Pharmacy

Micrograph showing ALL

The European Commission has granted marketing authorization for pegaspargase (Oncaspar) to be used as part of combination antineoplastic therapy for pediatric and adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

The approval means the drug can be marketed for this indication in the 28 member countries of the European Union (EU), as well as Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway.

Pegaspargase was already approved for use in Argentina, Belarus, Germany, Kazakhstan, Poland, Russia, Ukraine, and the US.

“Oncaspar has been used as an integral component of the treatment regimen for pediatric and adult patients with ALL for many years, in Europe and worldwide,” said Martin Schrappe, of Schleswig-Holstein University Hospital in Kiel, Germany.

“Today’s marketing authorization will ensure that more patients across the EU will benefit from access to Oncaspar as part of a standard of care regimen.”

The drug is being developed by Baxalta Incorporated.

First-line ALL

Researchers have evaluated the safety and effectiveness of pegaspargase in a study of 118 pediatric patients (ages 1 to 9) with newly diagnosed ALL. The patients were randomized 1:1 to pegaspargase or native E coli L-asparaginase, both as part of combination therapy.

Asparagine depletion (magnitude and duration) was similar between the 2 treatment arms. Event-free survival rates were also similar (about 80% in both arms), but the study was not designed to evaluate differences in event-free survival.

Grade 3/4 adverse events occurring in the pegaspargase and native E coli L-asparaginase arms, respectively, were abnormal liver tests (5% and 8%), elevated transaminases (3% and 7%), hyperbilirubinemia (2% and 2%), hyperglycemia (5% and 3%), central nervous system thrombosis (3% and 3%), coagulopathy (2% and 5%), pancreatitis (2% and 2%), and clinical allergic reactions to asparaginase (2% and 0%).

Previously treated ALL

Researchers have evaluated the effectiveness of pegaspargase in 4 open-label studies of patients with a history of prior clinical allergic reaction to asparaginase. The studies enrolled a total of 42 patients with multiply relapsed acute leukemia (39 with ALL).

Patients received pegaspargase as a single agent or as part of multi-agent chemotherapy. The re-induction response rate was 50%—36% complete responses and 14% partial responses. Three responses occurred in patients who received single-agent pegaspargase.

Adverse event information on pegaspargase in relapsed ALL has been compiled from 5 clinical trials. The studies enrolled a total of 174 patients with relapsed ALL who received pegaspargase as a single agent or as part of combination therapy.

Sixty-two of the patients had prior hypersensitivity reactions to asparaginase, and 112 did not. Allergic reactions to pegaspargase occurred in 32% of previously hypersensitive patients and 10% of non-hypersensitive patients.

The most common adverse events observed in patients who received pegaspargase were clinical allergic reactions, elevated transaminases, hyperbilirubinemia, and coagulopathies.

The most common serious adverse events due to pegaspargase were thrombosis (4%), hyperglycemia requiring insulin therapy (3%), and pancreatitis (1%).

For more details on these trials and pegaspargase in general, see the product information.

Micrograph showing ALL

The European Commission has granted marketing authorization for pegaspargase (Oncaspar) to be used as part of combination antineoplastic therapy for pediatric and adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

The approval means the drug can be marketed for this indication in the 28 member countries of the European Union (EU), as well as Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway.

Pegaspargase was already approved for use in Argentina, Belarus, Germany, Kazakhstan, Poland, Russia, Ukraine, and the US.

“Oncaspar has been used as an integral component of the treatment regimen for pediatric and adult patients with ALL for many years, in Europe and worldwide,” said Martin Schrappe, of Schleswig-Holstein University Hospital in Kiel, Germany.

“Today’s marketing authorization will ensure that more patients across the EU will benefit from access to Oncaspar as part of a standard of care regimen.”

The drug is being developed by Baxalta Incorporated.

First-line ALL

Researchers have evaluated the safety and effectiveness of pegaspargase in a study of 118 pediatric patients (ages 1 to 9) with newly diagnosed ALL. The patients were randomized 1:1 to pegaspargase or native E coli L-asparaginase, both as part of combination therapy.

Asparagine depletion (magnitude and duration) was similar between the 2 treatment arms. Event-free survival rates were also similar (about 80% in both arms), but the study was not designed to evaluate differences in event-free survival.

Grade 3/4 adverse events occurring in the pegaspargase and native E coli L-asparaginase arms, respectively, were abnormal liver tests (5% and 8%), elevated transaminases (3% and 7%), hyperbilirubinemia (2% and 2%), hyperglycemia (5% and 3%), central nervous system thrombosis (3% and 3%), coagulopathy (2% and 5%), pancreatitis (2% and 2%), and clinical allergic reactions to asparaginase (2% and 0%).

Previously treated ALL

Researchers have evaluated the effectiveness of pegaspargase in 4 open-label studies of patients with a history of prior clinical allergic reaction to asparaginase. The studies enrolled a total of 42 patients with multiply relapsed acute leukemia (39 with ALL).

Patients received pegaspargase as a single agent or as part of multi-agent chemotherapy. The re-induction response rate was 50%—36% complete responses and 14% partial responses. Three responses occurred in patients who received single-agent pegaspargase.

Adverse event information on pegaspargase in relapsed ALL has been compiled from 5 clinical trials. The studies enrolled a total of 174 patients with relapsed ALL who received pegaspargase as a single agent or as part of combination therapy.

Sixty-two of the patients had prior hypersensitivity reactions to asparaginase, and 112 did not. Allergic reactions to pegaspargase occurred in 32% of previously hypersensitive patients and 10% of non-hypersensitive patients.

The most common adverse events observed in patients who received pegaspargase were clinical allergic reactions, elevated transaminases, hyperbilirubinemia, and coagulopathies.

The most common serious adverse events due to pegaspargase were thrombosis (4%), hyperglycemia requiring insulin therapy (3%), and pancreatitis (1%).

For more details on these trials and pegaspargase in general, see the product information.

Micrograph showing ALL

The European Commission has granted marketing authorization for pegaspargase (Oncaspar) to be used as part of combination antineoplastic therapy for pediatric and adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

The approval means the drug can be marketed for this indication in the 28 member countries of the European Union (EU), as well as Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway.

Pegaspargase was already approved for use in Argentina, Belarus, Germany, Kazakhstan, Poland, Russia, Ukraine, and the US.

“Oncaspar has been used as an integral component of the treatment regimen for pediatric and adult patients with ALL for many years, in Europe and worldwide,” said Martin Schrappe, of Schleswig-Holstein University Hospital in Kiel, Germany.

“Today’s marketing authorization will ensure that more patients across the EU will benefit from access to Oncaspar as part of a standard of care regimen.”

The drug is being developed by Baxalta Incorporated.

First-line ALL

Researchers have evaluated the safety and effectiveness of pegaspargase in a study of 118 pediatric patients (ages 1 to 9) with newly diagnosed ALL. The patients were randomized 1:1 to pegaspargase or native E coli L-asparaginase, both as part of combination therapy.

Asparagine depletion (magnitude and duration) was similar between the 2 treatment arms. Event-free survival rates were also similar (about 80% in both arms), but the study was not designed to evaluate differences in event-free survival.

Grade 3/4 adverse events occurring in the pegaspargase and native E coli L-asparaginase arms, respectively, were abnormal liver tests (5% and 8%), elevated transaminases (3% and 7%), hyperbilirubinemia (2% and 2%), hyperglycemia (5% and 3%), central nervous system thrombosis (3% and 3%), coagulopathy (2% and 5%), pancreatitis (2% and 2%), and clinical allergic reactions to asparaginase (2% and 0%).

Previously treated ALL

Researchers have evaluated the effectiveness of pegaspargase in 4 open-label studies of patients with a history of prior clinical allergic reaction to asparaginase. The studies enrolled a total of 42 patients with multiply relapsed acute leukemia (39 with ALL).

Patients received pegaspargase as a single agent or as part of multi-agent chemotherapy. The re-induction response rate was 50%—36% complete responses and 14% partial responses. Three responses occurred in patients who received single-agent pegaspargase.

Adverse event information on pegaspargase in relapsed ALL has been compiled from 5 clinical trials. The studies enrolled a total of 174 patients with relapsed ALL who received pegaspargase as a single agent or as part of combination therapy.

Sixty-two of the patients had prior hypersensitivity reactions to asparaginase, and 112 did not. Allergic reactions to pegaspargase occurred in 32% of previously hypersensitive patients and 10% of non-hypersensitive patients.

The most common adverse events observed in patients who received pegaspargase were clinical allergic reactions, elevated transaminases, hyperbilirubinemia, and coagulopathies.

The most common serious adverse events due to pegaspargase were thrombosis (4%), hyperglycemia requiring insulin therapy (3%), and pancreatitis (1%).

For more details on these trials and pegaspargase in general, see the product information.

Micrograph showing CLL

Image by Mary Ann Thompson

Despite previous safety concerns, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted priority review for the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax.

The FDA is reviewing the drug as a potential treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), including those with 17p deletion, who have received at least 1 prior therapy.

A priority review designation is granted to drugs thought to have the potential to provide significant improvements in the treatment, prevention, or diagnosis of a disease.

