CML

MILAN – A full 61.5% of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in deep molecular remission for more than 1 year on long-term tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy remained alive and free of relapse 6 months after stopping their TKI in the EURO-SKI trial.

Molecular relapse-free survival at 9 months was 58% and 55% at 12 months.

The preplanned interim analysis after 200 patients allowed the trialists to discard the study’s null hypothesis that molecular relapse-free survival at 6 months would be 40% or less (P less than .0001).

"With less strict inclusion and relapse criteria than the A-STIM study and other trials, stopping is safe and we can continue with the trial," Dr. Susanne Saussele said in a late-breaking abstract session at the annual meeting of the European Hematology Association.

Importantly, interim results from the EURO-SKI (European Stop TKI) study also suggest that the level of molecular response (MR) achieved prior to TKI withdrawal affects molecular relapse-free survival.

Among 197 patients with molecular laboratory results available for exact classification, 49% of patients in MR⁴ relapsed, compared with 39% in MR^4.5 and 39% in MR⁵.

"In the setting of standardized molecular testing within a CML [chronic myeloid leukemia] stopping trial, it seems that molecular remission has an impact on molecular free-survival," said Dr. Saussele of University Medical Centre Mannheim, Germany.

As no statistical test was performed and this was an interim analysis, MR^4.5 or MR⁵ cannot yet be used as a criterion to select patients to withdraw from treatment, she said in an interview.

The findings do confirm results from the recent A-STIM (According to Stop Imatinib) study showing that loss of major molecular response can be used as a practical criterion for restarting imatinib (J. Clin. Oncol. 2014;32:424-30).

Several studies including the STIM (Stop Imatinib) trial and the STOP 2G-TKI (Stop Second Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors) study have shown that imatinib (Gleevec), dasatinib (Sprycel), and nilotinib (Tasigna) can be safely withdrawn in a substantial proportion of patients with CML in deep MR.

A number of questions remain open, however, such as which molecular level has to be reached before stopping TKI therapy, the minimal duration of TKI pretreatment or MR⁴ before stopping, and which prognostic factors influence molecular relapse-free survival, she said.

EURO-SKI was set up to define prognostic markers to increase the rate of patients in durable deep MR after stopping TKI treatment. Other aims are to evaluate methods of molecular monitoring, quality of life, and saved treatment costs per country.

Patients with chronic-phase CML from eight countries were eligible if they were on a TKI for at least 3 years and had a confirmed deep MR, defined as more than a 4 log reduction in BCR-ABL (breakpoint cluster region–Abelson) transcripts for more than 12 months confirmed by three consecutive polymerase chain reaction results.

MR⁴ status also had to be confirmed in an MR⁴-standardized laboratory according to criteria by Cross et al. (Leukemia 2012;26:2172-5)

Patients with previous or planned allogeneic stem cell transplantation or a prior TKI failure were excluded.

A total of 103 patients received pretreatment before TKI therapy, mostly with hydroxyurea alone (n = 71) or with interferon (n = 22). Their median age was 53 years.

First-line TKI was imatinib in 194 patients, nilotinib in 3, and dasatinib in 3.

The median duration of TKI therapy was 8 years and median MR⁴ duration before stopping TKI therapy was 5 years.

Dr. Saussele cautioned that adverse events and quality of life must be taken into account when considering TKI withdrawal in these patients.

A total of 222 adverse events were reported in 98 patients, with 57 events in 37 patients related to treatment stop. None were grade 4.

The most common adverse event was musculoskeletal or joint pain (39 events of all grades and 6 grade 3/4 events). This was first described in the Swedish EURO-SKI patients in 15-20% of patients after TKI withdrawal, prompting the investigators to send an advisory letter to all participating physicians, she remarked.

Other adverse events included sweating, skin disorders, folliculitis, depressive episodes, fatigue, urticaria, and weight loss.

The EURO-SKI trial was recently expanded to enroll 700 patients, with a quality of life analysis expected later this year. The next report on the primary endpoint is expected at the American Society of Hematology annual meeting, Dr. Saussele said.

Dr. Saussele reported honoraria and research and travel support from BMS, Novartis, and Pfizer.

[email protected]

MILAN – A full 61.5% of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in deep molecular remission for more than 1 year on long-term tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy remained alive and free of relapse 6 months after stopping their TKI in the EURO-SKI trial.

Molecular relapse-free survival at 9 months was 58% and 55% at 12 months.

The preplanned interim analysis after 200 patients allowed the trialists to discard the study’s null hypothesis that molecular relapse-free survival at 6 months would be 40% or less (P less than .0001).

"With less strict inclusion and relapse criteria than the A-STIM study and other trials, stopping is safe and we can continue with the trial," Dr. Susanne Saussele said in a late-breaking abstract session at the annual meeting of the European Hematology Association.

Importantly, interim results from the EURO-SKI (European Stop TKI) study also suggest that the level of molecular response (MR) achieved prior to TKI withdrawal affects molecular relapse-free survival.

Among 197 patients with molecular laboratory results available for exact classification, 49% of patients in MR⁴ relapsed, compared with 39% in MR^4.5 and 39% in MR⁵.

"In the setting of standardized molecular testing within a CML [chronic myeloid leukemia] stopping trial, it seems that molecular remission has an impact on molecular free-survival," said Dr. Saussele of University Medical Centre Mannheim, Germany.

As no statistical test was performed and this was an interim analysis, MR^4.5 or MR⁵ cannot yet be used as a criterion to select patients to withdraw from treatment, she said in an interview.

The findings do confirm results from the recent A-STIM (According to Stop Imatinib) study showing that loss of major molecular response can be used as a practical criterion for restarting imatinib (J. Clin. Oncol. 2014;32:424-30).

Several studies including the STIM (Stop Imatinib) trial and the STOP 2G-TKI (Stop Second Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors) study have shown that imatinib (Gleevec), dasatinib (Sprycel), and nilotinib (Tasigna) can be safely withdrawn in a substantial proportion of patients with CML in deep MR.

A number of questions remain open, however, such as which molecular level has to be reached before stopping TKI therapy, the minimal duration of TKI pretreatment or MR⁴ before stopping, and which prognostic factors influence molecular relapse-free survival, she said.

EURO-SKI was set up to define prognostic markers to increase the rate of patients in durable deep MR after stopping TKI treatment. Other aims are to evaluate methods of molecular monitoring, quality of life, and saved treatment costs per country.

Patients with chronic-phase CML from eight countries were eligible if they were on a TKI for at least 3 years and had a confirmed deep MR, defined as more than a 4 log reduction in BCR-ABL (breakpoint cluster region–Abelson) transcripts for more than 12 months confirmed by three consecutive polymerase chain reaction results.

MR⁴ status also had to be confirmed in an MR⁴-standardized laboratory according to criteria by Cross et al. (Leukemia 2012;26:2172-5)

Patients with previous or planned allogeneic stem cell transplantation or a prior TKI failure were excluded.

A total of 103 patients received pretreatment before TKI therapy, mostly with hydroxyurea alone (n = 71) or with interferon (n = 22). Their median age was 53 years.

First-line TKI was imatinib in 194 patients, nilotinib in 3, and dasatinib in 3.

The median duration of TKI therapy was 8 years and median MR⁴ duration before stopping TKI therapy was 5 years.

Dr. Saussele cautioned that adverse events and quality of life must be taken into account when considering TKI withdrawal in these patients.

A total of 222 adverse events were reported in 98 patients, with 57 events in 37 patients related to treatment stop. None were grade 4.

The most common adverse event was musculoskeletal or joint pain (39 events of all grades and 6 grade 3/4 events). This was first described in the Swedish EURO-SKI patients in 15-20% of patients after TKI withdrawal, prompting the investigators to send an advisory letter to all participating physicians, she remarked.

Other adverse events included sweating, skin disorders, folliculitis, depressive episodes, fatigue, urticaria, and weight loss.

The EURO-SKI trial was recently expanded to enroll 700 patients, with a quality of life analysis expected later this year. The next report on the primary endpoint is expected at the American Society of Hematology annual meeting, Dr. Saussele said.

Dr. Saussele reported honoraria and research and travel support from BMS, Novartis, and Pfizer.

[email protected]

MILAN – A full 61.5% of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in deep molecular remission for more than 1 year on long-term tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy remained alive and free of relapse 6 months after stopping their TKI in the EURO-SKI trial.

Molecular relapse-free survival at 9 months was 58% and 55% at 12 months.

The preplanned interim analysis after 200 patients allowed the trialists to discard the study’s null hypothesis that molecular relapse-free survival at 6 months would be 40% or less (P less than .0001).

"With less strict inclusion and relapse criteria than the A-STIM study and other trials, stopping is safe and we can continue with the trial," Dr. Susanne Saussele said in a late-breaking abstract session at the annual meeting of the European Hematology Association.

Importantly, interim results from the EURO-SKI (European Stop TKI) study also suggest that the level of molecular response (MR) achieved prior to TKI withdrawal affects molecular relapse-free survival.

Among 197 patients with molecular laboratory results available for exact classification, 49% of patients in MR⁴ relapsed, compared with 39% in MR^4.5 and 39% in MR⁵.

"In the setting of standardized molecular testing within a CML [chronic myeloid leukemia] stopping trial, it seems that molecular remission has an impact on molecular free-survival," said Dr. Saussele of University Medical Centre Mannheim, Germany.

As no statistical test was performed and this was an interim analysis, MR^4.5 or MR⁵ cannot yet be used as a criterion to select patients to withdraw from treatment, she said in an interview.

