Hodgkin Lymphoma

Crowded street

Photo by Pavel Novak

VIENNA—Living in overcrowded conditions may affect a young person’s risk of developing certain subtypes of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), according to researchers.

They studied more than 600 children and young adults with HL in England and found that patients who lived in areas with more overcrowded households had a lower incidence of nodular sclerosis (NS) HL but a higher incidence of the not-otherwise-specified (NOS) subtype of HL.

“Our findings related to the NS subtype may suggest that the recurrent infections to which children living in overcrowded conditions are likely to have been exposed stimulate their immune systems and, hence, protect them against developing this type of cancer later in their childhood and early adult life,” said Richard McNally, PhD, of Newcastle University in the UK.

“Those who have a genetic susceptibility to HL and have been less exposed to infection through not living in such overcrowded conditions may have less developed immune systems as a result and are therefore at greater risk of developing this subtype.”

Dr McNally and his colleagues added that it’s more difficult to interpret the findings in the NOS group because this subtype of HL is very heterogeneous. The team said the role of chance cannot be ruled out.

They presented this research at the 2015 European Cancer Congress (abstract 1414).

Dr McNally and his colleagues wanted to gain a better understanding of factors that cause HL, so they analyzed a cohort of young HL patients in Northern England, looking at factors such as sex, age, and socio-economic deprivation.

The researchers evaluated 621 cases of HL recorded in the Northern Region Young Persons’ Malignant Disease Registry. Patients were ages 0 to 24 at diagnosis and were diagnosed between 1968 and 2003.

There were 5 different subtypes of HL in this group:

• 247 cases of the NS type
• 143 NOS
• 105 of mixed cellularity
• 58 lymphocyte-rich cases
• 68 “others.”

Age and sex

Overall, more males than females had HL, but the male-female ratio varied by both age group and subtype. The age-standardized rate (ASR) of HL for males was 18.15 per million persons per year, and the ASR for females was 10.52 per million persons per year.

For the NS subtype, there were 130 males and 117 females, but this was reversed at ages 20 to 24, with 72 females and 55 males. The ASR for NS HL at 20 to 24 was 14.26 for males and 18.79 for females.

“That this change takes place after puberty seems to suggest that estrogens may be responsible in some way,” Dr McNally said. “There are a lot of genes directly regulated by sex hormones, and they are obvious suspects. Alternatively, epigenetic changes . . .  influencing key genes, induced by sex hormones, may be responsible.”

Overcrowding

The researchers calculated socio-economic deprivation using the 4 components of the Townsend deprivation score: household overcrowding, non-home ownership, unemployment, and households with no car.

They observed a lower incidence of NS HL among those patients living in areas with more overcrowded households. The relative risk of NS HL was 0.88 for a 1% increase in household overcrowding (P<0.001).

For the NOS subtype, the reverse was seen. A 1% increase in household overcrowding was associated with an increased incidence of NOS HL—a relative risk of 1.17.

Overcrowding seemed to have no effect on the incidence of mixed-cellularity HL or lymphocyte-rich HL.

“We knew already that recurrent infections may protect against childhood leukemia, and now it looks as we can add Hodgkin lymphoma and, particularly its NS subtype, to the list,” Dr McNally said. “In order to further investigate the factors involved, prospective studies should investigate the hormonal changes and recurrent infections and their direct link to the risk of lymphoma, but such studies are difficult to do in rare diseases.”

“A practical follow-up would be case-control studies examining biological markers related to exposure to a multitude of infectious agents, and indeed to hormonal status itself, while genetic studies are another possibility.”

Crowded street

Photo by Pavel Novak

VIENNA—Living in overcrowded conditions may affect a young person’s risk of developing certain subtypes of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), according to researchers.

They studied more than 600 children and young adults with HL in England and found that patients who lived in areas with more overcrowded households had a lower incidence of nodular sclerosis (NS) HL but a higher incidence of the not-otherwise-specified (NOS) subtype of HL.

“Our findings related to the NS subtype may suggest that the recurrent infections to which children living in overcrowded conditions are likely to have been exposed stimulate their immune systems and, hence, protect them against developing this type of cancer later in their childhood and early adult life,” said Richard McNally, PhD, of Newcastle University in the UK.

“Those who have a genetic susceptibility to HL and have been less exposed to infection through not living in such overcrowded conditions may have less developed immune systems as a result and are therefore at greater risk of developing this subtype.”

Dr McNally and his colleagues added that it’s more difficult to interpret the findings in the NOS group because this subtype of HL is very heterogeneous. The team said the role of chance cannot be ruled out.

They presented this research at the 2015 European Cancer Congress (abstract 1414).

Dr McNally and his colleagues wanted to gain a better understanding of factors that cause HL, so they analyzed a cohort of young HL patients in Northern England, looking at factors such as sex, age, and socio-economic deprivation.

The researchers evaluated 621 cases of HL recorded in the Northern Region Young Persons’ Malignant Disease Registry. Patients were ages 0 to 24 at diagnosis and were diagnosed between 1968 and 2003.

There were 5 different subtypes of HL in this group:

• 247 cases of the NS type
• 143 NOS
• 105 of mixed cellularity
• 58 lymphocyte-rich cases
• 68 “others.”

Age and sex

Overall, more males than females had HL, but the male-female ratio varied by both age group and subtype. The age-standardized rate (ASR) of HL for males was 18.15 per million persons per year, and the ASR for females was 10.52 per million persons per year.

For the NS subtype, there were 130 males and 117 females, but this was reversed at ages 20 to 24, with 72 females and 55 males. The ASR for NS HL at 20 to 24 was 14.26 for males and 18.79 for females.

“That this change takes place after puberty seems to suggest that estrogens may be responsible in some way,” Dr McNally said. “There are a lot of genes directly regulated by sex hormones, and they are obvious suspects. Alternatively, epigenetic changes . . .  influencing key genes, induced by sex hormones, may be responsible.”

Overcrowding

The researchers calculated socio-economic deprivation using the 4 components of the Townsend deprivation score: household overcrowding, non-home ownership, unemployment, and households with no car.

They observed a lower incidence of NS HL among those patients living in areas with more overcrowded households. The relative risk of NS HL was 0.88 for a 1% increase in household overcrowding (P<0.001).

For the NOS subtype, the reverse was seen. A 1% increase in household overcrowding was associated with an increased incidence of NOS HL—a relative risk of 1.17.

Overcrowding seemed to have no effect on the incidence of mixed-cellularity HL or lymphocyte-rich HL.

“We knew already that recurrent infections may protect against childhood leukemia, and now it looks as we can add Hodgkin lymphoma and, particularly its NS subtype, to the list,” Dr McNally said. “In order to further investigate the factors involved, prospective studies should investigate the hormonal changes and recurrent infections and their direct link to the risk of lymphoma, but such studies are difficult to do in rare diseases.”

“A practical follow-up would be case-control studies examining biological markers related to exposure to a multitude of infectious agents, and indeed to hormonal status itself, while genetic studies are another possibility.”

Crowded street

Photo by Pavel Novak

VIENNA—Living in overcrowded conditions may affect a young person’s risk of developing certain subtypes of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), according to researchers.

They studied more than 600 children and young adults with HL in England and found that patients who lived in areas with more overcrowded households had a lower incidence of nodular sclerosis (NS) HL but a higher incidence of the not-otherwise-specified (NOS) subtype of HL.

“Our findings related to the NS subtype may suggest that the recurrent infections to which children living in overcrowded conditions are likely to have been exposed stimulate their immune systems and, hence, protect them against developing this type of cancer later in their childhood and early adult life,” said Richard McNally, PhD, of Newcastle University in the UK.

“Those who have a genetic susceptibility to HL and have been less exposed to infection through not living in such overcrowded conditions may have less developed immune systems as a result and are therefore at greater risk of developing this subtype.”

Dr McNally and his colleagues added that it’s more difficult to interpret the findings in the NOS group because this subtype of HL is very heterogeneous. The team said the role of chance cannot be ruled out.

They presented this research at the 2015 European Cancer Congress (abstract 1414).

Dr McNally and his colleagues wanted to gain a better understanding of factors that cause HL, so they analyzed a cohort of young HL patients in Northern England, looking at factors such as sex, age, and socio-economic deprivation.

The researchers evaluated 621 cases of HL recorded in the Northern Region Young Persons’ Malignant Disease Registry. Patients were ages 0 to 24 at diagnosis and were diagnosed between 1968 and 2003.

There were 5 different subtypes of HL in this group:

• 247 cases of the NS type
• 143 NOS
• 105 of mixed cellularity
• 58 lymphocyte-rich cases
• 68 “others.”

Age and sex

Overall, more males than females had HL, but the male-female ratio varied by both age group and subtype. The age-standardized rate (ASR) of HL for males was 18.15 per million persons per year, and the ASR for females was 10.52 per million persons per year.

For the NS subtype, there were 130 males and 117 females, but this was reversed at ages 20 to 24, with 72 females and 55 males. The ASR for NS HL at 20 to 24 was 14.26 for males and 18.79 for females.

“That this change takes place after puberty seems to suggest that estrogens may be responsible in some way,” Dr McNally said. “There are a lot of genes directly regulated by sex hormones, and they are obvious suspects. Alternatively, epigenetic changes . . .  influencing key genes, induced by sex hormones, may be responsible.”

Overcrowding

The researchers calculated socio-economic deprivation using the 4 components of the Townsend deprivation score: household overcrowding, non-home ownership, unemployment, and households with no car.

They observed a lower incidence of NS HL among those patients living in areas with more overcrowded households. The relative risk of NS HL was 0.88 for a 1% increase in household overcrowding (P<0.001).

For the NOS subtype, the reverse was seen. A 1% increase in household overcrowding was associated with an increased incidence of NOS HL—a relative risk of 1.17.

Overcrowding seemed to have no effect on the incidence of mixed-cellularity HL or lymphocyte-rich HL.

“We knew already that recurrent infections may protect against childhood leukemia, and now it looks as we can add Hodgkin lymphoma and, particularly its NS subtype, to the list,” Dr McNally said. “In order to further investigate the factors involved, prospective studies should investigate the hormonal changes and recurrent infections and their direct link to the risk of lymphoma, but such studies are difficult to do in rare diseases.”

“A practical follow-up would be case-control studies examining biological markers related to exposure to a multitude of infectious agents, and indeed to hormonal status itself, while genetic studies are another possibility.”

 

 

Cancer patient receiving

chemotherapy

Photo by Rhoda Baer

 

VIENNA—Results of the EUROCARE-5 study have revealed regional differences in survival for European patients with hematologic malignancies.

The data showed regional variations in 5-year relative survival rates for a number of cancers.

But the differences were particularly pronounced for leukemias, non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs), and plasma cell neoplasms (PCNs).

Milena Sant, MD, of the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori in Milan, Italy, presented these results at the 2015 European Cancer Congress (LBA 1).

Data from this study have also been published in several articles in the October 2015 issue of the European Journal of Cancer.

EUROCARE-5 includes records from 22 million cancer patients diagnosed between 1978 and 2007. The latest data encompass more than 10 million patients (ages 15 and older) diagnosed from 1995 to 2007 and followed up to 2008.

The data came from 107 cancer registries in 29 countries. The researchers estimated 5-year relative survival and trends from 1999 to 2007 according to region—Ireland/UK, Northern Europe, Central Europe, Southern Europe, and Eastern Europe.

“In general, 5-year relative survival—survival that is adjusted for causes of death other than cancer—increased steadily over time in Europe, particularly in Eastern Europe, for most cancers,” Dr Sant said.

“However, the most dramatic geographical variations were observed for cancers of the blood where there have been recent advances in treatment, such as chronic myeloid and lymphocytic leukemias, non-Hodgkin lymphoma and 2 of its subtypes (follicular and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma), and multiple myeloma. Hodgkin lymphoma was the exception, with smaller regional variations and a fairly good prognosis in most countries.”

Hodgkin lymphoma and NHL

Of all the hematologic malignancies, 5-year relative survival was highest for Hodgkin lymphoma, at 80.8% (40,625 cases).  Five-year survival was 79.4% in Ireland and the UK, 85% in Northern countries, and 74.3% in Eastern Europe, which was significantly below the European average (P<0.0001).

For NHL, the 5-year relative survival was 59.4% (329,204 cases). Survival rates for NHL patients ranged from 49.7% in Eastern Europe to 63.3% in Northern Europe.

CLL/SLL

For chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), the 5-year relative survival was 70.4% (81,914 cases). CLL/SLL survival ranged from 58% in Eastern Europe to about 74% in Central and Northern Europe.

The researchers noted that between-country variations in CLL/SLL survival were high in all regions. Outliers that were significantly below the regional average were Austria (67%), Croatia (52%), and Bulgaria (45.5%).

PCNs

PCNs included multiple myeloma, plasmacytoma, and plasma cell leukemias. The 5-year relative survival for all PCNs was 39.2% (94,024 cases).

PCN survival rates were lowest in Eastern Europe (31.7%), slightly higher in the UK/Ireland (35.9%), and between 39.1% and 42% in the rest of Europe.

Myeloid leukemias

Of all the hematologic malignancies, 5-year relative survival was poorest for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), at 17.1% (57,026 cases).

AML survival rates in Ireland/UK (15.0%) and Eastern Europe (13.0%) were significantly below the European average. But AML survival in Sweden, Belgium, France, and Germany was significantly higher than the average (P<0.005).

Five-year relative survival for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) was 52.9% (17,713 cases).

Of all the hematologic malignancies, the survival gap between Eastern Europe and the rest of Europe was highest for CML. Five-year survival for CML patients was 33% in Eastern Europe and ranged from 51% to 58% in the rest of Europe.

The researchers also said there were striking survival variations by country in all areas. They found significant deviations from the regional average in Sweden (69.7%), Scotland (64.6%), France (71.7%), Austria (48.2%), Croatia (37.8%), Estonia (48.9%), Czech Republic (45.2%), and Latvia (22.1%).

“Results from EUROCARE can help to identify regions of low survival where action is needed to improve patients’ outcomes,” Dr Sant noted.

“Population-based survival information is essential for physicians, policy-makers, administrators, researchers, and patient organizations who deal with the needs of cancer patients, as well as with the issue of the growing expenditure on healthcare.”

 

 

Cancer patient receiving

chemotherapy

Photo by Rhoda Baer

 

VIENNA—Results of the EUROCARE-5 study have revealed regional differences in survival for European patients with hematologic malignancies.

The data showed regional variations in 5-year relative survival rates for a number of cancers.

But the differences were particularly pronounced for leukemias, non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs), and plasma cell neoplasms (PCNs).

Milena Sant, MD, of the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori in Milan, Italy, presented these results at the 2015 European Cancer Congress (LBA 1).

Data from this study have also been published in several articles in the October 2015 issue of the European Journal of Cancer.

EUROCARE-5 includes records from 22 million cancer patients diagnosed between 1978 and 2007. The latest data encompass more than 10 million patients (ages 15 and older) diagnosed from 1995 to 2007 and followed up to 2008.

The data came from 107 cancer registries in 29 countries. The researchers estimated 5-year relative survival and trends from 1999 to 2007 according to region—Ireland/UK, Northern Europe, Central Europe, Southern Europe, and Eastern Europe.