The designation means the FDA’s goal is to take action on a drug application within 6 months, compared to 10 months under standard review.

Venetoclax has proven active against CLL and other hematologic malignancies, but it is known to induce tumor lysis syndrome (TLS). In fact, TLS-related deaths temporarily halted enrollment in trials of venetoclax. But researchers discovered ways to reduce the risk of TLS, and the trials continued.

Venetoclax received breakthrough therapy designation from the FDA last year for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory CLL and 17p deletion. This designation is designed to expedite the development and review of medicines intended to treat serious or life-threatening diseases.

The new drug application for venetoclax is based, in part, on data from the phase 2 M13-982 study, which were just presented at the 2015 ASH Annual Meeting.

Phase 2 trial

M13-982 is an open-label, single-arm, multicenter study in which researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of venetoclax in patients with relapsed, refractory, or previously untreated CLL with 17p deletion.

The study included 107 patients with relapsed or refractory disease, and all but 1 had 17p deletion. An additional 50 patients with relapsed, refractory, or previously untreated disease have been enrolled in the safety expansion cohort.

The primary endpoint of the study is overall response rate as determined by an independent review committee, and secondary endpoints include complete response, partial response, duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. The level of minimal residual disease (MRD) in peripheral blood and/or bone marrow was assessed in a subset of patients.

The study met its primary endpoint, with an overall response rate of 79.4% among the 107 patients with relapsed or refractory disease. In addition, 7.5% of patients achieved a complete response, with or without complete recovery of blood counts in the bone marrow.

Forty-five patients had an assessment for MRD in the blood. Of these, 18 patients achieved MRD-negativity. Ten of these 18 patients also had bone marrow assessments, and 6 were MRD-negative.

At 1 year, 84.7% of all responses and 94.4% of MRD-negative responses were maintained. The 1-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 72% and 86.7%, respectively.

The most common serious adverse events were pyrexia (7%), autoimmune hemolytic anemia (7%), pneumonia (6%), and febrile neutropenia (5%). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (40%), infection (20%), anemia (18%), and thrombocytopenia (15%).

Laboratory TLS was reported in 5 patients. None had clinical consequences.

Venetoclax is under development by AbbVie and Genentech/Roche.

Micrograph showing CLL

Image by Mary Ann Thompson

Despite previous safety concerns, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted priority review for the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax.

The FDA is reviewing the drug as a potential treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), including those with 17p deletion, who have received at least 1 prior therapy.

A priority review designation is granted to drugs thought to have the potential to provide significant improvements in the treatment, prevention, or diagnosis of a disease.

The designation means the FDA’s goal is to take action on a drug application within 6 months, compared to 10 months under standard review.

Venetoclax has proven active against CLL and other hematologic malignancies, but it is known to induce tumor lysis syndrome (TLS). In fact, TLS-related deaths temporarily halted enrollment in trials of venetoclax. But researchers discovered ways to reduce the risk of TLS, and the trials continued.

Venetoclax received breakthrough therapy designation from the FDA last year for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory CLL and 17p deletion. This designation is designed to expedite the development and review of medicines intended to treat serious or life-threatening diseases.

The new drug application for venetoclax is based, in part, on data from the phase 2 M13-982 study, which were just presented at the 2015 ASH Annual Meeting.

Phase 2 trial

M13-982 is an open-label, single-arm, multicenter study in which researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of venetoclax in patients with relapsed, refractory, or previously untreated CLL with 17p deletion.

The study included 107 patients with relapsed or refractory disease, and all but 1 had 17p deletion. An additional 50 patients with relapsed, refractory, or previously untreated disease have been enrolled in the safety expansion cohort.

The primary endpoint of the study is overall response rate as determined by an independent review committee, and secondary endpoints include complete response, partial response, duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. The level of minimal residual disease (MRD) in peripheral blood and/or bone marrow was assessed in a subset of patients.

The study met its primary endpoint, with an overall response rate of 79.4% among the 107 patients with relapsed or refractory disease. In addition, 7.5% of patients achieved a complete response, with or without complete recovery of blood counts in the bone marrow.

Forty-five patients had an assessment for MRD in the blood. Of these, 18 patients achieved MRD-negativity. Ten of these 18 patients also had bone marrow assessments, and 6 were MRD-negative.

At 1 year, 84.7% of all responses and 94.4% of MRD-negative responses were maintained. The 1-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 72% and 86.7%, respectively.

The most common serious adverse events were pyrexia (7%), autoimmune hemolytic anemia (7%), pneumonia (6%), and febrile neutropenia (5%). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (40%), infection (20%), anemia (18%), and thrombocytopenia (15%).

Laboratory TLS was reported in 5 patients. None had clinical consequences.

Venetoclax is under development by AbbVie and Genentech/Roche.

Micrograph showing CLL

Image by Mary Ann Thompson

Despite previous safety concerns, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted priority review for the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax.

The FDA is reviewing the drug as a potential treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), including those with 17p deletion, who have received at least 1 prior therapy.

A priority review designation is granted to drugs thought to have the potential to provide significant improvements in the treatment, prevention, or diagnosis of a disease.

The designation means the FDA’s goal is to take action on a drug application within 6 months, compared to 10 months under standard review.

Venetoclax has proven active against CLL and other hematologic malignancies, but it is known to induce tumor lysis syndrome (TLS). In fact, TLS-related deaths temporarily halted enrollment in trials of venetoclax. But researchers discovered ways to reduce the risk of TLS, and the trials continued.

Venetoclax received breakthrough therapy designation from the FDA last year for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory CLL and 17p deletion. This designation is designed to expedite the development and review of medicines intended to treat serious or life-threatening diseases.

The new drug application for venetoclax is based, in part, on data from the phase 2 M13-982 study, which were just presented at the 2015 ASH Annual Meeting.

Phase 2 trial

M13-982 is an open-label, single-arm, multicenter study in which researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of venetoclax in patients with relapsed, refractory, or previously untreated CLL with 17p deletion.

The study included 107 patients with relapsed or refractory disease, and all but 1 had 17p deletion. An additional 50 patients with relapsed, refractory, or previously untreated disease have been enrolled in the safety expansion cohort.

The primary endpoint of the study is overall response rate as determined by an independent review committee, and secondary endpoints include complete response, partial response, duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. The level of minimal residual disease (MRD) in peripheral blood and/or bone marrow was assessed in a subset of patients.

The study met its primary endpoint, with an overall response rate of 79.4% among the 107 patients with relapsed or refractory disease. In addition, 7.5% of patients achieved a complete response, with or without complete recovery of blood counts in the bone marrow.

Forty-five patients had an assessment for MRD in the blood. Of these, 18 patients achieved MRD-negativity. Ten of these 18 patients also had bone marrow assessments, and 6 were MRD-negative.

At 1 year, 84.7% of all responses and 94.4% of MRD-negative responses were maintained. The 1-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 72% and 86.7%, respectively.

The most common serious adverse events were pyrexia (7%), autoimmune hemolytic anemia (7%), pneumonia (6%), and febrile neutropenia (5%). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (40%), infection (20%), anemia (18%), and thrombocytopenia (15%).

Laboratory TLS was reported in 5 patients. None had clinical consequences.

Venetoclax is under development by AbbVie and Genentech/Roche.

Sickled and normal

red blood cells

Image by Graham Beards

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted orphan drug designation for the small molecule GBT440 to treat patients with sickle cell disease (SCD).

GBT440 is being developed as a potentially disease-modifying therapy for SCD. The drug works by increasing hemoglobin’s affinity for oxygen.

Since oxygenated sickle hemoglobin does not polymerize, it is believed that GBT440 blocks polymerization and the resultant sickling of red blood cells.

If GBT440 can restore normal hemoglobin function and improve oxygen delivery, the drug may be capable of modifying the progression of SCD.

“Receiving orphan drug designation, along with the previously announced fast track designation, are important milestones in our regulatory strategy for GBT440 and highlight the FDA’s agreement that the SCD community faces a critical need for new treatments,” said Ted W. Love, MD, chief executive officer of Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc., the company developing GBT440.

The FDA grants orphan designation to drugs that are intended to treat diseases or conditions affecting fewer than 200,000 patients in the US. The designation provides the drug’s sponsor with various development incentives, including opportunities to apply for research-related tax credits and grant funding, assistance in designing clinical trials, and 7 years of US market exclusivity if the drug is approved.

The FDA grants fast track designation to facilitate and expedite the development and review of new drugs intended to treat serious or life-threatening conditions and address unmet medical need. Through the fast track program, a drug may be eligible for priority review and rolling review, and the company developing the drug may receive additional help from the FDA to expedite development.

GBT440 trial

Early results from an ongoing phase 1/2 study of GBT440 were presented at the 2015 ASH Annual Meeting last month (abstract 542*).

The trial, which includes healthy subjects and patients with SCD, is being conducted in 2 parts: part A (single-dose administration) and part B (multiple-dose administration, daily for 15 days in healthy subjects and 28 days in SCD patients).

As of November 20, 2015, 8 SCD patients completed part A, and 30 SCD patients had either completed or were ongoing in part B.

