ICML 2015

 

 

Growing monoclonal antibodies

Photo by Linda Bartlett

 

LUGANO—The defucosylated monoclonal antibody (mAb) ARGX-110, which is active against CD70-bearing tumor cells and CD70-dependent stimulation of regulatory T cells, has shown activity in relapsed/refractory T-cell lymphoma (TCL), according to investigators.

Of the 8 TCL patients enrolled in a phase 1 trial of ARGX-110, 3 had a biological response to the mAb.

In this dose-escalation trial, the maximum tolerated dose of ARGX-110 was not reached.

Marie Maerevoet, MD, of the Institut Jules Bordet in Brussels, Belgium, presented results from the lymphoma cohort of this trial at the 13th International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma (abstract 040*). The study was sponsored by arGEN-X, the company developing ARGX-110.

Dr  Maerevoet pointed out that more than half the tumor cells in 71% of patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) and 22% with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) are CD70-positive. CD70 signaling occurs via CD27, and CD27 shedding is a biomarker for an active pathway.

Since ARGX-110 has an affinity for CD70, inhibits CD27 signaling, and mediates the lysis of TCL in Sézary syndrome (SS), mycosis fungoides, and anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) cell lines, researchers decided to investigate the safety and clinical pharmacology of ARGX-110 monotherapy in metastatic, relapsed or refractory, solid tumors and hematologic malignancies.

Patients’ tumors had to express CD70 by immunohistochemistry, defined as more than 10% tumor cells of 2+ or 3+ intensity.

The primary endpoint was to determine the maximum tolerated dose. Secondary endpoints were pharmacology, immunogenicity, and efficacy signals.

Patient demographics

Between February 2013 and April 2015, investigators assigned 63 patients to receive ARGX-110 at doses ranging from 0.1 to 10 mg/kg intravenously once every 3 weeks until disease progression or withdrawal due to toxicity. Patients were pre-medicated with corticoid regimens.

Eighteen patients had lymphoid malignancies—8 with B-cell lymphomas, 8 with TCL, and 2 with Hodgkin lymphoma.

The TCL cohort consisted of 1 patient with SS, 1 with transformed SS, 1 with T-helper CTCL, 2 with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), 2 with PTCL not otherwise specified (NOS), and 1 with ALCL.

Patients were a median age of 62 (range, 55–78), had a median of 4 prior treatment regimens (range, 2–6), and received a median of 2 cycles of ARGX-110 (range, 1–6).

Dr Maerevoet noted that most lymphoma patients received a dose of 5 mg/kg every 3 weeks.

Safety

In the entire lymphoma cohort of 18 patients, 4 patients (22%) experienced a grade 1 or 2 infusion-related reaction. Three patients (18%) developed grade 3 sepsis—1 with Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia, 1 with AITL, and 1 with PTCL-NOS.

Two patients (11%) had hematologic toxicity consisting of a grade 3 decrease in hemoglobin and absolute neutrophil count, which was considered not related to treatment with ARGX-110.

“The maximum tolerated dose was not reached,” Dr Maerevoet said. “We didn’t observe auto-immune adverse events or impact on serum IgG or IgM.”

Efficacy outcomes

The main reason for withdrawal was progressive disease, which occurred in 14 lymphoma patients.

Two patients—1 with Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia and 1 with AITL—withdrew due to adverse events of sepsis (catheter infection, pneumonia), 1 patient with SS withdrew for social reasons, and 1 patient with follicular T-cell lymphoma (currently classified as PTCL-NOS) remains on study.

Dr Maerevoet described the 3 TCL patients who had a biologic response to ARGX-110. One patient with SS had a hematologic complete remission after 6 cycles at the 0.1 mg/kg dose.

Another patient with transformed SS experienced a depletion of circulating clones after 2 cycles of the 10 mg/kg dose. However, the patient ultimately died of progressive disease.

A third patient had resolution of autoimmune hemolytic anemia. This 61-year-old male with AITL achieved a partial response with normalization of LDH levels and an increase in hemoglobin to 7.9 g/dL without transfusion support after 2 doses of ARGX-110 at 5 mg/kg.

The patient became Coombs-negative and had a 16% reduction in tumor size by CT scan. However, the patient subsequently died of pneumonia.

The investigators also observed clinical activity in the peripheral blood, lymph nodes, and skin of 2 additional patients.

The biological activity of ARGX-110 as demonstrated by these TCL patients, in addition to the safety and tolerability of this mAb, led the team to conclude that further clinical investigation of ARGX-110 in TCL is warranted.

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

 

 

Growing monoclonal antibodies

Photo by Linda Bartlett

 

LUGANO—The defucosylated monoclonal antibody (mAb) ARGX-110, which is active against CD70-bearing tumor cells and CD70-dependent stimulation of regulatory T cells, has shown activity in relapsed/refractory T-cell lymphoma (TCL), according to investigators.

Of the 8 TCL patients enrolled in a phase 1 trial of ARGX-110, 3 had a biological response to the mAb.

In this dose-escalation trial, the maximum tolerated dose of ARGX-110 was not reached.

Marie Maerevoet, MD, of the Institut Jules Bordet in Brussels, Belgium, presented results from the lymphoma cohort of this trial at the 13th International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma (abstract 040*). The study was sponsored by arGEN-X, the company developing ARGX-110.

Dr  Maerevoet pointed out that more than half the tumor cells in 71% of patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) and 22% with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) are CD70-positive. CD70 signaling occurs via CD27, and CD27 shedding is a biomarker for an active pathway.

Since ARGX-110 has an affinity for CD70, inhibits CD27 signaling, and mediates the lysis of TCL in Sézary syndrome (SS), mycosis fungoides, and anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) cell lines, researchers decided to investigate the safety and clinical pharmacology of ARGX-110 monotherapy in metastatic, relapsed or refractory, solid tumors and hematologic malignancies.

Patients’ tumors had to express CD70 by immunohistochemistry, defined as more than 10% tumor cells of 2+ or 3+ intensity.

The primary endpoint was to determine the maximum tolerated dose. Secondary endpoints were pharmacology, immunogenicity, and efficacy signals.

Patient demographics

Between February 2013 and April 2015, investigators assigned 63 patients to receive ARGX-110 at doses ranging from 0.1 to 10 mg/kg intravenously once every 3 weeks until disease progression or withdrawal due to toxicity. Patients were pre-medicated with corticoid regimens.

Eighteen patients had lymphoid malignancies—8 with B-cell lymphomas, 8 with TCL, and 2 with Hodgkin lymphoma.

The TCL cohort consisted of 1 patient with SS, 1 with transformed SS, 1 with T-helper CTCL, 2 with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), 2 with PTCL not otherwise specified (NOS), and 1 with ALCL.

Patients were a median age of 62 (range, 55–78), had a median of 4 prior treatment regimens (range, 2–6), and received a median of 2 cycles of ARGX-110 (range, 1–6).

Dr Maerevoet noted that most lymphoma patients received a dose of 5 mg/kg every 3 weeks.

Safety

In the entire lymphoma cohort of 18 patients, 4 patients (22%) experienced a grade 1 or 2 infusion-related reaction. Three patients (18%) developed grade 3 sepsis—1 with Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia, 1 with AITL, and 1 with PTCL-NOS.

Two patients (11%) had hematologic toxicity consisting of a grade 3 decrease in hemoglobin and absolute neutrophil count, which was considered not related to treatment with ARGX-110.

“The maximum tolerated dose was not reached,” Dr Maerevoet said. “We didn’t observe auto-immune adverse events or impact on serum IgG or IgM.”

Efficacy outcomes

The main reason for withdrawal was progressive disease, which occurred in 14 lymphoma patients.

Two patients—1 with Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia and 1 with AITL—withdrew due to adverse events of sepsis (catheter infection, pneumonia), 1 patient with SS withdrew for social reasons, and 1 patient with follicular T-cell lymphoma (currently classified as PTCL-NOS) remains on study.

Dr Maerevoet described the 3 TCL patients who had a biologic response to ARGX-110. One patient with SS had a hematologic complete remission after 6 cycles at the 0.1 mg/kg dose.

Another patient with transformed SS experienced a depletion of circulating clones after 2 cycles of the 10 mg/kg dose. However, the patient ultimately died of progressive disease.

A third patient had resolution of autoimmune hemolytic anemia. This 61-year-old male with AITL achieved a partial response with normalization of LDH levels and an increase in hemoglobin to 7.9 g/dL without transfusion support after 2 doses of ARGX-110 at 5 mg/kg.

The patient became Coombs-negative and had a 16% reduction in tumor size by CT scan. However, the patient subsequently died of pneumonia.

The investigators also observed clinical activity in the peripheral blood, lymph nodes, and skin of 2 additional patients.

The biological activity of ARGX-110 as demonstrated by these TCL patients, in addition to the safety and tolerability of this mAb, led the team to conclude that further clinical investigation of ARGX-110 in TCL is warranted.

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

 

 

Growing monoclonal antibodies

Photo by Linda Bartlett

 

LUGANO—The defucosylated monoclonal antibody (mAb) ARGX-110, which is active against CD70-bearing tumor cells and CD70-dependent stimulation of regulatory T cells, has shown activity in relapsed/refractory T-cell lymphoma (TCL), according to investigators.

Of the 8 TCL patients enrolled in a phase 1 trial of ARGX-110, 3 had a biological response to the mAb.

In this dose-escalation trial, the maximum tolerated dose of ARGX-110 was not reached.

Marie Maerevoet, MD, of the Institut Jules Bordet in Brussels, Belgium, presented results from the lymphoma cohort of this trial at the 13th International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma (abstract 040*). The study was sponsored by arGEN-X, the company developing ARGX-110.

Dr  Maerevoet pointed out that more than half the tumor cells in 71% of patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) and 22% with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) are CD70-positive. CD70 signaling occurs via CD27, and CD27 shedding is a biomarker for an active pathway.

Since ARGX-110 has an affinity for CD70, inhibits CD27 signaling, and mediates the lysis of TCL in Sézary syndrome (SS), mycosis fungoides, and anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) cell lines, researchers decided to investigate the safety and clinical pharmacology of ARGX-110 monotherapy in metastatic, relapsed or refractory, solid tumors and hematologic malignancies.

Patients’ tumors had to express CD70 by immunohistochemistry, defined as more than 10% tumor cells of 2+ or 3+ intensity.

The primary endpoint was to determine the maximum tolerated dose. Secondary endpoints were pharmacology, immunogenicity, and efficacy signals.

Patient demographics

Between February 2013 and April 2015, investigators assigned 63 patients to receive ARGX-110 at doses ranging from 0.1 to 10 mg/kg intravenously once every 3 weeks until disease progression or withdrawal due to toxicity. Patients were pre-medicated with corticoid regimens.

Eighteen patients had lymphoid malignancies—8 with B-cell lymphomas, 8 with TCL, and 2 with Hodgkin lymphoma.

The TCL cohort consisted of 1 patient with SS, 1 with transformed SS, 1 with T-helper CTCL, 2 with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), 2 with PTCL not otherwise specified (NOS), and 1 with ALCL.

Patients were a median age of 62 (range, 55–78), had a median of 4 prior treatment regimens (range, 2–6), and received a median of 2 cycles of ARGX-110 (range, 1–6).

Dr Maerevoet noted that most lymphoma patients received a dose of 5 mg/kg every 3 weeks.

Safety

In the entire lymphoma cohort of 18 patients, 4 patients (22%) experienced a grade 1 or 2 infusion-related reaction. Three patients (18%) developed grade 3 sepsis—1 with Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia, 1 with AITL, and 1 with PTCL-NOS.

Two patients (11%) had hematologic toxicity consisting of a grade 3 decrease in hemoglobin and absolute neutrophil count, which was considered not related to treatment with ARGX-110.

“The maximum tolerated dose was not reached,” Dr Maerevoet said. “We didn’t observe auto-immune adverse events or impact on serum IgG or IgM.”

Efficacy outcomes

The main reason for withdrawal was progressive disease, which occurred in 14 lymphoma patients.

Two patients—1 with Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia and 1 with AITL—withdrew due to adverse events of sepsis (catheter infection, pneumonia), 1 patient with SS withdrew for social reasons, and 1 patient with follicular T-cell lymphoma (currently classified as PTCL-NOS) remains on study.

Dr Maerevoet described the 3 TCL patients who had a biologic response to ARGX-110. One patient with SS had a hematologic complete remission after 6 cycles at the 0.1 mg/kg dose.

Another patient with transformed SS experienced a depletion of circulating clones after 2 cycles of the 10 mg/kg dose. However, the patient ultimately died of progressive disease.

A third patient had resolution of autoimmune hemolytic anemia. This 61-year-old male with AITL achieved a partial response with normalization of LDH levels and an increase in hemoglobin to 7.9 g/dL without transfusion support after 2 doses of ARGX-110 at 5 mg/kg.

The patient became Coombs-negative and had a 16% reduction in tumor size by CT scan. However, the patient subsequently died of pneumonia.

The investigators also observed clinical activity in the peripheral blood, lymph nodes, and skin of 2 additional patients.

The biological activity of ARGX-110 as demonstrated by these TCL patients, in addition to the safety and tolerability of this mAb, led the team to conclude that further clinical investigation of ARGX-110 in TCL is warranted.

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

 

 

Micrograph showing DLBCL

 

LUGANO—The phase 1, first-in-human study of the novel SYK inhibitor TAK-659 is showing “good early evidence” of antitumor activity in patients with lymphoma, according to investigators.

The agent also appears to be fairly well tolerated, with 10 categories of adverse events occurring in 2 or more patients.

Adam M. Petrich, MD, of Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois, presented results from this ongoing study at the 13th International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma (13-ICML) as abstract 039.*

The study is supported by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.

Dr Petrich said the B-cell receptor signaling pathway is “very fertile ground with respect to development for novel targeting, particularly of B-cell malignancies, and SYK—the spleen tyrosine kinase—is an integral component of this.”

Investigators believe SYK has implications beyond B-cell lymphoma, including EBV-related malignancies, solid tumors, and myeloid leukemias.

Preclinical findings

In vitro experiments with TAK-659 showed “profound inhibition” of both SYK and FLT3, as indicated by the low IC₅₀ levels, Dr Petrich said.

He also pointed out that the EC₅₀ levels compare favorably to ibrutinib and idelalisib, with generally lower numbers in a broad panel of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

In animal models, TAK-659 exhibited a dose-dependent tumor-inhibitory property.

“And if we look at both germinal center B and non-germinal center B subtypes of large-cell lymphoma, we see activity across both types,” Dr Petrich said.

Phase 1 study

Investigators are currently conducting the phase 1 study, which is a standard 3+3 dose-escalation schema. The data cutoff for the ICML presentation was April 13, although the dose-escalation phase was still underway, and the maximum tolerated dose was not yet reached.

Based on preclinical data, the team projected the efficacious dose for humans to be approximately 600 to 1200 mg per day. Patients were started at 60 mg, and, at the next planned step of 120 mg, 2 patients developed asymptomatic lipase elevations.

“For that reason, we revised the protocol, allowed for those to not be considered dose-limiting toxicities, and explored intermediate doses,” Dr Petrich explained.

So the protocol now includes intermediate doses of 80 and 100 mg. Dr Petrich’s presentation focused on the 4 doses—60, 80, 100, and 120 mg taken orally once daily.

He said the observed human clearance of TAK-659 was approximately 3- to 4-fold lower than predicted based on the mouse pharmacokinetic (PK) data, which led to steady-state area under the curve values 3- to 4-fold higher in humans than predicted.

