User login
HCV Hub
AbbVie
acid
addicted
addiction
adolescent
adult sites
Advocacy
advocacy
agitated states
AJO, postsurgical analgesic, knee, replacement, surgery
alcohol
amphetamine
androgen
antibody
apple cider vinegar
assistance
Assistance
association
at home
attorney
audit
ayurvedic
baby
ban
baricitinib
bed bugs
best
bible
bisexual
black
bleach
blog
bulimia nervosa
buy
cannabis
certificate
certification
certified
cervical cancer, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging, MRI, IVIM, diffusion-weighted MRI, DWI
charlie sheen
cheap
cheapest
child
childhood
childlike
children
chronic fatigue syndrome
Cladribine Tablets
cocaine
cock
combination therapies, synergistic antitumor efficacy, pertuzumab, trastuzumab, ipilimumab, nivolumab, palbociclib, letrozole, lapatinib, docetaxel, trametinib, dabrafenib, carflzomib, lenalidomide
contagious
Cortical Lesions
cream
creams
crime
criminal
cure
dangerous
dangers
dasabuvir
Dasabuvir
dead
deadly
death
dementia
dependence
dependent
depression
dermatillomania
die
diet
direct-acting antivirals
Disability
Discount
discount
dog
drink
drug abuse
drug-induced
dying
eastern medicine
eat
ect
eczema
electroconvulsive therapy
electromagnetic therapy
electrotherapy
epa
epilepsy
erectile dysfunction
explosive disorder
fake
Fake-ovir
fatal
fatalities
fatality
fibromyalgia
financial
Financial
fish oil
food
foods
foundation
free
Gabriel Pardo
gaston
general hospital
genetic
geriatric
Giancarlo Comi
gilead
Gilead
glaucoma
Glenn S. Williams
Glenn Williams
Gloria Dalla Costa
gonorrhea
Greedy
greedy
guns
hallucinations
harvoni
Harvoni
herbal
herbs
heroin
herpes
Hidradenitis Suppurativa,
holistic
home
home remedies
home remedy
homeopathic
homeopathy
hydrocortisone
ice
image
images
job
kid
kids
kill
killer
laser
lawsuit
lawyer
ledipasvir
Ledipasvir
lesbian
lesions
lights
liver
lupus
marijuana
melancholic
memory loss
menopausal
mental retardation
military
milk
moisturizers
monoamine oxidase inhibitor drugs
MRI
MS
murder
national
natural
natural cure
natural cures
natural medications
natural medicine
natural medicines
natural remedies
natural remedy
natural treatment
natural treatments
naturally
Needy
needy
Neurology Reviews
neuropathic
nightclub massacre
nightclub shooting
nude
nudity
nutraceuticals
OASIS
oasis
off label
ombitasvir
Ombitasvir
ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir with dasabuvir
orlando shooting
overactive thyroid gland
overdose
overdosed
Paolo Preziosa
paritaprevir
Paritaprevir
pediatric
pedophile
photo
photos
picture
post partum
postnatal
pregnancy
pregnant
prenatal
prepartum
prison
program
Program
Protest
protest
psychedelics
pulse nightclub
puppy
purchase
purchasing
rape
recall
recreational drug
Rehabilitation
Retinal Measurements
retrograde ejaculation
risperdal
ritonavir
Ritonavir
ritonavir with dasabuvir
robin williams
sales
sasquatch
schizophrenia
seizure
seizures
sex
sexual
sexy
shock treatment
silver
sleep disorders
smoking
sociopath
sofosbuvir
Sofosbuvir
sovaldi
ssri
store
sue
suicidal
suicide
supplements
support
Support
Support Path
teen
teenage
teenagers
Telerehabilitation
testosterone
Th17
Th17:FoxP3+Treg cell ratio
Th22
toxic
toxin
tragedy
treatment resistant
V Pak
vagina
velpatasvir
Viekira Pa
Viekira Pak
viekira pak
violence
virgin
vitamin
VPak
weight loss
withdrawal
wrinkles
xxx
young adult
young adults
zoloft
financial
sofosbuvir
ritonavir with dasabuvir
discount
support path
program
ritonavir
greedy
ledipasvir
assistance
viekira pak
vpak
advocacy
needy
protest
abbvie
paritaprevir
ombitasvir
direct-acting antivirals
dasabuvir
gilead
fake-ovir
support
v pak
oasis
harvoni
Virologic response no protection against HCV liver decompensation
Patients with chronic hepatitis C who develop cirrhosis with severe portal hypertension are at greater risk of progressing to liver decompensation within the first 5 years of treatment, even if they show a sustained virologic response to therapy, a cohort study has found.
The study of 100 patients with hepatitis C and compensated cirrhosis showed that the probability of developing a first episode of liver decompensation at 1, 5, and 7 years was 4%, 25%, and 28%, respectively, among patients with an hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) value of 10 mm Hg or above, compared with 0, 0, and 16% in patients without cirrhosis with severe portal hypertension (CSPH).
Nearly three-quarters of the patients in the study had CSPH at baseline and 35% achieved a sustained virologic response, while 19% developed liver decompensation, according to Dr. Sabela Lens of the Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August-Pi-Sunyer, Barcelona, and coauthors.
“Although viral clearance was associated with a significant reduction in HVPG, this effect, at least 24 weeks after the end of treatment, was mild and only one-third of patients with a high-risk baseline situation with CSPH shifted to a condition of low risk for developing liver decompensation,” they wrote (Clin Gastro Hepatol. 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.04.013).
“The results of our study show that baseline HVPG value before antiviral treatment is a strong predictor of liver decompensation on follow-up evaluation,” Dr. Lens and associates noted.
The study was funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, and one author was funded by an unrestricted grant from Roche. There were no other conflicts of interest declared.
Patients with chronic hepatitis C who develop cirrhosis with severe portal hypertension are at greater risk of progressing to liver decompensation within the first 5 years of treatment, even if they show a sustained virologic response to therapy, a cohort study has found.
The study of 100 patients with hepatitis C and compensated cirrhosis showed that the probability of developing a first episode of liver decompensation at 1, 5, and 7 years was 4%, 25%, and 28%, respectively, among patients with an hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) value of 10 mm Hg or above, compared with 0, 0, and 16% in patients without cirrhosis with severe portal hypertension (CSPH).
Nearly three-quarters of the patients in the study had CSPH at baseline and 35% achieved a sustained virologic response, while 19% developed liver decompensation, according to Dr. Sabela Lens of the Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August-Pi-Sunyer, Barcelona, and coauthors.
“Although viral clearance was associated with a significant reduction in HVPG, this effect, at least 24 weeks after the end of treatment, was mild and only one-third of patients with a high-risk baseline situation with CSPH shifted to a condition of low risk for developing liver decompensation,” they wrote (Clin Gastro Hepatol. 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.04.013).
“The results of our study show that baseline HVPG value before antiviral treatment is a strong predictor of liver decompensation on follow-up evaluation,” Dr. Lens and associates noted.
The study was funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, and one author was funded by an unrestricted grant from Roche. There were no other conflicts of interest declared.
Patients with chronic hepatitis C who develop cirrhosis with severe portal hypertension are at greater risk of progressing to liver decompensation within the first 5 years of treatment, even if they show a sustained virologic response to therapy, a cohort study has found.
The study of 100 patients with hepatitis C and compensated cirrhosis showed that the probability of developing a first episode of liver decompensation at 1, 5, and 7 years was 4%, 25%, and 28%, respectively, among patients with an hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) value of 10 mm Hg or above, compared with 0, 0, and 16% in patients without cirrhosis with severe portal hypertension (CSPH).
Nearly three-quarters of the patients in the study had CSPH at baseline and 35% achieved a sustained virologic response, while 19% developed liver decompensation, according to Dr. Sabela Lens of the Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August-Pi-Sunyer, Barcelona, and coauthors.
“Although viral clearance was associated with a significant reduction in HVPG, this effect, at least 24 weeks after the end of treatment, was mild and only one-third of patients with a high-risk baseline situation with CSPH shifted to a condition of low risk for developing liver decompensation,” they wrote (Clin Gastro Hepatol. 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.04.013).
“The results of our study show that baseline HVPG value before antiviral treatment is a strong predictor of liver decompensation on follow-up evaluation,” Dr. Lens and associates noted.
The study was funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, and one author was funded by an unrestricted grant from Roche. There were no other conflicts of interest declared.
FROM CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
Key clinical point:Sustained virologic response is no protection against liver decompensation in patients who develop cirrhosis with severe portal hypertension.
Major finding: Patients with severe portal hypertension at baseline are nearly twice as likely to develop liver compensation at 7 years as those without severe portal hypertension.
Data source: Cohort study in 100 patients with hepatitis C and compensated cirrhosis.
Disclosures: The study was funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, and one author was funded by an unrestricted grant from Roche. There were no other conflicts of interest declared.
Ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin in advanced HCV does well
Combination treatment with ledipasvir, sofosbuvir, and ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection led to sustained viral response (SVR) rates of 86%-89% among nontransplanted patients and 60%-100% among transplant recipients, according to a study published in the September issue of Gastroenterology.
“Rates of SVR were over 85% in every group of patients with Child-Pugh class [CPC] B decompensated cirrhosis – in those who had and had not undergone liver transplantation, as well as those who were receiving 12 and 24 weeks of treatment,” said Dr. Michael Charlton of Intermountain Medical Center in Salt Lake City, and his associates. “Similar response rates were observed in Child-Pugh class C patients who had not undergone liver transplantation. Rates of response were numerically lower in liver transplant recipients with Child-Pugh class C disease, but the small sample size ... makes this a preliminary observation.”
Patients with chronic HCV infection and advanced liver disease have a poor prognosis because of their risk of liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma and because they have very limited treatment options. Chances of reinfection are 100% if patients have detectable virus at transplantation, and reinfection increases rates of subsequent graft loss, morbidity, and mortality, the investigators noted.
