Society News

You’ve probably noticed that we recently rolled out a new website – one that is updated, streamlined, and user-friendly (and if you haven’t, go check it out!). Our goal for this project was to ensure that chestnet.org remains your go-to resource when it comes to pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine, and to accomplish that, we recognized that some major changes were needed. In short, while we were on the cutting-edge of chest medicine, our website definitely was not.

That’s why we’ve redesigned everything from the ground up. Our very best tools, resources, and offerings are now front and center, which means that you’ll be able to find everything you’re looking for, plus some extras you aren’t, with a few simple clicks.

While there are a lot of new features on the site that we can’t wait for you to discover, here are the upgrades that we’re most excited about.
 

Mobile responsiveness

One of the biggest changes to the site is that it is now mobile responsive. That means you’ll have a seamless experience regardless of what device you’re on. Whether that’s a phone or a tablet, you’ll be able to log in to your account, view any of our resources, and purchase products – functions that used to be only accessible from a desktop.

Intuitive navigation

We have so much content to offer that finding a place for everything can be difficult, and, in the past, resources often got buried within the navigation. That’s why we spent months taking an inventory of our entire site so that we could reorganize all of our resources in a way that would make more sense to you – our users.

Community-centered

We know that you joined CHEST for more than our top-tier resources; you joined to be part of a community. That’s why the new site includes more community-based hubs and opportunities for peer-to-peer interaction. We’ll continue to add more features like blog commenting and Twitter feeds so that you can continue to engage with your colleagues, let your voice be heard, and expand your circle of peers.

User-focused design

What are you hoping to find when coming to our site? What do you want to accomplish? What features would make that easier? By asking these questions, employing a succinct set of design principles, and completing several rounds of member prototype testing, we believe that we redesigned the site not only for you, but with you.

While we’ve made some major upgrades, we’re not done yet. We’ll continue to enhance the site in the upcoming month with one goal in mind – to ensure you’re getting more out of your membership than ever before.

You’ve probably noticed that we recently rolled out a new website – one that is updated, streamlined, and user-friendly (and if you haven’t, go check it out!). Our goal for this project was to ensure that chestnet.org remains your go-to resource when it comes to pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine, and to accomplish that, we recognized that some major changes were needed. In short, while we were on the cutting-edge of chest medicine, our website definitely was not.

That’s why we’ve redesigned everything from the ground up. Our very best tools, resources, and offerings are now front and center, which means that you’ll be able to find everything you’re looking for, plus some extras you aren’t, with a few simple clicks.

While there are a lot of new features on the site that we can’t wait for you to discover, here are the upgrades that we’re most excited about.
 

Mobile responsiveness

One of the biggest changes to the site is that it is now mobile responsive. That means you’ll have a seamless experience regardless of what device you’re on. Whether that’s a phone or a tablet, you’ll be able to log in to your account, view any of our resources, and purchase products – functions that used to be only accessible from a desktop.

Intuitive navigation

We have so much content to offer that finding a place for everything can be difficult, and, in the past, resources often got buried within the navigation. That’s why we spent months taking an inventory of our entire site so that we could reorganize all of our resources in a way that would make more sense to you – our users.

Community-centered

We know that you joined CHEST for more than our top-tier resources; you joined to be part of a community. That’s why the new site includes more community-based hubs and opportunities for peer-to-peer interaction. We’ll continue to add more features like blog commenting and Twitter feeds so that you can continue to engage with your colleagues, let your voice be heard, and expand your circle of peers.

User-focused design

What are you hoping to find when coming to our site? What do you want to accomplish? What features would make that easier? By asking these questions, employing a succinct set of design principles, and completing several rounds of member prototype testing, we believe that we redesigned the site not only for you, but with you.

While we’ve made some major upgrades, we’re not done yet. We’ll continue to enhance the site in the upcoming month with one goal in mind – to ensure you’re getting more out of your membership than ever before.

You’ve probably noticed that we recently rolled out a new website – one that is updated, streamlined, and user-friendly (and if you haven’t, go check it out!). Our goal for this project was to ensure that chestnet.org remains your go-to resource when it comes to pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine, and to accomplish that, we recognized that some major changes were needed. In short, while we were on the cutting-edge of chest medicine, our website definitely was not.

That’s why we’ve redesigned everything from the ground up. Our very best tools, resources, and offerings are now front and center, which means that you’ll be able to find everything you’re looking for, plus some extras you aren’t, with a few simple clicks.

While there are a lot of new features on the site that we can’t wait for you to discover, here are the upgrades that we’re most excited about.
 

Mobile responsiveness

One of the biggest changes to the site is that it is now mobile responsive. That means you’ll have a seamless experience regardless of what device you’re on. Whether that’s a phone or a tablet, you’ll be able to log in to your account, view any of our resources, and purchase products – functions that used to be only accessible from a desktop.

Intuitive navigation

We have so much content to offer that finding a place for everything can be difficult, and, in the past, resources often got buried within the navigation. That’s why we spent months taking an inventory of our entire site so that we could reorganize all of our resources in a way that would make more sense to you – our users.

Community-centered

We know that you joined CHEST for more than our top-tier resources; you joined to be part of a community. That’s why the new site includes more community-based hubs and opportunities for peer-to-peer interaction. We’ll continue to add more features like blog commenting and Twitter feeds so that you can continue to engage with your colleagues, let your voice be heard, and expand your circle of peers.

User-focused design

What are you hoping to find when coming to our site? What do you want to accomplish? What features would make that easier? By asking these questions, employing a succinct set of design principles, and completing several rounds of member prototype testing, we believe that we redesigned the site not only for you, but with you.

While we’ve made some major upgrades, we’re not done yet. We’ll continue to enhance the site in the upcoming month with one goal in mind – to ensure you’re getting more out of your membership than ever before.

Disaster response

Advancing disaster medicine and global health in times of pandemic

Worldwide hardships due to COVID-19 have revealed opportunities for improvement. Disaster education, telemedicine, knowledge sharing, and resource allocation have been highlighted as such areas. In an August 2020 publication, Hart et al. argue, “Every hospital needs a Disaster Medicine physician now” (Hart et al. “Why Every US Hospital Needs a Disaster Medicine Physician Now”).

Every physician must be prepared to be the expert in times of disaster. A survey of U.S. medical students showed that despite few respondents (<27%) feeling adequately educated, >90% are willing to respond to a natural disaster or a pandemic (Kaiser et al. Disaster Med Pub Health Prep. 2009;3[4]:210-16). While natural disasters have increased by almost 35% since the 1990s, a robust approach to disaster education is not routinely implemented across the fields of medicine, nursing, allied health, and health administration (Freebairn. World Disasters Report 2020: Executive Summary. 2020 ed. IFRC. ). Notably, disaster education provides opportunities for multidisciplinary team-building where learners build a foundation of knowledge together. While no ideal educational model has been fully adopted, high-quality educational opportunities include National Disaster Life Support Foundation courses, SALT triage, and ATLS (Homer et al. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine).

Telemedicine has emerged as a very effective means of disaster support through both direct patient encounters and provider education. Tele-triage used to delineate patients requiring urgent hospitalization from those who can be managed at home has proven effective in areas with limited health care facilities (World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease.). Knowledge sharing opportunities from organizations like Project ECHO have allowed for >368,000 learners from 146 countries to exchange information during >8,000 learning sessions (Project ECHO COVID-19 response.).

Physicians of all specialties should continue to develop skills in triage, surge capacity management, ethical/legal issues surrounding disasters, organizational interoperability, and telemedicine, and emphasize skills to ensure their own personal protection.

Christopher Miller, DO, MPH

Steering Committee Fellow-in-Training Member

Sarang Patil, MD

Steering Committee Member
 

Practice operations

Telehealth and postpandemic care

Telehealth is the use of electronic information and telecommunication technologies to provide care when the physician and the patient are not in the same place. Telehealth has been available for 40 years. The COVID-19 pandemic forced health care providers, systems, and patients to quickly adapt to virtual audio and visual visits, new documentation parameters, billing, and reimbursement structures. Emergency rules have removed the barriers to adoption of home-based diagnostics and virtual visits. It is expected that 20% to 30% post-pandemic care will be provided via telehealth.

Telehealth is particularly beneficial in providing counseling services or managing chronic illnesses, such as COPD and heart failure. There has been an explosion of monitoring devices both wearable and implantable. Some devices, which monitor PA pressure, have been shown to reduce heart failure hospitalizations and all-cause hospitalizations (Shavelle DM, et al. Circ Heart Fail. 2020;13: e006863). Studies have been conducted on home spirometry and oximetry devices in post-lung transplant, ILD (Russell AM et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Oct 15; 194[8]:989-997), and CF patients (Compton M et al. Telemed J E Health . 2020 Aug;26[8]:978-84). As we move forward, we will have to ascertain what data acquisition is relevant and develop processes to address it in real time.

In this changing landscape of health care delivery, we can anticipate an increase in virtual visits and a trend toward e-consults, which will necessitate further advancements in remote monitoring and assessment and will require us to adopt new practice models.

Caitlin Baxter, MBBS

Steering Committee Fellow-in-Training

Namita Sood, MBBCh, FCCP

Steering Committee Member
 

Transplant network

The rise in lung transplant for older patients

Over the past 20 years, there has been a dramatic increase in lung transplantation in elderly patients, with wide variability in age limit amongst transplant centers. The number of recipients over the age of 65 has risen from 6.9% in 2004 to 29.6% in 2016 in the United States, and 2.6% to 17% internationally. There is a number of factors driving this increase; the prevalence of advanced lung disease with increasing age, advances in targeted therapies to treat cystic fibrosis, an increased willingness of centers to perform transplants in older patients, and the 2005 revision of the Lung Allocation Scoring System (Courtwright A, Cantu E. J Thoracic Dis. 2017:9[9]:3346-51).

In the past, outcomes posttransplant for elderly patients have been conflicting in single-center studies. More recently, Hayanga et al. found no difference in survival up to 1 year between individuals 60-69 and those over 70 (J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34[2]:182-88). Mosher et al., however, found the median survival dropped from 4.64 years for patients aged 65-69 to 3.07 years for patients ≥74 (J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021;40[1]:42-55). Notably, older recipients were more likely to be readmitted at 30 and 90 days, and more likely to be discharged to an inpatient rehabilitation facility following transplant (McCarthy et al. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36:S115; Tang et al. Clin Transplant. 2015;29:581-587).

The use of transplant in elderly patients comes with many concerns regarding neurocognitive status, frailty, and other comorbidities, all of which must be rigorously tested prior to consideration(Biswas R et al. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100:443-51). Recipient age, creatinine level, bilirubin level, steroid use at the time of transplant, and hospitalization at the time of transplant were associated with increased mortality (Mosher et al. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021;40[1]:42-55). Further research is warranted in this evolving area.

Melissa B. Lesko, DO

Grant Turner, MD, MHA

Steering Committee Members
 

Women’s lung health

Will the new pulmonary hypertension hemodynamic classification temper the PH ‘sex-paradox’?

Older and contemporary PH registries have consistently shown that PH predominantly affects women ~2 to 3.5 times than men, with female patients having better survival compared with men (Kozu K et al. Heart Vessels. 2018;33[8]:93), a fact attributed to better RV function in female than male subjects. This PH sex-paradox denotes that while estrogen leads to increased susceptibility to PH, it appears to confer better outcomes after PH develops due to improved RV function, since RV dysfunction is a strong predictor of poor outcomes in PH. Multiple preclinical studies have described how estrogen provides protective effects on the RV (Cheng TC et al. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2020;319:H1459; Frump AL et al. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2015;308:L873).
 

