Society News

Is this your first CHEST Annual Meeting? Co-Chair David Zielinski, MD, FCCP, shares some words of wisdom recounting his first experience at CHEST and what first-time attendees can expect from the annual meeting.

My very first CHEST meeting was 10 years ago at CHEST 2011 in Honolulu, Hawaii. I clearly remember my first session being a postgraduate course on Respiratory Management of Neuromuscular Disease and having the opportunity for hands-on teaching with devices and techniques. 

Simulation was unique at medical conferences at that time and has continued to evolve at subsequent CHEST meetings. 

Looking back, what really sticks out about this experience is what it started for me in terms of my career and learning. I was in a session with some of the biggest names in the field—people who I always looked up to as a relatively junior faculty. I was encouraged to get more involved at CHEST and with the committees. It put the bug in my ear. 

A few years later, I started to get involved in the NetWorks. Eventually, I became a faculty member myself alongside these individuals at subsequent CHEST meetings. Meeting these chest medicine professionals also led to more collaborations with them outside of CHEST. 

I never imagined this during my first meeting ten years ago. I have now been back to every meeting but one since that first one.  
The CHEST Annual Meeting has always stood out for its focus on quality clinical teaching, being ahead of the curve on interactivity and adjusting to the audience’s learning needs. 
For me personally, though, the three things that I have always enjoyed are as follows:

Simulation opportunities
One thing that sets apart CHEST 2021 from other conferences is the simulation sessions being offered online. 
These sessions are an opportunity to practice your skills and techniques with some of the best educators anywhere in the world. I have always come out of these sessions impressed. I encourage you to try it at least once.

The fun
From the receptions, the meet-ups, pop-up events, CHEST Challenge, the games… the list goes on: the fun element of CHEST makes it a more immersive atmosphere. When the meeting was solely virtual last year, CHEST still aimed to provide fun and will continue to do the same this year. Challenge your colleagues and new friends to games at the CHEST Player Hub online to see which one of you rises to the top of the leaderboard.

The community
CHEST 2021 (and CHEST the organization) helps you make connections and provides opportunities for leadership involvement. CHEST committees are always looking for leaders at all stages of their careers. Attending satellite meetings, like the NetWork open forums that are occurring online before the meeting starts this year, will allow you to begin networking with those with similar interests to your own and hopefully will spark your interest in getting more involved in the future. 
For many of us at CHEST, the NetWorks were a great place to start, and you can join one in the area that interests you most.  Through my involvement in CHEST, I have become a part of the community, meeting so many other clinicians and educators in my field. I have made great friendships, which keep me coming back every year.

Moving forward 
From the beginning, we have been planning CHEST 2021 so that if we needed to go entirely online, we could do so as seamlessly as possible. With the recent decision to cancel the in-person meeting and go fully online, plans are already underway to make CHEST 2021 just as successful as last year’s meeting. 
We can give you our commitment that your CHEST 2021 experience will live up to being a world-class event that separates itself from other current online offerings. I will be in attendance and hope to see you online.

Start planning your days with the CHEST 2021 Schedule at A Glance at chestmeeting.chestnet.org.

Is this your first CHEST Annual Meeting? Co-Chair David Zielinski, MD, FCCP, shares some words of wisdom recounting his first experience at CHEST and what first-time attendees can expect from the annual meeting.

My very first CHEST meeting was 10 years ago at CHEST 2011 in Honolulu, Hawaii. I clearly remember my first session being a postgraduate course on Respiratory Management of Neuromuscular Disease and having the opportunity for hands-on teaching with devices and techniques. 

Simulation was unique at medical conferences at that time and has continued to evolve at subsequent CHEST meetings. 

Looking back, what really sticks out about this experience is what it started for me in terms of my career and learning. I was in a session with some of the biggest names in the field—people who I always looked up to as a relatively junior faculty. I was encouraged to get more involved at CHEST and with the committees. It put the bug in my ear. 

A few years later, I started to get involved in the NetWorks. Eventually, I became a faculty member myself alongside these individuals at subsequent CHEST meetings. Meeting these chest medicine professionals also led to more collaborations with them outside of CHEST. 

I never imagined this during my first meeting ten years ago. I have now been back to every meeting but one since that first one.  
The CHEST Annual Meeting has always stood out for its focus on quality clinical teaching, being ahead of the curve on interactivity and adjusting to the audience’s learning needs. 
For me personally, though, the three things that I have always enjoyed are as follows:

Simulation opportunities
One thing that sets apart CHEST 2021 from other conferences is the simulation sessions being offered online. 
These sessions are an opportunity to practice your skills and techniques with some of the best educators anywhere in the world. I have always come out of these sessions impressed. I encourage you to try it at least once.

The fun
From the receptions, the meet-ups, pop-up events, CHEST Challenge, the games… the list goes on: the fun element of CHEST makes it a more immersive atmosphere. When the meeting was solely virtual last year, CHEST still aimed to provide fun and will continue to do the same this year. Challenge your colleagues and new friends to games at the CHEST Player Hub online to see which one of you rises to the top of the leaderboard.

The community
CHEST 2021 (and CHEST the organization) helps you make connections and provides opportunities for leadership involvement. CHEST committees are always looking for leaders at all stages of their careers. Attending satellite meetings, like the NetWork open forums that are occurring online before the meeting starts this year, will allow you to begin networking with those with similar interests to your own and hopefully will spark your interest in getting more involved in the future. 
For many of us at CHEST, the NetWorks were a great place to start, and you can join one in the area that interests you most.  Through my involvement in CHEST, I have become a part of the community, meeting so many other clinicians and educators in my field. I have made great friendships, which keep me coming back every year.

Moving forward 
From the beginning, we have been planning CHEST 2021 so that if we needed to go entirely online, we could do so as seamlessly as possible. With the recent decision to cancel the in-person meeting and go fully online, plans are already underway to make CHEST 2021 just as successful as last year’s meeting. 
We can give you our commitment that your CHEST 2021 experience will live up to being a world-class event that separates itself from other current online offerings. I will be in attendance and hope to see you online.

Start planning your days with the CHEST 2021 Schedule at A Glance at chestmeeting.chestnet.org.

Is this your first CHEST Annual Meeting? Co-Chair David Zielinski, MD, FCCP, shares some words of wisdom recounting his first experience at CHEST and what first-time attendees can expect from the annual meeting.

