Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Key clinical point: The combination of sorafenib adjuvant therapy and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) offers better survival outcomes than RFA alone in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) within Milan criteria after curative resection of primary HCC.

Major finding: Patients receiving RFA plus sorafenib vs RFA alone had significantly higher 1- and 3-year overall survival (97.7% vs 93.1%; P  =  .018 and 83.7% vs 61.3%; P < .001, respectively) and tumor-free survival (90.8% vs 67.8% and 49.0% vs 28.0%, respectively; both P < .001) rates.

Study details: This multicenter, retrospective study included 174 propensity score-matched pairs of adult patients with RHCC within Milan criteria who did or did not receive sorafenib after RFA.

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Zhou Q et al. Sorafenib as adjuvant therapy following radiofrequency ablation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria: A multicenter analysis. J Gastroenterol. 2022 (Jul 11). Doi: 10.1007/s00535-022-01895-3

Key clinical point: The combination of sorafenib adjuvant therapy and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) offers better survival outcomes than RFA alone in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) within Milan criteria after curative resection of primary HCC.

Major finding: Patients receiving RFA plus sorafenib vs RFA alone had significantly higher 1- and 3-year overall survival (97.7% vs 93.1%; P  =  .018 and 83.7% vs 61.3%; P < .001, respectively) and tumor-free survival (90.8% vs 67.8% and 49.0% vs 28.0%, respectively; both P < .001) rates.

Study details: This multicenter, retrospective study included 174 propensity score-matched pairs of adult patients with RHCC within Milan criteria who did or did not receive sorafenib after RFA.

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Zhou Q et al. Sorafenib as adjuvant therapy following radiofrequency ablation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria: A multicenter analysis. J Gastroenterol. 2022 (Jul 11). Doi: 10.1007/s00535-022-01895-3

Key clinical point: The combination of sorafenib adjuvant therapy and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) offers better survival outcomes than RFA alone in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) within Milan criteria after curative resection of primary HCC.

Major finding: Patients receiving RFA plus sorafenib vs RFA alone had significantly higher 1- and 3-year overall survival (97.7% vs 93.1%; P  =  .018 and 83.7% vs 61.3%; P < .001, respectively) and tumor-free survival (90.8% vs 67.8% and 49.0% vs 28.0%, respectively; both P < .001) rates.

Study details: This multicenter, retrospective study included 174 propensity score-matched pairs of adult patients with RHCC within Milan criteria who did or did not receive sorafenib after RFA.

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Zhou Q et al. Sorafenib as adjuvant therapy following radiofrequency ablation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria: A multicenter analysis. J Gastroenterol. 2022 (Jul 11). Doi: 10.1007/s00535-022-01895-3

Key clinical point: Baseline hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels are not associated with the clinical outcomes of patients with HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1)-based immunotherapy.

Major finding: Baseline HBV DNA levels were not significantly associated with the overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.77; P  =  .59) or progression-free survival (aHR 0.68; P  =  .098).

Study details: This single-center retrospective observational study included 217 patients with advanced HBV-related HCC who received ≥1 dose of anti-PD-1 therapy.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and Medical Science and Technology Research Project of Health Commission of Henan Province. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: An M et al. Association of hepatitis B virus DNA levels with overall survival for advanced hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma under immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2022 (Jul 30). Doi: 10.1007/s00262-022-03254-w

Key clinical point: Baseline hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels are not associated with the clinical outcomes of patients with HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1)-based immunotherapy.

Major finding: Baseline HBV DNA levels were not significantly associated with the overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.77; P  =  .59) or progression-free survival (aHR 0.68; P  =  .098).

Study details: This single-center retrospective observational study included 217 patients with advanced HBV-related HCC who received ≥1 dose of anti-PD-1 therapy.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and Medical Science and Technology Research Project of Health Commission of Henan Province. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: An M et al. Association of hepatitis B virus DNA levels with overall survival for advanced hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma under immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2022 (Jul 30). Doi: 10.1007/s00262-022-03254-w

Key clinical point: Baseline hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels are not associated with the clinical outcomes of patients with HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1)-based immunotherapy.

Major finding: Baseline HBV DNA levels were not significantly associated with the overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.77; P  =  .59) or progression-free survival (aHR 0.68; P  =  .098).

Study details: This single-center retrospective observational study included 217 patients with advanced HBV-related HCC who received ≥1 dose of anti-PD-1 therapy.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and Medical Science and Technology Research Project of Health Commission of Henan Province. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: An M et al. Association of hepatitis B virus DNA levels with overall survival for advanced hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma under immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2022 (Jul 30). Doi: 10.1007/s00262-022-03254-w

Key clinical point: Compared with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) offers better efficacy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) without significantly compromising safety.

Major finding: Patients receiving HAIC vs TACE had a significantly longer median overall survival (11.2 vs 9.0 months; P  =  .010) and progression-free survival (5.6 vs 2.0 months; P  =  .006) and a higher objective response rate (56.8% vs 18.2%; P < .001). No treatment‐related grade 4/5 adverse events were reported.

Study details: This was a propensity score‐matched cohort study including 44 pairs of adult patients with advanced HCC and PVTT who underwent HAIC with oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed or TACE.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Guiding Project of Science and Technology Program of Fujian Province, China.

Source: Chen S, Yuan B, et al. Hepatic arterial infusion oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed and chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein invasion: A propensity score-matching cohort study. J Surg Oncol. 2022 (Jul 20). Doi: 10.1002/jso.27023

Key clinical point: Compared with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) offers better efficacy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) without significantly compromising safety.

Major finding: Patients receiving HAIC vs TACE had a significantly longer median overall survival (11.2 vs 9.0 months; P  =  .010) and progression-free survival (5.6 vs 2.0 months; P  =  .006) and a higher objective response rate (56.8% vs 18.2%; P < .001). No treatment‐related grade 4/5 adverse events were reported.

Study details: This was a propensity score‐matched cohort study including 44 pairs of adult patients with advanced HCC and PVTT who underwent HAIC with oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed or TACE.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Guiding Project of Science and Technology Program of Fujian Province, China.

Source: Chen S, Yuan B, et al. Hepatic arterial infusion oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed and chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein invasion: A propensity score-matching cohort study. J Surg Oncol. 2022 (Jul 20). Doi: 10.1002/jso.27023

Key clinical point: Compared with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) offers better efficacy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) without significantly compromising safety.

Major finding: Patients receiving HAIC vs TACE had a significantly longer median overall survival (11.2 vs 9.0 months; P  =  .010) and progression-free survival (5.6 vs 2.0 months; P  =  .006) and a higher objective response rate (56.8% vs 18.2%; P < .001). No treatment‐related grade 4/5 adverse events were reported.

Study details: This was a propensity score‐matched cohort study including 44 pairs of adult patients with advanced HCC and PVTT who underwent HAIC with oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed or TACE.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Guiding Project of Science and Technology Program of Fujian Province, China.

Source: Chen S, Yuan B, et al. Hepatic arterial infusion oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed and chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein invasion: A propensity score-matching cohort study. J Surg Oncol. 2022 (Jul 20). Doi: 10.1002/jso.27023

Key clinical point: Heavy alcohol intake and ALDH2 rs671 polymorphism are associated with a significantly increased risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis.

Major finding: Alcohol intake amount (>160 vs 80-160 g/day: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.78; P  =  .04) and ALDH2 rs671 polymorphism (GA/AA vs GG genotype: aHR 5.61; P < .001) were significantly associated with an increased incidence of HCC.

Study details: This retrospective cohort study enrolled 1515 patients with cirrhosis due to heavy alcoholism or HBV infection.