The recent recommended updates to the hemodynamic definition reflect acknowledgment of irrefutable evidence that even mildly elevated mPAP (between 19 and 24 mm Hg) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality based on consistent data from pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) as well as from other forms of PH [Simonneau G et al. Eur Respir J. 2019;(Jan 24);53(1):1801913). With incorporation of the updated definition that more accurately captures the disease state and its progression, an unaddressed question still remains as to how the new classification will change PH treatment algorithm and outcomes in women compared with men. Setting the definition of PH at a mPAP of 20 mm Hg not only better represents the typical patients with PH in practice, such as those with PH due to left-sided heart disease (Group 2) or PH associated with chronic lung disease (Group 3), but incorporates the preclinical pathologic disease state of PH, in which symptoms may not be evident (Maron BA, et al. Circulation. 2016;133:1240). In adhering to the new PH definition, will earlier diagnosis across the spectrum of all individuals with PH before RV dysfunction has developed improve outcomes for all those afflicted with PH and equalize outcomes between men and women? As future studies continue to investigate the direct effects of sex hormones on the RV and dissect the mechanisms leading to the sex differences in RV function in PH, a pre-clinical diagnosis in all PH patients, particularly male patients with Group 2/3 disease, may mitigate some of the previously observed advantages of estrogen on outcomes in PH.

Lavannya Pandit, MD, FCCP

Disaster response

Advancing disaster medicine and global health in times of pandemic

Worldwide hardships due to COVID-19 have revealed opportunities for improvement. Disaster education, telemedicine, knowledge sharing, and resource allocation have been highlighted as such areas. In an August 2020 publication, Hart et al. argue, “Every hospital needs a Disaster Medicine physician now” (Hart et al. “Why Every US Hospital Needs a Disaster Medicine Physician Now”).

Every physician must be prepared to be the expert in times of disaster. A survey of U.S. medical students showed that despite few respondents (<27%) feeling adequately educated, >90% are willing to respond to a natural disaster or a pandemic (Kaiser et al. Disaster Med Pub Health Prep. 2009;3[4]:210-16). While natural disasters have increased by almost 35% since the 1990s, a robust approach to disaster education is not routinely implemented across the fields of medicine, nursing, allied health, and health administration (Freebairn. World Disasters Report 2020: Executive Summary. 2020 ed. IFRC. ). Notably, disaster education provides opportunities for multidisciplinary team-building where learners build a foundation of knowledge together. While no ideal educational model has been fully adopted, high-quality educational opportunities include National Disaster Life Support Foundation courses, SALT triage, and ATLS (Homer et al. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine).

Telemedicine has emerged as a very effective means of disaster support through both direct patient encounters and provider education. Tele-triage used to delineate patients requiring urgent hospitalization from those who can be managed at home has proven effective in areas with limited health care facilities (World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease.). Knowledge sharing opportunities from organizations like Project ECHO have allowed for >368,000 learners from 146 countries to exchange information during >8,000 learning sessions (Project ECHO COVID-19 response.).

Physicians of all specialties should continue to develop skills in triage, surge capacity management, ethical/legal issues surrounding disasters, organizational interoperability, and telemedicine, and emphasize skills to ensure their own personal protection.

Christopher Miller, DO, MPH

Steering Committee Fellow-in-Training Member

Sarang Patil, MD

Steering Committee Member
 

Practice operations

Telehealth and postpandemic care

Telehealth is the use of electronic information and telecommunication technologies to provide care when the physician and the patient are not in the same place. Telehealth has been available for 40 years. The COVID-19 pandemic forced health care providers, systems, and patients to quickly adapt to virtual audio and visual visits, new documentation parameters, billing, and reimbursement structures. Emergency rules have removed the barriers to adoption of home-based diagnostics and virtual visits. It is expected that 20% to 30% post-pandemic care will be provided via telehealth.

Telehealth is particularly beneficial in providing counseling services or managing chronic illnesses, such as COPD and heart failure. There has been an explosion of monitoring devices both wearable and implantable. Some devices, which monitor PA pressure, have been shown to reduce heart failure hospitalizations and all-cause hospitalizations (Shavelle DM, et al. Circ Heart Fail. 2020;13: e006863). Studies have been conducted on home spirometry and oximetry devices in post-lung transplant, ILD (Russell AM et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Oct 15; 194[8]:989-997), and CF patients (Compton M et al. Telemed J E Health . 2020 Aug;26[8]:978-84). As we move forward, we will have to ascertain what data acquisition is relevant and develop processes to address it in real time.

In this changing landscape of health care delivery, we can anticipate an increase in virtual visits and a trend toward e-consults, which will necessitate further advancements in remote monitoring and assessment and will require us to adopt new practice models.

Caitlin Baxter, MBBS

Steering Committee Fellow-in-Training

Namita Sood, MBBCh, FCCP

Steering Committee Member
 

Transplant network

The rise in lung transplant for older patients

Over the past 20 years, there has been a dramatic increase in lung transplantation in elderly patients, with wide variability in age limit amongst transplant centers. The number of recipients over the age of 65 has risen from 6.9% in 2004 to 29.6% in 2016 in the United States, and 2.6% to 17% internationally. There is a number of factors driving this increase; the prevalence of advanced lung disease with increasing age, advances in targeted therapies to treat cystic fibrosis, an increased willingness of centers to perform transplants in older patients, and the 2005 revision of the Lung Allocation Scoring System (Courtwright A, Cantu E. J Thoracic Dis. 2017:9[9]:3346-51).

In the past, outcomes posttransplant for elderly patients have been conflicting in single-center studies. More recently, Hayanga et al. found no difference in survival up to 1 year between individuals 60-69 and those over 70 (J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34[2]:182-88). Mosher et al., however, found the median survival dropped from 4.64 years for patients aged 65-69 to 3.07 years for patients ≥74 (J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021;40[1]:42-55). Notably, older recipients were more likely to be readmitted at 30 and 90 days, and more likely to be discharged to an inpatient rehabilitation facility following transplant (McCarthy et al. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36:S115; Tang et al. Clin Transplant. 2015;29:581-587).

The use of transplant in elderly patients comes with many concerns regarding neurocognitive status, frailty, and other comorbidities, all of which must be rigorously tested prior to consideration(Biswas R et al. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100:443-51). Recipient age, creatinine level, bilirubin level, steroid use at the time of transplant, and hospitalization at the time of transplant were associated with increased mortality (Mosher et al. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021;40[1]:42-55). Further research is warranted in this evolving area.

Melissa B. Lesko, DO

Grant Turner, MD, MHA

Steering Committee Members
 

Women’s lung health

Will the new pulmonary hypertension hemodynamic classification temper the PH ‘sex-paradox’?

Older and contemporary PH registries have consistently shown that PH predominantly affects women ~2 to 3.5 times than men, with female patients having better survival compared with men (Kozu K et al. Heart Vessels. 2018;33[8]:93), a fact attributed to better RV function in female than male subjects. This PH sex-paradox denotes that while estrogen leads to increased susceptibility to PH, it appears to confer better outcomes after PH develops due to improved RV function, since RV dysfunction is a strong predictor of poor outcomes in PH. Multiple preclinical studies have described how estrogen provides protective effects on the RV (Cheng TC et al. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2020;319:H1459; Frump AL et al. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2015;308:L873).
 

The recent recommended updates to the hemodynamic definition reflect acknowledgment of irrefutable evidence that even mildly elevated mPAP (between 19 and 24 mm Hg) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality based on consistent data from pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) as well as from other forms of PH [Simonneau G et al. Eur Respir J. 2019;(Jan 24);53(1):1801913). With incorporation of the updated definition that more accurately captures the disease state and its progression, an unaddressed question still remains as to how the new classification will change PH treatment algorithm and outcomes in women compared with men. Setting the definition of PH at a mPAP of 20 mm Hg not only better represents the typical patients with PH in practice, such as those with PH due to left-sided heart disease (Group 2) or PH associated with chronic lung disease (Group 3), but incorporates the preclinical pathologic disease state of PH, in which symptoms may not be evident (Maron BA, et al. Circulation. 2016;133:1240). In adhering to the new PH definition, will earlier diagnosis across the spectrum of all individuals with PH before RV dysfunction has developed improve outcomes for all those afflicted with PH and equalize outcomes between men and women? As future studies continue to investigate the direct effects of sex hormones on the RV and dissect the mechanisms leading to the sex differences in RV function in PH, a pre-clinical diagnosis in all PH patients, particularly male patients with Group 2/3 disease, may mitigate some of the previously observed advantages of estrogen on outcomes in PH.

Lavannya Pandit, MD, FCCP

Disaster response

Advancing disaster medicine and global health in times of pandemic

Worldwide hardships due to COVID-19 have revealed opportunities for improvement. Disaster education, telemedicine, knowledge sharing, and resource allocation have been highlighted as such areas. In an August 2020 publication, Hart et al. argue, “Every hospital needs a Disaster Medicine physician now” (Hart et al. “Why Every US Hospital Needs a Disaster Medicine Physician Now”).

Every physician must be prepared to be the expert in times of disaster. A survey of U.S. medical students showed that despite few respondents (<27%) feeling adequately educated, >90% are willing to respond to a natural disaster or a pandemic (Kaiser et al. Disaster Med Pub Health Prep. 2009;3[4]:210-16). While natural disasters have increased by almost 35% since the 1990s, a robust approach to disaster education is not routinely implemented across the fields of medicine, nursing, allied health, and health administration (Freebairn. World Disasters Report 2020: Executive Summary. 2020 ed. IFRC. ). Notably, disaster education provides opportunities for multidisciplinary team-building where learners build a foundation of knowledge together. While no ideal educational model has been fully adopted, high-quality educational opportunities include National Disaster Life Support Foundation courses, SALT triage, and ATLS (Homer et al. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine).

Telemedicine has emerged as a very effective means of disaster support through both direct patient encounters and provider education. Tele-triage used to delineate patients requiring urgent hospitalization from those who can be managed at home has proven effective in areas with limited health care facilities (World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease.). Knowledge sharing opportunities from organizations like Project ECHO have allowed for >368,000 learners from 146 countries to exchange information during >8,000 learning sessions (Project ECHO COVID-19 response.).

Physicians of all specialties should continue to develop skills in triage, surge capacity management, ethical/legal issues surrounding disasters, organizational interoperability, and telemedicine, and emphasize skills to ensure their own personal protection.

Christopher Miller, DO, MPH

Steering Committee Fellow-in-Training Member

Sarang Patil, MD

Steering Committee Member
 

Practice operations

Telehealth and postpandemic care

Telehealth is the use of electronic information and telecommunication technologies to provide care when the physician and the patient are not in the same place. Telehealth has been available for 40 years. The COVID-19 pandemic forced health care providers, systems, and patients to quickly adapt to virtual audio and visual visits, new documentation parameters, billing, and reimbursement structures. Emergency rules have removed the barriers to adoption of home-based diagnostics and virtual visits. It is expected that 20% to 30% post-pandemic care will be provided via telehealth.

Telehealth is particularly beneficial in providing counseling services or managing chronic illnesses, such as COPD and heart failure. There has been an explosion of monitoring devices both wearable and implantable. Some devices, which monitor PA pressure, have been shown to reduce heart failure hospitalizations and all-cause hospitalizations (Shavelle DM, et al. Circ Heart Fail. 2020;13: e006863). Studies have been conducted on home spirometry and oximetry devices in post-lung transplant, ILD (Russell AM et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Oct 15; 194[8]:989-997), and CF patients (Compton M et al. Telemed J E Health . 2020 Aug;26[8]:978-84). As we move forward, we will have to ascertain what data acquisition is relevant and develop processes to address it in real time.

In this changing landscape of health care delivery, we can anticipate an increase in virtual visits and a trend toward e-consults, which will necessitate further advancements in remote monitoring and assessment and will require us to adopt new practice models.

Caitlin Baxter, MBBS

Steering Committee Fellow-in-Training

Namita Sood, MBBCh, FCCP

Steering Committee Member
 

Transplant network

The rise in lung transplant for older patients

Over the past 20 years, there has been a dramatic increase in lung transplantation in elderly patients, with wide variability in age limit amongst transplant centers. The number of recipients over the age of 65 has risen from 6.9% in 2004 to 29.6% in 2016 in the United States, and 2.6% to 17% internationally. There is a number of factors driving this increase; the prevalence of advanced lung disease with increasing age, advances in targeted therapies to treat cystic fibrosis, an increased willingness of centers to perform transplants in older patients, and the 2005 revision of the Lung Allocation Scoring System (Courtwright A, Cantu E. J Thoracic Dis. 2017:9[9]:3346-51).