Of the 30 SCD patients, 16 patients completed 700 mg daily dosing and follow-up (12 on GBT440 and 4 on placebo), and 14 patients completed or were ongoing at 500 mg daily dosing and follow-up (10 on GBT440 and 4 on placebo). A cohort of SCD patients on 1000 mg per day for 28 days is currently enrolling.

Thus far, GBT440 treatment has conferred several improvements from baseline to day 28.

Hemoglobin increases were evident by day 4 of treatment. And the researchers observed absolute hemoglobin increases of 0.5 and 0.7 g/dL with GBT440 at 500 and 700 mg, respectively, compared with a 0.1 g/dL decrease with placebo.

The median reticulocyte count decreased by 31% and 37% with GBT440 at 500 and 700 mg, respectively, compared with a 7% increase with placebo, indicating that the hemoglobin rise is due to decreased hemolysis.

Median erythropoietin levels decreased by 9 and 18 mU/mL with GBT440 at 500 and 700 mg, respectively, compared with an increase of 28 mU/mL with placebo.

Median unconjugated bilirubin levels decrease by 31% and 43% with GBT440 at 500 mg and 700 mg, respectively, compared with an increase of 2% with placebo.

Median lactate dehydrogenase levels decreased by 20% and 12% with GBT440 at 500 and 700 mg, respectively, compared with a decrease of 7% with placebo.

Median sickle cell counts decreased by 56% and 46% with GBT440 at 500 and 700 mg, respectively, compared with a 14% increase with placebo.

The researchers noted high inter- and intra-patient variability in circulating sickle cell counts.

They said inflammatory soluble adhesion molecules for the 700 mg dose cohort showed promising trends in improvement. The median P-selectin decreased 19%, compared with an increase of 20% with placebo. And the median ICAM-1 decreased 6%, compared with an increase of 33% in placebo. Data for the 500 mg dose cohort has not yet been analyzed.

The researchers said pharmacokinetic data demonstrated linear and dose-proportional properties, with a half-life amenable to once-daily dosing.

And GBT440 was well tolerated over the 28 days of dosing. None of the SCD patients discontinued GBT440. The most common adverse event was headache, and there have been no serious adverse events thought to be drug-related.

“We continue to believe that GBT440 has the potential to become the first mechanism-based and disease-modifying therapeutic for this grievous disease and look forward to sharing full results from our phase 1/2 trial and potentially initiating a pivotal trial in adult patients with SCD in 2016,” Dr Love said.

*Data in the abstract differ from the presentation.

Sickled and normal

red blood cells

Image by Graham Beards

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted orphan drug designation for the small molecule GBT440 to treat patients with sickle cell disease (SCD).

GBT440 is being developed as a potentially disease-modifying therapy for SCD. The drug works by increasing hemoglobin’s affinity for oxygen.

Since oxygenated sickle hemoglobin does not polymerize, it is believed that GBT440 blocks polymerization and the resultant sickling of red blood cells.

If GBT440 can restore normal hemoglobin function and improve oxygen delivery, the drug may be capable of modifying the progression of SCD.

“Receiving orphan drug designation, along with the previously announced fast track designation, are important milestones in our regulatory strategy for GBT440 and highlight the FDA’s agreement that the SCD community faces a critical need for new treatments,” said Ted W. Love, MD, chief executive officer of Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc., the company developing GBT440.

The FDA grants orphan designation to drugs that are intended to treat diseases or conditions affecting fewer than 200,000 patients in the US. The designation provides the drug’s sponsor with various development incentives, including opportunities to apply for research-related tax credits and grant funding, assistance in designing clinical trials, and 7 years of US market exclusivity if the drug is approved.

The FDA grants fast track designation to facilitate and expedite the development and review of new drugs intended to treat serious or life-threatening conditions and address unmet medical need. Through the fast track program, a drug may be eligible for priority review and rolling review, and the company developing the drug may receive additional help from the FDA to expedite development.

GBT440 trial

Early results from an ongoing phase 1/2 study of GBT440 were presented at the 2015 ASH Annual Meeting last month (abstract 542*).

The trial, which includes healthy subjects and patients with SCD, is being conducted in 2 parts: part A (single-dose administration) and part B (multiple-dose administration, daily for 15 days in healthy subjects and 28 days in SCD patients).

As of November 20, 2015, 8 SCD patients completed part A, and 30 SCD patients had either completed or were ongoing in part B.

Of the 30 SCD patients, 16 patients completed 700 mg daily dosing and follow-up (12 on GBT440 and 4 on placebo), and 14 patients completed or were ongoing at 500 mg daily dosing and follow-up (10 on GBT440 and 4 on placebo). A cohort of SCD patients on 1000 mg per day for 28 days is currently enrolling.

Thus far, GBT440 treatment has conferred several improvements from baseline to day 28.

Hemoglobin increases were evident by day 4 of treatment. And the researchers observed absolute hemoglobin increases of 0.5 and 0.7 g/dL with GBT440 at 500 and 700 mg, respectively, compared with a 0.1 g/dL decrease with placebo.

The median reticulocyte count decreased by 31% and 37% with GBT440 at 500 and 700 mg, respectively, compared with a 7% increase with placebo, indicating that the hemoglobin rise is due to decreased hemolysis.

Median erythropoietin levels decreased by 9 and 18 mU/mL with GBT440 at 500 and 700 mg, respectively, compared with an increase of 28 mU/mL with placebo.

Median unconjugated bilirubin levels decrease by 31% and 43% with GBT440 at 500 mg and 700 mg, respectively, compared with an increase of 2% with placebo.

Median lactate dehydrogenase levels decreased by 20% and 12% with GBT440 at 500 and 700 mg, respectively, compared with a decrease of 7% with placebo.

Median sickle cell counts decreased by 56% and 46% with GBT440 at 500 and 700 mg, respectively, compared with a 14% increase with placebo.

The researchers noted high inter- and intra-patient variability in circulating sickle cell counts.

They said inflammatory soluble adhesion molecules for the 700 mg dose cohort showed promising trends in improvement. The median P-selectin decreased 19%, compared with an increase of 20% with placebo. And the median ICAM-1 decreased 6%, compared with an increase of 33% in placebo. Data for the 500 mg dose cohort has not yet been analyzed.

The researchers said pharmacokinetic data demonstrated linear and dose-proportional properties, with a half-life amenable to once-daily dosing.

And GBT440 was well tolerated over the 28 days of dosing. None of the SCD patients discontinued GBT440. The most common adverse event was headache, and there have been no serious adverse events thought to be drug-related.

“We continue to believe that GBT440 has the potential to become the first mechanism-based and disease-modifying therapeutic for this grievous disease and look forward to sharing full results from our phase 1/2 trial and potentially initiating a pivotal trial in adult patients with SCD in 2016,” Dr Love said.

*Data in the abstract differ from the presentation.

Sickled and normal

red blood cells

Image by Graham Beards

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted orphan drug designation for the small molecule GBT440 to treat patients with sickle cell disease (SCD).

GBT440 is being developed as a potentially disease-modifying therapy for SCD. The drug works by increasing hemoglobin’s affinity for oxygen.

Since oxygenated sickle hemoglobin does not polymerize, it is believed that GBT440 blocks polymerization and the resultant sickling of red blood cells.

If GBT440 can restore normal hemoglobin function and improve oxygen delivery, the drug may be capable of modifying the progression of SCD.

“Receiving orphan drug designation, along with the previously announced fast track designation, are important milestones in our regulatory strategy for GBT440 and highlight the FDA’s agreement that the SCD community faces a critical need for new treatments,” said Ted W. Love, MD, chief executive officer of Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc., the company developing GBT440.

The FDA grants orphan designation to drugs that are intended to treat diseases or conditions affecting fewer than 200,000 patients in the US. The designation provides the drug’s sponsor with various development incentives, including opportunities to apply for research-related tax credits and grant funding, assistance in designing clinical trials, and 7 years of US market exclusivity if the drug is approved.

The FDA grants fast track designation to facilitate and expedite the development and review of new drugs intended to treat serious or life-threatening conditions and address unmet medical need. Through the fast track program, a drug may be eligible for priority review and rolling review, and the company developing the drug may receive additional help from the FDA to expedite development.

GBT440 trial

Early results from an ongoing phase 1/2 study of GBT440 were presented at the 2015 ASH Annual Meeting last month (abstract 542*).

The trial, which includes healthy subjects and patients with SCD, is being conducted in 2 parts: part A (single-dose administration) and part B (multiple-dose administration, daily for 15 days in healthy subjects and 28 days in SCD patients).

As of November 20, 2015, 8 SCD patients completed part A, and 30 SCD patients had either completed or were ongoing in part B.

Of the 30 SCD patients, 16 patients completed 700 mg daily dosing and follow-up (12 on GBT440 and 4 on placebo), and 14 patients completed or were ongoing at 500 mg daily dosing and follow-up (10 on GBT440 and 4 on placebo). A cohort of SCD patients on 1000 mg per day for 28 days is currently enrolling.

Thus far, GBT440 treatment has conferred several improvements from baseline to day 28.