My very first CHEST meeting was 10 years ago at CHEST 2011 in Honolulu, Hawaii. I clearly remember my first session being a postgraduate course on Respiratory Management of Neuromuscular Disease and having the opportunity for hands-on teaching with devices and techniques. 

Simulation was unique at medical conferences at that time and has continued to evolve at subsequent CHEST meetings. 

Looking back, what really sticks out about this experience is what it started for me in terms of my career and learning. I was in a session with some of the biggest names in the field—people who I always looked up to as a relatively junior faculty. I was encouraged to get more involved at CHEST and with the committees. It put the bug in my ear. 

A few years later, I started to get involved in the NetWorks. Eventually, I became a faculty member myself alongside these individuals at subsequent CHEST meetings. Meeting these chest medicine professionals also led to more collaborations with them outside of CHEST. 

I never imagined this during my first meeting ten years ago. I have now been back to every meeting but one since that first one.  
The CHEST Annual Meeting has always stood out for its focus on quality clinical teaching, being ahead of the curve on interactivity and adjusting to the audience’s learning needs. 
For me personally, though, the three things that I have always enjoyed are as follows:

Simulation opportunities
One thing that sets apart CHEST 2021 from other conferences is the simulation sessions being offered online. 
These sessions are an opportunity to practice your skills and techniques with some of the best educators anywhere in the world. I have always come out of these sessions impressed. I encourage you to try it at least once.

The fun
From the receptions, the meet-ups, pop-up events, CHEST Challenge, the games… the list goes on: the fun element of CHEST makes it a more immersive atmosphere. When the meeting was solely virtual last year, CHEST still aimed to provide fun and will continue to do the same this year. Challenge your colleagues and new friends to games at the CHEST Player Hub online to see which one of you rises to the top of the leaderboard.

The community
CHEST 2021 (and CHEST the organization) helps you make connections and provides opportunities for leadership involvement. CHEST committees are always looking for leaders at all stages of their careers. Attending satellite meetings, like the NetWork open forums that are occurring online before the meeting starts this year, will allow you to begin networking with those with similar interests to your own and hopefully will spark your interest in getting more involved in the future. 
For many of us at CHEST, the NetWorks were a great place to start, and you can join one in the area that interests you most.  Through my involvement in CHEST, I have become a part of the community, meeting so many other clinicians and educators in my field. I have made great friendships, which keep me coming back every year.

Moving forward 
From the beginning, we have been planning CHEST 2021 so that if we needed to go entirely online, we could do so as seamlessly as possible. With the recent decision to cancel the in-person meeting and go fully online, plans are already underway to make CHEST 2021 just as successful as last year’s meeting. 
We can give you our commitment that your CHEST 2021 experience will live up to being a world-class event that separates itself from other current online offerings. I will be in attendance and hope to see you online.

Start planning your days with the CHEST 2021 Schedule at A Glance at chestmeeting.chestnet.org.

Community service grants are one way the Foundation strives to make a tangible, lasting impact on the lives of the patients we serve – they’re not just one-off projects with limited effects. But how do we really know that we’re making a difference?

For Dr. Roberta Kato, it’s when she gets to witness an “Aha!” moment – a time when everything clicks and a parent finally understands how to better care for their child. For Marina Lima, MD, MSc, it’s knowing that one more teen isn’t gasping for air. And for Dr. Joseph Huang, it’s seeing a country of 100 million people gain access to 14 pulmonologists when there was previously only one.

Why community service grants?

The Foundation began giving community service grants in 1997 under the leadership of CHEST President D. Robert McCaffree, MD, Master FCCP. He believed the program would be the best way to support his colleagues in achieving their community service endeavors .To date, over $2 million has been given specifically to community service projects. “

Our physicians experience the limitations of our health care system first-hand – a system that isn’t built to assist the people who need help the most. Finding solutions requires a willingness to think and operate creatively. The funding the Foundation provides through our community service grants supplies the resources to do just that – implement real-world solutions that will help patients gain better access to care.
 

Cases in point

Marina Lima, MD, MSc, was seeing an inordinate number of children and teens with uncontrolled asthma symptoms in Brazil. She applied for and was awarded a grant to make Asthmaland, the first gamified pediatric asthma educational program in Portuguese.

Besides her “Aha!” moments, Dr. Roberta Kato revealed a way she knows her work is making a difference: the funding is helping to shift the nonprofit landscape in her community.

“Sometimes there is a rift between different organizations. When I ask them to collaborate or advertise together, I get resistance. However, when I’ve reached out and said that I’ve received funding for an initiative, all of a sudden, there is forward movement. That is how I am hoping to make the biggest difference,” explained Dr. Kato.

Dr. Joseph Huang, who received a grant to fund the East Africa Training Initiative (EATI), is faced with a different obstacle. “We’ve been awarded the grant many times, and I know the Foundation is focused on supporting new, up-and-coming programs. Therefore, I’m committed to ensuring that my program can continue even after we stop receiving funding.”

How is Dr. Huang going to do that? Besides procuring ICU equipment, EATI focuses on training pulmonology fellows in east Africa. The fellows who graduate will train other physicians and care team members across the continent, both in hospitals and rural clinics, safeguarding the future of his program.
 

A clear vision for the future

While the Foundation is ready to tackle new problems, community service grants will remain the constant thread woven throughout the work, and it’s obvious why. As Dr. Huang emphasized, his grant “will ensure that the people living in Africa have a better chance at getting access to the care they need.”

When you strip away everything else, community service grants boil down to one thing: helping people live healthier, more fulfilled lives. What can be more worthwhile?

Help us continue this important work

While we are privileged to award numerous grants over the past 2 decades, our community service grants have always held a special place in the hearts and minds of everyone involved with the CHEST Foundation. We hope they hold a special place in your heart too.

Please consider donating so that we can continue this work together.

Community service grants are one way the Foundation strives to make a tangible, lasting impact on the lives of the patients we serve – they’re not just one-off projects with limited effects. But how do we really know that we’re making a difference?

For Dr. Roberta Kato, it’s when she gets to witness an “Aha!” moment – a time when everything clicks and a parent finally understands how to better care for their child. For Marina Lima, MD, MSc, it’s knowing that one more teen isn’t gasping for air. And for Dr. Joseph Huang, it’s seeing a country of 100 million people gain access to 14 pulmonologists when there was previously only one.