The findings do confirm results from the recent A-STIM (According to Stop Imatinib) study showing that loss of major molecular response can be used as a practical criterion for restarting imatinib (J. Clin. Oncol. 2014;32:424-30).

Several studies including the STIM (Stop Imatinib) trial and the STOP 2G-TKI (Stop Second Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors) study have shown that imatinib (Gleevec), dasatinib (Sprycel), and nilotinib (Tasigna) can be safely withdrawn in a substantial proportion of patients with CML in deep MR.

A number of questions remain open, however, such as which molecular level has to be reached before stopping TKI therapy, the minimal duration of TKI pretreatment or MR⁴ before stopping, and which prognostic factors influence molecular relapse-free survival, she said.

EURO-SKI was set up to define prognostic markers to increase the rate of patients in durable deep MR after stopping TKI treatment. Other aims are to evaluate methods of molecular monitoring, quality of life, and saved treatment costs per country.

Patients with chronic-phase CML from eight countries were eligible if they were on a TKI for at least 3 years and had a confirmed deep MR, defined as more than a 4 log reduction in BCR-ABL (breakpoint cluster region–Abelson) transcripts for more than 12 months confirmed by three consecutive polymerase chain reaction results.

MR⁴ status also had to be confirmed in an MR⁴-standardized laboratory according to criteria by Cross et al. (Leukemia 2012;26:2172-5)

Patients with previous or planned allogeneic stem cell transplantation or a prior TKI failure were excluded.

A total of 103 patients received pretreatment before TKI therapy, mostly with hydroxyurea alone (n = 71) or with interferon (n = 22). Their median age was 53 years.

First-line TKI was imatinib in 194 patients, nilotinib in 3, and dasatinib in 3.

The median duration of TKI therapy was 8 years and median MR⁴ duration before stopping TKI therapy was 5 years.

Dr. Saussele cautioned that adverse events and quality of life must be taken into account when considering TKI withdrawal in these patients.

A total of 222 adverse events were reported in 98 patients, with 57 events in 37 patients related to treatment stop. None were grade 4.

The most common adverse event was musculoskeletal or joint pain (39 events of all grades and 6 grade 3/4 events). This was first described in the Swedish EURO-SKI patients in 15-20% of patients after TKI withdrawal, prompting the investigators to send an advisory letter to all participating physicians, she remarked.

Other adverse events included sweating, skin disorders, folliculitis, depressive episodes, fatigue, urticaria, and weight loss.

The EURO-SKI trial was recently expanded to enroll 700 patients, with a quality of life analysis expected later this year. The next report on the primary endpoint is expected at the American Society of Hematology annual meeting, Dr. Saussele said.

Dr. Saussele reported honoraria and research and travel support from BMS, Novartis, and Pfizer.

[email protected]

MILAN – A full 61.5% of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in deep molecular remission for more than 1 year on long-term tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy remained alive and free of relapse 6 months after stopping their TKI in the EURO-SKI trial.

Molecular relapse-free survival at 9 months was 58% and 55% at 12 months.

The preplanned interim analysis after 200 patients allowed the trialists to discard the study’s null hypothesis that molecular relapse-free survival at 6 months would be 40% or less (P less than .0001).

"With less strict inclusion and relapse criteria than the A-STIM study and other trials, stopping is safe and we can continue with the trial," Dr. Susanne Saussele said in a late-breaking abstract session at the annual meeting of the European Hematology Association.

Importantly, interim results from the EURO-SKI (European Stop TKI) study also suggest that the level of molecular response (MR) achieved prior to TKI withdrawal affects molecular relapse-free survival.

Among 197 patients with molecular laboratory results available for exact classification, 49% of patients in MR⁴ relapsed, compared with 39% in MR^4.5 and 39% in MR⁵.

"In the setting of standardized molecular testing within a CML [chronic myeloid leukemia] stopping trial, it seems that molecular remission has an impact on molecular free-survival," said Dr. Saussele of University Medical Centre Mannheim, Germany.

As no statistical test was performed and this was an interim analysis, MR^4.5 or MR⁵ cannot yet be used as a criterion to select patients to withdraw from treatment, she said in an interview.

The findings do confirm results from the recent A-STIM (According to Stop Imatinib) study showing that loss of major molecular response can be used as a practical criterion for restarting imatinib (J. Clin. Oncol. 2014;32:424-30).

Several studies including the STIM (Stop Imatinib) trial and the STOP 2G-TKI (Stop Second Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors) study have shown that imatinib (Gleevec), dasatinib (Sprycel), and nilotinib (Tasigna) can be safely withdrawn in a substantial proportion of patients with CML in deep MR.

A number of questions remain open, however, such as which molecular level has to be reached before stopping TKI therapy, the minimal duration of TKI pretreatment or MR⁴ before stopping, and which prognostic factors influence molecular relapse-free survival, she said.

EURO-SKI was set up to define prognostic markers to increase the rate of patients in durable deep MR after stopping TKI treatment. Other aims are to evaluate methods of molecular monitoring, quality of life, and saved treatment costs per country.

Patients with chronic-phase CML from eight countries were eligible if they were on a TKI for at least 3 years and had a confirmed deep MR, defined as more than a 4 log reduction in BCR-ABL (breakpoint cluster region–Abelson) transcripts for more than 12 months confirmed by three consecutive polymerase chain reaction results.

MR⁴ status also had to be confirmed in an MR⁴-standardized laboratory according to criteria by Cross et al. (Leukemia 2012;26:2172-5)

Patients with previous or planned allogeneic stem cell transplantation or a prior TKI failure were excluded.

A total of 103 patients received pretreatment before TKI therapy, mostly with hydroxyurea alone (n = 71) or with interferon (n = 22). Their median age was 53 years.

First-line TKI was imatinib in 194 patients, nilotinib in 3, and dasatinib in 3.

The median duration of TKI therapy was 8 years and median MR⁴ duration before stopping TKI therapy was 5 years.

Dr. Saussele cautioned that adverse events and quality of life must be taken into account when considering TKI withdrawal in these patients.

A total of 222 adverse events were reported in 98 patients, with 57 events in 37 patients related to treatment stop. None were grade 4.

The most common adverse event was musculoskeletal or joint pain (39 events of all grades and 6 grade 3/4 events). This was first described in the Swedish EURO-SKI patients in 15-20% of patients after TKI withdrawal, prompting the investigators to send an advisory letter to all participating physicians, she remarked.

Other adverse events included sweating, skin disorders, folliculitis, depressive episodes, fatigue, urticaria, and weight loss.

The EURO-SKI trial was recently expanded to enroll 700 patients, with a quality of life analysis expected later this year. The next report on the primary endpoint is expected at the American Society of Hematology annual meeting, Dr. Saussele said.

Dr. Saussele reported honoraria and research and travel support from BMS, Novartis, and Pfizer.

[email protected]

MILAN – A full 61.5% of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in deep molecular remission for more than 1 year on long-term tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy remained alive and free of relapse 6 months after stopping their TKI in the EURO-SKI trial.

Molecular relapse-free survival at 9 months was 58% and 55% at 12 months.

The preplanned interim analysis after 200 patients allowed the trialists to discard the study’s null hypothesis that molecular relapse-free survival at 6 months would be 40% or less (P less than .0001).

"With less strict inclusion and relapse criteria than the A-STIM study and other trials, stopping is safe and we can continue with the trial," Dr. Susanne Saussele said in a late-breaking abstract session at the annual meeting of the European Hematology Association.

Importantly, interim results from the EURO-SKI (European Stop TKI) study also suggest that the level of molecular response (MR) achieved prior to TKI withdrawal affects molecular relapse-free survival.

Among 197 patients with molecular laboratory results available for exact classification, 49% of patients in MR⁴ relapsed, compared with 39% in MR^4.5 and 39% in MR⁵.

"In the setting of standardized molecular testing within a CML [chronic myeloid leukemia] stopping trial, it seems that molecular remission has an impact on molecular free-survival," said Dr. Saussele of University Medical Centre Mannheim, Germany.

As no statistical test was performed and this was an interim analysis, MR^4.5 or MR⁵ cannot yet be used as a criterion to select patients to withdraw from treatment, she said in an interview.

The findings do confirm results from the recent A-STIM (According to Stop Imatinib) study showing that loss of major molecular response can be used as a practical criterion for restarting imatinib (J. Clin. Oncol. 2014;32:424-30).

Several studies including the STIM (Stop Imatinib) trial and the STOP 2G-TKI (Stop Second Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors) study have shown that imatinib (Gleevec), dasatinib (Sprycel), and nilotinib (Tasigna) can be safely withdrawn in a substantial proportion of patients with CML in deep MR.

A number of questions remain open, however, such as which molecular level has to be reached before stopping TKI therapy, the minimal duration of TKI pretreatment or MR⁴ before stopping, and which prognostic factors influence molecular relapse-free survival, she said.

EURO-SKI was set up to define prognostic markers to increase the rate of patients in durable deep MR after stopping TKI treatment. Other aims are to evaluate methods of molecular monitoring, quality of life, and saved treatment costs per country.

Patients with chronic-phase CML from eight countries were eligible if they were on a TKI for at least 3 years and had a confirmed deep MR, defined as more than a 4 log reduction in BCR-ABL (breakpoint cluster region–Abelson) transcripts for more than 12 months confirmed by three consecutive polymerase chain reaction results.

MR⁴ status also had to be confirmed in an MR⁴-standardized laboratory according to criteria by Cross et al. (Leukemia 2012;26:2172-5)

Patients with previous or planned allogeneic stem cell transplantation or a prior TKI failure were excluded.

