CLL

Dr. Siddhartha Mukherjee has partnered with Puretech Health to launch a new biotechnology and immuno-oncology company to broaden the use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Dr. Mukherjee, a Columbia University researcher, hematologist, oncologist, and Pulitzer Prize–winning author of “The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer,” (New York: Scribner, a division of Simon & Schuster, 2011) is licensing his CAR T-cell technology to the joint venture, called Vor BioPharma.

Vor BioPharma will focus on advancing and expanding CAR T-cell therapy, a relatively new cancer treatment where T cells are first collected from a patient’s blood and then genetically engineered to produce CAR proteins on their surface. The CAR proteins are designed to bind specific antigens found on the patient’s cancer cells. These genetically engineered T cells are grown in a laboratory and then infused into the patient. As of now, CAR T-cell therapy is primarily used to treat B-cell leukemias and other chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

“We continue to make great strides in developing new ways to treat cancer using the body’s immune system,” said Dr. Mukherjee in a written statement announcing the partnership. “The positive clinical response researchers have achieved with CAR T-cell therapies in B-cell leukemias has led to great interest within the oncology community and is something we hope to achieve in other cancers over time,” he said.

“CAR T-cell therapies have shown remarkable progress in the clinic, yet their applicability beyond a small subset of cancers is currently very limited,” said Dr. Sanjiv Sam Gambhir of Stanford University and a member of the Vor Scientific Advisory Board. “This technology seeks to address bottlenecks that prevent CAR T-cell therapy from becoming more broadly useful in treating cancers outside of B-cell cancers.”

Other Vor BioPharma employees and Scientific Advisory Board members include Dr. Joseph Bolen, former President and Chief Scientific Officer of Moderna Therapeutics; Dr. Dan Littman of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute; and Dr. Derrick Rossi of Harvard University.

[email protected]

On Twitter @jess_craig94

Dr. Siddhartha Mukherjee has partnered with Puretech Health to launch a new biotechnology and immuno-oncology company to broaden the use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Dr. Mukherjee, a Columbia University researcher, hematologist, oncologist, and Pulitzer Prize–winning author of “The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer,” (New York: Scribner, a division of Simon & Schuster, 2011) is licensing his CAR T-cell technology to the joint venture, called Vor BioPharma.

Vor BioPharma will focus on advancing and expanding CAR T-cell therapy, a relatively new cancer treatment where T cells are first collected from a patient’s blood and then genetically engineered to produce CAR proteins on their surface. The CAR proteins are designed to bind specific antigens found on the patient’s cancer cells. These genetically engineered T cells are grown in a laboratory and then infused into the patient. As of now, CAR T-cell therapy is primarily used to treat B-cell leukemias and other chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

“We continue to make great strides in developing new ways to treat cancer using the body’s immune system,” said Dr. Mukherjee in a written statement announcing the partnership. “The positive clinical response researchers have achieved with CAR T-cell therapies in B-cell leukemias has led to great interest within the oncology community and is something we hope to achieve in other cancers over time,” he said.

“CAR T-cell therapies have shown remarkable progress in the clinic, yet their applicability beyond a small subset of cancers is currently very limited,” said Dr. Sanjiv Sam Gambhir of Stanford University and a member of the Vor Scientific Advisory Board. “This technology seeks to address bottlenecks that prevent CAR T-cell therapy from becoming more broadly useful in treating cancers outside of B-cell cancers.”

Other Vor BioPharma employees and Scientific Advisory Board members include Dr. Joseph Bolen, former President and Chief Scientific Officer of Moderna Therapeutics; Dr. Dan Littman of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute; and Dr. Derrick Rossi of Harvard University.

[email protected]

On Twitter @jess_craig94

Dr. Siddhartha Mukherjee has partnered with Puretech Health to launch a new biotechnology and immuno-oncology company to broaden the use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Dr. Mukherjee, a Columbia University researcher, hematologist, oncologist, and Pulitzer Prize–winning author of “The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer,” (New York: Scribner, a division of Simon & Schuster, 2011) is licensing his CAR T-cell technology to the joint venture, called Vor BioPharma.

Vor BioPharma will focus on advancing and expanding CAR T-cell therapy, a relatively new cancer treatment where T cells are first collected from a patient’s blood and then genetically engineered to produce CAR proteins on their surface. The CAR proteins are designed to bind specific antigens found on the patient’s cancer cells. These genetically engineered T cells are grown in a laboratory and then infused into the patient. As of now, CAR T-cell therapy is primarily used to treat B-cell leukemias and other chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

“We continue to make great strides in developing new ways to treat cancer using the body’s immune system,” said Dr. Mukherjee in a written statement announcing the partnership. “The positive clinical response researchers have achieved with CAR T-cell therapies in B-cell leukemias has led to great interest within the oncology community and is something we hope to achieve in other cancers over time,” he said.

“CAR T-cell therapies have shown remarkable progress in the clinic, yet their applicability beyond a small subset of cancers is currently very limited,” said Dr. Sanjiv Sam Gambhir of Stanford University and a member of the Vor Scientific Advisory Board. “This technology seeks to address bottlenecks that prevent CAR T-cell therapy from becoming more broadly useful in treating cancers outside of B-cell cancers.”

Other Vor BioPharma employees and Scientific Advisory Board members include Dr. Joseph Bolen, former President and Chief Scientific Officer of Moderna Therapeutics; Dr. Dan Littman of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute; and Dr. Derrick Rossi of Harvard University.

[email protected]

On Twitter @jess_craig94

FROM THE AACR ANNUAL MEETING

A differently engineered chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell promises to overcome major limitations of current CAR T cell therapies. Rather than engineer the CAR T cells to have a receptor that recognizes specific tumor antigens one at a time and requiring different CAR T cells for every antigen, this technique engineers a T cell receptor that can bind one invariant end of a bifunctional molecule. The molecule is constructed such that the other end can bind to whatever tumor cell surface marker is of interest. In this way, the CAR T cells can be constructed once and be directed to various tumor markers.

Standard CAR T cells are engineered to express on their surfaces receptors that recognize a specific antigen. These cells have been used up to now to recognize and kill tumor cells – for example, B cell leukemias carrying the pan-B cell marker CD19. The CAR T cells and their progeny, including memory T cells, remain in the body and continue to carry out their functions, potentially providing immune surveillance in case cancer cells arise again. But they uniquely recognize just CD19 – a problem, in that they kill even normal B cells, so-called off-target toxicity.

Beyond the unique specificity of standard CAR T cells, Philip Low, Ph.D., director of the Center for Drug Discovery at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana, said these cells have three major limitations. First, they may lyse tumor cells so rapidly that a systemic tumor lysis syndrome or “cytokine storm” occurs. Second, the persisting CAR T cells can kill normal cells – for example, ones directed against CD19 killing normal B cells. Third, tumor cells have unstable genomes, leading to tumor heterogeneity, with some cells potentially losing the targeted antigens and therefore becoming “invisible” to the CAR T cells.

“So what we have done is basically designed a solution to all three, and we call it a universal CAR T cell because of its ability, with the help of an adapter molecule, to recognize all of these mutated tumor cells within a heterogeneous tumor,” he said at the annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research. The key was to make a CAR T cell with a surface receptor that binds to the dye fluorescein. Then fluorescein is coupled through a short linker to a molecule that binds specifically to a molecule expressed on tumor cells. In this way the CAR T cell can be made to interact with any tumor cell, depending on what is coupled to the fluorescein. The technique is analogous to a socket wrench. Every socket has the same size hole that the ratchet handle fits into regardless of the size of the “business end” of the sockets, which recognize different size nuts.

Dr. Low gave an example of folic acid, for which he says a receptor is overexpressed on about 40% of human tumors but almost never on normal cells. “We link fluorescein to the vitamin folic acid,” he said. CAR T cells are injected into an animal, and nothing happens unless a folate-fluorescein conjugate is also injected. “As soon as we inject folate-fluorescein, the folate binds to the tumor cell surface, the fluorescein part of the folate-fluorescein binds to the CAR T cell, this forces a very tight interaction between the engineered T cell and the cancer cell, and we found it leads to melting away of the tumor,” he said.

This technique addresses the three major problems with standard CAR T cell therapy. By titrating the binding affinity, concentration, and rate of administration of the fluorescein conjugate, the rate of tumor killing can be controlled, mitigating tumor lysis syndrome. Plus, normal cells may be spared if the parameters are adjusted so that the conjugate binds only to cells with high levels of the target molecule, such as tumor cells.