Why community service grants?

The Foundation began giving community service grants in 1997 under the leadership of CHEST President D. Robert McCaffree, MD, Master FCCP. He believed the program would be the best way to support his colleagues in achieving their community service endeavors .To date, over $2 million has been given specifically to community service projects. “

Our physicians experience the limitations of our health care system first-hand – a system that isn’t built to assist the people who need help the most. Finding solutions requires a willingness to think and operate creatively. The funding the Foundation provides through our community service grants supplies the resources to do just that – implement real-world solutions that will help patients gain better access to care.
 

Cases in point

Marina Lima, MD, MSc, was seeing an inordinate number of children and teens with uncontrolled asthma symptoms in Brazil. She applied for and was awarded a grant to make Asthmaland, the first gamified pediatric asthma educational program in Portuguese.

Besides her “Aha!” moments, Dr. Roberta Kato revealed a way she knows her work is making a difference: the funding is helping to shift the nonprofit landscape in her community.

“Sometimes there is a rift between different organizations. When I ask them to collaborate or advertise together, I get resistance. However, when I’ve reached out and said that I’ve received funding for an initiative, all of a sudden, there is forward movement. That is how I am hoping to make the biggest difference,” explained Dr. Kato.

Dr. Joseph Huang, who received a grant to fund the East Africa Training Initiative (EATI), is faced with a different obstacle. “We’ve been awarded the grant many times, and I know the Foundation is focused on supporting new, up-and-coming programs. Therefore, I’m committed to ensuring that my program can continue even after we stop receiving funding.”

How is Dr. Huang going to do that? Besides procuring ICU equipment, EATI focuses on training pulmonology fellows in east Africa. The fellows who graduate will train other physicians and care team members across the continent, both in hospitals and rural clinics, safeguarding the future of his program.
 

A clear vision for the future

While the Foundation is ready to tackle new problems, community service grants will remain the constant thread woven throughout the work, and it’s obvious why. As Dr. Huang emphasized, his grant “will ensure that the people living in Africa have a better chance at getting access to the care they need.”

When you strip away everything else, community service grants boil down to one thing: helping people live healthier, more fulfilled lives. What can be more worthwhile?

Help us continue this important work

While we are privileged to award numerous grants over the past 2 decades, our community service grants have always held a special place in the hearts and minds of everyone involved with the CHEST Foundation. We hope they hold a special place in your heart too.

Please consider donating so that we can continue this work together.

Community service grants are one way the Foundation strives to make a tangible, lasting impact on the lives of the patients we serve – they’re not just one-off projects with limited effects. But how do we really know that we’re making a difference?

For Dr. Roberta Kato, it’s when she gets to witness an “Aha!” moment – a time when everything clicks and a parent finally understands how to better care for their child. For Marina Lima, MD, MSc, it’s knowing that one more teen isn’t gasping for air. And for Dr. Joseph Huang, it’s seeing a country of 100 million people gain access to 14 pulmonologists when there was previously only one.

Why community service grants?

The Foundation began giving community service grants in 1997 under the leadership of CHEST President D. Robert McCaffree, MD, Master FCCP. He believed the program would be the best way to support his colleagues in achieving their community service endeavors .To date, over $2 million has been given specifically to community service projects. “

Our physicians experience the limitations of our health care system first-hand – a system that isn’t built to assist the people who need help the most. Finding solutions requires a willingness to think and operate creatively. The funding the Foundation provides through our community service grants supplies the resources to do just that – implement real-world solutions that will help patients gain better access to care.
 

Cases in point

Marina Lima, MD, MSc, was seeing an inordinate number of children and teens with uncontrolled asthma symptoms in Brazil. She applied for and was awarded a grant to make Asthmaland, the first gamified pediatric asthma educational program in Portuguese.

Besides her “Aha!” moments, Dr. Roberta Kato revealed a way she knows her work is making a difference: the funding is helping to shift the nonprofit landscape in her community.

“Sometimes there is a rift between different organizations. When I ask them to collaborate or advertise together, I get resistance. However, when I’ve reached out and said that I’ve received funding for an initiative, all of a sudden, there is forward movement. That is how I am hoping to make the biggest difference,” explained Dr. Kato.

Dr. Joseph Huang, who received a grant to fund the East Africa Training Initiative (EATI), is faced with a different obstacle. “We’ve been awarded the grant many times, and I know the Foundation is focused on supporting new, up-and-coming programs. Therefore, I’m committed to ensuring that my program can continue even after we stop receiving funding.”

How is Dr. Huang going to do that? Besides procuring ICU equipment, EATI focuses on training pulmonology fellows in east Africa. The fellows who graduate will train other physicians and care team members across the continent, both in hospitals and rural clinics, safeguarding the future of his program.
 

A clear vision for the future

While the Foundation is ready to tackle new problems, community service grants will remain the constant thread woven throughout the work, and it’s obvious why. As Dr. Huang emphasized, his grant “will ensure that the people living in Africa have a better chance at getting access to the care they need.”

When you strip away everything else, community service grants boil down to one thing: helping people live healthier, more fulfilled lives. What can be more worthwhile?

Help us continue this important work

While we are privileged to award numerous grants over the past 2 decades, our community service grants have always held a special place in the hearts and minds of everyone involved with the CHEST Foundation. We hope they hold a special place in your heart too.

Please consider donating so that we can continue this work together.

CHEST has a long history of developing high quality clinical practice guidelines based on rigorous methodology, particularly in Thoracic Oncology, Pulmonary Vascular/Venous Thromboembolic Disease, and Clinical Pulmonary Medicine/Cough. Using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, CHEST guidelines aim to optimize patient care by providing evidence-based recommendations that are transparent and free from bias.

Recently, CHEST invested in reassessing how we could further enhance the relevance, timeliness, and impact of guidelines on patient care and outcomes. We re-evaluated how we prioritize guideline topics to ensure we identify conditions in which patient care might be significantly improved by the application of evidence-based recommendations. In addition to re-committing to the rigorous GRADE approach, we also committed to timelier guideline development that would cover a broader scope of clinical topics, better mirroring the needs of our membership.