A total of 103 patients received pretreatment before TKI therapy, mostly with hydroxyurea alone (n = 71) or with interferon (n = 22). Their median age was 53 years.

First-line TKI was imatinib in 194 patients, nilotinib in 3, and dasatinib in 3.

The median duration of TKI therapy was 8 years and median MR⁴ duration before stopping TKI therapy was 5 years.

Dr. Saussele cautioned that adverse events and quality of life must be taken into account when considering TKI withdrawal in these patients.

A total of 222 adverse events were reported in 98 patients, with 57 events in 37 patients related to treatment stop. None were grade 4.

The most common adverse event was musculoskeletal or joint pain (39 events of all grades and 6 grade 3/4 events). This was first described in the Swedish EURO-SKI patients in 15-20% of patients after TKI withdrawal, prompting the investigators to send an advisory letter to all participating physicians, she remarked.

Other adverse events included sweating, skin disorders, folliculitis, depressive episodes, fatigue, urticaria, and weight loss.

The EURO-SKI trial was recently expanded to enroll 700 patients, with a quality of life analysis expected later this year. The next report on the primary endpoint is expected at the American Society of Hematology annual meeting, Dr. Saussele said.

Dr. Saussele reported honoraria and research and travel support from BMS, Novartis, and Pfizer.

[email protected]

MILAN – A full 61.5% of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in deep molecular remission for more than 1 year on long-term tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy remained alive and free of relapse 6 months after stopping their TKI in the EURO-SKI trial.

Molecular relapse-free survival at 9 months was 58% and 55% at 12 months.

The preplanned interim analysis after 200 patients allowed the trialists to discard the study’s null hypothesis that molecular relapse-free survival at 6 months would be 40% or less (P less than .0001).

"With less strict inclusion and relapse criteria than the A-STIM study and other trials, stopping is safe and we can continue with the trial," Dr. Susanne Saussele said in a late-breaking abstract session at the annual meeting of the European Hematology Association.

Importantly, interim results from the EURO-SKI (European Stop TKI) study also suggest that the level of molecular response (MR) achieved prior to TKI withdrawal affects molecular relapse-free survival.

Among 197 patients with molecular laboratory results available for exact classification, 49% of patients in MR⁴ relapsed, compared with 39% in MR^4.5 and 39% in MR⁵.

"In the setting of standardized molecular testing within a CML [chronic myeloid leukemia] stopping trial, it seems that molecular remission has an impact on molecular free-survival," said Dr. Saussele of University Medical Centre Mannheim, Germany.

As no statistical test was performed and this was an interim analysis, MR^4.5 or MR⁵ cannot yet be used as a criterion to select patients to withdraw from treatment, she said in an interview.

The findings do confirm results from the recent A-STIM (According to Stop Imatinib) study showing that loss of major molecular response can be used as a practical criterion for restarting imatinib (J. Clin. Oncol. 2014;32:424-30).

Several studies including the STIM (Stop Imatinib) trial and the STOP 2G-TKI (Stop Second Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors) study have shown that imatinib (Gleevec), dasatinib (Sprycel), and nilotinib (Tasigna) can be safely withdrawn in a substantial proportion of patients with CML in deep MR.

A number of questions remain open, however, such as which molecular level has to be reached before stopping TKI therapy, the minimal duration of TKI pretreatment or MR⁴ before stopping, and which prognostic factors influence molecular relapse-free survival, she said.

EURO-SKI was set up to define prognostic markers to increase the rate of patients in durable deep MR after stopping TKI treatment. Other aims are to evaluate methods of molecular monitoring, quality of life, and saved treatment costs per country.

Patients with chronic-phase CML from eight countries were eligible if they were on a TKI for at least 3 years and had a confirmed deep MR, defined as more than a 4 log reduction in BCR-ABL (breakpoint cluster region–Abelson) transcripts for more than 12 months confirmed by three consecutive polymerase chain reaction results.

MR⁴ status also had to be confirmed in an MR⁴-standardized laboratory according to criteria by Cross et al. (Leukemia 2012;26:2172-5)

Patients with previous or planned allogeneic stem cell transplantation or a prior TKI failure were excluded.

A total of 103 patients received pretreatment before TKI therapy, mostly with hydroxyurea alone (n = 71) or with interferon (n = 22). Their median age was 53 years.

First-line TKI was imatinib in 194 patients, nilotinib in 3, and dasatinib in 3.

The median duration of TKI therapy was 8 years and median MR⁴ duration before stopping TKI therapy was 5 years.

Dr. Saussele cautioned that adverse events and quality of life must be taken into account when considering TKI withdrawal in these patients.

A total of 222 adverse events were reported in 98 patients, with 57 events in 37 patients related to treatment stop. None were grade 4.

The most common adverse event was musculoskeletal or joint pain (39 events of all grades and 6 grade 3/4 events). This was first described in the Swedish EURO-SKI patients in 15-20% of patients after TKI withdrawal, prompting the investigators to send an advisory letter to all participating physicians, she remarked.

Other adverse events included sweating, skin disorders, folliculitis, depressive episodes, fatigue, urticaria, and weight loss.

The EURO-SKI trial was recently expanded to enroll 700 patients, with a quality of life analysis expected later this year. The next report on the primary endpoint is expected at the American Society of Hematology annual meeting, Dr. Saussele said.

Dr. Saussele reported honoraria and research and travel support from BMS, Novartis, and Pfizer.

[email protected]

Audience at ASCO 2014

©ASCO/Phil McCarten

CHICAGO—Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are more likely to achieve a deep molecular response if they switch to nilotinib rather than remain on imatinib, updated research suggests.

Patients with detectable disease who crossed over from imatinib to nilotinib after 24 months on the ENESTcmr study were able to achieve deep molecular responses (MR 4.5) by 36 months.

But none of the patients who remained on imatinib achieved undetectable BCR-ABL transcripts.

“Longer follow-up supports switching from imatinib to nilotinib to attain deep molecular responses,” said study investigator Nelson Spector, MD, of Federal University of Rio de Janeiro in Brazil.

“Achievement of deeper molecular responses with nilotinib therapy may increase patient eligibility for treatment-free remission trials.”

Dr Spector presented these results—an update of the ongoing, phase 3 ENESTcmr study—at the 2014 ASCO Annual Meeting (abstract 7025).

The study included 207 patients with Philadelphia-chromosome-positive CML in chronic phase who were treated with imatinib for at least 2 years and achieved complete cytogenetic response but had detectable BCR-ABL transcripts.

With 36 months’ follow-up, rates of MR 4.5 remained higher with nilotinib vs imatinib (47% vs 33%). The median time to achievement of MR 4.5 was 24 months with nilotinib and was not reached with imatinib after the 36-month follow-up.

“Patients experienced a rapid reduction in median BCR-ABL levels within the first 3 months after crossover from imatinib to nilotinib,” Dr Spector said. “No patient with detectable BCR-ABL at 24 months who remained on imatinib achieved this response with another year of follow-up.”

MR 4.5 rates were higher by 12 months in patients randomized to nilotinib (33%) than patients who crossed over from imatinib to nilotinib (21%).

“Three years follow-up shows the ability to achieve undetectable BCR-ABL status with nilotinib as we strive to achieve deep molecular responses with the potential to stop therapy,” said ASCO discussant Michael Mauro, MD, of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York.

However, he questioned whether MR 4.5, “the last, deepest milestone of relevance, is enough to assess stopping.”

By 3 years of follow-up, 93 patients (92.1%) on nilotinib and 72 patients (69.9%) on imatinib had drug-related adverse events.

The most common events with nilotinib were headache, rash, and pruritus. With imatinib, the most common events were muscle spasms, nausea, and diarrhea. More cardiovascular events were reported in patients randomized to nilotinib compared with imatinib.

“Nilotinib-treated patients experienced adverse events early after switching from long-term imatinib therapy,” Dr Spector said. “These adverse events were expected and consistent with the safety profile of nilotinib observed in other studies.”

Audience at ASCO 2014

©ASCO/Phil McCarten

CHICAGO—Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are more likely to achieve a deep molecular response if they switch to nilotinib rather than remain on imatinib, updated research suggests.

Patients with detectable disease who crossed over from imatinib to nilotinib after 24 months on the ENESTcmr study were able to achieve deep molecular responses (MR 4.5) by 36 months.

But none of the patients who remained on imatinib achieved undetectable BCR-ABL transcripts.

“Longer follow-up supports switching from imatinib to nilotinib to attain deep molecular responses,” said study investigator Nelson Spector, MD, of Federal University of Rio de Janeiro in Brazil.

“Achievement of deeper molecular responses with nilotinib therapy may increase patient eligibility for treatment-free remission trials.”

Dr Spector presented these results—an update of the ongoing, phase 3 ENESTcmr study—at the 2014 ASCO Annual Meeting (abstract 7025).

The study included 207 patients with Philadelphia-chromosome-positive CML in chronic phase who were treated with imatinib for at least 2 years and achieved complete cytogenetic response but had detectable BCR-ABL transcripts.

With 36 months’ follow-up, rates of MR 4.5 remained higher with nilotinib vs imatinib (47% vs 33%). The median time to achievement of MR 4.5 was 24 months with nilotinib and was not reached with imatinib after the 36-month follow-up.

“Patients experienced a rapid reduction in median BCR-ABL levels within the first 3 months after crossover from imatinib to nilotinib,” Dr Spector said. “No patient with detectable BCR-ABL at 24 months who remained on imatinib achieved this response with another year of follow-up.”