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, E-Da Hospital-National Taiwan University Hospital Joint Research Program, and others.

Source: Tsai MC et al. Association of heavy alcohol intake and ALDH2 rs671 polymorphism with hepatocellular carcinoma and mortality in patients with hepatitis B virus–related cirrhosis. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(7):e2223511 (Jul 25). Doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.23511

Key clinical point: Heavy alcohol intake and ALDH2 rs671 polymorphism are associated with a significantly increased risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis.

Major finding: Alcohol intake amount (>160 vs 80-160 g/day: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.78; P  =  .04) and ALDH2 rs671 polymorphism (GA/AA vs GG genotype: aHR 5.61; P < .001) were significantly associated with an increased incidence of HCC.

Study details: This retrospective cohort study enrolled 1515 patients with cirrhosis due to heavy alcoholism or HBV infection.

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, E-Da Hospital-National Taiwan University Hospital Joint Research Program, and others.

Source: Tsai MC et al. Association of heavy alcohol intake and ALDH2 rs671 polymorphism with hepatocellular carcinoma and mortality in patients with hepatitis B virus–related cirrhosis. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(7):e2223511 (Jul 25). Doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.23511

Key clinical point: Heavy alcohol intake and ALDH2 rs671 polymorphism are associated with a significantly increased risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis.

Major finding: Alcohol intake amount (>160 vs 80-160 g/day: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.78; P  =  .04) and ALDH2 rs671 polymorphism (GA/AA vs GG genotype: aHR 5.61; P < .001) were significantly associated with an increased incidence of HCC.

Study details: This retrospective cohort study enrolled 1515 patients with cirrhosis due to heavy alcoholism or HBV infection.

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, E-Da Hospital-National Taiwan University Hospital Joint Research Program, and others.

Source: Tsai MC et al. Association of heavy alcohol intake and ALDH2 rs671 polymorphism with hepatocellular carcinoma and mortality in patients with hepatitis B virus–related cirrhosis. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(7):e2223511 (Jul 25). Doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.23511

Key clinical point: The excellent 10-year post-liver transplant (LT) outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) successfully downstaged to within Milan criteria (MC) substantiate the validity of the national downstaging policy.

Major finding: At 10 years after LT, patients with HCC always within MC, those with HCC downstaged before LT, and those with HCC unsuccessfully downstaged/progressed beyond MC during LT had survival rates of 61.5%, 52.1%, and 43.3%, respectively, and recurrence rates of 13.3%, 20.6%, and 41.4%, respectively.

Study details: This retrospective cohort study analyzed the prospective data of 2645 adult patients with HCC who underwent LT at 5 US academic centers.

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by the US Department of Defense, Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation, Spanish National Health Institute, and Cancer Research UK, among others. Two authors reported receiving grants or a board of directors’ honoraria from various sources.

Source: Tabrizian P et al. Ten-year outcomes of liver transplant and downstaging for hepatocellular carcinoma. JAMA Surg. 2022 (Jul 20). Doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.2800

Key clinical point: The excellent 10-year post-liver transplant (LT) outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) successfully downstaged to within Milan criteria (MC) substantiate the validity of the national downstaging policy.

Major finding: At 10 years after LT, patients with HCC always within MC, those with HCC downstaged before LT, and those with HCC unsuccessfully downstaged/progressed beyond MC during LT had survival rates of 61.5%, 52.1%, and 43.3%, respectively, and recurrence rates of 13.3%, 20.6%, and 41.4%, respectively.

Study details: This retrospective cohort study analyzed the prospective data of 2645 adult patients with HCC who underwent LT at 5 US academic centers.

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by the US Department of Defense, Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation, Spanish National Health Institute, and Cancer Research UK, among others. Two authors reported receiving grants or a board of directors’ honoraria from various sources.