Since resuming our guideline process last year, we completed four Expert Panel Reports covering COVID-19–related topics, as well as several CHEST clinical practice guidelines. This includes publications on the management of cough in various conditions and populations – chronic bronchitis, acute bronchitis in the immunocompromised adult, asthma and nonasthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis, and in children. We also published Diagnosis and Evaluation of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis earlier this year. This guideline outlines a patient-centered and interdisciplinary diagnostic approach to aid clinicians and patients in navigating many of the uncertainties in the evaluation of this condition.

Updates from two of our guidelines following our ‘living guideline’ model were also recently published – Screening for Lung Cancer and Antithrombic Therapy for VTE Disease. The Screening for Lung Cancer update provides guidance on patient selection for lung cancer screening, updating the age and smoking history criteria based on new evidence published since the original CHEST guideline. The updated guideline also provides recommendations for implementing high-quality lung cancer screening programs to optimize the overall benefits of screening.

In Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE, the structure of recommendations follows the chronology of VTE management: ‘Whether to treat,’ ‘Interventional and adjunctive treatments,’ ‘Initiation phase,’ ‘Treatment phase,’ ‘Extended phase,’ and ‘Complications of VTE.’ This guideline was designed to provide a comprehensive reference for VTE management in patients at any stage of the disease. Several recommendations are new from prior versions of the guideline, including whether patients with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis should be treated with anticoagulation and the choice of anticoagulant therapy for patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and thrombosis.

As we look toward the future of guideline development at CHEST, we are excited by the opportunity to expand the CHEST guideline portfolio. Starting in 2022, we will be broadening the scope of CHEST guidelines to include topics in nine clinical domains: Airway Disorders, Chest Infections, Clinical Pulmonary Medicine, Critical Care, Interstitial Lung Disease, Interventional Pulmonology, Pulmonary Vascular Disease (including venous thromboembolic disease), Thoracic Oncology, and Sleep. We anticipate issuing a Request for Proposals in select areas from these domains in the Spring of 2022, allowing CHEST members the opportunity to propose topics for which clinical guidance is needed.

As we recommit to the rigorous guideline methodology for which CHEST is known and broaden our impact across the spectrum of chest disease, we seek to ensure CHEST remains the leading resource for evidence-based guidelines in the field of chest medicine.

CHEST has a long history of developing high quality clinical practice guidelines based on rigorous methodology, particularly in Thoracic Oncology, Pulmonary Vascular/Venous Thromboembolic Disease, and Clinical Pulmonary Medicine/Cough. Using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, CHEST guidelines aim to optimize patient care by providing evidence-based recommendations that are transparent and free from bias.

Recently, CHEST invested in reassessing how we could further enhance the relevance, timeliness, and impact of guidelines on patient care and outcomes. We re-evaluated how we prioritize guideline topics to ensure we identify conditions in which patient care might be significantly improved by the application of evidence-based recommendations. In addition to re-committing to the rigorous GRADE approach, we also committed to timelier guideline development that would cover a broader scope of clinical topics, better mirroring the needs of our membership.

Since resuming our guideline process last year, we completed four Expert Panel Reports covering COVID-19–related topics, as well as several CHEST clinical practice guidelines. This includes publications on the management of cough in various conditions and populations – chronic bronchitis, acute bronchitis in the immunocompromised adult, asthma and nonasthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis, and in children. We also published Diagnosis and Evaluation of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis earlier this year. This guideline outlines a patient-centered and interdisciplinary diagnostic approach to aid clinicians and patients in navigating many of the uncertainties in the evaluation of this condition.

Updates from two of our guidelines following our ‘living guideline’ model were also recently published – Screening for Lung Cancer and Antithrombic Therapy for VTE Disease. The Screening for Lung Cancer update provides guidance on patient selection for lung cancer screening, updating the age and smoking history criteria based on new evidence published since the original CHEST guideline. The updated guideline also provides recommendations for implementing high-quality lung cancer screening programs to optimize the overall benefits of screening.

In Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE, the structure of recommendations follows the chronology of VTE management: ‘Whether to treat,’ ‘Interventional and adjunctive treatments,’ ‘Initiation phase,’ ‘Treatment phase,’ ‘Extended phase,’ and ‘Complications of VTE.’ This guideline was designed to provide a comprehensive reference for VTE management in patients at any stage of the disease. Several recommendations are new from prior versions of the guideline, including whether patients with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis should be treated with anticoagulation and the choice of anticoagulant therapy for patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and thrombosis.

As we look toward the future of guideline development at CHEST, we are excited by the opportunity to expand the CHEST guideline portfolio. Starting in 2022, we will be broadening the scope of CHEST guidelines to include topics in nine clinical domains: Airway Disorders, Chest Infections, Clinical Pulmonary Medicine, Critical Care, Interstitial Lung Disease, Interventional Pulmonology, Pulmonary Vascular Disease (including venous thromboembolic disease), Thoracic Oncology, and Sleep. We anticipate issuing a Request for Proposals in select areas from these domains in the Spring of 2022, allowing CHEST members the opportunity to propose topics for which clinical guidance is needed.

As we recommit to the rigorous guideline methodology for which CHEST is known and broaden our impact across the spectrum of chest disease, we seek to ensure CHEST remains the leading resource for evidence-based guidelines in the field of chest medicine.

CHEST has a long history of developing high quality clinical practice guidelines based on rigorous methodology, particularly in Thoracic Oncology, Pulmonary Vascular/Venous Thromboembolic Disease, and Clinical Pulmonary Medicine/Cough. Using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, CHEST guidelines aim to optimize patient care by providing evidence-based recommendations that are transparent and free from bias.

Recently, CHEST invested in reassessing how we could further enhance the relevance, timeliness, and impact of guidelines on patient care and outcomes. We re-evaluated how we prioritize guideline topics to ensure we identify conditions in which patient care might be significantly improved by the application of evidence-based recommendations. In addition to re-committing to the rigorous GRADE approach, we also committed to timelier guideline development that would cover a broader scope of clinical topics, better mirroring the needs of our membership.

Since resuming our guideline process last year, we completed four Expert Panel Reports covering COVID-19–related topics, as well as several CHEST clinical practice guidelines. This includes publications on the management of cough in various conditions and populations – chronic bronchitis, acute bronchitis in the immunocompromised adult, asthma and nonasthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis, and in children. We also published Diagnosis and Evaluation of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis earlier this year. This guideline outlines a patient-centered and interdisciplinary diagnostic approach to aid clinicians and patients in navigating many of the uncertainties in the evaluation of this condition.