MR 4.5 rates were higher by 12 months in patients randomized to nilotinib (33%) than patients who crossed over from imatinib to nilotinib (21%).

“Three years follow-up shows the ability to achieve undetectable BCR-ABL status with nilotinib as we strive to achieve deep molecular responses with the potential to stop therapy,” said ASCO discussant Michael Mauro, MD, of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York.

However, he questioned whether MR 4.5, “the last, deepest milestone of relevance, is enough to assess stopping.”

By 3 years of follow-up, 93 patients (92.1%) on nilotinib and 72 patients (69.9%) on imatinib had drug-related adverse events.

The most common events with nilotinib were headache, rash, and pruritus. With imatinib, the most common events were muscle spasms, nausea, and diarrhea. More cardiovascular events were reported in patients randomized to nilotinib compared with imatinib.

“Nilotinib-treated patients experienced adverse events early after switching from long-term imatinib therapy,” Dr Spector said. “These adverse events were expected and consistent with the safety profile of nilotinib observed in other studies.”

Audience at ASCO 2014

©ASCO/Phil McCarten

CHICAGO—Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are more likely to achieve a deep molecular response if they switch to nilotinib rather than remain on imatinib, updated research suggests.

Patients with detectable disease who crossed over from imatinib to nilotinib after 24 months on the ENESTcmr study were able to achieve deep molecular responses (MR 4.5) by 36 months.

But none of the patients who remained on imatinib achieved undetectable BCR-ABL transcripts.

“Longer follow-up supports switching from imatinib to nilotinib to attain deep molecular responses,” said study investigator Nelson Spector, MD, of Federal University of Rio de Janeiro in Brazil.

“Achievement of deeper molecular responses with nilotinib therapy may increase patient eligibility for treatment-free remission trials.”

Dr Spector presented these results—an update of the ongoing, phase 3 ENESTcmr study—at the 2014 ASCO Annual Meeting (abstract 7025).

The study included 207 patients with Philadelphia-chromosome-positive CML in chronic phase who were treated with imatinib for at least 2 years and achieved complete cytogenetic response but had detectable BCR-ABL transcripts.

With 36 months’ follow-up, rates of MR 4.5 remained higher with nilotinib vs imatinib (47% vs 33%). The median time to achievement of MR 4.5 was 24 months with nilotinib and was not reached with imatinib after the 36-month follow-up.

“Patients experienced a rapid reduction in median BCR-ABL levels within the first 3 months after crossover from imatinib to nilotinib,” Dr Spector said. “No patient with detectable BCR-ABL at 24 months who remained on imatinib achieved this response with another year of follow-up.”

MR 4.5 rates were higher by 12 months in patients randomized to nilotinib (33%) than patients who crossed over from imatinib to nilotinib (21%).

“Three years follow-up shows the ability to achieve undetectable BCR-ABL status with nilotinib as we strive to achieve deep molecular responses with the potential to stop therapy,” said ASCO discussant Michael Mauro, MD, of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York.

However, he questioned whether MR 4.5, “the last, deepest milestone of relevance, is enough to assess stopping.”

By 3 years of follow-up, 93 patients (92.1%) on nilotinib and 72 patients (69.9%) on imatinib had drug-related adverse events.

The most common events with nilotinib were headache, rash, and pruritus. With imatinib, the most common events were muscle spasms, nausea, and diarrhea. More cardiovascular events were reported in patients randomized to nilotinib compared with imatinib.

“Nilotinib-treated patients experienced adverse events early after switching from long-term imatinib therapy,” Dr Spector said. “These adverse events were expected and consistent with the safety profile of nilotinib observed in other studies.”

CHICAGO – After a decade on therapy with imatinib, a majority of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia will experience an adverse drug reaction, but most reactions are mild and manageable, according to results from a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Of 1,375 patients with CML who received imatinib (Gleevec) monotherapy at some point, 1,018 (74%) had nonhematologic toxicities sometime during therapy, but only 199 (14%) had grade 3 or 4 toxicities, and there were no deaths attributed to imatinib, reported Dr. Rüdiger Hehlmann of the University of Heidelberg, Germany, and his colleagues.

Adverse drug reactions were manageable even when imatinib was combined with interferon-alfa (IFN-alfa), the investigators from the German CML Study Group reported in a poster at the meeting.

"After 10 years, imatinib continues to be an excellent choice for most patients with CML," they wrote.

In the 13 years that have elapsed since imatinib was approved in the United States as the first-in-class tyrosine kinase inhibitor, second-generation TKIs and other targeted agents have emerged, drawing attention to the safety of the older regimen.

The investigators evaluated long-term follow-up data and analyzed adverse drug reaction data for 1,501 patients treated with imatinib monotherapy in doses of 400 or 800 mg/day, as well as imatinib 400 mg in combination with IFN-alfa.

At the most recent evaluation, in November 2013, 164 patients had died, 1,003 were still on imatinib, 275 had been switched to a second-generation TKI, and 106 underwent bone marrow transplant (some patients received more than one therapy, accounting for the difference in total numbers).

The median follow-up time was 6.5 years, with some patients on study for as long as 11.5 years.

The probability of 10-year survival was 84%, and of 10-year progression-free survival was 81%.

An analysis of survival by molecular response rates showed an overall survival rate of 89% for those who achieved a major molecular response (MR, defined as a BCR-ABL RNA level of 0.1% or less), and 74% for those who achieved MR 4.5 (a 4.5 log₁₀reduction or greater in BCR-ABL transcripts).

The 8-year probabilities for all grades of adverse events among the patients who received imatinib monotherapy were 41% for edema or fluid overload, 38% for gastrointestinal toxicities, 25% for myalgia/arthralgia, 20% for rash, 17% for musculoskeletal events, 17% for fatigue, 11% for neurological toxicities, and 10% for flulike symptoms.

Five patients had grade 2 or 3 peripheral arterial occlusive disease, but it was not clear whether these events were associated with imatinib.

For most patients the first adverse drug reaction occurred within 3 years of starting on imatinib, with the frequency of reactions decreasing thereafter.

Dr. Hehlmann disclosed receiving research support from Novartis, marketer of imatinib.

CHICAGO – After a decade on therapy with imatinib, a majority of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia will experience an adverse drug reaction, but most reactions are mild and manageable, according to results from a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Of 1,375 patients with CML who received imatinib (Gleevec) monotherapy at some point, 1,018 (74%) had nonhematologic toxicities sometime during therapy, but only 199 (14%) had grade 3 or 4 toxicities, and there were no deaths attributed to imatinib, reported Dr. Rüdiger Hehlmann of the University of Heidelberg, Germany, and his colleagues.

Adverse drug reactions were manageable even when imatinib was combined with interferon-alfa (IFN-alfa), the investigators from the German CML Study Group reported in a poster at the meeting.

"After 10 years, imatinib continues to be an excellent choice for most patients with CML," they wrote.

In the 13 years that have elapsed since imatinib was approved in the United States as the first-in-class tyrosine kinase inhibitor, second-generation TKIs and other targeted agents have emerged, drawing attention to the safety of the older regimen.

The investigators evaluated long-term follow-up data and analyzed adverse drug reaction data for 1,501 patients treated with imatinib monotherapy in doses of 400 or 800 mg/day, as well as imatinib 400 mg in combination with IFN-alfa.

At the most recent evaluation, in November 2013, 164 patients had died, 1,003 were still on imatinib, 275 had been switched to a second-generation TKI, and 106 underwent bone marrow transplant (some patients received more than one therapy, accounting for the difference in total numbers).

The median follow-up time was 6.5 years, with some patients on study for as long as 11.5 years.

The probability of 10-year survival was 84%, and of 10-year progression-free survival was 81%.

An analysis of survival by molecular response rates showed an overall survival rate of 89% for those who achieved a major molecular response (MR, defined as a BCR-ABL RNA level of 0.1% or less), and 74% for those who achieved MR 4.5 (a 4.5 log₁₀reduction or greater in BCR-ABL transcripts).

The 8-year probabilities for all grades of adverse events among the patients who received imatinib monotherapy were 41% for edema or fluid overload, 38% for gastrointestinal toxicities, 25% for myalgia/arthralgia, 20% for rash, 17% for musculoskeletal events, 17% for fatigue, 11% for neurological toxicities, and 10% for flulike symptoms.

Five patients had grade 2 or 3 peripheral arterial occlusive disease, but it was not clear whether these events were associated with imatinib.

For most patients the first adverse drug reaction occurred within 3 years of starting on imatinib, with the frequency of reactions decreasing thereafter.

Dr. Hehlmann disclosed receiving research support from Novartis, marketer of imatinib.

CHICAGO – After a decade on therapy with imatinib, a majority of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia will experience an adverse drug reaction, but most reactions are mild and manageable, according to results from a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Of 1,375 patients with CML who received imatinib (Gleevec) monotherapy at some point, 1,018 (74%) had nonhematologic toxicities sometime during therapy, but only 199 (14%) had grade 3 or 4 toxicities, and there were no deaths attributed to imatinib, reported Dr. Rüdiger Hehlmann of the University of Heidelberg, Germany, and his colleagues.

Adverse drug reactions were manageable even when imatinib was combined with interferon-alfa (IFN-alfa), the investigators from the German CML Study Group reported in a poster at the meeting.

"After 10 years, imatinib continues to be an excellent choice for most patients with CML," they wrote.

In the 13 years that have elapsed since imatinib was approved in the United States as the first-in-class tyrosine kinase inhibitor, second-generation TKIs and other targeted agents have emerged, drawing attention to the safety of the older regimen.

The investigators evaluated long-term follow-up data and analyzed adverse drug reaction data for 1,501 patients treated with imatinib monotherapy in doses of 400 or 800 mg/day, as well as imatinib 400 mg in combination with IFN-alfa.

At the most recent evaluation, in November 2013, 164 patients had died, 1,003 were still on imatinib, 275 had been switched to a second-generation TKI, and 106 underwent bone marrow transplant (some patients received more than one therapy, accounting for the difference in total numbers).

The median follow-up time was 6.5 years, with some patients on study for as long as 11.5 years.

The probability of 10-year survival was 84%, and of 10-year progression-free survival was 81%.

An analysis of survival by molecular response rates showed an overall survival rate of 89% for those who achieved a major molecular response (MR, defined as a BCR-ABL RNA level of 0.1% or less), and 74% for those who achieved MR 4.5 (a 4.5 log₁₀reduction or greater in BCR-ABL transcripts).

The 8-year probabilities for all grades of adverse events among the patients who received imatinib monotherapy were 41% for edema or fluid overload, 38% for gastrointestinal toxicities, 25% for myalgia/arthralgia, 20% for rash, 17% for musculoskeletal events, 17% for fatigue, 11% for neurological toxicities, and 10% for flulike symptoms.

Five patients had grade 2 or 3 peripheral arterial occlusive disease, but it was not clear whether these events were associated with imatinib.

For most patients the first adverse drug reaction occurred within 3 years of starting on imatinib, with the frequency of reactions decreasing thereafter.

Dr. Hehlmann disclosed receiving research support from Novartis, marketer of imatinib.

The introduction of BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in 2001 for treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) marked a paradigm shift in management of the disease. With that advance, CML has been largely managed as a chronic condition, with daily medication and frequent monitoring. Optimizing monitoring methods and identifying factors associated with response and long-term outcomes has thus been a major clinical research focus. Given the improved understanding of surveillance techniques in CML and the advent of several recently approved second- and third-generation TKIs, there have been recent updates to clinical practice guidelines.

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
 

The introduction of BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in 2001 for treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) marked a paradigm shift in management of the disease. With that advance, CML has been largely managed as a chronic condition, with daily medication and frequent monitoring. Optimizing monitoring methods and identifying factors associated with response and long-term outcomes has thus been a major clinical research focus. Given the improved understanding of surveillance techniques in CML and the advent of several recently approved second- and third-generation TKIs, there have been recent updates to clinical practice guidelines.

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
 

The introduction of BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in 2001 for treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) marked a paradigm shift in management of the disease. With that advance, CML has been largely managed as a chronic condition, with daily medication and frequent monitoring. Optimizing monitoring methods and identifying factors associated with response and long-term outcomes has thus been a major clinical research focus. Given the improved understanding of surveillance techniques in CML and the advent of several recently approved second- and third-generation TKIs, there have been recent updates to clinical practice guidelines.

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
 

Drug vials and a syringe

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has expanded the approval of omacetaxine mepesuccinate (Synribo) to include home administration.

The drug is already FDA-approved to treat adults with chronic or accelerated phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who do not respond to or cannot tolerate 2 or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

The new approval allows CML patients to self-administer subcutaneous injections of omacetaxine mepesuccinate at home.

“It had been necessary for adults living with chronic or accelerated phase CML who are prescribed Synribo to travel to their doctor’s office twice a day for 2 weeks, which can be extremely burdensome and inconvenient to both patients and their caregivers,” said Meir Wetzler, MD, FACP, Chief of the Leukemia Section at Roswell Park Cancer Institute in Buffalo, New York.

“Now, physicians can decide if their patients are candidates for self-administration and, if so, provide their patients with guidance on how to properly administer reconstituted Synribo in the home.”

The drug’s maker, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., is working to finalize a pharmacy support program that will help facilitate successful home administration of omacetaxine mepesuccinate. The program is expected to “go live” this month or next.

About omacetaxine mepesuccinate

Omacetaxine mepesuccinate is a protein synthesis inhibitor. Although the drug’s mechanism of action is not fully understood, it is known to prevent the production of Bcr-Abl and Mcl-1, which help drive CML.

In October 2012, the FDA granted omacetaxine mepesuccinate accelerated approval for the treatment of adult patients with chronic or accelerated phase CML with resistance and/or intolerance to 2 or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Omacetaxine mepesuccinate gained full FDA approval in February.

The drug has been associated with severe and fatal myelosuppression, including thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and anemia in some patients. So healthcare professionals should monitor patients’ complete blood counts weekly during induction and initial maintenance cycles and every 2 weeks during later maintenance cycles, as clinically indicated.

Omacetaxine mepesuccinate has been known to cause severe thrombocytopenia, which increases the risk of hemorrhage. Fatalities from cerebral hemorrhage have occurred. And severe, non-fatal gastrointestinal hemorrhages have occurred.

So healthcare professionals should monitor platelet counts as part of the complete blood count as recommended. Patients should not receive anticoagulants, aspirin, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs when their platelet counts are <50,000/μL, as these drugs may increase the risk of bleeding.

Omacetaxine mepesuccinate can induce glucose intolerance as well. So healthcare professionals should monitor blood glucose levels frequently, especially in patients with diabetes or risk factors for diabetes. Patients with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus should not receive omacetaxine mepesuccinate until good glycemic control has been established.

Omacetaxine mepesuccinate can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. So women should be advised to avoid becoming pregnant while using the drug.

For more details on omacetaxine mepesuccinate, see the full prescribing information.

Drug vials and a syringe

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has expanded the approval of omacetaxine mepesuccinate (Synribo) to include home administration.

The drug is already FDA-approved to treat adults with chronic or accelerated phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who do not respond to or cannot tolerate 2 or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

The new approval allows CML patients to self-administer subcutaneous injections of omacetaxine mepesuccinate at home.

“It had been necessary for adults living with chronic or accelerated phase CML who are prescribed Synribo to travel to their doctor’s office twice a day for 2 weeks, which can be extremely burdensome and inconvenient to both patients and their caregivers,” said Meir Wetzler, MD, FACP, Chief of the Leukemia Section at Roswell Park Cancer Institute in Buffalo, New York.

“Now, physicians can decide if their patients are candidates for self-administration and, if so, provide their patients with guidance on how to properly administer reconstituted Synribo in the home.”

The drug’s maker, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., is working to finalize a pharmacy support program that will help facilitate successful home administration of omacetaxine mepesuccinate. The program is expected to “go live” this month or next.

About omacetaxine mepesuccinate

Omacetaxine mepesuccinate is a protein synthesis inhibitor. Although the drug’s mechanism of action is not fully understood, it is known to prevent the production of Bcr-Abl and Mcl-1, which help drive CML.

In October 2012, the FDA granted omacetaxine mepesuccinate accelerated approval for the treatment of adult patients with chronic or accelerated phase CML with resistance and/or intolerance to 2 or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Omacetaxine mepesuccinate gained full FDA approval in February.

The drug has been associated with severe and fatal myelosuppression, including thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and anemia in some patients. So healthcare professionals should monitor patients’ complete blood counts weekly during induction and initial maintenance cycles and every 2 weeks during later maintenance cycles, as clinically indicated.

Omacetaxine mepesuccinate has been known to cause severe thrombocytopenia, which increases the risk of hemorrhage. Fatalities from cerebral hemorrhage have occurred. And severe, non-fatal gastrointestinal hemorrhages have occurred.

So healthcare professionals should monitor platelet counts as part of the complete blood count as recommended. Patients should not receive anticoagulants, aspirin, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs when their platelet counts are <50,000/μL, as these drugs may increase the risk of bleeding.

Omacetaxine mepesuccinate can induce glucose intolerance as well. So healthcare professionals should monitor blood glucose levels frequently, especially in patients with diabetes or risk factors for diabetes. Patients with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus should not receive omacetaxine mepesuccinate until good glycemic control has been established.

Omacetaxine mepesuccinate can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. So women should be advised to avoid becoming pregnant while using the drug.

For more details on omacetaxine mepesuccinate, see the full prescribing information.

Drug vials and a syringe

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has expanded the approval of omacetaxine mepesuccinate (Synribo) to include home administration.

The drug is already FDA-approved to treat adults with chronic or accelerated phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who do not respond to or cannot tolerate 2 or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

The new approval allows CML patients to self-administer subcutaneous injections of omacetaxine mepesuccinate at home.

“It had been necessary for adults living with chronic or accelerated phase CML who are prescribed Synribo to travel to their doctor’s office twice a day for 2 weeks, which can be extremely burdensome and inconvenient to both patients and their caregivers,” said Meir Wetzler, MD, FACP, Chief of the Leukemia Section at Roswell Park Cancer Institute in Buffalo, New York.

“Now, physicians can decide if their patients are candidates for self-administration and, if so, provide their patients with guidance on how to properly administer reconstituted Synribo in the home.”

The drug’s maker, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., is working to finalize a pharmacy support program that will help facilitate successful home administration of omacetaxine mepesuccinate. The program is expected to “go live” this month or next.

About omacetaxine mepesuccinate

Omacetaxine mepesuccinate is a protein synthesis inhibitor. Although the drug’s mechanism of action is not fully understood, it is known to prevent the production of Bcr-Abl and Mcl-1, which help drive CML.

In October 2012, the FDA granted omacetaxine mepesuccinate accelerated approval for the treatment of adult patients with chronic or accelerated phase CML with resistance and/or intolerance to 2 or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Omacetaxine mepesuccinate gained full FDA approval in February.