Hemoglobin increases were evident by day 4 of treatment. And the researchers observed absolute hemoglobin increases of 0.5 and 0.7 g/dL with GBT440 at 500 and 700 mg, respectively, compared with a 0.1 g/dL decrease with placebo.

The median reticulocyte count decreased by 31% and 37% with GBT440 at 500 and 700 mg, respectively, compared with a 7% increase with placebo, indicating that the hemoglobin rise is due to decreased hemolysis.

Median erythropoietin levels decreased by 9 and 18 mU/mL with GBT440 at 500 and 700 mg, respectively, compared with an increase of 28 mU/mL with placebo.

Median unconjugated bilirubin levels decrease by 31% and 43% with GBT440 at 500 mg and 700 mg, respectively, compared with an increase of 2% with placebo.

Median lactate dehydrogenase levels decreased by 20% and 12% with GBT440 at 500 and 700 mg, respectively, compared with a decrease of 7% with placebo.

Median sickle cell counts decreased by 56% and 46% with GBT440 at 500 and 700 mg, respectively, compared with a 14% increase with placebo.

The researchers noted high inter- and intra-patient variability in circulating sickle cell counts.

They said inflammatory soluble adhesion molecules for the 700 mg dose cohort showed promising trends in improvement. The median P-selectin decreased 19%, compared with an increase of 20% with placebo. And the median ICAM-1 decreased 6%, compared with an increase of 33% in placebo. Data for the 500 mg dose cohort has not yet been analyzed.

The researchers said pharmacokinetic data demonstrated linear and dose-proportional properties, with a half-life amenable to once-daily dosing.

And GBT440 was well tolerated over the 28 days of dosing. None of the SCD patients discontinued GBT440. The most common adverse event was headache, and there have been no serious adverse events thought to be drug-related.

“We continue to believe that GBT440 has the potential to become the first mechanism-based and disease-modifying therapeutic for this grievous disease and look forward to sharing full results from our phase 1/2 trial and potentially initiating a pivotal trial in adult patients with SCD in 2016,” Dr Love said.

*Data in the abstract differ from the presentation.

Antihemophilic factor

The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has recommended BAY 81-8973, a recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) compound, for approval in the European Union.

BAY 81-8973 is an unmodified, full-length, recombinant FVIII compound intended for the treatment and prophylaxis of bleeding in hemophilia A patients of all ages.

The CHMP’s recommendation has been relayed to the European Commission, which is expected to make a decision regarding BAY 81-8973 in the coming weeks.

If approved, BAY 81-8973 will be marketed for the aforementioned indication in the 28 member countries of the European Union, as well as Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway.

The CHMP’s recommendation is based on results from the LEOPOLD trials, which were presented at the National Hemophilia Foundation’s 67th Annual Meeting last August.

LEOPOLD trials

The LEOPOLD Clinical Development Program consists of 3 multinational clinical trials designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of BAY 81-8973 in subjects with severe hemophilia A (<1% FVIII:C).

LEOPOLD I is an open-label, cross-over, phase 3 study of males ages 12 to 65. The objectives were to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of BAY 81-8973 when used as prophylaxis, for the treatment of bleeding episodes, and for maintaining hemostasis during surgery. In LEOPOLD I, investigators assigned subjects to either the 2- or 3-times-weekly dosing regimens based on each patient’s phenotype, prior bleeding history and other factors.

LEOPOLD II is a randomized, cross-over, open-label trial conducted in male subjects ages 12 to 65. In this phase 3 study, 80 subjects were randomized to receive BAY 81-8973 either as a low-dose prophylaxis regimen (20-30 IU/kg; n=28) twice per week, high-dose prophylaxis (30-40 IU/kg; n=31) 3 times a week, or on-demand (n=21).

The primary objective was to demonstrate the superiority of prophylaxis over on-demand therapy, with the primary endpoint being bleeding frequency at 12 months.

LEOPOLD Kids is an open-label, non-randomized, phase 3 study. Part A is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BAY 81-8973 for prophylaxis, treatment of bleeds, and surgical management in previously treated children at least 12 years of age with twice or 3 times per week or every other day prophylaxis regimens. Part B of the study, which involves previously untreated patients, is ongoing.

Bayer HealthCare AG has submitted marketing applications for BAY 81-8973 in the US and several other countries and is pursuing regulatory approvals worldwide.

Antihemophilic factor

The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has recommended BAY 81-8973, a recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) compound, for approval in the European Union.

BAY 81-8973 is an unmodified, full-length, recombinant FVIII compound intended for the treatment and prophylaxis of bleeding in hemophilia A patients of all ages.

The CHMP’s recommendation has been relayed to the European Commission, which is expected to make a decision regarding BAY 81-8973 in the coming weeks.

If approved, BAY 81-8973 will be marketed for the aforementioned indication in the 28 member countries of the European Union, as well as Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway.

The CHMP’s recommendation is based on results from the LEOPOLD trials, which were presented at the National Hemophilia Foundation’s 67th Annual Meeting last August.

LEOPOLD trials

The LEOPOLD Clinical Development Program consists of 3 multinational clinical trials designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of BAY 81-8973 in subjects with severe hemophilia A (<1% FVIII:C).

LEOPOLD I is an open-label, cross-over, phase 3 study of males ages 12 to 65. The objectives were to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of BAY 81-8973 when used as prophylaxis, for the treatment of bleeding episodes, and for maintaining hemostasis during surgery. In LEOPOLD I, investigators assigned subjects to either the 2- or 3-times-weekly dosing regimens based on each patient’s phenotype, prior bleeding history and other factors.

LEOPOLD II is a randomized, cross-over, open-label trial conducted in male subjects ages 12 to 65. In this phase 3 study, 80 subjects were randomized to receive BAY 81-8973 either as a low-dose prophylaxis regimen (20-30 IU/kg; n=28) twice per week, high-dose prophylaxis (30-40 IU/kg; n=31) 3 times a week, or on-demand (n=21).

The primary objective was to demonstrate the superiority of prophylaxis over on-demand therapy, with the primary endpoint being bleeding frequency at 12 months.

LEOPOLD Kids is an open-label, non-randomized, phase 3 study. Part A is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BAY 81-8973 for prophylaxis, treatment of bleeds, and surgical management in previously treated children at least 12 years of age with twice or 3 times per week or every other day prophylaxis regimens. Part B of the study, which involves previously untreated patients, is ongoing.

Bayer HealthCare AG has submitted marketing applications for BAY 81-8973 in the US and several other countries and is pursuing regulatory approvals worldwide.

Antihemophilic factor

The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has recommended BAY 81-8973, a recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) compound, for approval in the European Union.

BAY 81-8973 is an unmodified, full-length, recombinant FVIII compound intended for the treatment and prophylaxis of bleeding in hemophilia A patients of all ages.

The CHMP’s recommendation has been relayed to the European Commission, which is expected to make a decision regarding BAY 81-8973 in the coming weeks.

If approved, BAY 81-8973 will be marketed for the aforementioned indication in the 28 member countries of the European Union, as well as Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway.

The CHMP’s recommendation is based on results from the LEOPOLD trials, which were presented at the National Hemophilia Foundation’s 67th Annual Meeting last August.

LEOPOLD trials

The LEOPOLD Clinical Development Program consists of 3 multinational clinical trials designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of BAY 81-8973 in subjects with severe hemophilia A (<1% FVIII:C).

LEOPOLD I is an open-label, cross-over, phase 3 study of males ages 12 to 65. The objectives were to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of BAY 81-8973 when used as prophylaxis, for the treatment of bleeding episodes, and for maintaining hemostasis during surgery. In LEOPOLD I, investigators assigned subjects to either the 2- or 3-times-weekly dosing regimens based on each patient’s phenotype, prior bleeding history and other factors.

LEOPOLD II is a randomized, cross-over, open-label trial conducted in male subjects ages 12 to 65. In this phase 3 study, 80 subjects were randomized to receive BAY 81-8973 either as a low-dose prophylaxis regimen (20-30 IU/kg; n=28) twice per week, high-dose prophylaxis (30-40 IU/kg; n=31) 3 times a week, or on-demand (n=21).

The primary objective was to demonstrate the superiority of prophylaxis over on-demand therapy, with the primary endpoint being bleeding frequency at 12 months.

LEOPOLD Kids is an open-label, non-randomized, phase 3 study. Part A is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BAY 81-8973 for prophylaxis, treatment of bleeds, and surgical management in previously treated children at least 12 years of age with twice or 3 times per week or every other day prophylaxis regimens. Part B of the study, which involves previously untreated patients, is ongoing.

Bayer HealthCare AG has submitted marketing applications for BAY 81-8973 in the US and several other countries and is pursuing regulatory approvals worldwide.

Vials of drug

Photo by Bill Branson

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the use of Bendeka, a liquid, low-volume (50 mL), 10-minute infusion formulation of bendamustine hydrochloride.

Bendeka is now approved to treat patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and patients with indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) that has progressed during or within 6 months of treatment with rituximab or a rituximab-containing regimen.

The FDA previously granted Bendeka orphan drug designation for CLL and indolent B-cell NHL.

Under a license agreement with Eagle Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. is responsible for all US commercial activities for Bendeka.