Because its low molecular weight, the bi-specific conjugate rapidly disappears from the circulation, and the cell killing can be terminated, allowing normal cells to regenerate – for example, in the case of normal B cells that carry CD19. Since CAR T cells generate progeny that stay in the body, the progeny remain “dormant” but are ready to be activated again by addition of the conjugate to attack tumor cells if they arise.

A major issue is dealing with tumor heterogeneity; Dr. Low’s method seems to address that, as well. “We have tumor-specific ligands for over 90% of all human cancers,” he said. “Within another couple of months we’ll have them for 100%.”

Tumors typically contain lots of hypoxic cells, and hypoxic cells overexpress carbonic anhydrase-9. “Virtually every tumor has large fractions of the tumor mass that overexpress carbonic anhydrase-9, and we have a ligand that binds very specifically to that,” Dr. Low said.

To address the problem of tumor heterogeneity, with different mutations within different areas of the tumor or over time because of genetic instability in the cells, Dr. Low said, “We have a cocktail of about five of these small molecules… they are inexpensive to produce… and they clear very rapidly… and with the cocktail we can hit nearly all cancer cells, even in heterogeneous cancers.”

One limitation, as with standard CAR T cell therapy, is that the technique will still depend on using an individual patient’s T cells to modify through use of a lentiviral vector, so there would not be a universal, off-the-shelf T cell to use for everyone.

The technique and materials have been tested only in animals so far, using tumor-specific ligands for the folate receptor, a prostate-specific membrane antigen, and an antigen overexpressed on neuroendocrine tumors. Dr. Low has intentions to move the technology into human trials. He said the bridging molecules exist in highly purified form, and CAR T cell technology has already been developed by others. “Today we see great success in animal models and have no reason to believe that it won’t translate at least to a good extent to the clinic,” he said. Still, he expects some obstacles along the way and is willing to partner with others working on similar problems as well as large pharmaceutical companies.

The research has been supported by Endocyte, a company that Dr. Low founded and for which he is Chief Scientific Officer and a member of the board of directors. He has filed two patents on the technology, which are held by Purdue University and licensed to Endocyte.

FROM THE AACR ANNUAL MEETING

A differently engineered chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell promises to overcome major limitations of current CAR T cell therapies. Rather than engineer the CAR T cells to have a receptor that recognizes specific tumor antigens one at a time and requiring different CAR T cells for every antigen, this technique engineers a T cell receptor that can bind one invariant end of a bifunctional molecule. The molecule is constructed such that the other end can bind to whatever tumor cell surface marker is of interest. In this way, the CAR T cells can be constructed once and be directed to various tumor markers.

Standard CAR T cells are engineered to express on their surfaces receptors that recognize a specific antigen. These cells have been used up to now to recognize and kill tumor cells – for example, B cell leukemias carrying the pan-B cell marker CD19. The CAR T cells and their progeny, including memory T cells, remain in the body and continue to carry out their functions, potentially providing immune surveillance in case cancer cells arise again. But they uniquely recognize just CD19 – a problem, in that they kill even normal B cells, so-called off-target toxicity.

Beyond the unique specificity of standard CAR T cells, Philip Low, Ph.D., director of the Center for Drug Discovery at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana, said these cells have three major limitations. First, they may lyse tumor cells so rapidly that a systemic tumor lysis syndrome or “cytokine storm” occurs. Second, the persisting CAR T cells can kill normal cells – for example, ones directed against CD19 killing normal B cells. Third, tumor cells have unstable genomes, leading to tumor heterogeneity, with some cells potentially losing the targeted antigens and therefore becoming “invisible” to the CAR T cells.

“So what we have done is basically designed a solution to all three, and we call it a universal CAR T cell because of its ability, with the help of an adapter molecule, to recognize all of these mutated tumor cells within a heterogeneous tumor,” he said at the annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research. The key was to make a CAR T cell with a surface receptor that binds to the dye fluorescein. Then fluorescein is coupled through a short linker to a molecule that binds specifically to a molecule expressed on tumor cells. In this way the CAR T cell can be made to interact with any tumor cell, depending on what is coupled to the fluorescein. The technique is analogous to a socket wrench. Every socket has the same size hole that the ratchet handle fits into regardless of the size of the “business end” of the sockets, which recognize different size nuts.

Dr. Low gave an example of folic acid, for which he says a receptor is overexpressed on about 40% of human tumors but almost never on normal cells. “We link fluorescein to the vitamin folic acid,” he said. CAR T cells are injected into an animal, and nothing happens unless a folate-fluorescein conjugate is also injected. “As soon as we inject folate-fluorescein, the folate binds to the tumor cell surface, the fluorescein part of the folate-fluorescein binds to the CAR T cell, this forces a very tight interaction between the engineered T cell and the cancer cell, and we found it leads to melting away of the tumor,” he said.

This technique addresses the three major problems with standard CAR T cell therapy. By titrating the binding affinity, concentration, and rate of administration of the fluorescein conjugate, the rate of tumor killing can be controlled, mitigating tumor lysis syndrome. Plus, normal cells may be spared if the parameters are adjusted so that the conjugate binds only to cells with high levels of the target molecule, such as tumor cells.

Because its low molecular weight, the bi-specific conjugate rapidly disappears from the circulation, and the cell killing can be terminated, allowing normal cells to regenerate – for example, in the case of normal B cells that carry CD19. Since CAR T cells generate progeny that stay in the body, the progeny remain “dormant” but are ready to be activated again by addition of the conjugate to attack tumor cells if they arise.

A major issue is dealing with tumor heterogeneity; Dr. Low’s method seems to address that, as well. “We have tumor-specific ligands for over 90% of all human cancers,” he said. “Within another couple of months we’ll have them for 100%.”

Tumors typically contain lots of hypoxic cells, and hypoxic cells overexpress carbonic anhydrase-9. “Virtually every tumor has large fractions of the tumor mass that overexpress carbonic anhydrase-9, and we have a ligand that binds very specifically to that,” Dr. Low said.

To address the problem of tumor heterogeneity, with different mutations within different areas of the tumor or over time because of genetic instability in the cells, Dr. Low said, “We have a cocktail of about five of these small molecules… they are inexpensive to produce… and they clear very rapidly… and with the cocktail we can hit nearly all cancer cells, even in heterogeneous cancers.”

One limitation, as with standard CAR T cell therapy, is that the technique will still depend on using an individual patient’s T cells to modify through use of a lentiviral vector, so there would not be a universal, off-the-shelf T cell to use for everyone.

The technique and materials have been tested only in animals so far, using tumor-specific ligands for the folate receptor, a prostate-specific membrane antigen, and an antigen overexpressed on neuroendocrine tumors. Dr. Low has intentions to move the technology into human trials. He said the bridging molecules exist in highly purified form, and CAR T cell technology has already been developed by others. “Today we see great success in animal models and have no reason to believe that it won’t translate at least to a good extent to the clinic,” he said. Still, he expects some obstacles along the way and is willing to partner with others working on similar problems as well as large pharmaceutical companies.

The research has been supported by Endocyte, a company that Dr. Low founded and for which he is Chief Scientific Officer and a member of the board of directors. He has filed two patents on the technology, which are held by Purdue University and licensed to Endocyte.

FROM THE AACR ANNUAL MEETING

A differently engineered chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell promises to overcome major limitations of current CAR T cell therapies. Rather than engineer the CAR T cells to have a receptor that recognizes specific tumor antigens one at a time and requiring different CAR T cells for every antigen, this technique engineers a T cell receptor that can bind one invariant end of a bifunctional molecule. The molecule is constructed such that the other end can bind to whatever tumor cell surface marker is of interest. In this way, the CAR T cells can be constructed once and be directed to various tumor markers.

Standard CAR T cells are engineered to express on their surfaces receptors that recognize a specific antigen. These cells have been used up to now to recognize and kill tumor cells – for example, B cell leukemias carrying the pan-B cell marker CD19. The CAR T cells and their progeny, including memory T cells, remain in the body and continue to carry out their functions, potentially providing immune surveillance in case cancer cells arise again. But they uniquely recognize just CD19 – a problem, in that they kill even normal B cells, so-called off-target toxicity.