Updates from two of our guidelines following our ‘living guideline’ model were also recently published – Screening for Lung Cancer and Antithrombic Therapy for VTE Disease. The Screening for Lung Cancer update provides guidance on patient selection for lung cancer screening, updating the age and smoking history criteria based on new evidence published since the original CHEST guideline. The updated guideline also provides recommendations for implementing high-quality lung cancer screening programs to optimize the overall benefits of screening.

In Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE, the structure of recommendations follows the chronology of VTE management: ‘Whether to treat,’ ‘Interventional and adjunctive treatments,’ ‘Initiation phase,’ ‘Treatment phase,’ ‘Extended phase,’ and ‘Complications of VTE.’ This guideline was designed to provide a comprehensive reference for VTE management in patients at any stage of the disease. Several recommendations are new from prior versions of the guideline, including whether patients with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis should be treated with anticoagulation and the choice of anticoagulant therapy for patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and thrombosis.

As we look toward the future of guideline development at CHEST, we are excited by the opportunity to expand the CHEST guideline portfolio. Starting in 2022, we will be broadening the scope of CHEST guidelines to include topics in nine clinical domains: Airway Disorders, Chest Infections, Clinical Pulmonary Medicine, Critical Care, Interstitial Lung Disease, Interventional Pulmonology, Pulmonary Vascular Disease (including venous thromboembolic disease), Thoracic Oncology, and Sleep. We anticipate issuing a Request for Proposals in select areas from these domains in the Spring of 2022, allowing CHEST members the opportunity to propose topics for which clinical guidance is needed.

As we recommit to the rigorous guideline methodology for which CHEST is known and broaden our impact across the spectrum of chest disease, we seek to ensure CHEST remains the leading resource for evidence-based guidelines in the field of chest medicine.

When life changes, so should your will. An old will can’t cover every change that may have occurred since it was first drawn. Ensure that this important document matches your current wishes by reviewing it every few years.

Use your will to give back!

Help support young investigators doing research. A flexible and versatile way to support the mission of the AGA Research Foundation is to leave a gift in your will or living trust, known as a charitable bequest.

• Gift us a share of what›s left in your estate after other obligations are met.
• Make a contingent bequest. That is, you give part of your estate to some individual if that person survives you; if not, then it goes to us.
• Create a charitable remainder trust to pay an income to your spouse or other loved one for life and designate the remaining principal for us.
• Create a charitable lead trust to pay income to us for a number of years, or for another person’s lifetime, with the trust assets eventually being distributed to your family.
• Donate a specific amount of cash or securities.

To make sure your will accomplishes all you intend, seek the help of an attorney who specializes in estate planning. If our organization fits into your plans, we can help you choose the method that best satisfies your wishes and our needs.

When life changes, so should your will. An old will can’t cover every change that may have occurred since it was first drawn. Ensure that this important document matches your current wishes by reviewing it every few years.

Use your will to give back!

Help support young investigators doing research. A flexible and versatile way to support the mission of the AGA Research Foundation is to leave a gift in your will or living trust, known as a charitable bequest.

• Gift us a share of what›s left in your estate after other obligations are met.
• Make a contingent bequest. That is, you give part of your estate to some individual if that person survives you; if not, then it goes to us.
• Create a charitable remainder trust to pay an income to your spouse or other loved one for life and designate the remaining principal for us.
• Create a charitable lead trust to pay income to us for a number of years, or for another person’s lifetime, with the trust assets eventually being distributed to your family.
• Donate a specific amount of cash or securities.

To make sure your will accomplishes all you intend, seek the help of an attorney who specializes in estate planning. If our organization fits into your plans, we can help you choose the method that best satisfies your wishes and our needs.

When life changes, so should your will. An old will can’t cover every change that may have occurred since it was first drawn. Ensure that this important document matches your current wishes by reviewing it every few years.

Use your will to give back!

Help support young investigators doing research. A flexible and versatile way to support the mission of the AGA Research Foundation is to leave a gift in your will or living trust, known as a charitable bequest.

• Gift us a share of what›s left in your estate after other obligations are met.
• Make a contingent bequest. That is, you give part of your estate to some individual if that person survives you; if not, then it goes to us.
• Create a charitable remainder trust to pay an income to your spouse or other loved one for life and designate the remaining principal for us.
• Create a charitable lead trust to pay income to us for a number of years, or for another person’s lifetime, with the trust assets eventually being distributed to your family.
• Donate a specific amount of cash or securities.

To make sure your will accomplishes all you intend, seek the help of an attorney who specializes in estate planning. If our organization fits into your plans, we can help you choose the method that best satisfies your wishes and our needs.

According to Endpoints News, Tadataka “Tachi” Yamada, MD, died unexpectedly of natural causes at his home in Seattle on Aug. 4, 2021. Dr. Yamada had a storied career as a GI leader, educator, and mentor before his work as a biotech pharma research chief and a global health advocate with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

AGA President John Inadomi, MD, tweeted “We lost a mentor, sponsor, role model and true pioneer in gastroenterology – Honor his legacy.” You can share your remembrances on the AGA Community.

Over the years, Tachi made enormous contributions to AGA. He served on multiple committees, too numerous to list. He served on the AGA Governing Board multiple times and as president.

He was awarded the association’s highest honor, the Julius Friedenwald Medal, in 2003. At that time, Chung Owyang, MD, wrote a bio of Tachi and noted his critical role in shaping AGA and Digestive Disease Week® (DDW). He was the founding chair of the AGA Council working hard to reformat DDW into a major international event for our subspecialty. He was also among the group of AGA leaders who proposed the establishment of the AGA Foundation.

In 1996, Tachi assumed the presidency of AGA during a time of great turbulence in health care, where not only the practice but also the education and research missions of gastroenterology were threatened by change. Tachi took on the challenge with exemplary vision, energy, and intelligence.

Dan Podolsky, MD, a former AGA president commented at the time of Tachi’s Friedenwald Medal that “Tachi applied characteristic creativity and energy to all AGA activities. An inspirational leader, he was especially effective in promoting the AGA’s commitment to the career development of young gastroenterologists, promoting digestive diseases research, and as a tireless advocate for the field of gastroenterology.”