In the past, outcomes posttransplant for elderly patients have been conflicting in single-center studies. More recently, Hayanga et al. found no difference in survival up to 1 year between individuals 60-69 and those over 70 (J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34[2]:182-88). Mosher et al., however, found the median survival dropped from 4.64 years for patients aged 65-69 to 3.07 years for patients ≥74 (J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021;40[1]:42-55). Notably, older recipients were more likely to be readmitted at 30 and 90 days, and more likely to be discharged to an inpatient rehabilitation facility following transplant (McCarthy et al. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36:S115; Tang et al. Clin Transplant. 2015;29:581-587).

The use of transplant in elderly patients comes with many concerns regarding neurocognitive status, frailty, and other comorbidities, all of which must be rigorously tested prior to consideration(Biswas R et al. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100:443-51). Recipient age, creatinine level, bilirubin level, steroid use at the time of transplant, and hospitalization at the time of transplant were associated with increased mortality (Mosher et al. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021;40[1]:42-55). Further research is warranted in this evolving area.

Melissa B. Lesko, DO

Grant Turner, MD, MHA

Steering Committee Members
 

Women’s lung health

Will the new pulmonary hypertension hemodynamic classification temper the PH ‘sex-paradox’?

Older and contemporary PH registries have consistently shown that PH predominantly affects women ~2 to 3.5 times than men, with female patients having better survival compared with men (Kozu K et al. Heart Vessels. 2018;33[8]:93), a fact attributed to better RV function in female than male subjects. This PH sex-paradox denotes that while estrogen leads to increased susceptibility to PH, it appears to confer better outcomes after PH develops due to improved RV function, since RV dysfunction is a strong predictor of poor outcomes in PH. Multiple preclinical studies have described how estrogen provides protective effects on the RV (Cheng TC et al. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2020;319:H1459; Frump AL et al. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2015;308:L873).
 

The recent recommended updates to the hemodynamic definition reflect acknowledgment of irrefutable evidence that even mildly elevated mPAP (between 19 and 24 mm Hg) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality based on consistent data from pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) as well as from other forms of PH [Simonneau G et al. Eur Respir J. 2019;(Jan 24);53(1):1801913). With incorporation of the updated definition that more accurately captures the disease state and its progression, an unaddressed question still remains as to how the new classification will change PH treatment algorithm and outcomes in women compared with men. Setting the definition of PH at a mPAP of 20 mm Hg not only better represents the typical patients with PH in practice, such as those with PH due to left-sided heart disease (Group 2) or PH associated with chronic lung disease (Group 3), but incorporates the preclinical pathologic disease state of PH, in which symptoms may not be evident (Maron BA, et al. Circulation. 2016;133:1240). In adhering to the new PH definition, will earlier diagnosis across the spectrum of all individuals with PH before RV dysfunction has developed improve outcomes for all those afflicted with PH and equalize outcomes between men and women? As future studies continue to investigate the direct effects of sex hormones on the RV and dissect the mechanisms leading to the sex differences in RV function in PH, a pre-clinical diagnosis in all PH patients, particularly male patients with Group 2/3 disease, may mitigate some of the previously observed advantages of estrogen on outcomes in PH.

Lavannya Pandit, MD, FCCP

The AGA journals Gastroenterology, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (CGH), Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology (CMGH), and Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (TIGE) recently selected the recipients of their editorial fellowships, which runs from July 2021 through June 2022. The AGA editorial fellowship program is in its fourth year. 

• Amisha Ahuja, MD (Gastroenterology)
• Helenie Kefalalkes, MD (Gastroenterology)
• Katherine Falloon, MD (CGH)
• Judy Trieu, MD, MPH (CGH)
• Lindsey Kennedy, PhD (CMGH)
• Vivian Ortiz, MD (CMGH)  
• Sagarika Satyavada, MD (TIGE)
• Eric Swei, MD (TIGE)

The AGA journals Gastroenterology, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (CGH), Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology (CMGH), and Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (TIGE) recently selected the recipients of their editorial fellowships, which runs from July 2021 through June 2022. The AGA editorial fellowship program is in its fourth year. 

• Amisha Ahuja, MD (Gastroenterology)
• Helenie Kefalalkes, MD (Gastroenterology)
• Katherine Falloon, MD (CGH)
• Judy Trieu, MD, MPH (CGH)
• Lindsey Kennedy, PhD (CMGH)
• Vivian Ortiz, MD (CMGH)  
• Sagarika Satyavada, MD (TIGE)
• Eric Swei, MD (TIGE)

The AGA journals Gastroenterology, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (CGH), Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology (CMGH), and Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (TIGE) recently selected the recipients of their editorial fellowships, which runs from July 2021 through June 2022. The AGA editorial fellowship program is in its fourth year. 

• Amisha Ahuja, MD (Gastroenterology)
• Helenie Kefalalkes, MD (Gastroenterology)
• Katherine Falloon, MD (CGH)
• Judy Trieu, MD, MPH (CGH)
• Lindsey Kennedy, PhD (CMGH)
• Vivian Ortiz, MD (CMGH)  
• Sagarika Satyavada, MD (TIGE)
• Eric Swei, MD (TIGE)

David Y. Graham, MD – William Beaumont Prize in Gastroenterology

Dr. David Graham is this year’s recipient of the AGA William Beaumont Prize in Gastroenterology. A remarkable clinician, scientist, and mentor to the next generation of GI, Dr. Graham currently serves as professor of medicine-gastroenterology at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas.

Dr. Graham was born in Ancon, in the Panama Canal Zone, where his father was working as an engineer. The family eventually settled in Lake Jackson, a small gulf coast town outside of Houston. There he developed a love for outdoor activities including hunting, fishing, and riding horses. He received a bachelor’s degree from the University of Notre Dame and returned home to Houston to receive his medical degree with honors from Baylor College of Medicine. Dr. Graham’s training was interrupted by the Vietnam War during which he was drafted into the U.S. Army as a flight surgeon.

In addition to his clinical and research missions, Dr. Graham has mentored numerous individuals during his years as a clinician scientist, many of whom have gone on to have successful careers in academic medicine. He has been an active AGA member for more than 4 decades, receiving several honors including the prestigious AGA Mentor Award in 2015 and the Janssen Award for Special Achievement in Gastroenterology.

Read more about Dr. Graham’s life and contribution to the GI community in a commentary in Gastroenterology written by Fasiha Kanwal, MD, and Hashem B. El-Serag, M, MPH. 
 

Kim E. Barrett, PHD, AGAF – Distinguished Achievement Award in Basic Science

Dr. Kim E. Barrett is the 2021 recipient of the AGA Distinguished Achievement Award in Basic Science for her outstanding contributions to understanding mechanisms and regulation of intestinal epithelial transport and barrier function. She currently serves as distinguished professor of medicine at the University of California, San Diego, and is serving as a rotating appointment as director of the Division of Graduate Education of the National Science Foundation.

Born in London, Dr. Barrett was the first of her family to attend college. She earned a BSc in Medicinal Chemistry at University College London where she also stayed to complete her PhD studies. Following the completion of her PhD, Dr. Barrett moved to the U.S. to continue her training at the National Institutes of Health, where she continued her work in studies on the functional heterogeneity of mast cells. Alongside her many contributions to the GI field, she still believes in having fun, living by the phrase “put yourself about a bit.” She is a proud member of the band GI Distress as one of the “Fabulous Fasebettes.”

Read more about Dr. Barrett’s contributions to the GI community in a commentary in Gastroenterology, written by Mark Donowitz, MD, and Stephen Keely, MD.

David Y. Graham, MD – William Beaumont Prize in Gastroenterology

Dr. David Graham is this year’s recipient of the AGA William Beaumont Prize in Gastroenterology. A remarkable clinician, scientist, and mentor to the next generation of GI, Dr. Graham currently serves as professor of medicine-gastroenterology at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas.

Dr. Graham was born in Ancon, in the Panama Canal Zone, where his father was working as an engineer. The family eventually settled in Lake Jackson, a small gulf coast town outside of Houston. There he developed a love for outdoor activities including hunting, fishing, and riding horses. He received a bachelor’s degree from the University of Notre Dame and returned home to Houston to receive his medical degree with honors from Baylor College of Medicine. Dr. Graham’s training was interrupted by the Vietnam War during which he was drafted into the U.S. Army as a flight surgeon.

In addition to his clinical and research missions, Dr. Graham has mentored numerous individuals during his years as a clinician scientist, many of whom have gone on to have successful careers in academic medicine. He has been an active AGA member for more than 4 decades, receiving several honors including the prestigious AGA Mentor Award in 2015 and the Janssen Award for Special Achievement in Gastroenterology.

Read more about Dr. Graham’s life and contribution to the GI community in a commentary in Gastroenterology written by Fasiha Kanwal, MD, and Hashem B. El-Serag, M, MPH. 
 

Kim E. Barrett, PHD, AGAF – Distinguished Achievement Award in Basic Science

Dr. Kim E. Barrett is the 2021 recipient of the AGA Distinguished Achievement Award in Basic Science for her outstanding contributions to understanding mechanisms and regulation of intestinal epithelial transport and barrier function. She currently serves as distinguished professor of medicine at the University of California, San Diego, and is serving as a rotating appointment as director of the Division of Graduate Education of the National Science Foundation.

Born in London, Dr. Barrett was the first of her family to attend college. She earned a BSc in Medicinal Chemistry at University College London where she also stayed to complete her PhD studies. Following the completion of her PhD, Dr. Barrett moved to the U.S. to continue her training at the National Institutes of Health, where she continued her work in studies on the functional heterogeneity of mast cells. Alongside her many contributions to the GI field, she still believes in having fun, living by the phrase “put yourself about a bit.” She is a proud member of the band GI Distress as one of the “Fabulous Fasebettes.”

Read more about Dr. Barrett’s contributions to the GI community in a commentary in Gastroenterology, written by Mark Donowitz, MD, and Stephen Keely, MD.

David Y. Graham, MD – William Beaumont Prize in Gastroenterology

Dr. David Graham is this year’s recipient of the AGA William Beaumont Prize in Gastroenterology. A remarkable clinician, scientist, and mentor to the next generation of GI, Dr. Graham currently serves as professor of medicine-gastroenterology at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas.

Dr. Graham was born in Ancon, in the Panama Canal Zone, where his father was working as an engineer. The family eventually settled in Lake Jackson, a small gulf coast town outside of Houston. There he developed a love for outdoor activities including hunting, fishing, and riding horses. He received a bachelor’s degree from the University of Notre Dame and returned home to Houston to receive his medical degree with honors from Baylor College of Medicine. Dr. Graham’s training was interrupted by the Vietnam War during which he was drafted into the U.S. Army as a flight surgeon.

In addition to his clinical and research missions, Dr. Graham has mentored numerous individuals during his years as a clinician scientist, many of whom have gone on to have successful careers in academic medicine. He has been an active AGA member for more than 4 decades, receiving several honors including the prestigious AGA Mentor Award in 2015 and the Janssen Award for Special Achievement in Gastroenterology.

Read more about Dr. Graham’s life and contribution to the GI community in a commentary in Gastroenterology written by Fasiha Kanwal, MD, and Hashem B. El-Serag, M, MPH. 
 

Kim E. Barrett, PHD, AGAF – Distinguished Achievement Award in Basic Science

Dr. Kim E. Barrett is the 2021 recipient of the AGA Distinguished Achievement Award in Basic Science for her outstanding contributions to understanding mechanisms and regulation of intestinal epithelial transport and barrier function. She currently serves as distinguished professor of medicine at the University of California, San Diego, and is serving as a rotating appointment as director of the Division of Graduate Education of the National Science Foundation.

Born in London, Dr. Barrett was the first of her family to attend college. She earned a BSc in Medicinal Chemistry at University College London where she also stayed to complete her PhD studies. Following the completion of her PhD, Dr. Barrett moved to the U.S. to continue her training at the National Institutes of Health, where she continued her work in studies on the functional heterogeneity of mast cells. Alongside her many contributions to the GI field, she still believes in having fun, living by the phrase “put yourself about a bit.” She is a proud member of the band GI Distress as one of the “Fabulous Fasebettes.”