Teva said it expects to make Bendeka commercially available to prescribers during the first quarter of 2016. For details on the drug, see the full prescribing information.

Teva also markets bendamustine hydrochloride under the trade name Treanda, which is FDA-approved to treat CLL and NHL and is available in 2 formulations:

• A solution of 45 mg/0.5 mL or 180 mg/2 mL in a single-dose vial
• A 25 mg or 100 mg lyophilized powder in a single-dose vial for reconstitution.
  

Vials of drug

Photo by Bill Branson

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the use of Bendeka, a liquid, low-volume (50 mL), 10-minute infusion formulation of bendamustine hydrochloride.

Bendeka is now approved to treat patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and patients with indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) that has progressed during or within 6 months of treatment with rituximab or a rituximab-containing regimen.

The FDA previously granted Bendeka orphan drug designation for CLL and indolent B-cell NHL.

Under a license agreement with Eagle Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. is responsible for all US commercial activities for Bendeka.

Teva said it expects to make Bendeka commercially available to prescribers during the first quarter of 2016. For details on the drug, see the full prescribing information.

Teva also markets bendamustine hydrochloride under the trade name Treanda, which is FDA-approved to treat CLL and NHL and is available in 2 formulations:

• A solution of 45 mg/0.5 mL or 180 mg/2 mL in a single-dose vial
• A 25 mg or 100 mg lyophilized powder in a single-dose vial for reconstitution.
  

Vials of drug

Photo by Bill Branson

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the use of Bendeka, a liquid, low-volume (50 mL), 10-minute infusion formulation of bendamustine hydrochloride.

Bendeka is now approved to treat patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and patients with indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) that has progressed during or within 6 months of treatment with rituximab or a rituximab-containing regimen.

The FDA previously granted Bendeka orphan drug designation for CLL and indolent B-cell NHL.

Under a license agreement with Eagle Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. is responsible for all US commercial activities for Bendeka.

Teva said it expects to make Bendeka commercially available to prescribers during the first quarter of 2016. For details on the drug, see the full prescribing information.

Teva also markets bendamustine hydrochloride under the trade name Treanda, which is FDA-approved to treat CLL and NHL and is available in 2 formulations:

• A solution of 45 mg/0.5 mL or 180 mg/2 mL in a single-dose vial
• A 25 mg or 100 mg lyophilized powder in a single-dose vial for reconstitution.
  

Micrograph showing DLBCL

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted breakthrough designation for the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy KTE-C19 as a treatment for refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), and transformed follicular lymphoma (TFL).

To create KTE-C19, T cells are modified to express a CAR designed to target CD19, a cell-surface protein expressed in B-cell lymphomas and leukemias.

Breakthrough therapy designation is designed to accelerate the development and review of medicines that demonstrate early clinical evidence of a substantial improvement over current treatment options for serious diseases.

The designation conveys all the features of the FDA’s fast track program, as well as more intensive FDA guidance on an efficient drug development program and eligibility for rolling review and priority review.

KTE-C19 research

In a study published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology last year, researchers evaluated KTE-C19 in 15 patients with advanced B-cell malignancies.

The patients received a conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine, followed 1 day later by a single infusion of KTE-C19. The researchers noted that the conditioning regimen is known to be active against B-cell malignancies and could have made a direct contribution to patient responses.

Thirteen patients were evaluable for response. One patient was lost to follow-up because of noncompliance, and 1 died soon after treatment. The researchers said the cause of death was likely cardiac arrhythmia.

The overall response rate was 92%. Eight patients achieved a complete response (CR), and 4 had a partial response (PR).

Of the 7 patients with DLBCL, 4 achieved a CR, 2 achieved a PR, and 1 had stable disease. Three of the CRs were ongoing at the time of publication, with the duration ranging from 9 months to 22 months.

Of the 4 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, 3 had a CR, and 1 had a PR. All 3 CRs were ongoing at the time of publication, with the duration ranging from 14 months to 23 months.

Among the 2 patients with indolent lymphomas, 1 achieved a CR, and 1 had a PR. The duration of the CR was 11 months at the time of publication.

KTE-C19 elicited a number of adverse events, including fever, hypotension, delirium, and other neurologic toxicities. All but 2 patients experienced grade 3/4 adverse events.

Three patients developed unexpected neurologic abnormalities. One patient experienced aphasia and right-sided facial paresis. One patient developed aphasia, confusion, and severe, generalized myoclonus. And 1 patient had aphasia, confusion, hemifacial spasms, apraxia, and gait disturbances.

KTE-C19 is currently under investigation in a phase 2 trial of refractory DLBCL, PMBCL, and TFL (ZUMA-1), a phase 2 trial of relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (ZUMA-2), a phase 1/2 trial of relapsed/refractory adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ZUMA-3), and a phase 1/2 trial of relapsed/refractory pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ZUMA-4).

Data from ZUMA-1 were presented at the 2015 ASH Annual Meeting (abstracts 2730 and 3991).

KTE-C19 is under development by Kite Pharma.

Micrograph showing DLBCL

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted breakthrough designation for the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy KTE-C19 as a treatment for refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), and transformed follicular lymphoma (TFL).

To create KTE-C19, T cells are modified to express a CAR designed to target CD19, a cell-surface protein expressed in B-cell lymphomas and leukemias.

Breakthrough therapy designation is designed to accelerate the development and review of medicines that demonstrate early clinical evidence of a substantial improvement over current treatment options for serious diseases.

The designation conveys all the features of the FDA’s fast track program, as well as more intensive FDA guidance on an efficient drug development program and eligibility for rolling review and priority review.

KTE-C19 research

In a study published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology last year, researchers evaluated KTE-C19 in 15 patients with advanced B-cell malignancies.

The patients received a conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine, followed 1 day later by a single infusion of KTE-C19. The researchers noted that the conditioning regimen is known to be active against B-cell malignancies and could have made a direct contribution to patient responses.

Thirteen patients were evaluable for response. One patient was lost to follow-up because of noncompliance, and 1 died soon after treatment. The researchers said the cause of death was likely cardiac arrhythmia.

The overall response rate was 92%. Eight patients achieved a complete response (CR), and 4 had a partial response (PR).

Of the 7 patients with DLBCL, 4 achieved a CR, 2 achieved a PR, and 1 had stable disease. Three of the CRs were ongoing at the time of publication, with the duration ranging from 9 months to 22 months.

Of the 4 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, 3 had a CR, and 1 had a PR. All 3 CRs were ongoing at the time of publication, with the duration ranging from 14 months to 23 months.

Among the 2 patients with indolent lymphomas, 1 achieved a CR, and 1 had a PR. The duration of the CR was 11 months at the time of publication.

KTE-C19 elicited a number of adverse events, including fever, hypotension, delirium, and other neurologic toxicities. All but 2 patients experienced grade 3/4 adverse events.

Three patients developed unexpected neurologic abnormalities. One patient experienced aphasia and right-sided facial paresis. One patient developed aphasia, confusion, and severe, generalized myoclonus. And 1 patient had aphasia, confusion, hemifacial spasms, apraxia, and gait disturbances.

KTE-C19 is currently under investigation in a phase 2 trial of refractory DLBCL, PMBCL, and TFL (ZUMA-1), a phase 2 trial of relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (ZUMA-2), a phase 1/2 trial of relapsed/refractory adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ZUMA-3), and a phase 1/2 trial of relapsed/refractory pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ZUMA-4).

Data from ZUMA-1 were presented at the 2015 ASH Annual Meeting (abstracts 2730 and 3991).

KTE-C19 is under development by Kite Pharma.

Micrograph showing DLBCL

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted breakthrough designation for the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy KTE-C19 as a treatment for refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), and transformed follicular lymphoma (TFL).

To create KTE-C19, T cells are modified to express a CAR designed to target CD19, a cell-surface protein expressed in B-cell lymphomas and leukemias.

Breakthrough therapy designation is designed to accelerate the development and review of medicines that demonstrate early clinical evidence of a substantial improvement over current treatment options for serious diseases.

The designation conveys all the features of the FDA’s fast track program, as well as more intensive FDA guidance on an efficient drug development program and eligibility for rolling review and priority review.

KTE-C19 research

In a study published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology last year, researchers evaluated KTE-C19 in 15 patients with advanced B-cell malignancies.

The patients received a conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine, followed 1 day later by a single infusion of KTE-C19. The researchers noted that the conditioning regimen is known to be active against B-cell malignancies and could have made a direct contribution to patient responses.

Thirteen patients were evaluable for response. One patient was lost to follow-up because of noncompliance, and 1 died soon after treatment. The researchers said the cause of death was likely cardiac arrhythmia.

The overall response rate was 92%. Eight patients achieved a complete response (CR), and 4 had a partial response (PR).

Of the 7 patients with DLBCL, 4 achieved a CR, 2 achieved a PR, and 1 had stable disease. Three of the CRs were ongoing at the time of publication, with the duration ranging from 9 months to 22 months.

Of the 4 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, 3 had a CR, and 1 had a PR. All 3 CRs were ongoing at the time of publication, with the duration ranging from 14 months to 23 months.