“Tachi has not only led our field, but he has been a global leader helping pharma rethink their role in global health, and helping the Gates Foundation save so many lives. He was soft-spoken but his worldwide contributions and vision will carry on. Heartfelt condolences to his family and friends,” said Bishr Omary, MD, PhD, past president of AGA Institute.

According to Endpoints News, Tadataka “Tachi” Yamada, MD, died unexpectedly of natural causes at his home in Seattle on Aug. 4, 2021. Dr. Yamada had a storied career as a GI leader, educator, and mentor before his work as a biotech pharma research chief and a global health advocate with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

AGA President John Inadomi, MD, tweeted “We lost a mentor, sponsor, role model and true pioneer in gastroenterology – Honor his legacy.” You can share your remembrances on the AGA Community.

Over the years, Tachi made enormous contributions to AGA. He served on multiple committees, too numerous to list. He served on the AGA Governing Board multiple times and as president.

He was awarded the association’s highest honor, the Julius Friedenwald Medal, in 2003. At that time, Chung Owyang, MD, wrote a bio of Tachi and noted his critical role in shaping AGA and Digestive Disease Week® (DDW). He was the founding chair of the AGA Council working hard to reformat DDW into a major international event for our subspecialty. He was also among the group of AGA leaders who proposed the establishment of the AGA Foundation.

In 1996, Tachi assumed the presidency of AGA during a time of great turbulence in health care, where not only the practice but also the education and research missions of gastroenterology were threatened by change. Tachi took on the challenge with exemplary vision, energy, and intelligence.

Dan Podolsky, MD, a former AGA president commented at the time of Tachi’s Friedenwald Medal that “Tachi applied characteristic creativity and energy to all AGA activities. An inspirational leader, he was especially effective in promoting the AGA’s commitment to the career development of young gastroenterologists, promoting digestive diseases research, and as a tireless advocate for the field of gastroenterology.”

“Tachi has not only led our field, but he has been a global leader helping pharma rethink their role in global health, and helping the Gates Foundation save so many lives. He was soft-spoken but his worldwide contributions and vision will carry on. Heartfelt condolences to his family and friends,” said Bishr Omary, MD, PhD, past president of AGA Institute.

According to Endpoints News, Tadataka “Tachi” Yamada, MD, died unexpectedly of natural causes at his home in Seattle on Aug. 4, 2021. Dr. Yamada had a storied career as a GI leader, educator, and mentor before his work as a biotech pharma research chief and a global health advocate with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

AGA President John Inadomi, MD, tweeted “We lost a mentor, sponsor, role model and true pioneer in gastroenterology – Honor his legacy.” You can share your remembrances on the AGA Community.

Over the years, Tachi made enormous contributions to AGA. He served on multiple committees, too numerous to list. He served on the AGA Governing Board multiple times and as president.

He was awarded the association’s highest honor, the Julius Friedenwald Medal, in 2003. At that time, Chung Owyang, MD, wrote a bio of Tachi and noted his critical role in shaping AGA and Digestive Disease Week® (DDW). He was the founding chair of the AGA Council working hard to reformat DDW into a major international event for our subspecialty. He was also among the group of AGA leaders who proposed the establishment of the AGA Foundation.

In 1996, Tachi assumed the presidency of AGA during a time of great turbulence in health care, where not only the practice but also the education and research missions of gastroenterology were threatened by change. Tachi took on the challenge with exemplary vision, energy, and intelligence.

Dan Podolsky, MD, a former AGA president commented at the time of Tachi’s Friedenwald Medal that “Tachi applied characteristic creativity and energy to all AGA activities. An inspirational leader, he was especially effective in promoting the AGA’s commitment to the career development of young gastroenterologists, promoting digestive diseases research, and as a tireless advocate for the field of gastroenterology.”

“Tachi has not only led our field, but he has been a global leader helping pharma rethink their role in global health, and helping the Gates Foundation save so many lives. He was soft-spoken but his worldwide contributions and vision will carry on. Heartfelt condolences to his family and friends,” said Bishr Omary, MD, PhD, past president of AGA Institute.

Whether you’re a clinician or researcher, your voice is an important part of AGA’s mission to advocate for health care policies that support GI patients and practitioners.

Help us elevate the GI perspective by participating in AGA Advocacy Day on Thursday, Sept. 23, 2021, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. EDT. This is a unique opportunity for you to virtually meet with federal legislators to share your experiences and show how supporting the needs of GIs and our patients impacts the community they represent.

No prior advocacy experience needed! AGA staff will supply key talking points on a variety of health care policies and provide plenty of training to help you tell your story in a way that inspires and influences policymakers.

Your participation on this day – no matter how long – is vital to our success. If you can’t attend meetings the entire day, then share your availability during registration and we’ll arrange meetings around your busy schedule.

Save your spot.

Whether you’re a clinician or researcher, your voice is an important part of AGA’s mission to advocate for health care policies that support GI patients and practitioners.

Help us elevate the GI perspective by participating in AGA Advocacy Day on Thursday, Sept. 23, 2021, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. EDT. This is a unique opportunity for you to virtually meet with federal legislators to share your experiences and show how supporting the needs of GIs and our patients impacts the community they represent.

No prior advocacy experience needed! AGA staff will supply key talking points on a variety of health care policies and provide plenty of training to help you tell your story in a way that inspires and influences policymakers.

Your participation on this day – no matter how long – is vital to our success. If you can’t attend meetings the entire day, then share your availability during registration and we’ll arrange meetings around your busy schedule.

Save your spot.

Whether you’re a clinician or researcher, your voice is an important part of AGA’s mission to advocate for health care policies that support GI patients and practitioners.

Help us elevate the GI perspective by participating in AGA Advocacy Day on Thursday, Sept. 23, 2021, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. EDT. This is a unique opportunity for you to virtually meet with federal legislators to share your experiences and show how supporting the needs of GIs and our patients impacts the community they represent.

No prior advocacy experience needed! AGA staff will supply key talking points on a variety of health care policies and provide plenty of training to help you tell your story in a way that inspires and influences policymakers.

Your participation on this day – no matter how long – is vital to our success. If you can’t attend meetings the entire day, then share your availability during registration and we’ll arrange meetings around your busy schedule.

Save your spot.