Source: Tabrizian P et al. Ten-year outcomes of liver transplant and downstaging for hepatocellular carcinoma. JAMA Surg. 2022 (Jul 20). Doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.2800

Key clinical point: The excellent 10-year post-liver transplant (LT) outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) successfully downstaged to within Milan criteria (MC) substantiate the validity of the national downstaging policy.

Major finding: At 10 years after LT, patients with HCC always within MC, those with HCC downstaged before LT, and those with HCC unsuccessfully downstaged/progressed beyond MC during LT had survival rates of 61.5%, 52.1%, and 43.3%, respectively, and recurrence rates of 13.3%, 20.6%, and 41.4%, respectively.

Study details: This retrospective cohort study analyzed the prospective data of 2645 adult patients with HCC who underwent LT at 5 US academic centers.

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by the US Department of Defense, Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation, Spanish National Health Institute, and Cancer Research UK, among others. Two authors reported receiving grants or a board of directors’ honoraria from various sources.

Source: Tabrizian P et al. Ten-year outcomes of liver transplant and downstaging for hepatocellular carcinoma. JAMA Surg. 2022 (Jul 20). Doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.2800

Key clinical point: The excellent 10-year post-liver transplant (LT) outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) successfully downstaged to within Milan criteria (MC) substantiate the validity of the national downstaging policy.

Major finding: At 10 years after LT, patients with HCC always within MC, those with HCC downstaged before LT, and those with HCC unsuccessfully downstaged/progressed beyond MC during LT had survival rates of 61.5%, 52.1%, and 43.3%, respectively, and recurrence rates of 13.3%, 20.6%, and 41.4%, respectively.

Study details: This retrospective cohort study analyzed the prospective data of 2645 adult patients with HCC who underwent LT at 5 US academic centers.

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by the US Department of Defense, Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation, Spanish National Health Institute, and Cancer Research UK, among others. Two authors reported receiving grants or a board of directors’ honoraria from various sources.

Source: Tabrizian P et al. Ten-year outcomes of liver transplant and downstaging for hepatocellular carcinoma. JAMA Surg. 2022 (Jul 20). Doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.2800

Key clinical point: The excellent 10-year post-liver transplant (LT) outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) successfully downstaged to within Milan criteria (MC) substantiate the validity of the national downstaging policy.

Major finding: At 10 years after LT, patients with HCC always within MC, those with HCC downstaged before LT, and those with HCC unsuccessfully downstaged/progressed beyond MC during LT had survival rates of 61.5%, 52.1%, and 43.3%, respectively, and recurrence rates of 13.3%, 20.6%, and 41.4%, respectively.

Study details: This retrospective cohort study analyzed the prospective data of 2645 adult patients with HCC who underwent LT at 5 US academic centers.

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by the US Department of Defense, Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation, Spanish National Health Institute, and Cancer Research UK, among others. Two authors reported receiving grants or a board of directors’ honoraria from various sources.

Source: Tabrizian P et al. Ten-year outcomes of liver transplant and downstaging for hepatocellular carcinoma. JAMA Surg. 2022 (Jul 20). Doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.2800

Key clinical point: The excellent 10-year post-liver transplant (LT) outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) successfully downstaged to within Milan criteria (MC) substantiate the validity of the national downstaging policy.

Major finding: At 10 years after LT, patients with HCC always within MC, those with HCC downstaged before LT, and those with HCC unsuccessfully downstaged/progressed beyond MC during LT had survival rates of 61.5%, 52.1%, and 43.3%, respectively, and recurrence rates of 13.3%, 20.6%, and 41.4%, respectively.

Study details: This retrospective cohort study analyzed the prospective data of 2645 adult patients with HCC who underwent LT at 5 US academic centers.

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by the US Department of Defense, Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation, Spanish National Health Institute, and Cancer Research UK, among others. Two authors reported receiving grants or a board of directors’ honoraria from various sources.