Among the 2 patients with indolent lymphomas, 1 achieved a CR, and 1 had a PR. The duration of the CR was 11 months at the time of publication.

KTE-C19 elicited a number of adverse events, including fever, hypotension, delirium, and other neurologic toxicities. All but 2 patients experienced grade 3/4 adverse events.

Three patients developed unexpected neurologic abnormalities. One patient experienced aphasia and right-sided facial paresis. One patient developed aphasia, confusion, and severe, generalized myoclonus. And 1 patient had aphasia, confusion, hemifacial spasms, apraxia, and gait disturbances.

KTE-C19 is currently under investigation in a phase 2 trial of refractory DLBCL, PMBCL, and TFL (ZUMA-1), a phase 2 trial of relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (ZUMA-2), a phase 1/2 trial of relapsed/refractory adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ZUMA-3), and a phase 1/2 trial of relapsed/refractory pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ZUMA-4).

Data from ZUMA-1 were presented at the 2015 ASH Annual Meeting (abstracts 2730 and 3991).

KTE-C19 is under development by Kite Pharma.

Warfarin tablets

A retrospective study published in The BMJ suggests the possibility of a significant drug interaction between warfarin and the sulfonylureas glipizide and glimepiride.

Taking either of these diabetes drugs in conjunction with warfarin was linked to increased hospitalizations for falls, altered mental state, and insulin shock among patients 65 and older.

Hospital admissions or emergency room visits were nearly 22% higher for patients who were taking warfarin with glipizide or glimepiride, compared to patients taking the diabetes drugs alone.

Clinical references warn doctors of a potential interaction between these drugs, but evidence of it has been thin, according to lead study author John Romley, PhD, of the University of Southern California (USC) in Los Angeles.

He and his colleagues said that, in their study, evidence of the drug-to-drug interaction was clear.

When taken with glipizide or glimepiride, warfarin can intensify their effects and send blood sugar levels crashing. Patients experiencing hypoglycemia may seem drunk, lightheaded, and confused, and are at risk of falling.

“The take-home message is simply that an interaction can occur that has clinical significance, so providers need to be aware in order to prevent a low blood sugar issue from occurring,” said Anne Peters, MD, also of USC.

“Sometimes this means having the patient monitor their blood sugar levels more often. There are many ways to deal with the issue if one is forewarned.”

Pharmacists don’t need to change patient instructions, added Bradley Williams, PharmD, of USC.

“What it does require is for pharmacists and other clinicians to be more vigilant when a sulfonylurea is added to a regimen that includes warfarin, as well as when a patient who is taking both has a change in their medical status,” Dr Williams said.

“I think additional research into the potential interactions between medications for diabetes and warfarin, as well as other drugs that affect blood clotting, is warranted because of the potential consequences of excessive bleeding.”

For the current study, the researchers analyzed a random sample of 465,918 Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes who filled a prescription for glipizide or glimepiride between 2006 and 2011. About 15% of these patients (n=71,895) also filled a prescription for warfarin.

The researchers found that hospital admissions or emergency department visits for hypoglycemia were more common with concurrent warfarin and glipizide/glimepiride use than with glipizide/glimepiride use alone. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) was 1.22.

The risk of hypoglycemia associated with concurrent use was higher among patients taking warfarin for the first time, as well as in patients ages 65 to 74.

Concurrent use of warfarin and glipizide/glimepiride was also associated with hospital admission or emergency department visits for fall-related fractures (AOR=1.47) and altered consciousness/mental status (AOR=1.22).

The researchers said these findings may not be generalizable beyond the elderly Medicare population.

They also noted that their findings could be confounded by some unmeasured characteristics in patients that may be connected to warfarin use or a risk for hypoglycemia. Another limitation of this study is that the researchers did not measure drug use directly.

Warfarin tablets

A retrospective study published in The BMJ suggests the possibility of a significant drug interaction between warfarin and the sulfonylureas glipizide and glimepiride.

Taking either of these diabetes drugs in conjunction with warfarin was linked to increased hospitalizations for falls, altered mental state, and insulin shock among patients 65 and older.

Hospital admissions or emergency room visits were nearly 22% higher for patients who were taking warfarin with glipizide or glimepiride, compared to patients taking the diabetes drugs alone.

Clinical references warn doctors of a potential interaction between these drugs, but evidence of it has been thin, according to lead study author John Romley, PhD, of the University of Southern California (USC) in Los Angeles.

He and his colleagues said that, in their study, evidence of the drug-to-drug interaction was clear.

When taken with glipizide or glimepiride, warfarin can intensify their effects and send blood sugar levels crashing. Patients experiencing hypoglycemia may seem drunk, lightheaded, and confused, and are at risk of falling.

“The take-home message is simply that an interaction can occur that has clinical significance, so providers need to be aware in order to prevent a low blood sugar issue from occurring,” said Anne Peters, MD, also of USC.

“Sometimes this means having the patient monitor their blood sugar levels more often. There are many ways to deal with the issue if one is forewarned.”

Pharmacists don’t need to change patient instructions, added Bradley Williams, PharmD, of USC.

“What it does require is for pharmacists and other clinicians to be more vigilant when a sulfonylurea is added to a regimen that includes warfarin, as well as when a patient who is taking both has a change in their medical status,” Dr Williams said.

“I think additional research into the potential interactions between medications for diabetes and warfarin, as well as other drugs that affect blood clotting, is warranted because of the potential consequences of excessive bleeding.”

For the current study, the researchers analyzed a random sample of 465,918 Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes who filled a prescription for glipizide or glimepiride between 2006 and 2011. About 15% of these patients (n=71,895) also filled a prescription for warfarin.

The researchers found that hospital admissions or emergency department visits for hypoglycemia were more common with concurrent warfarin and glipizide/glimepiride use than with glipizide/glimepiride use alone. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) was 1.22.

The risk of hypoglycemia associated with concurrent use was higher among patients taking warfarin for the first time, as well as in patients ages 65 to 74.

Concurrent use of warfarin and glipizide/glimepiride was also associated with hospital admission or emergency department visits for fall-related fractures (AOR=1.47) and altered consciousness/mental status (AOR=1.22).

The researchers said these findings may not be generalizable beyond the elderly Medicare population.

They also noted that their findings could be confounded by some unmeasured characteristics in patients that may be connected to warfarin use or a risk for hypoglycemia. Another limitation of this study is that the researchers did not measure drug use directly.

Warfarin tablets

A retrospective study published in The BMJ suggests the possibility of a significant drug interaction between warfarin and the sulfonylureas glipizide and glimepiride.

Taking either of these diabetes drugs in conjunction with warfarin was linked to increased hospitalizations for falls, altered mental state, and insulin shock among patients 65 and older.

Hospital admissions or emergency room visits were nearly 22% higher for patients who were taking warfarin with glipizide or glimepiride, compared to patients taking the diabetes drugs alone.

Clinical references warn doctors of a potential interaction between these drugs, but evidence of it has been thin, according to lead study author John Romley, PhD, of the University of Southern California (USC) in Los Angeles.

He and his colleagues said that, in their study, evidence of the drug-to-drug interaction was clear.

When taken with glipizide or glimepiride, warfarin can intensify their effects and send blood sugar levels crashing. Patients experiencing hypoglycemia may seem drunk, lightheaded, and confused, and are at risk of falling.

“The take-home message is simply that an interaction can occur that has clinical significance, so providers need to be aware in order to prevent a low blood sugar issue from occurring,” said Anne Peters, MD, also of USC.

“Sometimes this means having the patient monitor their blood sugar levels more often. There are many ways to deal with the issue if one is forewarned.”

Pharmacists don’t need to change patient instructions, added Bradley Williams, PharmD, of USC.

“What it does require is for pharmacists and other clinicians to be more vigilant when a sulfonylurea is added to a regimen that includes warfarin, as well as when a patient who is taking both has a change in their medical status,” Dr Williams said.

“I think additional research into the potential interactions between medications for diabetes and warfarin, as well as other drugs that affect blood clotting, is warranted because of the potential consequences of excessive bleeding.”

For the current study, the researchers analyzed a random sample of 465,918 Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes who filled a prescription for glipizide or glimepiride between 2006 and 2011. About 15% of these patients (n=71,895) also filled a prescription for warfarin.

The researchers found that hospital admissions or emergency department visits for hypoglycemia were more common with concurrent warfarin and glipizide/glimepiride use than with glipizide/glimepiride use alone. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) was 1.22.

The risk of hypoglycemia associated with concurrent use was higher among patients taking warfarin for the first time, as well as in patients ages 65 to 74.

Concurrent use of warfarin and glipizide/glimepiride was also associated with hospital admission or emergency department visits for fall-related fractures (AOR=1.47) and altered consciousness/mental status (AOR=1.22).

The researchers said these findings may not be generalizable beyond the elderly Medicare population.

They also noted that their findings could be confounded by some unmeasured characteristics in patients that may be connected to warfarin use or a risk for hypoglycemia. Another limitation of this study is that the researchers did not measure drug use directly.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved a recombinant von Willebrand factor product, Vonvendi (formerly BAX 111), for use in adults with von Willebrand disease (VWD).