To assess the recently approved sofosbuvir-ledipasvir regimen, they conducted an open-label, phase II trial (SOLAR-1) of the combination plus ribavirin in 337 HCV-infected patients with advanced liver disease, including transplant recipients. Nearly all (99%) of the patients had HCV genotype 1 infection, while 1% had genotype 4 infection. The investigators randomized patients to receive 90 mg ledipasvir and 400 mg sofosbuvir in a fixed-dose daily regimen for either 12 or 24 weeks in combination with ribavirin, which was dosed based on body weight, tolerance of side effects, and extent of liver disease. Patients with CPC C cirrhosis received lower doses of ribavirin because of increased risk of hemotoxicity (Gastroenterology 2015 May 15. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2015.05.010).
Nontransplanted patients who had decompensated cirrhosis achieved SVR12 or SVR24 rates of 86%-89%, even if they had CPC C decompensated disease, the researchers reported. “Our results also demonstrate that SVR12 in patients with decompensated cirrhosis is associated with early improvements in CPC and MELD [Model for End-Stage Liver Disease] scores, suggesting that eradication of the virus can rapidly improve hepatic function by attenuating the injury and inflammation due to HCV replication,” they said. Patients with CPC B disease also had significant improvements in albumin and bilirubin levels after 4 weeks of treatment.
Among transplant recipients who were noncirrhotic or were in compensated cirrhosis, SVR rates ranged from 96% to 98%, regardless of treatment duration or presence of cirrhosis, Dr. Charlton and associates reported. Among transplant recipients with decompensated cirrhosis, SVR rates were 86%-88% for the subgroup with CPC B disease, but were 60% for CPC C patients who were treated for 12 weeks, and were 75% for CPC C patients who were treated for 24 weeks. In contrast, all six patients with fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis achieved SVR and also experienced large drops in total bilirubin levels within 2-4 weeks of starting treatment, the researchers said. Finally, among the seven patients who underwent liver transplantation either during treatment or before posttreatment week 12, six achieved virologic response after surgery, and one died of multiorgan failure and septic shock 1 day after testing negative for HCV RNA.
In all, 13 patients (4%) discontinued treatment because of adverse events, primarily liver decompensation, the researchers reported. Adverse events that led more than one patient to stop treatment included sepsis, renal failure, dyspnea, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Patients were more likely to stop taking ribavirin if they were treated for 24 weeks or had worsening disease. Ten patients died on study, but none of the deaths were thought to be related to treatment, the researchers wrote.
Dr. Charlton disclosed ties with Gilead Sciences, maker of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir. Gilead funded the study. Four coauthors reported having no conflicts; the other 25 investigators reported employment or other financial ties with numerous pharmaceutical companies.
Combination treatment with ledipasvir, sofosbuvir, and ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection led to sustained viral response (SVR) rates of 86%-89% among nontransplanted patients and 60%-100% among transplant recipients, according to a study published in the September issue of Gastroenterology.
“Rates of SVR were over 85% in every group of patients with Child-Pugh class [CPC] B decompensated cirrhosis – in those who had and had not undergone liver transplantation, as well as those who were receiving 12 and 24 weeks of treatment,” said Dr. Michael Charlton of Intermountain Medical Center in Salt Lake City, and his associates. “Similar response rates were observed in Child-Pugh class C patients who had not undergone liver transplantation. Rates of response were numerically lower in liver transplant recipients with Child-Pugh class C disease, but the small sample size ... makes this a preliminary observation.”
Patients with chronic HCV infection and advanced liver disease have a poor prognosis because of their risk of liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma and because they have very limited treatment options. Chances of reinfection are 100% if patients have detectable virus at transplantation, and reinfection increases rates of subsequent graft loss, morbidity, and mortality, the investigators noted.
To assess the recently approved sofosbuvir-ledipasvir regimen, they conducted an open-label, phase II trial (SOLAR-1) of the combination plus ribavirin in 337 HCV-infected patients with advanced liver disease, including transplant recipients. Nearly all (99%) of the patients had HCV genotype 1 infection, while 1% had genotype 4 infection. The investigators randomized patients to receive 90 mg ledipasvir and 400 mg sofosbuvir in a fixed-dose daily regimen for either 12 or 24 weeks in combination with ribavirin, which was dosed based on body weight, tolerance of side effects, and extent of liver disease. Patients with CPC C cirrhosis received lower doses of ribavirin because of increased risk of hemotoxicity (Gastroenterology 2015 May 15. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2015.05.010).
Nontransplanted patients who had decompensated cirrhosis achieved SVR12 or SVR24 rates of 86%-89%, even if they had CPC C decompensated disease, the researchers reported. “Our results also demonstrate that SVR12 in patients with decompensated cirrhosis is associated with early improvements in CPC and MELD [Model for End-Stage Liver Disease] scores, suggesting that eradication of the virus can rapidly improve hepatic function by attenuating the injury and inflammation due to HCV replication,” they said. Patients with CPC B disease also had significant improvements in albumin and bilirubin levels after 4 weeks of treatment.
Among transplant recipients who were noncirrhotic or were in compensated cirrhosis, SVR rates ranged from 96% to 98%, regardless of treatment duration or presence of cirrhosis, Dr. Charlton and associates reported. Among transplant recipients with decompensated cirrhosis, SVR rates were 86%-88% for the subgroup with CPC B disease, but were 60% for CPC C patients who were treated for 12 weeks, and were 75% for CPC C patients who were treated for 24 weeks. In contrast, all six patients with fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis achieved SVR and also experienced large drops in total bilirubin levels within 2-4 weeks of starting treatment, the researchers said. Finally, among the seven patients who underwent liver transplantation either during treatment or before posttreatment week 12, six achieved virologic response after surgery, and one died of multiorgan failure and septic shock 1 day after testing negative for HCV RNA.
In all, 13 patients (4%) discontinued treatment because of adverse events, primarily liver decompensation, the researchers reported. Adverse events that led more than one patient to stop treatment included sepsis, renal failure, dyspnea, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Patients were more likely to stop taking ribavirin if they were treated for 24 weeks or had worsening disease. Ten patients died on study, but none of the deaths were thought to be related to treatment, the researchers wrote.
Dr. Charlton disclosed ties with Gilead Sciences, maker of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir. Gilead funded the study. Four coauthors reported having no conflicts; the other 25 investigators reported employment or other financial ties with numerous pharmaceutical companies.
Combination treatment with ledipasvir, sofosbuvir, and ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection led to sustained viral response (SVR) rates of 86%-89% among nontransplanted patients and 60%-100% among transplant recipients, according to a study published in the September issue of Gastroenterology.
“Rates of SVR were over 85% in every group of patients with Child-Pugh class [CPC] B decompensated cirrhosis – in those who had and had not undergone liver transplantation, as well as those who were receiving 12 and 24 weeks of treatment,” said Dr. Michael Charlton of Intermountain Medical Center in Salt Lake City, and his associates. “Similar response rates were observed in Child-Pugh class C patients who had not undergone liver transplantation. Rates of response were numerically lower in liver transplant recipients with Child-Pugh class C disease, but the small sample size ... makes this a preliminary observation.”
Patients with chronic HCV infection and advanced liver disease have a poor prognosis because of their risk of liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma and because they have very limited treatment options. Chances of reinfection are 100% if patients have detectable virus at transplantation, and reinfection increases rates of subsequent graft loss, morbidity, and mortality, the investigators noted.
To assess the recently approved sofosbuvir-ledipasvir regimen, they conducted an open-label, phase II trial (SOLAR-1) of the combination plus ribavirin in 337 HCV-infected patients with advanced liver disease, including transplant recipients. Nearly all (99%) of the patients had HCV genotype 1 infection, while 1% had genotype 4 infection. The investigators randomized patients to receive 90 mg ledipasvir and 400 mg sofosbuvir in a fixed-dose daily regimen for either 12 or 24 weeks in combination with ribavirin, which was dosed based on body weight, tolerance of side effects, and extent of liver disease. Patients with CPC C cirrhosis received lower doses of ribavirin because of increased risk of hemotoxicity (Gastroenterology 2015 May 15. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2015.05.010).
Nontransplanted patients who had decompensated cirrhosis achieved SVR12 or SVR24 rates of 86%-89%, even if they had CPC C decompensated disease, the researchers reported. “Our results also demonstrate that SVR12 in patients with decompensated cirrhosis is associated with early improvements in CPC and MELD [Model for End-Stage Liver Disease] scores, suggesting that eradication of the virus can rapidly improve hepatic function by attenuating the injury and inflammation due to HCV replication,” they said. Patients with CPC B disease also had significant improvements in albumin and bilirubin levels after 4 weeks of treatment.
Among transplant recipients who were noncirrhotic or were in compensated cirrhosis, SVR rates ranged from 96% to 98%, regardless of treatment duration or presence of cirrhosis, Dr. Charlton and associates reported. Among transplant recipients with decompensated cirrhosis, SVR rates were 86%-88% for the subgroup with CPC B disease, but were 60% for CPC C patients who were treated for 12 weeks, and were 75% for CPC C patients who were treated for 24 weeks. In contrast, all six patients with fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis achieved SVR and also experienced large drops in total bilirubin levels within 2-4 weeks of starting treatment, the researchers said. Finally, among the seven patients who underwent liver transplantation either during treatment or before posttreatment week 12, six achieved virologic response after surgery, and one died of multiorgan failure and septic shock 1 day after testing negative for HCV RNA.
In all, 13 patients (4%) discontinued treatment because of adverse events, primarily liver decompensation, the researchers reported. Adverse events that led more than one patient to stop treatment included sepsis, renal failure, dyspnea, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Patients were more likely to stop taking ribavirin if they were treated for 24 weeks or had worsening disease. Ten patients died on study, but none of the deaths were thought to be related to treatment, the researchers wrote.
