer while pregnant had similar cognitive, cardiac, and general development in early childhood as did those born to women without cancer, according to results presented at the European Cancer Congress and simultaneously published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The case-control study found no significant differences in mental development among children exposed to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery alone, or no treatment. In addition, the number of chemotherapy cycles during pregnancy, which ranged from 1 to 10, also had no impact on mental development when measured at 18 months and 3 years, Dr. Frédéric Amant, a gynecologic oncologist at University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium and at Antoni van Leeuwenhoek in Amsterdam, said during a press briefing.

Chemotherapy was given in only the second and third trimesters, he noted.

During pregnancy, 96 of the 129 children were exposed to chemotherapy alone or in combination with other treatments, 11 to radiotherapy alone or in combination with other treatments, 13 to surgery alone, 2 to other drugs therapies, and 14 to no treatment. The 129 controls were born to healthy mothers after uncomplicated pregnancies and deliveries (N Engl J Med. Sep 28, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1508913.).

More than 60% of children with perinatal cancer exposure were born premature, but their development at a median age of 22 months was normal for their gestational age at birth.

The incidence of prematurity is high, but in most cases the children were born prematurely because of a medical decision to induce preterm so the mother could continue cancer therapy after delivery, Dr. Amant said in an interview.

Children with a birthweight below the 10th percentile were born more often to mothers with cancer during pregnancy than were children in the control group, but the difference was not significantly different (22% vs. 15.2%; P = .16).

“Overall, these data should be reassuring to women who are facing a new diagnosis of cancer during pregnancy and to their families,” Dr. Michael Greene, chief of obstetrics at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, and Dr. Dan Longo, an oncologist from the Dana Farber Cancer Institute, also in Boston, wrote in an accompanying editorial (N Engl J Med. Sep 28, doi:10.1056/NEJMe1512188.).

“Prudence continues to suggest avoiding cancer treatment in the first trimester, however, treatment in the second and third trimester is likely to be best for both mothers and their offspring,” they stated.

Dr. Peter Naredi, European CanCer Organization scientific cochair of the Congress, said that “while further follow-up of these children is required, the important message at this stage seems to be that doctors should not only start cancer treatment immediately, but should also try to maintain the pregnancy to as near full term as possible.”

The study was funded by the Belgian National Cancer Plan, Research Fund Flanders, Stichting tegen Kanker, Katholieke University Leuven, and Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven. Dr. Amant reported having no financial disclosures. Dr. Greene and Dr. Longo reported that they are editors for the New England Journal of Medicine.

[email protected]

On Twitter @pwendl