The drug has been associated with severe and fatal myelosuppression, including thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and anemia in some patients. So healthcare professionals should monitor patients’ complete blood counts weekly during induction and initial maintenance cycles and every 2 weeks during later maintenance cycles, as clinically indicated.

Omacetaxine mepesuccinate has been known to cause severe thrombocytopenia, which increases the risk of hemorrhage. Fatalities from cerebral hemorrhage have occurred. And severe, non-fatal gastrointestinal hemorrhages have occurred.

So healthcare professionals should monitor platelet counts as part of the complete blood count as recommended. Patients should not receive anticoagulants, aspirin, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs when their platelet counts are <50,000/μL, as these drugs may increase the risk of bleeding.

Omacetaxine mepesuccinate can induce glucose intolerance as well. So healthcare professionals should monitor blood glucose levels frequently, especially in patients with diabetes or risk factors for diabetes. Patients with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus should not receive omacetaxine mepesuccinate until good glycemic control has been established.

Omacetaxine mepesuccinate can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. So women should be advised to avoid becoming pregnant while using the drug.

For more details on omacetaxine mepesuccinate, see the full prescribing information.

Chronic myeloid leukemia cells

Credit: UC San Diego

Preclinical research in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has pointed to a relationship between cell adherence and treatment resistance.

Investigators found that a population of plastic-adherent K562 cells with increased expression of BCR-ABL exhibited greater resistance to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib than nonadherent K562 cells.

“Previous studies have linked high levels of the BCR-ABL mutation with drug resistance,” said Richard Byers, PhD, of The University of Manchester in the UK.

“We wanted to see how expression of BCR-ABL differed across groups of CML cells and, in particular, whether there were differences between adherent and nonadherent populations.”

Dr Byers and his colleagues described this investigation in Experimental Hematology.

The researchers evaluated the heterogeneity of BCR-ABL expression at DNA, messenger RNA, and protein levels, using the CML-derived K562 cell line.

They grew cells in suspension and found that some cells adhered to the plastic dish. The investigators then separated the plastic-adherent and nonadherent cell populations and studied them as single cells and in bulk.

The first discovery was that adherent and nonadherent cells had similar BCR-ABL fusion gene copy numbers.

In bulk-cell analysis, the mean relative normalized ratio for genomic ABL DNA copy number was 47.73 for adherent cells and 53.40 for nonadherent cells (P=0.11). In single-cell analysis, the mean copy numbers were 13.83 and 14.22, respectively (P=0.63).

On the other hand, there was a significant difference in BCR-ABL messenger RNA expression between adherent and nonadherent cells.

In bulk cells, the level of BCR-ABL messenger RNA transcripts was 11-fold higher in adherent cells than in nondherent cells (P=0.022). And single-cell analysis revealed the mean BCR-ABL copy number was 53.11 for adherent cells and 14.06 for nonadherent cells (P=0.0013).

Adherent cells also exhibited significantly upregulated phosphorylation of BCR protein compared to nonadherent cells.

Flow cytometry showed that a mean of 61.9% of adherent cells were positive for phosphor-BCR, compared to 14.5% of nonadherent cells (P=0.0074). And single-cell analysis revealed a mean signal number per cell of 8.23 among adherent cells and 3.02 among nonadherent cells (P<0.0001).

In addition, whole-genome microRNA profiling showed that adherent and nonadherent cell populations expressed significantly different microRNA species.

Finally, the researchers found that treatment with imatinib reduced cell viability more rapidly in nonadherent cells than in adherent cells (P<0.005). The adherent cells showed a decrease in cell viability at 24 hours, compared to 4 hours for nonadherent cells.

The investigators said this research suggests that CML patients may have a similar adherent cell population that mediates resistance to imatinib. And the study highlights the importance of single-cell analysis.

“The small number of cells that show high levels of BCR-ABL may not be detectable through bulk analysis of large samples,” Dr Byers said. “It looks like it is important to look at protein levels in single cells.”

“In future, it may be possible to measure BCR-ABL levels in individual cells in the clinic. This will help us identify the resistant, high-BCR-ABL cells and better understand how patients develop resistance to imatinib treatment, with the aim of combating this resistance to make response more durable and the treatment more effective.”

Chronic myeloid leukemia cells

Credit: UC San Diego

Preclinical research in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has pointed to a relationship between cell adherence and treatment resistance.

Investigators found that a population of plastic-adherent K562 cells with increased expression of BCR-ABL exhibited greater resistance to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib than nonadherent K562 cells.

“Previous studies have linked high levels of the BCR-ABL mutation with drug resistance,” said Richard Byers, PhD, of The University of Manchester in the UK.

“We wanted to see how expression of BCR-ABL differed across groups of CML cells and, in particular, whether there were differences between adherent and nonadherent populations.”

Dr Byers and his colleagues described this investigation in Experimental Hematology.

The researchers evaluated the heterogeneity of BCR-ABL expression at DNA, messenger RNA, and protein levels, using the CML-derived K562 cell line.

They grew cells in suspension and found that some cells adhered to the plastic dish. The investigators then separated the plastic-adherent and nonadherent cell populations and studied them as single cells and in bulk.

The first discovery was that adherent and nonadherent cells had similar BCR-ABL fusion gene copy numbers.

In bulk-cell analysis, the mean relative normalized ratio for genomic ABL DNA copy number was 47.73 for adherent cells and 53.40 for nonadherent cells (P=0.11). In single-cell analysis, the mean copy numbers were 13.83 and 14.22, respectively (P=0.63).

On the other hand, there was a significant difference in BCR-ABL messenger RNA expression between adherent and nonadherent cells.

In bulk cells, the level of BCR-ABL messenger RNA transcripts was 11-fold higher in adherent cells than in nondherent cells (P=0.022). And single-cell analysis revealed the mean BCR-ABL copy number was 53.11 for adherent cells and 14.06 for nonadherent cells (P=0.0013).

Adherent cells also exhibited significantly upregulated phosphorylation of BCR protein compared to nonadherent cells.

Flow cytometry showed that a mean of 61.9% of adherent cells were positive for phosphor-BCR, compared to 14.5% of nonadherent cells (P=0.0074). And single-cell analysis revealed a mean signal number per cell of 8.23 among adherent cells and 3.02 among nonadherent cells (P<0.0001).

In addition, whole-genome microRNA profiling showed that adherent and nonadherent cell populations expressed significantly different microRNA species.

Finally, the researchers found that treatment with imatinib reduced cell viability more rapidly in nonadherent cells than in adherent cells (P<0.005). The adherent cells showed a decrease in cell viability at 24 hours, compared to 4 hours for nonadherent cells.

The investigators said this research suggests that CML patients may have a similar adherent cell population that mediates resistance to imatinib. And the study highlights the importance of single-cell analysis.

“The small number of cells that show high levels of BCR-ABL may not be detectable through bulk analysis of large samples,” Dr Byers said. “It looks like it is important to look at protein levels in single cells.”

“In future, it may be possible to measure BCR-ABL levels in individual cells in the clinic. This will help us identify the resistant, high-BCR-ABL cells and better understand how patients develop resistance to imatinib treatment, with the aim of combating this resistance to make response more durable and the treatment more effective.”

Chronic myeloid leukemia cells

Credit: UC San Diego

Preclinical research in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has pointed to a relationship between cell adherence and treatment resistance.

Investigators found that a population of plastic-adherent K562 cells with increased expression of BCR-ABL exhibited greater resistance to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib than nonadherent K562 cells.

“Previous studies have linked high levels of the BCR-ABL mutation with drug resistance,” said Richard Byers, PhD, of The University of Manchester in the UK.

“We wanted to see how expression of BCR-ABL differed across groups of CML cells and, in particular, whether there were differences between adherent and nonadherent populations.”

Dr Byers and his colleagues described this investigation in Experimental Hematology.

The researchers evaluated the heterogeneity of BCR-ABL expression at DNA, messenger RNA, and protein levels, using the CML-derived K562 cell line.

They grew cells in suspension and found that some cells adhered to the plastic dish. The investigators then separated the plastic-adherent and nonadherent cell populations and studied them as single cells and in bulk.

The first discovery was that adherent and nonadherent cells had similar BCR-ABL fusion gene copy numbers.

In bulk-cell analysis, the mean relative normalized ratio for genomic ABL DNA copy number was 47.73 for adherent cells and 53.40 for nonadherent cells (P=0.11). In single-cell analysis, the mean copy numbers were 13.83 and 14.22, respectively (P=0.63).

On the other hand, there was a significant difference in BCR-ABL messenger RNA expression between adherent and nonadherent cells.

In bulk cells, the level of BCR-ABL messenger RNA transcripts was 11-fold higher in adherent cells than in nondherent cells (P=0.022). And single-cell analysis revealed the mean BCR-ABL copy number was 53.11 for adherent cells and 14.06 for nonadherent cells (P=0.0013).

Adherent cells also exhibited significantly upregulated phosphorylation of BCR protein compared to nonadherent cells.

Flow cytometry showed that a mean of 61.9% of adherent cells were positive for phosphor-BCR, compared to 14.5% of nonadherent cells (P=0.0074). And single-cell analysis revealed a mean signal number per cell of 8.23 among adherent cells and 3.02 among nonadherent cells (P<0.0001).

In addition, whole-genome microRNA profiling showed that adherent and nonadherent cell populations expressed significantly different microRNA species.