“In general, 5-year relative survival—survival that is adjusted for causes of death other than cancer—increased steadily over time in Europe, particularly in Eastern Europe, for most cancers,” Dr Sant said.

“However, the most dramatic geographical variations were observed for cancers of the blood where there have been recent advances in treatment, such as chronic myeloid and lymphocytic leukemias, non-Hodgkin lymphoma and 2 of its subtypes (follicular and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma), and multiple myeloma. Hodgkin lymphoma was the exception, with smaller regional variations and a fairly good prognosis in most countries.”

Hodgkin lymphoma and NHL

Of all the hematologic malignancies, 5-year relative survival was highest for Hodgkin lymphoma, at 80.8% (40,625 cases).  Five-year survival was 79.4% in Ireland and the UK, 85% in Northern countries, and 74.3% in Eastern Europe, which was significantly below the European average (P<0.0001).

For NHL, the 5-year relative survival was 59.4% (329,204 cases). Survival rates for NHL patients ranged from 49.7% in Eastern Europe to 63.3% in Northern Europe.

CLL/SLL

For chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), the 5-year relative survival was 70.4% (81,914 cases). CLL/SLL survival ranged from 58% in Eastern Europe to about 74% in Central and Northern Europe.

The researchers noted that between-country variations in CLL/SLL survival were high in all regions. Outliers that were significantly below the regional average were Austria (67%), Croatia (52%), and Bulgaria (45.5%).

PCNs

PCNs included multiple myeloma, plasmacytoma, and plasma cell leukemias. The 5-year relative survival for all PCNs was 39.2% (94,024 cases).

PCN survival rates were lowest in Eastern Europe (31.7%), slightly higher in the UK/Ireland (35.9%), and between 39.1% and 42% in the rest of Europe.

Myeloid leukemias

Of all the hematologic malignancies, 5-year relative survival was poorest for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), at 17.1% (57,026 cases).

AML survival rates in Ireland/UK (15.0%) and Eastern Europe (13.0%) were significantly below the European average. But AML survival in Sweden, Belgium, France, and Germany was significantly higher than the average (P<0.005).

Five-year relative survival for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) was 52.9% (17,713 cases).

Of all the hematologic malignancies, the survival gap between Eastern Europe and the rest of Europe was highest for CML. Five-year survival for CML patients was 33% in Eastern Europe and ranged from 51% to 58% in the rest of Europe.

The researchers also said there were striking survival variations by country in all areas. They found significant deviations from the regional average in Sweden (69.7%), Scotland (64.6%), France (71.7%), Austria (48.2%), Croatia (37.8%), Estonia (48.9%), Czech Republic (45.2%), and Latvia (22.1%).

“Results from EUROCARE can help to identify regions of low survival where action is needed to improve patients’ outcomes,” Dr Sant noted.

“Population-based survival information is essential for physicians, policy-makers, administrators, researchers, and patient organizations who deal with the needs of cancer patients, as well as with the issue of the growing expenditure on healthcare.”

 

 

Cancer patient receiving

chemotherapy

Photo by Rhoda Baer

 

VIENNA—Results of the EUROCARE-5 study have revealed regional differences in survival for European patients with hematologic malignancies.

The data showed regional variations in 5-year relative survival rates for a number of cancers.

But the differences were particularly pronounced for leukemias, non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs), and plasma cell neoplasms (PCNs).

Milena Sant, MD, of the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori in Milan, Italy, presented these results at the 2015 European Cancer Congress (LBA 1).

Data from this study have also been published in several articles in the October 2015 issue of the European Journal of Cancer.

EUROCARE-5 includes records from 22 million cancer patients diagnosed between 1978 and 2007. The latest data encompass more than 10 million patients (ages 15 and older) diagnosed from 1995 to 2007 and followed up to 2008.

The data came from 107 cancer registries in 29 countries. The researchers estimated 5-year relative survival and trends from 1999 to 2007 according to region—Ireland/UK, Northern Europe, Central Europe, Southern Europe, and Eastern Europe.

“In general, 5-year relative survival—survival that is adjusted for causes of death other than cancer—increased steadily over time in Europe, particularly in Eastern Europe, for most cancers,” Dr Sant said.

“However, the most dramatic geographical variations were observed for cancers of the blood where there have been recent advances in treatment, such as chronic myeloid and lymphocytic leukemias, non-Hodgkin lymphoma and 2 of its subtypes (follicular and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma), and multiple myeloma. Hodgkin lymphoma was the exception, with smaller regional variations and a fairly good prognosis in most countries.”

Hodgkin lymphoma and NHL

Of all the hematologic malignancies, 5-year relative survival was highest for Hodgkin lymphoma, at 80.8% (40,625 cases).  Five-year survival was 79.4% in Ireland and the UK, 85% in Northern countries, and 74.3% in Eastern Europe, which was significantly below the European average (P<0.0001).

For NHL, the 5-year relative survival was 59.4% (329,204 cases). Survival rates for NHL patients ranged from 49.7% in Eastern Europe to 63.3% in Northern Europe.

CLL/SLL

For chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), the 5-year relative survival was 70.4% (81,914 cases). CLL/SLL survival ranged from 58% in Eastern Europe to about 74% in Central and Northern Europe.

The researchers noted that between-country variations in CLL/SLL survival were high in all regions. Outliers that were significantly below the regional average were Austria (67%), Croatia (52%), and Bulgaria (45.5%).

PCNs

PCNs included multiple myeloma, plasmacytoma, and plasma cell leukemias. The 5-year relative survival for all PCNs was 39.2% (94,024 cases).

PCN survival rates were lowest in Eastern Europe (31.7%), slightly higher in the UK/Ireland (35.9%), and between 39.1% and 42% in the rest of Europe.

Myeloid leukemias

Of all the hematologic malignancies, 5-year relative survival was poorest for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), at 17.1% (57,026 cases).

AML survival rates in Ireland/UK (15.0%) and Eastern Europe (13.0%) were significantly below the European average. But AML survival in Sweden, Belgium, France, and Germany was significantly higher than the average (P<0.005).

Five-year relative survival for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) was 52.9% (17,713 cases).

Of all the hematologic malignancies, the survival gap between Eastern Europe and the rest of Europe was highest for CML. Five-year survival for CML patients was 33% in Eastern Europe and ranged from 51% to 58% in the rest of Europe.

The researchers also said there were striking survival variations by country in all areas. They found significant deviations from the regional average in Sweden (69.7%), Scotland (64.6%), France (71.7%), Austria (48.2%), Croatia (37.8%), Estonia (48.9%), Czech Republic (45.2%), and Latvia (22.1%).

“Results from EUROCARE can help to identify regions of low survival where action is needed to improve patients’ outcomes,” Dr Sant noted.

“Population-based survival information is essential for physicians, policy-makers, administrators, researchers, and patient organizations who deal with the needs of cancer patients, as well as with the issue of the growing expenditure on healthcare.”

Brentuximab vedotin

Photo from Business Wire

First-line treatment with brentuximab vedotin (BV) can produce a high response rate in older Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients who are unfit for chemotherapy, according to research published in Blood.

In this small study, single-agent BV produced an overall response rate of 92% and a complete response rate of 73%.

However, the drug also produced a high rate of peripheral sensory neuropathy (78%), which was the most common adverse event.

This phase 2 trial is the first to assess BV as front-line treatment. The study was funded by Seattle Genetics, Inc., which is developing BV in collaboration with Takeda Pharmaceutical Company.

Andres Forero-Torres, MD, of the University of Alabama at Birmingham, and his colleagues conducted the research, enrolling 27 HL patients (ages 64 to 92) in the trial.

The patients were either ineligible for conventional chemotherapy or declined treatment after receiving information about its risks.

They received 1.8 mg/kg of intravenous BV every 3 weeks for up to 16 doses. Those who benefitted from the drug could continue beyond this time period until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study closure.

Patients received a median of 8 cycles, with 4 patients completing 16 cycles and 1 patient completing 23 cycles.

Peripheral neuropathy was the primary adverse event leading to dose modifications. Fourteen patients (52%) had dose delays, typically lasting a week (range, 1 to 3). But 11 patients (41%) had permanent dose reductions to 1.2 mg/kg.

Safety

All 27 patients were evaluable for safety, and all experienced at least 1 adverse event. The most commonly reported events were peripheral sensory neuropathy (n=21, 78%), fatigue (n=12, 44%), and nausea (n=12, 44%).

Treatment-emergent grade 3 adverse events included peripheral sensory neuropathy (n=7, 26%), rash (n=2, 7%), urinary tract infection (n=1, 4%), and maculopapular rash (n=1, 4%)

There were 2 grade 4 events—hyperuricemia and drug hypersensitivity to anesthesia—considered unrelated to BV.

Efficacy

Twenty-six patients were evaluable for efficacy. One patient was found to have nodular lymphocyte predominant HL and was therefore excluded.

The overall response rate was 92%. Nineteen patients had a complete response, 5 had a partial response, and 2 had stable disease.

The median duration of response was about 9.1 months (range, 2.8 to 20.9+ months).

The median progression-free survival was 10.5 months (range, 2.6+ to 22.3+ months), and the median overall survival had not been reached at the time of analysis (range, 4.6+ to 24.9+ months).

“While we observed promising responses,” Dr Forero-Torres said, “the next step is to evaluate this drug in combination with additional chemotherapy or immunotherapies that might allow us to prolong the response without relapse.”

Brentuximab vedotin

Photo from Business Wire

First-line treatment with brentuximab vedotin (BV) can produce a high response rate in older Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients who are unfit for chemotherapy, according to research published in Blood.

In this small study, single-agent BV produced an overall response rate of 92% and a complete response rate of 73%.

However, the drug also produced a high rate of peripheral sensory neuropathy (78%), which was the most common adverse event.

This phase 2 trial is the first to assess BV as front-line treatment. The study was funded by Seattle Genetics, Inc., which is developing BV in collaboration with Takeda Pharmaceutical Company.

Andres Forero-Torres, MD, of the University of Alabama at Birmingham, and his colleagues conducted the research, enrolling 27 HL patients (ages 64 to 92) in the trial.

The patients were either ineligible for conventional chemotherapy or declined treatment after receiving information about its risks.

They received 1.8 mg/kg of intravenous BV every 3 weeks for up to 16 doses. Those who benefitted from the drug could continue beyond this time period until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study closure.

Patients received a median of 8 cycles, with 4 patients completing 16 cycles and 1 patient completing 23 cycles.

Peripheral neuropathy was the primary adverse event leading to dose modifications. Fourteen patients (52%) had dose delays, typically lasting a week (range, 1 to 3). But 11 patients (41%) had permanent dose reductions to 1.2 mg/kg.

Safety

All 27 patients were evaluable for safety, and all experienced at least 1 adverse event. The most commonly reported events were peripheral sensory neuropathy (n=21, 78%), fatigue (n=12, 44%), and nausea (n=12, 44%).

Treatment-emergent grade 3 adverse events included peripheral sensory neuropathy (n=7, 26%), rash (n=2, 7%), urinary tract infection (n=1, 4%), and maculopapular rash (n=1, 4%)

There were 2 grade 4 events—hyperuricemia and drug hypersensitivity to anesthesia—considered unrelated to BV.

Efficacy

Twenty-six patients were evaluable for efficacy. One patient was found to have nodular lymphocyte predominant HL and was therefore excluded.

The overall response rate was 92%. Nineteen patients had a complete response, 5 had a partial response, and 2 had stable disease.

The median duration of response was about 9.1 months (range, 2.8 to 20.9+ months).

The median progression-free survival was 10.5 months (range, 2.6+ to 22.3+ months), and the median overall survival had not been reached at the time of analysis (range, 4.6+ to 24.9+ months).

“While we observed promising responses,” Dr Forero-Torres said, “the next step is to evaluate this drug in combination with additional chemotherapy or immunotherapies that might allow us to prolong the response without relapse.”

Brentuximab vedotin

Photo from Business Wire

First-line treatment with brentuximab vedotin (BV) can produce a high response rate in older Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients who are unfit for chemotherapy, according to research published in Blood.

In this small study, single-agent BV produced an overall response rate of 92% and a complete response rate of 73%.

However, the drug also produced a high rate of peripheral sensory neuropathy (78%), which was the most common adverse event.

This phase 2 trial is the first to assess BV as front-line treatment. The study was funded by Seattle Genetics, Inc., which is developing BV in collaboration with Takeda Pharmaceutical Company.

Andres Forero-Torres, MD, of the University of Alabama at Birmingham, and his colleagues conducted the research, enrolling 27 HL patients (ages 64 to 92) in the trial.

The patients were either ineligible for conventional chemotherapy or declined treatment after receiving information about its risks.

They received 1.8 mg/kg of intravenous BV every 3 weeks for up to 16 doses. Those who benefitted from the drug could continue beyond this time period until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study closure.

Patients received a median of 8 cycles, with 4 patients completing 16 cycles and 1 patient completing 23 cycles.

Peripheral neuropathy was the primary adverse event leading to dose modifications. Fourteen patients (52%) had dose delays, typically lasting a week (range, 1 to 3). But 11 patients (41%) had permanent dose reductions to 1.2 mg/kg.

Safety

All 27 patients were evaluable for safety, and all experienced at least 1 adverse event. The most commonly reported events were peripheral sensory neuropathy (n=21, 78%), fatigue (n=12, 44%), and nausea (n=12, 44%).

Treatment-emergent grade 3 adverse events included peripheral sensory neuropathy (n=7, 26%), rash (n=2, 7%), urinary tract infection (n=1, 4%), and maculopapular rash (n=1, 4%)

There were 2 grade 4 events—hyperuricemia and drug hypersensitivity to anesthesia—considered unrelated to BV.

Efficacy

Twenty-six patients were evaluable for efficacy. One patient was found to have nodular lymphocyte predominant HL and was therefore excluded.

The overall response rate was 92%. Nineteen patients had a complete response, 5 had a partial response, and 2 had stable disease.

The median duration of response was about 9.1 months (range, 2.8 to 20.9+ months).

The median progression-free survival was 10.5 months (range, 2.6+ to 22.3+ months), and the median overall survival had not been reached at the time of analysis (range, 4.6+ to 24.9+ months).

“While we observed promising responses,” Dr Forero-Torres said, “the next step is to evaluate this drug in combination with additional chemotherapy or immunotherapies that might allow us to prolong the response without relapse.”

Prescription drugs

Photo courtesy of CDC

England’s National Health Service (NHS) plans to remove several drugs used to treat hematologic malignancies from the Cancer Drugs Fund (CDF).

The plan is that, as of November 4, 2015, pomalidomide, lenalidomide, ibrutinib, dasatinib, brentuximab, bosutinib, and bendamustine will no longer be funded via the CDF for certain indications.

Ofatumumab was removed from the CDF list yesterday but is now available through the NHS.

Drugs used to treat solid tumor malignancies are set to be de-funded through CDF in November as well.

However, the NHS said the proposal to remove a drug from the CDF is not necessarily a final decision.

In cases where a drug offers enough clinical benefit, the pharmaceutical company developing that drug has the opportunity to reduce the price they are asking the NHS to pay to ensure that it achieves a satisfactory level of value for money. The NHS said a number of such negotiations are underway.

In addition, patients who are currently receiving the drugs set to be removed from the CDF will continue to have access to those drugs.