Vonvendi is the first FDA-approved recombinant von Willebrand factor.

It is now approved for the on-demand treatment and control of bleeding episodes in VWD patients 18 years of age and older.

Vonvendi is expected to be broadly available in the US in late 2016.

Compared to other marketed von Willebrand factor concentrates, Vonvendi contains a more consistent concentration of ultra-large-molecular-weight multimers. And the product is developed using a plasma- and albumin-free manufacturing method.

Vonvendi is the first von Willebrand factor concentrate in the US that contains only trace amounts of factor VIII (FVIII), offering the flexibility to administer FVIII only when needed.

The FDA’s approval of Vonvendi was based on results from a phase 3 trial recently published in Blood. The study included 49 patients with WWD who received Vonvendi with and without recombinant FVIII.

All participants reported successful treatment of bleeding episodes. Most (96.9%) treated bleeds (n=192 bleeds in 22 patients) achieved an “excellent” efficacy rating.

Most bleeds (81.8%) were resolved with a single infusion of Vonvendi, and the treatment had a mean half-life of 21.9 hours.

There were 8 adverse events considered related to Vonvendi, but only 2 of these were serious. One patient experienced 2 simultaneous serious adverse events—chest discomfort and increased heart rate—but these were resolved.

There were no thrombotic events in this trial, no treatment-related binding or neutralizing antibodies against von Willebrand factor, and no neutralizing antibodies against FVIII.

Vonvendi is manufactured by Baxalta Incorporated. Baxalta said it is building a robust clinical development program to optimize patient access to Vonvendi worldwide. A series of clinical programs are planned to evaluate its use for prophylaxis, surgical, and pediatric indications.

Baxalta expects to file for regulatory approvals in Europe in 2017 and in other markets around the world.

For more details on Vonvendi, see the product information.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved a recombinant von Willebrand factor product, Vonvendi (formerly BAX 111), for use in adults with von Willebrand disease (VWD).

Vonvendi is the first FDA-approved recombinant von Willebrand factor.

It is now approved for the on-demand treatment and control of bleeding episodes in VWD patients 18 years of age and older.

Vonvendi is expected to be broadly available in the US in late 2016.

Compared to other marketed von Willebrand factor concentrates, Vonvendi contains a more consistent concentration of ultra-large-molecular-weight multimers. And the product is developed using a plasma- and albumin-free manufacturing method.

Vonvendi is the first von Willebrand factor concentrate in the US that contains only trace amounts of factor VIII (FVIII), offering the flexibility to administer FVIII only when needed.

The FDA’s approval of Vonvendi was based on results from a phase 3 trial recently published in Blood. The study included 49 patients with WWD who received Vonvendi with and without recombinant FVIII.

All participants reported successful treatment of bleeding episodes. Most (96.9%) treated bleeds (n=192 bleeds in 22 patients) achieved an “excellent” efficacy rating.

Most bleeds (81.8%) were resolved with a single infusion of Vonvendi, and the treatment had a mean half-life of 21.9 hours.

There were 8 adverse events considered related to Vonvendi, but only 2 of these were serious. One patient experienced 2 simultaneous serious adverse events—chest discomfort and increased heart rate—but these were resolved.

There were no thrombotic events in this trial, no treatment-related binding or neutralizing antibodies against von Willebrand factor, and no neutralizing antibodies against FVIII.

Vonvendi is manufactured by Baxalta Incorporated. Baxalta said it is building a robust clinical development program to optimize patient access to Vonvendi worldwide. A series of clinical programs are planned to evaluate its use for prophylaxis, surgical, and pediatric indications.

Baxalta expects to file for regulatory approvals in Europe in 2017 and in other markets around the world.

For more details on Vonvendi, see the product information.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved a recombinant von Willebrand factor product, Vonvendi (formerly BAX 111), for use in adults with von Willebrand disease (VWD).

Vonvendi is the first FDA-approved recombinant von Willebrand factor.

It is now approved for the on-demand treatment and control of bleeding episodes in VWD patients 18 years of age and older.

Vonvendi is expected to be broadly available in the US in late 2016.

Compared to other marketed von Willebrand factor concentrates, Vonvendi contains a more consistent concentration of ultra-large-molecular-weight multimers. And the product is developed using a plasma- and albumin-free manufacturing method.

Vonvendi is the first von Willebrand factor concentrate in the US that contains only trace amounts of factor VIII (FVIII), offering the flexibility to administer FVIII only when needed.

The FDA’s approval of Vonvendi was based on results from a phase 3 trial recently published in Blood. The study included 49 patients with WWD who received Vonvendi with and without recombinant FVIII.

All participants reported successful treatment of bleeding episodes. Most (96.9%) treated bleeds (n=192 bleeds in 22 patients) achieved an “excellent” efficacy rating.

Most bleeds (81.8%) were resolved with a single infusion of Vonvendi, and the treatment had a mean half-life of 21.9 hours.

There were 8 adverse events considered related to Vonvendi, but only 2 of these were serious. One patient experienced 2 simultaneous serious adverse events—chest discomfort and increased heart rate—but these were resolved.

There were no thrombotic events in this trial, no treatment-related binding or neutralizing antibodies against von Willebrand factor, and no neutralizing antibodies against FVIII.

Vonvendi is manufactured by Baxalta Incorporated. Baxalta said it is building a robust clinical development program to optimize patient access to Vonvendi worldwide. A series of clinical programs are planned to evaluate its use for prophylaxis, surgical, and pediatric indications.

Baxalta expects to file for regulatory approvals in Europe in 2017 and in other markets around the world.

For more details on Vonvendi, see the product information.

Chemotherapy drugs

Photo by Bill Branson

The price of cancer drugs varies widely between European countries, Australia, and New Zealand, according to a study published in The Lancet Oncology.

The study indicates that, overall, the UK and Mediterranean countries such as Greece, Spain, and Portugal pay the lowest average unit manufacturer prices for a group of 31 originator cancer drugs (new drugs under patent).

And Sweden, Switzerland, and Germany pay the highest prices.

The greatest differences in price were noted for gemcitabine, which costs €209 per vial in New Zealand and €43 in Australia, and zoledronic acid, which costs €330 per vial in New Zealand but €128 in Greece.*

“Public payers in Germany are paying 223% more in terms of official prices for interferon alfa 2b for melanoma and leukemia treatment than those in Greece,” noted study author Sabine Vogler, PhD, of the WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Policies in Vienna, Austria.

“For gefitinib to treat non-small-lung cancer, the price in Germany is 172% higher than in New Zealand.”

To uncover these price differences, Dr Vogler and her colleagues reviewed official drug price data from the Pharma Price Information (PPI) service of the Austrian Public Health Institute for 16 European countries**, and from the pharmaceutical schedules in Australia and New Zealand.

The researchers compared what manufacturers charged for a unit (ie, price per tablet or vial) of 31 originator cancer drugs in June 2013.

None of these drugs had a unit price lower than €10. Four drugs (13%) had an average unit manufacturer price between €250 and €500, and 2 drugs (6%) had an average unit price between €500 and €1000.

Seven drugs (23%) had an average unit price higher than €1000. For example, plerixafor cost over €5000 per injection.

The price differences between the highest- and lowest-priced countries ranged from 28% to 50% for a third of the drugs sampled, between 50% and 100% for half of the drugs, and between 100% and 200% for 3 drugs (10%).

The researchers noted that information on real drug prices is scarce. The cancer drug prices they surveyed did not include confidential discounts such as those agreed upon in managed-entry arrangements that are increasingly used in countries such as Australia, Italy, the UK, and the Netherlands.

“Some high-income countries have managed to barter the manufacturers down to lower prices, but these agreements, including the agreed prices, are confidential,” Dr Vogler explained.

“Although these agreements ensure patient access to new drugs, other countries risk overpaying when setting drug prices through the common practice of external price referencing, or international price comparison, because they can only use the official undiscounted prices as a benchmark. There needs to be far more transparency.”

“We hope that our findings will provide concrete evidence for policymakers to take action to address high prices and ensure more transparency in cancer drug pricing so that costs and access to new drugs does not depend on where a patient lives.”

*Gemcitabine and zoledronic acid have generic versions in several countries, and originator prices were decreased in some countries following patent expiry but not in others.

**Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Finland, France, Italy, Ireland, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the UK.

Chemotherapy drugs

Photo by Bill Branson

The price of cancer drugs varies widely between European countries, Australia, and New Zealand, according to a study published in The Lancet Oncology.

The study indicates that, overall, the UK and Mediterranean countries such as Greece, Spain, and Portugal pay the lowest average unit manufacturer prices for a group of 31 originator cancer drugs (new drugs under patent).

And Sweden, Switzerland, and Germany pay the highest prices.

The greatest differences in price were noted for gemcitabine, which costs €209 per vial in New Zealand and €43 in Australia, and zoledronic acid, which costs €330 per vial in New Zealand but €128 in Greece.*

“Public payers in Germany are paying 223% more in terms of official prices for interferon alfa 2b for melanoma and leukemia treatment than those in Greece,” noted study author Sabine Vogler, PhD, of the WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Policies in Vienna, Austria.