Finally, the researchers found that treatment with imatinib reduced cell viability more rapidly in nonadherent cells than in adherent cells (P<0.005). The adherent cells showed a decrease in cell viability at 24 hours, compared to 4 hours for nonadherent cells.

The investigators said this research suggests that CML patients may have a similar adherent cell population that mediates resistance to imatinib. And the study highlights the importance of single-cell analysis.

“The small number of cells that show high levels of BCR-ABL may not be detectable through bulk analysis of large samples,” Dr Byers said. “It looks like it is important to look at protein levels in single cells.”

“In future, it may be possible to measure BCR-ABL levels in individual cells in the clinic. This will help us identify the resistant, high-BCR-ABL cells and better understand how patients develop resistance to imatinib treatment, with the aim of combating this resistance to make response more durable and the treatment more effective.”

Drug in vials

Credit: Bill Branson

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted full approval of omacetaxine mepesuccinate (Synribo) for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).

The drug received accelerated approval in October 2012 to treat adults with chronic phase (CP) or accelerated phase (AP) CML who were resistant to or could not tolerate 2 or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

But additional clinical trial data were required before the FDA could grant the drug full approval.

Now, the agency has granted that approval based on the final analysis of two phase 2 trials.

The original approval of omacetaxine mepesuccinate was based on an analysis of combined data subsets from these trials. The pooled analysis included patients who had received 2 or more approved TKIs and, at a minimum, had evidence of resistance or intolerance to dasatinib and/or nilotinib.

Forty-seven percent of patients with CP CML and 63% of patients with AP CML had failed treatment with 3 TKIs—imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib. The majority of patients had also received other treatments, including hydroxyurea, interferon, and cytarabine.

Among CP patients, 18% (14/76) achieved a major cytogenetic response (MCyR). The mean time to MCyR onset was 3.5 months, and the median duration of MCyR was 12.5 months.

Among AP Patients, 14% (5/35) achieved a major hematologic response (MaHR). The mean time to MaHR onset was 2.3 months, and the median duration of MaHR was 4.7 months.

The most common adverse events for AP and CP patients (occurring in 20% or more) were thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia, diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, asthenia, injection site reaction, pyrexia, infection, and lymphopenia.

Omacetaxine mepesuccinate is the first protein synthesis inhibitor for CML. Although the drug’s mechanism of action is not fully understood, it is known to prevent the production of Bcr-Abl and Mcl-1, which help drive CML.

For more details on omacetaxine mepesuccinate, see the full prescribing information.

Drug in vials

Credit: Bill Branson

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted full approval of omacetaxine mepesuccinate (Synribo) for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).

The drug received accelerated approval in October 2012 to treat adults with chronic phase (CP) or accelerated phase (AP) CML who were resistant to or could not tolerate 2 or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

But additional clinical trial data were required before the FDA could grant the drug full approval.

Now, the agency has granted that approval based on the final analysis of two phase 2 trials.

The original approval of omacetaxine mepesuccinate was based on an analysis of combined data subsets from these trials. The pooled analysis included patients who had received 2 or more approved TKIs and, at a minimum, had evidence of resistance or intolerance to dasatinib and/or nilotinib.

Forty-seven percent of patients with CP CML and 63% of patients with AP CML had failed treatment with 3 TKIs—imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib. The majority of patients had also received other treatments, including hydroxyurea, interferon, and cytarabine.

Among CP patients, 18% (14/76) achieved a major cytogenetic response (MCyR). The mean time to MCyR onset was 3.5 months, and the median duration of MCyR was 12.5 months.

Among AP Patients, 14% (5/35) achieved a major hematologic response (MaHR). The mean time to MaHR onset was 2.3 months, and the median duration of MaHR was 4.7 months.

The most common adverse events for AP and CP patients (occurring in 20% or more) were thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia, diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, asthenia, injection site reaction, pyrexia, infection, and lymphopenia.

Omacetaxine mepesuccinate is the first protein synthesis inhibitor for CML. Although the drug’s mechanism of action is not fully understood, it is known to prevent the production of Bcr-Abl and Mcl-1, which help drive CML.

For more details on omacetaxine mepesuccinate, see the full prescribing information.

Drug in vials

Credit: Bill Branson

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted full approval of omacetaxine mepesuccinate (Synribo) for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).

The drug received accelerated approval in October 2012 to treat adults with chronic phase (CP) or accelerated phase (AP) CML who were resistant to or could not tolerate 2 or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

But additional clinical trial data were required before the FDA could grant the drug full approval.

Now, the agency has granted that approval based on the final analysis of two phase 2 trials.

The original approval of omacetaxine mepesuccinate was based on an analysis of combined data subsets from these trials. The pooled analysis included patients who had received 2 or more approved TKIs and, at a minimum, had evidence of resistance or intolerance to dasatinib and/or nilotinib.

Forty-seven percent of patients with CP CML and 63% of patients with AP CML had failed treatment with 3 TKIs—imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib. The majority of patients had also received other treatments, including hydroxyurea, interferon, and cytarabine.

Among CP patients, 18% (14/76) achieved a major cytogenetic response (MCyR). The mean time to MCyR onset was 3.5 months, and the median duration of MCyR was 12.5 months.

Among AP Patients, 14% (5/35) achieved a major hematologic response (MaHR). The mean time to MaHR onset was 2.3 months, and the median duration of MaHR was 4.7 months.

The most common adverse events for AP and CP patients (occurring in 20% or more) were thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia, diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, asthenia, injection site reaction, pyrexia, infection, and lymphopenia.

Omacetaxine mepesuccinate is the first protein synthesis inhibitor for CML. Although the drug’s mechanism of action is not fully understood, it is known to prevent the production of Bcr-Abl and Mcl-1, which help drive CML.

For more details on omacetaxine mepesuccinate, see the full prescribing information.

Doctor evaluating a patient

Credit: CDC

Results of population-based research suggest that financial status may affect survival in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) living in the UK.

The study showed that, despite equal access to the same clinical care and treatment, survival rates were significantly lower for patients living in more deprived areas.

The researchers said this difference might be explained by lower rates of treatment compliance in the less affluent population.

“These findings highlight the importance of conducting comprehensive, population-based studies to examine treatment pathways across the entire patient population, rather than solely concentrating on findings from clinical trials,” said study author Alexandra Smith, PhD, of the University of York in the UK.

She and her colleagues recounted their findings in BMJ Open.

The team analyzed data from 242 patients who were diagnosed with CML from September 2004 to August 2011. Ninety-seven percent of patients had chronic-phase disease at presentation, and 86% were Ph-positive.

Fifty-five percent of patients were younger than 60 at diagnosis, and 60% were male. Fifty-nine percent lived in deprivation quintiles 1 to 3, and 41% lived in the less affluent quintiles 4 and 5.

Ninety-seven percent of patients received treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs)—94% imatinib and the rest dasatinib. Three percent of patients were not treated with TKIs due to death, relocation, refusal, a more serious competing comorbidity, or the use of supportive care alone.

Factors affecting survival

The minimum follow-up was 1.5 years, and the maximum was 8.5 years. The overall 5-year survival was 79%. And the relative survival, which took into account the background mortality in the general population, was 89%.

The relative survival curves did not differ significantly between the 2 age groups. Five-year relative survival was 90% for patients younger than 60 and 87% for those older than 60.

Gender also had little impact on relative survival. The 5-year rates were 90% for men and 89% for women.

However, relative survival differed significantly according to affluence. The 5-year relative survival was 95% for the most affluent patients (quintiles 1 to 3) and 80% for the least affluent (quintiles 4 and 5).

Although 41% of all patients lived in the less affluent areas, this group accounted for about 60% of the deaths.

The researchers said this finding could not be attributed to biological features of disease or access to therapy. But they believe a lack of treatment compliance could be the cause.

“We suspect a major factor is that we are not supporting patients sufficiently to allow them to be fully compliant with a treatment that needs to be taken every day to be effective,” said Russell Patmore, MD, of Castle Hill Hospital in the UK.

“We would encourage all teams treating patients with CML to use these findings to focus their resource where it is likely to be most beneficial. This includes helping patients to manage their CML by explaining fully the importance of daily treatment and providing easy access to ongoing support.”

Doctor evaluating a patient

Credit: CDC

Results of population-based research suggest that financial status may affect survival in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) living in the UK.

The study showed that, despite equal access to the same clinical care and treatment, survival rates were significantly lower for patients living in more deprived areas.

The researchers said this difference might be explained by lower rates of treatment compliance in the less affluent population.

“These findings highlight the importance of conducting comprehensive, population-based studies to examine treatment pathways across the entire patient population, rather than solely concentrating on findings from clinical trials,” said study author Alexandra Smith, PhD, of the University of York in the UK.

She and her colleagues recounted their findings in BMJ Open.

The team analyzed data from 242 patients who were diagnosed with CML from September 2004 to August 2011. Ninety-seven percent of patients had chronic-phase disease at presentation, and 86% were Ph-positive.

Fifty-five percent of patients were younger than 60 at diagnosis, and 60% were male. Fifty-nine percent lived in deprivation quintiles 1 to 3, and 41% lived in the less affluent quintiles 4 and 5.

Ninety-seven percent of patients received treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs)—94% imatinib and the rest dasatinib. Three percent of patients were not treated with TKIs due to death, relocation, refusal, a more serious competing comorbidity, or the use of supportive care alone.

Factors affecting survival

The minimum follow-up was 1.5 years, and the maximum was 8.5 years. The overall 5-year survival was 79%. And the relative survival, which took into account the background mortality in the general population, was 89%.