About the CDF and the NHS

The CDF—set up in 2010 and currently due to run until March 2016—is money the government has set aside to pay for cancer drugs that haven’t been approved by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and aren’t available within the NHS in England. Most cancer drugs are routinely funded outside of the CDF.

NHS England and NICE are planning to consult on a proposed new system for commissioning cancer drugs. The NHS said the new system will be designed to provide the agency with a more systematic approach to getting the best price for cancer drugs.

Reason for drug removals

The NHS previously increased the budget for the CDF from £200 million in 2013/14, to £280 million in 2014/15, and £340 million from April 2015. This represents a total increase of 70% since August 2014.

However, current projections suggest that spending would rise to around £410 million for this year, an over-spend of £70 million, in the absence of further prioritization. The NHS said this money could be used for other aspects of cancer treatment or NHS services for other patient groups.

Therefore, some drugs are set to be removed from the CDF. The NHS said all decisions on drugs to be maintained in the CDF were based on the advice of clinicians, the best available evidence, and the cost of the treatment.

“There is no escaping the fact that we face a difficult set of choices, but it is our duty to ensure we get maximum value from every penny available on behalf of patients,” said Peter Clark, chair of the CDF.

“We must ensure we invest in those treatments that offer the most benefit, based on rigorous evidence-based clinical analysis and an assessment of the cost of those treatments.”

While de-funding certain drugs will reduce costs, the CDF is not expected to be back on budget this financial year. The NHS does expect the CDF will be operating within its budget during 2016/17.

Blood cancer drugs to be removed

The following drugs are currently on the CDF list for the following indications, but they are set to be de-listed on November 4, 2015.

Bendamustine

For the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• CLL (not licensed in this indication)
• Second-line indication, third-line indication, or fourth-line indication
• To be used within the treating Trust’s governance framework, as bendamustine is not licensed in this indication

For the treatment of relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• MCL
• Option for second- or subsequent-line chemotherapy
• No previous treatment with bendamustine
• To be used within the treating Trust’s governance framework, as bendamustine is not licensed in this indication

*Bendamustine will remain on the CDF for other indications.

Bosutinib

For the treatment of refractory, chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Chronic phase CML
• Refractory to nilotinib or dasatinib (if dasatinib accessed via a clinical trial or via its current approved CDF indication)

For the treatment of refractory, accelerated phase CML where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Accelerated phase CML
• Refractory to nilotinib or dasatinib (if dasatinib accessed via a clinical trial or via its current approved CDF indication)
• Significant intolerance to nilotinib (grade 3 or 4 events)

For the treatment of accelerated phase CML where there is intolerance of treatments and where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Accelerated phase CML
• Significant intolerance to dasatinib (grade 3 or 4 adverse events; if dasatinib accessed via its current approved CDF indication)
• Significant intolerance to nilotinib (grade 3 or 4 events)

*Bosutinib will still be available through the CDF for patients with chronic phase CML that is intolerant of other treatments.

Brentuximab

For the treatment of refractory, systemic anaplastic lymphoma where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Relapsed or refractory systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma

For the treatment of relapsed or refractory CD30+ Hodgkin lymphoma where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Relapsed or refractory CD30+ Hodgkin lymphoma
• Following autologous stem cell transplant or following at least 2 prior therapies when autologous stem cell transplant or multi-agent chemotherapy is not an option

Dasatinib

For the treatment of Philadelphia-chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Refractory or significant intolerance or resistance to prior therapy including imatinib (grade 3 or 4 adverse events)
• Second-line indication or third-line indication

*Dasatinib will still be available for chronic phase and accelerated phase CML.

Ibrutinib

For the treatment of relapsed/refractory CLL where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Confirmed CLL
• Must have received at least 1 prior therapy for CLL
• Considered not appropriate for treatment or retreatment with purine-analogue-based therapy due to:

  • Failure to respond to chemo-immunotherapy or
  • A progression-free interval of less than 3 years or
  • Age of 70 years or more or
  • Age of 65 years or more plus the presence of comorbidities or
  • A 17p or TP53 deletion

• ECOG performance status of 0-2
• A neutrophil count of ≥0.75 x 10⁹/L
• A platelet count of ≥30 x 10⁹/L
• Patient not on warfarin or CYP3A4/5 inhibitors
• No prior treatment with idelalisib

For the treatment of relapsed/refractory MCL where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Confirmed MCL with cyclin D1 overexpression or translocation breakpoints at t(11;14)
• Failure to achieve at least partial response with, or documented disease progression disease after, the most recent treatment regimen
• ECOG performance status of 0-2
• At least 1 but no more than 5 previous lines of treatment

Lenalidomide

For the second-line treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• MM
• Second-line indication
• Contraindication to bortezomib or previously received bortezomib in the first-line setting

*Lenalidomide will still be available for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes with 5q deletion.

Pomalidomide

For the treatment of relapsed and refractory MM where the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically
• MM
• Performance status of 0-2
• Previously received treatment with adequate trials of at least all of the following options of therapy: bortezomib, lenalidomide, and alkylating agents
• Failed treatment with bortezomib or lenalidomide, as defined by: progression on or before 60 days of treatment, progressive disease 6 months or less after achieving a partial response, or intolerance to bortezomib
• Refractory disease to previous treatment
• No resistance to high-dose dexamethasone used in the last line of therapy
• No peripheral neuropathy of grade 2 or more

A complete list of proposed changes to the CDF, as well as the drugs that were de-listed on March 12, 2015, is available on the NHS website.

Prescription drugs

Photo courtesy of CDC

England’s National Health Service (NHS) plans to remove several drugs used to treat hematologic malignancies from the Cancer Drugs Fund (CDF).

The plan is that, as of November 4, 2015, pomalidomide, lenalidomide, ibrutinib, dasatinib, brentuximab, bosutinib, and bendamustine will no longer be funded via the CDF for certain indications.

Ofatumumab was removed from the CDF list yesterday but is now available through the NHS.

Drugs used to treat solid tumor malignancies are set to be de-funded through CDF in November as well.

However, the NHS said the proposal to remove a drug from the CDF is not necessarily a final decision.

In cases where a drug offers enough clinical benefit, the pharmaceutical company developing that drug has the opportunity to reduce the price they are asking the NHS to pay to ensure that it achieves a satisfactory level of value for money. The NHS said a number of such negotiations are underway.

In addition, patients who are currently receiving the drugs set to be removed from the CDF will continue to have access to those drugs.

About the CDF and the NHS

The CDF—set up in 2010 and currently due to run until March 2016—is money the government has set aside to pay for cancer drugs that haven’t been approved by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and aren’t available within the NHS in England. Most cancer drugs are routinely funded outside of the CDF.

NHS England and NICE are planning to consult on a proposed new system for commissioning cancer drugs. The NHS said the new system will be designed to provide the agency with a more systematic approach to getting the best price for cancer drugs.

Reason for drug removals

The NHS previously increased the budget for the CDF from £200 million in 2013/14, to £280 million in 2014/15, and £340 million from April 2015. This represents a total increase of 70% since August 2014.

However, current projections suggest that spending would rise to around £410 million for this year, an over-spend of £70 million, in the absence of further prioritization. The NHS said this money could be used for other aspects of cancer treatment or NHS services for other patient groups.

Therefore, some drugs are set to be removed from the CDF. The NHS said all decisions on drugs to be maintained in the CDF were based on the advice of clinicians, the best available evidence, and the cost of the treatment.

“There is no escaping the fact that we face a difficult set of choices, but it is our duty to ensure we get maximum value from every penny available on behalf of patients,” said Peter Clark, chair of the CDF.

“We must ensure we invest in those treatments that offer the most benefit, based on rigorous evidence-based clinical analysis and an assessment of the cost of those treatments.”

While de-funding certain drugs will reduce costs, the CDF is not expected to be back on budget this financial year. The NHS does expect the CDF will be operating within its budget during 2016/17.

Blood cancer drugs to be removed

The following drugs are currently on the CDF list for the following indications, but they are set to be de-listed on November 4, 2015.

Bendamustine

For the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• CLL (not licensed in this indication)
• Second-line indication, third-line indication, or fourth-line indication
• To be used within the treating Trust’s governance framework, as bendamustine is not licensed in this indication

For the treatment of relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• MCL
• Option for second- or subsequent-line chemotherapy
• No previous treatment with bendamustine
• To be used within the treating Trust’s governance framework, as bendamustine is not licensed in this indication

*Bendamustine will remain on the CDF for other indications.

Bosutinib

For the treatment of refractory, chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Chronic phase CML
• Refractory to nilotinib or dasatinib (if dasatinib accessed via a clinical trial or via its current approved CDF indication)

For the treatment of refractory, accelerated phase CML where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Accelerated phase CML
• Refractory to nilotinib or dasatinib (if dasatinib accessed via a clinical trial or via its current approved CDF indication)
• Significant intolerance to nilotinib (grade 3 or 4 events)

For the treatment of accelerated phase CML where there is intolerance of treatments and where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Accelerated phase CML
• Significant intolerance to dasatinib (grade 3 or 4 adverse events; if dasatinib accessed via its current approved CDF indication)
• Significant intolerance to nilotinib (grade 3 or 4 events)

*Bosutinib will still be available through the CDF for patients with chronic phase CML that is intolerant of other treatments.

Brentuximab

For the treatment of refractory, systemic anaplastic lymphoma where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Relapsed or refractory systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma

For the treatment of relapsed or refractory CD30+ Hodgkin lymphoma where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Relapsed or refractory CD30+ Hodgkin lymphoma
• Following autologous stem cell transplant or following at least 2 prior therapies when autologous stem cell transplant or multi-agent chemotherapy is not an option

Dasatinib

For the treatment of Philadelphia-chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Refractory or significant intolerance or resistance to prior therapy including imatinib (grade 3 or 4 adverse events)
• Second-line indication or third-line indication

*Dasatinib will still be available for chronic phase and accelerated phase CML.

Ibrutinib

For the treatment of relapsed/refractory CLL where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Confirmed CLL
• Must have received at least 1 prior therapy for CLL
• Considered not appropriate for treatment or retreatment with purine-analogue-based therapy due to:

  • Failure to respond to chemo-immunotherapy or
  • A progression-free interval of less than 3 years or
  • Age of 70 years or more or
  • Age of 65 years or more plus the presence of comorbidities or
  • A 17p or TP53 deletion

• ECOG performance status of 0-2
• A neutrophil count of ≥0.75 x 10⁹/L
• A platelet count of ≥30 x 10⁹/L
• Patient not on warfarin or CYP3A4/5 inhibitors
• No prior treatment with idelalisib

For the treatment of relapsed/refractory MCL where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Confirmed MCL with cyclin D1 overexpression or translocation breakpoints at t(11;14)
• Failure to achieve at least partial response with, or documented disease progression disease after, the most recent treatment regimen
• ECOG performance status of 0-2
• At least 1 but no more than 5 previous lines of treatment

Lenalidomide

For the second-line treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• MM
• Second-line indication
• Contraindication to bortezomib or previously received bortezomib in the first-line setting

*Lenalidomide will still be available for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes with 5q deletion.

Pomalidomide

For the treatment of relapsed and refractory MM where the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically
• MM
• Performance status of 0-2
• Previously received treatment with adequate trials of at least all of the following options of therapy: bortezomib, lenalidomide, and alkylating agents
• Failed treatment with bortezomib or lenalidomide, as defined by: progression on or before 60 days of treatment, progressive disease 6 months or less after achieving a partial response, or intolerance to bortezomib
• Refractory disease to previous treatment
• No resistance to high-dose dexamethasone used in the last line of therapy
• No peripheral neuropathy of grade 2 or more

A complete list of proposed changes to the CDF, as well as the drugs that were de-listed on March 12, 2015, is available on the NHS website.

Prescription drugs

Photo courtesy of CDC

England’s National Health Service (NHS) plans to remove several drugs used to treat hematologic malignancies from the Cancer Drugs Fund (CDF).

The plan is that, as of November 4, 2015, pomalidomide, lenalidomide, ibrutinib, dasatinib, brentuximab, bosutinib, and bendamustine will no longer be funded via the CDF for certain indications.

Ofatumumab was removed from the CDF list yesterday but is now available through the NHS.

Drugs used to treat solid tumor malignancies are set to be de-funded through CDF in November as well.

However, the NHS said the proposal to remove a drug from the CDF is not necessarily a final decision.

In cases where a drug offers enough clinical benefit, the pharmaceutical company developing that drug has the opportunity to reduce the price they are asking the NHS to pay to ensure that it achieves a satisfactory level of value for money. The NHS said a number of such negotiations are underway.

In addition, patients who are currently receiving the drugs set to be removed from the CDF will continue to have access to those drugs.

About the CDF and the NHS

The CDF—set up in 2010 and currently due to run until March 2016—is money the government has set aside to pay for cancer drugs that haven’t been approved by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and aren’t available within the NHS in England. Most cancer drugs are routinely funded outside of the CDF.

NHS England and NICE are planning to consult on a proposed new system for commissioning cancer drugs. The NHS said the new system will be designed to provide the agency with a more systematic approach to getting the best price for cancer drugs.

Reason for drug removals

The NHS previously increased the budget for the CDF from £200 million in 2013/14, to £280 million in 2014/15, and £340 million from April 2015. This represents a total increase of 70% since August 2014.

However, current projections suggest that spending would rise to around £410 million for this year, an over-spend of £70 million, in the absence of further prioritization. The NHS said this money could be used for other aspects of cancer treatment or NHS services for other patient groups.

Therefore, some drugs are set to be removed from the CDF. The NHS said all decisions on drugs to be maintained in the CDF were based on the advice of clinicians, the best available evidence, and the cost of the treatment.

“There is no escaping the fact that we face a difficult set of choices, but it is our duty to ensure we get maximum value from every penny available on behalf of patients,” said Peter Clark, chair of the CDF.

“We must ensure we invest in those treatments that offer the most benefit, based on rigorous evidence-based clinical analysis and an assessment of the cost of those treatments.”

While de-funding certain drugs will reduce costs, the CDF is not expected to be back on budget this financial year. The NHS does expect the CDF will be operating within its budget during 2016/17.

Blood cancer drugs to be removed

The following drugs are currently on the CDF list for the following indications, but they are set to be de-listed on November 4, 2015.

Bendamustine

For the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• CLL (not licensed in this indication)
• Second-line indication, third-line indication, or fourth-line indication
• To be used within the treating Trust’s governance framework, as bendamustine is not licensed in this indication

For the treatment of relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• MCL
• Option for second- or subsequent-line chemotherapy
• No previous treatment with bendamustine
• To be used within the treating Trust’s governance framework, as bendamustine is not licensed in this indication

*Bendamustine will remain on the CDF for other indications.

Bosutinib

For the treatment of refractory, chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Chronic phase CML
• Refractory to nilotinib or dasatinib (if dasatinib accessed via a clinical trial or via its current approved CDF indication)

For the treatment of refractory, accelerated phase CML where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Accelerated phase CML
• Refractory to nilotinib or dasatinib (if dasatinib accessed via a clinical trial or via its current approved CDF indication)
• Significant intolerance to nilotinib (grade 3 or 4 events)

For the treatment of accelerated phase CML where there is intolerance of treatments and where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Accelerated phase CML
• Significant intolerance to dasatinib (grade 3 or 4 adverse events; if dasatinib accessed via its current approved CDF indication)
• Significant intolerance to nilotinib (grade 3 or 4 events)

*Bosutinib will still be available through the CDF for patients with chronic phase CML that is intolerant of other treatments.