AGA, in collaboration with seven professional associations, convened an international conference of 32 experts to develop a multidisciplinary action plan to improve care for the growing population of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). The recommendations from this meeting have been copublished in Gastroenterology along with three other leading journals: Diabetes Care, Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental, and Obesity: The Journal of the Obesity Society.

Key findings from this special report include the following:

• Patients with obesity or type 2 diabetes are at a higher risk of developing NAFLD/NASH with diabetes being a major risk factor for worse disease severity and progression to cirrhosis (permanent damage to the liver).
• Primary care providers are critical to managing this growing epidemic. They should be the first line for screening patients at risk, stratifying patients based on their risk for advanced fibrosis, and providing effective management and referrals.
• The guiding principle for risk stratification is to rule out advanced fibrosis by simple, noninvasive fibrosis scores (such as NAFLD fibrosis score or Fibrosis-4 Index). Patients at intermediate or high risk may require further assessment with a second-line test – evaluation with elastography or by serum marker test with direct measures of fibrogenesis.
• Because NAFLD is not an isolated disease but a component of cardiometabolic abnormalities typically associated with obesity, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes, the cornerstone of therapy is lifestyle-based therapies (altered diet – such as reduced-calorie or Mediterranean diets – and regular, moderate physical activity), as well as replacing obesogenic medications, to decrease body weight and improve cardiometabolic health. Patients with diabetes who also have NASH may benefit from certain antidiabetic medications (such as pioglitazone and semaglutide) that treat not only their diabetes but also reverse steatohepatitis and improve cardiometabolic health.
• Optimal care of patients with NAFLD and NASH requires collaboration among primary care providers, endocrinologists, diabetologists, obesity medicine specialists, gastroenterologists, and hepatologists to tackle both the liver manifestations of the disease and the comorbid metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk, as well as screening and treating other comorbid conditions (such as obstructive sleep apnea).

AGA, in collaboration with seven professional associations, convened an international conference of 32 experts to develop a multidisciplinary action plan to improve care for the growing population of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). The recommendations from this meeting have been copublished in Gastroenterology along with three other leading journals: Diabetes Care, Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental, and Obesity: The Journal of the Obesity Society.

Key findings from this special report include the following:

• Patients with obesity or type 2 diabetes are at a higher risk of developing NAFLD/NASH with diabetes being a major risk factor for worse disease severity and progression to cirrhosis (permanent damage to the liver).
• Primary care providers are critical to managing this growing epidemic. They should be the first line for screening patients at risk, stratifying patients based on their risk for advanced fibrosis, and providing effective management and referrals.
• The guiding principle for risk stratification is to rule out advanced fibrosis by simple, noninvasive fibrosis scores (such as NAFLD fibrosis score or Fibrosis-4 Index). Patients at intermediate or high risk may require further assessment with a second-line test – evaluation with elastography or by serum marker test with direct measures of fibrogenesis.
• Because NAFLD is not an isolated disease but a component of cardiometabolic abnormalities typically associated with obesity, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes, the cornerstone of therapy is lifestyle-based therapies (altered diet – such as reduced-calorie or Mediterranean diets – and regular, moderate physical activity), as well as replacing obesogenic medications, to decrease body weight and improve cardiometabolic health. Patients with diabetes who also have NASH may benefit from certain antidiabetic medications (such as pioglitazone and semaglutide) that treat not only their diabetes but also reverse steatohepatitis and improve cardiometabolic health.
• Optimal care of patients with NAFLD and NASH requires collaboration among primary care providers, endocrinologists, diabetologists, obesity medicine specialists, gastroenterologists, and hepatologists to tackle both the liver manifestations of the disease and the comorbid metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk, as well as screening and treating other comorbid conditions (such as obstructive sleep apnea).

AGA, in collaboration with seven professional associations, convened an international conference of 32 experts to develop a multidisciplinary action plan to improve care for the growing population of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). The recommendations from this meeting have been copublished in Gastroenterology along with three other leading journals: Diabetes Care, Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental, and Obesity: The Journal of the Obesity Society.

Key findings from this special report include the following:

• Patients with obesity or type 2 diabetes are at a higher risk of developing NAFLD/NASH with diabetes being a major risk factor for worse disease severity and progression to cirrhosis (permanent damage to the liver).
• Primary care providers are critical to managing this growing epidemic. They should be the first line for screening patients at risk, stratifying patients based on their risk for advanced fibrosis, and providing effective management and referrals.
• The guiding principle for risk stratification is to rule out advanced fibrosis by simple, noninvasive fibrosis scores (such as NAFLD fibrosis score or Fibrosis-4 Index). Patients at intermediate or high risk may require further assessment with a second-line test – evaluation with elastography or by serum marker test with direct measures of fibrogenesis.
• Because NAFLD is not an isolated disease but a component of cardiometabolic abnormalities typically associated with obesity, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes, the cornerstone of therapy is lifestyle-based therapies (altered diet – such as reduced-calorie or Mediterranean diets – and regular, moderate physical activity), as well as replacing obesogenic medications, to decrease body weight and improve cardiometabolic health. Patients with diabetes who also have NASH may benefit from certain antidiabetic medications (such as pioglitazone and semaglutide) that treat not only their diabetes but also reverse steatohepatitis and improve cardiometabolic health.
• Optimal care of patients with NAFLD and NASH requires collaboration among primary care providers, endocrinologists, diabetologists, obesity medicine specialists, gastroenterologists, and hepatologists to tackle both the liver manifestations of the disease and the comorbid metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk, as well as screening and treating other comorbid conditions (such as obstructive sleep apnea).

After an extensive review of the present and potential conditions affecting in-person participation, CHEST 2021 will be fully online again this year. Our goal is to make attending CHEST 2021 as accessible as possible for the entire chest medicine community. Make sure to join your colleagues online for the most exciting event in chest medicine, October 17-20.

After an extensive review of the present and potential conditions affecting in-person participation, CHEST 2021 will be fully online again this year. Our goal is to make attending CHEST 2021 as accessible as possible for the entire chest medicine community. Make sure to join your colleagues online for the most exciting event in chest medicine, October 17-20.

After an extensive review of the present and potential conditions affecting in-person participation, CHEST 2021 will be fully online again this year. Our goal is to make attending CHEST 2021 as accessible as possible for the entire chest medicine community. Make sure to join your colleagues online for the most exciting event in chest medicine, October 17-20.

One way members get involved in CHEST’s philanthropic efforts takes place each year with the start of the NetWorks Challenge. CHEST members compete through their NetWorks – special interest groups that focus on particular areas of chest medicine – to raise funds that support Foundation microgrants.

NetWorks Challenge 2021 kicked off in June with a special twist to celebrate the Foundation’s 25th anniversary. Each NetWork is asked to complete a 25k virtual physical challenge. This can be done by walking, running, biking, swimming—or any other physical activity.

Through the challenge, members engage in friendly competition while supporting the goals of the Foundation. This year, money raised will directly help the Foundation in addressing health disparities through our microgrants program. In addition, the funds will support travel grants for doctors in training looking to attend CHEST 2021.

By participating in the NetWorks Challenge, members help fund grants that aim to lend a hand to those who need it the most. Expanding research capabilities, improving patient care, and giving access to medical equipment are just a few ways microgrants from the CHEST Foundation have been used in the past.

Inspired by the Listening Tour and the struggles experienced by underserved communities, money raised through the Network Challenge will go to a new pilot microgrant program called Rita’s Fund. The grants aim to supplement community-based projects that provide resources to individuals to help drastically change their quality of life. Funding will assist with coverage for medical equipment, transportation, and access to technology for those living with lung disease and other medical complications.

NetWork members are asked to encourage one another to join in this summer’s race to 25k.

To learn more about this initiative and this year’s NetWorks Challenge, visit chestfoundation.org/nwc21. And, don’t miss the summer issue of Donor Spotlight.

One way members get involved in CHEST’s philanthropic efforts takes place each year with the start of the NetWorks Challenge. CHEST members compete through their NetWorks – special interest groups that focus on particular areas of chest medicine – to raise funds that support Foundation microgrants.

NetWorks Challenge 2021 kicked off in June with a special twist to celebrate the Foundation’s 25th anniversary. Each NetWork is asked to complete a 25k virtual physical challenge. This can be done by walking, running, biking, swimming—or any other physical activity.

Through the challenge, members engage in friendly competition while supporting the goals of the Foundation. This year, money raised will directly help the Foundation in addressing health disparities through our microgrants program. In addition, the funds will support travel grants for doctors in training looking to attend CHEST 2021.

By participating in the NetWorks Challenge, members help fund grants that aim to lend a hand to those who need it the most. Expanding research capabilities, improving patient care, and giving access to medical equipment are just a few ways microgrants from the CHEST Foundation have been used in the past.

Inspired by the Listening Tour and the struggles experienced by underserved communities, money raised through the Network Challenge will go to a new pilot microgrant program called Rita’s Fund. The grants aim to supplement community-based projects that provide resources to individuals to help drastically change their quality of life. Funding will assist with coverage for medical equipment, transportation, and access to technology for those living with lung disease and other medical complications.

NetWork members are asked to encourage one another to join in this summer’s race to 25k.

To learn more about this initiative and this year’s NetWorks Challenge, visit chestfoundation.org/nwc21. And, don’t miss the summer issue of Donor Spotlight.

One way members get involved in CHEST’s philanthropic efforts takes place each year with the start of the NetWorks Challenge. CHEST members compete through their NetWorks – special interest groups that focus on particular areas of chest medicine – to raise funds that support Foundation microgrants.

NetWorks Challenge 2021 kicked off in June with a special twist to celebrate the Foundation’s 25th anniversary. Each NetWork is asked to complete a 25k virtual physical challenge. This can be done by walking, running, biking, swimming—or any other physical activity.

Through the challenge, members engage in friendly competition while supporting the goals of the Foundation. This year, money raised will directly help the Foundation in addressing health disparities through our microgrants program. In addition, the funds will support travel grants for doctors in training looking to attend CHEST 2021.

By participating in the NetWorks Challenge, members help fund grants that aim to lend a hand to those who need it the most. Expanding research capabilities, improving patient care, and giving access to medical equipment are just a few ways microgrants from the CHEST Foundation have been used in the past.

Inspired by the Listening Tour and the struggles experienced by underserved communities, money raised through the Network Challenge will go to a new pilot microgrant program called Rita’s Fund. The grants aim to supplement community-based projects that provide resources to individuals to help drastically change their quality of life. Funding will assist with coverage for medical equipment, transportation, and access to technology for those living with lung disease and other medical complications.

NetWork members are asked to encourage one another to join in this summer’s race to 25k.

To learn more about this initiative and this year’s NetWorks Challenge, visit chestfoundation.org/nwc21. And, don’t miss the summer issue of Donor Spotlight.

Peak inspiratory flow as a predictive therapeutic biomarker in COPD. By Drs. D. Mahler and D. Halpin.Family presence for critically ill patients during a pandemic. By Drs. J. Hart and S. Taylor.



Executive summary: diagnosis and evaluation of hypersensitivity pneumonitis: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. By Dr. L. Fernandez Perez et al.



The usefulness of chest CT imaging in patients with suspected or diagnosed COVID-19: A review of literature. By Dr. S. Machnicki et al.



Oxygen therapy in sleep-disordered breathing. By Dr. S. Zeineddine et al.

Peak inspiratory flow as a predictive therapeutic biomarker in COPD. By Drs. D. Mahler and D. Halpin.Family presence for critically ill patients during a pandemic. By Drs. J. Hart and S. Taylor.



Executive summary: diagnosis and evaluation of hypersensitivity pneumonitis: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. By Dr. L. Fernandez Perez et al.



The usefulness of chest CT imaging in patients with suspected or diagnosed COVID-19: A review of literature. By Dr. S. Machnicki et al.



Oxygen therapy in sleep-disordered breathing. By Dr. S. Zeineddine et al.

Peak inspiratory flow as a predictive therapeutic biomarker in COPD. By Drs. D. Mahler and D. Halpin.Family presence for critically ill patients during a pandemic. By Drs. J. Hart and S. Taylor.



Executive summary: diagnosis and evaluation of hypersensitivity pneumonitis: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. By Dr. L. Fernandez Perez et al.



The usefulness of chest CT imaging in patients with suspected or diagnosed COVID-19: A review of literature. By Dr. S. Machnicki et al.



Oxygen therapy in sleep-disordered breathing. By Dr. S. Zeineddine et al.