Patient demographics

The investigators enrolled 21 patients, 12 with solid tumors, 6 with DLBCL, and 3 with FL. The median age was 60 years, 66% were male, and 62% had received 4 or more prior therapies.

The median number of TAK-659 treatment cycles was 2 (range, 1–10), and 5 patients are still on active treatment. Dr Petrich pointed out that 4 of the 5 longest-treated patients have DLBCL, and “the record holder with DLBCL is about to celebrate 1 year on therapy.”

Safety

“The safety profile in humans showed that [TAK-659] was actually quite tolerable,” Dr Petrich said.

There were 10 categories of treatment-related adverse events (AEs) that occurred in 2 or more patients. They were, in descending order, fatigue, anemia, diarrhea, elevated AST, hypophosphatemia, nausea, rash, elevated lipase, elevated ALT, and anorexia.

The majority of AEs were grade 1 or 2. However, there were grade 3/4 cases of anemia, diarrhea, elevated AST, and hypophosphatemia. And elevated lipase—the asymptomatic, dose-limiting toxicity for which the protocol was modified—consisted entirely of grade 3 or 4 events.

Episodes of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 1 patient each, and both were grade 1.

“So [TAK-659] seems quite well tolerated in that regard as well,” Dr Petrich observed.

The plasma profile on days 1 and 15 of cycle 1 indicate that PK steady-state conditions are generally achieved by day 8, with moderate accumulation after repeated, once-daily dosing for 15 days.

Antitumor activity

Of the 12 evaluable patients, 5 had tumor shrinkage at the 60, 80, or 100 mg dose levels. Three of the 6 DLBCL patients experienced tumor shrinkage, and there were “2 dramatic responses in patients with follicular lymphoma, including 1 CR [complete response],” Dr Petrich said.

One of these FL patients had an aggressive phenotype and never had a previous response last longer than 20 months.

“[H]e actually achieved a CR within 2 cycles—a dramatic response for his disease—and he remains on treatment, and he’s up to cycle 5 now,” Dr Petrich said.

The team concluded that the PK data support daily dosing, despite lower clearance than originally predicted.

“[There is] good early evidence of antitumor activity and no significant safety signals,” Dr Petrich said. “And the [hematologic] toxicity profile, in particular, seems to suggest this is a well-tolerated drug.”

The investigators are conducting expansion cohorts and are considering future combination studies. They recently activated a study in acute myeloid leukemia because TAK-659 has FLT3 inhibitory properties.  

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

 

 

Micrograph showing DLBCL

 

LUGANO—The phase 1, first-in-human study of the novel SYK inhibitor TAK-659 is showing “good early evidence” of antitumor activity in patients with lymphoma, according to investigators.

The agent also appears to be fairly well tolerated, with 10 categories of adverse events occurring in 2 or more patients.

Adam M. Petrich, MD, of Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois, presented results from this ongoing study at the 13th International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma (13-ICML) as abstract 039.*

The study is supported by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.

Dr Petrich said the B-cell receptor signaling pathway is “very fertile ground with respect to development for novel targeting, particularly of B-cell malignancies, and SYK—the spleen tyrosine kinase—is an integral component of this.”

Investigators believe SYK has implications beyond B-cell lymphoma, including EBV-related malignancies, solid tumors, and myeloid leukemias.

Preclinical findings

In vitro experiments with TAK-659 showed “profound inhibition” of both SYK and FLT3, as indicated by the low IC₅₀ levels, Dr Petrich said.

He also pointed out that the EC₅₀ levels compare favorably to ibrutinib and idelalisib, with generally lower numbers in a broad panel of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

In animal models, TAK-659 exhibited a dose-dependent tumor-inhibitory property.

“And if we look at both germinal center B and non-germinal center B subtypes of large-cell lymphoma, we see activity across both types,” Dr Petrich said.

Phase 1 study

Investigators are currently conducting the phase 1 study, which is a standard 3+3 dose-escalation schema. The data cutoff for the ICML presentation was April 13, although the dose-escalation phase was still underway, and the maximum tolerated dose was not yet reached.

Based on preclinical data, the team projected the efficacious dose for humans to be approximately 600 to 1200 mg per day. Patients were started at 60 mg, and, at the next planned step of 120 mg, 2 patients developed asymptomatic lipase elevations.

“For that reason, we revised the protocol, allowed for those to not be considered dose-limiting toxicities, and explored intermediate doses,” Dr Petrich explained.

So the protocol now includes intermediate doses of 80 and 100 mg. Dr Petrich’s presentation focused on the 4 doses—60, 80, 100, and 120 mg taken orally once daily.

He said the observed human clearance of TAK-659 was approximately 3- to 4-fold lower than predicted based on the mouse pharmacokinetic (PK) data, which led to steady-state area under the curve values 3- to 4-fold higher in humans than predicted.

Patient demographics

The investigators enrolled 21 patients, 12 with solid tumors, 6 with DLBCL, and 3 with FL. The median age was 60 years, 66% were male, and 62% had received 4 or more prior therapies.

The median number of TAK-659 treatment cycles was 2 (range, 1–10), and 5 patients are still on active treatment. Dr Petrich pointed out that 4 of the 5 longest-treated patients have DLBCL, and “the record holder with DLBCL is about to celebrate 1 year on therapy.”

Safety

“The safety profile in humans showed that [TAK-659] was actually quite tolerable,” Dr Petrich said.

There were 10 categories of treatment-related adverse events (AEs) that occurred in 2 or more patients. They were, in descending order, fatigue, anemia, diarrhea, elevated AST, hypophosphatemia, nausea, rash, elevated lipase, elevated ALT, and anorexia.

The majority of AEs were grade 1 or 2. However, there were grade 3/4 cases of anemia, diarrhea, elevated AST, and hypophosphatemia. And elevated lipase—the asymptomatic, dose-limiting toxicity for which the protocol was modified—consisted entirely of grade 3 or 4 events.

Episodes of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 1 patient each, and both were grade 1.

“So [TAK-659] seems quite well tolerated in that regard as well,” Dr Petrich observed.

The plasma profile on days 1 and 15 of cycle 1 indicate that PK steady-state conditions are generally achieved by day 8, with moderate accumulation after repeated, once-daily dosing for 15 days.

Antitumor activity

Of the 12 evaluable patients, 5 had tumor shrinkage at the 60, 80, or 100 mg dose levels. Three of the 6 DLBCL patients experienced tumor shrinkage, and there were “2 dramatic responses in patients with follicular lymphoma, including 1 CR [complete response],” Dr Petrich said.

One of these FL patients had an aggressive phenotype and never had a previous response last longer than 20 months.

“[H]e actually achieved a CR within 2 cycles—a dramatic response for his disease—and he remains on treatment, and he’s up to cycle 5 now,” Dr Petrich said.

The team concluded that the PK data support daily dosing, despite lower clearance than originally predicted.

“[There is] good early evidence of antitumor activity and no significant safety signals,” Dr Petrich said. “And the [hematologic] toxicity profile, in particular, seems to suggest this is a well-tolerated drug.”

The investigators are conducting expansion cohorts and are considering future combination studies. They recently activated a study in acute myeloid leukemia because TAK-659 has FLT3 inhibitory properties.  

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

 

 

Micrograph showing DLBCL

 

LUGANO—The phase 1, first-in-human study of the novel SYK inhibitor TAK-659 is showing “good early evidence” of antitumor activity in patients with lymphoma, according to investigators.

The agent also appears to be fairly well tolerated, with 10 categories of adverse events occurring in 2 or more patients.

Adam M. Petrich, MD, of Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois, presented results from this ongoing study at the 13th International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma (13-ICML) as abstract 039.*

The study is supported by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.

Dr Petrich said the B-cell receptor signaling pathway is “very fertile ground with respect to development for novel targeting, particularly of B-cell malignancies, and SYK—the spleen tyrosine kinase—is an integral component of this.”

Investigators believe SYK has implications beyond B-cell lymphoma, including EBV-related malignancies, solid tumors, and myeloid leukemias.

Preclinical findings

In vitro experiments with TAK-659 showed “profound inhibition” of both SYK and FLT3, as indicated by the low IC₅₀ levels, Dr Petrich said.

He also pointed out that the EC₅₀ levels compare favorably to ibrutinib and idelalisib, with generally lower numbers in a broad panel of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

In animal models, TAK-659 exhibited a dose-dependent tumor-inhibitory property.

“And if we look at both germinal center B and non-germinal center B subtypes of large-cell lymphoma, we see activity across both types,” Dr Petrich said.

Phase 1 study

Investigators are currently conducting the phase 1 study, which is a standard 3+3 dose-escalation schema. The data cutoff for the ICML presentation was April 13, although the dose-escalation phase was still underway, and the maximum tolerated dose was not yet reached.

Based on preclinical data, the team projected the efficacious dose for humans to be approximately 600 to 1200 mg per day. Patients were started at 60 mg, and, at the next planned step of 120 mg, 2 patients developed asymptomatic lipase elevations.

“For that reason, we revised the protocol, allowed for those to not be considered dose-limiting toxicities, and explored intermediate doses,” Dr Petrich explained.

So the protocol now includes intermediate doses of 80 and 100 mg. Dr Petrich’s presentation focused on the 4 doses—60, 80, 100, and 120 mg taken orally once daily.

He said the observed human clearance of TAK-659 was approximately 3- to 4-fold lower than predicted based on the mouse pharmacokinetic (PK) data, which led to steady-state area under the curve values 3- to 4-fold higher in humans than predicted.

Patient demographics

The investigators enrolled 21 patients, 12 with solid tumors, 6 with DLBCL, and 3 with FL. The median age was 60 years, 66% were male, and 62% had received 4 or more prior therapies.

The median number of TAK-659 treatment cycles was 2 (range, 1–10), and 5 patients are still on active treatment. Dr Petrich pointed out that 4 of the 5 longest-treated patients have DLBCL, and “the record holder with DLBCL is about to celebrate 1 year on therapy.”

Safety

“The safety profile in humans showed that [TAK-659] was actually quite tolerable,” Dr Petrich said.

There were 10 categories of treatment-related adverse events (AEs) that occurred in 2 or more patients. They were, in descending order, fatigue, anemia, diarrhea, elevated AST, hypophosphatemia, nausea, rash, elevated lipase, elevated ALT, and anorexia.

The majority of AEs were grade 1 or 2. However, there were grade 3/4 cases of anemia, diarrhea, elevated AST, and hypophosphatemia. And elevated lipase—the asymptomatic, dose-limiting toxicity for which the protocol was modified—consisted entirely of grade 3 or 4 events.

Episodes of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 1 patient each, and both were grade 1.

“So [TAK-659] seems quite well tolerated in that regard as well,” Dr Petrich observed.

The plasma profile on days 1 and 15 of cycle 1 indicate that PK steady-state conditions are generally achieved by day 8, with moderate accumulation after repeated, once-daily dosing for 15 days.

Antitumor activity

Of the 12 evaluable patients, 5 had tumor shrinkage at the 60, 80, or 100 mg dose levels. Three of the 6 DLBCL patients experienced tumor shrinkage, and there were “2 dramatic responses in patients with follicular lymphoma, including 1 CR [complete response],” Dr Petrich said.

One of these FL patients had an aggressive phenotype and never had a previous response last longer than 20 months.

“[H]e actually achieved a CR within 2 cycles—a dramatic response for his disease—and he remains on treatment, and he’s up to cycle 5 now,” Dr Petrich said.

The team concluded that the PK data support daily dosing, despite lower clearance than originally predicted.

“[There is] good early evidence of antitumor activity and no significant safety signals,” Dr Petrich said. “And the [hematologic] toxicity profile, in particular, seems to suggest this is a well-tolerated drug.”

The investigators are conducting expansion cohorts and are considering future combination studies. They recently activated a study in acute myeloid leukemia because TAK-659 has FLT3 inhibitory properties.  

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

Patient receives chemotherapy

Photo by Rhoda Baer

LUGANO—Long-awaited results of the Intergroup H10 trial in PET-positive Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients have shown that intensifying chemotherapy significantly increases 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and produces a non-significant increase in overall survival (OS).

Switching patients who are PET-positive after 2 cycles of ABVD to escalated BEACOPP and involved-node radiotherapy increased 5-year PFS to 91% and 5-year OS to 96%.

The trial was a cooperative effort of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Lymphoma Study Association (LYSA), and Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL).

The investigators already knew that early FDG-PET scans have prognostic impact. Patients with a negative PET scan after 2 cycles of chemotherapy have very good outcomes, while those with PET-positive interim scans have poor outcomes.

So the team designed the H10 trial to learn whether they could reduce long-term toxicity in the majority of patients and improve outcomes in the unfavorable subgroups.

Results of the primary endpoint—whether chemotherapy alone is as effective as, but less toxic than, combined-modality treatment in PET-negative patients after 2 cycles of ABVD—were published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The secondary endpoint was an improvement in PFS with an early change from ABVD to escalated BEACOPP in stage I or II HL patients who are PET-positive after 2 cycles of ABVD.

John M. M. Raemaekers, MD, PhD, of Radboud University Medical Center in The Netherlands, presented details on the trial’s secondary endpoint at the 13th International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma (no abstract available).

H10 trial design

The investigators enrolled patients with favorable and unfavorable prognostic characteristics.

Unfavorable characteristics consisted of age 50 or older, more than 3 nodal areas, mediastinal-to-thorax ratio of 0.35 or higher, erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 50 mm or greater without B symptoms, or erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 30 mm or greater with B symptoms.

In the standard treatment arm, patients with favorable or unfavorable characteristics were treated similarly. After 2 cycles of ABVD, a PET scan was performed, and, irrespective of the result, patients received combined-modality treatment of ABVD followed by involved-node radiotherapy.

In the experimental arm, patients who were PET-negative had chemotherapy alone without involved-node radiotherapy. PET-negative patients were not discussed further in this presentation.

For the PET-positive patients in the experimental arm, the treatment for those with favorable and unfavorable characteristics was identical.

Patients who were PET-positive after 2 cycles were switched to 2 escalated BEACOPP cycles plus involved-node radiotherapy. Patients were considered PET-positive if they had a Deauville score of 3, 4, or 5.

Randomization

The first patient was enrolled in November 2006 and the last in June 2011. Investigators randomized 1950 patients, 754 with favorable and 1196 with unfavorable characteristics. All patients had untreated, supradiaphragmatic, clinical stage I or II HL.

Nine hundred fifty-four patients were enrolled in the standard arm, 371 with favorable characteristics and 583 with unfavorable. Nine hundred seventy-one patients entered the experimental arm, 376 with favorable and 595 with unfavorable characteristics.

Twenty-five patients were excluded because they did not complete the first 2 cycles of ABVD or did not have a PET scan.

After 2 cycles of ABVD, 361 patients were PET-positive, 192 in the ABVD arm (54 favorable, 138 unfavorable), and 169 in the escalated BEACOPP arm (43 favorable, 126 unfavorable).

The median age was 30 years in both arms (range, 15 to 70), and the investigators followed patients for a median of 4.5 years.

Results

The only grade 3-4 toxicities were hematologic events and infection.

“As expected, the neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia, grade 3-4, were more frequent in the experimental BEACOPP arm,” Dr Raemaekers said.

The incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia was 30.3% (ABVD) and 53.5% (BEACOPP), thrombocytopenia was 0% (ABVD) and 19.7% (BEACOPP), and anemia was 0% (ABVD) and 4.9% (BEACOPP).

The incidence of grade 3-4 febrile neutropenia was 1.1% (ABVD) and 23.9% (BEACOPP), and infection without neutropenia was 1.1% (ABVD) and 11.2% (BEACOPP).

Progression or relapse occurred in 18.8% of patients in the ABVD arm and 7.7% in the BEACOPP arm.

There were 18 deaths in the ABVD arm and 7 deaths in the BEACOPP arm. Eleven deaths in the ABVD arm and 3 in the BEACOPP arm were due to progressive disease or relapse.

The investigators also tallied up the number of patients who progressed, relapsed, or died, whichever occurred first. Forty-one patients in the ABVD arm fulfilled one of these criteria, compared to 16 in the BEACOPP arm.

“Progression and relapse had to be established by conventional restaging, including physical exam, chest X-ray, and CT scan,” Dr Raemaekers pointed out. “And it was based on any new lesion or increase by 50% or more in size of previously involved sites.”

Patients in the BEACOPP arm experienced a significantly better PFS than the ABVD arm, with a hazard ratio of 0.42 (P=0.002). The 5-year PFS was 91% in the BEACOPP arm and 77% in the ABVD arm.

The 5-year OS was 89% in the ABVD arm and 96% in the BEACOPP arm, a difference that was not statistically significant.

“But [the trial] was also not powered for overall survival,” Dr Raemaekers said. “[T]here is a hint, at least, that, even in overall survival, the BEACOPP arm is superior to the ABVD arm.”

Based on these findings, the investigators concluded that, despite increased toxicity, physicians should consider intensifying chemotherapy in early PET-positive patients with stage I/II HL in the combined-modality setting.

Patient receives chemotherapy

Photo by Rhoda Baer

LUGANO—Long-awaited results of the Intergroup H10 trial in PET-positive Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients have shown that intensifying chemotherapy significantly increases 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and produces a non-significant increase in overall survival (OS).

Switching patients who are PET-positive after 2 cycles of ABVD to escalated BEACOPP and involved-node radiotherapy increased 5-year PFS to 91% and 5-year OS to 96%.

The trial was a cooperative effort of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Lymphoma Study Association (LYSA), and Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL).

The investigators already knew that early FDG-PET scans have prognostic impact. Patients with a negative PET scan after 2 cycles of chemotherapy have very good outcomes, while those with PET-positive interim scans have poor outcomes.

So the team designed the H10 trial to learn whether they could reduce long-term toxicity in the majority of patients and improve outcomes in the unfavorable subgroups.

Results of the primary endpoint—whether chemotherapy alone is as effective as, but less toxic than, combined-modality treatment in PET-negative patients after 2 cycles of ABVD—were published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The secondary endpoint was an improvement in PFS with an early change from ABVD to escalated BEACOPP in stage I or II HL patients who are PET-positive after 2 cycles of ABVD.

John M. M. Raemaekers, MD, PhD, of Radboud University Medical Center in The Netherlands, presented details on the trial’s secondary endpoint at the 13th International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma (no abstract available).

H10 trial design

The investigators enrolled patients with favorable and unfavorable prognostic characteristics.

Unfavorable characteristics consisted of age 50 or older, more than 3 nodal areas, mediastinal-to-thorax ratio of 0.35 or higher, erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 50 mm or greater without B symptoms, or erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 30 mm or greater with B symptoms.

In the standard treatment arm, patients with favorable or unfavorable characteristics were treated similarly. After 2 cycles of ABVD, a PET scan was performed, and, irrespective of the result, patients received combined-modality treatment of ABVD followed by involved-node radiotherapy.

In the experimental arm, patients who were PET-negative had chemotherapy alone without involved-node radiotherapy. PET-negative patients were not discussed further in this presentation.

For the PET-positive patients in the experimental arm, the treatment for those with favorable and unfavorable characteristics was identical.

Patients who were PET-positive after 2 cycles were switched to 2 escalated BEACOPP cycles plus involved-node radiotherapy. Patients were considered PET-positive if they had a Deauville score of 3, 4, or 5.

Randomization

The first patient was enrolled in November 2006 and the last in June 2011. Investigators randomized 1950 patients, 754 with favorable and 1196 with unfavorable characteristics. All patients had untreated, supradiaphragmatic, clinical stage I or II HL.

Nine hundred fifty-four patients were enrolled in the standard arm, 371 with favorable characteristics and 583 with unfavorable. Nine hundred seventy-one patients entered the experimental arm, 376 with favorable and 595 with unfavorable characteristics.

Twenty-five patients were excluded because they did not complete the first 2 cycles of ABVD or did not have a PET scan.

After 2 cycles of ABVD, 361 patients were PET-positive, 192 in the ABVD arm (54 favorable, 138 unfavorable), and 169 in the escalated BEACOPP arm (43 favorable, 126 unfavorable).

The median age was 30 years in both arms (range, 15 to 70), and the investigators followed patients for a median of 4.5 years.

Results

The only grade 3-4 toxicities were hematologic events and infection.

“As expected, the neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia, grade 3-4, were more frequent in the experimental BEACOPP arm,” Dr Raemaekers said.

The incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia was 30.3% (ABVD) and 53.5% (BEACOPP), thrombocytopenia was 0% (ABVD) and 19.7% (BEACOPP), and anemia was 0% (ABVD) and 4.9% (BEACOPP).

The incidence of grade 3-4 febrile neutropenia was 1.1% (ABVD) and 23.9% (BEACOPP), and infection without neutropenia was 1.1% (ABVD) and 11.2% (BEACOPP).

Progression or relapse occurred in 18.8% of patients in the ABVD arm and 7.7% in the BEACOPP arm.

There were 18 deaths in the ABVD arm and 7 deaths in the BEACOPP arm. Eleven deaths in the ABVD arm and 3 in the BEACOPP arm were due to progressive disease or relapse.

The investigators also tallied up the number of patients who progressed, relapsed, or died, whichever occurred first. Forty-one patients in the ABVD arm fulfilled one of these criteria, compared to 16 in the BEACOPP arm.

“Progression and relapse had to be established by conventional restaging, including physical exam, chest X-ray, and CT scan,” Dr Raemaekers pointed out. “And it was based on any new lesion or increase by 50% or more in size of previously involved sites.”

Patients in the BEACOPP arm experienced a significantly better PFS than the ABVD arm, with a hazard ratio of 0.42 (P=0.002). The 5-year PFS was 91% in the BEACOPP arm and 77% in the ABVD arm.

The 5-year OS was 89% in the ABVD arm and 96% in the BEACOPP arm, a difference that was not statistically significant.

“But [the trial] was also not powered for overall survival,” Dr Raemaekers said. “[T]here is a hint, at least, that, even in overall survival, the BEACOPP arm is superior to the ABVD arm.”

Based on these findings, the investigators concluded that, despite increased toxicity, physicians should consider intensifying chemotherapy in early PET-positive patients with stage I/II HL in the combined-modality setting.

Patient receives chemotherapy

Photo by Rhoda Baer

LUGANO—Long-awaited results of the Intergroup H10 trial in PET-positive Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients have shown that intensifying chemotherapy significantly increases 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and produces a non-significant increase in overall survival (OS).

Switching patients who are PET-positive after 2 cycles of ABVD to escalated BEACOPP and involved-node radiotherapy increased 5-year PFS to 91% and 5-year OS to 96%.

The trial was a cooperative effort of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Lymphoma Study Association (LYSA), and Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL).

The investigators already knew that early FDG-PET scans have prognostic impact. Patients with a negative PET scan after 2 cycles of chemotherapy have very good outcomes, while those with PET-positive interim scans have poor outcomes.

So the team designed the H10 trial to learn whether they could reduce long-term toxicity in the majority of patients and improve outcomes in the unfavorable subgroups.

Results of the primary endpoint—whether chemotherapy alone is as effective as, but less toxic than, combined-modality treatment in PET-negative patients after 2 cycles of ABVD—were published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The secondary endpoint was an improvement in PFS with an early change from ABVD to escalated BEACOPP in stage I or II HL patients who are PET-positive after 2 cycles of ABVD.

John M. M. Raemaekers, MD, PhD, of Radboud University Medical Center in The Netherlands, presented details on the trial’s secondary endpoint at the 13th International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma (no abstract available).

H10 trial design

The investigators enrolled patients with favorable and unfavorable prognostic characteristics.

Unfavorable characteristics consisted of age 50 or older, more than 3 nodal areas, mediastinal-to-thorax ratio of 0.35 or higher, erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 50 mm or greater without B symptoms, or erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 30 mm or greater with B symptoms.

In the standard treatment arm, patients with favorable or unfavorable characteristics were treated similarly. After 2 cycles of ABVD, a PET scan was performed, and, irrespective of the result, patients received combined-modality treatment of ABVD followed by involved-node radiotherapy.

In the experimental arm, patients who were PET-negative had chemotherapy alone without involved-node radiotherapy. PET-negative patients were not discussed further in this presentation.

For the PET-positive patients in the experimental arm, the treatment for those with favorable and unfavorable characteristics was identical.

Patients who were PET-positive after 2 cycles were switched to 2 escalated BEACOPP cycles plus involved-node radiotherapy. Patients were considered PET-positive if they had a Deauville score of 3, 4, or 5.

Randomization

The first patient was enrolled in November 2006 and the last in June 2011. Investigators randomized 1950 patients, 754 with favorable and 1196 with unfavorable characteristics. All patients had untreated, supradiaphragmatic, clinical stage I or II HL.

Nine hundred fifty-four patients were enrolled in the standard arm, 371 with favorable characteristics and 583 with unfavorable. Nine hundred seventy-one patients entered the experimental arm, 376 with favorable and 595 with unfavorable characteristics.

Twenty-five patients were excluded because they did not complete the first 2 cycles of ABVD or did not have a PET scan.

After 2 cycles of ABVD, 361 patients were PET-positive, 192 in the ABVD arm (54 favorable, 138 unfavorable), and 169 in the escalated BEACOPP arm (43 favorable, 126 unfavorable).

The median age was 30 years in both arms (range, 15 to 70), and the investigators followed patients for a median of 4.5 years.

Results

The only grade 3-4 toxicities were hematologic events and infection.

“As expected, the neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia, grade 3-4, were more frequent in the experimental BEACOPP arm,” Dr Raemaekers said.

The incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia was 30.3% (ABVD) and 53.5% (BEACOPP), thrombocytopenia was 0% (ABVD) and 19.7% (BEACOPP), and anemia was 0% (ABVD) and 4.9% (BEACOPP).

The incidence of grade 3-4 febrile neutropenia was 1.1% (ABVD) and 23.9% (BEACOPP), and infection without neutropenia was 1.1% (ABVD) and 11.2% (BEACOPP).

Progression or relapse occurred in 18.8% of patients in the ABVD arm and 7.7% in the BEACOPP arm.

There were 18 deaths in the ABVD arm and 7 deaths in the BEACOPP arm. Eleven deaths in the ABVD arm and 3 in the BEACOPP arm were due to progressive disease or relapse.

The investigators also tallied up the number of patients who progressed, relapsed, or died, whichever occurred first. Forty-one patients in the ABVD arm fulfilled one of these criteria, compared to 16 in the BEACOPP arm.

“Progression and relapse had to be established by conventional restaging, including physical exam, chest X-ray, and CT scan,” Dr Raemaekers pointed out. “And it was based on any new lesion or increase by 50% or more in size of previously involved sites.”

Patients in the BEACOPP arm experienced a significantly better PFS than the ABVD arm, with a hazard ratio of 0.42 (P=0.002). The 5-year PFS was 91% in the BEACOPP arm and 77% in the ABVD arm.

The 5-year OS was 89% in the ABVD arm and 96% in the BEACOPP arm, a difference that was not statistically significant.

“But [the trial] was also not powered for overall survival,” Dr Raemaekers said. “[T]here is a hint, at least, that, even in overall survival, the BEACOPP arm is superior to the ABVD arm.”

Based on these findings, the investigators concluded that, despite increased toxicity, physicians should consider intensifying chemotherapy in early PET-positive patients with stage I/II HL in the combined-modality setting.

 

 

Owen O’Connor, MD, PhD

Photo by Larry Young

 

LUGANO—Updated phase 1 results with TGR-1202 suggest this next-generation PI3kδ inhibitor lacks the hepatotoxicity associated with other PI3Kδ inhibitors.

Investigators also confirmed that no case of colitis has been reported to date with TGR-1202, and only 2% of evaluable patients on this trial have experienced grade 3-4 diarrhea.

The study is an ongoing, first-in-human trial in patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies.

Owen O’Connor, MD, PhD, of Columbia University Medical Center in New York, New York, shared results from this trial at the 13th International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma (abstract 038*). The trial is sponsored by TG Therapeutics, Inc., the company developing TGR-1202.

“TGR-1202 is a radically different sort of PI3kδ inhibitor,” Dr O’Connor said. “[I]t’s really a unique chemical entity that is different from the previous 2 structures [idelalisib and duvelisib] that you’ve probably heard something about.”

Study design

This ongoing trial of TGR-1202 is open to patients with hematologic malignancies who relapsed after or were refractory to at least 1 prior treatment regimen. Patients are eligible if they have an ECOG performance status of 2 or less with adequate organ system function, including absolute neutrophil count of 750/μL or greater and platelets of 50,000/μL or greater.

TGR-1202 is dosed orally, once a day in continuous, 28-day cycles. The original dose-escalation portion of the study was a classic 3+3 design, starting at 50 mg and increasing to 1800 mg. Patients who received prior therapy with a PI3K and/or mTOR inhibitor were excluded from the dose-escalation cohorts but were allowed in the expansion cohorts.

Dr O’Connor pointed out that, through cohort 5, TGR-1202 was taken in the fasting state. However, pharmacokinetic studies performed in the fed state revealed that the area under the curve (AUC) and Cmax could be doubled by taking the drug with food. So the expansions in the ongoing 800 mg and 1200 mg cohorts are being conducted in the fed state.

Dr O’Connor also noted that a subsequent, micronized version of TGR-1202 was developed. The micronization “essentially increases the surface area of the formulation, allowing for better bioavailability and markedly increases the AUC and Cmax exposure,” he said.

So the investigators conducted a second escalation with the micronized formulation, starting at 200 mg and increasing to 800 mg. At present, they are enrolling patients to the 800 mg and 1200 mg cohorts conducted in the fed state with the micronized formulation.

Demographics

Dr O’Connor presented data on 66 patients who were evaluable for safety and 51 for efficacy. The patients’ median age was 66 (range, 22–85), and 46 were male.

In all, there were 20 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), 17 with follicular lymphoma, 10 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 9 with Hodgkin lymphoma, 5 with mantle cell lymphoma, 3 with marginal zone lymphoma, 1 with Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia, and 1 with hairy cell leukemia.

Patients had received a median of 3 prior therapies (range, 1–14), and 36 (55%) had 3 or more prior therapies. Thirty-four patients (52%) were refractory to their prior therapy.

Efficacy

Dr O’Connor reported that higher doses of TGR-1202—1200 mg of the initial formulation and 600 mg or more of the micronized version—demonstrated rapid and profound responses in CLL, follicular lymphoma, and marginal zone lymphoma.

Responses have been limited in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, and mantle cell lymphoma.

Eighty-eight percent of CLL patients achieved a nodal partial remission, and 63% achieved a response according to iwCLL criteria (Hallek 2008).

Safety and tolerability

Adverse events occurring in more than 10% of patients included nausea (41%), diarrhea (32%), fatigue (32%), headache (23%), vomiting (23%), cough (21%), decreased appetite (17%), rash (17%), constipation (14%), hypokalemia (14%), anemia, dizziness, dyspnea, neutropenia, and pyrexia (12% each), and abdominal pain (11%).

The most common grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia, occurring in 11% of patients.

“But other than that, the bulk of the toxicities in terms of grade 3-4 events were relatively modest,” Dr O’Connor said. “[I]t’s worth pointing out that diarrhea grade 3-4 only occurred in about 2% of patients in the population.”