Dr. Charlton disclosed ties with Gilead Sciences, maker of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir. Gilead funded the study. Four coauthors reported having no conflicts; the other 25 investigators reported employment or other financial ties with numerous pharmaceutical companies.
FROM GASTROENTEROLOGY
Key clinical point: Ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for 12 weeks achieved high SVR rates among patients with hepatitis C virus infection and advanced liver disease.
Major finding: Rates of SVR exceeded 85% in every cohort of Child-Pugh class B decompensated cirrhosis, regardless of treatment duration or transplantation status.
Data source: Randomized open-label phase II study of 337 patients with chronic HCV infection and advanced liver disease.
Disclosures: Dr. Charlton disclosed ties with Gilead Sciences, maker of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir. Gilead funded the study. Four coauthors reported having no conflicts; the other 25 investigators reported employment or other financial ties with numerous pharmaceutical companies.
Cirrhosis in HCV often goes unreported
More than 28% of patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) virus infection met at least one criterion for cirrhosis, while only 7% had biopsy confirmation of the condition, investigators reported in the August issue of the American Journal of Gastroenterology.
Furthermore, only half of the patients with a positive biopsy had been given an associated ICD-9-CM code, said Dr. Stuart Gordon at Henry Ford Health System in Detroit and his associates. Cirrhosis in CHC therefore might often go unreported, leading to “overly conservative” estimates of its prevalence, associated health care costs, and the cost-effectiveness of the newer HCV treatments, they said.
The researchers analyzed data for 9,783 patients with CHC from the Chronic Hepatitis Cohort Study who were treated between 2006 and 2010. They compared the prevalence of biopsy-confirmed cirrhosis (Metavir stage 4 or pathologist’s report) with the proportion of patients who met at least one of four criteria: positive biopsy; Fibrosis-4 score of at least 5.88, or the presence of a diagnosis or procedural code for cirrhosis or hepatic decompensation. Patients averaged 55 years of age, and most were white males with health insurance, the researchers said (Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2015;110:1169-77).
In all, 28.5% of CHC patients met at least one of the four criteria, including 22% who met the Fibrosis-4 threshold, 6.8% who were biopsy positive, and 5.7% and 4.9% who had a diagnostic or procedural code for cirrhosis or hepatic decompensation, respectively, said the investigators. Patients had significantly greater odds of cirrhosis (P less than .05) if they were older, male, Asian, Hispanic, had genotype 3 HCV infection, HIV coinfection, or a history of antiviral treatment, alcohol abuse, or diabetes, they added. “Our findings are the first in the United States to attempt an accurate estimate of the prevalence of cirrhosis in the CHC patient population at large,” the researchers concluded. “Use of additional parameters suggests a fourfold higher prevalence of cirrhosis than is revealed by biopsy alone. These findings suggest that cirrhosis in CHC patients may be significantly underdocumented and underdiagnosed.”
The CDC Foundation funds the Chronic Hepatitis Cohort Study. Dr. Gordon reported financial relationships with numerous makers of anti-HCV therapies. The other investigators reported having no conflicts of interest.
More than 28% of patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) virus infection met at least one criterion for cirrhosis, while only 7% had biopsy confirmation of the condition, investigators reported in the August issue of the American Journal of Gastroenterology.
Furthermore, only half of the patients with a positive biopsy had been given an associated ICD-9-CM code, said Dr. Stuart Gordon at Henry Ford Health System in Detroit and his associates. Cirrhosis in CHC therefore might often go unreported, leading to “overly conservative” estimates of its prevalence, associated health care costs, and the cost-effectiveness of the newer HCV treatments, they said.
The researchers analyzed data for 9,783 patients with CHC from the Chronic Hepatitis Cohort Study who were treated between 2006 and 2010. They compared the prevalence of biopsy-confirmed cirrhosis (Metavir stage 4 or pathologist’s report) with the proportion of patients who met at least one of four criteria: positive biopsy; Fibrosis-4 score of at least 5.88, or the presence of a diagnosis or procedural code for cirrhosis or hepatic decompensation. Patients averaged 55 years of age, and most were white males with health insurance, the researchers said (Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2015;110:1169-77).
In all, 28.5% of CHC patients met at least one of the four criteria, including 22% who met the Fibrosis-4 threshold, 6.8% who were biopsy positive, and 5.7% and 4.9% who had a diagnostic or procedural code for cirrhosis or hepatic decompensation, respectively, said the investigators. Patients had significantly greater odds of cirrhosis (P less than .05) if they were older, male, Asian, Hispanic, had genotype 3 HCV infection, HIV coinfection, or a history of antiviral treatment, alcohol abuse, or diabetes, they added. “Our findings are the first in the United States to attempt an accurate estimate of the prevalence of cirrhosis in the CHC patient population at large,” the researchers concluded. “Use of additional parameters suggests a fourfold higher prevalence of cirrhosis than is revealed by biopsy alone. These findings suggest that cirrhosis in CHC patients may be significantly underdocumented and underdiagnosed.”
The CDC Foundation funds the Chronic Hepatitis Cohort Study. Dr. Gordon reported financial relationships with numerous makers of anti-HCV therapies. The other investigators reported having no conflicts of interest.
More than 28% of patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) virus infection met at least one criterion for cirrhosis, while only 7% had biopsy confirmation of the condition, investigators reported in the August issue of the American Journal of Gastroenterology.
Furthermore, only half of the patients with a positive biopsy had been given an associated ICD-9-CM code, said Dr. Stuart Gordon at Henry Ford Health System in Detroit and his associates. Cirrhosis in CHC therefore might often go unreported, leading to “overly conservative” estimates of its prevalence, associated health care costs, and the cost-effectiveness of the newer HCV treatments, they said.
The researchers analyzed data for 9,783 patients with CHC from the Chronic Hepatitis Cohort Study who were treated between 2006 and 2010. They compared the prevalence of biopsy-confirmed cirrhosis (Metavir stage 4 or pathologist’s report) with the proportion of patients who met at least one of four criteria: positive biopsy; Fibrosis-4 score of at least 5.88, or the presence of a diagnosis or procedural code for cirrhosis or hepatic decompensation. Patients averaged 55 years of age, and most were white males with health insurance, the researchers said (Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2015;110:1169-77).
In all, 28.5% of CHC patients met at least one of the four criteria, including 22% who met the Fibrosis-4 threshold, 6.8% who were biopsy positive, and 5.7% and 4.9% who had a diagnostic or procedural code for cirrhosis or hepatic decompensation, respectively, said the investigators. Patients had significantly greater odds of cirrhosis (P less than .05) if they were older, male, Asian, Hispanic, had genotype 3 HCV infection, HIV coinfection, or a history of antiviral treatment, alcohol abuse, or diabetes, they added. “Our findings are the first in the United States to attempt an accurate estimate of the prevalence of cirrhosis in the CHC patient population at large,” the researchers concluded. “Use of additional parameters suggests a fourfold higher prevalence of cirrhosis than is revealed by biopsy alone. These findings suggest that cirrhosis in CHC patients may be significantly underdocumented and underdiagnosed.”
The CDC Foundation funds the Chronic Hepatitis Cohort Study. Dr. Gordon reported financial relationships with numerous makers of anti-HCV therapies. The other investigators reported having no conflicts of interest.
FROM THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Key clinical point: Cirrhosis might be more common among patients with HCV virus infection than studies based on ICD-9 codes would suggest.
Major finding: 28.5% of patients met more than one of four criteria for cirrhosis, but only 7% had a positive biopsy.
Data source: Observational study of 9,783 patients with chronic HCV infection from the Chronic Hepatitis Cohort Study.
Disclosures: The CDC Foundation funds the Chronic Hepatitis Cohort Study. Dr. Gordon reported financial relationships with numerous makers of therapies for chronic HCV infection. The other investigators reported having no conflicts of interest.
FDA approves Daklinza for HCV genotype 3 infections
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved Daklinza (daclatasvir), a hepatitis C virus (HCV) drug that, when used in combination with sofosbuvir, does not require coadministration of interferon or ribavirin for the treatment of HCV genotype 3 infections, the agency announced in a statement on July 24, 2015.
In a clinical trial, 152 treatment-naive and treatment-experienced participants with chronic HCV genotype 3 infection received Daklinza 60 mg plus sofosbuvir 400 mg once daily for 12 weeks, and were monitored for 24 weeks post treatment; 98% of the treatment-naive participants with no cirrhosis of the liver (and 58% of the treatment-naive participants with cirrhosis) achieved a sustained virologic response. Among the participants who were treatment experienced, 92% with no cirrhosis of the liver and 69% with cirrhosis achieved sustained virologic response.
“Today’s approval provides a new option for patients with genotype 3 HCV, including those patients who cannot tolerate ribavirin,” said Dr. Edward Cox, director of the Office of Antimicrobial Products in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, in a statement.
The most common side effects of Daklinza with sofosbuvir were fatigue and headache.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, approximately 2.7 million Americans are infected with HCV of which approximately 10 percent are genotype 3.
Daklinza is marketed by Bristol-Myers Squibb, based in Princeton, N.J.
Read the full FDA statement at: www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm455888.htm.
The recent FDA approval of Daklinza and Technivie for hepatitis C offer some additional weapons in the treatment of hepatitis C; however, their approval does not dramatically alter the treatment landscape at this point. Technivie is FDA approved for genotype 4, a small fraction of patients with hepatitis C, and does not offer much improvement over off-label use of Harvoni or Viekira Pak for genotype 4 patients. Daklinza is FDA approved in combination with sofosbuvir for 12 weeks for treatment-naive patients with genotype 3 and should also be considered for off-label use for genotype 2 patients.
While SVRs for noncirrhotic treatment-naive genotype 3 patients are high, achieving high SVRs in patients with cirrhosis requires treatment extension to 24 weeks to achieve an SVR around 90% at a cost of nearly $300,000. While this is an improvement on sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for treatment-experienced patients with cirrhosis, it nevertheless is an extremely expensive option that will likely be met with resistance from payers. It will also likely be displaced as a treatment option for genotype 2 and 3 patients when Gilead's pan-genotypic NS5A inhibitor (GS-5816) makes it to market as anticipated within the next year.