Beyond the unique specificity of standard CAR T cells, Philip Low, Ph.D., director of the Center for Drug Discovery at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana, said these cells have three major limitations. First, they may lyse tumor cells so rapidly that a systemic tumor lysis syndrome or “cytokine storm” occurs. Second, the persisting CAR T cells can kill normal cells – for example, ones directed against CD19 killing normal B cells. Third, tumor cells have unstable genomes, leading to tumor heterogeneity, with some cells potentially losing the targeted antigens and therefore becoming “invisible” to the CAR T cells.

“So what we have done is basically designed a solution to all three, and we call it a universal CAR T cell because of its ability, with the help of an adapter molecule, to recognize all of these mutated tumor cells within a heterogeneous tumor,” he said at the annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research. The key was to make a CAR T cell with a surface receptor that binds to the dye fluorescein. Then fluorescein is coupled through a short linker to a molecule that binds specifically to a molecule expressed on tumor cells. In this way the CAR T cell can be made to interact with any tumor cell, depending on what is coupled to the fluorescein. The technique is analogous to a socket wrench. Every socket has the same size hole that the ratchet handle fits into regardless of the size of the “business end” of the sockets, which recognize different size nuts.

Dr. Low gave an example of folic acid, for which he says a receptor is overexpressed on about 40% of human tumors but almost never on normal cells. “We link fluorescein to the vitamin folic acid,” he said. CAR T cells are injected into an animal, and nothing happens unless a folate-fluorescein conjugate is also injected. “As soon as we inject folate-fluorescein, the folate binds to the tumor cell surface, the fluorescein part of the folate-fluorescein binds to the CAR T cell, this forces a very tight interaction between the engineered T cell and the cancer cell, and we found it leads to melting away of the tumor,” he said.

This technique addresses the three major problems with standard CAR T cell therapy. By titrating the binding affinity, concentration, and rate of administration of the fluorescein conjugate, the rate of tumor killing can be controlled, mitigating tumor lysis syndrome. Plus, normal cells may be spared if the parameters are adjusted so that the conjugate binds only to cells with high levels of the target molecule, such as tumor cells.

Because its low molecular weight, the bi-specific conjugate rapidly disappears from the circulation, and the cell killing can be terminated, allowing normal cells to regenerate – for example, in the case of normal B cells that carry CD19. Since CAR T cells generate progeny that stay in the body, the progeny remain “dormant” but are ready to be activated again by addition of the conjugate to attack tumor cells if they arise.

A major issue is dealing with tumor heterogeneity; Dr. Low’s method seems to address that, as well. “We have tumor-specific ligands for over 90% of all human cancers,” he said. “Within another couple of months we’ll have them for 100%.”

Tumors typically contain lots of hypoxic cells, and hypoxic cells overexpress carbonic anhydrase-9. “Virtually every tumor has large fractions of the tumor mass that overexpress carbonic anhydrase-9, and we have a ligand that binds very specifically to that,” Dr. Low said.

To address the problem of tumor heterogeneity, with different mutations within different areas of the tumor or over time because of genetic instability in the cells, Dr. Low said, “We have a cocktail of about five of these small molecules… they are inexpensive to produce… and they clear very rapidly… and with the cocktail we can hit nearly all cancer cells, even in heterogeneous cancers.”

One limitation, as with standard CAR T cell therapy, is that the technique will still depend on using an individual patient’s T cells to modify through use of a lentiviral vector, so there would not be a universal, off-the-shelf T cell to use for everyone.

The technique and materials have been tested only in animals so far, using tumor-specific ligands for the folate receptor, a prostate-specific membrane antigen, and an antigen overexpressed on neuroendocrine tumors. Dr. Low has intentions to move the technology into human trials. He said the bridging molecules exist in highly purified form, and CAR T cell technology has already been developed by others. “Today we see great success in animal models and have no reason to believe that it won’t translate at least to a good extent to the clinic,” he said. Still, he expects some obstacles along the way and is willing to partner with others working on similar problems as well as large pharmaceutical companies.

The research has been supported by Endocyte, a company that Dr. Low founded and for which he is Chief Scientific Officer and a member of the board of directors. He has filed two patents on the technology, which are held by Purdue University and licensed to Endocyte.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells can be identified at levels as low as 0.0010% with a newly developed and validated single-tube assay, Dr. Andy C. Rawstro of St. James’s Institute of Oncology, Leeds, England, and his colleagues said in a European Research Initiative on CLL (ERIC) project report in Leukemia.

The high-throughput sequencing assay consists of a core panel of six markers – CD19, CD20, CD5, CD43, CD79b and CD81 – with a component specification independent of instrument and reagents. The new assay eliminates the need to distribute the blood sample across multiple tubes, which can impair sensitivity in cases with poor cellularity. The assay can be locally revalidated using normal peripheral blood and can be used to investigate new markers.

The new assay was validated in a multicenter study of 128 samples from 108 patients with CLL or monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis, studied either at diagnosis or after FCR-based (fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab) treatment and compared with peripheral blood samples from healthy young women. In a parallel analysis, the assay compared with flow cytometry results at the 0.010% level, the minimal residual disease threshold defined in the 2008 International Workshop on CLL guidelines. The new assay, however, also was able to detect disease at the 0.0010% (one CLL cell in 1 million leukocytes) level.

The ability to detect disease below the levels that can be assessed by flow cytometry may prove to be a valuable resource to improve quantification of minimal residual disease and evaluate treatment response in CLL. Using minimal residual disease as a surrogate measure for treatment effectiveness would avoid the need for prolonged observation times in assessing new therapies, the researchers said (Leukemia 2016;30:929-36).

Dr. Rawstro disclosed receiving honoraria from Celgene, Abbvie, Gilead, Roche, and GSK. He receives royalty payments from BD Biosciences (Intrasure reagent) and study reagents. He is a consultant for Gilead and Biogen Idec.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells can be identified at levels as low as 0.0010% with a newly developed and validated single-tube assay, Dr. Andy C. Rawstro of St. James’s Institute of Oncology, Leeds, England, and his colleagues said in a European Research Initiative on CLL (ERIC) project report in Leukemia.

The high-throughput sequencing assay consists of a core panel of six markers – CD19, CD20, CD5, CD43, CD79b and CD81 – with a component specification independent of instrument and reagents. The new assay eliminates the need to distribute the blood sample across multiple tubes, which can impair sensitivity in cases with poor cellularity. The assay can be locally revalidated using normal peripheral blood and can be used to investigate new markers.

The new assay was validated in a multicenter study of 128 samples from 108 patients with CLL or monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis, studied either at diagnosis or after FCR-based (fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab) treatment and compared with peripheral blood samples from healthy young women. In a parallel analysis, the assay compared with flow cytometry results at the 0.010% level, the minimal residual disease threshold defined in the 2008 International Workshop on CLL guidelines. The new assay, however, also was able to detect disease at the 0.0010% (one CLL cell in 1 million leukocytes) level.

The ability to detect disease below the levels that can be assessed by flow cytometry may prove to be a valuable resource to improve quantification of minimal residual disease and evaluate treatment response in CLL. Using minimal residual disease as a surrogate measure for treatment effectiveness would avoid the need for prolonged observation times in assessing new therapies, the researchers said (Leukemia 2016;30:929-36).

Dr. Rawstro disclosed receiving honoraria from Celgene, Abbvie, Gilead, Roche, and GSK. He receives royalty payments from BD Biosciences (Intrasure reagent) and study reagents. He is a consultant for Gilead and Biogen Idec.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells can be identified at levels as low as 0.0010% with a newly developed and validated single-tube assay, Dr. Andy C. Rawstro of St. James’s Institute of Oncology, Leeds, England, and his colleagues said in a European Research Initiative on CLL (ERIC) project report in Leukemia.

The high-throughput sequencing assay consists of a core panel of six markers – CD19, CD20, CD5, CD43, CD79b and CD81 – with a component specification independent of instrument and reagents. The new assay eliminates the need to distribute the blood sample across multiple tubes, which can impair sensitivity in cases with poor cellularity. The assay can be locally revalidated using normal peripheral blood and can be used to investigate new markers.

The new assay was validated in a multicenter study of 128 samples from 108 patients with CLL or monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis, studied either at diagnosis or after FCR-based (fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab) treatment and compared with peripheral blood samples from healthy young women. In a parallel analysis, the assay compared with flow cytometry results at the 0.010% level, the minimal residual disease threshold defined in the 2008 International Workshop on CLL guidelines. The new assay, however, also was able to detect disease at the 0.0010% (one CLL cell in 1 million leukocytes) level.