Approximately 50% of patients (n=31) have been on study for more than 6 months, and approximately 30% taking a higher dose level have been on study for 6 months or more. Twenty-five of 37 patients exposed to 800 mg or more of the micronized formulation currently remain on study.

“So this gives you a sense that it is a very well-tolerated drug, with patients staying on for extended periods of time,” Dr O’Connor said.

He added that time on study becomes relevant in assessing some of the gastrointestinal toxicities seen with other PI3Kδ inhibitors, where it seems the median time to gastrointestinal toxicity is beyond 6 months.

“So far, and I’m willing to concede it’s early, but with half the patients being treated for over 6 months, [diarrhea/colitis] seems to be much lower than the experience with the other PI3 kinase inhibitors,” Dr O’Connor said.

“I think one of the more important features of [TGR-1202], and one that allows me to think we might be able to integrate this drug a little more readily into various combination regimens, are the discontinuations due to other adverse events.”

“Only 4% treated with [TGR-1202] had discontinuations secondary to adverse events. [A]nd it looks like the efficacy is in line with what we’d expect with some of the other drugs, but this [study] is actively accruing still.”

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

 

 

Owen O’Connor, MD, PhD

Photo by Larry Young

 

LUGANO—Updated phase 1 results with TGR-1202 suggest this next-generation PI3kδ inhibitor lacks the hepatotoxicity associated with other PI3Kδ inhibitors.

Investigators also confirmed that no case of colitis has been reported to date with TGR-1202, and only 2% of evaluable patients on this trial have experienced grade 3-4 diarrhea.

The study is an ongoing, first-in-human trial in patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies.

Owen O’Connor, MD, PhD, of Columbia University Medical Center in New York, New York, shared results from this trial at the 13th International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma (abstract 038*). The trial is sponsored by TG Therapeutics, Inc., the company developing TGR-1202.

“TGR-1202 is a radically different sort of PI3kδ inhibitor,” Dr O’Connor said. “[I]t’s really a unique chemical entity that is different from the previous 2 structures [idelalisib and duvelisib] that you’ve probably heard something about.”

Study design

This ongoing trial of TGR-1202 is open to patients with hematologic malignancies who relapsed after or were refractory to at least 1 prior treatment regimen. Patients are eligible if they have an ECOG performance status of 2 or less with adequate organ system function, including absolute neutrophil count of 750/μL or greater and platelets of 50,000/μL or greater.

TGR-1202 is dosed orally, once a day in continuous, 28-day cycles. The original dose-escalation portion of the study was a classic 3+3 design, starting at 50 mg and increasing to 1800 mg. Patients who received prior therapy with a PI3K and/or mTOR inhibitor were excluded from the dose-escalation cohorts but were allowed in the expansion cohorts.

Dr O’Connor pointed out that, through cohort 5, TGR-1202 was taken in the fasting state. However, pharmacokinetic studies performed in the fed state revealed that the area under the curve (AUC) and Cmax could be doubled by taking the drug with food. So the expansions in the ongoing 800 mg and 1200 mg cohorts are being conducted in the fed state.

Dr O’Connor also noted that a subsequent, micronized version of TGR-1202 was developed. The micronization “essentially increases the surface area of the formulation, allowing for better bioavailability and markedly increases the AUC and Cmax exposure,” he said.

So the investigators conducted a second escalation with the micronized formulation, starting at 200 mg and increasing to 800 mg. At present, they are enrolling patients to the 800 mg and 1200 mg cohorts conducted in the fed state with the micronized formulation.

Demographics

Dr O’Connor presented data on 66 patients who were evaluable for safety and 51 for efficacy. The patients’ median age was 66 (range, 22–85), and 46 were male.

In all, there were 20 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), 17 with follicular lymphoma, 10 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 9 with Hodgkin lymphoma, 5 with mantle cell lymphoma, 3 with marginal zone lymphoma, 1 with Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia, and 1 with hairy cell leukemia.

Patients had received a median of 3 prior therapies (range, 1–14), and 36 (55%) had 3 or more prior therapies. Thirty-four patients (52%) were refractory to their prior therapy.

Efficacy

Dr O’Connor reported that higher doses of TGR-1202—1200 mg of the initial formulation and 600 mg or more of the micronized version—demonstrated rapid and profound responses in CLL, follicular lymphoma, and marginal zone lymphoma.

Responses have been limited in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, and mantle cell lymphoma.

Eighty-eight percent of CLL patients achieved a nodal partial remission, and 63% achieved a response according to iwCLL criteria (Hallek 2008).

Safety and tolerability

Adverse events occurring in more than 10% of patients included nausea (41%), diarrhea (32%), fatigue (32%), headache (23%), vomiting (23%), cough (21%), decreased appetite (17%), rash (17%), constipation (14%), hypokalemia (14%), anemia, dizziness, dyspnea, neutropenia, and pyrexia (12% each), and abdominal pain (11%).

The most common grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia, occurring in 11% of patients.

“But other than that, the bulk of the toxicities in terms of grade 3-4 events were relatively modest,” Dr O’Connor said. “[I]t’s worth pointing out that diarrhea grade 3-4 only occurred in about 2% of patients in the population.”

Approximately 50% of patients (n=31) have been on study for more than 6 months, and approximately 30% taking a higher dose level have been on study for 6 months or more. Twenty-five of 37 patients exposed to 800 mg or more of the micronized formulation currently remain on study.

“So this gives you a sense that it is a very well-tolerated drug, with patients staying on for extended periods of time,” Dr O’Connor said.

He added that time on study becomes relevant in assessing some of the gastrointestinal toxicities seen with other PI3Kδ inhibitors, where it seems the median time to gastrointestinal toxicity is beyond 6 months.

“So far, and I’m willing to concede it’s early, but with half the patients being treated for over 6 months, [diarrhea/colitis] seems to be much lower than the experience with the other PI3 kinase inhibitors,” Dr O’Connor said.

“I think one of the more important features of [TGR-1202], and one that allows me to think we might be able to integrate this drug a little more readily into various combination regimens, are the discontinuations due to other adverse events.”

“Only 4% treated with [TGR-1202] had discontinuations secondary to adverse events. [A]nd it looks like the efficacy is in line with what we’d expect with some of the other drugs, but this [study] is actively accruing still.”

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

 

 

Owen O’Connor, MD, PhD

Photo by Larry Young

 

LUGANO—Updated phase 1 results with TGR-1202 suggest this next-generation PI3kδ inhibitor lacks the hepatotoxicity associated with other PI3Kδ inhibitors.

Investigators also confirmed that no case of colitis has been reported to date with TGR-1202, and only 2% of evaluable patients on this trial have experienced grade 3-4 diarrhea.

The study is an ongoing, first-in-human trial in patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies.

Owen O’Connor, MD, PhD, of Columbia University Medical Center in New York, New York, shared results from this trial at the 13th International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma (abstract 038*). The trial is sponsored by TG Therapeutics, Inc., the company developing TGR-1202.

“TGR-1202 is a radically different sort of PI3kδ inhibitor,” Dr O’Connor said. “[I]t’s really a unique chemical entity that is different from the previous 2 structures [idelalisib and duvelisib] that you’ve probably heard something about.”

Study design

This ongoing trial of TGR-1202 is open to patients with hematologic malignancies who relapsed after or were refractory to at least 1 prior treatment regimen. Patients are eligible if they have an ECOG performance status of 2 or less with adequate organ system function, including absolute neutrophil count of 750/μL or greater and platelets of 50,000/μL or greater.

TGR-1202 is dosed orally, once a day in continuous, 28-day cycles. The original dose-escalation portion of the study was a classic 3+3 design, starting at 50 mg and increasing to 1800 mg. Patients who received prior therapy with a PI3K and/or mTOR inhibitor were excluded from the dose-escalation cohorts but were allowed in the expansion cohorts.

Dr O’Connor pointed out that, through cohort 5, TGR-1202 was taken in the fasting state. However, pharmacokinetic studies performed in the fed state revealed that the area under the curve (AUC) and Cmax could be doubled by taking the drug with food. So the expansions in the ongoing 800 mg and 1200 mg cohorts are being conducted in the fed state.

Dr O’Connor also noted that a subsequent, micronized version of TGR-1202 was developed. The micronization “essentially increases the surface area of the formulation, allowing for better bioavailability and markedly increases the AUC and Cmax exposure,” he said.

So the investigators conducted a second escalation with the micronized formulation, starting at 200 mg and increasing to 800 mg. At present, they are enrolling patients to the 800 mg and 1200 mg cohorts conducted in the fed state with the micronized formulation.

Demographics

Dr O’Connor presented data on 66 patients who were evaluable for safety and 51 for efficacy. The patients’ median age was 66 (range, 22–85), and 46 were male.

In all, there were 20 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), 17 with follicular lymphoma, 10 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 9 with Hodgkin lymphoma, 5 with mantle cell lymphoma, 3 with marginal zone lymphoma, 1 with Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia, and 1 with hairy cell leukemia.

Patients had received a median of 3 prior therapies (range, 1–14), and 36 (55%) had 3 or more prior therapies. Thirty-four patients (52%) were refractory to their prior therapy.

Efficacy

Dr O’Connor reported that higher doses of TGR-1202—1200 mg of the initial formulation and 600 mg or more of the micronized version—demonstrated rapid and profound responses in CLL, follicular lymphoma, and marginal zone lymphoma.

Responses have been limited in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, and mantle cell lymphoma.

Eighty-eight percent of CLL patients achieved a nodal partial remission, and 63% achieved a response according to iwCLL criteria (Hallek 2008).

Safety and tolerability

Adverse events occurring in more than 10% of patients included nausea (41%), diarrhea (32%), fatigue (32%), headache (23%), vomiting (23%), cough (21%), decreased appetite (17%), rash (17%), constipation (14%), hypokalemia (14%), anemia, dizziness, dyspnea, neutropenia, and pyrexia (12% each), and abdominal pain (11%).

The most common grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia, occurring in 11% of patients.

“But other than that, the bulk of the toxicities in terms of grade 3-4 events were relatively modest,” Dr O’Connor said. “[I]t’s worth pointing out that diarrhea grade 3-4 only occurred in about 2% of patients in the population.”

Approximately 50% of patients (n=31) have been on study for more than 6 months, and approximately 30% taking a higher dose level have been on study for 6 months or more. Twenty-five of 37 patients exposed to 800 mg or more of the micronized formulation currently remain on study.

“So this gives you a sense that it is a very well-tolerated drug, with patients staying on for extended periods of time,” Dr O’Connor said.

He added that time on study becomes relevant in assessing some of the gastrointestinal toxicities seen with other PI3Kδ inhibitors, where it seems the median time to gastrointestinal toxicity is beyond 6 months.

“So far, and I’m willing to concede it’s early, but with half the patients being treated for over 6 months, [diarrhea/colitis] seems to be much lower than the experience with the other PI3 kinase inhibitors,” Dr O’Connor said.

“I think one of the more important features of [TGR-1202], and one that allows me to think we might be able to integrate this drug a little more readily into various combination regimens, are the discontinuations due to other adverse events.”

“Only 4% treated with [TGR-1202] had discontinuations secondary to adverse events. [A]nd it looks like the efficacy is in line with what we’d expect with some of the other drugs, but this [study] is actively accruing still.”

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

John Timmerman, MD

Photo courtesy of UCLA

LUGANO—The PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab produces rapid, durable, and, in some cases, “dramatic” responses in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), according to a speaker at the 13th International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma.

The drug has also produced durable responses in follicular lymphoma (FL), cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), although patient numbers for these malignancies are small.

John Timmerman, MD, of the University of California, Los Angeles, presented these results from a phase 1 study of patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoid malignancies and chronic HL (abstract 010).

Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical Company are sponsors of the trial.

Original results of the study, with a data cutoff of June 2014, were reported at ASH 2014, with 40 weeks of median follow-up.

The update presented at 13-ICML, with a data lock in April 2015, includes an additional 10 months of data, for a median follow-up of 76 weeks.

Investigators enrolled 105 patients in this dose-escalation study to receive nivolumab at 1 mg/kg, then 3 mg/kg, every 2 weeks for 2 years.

Twenty-three patients had HL. Thirty-one had B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), including 11 with FL and 10 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

Twenty-three patients had T-cell NHL, including 5 with PTCL and 13 with CTCL/mycosis fungoides (MF). Twenty-seven patients had multiple myeloma (MM), and 1 had chronic myeloid leukemia.

Patients were heavily pretreated. Seventy-eight percent of HL patients and 26% of T-NHL patients had prior brentuximab vedotin. And 78% (HL), 14% (B-NHL), 9% (T-NHL), and 56% (MM) of patients had a prior autologous transplant.

The median number of prior therapies was 5 (range, 2-15) for HL patients and ranged from 1 to 16 for all patients.

The study’s primary endpoint was safety and tolerability, and the secondary endpoint was efficacy.

Safety and tolerability

Ninety-seven percent of patients had an adverse event, 69% of them related to study treatment and 21% of them treatment-related grade 3-4 events.

Fifteen patients (14%) discontinued treatment due to a related adverse event, including 3 with pneumonitis and 1 each with enteritis, stomatitis, pancreatitis, rash, conjunctivitis, sepsis, diplopia, myositis, neutropenia, myelodysplastic syndrome, increased creatinine phosphokinase, and peripheral neuropathy.

“Immune-related adverse events were generally seen early on and generally of low grade,” Dr Timmerman said. “However, it is notable that there were several grade 3 immune-related adverse events that can be seen as far as 6 months out after the start of therapy.”

These included skin, gastrointestinal, and pulmonary events. Most immune-related adverse events (83%) were resolved using protocol-prescribed procedures.

Efficacy

The overall response rate was 87% for HL, 36% for DLBCL, 40% for FL, 15% for CTCL/MF, 40% for PTCL, and 4% for MM.

Dr Timmerman pointed out that, since ASH, 2 additional conversions from partial response (PR) to complete response (CR) occurred in patients with HL. To date, 6 of 23 HL patients have achieved a CR and 14 a PR.

In B-cell NHL, there were additional conversions from PR to CR in DLBCL, while responses remained the same in FL and in the 4 responders with T-cell lymphomas.

“Intriguingly, there has been 1 late CR in the multiple myeloma cohort, which previously had shown no responses,” Dr Timmerman said.

Durability of response

This study suggests PD-1 blockade can produce durable responses in hematologic malignancies, as it does in melanoma and renal cell carcinoma.

In HL, the median response duration at a median follow-up of 86 weeks has not yet been reached, and half (n=10) of the responses are still ongoing.

In FL, CTCL, and PTCL, the median response duration has not been reached at a median follow-up of 81, 43, and 31 weeks, respectively. Of note, there are ongoing responses in at least half of patients in these tumor types.

In HL, none of the 6 patients in CR has progressed, although there have been some progressions in the PR group.

The rapidity of responses is also notable, Dr Timmerman said.

“[I]t’s very interesting that some patients have resolution of symptoms and improvement of symptoms within even 1 day of starting nivolumab therapy,” he said.

And responses to nivolumab in HL “can be very dramatic,” he added, as illustrated in the following case from the Mayo Clinic.

A patient with multiple sites of bulky FDG-avid tumors was scheduled to enter hospice. But first, he entered the nivolumab trial. Within 6 weeks of initiating treatment, he had achieved a near-CR. This response has been maintained for 2 years.

“The occurrence of very durable responses in the PR and CR groups has led us to question whether patients should go on to allogeneic stem cell transplantation after achieving responses with nivolumab or, rather, continue on nivolumab as long as their response remains,” Dr Timmerman said.