Dr. Sean Koppe is director of hepatology at the University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System, Chicago. He has no conflicts of interest.
The recent FDA approval of Daklinza and Technivie for hepatitis C offer some additional weapons in the treatment of hepatitis C; however, their approval does not dramatically alter the treatment landscape at this point. Technivie is FDA approved for genotype 4, a small fraction of patients with hepatitis C, and does not offer much improvement over off-label use of Harvoni or Viekira Pak for genotype 4 patients. Daklinza is FDA approved in combination with sofosbuvir for 12 weeks for treatment-naive patients with genotype 3 and should also be considered for off-label use for genotype 2 patients.
While SVRs for noncirrhotic treatment-naive genotype 3 patients are high, achieving high SVRs in patients with cirrhosis requires treatment extension to 24 weeks to achieve an SVR around 90% at a cost of nearly $300,000. While this is an improvement on sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for treatment-experienced patients with cirrhosis, it nevertheless is an extremely expensive option that will likely be met with resistance from payers. It will also likely be displaced as a treatment option for genotype 2 and 3 patients when Gilead's pan-genotypic NS5A inhibitor (GS-5816) makes it to market as anticipated within the next year.
Dr. Sean Koppe is director of hepatology at the University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System, Chicago. He has no conflicts of interest.
The recent FDA approval of Daklinza and Technivie for hepatitis C offer some additional weapons in the treatment of hepatitis C; however, their approval does not dramatically alter the treatment landscape at this point. Technivie is FDA approved for genotype 4, a small fraction of patients with hepatitis C, and does not offer much improvement over off-label use of Harvoni or Viekira Pak for genotype 4 patients. Daklinza is FDA approved in combination with sofosbuvir for 12 weeks for treatment-naive patients with genotype 3 and should also be considered for off-label use for genotype 2 patients.
While SVRs for noncirrhotic treatment-naive genotype 3 patients are high, achieving high SVRs in patients with cirrhosis requires treatment extension to 24 weeks to achieve an SVR around 90% at a cost of nearly $300,000. While this is an improvement on sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for treatment-experienced patients with cirrhosis, it nevertheless is an extremely expensive option that will likely be met with resistance from payers. It will also likely be displaced as a treatment option for genotype 2 and 3 patients when Gilead's pan-genotypic NS5A inhibitor (GS-5816) makes it to market as anticipated within the next year.
Dr. Sean Koppe is director of hepatology at the University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System, Chicago. He has no conflicts of interest.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved Daklinza (daclatasvir), a hepatitis C virus (HCV) drug that, when used in combination with sofosbuvir, does not require coadministration of interferon or ribavirin for the treatment of HCV genotype 3 infections, the agency announced in a statement on July 24, 2015.
In a clinical trial, 152 treatment-naive and treatment-experienced participants with chronic HCV genotype 3 infection received Daklinza 60 mg plus sofosbuvir 400 mg once daily for 12 weeks, and were monitored for 24 weeks post treatment; 98% of the treatment-naive participants with no cirrhosis of the liver (and 58% of the treatment-naive participants with cirrhosis) achieved a sustained virologic response. Among the participants who were treatment experienced, 92% with no cirrhosis of the liver and 69% with cirrhosis achieved sustained virologic response.
“Today’s approval provides a new option for patients with genotype 3 HCV, including those patients who cannot tolerate ribavirin,” said Dr. Edward Cox, director of the Office of Antimicrobial Products in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, in a statement.
The most common side effects of Daklinza with sofosbuvir were fatigue and headache.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, approximately 2.7 million Americans are infected with HCV of which approximately 10 percent are genotype 3.
Daklinza is marketed by Bristol-Myers Squibb, based in Princeton, N.J.
Read the full FDA statement at: www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm455888.htm.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved Daklinza (daclatasvir), a hepatitis C virus (HCV) drug that, when used in combination with sofosbuvir, does not require coadministration of interferon or ribavirin for the treatment of HCV genotype 3 infections, the agency announced in a statement on July 24, 2015.
In a clinical trial, 152 treatment-naive and treatment-experienced participants with chronic HCV genotype 3 infection received Daklinza 60 mg plus sofosbuvir 400 mg once daily for 12 weeks, and were monitored for 24 weeks post treatment; 98% of the treatment-naive participants with no cirrhosis of the liver (and 58% of the treatment-naive participants with cirrhosis) achieved a sustained virologic response. Among the participants who were treatment experienced, 92% with no cirrhosis of the liver and 69% with cirrhosis achieved sustained virologic response.
“Today’s approval provides a new option for patients with genotype 3 HCV, including those patients who cannot tolerate ribavirin,” said Dr. Edward Cox, director of the Office of Antimicrobial Products in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, in a statement.
The most common side effects of Daklinza with sofosbuvir were fatigue and headache.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, approximately 2.7 million Americans are infected with HCV of which approximately 10 percent are genotype 3.
Daklinza is marketed by Bristol-Myers Squibb, based in Princeton, N.J.
Read the full FDA statement at: www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm455888.htm.
FDA approves oral interferon-free treatment for genotype 4 HCV infection
The first interferon-free treatment for people with genotype 4 hepatitis C infection has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration.
On July 24, the FDA approved a combination of three antivirals – ombitasvir, paritaprevir, and ritonavir – for use with ribavirin for treating hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 4 infections in people without cirrhosis, according to the agency’s statement announcing the approval. The combination tablet will be marketed as Technivie, by Abbvie. Ombitasvir is an HCV NS5A inhibitor, paritaprevir is an HCV NS3/4A protease inhibitor, and ritonavir is an HCV CYP3A inhibitor.
Technivie “is the first drug that has demonstrated safety and efficacy to treat genotype 4 HCV infections without the need for coadministration of interferon,” the statement said. It is administered orally. Technivie is a fixed-dose combination of paritaprevir/ritonavir (150/100 mg) co-formulated with ombitasvir (25 mg); it is dosed once a day and should be taken with a meal. It is co-administered with weight-based RBV (1000mg or 1200mg in divided doses, twice a day), taken with food, according to the company's statement announcing approval.
The FDA statement refers to that study of 135 people with chronic HCV genotype 4 infections and no cirrhosis, treated with the three antivirals plus ribavirin once a day for 12 weeks (91 patients), or without ribavirin (44 patients) for 12 weeks. All the patients on the three-drug combination plus ribavirin achieved a sustained virologic response (SVR12) 12 weeks after stopping treatment (no HCV detected in the blood) vs. 91% of those who did not take ribavirin. Fatigue, weakness, nausea, insomnia, pruritus and other skin reactions are among the most common adverse events associated with treatment with Technivie and ribavirin, according to the FDA statement.
The statement adds that the prescribing information includes a warning that elevations of liver enzymes up to greater than five times the upper limit of normal occurred in about 1% of the patients in clinical trials, which were more common among women taking contraceptives that contain ethinyl estradiol. Before starting treatment, women should discontinue contraceptives that containing ethinyl estradiol, and “hepatic laboratory testing should be performed during the first 4 weeks of treatment, and as clinically indicated thereafter,” the FDA statement said.
The three antivirals included in Technivie, plus dasabuvir (an HCV nonnucleoside NS5B polymerase inhibitor), are copackaged in the Viekira Pak, which was approved for the treatment of HCV genotype 1 chronic HCV infection, with or without ribavirin in 2014, and is also manufactured by Abbvie.
About 2.7 million people in the United States have chronic HCV infection, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HCV genotype 4 is one of the least common types of HCV in the United States.
*This story was updated 7/24/2015.
The recent FDA approval of Daklinza and Technivie for hepatitis C offer some additional weapons in the treatment of hepatitis C; however, their approval does not dramatically alter the treatment landscape at this point. Technivie is FDA approved for genotype 4, a small fraction of patients with hepatitis C, and does not offer much improvement over off-label use of Harvoni or Viekira Pak for genotype 4 patients. Daklinza is FDA approved in combination with sofosbuvir for 12 weeks for treatment-naive patients with genotype 3 and should also be considered for off-label use for genotype 2 patients.
While SVRs for noncirrhotic treatment-naive genotype 3 patients are high, achieving high SVRs in patients with cirrhosis requires treatment extension to 24 weeks to achieve an SVR around 90% at a cost of nearly $300,000. While this is an improvement on sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for treatment-experienced patients with cirrhosis, it nevertheless is an extremely expensive option that will likely be met with resistance from payers. It will also likely be displaced as a treatment option for genotype 2 and 3 patients when Gilead's pan-genotypic NS5A inhibitor (GS-5816) makes it to market as anticipated within the next year.
Dr. Sean Koppe is director of hepatology at the University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System, Chicago. He has no conflicts of interest.
The recent FDA approval of Daklinza and Technivie for hepatitis C offer some additional weapons in the treatment of hepatitis C; however, their approval does not dramatically alter the treatment landscape at this point. Technivie is FDA approved for genotype 4, a small fraction of patients with hepatitis C, and does not offer much improvement over off-label use of Harvoni or Viekira Pak for genotype 4 patients. Daklinza is FDA approved in combination with sofosbuvir for 12 weeks for treatment-naive patients with genotype 3 and should also be considered for off-label use for genotype 2 patients.
While SVRs for noncirrhotic treatment-naive genotype 3 patients are high, achieving high SVRs in patients with cirrhosis requires treatment extension to 24 weeks to achieve an SVR around 90% at a cost of nearly $300,000. While this is an improvement on sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for treatment-experienced patients with cirrhosis, it nevertheless is an extremely expensive option that will likely be met with resistance from payers. It will also likely be displaced as a treatment option for genotype 2 and 3 patients when Gilead's pan-genotypic NS5A inhibitor (GS-5816) makes it to market as anticipated within the next year.