The relative survival curves did not differ significantly between the 2 age groups. Five-year relative survival was 90% for patients younger than 60 and 87% for those older than 60.

Gender also had little impact on relative survival. The 5-year rates were 90% for men and 89% for women.

However, relative survival differed significantly according to affluence. The 5-year relative survival was 95% for the most affluent patients (quintiles 1 to 3) and 80% for the least affluent (quintiles 4 and 5).

Although 41% of all patients lived in the less affluent areas, this group accounted for about 60% of the deaths.

The researchers said this finding could not be attributed to biological features of disease or access to therapy. But they believe a lack of treatment compliance could be the cause.

“We suspect a major factor is that we are not supporting patients sufficiently to allow them to be fully compliant with a treatment that needs to be taken every day to be effective,” said Russell Patmore, MD, of Castle Hill Hospital in the UK.

“We would encourage all teams treating patients with CML to use these findings to focus their resource where it is likely to be most beneficial. This includes helping patients to manage their CML by explaining fully the importance of daily treatment and providing easy access to ongoing support.”

Doctor evaluating a patient

Credit: CDC

Results of population-based research suggest that financial status may affect survival in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) living in the UK.

The study showed that, despite equal access to the same clinical care and treatment, survival rates were significantly lower for patients living in more deprived areas.

The researchers said this difference might be explained by lower rates of treatment compliance in the less affluent population.

“These findings highlight the importance of conducting comprehensive, population-based studies to examine treatment pathways across the entire patient population, rather than solely concentrating on findings from clinical trials,” said study author Alexandra Smith, PhD, of the University of York in the UK.

She and her colleagues recounted their findings in BMJ Open.

The team analyzed data from 242 patients who were diagnosed with CML from September 2004 to August 2011. Ninety-seven percent of patients had chronic-phase disease at presentation, and 86% were Ph-positive.

Fifty-five percent of patients were younger than 60 at diagnosis, and 60% were male. Fifty-nine percent lived in deprivation quintiles 1 to 3, and 41% lived in the less affluent quintiles 4 and 5.

Ninety-seven percent of patients received treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs)—94% imatinib and the rest dasatinib. Three percent of patients were not treated with TKIs due to death, relocation, refusal, a more serious competing comorbidity, or the use of supportive care alone.

Factors affecting survival

The minimum follow-up was 1.5 years, and the maximum was 8.5 years. The overall 5-year survival was 79%. And the relative survival, which took into account the background mortality in the general population, was 89%.

The relative survival curves did not differ significantly between the 2 age groups. Five-year relative survival was 90% for patients younger than 60 and 87% for those older than 60.

Gender also had little impact on relative survival. The 5-year rates were 90% for men and 89% for women.

However, relative survival differed significantly according to affluence. The 5-year relative survival was 95% for the most affluent patients (quintiles 1 to 3) and 80% for the least affluent (quintiles 4 and 5).

Although 41% of all patients lived in the less affluent areas, this group accounted for about 60% of the deaths.

The researchers said this finding could not be attributed to biological features of disease or access to therapy. But they believe a lack of treatment compliance could be the cause.

“We suspect a major factor is that we are not supporting patients sufficiently to allow them to be fully compliant with a treatment that needs to be taken every day to be effective,” said Russell Patmore, MD, of Castle Hill Hospital in the UK.

“We would encourage all teams treating patients with CML to use these findings to focus their resource where it is likely to be most beneficial. This includes helping patients to manage their CML by explaining fully the importance of daily treatment and providing easy access to ongoing support.”

Less than 3 months after it was pulled from the market due to safety concerns, ponatinib (Iclusig) is once again commercially available in the US.

Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc., has begun shipping the drug to Biologics, Inc., its exclusive specialty pharmacy. And the pharmacy has started filling prescriptions and distributing ponatinib to patients in need.

The drug is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) or Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) that is resistant to or intolerant of other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

Safety concerns prompt action

Last October, the latest results of the phase 2 PACE trial revealed that ponatinib can increase a patient’s risk of arterial and venous thrombotic events. So all trials of the drug were placed on partial clinical hold, with the exception of the phase 3 EPIC trial, which was discontinued.

Then, the FDA suspended sales and marketing of ponatinib, pending results of a safety evaluation. But in December, the agency decided the drug could return to the market if new safety measures were implemented.

The FDA approved revised prescribing information and a communications Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy for ponatinib. The prescribing information includes a revised indication statement and boxed warning, updated safety information, and recommendations regarding dosing considerations for prescribers.

Now, ponatinib is indicated for the treatment of:

• Adults with T315I-positive CML (chronic, accelerated, or blast phase)
• Adults with T315I-positive Ph+ ALL
• Adults with CML (chronic, accelerated, or blast phase) who cannot receive another TKI
• Adults with Ph+ ALL who cannot receive another TKI.

The starting dose of ponatinib remains 45 mg daily.

IND program

On November 1, 2013, there were approximately 640 patients receiving ponatinib through commercial channels in the US. Since then, the drug was only made available through emergency and single-patient investigational new drug (IND) applications, which were reviewed and approved by the FDA on a case-by-case basis.

The FDA has approved more than 370 INDs since early November, and more than 300 patients have received ponatinib at no cost through this process.

Ariad expects most of these patients, many of whom received a 3-month supply of ponatinib, to transition from the IND program to commercial therapy by the end of the first quarter of 2014. The IND program is now closed to new patients with Ph+ leukemias.

Ponatinib is currently priced in the US at approximately $125,000 per year. For more information on the drug, visit www.iclusig.com.

Less than 3 months after it was pulled from the market due to safety concerns, ponatinib (Iclusig) is once again commercially available in the US.

Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc., has begun shipping the drug to Biologics, Inc., its exclusive specialty pharmacy. And the pharmacy has started filling prescriptions and distributing ponatinib to patients in need.

The drug is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) or Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) that is resistant to or intolerant of other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

Safety concerns prompt action

Last October, the latest results of the phase 2 PACE trial revealed that ponatinib can increase a patient’s risk of arterial and venous thrombotic events. So all trials of the drug were placed on partial clinical hold, with the exception of the phase 3 EPIC trial, which was discontinued.

Then, the FDA suspended sales and marketing of ponatinib, pending results of a safety evaluation. But in December, the agency decided the drug could return to the market if new safety measures were implemented.

The FDA approved revised prescribing information and a communications Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy for ponatinib. The prescribing information includes a revised indication statement and boxed warning, updated safety information, and recommendations regarding dosing considerations for prescribers.

Now, ponatinib is indicated for the treatment of:

• Adults with T315I-positive CML (chronic, accelerated, or blast phase)
• Adults with T315I-positive Ph+ ALL
• Adults with CML (chronic, accelerated, or blast phase) who cannot receive another TKI
• Adults with Ph+ ALL who cannot receive another TKI.

The starting dose of ponatinib remains 45 mg daily.

IND program

On November 1, 2013, there were approximately 640 patients receiving ponatinib through commercial channels in the US. Since then, the drug was only made available through emergency and single-patient investigational new drug (IND) applications, which were reviewed and approved by the FDA on a case-by-case basis.

The FDA has approved more than 370 INDs since early November, and more than 300 patients have received ponatinib at no cost through this process.

Ariad expects most of these patients, many of whom received a 3-month supply of ponatinib, to transition from the IND program to commercial therapy by the end of the first quarter of 2014. The IND program is now closed to new patients with Ph+ leukemias.

Ponatinib is currently priced in the US at approximately $125,000 per year. For more information on the drug, visit www.iclusig.com.

Less than 3 months after it was pulled from the market due to safety concerns, ponatinib (Iclusig) is once again commercially available in the US.

Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc., has begun shipping the drug to Biologics, Inc., its exclusive specialty pharmacy. And the pharmacy has started filling prescriptions and distributing ponatinib to patients in need.

The drug is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) or Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) that is resistant to or intolerant of other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

Safety concerns prompt action

Last October, the latest results of the phase 2 PACE trial revealed that ponatinib can increase a patient’s risk of arterial and venous thrombotic events. So all trials of the drug were placed on partial clinical hold, with the exception of the phase 3 EPIC trial, which was discontinued.

Then, the FDA suspended sales and marketing of ponatinib, pending results of a safety evaluation. But in December, the agency decided the drug could return to the market if new safety measures were implemented.

The FDA approved revised prescribing information and a communications Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy for ponatinib. The prescribing information includes a revised indication statement and boxed warning, updated safety information, and recommendations regarding dosing considerations for prescribers.

Now, ponatinib is indicated for the treatment of:

• Adults with T315I-positive CML (chronic, accelerated, or blast phase)
• Adults with T315I-positive Ph+ ALL
• Adults with CML (chronic, accelerated, or blast phase) who cannot receive another TKI
• Adults with Ph+ ALL who cannot receive another TKI.

The starting dose of ponatinib remains 45 mg daily.

IND program

On November 1, 2013, there were approximately 640 patients receiving ponatinib through commercial channels in the US. Since then, the drug was only made available through emergency and single-patient investigational new drug (IND) applications, which were reviewed and approved by the FDA on a case-by-case basis.

The FDA has approved more than 370 INDs since early November, and more than 300 patients have received ponatinib at no cost through this process.

Ariad expects most of these patients, many of whom received a 3-month supply of ponatinib, to transition from the IND program to commercial therapy by the end of the first quarter of 2014. The IND program is now closed to new patients with Ph+ leukemias.

Ponatinib is currently priced in the US at approximately $125,000 per year. For more information on the drug, visit www.iclusig.com.