The ability to detect disease below the levels that can be assessed by flow cytometry may prove to be a valuable resource to improve quantification of minimal residual disease and evaluate treatment response in CLL. Using minimal residual disease as a surrogate measure for treatment effectiveness would avoid the need for prolonged observation times in assessing new therapies, the researchers said (Leukemia 2016;30:929-36).

Dr. Rawstro disclosed receiving honoraria from Celgene, Abbvie, Gilead, Roche, and GSK. He receives royalty payments from BD Biosciences (Intrasure reagent) and study reagents. He is a consultant for Gilead and Biogen Idec.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

Stronger teamwork among researchers, sharing data, and realignment of incentives for scientific breakthroughs, in addition to more funding, are key steps needed to advance cancer research, Vice President Joe Biden said during the annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR).

During a plenary speech to close the meeting, Vice President Biden praised the dedication of current cancer researchers and pledged to break down the walls that prevent them from achieving more progress in the field.

“I made a commitment that I will – as I gain this information and knowledge – I will eliminate the barriers that get in your way, get in the way of science and research and development,” he said. “I had to ... learn from all of you how we can proceed, how we can break down silos, how we can accommodate more rapidly the efforts you’re making.”

Vice President Biden, who is leading a new $1 billion initiative to eliminate cancer called “Moonshot,” outlined the top obstacles to cancer research he has garnered from recent visits with renowned cancer scientists and research leaders around the world. This includes a lack of unity among researchers, poor rewards for novel research, and limited data sharing, he said.

“The way the system now is set up, researchers are not incentivized to share their data,” Vice President Biden said, acknowledging that some medical experts are against the idea. “But every expert I’ve spoken to said you need to share these data to move this process rapidly.”

Involving patients earlier in clinical trials design is also a primary focus, he said. Patients should understand more about trials and be more open to signing up.

He noted the “incredible” research currently being conducted by various entities, such as AACR’s Project Genie, Orion Foundation, and The Parker Institute. Mr. Biden stressed however, that such efforts are too isolated.

“It raises [the] question: ‘Why is all this being done separately?’ ” Vice President Biden said. “Why is so much money being spent when if it’s aggregated, everyone acknowledges, the answers would come more quickly?”

Incentives for new research and the way in which funding is alloted must also be redesigned, he stressed. Today, it takes too long for researchers to get projects approved by the government and funding dispersed. He acknowledged the difficulty researchers face in obtaining grants and the fact that those who think “outside the box” are less likely to receive funding.

“It seems to me that we slow down our best minds by making them spend years in the lab before they can get their own grants and, when they do, they spend a third of their time writing a grant that takes months to be approved and awarded,” he said. “It’s like asking Derek Jeter to take several years off to sell bonds to build Yankee stadium.”

The Vice President did not purport to have all the answers, and asked those at the AARC meeting to provide feedback on his suggestions.

“The question I’d ask you to contemplate, because I’d like you to communicate with us, is, ‘Does it require realigning incentives; changing behaviors to take advantage of this inflection point? Does it require sharing more knowledge, treatment, and understanding? Or does that slow the process up?’ ”

He added,“I hope you all know it, but you’re one of the most valuable resources that our great country has, those of you sitting in this room. So ask your institutions, your colleagues, your mentors, your administrators: How can we move your ideas faster together in the interest of patients?”

The Vice President’s Moonshot initiative was announced during President Obama’s 2016 State of the Union Address. The effort includes a new Cancer Moonshot Task Force that will focus on federal investments, targeted incentives, private sector efforts from industry and philanthropy, patient engagement initiatives, and other mechanisms to support cancer research and enable progress in treatment and care, according to the White House. As part of the plan, the President’s fiscal 2017 budget proposes $755 million in mandatory funds for new cancer-related research activities at the National Institutes of Health and the Food and Drug Administration. The initiative also includes increased investments by the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs in cancer research, including through funding centers of excellence focused on specific cancers and conducting longitudinal studies to determine risk factors and enhance treatment.

[email protected]

On Twitter @legal_med

Stronger teamwork among researchers, sharing data, and realignment of incentives for scientific breakthroughs, in addition to more funding, are key steps needed to advance cancer research, Vice President Joe Biden said during the annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR).

During a plenary speech to close the meeting, Vice President Biden praised the dedication of current cancer researchers and pledged to break down the walls that prevent them from achieving more progress in the field.

“I made a commitment that I will – as I gain this information and knowledge – I will eliminate the barriers that get in your way, get in the way of science and research and development,” he said. “I had to ... learn from all of you how we can proceed, how we can break down silos, how we can accommodate more rapidly the efforts you’re making.”

Vice President Biden, who is leading a new $1 billion initiative to eliminate cancer called “Moonshot,” outlined the top obstacles to cancer research he has garnered from recent visits with renowned cancer scientists and research leaders around the world. This includes a lack of unity among researchers, poor rewards for novel research, and limited data sharing, he said.

“The way the system now is set up, researchers are not incentivized to share their data,” Vice President Biden said, acknowledging that some medical experts are against the idea. “But every expert I’ve spoken to said you need to share these data to move this process rapidly.”

Involving patients earlier in clinical trials design is also a primary focus, he said. Patients should understand more about trials and be more open to signing up.

He noted the “incredible” research currently being conducted by various entities, such as AACR’s Project Genie, Orion Foundation, and The Parker Institute. Mr. Biden stressed however, that such efforts are too isolated.

“It raises [the] question: ‘Why is all this being done separately?’ ” Vice President Biden said. “Why is so much money being spent when if it’s aggregated, everyone acknowledges, the answers would come more quickly?”

Incentives for new research and the way in which funding is alloted must also be redesigned, he stressed. Today, it takes too long for researchers to get projects approved by the government and funding dispersed. He acknowledged the difficulty researchers face in obtaining grants and the fact that those who think “outside the box” are less likely to receive funding.

“It seems to me that we slow down our best minds by making them spend years in the lab before they can get their own grants and, when they do, they spend a third of their time writing a grant that takes months to be approved and awarded,” he said. “It’s like asking Derek Jeter to take several years off to sell bonds to build Yankee stadium.”

The Vice President did not purport to have all the answers, and asked those at the AARC meeting to provide feedback on his suggestions.

“The question I’d ask you to contemplate, because I’d like you to communicate with us, is, ‘Does it require realigning incentives; changing behaviors to take advantage of this inflection point? Does it require sharing more knowledge, treatment, and understanding? Or does that slow the process up?’ ”

He added,“I hope you all know it, but you’re one of the most valuable resources that our great country has, those of you sitting in this room. So ask your institutions, your colleagues, your mentors, your administrators: How can we move your ideas faster together in the interest of patients?”

The Vice President’s Moonshot initiative was announced during President Obama’s 2016 State of the Union Address. The effort includes a new Cancer Moonshot Task Force that will focus on federal investments, targeted incentives, private sector efforts from industry and philanthropy, patient engagement initiatives, and other mechanisms to support cancer research and enable progress in treatment and care, according to the White House. As part of the plan, the President’s fiscal 2017 budget proposes $755 million in mandatory funds for new cancer-related research activities at the National Institutes of Health and the Food and Drug Administration. The initiative also includes increased investments by the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs in cancer research, including through funding centers of excellence focused on specific cancers and conducting longitudinal studies to determine risk factors and enhance treatment.

[email protected]

On Twitter @legal_med

Stronger teamwork among researchers, sharing data, and realignment of incentives for scientific breakthroughs, in addition to more funding, are key steps needed to advance cancer research, Vice President Joe Biden said during the annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR).

During a plenary speech to close the meeting, Vice President Biden praised the dedication of current cancer researchers and pledged to break down the walls that prevent them from achieving more progress in the field.

“I made a commitment that I will – as I gain this information and knowledge – I will eliminate the barriers that get in your way, get in the way of science and research and development,” he said. “I had to ... learn from all of you how we can proceed, how we can break down silos, how we can accommodate more rapidly the efforts you’re making.”

Vice President Biden, who is leading a new $1 billion initiative to eliminate cancer called “Moonshot,” outlined the top obstacles to cancer research he has garnered from recent visits with renowned cancer scientists and research leaders around the world. This includes a lack of unity among researchers, poor rewards for novel research, and limited data sharing, he said.

“The way the system now is set up, researchers are not incentivized to share their data,” Vice President Biden said, acknowledging that some medical experts are against the idea. “But every expert I’ve spoken to said you need to share these data to move this process rapidly.”

Involving patients earlier in clinical trials design is also a primary focus, he said. Patients should understand more about trials and be more open to signing up.

He noted the “incredible” research currently being conducted by various entities, such as AACR’s Project Genie, Orion Foundation, and The Parker Institute. Mr. Biden stressed however, that such efforts are too isolated.

“It raises [the] question: ‘Why is all this being done separately?’ ” Vice President Biden said. “Why is so much money being spent when if it’s aggregated, everyone acknowledges, the answers would come more quickly?”

Incentives for new research and the way in which funding is alloted must also be redesigned, he stressed. Today, it takes too long for researchers to get projects approved by the government and funding dispersed. He acknowledged the difficulty researchers face in obtaining grants and the fact that those who think “outside the box” are less likely to receive funding.

“It seems to me that we slow down our best minds by making them spend years in the lab before they can get their own grants and, when they do, they spend a third of their time writing a grant that takes months to be approved and awarded,” he said. “It’s like asking Derek Jeter to take several years off to sell bonds to build Yankee stadium.”

The Vice President did not purport to have all the answers, and asked those at the AARC meeting to provide feedback on his suggestions.

“The question I’d ask you to contemplate, because I’d like you to communicate with us, is, ‘Does it require realigning incentives; changing behaviors to take advantage of this inflection point? Does it require sharing more knowledge, treatment, and understanding? Or does that slow the process up?’ ”

He added,“I hope you all know it, but you’re one of the most valuable resources that our great country has, those of you sitting in this room. So ask your institutions, your colleagues, your mentors, your administrators: How can we move your ideas faster together in the interest of patients?”

The Vice President’s Moonshot initiative was announced during President Obama’s 2016 State of the Union Address. The effort includes a new Cancer Moonshot Task Force that will focus on federal investments, targeted incentives, private sector efforts from industry and philanthropy, patient engagement initiatives, and other mechanisms to support cancer research and enable progress in treatment and care, according to the White House. As part of the plan, the President’s fiscal 2017 budget proposes $755 million in mandatory funds for new cancer-related research activities at the National Institutes of Health and the Food and Drug Administration. The initiative also includes increased investments by the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs in cancer research, including through funding centers of excellence focused on specific cancers and conducting longitudinal studies to determine risk factors and enhance treatment.

[email protected]

On Twitter @legal_med

Patients with newly diagnosed chronic lymphocytic leukemia should standardly undergo immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region gene (IGHV) mutation status and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) tests, based on the results of a meta-analysis published in Blood.

“This change will help define the minimal standard initial prognostic evaluation for patients with CLL and help facilitate use of the powerful, recently developed, integrated prognostic indices, all of which are dependent on these 2 variables,” wrote Dr. Sameer A. Parikh of Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., and associates.

By Gregor1976 via Wikimedia Commons

IGHV and FISH have prognostic value independent of clinical stage in patients with newly diagnosed and previously untreated CLL, they said (Blood. 2016;127[14]:1752-60). Better understanding of the patient’s risk of disease progression at diagnosis can guide counseling and follow-up intervals, and could potentially influence the decision to treat high-risk patients on early intervention protocols.

IGHV and FISH also appear to provide additional information on progression-free and overall survival.

The researchers cautioned, however, that the results of these tests should not be used to initiate CLL-specific therapy. Only patients who meet indications for therapy based on the 2008 International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia guidelines should receive treatment.

Further, they noted, the median age of patients included in studies that they analyzed was 64 years; the median age of patients with CLL is 72 years. The prognostic abilities of IGHV mutation and FISH may differ in these older individuals with CLL.

The researchers analyzed 31 studies that met the criteria for inclusion – full-length publications that included at least 200 patients and reported on the prognostic value of IGHV and/or FISH for predicting progression-free or overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed CLL.

They found that the median progression-free survival (range, about 1-5 years) was significantly shorter for patients with unmutated IGHV genes, than was the median progression-free survival (range, about 9-19 years) for those with mutated IGHV genes. Similarly, the median overall survival was significantly shorter for patients with unmutated IGHV (range, about 3-10 years) than for those with mutated IGHV (range, about 18-26 years).

For patients with high-risk FISH (including del17p13 and del11q23), the median progression-free survival was significantly shorter (range, about 0.1-5 years) than for those with low/intermediate-risk FISH (including del13q, normal, and trisomy 12; range, about 1.5-22 years). Median overall survival also significantly differed, ranging from about 3-10 years for patients with high-risk FISH and from about 7.5-20.5 years for those with low/intermediate-risk FISH.

In multivariable analyses, the hazard ratio for high-risk FISH ranged from 1.3 to 4.7 for progression-free survival and from 0.9 to 8.2 for overall survival. In studies reporting the results of multivariable analysis, high-risk FISH remained an independent predictor of progression-free survival in 8 of 17 studies and of overall survival in 10 of 14 studies, including in 10 of 13 studies adjusting for the prognostic impact of IGHV.

In multivariable analyses, IGHV remained an independent predictor of progression-free survival in 15 of 18 studies, including 12 of 15 studies adjusting for the prognostic impact of FISH. IGHV remained an independent predictor of overall survival in 11 of 15 studies reporting the results of multivariable analysis, including 10 of 14 studies adjusting for the prognostic impact of FISH.

Patients with newly diagnosed chronic lymphocytic leukemia should standardly undergo immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region gene (IGHV) mutation status and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) tests, based on the results of a meta-analysis published in Blood.

“This change will help define the minimal standard initial prognostic evaluation for patients with CLL and help facilitate use of the powerful, recently developed, integrated prognostic indices, all of which are dependent on these 2 variables,” wrote Dr. Sameer A. Parikh of Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., and associates.

By Gregor1976 via Wikimedia Commons

IGHV and FISH have prognostic value independent of clinical stage in patients with newly diagnosed and previously untreated CLL, they said (Blood. 2016;127[14]:1752-60). Better understanding of the patient’s risk of disease progression at diagnosis can guide counseling and follow-up intervals, and could potentially influence the decision to treat high-risk patients on early intervention protocols.

IGHV and FISH also appear to provide additional information on progression-free and overall survival.

The researchers cautioned, however, that the results of these tests should not be used to initiate CLL-specific therapy. Only patients who meet indications for therapy based on the 2008 International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia guidelines should receive treatment.

Further, they noted, the median age of patients included in studies that they analyzed was 64 years; the median age of patients with CLL is 72 years. The prognostic abilities of IGHV mutation and FISH may differ in these older individuals with CLL.

The researchers analyzed 31 studies that met the criteria for inclusion – full-length publications that included at least 200 patients and reported on the prognostic value of IGHV and/or FISH for predicting progression-free or overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed CLL.

They found that the median progression-free survival (range, about 1-5 years) was significantly shorter for patients with unmutated IGHV genes, than was the median progression-free survival (range, about 9-19 years) for those with mutated IGHV genes. Similarly, the median overall survival was significantly shorter for patients with unmutated IGHV (range, about 3-10 years) than for those with mutated IGHV (range, about 18-26 years).

For patients with high-risk FISH (including del17p13 and del11q23), the median progression-free survival was significantly shorter (range, about 0.1-5 years) than for those with low/intermediate-risk FISH (including del13q, normal, and trisomy 12; range, about 1.5-22 years). Median overall survival also significantly differed, ranging from about 3-10 years for patients with high-risk FISH and from about 7.5-20.5 years for those with low/intermediate-risk FISH.

In multivariable analyses, the hazard ratio for high-risk FISH ranged from 1.3 to 4.7 for progression-free survival and from 0.9 to 8.2 for overall survival. In studies reporting the results of multivariable analysis, high-risk FISH remained an independent predictor of progression-free survival in 8 of 17 studies and of overall survival in 10 of 14 studies, including in 10 of 13 studies adjusting for the prognostic impact of IGHV.

In multivariable analyses, IGHV remained an independent predictor of progression-free survival in 15 of 18 studies, including 12 of 15 studies adjusting for the prognostic impact of FISH. IGHV remained an independent predictor of overall survival in 11 of 15 studies reporting the results of multivariable analysis, including 10 of 14 studies adjusting for the prognostic impact of FISH.

Patients with newly diagnosed chronic lymphocytic leukemia should standardly undergo immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region gene (IGHV) mutation status and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) tests, based on the results of a meta-analysis published in Blood.

“This change will help define the minimal standard initial prognostic evaluation for patients with CLL and help facilitate use of the powerful, recently developed, integrated prognostic indices, all of which are dependent on these 2 variables,” wrote Dr. Sameer A. Parikh of Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., and associates.

By Gregor1976 via Wikimedia Commons

IGHV and FISH have prognostic value independent of clinical stage in patients with newly diagnosed and previously untreated CLL, they said (Blood. 2016;127[14]:1752-60). Better understanding of the patient’s risk of disease progression at diagnosis can guide counseling and follow-up intervals, and could potentially influence the decision to treat high-risk patients on early intervention protocols.

IGHV and FISH also appear to provide additional information on progression-free and overall survival.

The researchers cautioned, however, that the results of these tests should not be used to initiate CLL-specific therapy. Only patients who meet indications for therapy based on the 2008 International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia guidelines should receive treatment.

Further, they noted, the median age of patients included in studies that they analyzed was 64 years; the median age of patients with CLL is 72 years. The prognostic abilities of IGHV mutation and FISH may differ in these older individuals with CLL.

The researchers analyzed 31 studies that met the criteria for inclusion – full-length publications that included at least 200 patients and reported on the prognostic value of IGHV and/or FISH for predicting progression-free or overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed CLL.

They found that the median progression-free survival (range, about 1-5 years) was significantly shorter for patients with unmutated IGHV genes, than was the median progression-free survival (range, about 9-19 years) for those with mutated IGHV genes. Similarly, the median overall survival was significantly shorter for patients with unmutated IGHV (range, about 3-10 years) than for those with mutated IGHV (range, about 18-26 years).

For patients with high-risk FISH (including del17p13 and del11q23), the median progression-free survival was significantly shorter (range, about 0.1-5 years) than for those with low/intermediate-risk FISH (including del13q, normal, and trisomy 12; range, about 1.5-22 years). Median overall survival also significantly differed, ranging from about 3-10 years for patients with high-risk FISH and from about 7.5-20.5 years for those with low/intermediate-risk FISH.

In multivariable analyses, the hazard ratio for high-risk FISH ranged from 1.3 to 4.7 for progression-free survival and from 0.9 to 8.2 for overall survival. In studies reporting the results of multivariable analysis, high-risk FISH remained an independent predictor of progression-free survival in 8 of 17 studies and of overall survival in 10 of 14 studies, including in 10 of 13 studies adjusting for the prognostic impact of IGHV.

In multivariable analyses, IGHV remained an independent predictor of progression-free survival in 15 of 18 studies, including 12 of 15 studies adjusting for the prognostic impact of FISH. IGHV remained an independent predictor of overall survival in 11 of 15 studies reporting the results of multivariable analysis, including 10 of 14 studies adjusting for the prognostic impact of FISH.

Venetoclax has been approved for the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who have a 17p deletion and who have been treated with a least one prior therapy, the Food and Drug Administration has announced.

The drug will be marketed as Venclexta, and is indicated for daily use after detection of a 17p deletion is confirmed through the use of the FDA-approved companion diagnostic test, the Vysis CLL FISH probe kit. A 17p deletion occurs in about 10% of patients with untreated CLL and in about 20% of patients with relapsed CLL. Venetoclax targets the B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) protein, according to the FDA press release.

“Up to half of people whose CLL progressed have 17p deletion,” Dr. Sandra Horning, chief medical officer and head of Global Product Development for Genentech, said in a press release issued by the company. Venclexta will be marketed by AbbVie and Genentech USA. The Vysis CLL FISH probe kit is manufactured by Abbott Molecular.

“For certain patients with CLL who have not had favorable outcomes with other therapies, Venclexta may provide a new option,” Dr. Richard Pazdur, director of the Office of Hematology and Oncology Products in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, said in a press release issued by the FDA.

The approval was based on a clinical trial of 106 patients who had CLL and 17p deletions and who had received at least one prior therapy. Trial participants took oral venetoclax daily, beginning with a 20 mg dose that was increased over a 5-week period to 400 mg. A complete or partial remission of CLL occurred in 80% of trial participants. Data on venetoclax also was presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The most common side effects of venetoclax include neutropenia, diarrhea, nausea, anemia, upper respiratory tract infection, thrombocytopenia, and fatigue.

The FDA granted the Venclexta application breakthrough therapy designation, priority review status, and accelerated approval for this indication. Venclexta also received orphan drug designation.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

Venetoclax has been approved for the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who have a 17p deletion and who have been treated with a least one prior therapy, the Food and Drug Administration has announced.

The drug will be marketed as Venclexta, and is indicated for daily use after detection of a 17p deletion is confirmed through the use of the FDA-approved companion diagnostic test, the Vysis CLL FISH probe kit. A 17p deletion occurs in about 10% of patients with untreated CLL and in about 20% of patients with relapsed CLL. Venetoclax targets the B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) protein, according to the FDA press release.

“Up to half of people whose CLL progressed have 17p deletion,” Dr. Sandra Horning, chief medical officer and head of Global Product Development for Genentech, said in a press release issued by the company. Venclexta will be marketed by AbbVie and Genentech USA. The Vysis CLL FISH probe kit is manufactured by Abbott Molecular.

“For certain patients with CLL who have not had favorable outcomes with other therapies, Venclexta may provide a new option,” Dr. Richard Pazdur, director of the Office of Hematology and Oncology Products in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, said in a press release issued by the FDA.

The approval was based on a clinical trial of 106 patients who had CLL and 17p deletions and who had received at least one prior therapy. Trial participants took oral venetoclax daily, beginning with a 20 mg dose that was increased over a 5-week period to 400 mg. A complete or partial remission of CLL occurred in 80% of trial participants. Data on venetoclax also was presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The most common side effects of venetoclax include neutropenia, diarrhea, nausea, anemia, upper respiratory tract infection, thrombocytopenia, and fatigue.

The FDA granted the Venclexta application breakthrough therapy designation, priority review status, and accelerated approval for this indication. Venclexta also received orphan drug designation.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

Venetoclax has been approved for the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who have a 17p deletion and who have been treated with a least one prior therapy, the Food and Drug Administration has announced.

The drug will be marketed as Venclexta, and is indicated for daily use after detection of a 17p deletion is confirmed through the use of the FDA-approved companion diagnostic test, the Vysis CLL FISH probe kit. A 17p deletion occurs in about 10% of patients with untreated CLL and in about 20% of patients with relapsed CLL. Venetoclax targets the B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) protein, according to the FDA press release.

“Up to half of people whose CLL progressed have 17p deletion,” Dr. Sandra Horning, chief medical officer and head of Global Product Development for Genentech, said in a press release issued by the company. Venclexta will be marketed by AbbVie and Genentech USA. The Vysis CLL FISH probe kit is manufactured by Abbott Molecular.

“For certain patients with CLL who have not had favorable outcomes with other therapies, Venclexta may provide a new option,” Dr. Richard Pazdur, director of the Office of Hematology and Oncology Products in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, said in a press release issued by the FDA.

The approval was based on a clinical trial of 106 patients who had CLL and 17p deletions and who had received at least one prior therapy. Trial participants took oral venetoclax daily, beginning with a 20 mg dose that was increased over a 5-week period to 400 mg. A complete or partial remission of CLL occurred in 80% of trial participants. Data on venetoclax also was presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The most common side effects of venetoclax include neutropenia, diarrhea, nausea, anemia, upper respiratory tract infection, thrombocytopenia, and fatigue.

The FDA granted the Venclexta application breakthrough therapy designation, priority review status, and accelerated approval for this indication. Venclexta also received orphan drug designation.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

Federal officials took the next step in their moonshot to end cancer by announcing on April 4 a blue ribbon panel to guide the effort.

A total of 28 leading researchers, clinicians, and patient advocates have been named to the panel charged with informing the scientific direction and goals of the National Cancer Moonshot Initiative, led by Vice President Joe Biden.

“This Blue Ribbon Panel will ensure that, as [the National Institutes of Health] allocates new resources through the Moonshot, decisions will be grounded in the best science,” Vice President Biden said in a statement. “I look forward to working with this panel and many others involved with the Moonshot to make unprecedented improvements in prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer.”

The key goals of the initiative were set out simultaneously in a perspective from Dr. Francis S. Collins, NIH director, and Dr. Douglas R. Lowy, director of the National Cancer Institute. The editorial was published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

“Fueled by an additional $680 million in the proposed fiscal year 2017 budget for the NIH, plus additional resources for the Food and Drug Administration, the initiative will aim to accelerate progress toward the next generation of interventions that we hope will substantially reduce cancer incidence and dramatically improve patient outcomes,” Dr. Collins and Dr. Lowy wrote. “The NIH’s most compelling opportunities for progress will be set forth by late summer 2016 in a research plan informed by the deliberations of a blue-ribbon panel of experts, which will provide scientific input to the National Cancer Advisory Board. Some possible opportunities include vaccine development, early-detection technology, single-cell genomic analysis, immunotherapy, a focus on pediatric cancer, and enhanced data sharing.”

To read the full editorial, click here.

[email protected]

On Twitter @denisefulton

Federal officials took the next step in their moonshot to end cancer by announcing on April 4 a blue ribbon panel to guide the effort.

A total of 28 leading researchers, clinicians, and patient advocates have been named to the panel charged with informing the scientific direction and goals of the National Cancer Moonshot Initiative, led by Vice President Joe Biden.

“This Blue Ribbon Panel will ensure that, as [the National Institutes of Health] allocates new resources through the Moonshot, decisions will be grounded in the best science,” Vice President Biden said in a statement. “I look forward to working with this panel and many others involved with the Moonshot to make unprecedented improvements in prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer.”

The key goals of the initiative were set out simultaneously in a perspective from Dr. Francis S. Collins, NIH director, and Dr. Douglas R. Lowy, director of the National Cancer Institute. The editorial was published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

“Fueled by an additional $680 million in the proposed fiscal year 2017 budget for the NIH, plus additional resources for the Food and Drug Administration, the initiative will aim to accelerate progress toward the next generation of interventions that we hope will substantially reduce cancer incidence and dramatically improve patient outcomes,” Dr. Collins and Dr. Lowy wrote. “The NIH’s most compelling opportunities for progress will be set forth by late summer 2016 in a research plan informed by the deliberations of a blue-ribbon panel of experts, which will provide scientific input to the National Cancer Advisory Board. Some possible opportunities include vaccine development, early-detection technology, single-cell genomic analysis, immunotherapy, a focus on pediatric cancer, and enhanced data sharing.”

To read the full editorial, click here.

[email protected]

On Twitter @denisefulton

Federal officials took the next step in their moonshot to end cancer by announcing on April 4 a blue ribbon panel to guide the effort.

A total of 28 leading researchers, clinicians, and patient advocates have been named to the panel charged with informing the scientific direction and goals of the National Cancer Moonshot Initiative, led by Vice President Joe Biden.

“This Blue Ribbon Panel will ensure that, as [the National Institutes of Health] allocates new resources through the Moonshot, decisions will be grounded in the best science,” Vice President Biden said in a statement. “I look forward to working with this panel and many others involved with the Moonshot to make unprecedented improvements in prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer.”

The key goals of the initiative were set out simultaneously in a perspective from Dr. Francis S. Collins, NIH director, and Dr. Douglas R. Lowy, director of the National Cancer Institute. The editorial was published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

“Fueled by an additional $680 million in the proposed fiscal year 2017 budget for the NIH, plus additional resources for the Food and Drug Administration, the initiative will aim to accelerate progress toward the next generation of interventions that we hope will substantially reduce cancer incidence and dramatically improve patient outcomes,” Dr. Collins and Dr. Lowy wrote. “The NIH’s most compelling opportunities for progress will be set forth by late summer 2016 in a research plan informed by the deliberations of a blue-ribbon panel of experts, which will provide scientific input to the National Cancer Advisory Board. Some possible opportunities include vaccine development, early-detection technology, single-cell genomic analysis, immunotherapy, a focus on pediatric cancer, and enhanced data sharing.”

To read the full editorial, click here.

[email protected]

On Twitter @denisefulton

Mutations in the RPS15 gene occurred in 8 of 41 patients with relapsing chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and the mutations were present before treatment in 7 of the 8, a possible indication that the aberrations are early genetic events in aggressive CLL pathobiology.

RPS15 mutations may lead to defective p53 stability and increased degradation, representing a potential novel mechanism in CLL pathobiology. The findings suggest “RPS15-mutant cases should be treated with alternative regimens that act independently of the p53 pathway,” wrote Dr. Viktor Ljungström of the department of immunology, genetics, and pathology, Uppsala (Sweden) University, and colleagues (Blood 2016 Feb 25. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-10-674572).

©SilverV/thinkstockphotos.com

In their study, the researchers performed whole exome sequencing of 110 samples collected before and after treatment from 41 patients with aggressive CLL that relapsed after a median of 2 years; 7 patients had mutations in RPS15 before treatment, and 8 had RPS15 mutations after treatment. The findings suggest that standard therapy with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab was not intrinsically mutagenic.

High frequencies of mutations were linked to poor outcome in both pretreated and relapse samples. These mutations included NOTCH1, TP53, ATM, SF3B1, MGA, and BIRC3. At least one mutation was seen before treatment in 26 of the 41 patients, and that rate rose to 33 of 41 patients at relapse. Two or more mutations were noted before treatment in 12 of 41 patients, and that rose to 15 of 41 at relapse.

In response to their findings, the researchers next performed targeted resequencing of the RPS15 hot spot (exon 4) in an extended series of 790 patients with CLL, intentionally enriched with 605 cases with adverse prognostic profiles. They found an additional 36 mutations in RPS15 (36/605, 6%). In contrast, none of the 185 patients with more favorable prognostic, IGHV-mutated CLL carried RPS15 mutations. RPS15-mutant patients without concomitant TP53 aberrations had an overall survival similar to other aggressive CLL subgroups, but none of the patients with both mutations survived at 10 years, compared with 59% of patients with wild-type RPS15 and wild-type TP53, “pointing to a dismal prognosis for RPS15-mutated CLL,” they wrote.

They also analyzed 30 cases with Richter syndrome (CLL transformed into diffuse large B-cell lymphoma), and only a single case was found to carry an RPS15 mutation, and the mutation was also observed in the preceding CLL phase. This finding indicates that RPS15 mutation probably does not underlie the transformation of CLL to Richter syndrome, according to the researchers.

Dr. Ljungström and coauthors reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

Mutations in the RPS15 gene occurred in 8 of 41 patients with relapsing chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and the mutations were present before treatment in 7 of the 8, a possible indication that the aberrations are early genetic events in aggressive CLL pathobiology.

RPS15 mutations may lead to defective p53 stability and increased degradation, representing a potential novel mechanism in CLL pathobiology. The findings suggest “RPS15-mutant cases should be treated with alternative regimens that act independently of the p53 pathway,” wrote Dr. Viktor Ljungström of the department of immunology, genetics, and pathology, Uppsala (Sweden) University, and colleagues (Blood 2016 Feb 25. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-10-674572).

©SilverV/thinkstockphotos.com

In their study, the researchers performed whole exome sequencing of 110 samples collected before and after treatment from 41 patients with aggressive CLL that relapsed after a median of 2 years; 7 patients had mutations in RPS15 before treatment, and 8 had RPS15 mutations after treatment. The findings suggest that standard therapy with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab was not intrinsically mutagenic.

High frequencies of mutations were linked to poor outcome in both pretreated and relapse samples. These mutations included NOTCH1, TP53, ATM, SF3B1, MGA, and BIRC3. At least one mutation was seen before treatment in 26 of the 41 patients, and that rate rose to 33 of 41 patients at relapse. Two or more mutations were noted before treatment in 12 of 41 patients, and that rose to 15 of 41 at relapse.

In response to their findings, the researchers next performed targeted resequencing of the RPS15 hot spot (exon 4) in an extended series of 790 patients with CLL, intentionally enriched with 605 cases with adverse prognostic profiles. They found an additional 36 mutations in RPS15 (36/605, 6%). In contrast, none of the 185 patients with more favorable prognostic, IGHV-mutated CLL carried RPS15 mutations. RPS15-mutant patients without concomitant TP53 aberrations had an overall survival similar to other aggressive CLL subgroups, but none of the patients with both mutations survived at 10 years, compared with 59% of patients with wild-type RPS15 and wild-type TP53, “pointing to a dismal prognosis for RPS15-mutated CLL,” they wrote.

They also analyzed 30 cases with Richter syndrome (CLL transformed into diffuse large B-cell lymphoma), and only a single case was found to carry an RPS15 mutation, and the mutation was also observed in the preceding CLL phase. This finding indicates that RPS15 mutation probably does not underlie the transformation of CLL to Richter syndrome, according to the researchers.

Dr. Ljungström and coauthors reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

Mutations in the RPS15 gene occurred in 8 of 41 patients with relapsing chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and the mutations were present before treatment in 7 of the 8, a possible indication that the aberrations are early genetic events in aggressive CLL pathobiology.

RPS15 mutations may lead to defective p53 stability and increased degradation, representing a potential novel mechanism in CLL pathobiology. The findings suggest “RPS15-mutant cases should be treated with alternative regimens that act independently of the p53 pathway,” wrote Dr. Viktor Ljungström of the department of immunology, genetics, and pathology, Uppsala (Sweden) University, and colleagues (Blood 2016 Feb 25. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-10-674572).

©SilverV/thinkstockphotos.com

In their study, the researchers performed whole exome sequencing of 110 samples collected before and after treatment from 41 patients with aggressive CLL that relapsed after a median of 2 years; 7 patients had mutations in RPS15 before treatment, and 8 had RPS15 mutations after treatment. The findings suggest that standard therapy with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab was not intrinsically mutagenic.

High frequencies of mutations were linked to poor outcome in both pretreated and relapse samples. These mutations included NOTCH1, TP53, ATM, SF3B1, MGA, and BIRC3. At least one mutation was seen before treatment in 26 of the 41 patients, and that rate rose to 33 of 41 patients at relapse. Two or more mutations were noted before treatment in 12 of 41 patients, and that rose to 15 of 41 at relapse.

In response to their findings, the researchers next performed targeted resequencing of the RPS15 hot spot (exon 4) in an extended series of 790 patients with CLL, intentionally enriched with 605 cases with adverse prognostic profiles. They found an additional 36 mutations in RPS15 (36/605, 6%). In contrast, none of the 185 patients with more favorable prognostic, IGHV-mutated CLL carried RPS15 mutations. RPS15-mutant patients without concomitant TP53 aberrations had an overall survival similar to other aggressive CLL subgroups, but none of the patients with both mutations survived at 10 years, compared with 59% of patients with wild-type RPS15 and wild-type TP53, “pointing to a dismal prognosis for RPS15-mutated CLL,” they wrote.

They also analyzed 30 cases with Richter syndrome (CLL transformed into diffuse large B-cell lymphoma), and only a single case was found to carry an RPS15 mutation, and the mutation was also observed in the preceding CLL phase. This finding indicates that RPS15 mutation probably does not underlie the transformation of CLL to Richter syndrome, according to the researchers.

Dr. Ljungström and coauthors reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

An increased rate of adverse events, including deaths, have been reported in clinical trials with idelalisib (Zydelig) in combination with other cancer medicines, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced.

Gilead Sciences, Inc. has confirmed that they are stopping six clinical trials in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, small lymphocytic lymphoma and indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas. The FDA is reviewing the findings of the clinical trials and will communicate new information as necessary, according to the FDA press release.

Idelalisib is not approved for previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. It is approved by the FDA for the treatment of:

• Relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia, in combination with rituximab, in patients for whom rituximab alone would be considered appropriate therapy due to other co-morbidities.

• Relapsed follicular B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies.

• Relapsed small lymphocytic lymphoma in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies.

Adverse events involving idelalisib should be reported to the FDA MedWatch program, the release advised.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

An increased rate of adverse events, including deaths, have been reported in clinical trials with idelalisib (Zydelig) in combination with other cancer medicines, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced.

Gilead Sciences, Inc. has confirmed that they are stopping six clinical trials in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, small lymphocytic lymphoma and indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas. The FDA is reviewing the findings of the clinical trials and will communicate new information as necessary, according to the FDA press release.

Idelalisib is not approved for previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. It is approved by the FDA for the treatment of:

• Relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia, in combination with rituximab, in patients for whom rituximab alone would be considered appropriate therapy due to other co-morbidities.

• Relapsed follicular B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies.

• Relapsed small lymphocytic lymphoma in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies.

Adverse events involving idelalisib should be reported to the FDA MedWatch program, the release advised.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

An increased rate of adverse events, including deaths, have been reported in clinical trials with idelalisib (Zydelig) in combination with other cancer medicines, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced.

Gilead Sciences, Inc. has confirmed that they are stopping six clinical trials in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, small lymphocytic lymphoma and indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas. The FDA is reviewing the findings of the clinical trials and will communicate new information as necessary, according to the FDA press release.

Idelalisib is not approved for previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. It is approved by the FDA for the treatment of:

• Relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia, in combination with rituximab, in patients for whom rituximab alone would be considered appropriate therapy due to other co-morbidities.

• Relapsed follicular B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies.

• Relapsed small lymphocytic lymphoma in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies.

Adverse events involving idelalisib should be reported to the FDA MedWatch program, the release advised.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

Ibrutinib (Imbruvica) has been approved as a first-line treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), irrespective of their treatment history, according to a statement issued by the manufacturer, AbbVie.

The approval is based on data from the randomized, multicenter, open-label phase III RESONATE-2 trial, which evaluated the use of ibrutinib versus chlorambucil in 269 treatment-naive patients with CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) aged 65 years or older. The RESONATE-2 data were presented at the 2015 annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

VashiDonsk/Wikimedia Commons/Creative Commons BY-SA 3.0

“The progression-free survival data seen in these previously untreated CLL patients are strong and encouraging,” Dr. Jan Burger of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, and the lead investigator of RESONATE-2, said in the AbbVie statement. “This is especially important for first-line CLL patients, when considering the safety profile. This treatment represents another option for these patients.”

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network also recently published an update to its clinical practice guidelines for non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas, granting Imbruvica a category 1 recommendation for certain CLL patients, including as a first-line treatment option for frail CLL patients with significant comorbidities, as well as for CLL patients with or without del 17p or the genetic mutation TP53 who are 70 years or older, or younger patients with significant comorbidities, the AbbVie statement noted.

Imbruvica has been jointly developed and commercialized by Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company, and by Janssen Biotech.

[email protected]

Ibrutinib (Imbruvica) has been approved as a first-line treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), irrespective of their treatment history, according to a statement issued by the manufacturer, AbbVie.

The approval is based on data from the randomized, multicenter, open-label phase III RESONATE-2 trial, which evaluated the use of ibrutinib versus chlorambucil in 269 treatment-naive patients with CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) aged 65 years or older. The RESONATE-2 data were presented at the 2015 annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

VashiDonsk/Wikimedia Commons/Creative Commons BY-SA 3.0

“The progression-free survival data seen in these previously untreated CLL patients are strong and encouraging,” Dr. Jan Burger of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, and the lead investigator of RESONATE-2, said in the AbbVie statement. “This is especially important for first-line CLL patients, when considering the safety profile. This treatment represents another option for these patients.”

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network also recently published an update to its clinical practice guidelines for non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas, granting Imbruvica a category 1 recommendation for certain CLL patients, including as a first-line treatment option for frail CLL patients with significant comorbidities, as well as for CLL patients with or without del 17p or the genetic mutation TP53 who are 70 years or older, or younger patients with significant comorbidities, the AbbVie statement noted.

Imbruvica has been jointly developed and commercialized by Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company, and by Janssen Biotech.

[email protected]

Ibrutinib (Imbruvica) has been approved as a first-line treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), irrespective of their treatment history, according to a statement issued by the manufacturer, AbbVie.

The approval is based on data from the randomized, multicenter, open-label phase III RESONATE-2 trial, which evaluated the use of ibrutinib versus chlorambucil in 269 treatment-naive patients with CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) aged 65 years or older. The RESONATE-2 data were presented at the 2015 annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

VashiDonsk/Wikimedia Commons/Creative Commons BY-SA 3.0

“The progression-free survival data seen in these previously untreated CLL patients are strong and encouraging,” Dr. Jan Burger of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, and the lead investigator of RESONATE-2, said in the AbbVie statement. “This is especially important for first-line CLL patients, when considering the safety profile. This treatment represents another option for these patients.”

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network also recently published an update to its clinical practice guidelines for non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas, granting Imbruvica a category 1 recommendation for certain CLL patients, including as a first-line treatment option for frail CLL patients with significant comorbidities, as well as for CLL patients with or without del 17p or the genetic mutation TP53 who are 70 years or older, or younger patients with significant comorbidities, the AbbVie statement noted.

Imbruvica has been jointly developed and commercialized by Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company, and by Janssen Biotech.

[email protected]