Brentuximab

For the treatment of refractory, systemic anaplastic lymphoma where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Relapsed or refractory systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma

For the treatment of relapsed or refractory CD30+ Hodgkin lymphoma where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Relapsed or refractory CD30+ Hodgkin lymphoma
• Following autologous stem cell transplant or following at least 2 prior therapies when autologous stem cell transplant or multi-agent chemotherapy is not an option

Dasatinib

For the treatment of Philadelphia-chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Refractory or significant intolerance or resistance to prior therapy including imatinib (grade 3 or 4 adverse events)
• Second-line indication or third-line indication

*Dasatinib will still be available for chronic phase and accelerated phase CML.

Ibrutinib

For the treatment of relapsed/refractory CLL where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Confirmed CLL
• Must have received at least 1 prior therapy for CLL
• Considered not appropriate for treatment or retreatment with purine-analogue-based therapy due to:

  • Failure to respond to chemo-immunotherapy or
  • A progression-free interval of less than 3 years or
  • Age of 70 years or more or
  • Age of 65 years or more plus the presence of comorbidities or
  • A 17p or TP53 deletion

• ECOG performance status of 0-2
• A neutrophil count of ≥0.75 x 10⁹/L
• A platelet count of ≥30 x 10⁹/L
• Patient not on warfarin or CYP3A4/5 inhibitors
• No prior treatment with idelalisib

For the treatment of relapsed/refractory MCL where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• Confirmed MCL with cyclin D1 overexpression or translocation breakpoints at t(11;14)
• Failure to achieve at least partial response with, or documented disease progression disease after, the most recent treatment regimen
• ECOG performance status of 0-2
• At least 1 but no more than 5 previous lines of treatment

Lenalidomide

For the second-line treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) where all the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically trained and accredited in the use of systemic anticancer therapy
• MM
• Second-line indication
• Contraindication to bortezomib or previously received bortezomib in the first-line setting

*Lenalidomide will still be available for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes with 5q deletion.

Pomalidomide

For the treatment of relapsed and refractory MM where the following criteria are met:

• Application made by and first cycle of systemic anticancer therapy to be prescribed by a consultant specialist specifically
• MM
• Performance status of 0-2
• Previously received treatment with adequate trials of at least all of the following options of therapy: bortezomib, lenalidomide, and alkylating agents
• Failed treatment with bortezomib or lenalidomide, as defined by: progression on or before 60 days of treatment, progressive disease 6 months or less after achieving a partial response, or intolerance to bortezomib
• Refractory disease to previous treatment
• No resistance to high-dose dexamethasone used in the last line of therapy
• No peripheral neuropathy of grade 2 or more

A complete list of proposed changes to the CDF, as well as the drugs that were de-listed on March 12, 2015, is available on the NHS website.

Brentuximab vedotin

Photo from Business Wire

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris) for use as consolidation treatment after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-HSCT) in patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) at high risk of relapse or progression.

The drug is the first FDA-approved consolidation option available to these patients.

The approval was based on results of the phase 3 AETHERA trial.

Results from this trial also served to convert a prior accelerated approval of brentuximab vedotin to regular approval. The drug is now fully approved for the treatment of classical HL patients who have failed auto-HSCT and those who have failed at least 2 prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimens and are not candidates for auto-HSCT.

Brentuximab vedotin is also FDA-approved to treat patients with systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma who have failed at least 1 prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimen. The drug has accelerated approval for this indication based on overall response rate. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

AETHERA trial

The trial was designed to compare brentuximab vedotin to placebo, both administered for up to 16 cycles (approximately 1 year) every 3 weeks following auto-HSCT. Results from the trial were published in The Lancet in March and presented at the 2014 ASH Annual Meeting.

The study enrolled 329 HL patients at risk of relapse or progression, including 165 on the brentuximab vedotin arm and 164 on the placebo arm.

Patients were eligible for enrollment in the AETHERA trial if they had a history of primary refractory HL, relapsed within a year of receiving frontline chemotherapy, and/or had disease outside of the lymph nodes at the time of pre-auto-HSCT relapse.

Brentuximab vedotin conferred a significant increase in progression-free survival over placebo, with a hazard ratio of 0.57 (P=0.001). The median progression-free survival was 43 months for patients who received brentuximab vedotin and 24 months for patients who received placebo.

The most common adverse events (≥20%), of any grade and regardless of causality, in the brentuximab vedotin arm were neutropenia (78%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (56%), thrombocytopenia (41%), anemia (27%), upper respiratory tract infection (26%), fatigue (24%), peripheral motor neuropathy (23%), nausea (22%), cough (21%), and diarrhea (20%).

The most common adverse events (≥20%), of any grade and regardless of causality, in the placebo arm were neutropenia (34%), upper respiratory tract infection (23%), and thrombocytopenia (20%).

In all, 67% of patients on the brentuximab vedotin arm experienced peripheral neuropathy. Of those patients, 85% had resolution (59%) or partial improvement (26%) in symptoms at the time of their last evaluation, with a median time to improvement of 23 weeks (range, 0.1-138).

Brentuximab vedotin

Photo from Business Wire

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris) for use as consolidation treatment after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-HSCT) in patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) at high risk of relapse or progression.

The drug is the first FDA-approved consolidation option available to these patients.

The approval was based on results of the phase 3 AETHERA trial.

Results from this trial also served to convert a prior accelerated approval of brentuximab vedotin to regular approval. The drug is now fully approved for the treatment of classical HL patients who have failed auto-HSCT and those who have failed at least 2 prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimens and are not candidates for auto-HSCT.

Brentuximab vedotin is also FDA-approved to treat patients with systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma who have failed at least 1 prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimen. The drug has accelerated approval for this indication based on overall response rate. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

AETHERA trial

The trial was designed to compare brentuximab vedotin to placebo, both administered for up to 16 cycles (approximately 1 year) every 3 weeks following auto-HSCT. Results from the trial were published in The Lancet in March and presented at the 2014 ASH Annual Meeting.

The study enrolled 329 HL patients at risk of relapse or progression, including 165 on the brentuximab vedotin arm and 164 on the placebo arm.

Patients were eligible for enrollment in the AETHERA trial if they had a history of primary refractory HL, relapsed within a year of receiving frontline chemotherapy, and/or had disease outside of the lymph nodes at the time of pre-auto-HSCT relapse.

Brentuximab vedotin conferred a significant increase in progression-free survival over placebo, with a hazard ratio of 0.57 (P=0.001). The median progression-free survival was 43 months for patients who received brentuximab vedotin and 24 months for patients who received placebo.

The most common adverse events (≥20%), of any grade and regardless of causality, in the brentuximab vedotin arm were neutropenia (78%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (56%), thrombocytopenia (41%), anemia (27%), upper respiratory tract infection (26%), fatigue (24%), peripheral motor neuropathy (23%), nausea (22%), cough (21%), and diarrhea (20%).

The most common adverse events (≥20%), of any grade and regardless of causality, in the placebo arm were neutropenia (34%), upper respiratory tract infection (23%), and thrombocytopenia (20%).

In all, 67% of patients on the brentuximab vedotin arm experienced peripheral neuropathy. Of those patients, 85% had resolution (59%) or partial improvement (26%) in symptoms at the time of their last evaluation, with a median time to improvement of 23 weeks (range, 0.1-138).

Brentuximab vedotin

Photo from Business Wire

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris) for use as consolidation treatment after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-HSCT) in patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) at high risk of relapse or progression.

The drug is the first FDA-approved consolidation option available to these patients.

The approval was based on results of the phase 3 AETHERA trial.

Results from this trial also served to convert a prior accelerated approval of brentuximab vedotin to regular approval. The drug is now fully approved for the treatment of classical HL patients who have failed auto-HSCT and those who have failed at least 2 prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimens and are not candidates for auto-HSCT.

Brentuximab vedotin is also FDA-approved to treat patients with systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma who have failed at least 1 prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimen. The drug has accelerated approval for this indication based on overall response rate. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

AETHERA trial

The trial was designed to compare brentuximab vedotin to placebo, both administered for up to 16 cycles (approximately 1 year) every 3 weeks following auto-HSCT. Results from the trial were published in The Lancet in March and presented at the 2014 ASH Annual Meeting.

The study enrolled 329 HL patients at risk of relapse or progression, including 165 on the brentuximab vedotin arm and 164 on the placebo arm.

Patients were eligible for enrollment in the AETHERA trial if they had a history of primary refractory HL, relapsed within a year of receiving frontline chemotherapy, and/or had disease outside of the lymph nodes at the time of pre-auto-HSCT relapse.

Brentuximab vedotin conferred a significant increase in progression-free survival over placebo, with a hazard ratio of 0.57 (P=0.001). The median progression-free survival was 43 months for patients who received brentuximab vedotin and 24 months for patients who received placebo.

The most common adverse events (≥20%), of any grade and regardless of causality, in the brentuximab vedotin arm were neutropenia (78%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (56%), thrombocytopenia (41%), anemia (27%), upper respiratory tract infection (26%), fatigue (24%), peripheral motor neuropathy (23%), nausea (22%), cough (21%), and diarrhea (20%).

The most common adverse events (≥20%), of any grade and regardless of causality, in the placebo arm were neutropenia (34%), upper respiratory tract infection (23%), and thrombocytopenia (20%).

In all, 67% of patients on the brentuximab vedotin arm experienced peripheral neuropathy. Of those patients, 85% had resolution (59%) or partial improvement (26%) in symptoms at the time of their last evaluation, with a median time to improvement of 23 weeks (range, 0.1-138).

Bleomycin can be eliminated after two cycles of the ABVD chemotherapeutic regimen based on a negative interim PET scan finding in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma, according to the 3-year findings of the RATHL study.

Being able to omit bleomycin after a negative interim PET scan was associated with a lower rate of pulmonary toxicity, but no loss in efficacy. For patients with positive interim PET scans, a more aggressive therapy was associated with good outcomes, suggesting that response-adapted therapy can yield good results, Dr. Peter Johnson said at the International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma in Lugano, Switzerland.

In the large international RATHL study (Response-Adapted Therapy in Hodgkin Lymphoma study) 1,137 adults with newly diagnosed disease (41% stage II, 31% stage III, 28% stage IV) underwent PET-CT scans at baseline and after completing two cycles of ABVD (adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine). The patients’ PET images were centrally reviewed using a 5-point scale as either negative (1-3) or positive (4-5),

The majority of patients (84%) had negative scans after two cycles of the ABVD regimen and were randomized to receive four additional cycles either with or without bleomycin (ABVD or AVD). Consolidation radiotherapy was not advised for patients whose interim PET scans were negative, regardless of baseline bulk or residual masses, Dr. Johnson, of the Cancer Research UK Centre at University of Southampton, England, reported.

Patients with positive interim PET scans received escalated therapy with a BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin [Adriamycin], cyclophosphamide, vincristine [Oncovin], procarbazine, prednisolone) regimen. They received either eBEACOPP and BEASCOPP-14.

At the 3-year follow-up, progression-free survival in the PET-negative group was 85% for both the ABVD- and AVD-treated patients. Similarly, overall survival was 97% for both groups.

Factors that predicted treatment failure after a negative interim PET scan were initial tumor stage and international prognostic score, but not bulk, B symptoms, or score of the interim PET scan.

ABVD was associated with more pulmonary toxicity than was AVD.

Of 174 patients who had a positive interim PET scan and received escalated therapy, 74% had a subsequent negative PET scan after treatment. Their 3-year, progression-free survival rate was 68%, and their overall survival was 86% with no difference in outcome between two variations of BEACOPP (eBEACOPP and BEASCOPP-14).

Of the 53 deaths in the study, 19 were caused by Hodgkin lymphoma. The overall 3-year progression-free survival is 83%, and overall survival is 95%.

The results of the RATHL study have important implications for therapy of Hodgkin lymphoma, Dr. Johnson stated. First, interim PET scans are highly predictive for response to ABVD, providing valuable prognostic information to support decisions related to escalation of therapy. Secondly, after two cycles of ABVD, “it is safe to omit bleomycin from subsequent cycles, without consolidation radiotherapy,” he reported.

Omitting bleomycin has the potential to reduce pulmonary toxicity from chemotherapy, especially dyspnea, thromboembolism, and neutropenic fever, Dr. Johnson added. In the RATHL study, rates of pulmonary toxicity were significantly higher in the group receiving bleomycin.

Bleomycin can be eliminated after two cycles of the ABVD chemotherapeutic regimen based on a negative interim PET scan finding in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma, according to the 3-year findings of the RATHL study.

Being able to omit bleomycin after a negative interim PET scan was associated with a lower rate of pulmonary toxicity, but no loss in efficacy. For patients with positive interim PET scans, a more aggressive therapy was associated with good outcomes, suggesting that response-adapted therapy can yield good results, Dr. Peter Johnson said at the International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma in Lugano, Switzerland.

In the large international RATHL study (Response-Adapted Therapy in Hodgkin Lymphoma study) 1,137 adults with newly diagnosed disease (41% stage II, 31% stage III, 28% stage IV) underwent PET-CT scans at baseline and after completing two cycles of ABVD (adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine). The patients’ PET images were centrally reviewed using a 5-point scale as either negative (1-3) or positive (4-5),

The majority of patients (84%) had negative scans after two cycles of the ABVD regimen and were randomized to receive four additional cycles either with or without bleomycin (ABVD or AVD). Consolidation radiotherapy was not advised for patients whose interim PET scans were negative, regardless of baseline bulk or residual masses, Dr. Johnson, of the Cancer Research UK Centre at University of Southampton, England, reported.

Patients with positive interim PET scans received escalated therapy with a BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin [Adriamycin], cyclophosphamide, vincristine [Oncovin], procarbazine, prednisolone) regimen. They received either eBEACOPP and BEASCOPP-14.

At the 3-year follow-up, progression-free survival in the PET-negative group was 85% for both the ABVD- and AVD-treated patients. Similarly, overall survival was 97% for both groups.

Factors that predicted treatment failure after a negative interim PET scan were initial tumor stage and international prognostic score, but not bulk, B symptoms, or score of the interim PET scan.

ABVD was associated with more pulmonary toxicity than was AVD.

Of 174 patients who had a positive interim PET scan and received escalated therapy, 74% had a subsequent negative PET scan after treatment. Their 3-year, progression-free survival rate was 68%, and their overall survival was 86% with no difference in outcome between two variations of BEACOPP (eBEACOPP and BEASCOPP-14).

Of the 53 deaths in the study, 19 were caused by Hodgkin lymphoma. The overall 3-year progression-free survival is 83%, and overall survival is 95%.

The results of the RATHL study have important implications for therapy of Hodgkin lymphoma, Dr. Johnson stated. First, interim PET scans are highly predictive for response to ABVD, providing valuable prognostic information to support decisions related to escalation of therapy. Secondly, after two cycles of ABVD, “it is safe to omit bleomycin from subsequent cycles, without consolidation radiotherapy,” he reported.