Dr. Sean Koppe is director of hepatology at the University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System, Chicago. He has no conflicts of interest.
The recent FDA approval of Daklinza and Technivie for hepatitis C offer some additional weapons in the treatment of hepatitis C; however, their approval does not dramatically alter the treatment landscape at this point. Technivie is FDA approved for genotype 4, a small fraction of patients with hepatitis C, and does not offer much improvement over off-label use of Harvoni or Viekira Pak for genotype 4 patients. Daklinza is FDA approved in combination with sofosbuvir for 12 weeks for treatment-naive patients with genotype 3 and should also be considered for off-label use for genotype 2 patients.
While SVRs for noncirrhotic treatment-naive genotype 3 patients are high, achieving high SVRs in patients with cirrhosis requires treatment extension to 24 weeks to achieve an SVR around 90% at a cost of nearly $300,000. While this is an improvement on sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for treatment-experienced patients with cirrhosis, it nevertheless is an extremely expensive option that will likely be met with resistance from payers. It will also likely be displaced as a treatment option for genotype 2 and 3 patients when Gilead's pan-genotypic NS5A inhibitor (GS-5816) makes it to market as anticipated within the next year.
Dr. Sean Koppe is director of hepatology at the University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System, Chicago. He has no conflicts of interest.
The first interferon-free treatment for people with genotype 4 hepatitis C infection has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration.
On July 24, the FDA approved a combination of three antivirals – ombitasvir, paritaprevir, and ritonavir – for use with ribavirin for treating hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 4 infections in people without cirrhosis, according to the agency’s statement announcing the approval. The combination tablet will be marketed as Technivie, by Abbvie. Ombitasvir is an HCV NS5A inhibitor, paritaprevir is an HCV NS3/4A protease inhibitor, and ritonavir is an HCV CYP3A inhibitor.
Technivie “is the first drug that has demonstrated safety and efficacy to treat genotype 4 HCV infections without the need for coadministration of interferon,” the statement said. It is administered orally. Technivie is a fixed-dose combination of paritaprevir/ritonavir (150/100 mg) co-formulated with ombitasvir (25 mg); it is dosed once a day and should be taken with a meal. It is co-administered with weight-based RBV (1000mg or 1200mg in divided doses, twice a day), taken with food, according to the company's statement announcing approval.
The FDA statement refers to that study of 135 people with chronic HCV genotype 4 infections and no cirrhosis, treated with the three antivirals plus ribavirin once a day for 12 weeks (91 patients), or without ribavirin (44 patients) for 12 weeks. All the patients on the three-drug combination plus ribavirin achieved a sustained virologic response (SVR12) 12 weeks after stopping treatment (no HCV detected in the blood) vs. 91% of those who did not take ribavirin. Fatigue, weakness, nausea, insomnia, pruritus and other skin reactions are among the most common adverse events associated with treatment with Technivie and ribavirin, according to the FDA statement.
The statement adds that the prescribing information includes a warning that elevations of liver enzymes up to greater than five times the upper limit of normal occurred in about 1% of the patients in clinical trials, which were more common among women taking contraceptives that contain ethinyl estradiol. Before starting treatment, women should discontinue contraceptives that containing ethinyl estradiol, and “hepatic laboratory testing should be performed during the first 4 weeks of treatment, and as clinically indicated thereafter,” the FDA statement said.
The three antivirals included in Technivie, plus dasabuvir (an HCV nonnucleoside NS5B polymerase inhibitor), are copackaged in the Viekira Pak, which was approved for the treatment of HCV genotype 1 chronic HCV infection, with or without ribavirin in 2014, and is also manufactured by Abbvie.
About 2.7 million people in the United States have chronic HCV infection, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HCV genotype 4 is one of the least common types of HCV in the United States.
*This story was updated 7/24/2015.
The first interferon-free treatment for people with genotype 4 hepatitis C infection has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration.
On July 24, the FDA approved a combination of three antivirals – ombitasvir, paritaprevir, and ritonavir – for use with ribavirin for treating hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 4 infections in people without cirrhosis, according to the agency’s statement announcing the approval. The combination tablet will be marketed as Technivie, by Abbvie. Ombitasvir is an HCV NS5A inhibitor, paritaprevir is an HCV NS3/4A protease inhibitor, and ritonavir is an HCV CYP3A inhibitor.
Technivie “is the first drug that has demonstrated safety and efficacy to treat genotype 4 HCV infections without the need for coadministration of interferon,” the statement said. It is administered orally. Technivie is a fixed-dose combination of paritaprevir/ritonavir (150/100 mg) co-formulated with ombitasvir (25 mg); it is dosed once a day and should be taken with a meal. It is co-administered with weight-based RBV (1000mg or 1200mg in divided doses, twice a day), taken with food, according to the company's statement announcing approval.
The FDA statement refers to that study of 135 people with chronic HCV genotype 4 infections and no cirrhosis, treated with the three antivirals plus ribavirin once a day for 12 weeks (91 patients), or without ribavirin (44 patients) for 12 weeks. All the patients on the three-drug combination plus ribavirin achieved a sustained virologic response (SVR12) 12 weeks after stopping treatment (no HCV detected in the blood) vs. 91% of those who did not take ribavirin. Fatigue, weakness, nausea, insomnia, pruritus and other skin reactions are among the most common adverse events associated with treatment with Technivie and ribavirin, according to the FDA statement.
The statement adds that the prescribing information includes a warning that elevations of liver enzymes up to greater than five times the upper limit of normal occurred in about 1% of the patients in clinical trials, which were more common among women taking contraceptives that contain ethinyl estradiol. Before starting treatment, women should discontinue contraceptives that containing ethinyl estradiol, and “hepatic laboratory testing should be performed during the first 4 weeks of treatment, and as clinically indicated thereafter,” the FDA statement said.
The three antivirals included in Technivie, plus dasabuvir (an HCV nonnucleoside NS5B polymerase inhibitor), are copackaged in the Viekira Pak, which was approved for the treatment of HCV genotype 1 chronic HCV infection, with or without ribavirin in 2014, and is also manufactured by Abbvie.
About 2.7 million people in the United States have chronic HCV infection, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HCV genotype 4 is one of the least common types of HCV in the United States.
*This story was updated 7/24/2015.
Georgia launches HCV elimination program
With assistance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the country of Georgia has launched a hepatitis C elimination program aimed at reducing disease transmission and meeting increased demand for diagnosis and treatment, report Dr. Kiren Mitruka and coauthors in the July 24 CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.
Georgia has one of the world’s highest HCV prevalence rates, at 6.7%. To prepare for the launch of the program, efforts focused on describing HCV epidemiology, evaluating laboratory and health care capacity, and conducting program monitoring and evaluation, the report said.
A population-based serosurvey began in Georgia in May 2015, and seven sites have since opened to diagnose and treat HCV patients.
Results from the first phase of the program, which focused on improving access to affordable diagnostics and treatment for HCV patients with severe liver disease, found that 6,491 patients sought treatment and 6,177 (95.2%) initiated diagnostic work-up through July 3, 2015. Among these, 1,519 (24.6%) completed work-up, 1,474 (97.0%) of whom initiated treatment, the investigators reported.
Persisting challenges include the asymptomatic, chronic nature of HCV, which may result in delayed diagnosis, and ongoing transmission in health care settings and among hard to reach populations with the possibility of reinfection.
To address these obstacles, Georgia’s “comprehensive elimination plan” will cover advocacy, prevention, surveillance, testing, and access to care.
“Monitoring and evaluation will continue, and efforts are ongoing to develop an external QA/QC system to be used by laboratories to achieve and maintain biologic safety and quality diagnostic standards,” Dr. Mitruka and colleagues said.
“Georgia’s elimination program can provide information and experience that will assist similar efforts in other parts of the world,” the authors concluded.
Read the full report here: MMWR 2015 July 24.
With assistance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the country of Georgia has launched a hepatitis C elimination program aimed at reducing disease transmission and meeting increased demand for diagnosis and treatment, report Dr. Kiren Mitruka and coauthors in the July 24 CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.
Georgia has one of the world’s highest HCV prevalence rates, at 6.7%. To prepare for the launch of the program, efforts focused on describing HCV epidemiology, evaluating laboratory and health care capacity, and conducting program monitoring and evaluation, the report said.
A population-based serosurvey began in Georgia in May 2015, and seven sites have since opened to diagnose and treat HCV patients.
Results from the first phase of the program, which focused on improving access to affordable diagnostics and treatment for HCV patients with severe liver disease, found that 6,491 patients sought treatment and 6,177 (95.2%) initiated diagnostic work-up through July 3, 2015. Among these, 1,519 (24.6%) completed work-up, 1,474 (97.0%) of whom initiated treatment, the investigators reported.
Persisting challenges include the asymptomatic, chronic nature of HCV, which may result in delayed diagnosis, and ongoing transmission in health care settings and among hard to reach populations with the possibility of reinfection.
To address these obstacles, Georgia’s “comprehensive elimination plan” will cover advocacy, prevention, surveillance, testing, and access to care.
“Monitoring and evaluation will continue, and efforts are ongoing to develop an external QA/QC system to be used by laboratories to achieve and maintain biologic safety and quality diagnostic standards,” Dr. Mitruka and colleagues said.
“Georgia’s elimination program can provide information and experience that will assist similar efforts in other parts of the world,” the authors concluded.
Read the full report here: MMWR 2015 July 24.
With assistance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the country of Georgia has launched a hepatitis C elimination program aimed at reducing disease transmission and meeting increased demand for diagnosis and treatment, report Dr. Kiren Mitruka and coauthors in the July 24 CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.
Georgia has one of the world’s highest HCV prevalence rates, at 6.7%. To prepare for the launch of the program, efforts focused on describing HCV epidemiology, evaluating laboratory and health care capacity, and conducting program monitoring and evaluation, the report said.
A population-based serosurvey began in Georgia in May 2015, and seven sites have since opened to diagnose and treat HCV patients.
Results from the first phase of the program, which focused on improving access to affordable diagnostics and treatment for HCV patients with severe liver disease, found that 6,491 patients sought treatment and 6,177 (95.2%) initiated diagnostic work-up through July 3, 2015. Among these, 1,519 (24.6%) completed work-up, 1,474 (97.0%) of whom initiated treatment, the investigators reported.
Persisting challenges include the asymptomatic, chronic nature of HCV, which may result in delayed diagnosis, and ongoing transmission in health care settings and among hard to reach populations with the possibility of reinfection.
To address these obstacles, Georgia’s “comprehensive elimination plan” will cover advocacy, prevention, surveillance, testing, and access to care.
“Monitoring and evaluation will continue, and efforts are ongoing to develop an external QA/QC system to be used by laboratories to achieve and maintain biologic safety and quality diagnostic standards,” Dr. Mitruka and colleagues said.
“Georgia’s elimination program can provide information and experience that will assist similar efforts in other parts of the world,” the authors concluded.
Read the full report here: MMWR 2015 July 24.
Daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir safe and effective in HCV/HIV coinfection
Patients treated with daclatasvir and sofosbuvir for hepatitis C who are coinfected with HIV have shown a significant virologic response, regardless of whether they had already been treated for their hepatitis C infection, according to data presented at the International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment & Prevention.
The open-label ALLY-2 study – published simultaneously in the July 21 online edition of the New England Journal of Medicine – in 151 previously untreated patients with hepatitis C and HIV, and 52 previously treated patients, showed 12 weeks of treatment with NS5A inhibitor daclatasvir and sofosbuvir achieved a sustained virologic response in 96.4% of untreated patients and 97.7% of previously treated patients with HCV genotype 1, with no adverse effects on HIV-1 suppression.
Among previously untreated patients treated for 8 weeks, the response rate was 75.6%, and there were no study-drug discontinuations because of adverse events (N. Engl. J. Med. 2015 July 21 [doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1503153]).
“The lower efficacy observed after 8 weeks of treatment suggests that 12 weeks of therapy may be preferred for most patients with HIV-HCV coinfection,” wrote Dr. David L. Wyles of the University of California, San Diego, and his coauthors.
Bristol-Myers Squibb supported the study. Dr. Wyles reported serving as a scientific consultant to Bristol-Myers Squibb and Gilead Sciences. Some coauthors declared grants, personal fees, and speakers fees from pharmaceutical companies, including Bristol-Myers Squibb, and several authors are employees of Bristol-Myers Squibb.
Patients treated with daclatasvir and sofosbuvir for hepatitis C who are coinfected with HIV have shown a significant virologic response, regardless of whether they had already been treated for their hepatitis C infection, according to data presented at the International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment & Prevention.
The open-label ALLY-2 study – published simultaneously in the July 21 online edition of the New England Journal of Medicine – in 151 previously untreated patients with hepatitis C and HIV, and 52 previously treated patients, showed 12 weeks of treatment with NS5A inhibitor daclatasvir and sofosbuvir achieved a sustained virologic response in 96.4% of untreated patients and 97.7% of previously treated patients with HCV genotype 1, with no adverse effects on HIV-1 suppression.
Among previously untreated patients treated for 8 weeks, the response rate was 75.6%, and there were no study-drug discontinuations because of adverse events (N. Engl. J. Med. 2015 July 21 [doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1503153]).
“The lower efficacy observed after 8 weeks of treatment suggests that 12 weeks of therapy may be preferred for most patients with HIV-HCV coinfection,” wrote Dr. David L. Wyles of the University of California, San Diego, and his coauthors.
Bristol-Myers Squibb supported the study. Dr. Wyles reported serving as a scientific consultant to Bristol-Myers Squibb and Gilead Sciences. Some coauthors declared grants, personal fees, and speakers fees from pharmaceutical companies, including Bristol-Myers Squibb, and several authors are employees of Bristol-Myers Squibb.
Patients treated with daclatasvir and sofosbuvir for hepatitis C who are coinfected with HIV have shown a significant virologic response, regardless of whether they had already been treated for their hepatitis C infection, according to data presented at the International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment & Prevention.
The open-label ALLY-2 study – published simultaneously in the July 21 online edition of the New England Journal of Medicine – in 151 previously untreated patients with hepatitis C and HIV, and 52 previously treated patients, showed 12 weeks of treatment with NS5A inhibitor daclatasvir and sofosbuvir achieved a sustained virologic response in 96.4% of untreated patients and 97.7% of previously treated patients with HCV genotype 1, with no adverse effects on HIV-1 suppression.
Among previously untreated patients treated for 8 weeks, the response rate was 75.6%, and there were no study-drug discontinuations because of adverse events (N. Engl. J. Med. 2015 July 21 [doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1503153]).
“The lower efficacy observed after 8 weeks of treatment suggests that 12 weeks of therapy may be preferred for most patients with HIV-HCV coinfection,” wrote Dr. David L. Wyles of the University of California, San Diego, and his coauthors.
Bristol-Myers Squibb supported the study. Dr. Wyles reported serving as a scientific consultant to Bristol-Myers Squibb and Gilead Sciences. Some coauthors declared grants, personal fees, and speakers fees from pharmaceutical companies, including Bristol-Myers Squibb, and several authors are employees of Bristol-Myers Squibb.
FROM NEJM
Key clinical point: Daclatasvir and sofosbuvir therapy achieves sustained virologic response in patients coinfected with hepatitis C and HIV, without compromising HIV suppression.
Major finding: Treatment with NS5A inhibitor daclatasvir and sofosbuvir achieved a sustained virologic response in 96.4% of untreated patients and 97.7% of previously treated patients with HCV genotype 1.
Data source: A prospective, open-label study in 203 untreated and treated patients with hepatitis C and HIV.
Disclosures: Bristol-Myers Squibb supported the study. Dr. Wyles reported serving as a scientific consultant to Bristol-Myers Squibb and Gilead Sciences. Some coauthors declared grants, personal fees, and speakers fees from pharmaceutical companies, including Bristol-Myers Squibb, and several authors are employees of Bristol-Myers Squibb.
Ledipasvir plus sofosbuvir achieve excellent response in HCV/HIV coinfection
Treatment with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir achieves sustained virologic response at 12 weeks in patients with hepatitis C who also are infected with HIV, according to the results of the open-label ION-4 study presented at the International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment.
The multicenter study in 335 patients – published simultaneously online July 21 by the New England Journal of Medicine – showed, overall, that 96% of patients had a sustained virologic response 12 weeks after the end of therapy, while the response rates were higher (100%) among individuals with HCV genotype 4 but lower in black patients.
“This association between black race and a decreased rate of virologic response was not observed in the 308 black patients who were monoinfected with HCV receiving ledipasvir-sofosbuvir across the phase III program,” wrote Dr. Susanna Naggie of the Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, N.C., and her coauthors.
Response rates were not influenced by previous treatments or the presence of cirrhosis, and while there were some adverse events such as headache, fatigue, and diarrhea, no patient had confirmed HIV-1 virologic rebound (N. Engl. J. Med. 2015 July 21 [doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1501315]).
The study was supported by Gilead Sciences. Some authors declared grants, support, advisory board positions, and consultancies from pharmaceutical companies, including Gilead Sciences, and several authors are employees of Gilead Sciences.
Treatment with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir achieves sustained virologic response at 12 weeks in patients with hepatitis C who also are infected with HIV, according to the results of the open-label ION-4 study presented at the International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment.
The multicenter study in 335 patients – published simultaneously online July 21 by the New England Journal of Medicine – showed, overall, that 96% of patients had a sustained virologic response 12 weeks after the end of therapy, while the response rates were higher (100%) among individuals with HCV genotype 4 but lower in black patients.
“This association between black race and a decreased rate of virologic response was not observed in the 308 black patients who were monoinfected with HCV receiving ledipasvir-sofosbuvir across the phase III program,” wrote Dr. Susanna Naggie of the Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, N.C., and her coauthors.
Response rates were not influenced by previous treatments or the presence of cirrhosis, and while there were some adverse events such as headache, fatigue, and diarrhea, no patient had confirmed HIV-1 virologic rebound (N. Engl. J. Med. 2015 July 21 [doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1501315]).
The study was supported by Gilead Sciences. Some authors declared grants, support, advisory board positions, and consultancies from pharmaceutical companies, including Gilead Sciences, and several authors are employees of Gilead Sciences.
Treatment with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir achieves sustained virologic response at 12 weeks in patients with hepatitis C who also are infected with HIV, according to the results of the open-label ION-4 study presented at the International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment.
The multicenter study in 335 patients – published simultaneously online July 21 by the New England Journal of Medicine – showed, overall, that 96% of patients had a sustained virologic response 12 weeks after the end of therapy, while the response rates were higher (100%) among individuals with HCV genotype 4 but lower in black patients.
“This association between black race and a decreased rate of virologic response was not observed in the 308 black patients who were monoinfected with HCV receiving ledipasvir-sofosbuvir across the phase III program,” wrote Dr. Susanna Naggie of the Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, N.C., and her coauthors.
Response rates were not influenced by previous treatments or the presence of cirrhosis, and while there were some adverse events such as headache, fatigue, and diarrhea, no patient had confirmed HIV-1 virologic rebound (N. Engl. J. Med. 2015 July 21 [doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1501315]).
The study was supported by Gilead Sciences. Some authors declared grants, support, advisory board positions, and consultancies from pharmaceutical companies, including Gilead Sciences, and several authors are employees of Gilead Sciences.
FROM IAS 2015
Key clinical point: Treatment with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir achieves sustained virologic response in patients coinfected with hepatitis C and HIV.
Major finding: Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir are associated with a 96% sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after treatment in patients coinfected with HCV and HIV.
Data source: A prospective open-label study in 335 patients with HCV and HIV.
Disclosures: The study was supported by Gilead Sciences. Some authors declared grants, support, advisory board positions, and consultancies from pharmaceutical companies, including Gilead Sciences, and several authors are employees of Gilead Sciences.
Online recommendations provide constantly updated HCV management guidelines
The newest guidelines for testing, managing, and treating hepatitis C infections in adults are part of a “living document” – a constantly updated online resource that reflects the ever-changing world of hepatitis research.
A joint venture of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the document puts cutting-edge science in the hands of clinicians, Dr. Gary L. Davis wrote (Hepatology 2015 June 25 [doi:10.1002/hep.27950]). The continuously updated version may be accessed at any time at www.hcvguidelines.org.
“The pace of hepatitis C virus (HCV) drug development in recent years has accelerated dramatically,” wrote Dr. Davis, cochair for the AASLD/IDSA HCV Guidance writing group. “Such information and advice can be difficult to access readily given the diverse sources from which information is available, and the sometimes lengthy time needed for publication of original articles and scholarly perspectives. Traditional practice guidelines for more established areas of medicine and care often take years to develop and bring to publication. In the new era in hepatitis C treatment, such a process would not be nimble or timely enough to address the needs of patients with HCV infection, practitioners caring for these patients, or payers approving therapies for use.”
The online guidelines “will undergo real-time revisions as the field evolves,” Dr. Davis noted. A panel of 26 hepatologists and infectious diseases specialists and a patient advocate developed the original consensus recommendations.
The new update contains recommendations for direct antiviral drug regimens in treatment-naive patients and for all six HCV genotypes. A second section examines the recommended regimens for patients who have failed treatment with PEG-interferon and ribavirin, with or without a direct antiviral agent.
The document also gives guidance for managing patients with and without a sustained viral response and concludes with a section on treating special patient populations (decompensated cirrhosis, post-transplant HCV infections, renal impairment, and coinfection with HIV).
On Twitter @Alz_Gal
The newest guidelines for testing, managing, and treating hepatitis C infections in adults are part of a “living document” – a constantly updated online resource that reflects the ever-changing world of hepatitis research.
A joint venture of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the document puts cutting-edge science in the hands of clinicians, Dr. Gary L. Davis wrote (Hepatology 2015 June 25 [doi:10.1002/hep.27950]). The continuously updated version may be accessed at any time at www.hcvguidelines.org.
“The pace of hepatitis C virus (HCV) drug development in recent years has accelerated dramatically,” wrote Dr. Davis, cochair for the AASLD/IDSA HCV Guidance writing group. “Such information and advice can be difficult to access readily given the diverse sources from which information is available, and the sometimes lengthy time needed for publication of original articles and scholarly perspectives. Traditional practice guidelines for more established areas of medicine and care often take years to develop and bring to publication. In the new era in hepatitis C treatment, such a process would not be nimble or timely enough to address the needs of patients with HCV infection, practitioners caring for these patients, or payers approving therapies for use.”
The online guidelines “will undergo real-time revisions as the field evolves,” Dr. Davis noted. A panel of 26 hepatologists and infectious diseases specialists and a patient advocate developed the original consensus recommendations.
The new update contains recommendations for direct antiviral drug regimens in treatment-naive patients and for all six HCV genotypes. A second section examines the recommended regimens for patients who have failed treatment with PEG-interferon and ribavirin, with or without a direct antiviral agent.
The document also gives guidance for managing patients with and without a sustained viral response and concludes with a section on treating special patient populations (decompensated cirrhosis, post-transplant HCV infections, renal impairment, and coinfection with HIV).
On Twitter @Alz_Gal
The newest guidelines for testing, managing, and treating hepatitis C infections in adults are part of a “living document” – a constantly updated online resource that reflects the ever-changing world of hepatitis research.
A joint venture of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the document puts cutting-edge science in the hands of clinicians, Dr. Gary L. Davis wrote (Hepatology 2015 June 25 [doi:10.1002/hep.27950]). The continuously updated version may be accessed at any time at www.hcvguidelines.org.
“The pace of hepatitis C virus (HCV) drug development in recent years has accelerated dramatically,” wrote Dr. Davis, cochair for the AASLD/IDSA HCV Guidance writing group. “Such information and advice can be difficult to access readily given the diverse sources from which information is available, and the sometimes lengthy time needed for publication of original articles and scholarly perspectives. Traditional practice guidelines for more established areas of medicine and care often take years to develop and bring to publication. In the new era in hepatitis C treatment, such a process would not be nimble or timely enough to address the needs of patients with HCV infection, practitioners caring for these patients, or payers approving therapies for use.”
The online guidelines “will undergo real-time revisions as the field evolves,” Dr. Davis noted. A panel of 26 hepatologists and infectious diseases specialists and a patient advocate developed the original consensus recommendations.
The new update contains recommendations for direct antiviral drug regimens in treatment-naive patients and for all six HCV genotypes. A second section examines the recommended regimens for patients who have failed treatment with PEG-interferon and ribavirin, with or without a direct antiviral agent.
The document also gives guidance for managing patients with and without a sustained viral response and concludes with a section on treating special patient populations (decompensated cirrhosis, post-transplant HCV infections, renal impairment, and coinfection with HIV).
On Twitter @Alz_Gal
DDW: Single daily pill knocks out HCV in prior nonresponders
WASHINGTON – An investigational once-daily antiviral drug combination produced high rates of sustained viral responses after 12 or 16 weeks of therapy – with or without ribavirin – in patients with chronic hepatitis viral infections for whom prior therapy with peg-interferon and ribavirin had failed, investigators reported.
The rate of sustained viral responses at 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12) was 92% for patients who received the combination of grazoprevir and elbasvir (GZR/EBR, Merck) alone, compared with 94% for patients who received the antivirals plus ribavirin, reported Dr. Paul Kwo of Indiana University Hospital in Indianapolis.
Among patients who received 16 weeks of therapy, the SVR12 rates were 92% without ribavirin, and 97% with ribavirin, Dr. Kwo said at the annual Digestive Disease Week.
“In patients who have failed peg-interferon and ribavirin therapy, 12 weeks of grazoprevir and elbasvir without ribavirin gives outstanding SVR rates in genotype 1b-infected individuals, regardless of treatment response, including those with cirrhosis. If you’re a relapser with genotype 1a or genotype 4 infection, 12 weeks of grazoprevir and elbasvir gives outstanding SVR rates. For genotype 1a, 4 and 6 prior null and partial responders, including those with cirrhosis, 16 weeks of grazoprevir and elbasvir with ribavirin gives outstanding SVR rates with no virologic failures,” he said.
Dr. Kwo presented updated results from the C-EDGE(Study of Efficacy and Safety of Grazoprevir (MK-5172)/Elbasvir (MK-8742) Combination Regimen for Treatment-Naive Participants With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotypes 1, 4, and 6) treatment-experienced trial.
The 12-week C-EDGE results in 316 treatment-naive patients were presented earlier this year in Vienna at the International Liver Congress.
The fixed-dose, once-daily combination is composed of grazoprevir, an inhibitor of the HCV NS3/4a protease, at a dose of 100 mg, and elbasvir, a potent inhibitor of the NS5a protein, at a dose of 50 mg. This combination was shown to have broad activity against most HCV genotypes in vitro, and was efficacious in both treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients with and without cirrhosis, including those with HIV/HCV coinfections, in the C-WORTHY trial.
The C-EDGE study was a phase III trial of GZR/EBR with or without ribavirin for 12 or 16 weeks for patients for whom prior therapy with peg-interferon and ribavirin had failed because of either null or partial response or viral relapse. The trial included patients with and without cirrhosis, those with HCV genotypes 1, 4, or 6, and those with either HCV mono-infections or HIV coinfections.
A total of 420 patients were enrolled.
As noted before, 97 of 105 patients (92%) on 12 weeks of therapy without ribavirin had an SVR12, although two patients in this group were lost to follow-up or discontinued therapy for reasons other than virologic failure (included as nonresponders). Among patients who received 12 weeks of GZR/EBR plus ribavirin, 98 of 104 (94%) had an SVR12, with no losses to follow-up.
For those patients treated for 16 weeks, 97 of 105 (92%) without ribavirin had an SVR12, compared with 103 of 106 (97%) who received ribavirin in addition to the combination antivirals. In these groups, one and three patients, respectively, were lost to follow-up.
In a subanalysis by HCV genotype or subtype, the combination alone was least effective among patients with genotype 4 treated for 16 weeks, with 3 of 5 patients (60%) having an SVR12, compared with 7 of 9 patients (79%) with genotype 4 treated with no ribavirin for 12 weeks, 14 of 15 (93%) with ribavirin for 12 weeks, and 8 of 8 (100%) treated with ribavirin for 16 weeks. The overall numbers of patients in each subgroup was too small for statistical significance analysis, however.
Among patients with HCV coinfection, the SVR12 rate was 100% in all treatment arms except 16 weeks GZR/EBR without ribavirin (5 of 6; 83%).
A subanalysis by prior response, excluding the 12 total patients who did not complete treatment, showed excellent SVR12 rates in all four treatment arms among patients with a prior relapse, and slightly less robust but still high rates among prior partial or null responders, Dr. Kwo said.
Patients tolerated the regimen well, with the rates of serious adverse events ranging from 2.9% to 3.8%. There were no deaths, and seven discontinuations due to adverse events (one in each in the 12-week arms, and five in the 16-week with ribavirin arm). A total of 31 patients who received ribavirin had hemoglobin reductions below 10 g/dL, and 60 reported fatigue, both common with ribavirin. The majority of adverse events in all arms were fatigue, headache, and nausea.
The combination has received two Breakthrough Therapy designations from the Food and Drug Administration for patients with HCV genotype 4, and for patients with genotype 1 infections who are on hemodialysis for end stage renal disease. The breakthrough designation makes the drug eligible for expedited review.
Dr. Kwo disclosed ties with Merck, which supported the C-EDGE study.
WASHINGTON – An investigational once-daily antiviral drug combination produced high rates of sustained viral responses after 12 or 16 weeks of therapy – with or without ribavirin – in patients with chronic hepatitis viral infections for whom prior therapy with peg-interferon and ribavirin had failed, investigators reported.
The rate of sustained viral responses at 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12) was 92% for patients who received the combination of grazoprevir and elbasvir (GZR/EBR, Merck) alone, compared with 94% for patients who received the antivirals plus ribavirin, reported Dr. Paul Kwo of Indiana University Hospital in Indianapolis.
Among patients who received 16 weeks of therapy, the SVR12 rates were 92% without ribavirin, and 97% with ribavirin, Dr. Kwo said at the annual Digestive Disease Week.
“In patients who have failed peg-interferon and ribavirin therapy, 12 weeks of grazoprevir and elbasvir without ribavirin gives outstanding SVR rates in genotype 1b-infected individuals, regardless of treatment response, including those with cirrhosis. If you’re a relapser with genotype 1a or genotype 4 infection, 12 weeks of grazoprevir and elbasvir gives outstanding SVR rates. For genotype 1a, 4 and 6 prior null and partial responders, including those with cirrhosis, 16 weeks of grazoprevir and elbasvir with ribavirin gives outstanding SVR rates with no virologic failures,” he said.
Dr. Kwo presented updated results from the C-EDGE(Study of Efficacy and Safety of Grazoprevir (MK-5172)/Elbasvir (MK-8742) Combination Regimen for Treatment-Naive Participants With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotypes 1, 4, and 6) treatment-experienced trial.
The 12-week C-EDGE results in 316 treatment-naive patients were presented earlier this year in Vienna at the International Liver Congress.
The fixed-dose, once-daily combination is composed of grazoprevir, an inhibitor of the HCV NS3/4a protease, at a dose of 100 mg, and elbasvir, a potent inhibitor of the NS5a protein, at a dose of 50 mg. This combination was shown to have broad activity against most HCV genotypes in vitro, and was efficacious in both treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients with and without cirrhosis, including those with HIV/HCV coinfections, in the C-WORTHY trial.
The C-EDGE study was a phase III trial of GZR/EBR with or without ribavirin for 12 or 16 weeks for patients for whom prior therapy with peg-interferon and ribavirin had failed because of either null or partial response or viral relapse. The trial included patients with and without cirrhosis, those with HCV genotypes 1, 4, or 6, and those with either HCV mono-infections or HIV coinfections.
A total of 420 patients were enrolled.
As noted before, 97 of 105 patients (92%) on 12 weeks of therapy without ribavirin had an SVR12, although two patients in this group were lost to follow-up or discontinued therapy for reasons other than virologic failure (included as nonresponders). Among patients who received 12 weeks of GZR/EBR plus ribavirin, 98 of 104 (94%) had an SVR12, with no losses to follow-up.
For those patients treated for 16 weeks, 97 of 105 (92%) without ribavirin had an SVR12, compared with 103 of 106 (97%) who received ribavirin in addition to the combination antivirals. In these groups, one and three patients, respectively, were lost to follow-up.
In a subanalysis by HCV genotype or subtype, the combination alone was least effective among patients with genotype 4 treated for 16 weeks, with 3 of 5 patients (60%) having an SVR12, compared with 7 of 9 patients (79%) with genotype 4 treated with no ribavirin for 12 weeks, 14 of 15 (93%) with ribavirin for 12 weeks, and 8 of 8 (100%) treated with ribavirin for 16 weeks. The overall numbers of patients in each subgroup was too small for statistical significance analysis, however.
Among patients with HCV coinfection, the SVR12 rate was 100% in all treatment arms except 16 weeks GZR/EBR without ribavirin (5 of 6; 83%).
A subanalysis by prior response, excluding the 12 total patients who did not complete treatment, showed excellent SVR12 rates in all four treatment arms among patients with a prior relapse, and slightly less robust but still high rates among prior partial or null responders, Dr. Kwo said.
Patients tolerated the regimen well, with the rates of serious adverse events ranging from 2.9% to 3.8%. There were no deaths, and seven discontinuations due to adverse events (one in each in the 12-week arms, and five in the 16-week with ribavirin arm). A total of 31 patients who received ribavirin had hemoglobin reductions below 10 g/dL, and 60 reported fatigue, both common with ribavirin. The majority of adverse events in all arms were fatigue, headache, and nausea.
The combination has received two Breakthrough Therapy designations from the Food and Drug Administration for patients with HCV genotype 4, and for patients with genotype 1 infections who are on hemodialysis for end stage renal disease. The breakthrough designation makes the drug eligible for expedited review.
Dr. Kwo disclosed ties with Merck, which supported the C-EDGE study.
WASHINGTON – An investigational once-daily antiviral drug combination produced high rates of sustained viral responses after 12 or 16 weeks of therapy – with or without ribavirin – in patients with chronic hepatitis viral infections for whom prior therapy with peg-interferon and ribavirin had failed, investigators reported.
The rate of sustained viral responses at 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12) was 92% for patients who received the combination of grazoprevir and elbasvir (GZR/EBR, Merck) alone, compared with 94% for patients who received the antivirals plus ribavirin, reported Dr. Paul Kwo of Indiana University Hospital in Indianapolis.
Among patients who received 16 weeks of therapy, the SVR12 rates were 92% without ribavirin, and 97% with ribavirin, Dr. Kwo said at the annual Digestive Disease Week.
“In patients who have failed peg-interferon and ribavirin therapy, 12 weeks of grazoprevir and elbasvir without ribavirin gives outstanding SVR rates in genotype 1b-infected individuals, regardless of treatment response, including those with cirrhosis. If you’re a relapser with genotype 1a or genotype 4 infection, 12 weeks of grazoprevir and elbasvir gives outstanding SVR rates. For genotype 1a, 4 and 6 prior null and partial responders, including those with cirrhosis, 16 weeks of grazoprevir and elbasvir with ribavirin gives outstanding SVR rates with no virologic failures,” he said.
Dr. Kwo presented updated results from the C-EDGE(Study of Efficacy and Safety of Grazoprevir (MK-5172)/Elbasvir (MK-8742) Combination Regimen for Treatment-Naive Participants With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotypes 1, 4, and 6) treatment-experienced trial.
The 12-week C-EDGE results in 316 treatment-naive patients were presented earlier this year in Vienna at the International Liver Congress.
The fixed-dose, once-daily combination is composed of grazoprevir, an inhibitor of the HCV NS3/4a protease, at a dose of 100 mg, and elbasvir, a potent inhibitor of the NS5a protein, at a dose of 50 mg. This combination was shown to have broad activity against most HCV genotypes in vitro, and was efficacious in both treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients with and without cirrhosis, including those with HIV/HCV coinfections, in the C-WORTHY trial.
The C-EDGE study was a phase III trial of GZR/EBR with or without ribavirin for 12 or 16 weeks for patients for whom prior therapy with peg-interferon and ribavirin had failed because of either null or partial response or viral relapse. The trial included patients with and without cirrhosis, those with HCV genotypes 1, 4, or 6, and those with either HCV mono-infections or HIV coinfections.
A total of 420 patients were enrolled.
As noted before, 97 of 105 patients (92%) on 12 weeks of therapy without ribavirin had an SVR12, although two patients in this group were lost to follow-up or discontinued therapy for reasons other than virologic failure (included as nonresponders). Among patients who received 12 weeks of GZR/EBR plus ribavirin, 98 of 104 (94%) had an SVR12, with no losses to follow-up.
For those patients treated for 16 weeks, 97 of 105 (92%) without ribavirin had an SVR12, compared with 103 of 106 (97%) who received ribavirin in addition to the combination antivirals. In these groups, one and three patients, respectively, were lost to follow-up.
In a subanalysis by HCV genotype or subtype, the combination alone was least effective among patients with genotype 4 treated for 16 weeks, with 3 of 5 patients (60%) having an SVR12, compared with 7 of 9 patients (79%) with genotype 4 treated with no ribavirin for 12 weeks, 14 of 15 (93%) with ribavirin for 12 weeks, and 8 of 8 (100%) treated with ribavirin for 16 weeks. The overall numbers of patients in each subgroup was too small for statistical significance analysis, however.
Among patients with HCV coinfection, the SVR12 rate was 100% in all treatment arms except 16 weeks GZR/EBR without ribavirin (5 of 6; 83%).
A subanalysis by prior response, excluding the 12 total patients who did not complete treatment, showed excellent SVR12 rates in all four treatment arms among patients with a prior relapse, and slightly less robust but still high rates among prior partial or null responders, Dr. Kwo said.
Patients tolerated the regimen well, with the rates of serious adverse events ranging from 2.9% to 3.8%. There were no deaths, and seven discontinuations due to adverse events (one in each in the 12-week arms, and five in the 16-week with ribavirin arm). A total of 31 patients who received ribavirin had hemoglobin reductions below 10 g/dL, and 60 reported fatigue, both common with ribavirin. The majority of adverse events in all arms were fatigue, headache, and nausea.
The combination has received two Breakthrough Therapy designations from the Food and Drug Administration for patients with HCV genotype 4, and for patients with genotype 1 infections who are on hemodialysis for end stage renal disease. The breakthrough designation makes the drug eligible for expedited review.
Dr. Kwo disclosed ties with Merck, which supported the C-EDGE study.
AT DDW 2015
Key clinical point: A fixed dose combination of grazoprevir and elbasvir, with or without ribavirin, was effective in patients with previously treated HCV infections.
Major finding: SVR12 was 92% for patients who received the combination of grazoprevir and elbasvir alone, compared with 94% for patients who received the antivirals plus ribavirin for 12 weeks.
Data source: Randomized clinical trial of 420 patients with HCV genotypes 1, 4, and 6 for whom prior therapy with peg-interferon/ribavirin had failed.
Disclosures: Dr. Kwo disclosed ties with Merck, which supported the C-EDGE study.