Read more about Dr. Barrett’s contributions to the GI community in a commentary in Gastroenterology, written by Mark Donowitz, MD, and Stephen Keely, MD.

AGA has released a new Clinical Practice Update Expert Review providing 12 best practice advice statements on the diagnosis and management of bleeding gastric varices. The evidence-based advice includes the following: 

• Initial therapy for bleeding gastric varices should focus on acute hemostasis for hemodynamic stabilization with a plan for further diagnostic evaluation and/or transfer to a tertiary care center with expertise in gastric varices management. 
• Following initial endoscopic hemostasis, cross-sectional (magnetic resonance or CT) imaging with portal venous contrast phase should be obtained to determine vascular anatomy, including the presence or absence of portosystemic shunts and gastrorenal shunts. 
• Determination of definitive therapy for bleeding gastric varices should be based on endoscopic appearance of the gastric varix, the underlying vascular anatomy, presence of comorbid portal hypertensive complications, and available local resources. This is ideally done via a multidisciplinary discussion between the GI or hepatologist and the interventional radiologist. 

In this AGA Clinical Practice Update Expert Review, the experts also suggest adding an estimate of variceal size and high-risk stigmata (discolored marks, platelet plugs) to the Sarin classification when describing patients’ gastric varices.  

Read the full list of the best practice advice statements in the AGA Clinical Practice Update on Management of Bleeding Gastric Varices: Expert Review. 

AGA has released a new Clinical Practice Update Expert Review providing 12 best practice advice statements on the diagnosis and management of bleeding gastric varices. The evidence-based advice includes the following: 

• Initial therapy for bleeding gastric varices should focus on acute hemostasis for hemodynamic stabilization with a plan for further diagnostic evaluation and/or transfer to a tertiary care center with expertise in gastric varices management. 
• Following initial endoscopic hemostasis, cross-sectional (magnetic resonance or CT) imaging with portal venous contrast phase should be obtained to determine vascular anatomy, including the presence or absence of portosystemic shunts and gastrorenal shunts. 
• Determination of definitive therapy for bleeding gastric varices should be based on endoscopic appearance of the gastric varix, the underlying vascular anatomy, presence of comorbid portal hypertensive complications, and available local resources. This is ideally done via a multidisciplinary discussion between the GI or hepatologist and the interventional radiologist. 

In this AGA Clinical Practice Update Expert Review, the experts also suggest adding an estimate of variceal size and high-risk stigmata (discolored marks, platelet plugs) to the Sarin classification when describing patients’ gastric varices.  

Read the full list of the best practice advice statements in the AGA Clinical Practice Update on Management of Bleeding Gastric Varices: Expert Review. 

AGA has released a new Clinical Practice Update Expert Review providing 12 best practice advice statements on the diagnosis and management of bleeding gastric varices. The evidence-based advice includes the following: 

• Initial therapy for bleeding gastric varices should focus on acute hemostasis for hemodynamic stabilization with a plan for further diagnostic evaluation and/or transfer to a tertiary care center with expertise in gastric varices management. 
• Following initial endoscopic hemostasis, cross-sectional (magnetic resonance or CT) imaging with portal venous contrast phase should be obtained to determine vascular anatomy, including the presence or absence of portosystemic shunts and gastrorenal shunts. 
• Determination of definitive therapy for bleeding gastric varices should be based on endoscopic appearance of the gastric varix, the underlying vascular anatomy, presence of comorbid portal hypertensive complications, and available local resources. This is ideally done via a multidisciplinary discussion between the GI or hepatologist and the interventional radiologist. 

In this AGA Clinical Practice Update Expert Review, the experts also suggest adding an estimate of variceal size and high-risk stigmata (discolored marks, platelet plugs) to the Sarin classification when describing patients’ gastric varices.  

Read the full list of the best practice advice statements in the AGA Clinical Practice Update on Management of Bleeding Gastric Varices: Expert Review. 

Hormone replacement therapy and development of new asthma. By Dr. E. Hansen et al.



Sex and gender omic biomarkers in men and women with COPD: Considerations for precision medicine. By Dr. D. Demeo.



Pulmonary function and radiological features in survivors of critical covid-19: A 3-month prospective cohort. By Dr. F. Barbe et al.



Characteristics and prevalence of domestic and occupational inhalational exposures across interstitial lung diseases. By Dr. C. Lee et al.



Identification and remediation of environmental exposures in patients with interstitial lung disease: Evidence review and practical considerations. By Dr. M. Salisbury et al.



How we do it: Creating an organizational culture for the chest physician. By Dr. J. Stoller et al..



Proposed quality metrics for lung cancer screening programs: A national lung cancer roundtable project. By Dr. P. Mazzone et al.

Hormone replacement therapy and development of new asthma. By Dr. E. Hansen et al.



Sex and gender omic biomarkers in men and women with COPD: Considerations for precision medicine. By Dr. D. Demeo.



Pulmonary function and radiological features in survivors of critical covid-19: A 3-month prospective cohort. By Dr. F. Barbe et al.



Characteristics and prevalence of domestic and occupational inhalational exposures across interstitial lung diseases. By Dr. C. Lee et al.



Identification and remediation of environmental exposures in patients with interstitial lung disease: Evidence review and practical considerations. By Dr. M. Salisbury et al.



How we do it: Creating an organizational culture for the chest physician. By Dr. J. Stoller et al..



Proposed quality metrics for lung cancer screening programs: A national lung cancer roundtable project. By Dr. P. Mazzone et al.

Hormone replacement therapy and development of new asthma. By Dr. E. Hansen et al.



Sex and gender omic biomarkers in men and women with COPD: Considerations for precision medicine. By Dr. D. Demeo.



Pulmonary function and radiological features in survivors of critical covid-19: A 3-month prospective cohort. By Dr. F. Barbe et al.



Characteristics and prevalence of domestic and occupational inhalational exposures across interstitial lung diseases. By Dr. C. Lee et al.



Identification and remediation of environmental exposures in patients with interstitial lung disease: Evidence review and practical considerations. By Dr. M. Salisbury et al.



How we do it: Creating an organizational culture for the chest physician. By Dr. J. Stoller et al..



Proposed quality metrics for lung cancer screening programs: A national lung cancer roundtable project. By Dr. P. Mazzone et al.

The NetWorks Challenge 2021 is kicking off in July with a 25k to celebrate the Foundation’s 25th anniversary. This year, we’re asking each NetWork to participate in a physical challenge, virtually. Make your way to 25k by walking, running, biking – or any activity that suits you.

Through the challenge, you can engage in friendly competition while supporting the goals of the Foundation. This year, money raised will directly help us in addressing health disparities through our microgrants program and will support travel grants for doctors-in-training looking to attend CHEST 2021.

With your help, by participating in the NetWorks Challenge, we can fund grants that aim to lend a hand to those who need it the most. Expanding research capabilities, improving patient care, and giving access to medical equipment are just a few ways microgrants from the CHEST Foundation have been used in the past.

Salim Surani, MD, MSc, FCCP, is a long-time supporter of the NetWorks Challenge and the Foundation’s grants program. “Whatever the Foundation pays in terms of grants and awards not only impacts the recipient but also the community as a whole ... For me, it was a no-brainer to get involved in an organization that actually raises funding to support community, education, and research,” Dr. Surani said.

With your support, during the NetWorks Challenge, we can provide grants to more clinicians looking to make a difference in chest medicine.

Encourage your NetWork members to join you this summer in the race to 25k.

“When you work within the NetWorks and join together, and work along with the CHEST Foundation, the impact is much more powerful. I always believed that it is a privilege for us that we have the outlet at the CHEST Foundation to provide grants,” Dr. Surani said.

To learn more about this initiative and this year’s NetWorks Challenge, visit the CHEST Foundation’s website at https://foundation.chestnet.org/.

The NetWorks Challenge 2021 is kicking off in July with a 25k to celebrate the Foundation’s 25th anniversary. This year, we’re asking each NetWork to participate in a physical challenge, virtually. Make your way to 25k by walking, running, biking – or any activity that suits you.

Through the challenge, you can engage in friendly competition while supporting the goals of the Foundation. This year, money raised will directly help us in addressing health disparities through our microgrants program and will support travel grants for doctors-in-training looking to attend CHEST 2021.

With your help, by participating in the NetWorks Challenge, we can fund grants that aim to lend a hand to those who need it the most. Expanding research capabilities, improving patient care, and giving access to medical equipment are just a few ways microgrants from the CHEST Foundation have been used in the past.

Salim Surani, MD, MSc, FCCP, is a long-time supporter of the NetWorks Challenge and the Foundation’s grants program. “Whatever the Foundation pays in terms of grants and awards not only impacts the recipient but also the community as a whole ... For me, it was a no-brainer to get involved in an organization that actually raises funding to support community, education, and research,” Dr. Surani said.

With your support, during the NetWorks Challenge, we can provide grants to more clinicians looking to make a difference in chest medicine.

Encourage your NetWork members to join you this summer in the race to 25k.

“When you work within the NetWorks and join together, and work along with the CHEST Foundation, the impact is much more powerful. I always believed that it is a privilege for us that we have the outlet at the CHEST Foundation to provide grants,” Dr. Surani said.

To learn more about this initiative and this year’s NetWorks Challenge, visit the CHEST Foundation’s website at https://foundation.chestnet.org/.

The NetWorks Challenge 2021 is kicking off in July with a 25k to celebrate the Foundation’s 25th anniversary. This year, we’re asking each NetWork to participate in a physical challenge, virtually. Make your way to 25k by walking, running, biking – or any activity that suits you.

Through the challenge, you can engage in friendly competition while supporting the goals of the Foundation. This year, money raised will directly help us in addressing health disparities through our microgrants program and will support travel grants for doctors-in-training looking to attend CHEST 2021.

With your help, by participating in the NetWorks Challenge, we can fund grants that aim to lend a hand to those who need it the most. Expanding research capabilities, improving patient care, and giving access to medical equipment are just a few ways microgrants from the CHEST Foundation have been used in the past.

Salim Surani, MD, MSc, FCCP, is a long-time supporter of the NetWorks Challenge and the Foundation’s grants program. “Whatever the Foundation pays in terms of grants and awards not only impacts the recipient but also the community as a whole ... For me, it was a no-brainer to get involved in an organization that actually raises funding to support community, education, and research,” Dr. Surani said.

With your support, during the NetWorks Challenge, we can provide grants to more clinicians looking to make a difference in chest medicine.

Encourage your NetWork members to join you this summer in the race to 25k.

“When you work within the NetWorks and join together, and work along with the CHEST Foundation, the impact is much more powerful. I always believed that it is a privilege for us that we have the outlet at the CHEST Foundation to provide grants,” Dr. Surani said.

To learn more about this initiative and this year’s NetWorks Challenge, visit the CHEST Foundation’s website at https://foundation.chestnet.org/.

This year’s CHEST Annual Meeting will push the envelope of fun through various educational games and experiences for those attending on-site and online.

CHEST is supercharging the escape room experience with the expansion of two unique on-site escape scenarios to solve, First Contact and Shuttle Crash. In escape rooms, small teams work against the clock to solve a medical puzzle and unlock the final challenges. Those attending online can take a break and join the excitement with First Contact, a mission to Jupiter led by our space lieutenant, William Kelly, MD, FCCP, and faculty and staff game fleet. To build off the futuristic hands-on experiences, CHEST will be debuting intubation procedural simulations using state-of-the-art virtual reality technology.

If you prefer to join the fun using your mobile device, CHEST is releasing daily task-based missions that you can track and complete using your phone. These missions will include a variety of social activities designed around the conference halls, hotels, clinic, and your own home that are sure to get you moving and working as a team.

During the 4 days of the annual meeting, CHEST will also host an exclusive event called “Play With the Pros.” You can test your knowledge and play alongside annual meeting cochairs, Chris Carroll, MD, FCCP, and David Zielinski, MD, FCCP, for the chance to win a grand prize. As an added bonus, CHEST is offering daily prize drawings for players and social media recognition to those who top the leaderboards in the CHEST Player Hub. The Player Hub hosts more than 10 bite-sized mobile games and is available on demand with your CHEST ID.

Additionally, live game breaks hosted by our faculty between education sessions will give you the chance to unwind and play in real time with your peers and colleagues. On-site, CHEST invites you to shoot hoops, drive remote-controlled cars, and shuffle across the gameboard floors. From your couch or desk, you can tune in to test your knowledge in our livestreamed trivia or sign up for the chance to receive a trivia question phone call from our faculty, which is tied to a grand prize.

The opportunities to play and learn during CHEST Games are endless at CHEST 2021!

This year’s CHEST Annual Meeting will push the envelope of fun through various educational games and experiences for those attending on-site and online.

CHEST is supercharging the escape room experience with the expansion of two unique on-site escape scenarios to solve, First Contact and Shuttle Crash. In escape rooms, small teams work against the clock to solve a medical puzzle and unlock the final challenges. Those attending online can take a break and join the excitement with First Contact, a mission to Jupiter led by our space lieutenant, William Kelly, MD, FCCP, and faculty and staff game fleet. To build off the futuristic hands-on experiences, CHEST will be debuting intubation procedural simulations using state-of-the-art virtual reality technology.

If you prefer to join the fun using your mobile device, CHEST is releasing daily task-based missions that you can track and complete using your phone. These missions will include a variety of social activities designed around the conference halls, hotels, clinic, and your own home that are sure to get you moving and working as a team.

During the 4 days of the annual meeting, CHEST will also host an exclusive event called “Play With the Pros.” You can test your knowledge and play alongside annual meeting cochairs, Chris Carroll, MD, FCCP, and David Zielinski, MD, FCCP, for the chance to win a grand prize. As an added bonus, CHEST is offering daily prize drawings for players and social media recognition to those who top the leaderboards in the CHEST Player Hub. The Player Hub hosts more than 10 bite-sized mobile games and is available on demand with your CHEST ID.

Additionally, live game breaks hosted by our faculty between education sessions will give you the chance to unwind and play in real time with your peers and colleagues. On-site, CHEST invites you to shoot hoops, drive remote-controlled cars, and shuffle across the gameboard floors. From your couch or desk, you can tune in to test your knowledge in our livestreamed trivia or sign up for the chance to receive a trivia question phone call from our faculty, which is tied to a grand prize.

The opportunities to play and learn during CHEST Games are endless at CHEST 2021!

This year’s CHEST Annual Meeting will push the envelope of fun through various educational games and experiences for those attending on-site and online.

CHEST is supercharging the escape room experience with the expansion of two unique on-site escape scenarios to solve, First Contact and Shuttle Crash. In escape rooms, small teams work against the clock to solve a medical puzzle and unlock the final challenges. Those attending online can take a break and join the excitement with First Contact, a mission to Jupiter led by our space lieutenant, William Kelly, MD, FCCP, and faculty and staff game fleet. To build off the futuristic hands-on experiences, CHEST will be debuting intubation procedural simulations using state-of-the-art virtual reality technology.

If you prefer to join the fun using your mobile device, CHEST is releasing daily task-based missions that you can track and complete using your phone. These missions will include a variety of social activities designed around the conference halls, hotels, clinic, and your own home that are sure to get you moving and working as a team.

During the 4 days of the annual meeting, CHEST will also host an exclusive event called “Play With the Pros.” You can test your knowledge and play alongside annual meeting cochairs, Chris Carroll, MD, FCCP, and David Zielinski, MD, FCCP, for the chance to win a grand prize. As an added bonus, CHEST is offering daily prize drawings for players and social media recognition to those who top the leaderboards in the CHEST Player Hub. The Player Hub hosts more than 10 bite-sized mobile games and is available on demand with your CHEST ID.

Additionally, live game breaks hosted by our faculty between education sessions will give you the chance to unwind and play in real time with your peers and colleagues. On-site, CHEST invites you to shoot hoops, drive remote-controlled cars, and shuffle across the gameboard floors. From your couch or desk, you can tune in to test your knowledge in our livestreamed trivia or sign up for the chance to receive a trivia question phone call from our faculty, which is tied to a grand prize.

The opportunities to play and learn during CHEST Games are endless at CHEST 2021!

The CHEST Board of Regents met in mid-June for its first in-person meeting in more than a year. It served as a lovely reminder that not only are in-person meetings a more effective way to conduct the business of the College, but that the members of the board have really missed seeing each other without an intervening screen and webcam.

First on the agenda was a recap by the CHEST presidents of their recent strategic retreat. Most relevant to the organization was a recommendation that we revise the manner by which the CHEST strategic plan is set. If the last year has taught us anything, it is that planning for the future is essential, but we must also allow for flexibility when external forces change what the future holds. Accordingly, we will be replacing the former 5-year planning cycle with a more nimble annual review. From a member’s standpoint, this means that you will see more frequent revisions of those plans (Strategic Plan, American College of Chest Physicians).

Over the last year, the CHEST Foundation has sponsored a series of “listening tours,” which has allowed our members and leaders to hear from many of our patients who feel disenfranchised from the medical system because of struggles with communication, finances, and access, among other issues. The willingness of our patients to share their struggles with us has inspired the Foundation to try to make inroads into these, better navigating these barriers. In direct response to what we’ve heard, the team is designing programs to help our caregivers focus on the psychological, social, environmental, and personal factors that impact our patients’ ability to obtain the critical health care that all need and deserve.

Our ability to execute and deliver such programs is contingent on successful fundraising efforts. Ian Nathanson, president of the CHEST Foundation, reviewed fundraising progress with the board. Over these long months, donors, participants, and friends of the Foundation have participated in virtual events designed to foster engagement and comradery through this difficult time. This June, we held a virtual and in-person Belmont Stakes event that has shown that we can adapt to challenging times and that our membership is still incredibly supportive of the Foundation’s mission. Thank you to all of you who participated in or donated to the CHEST Foundation over the last year!

The last 18 months have had a marked impact on our ability to provide the live, interactive learning experiences for which CHEST is known, but efforts in the remote learning space have yielded impressive increases in both the number of remote learning opportunities and the breadth of our members who are using them. As one example, the number of CHEST podcast views quadrupled last year compared with 2019. Although CHEST reopened its headquarters for live learning opportunities this summer, and we are looking to move significantly back toward “business as usual” with CHEST 2021 in Orlando this October, we will also be carefully considering how best to incorporate the lessons learned in the remote offering space as the world reopens in the coming year.

Neil Freedman, chair of CHEST’s Health Advocacy and Policy Committee (HPAC), presented a review of the committee’s work since its inception just over 1 year ago. In addition to putting together a multi-society Technical Expert Panel on the use and coverage of noninvasive ventilation, HPAC worked with 18 other societies in drafting a response to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s draft on coverage for CPAP therapy for obstructive sleep apnea. For members interested in getting more involved in CHEST’s advocacy efforts, we are seeking self-nominations for members of several working groups (nominations to open soon); in addition, there will be sessions during CHEST 2021 focused on our advocacy efforts and how you can participate, as well as best practices in the advocacy space.

Several months ago, the Exeter Group was asked by the board to analyze how CHEST can expand our organizational efforts in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Representatives from the Exeter Group joined the meeting to provide board members with preliminary data. Limited interviews with both members and staff have begun to provide a picture of where CHEST has already made some progress in this space, and where our ongoing challenges and opportunities for improvement still exist; it is clear that there is a wide range of opinions on these complicated issues. As our consultants are only 1 month into this 6-month phase of the project, we expect a great deal more information to come, with a plan for ongoing surveys of and focus groups for our members; when you receive one of these requests, please make every effort to complete it as candidly as possible, regardless of your viewpoint. The consulting work will culminate with a final presentation to the board just before the annual meeting in the fall, with specific recommendations on organizational actions that will be used to implement a multiyear DEI plan.

The Governance Committee, represented by Stephanie Levine, made several recommendations to revision of the CHEST Foundations bylaws. Specifically, the new bylaws permit Trustees of the Foundation to be re-elected to positions on the board beyond the current 6-year maximum term after several years away from the position. The position of President-Designate of the Foundation will also be eliminated, allowing for a 2-year term for the President-Elect of the Foundation and a 2-year term for the President of the Foundation.

One of the main challenges for an organization of 19,000 people is to ensure that we can engage as many of our members as possible. The NetWorks structure has historically been the primary mechanism for members to pursue initial leadership opportunities within the College. CHEST Past-President Stephanie Levine previously established a working group to revisit NetWork structure in an effort to ensure ample opportunities for engagement within CHEST. The final agenda item at this board meeting was a discussion about restructuring the CHEST NetWorks to create mechanisms that will help us balance the needs of the College with the energy of the volunteers to maximize productivity and engagement of all parties. The plan would increase the number of leadership positions available within the NetWork structure. While the final nomenclature and distribution of NetWorks amongst the pillars has yet to be finalized, the board was supportive of this modification and expects implementation in the next 12 months, with details to be provided to the membership as they are fleshed out.

After a full day’s agenda, CHEST President Steve Simpson adjourned the board meeting. The Board of Regents will meet remotely in August (the summer call has always been a remote meeting) and again in Orlando in October.

The CHEST Board of Regents met in mid-June for its first in-person meeting in more than a year. It served as a lovely reminder that not only are in-person meetings a more effective way to conduct the business of the College, but that the members of the board have really missed seeing each other without an intervening screen and webcam.

First on the agenda was a recap by the CHEST presidents of their recent strategic retreat. Most relevant to the organization was a recommendation that we revise the manner by which the CHEST strategic plan is set. If the last year has taught us anything, it is that planning for the future is essential, but we must also allow for flexibility when external forces change what the future holds. Accordingly, we will be replacing the former 5-year planning cycle with a more nimble annual review. From a member’s standpoint, this means that you will see more frequent revisions of those plans (Strategic Plan, American College of Chest Physicians).

Over the last year, the CHEST Foundation has sponsored a series of “listening tours,” which has allowed our members and leaders to hear from many of our patients who feel disenfranchised from the medical system because of struggles with communication, finances, and access, among other issues. The willingness of our patients to share their struggles with us has inspired the Foundation to try to make inroads into these, better navigating these barriers. In direct response to what we’ve heard, the team is designing programs to help our caregivers focus on the psychological, social, environmental, and personal factors that impact our patients’ ability to obtain the critical health care that all need and deserve.

Our ability to execute and deliver such programs is contingent on successful fundraising efforts. Ian Nathanson, president of the CHEST Foundation, reviewed fundraising progress with the board. Over these long months, donors, participants, and friends of the Foundation have participated in virtual events designed to foster engagement and comradery through this difficult time. This June, we held a virtual and in-person Belmont Stakes event that has shown that we can adapt to challenging times and that our membership is still incredibly supportive of the Foundation’s mission. Thank you to all of you who participated in or donated to the CHEST Foundation over the last year!

The last 18 months have had a marked impact on our ability to provide the live, interactive learning experiences for which CHEST is known, but efforts in the remote learning space have yielded impressive increases in both the number of remote learning opportunities and the breadth of our members who are using them. As one example, the number of CHEST podcast views quadrupled last year compared with 2019. Although CHEST reopened its headquarters for live learning opportunities this summer, and we are looking to move significantly back toward “business as usual” with CHEST 2021 in Orlando this October, we will also be carefully considering how best to incorporate the lessons learned in the remote offering space as the world reopens in the coming year.

Neil Freedman, chair of CHEST’s Health Advocacy and Policy Committee (HPAC), presented a review of the committee’s work since its inception just over 1 year ago. In addition to putting together a multi-society Technical Expert Panel on the use and coverage of noninvasive ventilation, HPAC worked with 18 other societies in drafting a response to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s draft on coverage for CPAP therapy for obstructive sleep apnea. For members interested in getting more involved in CHEST’s advocacy efforts, we are seeking self-nominations for members of several working groups (nominations to open soon); in addition, there will be sessions during CHEST 2021 focused on our advocacy efforts and how you can participate, as well as best practices in the advocacy space.

Several months ago, the Exeter Group was asked by the board to analyze how CHEST can expand our organizational efforts in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Representatives from the Exeter Group joined the meeting to provide board members with preliminary data. Limited interviews with both members and staff have begun to provide a picture of where CHEST has already made some progress in this space, and where our ongoing challenges and opportunities for improvement still exist; it is clear that there is a wide range of opinions on these complicated issues. As our consultants are only 1 month into this 6-month phase of the project, we expect a great deal more information to come, with a plan for ongoing surveys of and focus groups for our members; when you receive one of these requests, please make every effort to complete it as candidly as possible, regardless of your viewpoint. The consulting work will culminate with a final presentation to the board just before the annual meeting in the fall, with specific recommendations on organizational actions that will be used to implement a multiyear DEI plan.

The Governance Committee, represented by Stephanie Levine, made several recommendations to revision of the CHEST Foundations bylaws. Specifically, the new bylaws permit Trustees of the Foundation to be re-elected to positions on the board beyond the current 6-year maximum term after several years away from the position. The position of President-Designate of the Foundation will also be eliminated, allowing for a 2-year term for the President-Elect of the Foundation and a 2-year term for the President of the Foundation.

One of the main challenges for an organization of 19,000 people is to ensure that we can engage as many of our members as possible. The NetWorks structure has historically been the primary mechanism for members to pursue initial leadership opportunities within the College. CHEST Past-President Stephanie Levine previously established a working group to revisit NetWork structure in an effort to ensure ample opportunities for engagement within CHEST. The final agenda item at this board meeting was a discussion about restructuring the CHEST NetWorks to create mechanisms that will help us balance the needs of the College with the energy of the volunteers to maximize productivity and engagement of all parties. The plan would increase the number of leadership positions available within the NetWork structure. While the final nomenclature and distribution of NetWorks amongst the pillars has yet to be finalized, the board was supportive of this modification and expects implementation in the next 12 months, with details to be provided to the membership as they are fleshed out.

After a full day’s agenda, CHEST President Steve Simpson adjourned the board meeting. The Board of Regents will meet remotely in August (the summer call has always been a remote meeting) and again in Orlando in October.

The CHEST Board of Regents met in mid-June for its first in-person meeting in more than a year. It served as a lovely reminder that not only are in-person meetings a more effective way to conduct the business of the College, but that the members of the board have really missed seeing each other without an intervening screen and webcam.

First on the agenda was a recap by the CHEST presidents of their recent strategic retreat. Most relevant to the organization was a recommendation that we revise the manner by which the CHEST strategic plan is set. If the last year has taught us anything, it is that planning for the future is essential, but we must also allow for flexibility when external forces change what the future holds. Accordingly, we will be replacing the former 5-year planning cycle with a more nimble annual review. From a member’s standpoint, this means that you will see more frequent revisions of those plans (Strategic Plan, American College of Chest Physicians).

Over the last year, the CHEST Foundation has sponsored a series of “listening tours,” which has allowed our members and leaders to hear from many of our patients who feel disenfranchised from the medical system because of struggles with communication, finances, and access, among other issues. The willingness of our patients to share their struggles with us has inspired the Foundation to try to make inroads into these, better navigating these barriers. In direct response to what we’ve heard, the team is designing programs to help our caregivers focus on the psychological, social, environmental, and personal factors that impact our patients’ ability to obtain the critical health care that all need and deserve.

Our ability to execute and deliver such programs is contingent on successful fundraising efforts. Ian Nathanson, president of the CHEST Foundation, reviewed fundraising progress with the board. Over these long months, donors, participants, and friends of the Foundation have participated in virtual events designed to foster engagement and comradery through this difficult time. This June, we held a virtual and in-person Belmont Stakes event that has shown that we can adapt to challenging times and that our membership is still incredibly supportive of the Foundation’s mission. Thank you to all of you who participated in or donated to the CHEST Foundation over the last year!

The last 18 months have had a marked impact on our ability to provide the live, interactive learning experiences for which CHEST is known, but efforts in the remote learning space have yielded impressive increases in both the number of remote learning opportunities and the breadth of our members who are using them. As one example, the number of CHEST podcast views quadrupled last year compared with 2019. Although CHEST reopened its headquarters for live learning opportunities this summer, and we are looking to move significantly back toward “business as usual” with CHEST 2021 in Orlando this October, we will also be carefully considering how best to incorporate the lessons learned in the remote offering space as the world reopens in the coming year.

Neil Freedman, chair of CHEST’s Health Advocacy and Policy Committee (HPAC), presented a review of the committee’s work since its inception just over 1 year ago. In addition to putting together a multi-society Technical Expert Panel on the use and coverage of noninvasive ventilation, HPAC worked with 18 other societies in drafting a response to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s draft on coverage for CPAP therapy for obstructive sleep apnea. For members interested in getting more involved in CHEST’s advocacy efforts, we are seeking self-nominations for members of several working groups (nominations to open soon); in addition, there will be sessions during CHEST 2021 focused on our advocacy efforts and how you can participate, as well as best practices in the advocacy space.

Several months ago, the Exeter Group was asked by the board to analyze how CHEST can expand our organizational efforts in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Representatives from the Exeter Group joined the meeting to provide board members with preliminary data. Limited interviews with both members and staff have begun to provide a picture of where CHEST has already made some progress in this space, and where our ongoing challenges and opportunities for improvement still exist; it is clear that there is a wide range of opinions on these complicated issues. As our consultants are only 1 month into this 6-month phase of the project, we expect a great deal more information to come, with a plan for ongoing surveys of and focus groups for our members; when you receive one of these requests, please make every effort to complete it as candidly as possible, regardless of your viewpoint. The consulting work will culminate with a final presentation to the board just before the annual meeting in the fall, with specific recommendations on organizational actions that will be used to implement a multiyear DEI plan.

The Governance Committee, represented by Stephanie Levine, made several recommendations to revision of the CHEST Foundations bylaws. Specifically, the new bylaws permit Trustees of the Foundation to be re-elected to positions on the board beyond the current 6-year maximum term after several years away from the position. The position of President-Designate of the Foundation will also be eliminated, allowing for a 2-year term for the President-Elect of the Foundation and a 2-year term for the President of the Foundation.

One of the main challenges for an organization of 19,000 people is to ensure that we can engage as many of our members as possible. The NetWorks structure has historically been the primary mechanism for members to pursue initial leadership opportunities within the College. CHEST Past-President Stephanie Levine previously established a working group to revisit NetWork structure in an effort to ensure ample opportunities for engagement within CHEST. The final agenda item at this board meeting was a discussion about restructuring the CHEST NetWorks to create mechanisms that will help us balance the needs of the College with the energy of the volunteers to maximize productivity and engagement of all parties. The plan would increase the number of leadership positions available within the NetWork structure. While the final nomenclature and distribution of NetWorks amongst the pillars has yet to be finalized, the board was supportive of this modification and expects implementation in the next 12 months, with details to be provided to the membership as they are fleshed out.

After a full day’s agenda, CHEST President Steve Simpson adjourned the board meeting. The Board of Regents will meet remotely in August (the summer call has always been a remote meeting) and again in Orlando in October.

Airways disorders

Eosinophils in COPD

Using peripheral blood eosinophilia (PBE) as a treatable biomarker of airway inflammation in patients with COPD has become an area of controversy in pulmonary medicine.

The proponents find a role for PBE testing in initiation and withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and as a target for monoclonal antibodies in future studies.¹ Post hoc analyses showed that variable doses of ICS/LABA combination compared with LABA alone in COPD patients were associated with much higher exacerbation reduction in patients with eosinophils counts of ≥2% and magnitude of effect proportionally increased from 29% to 42% with increasing eosinophil count from ≥2% to ≥6% suggesting a dose-response relationship.² A post hoc analysis of the WISDOM trial showed increased risk of exacerbation after ICS discontinuation in COPD patients with high eosinophils (≥300 cells/mcL or ≥4%) while exacerbation risk was not increased in patients with low eosinophils (<150 cells/mcL or <2%).³

The opponents of eosinophil-guided therapy object that the level of evidence is weak as this is based on the post hoc analyses of randomized control trials on patients with increased exacerbation risk at baseline, which in itself is an independent predictor of future exacerbations.⁴ Some observational studies failed to find increased risk of exacerbation with higher eosinophil count while others found that higher eosinophil count was associated with increased survival and better quality of life.^5,6 Anti-eosinophilic biologics have failed to show consistent benefit in exacerbation reduction in COPD patients so far, despite showing a reduction in the PBE.^7-9

The GOLD COPD Guidelines support the use of ICS in patients with eosinophils >300 cells/mcL especially with a history of exacerbation and recommend against ICS in patients with eosinophils <100 cells/mcL.¹⁰

Farrukh Abbas, MD
Steering Committee Fellow-in-Training
Allen J. Blaivas, MD, FCCP
NetWork Chair
 

References

1. Wade RC and Wells JM. Chest. 2020;157(5):1073-5.

2. Pascoe S et al. The Lancet Respir Med. 2015;3(6):435-42.

3. Watz H et al. The Lancet Respir Med. 2016;4(5):390-8.

4. Criner GJ. Chest. 2020;157(5):1075-8.

5. Shin SH et al. Respir Res. 2018;19(1):134.

6. Casanova C et al. Eur Respir J. 2017;50(5):1701162.

7. Pavord ID et al. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(17):1613-29.

8. Criner GJ et al. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(11):1023-34.

9. Mycroft K et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Sep;8(8):2565-74.

10. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2021 Report.
 

Clinical research

Long-COVID: COVID-19 disease beyond the pandemic

There are increasing reports of persistent multiorgan symptoms following COVID-19 infection.

In December 2020, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) developed guidelines, based primarily on expert opinion, to define and manage ongoing symptomatic COVID-19 (symptoms for 4-12 weeks after infection) and post-COVID syndrome (symptoms present for > 12 weeks without alternative explanation). Subsequently, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), released in February 2021 an initiative to study Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV2 infection (PASC). Symptoms can include, respiratory (cough, shortness of breath), cardiac (palpitations, chest pain), fatigue and physical limitations, and neurologic (depression, insomnia, cognitive impairment) (Lancet 2020 Dec 12;396[10266]:1861). The majority of patients with post-COVID syndrome have microbiological recovery (PCR negative), and often have radiological recovery. Risk factors include older age, female sex, and comorbidities (Raveendran AV. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021 May-June;15[3]:869-75).

Diagnosis and access to care pose significant challenges for post-COVID syndrome, and it is difficult to estimate exactly how many are affected – one report from Italy found that up to 87% of discharged hospitalized patients had persistent symptom(s) at 60 days (Carfi A. JAMA 2020 Aug;324[6]:603-5). Thus far, management recommendations include a multidisciplinary approach to evaluation, symptomatic treatment, organ specific treatment (for example, consideration of corticosteroids for persistent inflammatory interstitial lung disease) (Myall KJ. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 May;8[5]:799-806), physical/occupational therapy, and psychological support. Many institutions have established, or are working to establish post-COVID clinics (Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020 Aug;32[8]:1613-20). Currently, the NIH is offering funding opportunities and there are many clinical trials across the world actively recruiting patients.

Ankita Agarwal, MD
Steering Committee Fellow-in-Training
Bharat Bajantri, MD
Steering Committee Member
Aravind Menon, MD
Steering Committee Fellow-in-Training
 

Critical care

Sedation practices in the ICU: Moving past the COVID-19 pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic brought unprecedented change to critical care practice patterns, and sedation practices in the intensive care unit are no exception. In a large cohort analysis of over 2,000 adults with COVID-19 (Pun BT, et al. Lancet Respir Med. 2021;9[3]:239-50), 64% of patients received benzodiazepines (median of 7 days), and patients were deeply sedated. More than half of the patients were delirious, with benzodiazepine use associated with increased incidence of delirium. These observations represent a significant departure from well-established pre-COVID best-practices in sedation: light targets, daily sedation interruption, and avoiding continuous benzodiazepine infusions whenever possible (Girard TD, et al. Lancet; 2008;371[9607]:126-34; Fraser GL, et al. Crit Care Med;2013 Sep;41[9 Suppl 1]:S30-8; Riker RR, et al. JAMA;2009;301[5]:489-99).

As COVID-19 case counts begin to improve in many of our communities, we have the opportunity to refocus on best sedation practices and build on a growing body of recent evidence. The MENDS2 trial, completed pre-COVID-19, assigned mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis to either propofol or dexmedetomidine and showed no difference in delirium or coma in this cohort of lightly sedated patients (Hughes CG, et al. N Engl J Med. 2021;384[15]:1424-36). Furthering this point, Olsen et al. found no difference in outcomes when mechanically ventilated patients were randomized to no sedation vs light sedation (Olsen HT, et al. N Engl J Med; 2020;382[12]:1103-11).

While the evidence surrounding sedation strategies in the critically ill continues to grow, one thing is certain: promoting lighter sedation targets and reengaging in sedation-related best practices following the COVID-19 pandemic will continue to play a vital role in improving both short and long-term outcomes for our critically ill patients.

Casey Cable, MD, MSc
Steering Committee Member

Kyle Stinehart, MD
Steering Committee Member
 

Home mechanical ventilation

How to initiate a chronic respiratory failure clinic

Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is an established treatment for chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure from neuromuscular disorders, COPD, obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS), and restrictive thoracic disorders. Previously, hospital admission was considered essential for setup of chronic NIV but with advances in the modes of ventilation and remote monitoring, hospital admission has become less justifiable, especially in countries with centralized medical systems and presence of centers of excellence for home ventilation (Van Den Biggelaar RJM, et al. Chest. 2020;158[6]:2493-2501); Duiverman ML, et al. Thorax. 2020;75:244-52). In the United States, where centralized health care is atypical, management of NIV has been disparate with no clear consensus on practice patterns. Thus, we hope to provide some guidance toward the establishment of such clinics in the U.S.
 

Prior to developing an NIV clinic, establishing a referral source from neuromuscular, rehabilitation/spinal cord injury, bariatric surgery, and COPD programs is important. After this, collaboration with a respiratory therapist through durable medical equipment is essential to building a robust care team. These companies are also important for assisting in remote monitoring, providing overnight pulse oximetry/CO₂ monitoring, mask fitting, and airway clearance. Clinicians are encouraged to develop protocols for initiation and titration of NIV and mouthpiece ventilation. Clinics should provide spirometry, maximal inspiratory pressure, transcutaneous CO₂, and/or blood gas testing. Additionally, in this patient population, wheelchair scales are necessary. Clinical workflow should include a review of NIV downloads, identify asynchronies and troubleshoot it in timely and reliable manner (Blouet S, et al. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018;13:2577-86). Lastly, effort should be made for an adequate assessment of the home situation including layout of home along with family support utilizing social worker and palliative care team. Due to patient mobility, we encourage continued availability of telehealth for these patients.

In summary, strong clinical infrastructure, a robust care team, and an efficient, secure, reliable telemonitoring system are key to provide better care to this vulnerable patient population.

Ashima S. Sahni, MD, MBBS, FCCP
NetWork Member

Amen Sergew, MD
Steering Committee Member

Interstitial and diffuse lung disease

Treatment for pulmonary hypertension secondary to interstitial lung disease

The development of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) (PH-ILD) is associated with increased supplemental oxygen requirements, reduced functional status, and decreased survival (King CS, et al. Chest. 2020;158[4]:1651).

An inhaled formulation of treprostinil (Tyvaso) is the first treatment option approved by the FDA for patients with PH-ILD, including those with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, connective tissue disease-associated ILD, and combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema. Approval was based on results from the INCREASE trial (Waxman A, et al. N Engl J Med. 2021;384[4]:325), a phase III multicenter, randomized, double-blinded study comparing the inhaled formulation to placebo in 326 patients over a 16-week period. Participants in the treatment arm were given up to 12 breaths of the formulation per session, four times per day. Subjects treated with this inhaled formulation met the primary study endpoint, an increase in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) from baseline to week 16, walking 21 m farther than placebo-treated control subjects. Furthermore, patients receiving the new formulation had a decrease in NT-proBNP levels (compared with increases in the placebo arm) and a reduction in clinical worsening (23% of inhalation formulation-treated vs. 33% of placebo-treated subjects). This formulation of treprostinil was well-tolerated with a safety profile consistent with common prostacyclin-related adverse events, including cough, headache, dyspnea, dizziness, nausea, fatigue, and diarrhea. Its approval will dramatically alter the ILD treatment landscape. It now necessitates the use of PH screening in this patient population. However, care will need to be exercised in appropriate patient selection for treatment, using the study inclusion and exclusion criteria as a starting point. Appropriate use of this formulation will hopefully help mitigate the negative outcomes impacting patients with PH-ILD.

Rebecca Anna Gersten, MD
Adrian Shifren, MD
Steering Committee Members

Airways disorders

Eosinophils in COPD

Using peripheral blood eosinophilia (PBE) as a treatable biomarker of airway inflammation in patients with COPD has become an area of controversy in pulmonary medicine.

The proponents find a role for PBE testing in initiation and withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and as a target for monoclonal antibodies in future studies.¹ Post hoc analyses showed that variable doses of ICS/LABA combination compared with LABA alone in COPD patients were associated with much higher exacerbation reduction in patients with eosinophils counts of ≥2% and magnitude of effect proportionally increased from 29% to 42% with increasing eosinophil count from ≥2% to ≥6% suggesting a dose-response relationship.² A post hoc analysis of the WISDOM trial showed increased risk of exacerbation after ICS discontinuation in COPD patients with high eosinophils (≥300 cells/mcL or ≥4%) while exacerbation risk was not increased in patients with low eosinophils (<150 cells/mcL or <2%).³

The opponents of eosinophil-guided therapy object that the level of evidence is weak as this is based on the post hoc analyses of randomized control trials on patients with increased exacerbation risk at baseline, which in itself is an independent predictor of future exacerbations.⁴ Some observational studies failed to find increased risk of exacerbation with higher eosinophil count while others found that higher eosinophil count was associated with increased survival and better quality of life.^5,6 Anti-eosinophilic biologics have failed to show consistent benefit in exacerbation reduction in COPD patients so far, despite showing a reduction in the PBE.^7-9

The GOLD COPD Guidelines support the use of ICS in patients with eosinophils >300 cells/mcL especially with a history of exacerbation and recommend against ICS in patients with eosinophils <100 cells/mcL.¹⁰

Farrukh Abbas, MD
Steering Committee Fellow-in-Training
Allen J. Blaivas, MD, FCCP
NetWork Chair
 

References

1. Wade RC and Wells JM. Chest. 2020;157(5):1073-5.

2. Pascoe S et al. The Lancet Respir Med. 2015;3(6):435-42.

3. Watz H et al. The Lancet Respir Med. 2016;4(5):390-8.

4. Criner GJ. Chest. 2020;157(5):1075-8.

5. Shin SH et al. Respir Res. 2018;19(1):134.

6. Casanova C et al. Eur Respir J. 2017;50(5):1701162.

7. Pavord ID et al. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(17):1613-29.

8. Criner GJ et al. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(11):1023-34.

9. Mycroft K et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Sep;8(8):2565-74.

10. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2021 Report.
 

Clinical research

Long-COVID: COVID-19 disease beyond the pandemic

There are increasing reports of persistent multiorgan symptoms following COVID-19 infection.

In December 2020, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) developed guidelines, based primarily on expert opinion, to define and manage ongoing symptomatic COVID-19 (symptoms for 4-12 weeks after infection) and post-COVID syndrome (symptoms present for > 12 weeks without alternative explanation). Subsequently, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), released in February 2021 an initiative to study Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV2 infection (PASC). Symptoms can include, respiratory (cough, shortness of breath), cardiac (palpitations, chest pain), fatigue and physical limitations, and neurologic (depression, insomnia, cognitive impairment) (Lancet 2020 Dec 12;396[10266]:1861). The majority of patients with post-COVID syndrome have microbiological recovery (PCR negative), and often have radiological recovery. Risk factors include older age, female sex, and comorbidities (Raveendran AV. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021 May-June;15[3]:869-75).

Diagnosis and access to care pose significant challenges for post-COVID syndrome, and it is difficult to estimate exactly how many are affected – one report from Italy found that up to 87% of discharged hospitalized patients had persistent symptom(s) at 60 days (Carfi A. JAMA 2020 Aug;324[6]:603-5). Thus far, management recommendations include a multidisciplinary approach to evaluation, symptomatic treatment, organ specific treatment (for example, consideration of corticosteroids for persistent inflammatory interstitial lung disease) (Myall KJ. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 May;8[5]:799-806), physical/occupational therapy, and psychological support. Many institutions have established, or are working to establish post-COVID clinics (Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020 Aug;32[8]:1613-20). Currently, the NIH is offering funding opportunities and there are many clinical trials across the world actively recruiting patients.

Ankita Agarwal, MD
Steering Committee Fellow-in-Training
Bharat Bajantri, MD
Steering Committee Member
Aravind Menon, MD
Steering Committee Fellow-in-Training
 

Critical care

Sedation practices in the ICU: Moving past the COVID-19 pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic brought unprecedented change to critical care practice patterns, and sedation practices in the intensive care unit are no exception. In a large cohort analysis of over 2,000 adults with COVID-19 (Pun BT, et al. Lancet Respir Med. 2021;9[3]:239-50), 64% of patients received benzodiazepines (median of 7 days), and patients were deeply sedated. More than half of the patients were delirious, with benzodiazepine use associated with increased incidence of delirium. These observations represent a significant departure from well-established pre-COVID best-practices in sedation: light targets, daily sedation interruption, and avoiding continuous benzodiazepine infusions whenever possible (Girard TD, et al. Lancet; 2008;371[9607]:126-34; Fraser GL, et al. Crit Care Med;2013 Sep;41[9 Suppl 1]:S30-8; Riker RR, et al. JAMA;2009;301[5]:489-99).

As COVID-19 case counts begin to improve in many of our communities, we have the opportunity to refocus on best sedation practices and build on a growing body of recent evidence. The MENDS2 trial, completed pre-COVID-19, assigned mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis to either propofol or dexmedetomidine and showed no difference in delirium or coma in this cohort of lightly sedated patients (Hughes CG, et al. N Engl J Med. 2021;384[15]:1424-36). Furthering this point, Olsen et al. found no difference in outcomes when mechanically ventilated patients were randomized to no sedation vs light sedation (Olsen HT, et al. N Engl J Med; 2020;382[12]:1103-11).

While the evidence surrounding sedation strategies in the critically ill continues to grow, one thing is certain: promoting lighter sedation targets and reengaging in sedation-related best practices following the COVID-19 pandemic will continue to play a vital role in improving both short and long-term outcomes for our critically ill patients.

Casey Cable, MD, MSc
Steering Committee Member

Kyle Stinehart, MD
Steering Committee Member
 

Home mechanical ventilation

How to initiate a chronic respiratory failure clinic

Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is an established treatment for chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure from neuromuscular disorders, COPD, obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS), and restrictive thoracic disorders. Previously, hospital admission was considered essential for setup of chronic NIV but with advances in the modes of ventilation and remote monitoring, hospital admission has become less justifiable, especially in countries with centralized medical systems and presence of centers of excellence for home ventilation (Van Den Biggelaar RJM, et al. Chest. 2020;158[6]:2493-2501); Duiverman ML, et al. Thorax. 2020;75:244-52). In the United States, where centralized health care is atypical, management of NIV has been disparate with no clear consensus on practice patterns. Thus, we hope to provide some guidance toward the establishment of such clinics in the U.S.
 

Prior to developing an NIV clinic, establishing a referral source from neuromuscular, rehabilitation/spinal cord injury, bariatric surgery, and COPD programs is important. After this, collaboration with a respiratory therapist through durable medical equipment is essential to building a robust care team. These companies are also important for assisting in remote monitoring, providing overnight pulse oximetry/CO₂ monitoring, mask fitting, and airway clearance. Clinicians are encouraged to develop protocols for initiation and titration of NIV and mouthpiece ventilation. Clinics should provide spirometry, maximal inspiratory pressure, transcutaneous CO₂, and/or blood gas testing. Additionally, in this patient population, wheelchair scales are necessary. Clinical workflow should include a review of NIV downloads, identify asynchronies and troubleshoot it in timely and reliable manner (Blouet S, et al. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018;13:2577-86). Lastly, effort should be made for an adequate assessment of the home situation including layout of home along with family support utilizing social worker and palliative care team. Due to patient mobility, we encourage continued availability of telehealth for these patients.

In summary, strong clinical infrastructure, a robust care team, and an efficient, secure, reliable telemonitoring system are key to provide better care to this vulnerable patient population.

Ashima S. Sahni, MD, MBBS, FCCP
NetWork Member

Amen Sergew, MD
Steering Committee Member

Interstitial and diffuse lung disease

Treatment for pulmonary hypertension secondary to interstitial lung disease

The development of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) (PH-ILD) is associated with increased supplemental oxygen requirements, reduced functional status, and decreased survival (King CS, et al. Chest. 2020;158[4]:1651).

An inhaled formulation of treprostinil (Tyvaso) is the first treatment option approved by the FDA for patients with PH-ILD, including those with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, connective tissue disease-associated ILD, and combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema. Approval was based on results from the INCREASE trial (Waxman A, et al. N Engl J Med. 2021;384[4]:325), a phase III multicenter, randomized, double-blinded study comparing the inhaled formulation to placebo in 326 patients over a 16-week period. Participants in the treatment arm were given up to 12 breaths of the formulation per session, four times per day. Subjects treated with this inhaled formulation met the primary study endpoint, an increase in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) from baseline to week 16, walking 21 m farther than placebo-treated control subjects. Furthermore, patients receiving the new formulation had a decrease in NT-proBNP levels (compared with increases in the placebo arm) and a reduction in clinical worsening (23% of inhalation formulation-treated vs. 33% of placebo-treated subjects). This formulation of treprostinil was well-tolerated with a safety profile consistent with common prostacyclin-related adverse events, including cough, headache, dyspnea, dizziness, nausea, fatigue, and diarrhea. Its approval will dramatically alter the ILD treatment landscape. It now necessitates the use of PH screening in this patient population. However, care will need to be exercised in appropriate patient selection for treatment, using the study inclusion and exclusion criteria as a starting point. Appropriate use of this formulation will hopefully help mitigate the negative outcomes impacting patients with PH-ILD.

Rebecca Anna Gersten, MD
Adrian Shifren, MD
Steering Committee Members

Airways disorders

Eosinophils in COPD

Using peripheral blood eosinophilia (PBE) as a treatable biomarker of airway inflammation in patients with COPD has become an area of controversy in pulmonary medicine.

The proponents find a role for PBE testing in initiation and withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and as a target for monoclonal antibodies in future studies.¹ Post hoc analyses showed that variable doses of ICS/LABA combination compared with LABA alone in COPD patients were associated with much higher exacerbation reduction in patients with eosinophils counts of ≥2% and magnitude of effect proportionally increased from 29% to 42% with increasing eosinophil count from ≥2% to ≥6% suggesting a dose-response relationship.² A post hoc analysis of the WISDOM trial showed increased risk of exacerbation after ICS discontinuation in COPD patients with high eosinophils (≥300 cells/mcL or ≥4%) while exacerbation risk was not increased in patients with low eosinophils (<150 cells/mcL or <2%).³

The opponents of eosinophil-guided therapy object that the level of evidence is weak as this is based on the post hoc analyses of randomized control trials on patients with increased exacerbation risk at baseline, which in itself is an independent predictor of future exacerbations.⁴ Some observational studies failed to find increased risk of exacerbation with higher eosinophil count while others found that higher eosinophil count was associated with increased survival and better quality of life.^5,6 Anti-eosinophilic biologics have failed to show consistent benefit in exacerbation reduction in COPD patients so far, despite showing a reduction in the PBE.^7-9

The GOLD COPD Guidelines support the use of ICS in patients with eosinophils >300 cells/mcL especially with a history of exacerbation and recommend against ICS in patients with eosinophils <100 cells/mcL.¹⁰

Farrukh Abbas, MD
Steering Committee Fellow-in-Training
Allen J. Blaivas, MD, FCCP
NetWork Chair
 

References

1. Wade RC and Wells JM. Chest. 2020;157(5):1073-5.

2. Pascoe S et al. The Lancet Respir Med. 2015;3(6):435-42.

3. Watz H et al. The Lancet Respir Med. 2016;4(5):390-8.

4. Criner GJ. Chest. 2020;157(5):1075-8.

5. Shin SH et al. Respir Res. 2018;19(1):134.

6. Casanova C et al. Eur Respir J. 2017;50(5):1701162.

7. Pavord ID et al. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(17):1613-29.

8. Criner GJ et al. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(11):1023-34.

9. Mycroft K et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Sep;8(8):2565-74.

10. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2021 Report.
 

Clinical research

Long-COVID: COVID-19 disease beyond the pandemic

There are increasing reports of persistent multiorgan symptoms following COVID-19 infection.

In December 2020, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) developed guidelines, based primarily on expert opinion, to define and manage ongoing symptomatic COVID-19 (symptoms for 4-12 weeks after infection) and post-COVID syndrome (symptoms present for > 12 weeks without alternative explanation). Subsequently, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), released in February 2021 an initiative to study Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV2 infection (PASC). Symptoms can include, respiratory (cough, shortness of breath), cardiac (palpitations, chest pain), fatigue and physical limitations, and neurologic (depression, insomnia, cognitive impairment) (Lancet 2020 Dec 12;396[10266]:1861). The majority of patients with post-COVID syndrome have microbiological recovery (PCR negative), and often have radiological recovery. Risk factors include older age, female sex, and comorbidities (Raveendran AV. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021 May-June;15[3]:869-75).

Diagnosis and access to care pose significant challenges for post-COVID syndrome, and it is difficult to estimate exactly how many are affected – one report from Italy found that up to 87% of discharged hospitalized patients had persistent symptom(s) at 60 days (Carfi A. JAMA 2020 Aug;324[6]:603-5). Thus far, management recommendations include a multidisciplinary approach to evaluation, symptomatic treatment, organ specific treatment (for example, consideration of corticosteroids for persistent inflammatory interstitial lung disease) (Myall KJ. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 May;8[5]:799-806), physical/occupational therapy, and psychological support. Many institutions have established, or are working to establish post-COVID clinics (Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020 Aug;32[8]:1613-20). Currently, the NIH is offering funding opportunities and there are many clinical trials across the world actively recruiting patients.

Ankita Agarwal, MD
Steering Committee Fellow-in-Training
Bharat Bajantri, MD
Steering Committee Member
Aravind Menon, MD
Steering Committee Fellow-in-Training
 

Critical care

Sedation practices in the ICU: Moving past the COVID-19 pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic brought unprecedented change to critical care practice patterns, and sedation practices in the intensive care unit are no exception. In a large cohort analysis of over 2,000 adults with COVID-19 (Pun BT, et al. Lancet Respir Med. 2021;9[3]:239-50), 64% of patients received benzodiazepines (median of 7 days), and patients were deeply sedated. More than half of the patients were delirious, with benzodiazepine use associated with increased incidence of delirium. These observations represent a significant departure from well-established pre-COVID best-practices in sedation: light targets, daily sedation interruption, and avoiding continuous benzodiazepine infusions whenever possible (Girard TD, et al. Lancet; 2008;371[9607]:126-34; Fraser GL, et al. Crit Care Med;2013 Sep;41[9 Suppl 1]:S30-8; Riker RR, et al. JAMA;2009;301[5]:489-99).

As COVID-19 case counts begin to improve in many of our communities, we have the opportunity to refocus on best sedation practices and build on a growing body of recent evidence. The MENDS2 trial, completed pre-COVID-19, assigned mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis to either propofol or dexmedetomidine and showed no difference in delirium or coma in this cohort of lightly sedated patients (Hughes CG, et al. N Engl J Med. 2021;384[15]:1424-36). Furthering this point, Olsen et al. found no difference in outcomes when mechanically ventilated patients were randomized to no sedation vs light sedation (Olsen HT, et al. N Engl J Med; 2020;382[12]:1103-11).

While the evidence surrounding sedation strategies in the critically ill continues to grow, one thing is certain: promoting lighter sedation targets and reengaging in sedation-related best practices following the COVID-19 pandemic will continue to play a vital role in improving both short and long-term outcomes for our critically ill patients.

Casey Cable, MD, MSc
Steering Committee Member

Kyle Stinehart, MD
Steering Committee Member
 

Home mechanical ventilation

How to initiate a chronic respiratory failure clinic

Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is an established treatment for chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure from neuromuscular disorders, COPD, obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS), and restrictive thoracic disorders. Previously, hospital admission was considered essential for setup of chronic NIV but with advances in the modes of ventilation and remote monitoring, hospital admission has become less justifiable, especially in countries with centralized medical systems and presence of centers of excellence for home ventilation (Van Den Biggelaar RJM, et al. Chest. 2020;158[6]:2493-2501); Duiverman ML, et al. Thorax. 2020;75:244-52). In the United States, where centralized health care is atypical, management of NIV has been disparate with no clear consensus on practice patterns. Thus, we hope to provide some guidance toward the establishment of such clinics in the U.S.
 

Prior to developing an NIV clinic, establishing a referral source from neuromuscular, rehabilitation/spinal cord injury, bariatric surgery, and COPD programs is important. After this, collaboration with a respiratory therapist through durable medical equipment is essential to building a robust care team. These companies are also important for assisting in remote monitoring, providing overnight pulse oximetry/CO₂ monitoring, mask fitting, and airway clearance. Clinicians are encouraged to develop protocols for initiation and titration of NIV and mouthpiece ventilation. Clinics should provide spirometry, maximal inspiratory pressure, transcutaneous CO₂, and/or blood gas testing. Additionally, in this patient population, wheelchair scales are necessary. Clinical workflow should include a review of NIV downloads, identify asynchronies and troubleshoot it in timely and reliable manner (Blouet S, et al. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018;13:2577-86). Lastly, effort should be made for an adequate assessment of the home situation including layout of home along with family support utilizing social worker and palliative care team. Due to patient mobility, we encourage continued availability of telehealth for these patients.

In summary, strong clinical infrastructure, a robust care team, and an efficient, secure, reliable telemonitoring system are key to provide better care to this vulnerable patient population.

Ashima S. Sahni, MD, MBBS, FCCP
NetWork Member

Amen Sergew, MD
Steering Committee Member

Interstitial and diffuse lung disease

Treatment for pulmonary hypertension secondary to interstitial lung disease

The development of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) (PH-ILD) is associated with increased supplemental oxygen requirements, reduced functional status, and decreased survival (King CS, et al. Chest. 2020;158[4]:1651).

An inhaled formulation of treprostinil (Tyvaso) is the first treatment option approved by the FDA for patients with PH-ILD, including those with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, connective tissue disease-associated ILD, and combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema. Approval was based on results from the INCREASE trial (Waxman A, et al. N Engl J Med. 2021;384[4]:325), a phase III multicenter, randomized, double-blinded study comparing the inhaled formulation to placebo in 326 patients over a 16-week period. Participants in the treatment arm were given up to 12 breaths of the formulation per session, four times per day. Subjects treated with this inhaled formulation met the primary study endpoint, an increase in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) from baseline to week 16, walking 21 m farther than placebo-treated control subjects. Furthermore, patients receiving the new formulation had a decrease in NT-proBNP levels (compared with increases in the placebo arm) and a reduction in clinical worsening (23% of inhalation formulation-treated vs. 33% of placebo-treated subjects). This formulation of treprostinil was well-tolerated with a safety profile consistent with common prostacyclin-related adverse events, including cough, headache, dyspnea, dizziness, nausea, fatigue, and diarrhea. Its approval will dramatically alter the ILD treatment landscape. It now necessitates the use of PH screening in this patient population. However, care will need to be exercised in appropriate patient selection for treatment, using the study inclusion and exclusion criteria as a starting point. Appropriate use of this formulation will hopefully help mitigate the negative outcomes impacting patients with PH-ILD.

Rebecca Anna Gersten, MD
Adrian Shifren, MD
Steering Committee Members