He added that an international, phase 2 trial in HL is underway and is accruing briskly.

Nivolumab was awarded breakthrough designation by the US Food and Drug Administration last year. Breakthrough designation is intended to expedite the development and review of drugs for serious or life-threatening conditions.

John Timmerman, MD

Photo courtesy of UCLA

LUGANO—The PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab produces rapid, durable, and, in some cases, “dramatic” responses in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), according to a speaker at the 13th International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma.

The drug has also produced durable responses in follicular lymphoma (FL), cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), although patient numbers for these malignancies are small.

John Timmerman, MD, of the University of California, Los Angeles, presented these results from a phase 1 study of patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoid malignancies and chronic HL (abstract 010).

Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical Company are sponsors of the trial.

Original results of the study, with a data cutoff of June 2014, were reported at ASH 2014, with 40 weeks of median follow-up.

The update presented at 13-ICML, with a data lock in April 2015, includes an additional 10 months of data, for a median follow-up of 76 weeks.

Investigators enrolled 105 patients in this dose-escalation study to receive nivolumab at 1 mg/kg, then 3 mg/kg, every 2 weeks for 2 years.

Twenty-three patients had HL. Thirty-one had B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), including 11 with FL and 10 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

Twenty-three patients had T-cell NHL, including 5 with PTCL and 13 with CTCL/mycosis fungoides (MF). Twenty-seven patients had multiple myeloma (MM), and 1 had chronic myeloid leukemia.

Patients were heavily pretreated. Seventy-eight percent of HL patients and 26% of T-NHL patients had prior brentuximab vedotin. And 78% (HL), 14% (B-NHL), 9% (T-NHL), and 56% (MM) of patients had a prior autologous transplant.

The median number of prior therapies was 5 (range, 2-15) for HL patients and ranged from 1 to 16 for all patients.

The study’s primary endpoint was safety and tolerability, and the secondary endpoint was efficacy.

Safety and tolerability

Ninety-seven percent of patients had an adverse event, 69% of them related to study treatment and 21% of them treatment-related grade 3-4 events.

Fifteen patients (14%) discontinued treatment due to a related adverse event, including 3 with pneumonitis and 1 each with enteritis, stomatitis, pancreatitis, rash, conjunctivitis, sepsis, diplopia, myositis, neutropenia, myelodysplastic syndrome, increased creatinine phosphokinase, and peripheral neuropathy.

“Immune-related adverse events were generally seen early on and generally of low grade,” Dr Timmerman said. “However, it is notable that there were several grade 3 immune-related adverse events that can be seen as far as 6 months out after the start of therapy.”

These included skin, gastrointestinal, and pulmonary events. Most immune-related adverse events (83%) were resolved using protocol-prescribed procedures.

Efficacy

The overall response rate was 87% for HL, 36% for DLBCL, 40% for FL, 15% for CTCL/MF, 40% for PTCL, and 4% for MM.

Dr Timmerman pointed out that, since ASH, 2 additional conversions from partial response (PR) to complete response (CR) occurred in patients with HL. To date, 6 of 23 HL patients have achieved a CR and 14 a PR.

In B-cell NHL, there were additional conversions from PR to CR in DLBCL, while responses remained the same in FL and in the 4 responders with T-cell lymphomas.

“Intriguingly, there has been 1 late CR in the multiple myeloma cohort, which previously had shown no responses,” Dr Timmerman said.

Durability of response

This study suggests PD-1 blockade can produce durable responses in hematologic malignancies, as it does in melanoma and renal cell carcinoma.

In HL, the median response duration at a median follow-up of 86 weeks has not yet been reached, and half (n=10) of the responses are still ongoing.

In FL, CTCL, and PTCL, the median response duration has not been reached at a median follow-up of 81, 43, and 31 weeks, respectively. Of note, there are ongoing responses in at least half of patients in these tumor types.

In HL, none of the 6 patients in CR has progressed, although there have been some progressions in the PR group.

The rapidity of responses is also notable, Dr Timmerman said.

“[I]t’s very interesting that some patients have resolution of symptoms and improvement of symptoms within even 1 day of starting nivolumab therapy,” he said.

And responses to nivolumab in HL “can be very dramatic,” he added, as illustrated in the following case from the Mayo Clinic.

A patient with multiple sites of bulky FDG-avid tumors was scheduled to enter hospice. But first, he entered the nivolumab trial. Within 6 weeks of initiating treatment, he had achieved a near-CR. This response has been maintained for 2 years.

“The occurrence of very durable responses in the PR and CR groups has led us to question whether patients should go on to allogeneic stem cell transplantation after achieving responses with nivolumab or, rather, continue on nivolumab as long as their response remains,” Dr Timmerman said.

He added that an international, phase 2 trial in HL is underway and is accruing briskly.

Nivolumab was awarded breakthrough designation by the US Food and Drug Administration last year. Breakthrough designation is intended to expedite the development and review of drugs for serious or life-threatening conditions.

John Timmerman, MD

Photo courtesy of UCLA

LUGANO—The PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab produces rapid, durable, and, in some cases, “dramatic” responses in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), according to a speaker at the 13th International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma.

The drug has also produced durable responses in follicular lymphoma (FL), cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), although patient numbers for these malignancies are small.

John Timmerman, MD, of the University of California, Los Angeles, presented these results from a phase 1 study of patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoid malignancies and chronic HL (abstract 010).

Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical Company are sponsors of the trial.

Original results of the study, with a data cutoff of June 2014, were reported at ASH 2014, with 40 weeks of median follow-up.

The update presented at 13-ICML, with a data lock in April 2015, includes an additional 10 months of data, for a median follow-up of 76 weeks.

Investigators enrolled 105 patients in this dose-escalation study to receive nivolumab at 1 mg/kg, then 3 mg/kg, every 2 weeks for 2 years.

Twenty-three patients had HL. Thirty-one had B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), including 11 with FL and 10 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

Twenty-three patients had T-cell NHL, including 5 with PTCL and 13 with CTCL/mycosis fungoides (MF). Twenty-seven patients had multiple myeloma (MM), and 1 had chronic myeloid leukemia.

Patients were heavily pretreated. Seventy-eight percent of HL patients and 26% of T-NHL patients had prior brentuximab vedotin. And 78% (HL), 14% (B-NHL), 9% (T-NHL), and 56% (MM) of patients had a prior autologous transplant.

The median number of prior therapies was 5 (range, 2-15) for HL patients and ranged from 1 to 16 for all patients.

The study’s primary endpoint was safety and tolerability, and the secondary endpoint was efficacy.

Safety and tolerability

Ninety-seven percent of patients had an adverse event, 69% of them related to study treatment and 21% of them treatment-related grade 3-4 events.

Fifteen patients (14%) discontinued treatment due to a related adverse event, including 3 with pneumonitis and 1 each with enteritis, stomatitis, pancreatitis, rash, conjunctivitis, sepsis, diplopia, myositis, neutropenia, myelodysplastic syndrome, increased creatinine phosphokinase, and peripheral neuropathy.

“Immune-related adverse events were generally seen early on and generally of low grade,” Dr Timmerman said. “However, it is notable that there were several grade 3 immune-related adverse events that can be seen as far as 6 months out after the start of therapy.”

These included skin, gastrointestinal, and pulmonary events. Most immune-related adverse events (83%) were resolved using protocol-prescribed procedures.

Efficacy

The overall response rate was 87% for HL, 36% for DLBCL, 40% for FL, 15% for CTCL/MF, 40% for PTCL, and 4% for MM.

Dr Timmerman pointed out that, since ASH, 2 additional conversions from partial response (PR) to complete response (CR) occurred in patients with HL. To date, 6 of 23 HL patients have achieved a CR and 14 a PR.

In B-cell NHL, there were additional conversions from PR to CR in DLBCL, while responses remained the same in FL and in the 4 responders with T-cell lymphomas.

“Intriguingly, there has been 1 late CR in the multiple myeloma cohort, which previously had shown no responses,” Dr Timmerman said.

Durability of response

This study suggests PD-1 blockade can produce durable responses in hematologic malignancies, as it does in melanoma and renal cell carcinoma.

In HL, the median response duration at a median follow-up of 86 weeks has not yet been reached, and half (n=10) of the responses are still ongoing.

In FL, CTCL, and PTCL, the median response duration has not been reached at a median follow-up of 81, 43, and 31 weeks, respectively. Of note, there are ongoing responses in at least half of patients in these tumor types.

In HL, none of the 6 patients in CR has progressed, although there have been some progressions in the PR group.

The rapidity of responses is also notable, Dr Timmerman said.

“[I]t’s very interesting that some patients have resolution of symptoms and improvement of symptoms within even 1 day of starting nivolumab therapy,” he said.

And responses to nivolumab in HL “can be very dramatic,” he added, as illustrated in the following case from the Mayo Clinic.

A patient with multiple sites of bulky FDG-avid tumors was scheduled to enter hospice. But first, he entered the nivolumab trial. Within 6 weeks of initiating treatment, he had achieved a near-CR. This response has been maintained for 2 years.

“The occurrence of very durable responses in the PR and CR groups has led us to question whether patients should go on to allogeneic stem cell transplantation after achieving responses with nivolumab or, rather, continue on nivolumab as long as their response remains,” Dr Timmerman said.

He added that an international, phase 2 trial in HL is underway and is accruing briskly.

Nivolumab was awarded breakthrough designation by the US Food and Drug Administration last year. Breakthrough designation is intended to expedite the development and review of drugs for serious or life-threatening conditions.

 

 

Micrograph showing

follicular lymphoma

 

LUGANO—An anti-CD37 antibody-radionuclide conjugate provides sustained efficacy and a manageable safety profile in patients with relapsed, CD37⁺ non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), according to researchers.

The drug, ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-HH1 (Betalutin), consists of the tumor-specific antibody HH1, which targets the CD37 antigen on the surface of NHL cells, conjugated to the β-emitting isotope lutetium-177 (Lu-177) via the chemical linker DOTA.

In an ongoing, phase 1/2 trial, Betalutin has produced responses in 7 of 12 evaluable patients with relapsed NHL, and 5 of those responses are ongoing.

Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were largely hematologic in nature, and many were transient and reversible. However, grade 3/4 AEs occurred at all 3 dose levels investigated in this study, as did serious AEs.

Arne Kolstad, MD, PhD, of Oslo University Hospital in Norway, and his colleagues reported these results at the 13th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma (abstract 287*). The study was sponsored by Nordic Nanovector, the company developing Betalutin.

Thus far, the researchers have evaluated 13 patients with relapsed, CD37⁺ NHL. Twelve patients had a primary diagnosis of follicular lymphoma, and 1 had mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). The patients’ median age was 68 (range, 41-78), and they had received 1 to 8 prior treatments.

In this dose-finding study, the researchers investigated 3 dose levels of Betalutin. Four patients received Betalutin at 10 MBq/kg biweekly, 6 received 15 MBq/kg biweekly, and 3 (including the MCL patient) received 20 MBq/kg biweekly.

All patients received 50 mg of HH1 prior to Betalutin. Patients also received rituximab at 375 mg/m² on days -28 and -21 (prior to Betalutin on day 0).

Safety and dosing

Dose-limiting toxicities occurred at the 20 MBq/kg biweekly dose, so researchers said 15 MBq/kg biweekly, with HH1 pre-dosing, is the current recommended dose of Betalutin.

Treatment-emergent grade 3 AEs in the 10 MBq/kg group included thrombocytopenia (n=1), neutropenia (n=2), pneumonia (n=1), and pulmonary embolism (n=1). There were no grade 4 AEs in this group.

In the 15 MBq/kg group, 2 patients had grade 3 thrombocytopenia, and 1 had grade 4. One patient each had grade 3 and 4 neutropenia.

Grade 3/4 AEs in the 20 MBq/kg group included grade 4 thrombocytopenia (n=3), grade 3 (n=1) and grade 4 (n=2) neutropenia, and grade 3 epistaxis (n=1).

Serious AEs included pulmonary embolism (1 in the 10 MBq/kg group), pneumonia (1 in the 10 MBq/kg group), atrial fibrillation (2 in the 15 MBq/kg group), thrombocytopenia (1 in the 20 MBq/kg group), and epistaxis (1 in the 20 MBq/kg group).

The researchers said all hematologic AEs were transient and reversible. They also pointed out that 6 patients in this trial have been followed for a year or more, and there have been no secondary malignancies or other events that would suggest long-term toxicity.

Efficacy and next steps

Twelve patients were evaluable for efficacy. Seven patients responded to treatment, including 4 complete responses (CRs) and 3 partial responses. Two patients had stable disease, and 3 progressed. Eight patients had a 50% or greater reduction in tumor volume.

The median response duration has not been reached, and 5 patients’ responses are ongoing. The duration of response in these patients ranges from 6 months to more than 21 months. All 4 patients who achieved a CR (including the MCL patient) are still in CR.

The researchers concluded that Betalutin delivers a highly favorable response rate, with durable clinical responses, and the drug has a predictable and manageable safety profile.

They have opened a new arm of this study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Betalutin at 15 MBq/kg biweekly and 17.5 MBq/kg biweekly without HH1 pre-dosing.

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

 

 

Micrograph showing

follicular lymphoma

 

LUGANO—An anti-CD37 antibody-radionuclide conjugate provides sustained efficacy and a manageable safety profile in patients with relapsed, CD37⁺ non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), according to researchers.

The drug, ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-HH1 (Betalutin), consists of the tumor-specific antibody HH1, which targets the CD37 antigen on the surface of NHL cells, conjugated to the β-emitting isotope lutetium-177 (Lu-177) via the chemical linker DOTA.

In an ongoing, phase 1/2 trial, Betalutin has produced responses in 7 of 12 evaluable patients with relapsed NHL, and 5 of those responses are ongoing.

Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were largely hematologic in nature, and many were transient and reversible. However, grade 3/4 AEs occurred at all 3 dose levels investigated in this study, as did serious AEs.

Arne Kolstad, MD, PhD, of Oslo University Hospital in Norway, and his colleagues reported these results at the 13th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma (abstract 287*). The study was sponsored by Nordic Nanovector, the company developing Betalutin.

Thus far, the researchers have evaluated 13 patients with relapsed, CD37⁺ NHL. Twelve patients had a primary diagnosis of follicular lymphoma, and 1 had mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). The patients’ median age was 68 (range, 41-78), and they had received 1 to 8 prior treatments.

In this dose-finding study, the researchers investigated 3 dose levels of Betalutin. Four patients received Betalutin at 10 MBq/kg biweekly, 6 received 15 MBq/kg biweekly, and 3 (including the MCL patient) received 20 MBq/kg biweekly.

All patients received 50 mg of HH1 prior to Betalutin. Patients also received rituximab at 375 mg/m² on days -28 and -21 (prior to Betalutin on day 0).

Safety and dosing

Dose-limiting toxicities occurred at the 20 MBq/kg biweekly dose, so researchers said 15 MBq/kg biweekly, with HH1 pre-dosing, is the current recommended dose of Betalutin.

Treatment-emergent grade 3 AEs in the 10 MBq/kg group included thrombocytopenia (n=1), neutropenia (n=2), pneumonia (n=1), and pulmonary embolism (n=1). There were no grade 4 AEs in this group.

In the 15 MBq/kg group, 2 patients had grade 3 thrombocytopenia, and 1 had grade 4. One patient each had grade 3 and 4 neutropenia.

Grade 3/4 AEs in the 20 MBq/kg group included grade 4 thrombocytopenia (n=3), grade 3 (n=1) and grade 4 (n=2) neutropenia, and grade 3 epistaxis (n=1).

Serious AEs included pulmonary embolism (1 in the 10 MBq/kg group), pneumonia (1 in the 10 MBq/kg group), atrial fibrillation (2 in the 15 MBq/kg group), thrombocytopenia (1 in the 20 MBq/kg group), and epistaxis (1 in the 20 MBq/kg group).

The researchers said all hematologic AEs were transient and reversible. They also pointed out that 6 patients in this trial have been followed for a year or more, and there have been no secondary malignancies or other events that would suggest long-term toxicity.

Efficacy and next steps

Twelve patients were evaluable for efficacy. Seven patients responded to treatment, including 4 complete responses (CRs) and 3 partial responses. Two patients had stable disease, and 3 progressed. Eight patients had a 50% or greater reduction in tumor volume.

The median response duration has not been reached, and 5 patients’ responses are ongoing. The duration of response in these patients ranges from 6 months to more than 21 months. All 4 patients who achieved a CR (including the MCL patient) are still in CR.

The researchers concluded that Betalutin delivers a highly favorable response rate, with durable clinical responses, and the drug has a predictable and manageable safety profile.

They have opened a new arm of this study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Betalutin at 15 MBq/kg biweekly and 17.5 MBq/kg biweekly without HH1 pre-dosing.

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

 

 

Micrograph showing

follicular lymphoma

 

LUGANO—An anti-CD37 antibody-radionuclide conjugate provides sustained efficacy and a manageable safety profile in patients with relapsed, CD37⁺ non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), according to researchers.

The drug, ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-HH1 (Betalutin), consists of the tumor-specific antibody HH1, which targets the CD37 antigen on the surface of NHL cells, conjugated to the β-emitting isotope lutetium-177 (Lu-177) via the chemical linker DOTA.

In an ongoing, phase 1/2 trial, Betalutin has produced responses in 7 of 12 evaluable patients with relapsed NHL, and 5 of those responses are ongoing.

Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were largely hematologic in nature, and many were transient and reversible. However, grade 3/4 AEs occurred at all 3 dose levels investigated in this study, as did serious AEs.

Arne Kolstad, MD, PhD, of Oslo University Hospital in Norway, and his colleagues reported these results at the 13th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma (abstract 287*). The study was sponsored by Nordic Nanovector, the company developing Betalutin.

Thus far, the researchers have evaluated 13 patients with relapsed, CD37⁺ NHL. Twelve patients had a primary diagnosis of follicular lymphoma, and 1 had mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). The patients’ median age was 68 (range, 41-78), and they had received 1 to 8 prior treatments.

In this dose-finding study, the researchers investigated 3 dose levels of Betalutin. Four patients received Betalutin at 10 MBq/kg biweekly, 6 received 15 MBq/kg biweekly, and 3 (including the MCL patient) received 20 MBq/kg biweekly.

All patients received 50 mg of HH1 prior to Betalutin. Patients also received rituximab at 375 mg/m² on days -28 and -21 (prior to Betalutin on day 0).

Safety and dosing

Dose-limiting toxicities occurred at the 20 MBq/kg biweekly dose, so researchers said 15 MBq/kg biweekly, with HH1 pre-dosing, is the current recommended dose of Betalutin.

Treatment-emergent grade 3 AEs in the 10 MBq/kg group included thrombocytopenia (n=1), neutropenia (n=2), pneumonia (n=1), and pulmonary embolism (n=1). There were no grade 4 AEs in this group.

In the 15 MBq/kg group, 2 patients had grade 3 thrombocytopenia, and 1 had grade 4. One patient each had grade 3 and 4 neutropenia.

Grade 3/4 AEs in the 20 MBq/kg group included grade 4 thrombocytopenia (n=3), grade 3 (n=1) and grade 4 (n=2) neutropenia, and grade 3 epistaxis (n=1).

Serious AEs included pulmonary embolism (1 in the 10 MBq/kg group), pneumonia (1 in the 10 MBq/kg group), atrial fibrillation (2 in the 15 MBq/kg group), thrombocytopenia (1 in the 20 MBq/kg group), and epistaxis (1 in the 20 MBq/kg group).

The researchers said all hematologic AEs were transient and reversible. They also pointed out that 6 patients in this trial have been followed for a year or more, and there have been no secondary malignancies or other events that would suggest long-term toxicity.

Efficacy and next steps

Twelve patients were evaluable for efficacy. Seven patients responded to treatment, including 4 complete responses (CRs) and 3 partial responses. Two patients had stable disease, and 3 progressed. Eight patients had a 50% or greater reduction in tumor volume.

The median response duration has not been reached, and 5 patients’ responses are ongoing. The duration of response in these patients ranges from 6 months to more than 21 months. All 4 patients who achieved a CR (including the MCL patient) are still in CR.

The researchers concluded that Betalutin delivers a highly favorable response rate, with durable clinical responses, and the drug has a predictable and manageable safety profile.

They have opened a new arm of this study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Betalutin at 15 MBq/kg biweekly and 17.5 MBq/kg biweekly without HH1 pre-dosing.

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

Palazzo Dei Congressi,

site of 13-ICML

LUGANO—Adding thiotepa and rituximab to the treatment of primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma is feasible from a safety perspective and has yielded promising results, according to new research.

An analysis of the IELSG 32 trial—in which patients received methotrexate and cytarabine alone, with rituximab, or with rituximab and thiotepa—has shown the 4-drug regimen improves responses and progression-free survival.

IELSG 32 builds on the foundation of the IELSG 20 trial to determine the best induction therapy for patients with primary CNS lymphoma. In IELSG 20, the complete response (CR) rate was higher among patients receiving high-dose methotrexate and cytarabine than in patients receiving methotrexate alone.

So the researchers decided to investigate whether rituximab and/or thiotepa added to the regimen would impact patient outcome. Rituximab has been associated with improved CR rates in primary CNS lymphoma, and thiotepa is active against aggressive lymphomas. Thiotepa is also able to cross the blood–brain barrier.

Andrés J.M. Ferreri, MD, of IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele in Milan, Italy, reported the results of this research on behalf of the International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group (IELSG) at the 13th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma (abstract 009).

Treatment and toxicity

The investigators randomized 227 patients from 53 centers in 5 countries to 4 cycles of treatment in 3 cohorts:

• Arm A consisted of 4 cycles of methotrexate (3.5 g/m²) on day 1 and cytarabine (2 g/m²) twice a day on days 2 and 3 every 3 weeks.
• Arm B added rituximab (375 mg/m²) on days 5 and 0 to the regimen.
• Arm C added rituximab and thiotepa (30 mg/m²) on day 4 to the regimen.

Eight patients were excluded for various reasons, including incorrect diagnosis. So 219 patients received therapy, 75 in arm A, 69 in arm B, and 75 in arm C.

Patients were a median age of 58 years in arm A and 57 in arms B and C, and the majority were male. More than 80% of patients in all arms were intermediate- or high-risk according to IELSG. And all patients had the diffuse large B-cell lymphoma histotype.

Patients in arm A received 74% of the planned courses, those in arm B received 86%, and those in arm C received 91%. The relative dose intensity across all arms of each drug administered was not significantly different among the arms.

“As expected, hematologic toxicity was common, with grade 4 neutropenia (P=0.01) and thrombocytopenia (P=0.0001) being significantly more common for arm C,” Dr Ferreri said. “However, this was not associated with an increasing array of severe infections, interruptions, toxicity, or toxic deaths.”

Peripheral blood stem cell collection was successful in 94% of patients in arms A and C and 96% of patients in arm B.

Response rates

The overall response rate (ORR) was 72% in IELSG 32, compared to 54% in IELSG 20. But the CR rate was not significantly higher in IELSG 32 than in IELSG 20, at 34% and 31%, respectively.

“There are many explanations for this,” Dr Ferreri said. “But I think it was because there were a significantly greater number of patients with higher IELSG risk [in IELSG 32], a higher proportion of poor-prognosis patients.”

Patients in arm C had significantly higher response rates than patients in the other 2 arms, with a CR rate of 49%, a partial response (PR) rate of 37%, and an ORR of 87%.

This compared to a CR rate of 23% in arm A and 30% in arm B, a PR rate of 31% in arm A and 30% in arm B, and an ORR of 53% in arm A and 74% in arm B.

The investigators also analyzed activity according to IELSG risk.

“Arm C was significantly more active in all the 3 subgroups,” Dr Ferreri observed, “and importantly, the overall response rate and complete remission rate were similar for each arm in the 3 different risk groups.”

Second randomization and survival

One hundred and eighteen patients went on to a second randomization, 35 from arm A, 35 from arm B, and 48 from arm C.

Fifty-nine patients were randomized to the whole-brain radiotherapy cohort, and 59 to the carmustine-thiotepa-autologous stem cell transplant cohort.

At a median follow-up of 21 months, 110 patients remain failure free, 32% from arm A, 54% from arm B, and 65% from arm C. Failure in 97% of the cases was due to primary site involvement, usually the brain.

Fifty-six percent of the patients are still alive, 39% in arm A, 59% in arm B, and 69% in arm C.

Ninety-seven patients died, 73 from lymphoma, 15 from toxicity of the first-line treatment, 2 from toxicity of the salvage regimen, 2 from neurotoxicity, and 5 from other causes.

Dr Ferreri concluded that the MATRIX regimen—the addition of rituximab and thiotepa to methotrexate and cytarabine—was associated with significant improvements in CR rate, ORR, and progression-free and overall survival.

The addition of rituximab and thiotepa did not increase toxicity, with the exception of greater hematologic adverse events, nor did the drugs increase the rates of severe complications. The agents also allowed for high rates of successful stem cell collection.

Palazzo Dei Congressi,

site of 13-ICML

LUGANO—Adding thiotepa and rituximab to the treatment of primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma is feasible from a safety perspective and has yielded promising results, according to new research.

An analysis of the IELSG 32 trial—in which patients received methotrexate and cytarabine alone, with rituximab, or with rituximab and thiotepa—has shown the 4-drug regimen improves responses and progression-free survival.

IELSG 32 builds on the foundation of the IELSG 20 trial to determine the best induction therapy for patients with primary CNS lymphoma. In IELSG 20, the complete response (CR) rate was higher among patients receiving high-dose methotrexate and cytarabine than in patients receiving methotrexate alone.

So the researchers decided to investigate whether rituximab and/or thiotepa added to the regimen would impact patient outcome. Rituximab has been associated with improved CR rates in primary CNS lymphoma, and thiotepa is active against aggressive lymphomas. Thiotepa is also able to cross the blood–brain barrier.

Andrés J.M. Ferreri, MD, of IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele in Milan, Italy, reported the results of this research on behalf of the International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group (IELSG) at the 13th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma (abstract 009).

Treatment and toxicity

The investigators randomized 227 patients from 53 centers in 5 countries to 4 cycles of treatment in 3 cohorts:

• Arm A consisted of 4 cycles of methotrexate (3.5 g/m²) on day 1 and cytarabine (2 g/m²) twice a day on days 2 and 3 every 3 weeks.
• Arm B added rituximab (375 mg/m²) on days 5 and 0 to the regimen.
• Arm C added rituximab and thiotepa (30 mg/m²) on day 4 to the regimen.

Eight patients were excluded for various reasons, including incorrect diagnosis. So 219 patients received therapy, 75 in arm A, 69 in arm B, and 75 in arm C.

Patients were a median age of 58 years in arm A and 57 in arms B and C, and the majority were male. More than 80% of patients in all arms were intermediate- or high-risk according to IELSG. And all patients had the diffuse large B-cell lymphoma histotype.

Patients in arm A received 74% of the planned courses, those in arm B received 86%, and those in arm C received 91%. The relative dose intensity across all arms of each drug administered was not significantly different among the arms.

“As expected, hematologic toxicity was common, with grade 4 neutropenia (P=0.01) and thrombocytopenia (P=0.0001) being significantly more common for arm C,” Dr Ferreri said. “However, this was not associated with an increasing array of severe infections, interruptions, toxicity, or toxic deaths.”

Peripheral blood stem cell collection was successful in 94% of patients in arms A and C and 96% of patients in arm B.

Response rates

The overall response rate (ORR) was 72% in IELSG 32, compared to 54% in IELSG 20. But the CR rate was not significantly higher in IELSG 32 than in IELSG 20, at 34% and 31%, respectively.

“There are many explanations for this,” Dr Ferreri said. “But I think it was because there were a significantly greater number of patients with higher IELSG risk [in IELSG 32], a higher proportion of poor-prognosis patients.”

Patients in arm C had significantly higher response rates than patients in the other 2 arms, with a CR rate of 49%, a partial response (PR) rate of 37%, and an ORR of 87%.

This compared to a CR rate of 23% in arm A and 30% in arm B, a PR rate of 31% in arm A and 30% in arm B, and an ORR of 53% in arm A and 74% in arm B.

The investigators also analyzed activity according to IELSG risk.

“Arm C was significantly more active in all the 3 subgroups,” Dr Ferreri observed, “and importantly, the overall response rate and complete remission rate were similar for each arm in the 3 different risk groups.”

Second randomization and survival

One hundred and eighteen patients went on to a second randomization, 35 from arm A, 35 from arm B, and 48 from arm C.

Fifty-nine patients were randomized to the whole-brain radiotherapy cohort, and 59 to the carmustine-thiotepa-autologous stem cell transplant cohort.

At a median follow-up of 21 months, 110 patients remain failure free, 32% from arm A, 54% from arm B, and 65% from arm C. Failure in 97% of the cases was due to primary site involvement, usually the brain.

Fifty-six percent of the patients are still alive, 39% in arm A, 59% in arm B, and 69% in arm C.

Ninety-seven patients died, 73 from lymphoma, 15 from toxicity of the first-line treatment, 2 from toxicity of the salvage regimen, 2 from neurotoxicity, and 5 from other causes.

Dr Ferreri concluded that the MATRIX regimen—the addition of rituximab and thiotepa to methotrexate and cytarabine—was associated with significant improvements in CR rate, ORR, and progression-free and overall survival.

The addition of rituximab and thiotepa did not increase toxicity, with the exception of greater hematologic adverse events, nor did the drugs increase the rates of severe complications. The agents also allowed for high rates of successful stem cell collection.

Palazzo Dei Congressi,

site of 13-ICML

LUGANO—Adding thiotepa and rituximab to the treatment of primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma is feasible from a safety perspective and has yielded promising results, according to new research.

An analysis of the IELSG 32 trial—in which patients received methotrexate and cytarabine alone, with rituximab, or with rituximab and thiotepa—has shown the 4-drug regimen improves responses and progression-free survival.

IELSG 32 builds on the foundation of the IELSG 20 trial to determine the best induction therapy for patients with primary CNS lymphoma. In IELSG 20, the complete response (CR) rate was higher among patients receiving high-dose methotrexate and cytarabine than in patients receiving methotrexate alone.

So the researchers decided to investigate whether rituximab and/or thiotepa added to the regimen would impact patient outcome. Rituximab has been associated with improved CR rates in primary CNS lymphoma, and thiotepa is active against aggressive lymphomas. Thiotepa is also able to cross the blood–brain barrier.

Andrés J.M. Ferreri, MD, of IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele in Milan, Italy, reported the results of this research on behalf of the International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group (IELSG) at the 13th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma (abstract 009).

Treatment and toxicity

The investigators randomized 227 patients from 53 centers in 5 countries to 4 cycles of treatment in 3 cohorts:

• Arm A consisted of 4 cycles of methotrexate (3.5 g/m²) on day 1 and cytarabine (2 g/m²) twice a day on days 2 and 3 every 3 weeks.
• Arm B added rituximab (375 mg/m²) on days 5 and 0 to the regimen.
• Arm C added rituximab and thiotepa (30 mg/m²) on day 4 to the regimen.

Eight patients were excluded for various reasons, including incorrect diagnosis. So 219 patients received therapy, 75 in arm A, 69 in arm B, and 75 in arm C.

Patients were a median age of 58 years in arm A and 57 in arms B and C, and the majority were male. More than 80% of patients in all arms were intermediate- or high-risk according to IELSG. And all patients had the diffuse large B-cell lymphoma histotype.

Patients in arm A received 74% of the planned courses, those in arm B received 86%, and those in arm C received 91%. The relative dose intensity across all arms of each drug administered was not significantly different among the arms.

“As expected, hematologic toxicity was common, with grade 4 neutropenia (P=0.01) and thrombocytopenia (P=0.0001) being significantly more common for arm C,” Dr Ferreri said. “However, this was not associated with an increasing array of severe infections, interruptions, toxicity, or toxic deaths.”

Peripheral blood stem cell collection was successful in 94% of patients in arms A and C and 96% of patients in arm B.

Response rates

The overall response rate (ORR) was 72% in IELSG 32, compared to 54% in IELSG 20. But the CR rate was not significantly higher in IELSG 32 than in IELSG 20, at 34% and 31%, respectively.

“There are many explanations for this,” Dr Ferreri said. “But I think it was because there were a significantly greater number of patients with higher IELSG risk [in IELSG 32], a higher proportion of poor-prognosis patients.”

Patients in arm C had significantly higher response rates than patients in the other 2 arms, with a CR rate of 49%, a partial response (PR) rate of 37%, and an ORR of 87%.

This compared to a CR rate of 23% in arm A and 30% in arm B, a PR rate of 31% in arm A and 30% in arm B, and an ORR of 53% in arm A and 74% in arm B.

The investigators also analyzed activity according to IELSG risk.

“Arm C was significantly more active in all the 3 subgroups,” Dr Ferreri observed, “and importantly, the overall response rate and complete remission rate were similar for each arm in the 3 different risk groups.”

Second randomization and survival

One hundred and eighteen patients went on to a second randomization, 35 from arm A, 35 from arm B, and 48 from arm C.

Fifty-nine patients were randomized to the whole-brain radiotherapy cohort, and 59 to the carmustine-thiotepa-autologous stem cell transplant cohort.

At a median follow-up of 21 months, 110 patients remain failure free, 32% from arm A, 54% from arm B, and 65% from arm C. Failure in 97% of the cases was due to primary site involvement, usually the brain.

Fifty-six percent of the patients are still alive, 39% in arm A, 59% in arm B, and 69% in arm C.

Ninety-seven patients died, 73 from lymphoma, 15 from toxicity of the first-line treatment, 2 from toxicity of the salvage regimen, 2 from neurotoxicity, and 5 from other causes.

Dr Ferreri concluded that the MATRIX regimen—the addition of rituximab and thiotepa to methotrexate and cytarabine—was associated with significant improvements in CR rate, ORR, and progression-free and overall survival.

The addition of rituximab and thiotepa did not increase toxicity, with the exception of greater hematologic adverse events, nor did the drugs increase the rates of severe complications. The agents also allowed for high rates of successful stem cell collection.

 

 

Micrograph showing FL

 

LUGANO—The EZH2 inhibitor tazemetostat (EPZ-6438) has shown “meaningful clinical activity” as monotherapy in patients with advanced non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), according to researchers.

In a phase 1 trial, 9 of the 15 evaluable NHL patients achieved an objective response to tazemetostat.

This included 2 ongoing complete responses (CRs), 1 in a patient with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and 1 in a patient with follicular lymphoma (FL).

It also included a partial response (PR) in the first treated patient with an EZH2 mutation.

And researchers said the drug was largely well-tolerated, as most adverse events were grade 1 or 2.

“The breadth, depth, and durability of responses seen in NHL patients among multiple histologies continue to impress, as does the safety and tolerability of tazemetostat in this phase 1 study,” said Vincent Ribrag, MD, of Institut Gustave Roussy in Villejuif, France.

“Among the patients in the dose-escalation cohorts, we have seen a noteworthy deepening of responses over time, and, in the first treated patient with an EZH2 tumor mutation, we have seen a partial response, which is very encouraging.”

Dr Ribrag presented these results at the 13th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma (abstract 145*). The study, which was previously presented at the 26th EORTC-NCI-AACR Symposium on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics, was sponsored by Epizyme, Inc., the company developing tazemetostat.

The phase 1 trial has enrolled 19 patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell NHL and 26 patients with advanced solid tumors.

Researchers have evaluated 5 cohorts of patients in the dose-escalation portion of the study—100 mg, 200 mg, 400 mg, 800 mg, and 1600 mg—and 2 cohorts—800 mg and 1600 mg—in the dose-expansion phase. All doses of tazemetostat were given twice daily.

The 19 NHL patients had a median age of 61 (range, 24-84) and were heavily pretreated. Eighty-five percent had received 3 or more prior therapies, and 37% had received 5 or more prior therapies.

Thirty-seven percent of patients were refractory to their last prior regimen, and 26% had received a prior autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

Dosing and efficacy

As of June 8, 2015, 15 NHL patients were evaluable for efficacy. Nine had achieved an objective response, including 2 patients with an ongoing CR. All responses were observed between 2 and 10 months on therapy.

Five of the 9 evaluable patients with DLBCL achieved an objective response. One DLBCL patient with a CR remains on study at 18 months of treatment.

Three of 5 evaluable patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) achieved an objective response. One FL patient with a CR remains on study at 13 months, and 1 FL patient with a PR remains on study at 13 months.

The only patient with marginal zone lymphoma achieved a PR and continues on study at 11 months.

One of the 14 patients evaluated for EZH2 status has a specific EZH2 tumor mutation (Y646H). This patient, who had DLBCL that relapsed or was refractory to 6 previous treatment regimens, achieved a PR after 16 weeks of therapy and remains on study.

The recommended phase 2 dose of tazemetostat is 800 mg twice daily.

Adverse events and next steps

All of the 45 enrolled patients were evaluable for safety. Treatment-related adverse events included asthenia (n=10), nausea (n=6), dyspepsia (n=5), thrombocytopenia (n=4), anorexia (n=4), anemia (n=4), vomiting (n=3), constipation (n=2), muscle spasm (n=2), hypertension (n=2), neutropenia (n=2), and elevated transaminase (n=1).

There were 5 grade 3 or higher adverse events related to treatment, including grade 3 anorexia, grade 3 hypertension, grade 3 transaminase elevation, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, and grade 4 neutropenia.

Epizyme plans to report a further update from this trial by the end of this year. The company is now enrolling patients in a phase 2 study of tazemetostat monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory NHL, stratified by cell of origin and EZH2 mutation status.

Epizyme is also planning a phase 2 trial of tazemetostat in adults with INI1-deficient solid tumors, a phase 1 study of pediatric patients with INI1-deficient solid tumors, a combination study of tazemetostat with R-CHOP in patients with DLBCL, and a combination study of tazemetostat with a B-cell signaling agent or other emerging targeted therapies for B-cell lymphomas.

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

 

 

Micrograph showing FL

 

LUGANO—The EZH2 inhibitor tazemetostat (EPZ-6438) has shown “meaningful clinical activity” as monotherapy in patients with advanced non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), according to researchers.

In a phase 1 trial, 9 of the 15 evaluable NHL patients achieved an objective response to tazemetostat.

This included 2 ongoing complete responses (CRs), 1 in a patient with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and 1 in a patient with follicular lymphoma (FL).

It also included a partial response (PR) in the first treated patient with an EZH2 mutation.

And researchers said the drug was largely well-tolerated, as most adverse events were grade 1 or 2.

“The breadth, depth, and durability of responses seen in NHL patients among multiple histologies continue to impress, as does the safety and tolerability of tazemetostat in this phase 1 study,” said Vincent Ribrag, MD, of Institut Gustave Roussy in Villejuif, France.

“Among the patients in the dose-escalation cohorts, we have seen a noteworthy deepening of responses over time, and, in the first treated patient with an EZH2 tumor mutation, we have seen a partial response, which is very encouraging.”

Dr Ribrag presented these results at the 13th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma (abstract 145*). The study, which was previously presented at the 26th EORTC-NCI-AACR Symposium on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics, was sponsored by Epizyme, Inc., the company developing tazemetostat.

The phase 1 trial has enrolled 19 patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell NHL and 26 patients with advanced solid tumors.

Researchers have evaluated 5 cohorts of patients in the dose-escalation portion of the study—100 mg, 200 mg, 400 mg, 800 mg, and 1600 mg—and 2 cohorts—800 mg and 1600 mg—in the dose-expansion phase. All doses of tazemetostat were given twice daily.

The 19 NHL patients had a median age of 61 (range, 24-84) and were heavily pretreated. Eighty-five percent had received 3 or more prior therapies, and 37% had received 5 or more prior therapies.

Thirty-seven percent of patients were refractory to their last prior regimen, and 26% had received a prior autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

Dosing and efficacy

As of June 8, 2015, 15 NHL patients were evaluable for efficacy. Nine had achieved an objective response, including 2 patients with an ongoing CR. All responses were observed between 2 and 10 months on therapy.

Five of the 9 evaluable patients with DLBCL achieved an objective response. One DLBCL patient with a CR remains on study at 18 months of treatment.

Three of 5 evaluable patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) achieved an objective response. One FL patient with a CR remains on study at 13 months, and 1 FL patient with a PR remains on study at 13 months.

The only patient with marginal zone lymphoma achieved a PR and continues on study at 11 months.

One of the 14 patients evaluated for EZH2 status has a specific EZH2 tumor mutation (Y646H). This patient, who had DLBCL that relapsed or was refractory to 6 previous treatment regimens, achieved a PR after 16 weeks of therapy and remains on study.

The recommended phase 2 dose of tazemetostat is 800 mg twice daily.

Adverse events and next steps

All of the 45 enrolled patients were evaluable for safety. Treatment-related adverse events included asthenia (n=10), nausea (n=6), dyspepsia (n=5), thrombocytopenia (n=4), anorexia (n=4), anemia (n=4), vomiting (n=3), constipation (n=2), muscle spasm (n=2), hypertension (n=2), neutropenia (n=2), and elevated transaminase (n=1).

There were 5 grade 3 or higher adverse events related to treatment, including grade 3 anorexia, grade 3 hypertension, grade 3 transaminase elevation, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, and grade 4 neutropenia.

Epizyme plans to report a further update from this trial by the end of this year. The company is now enrolling patients in a phase 2 study of tazemetostat monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory NHL, stratified by cell of origin and EZH2 mutation status.

Epizyme is also planning a phase 2 trial of tazemetostat in adults with INI1-deficient solid tumors, a phase 1 study of pediatric patients with INI1-deficient solid tumors, a combination study of tazemetostat with R-CHOP in patients with DLBCL, and a combination study of tazemetostat with a B-cell signaling agent or other emerging targeted therapies for B-cell lymphomas.

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

 

 

Micrograph showing FL

 

LUGANO—The EZH2 inhibitor tazemetostat (EPZ-6438) has shown “meaningful clinical activity” as monotherapy in patients with advanced non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), according to researchers.

In a phase 1 trial, 9 of the 15 evaluable NHL patients achieved an objective response to tazemetostat.

This included 2 ongoing complete responses (CRs), 1 in a patient with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and 1 in a patient with follicular lymphoma (FL).

It also included a partial response (PR) in the first treated patient with an EZH2 mutation.

And researchers said the drug was largely well-tolerated, as most adverse events were grade 1 or 2.

“The breadth, depth, and durability of responses seen in NHL patients among multiple histologies continue to impress, as does the safety and tolerability of tazemetostat in this phase 1 study,” said Vincent Ribrag, MD, of Institut Gustave Roussy in Villejuif, France.

“Among the patients in the dose-escalation cohorts, we have seen a noteworthy deepening of responses over time, and, in the first treated patient with an EZH2 tumor mutation, we have seen a partial response, which is very encouraging.”

Dr Ribrag presented these results at the 13th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma (abstract 145*). The study, which was previously presented at the 26th EORTC-NCI-AACR Symposium on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics, was sponsored by Epizyme, Inc., the company developing tazemetostat.

The phase 1 trial has enrolled 19 patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell NHL and 26 patients with advanced solid tumors.

Researchers have evaluated 5 cohorts of patients in the dose-escalation portion of the study—100 mg, 200 mg, 400 mg, 800 mg, and 1600 mg—and 2 cohorts—800 mg and 1600 mg—in the dose-expansion phase. All doses of tazemetostat were given twice daily.

The 19 NHL patients had a median age of 61 (range, 24-84) and were heavily pretreated. Eighty-five percent had received 3 or more prior therapies, and 37% had received 5 or more prior therapies.

Thirty-seven percent of patients were refractory to their last prior regimen, and 26% had received a prior autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

Dosing and efficacy

As of June 8, 2015, 15 NHL patients were evaluable for efficacy. Nine had achieved an objective response, including 2 patients with an ongoing CR. All responses were observed between 2 and 10 months on therapy.

Five of the 9 evaluable patients with DLBCL achieved an objective response. One DLBCL patient with a CR remains on study at 18 months of treatment.

Three of 5 evaluable patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) achieved an objective response. One FL patient with a CR remains on study at 13 months, and 1 FL patient with a PR remains on study at 13 months.

The only patient with marginal zone lymphoma achieved a PR and continues on study at 11 months.

One of the 14 patients evaluated for EZH2 status has a specific EZH2 tumor mutation (Y646H). This patient, who had DLBCL that relapsed or was refractory to 6 previous treatment regimens, achieved a PR after 16 weeks of therapy and remains on study.

The recommended phase 2 dose of tazemetostat is 800 mg twice daily.

Adverse events and next steps

All of the 45 enrolled patients were evaluable for safety. Treatment-related adverse events included asthenia (n=10), nausea (n=6), dyspepsia (n=5), thrombocytopenia (n=4), anorexia (n=4), anemia (n=4), vomiting (n=3), constipation (n=2), muscle spasm (n=2), hypertension (n=2), neutropenia (n=2), and elevated transaminase (n=1).

There were 5 grade 3 or higher adverse events related to treatment, including grade 3 anorexia, grade 3 hypertension, grade 3 transaminase elevation, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, and grade 4 neutropenia.

Epizyme plans to report a further update from this trial by the end of this year. The company is now enrolling patients in a phase 2 study of tazemetostat monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory NHL, stratified by cell of origin and EZH2 mutation status.

Epizyme is also planning a phase 2 trial of tazemetostat in adults with INI1-deficient solid tumors, a phase 1 study of pediatric patients with INI1-deficient solid tumors, a combination study of tazemetostat with R-CHOP in patients with DLBCL, and a combination study of tazemetostat with a B-cell signaling agent or other emerging targeted therapies for B-cell lymphomas.

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

PET scanner

Photo by Jens Maus

LUGANO—Results of the RATHL trial indicate that bleomycin can be omitted from ABVD therapy following a negative interim FDG-PET scan in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma.

Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the same at 3 years for patients who were PET-negative after 2 cycles of ABVD and then continued therapy with or without bleomycin.

These results were presented at the 13th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma (13-ICML).

Investigators based the RATHL study on the principles that it’s desirable to de-escalate treatment in the best responders to avoid late toxicity and that PET scans after 2 cycles of ABVD are highly predictive.

The team enrolled 1214 patients from 6 countries, 861 of whom were in the UK. Patients received a PET scan at staging, 2 cycles of ABVD, and then a second PET scan (PET2).

If patients were negative after PET2, they were randomized to receive 4 more cycles of ABVD or AVD and no radiotherapy.

If they were positive after PET2, patients received 4 cycles of BEACOPP-14 or 3 cycles of escalated BEACOPP. These patients then received a third PET scan, and the positive patients went on to receive radiotherapy or a salvage regimen.

The PET3-negative patients received 2 more cycles of BEACOPP-14 or one of escalated BEACOPP without radiotherapy.

Peter W. Johnson, MD, of the University of Southampton in the UK, presented the results of these treatment regimens during the plenary session of 13-ICML as abstract 008.

Patient characteristics

Patients were a median age of 33 (range, 18-79), and 55% were male. They had disease stages of II (41%), III (31%), or IV (28%).

Seventy-four percent of patients had a performance status of 0. Almost half (49%) had an IPS score of 2 to 3, and 18% had an IPS score of 4 or more. Thirty-two percent had bulky disease.

Investigators followed the patients for a median of 34.7 months (range, 1 day to 68.2 months).

Results after PET2

Seventy-seven patients were missing a second PET scan, mostly due to PET protocol violations of having to use the same scanner for the baseline and second scan and the same acquisition time.

“We were very strict on our quality control,” Dr Johnson said, “because we wished to make sure this was reproducible data.”

So the results after 2 cycles of ABVD treatment were based on 1137 patients.

PET-negative patients

More than 80% of patients were PET-negative after 2 cycles. Four hundred and sixty-nine patients were randomized to receive ABVD and 466 to AVD.

The groups were well-balanced in terms of median age, performance status, stage, B symptoms, bulky disease, and IPS score.

There was a significant excess of neutropenic fever (P=0.032) and infection (P=0.040) in those patients continuing on ABVD compared to AVD. And any hematologic toxicity was highly significantly different between the 2 arms (P<0.001).

“So we have demonstrated that continuing with bleomycin beyond cycle 2 is accompanied by significantly more toxicity,” Dr Johnson said.

Ninety-eight percent of patients in both cohorts received at least 6 cycles of therapy post-randomization.

At a median follow-up of 36.3 months, 65% of patients in the ABVD arm and 69% in the AVD arm achieved a complete remission (CR) or unconfirmed CR (CRu).

Fourteen patients died in each of the arms. Seven patients died of their disease in the AVD arm, compared with 1 in the ABVD arm. Slightly more patients died from toxicity in the ABVD arm.

The primary endpoint of PFS showed very little difference between the 2 arms. The 3-year PFS in the intent-to-treat analysis was 85.4% for patients in the ABVD arm and 84.4% for those in the AVD arm.

The investigators observed that the PFS of 85% was somewhat lower than the 95% PFS observed in the literature. So they looked at the association between baseline factors and PFS after negative PET2.

“And what stands out from this is that if you have high-stage disease at presentation, there is a slightly higher chance of treatment failure following a negative PET scan,” Dr Johnson said. “And you can see the trend here, from early stage disease up to advanced-stage disease, the PET scan becomes a less reliable indicator of result.”

The investigators also conducted a subgroup analysis of the PET2-negative patients and found there was no difference in outcome between treatment arms in patients with more advanced disease, with bulky disease, with a high IPS score, or according to the PET score.

“So we have not succeeded in finding any subgroup where it appears to be beneficial to continue bleomycin,” Dr Johnson said.

The OS rate was also the same between the 2 arms, at 97%.

PET2-positive patients

One hundred and seventy-four patients who were positive after the second PET scan received either BEACOPP for 14 days or escalated BEACOPP.

The percentage of patients who experienced grade 3-4 toxicities was largely similar between the 2 regimens, although the patients receiving escalated BEACOPP had more neutropenia (P=0.057), thrombocytopenia (P=0.001), and neutropenic fever (P=0.08).

In terms of efficacy, two-thirds of patients became PET-negative by the third PET scan, and 48% of patients achieved a CR or CRu.

Twenty-one patients died, 8 due to Hodgkin lymphoma.

The PFS was 66.0% in the BEACOPP-14 group and 71.1% in the escalated-BEACOPP group. The 3-year OS was 89.6% in the BEACOPP-14 group and 82.8% in the escalated-BEACOPP group.

For the entire group of 1214 patients, the 3-year PFS was 82.5%, and the OS was 95.4%.

Based on these results, the investigators concluded that it is safe to omit bleomycin and consolidation radiotherapy from subsequent ABVD therapy after a negative interim PET scan. And doing so reduces toxicity, especially dyspnea, thromboembolism, and neutropenic fever.

“[B]y using more selective chemotherapy and much less radiotherapy than we have previously used in our studies, where we’re giving less than 3% of patients consolidation radiotherapy, the results appear to be favorable and an improvement over what we have seen previously,” Dr Johnson said.

Details on lung toxicity in this study were presented separately at 13-ICML as abstract 041.

PET scanner

Photo by Jens Maus

LUGANO—Results of the RATHL trial indicate that bleomycin can be omitted from ABVD therapy following a negative interim FDG-PET scan in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma.

Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the same at 3 years for patients who were PET-negative after 2 cycles of ABVD and then continued therapy with or without bleomycin.

These results were presented at the 13th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma (13-ICML).

Investigators based the RATHL study on the principles that it’s desirable to de-escalate treatment in the best responders to avoid late toxicity and that PET scans after 2 cycles of ABVD are highly predictive.

The team enrolled 1214 patients from 6 countries, 861 of whom were in the UK. Patients received a PET scan at staging, 2 cycles of ABVD, and then a second PET scan (PET2).

If patients were negative after PET2, they were randomized to receive 4 more cycles of ABVD or AVD and no radiotherapy.

If they were positive after PET2, patients received 4 cycles of BEACOPP-14 or 3 cycles of escalated BEACOPP. These patients then received a third PET scan, and the positive patients went on to receive radiotherapy or a salvage regimen.

The PET3-negative patients received 2 more cycles of BEACOPP-14 or one of escalated BEACOPP without radiotherapy.

Peter W. Johnson, MD, of the University of Southampton in the UK, presented the results of these treatment regimens during the plenary session of 13-ICML as abstract 008.

Patient characteristics

Patients were a median age of 33 (range, 18-79), and 55% were male. They had disease stages of II (41%), III (31%), or IV (28%).

Seventy-four percent of patients had a performance status of 0. Almost half (49%) had an IPS score of 2 to 3, and 18% had an IPS score of 4 or more. Thirty-two percent had bulky disease.

Investigators followed the patients for a median of 34.7 months (range, 1 day to 68.2 months).

Results after PET2

Seventy-seven patients were missing a second PET scan, mostly due to PET protocol violations of having to use the same scanner for the baseline and second scan and the same acquisition time.

“We were very strict on our quality control,” Dr Johnson said, “because we wished to make sure this was reproducible data.”

So the results after 2 cycles of ABVD treatment were based on 1137 patients.

PET-negative patients

More than 80% of patients were PET-negative after 2 cycles. Four hundred and sixty-nine patients were randomized to receive ABVD and 466 to AVD.

The groups were well-balanced in terms of median age, performance status, stage, B symptoms, bulky disease, and IPS score.

There was a significant excess of neutropenic fever (P=0.032) and infection (P=0.040) in those patients continuing on ABVD compared to AVD. And any hematologic toxicity was highly significantly different between the 2 arms (P<0.001).

“So we have demonstrated that continuing with bleomycin beyond cycle 2 is accompanied by significantly more toxicity,” Dr Johnson said.

Ninety-eight percent of patients in both cohorts received at least 6 cycles of therapy post-randomization.

At a median follow-up of 36.3 months, 65% of patients in the ABVD arm and 69% in the AVD arm achieved a complete remission (CR) or unconfirmed CR (CRu).

Fourteen patients died in each of the arms. Seven patients died of their disease in the AVD arm, compared with 1 in the ABVD arm. Slightly more patients died from toxicity in the ABVD arm.

The primary endpoint of PFS showed very little difference between the 2 arms. The 3-year PFS in the intent-to-treat analysis was 85.4% for patients in the ABVD arm and 84.4% for those in the AVD arm.

The investigators observed that the PFS of 85% was somewhat lower than the 95% PFS observed in the literature. So they looked at the association between baseline factors and PFS after negative PET2.

“And what stands out from this is that if you have high-stage disease at presentation, there is a slightly higher chance of treatment failure following a negative PET scan,” Dr Johnson said. “And you can see the trend here, from early stage disease up to advanced-stage disease, the PET scan becomes a less reliable indicator of result.”

The investigators also conducted a subgroup analysis of the PET2-negative patients and found there was no difference in outcome between treatment arms in patients with more advanced disease, with bulky disease, with a high IPS score, or according to the PET score.

“So we have not succeeded in finding any subgroup where it appears to be beneficial to continue bleomycin,” Dr Johnson said.

The OS rate was also the same between the 2 arms, at 97%.

PET2-positive patients

One hundred and seventy-four patients who were positive after the second PET scan received either BEACOPP for 14 days or escalated BEACOPP.

The percentage of patients who experienced grade 3-4 toxicities was largely similar between the 2 regimens, although the patients receiving escalated BEACOPP had more neutropenia (P=0.057), thrombocytopenia (P=0.001), and neutropenic fever (P=0.08).

In terms of efficacy, two-thirds of patients became PET-negative by the third PET scan, and 48% of patients achieved a CR or CRu.

Twenty-one patients died, 8 due to Hodgkin lymphoma.

The PFS was 66.0% in the BEACOPP-14 group and 71.1% in the escalated-BEACOPP group. The 3-year OS was 89.6% in the BEACOPP-14 group and 82.8% in the escalated-BEACOPP group.

For the entire group of 1214 patients, the 3-year PFS was 82.5%, and the OS was 95.4%.

Based on these results, the investigators concluded that it is safe to omit bleomycin and consolidation radiotherapy from subsequent ABVD therapy after a negative interim PET scan. And doing so reduces toxicity, especially dyspnea, thromboembolism, and neutropenic fever.

“[B]y using more selective chemotherapy and much less radiotherapy than we have previously used in our studies, where we’re giving less than 3% of patients consolidation radiotherapy, the results appear to be favorable and an improvement over what we have seen previously,” Dr Johnson said.

Details on lung toxicity in this study were presented separately at 13-ICML as abstract 041.

PET scanner

Photo by Jens Maus

LUGANO—Results of the RATHL trial indicate that bleomycin can be omitted from ABVD therapy following a negative interim FDG-PET scan in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma.

Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the same at 3 years for patients who were PET-negative after 2 cycles of ABVD and then continued therapy with or without bleomycin.

These results were presented at the 13th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma (13-ICML).

Investigators based the RATHL study on the principles that it’s desirable to de-escalate treatment in the best responders to avoid late toxicity and that PET scans after 2 cycles of ABVD are highly predictive.

The team enrolled 1214 patients from 6 countries, 861 of whom were in the UK. Patients received a PET scan at staging, 2 cycles of ABVD, and then a second PET scan (PET2).

If patients were negative after PET2, they were randomized to receive 4 more cycles of ABVD or AVD and no radiotherapy.

If they were positive after PET2, patients received 4 cycles of BEACOPP-14 or 3 cycles of escalated BEACOPP. These patients then received a third PET scan, and the positive patients went on to receive radiotherapy or a salvage regimen.

The PET3-negative patients received 2 more cycles of BEACOPP-14 or one of escalated BEACOPP without radiotherapy.

Peter W. Johnson, MD, of the University of Southampton in the UK, presented the results of these treatment regimens during the plenary session of 13-ICML as abstract 008.

Patient characteristics

Patients were a median age of 33 (range, 18-79), and 55% were male. They had disease stages of II (41%), III (31%), or IV (28%).

Seventy-four percent of patients had a performance status of 0. Almost half (49%) had an IPS score of 2 to 3, and 18% had an IPS score of 4 or more. Thirty-two percent had bulky disease.

Investigators followed the patients for a median of 34.7 months (range, 1 day to 68.2 months).

Results after PET2

Seventy-seven patients were missing a second PET scan, mostly due to PET protocol violations of having to use the same scanner for the baseline and second scan and the same acquisition time.

“We were very strict on our quality control,” Dr Johnson said, “because we wished to make sure this was reproducible data.”

So the results after 2 cycles of ABVD treatment were based on 1137 patients.

PET-negative patients

More than 80% of patients were PET-negative after 2 cycles. Four hundred and sixty-nine patients were randomized to receive ABVD and 466 to AVD.

The groups were well-balanced in terms of median age, performance status, stage, B symptoms, bulky disease, and IPS score.

There was a significant excess of neutropenic fever (P=0.032) and infection (P=0.040) in those patients continuing on ABVD compared to AVD. And any hematologic toxicity was highly significantly different between the 2 arms (P<0.001).

“So we have demonstrated that continuing with bleomycin beyond cycle 2 is accompanied by significantly more toxicity,” Dr Johnson said.

Ninety-eight percent of patients in both cohorts received at least 6 cycles of therapy post-randomization.

At a median follow-up of 36.3 months, 65% of patients in the ABVD arm and 69% in the AVD arm achieved a complete remission (CR) or unconfirmed CR (CRu).

Fourteen patients died in each of the arms. Seven patients died of their disease in the AVD arm, compared with 1 in the ABVD arm. Slightly more patients died from toxicity in the ABVD arm.

The primary endpoint of PFS showed very little difference between the 2 arms. The 3-year PFS in the intent-to-treat analysis was 85.4% for patients in the ABVD arm and 84.4% for those in the AVD arm.

The investigators observed that the PFS of 85% was somewhat lower than the 95% PFS observed in the literature. So they looked at the association between baseline factors and PFS after negative PET2.

“And what stands out from this is that if you have high-stage disease at presentation, there is a slightly higher chance of treatment failure following a negative PET scan,” Dr Johnson said. “And you can see the trend here, from early stage disease up to advanced-stage disease, the PET scan becomes a less reliable indicator of result.”

The investigators also conducted a subgroup analysis of the PET2-negative patients and found there was no difference in outcome between treatment arms in patients with more advanced disease, with bulky disease, with a high IPS score, or according to the PET score.

“So we have not succeeded in finding any subgroup where it appears to be beneficial to continue bleomycin,” Dr Johnson said.

The OS rate was also the same between the 2 arms, at 97%.

PET2-positive patients

One hundred and seventy-four patients who were positive after the second PET scan received either BEACOPP for 14 days or escalated BEACOPP.

The percentage of patients who experienced grade 3-4 toxicities was largely similar between the 2 regimens, although the patients receiving escalated BEACOPP had more neutropenia (P=0.057), thrombocytopenia (P=0.001), and neutropenic fever (P=0.08).

In terms of efficacy, two-thirds of patients became PET-negative by the third PET scan, and 48% of patients achieved a CR or CRu.

Twenty-one patients died, 8 due to Hodgkin lymphoma.

The PFS was 66.0% in the BEACOPP-14 group and 71.1% in the escalated-BEACOPP group. The 3-year OS was 89.6% in the BEACOPP-14 group and 82.8% in the escalated-BEACOPP group.

For the entire group of 1214 patients, the 3-year PFS was 82.5%, and the OS was 95.4%.

Based on these results, the investigators concluded that it is safe to omit bleomycin and consolidation radiotherapy from subsequent ABVD therapy after a negative interim PET scan. And doing so reduces toxicity, especially dyspnea, thromboembolism, and neutropenic fever.

“[B]y using more selective chemotherapy and much less radiotherapy than we have previously used in our studies, where we’re giving less than 3% of patients consolidation radiotherapy, the results appear to be favorable and an improvement over what we have seen previously,” Dr Johnson said.

Details on lung toxicity in this study were presented separately at 13-ICML as abstract 041.