Omitting bleomycin has the potential to reduce pulmonary toxicity from chemotherapy, especially dyspnea, thromboembolism, and neutropenic fever, Dr. Johnson added. In the RATHL study, rates of pulmonary toxicity were significantly higher in the group receiving bleomycin.

Bleomycin can be eliminated after two cycles of the ABVD chemotherapeutic regimen based on a negative interim PET scan finding in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma, according to the 3-year findings of the RATHL study.

Being able to omit bleomycin after a negative interim PET scan was associated with a lower rate of pulmonary toxicity, but no loss in efficacy. For patients with positive interim PET scans, a more aggressive therapy was associated with good outcomes, suggesting that response-adapted therapy can yield good results, Dr. Peter Johnson said at the International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma in Lugano, Switzerland.

In the large international RATHL study (Response-Adapted Therapy in Hodgkin Lymphoma study) 1,137 adults with newly diagnosed disease (41% stage II, 31% stage III, 28% stage IV) underwent PET-CT scans at baseline and after completing two cycles of ABVD (adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine). The patients’ PET images were centrally reviewed using a 5-point scale as either negative (1-3) or positive (4-5),

The majority of patients (84%) had negative scans after two cycles of the ABVD regimen and were randomized to receive four additional cycles either with or without bleomycin (ABVD or AVD). Consolidation radiotherapy was not advised for patients whose interim PET scans were negative, regardless of baseline bulk or residual masses, Dr. Johnson, of the Cancer Research UK Centre at University of Southampton, England, reported.

Patients with positive interim PET scans received escalated therapy with a BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin [Adriamycin], cyclophosphamide, vincristine [Oncovin], procarbazine, prednisolone) regimen. They received either eBEACOPP and BEASCOPP-14.

At the 3-year follow-up, progression-free survival in the PET-negative group was 85% for both the ABVD- and AVD-treated patients. Similarly, overall survival was 97% for both groups.

Factors that predicted treatment failure after a negative interim PET scan were initial tumor stage and international prognostic score, but not bulk, B symptoms, or score of the interim PET scan.

ABVD was associated with more pulmonary toxicity than was AVD.

Of 174 patients who had a positive interim PET scan and received escalated therapy, 74% had a subsequent negative PET scan after treatment. Their 3-year, progression-free survival rate was 68%, and their overall survival was 86% with no difference in outcome between two variations of BEACOPP (eBEACOPP and BEASCOPP-14).

Of the 53 deaths in the study, 19 were caused by Hodgkin lymphoma. The overall 3-year progression-free survival is 83%, and overall survival is 95%.

The results of the RATHL study have important implications for therapy of Hodgkin lymphoma, Dr. Johnson stated. First, interim PET scans are highly predictive for response to ABVD, providing valuable prognostic information to support decisions related to escalation of therapy. Secondly, after two cycles of ABVD, “it is safe to omit bleomycin from subsequent cycles, without consolidation radiotherapy,” he reported.

Omitting bleomycin has the potential to reduce pulmonary toxicity from chemotherapy, especially dyspnea, thromboembolism, and neutropenic fever, Dr. Johnson added. In the RATHL study, rates of pulmonary toxicity were significantly higher in the group receiving bleomycin.

 

 

Growing monoclonal antibodies

Photo by Linda Bartlett

 

LUGANO—The defucosylated monoclonal antibody (mAb) ARGX-110, which is active against CD70-bearing tumor cells and CD70-dependent stimulation of regulatory T cells, has shown activity in relapsed/refractory T-cell lymphoma (TCL), according to investigators.

Of the 8 TCL patients enrolled in a phase 1 trial of ARGX-110, 3 had a biological response to the mAb.

In this dose-escalation trial, the maximum tolerated dose of ARGX-110 was not reached.

Marie Maerevoet, MD, of the Institut Jules Bordet in Brussels, Belgium, presented results from the lymphoma cohort of this trial at the 13th International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma (abstract 040*). The study was sponsored by arGEN-X, the company developing ARGX-110.

Dr  Maerevoet pointed out that more than half the tumor cells in 71% of patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) and 22% with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) are CD70-positive. CD70 signaling occurs via CD27, and CD27 shedding is a biomarker for an active pathway.

Since ARGX-110 has an affinity for CD70, inhibits CD27 signaling, and mediates the lysis of TCL in Sézary syndrome (SS), mycosis fungoides, and anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) cell lines, researchers decided to investigate the safety and clinical pharmacology of ARGX-110 monotherapy in metastatic, relapsed or refractory, solid tumors and hematologic malignancies.

Patients’ tumors had to express CD70 by immunohistochemistry, defined as more than 10% tumor cells of 2+ or 3+ intensity.

The primary endpoint was to determine the maximum tolerated dose. Secondary endpoints were pharmacology, immunogenicity, and efficacy signals.

Patient demographics

Between February 2013 and April 2015, investigators assigned 63 patients to receive ARGX-110 at doses ranging from 0.1 to 10 mg/kg intravenously once every 3 weeks until disease progression or withdrawal due to toxicity. Patients were pre-medicated with corticoid regimens.

Eighteen patients had lymphoid malignancies—8 with B-cell lymphomas, 8 with TCL, and 2 with Hodgkin lymphoma.

The TCL cohort consisted of 1 patient with SS, 1 with transformed SS, 1 with T-helper CTCL, 2 with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), 2 with PTCL not otherwise specified (NOS), and 1 with ALCL.

Patients were a median age of 62 (range, 55–78), had a median of 4 prior treatment regimens (range, 2–6), and received a median of 2 cycles of ARGX-110 (range, 1–6).

Dr Maerevoet noted that most lymphoma patients received a dose of 5 mg/kg every 3 weeks.

Safety

In the entire lymphoma cohort of 18 patients, 4 patients (22%) experienced a grade 1 or 2 infusion-related reaction. Three patients (18%) developed grade 3 sepsis—1 with Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia, 1 with AITL, and 1 with PTCL-NOS.

Two patients (11%) had hematologic toxicity consisting of a grade 3 decrease in hemoglobin and absolute neutrophil count, which was considered not related to treatment with ARGX-110.

“The maximum tolerated dose was not reached,” Dr Maerevoet said. “We didn’t observe auto-immune adverse events or impact on serum IgG or IgM.”

Efficacy outcomes

The main reason for withdrawal was progressive disease, which occurred in 14 lymphoma patients.

Two patients—1 with Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia and 1 with AITL—withdrew due to adverse events of sepsis (catheter infection, pneumonia), 1 patient with SS withdrew for social reasons, and 1 patient with follicular T-cell lymphoma (currently classified as PTCL-NOS) remains on study.

Dr Maerevoet described the 3 TCL patients who had a biologic response to ARGX-110. One patient with SS had a hematologic complete remission after 6 cycles at the 0.1 mg/kg dose.

Another patient with transformed SS experienced a depletion of circulating clones after 2 cycles of the 10 mg/kg dose. However, the patient ultimately died of progressive disease.

A third patient had resolution of autoimmune hemolytic anemia. This 61-year-old male with AITL achieved a partial response with normalization of LDH levels and an increase in hemoglobin to 7.9 g/dL without transfusion support after 2 doses of ARGX-110 at 5 mg/kg.

The patient became Coombs-negative and had a 16% reduction in tumor size by CT scan. However, the patient subsequently died of pneumonia.

The investigators also observed clinical activity in the peripheral blood, lymph nodes, and skin of 2 additional patients.

The biological activity of ARGX-110 as demonstrated by these TCL patients, in addition to the safety and tolerability of this mAb, led the team to conclude that further clinical investigation of ARGX-110 in TCL is warranted.

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

 

 

Growing monoclonal antibodies

Photo by Linda Bartlett

 

LUGANO—The defucosylated monoclonal antibody (mAb) ARGX-110, which is active against CD70-bearing tumor cells and CD70-dependent stimulation of regulatory T cells, has shown activity in relapsed/refractory T-cell lymphoma (TCL), according to investigators.

Of the 8 TCL patients enrolled in a phase 1 trial of ARGX-110, 3 had a biological response to the mAb.

In this dose-escalation trial, the maximum tolerated dose of ARGX-110 was not reached.

Marie Maerevoet, MD, of the Institut Jules Bordet in Brussels, Belgium, presented results from the lymphoma cohort of this trial at the 13th International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma (abstract 040*). The study was sponsored by arGEN-X, the company developing ARGX-110.

Dr  Maerevoet pointed out that more than half the tumor cells in 71% of patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) and 22% with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) are CD70-positive. CD70 signaling occurs via CD27, and CD27 shedding is a biomarker for an active pathway.

Since ARGX-110 has an affinity for CD70, inhibits CD27 signaling, and mediates the lysis of TCL in Sézary syndrome (SS), mycosis fungoides, and anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) cell lines, researchers decided to investigate the safety and clinical pharmacology of ARGX-110 monotherapy in metastatic, relapsed or refractory, solid tumors and hematologic malignancies.

Patients’ tumors had to express CD70 by immunohistochemistry, defined as more than 10% tumor cells of 2+ or 3+ intensity.

The primary endpoint was to determine the maximum tolerated dose. Secondary endpoints were pharmacology, immunogenicity, and efficacy signals.

Patient demographics

Between February 2013 and April 2015, investigators assigned 63 patients to receive ARGX-110 at doses ranging from 0.1 to 10 mg/kg intravenously once every 3 weeks until disease progression or withdrawal due to toxicity. Patients were pre-medicated with corticoid regimens.

Eighteen patients had lymphoid malignancies—8 with B-cell lymphomas, 8 with TCL, and 2 with Hodgkin lymphoma.

The TCL cohort consisted of 1 patient with SS, 1 with transformed SS, 1 with T-helper CTCL, 2 with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), 2 with PTCL not otherwise specified (NOS), and 1 with ALCL.

Patients were a median age of 62 (range, 55–78), had a median of 4 prior treatment regimens (range, 2–6), and received a median of 2 cycles of ARGX-110 (range, 1–6).

Dr Maerevoet noted that most lymphoma patients received a dose of 5 mg/kg every 3 weeks.

Safety

In the entire lymphoma cohort of 18 patients, 4 patients (22%) experienced a grade 1 or 2 infusion-related reaction. Three patients (18%) developed grade 3 sepsis—1 with Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia, 1 with AITL, and 1 with PTCL-NOS.

Two patients (11%) had hematologic toxicity consisting of a grade 3 decrease in hemoglobin and absolute neutrophil count, which was considered not related to treatment with ARGX-110.

“The maximum tolerated dose was not reached,” Dr Maerevoet said. “We didn’t observe auto-immune adverse events or impact on serum IgG or IgM.”

Efficacy outcomes

The main reason for withdrawal was progressive disease, which occurred in 14 lymphoma patients.

Two patients—1 with Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia and 1 with AITL—withdrew due to adverse events of sepsis (catheter infection, pneumonia), 1 patient with SS withdrew for social reasons, and 1 patient with follicular T-cell lymphoma (currently classified as PTCL-NOS) remains on study.

Dr Maerevoet described the 3 TCL patients who had a biologic response to ARGX-110. One patient with SS had a hematologic complete remission after 6 cycles at the 0.1 mg/kg dose.

Another patient with transformed SS experienced a depletion of circulating clones after 2 cycles of the 10 mg/kg dose. However, the patient ultimately died of progressive disease.

A third patient had resolution of autoimmune hemolytic anemia. This 61-year-old male with AITL achieved a partial response with normalization of LDH levels and an increase in hemoglobin to 7.9 g/dL without transfusion support after 2 doses of ARGX-110 at 5 mg/kg.

The patient became Coombs-negative and had a 16% reduction in tumor size by CT scan. However, the patient subsequently died of pneumonia.

The investigators also observed clinical activity in the peripheral blood, lymph nodes, and skin of 2 additional patients.

The biological activity of ARGX-110 as demonstrated by these TCL patients, in addition to the safety and tolerability of this mAb, led the team to conclude that further clinical investigation of ARGX-110 in TCL is warranted.

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

 

 

Growing monoclonal antibodies

Photo by Linda Bartlett

 

LUGANO—The defucosylated monoclonal antibody (mAb) ARGX-110, which is active against CD70-bearing tumor cells and CD70-dependent stimulation of regulatory T cells, has shown activity in relapsed/refractory T-cell lymphoma (TCL), according to investigators.

Of the 8 TCL patients enrolled in a phase 1 trial of ARGX-110, 3 had a biological response to the mAb.

In this dose-escalation trial, the maximum tolerated dose of ARGX-110 was not reached.

Marie Maerevoet, MD, of the Institut Jules Bordet in Brussels, Belgium, presented results from the lymphoma cohort of this trial at the 13th International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma (abstract 040*). The study was sponsored by arGEN-X, the company developing ARGX-110.

Dr  Maerevoet pointed out that more than half the tumor cells in 71% of patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) and 22% with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) are CD70-positive. CD70 signaling occurs via CD27, and CD27 shedding is a biomarker for an active pathway.

Since ARGX-110 has an affinity for CD70, inhibits CD27 signaling, and mediates the lysis of TCL in Sézary syndrome (SS), mycosis fungoides, and anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) cell lines, researchers decided to investigate the safety and clinical pharmacology of ARGX-110 monotherapy in metastatic, relapsed or refractory, solid tumors and hematologic malignancies.

Patients’ tumors had to express CD70 by immunohistochemistry, defined as more than 10% tumor cells of 2+ or 3+ intensity.

The primary endpoint was to determine the maximum tolerated dose. Secondary endpoints were pharmacology, immunogenicity, and efficacy signals.

Patient demographics

Between February 2013 and April 2015, investigators assigned 63 patients to receive ARGX-110 at doses ranging from 0.1 to 10 mg/kg intravenously once every 3 weeks until disease progression or withdrawal due to toxicity. Patients were pre-medicated with corticoid regimens.

Eighteen patients had lymphoid malignancies—8 with B-cell lymphomas, 8 with TCL, and 2 with Hodgkin lymphoma.

The TCL cohort consisted of 1 patient with SS, 1 with transformed SS, 1 with T-helper CTCL, 2 with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), 2 with PTCL not otherwise specified (NOS), and 1 with ALCL.

Patients were a median age of 62 (range, 55–78), had a median of 4 prior treatment regimens (range, 2–6), and received a median of 2 cycles of ARGX-110 (range, 1–6).

Dr Maerevoet noted that most lymphoma patients received a dose of 5 mg/kg every 3 weeks.

Safety

In the entire lymphoma cohort of 18 patients, 4 patients (22%) experienced a grade 1 or 2 infusion-related reaction. Three patients (18%) developed grade 3 sepsis—1 with Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia, 1 with AITL, and 1 with PTCL-NOS.

Two patients (11%) had hematologic toxicity consisting of a grade 3 decrease in hemoglobin and absolute neutrophil count, which was considered not related to treatment with ARGX-110.

“The maximum tolerated dose was not reached,” Dr Maerevoet said. “We didn’t observe auto-immune adverse events or impact on serum IgG or IgM.”

Efficacy outcomes

The main reason for withdrawal was progressive disease, which occurred in 14 lymphoma patients.

Two patients—1 with Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia and 1 with AITL—withdrew due to adverse events of sepsis (catheter infection, pneumonia), 1 patient with SS withdrew for social reasons, and 1 patient with follicular T-cell lymphoma (currently classified as PTCL-NOS) remains on study.

Dr Maerevoet described the 3 TCL patients who had a biologic response to ARGX-110. One patient with SS had a hematologic complete remission after 6 cycles at the 0.1 mg/kg dose.

Another patient with transformed SS experienced a depletion of circulating clones after 2 cycles of the 10 mg/kg dose. However, the patient ultimately died of progressive disease.

A third patient had resolution of autoimmune hemolytic anemia. This 61-year-old male with AITL achieved a partial response with normalization of LDH levels and an increase in hemoglobin to 7.9 g/dL without transfusion support after 2 doses of ARGX-110 at 5 mg/kg.

The patient became Coombs-negative and had a 16% reduction in tumor size by CT scan. However, the patient subsequently died of pneumonia.

The investigators also observed clinical activity in the peripheral blood, lymph nodes, and skin of 2 additional patients.

The biological activity of ARGX-110 as demonstrated by these TCL patients, in addition to the safety and tolerability of this mAb, led the team to conclude that further clinical investigation of ARGX-110 in TCL is warranted.

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

Patient receives chemotherapy

Photo by Rhoda Baer

LUGANO—Long-awaited results of the Intergroup H10 trial in PET-positive Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients have shown that intensifying chemotherapy significantly increases 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and produces a non-significant increase in overall survival (OS).

Switching patients who are PET-positive after 2 cycles of ABVD to escalated BEACOPP and involved-node radiotherapy increased 5-year PFS to 91% and 5-year OS to 96%.

The trial was a cooperative effort of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Lymphoma Study Association (LYSA), and Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL).

The investigators already knew that early FDG-PET scans have prognostic impact. Patients with a negative PET scan after 2 cycles of chemotherapy have very good outcomes, while those with PET-positive interim scans have poor outcomes.

So the team designed the H10 trial to learn whether they could reduce long-term toxicity in the majority of patients and improve outcomes in the unfavorable subgroups.

Results of the primary endpoint—whether chemotherapy alone is as effective as, but less toxic than, combined-modality treatment in PET-negative patients after 2 cycles of ABVD—were published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The secondary endpoint was an improvement in PFS with an early change from ABVD to escalated BEACOPP in stage I or II HL patients who are PET-positive after 2 cycles of ABVD.

John M. M. Raemaekers, MD, PhD, of Radboud University Medical Center in The Netherlands, presented details on the trial’s secondary endpoint at the 13th International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma (no abstract available).

H10 trial design

The investigators enrolled patients with favorable and unfavorable prognostic characteristics.

Unfavorable characteristics consisted of age 50 or older, more than 3 nodal areas, mediastinal-to-thorax ratio of 0.35 or higher, erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 50 mm or greater without B symptoms, or erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 30 mm or greater with B symptoms.

In the standard treatment arm, patients with favorable or unfavorable characteristics were treated similarly. After 2 cycles of ABVD, a PET scan was performed, and, irrespective of the result, patients received combined-modality treatment of ABVD followed by involved-node radiotherapy.

In the experimental arm, patients who were PET-negative had chemotherapy alone without involved-node radiotherapy. PET-negative patients were not discussed further in this presentation.

For the PET-positive patients in the experimental arm, the treatment for those with favorable and unfavorable characteristics was identical.

Patients who were PET-positive after 2 cycles were switched to 2 escalated BEACOPP cycles plus involved-node radiotherapy. Patients were considered PET-positive if they had a Deauville score of 3, 4, or 5.

Randomization

The first patient was enrolled in November 2006 and the last in June 2011. Investigators randomized 1950 patients, 754 with favorable and 1196 with unfavorable characteristics. All patients had untreated, supradiaphragmatic, clinical stage I or II HL.

Nine hundred fifty-four patients were enrolled in the standard arm, 371 with favorable characteristics and 583 with unfavorable. Nine hundred seventy-one patients entered the experimental arm, 376 with favorable and 595 with unfavorable characteristics.

Twenty-five patients were excluded because they did not complete the first 2 cycles of ABVD or did not have a PET scan.

After 2 cycles of ABVD, 361 patients were PET-positive, 192 in the ABVD arm (54 favorable, 138 unfavorable), and 169 in the escalated BEACOPP arm (43 favorable, 126 unfavorable).

The median age was 30 years in both arms (range, 15 to 70), and the investigators followed patients for a median of 4.5 years.

Results

The only grade 3-4 toxicities were hematologic events and infection.

“As expected, the neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia, grade 3-4, were more frequent in the experimental BEACOPP arm,” Dr Raemaekers said.

The incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia was 30.3% (ABVD) and 53.5% (BEACOPP), thrombocytopenia was 0% (ABVD) and 19.7% (BEACOPP), and anemia was 0% (ABVD) and 4.9% (BEACOPP).

The incidence of grade 3-4 febrile neutropenia was 1.1% (ABVD) and 23.9% (BEACOPP), and infection without neutropenia was 1.1% (ABVD) and 11.2% (BEACOPP).

Progression or relapse occurred in 18.8% of patients in the ABVD arm and 7.7% in the BEACOPP arm.

There were 18 deaths in the ABVD arm and 7 deaths in the BEACOPP arm. Eleven deaths in the ABVD arm and 3 in the BEACOPP arm were due to progressive disease or relapse.

The investigators also tallied up the number of patients who progressed, relapsed, or died, whichever occurred first. Forty-one patients in the ABVD arm fulfilled one of these criteria, compared to 16 in the BEACOPP arm.

“Progression and relapse had to be established by conventional restaging, including physical exam, chest X-ray, and CT scan,” Dr Raemaekers pointed out. “And it was based on any new lesion or increase by 50% or more in size of previously involved sites.”

Patients in the BEACOPP arm experienced a significantly better PFS than the ABVD arm, with a hazard ratio of 0.42 (P=0.002). The 5-year PFS was 91% in the BEACOPP arm and 77% in the ABVD arm.

The 5-year OS was 89% in the ABVD arm and 96% in the BEACOPP arm, a difference that was not statistically significant.

“But [the trial] was also not powered for overall survival,” Dr Raemaekers said. “[T]here is a hint, at least, that, even in overall survival, the BEACOPP arm is superior to the ABVD arm.”

Based on these findings, the investigators concluded that, despite increased toxicity, physicians should consider intensifying chemotherapy in early PET-positive patients with stage I/II HL in the combined-modality setting.

Patient receives chemotherapy

Photo by Rhoda Baer

LUGANO—Long-awaited results of the Intergroup H10 trial in PET-positive Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients have shown that intensifying chemotherapy significantly increases 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and produces a non-significant increase in overall survival (OS).

Switching patients who are PET-positive after 2 cycles of ABVD to escalated BEACOPP and involved-node radiotherapy increased 5-year PFS to 91% and 5-year OS to 96%.

The trial was a cooperative effort of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Lymphoma Study Association (LYSA), and Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL).

The investigators already knew that early FDG-PET scans have prognostic impact. Patients with a negative PET scan after 2 cycles of chemotherapy have very good outcomes, while those with PET-positive interim scans have poor outcomes.

So the team designed the H10 trial to learn whether they could reduce long-term toxicity in the majority of patients and improve outcomes in the unfavorable subgroups.

Results of the primary endpoint—whether chemotherapy alone is as effective as, but less toxic than, combined-modality treatment in PET-negative patients after 2 cycles of ABVD—were published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The secondary endpoint was an improvement in PFS with an early change from ABVD to escalated BEACOPP in stage I or II HL patients who are PET-positive after 2 cycles of ABVD.

John M. M. Raemaekers, MD, PhD, of Radboud University Medical Center in The Netherlands, presented details on the trial’s secondary endpoint at the 13th International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma (no abstract available).

H10 trial design

The investigators enrolled patients with favorable and unfavorable prognostic characteristics.

Unfavorable characteristics consisted of age 50 or older, more than 3 nodal areas, mediastinal-to-thorax ratio of 0.35 or higher, erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 50 mm or greater without B symptoms, or erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 30 mm or greater with B symptoms.

In the standard treatment arm, patients with favorable or unfavorable characteristics were treated similarly. After 2 cycles of ABVD, a PET scan was performed, and, irrespective of the result, patients received combined-modality treatment of ABVD followed by involved-node radiotherapy.

In the experimental arm, patients who were PET-negative had chemotherapy alone without involved-node radiotherapy. PET-negative patients were not discussed further in this presentation.

For the PET-positive patients in the experimental arm, the treatment for those with favorable and unfavorable characteristics was identical.

Patients who were PET-positive after 2 cycles were switched to 2 escalated BEACOPP cycles plus involved-node radiotherapy. Patients were considered PET-positive if they had a Deauville score of 3, 4, or 5.

Randomization

The first patient was enrolled in November 2006 and the last in June 2011. Investigators randomized 1950 patients, 754 with favorable and 1196 with unfavorable characteristics. All patients had untreated, supradiaphragmatic, clinical stage I or II HL.

Nine hundred fifty-four patients were enrolled in the standard arm, 371 with favorable characteristics and 583 with unfavorable. Nine hundred seventy-one patients entered the experimental arm, 376 with favorable and 595 with unfavorable characteristics.

Twenty-five patients were excluded because they did not complete the first 2 cycles of ABVD or did not have a PET scan.

After 2 cycles of ABVD, 361 patients were PET-positive, 192 in the ABVD arm (54 favorable, 138 unfavorable), and 169 in the escalated BEACOPP arm (43 favorable, 126 unfavorable).

The median age was 30 years in both arms (range, 15 to 70), and the investigators followed patients for a median of 4.5 years.

Results

The only grade 3-4 toxicities were hematologic events and infection.

“As expected, the neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia, grade 3-4, were more frequent in the experimental BEACOPP arm,” Dr Raemaekers said.

The incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia was 30.3% (ABVD) and 53.5% (BEACOPP), thrombocytopenia was 0% (ABVD) and 19.7% (BEACOPP), and anemia was 0% (ABVD) and 4.9% (BEACOPP).

The incidence of grade 3-4 febrile neutropenia was 1.1% (ABVD) and 23.9% (BEACOPP), and infection without neutropenia was 1.1% (ABVD) and 11.2% (BEACOPP).

Progression or relapse occurred in 18.8% of patients in the ABVD arm and 7.7% in the BEACOPP arm.

There were 18 deaths in the ABVD arm and 7 deaths in the BEACOPP arm. Eleven deaths in the ABVD arm and 3 in the BEACOPP arm were due to progressive disease or relapse.

The investigators also tallied up the number of patients who progressed, relapsed, or died, whichever occurred first. Forty-one patients in the ABVD arm fulfilled one of these criteria, compared to 16 in the BEACOPP arm.

“Progression and relapse had to be established by conventional restaging, including physical exam, chest X-ray, and CT scan,” Dr Raemaekers pointed out. “And it was based on any new lesion or increase by 50% or more in size of previously involved sites.”

Patients in the BEACOPP arm experienced a significantly better PFS than the ABVD arm, with a hazard ratio of 0.42 (P=0.002). The 5-year PFS was 91% in the BEACOPP arm and 77% in the ABVD arm.

The 5-year OS was 89% in the ABVD arm and 96% in the BEACOPP arm, a difference that was not statistically significant.

“But [the trial] was also not powered for overall survival,” Dr Raemaekers said. “[T]here is a hint, at least, that, even in overall survival, the BEACOPP arm is superior to the ABVD arm.”

Based on these findings, the investigators concluded that, despite increased toxicity, physicians should consider intensifying chemotherapy in early PET-positive patients with stage I/II HL in the combined-modality setting.

Patient receives chemotherapy

Photo by Rhoda Baer

LUGANO—Long-awaited results of the Intergroup H10 trial in PET-positive Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients have shown that intensifying chemotherapy significantly increases 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and produces a non-significant increase in overall survival (OS).

Switching patients who are PET-positive after 2 cycles of ABVD to escalated BEACOPP and involved-node radiotherapy increased 5-year PFS to 91% and 5-year OS to 96%.

The trial was a cooperative effort of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Lymphoma Study Association (LYSA), and Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL).

The investigators already knew that early FDG-PET scans have prognostic impact. Patients with a negative PET scan after 2 cycles of chemotherapy have very good outcomes, while those with PET-positive interim scans have poor outcomes.

So the team designed the H10 trial to learn whether they could reduce long-term toxicity in the majority of patients and improve outcomes in the unfavorable subgroups.

Results of the primary endpoint—whether chemotherapy alone is as effective as, but less toxic than, combined-modality treatment in PET-negative patients after 2 cycles of ABVD—were published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The secondary endpoint was an improvement in PFS with an early change from ABVD to escalated BEACOPP in stage I or II HL patients who are PET-positive after 2 cycles of ABVD.

John M. M. Raemaekers, MD, PhD, of Radboud University Medical Center in The Netherlands, presented details on the trial’s secondary endpoint at the 13th International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma (no abstract available).

H10 trial design

The investigators enrolled patients with favorable and unfavorable prognostic characteristics.

Unfavorable characteristics consisted of age 50 or older, more than 3 nodal areas, mediastinal-to-thorax ratio of 0.35 or higher, erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 50 mm or greater without B symptoms, or erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 30 mm or greater with B symptoms.

In the standard treatment arm, patients with favorable or unfavorable characteristics were treated similarly. After 2 cycles of ABVD, a PET scan was performed, and, irrespective of the result, patients received combined-modality treatment of ABVD followed by involved-node radiotherapy.

In the experimental arm, patients who were PET-negative had chemotherapy alone without involved-node radiotherapy. PET-negative patients were not discussed further in this presentation.

For the PET-positive patients in the experimental arm, the treatment for those with favorable and unfavorable characteristics was identical.

Patients who were PET-positive after 2 cycles were switched to 2 escalated BEACOPP cycles plus involved-node radiotherapy. Patients were considered PET-positive if they had a Deauville score of 3, 4, or 5.

Randomization

The first patient was enrolled in November 2006 and the last in June 2011. Investigators randomized 1950 patients, 754 with favorable and 1196 with unfavorable characteristics. All patients had untreated, supradiaphragmatic, clinical stage I or II HL.

Nine hundred fifty-four patients were enrolled in the standard arm, 371 with favorable characteristics and 583 with unfavorable. Nine hundred seventy-one patients entered the experimental arm, 376 with favorable and 595 with unfavorable characteristics.

Twenty-five patients were excluded because they did not complete the first 2 cycles of ABVD or did not have a PET scan.

After 2 cycles of ABVD, 361 patients were PET-positive, 192 in the ABVD arm (54 favorable, 138 unfavorable), and 169 in the escalated BEACOPP arm (43 favorable, 126 unfavorable).

The median age was 30 years in both arms (range, 15 to 70), and the investigators followed patients for a median of 4.5 years.

Results

The only grade 3-4 toxicities were hematologic events and infection.

“As expected, the neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia, grade 3-4, were more frequent in the experimental BEACOPP arm,” Dr Raemaekers said.

The incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia was 30.3% (ABVD) and 53.5% (BEACOPP), thrombocytopenia was 0% (ABVD) and 19.7% (BEACOPP), and anemia was 0% (ABVD) and 4.9% (BEACOPP).

The incidence of grade 3-4 febrile neutropenia was 1.1% (ABVD) and 23.9% (BEACOPP), and infection without neutropenia was 1.1% (ABVD) and 11.2% (BEACOPP).

Progression or relapse occurred in 18.8% of patients in the ABVD arm and 7.7% in the BEACOPP arm.

There were 18 deaths in the ABVD arm and 7 deaths in the BEACOPP arm. Eleven deaths in the ABVD arm and 3 in the BEACOPP arm were due to progressive disease or relapse.

The investigators also tallied up the number of patients who progressed, relapsed, or died, whichever occurred first. Forty-one patients in the ABVD arm fulfilled one of these criteria, compared to 16 in the BEACOPP arm.

“Progression and relapse had to be established by conventional restaging, including physical exam, chest X-ray, and CT scan,” Dr Raemaekers pointed out. “And it was based on any new lesion or increase by 50% or more in size of previously involved sites.”

Patients in the BEACOPP arm experienced a significantly better PFS than the ABVD arm, with a hazard ratio of 0.42 (P=0.002). The 5-year PFS was 91% in the BEACOPP arm and 77% in the ABVD arm.

The 5-year OS was 89% in the ABVD arm and 96% in the BEACOPP arm, a difference that was not statistically significant.

“But [the trial] was also not powered for overall survival,” Dr Raemaekers said. “[T]here is a hint, at least, that, even in overall survival, the BEACOPP arm is superior to the ABVD arm.”

Based on these findings, the investigators concluded that, despite increased toxicity, physicians should consider intensifying chemotherapy in early PET-positive patients with stage I/II HL in the combined-modality setting.

 

 

Owen O’Connor, MD, PhD

Photo by Larry Young

 

LUGANO—Updated phase 1 results with TGR-1202 suggest this next-generation PI3kδ inhibitor lacks the hepatotoxicity associated with other PI3Kδ inhibitors.

Investigators also confirmed that no case of colitis has been reported to date with TGR-1202, and only 2% of evaluable patients on this trial have experienced grade 3-4 diarrhea.

The study is an ongoing, first-in-human trial in patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies.

Owen O’Connor, MD, PhD, of Columbia University Medical Center in New York, New York, shared results from this trial at the 13th International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma (abstract 038*). The trial is sponsored by TG Therapeutics, Inc., the company developing TGR-1202.

“TGR-1202 is a radically different sort of PI3kδ inhibitor,” Dr O’Connor said. “[I]t’s really a unique chemical entity that is different from the previous 2 structures [idelalisib and duvelisib] that you’ve probably heard something about.”

Study design

This ongoing trial of TGR-1202 is open to patients with hematologic malignancies who relapsed after or were refractory to at least 1 prior treatment regimen. Patients are eligible if they have an ECOG performance status of 2 or less with adequate organ system function, including absolute neutrophil count of 750/μL or greater and platelets of 50,000/μL or greater.

TGR-1202 is dosed orally, once a day in continuous, 28-day cycles. The original dose-escalation portion of the study was a classic 3+3 design, starting at 50 mg and increasing to 1800 mg. Patients who received prior therapy with a PI3K and/or mTOR inhibitor were excluded from the dose-escalation cohorts but were allowed in the expansion cohorts.

Dr O’Connor pointed out that, through cohort 5, TGR-1202 was taken in the fasting state. However, pharmacokinetic studies performed in the fed state revealed that the area under the curve (AUC) and Cmax could be doubled by taking the drug with food. So the expansions in the ongoing 800 mg and 1200 mg cohorts are being conducted in the fed state.

Dr O’Connor also noted that a subsequent, micronized version of TGR-1202 was developed. The micronization “essentially increases the surface area of the formulation, allowing for better bioavailability and markedly increases the AUC and Cmax exposure,” he said.

So the investigators conducted a second escalation with the micronized formulation, starting at 200 mg and increasing to 800 mg. At present, they are enrolling patients to the 800 mg and 1200 mg cohorts conducted in the fed state with the micronized formulation.

Demographics

Dr O’Connor presented data on 66 patients who were evaluable for safety and 51 for efficacy. The patients’ median age was 66 (range, 22–85), and 46 were male.

In all, there were 20 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), 17 with follicular lymphoma, 10 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 9 with Hodgkin lymphoma, 5 with mantle cell lymphoma, 3 with marginal zone lymphoma, 1 with Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia, and 1 with hairy cell leukemia.

Patients had received a median of 3 prior therapies (range, 1–14), and 36 (55%) had 3 or more prior therapies. Thirty-four patients (52%) were refractory to their prior therapy.

Efficacy

Dr O’Connor reported that higher doses of TGR-1202—1200 mg of the initial formulation and 600 mg or more of the micronized version—demonstrated rapid and profound responses in CLL, follicular lymphoma, and marginal zone lymphoma.

Responses have been limited in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, and mantle cell lymphoma.

Eighty-eight percent of CLL patients achieved a nodal partial remission, and 63% achieved a response according to iwCLL criteria (Hallek 2008).

Safety and tolerability

Adverse events occurring in more than 10% of patients included nausea (41%), diarrhea (32%), fatigue (32%), headache (23%), vomiting (23%), cough (21%), decreased appetite (17%), rash (17%), constipation (14%), hypokalemia (14%), anemia, dizziness, dyspnea, neutropenia, and pyrexia (12% each), and abdominal pain (11%).

The most common grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia, occurring in 11% of patients.

“But other than that, the bulk of the toxicities in terms of grade 3-4 events were relatively modest,” Dr O’Connor said. “[I]t’s worth pointing out that diarrhea grade 3-4 only occurred in about 2% of patients in the population.”

Approximately 50% of patients (n=31) have been on study for more than 6 months, and approximately 30% taking a higher dose level have been on study for 6 months or more. Twenty-five of 37 patients exposed to 800 mg or more of the micronized formulation currently remain on study.

“So this gives you a sense that it is a very well-tolerated drug, with patients staying on for extended periods of time,” Dr O’Connor said.

He added that time on study becomes relevant in assessing some of the gastrointestinal toxicities seen with other PI3Kδ inhibitors, where it seems the median time to gastrointestinal toxicity is beyond 6 months.

“So far, and I’m willing to concede it’s early, but with half the patients being treated for over 6 months, [diarrhea/colitis] seems to be much lower than the experience with the other PI3 kinase inhibitors,” Dr O’Connor said.

“I think one of the more important features of [TGR-1202], and one that allows me to think we might be able to integrate this drug a little more readily into various combination regimens, are the discontinuations due to other adverse events.”

“Only 4% treated with [TGR-1202] had discontinuations secondary to adverse events. [A]nd it looks like the efficacy is in line with what we’d expect with some of the other drugs, but this [study] is actively accruing still.”

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

 

 

Owen O’Connor, MD, PhD

Photo by Larry Young

 

LUGANO—Updated phase 1 results with TGR-1202 suggest this next-generation PI3kδ inhibitor lacks the hepatotoxicity associated with other PI3Kδ inhibitors.

Investigators also confirmed that no case of colitis has been reported to date with TGR-1202, and only 2% of evaluable patients on this trial have experienced grade 3-4 diarrhea.

The study is an ongoing, first-in-human trial in patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies.

Owen O’Connor, MD, PhD, of Columbia University Medical Center in New York, New York, shared results from this trial at the 13th International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma (abstract 038*). The trial is sponsored by TG Therapeutics, Inc., the company developing TGR-1202.

“TGR-1202 is a radically different sort of PI3kδ inhibitor,” Dr O’Connor said. “[I]t’s really a unique chemical entity that is different from the previous 2 structures [idelalisib and duvelisib] that you’ve probably heard something about.”

Study design

This ongoing trial of TGR-1202 is open to patients with hematologic malignancies who relapsed after or were refractory to at least 1 prior treatment regimen. Patients are eligible if they have an ECOG performance status of 2 or less with adequate organ system function, including absolute neutrophil count of 750/μL or greater and platelets of 50,000/μL or greater.

TGR-1202 is dosed orally, once a day in continuous, 28-day cycles. The original dose-escalation portion of the study was a classic 3+3 design, starting at 50 mg and increasing to 1800 mg. Patients who received prior therapy with a PI3K and/or mTOR inhibitor were excluded from the dose-escalation cohorts but were allowed in the expansion cohorts.

Dr O’Connor pointed out that, through cohort 5, TGR-1202 was taken in the fasting state. However, pharmacokinetic studies performed in the fed state revealed that the area under the curve (AUC) and Cmax could be doubled by taking the drug with food. So the expansions in the ongoing 800 mg and 1200 mg cohorts are being conducted in the fed state.

Dr O’Connor also noted that a subsequent, micronized version of TGR-1202 was developed. The micronization “essentially increases the surface area of the formulation, allowing for better bioavailability and markedly increases the AUC and Cmax exposure,” he said.

So the investigators conducted a second escalation with the micronized formulation, starting at 200 mg and increasing to 800 mg. At present, they are enrolling patients to the 800 mg and 1200 mg cohorts conducted in the fed state with the micronized formulation.

Demographics

Dr O’Connor presented data on 66 patients who were evaluable for safety and 51 for efficacy. The patients’ median age was 66 (range, 22–85), and 46 were male.

In all, there were 20 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), 17 with follicular lymphoma, 10 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 9 with Hodgkin lymphoma, 5 with mantle cell lymphoma, 3 with marginal zone lymphoma, 1 with Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia, and 1 with hairy cell leukemia.

Patients had received a median of 3 prior therapies (range, 1–14), and 36 (55%) had 3 or more prior therapies. Thirty-four patients (52%) were refractory to their prior therapy.

Efficacy

Dr O’Connor reported that higher doses of TGR-1202—1200 mg of the initial formulation and 600 mg or more of the micronized version—demonstrated rapid and profound responses in CLL, follicular lymphoma, and marginal zone lymphoma.

Responses have been limited in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, and mantle cell lymphoma.

Eighty-eight percent of CLL patients achieved a nodal partial remission, and 63% achieved a response according to iwCLL criteria (Hallek 2008).

Safety and tolerability

Adverse events occurring in more than 10% of patients included nausea (41%), diarrhea (32%), fatigue (32%), headache (23%), vomiting (23%), cough (21%), decreased appetite (17%), rash (17%), constipation (14%), hypokalemia (14%), anemia, dizziness, dyspnea, neutropenia, and pyrexia (12% each), and abdominal pain (11%).

The most common grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia, occurring in 11% of patients.

“But other than that, the bulk of the toxicities in terms of grade 3-4 events were relatively modest,” Dr O’Connor said. “[I]t’s worth pointing out that diarrhea grade 3-4 only occurred in about 2% of patients in the population.”

Approximately 50% of patients (n=31) have been on study for more than 6 months, and approximately 30% taking a higher dose level have been on study for 6 months or more. Twenty-five of 37 patients exposed to 800 mg or more of the micronized formulation currently remain on study.

“So this gives you a sense that it is a very well-tolerated drug, with patients staying on for extended periods of time,” Dr O’Connor said.

He added that time on study becomes relevant in assessing some of the gastrointestinal toxicities seen with other PI3Kδ inhibitors, where it seems the median time to gastrointestinal toxicity is beyond 6 months.

“So far, and I’m willing to concede it’s early, but with half the patients being treated for over 6 months, [diarrhea/colitis] seems to be much lower than the experience with the other PI3 kinase inhibitors,” Dr O’Connor said.

“I think one of the more important features of [TGR-1202], and one that allows me to think we might be able to integrate this drug a little more readily into various combination regimens, are the discontinuations due to other adverse events.”

“Only 4% treated with [TGR-1202] had discontinuations secondary to adverse events. [A]nd it looks like the efficacy is in line with what we’d expect with some of the other drugs, but this [study] is actively accruing still.”

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

 

 

Owen O’Connor, MD, PhD

Photo by Larry Young

 

LUGANO—Updated phase 1 results with TGR-1202 suggest this next-generation PI3kδ inhibitor lacks the hepatotoxicity associated with other PI3Kδ inhibitors.

Investigators also confirmed that no case of colitis has been reported to date with TGR-1202, and only 2% of evaluable patients on this trial have experienced grade 3-4 diarrhea.

The study is an ongoing, first-in-human trial in patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies.

Owen O’Connor, MD, PhD, of Columbia University Medical Center in New York, New York, shared results from this trial at the 13th International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma (abstract 038*). The trial is sponsored by TG Therapeutics, Inc., the company developing TGR-1202.

“TGR-1202 is a radically different sort of PI3kδ inhibitor,” Dr O’Connor said. “[I]t’s really a unique chemical entity that is different from the previous 2 structures [idelalisib and duvelisib] that you’ve probably heard something about.”

Study design

This ongoing trial of TGR-1202 is open to patients with hematologic malignancies who relapsed after or were refractory to at least 1 prior treatment regimen. Patients are eligible if they have an ECOG performance status of 2 or less with adequate organ system function, including absolute neutrophil count of 750/μL or greater and platelets of 50,000/μL or greater.

TGR-1202 is dosed orally, once a day in continuous, 28-day cycles. The original dose-escalation portion of the study was a classic 3+3 design, starting at 50 mg and increasing to 1800 mg. Patients who received prior therapy with a PI3K and/or mTOR inhibitor were excluded from the dose-escalation cohorts but were allowed in the expansion cohorts.

Dr O’Connor pointed out that, through cohort 5, TGR-1202 was taken in the fasting state. However, pharmacokinetic studies performed in the fed state revealed that the area under the curve (AUC) and Cmax could be doubled by taking the drug with food. So the expansions in the ongoing 800 mg and 1200 mg cohorts are being conducted in the fed state.

Dr O’Connor also noted that a subsequent, micronized version of TGR-1202 was developed. The micronization “essentially increases the surface area of the formulation, allowing for better bioavailability and markedly increases the AUC and Cmax exposure,” he said.

So the investigators conducted a second escalation with the micronized formulation, starting at 200 mg and increasing to 800 mg. At present, they are enrolling patients to the 800 mg and 1200 mg cohorts conducted in the fed state with the micronized formulation.

Demographics

Dr O’Connor presented data on 66 patients who were evaluable for safety and 51 for efficacy. The patients’ median age was 66 (range, 22–85), and 46 were male.

In all, there were 20 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), 17 with follicular lymphoma, 10 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 9 with Hodgkin lymphoma, 5 with mantle cell lymphoma, 3 with marginal zone lymphoma, 1 with Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia, and 1 with hairy cell leukemia.

Patients had received a median of 3 prior therapies (range, 1–14), and 36 (55%) had 3 or more prior therapies. Thirty-four patients (52%) were refractory to their prior therapy.

Efficacy

Dr O’Connor reported that higher doses of TGR-1202—1200 mg of the initial formulation and 600 mg or more of the micronized version—demonstrated rapid and profound responses in CLL, follicular lymphoma, and marginal zone lymphoma.

Responses have been limited in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, and mantle cell lymphoma.

Eighty-eight percent of CLL patients achieved a nodal partial remission, and 63% achieved a response according to iwCLL criteria (Hallek 2008).

Safety and tolerability

Adverse events occurring in more than 10% of patients included nausea (41%), diarrhea (32%), fatigue (32%), headache (23%), vomiting (23%), cough (21%), decreased appetite (17%), rash (17%), constipation (14%), hypokalemia (14%), anemia, dizziness, dyspnea, neutropenia, and pyrexia (12% each), and abdominal pain (11%).

The most common grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia, occurring in 11% of patients.

“But other than that, the bulk of the toxicities in terms of grade 3-4 events were relatively modest,” Dr O’Connor said. “[I]t’s worth pointing out that diarrhea grade 3-4 only occurred in about 2% of patients in the population.”

Approximately 50% of patients (n=31) have been on study for more than 6 months, and approximately 30% taking a higher dose level have been on study for 6 months or more. Twenty-five of 37 patients exposed to 800 mg or more of the micronized formulation currently remain on study.

“So this gives you a sense that it is a very well-tolerated drug, with patients staying on for extended periods of time,” Dr O’Connor said.

He added that time on study becomes relevant in assessing some of the gastrointestinal toxicities seen with other PI3Kδ inhibitors, where it seems the median time to gastrointestinal toxicity is beyond 6 months.

“So far, and I’m willing to concede it’s early, but with half the patients being treated for over 6 months, [diarrhea/colitis] seems to be much lower than the experience with the other PI3 kinase inhibitors,” Dr O’Connor said.

“I think one of the more important features of [TGR-1202], and one that allows me to think we might be able to integrate this drug a little more readily into various combination regimens, are the discontinuations due to other adverse events.”

“Only 4% treated with [TGR-1202] had discontinuations secondary to adverse events. [A]nd it looks like the efficacy is in line with what we’d expect with some of the other drugs, but this [study] is actively accruing still.”

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

John Timmerman, MD

Photo courtesy of UCLA

LUGANO—The PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab produces rapid, durable, and, in some cases, “dramatic” responses in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), according to a speaker at the 13th International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma.

The drug has also produced durable responses in follicular lymphoma (FL), cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), although patient numbers for these malignancies are small.

John Timmerman, MD, of the University of California, Los Angeles, presented these results from a phase 1 study of patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoid malignancies and chronic HL (abstract 010).

Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical Company are sponsors of the trial.

Original results of the study, with a data cutoff of June 2014, were reported at ASH 2014, with 40 weeks of median follow-up.

The update presented at 13-ICML, with a data lock in April 2015, includes an additional 10 months of data, for a median follow-up of 76 weeks.

Investigators enrolled 105 patients in this dose-escalation study to receive nivolumab at 1 mg/kg, then 3 mg/kg, every 2 weeks for 2 years.

Twenty-three patients had HL. Thirty-one had B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), including 11 with FL and 10 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

Twenty-three patients had T-cell NHL, including 5 with PTCL and 13 with CTCL/mycosis fungoides (MF). Twenty-seven patients had multiple myeloma (MM), and 1 had chronic myeloid leukemia.

Patients were heavily pretreated. Seventy-eight percent of HL patients and 26% of T-NHL patients had prior brentuximab vedotin. And 78% (HL), 14% (B-NHL), 9% (T-NHL), and 56% (MM) of patients had a prior autologous transplant.

The median number of prior therapies was 5 (range, 2-15) for HL patients and ranged from 1 to 16 for all patients.

The study’s primary endpoint was safety and tolerability, and the secondary endpoint was efficacy.

Safety and tolerability

Ninety-seven percent of patients had an adverse event, 69% of them related to study treatment and 21% of them treatment-related grade 3-4 events.

Fifteen patients (14%) discontinued treatment due to a related adverse event, including 3 with pneumonitis and 1 each with enteritis, stomatitis, pancreatitis, rash, conjunctivitis, sepsis, diplopia, myositis, neutropenia, myelodysplastic syndrome, increased creatinine phosphokinase, and peripheral neuropathy.

“Immune-related adverse events were generally seen early on and generally of low grade,” Dr Timmerman said. “However, it is notable that there were several grade 3 immune-related adverse events that can be seen as far as 6 months out after the start of therapy.”

These included skin, gastrointestinal, and pulmonary events. Most immune-related adverse events (83%) were resolved using protocol-prescribed procedures.

Efficacy

The overall response rate was 87% for HL, 36% for DLBCL, 40% for FL, 15% for CTCL/MF, 40% for PTCL, and 4% for MM.

Dr Timmerman pointed out that, since ASH, 2 additional conversions from partial response (PR) to complete response (CR) occurred in patients with HL. To date, 6 of 23 HL patients have achieved a CR and 14 a PR.

In B-cell NHL, there were additional conversions from PR to CR in DLBCL, while responses remained the same in FL and in the 4 responders with T-cell lymphomas.

“Intriguingly, there has been 1 late CR in the multiple myeloma cohort, which previously had shown no responses,” Dr Timmerman said.

Durability of response

This study suggests PD-1 blockade can produce durable responses in hematologic malignancies, as it does in melanoma and renal cell carcinoma.

In HL, the median response duration at a median follow-up of 86 weeks has not yet been reached, and half (n=10) of the responses are still ongoing.

In FL, CTCL, and PTCL, the median response duration has not been reached at a median follow-up of 81, 43, and 31 weeks, respectively. Of note, there are ongoing responses in at least half of patients in these tumor types.

In HL, none of the 6 patients in CR has progressed, although there have been some progressions in the PR group.

The rapidity of responses is also notable, Dr Timmerman said.

“[I]t’s very interesting that some patients have resolution of symptoms and improvement of symptoms within even 1 day of starting nivolumab therapy,” he said.

And responses to nivolumab in HL “can be very dramatic,” he added, as illustrated in the following case from the Mayo Clinic.

A patient with multiple sites of bulky FDG-avid tumors was scheduled to enter hospice. But first, he entered the nivolumab trial. Within 6 weeks of initiating treatment, he had achieved a near-CR. This response has been maintained for 2 years.

“The occurrence of very durable responses in the PR and CR groups has led us to question whether patients should go on to allogeneic stem cell transplantation after achieving responses with nivolumab or, rather, continue on nivolumab as long as their response remains,” Dr Timmerman said.

He added that an international, phase 2 trial in HL is underway and is accruing briskly.

Nivolumab was awarded breakthrough designation by the US Food and Drug Administration last year. Breakthrough designation is intended to expedite the development and review of drugs for serious or life-threatening conditions.

John Timmerman, MD

Photo courtesy of UCLA

LUGANO—The PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab produces rapid, durable, and, in some cases, “dramatic” responses in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), according to a speaker at the 13th International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma.

The drug has also produced durable responses in follicular lymphoma (FL), cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), although patient numbers for these malignancies are small.

John Timmerman, MD, of the University of California, Los Angeles, presented these results from a phase 1 study of patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoid malignancies and chronic HL (abstract 010).

Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical Company are sponsors of the trial.

Original results of the study, with a data cutoff of June 2014, were reported at ASH 2014, with 40 weeks of median follow-up.

The update presented at 13-ICML, with a data lock in April 2015, includes an additional 10 months of data, for a median follow-up of 76 weeks.

Investigators enrolled 105 patients in this dose-escalation study to receive nivolumab at 1 mg/kg, then 3 mg/kg, every 2 weeks for 2 years.

Twenty-three patients had HL. Thirty-one had B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), including 11 with FL and 10 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

Twenty-three patients had T-cell NHL, including 5 with PTCL and 13 with CTCL/mycosis fungoides (MF). Twenty-seven patients had multiple myeloma (MM), and 1 had chronic myeloid leukemia.

Patients were heavily pretreated. Seventy-eight percent of HL patients and 26% of T-NHL patients had prior brentuximab vedotin. And 78% (HL), 14% (B-NHL), 9% (T-NHL), and 56% (MM) of patients had a prior autologous transplant.

The median number of prior therapies was 5 (range, 2-15) for HL patients and ranged from 1 to 16 for all patients.

The study’s primary endpoint was safety and tolerability, and the secondary endpoint was efficacy.

Safety and tolerability

Ninety-seven percent of patients had an adverse event, 69% of them related to study treatment and 21% of them treatment-related grade 3-4 events.

Fifteen patients (14%) discontinued treatment due to a related adverse event, including 3 with pneumonitis and 1 each with enteritis, stomatitis, pancreatitis, rash, conjunctivitis, sepsis, diplopia, myositis, neutropenia, myelodysplastic syndrome, increased creatinine phosphokinase, and peripheral neuropathy.

“Immune-related adverse events were generally seen early on and generally of low grade,” Dr Timmerman said. “However, it is notable that there were several grade 3 immune-related adverse events that can be seen as far as 6 months out after the start of therapy.”

These included skin, gastrointestinal, and pulmonary events. Most immune-related adverse events (83%) were resolved using protocol-prescribed procedures.

Efficacy

The overall response rate was 87% for HL, 36% for DLBCL, 40% for FL, 15% for CTCL/MF, 40% for PTCL, and 4% for MM.

Dr Timmerman pointed out that, since ASH, 2 additional conversions from partial response (PR) to complete response (CR) occurred in patients with HL. To date, 6 of 23 HL patients have achieved a CR and 14 a PR.

In B-cell NHL, there were additional conversions from PR to CR in DLBCL, while responses remained the same in FL and in the 4 responders with T-cell lymphomas.

“Intriguingly, there has been 1 late CR in the multiple myeloma cohort, which previously had shown no responses,” Dr Timmerman said.

Durability of response

This study suggests PD-1 blockade can produce durable responses in hematologic malignancies, as it does in melanoma and renal cell carcinoma.

In HL, the median response duration at a median follow-up of 86 weeks has not yet been reached, and half (n=10) of the responses are still ongoing.

In FL, CTCL, and PTCL, the median response duration has not been reached at a median follow-up of 81, 43, and 31 weeks, respectively. Of note, there are ongoing responses in at least half of patients in these tumor types.

In HL, none of the 6 patients in CR has progressed, although there have been some progressions in the PR group.

The rapidity of responses is also notable, Dr Timmerman said.

“[I]t’s very interesting that some patients have resolution of symptoms and improvement of symptoms within even 1 day of starting nivolumab therapy,” he said.

And responses to nivolumab in HL “can be very dramatic,” he added, as illustrated in the following case from the Mayo Clinic.

A patient with multiple sites of bulky FDG-avid tumors was scheduled to enter hospice. But first, he entered the nivolumab trial. Within 6 weeks of initiating treatment, he had achieved a near-CR. This response has been maintained for 2 years.

“The occurrence of very durable responses in the PR and CR groups has led us to question whether patients should go on to allogeneic stem cell transplantation after achieving responses with nivolumab or, rather, continue on nivolumab as long as their response remains,” Dr Timmerman said.

He added that an international, phase 2 trial in HL is underway and is accruing briskly.

Nivolumab was awarded breakthrough designation by the US Food and Drug Administration last year. Breakthrough designation is intended to expedite the development and review of drugs for serious or life-threatening conditions.

John Timmerman, MD

Photo courtesy of UCLA

LUGANO—The PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab produces rapid, durable, and, in some cases, “dramatic” responses in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), according to a speaker at the 13th International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma.

The drug has also produced durable responses in follicular lymphoma (FL), cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), although patient numbers for these malignancies are small.

John Timmerman, MD, of the University of California, Los Angeles, presented these results from a phase 1 study of patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoid malignancies and chronic HL (abstract 010).

Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical Company are sponsors of the trial.

Original results of the study, with a data cutoff of June 2014, were reported at ASH 2014, with 40 weeks of median follow-up.

The update presented at 13-ICML, with a data lock in April 2015, includes an additional 10 months of data, for a median follow-up of 76 weeks.

Investigators enrolled 105 patients in this dose-escalation study to receive nivolumab at 1 mg/kg, then 3 mg/kg, every 2 weeks for 2 years.

Twenty-three patients had HL. Thirty-one had B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), including 11 with FL and 10 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

Twenty-three patients had T-cell NHL, including 5 with PTCL and 13 with CTCL/mycosis fungoides (MF). Twenty-seven patients had multiple myeloma (MM), and 1 had chronic myeloid leukemia.

Patients were heavily pretreated. Seventy-eight percent of HL patients and 26% of T-NHL patients had prior brentuximab vedotin. And 78% (HL), 14% (B-NHL), 9% (T-NHL), and 56% (MM) of patients had a prior autologous transplant.

The median number of prior therapies was 5 (range, 2-15) for HL patients and ranged from 1 to 16 for all patients.

The study’s primary endpoint was safety and tolerability, and the secondary endpoint was efficacy.

Safety and tolerability

Ninety-seven percent of patients had an adverse event, 69% of them related to study treatment and 21% of them treatment-related grade 3-4 events.

Fifteen patients (14%) discontinued treatment due to a related adverse event, including 3 with pneumonitis and 1 each with enteritis, stomatitis, pancreatitis, rash, conjunctivitis, sepsis, diplopia, myositis, neutropenia, myelodysplastic syndrome, increased creatinine phosphokinase, and peripheral neuropathy.

“Immune-related adverse events were generally seen early on and generally of low grade,” Dr Timmerman said. “However, it is notable that there were several grade 3 immune-related adverse events that can be seen as far as 6 months out after the start of therapy.”

These included skin, gastrointestinal, and pulmonary events. Most immune-related adverse events (83%) were resolved using protocol-prescribed procedures.

Efficacy

The overall response rate was 87% for HL, 36% for DLBCL, 40% for FL, 15% for CTCL/MF, 40% for PTCL, and 4% for MM.

Dr Timmerman pointed out that, since ASH, 2 additional conversions from partial response (PR) to complete response (CR) occurred in patients with HL. To date, 6 of 23 HL patients have achieved a CR and 14 a PR.

In B-cell NHL, there were additional conversions from PR to CR in DLBCL, while responses remained the same in FL and in the 4 responders with T-cell lymphomas.

“Intriguingly, there has been 1 late CR in the multiple myeloma cohort, which previously had shown no responses,” Dr Timmerman said.

Durability of response

This study suggests PD-1 blockade can produce durable responses in hematologic malignancies, as it does in melanoma and renal cell carcinoma.

In HL, the median response duration at a median follow-up of 86 weeks has not yet been reached, and half (n=10) of the responses are still ongoing.

In FL, CTCL, and PTCL, the median response duration has not been reached at a median follow-up of 81, 43, and 31 weeks, respectively. Of note, there are ongoing responses in at least half of patients in these tumor types.

In HL, none of the 6 patients in CR has progressed, although there have been some progressions in the PR group.

The rapidity of responses is also notable, Dr Timmerman said.

“[I]t’s very interesting that some patients have resolution of symptoms and improvement of symptoms within even 1 day of starting nivolumab therapy,” he said.

And responses to nivolumab in HL “can be very dramatic,” he added, as illustrated in the following case from the Mayo Clinic.

A patient with multiple sites of bulky FDG-avid tumors was scheduled to enter hospice. But first, he entered the nivolumab trial. Within 6 weeks of initiating treatment, he had achieved a near-CR. This response has been maintained for 2 years.

“The occurrence of very durable responses in the PR and CR groups has led us to question whether patients should go on to allogeneic stem cell transplantation after achieving responses with nivolumab or, rather, continue on nivolumab as long as their response remains,” Dr Timmerman said.

He added that an international, phase 2 trial in HL is underway and is accruing briskly.

Nivolumab was awarded breakthrough designation by the US Food and Drug Administration last year. Breakthrough designation is intended to expedite the development and review of drugs for serious or life-threatening conditions.