Source: Tabrizian P et al. Ten-year outcomes of liver transplant and downstaging for hepatocellular carcinoma. JAMA Surg. 2022 (Jul 20). Doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.2800

Key clinical point: Lenvatinib combined with transarterial chemoembolization (LEN-TACE) is more effective than LEN alone as the first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Major finding: After a 17.0-month median follow-up, the LEN-TACE vs LEN group had a significantly longer median overall survival (17.8 vs 11.5 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.45; P < .001) and progression-free survival (10.6 vs 6.4 months; HR 0.43; P < .001) and higher objective response rate (54.1% vs 25.0%; P < .001).

Study details: Findings are from a multicenter, phase 3 trial, LAUNCH, that included 338 adult patients with treatment-naive primary or initial recurrent advanced HCC after surgery who were randomly assigned to receive LEN-TACE (n = 170) or LEN monotherapy (n = 168).

Disclosures: This study was supported by Science and Technology Innovation 2030 Major Projects, China, among others. One author declared serving as a consultant/advisor for and receiving honoraria and research funding from GenomiCare.

Source: Peng Z et al. Lenvatinib combined with transarterial chemoembolization as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase III, randomized clinical trial (LAUNCH). J Clin Oncol. 2022 (Aug 3). Doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00392

Key clinical point: Lenvatinib combined with transarterial chemoembolization (LEN-TACE) is more effective than LEN alone as the first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Major finding: After a 17.0-month median follow-up, the LEN-TACE vs LEN group had a significantly longer median overall survival (17.8 vs 11.5 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.45; P < .001) and progression-free survival (10.6 vs 6.4 months; HR 0.43; P < .001) and higher objective response rate (54.1% vs 25.0%; P < .001).

Study details: Findings are from a multicenter, phase 3 trial, LAUNCH, that included 338 adult patients with treatment-naive primary or initial recurrent advanced HCC after surgery who were randomly assigned to receive LEN-TACE (n = 170) or LEN monotherapy (n = 168).

Disclosures: This study was supported by Science and Technology Innovation 2030 Major Projects, China, among others. One author declared serving as a consultant/advisor for and receiving honoraria and research funding from GenomiCare.

Source: Peng Z et al. Lenvatinib combined with transarterial chemoembolization as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase III, randomized clinical trial (LAUNCH). J Clin Oncol. 2022 (Aug 3). Doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00392

Key clinical point: Lenvatinib combined with transarterial chemoembolization (LEN-TACE) is more effective than LEN alone as the first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Major finding: After a 17.0-month median follow-up, the LEN-TACE vs LEN group had a significantly longer median overall survival (17.8 vs 11.5 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.45; P < .001) and progression-free survival (10.6 vs 6.4 months; HR 0.43; P < .001) and higher objective response rate (54.1% vs 25.0%; P < .001).

Study details: Findings are from a multicenter, phase 3 trial, LAUNCH, that included 338 adult patients with treatment-naive primary or initial recurrent advanced HCC after surgery who were randomly assigned to receive LEN-TACE (n = 170) or LEN monotherapy (n = 168).

Disclosures: This study was supported by Science and Technology Innovation 2030 Major Projects, China, among others. One author declared serving as a consultant/advisor for and receiving honoraria and research funding from GenomiCare.

Source: Peng Z et al. Lenvatinib combined with transarterial chemoembolization as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase III, randomized clinical trial (LAUNCH). J Clin Oncol. 2022 (Aug 3). Doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00392

Key clinical point: A single session of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) may not always confer significant survival benefits in patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); initial nonresponders benefit from a second TACE session.

Major finding: The overall survival of responders to the first TACE was significantly better than that of nonresponders (36.7 vs 21.5 months; P  =  .071) and comparable with that of initial nonresponders who responded to the second TACE (36.7 vs 47.8 months; P  =  .701).

Study details: This retrospective study reviewed the data of 94 patients with intermediate-stage HCC who underwent TACE and magnetic resonance imaging before and after TACE.

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by the US National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute and Philips Research North America (PRNA), Cambridge, USA. Some authors reported being advisory board members or consultants for or receiving research grants from various sources. MD Lin is a former employee of PRNA.

Source: Zhao Y et al. Three-dimensional quantitative tumor response and survival analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients who failed initial transarterial chemoembolization: Repeat or switch treatment? Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(15):3615 (Jul 25). Doi: 10.3390/cancers14153615

Key clinical point: A single session of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) may not always confer significant survival benefits in patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); initial nonresponders benefit from a second TACE session.

Major finding: The overall survival of responders to the first TACE was significantly better than that of nonresponders (36.7 vs 21.5 months; P  =  .071) and comparable with that of initial nonresponders who responded to the second TACE (36.7 vs 47.8 months; P  =  .701).

Study details: This retrospective study reviewed the data of 94 patients with intermediate-stage HCC who underwent TACE and magnetic resonance imaging before and after TACE.

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by the US National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute and Philips Research North America (PRNA), Cambridge, USA. Some authors reported being advisory board members or consultants for or receiving research grants from various sources. MD Lin is a former employee of PRNA.

Source: Zhao Y et al. Three-dimensional quantitative tumor response and survival analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients who failed initial transarterial chemoembolization: Repeat or switch treatment? Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(15):3615 (Jul 25). Doi: 10.3390/cancers14153615

Key clinical point: A single session of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) may not always confer significant survival benefits in patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); initial nonresponders benefit from a second TACE session.

Major finding: The overall survival of responders to the first TACE was significantly better than that of nonresponders (36.7 vs 21.5 months; P  =  .071) and comparable with that of initial nonresponders who responded to the second TACE (36.7 vs 47.8 months; P  =  .701).

Study details: This retrospective study reviewed the data of 94 patients with intermediate-stage HCC who underwent TACE and magnetic resonance imaging before and after TACE.

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by the US National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute and Philips Research North America (PRNA), Cambridge, USA. Some authors reported being advisory board members or consultants for or receiving research grants from various sources. MD Lin is a former employee of PRNA.

Source: Zhao Y et al. Three-dimensional quantitative tumor response and survival analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients who failed initial transarterial chemoembolization: Repeat or switch treatment? Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(15):3615 (Jul 25). Doi: 10.3390/cancers14153615

Key clinical point: The combination of sorafenib, an immune checkpoint inhibitor (camrelizumab/tislelizumab), transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SITS) is more effective than sorafenib plus TACE (ST) in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT), especially as a downstaging strategy.

Major finding: The SITS vs ST group had a significantly higher objective response rate (53.3% vs 25.0%; P  =  .036) and longer median progression-free survival (10.4 vs 6.3 months; P  =  .015) and overall survival (13.8 vs 8.8 months; P  =  .013), with 12 patients vs none experiencing successful downstaging.

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective study including 62 patients with advanced HCC and PVTT who received SITS (n = 30) or ST (n = 32).

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Hubei Chen Xiaoping Science and Technology Development Foundation, China, and the Autonomous Exploration and Innovation Fund Subject for Graduate Student of Central South University, China. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Zhang Z et al. A Combination of sorafenib, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, TACE and stereotactic body radiation therapy versus sorafenib and TACE in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma accompanied by portal vein tumor thrombus. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(15):3619 (Jul 25). Doi:  10.3390/cancers14153619

Key clinical point: The combination of sorafenib, an immune checkpoint inhibitor (camrelizumab/tislelizumab), transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SITS) is more effective than sorafenib plus TACE (ST) in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT), especially as a downstaging strategy.

Major finding: The SITS vs ST group had a significantly higher objective response rate (53.3% vs 25.0%; P  =  .036) and longer median progression-free survival (10.4 vs 6.3 months; P  =  .015) and overall survival (13.8 vs 8.8 months; P  =  .013), with 12 patients vs none experiencing successful downstaging.

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective study including 62 patients with advanced HCC and PVTT who received SITS (n = 30) or ST (n = 32).

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Hubei Chen Xiaoping Science and Technology Development Foundation, China, and the Autonomous Exploration and Innovation Fund Subject for Graduate Student of Central South University, China. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Zhang Z et al. A Combination of sorafenib, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, TACE and stereotactic body radiation therapy versus sorafenib and TACE in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma accompanied by portal vein tumor thrombus. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(15):3619 (Jul 25). Doi:  10.3390/cancers14153619

Key clinical point: The combination of sorafenib, an immune checkpoint inhibitor (camrelizumab/tislelizumab), transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SITS) is more effective than sorafenib plus TACE (ST) in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT), especially as a downstaging strategy.

Major finding: The SITS vs ST group had a significantly higher objective response rate (53.3% vs 25.0%; P  =  .036) and longer median progression-free survival (10.4 vs 6.3 months; P  =  .015) and overall survival (13.8 vs 8.8 months; P  =  .013), with 12 patients vs none experiencing successful downstaging.

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective study including 62 patients with advanced HCC and PVTT who received SITS (n = 30) or ST (n = 32).

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Hubei Chen Xiaoping Science and Technology Development Foundation, China, and the Autonomous Exploration and Innovation Fund Subject for Graduate Student of Central South University, China. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Zhang Z et al. A Combination of sorafenib, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, TACE and stereotactic body radiation therapy versus sorafenib and TACE in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma accompanied by portal vein tumor thrombus. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(15):3619 (Jul 25). Doi:  10.3390/cancers14153619

Key clinical point: Percutaneous no-touch radiofrequency ablation (NtRFA) provides effective tumor control in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ≤5 cm, with a lower local tumor progression (LTP) rate than that with conventional RFA.

Major finding: NtRFA offered a pooled overall LTP rate of 6% (95% CI 4%-8%) and significantly lower LTP rates compared with conventional RFA (hazard ratio 0.28; relative risk 0.26; both P < .01).

Study details: This was a meta-analysis of 12 studies that included 900 patients and evaluated LTP after NtRFA for HCC ≤5 cm.

Disclosures: This study was supported by a Korea Medical Device Development Fund grant funded by the Korea government. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Kim TH et al. Can “no-touch” radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma improve local tumor control? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2022 (Jul 30). Doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08991-1

Key clinical point: Percutaneous no-touch radiofrequency ablation (NtRFA) provides effective tumor control in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ≤5 cm, with a lower local tumor progression (LTP) rate than that with conventional RFA.

Major finding: NtRFA offered a pooled overall LTP rate of 6% (95% CI 4%-8%) and significantly lower LTP rates compared with conventional RFA (hazard ratio 0.28; relative risk 0.26; both P < .01).

Study details: This was a meta-analysis of 12 studies that included 900 patients and evaluated LTP after NtRFA for HCC ≤5 cm.

Disclosures: This study was supported by a Korea Medical Device Development Fund grant funded by the Korea government. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Kim TH et al. Can “no-touch” radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma improve local tumor control? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2022 (Jul 30). Doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08991-1

Key clinical point: Percutaneous no-touch radiofrequency ablation (NtRFA) provides effective tumor control in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ≤5 cm, with a lower local tumor progression (LTP) rate than that with conventional RFA.

Major finding: NtRFA offered a pooled overall LTP rate of 6% (95% CI 4%-8%) and significantly lower LTP rates compared with conventional RFA (hazard ratio 0.28; relative risk 0.26; both P < .01).

Study details: This was a meta-analysis of 12 studies that included 900 patients and evaluated LTP after NtRFA for HCC ≤5 cm.

Disclosures: This study was supported by a Korea Medical Device Development Fund grant funded by the Korea government. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Kim TH et al. Can “no-touch” radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma improve local tumor control? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2022 (Jul 30). Doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08991-1