“For gefitinib to treat non-small-lung cancer, the price in Germany is 172% higher than in New Zealand.”

To uncover these price differences, Dr Vogler and her colleagues reviewed official drug price data from the Pharma Price Information (PPI) service of the Austrian Public Health Institute for 16 European countries**, and from the pharmaceutical schedules in Australia and New Zealand.

The researchers compared what manufacturers charged for a unit (ie, price per tablet or vial) of 31 originator cancer drugs in June 2013.

None of these drugs had a unit price lower than €10. Four drugs (13%) had an average unit manufacturer price between €250 and €500, and 2 drugs (6%) had an average unit price between €500 and €1000.

Seven drugs (23%) had an average unit price higher than €1000. For example, plerixafor cost over €5000 per injection.

The price differences between the highest- and lowest-priced countries ranged from 28% to 50% for a third of the drugs sampled, between 50% and 100% for half of the drugs, and between 100% and 200% for 3 drugs (10%).

The researchers noted that information on real drug prices is scarce. The cancer drug prices they surveyed did not include confidential discounts such as those agreed upon in managed-entry arrangements that are increasingly used in countries such as Australia, Italy, the UK, and the Netherlands.

“Some high-income countries have managed to barter the manufacturers down to lower prices, but these agreements, including the agreed prices, are confidential,” Dr Vogler explained.

“Although these agreements ensure patient access to new drugs, other countries risk overpaying when setting drug prices through the common practice of external price referencing, or international price comparison, because they can only use the official undiscounted prices as a benchmark. There needs to be far more transparency.”

“We hope that our findings will provide concrete evidence for policymakers to take action to address high prices and ensure more transparency in cancer drug pricing so that costs and access to new drugs does not depend on where a patient lives.”

*Gemcitabine and zoledronic acid have generic versions in several countries, and originator prices were decreased in some countries following patent expiry but not in others.

**Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Finland, France, Italy, Ireland, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the UK.

Chemotherapy drugs

Photo by Bill Branson

The price of cancer drugs varies widely between European countries, Australia, and New Zealand, according to a study published in The Lancet Oncology.

The study indicates that, overall, the UK and Mediterranean countries such as Greece, Spain, and Portugal pay the lowest average unit manufacturer prices for a group of 31 originator cancer drugs (new drugs under patent).

And Sweden, Switzerland, and Germany pay the highest prices.

The greatest differences in price were noted for gemcitabine, which costs €209 per vial in New Zealand and €43 in Australia, and zoledronic acid, which costs €330 per vial in New Zealand but €128 in Greece.*

“Public payers in Germany are paying 223% more in terms of official prices for interferon alfa 2b for melanoma and leukemia treatment than those in Greece,” noted study author Sabine Vogler, PhD, of the WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Policies in Vienna, Austria.

“For gefitinib to treat non-small-lung cancer, the price in Germany is 172% higher than in New Zealand.”

To uncover these price differences, Dr Vogler and her colleagues reviewed official drug price data from the Pharma Price Information (PPI) service of the Austrian Public Health Institute for 16 European countries**, and from the pharmaceutical schedules in Australia and New Zealand.

The researchers compared what manufacturers charged for a unit (ie, price per tablet or vial) of 31 originator cancer drugs in June 2013.

None of these drugs had a unit price lower than €10. Four drugs (13%) had an average unit manufacturer price between €250 and €500, and 2 drugs (6%) had an average unit price between €500 and €1000.

Seven drugs (23%) had an average unit price higher than €1000. For example, plerixafor cost over €5000 per injection.

The price differences between the highest- and lowest-priced countries ranged from 28% to 50% for a third of the drugs sampled, between 50% and 100% for half of the drugs, and between 100% and 200% for 3 drugs (10%).

The researchers noted that information on real drug prices is scarce. The cancer drug prices they surveyed did not include confidential discounts such as those agreed upon in managed-entry arrangements that are increasingly used in countries such as Australia, Italy, the UK, and the Netherlands.

“Some high-income countries have managed to barter the manufacturers down to lower prices, but these agreements, including the agreed prices, are confidential,” Dr Vogler explained.

“Although these agreements ensure patient access to new drugs, other countries risk overpaying when setting drug prices through the common practice of external price referencing, or international price comparison, because they can only use the official undiscounted prices as a benchmark. There needs to be far more transparency.”

“We hope that our findings will provide concrete evidence for policymakers to take action to address high prices and ensure more transparency in cancer drug pricing so that costs and access to new drugs does not depend on where a patient lives.”

*Gemcitabine and zoledronic acid have generic versions in several countries, and originator prices were decreased in some countries following patent expiry but not in others.

**Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Finland, France, Italy, Ireland, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the UK.

Prescription drugs

Photo by Steven Harbour

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the use of imatinib mesylate, a generic version of Novartis’s Gleevec being developed by a subsidiary of Sun Pharmaceuticals Limited.

Under the terms of a settlement agreement with Novartis, the Sun Pharma subsidiary is allowed to launch its generic imatinib in the US on February 1, 2016.

The drug will be available in 100 mg and 400 mg tablets.

The Sun Pharma subsidiary was the first company to file an abbreviated new drug application for generic imatinib with a para IV certification and is therefore eligible for 180 days of marketing exclusivity in the US.

Sun Pharma’s imatinib mesylate is approved for the following indications:

• Newly diagnosed adult and pediatric patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive chronic myeloid leukemia (Ph+ CML) in chronic phase
• Patients with (Ph+ CML) in blast crisis, accelerated phase, or in chronic phase after failure of interferon-alpha therapy
• Adult patients with relapsed or refractory Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia
• Adult patients with myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative diseases associated with PDGFR gene re-arrangements
• Adult patients with aggressive systemic mastocytosis without the D816V c-Kit mutation or with c-Kit mutational status unknown
•  Adult patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) and/or chronic eosinophilic leukemia (CEL) who have the FIP1L1-PDGFRα fusion kinase and for patients with HES and/or CEL who are FIP1L1- PDGFRα fusion kinase negative or unknown
• Adult patients with unresectable, recurrent and/or metastatic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.

The drug is not approved to treat patients with KIT (CD117)-positive unresectable and/or metastatic malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Prescription drugs

Photo by Steven Harbour

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the use of imatinib mesylate, a generic version of Novartis’s Gleevec being developed by a subsidiary of Sun Pharmaceuticals Limited.

Under the terms of a settlement agreement with Novartis, the Sun Pharma subsidiary is allowed to launch its generic imatinib in the US on February 1, 2016.

The drug will be available in 100 mg and 400 mg tablets.

The Sun Pharma subsidiary was the first company to file an abbreviated new drug application for generic imatinib with a para IV certification and is therefore eligible for 180 days of marketing exclusivity in the US.

Sun Pharma’s imatinib mesylate is approved for the following indications:

• Newly diagnosed adult and pediatric patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive chronic myeloid leukemia (Ph+ CML) in chronic phase
• Patients with (Ph+ CML) in blast crisis, accelerated phase, or in chronic phase after failure of interferon-alpha therapy
• Adult patients with relapsed or refractory Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia
• Adult patients with myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative diseases associated with PDGFR gene re-arrangements
• Adult patients with aggressive systemic mastocytosis without the D816V c-Kit mutation or with c-Kit mutational status unknown
•  Adult patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) and/or chronic eosinophilic leukemia (CEL) who have the FIP1L1-PDGFRα fusion kinase and for patients with HES and/or CEL who are FIP1L1- PDGFRα fusion kinase negative or unknown
• Adult patients with unresectable, recurrent and/or metastatic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.

The drug is not approved to treat patients with KIT (CD117)-positive unresectable and/or metastatic malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Prescription drugs

Photo by Steven Harbour

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the use of imatinib mesylate, a generic version of Novartis’s Gleevec being developed by a subsidiary of Sun Pharmaceuticals Limited.

Under the terms of a settlement agreement with Novartis, the Sun Pharma subsidiary is allowed to launch its generic imatinib in the US on February 1, 2016.

The drug will be available in 100 mg and 400 mg tablets.

The Sun Pharma subsidiary was the first company to file an abbreviated new drug application for generic imatinib with a para IV certification and is therefore eligible for 180 days of marketing exclusivity in the US.

Sun Pharma’s imatinib mesylate is approved for the following indications:

• Newly diagnosed adult and pediatric patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive chronic myeloid leukemia (Ph+ CML) in chronic phase
• Patients with (Ph+ CML) in blast crisis, accelerated phase, or in chronic phase after failure of interferon-alpha therapy
• Adult patients with relapsed or refractory Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia
• Adult patients with myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative diseases associated with PDGFR gene re-arrangements
• Adult patients with aggressive systemic mastocytosis without the D816V c-Kit mutation or with c-Kit mutational status unknown
•  Adult patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) and/or chronic eosinophilic leukemia (CEL) who have the FIP1L1-PDGFRα fusion kinase and for patients with HES and/or CEL who are FIP1L1- PDGFRα fusion kinase negative or unknown
• Adult patients with unresectable, recurrent and/or metastatic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.

The drug is not approved to treat patients with KIT (CD117)-positive unresectable and/or metastatic malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors.