CLL

Daily oral treatment with venetoclax induced substantial responses with manageable adverse effects in patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma in a first-in-human phase I dose-escalation study.

The promising effects of the highly selective investigational inhibitor of BCL2 – a protein central to the survival of CLL cells – were noted even in patients with poor prognostic features, who comprised 89% of the cohort, reported Dr. Andrew W. Roberts of Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia, and his colleagues. The study was published online Jan. 28 in The New England Journal of Medicine.

In the dose escalation phase of the study, 56 patients received active treatment at doses raging from 150 to 1,200 mg daily, and 60 additional patients received weekly stepwise ramp-up with doses beginning at 20 mg daily with weekly increases to 50 mg, 100 mg, and 200 mg daily up to the target dose of 400 mg daily. The patients had received a median of 3 previous therapies (range, 1-11).

Of 116 treated patients, 92 (79%) had a response, and 20% achieved complete remission, including 5% with no minimal residual disease on flow cytometry, the investigators said (N Engl J Med. 2016;374:311-22).

Venetoclax was active at all doses used in the study, and no maximum tolerated dose was identified.

Tumor lysis syndrome occurred in 10 patients, but clinically important sequelae occurred in only 3 of those patients, 2 of whom had severe sequelae. After adjustments were made to dosing schedule, no further cases occurred.

Other side effects included mild diarrhea, upper respiratory tract infection, nausea, and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, which occurred in 41%-52% of patients. Serious adverse events included febrile neutropenia in 6% of patients, pneumonia in 4%, upper respiratory tract infection in 3%, and immune thrombocytopenia in 3%.

Among the patients with an adverse prognosis, treatment response rates ranged from 71% to 79%, depending on the subgroup. For example, the response rate was 79% in 70 patients with resistance to fludarabine, and 71% in 31 patients with chromosome 17p deletions.

New treatments, including ibrutinib monotherapy and idelalisib in combination with rituximab, have improved outcomes for patients with relapsed CLL, but despite these advances, complete remissions remain uncommon, the authors said.

“This first trial of venetoclax showed the potential of BCL2 antagonism as an additional therapeutic avenue for patients with relapsed CLL,” they wrote, adding that the 79% overall response rate in this study – including deep responses and complete responses without minimal residual disease in patients up to age 86 years and patients with poor prognostic factors – “provides support for further development of venetoclax as a treatment option for patients with heavily pretreated relapsed or refractory CLL or SLL.”

Of note, the Food and Drug Administration on Jan. 28 – the date this study was released – granted venetoclax Breakthrough Therapy Designation for use in combination with hypomethylating agents for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia patients who aren’t eligible for standard induction chemotherapy. The designation – the third for the agent – is supported by data from a single study of untreated patients aged 65 years or older with AML. Prior venetoclax Breakthrough Therapy Designations were granted in April 2015 for its use as monotherapy in patients with refractory CLL who have the 17p deletion genetic mutation, and in January for its use with rituximab for the treatment of relapsed/refractory CLL.

AbbVie and Genentech supported the study. Dr. Roberts reported receiving grant support and study drugs form AbbVie, serving as an investigator in trials sponsored by Genentech, AbbVie, Janssen, and Beigene, and receiving institutional research funding from Genentech for the development of venetoclax. His coauthors reported ties to various pharmaceutical companies.

[email protected]

Daily oral treatment with venetoclax induced substantial responses with manageable adverse effects in patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma in a first-in-human phase I dose-escalation study.

The promising effects of the highly selective investigational inhibitor of BCL2 – a protein central to the survival of CLL cells – were noted even in patients with poor prognostic features, who comprised 89% of the cohort, reported Dr. Andrew W. Roberts of Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia, and his colleagues. The study was published online Jan. 28 in The New England Journal of Medicine.

In the dose escalation phase of the study, 56 patients received active treatment at doses raging from 150 to 1,200 mg daily, and 60 additional patients received weekly stepwise ramp-up with doses beginning at 20 mg daily with weekly increases to 50 mg, 100 mg, and 200 mg daily up to the target dose of 400 mg daily. The patients had received a median of 3 previous therapies (range, 1-11).

Of 116 treated patients, 92 (79%) had a response, and 20% achieved complete remission, including 5% with no minimal residual disease on flow cytometry, the investigators said (N Engl J Med. 2016;374:311-22).

Venetoclax was active at all doses used in the study, and no maximum tolerated dose was identified.

Tumor lysis syndrome occurred in 10 patients, but clinically important sequelae occurred in only 3 of those patients, 2 of whom had severe sequelae. After adjustments were made to dosing schedule, no further cases occurred.

Other side effects included mild diarrhea, upper respiratory tract infection, nausea, and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, which occurred in 41%-52% of patients. Serious adverse events included febrile neutropenia in 6% of patients, pneumonia in 4%, upper respiratory tract infection in 3%, and immune thrombocytopenia in 3%.

Among the patients with an adverse prognosis, treatment response rates ranged from 71% to 79%, depending on the subgroup. For example, the response rate was 79% in 70 patients with resistance to fludarabine, and 71% in 31 patients with chromosome 17p deletions.

New treatments, including ibrutinib monotherapy and idelalisib in combination with rituximab, have improved outcomes for patients with relapsed CLL, but despite these advances, complete remissions remain uncommon, the authors said.

“This first trial of venetoclax showed the potential of BCL2 antagonism as an additional therapeutic avenue for patients with relapsed CLL,” they wrote, adding that the 79% overall response rate in this study – including deep responses and complete responses without minimal residual disease in patients up to age 86 years and patients with poor prognostic factors – “provides support for further development of venetoclax as a treatment option for patients with heavily pretreated relapsed or refractory CLL or SLL.”

Of note, the Food and Drug Administration on Jan. 28 – the date this study was released – granted venetoclax Breakthrough Therapy Designation for use in combination with hypomethylating agents for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia patients who aren’t eligible for standard induction chemotherapy. The designation – the third for the agent – is supported by data from a single study of untreated patients aged 65 years or older with AML. Prior venetoclax Breakthrough Therapy Designations were granted in April 2015 for its use as monotherapy in patients with refractory CLL who have the 17p deletion genetic mutation, and in January for its use with rituximab for the treatment of relapsed/refractory CLL.

AbbVie and Genentech supported the study. Dr. Roberts reported receiving grant support and study drugs form AbbVie, serving as an investigator in trials sponsored by Genentech, AbbVie, Janssen, and Beigene, and receiving institutional research funding from Genentech for the development of venetoclax. His coauthors reported ties to various pharmaceutical companies.

[email protected]

Daily oral treatment with venetoclax induced substantial responses with manageable adverse effects in patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma in a first-in-human phase I dose-escalation study.

The promising effects of the highly selective investigational inhibitor of BCL2 – a protein central to the survival of CLL cells – were noted even in patients with poor prognostic features, who comprised 89% of the cohort, reported Dr. Andrew W. Roberts of Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia, and his colleagues. The study was published online Jan. 28 in The New England Journal of Medicine.

In the dose escalation phase of the study, 56 patients received active treatment at doses raging from 150 to 1,200 mg daily, and 60 additional patients received weekly stepwise ramp-up with doses beginning at 20 mg daily with weekly increases to 50 mg, 100 mg, and 200 mg daily up to the target dose of 400 mg daily. The patients had received a median of 3 previous therapies (range, 1-11).

Of 116 treated patients, 92 (79%) had a response, and 20% achieved complete remission, including 5% with no minimal residual disease on flow cytometry, the investigators said (N Engl J Med. 2016;374:311-22).

Venetoclax was active at all doses used in the study, and no maximum tolerated dose was identified.

Tumor lysis syndrome occurred in 10 patients, but clinically important sequelae occurred in only 3 of those patients, 2 of whom had severe sequelae. After adjustments were made to dosing schedule, no further cases occurred.

Other side effects included mild diarrhea, upper respiratory tract infection, nausea, and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, which occurred in 41%-52% of patients. Serious adverse events included febrile neutropenia in 6% of patients, pneumonia in 4%, upper respiratory tract infection in 3%, and immune thrombocytopenia in 3%.

Among the patients with an adverse prognosis, treatment response rates ranged from 71% to 79%, depending on the subgroup. For example, the response rate was 79% in 70 patients with resistance to fludarabine, and 71% in 31 patients with chromosome 17p deletions.

New treatments, including ibrutinib monotherapy and idelalisib in combination with rituximab, have improved outcomes for patients with relapsed CLL, but despite these advances, complete remissions remain uncommon, the authors said.

“This first trial of venetoclax showed the potential of BCL2 antagonism as an additional therapeutic avenue for patients with relapsed CLL,” they wrote, adding that the 79% overall response rate in this study – including deep responses and complete responses without minimal residual disease in patients up to age 86 years and patients with poor prognostic factors – “provides support for further development of venetoclax as a treatment option for patients with heavily pretreated relapsed or refractory CLL or SLL.”

Of note, the Food and Drug Administration on Jan. 28 – the date this study was released – granted venetoclax Breakthrough Therapy Designation for use in combination with hypomethylating agents for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia patients who aren’t eligible for standard induction chemotherapy. The designation – the third for the agent – is supported by data from a single study of untreated patients aged 65 years or older with AML. Prior venetoclax Breakthrough Therapy Designations were granted in April 2015 for its use as monotherapy in patients with refractory CLL who have the 17p deletion genetic mutation, and in January for its use with rituximab for the treatment of relapsed/refractory CLL.

AbbVie and Genentech supported the study. Dr. Roberts reported receiving grant support and study drugs form AbbVie, serving as an investigator in trials sponsored by Genentech, AbbVie, Janssen, and Beigene, and receiving institutional research funding from Genentech for the development of venetoclax. His coauthors reported ties to various pharmaceutical companies.

[email protected]

Acalabrutinib, an oral drug that is a more specific Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor related to ibrutinib, produced a high response rate and durable remissions at a median 14 months of follow-up in an uncontrolled phase I/II trial of 61 adults with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia, according to a report published online Jan. 28 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The study patients had received a median of three previous therapies for CLL; 31% had chromosome 17p13.1 deletions, and 75% had unmutated immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable genes.

At the analysis, one patient had died from pneumonia at 13 months and CLL had progressed at 16 months in another patient. The overall response rate among the 60 evaluable patients was 95%, with a partial response in 85% and a partial response with lymphocytosis in 10%. The rate of stable disease was 5%. Adverse events were mostly mild and self-limiting; eight patients (13%) discontinued treatment, said Dr. John C. Byrd of the division of hematology, Ohio State University, Columbus, and his associates.

All 18 patients with chromosome 17p13.1 deletions responded to acalabrutinib, with a partial response in 89% and a partial response with lymphocytosis in 11%. One patient with a chromosome 17p13.1 deletion had disease progression, and this patient had a C481S (major clone) mutation in BTK and an L845F (minor clone) mutation in PLCγ2.

No cases of Richter’s transformation occurred.

Patients were treated at six sites in the United States and the United Kingdom. Four different doses of oral acalabrutinib were used in the first phase of the study; the drug’s low toxicity permitted a twice-daily 100-mg dose in phase II of the study. Twice-daily dosing promoted continuous levels of drug binding to BTK, according to the researchers. It is hoped that this approach will decrease drug resistance and will perhaps lower the rate of transformation into large-cell lymphoma.

Among patients who had cytopenia at entry into the study, platelet count improved in 62%, hemoglobin levels improved in 76%, and absolute neutrophil count improved in 80%. Among patients who had B symptoms (weight loss, night sweats, and fever) at study entry, those symptoms resolved in 88% by the third cycle of treatment and in 100% by the ninth cycle, Dr. Byrd and his associates said (N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1509981). The most common adverse events were headache (43% of patients), diarrhea (39%), weight gain (26%), pyrexia (23%), and upper respiratory tract infection (23%). Fewer than 2% of patients developed severe diarrhea, rash, arthralgia, myalgia, bruising, or bleeding.

These findings offered strong justification to further investigate the efficacy and safety of acalabrutinib for relapsed CLL, and a phase III trial is now underway, the investigators added.

Acalabrutinib, an oral drug that is a more specific Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor related to ibrutinib, produced a high response rate and durable remissions at a median 14 months of follow-up in an uncontrolled phase I/II trial of 61 adults with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia, according to a report published online Jan. 28 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The study patients had received a median of three previous therapies for CLL; 31% had chromosome 17p13.1 deletions, and 75% had unmutated immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable genes.

At the analysis, one patient had died from pneumonia at 13 months and CLL had progressed at 16 months in another patient. The overall response rate among the 60 evaluable patients was 95%, with a partial response in 85% and a partial response with lymphocytosis in 10%. The rate of stable disease was 5%. Adverse events were mostly mild and self-limiting; eight patients (13%) discontinued treatment, said Dr. John C. Byrd of the division of hematology, Ohio State University, Columbus, and his associates.

All 18 patients with chromosome 17p13.1 deletions responded to acalabrutinib, with a partial response in 89% and a partial response with lymphocytosis in 11%. One patient with a chromosome 17p13.1 deletion had disease progression, and this patient had a C481S (major clone) mutation in BTK and an L845F (minor clone) mutation in PLCγ2.

No cases of Richter’s transformation occurred.

Patients were treated at six sites in the United States and the United Kingdom. Four different doses of oral acalabrutinib were used in the first phase of the study; the drug’s low toxicity permitted a twice-daily 100-mg dose in phase II of the study. Twice-daily dosing promoted continuous levels of drug binding to BTK, according to the researchers. It is hoped that this approach will decrease drug resistance and will perhaps lower the rate of transformation into large-cell lymphoma.

Among patients who had cytopenia at entry into the study, platelet count improved in 62%, hemoglobin levels improved in 76%, and absolute neutrophil count improved in 80%. Among patients who had B symptoms (weight loss, night sweats, and fever) at study entry, those symptoms resolved in 88% by the third cycle of treatment and in 100% by the ninth cycle, Dr. Byrd and his associates said (N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1509981). The most common adverse events were headache (43% of patients), diarrhea (39%), weight gain (26%), pyrexia (23%), and upper respiratory tract infection (23%). Fewer than 2% of patients developed severe diarrhea, rash, arthralgia, myalgia, bruising, or bleeding.

These findings offered strong justification to further investigate the efficacy and safety of acalabrutinib for relapsed CLL, and a phase III trial is now underway, the investigators added.

Acalabrutinib, an oral drug that is a more specific Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor related to ibrutinib, produced a high response rate and durable remissions at a median 14 months of follow-up in an uncontrolled phase I/II trial of 61 adults with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia, according to a report published online Jan. 28 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The study patients had received a median of three previous therapies for CLL; 31% had chromosome 17p13.1 deletions, and 75% had unmutated immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable genes.

At the analysis, one patient had died from pneumonia at 13 months and CLL had progressed at 16 months in another patient. The overall response rate among the 60 evaluable patients was 95%, with a partial response in 85% and a partial response with lymphocytosis in 10%. The rate of stable disease was 5%. Adverse events were mostly mild and self-limiting; eight patients (13%) discontinued treatment, said Dr. John C. Byrd of the division of hematology, Ohio State University, Columbus, and his associates.

All 18 patients with chromosome 17p13.1 deletions responded to acalabrutinib, with a partial response in 89% and a partial response with lymphocytosis in 11%. One patient with a chromosome 17p13.1 deletion had disease progression, and this patient had a C481S (major clone) mutation in BTK and an L845F (minor clone) mutation in PLCγ2.

No cases of Richter’s transformation occurred.

Patients were treated at six sites in the United States and the United Kingdom. Four different doses of oral acalabrutinib were used in the first phase of the study; the drug’s low toxicity permitted a twice-daily 100-mg dose in phase II of the study. Twice-daily dosing promoted continuous levels of drug binding to BTK, according to the researchers. It is hoped that this approach will decrease drug resistance and will perhaps lower the rate of transformation into large-cell lymphoma.

Among patients who had cytopenia at entry into the study, platelet count improved in 62%, hemoglobin levels improved in 76%, and absolute neutrophil count improved in 80%. Among patients who had B symptoms (weight loss, night sweats, and fever) at study entry, those symptoms resolved in 88% by the third cycle of treatment and in 100% by the ninth cycle, Dr. Byrd and his associates said (N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1509981). The most common adverse events were headache (43% of patients), diarrhea (39%), weight gain (26%), pyrexia (23%), and upper respiratory tract infection (23%). Fewer than 2% of patients developed severe diarrhea, rash, arthralgia, myalgia, bruising, or bleeding.

These findings offered strong justification to further investigate the efficacy and safety of acalabrutinib for relapsed CLL, and a phase III trial is now underway, the investigators added.

Ofatumumab has been approved for extended treatment of patients who are in complete or partial response after at least two lines of therapy for recurrent or progressive chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced on Jan. 19.

Ofatumumab (Arzerra Injection, Novartis Pharmaceuticals) was previously approved for treatment-naive patients with CLL for whom fludarabine-based therapy was considered inappropriate and for patients with CLL refractory to fludarabine and alemtuzumab.

Courtesy Wikimedia Commons/FitzColinGerald/Creative Commons License

Approval of the new indication was based on the results of a randomized, open-label trial that found improved progression-free survival with ofatumumab as compared with observation in patients whose disease had a complete or partial response after at least two lines of prior therapy, the FDA said in a press release.

In the study, 238 patients were randomized to ofatumumab and 236 to observation. Patients in the ofatumumab arm had received a range of two to five prior therapies. The median progression-free survival was significantly longer with ofatumumab at 29.4 months (95% confidence interval, 26.2-34.2) than with observation at 15.2 months (95% CI, 11.8-18.8).

Of patients treated with ofatumumab, 33% reported serious adverse reactions. The most common were pneumonia, pyrexia, and neutropenia (including febrile neutropenia).

The recommended dose and schedule for ofatumumab therapy is 300 mg by intravenous infusion on day 1 followed by 1,000 mg on day 8, and then 7 weeks later, and then every 8 weeks thereafter for up to a maximum of 2 years.

Full prescribing information is available at http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2016/125326s062lbl.pdf.

[email protected]

Ofatumumab has been approved for extended treatment of patients who are in complete or partial response after at least two lines of therapy for recurrent or progressive chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced on Jan. 19.

Ofatumumab (Arzerra Injection, Novartis Pharmaceuticals) was previously approved for treatment-naive patients with CLL for whom fludarabine-based therapy was considered inappropriate and for patients with CLL refractory to fludarabine and alemtuzumab.

Courtesy Wikimedia Commons/FitzColinGerald/Creative Commons License

Approval of the new indication was based on the results of a randomized, open-label trial that found improved progression-free survival with ofatumumab as compared with observation in patients whose disease had a complete or partial response after at least two lines of prior therapy, the FDA said in a press release.

In the study, 238 patients were randomized to ofatumumab and 236 to observation. Patients in the ofatumumab arm had received a range of two to five prior therapies. The median progression-free survival was significantly longer with ofatumumab at 29.4 months (95% confidence interval, 26.2-34.2) than with observation at 15.2 months (95% CI, 11.8-18.8).

Of patients treated with ofatumumab, 33% reported serious adverse reactions. The most common were pneumonia, pyrexia, and neutropenia (including febrile neutropenia).

The recommended dose and schedule for ofatumumab therapy is 300 mg by intravenous infusion on day 1 followed by 1,000 mg on day 8, and then 7 weeks later, and then every 8 weeks thereafter for up to a maximum of 2 years.

Full prescribing information is available at http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2016/125326s062lbl.pdf.

[email protected]

Ofatumumab has been approved for extended treatment of patients who are in complete or partial response after at least two lines of therapy for recurrent or progressive chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced on Jan. 19.

Ofatumumab (Arzerra Injection, Novartis Pharmaceuticals) was previously approved for treatment-naive patients with CLL for whom fludarabine-based therapy was considered inappropriate and for patients with CLL refractory to fludarabine and alemtuzumab.

Courtesy Wikimedia Commons/FitzColinGerald/Creative Commons License

Approval of the new indication was based on the results of a randomized, open-label trial that found improved progression-free survival with ofatumumab as compared with observation in patients whose disease had a complete or partial response after at least two lines of prior therapy, the FDA said in a press release.

In the study, 238 patients were randomized to ofatumumab and 236 to observation. Patients in the ofatumumab arm had received a range of two to five prior therapies. The median progression-free survival was significantly longer with ofatumumab at 29.4 months (95% confidence interval, 26.2-34.2) than with observation at 15.2 months (95% CI, 11.8-18.8).

Of patients treated with ofatumumab, 33% reported serious adverse reactions. The most common were pneumonia, pyrexia, and neutropenia (including febrile neutropenia).

The recommended dose and schedule for ofatumumab therapy is 300 mg by intravenous infusion on day 1 followed by 1,000 mg on day 8, and then 7 weeks later, and then every 8 weeks thereafter for up to a maximum of 2 years.

Full prescribing information is available at http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2016/125326s062lbl.pdf.

[email protected]

ORLANDO – Venetoclax monotherapy achieved an overall response rate of 79% in a high-risk population of 107 patients with relapsed or refractory del(17p) chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Dr. Stephan Stilgenbauer reported in a late-breaking abstract at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Of the 85 responders, the response was maintained at 1 year in 85%. Of the 45 patients assessed for minimal residual disease in the blood, 18 achieved MRD negativity. Ten of these 18 patients also had bone marrow assessments and six were MRD negative.

Dr. Stilgenbauer of the University of Ulm (Germany), discussed the implications of the phase II study findings in our exclusive interview at ASH, as well as phase III study plans and the use of venetoclax in combination therapies.

He receives honoraria or research funding from a wide range of companies, including AbbVie and Genentech, the companies collaborating on the development of venetoclax.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

ORLANDO – Venetoclax monotherapy achieved an overall response rate of 79% in a high-risk population of 107 patients with relapsed or refractory del(17p) chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Dr. Stephan Stilgenbauer reported in a late-breaking abstract at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Of the 85 responders, the response was maintained at 1 year in 85%. Of the 45 patients assessed for minimal residual disease in the blood, 18 achieved MRD negativity. Ten of these 18 patients also had bone marrow assessments and six were MRD negative.

Dr. Stilgenbauer of the University of Ulm (Germany), discussed the implications of the phase II study findings in our exclusive interview at ASH, as well as phase III study plans and the use of venetoclax in combination therapies.

He receives honoraria or research funding from a wide range of companies, including AbbVie and Genentech, the companies collaborating on the development of venetoclax.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

ORLANDO – Venetoclax monotherapy achieved an overall response rate of 79% in a high-risk population of 107 patients with relapsed or refractory del(17p) chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Dr. Stephan Stilgenbauer reported in a late-breaking abstract at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Of the 85 responders, the response was maintained at 1 year in 85%. Of the 45 patients assessed for minimal residual disease in the blood, 18 achieved MRD negativity. Ten of these 18 patients also had bone marrow assessments and six were MRD negative.

Dr. Stilgenbauer of the University of Ulm (Germany), discussed the implications of the phase II study findings in our exclusive interview at ASH, as well as phase III study plans and the use of venetoclax in combination therapies.

He receives honoraria or research funding from a wide range of companies, including AbbVie and Genentech, the companies collaborating on the development of venetoclax.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

Ibrutinib may prove useful for patients whose chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) relapses after allogeneic stem cell transplantation, Dr. C. S. Link and colleagues reported.

Ibrutinib has shown efficacy in patients with high-risk CLL, but there are few data from patients who relapsed after allogeneic stem cell transplantation, wrote Dr. Link of the Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus and the DFG Research Center for Regenerative Therapies, both at the Technische Universität Dresden (Germany).

The researchers performed analyses on cytokine levels and direct measuring of CD4 Th1 and CD4 Th2 cells in a study of five CLL patients treated with ibrutinib for relapse after allogeneic transplants. All patients had partial responses to ibrutinib and one had a minimal residual disease–negative remission.

At 1 year, none of the patients had relapsed; however, one patient died of pneumonia while on ibrutinib treatment. No other unexpected adverse events were observed, the researchers reported in the study, which was published online on Jan. 11.

No substantial changes in T-cell distribution in favor of a CD4 Th1 T-cell shift were noted based on flow cytometry and analyses of T cell–mediated cytokine levels. No acute exacerbations of graft-versus-host disease occurred.

Click here to read the study (Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016 Jan 11. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2015.339).

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

Ibrutinib may prove useful for patients whose chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) relapses after allogeneic stem cell transplantation, Dr. C. S. Link and colleagues reported.

Ibrutinib has shown efficacy in patients with high-risk CLL, but there are few data from patients who relapsed after allogeneic stem cell transplantation, wrote Dr. Link of the Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus and the DFG Research Center for Regenerative Therapies, both at the Technische Universität Dresden (Germany).

The researchers performed analyses on cytokine levels and direct measuring of CD4 Th1 and CD4 Th2 cells in a study of five CLL patients treated with ibrutinib for relapse after allogeneic transplants. All patients had partial responses to ibrutinib and one had a minimal residual disease–negative remission.

At 1 year, none of the patients had relapsed; however, one patient died of pneumonia while on ibrutinib treatment. No other unexpected adverse events were observed, the researchers reported in the study, which was published online on Jan. 11.

No substantial changes in T-cell distribution in favor of a CD4 Th1 T-cell shift were noted based on flow cytometry and analyses of T cell–mediated cytokine levels. No acute exacerbations of graft-versus-host disease occurred.

Click here to read the study (Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016 Jan 11. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2015.339).

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

Ibrutinib may prove useful for patients whose chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) relapses after allogeneic stem cell transplantation, Dr. C. S. Link and colleagues reported.

Ibrutinib has shown efficacy in patients with high-risk CLL, but there are few data from patients who relapsed after allogeneic stem cell transplantation, wrote Dr. Link of the Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus and the DFG Research Center for Regenerative Therapies, both at the Technische Universität Dresden (Germany).

The researchers performed analyses on cytokine levels and direct measuring of CD4 Th1 and CD4 Th2 cells in a study of five CLL patients treated with ibrutinib for relapse after allogeneic transplants. All patients had partial responses to ibrutinib and one had a minimal residual disease–negative remission.

At 1 year, none of the patients had relapsed; however, one patient died of pneumonia while on ibrutinib treatment. No other unexpected adverse events were observed, the researchers reported in the study, which was published online on Jan. 11.

No substantial changes in T-cell distribution in favor of a CD4 Th1 T-cell shift were noted based on flow cytometry and analyses of T cell–mediated cytokine levels. No acute exacerbations of graft-versus-host disease occurred.

Click here to read the study (Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016 Jan 11. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2015.339).

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

SAN FRANCISCO – Novel targeted agents offer more options for treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and if properly leveraged, may be able to shorten the time on treatment, improving acceptability to patients and possibly reducing treatment costs, according to Dr. William G. Wierda.

BTK inhibitors

Agents that inhibit Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) block signaling through the B-cell receptor in CLL, triggering apoptosis, said Dr. Wierda, professor and medical director, department of leukemia, division of cancer medicine, at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston. One such agent, ibrutinib (Imbruvica), is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of relapsed CLL and for treatment of newly diagnosed CLL having 17p deletion, a high-risk factor.

Results from RESONATE-2, a randomized trial comparing ibrutinib with chlorambucil as frontline therapy in older adults with CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma, will be reported later this year. “We don’t know the details of that publicly yet, but we do know from a press release that it is a positive trial and showed improvement in outcomes for ibrutinib-treated patients. With that data, we will likely have an expanded label for ibrutinib into the frontline setting, at least for the elderly population,” he said at the NCCN Annual Congress: Hematologic Malignancies.

Longer-term data, collected 3 years after patients started ibrutinib monotherapy, have been very good, with overall response rates of 90% in those with relapsed or refractory disease and 87% in those with treatment-naive disease (ASCO 2014. Abstract 7014). “The last time I saw these data updated, the complete remission portions have increased. So as patients remain on the treatment, responses do improve,” Dr. Wierda noted. Complete remission rates now are about 14% and 24%, respectively. Median progression-free survival has not been reached in either group.

Data from the randomized RESONATE trial, which led to ibrutinib’s approval in relapsed CLL, showed benefit relative to ofatumumab across subgroups, including patients who had disease that was refractory to purine analogs, who had the 17p deletion and who had received at least three prior regimens (ASCO 2014. Abstract LBA7008).

The main grade 3 or 4 toxicity of ibrutinib in patients with CLL is infections, but atrial fibrillation and bleeding/hemorrhage are each seen in about 5% of patients. “The trials all excluded patients on warfarin, so we do not recommend treating patients with ibrutinib who are on warfarin,” Dr. Wierda commented. “If patients are anticoagulated on warfarin and we want to put them on ibrutinib, I will usually switch them over to something like Xarelto [rivaroxaban],” he said. Toxicity generally declines with longer treatment.

Discontinuations because of toxicity or Richter transformation usually occur within the first 18 months (JAMA Oncol. 2015;1[1]:80-7). “The concerning [point] for me though is the patients who develop refractory disease. … The incidence starts to go up significantly as you go out beyond 30 or 36 months,” he said. “We are reviewing our data right now to see if we make a similar observation. But that suggests to me that the longer the patients stay on treatment, the more at risk they are for progressing and developing refractory disease.”

The HELIOS trial tested addition of ibrutinib to bendamustine (Treanda) and rituximab (Rituxan) (ASCO 2015. Abstract LBA7005). Results showed superior progression-free survival with the three-drug combination. “But the question that always comes up when this data is presented is, well, how would it compare with ibrutinib monotherapy? Until that question for me is adequately addressed … I would probably be inclined to give patients ibrutinib monotherapy over the combination,” Dr. Wierda said.

Trials are testing a wide range of other combinations. “To me, this suggests that we really don’t have a direction or a rational strategy for combinations with these agents. … Right now, I’m excited about combining ibrutinib with venetoclax. … They seem clinically complementary, and there is some laboratory data that suggests as well that there will be a complementary mechanism of action.”

PI3 kinase inhibitors

Inhibitors of PI3 kinase also block signaling through the B-cell receptor. In this drug class, idelalisib (Zydelig) is approved for treating relapsed CLL in combination with rituximab.

The phase III trial establishing efficacy of this combination showed that it improved both progression-free and overall survival over rituximab alone (ASH 2014. Abstract 330). Median progression-free survival was 19.4 months. There was similar benefit across various subgroups, including patients with 17p deletion or an unmutated IGHV gene, another high-risk factor.

One of the main toxicities of idelalisib, elevation of liver function test results, typically occurs early and is usually not treatment limiting. Colitis occurs with two predominant patterns: early onset and late onset. “The early colitis in my experience hasn’t necessarily been treatment limiting. We can usually get those patients through their diarrhea [by] withholding the drug; sometimes we’ll give budesonide, and can restart the drug at a lower dose,” Dr. Wierda said. “It’s the late colitis that we have difficulty with – colitis that occurs after patients have been on 3 months, 6 months. And in my experience, those patients have had more severe colitis, and it’s been more treatment limiting.”

Ongoing trials are testing idelalisib in combinations for CLL as well. “Certainly, there’s a number of strategies, and as with ibrutinib, it’s difficult for me to identify a rational combination or a clear combination that I think is going to be superior or a significant advance,” he said. Trials are also testing other PI3 kinase inhibitors, such as duvelisib (IPI-145), now in a phase III registration trial in patients with relapsed or refractory disease.

BCL-2 inhibitors

The investigational agent venetoclax (formerly ABT-199/GDC-199) inhibits BCL-2, which is overexpressed in CLL and renders the cells resistant to apoptosis. It has advanced to a pair of phase III trials, one testing it when combined with rituximab and the other when combined with obinutuzumab (Gazyva).

When used as monotherapy for patients with relapsed disease, venetoclax achieved an overall response rate of 77% and a complete response rate of 23% (EHA 2014. Abstract S702). Benefit was similar among high-risk groups, including patients with the 17p deletion or fludarabine-refractory disease. With a median follow-up of 5.3 months, median progression-free survival for patients treated at the full dose has not been reached.

In earlier trials, venetoclax was associated with a problematic tumor lysis syndrome, according to Dr. Wierda. But that issue has largely been resolved by starting at a low dose and escalating gradually to a full dose; in the trial, it was seen in 7% of patients. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse event was neutropenia, seen in 33% of patients; however, this toxicity can usually be managed with growth factors and dose reduction, he said.

The combination of venetoclax with rituximab in relapsed CLL yields an 88% overall response rate and a 31% complete response rate (ASH 2014. Abstract 325). Respective values were 78% and 22% in patients with 17p deletion. Moreover, some patients were found to have become negative for minimal residual disease on the combination, although it was not systematically assessed, Dr. Wierda noted.

“Venetoclax is a drug we will hear more about. … It has activity. I think it has a future in treating CLL, and it will be approved in time,” he said.

Leveraging targeted therapies

These new targeted agents, and others in the pipeline, could potentially be leveraged in several ways to improve CLL treatment strategies, according to Dr. Wierda.

Importantly, if ibrutinib becomes approved for universal frontline therapy, a large share of patients are likely to achieve partial remission. “We know if patients are in partial remission, you can’t really stop their treatment on ibrutinib; they will progress. And there was some data reported at ASH [American Society of Hematology] this past year that patients who were on a lower dose or patients who had dose interruption did poorer,” he said. Furthermore, most patients don’t like to be on treatment indefinitely.

“So we’re working on trials to expand our options for consolidation strategies in patients who have been on ibrutinib. We are trying to push them over into a complete remission by adding additional agents,” he explained.

For example, an ongoing trial is testing addition of nivolumab (Opdivo), an immune checkpoint inhibitor, in patients who have been on ibrutinib for at least 9 months and still have a partial remission. “The strategy with that is to try to consolidate them and to get them into a deep remission, where we can have a discussion about holding their treatment or stopping their treatment, or at least to the point where we are comfortable doing that,” he said.

Dr. Wierda disclosed that he has various relationships with AbbVie, Ascerta, Celgene, Emergent BioSolutions, Genentech, Genzyme, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Juno Therapeutics, Karyopharm, Kite Pharma, Merck, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Pharmacyclics, Roche Laboratories, and Sanofi-Aventis U.S.

SAN FRANCISCO – Novel targeted agents offer more options for treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and if properly leveraged, may be able to shorten the time on treatment, improving acceptability to patients and possibly reducing treatment costs, according to Dr. William G. Wierda.

BTK inhibitors

Agents that inhibit Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) block signaling through the B-cell receptor in CLL, triggering apoptosis, said Dr. Wierda, professor and medical director, department of leukemia, division of cancer medicine, at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston. One such agent, ibrutinib (Imbruvica), is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of relapsed CLL and for treatment of newly diagnosed CLL having 17p deletion, a high-risk factor.

Results from RESONATE-2, a randomized trial comparing ibrutinib with chlorambucil as frontline therapy in older adults with CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma, will be reported later this year. “We don’t know the details of that publicly yet, but we do know from a press release that it is a positive trial and showed improvement in outcomes for ibrutinib-treated patients. With that data, we will likely have an expanded label for ibrutinib into the frontline setting, at least for the elderly population,” he said at the NCCN Annual Congress: Hematologic Malignancies.

Longer-term data, collected 3 years after patients started ibrutinib monotherapy, have been very good, with overall response rates of 90% in those with relapsed or refractory disease and 87% in those with treatment-naive disease (ASCO 2014. Abstract 7014). “The last time I saw these data updated, the complete remission portions have increased. So as patients remain on the treatment, responses do improve,” Dr. Wierda noted. Complete remission rates now are about 14% and 24%, respectively. Median progression-free survival has not been reached in either group.

Data from the randomized RESONATE trial, which led to ibrutinib’s approval in relapsed CLL, showed benefit relative to ofatumumab across subgroups, including patients who had disease that was refractory to purine analogs, who had the 17p deletion and who had received at least three prior regimens (ASCO 2014. Abstract LBA7008).

The main grade 3 or 4 toxicity of ibrutinib in patients with CLL is infections, but atrial fibrillation and bleeding/hemorrhage are each seen in about 5% of patients. “The trials all excluded patients on warfarin, so we do not recommend treating patients with ibrutinib who are on warfarin,” Dr. Wierda commented. “If patients are anticoagulated on warfarin and we want to put them on ibrutinib, I will usually switch them over to something like Xarelto [rivaroxaban],” he said. Toxicity generally declines with longer treatment.

Discontinuations because of toxicity or Richter transformation usually occur within the first 18 months (JAMA Oncol. 2015;1[1]:80-7). “The concerning [point] for me though is the patients who develop refractory disease. … The incidence starts to go up significantly as you go out beyond 30 or 36 months,” he said. “We are reviewing our data right now to see if we make a similar observation. But that suggests to me that the longer the patients stay on treatment, the more at risk they are for progressing and developing refractory disease.”

The HELIOS trial tested addition of ibrutinib to bendamustine (Treanda) and rituximab (Rituxan) (ASCO 2015. Abstract LBA7005). Results showed superior progression-free survival with the three-drug combination. “But the question that always comes up when this data is presented is, well, how would it compare with ibrutinib monotherapy? Until that question for me is adequately addressed … I would probably be inclined to give patients ibrutinib monotherapy over the combination,” Dr. Wierda said.

Trials are testing a wide range of other combinations. “To me, this suggests that we really don’t have a direction or a rational strategy for combinations with these agents. … Right now, I’m excited about combining ibrutinib with venetoclax. … They seem clinically complementary, and there is some laboratory data that suggests as well that there will be a complementary mechanism of action.”

PI3 kinase inhibitors

Inhibitors of PI3 kinase also block signaling through the B-cell receptor. In this drug class, idelalisib (Zydelig) is approved for treating relapsed CLL in combination with rituximab.

The phase III trial establishing efficacy of this combination showed that it improved both progression-free and overall survival over rituximab alone (ASH 2014. Abstract 330). Median progression-free survival was 19.4 months. There was similar benefit across various subgroups, including patients with 17p deletion or an unmutated IGHV gene, another high-risk factor.

One of the main toxicities of idelalisib, elevation of liver function test results, typically occurs early and is usually not treatment limiting. Colitis occurs with two predominant patterns: early onset and late onset. “The early colitis in my experience hasn’t necessarily been treatment limiting. We can usually get those patients through their diarrhea [by] withholding the drug; sometimes we’ll give budesonide, and can restart the drug at a lower dose,” Dr. Wierda said. “It’s the late colitis that we have difficulty with – colitis that occurs after patients have been on 3 months, 6 months. And in my experience, those patients have had more severe colitis, and it’s been more treatment limiting.”

Ongoing trials are testing idelalisib in combinations for CLL as well. “Certainly, there’s a number of strategies, and as with ibrutinib, it’s difficult for me to identify a rational combination or a clear combination that I think is going to be superior or a significant advance,” he said. Trials are also testing other PI3 kinase inhibitors, such as duvelisib (IPI-145), now in a phase III registration trial in patients with relapsed or refractory disease.

BCL-2 inhibitors

The investigational agent venetoclax (formerly ABT-199/GDC-199) inhibits BCL-2, which is overexpressed in CLL and renders the cells resistant to apoptosis. It has advanced to a pair of phase III trials, one testing it when combined with rituximab and the other when combined with obinutuzumab (Gazyva).

When used as monotherapy for patients with relapsed disease, venetoclax achieved an overall response rate of 77% and a complete response rate of 23% (EHA 2014. Abstract S702). Benefit was similar among high-risk groups, including patients with the 17p deletion or fludarabine-refractory disease. With a median follow-up of 5.3 months, median progression-free survival for patients treated at the full dose has not been reached.

In earlier trials, venetoclax was associated with a problematic tumor lysis syndrome, according to Dr. Wierda. But that issue has largely been resolved by starting at a low dose and escalating gradually to a full dose; in the trial, it was seen in 7% of patients. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse event was neutropenia, seen in 33% of patients; however, this toxicity can usually be managed with growth factors and dose reduction, he said.

The combination of venetoclax with rituximab in relapsed CLL yields an 88% overall response rate and a 31% complete response rate (ASH 2014. Abstract 325). Respective values were 78% and 22% in patients with 17p deletion. Moreover, some patients were found to have become negative for minimal residual disease on the combination, although it was not systematically assessed, Dr. Wierda noted.

“Venetoclax is a drug we will hear more about. … It has activity. I think it has a future in treating CLL, and it will be approved in time,” he said.

Leveraging targeted therapies

These new targeted agents, and others in the pipeline, could potentially be leveraged in several ways to improve CLL treatment strategies, according to Dr. Wierda.

Importantly, if ibrutinib becomes approved for universal frontline therapy, a large share of patients are likely to achieve partial remission. “We know if patients are in partial remission, you can’t really stop their treatment on ibrutinib; they will progress. And there was some data reported at ASH [American Society of Hematology] this past year that patients who were on a lower dose or patients who had dose interruption did poorer,” he said. Furthermore, most patients don’t like to be on treatment indefinitely.

“So we’re working on trials to expand our options for consolidation strategies in patients who have been on ibrutinib. We are trying to push them over into a complete remission by adding additional agents,” he explained.

For example, an ongoing trial is testing addition of nivolumab (Opdivo), an immune checkpoint inhibitor, in patients who have been on ibrutinib for at least 9 months and still have a partial remission. “The strategy with that is to try to consolidate them and to get them into a deep remission, where we can have a discussion about holding their treatment or stopping their treatment, or at least to the point where we are comfortable doing that,” he said.

Dr. Wierda disclosed that he has various relationships with AbbVie, Ascerta, Celgene, Emergent BioSolutions, Genentech, Genzyme, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Juno Therapeutics, Karyopharm, Kite Pharma, Merck, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Pharmacyclics, Roche Laboratories, and Sanofi-Aventis U.S.

SAN FRANCISCO – Novel targeted agents offer more options for treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and if properly leveraged, may be able to shorten the time on treatment, improving acceptability to patients and possibly reducing treatment costs, according to Dr. William G. Wierda.

BTK inhibitors

Agents that inhibit Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) block signaling through the B-cell receptor in CLL, triggering apoptosis, said Dr. Wierda, professor and medical director, department of leukemia, division of cancer medicine, at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston. One such agent, ibrutinib (Imbruvica), is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of relapsed CLL and for treatment of newly diagnosed CLL having 17p deletion, a high-risk factor.

Results from RESONATE-2, a randomized trial comparing ibrutinib with chlorambucil as frontline therapy in older adults with CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma, will be reported later this year. “We don’t know the details of that publicly yet, but we do know from a press release that it is a positive trial and showed improvement in outcomes for ibrutinib-treated patients. With that data, we will likely have an expanded label for ibrutinib into the frontline setting, at least for the elderly population,” he said at the NCCN Annual Congress: Hematologic Malignancies.

Longer-term data, collected 3 years after patients started ibrutinib monotherapy, have been very good, with overall response rates of 90% in those with relapsed or refractory disease and 87% in those with treatment-naive disease (ASCO 2014. Abstract 7014). “The last time I saw these data updated, the complete remission portions have increased. So as patients remain on the treatment, responses do improve,” Dr. Wierda noted. Complete remission rates now are about 14% and 24%, respectively. Median progression-free survival has not been reached in either group.

Data from the randomized RESONATE trial, which led to ibrutinib’s approval in relapsed CLL, showed benefit relative to ofatumumab across subgroups, including patients who had disease that was refractory to purine analogs, who had the 17p deletion and who had received at least three prior regimens (ASCO 2014. Abstract LBA7008).

The main grade 3 or 4 toxicity of ibrutinib in patients with CLL is infections, but atrial fibrillation and bleeding/hemorrhage are each seen in about 5% of patients. “The trials all excluded patients on warfarin, so we do not recommend treating patients with ibrutinib who are on warfarin,” Dr. Wierda commented. “If patients are anticoagulated on warfarin and we want to put them on ibrutinib, I will usually switch them over to something like Xarelto [rivaroxaban],” he said. Toxicity generally declines with longer treatment.

Discontinuations because of toxicity or Richter transformation usually occur within the first 18 months (JAMA Oncol. 2015;1[1]:80-7). “The concerning [point] for me though is the patients who develop refractory disease. … The incidence starts to go up significantly as you go out beyond 30 or 36 months,” he said. “We are reviewing our data right now to see if we make a similar observation. But that suggests to me that the longer the patients stay on treatment, the more at risk they are for progressing and developing refractory disease.”

The HELIOS trial tested addition of ibrutinib to bendamustine (Treanda) and rituximab (Rituxan) (ASCO 2015. Abstract LBA7005). Results showed superior progression-free survival with the three-drug combination. “But the question that always comes up when this data is presented is, well, how would it compare with ibrutinib monotherapy? Until that question for me is adequately addressed … I would probably be inclined to give patients ibrutinib monotherapy over the combination,” Dr. Wierda said.

Trials are testing a wide range of other combinations. “To me, this suggests that we really don’t have a direction or a rational strategy for combinations with these agents. … Right now, I’m excited about combining ibrutinib with venetoclax. … They seem clinically complementary, and there is some laboratory data that suggests as well that there will be a complementary mechanism of action.”

PI3 kinase inhibitors

Inhibitors of PI3 kinase also block signaling through the B-cell receptor. In this drug class, idelalisib (Zydelig) is approved for treating relapsed CLL in combination with rituximab.

The phase III trial establishing efficacy of this combination showed that it improved both progression-free and overall survival over rituximab alone (ASH 2014. Abstract 330). Median progression-free survival was 19.4 months. There was similar benefit across various subgroups, including patients with 17p deletion or an unmutated IGHV gene, another high-risk factor.

One of the main toxicities of idelalisib, elevation of liver function test results, typically occurs early and is usually not treatment limiting. Colitis occurs with two predominant patterns: early onset and late onset. “The early colitis in my experience hasn’t necessarily been treatment limiting. We can usually get those patients through their diarrhea [by] withholding the drug; sometimes we’ll give budesonide, and can restart the drug at a lower dose,” Dr. Wierda said. “It’s the late colitis that we have difficulty with – colitis that occurs after patients have been on 3 months, 6 months. And in my experience, those patients have had more severe colitis, and it’s been more treatment limiting.”

Ongoing trials are testing idelalisib in combinations for CLL as well. “Certainly, there’s a number of strategies, and as with ibrutinib, it’s difficult for me to identify a rational combination or a clear combination that I think is going to be superior or a significant advance,” he said. Trials are also testing other PI3 kinase inhibitors, such as duvelisib (IPI-145), now in a phase III registration trial in patients with relapsed or refractory disease.

BCL-2 inhibitors

The investigational agent venetoclax (formerly ABT-199/GDC-199) inhibits BCL-2, which is overexpressed in CLL and renders the cells resistant to apoptosis. It has advanced to a pair of phase III trials, one testing it when combined with rituximab and the other when combined with obinutuzumab (Gazyva).

When used as monotherapy for patients with relapsed disease, venetoclax achieved an overall response rate of 77% and a complete response rate of 23% (EHA 2014. Abstract S702). Benefit was similar among high-risk groups, including patients with the 17p deletion or fludarabine-refractory disease. With a median follow-up of 5.3 months, median progression-free survival for patients treated at the full dose has not been reached.

In earlier trials, venetoclax was associated with a problematic tumor lysis syndrome, according to Dr. Wierda. But that issue has largely been resolved by starting at a low dose and escalating gradually to a full dose; in the trial, it was seen in 7% of patients. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse event was neutropenia, seen in 33% of patients; however, this toxicity can usually be managed with growth factors and dose reduction, he said.

The combination of venetoclax with rituximab in relapsed CLL yields an 88% overall response rate and a 31% complete response rate (ASH 2014. Abstract 325). Respective values were 78% and 22% in patients with 17p deletion. Moreover, some patients were found to have become negative for minimal residual disease on the combination, although it was not systematically assessed, Dr. Wierda noted.

“Venetoclax is a drug we will hear more about. … It has activity. I think it has a future in treating CLL, and it will be approved in time,” he said.

Leveraging targeted therapies

These new targeted agents, and others in the pipeline, could potentially be leveraged in several ways to improve CLL treatment strategies, according to Dr. Wierda.

Importantly, if ibrutinib becomes approved for universal frontline therapy, a large share of patients are likely to achieve partial remission. “We know if patients are in partial remission, you can’t really stop their treatment on ibrutinib; they will progress. And there was some data reported at ASH [American Society of Hematology] this past year that patients who were on a lower dose or patients who had dose interruption did poorer,” he said. Furthermore, most patients don’t like to be on treatment indefinitely.

“So we’re working on trials to expand our options for consolidation strategies in patients who have been on ibrutinib. We are trying to push them over into a complete remission by adding additional agents,” he explained.

For example, an ongoing trial is testing addition of nivolumab (Opdivo), an immune checkpoint inhibitor, in patients who have been on ibrutinib for at least 9 months and still have a partial remission. “The strategy with that is to try to consolidate them and to get them into a deep remission, where we can have a discussion about holding their treatment or stopping their treatment, or at least to the point where we are comfortable doing that,” he said.

Dr. Wierda disclosed that he has various relationships with AbbVie, Ascerta, Celgene, Emergent BioSolutions, Genentech, Genzyme, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Juno Therapeutics, Karyopharm, Kite Pharma, Merck, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Pharmacyclics, Roche Laboratories, and Sanofi-Aventis U.S.

ORLANDO – An experimental combination of obinutuzumab and venetoclax appears safe as frontline therapy for patients with active, untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia and comorbidities.

In the safety run-in portion of a phase 3, open-label trial comparing the combination of obinutuzumab (Gazyva) and the investigational Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax with obinutuzumab and its usual partner chlorambucil in 12 patients, only two of seven patients classified as being at high risk for the tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) developed laboratory-defined TLS, and no patients had clinical TLS.

The combination did not meet any of the pre-specified stopping criteria, and early data hinted at efficacy for the combination, said Dr. Kirsten Fischer, from the Center for Integrated Oncology at University Hospital Cologne in Germany.

“As with previous reports, our data confirm rapid and profound reduction in lymphocyte counts after the first dose obinutuzumab in all 12 [evaluable] patients,” she said at the American Society of Hematology annual meeting.

In the CLL 11 trial, investigators in the German CLL group previously showed that the combination of the anti-CD20 antibody obinutuzumab and chlorambucil resulted in improved overall survival compared to chlorambucil alone in patients with previously untreated CLL and coexisting medical conditions. The combination is approved in the United States for adults with treatment-naïve CLL.

Venetoclax has been shown to have good efficacy against relapsed/refractory CLL both as monotherapy and in combination with rituximab, prompting the investigators to explore it in combination with the rituximab follow-on drug obinutuzumab.

In the safety run-in phase of the CLL 14 trial, the investigators enrolled 13 adults (median age 75, range 59-88 years) with newly diagnosed, active confirmed CLL and coexisting medical conditions as determined either by a score greater 6 on the cumulative illness rating scale (CIRS) or by estimated creatinine clearance less than 70 mL/min.

The patients were treated with 6 cycles of obinutuzumab and venetoclax followed by 6 additional cycles of venetoclax. Obinutuzumab was administered intravenously 100 mg on day 1 and 900 mg on day 2, with the option to deliver 1,000 mg on day 1 instead, then 1,000 mg on days 8 and 15 of cycle 1, and 1,000 mg on day 1 for cycles 2-6.

The dose of venetoclax was titrated upward gradually, with doses of 20 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, and up to 400 mg administered starting on day 22 of cycle 1.

Planned stopping criteria were one treatment-related death or a grade 4 adverse event related to clinical TLS despite prophylaxis as specified by the protocol.

At the time of data cutoff (October 2015), 12 patients had been on treatment for at least 4 weeks and had reached the maximum venetoclax dose. Two patients had reached 11 cycles, three had reached 10 cycles, and seven had reached 8 cycles.

Grade 1 or 2 adverse events in all 13 enrolled patients included infusion-related reactions in 8; infections in 6; diarrhea, hyperkalemia, and constipation in 5; nausea, dizziness and cough in 4; and fatigue, headache and pruritus in 3.

Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia in five patients; infusion related reactions; syncope, thrombocytopenia and laboratory-defined TLS in two patients; and bradycardia, hyperglycemia, influenza, leucopenia, pyrexia, respiratory tract infection, and elevated transaminases in one patient each.

As noted, all 12 evaluable patients had rapid drops in absolute lymphocyte counts, and all but one had complete resolution of lymphadenopathy after three cycles, with the improvement maintained after six cycles. The remaining patient had a decrease to near normal after both three and six cycles.

Of the 12 patients, 11 had a partial response after three cycles, and the remaining patient had stable disease, for an overall response rate of 92%. The overall response rate after six cycles was 100%, with all patients having a partial response.

The data were sufficiently good to justify continuing with the randomized phase, which began in August 2015, Dr. Fischer noted.

The study is sponsored by Hoffman-La Roche and AbbVie. Dr. Fischer disclosed receiving travel grants from Hoffman-La Roche.

ORLANDO – An experimental combination of obinutuzumab and venetoclax appears safe as frontline therapy for patients with active, untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia and comorbidities.

In the safety run-in portion of a phase 3, open-label trial comparing the combination of obinutuzumab (Gazyva) and the investigational Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax with obinutuzumab and its usual partner chlorambucil in 12 patients, only two of seven patients classified as being at high risk for the tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) developed laboratory-defined TLS, and no patients had clinical TLS.

The combination did not meet any of the pre-specified stopping criteria, and early data hinted at efficacy for the combination, said Dr. Kirsten Fischer, from the Center for Integrated Oncology at University Hospital Cologne in Germany.

“As with previous reports, our data confirm rapid and profound reduction in lymphocyte counts after the first dose obinutuzumab in all 12 [evaluable] patients,” she said at the American Society of Hematology annual meeting.

In the CLL 11 trial, investigators in the German CLL group previously showed that the combination of the anti-CD20 antibody obinutuzumab and chlorambucil resulted in improved overall survival compared to chlorambucil alone in patients with previously untreated CLL and coexisting medical conditions. The combination is approved in the United States for adults with treatment-naïve CLL.

Venetoclax has been shown to have good efficacy against relapsed/refractory CLL both as monotherapy and in combination with rituximab, prompting the investigators to explore it in combination with the rituximab follow-on drug obinutuzumab.

In the safety run-in phase of the CLL 14 trial, the investigators enrolled 13 adults (median age 75, range 59-88 years) with newly diagnosed, active confirmed CLL and coexisting medical conditions as determined either by a score greater 6 on the cumulative illness rating scale (CIRS) or by estimated creatinine clearance less than 70 mL/min.

The patients were treated with 6 cycles of obinutuzumab and venetoclax followed by 6 additional cycles of venetoclax. Obinutuzumab was administered intravenously 100 mg on day 1 and 900 mg on day 2, with the option to deliver 1,000 mg on day 1 instead, then 1,000 mg on days 8 and 15 of cycle 1, and 1,000 mg on day 1 for cycles 2-6.

The dose of venetoclax was titrated upward gradually, with doses of 20 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, and up to 400 mg administered starting on day 22 of cycle 1.

Planned stopping criteria were one treatment-related death or a grade 4 adverse event related to clinical TLS despite prophylaxis as specified by the protocol.

At the time of data cutoff (October 2015), 12 patients had been on treatment for at least 4 weeks and had reached the maximum venetoclax dose. Two patients had reached 11 cycles, three had reached 10 cycles, and seven had reached 8 cycles.

Grade 1 or 2 adverse events in all 13 enrolled patients included infusion-related reactions in 8; infections in 6; diarrhea, hyperkalemia, and constipation in 5; nausea, dizziness and cough in 4; and fatigue, headache and pruritus in 3.

Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia in five patients; infusion related reactions; syncope, thrombocytopenia and laboratory-defined TLS in two patients; and bradycardia, hyperglycemia, influenza, leucopenia, pyrexia, respiratory tract infection, and elevated transaminases in one patient each.

As noted, all 12 evaluable patients had rapid drops in absolute lymphocyte counts, and all but one had complete resolution of lymphadenopathy after three cycles, with the improvement maintained after six cycles. The remaining patient had a decrease to near normal after both three and six cycles.

Of the 12 patients, 11 had a partial response after three cycles, and the remaining patient had stable disease, for an overall response rate of 92%. The overall response rate after six cycles was 100%, with all patients having a partial response.

The data were sufficiently good to justify continuing with the randomized phase, which began in August 2015, Dr. Fischer noted.

The study is sponsored by Hoffman-La Roche and AbbVie. Dr. Fischer disclosed receiving travel grants from Hoffman-La Roche.

ORLANDO – An experimental combination of obinutuzumab and venetoclax appears safe as frontline therapy for patients with active, untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia and comorbidities.

In the safety run-in portion of a phase 3, open-label trial comparing the combination of obinutuzumab (Gazyva) and the investigational Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax with obinutuzumab and its usual partner chlorambucil in 12 patients, only two of seven patients classified as being at high risk for the tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) developed laboratory-defined TLS, and no patients had clinical TLS.

The combination did not meet any of the pre-specified stopping criteria, and early data hinted at efficacy for the combination, said Dr. Kirsten Fischer, from the Center for Integrated Oncology at University Hospital Cologne in Germany.

“As with previous reports, our data confirm rapid and profound reduction in lymphocyte counts after the first dose obinutuzumab in all 12 [evaluable] patients,” she said at the American Society of Hematology annual meeting.

In the CLL 11 trial, investigators in the German CLL group previously showed that the combination of the anti-CD20 antibody obinutuzumab and chlorambucil resulted in improved overall survival compared to chlorambucil alone in patients with previously untreated CLL and coexisting medical conditions. The combination is approved in the United States for adults with treatment-naïve CLL.

Venetoclax has been shown to have good efficacy against relapsed/refractory CLL both as monotherapy and in combination with rituximab, prompting the investigators to explore it in combination with the rituximab follow-on drug obinutuzumab.

In the safety run-in phase of the CLL 14 trial, the investigators enrolled 13 adults (median age 75, range 59-88 years) with newly diagnosed, active confirmed CLL and coexisting medical conditions as determined either by a score greater 6 on the cumulative illness rating scale (CIRS) or by estimated creatinine clearance less than 70 mL/min.

The patients were treated with 6 cycles of obinutuzumab and venetoclax followed by 6 additional cycles of venetoclax. Obinutuzumab was administered intravenously 100 mg on day 1 and 900 mg on day 2, with the option to deliver 1,000 mg on day 1 instead, then 1,000 mg on days 8 and 15 of cycle 1, and 1,000 mg on day 1 for cycles 2-6.

The dose of venetoclax was titrated upward gradually, with doses of 20 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, and up to 400 mg administered starting on day 22 of cycle 1.

Planned stopping criteria were one treatment-related death or a grade 4 adverse event related to clinical TLS despite prophylaxis as specified by the protocol.

At the time of data cutoff (October 2015), 12 patients had been on treatment for at least 4 weeks and had reached the maximum venetoclax dose. Two patients had reached 11 cycles, three had reached 10 cycles, and seven had reached 8 cycles.

Grade 1 or 2 adverse events in all 13 enrolled patients included infusion-related reactions in 8; infections in 6; diarrhea, hyperkalemia, and constipation in 5; nausea, dizziness and cough in 4; and fatigue, headache and pruritus in 3.

Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia in five patients; infusion related reactions; syncope, thrombocytopenia and laboratory-defined TLS in two patients; and bradycardia, hyperglycemia, influenza, leucopenia, pyrexia, respiratory tract infection, and elevated transaminases in one patient each.

As noted, all 12 evaluable patients had rapid drops in absolute lymphocyte counts, and all but one had complete resolution of lymphadenopathy after three cycles, with the improvement maintained after six cycles. The remaining patient had a decrease to near normal after both three and six cycles.

Of the 12 patients, 11 had a partial response after three cycles, and the remaining patient had stable disease, for an overall response rate of 92%. The overall response rate after six cycles was 100%, with all patients having a partial response.

The data were sufficiently good to justify continuing with the randomized phase, which began in August 2015, Dr. Fischer noted.

The study is sponsored by Hoffman-La Roche and AbbVie. Dr. Fischer disclosed receiving travel grants from Hoffman-La Roche.

The Food and Drug Administration has approved a new rapid-infusion form of bendamustine hydrochloride for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

The new formulation of bendamustine (Bendeka) is a 50-mL liquid designed for 10-minute infusion. It was granted orphan drug status for both the leukemia and lymphoma indications.

Bendeka is approved as primary therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and also for indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) that has progressed during or within 6 months of treatment with rituximab or a rituximab-containing regimen.

According to the prescribing information, the recommended dosing regimen for CLL is 100 mg/m² infused intravenously over 10 minutes on days 1 and 2 of a 28-day cycle, up to six cycles. For NHL, the regimen calls for 120 mg/m² infused intravenously over 10 minutes on days 1 and 2 of a 21-day cycle, up to eight cycles.

The most common hematologic adverse reactions are lymphopenia, anemia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia. Bendamustine has been associated with severe – and even fatal – myelosuppression.

Bendeka is manufactured by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries and succeeds Teva’s previously approved form of bendamustine, Treanda, approved in 2008. “Since 2008, Treanda has played a valuable role in the treatment of patients with CLL or indolent B-cell NHL that has progressed,” Paul Rittman, Teva Oncology’s vice president and general manager, said in a press statement. Treanda’s orphan drug exclusivity status for the NHL indication was set to expire in October, and its pediatric exclusivity status for that indication, next April. Its CLL exclusivity status expired in September.

Teva purchased the new formulation from Eagle Pharmaceuticals last February. The deal was closed with an upfront payment of $30 million, and potential for up to $90 million in additional payments, as well as double-digit royalties on net sales.

At the time of purchase, Eagle had secured orphan drug designations for Bendeka in both CLL and NHL and had submitted the New Drug Application under priority review. Bendeka may be eligible for a 7-year exclusivity status.

The drug is scheduled to be available during the first quarter of 2016.

[email protected]

The Food and Drug Administration has approved a new rapid-infusion form of bendamustine hydrochloride for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

The new formulation of bendamustine (Bendeka) is a 50-mL liquid designed for 10-minute infusion. It was granted orphan drug status for both the leukemia and lymphoma indications.

Bendeka is approved as primary therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and also for indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) that has progressed during or within 6 months of treatment with rituximab or a rituximab-containing regimen.

According to the prescribing information, the recommended dosing regimen for CLL is 100 mg/m² infused intravenously over 10 minutes on days 1 and 2 of a 28-day cycle, up to six cycles. For NHL, the regimen calls for 120 mg/m² infused intravenously over 10 minutes on days 1 and 2 of a 21-day cycle, up to eight cycles.

The most common hematologic adverse reactions are lymphopenia, anemia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia. Bendamustine has been associated with severe – and even fatal – myelosuppression.

Bendeka is manufactured by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries and succeeds Teva’s previously approved form of bendamustine, Treanda, approved in 2008. “Since 2008, Treanda has played a valuable role in the treatment of patients with CLL or indolent B-cell NHL that has progressed,” Paul Rittman, Teva Oncology’s vice president and general manager, said in a press statement. Treanda’s orphan drug exclusivity status for the NHL indication was set to expire in October, and its pediatric exclusivity status for that indication, next April. Its CLL exclusivity status expired in September.

Teva purchased the new formulation from Eagle Pharmaceuticals last February. The deal was closed with an upfront payment of $30 million, and potential for up to $90 million in additional payments, as well as double-digit royalties on net sales.

At the time of purchase, Eagle had secured orphan drug designations for Bendeka in both CLL and NHL and had submitted the New Drug Application under priority review. Bendeka may be eligible for a 7-year exclusivity status.

The drug is scheduled to be available during the first quarter of 2016.

[email protected]

The Food and Drug Administration has approved a new rapid-infusion form of bendamustine hydrochloride for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

The new formulation of bendamustine (Bendeka) is a 50-mL liquid designed for 10-minute infusion. It was granted orphan drug status for both the leukemia and lymphoma indications.

Bendeka is approved as primary therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and also for indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) that has progressed during or within 6 months of treatment with rituximab or a rituximab-containing regimen.

According to the prescribing information, the recommended dosing regimen for CLL is 100 mg/m² infused intravenously over 10 minutes on days 1 and 2 of a 28-day cycle, up to six cycles. For NHL, the regimen calls for 120 mg/m² infused intravenously over 10 minutes on days 1 and 2 of a 21-day cycle, up to eight cycles.

The most common hematologic adverse reactions are lymphopenia, anemia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia. Bendamustine has been associated with severe – and even fatal – myelosuppression.

Bendeka is manufactured by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries and succeeds Teva’s previously approved form of bendamustine, Treanda, approved in 2008. “Since 2008, Treanda has played a valuable role in the treatment of patients with CLL or indolent B-cell NHL that has progressed,” Paul Rittman, Teva Oncology’s vice president and general manager, said in a press statement. Treanda’s orphan drug exclusivity status for the NHL indication was set to expire in October, and its pediatric exclusivity status for that indication, next April. Its CLL exclusivity status expired in September.

Teva purchased the new formulation from Eagle Pharmaceuticals last February. The deal was closed with an upfront payment of $30 million, and potential for up to $90 million in additional payments, as well as double-digit royalties on net sales.

At the time of purchase, Eagle had secured orphan drug designations for Bendeka in both CLL and NHL and had submitted the New Drug Application under priority review. Bendeka may be eligible for a 7-year exclusivity status.

The drug is scheduled to be available during the first quarter of 2016.

[email protected]

ORLANDO – Adding the PI3K inhibitor idelalisib to a standard regimen of bendamustine and rituximab significantly reduced the risk of both disease progression and death for patients with relapsed and/or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia, results of a phase III randomized trial showed.

At a median follow-up of 12 months, the primary endpoint of median progression-free survival was 23.1 months for patients treated with idelalisib (Zydelig), bendamustine, and rituximab (idel+BR), compared with 11.1 months for bendamustine and rituximab (BR) plus a placebo, reported Dr. Andrew Zelenetz of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.

“Median overall survival was not reached in either arm. However, there was a significant improvement in overall survival, with a 45% reduction in the risk of death [with idel+BR],” he said in a late-breaking abstract session at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The trial was stopped early after a data review at the first planned interim analysis showed significant superiority for the three-drug combination.

The results were consistent across subgroups, including patients with high-risk features such as deletion 17p and mutated TP53 (del[17p]/TP53), unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (IgHV), and treatment-refractory disease.

The rationale behind adding idelalisib, an inhibitor of the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K), is that signaling via the PI3K pathway is hyperactive and can be targeted, Dr. Zelenetz explained.

Study 115 was a phase III trial with accrual from June 2012 through August 2015. Investigators enrolled 416 patients with relapsed /refractory CLL and randomly assigned them to receive BR for six 28-day cycles of bendamustine (70 mg/m² on days 1 and 2 of each cycle) and rituximab (375 mg/m² for cycle 1, and 500 mg/m² for cycles 2 through 6), plus either idelalisib 150 mg b.i.d. or placebo, each administered continuously until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or death.

The patients were stratified by mutational and disease status (refractory defined as CLL progression less than 6 months from completion of prior therapy, or relapsed CLL progression 6 months or more from completion of prior therapy.

The trial was halted early after the first planned interim analysis, which was conducted after 75% of the total number of 260 planned events of CLL progression or death from any cause had occurred. The data cutoff was June 15, 2015.

The intention-to-treat analysis included 207 patients assigned to idelalisib and 209 assigned to placebo. Three-fourths (76%) of the patients were male.

In all, 46% of patients had Rai stage III/IV disease. The median time since the completion of the last therapy was 16 months.

The proportions of patients with high-risk features included del(17p)/p53 mutation in 32.9%, unmutated IgHV in 83.2%, and treatment-refractory disease in 29.8%.

As noted, the median progression-free survival with idelalisib at a median follow-up of 12 months was 23.1 months vs. 11.1 months for placebo. That translated into a hazard ratio of 0.33 (P less than .0001).

Among patients with neither del(17p) nor TP53 mutations, the HR for progression was 0.22. Among patients with either del(17p) or a TP53 mutation, the HR was 0.50 (95% confidence intervals show statistical significance for both).

Overall response rates were 68% among patients who received idelalisib, and 45% for those who received placebo. There were five complete responses (2%) in the idelalisib group and none in the placebo group.

The idelalisib group also had a higher proportion of patients with a greater than 50% reduction in involved lymph nodes (96% vs. 61%), and had better organomegaly responses (spleen and liver) and hematologic responses (hemoglobin, neutrophils, and platelets).

Grade 3 or greater adverse events occurred in 93% of patients on idelalisib, compared with 76% of those on placebo. The proportion of patients with any serious adverse event was 66% vs. 44%, respectively.

Adverse events leading to drug dose reduction were seen in 11% of idelalisib-treated patients, compared with 6% of placebo controls, and therapy was discontinued in 26% vs. 13%, respectively.

Ten patients in the idelalisib arm and seven in the placebo arm died during the study.

Adverse events that occurred more commonly with idelalisib included neutropenia, pyrexia, diarrhea, febrile neutropenia, pneumonia, rash, and elevated liver enzymes.

Session moderator Dr. David P. Steensma of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston asked Dr. Zelenetz how idelalisib plus BR stacked up to ibrutinib (Imbruvica) plus BR in this population.

Dr. Zelenetz noted that patients were excluded from the HELIOS trial of ibrutinib plus BR if they had del(17p). Comparing the subset of patients in Study 115 without del(17p) with patients in the ibrutinib study, “the results are virtually superimposable,” Dr. Zelenetz said, and “the two treatments are really remarkably similar.”

The overall survival benefit was larger in the HELIOS trial, Dr. Zelenetz noted, but that was largely because the trial allowed patients to cross over from placebo to the active drug.

Gilead Sciences funded Study 115. Dr. Zelenetz disclosed receiving research funding from the company and discussing off-label use of idelalisib for relapsed/refractory CLL.

ORLANDO – Adding the PI3K inhibitor idelalisib to a standard regimen of bendamustine and rituximab significantly reduced the risk of both disease progression and death for patients with relapsed and/or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia, results of a phase III randomized trial showed.

At a median follow-up of 12 months, the primary endpoint of median progression-free survival was 23.1 months for patients treated with idelalisib (Zydelig), bendamustine, and rituximab (idel+BR), compared with 11.1 months for bendamustine and rituximab (BR) plus a placebo, reported Dr. Andrew Zelenetz of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.

“Median overall survival was not reached in either arm. However, there was a significant improvement in overall survival, with a 45% reduction in the risk of death [with idel+BR],” he said in a late-breaking abstract session at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The trial was stopped early after a data review at the first planned interim analysis showed significant superiority for the three-drug combination.

The results were consistent across subgroups, including patients with high-risk features such as deletion 17p and mutated TP53 (del[17p]/TP53), unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (IgHV), and treatment-refractory disease.

The rationale behind adding idelalisib, an inhibitor of the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K), is that signaling via the PI3K pathway is hyperactive and can be targeted, Dr. Zelenetz explained.

Study 115 was a phase III trial with accrual from June 2012 through August 2015. Investigators enrolled 416 patients with relapsed /refractory CLL and randomly assigned them to receive BR for six 28-day cycles of bendamustine (70 mg/m² on days 1 and 2 of each cycle) and rituximab (375 mg/m² for cycle 1, and 500 mg/m² for cycles 2 through 6), plus either idelalisib 150 mg b.i.d. or placebo, each administered continuously until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or death.

The patients were stratified by mutational and disease status (refractory defined as CLL progression less than 6 months from completion of prior therapy, or relapsed CLL progression 6 months or more from completion of prior therapy.

The trial was halted early after the first planned interim analysis, which was conducted after 75% of the total number of 260 planned events of CLL progression or death from any cause had occurred. The data cutoff was June 15, 2015.

The intention-to-treat analysis included 207 patients assigned to idelalisib and 209 assigned to placebo. Three-fourths (76%) of the patients were male.

In all, 46% of patients had Rai stage III/IV disease. The median time since the completion of the last therapy was 16 months.

The proportions of patients with high-risk features included del(17p)/p53 mutation in 32.9%, unmutated IgHV in 83.2%, and treatment-refractory disease in 29.8%.

As noted, the median progression-free survival with idelalisib at a median follow-up of 12 months was 23.1 months vs. 11.1 months for placebo. That translated into a hazard ratio of 0.33 (P less than .0001).

Among patients with neither del(17p) nor TP53 mutations, the HR for progression was 0.22. Among patients with either del(17p) or a TP53 mutation, the HR was 0.50 (95% confidence intervals show statistical significance for both).

Overall response rates were 68% among patients who received idelalisib, and 45% for those who received placebo. There were five complete responses (2%) in the idelalisib group and none in the placebo group.

The idelalisib group also had a higher proportion of patients with a greater than 50% reduction in involved lymph nodes (96% vs. 61%), and had better organomegaly responses (spleen and liver) and hematologic responses (hemoglobin, neutrophils, and platelets).

Grade 3 or greater adverse events occurred in 93% of patients on idelalisib, compared with 76% of those on placebo. The proportion of patients with any serious adverse event was 66% vs. 44%, respectively.

Adverse events leading to drug dose reduction were seen in 11% of idelalisib-treated patients, compared with 6% of placebo controls, and therapy was discontinued in 26% vs. 13%, respectively.

Ten patients in the idelalisib arm and seven in the placebo arm died during the study.

Adverse events that occurred more commonly with idelalisib included neutropenia, pyrexia, diarrhea, febrile neutropenia, pneumonia, rash, and elevated liver enzymes.

Session moderator Dr. David P. Steensma of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston asked Dr. Zelenetz how idelalisib plus BR stacked up to ibrutinib (Imbruvica) plus BR in this population.

Dr. Zelenetz noted that patients were excluded from the HELIOS trial of ibrutinib plus BR if they had del(17p). Comparing the subset of patients in Study 115 without del(17p) with patients in the ibrutinib study, “the results are virtually superimposable,” Dr. Zelenetz said, and “the two treatments are really remarkably similar.”

The overall survival benefit was larger in the HELIOS trial, Dr. Zelenetz noted, but that was largely because the trial allowed patients to cross over from placebo to the active drug.

Gilead Sciences funded Study 115. Dr. Zelenetz disclosed receiving research funding from the company and discussing off-label use of idelalisib for relapsed/refractory CLL.

ORLANDO – Adding the PI3K inhibitor idelalisib to a standard regimen of bendamustine and rituximab significantly reduced the risk of both disease progression and death for patients with relapsed and/or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia, results of a phase III randomized trial showed.

At a median follow-up of 12 months, the primary endpoint of median progression-free survival was 23.1 months for patients treated with idelalisib (Zydelig), bendamustine, and rituximab (idel+BR), compared with 11.1 months for bendamustine and rituximab (BR) plus a placebo, reported Dr. Andrew Zelenetz of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.

“Median overall survival was not reached in either arm. However, there was a significant improvement in overall survival, with a 45% reduction in the risk of death [with idel+BR],” he said in a late-breaking abstract session at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The trial was stopped early after a data review at the first planned interim analysis showed significant superiority for the three-drug combination.

The results were consistent across subgroups, including patients with high-risk features such as deletion 17p and mutated TP53 (del[17p]/TP53), unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (IgHV), and treatment-refractory disease.

The rationale behind adding idelalisib, an inhibitor of the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K), is that signaling via the PI3K pathway is hyperactive and can be targeted, Dr. Zelenetz explained.

Study 115 was a phase III trial with accrual from June 2012 through August 2015. Investigators enrolled 416 patients with relapsed /refractory CLL and randomly assigned them to receive BR for six 28-day cycles of bendamustine (70 mg/m² on days 1 and 2 of each cycle) and rituximab (375 mg/m² for cycle 1, and 500 mg/m² for cycles 2 through 6), plus either idelalisib 150 mg b.i.d. or placebo, each administered continuously until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or death.

The patients were stratified by mutational and disease status (refractory defined as CLL progression less than 6 months from completion of prior therapy, or relapsed CLL progression 6 months or more from completion of prior therapy.

The trial was halted early after the first planned interim analysis, which was conducted after 75% of the total number of 260 planned events of CLL progression or death from any cause had occurred. The data cutoff was June 15, 2015.

The intention-to-treat analysis included 207 patients assigned to idelalisib and 209 assigned to placebo. Three-fourths (76%) of the patients were male.

In all, 46% of patients had Rai stage III/IV disease. The median time since the completion of the last therapy was 16 months.

The proportions of patients with high-risk features included del(17p)/p53 mutation in 32.9%, unmutated IgHV in 83.2%, and treatment-refractory disease in 29.8%.

As noted, the median progression-free survival with idelalisib at a median follow-up of 12 months was 23.1 months vs. 11.1 months for placebo. That translated into a hazard ratio of 0.33 (P less than .0001).

Among patients with neither del(17p) nor TP53 mutations, the HR for progression was 0.22. Among patients with either del(17p) or a TP53 mutation, the HR was 0.50 (95% confidence intervals show statistical significance for both).

Overall response rates were 68% among patients who received idelalisib, and 45% for those who received placebo. There were five complete responses (2%) in the idelalisib group and none in the placebo group.

The idelalisib group also had a higher proportion of patients with a greater than 50% reduction in involved lymph nodes (96% vs. 61%), and had better organomegaly responses (spleen and liver) and hematologic responses (hemoglobin, neutrophils, and platelets).

Grade 3 or greater adverse events occurred in 93% of patients on idelalisib, compared with 76% of those on placebo. The proportion of patients with any serious adverse event was 66% vs. 44%, respectively.

Adverse events leading to drug dose reduction were seen in 11% of idelalisib-treated patients, compared with 6% of placebo controls, and therapy was discontinued in 26% vs. 13%, respectively.

Ten patients in the idelalisib arm and seven in the placebo arm died during the study.

Adverse events that occurred more commonly with idelalisib included neutropenia, pyrexia, diarrhea, febrile neutropenia, pneumonia, rash, and elevated liver enzymes.

Session moderator Dr. David P. Steensma of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston asked Dr. Zelenetz how idelalisib plus BR stacked up to ibrutinib (Imbruvica) plus BR in this population.

Dr. Zelenetz noted that patients were excluded from the HELIOS trial of ibrutinib plus BR if they had del(17p). Comparing the subset of patients in Study 115 without del(17p) with patients in the ibrutinib study, “the results are virtually superimposable,” Dr. Zelenetz said, and “the two treatments are really remarkably similar.”

The overall survival benefit was larger in the HELIOS trial, Dr. Zelenetz noted, but that was largely because the trial allowed patients to cross over from placebo to the active drug.

Gilead Sciences funded Study 115. Dr. Zelenetz disclosed receiving research funding from the company and discussing off-label use of idelalisib for relapsed/refractory CLL.

ORLANDO – Idelalisib given as first-line therapy for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia carries a high risk of early fulminant hepatotoxicity requiring drug interruption and steroids, investigators reported.

Among 24 patients who received idelalisib (Zydelig) monotherapy in a phase II trial of a combination of idelalisib followed by idelalisib concurrent with ofatumumab (Arzerra) as first-line therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), 12 patients developed acute hepatotoxicity, marked by rapidly soaring levels of transaminase within about 28 days of starting therapy. An additional four patients developed hepatotoxicity at around 130 days, noted Dr. Benjamin L. Lampson, a clinical fellow in medicine at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston.

“Multiple lines of evidence suggest that this early hepatotoxicity is immune mediated. The proportion of regulatory T cells in the peripheral blood decrease on idelalisib therapy, providing a possible explanation for the development of early hepatotoxicity,” he said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The toxicities occur more frequently among younger and less heavily pretreated patients, and are likely due to on-target, immune-mediated effects, he noted.

Dr. Lampson presented data on the first 24 patients in an ongoing phase II trial. Patients with previously untreated CLL receive idelalisib 150 mg twice daily for 56 days, in an attempt to mobilize neoplastic B cells from the peripheral lymphoid tissues and into the bloodstream.

Following the monotherapy phase, patients are given ofatumumab in an attempt to clear the disease from peripheral blood.

“This dosing strategy is slightly different than what has been previously been used in trials combining these particular drugs. Specifically, previously reported trials have started these agents simultaneously without a lead-in period of monotherapy,” Dr. Lampson explained.

When the lead-in phase is completed, patients receive idelalisib plus ofatumumab infusions once weekly for 8 weeks, followed by once-monthly infusions for 4 months. Patients then continue on idelalisib indefinitely. The primary endpoint is the overall response rate assessed 2 months after the completion of the combination therapy.

For the first 24 patients treated as of Nov. 9, 2015, the median time on therapy was 7.7 months and median follow-up was 14.7 months.

The median patient age was 67.4 years (range 57.6-84.9). CLL genetics showed that 13 patients had unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (IgHV) disease, 4 had the 17p deletion and TP53 mutation, 1 had deletion 11q, and 13 had deletion 13q; some patients had more than one mutation.

“What we began to notice after enrolling just a few subjects on the trial was that severe hepatotoxicity was occurring shortly after initiating idelalisib,” Dr. Lampson said.

He presented one case, a 58-year-old man who was in the idelalisib monotherapy phase of the study. He developed grade 3 hepatotoxicity 28 days after starting the drug, despite having a normal liver function test just 1 day earlier. The drug was stopped, but his liver function tests continued to rise, suggesting a self-perpetuating or self-sustaining process.

On day 32, the patient was admitted to the hospital, and on day 33 he was started on steroids, based on the hypothesis that the hepatotoxicity might have been immune mediated. Two days after initiation of steroids, his liver function tests continued to rise, whereupon he was started on mycophenolate mofetil.

“With these two forms of immunosuppression, the [liver function tests] did eventually normalize, although the steroids and mycophenolate had to be tapered over a period of many weeks. And this patient was not the only patient to experience toxicity; in fact, hepatotoxicity was frequent and often severe,” he said.

At the time of maximum incidence, week 4, the percentage of patients with any hepatotoxicity was 46%, with 13% at grade 4, and 21% at grade 3.

“The median time to initial development of hepatotoxicity is 28 days. This suggests that the mechanism of hepatotoxicity is not immediate, but takes time to develop, consistent with an adaptive immune response. Furthermore, hepatotoxicity is typically occurring before the first dose of ofatumumab is occurring at week 8, suggesting idelalisib alone is the cause of the hepatotoxicity,” Dr. Lampson said.

A comparison of data from the ongoing study and from three previous studies – two with idelalisib in relapsed refractory disease, and one as first-line therapy in patients 65 and older – showed that grade 3 or greater hepatotoxicity was lowest in a phase I trial of idelalisib in which patients had received a median of five prior lines of therapy, occurring in only 1.9% of patients. In contrast, in the current study, 52% of patients experienced grade 3 or 4 transaminitis at some point in the trial.

Evidence for the hepatotoxicity being an on-target immune-mediated effect comes from lymphocytic infiltrate on liver biopsy and lymphocytic colitis in idelalisib-treated patients. Additional evidence comes from the fact that the toxicity is both treatable and preventable with steroids, he said.

He cautioned that hepatotoxicity can recur rapidly when the drug is reintroduced.

“In general, our experience has been if idelalisib is resumed while the subject remains on steroids, the drug is more likely to be tolerated and the subject eventually can be tapered off steroids,” he said.

Asked by an audience member whether patients who are receiving idelalisib in the first-line setting should also receive steroids, Dr. Lampson said that they closely monitor patient liver enzymes around 28 days, and if grade 1 transaminitis is detected, patients are automatically started on low-dose steroids.

The study is sponsored by the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in collaboration with Gilead Sciences and GlaxoSmithKline. Dr. Lampson and colleagues declared no relevant conflicts of interest.

ORLANDO – Idelalisib given as first-line therapy for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia carries a high risk of early fulminant hepatotoxicity requiring drug interruption and steroids, investigators reported.

Among 24 patients who received idelalisib (Zydelig) monotherapy in a phase II trial of a combination of idelalisib followed by idelalisib concurrent with ofatumumab (Arzerra) as first-line therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), 12 patients developed acute hepatotoxicity, marked by rapidly soaring levels of transaminase within about 28 days of starting therapy. An additional four patients developed hepatotoxicity at around 130 days, noted Dr. Benjamin L. Lampson, a clinical fellow in medicine at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston.

“Multiple lines of evidence suggest that this early hepatotoxicity is immune mediated. The proportion of regulatory T cells in the peripheral blood decrease on idelalisib therapy, providing a possible explanation for the development of early hepatotoxicity,” he said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The toxicities occur more frequently among younger and less heavily pretreated patients, and are likely due to on-target, immune-mediated effects, he noted.

Dr. Lampson presented data on the first 24 patients in an ongoing phase II trial. Patients with previously untreated CLL receive idelalisib 150 mg twice daily for 56 days, in an attempt to mobilize neoplastic B cells from the peripheral lymphoid tissues and into the bloodstream.

Following the monotherapy phase, patients are given ofatumumab in an attempt to clear the disease from peripheral blood.

“This dosing strategy is slightly different than what has been previously been used in trials combining these particular drugs. Specifically, previously reported trials have started these agents simultaneously without a lead-in period of monotherapy,” Dr. Lampson explained.

When the lead-in phase is completed, patients receive idelalisib plus ofatumumab infusions once weekly for 8 weeks, followed by once-monthly infusions for 4 months. Patients then continue on idelalisib indefinitely. The primary endpoint is the overall response rate assessed 2 months after the completion of the combination therapy.

For the first 24 patients treated as of Nov. 9, 2015, the median time on therapy was 7.7 months and median follow-up was 14.7 months.

The median patient age was 67.4 years (range 57.6-84.9). CLL genetics showed that 13 patients had unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (IgHV) disease, 4 had the 17p deletion and TP53 mutation, 1 had deletion 11q, and 13 had deletion 13q; some patients had more than one mutation.

“What we began to notice after enrolling just a few subjects on the trial was that severe hepatotoxicity was occurring shortly after initiating idelalisib,” Dr. Lampson said.

He presented one case, a 58-year-old man who was in the idelalisib monotherapy phase of the study. He developed grade 3 hepatotoxicity 28 days after starting the drug, despite having a normal liver function test just 1 day earlier. The drug was stopped, but his liver function tests continued to rise, suggesting a self-perpetuating or self-sustaining process.

On day 32, the patient was admitted to the hospital, and on day 33 he was started on steroids, based on the hypothesis that the hepatotoxicity might have been immune mediated. Two days after initiation of steroids, his liver function tests continued to rise, whereupon he was started on mycophenolate mofetil.

“With these two forms of immunosuppression, the [liver function tests] did eventually normalize, although the steroids and mycophenolate had to be tapered over a period of many weeks. And this patient was not the only patient to experience toxicity; in fact, hepatotoxicity was frequent and often severe,” he said.

At the time of maximum incidence, week 4, the percentage of patients with any hepatotoxicity was 46%, with 13% at grade 4, and 21% at grade 3.

“The median time to initial development of hepatotoxicity is 28 days. This suggests that the mechanism of hepatotoxicity is not immediate, but takes time to develop, consistent with an adaptive immune response. Furthermore, hepatotoxicity is typically occurring before the first dose of ofatumumab is occurring at week 8, suggesting idelalisib alone is the cause of the hepatotoxicity,” Dr. Lampson said.

A comparison of data from the ongoing study and from three previous studies – two with idelalisib in relapsed refractory disease, and one as first-line therapy in patients 65 and older – showed that grade 3 or greater hepatotoxicity was lowest in a phase I trial of idelalisib in which patients had received a median of five prior lines of therapy, occurring in only 1.9% of patients. In contrast, in the current study, 52% of patients experienced grade 3 or 4 transaminitis at some point in the trial.

Evidence for the hepatotoxicity being an on-target immune-mediated effect comes from lymphocytic infiltrate on liver biopsy and lymphocytic colitis in idelalisib-treated patients. Additional evidence comes from the fact that the toxicity is both treatable and preventable with steroids, he said.

He cautioned that hepatotoxicity can recur rapidly when the drug is reintroduced.

“In general, our experience has been if idelalisib is resumed while the subject remains on steroids, the drug is more likely to be tolerated and the subject eventually can be tapered off steroids,” he said.

Asked by an audience member whether patients who are receiving idelalisib in the first-line setting should also receive steroids, Dr. Lampson said that they closely monitor patient liver enzymes around 28 days, and if grade 1 transaminitis is detected, patients are automatically started on low-dose steroids.

The study is sponsored by the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in collaboration with Gilead Sciences and GlaxoSmithKline. Dr. Lampson and colleagues declared no relevant conflicts of interest.

ORLANDO – Idelalisib given as first-line therapy for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia carries a high risk of early fulminant hepatotoxicity requiring drug interruption and steroids, investigators reported.

Among 24 patients who received idelalisib (Zydelig) monotherapy in a phase II trial of a combination of idelalisib followed by idelalisib concurrent with ofatumumab (Arzerra) as first-line therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), 12 patients developed acute hepatotoxicity, marked by rapidly soaring levels of transaminase within about 28 days of starting therapy. An additional four patients developed hepatotoxicity at around 130 days, noted Dr. Benjamin L. Lampson, a clinical fellow in medicine at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston.

“Multiple lines of evidence suggest that this early hepatotoxicity is immune mediated. The proportion of regulatory T cells in the peripheral blood decrease on idelalisib therapy, providing a possible explanation for the development of early hepatotoxicity,” he said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The toxicities occur more frequently among younger and less heavily pretreated patients, and are likely due to on-target, immune-mediated effects, he noted.

Dr. Lampson presented data on the first 24 patients in an ongoing phase II trial. Patients with previously untreated CLL receive idelalisib 150 mg twice daily for 56 days, in an attempt to mobilize neoplastic B cells from the peripheral lymphoid tissues and into the bloodstream.

Following the monotherapy phase, patients are given ofatumumab in an attempt to clear the disease from peripheral blood.

“This dosing strategy is slightly different than what has been previously been used in trials combining these particular drugs. Specifically, previously reported trials have started these agents simultaneously without a lead-in period of monotherapy,” Dr. Lampson explained.

When the lead-in phase is completed, patients receive idelalisib plus ofatumumab infusions once weekly for 8 weeks, followed by once-monthly infusions for 4 months. Patients then continue on idelalisib indefinitely. The primary endpoint is the overall response rate assessed 2 months after the completion of the combination therapy.

For the first 24 patients treated as of Nov. 9, 2015, the median time on therapy was 7.7 months and median follow-up was 14.7 months.

The median patient age was 67.4 years (range 57.6-84.9). CLL genetics showed that 13 patients had unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (IgHV) disease, 4 had the 17p deletion and TP53 mutation, 1 had deletion 11q, and 13 had deletion 13q; some patients had more than one mutation.

“What we began to notice after enrolling just a few subjects on the trial was that severe hepatotoxicity was occurring shortly after initiating idelalisib,” Dr. Lampson said.

He presented one case, a 58-year-old man who was in the idelalisib monotherapy phase of the study. He developed grade 3 hepatotoxicity 28 days after starting the drug, despite having a normal liver function test just 1 day earlier. The drug was stopped, but his liver function tests continued to rise, suggesting a self-perpetuating or self-sustaining process.

On day 32, the patient was admitted to the hospital, and on day 33 he was started on steroids, based on the hypothesis that the hepatotoxicity might have been immune mediated. Two days after initiation of steroids, his liver function tests continued to rise, whereupon he was started on mycophenolate mofetil.

“With these two forms of immunosuppression, the [liver function tests] did eventually normalize, although the steroids and mycophenolate had to be tapered over a period of many weeks. And this patient was not the only patient to experience toxicity; in fact, hepatotoxicity was frequent and often severe,” he said.

At the time of maximum incidence, week 4, the percentage of patients with any hepatotoxicity was 46%, with 13% at grade 4, and 21% at grade 3.

“The median time to initial development of hepatotoxicity is 28 days. This suggests that the mechanism of hepatotoxicity is not immediate, but takes time to develop, consistent with an adaptive immune response. Furthermore, hepatotoxicity is typically occurring before the first dose of ofatumumab is occurring at week 8, suggesting idelalisib alone is the cause of the hepatotoxicity,” Dr. Lampson said.

A comparison of data from the ongoing study and from three previous studies – two with idelalisib in relapsed refractory disease, and one as first-line therapy in patients 65 and older – showed that grade 3 or greater hepatotoxicity was lowest in a phase I trial of idelalisib in which patients had received a median of five prior lines of therapy, occurring in only 1.9% of patients. In contrast, in the current study, 52% of patients experienced grade 3 or 4 transaminitis at some point in the trial.

Evidence for the hepatotoxicity being an on-target immune-mediated effect comes from lymphocytic infiltrate on liver biopsy and lymphocytic colitis in idelalisib-treated patients. Additional evidence comes from the fact that the toxicity is both treatable and preventable with steroids, he said.

He cautioned that hepatotoxicity can recur rapidly when the drug is reintroduced.

“In general, our experience has been if idelalisib is resumed while the subject remains on steroids, the drug is more likely to be tolerated and the subject eventually can be tapered off steroids,” he said.

Asked by an audience member whether patients who are receiving idelalisib in the first-line setting should also receive steroids, Dr. Lampson said that they closely monitor patient liver enzymes around 28 days, and if grade 1 transaminitis is detected, patients are automatically started on low-dose steroids.

The study is sponsored by the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in collaboration with Gilead Sciences and GlaxoSmithKline. Dr. Lampson and colleagues declared no relevant conflicts of interest.