Azithromycin ineffective for secondary coronary heart disease prevention

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 08:40
Display Headline
Azithromycin ineffective for secondary coronary heart disease prevention
PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS

For now, a 3-month regimen of azithromycin should not be used to prevent recurrent coronary heart disease (CHD) events in patients with a previous myocardial infarction and evidence of exposure to Chlamydia pneumoniae. This does not exclude the possibility that other antibiotic regimens may produce a significant benefit in reducing morbidity and mortality from CHD.

 
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Practice Recommendations from Key Studies

O’Connor CM, Dunne MW, Pfeffer MA, et al. Azithromycin for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease events. The WIZARD study: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2003; 290:1459–1466.

Andrea D. Tribastone, MD
Department of Family Medicine, University of Virginia, Stoney Creek Family Practice, Nellysford, Va. E-mail: [email protected].

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 53(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
8-24
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Practice Recommendations from Key Studies

O’Connor CM, Dunne MW, Pfeffer MA, et al. Azithromycin for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease events. The WIZARD study: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2003; 290:1459–1466.

Andrea D. Tribastone, MD
Department of Family Medicine, University of Virginia, Stoney Creek Family Practice, Nellysford, Va. E-mail: [email protected].

Author and Disclosure Information

Practice Recommendations from Key Studies

O’Connor CM, Dunne MW, Pfeffer MA, et al. Azithromycin for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease events. The WIZARD study: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2003; 290:1459–1466.

Andrea D. Tribastone, MD
Department of Family Medicine, University of Virginia, Stoney Creek Family Practice, Nellysford, Va. E-mail: [email protected].

Article PDF
Article PDF
PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS

For now, a 3-month regimen of azithromycin should not be used to prevent recurrent coronary heart disease (CHD) events in patients with a previous myocardial infarction and evidence of exposure to Chlamydia pneumoniae. This does not exclude the possibility that other antibiotic regimens may produce a significant benefit in reducing morbidity and mortality from CHD.

 
PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS

For now, a 3-month regimen of azithromycin should not be used to prevent recurrent coronary heart disease (CHD) events in patients with a previous myocardial infarction and evidence of exposure to Chlamydia pneumoniae. This does not exclude the possibility that other antibiotic regimens may produce a significant benefit in reducing morbidity and mortality from CHD.

 
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 53(1)
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 53(1)
Page Number
8-24
Page Number
8-24
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Azithromycin ineffective for secondary coronary heart disease prevention
Display Headline
Azithromycin ineffective for secondary coronary heart disease prevention
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Article PDF Media

Nebulized 3% saline effective for viral bronchiolitis

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 08:39
Display Headline
Nebulized 3% saline effective for viral bronchiolitis
PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS

This small, poorly described study suggests that nebulized 3% hypertonic saline improves outcomes for nonhospitalized infants with bronchiolitis more than the use of normal saline.

While this study has significant flaws, the intervention appears safe. It would be reasonable to use nebulized 3% saline while waiting for larger, better studies.

 
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Practice Recommendations from Key Studies

Sarrell EM, Tal G, Witzling M, et al. Nebulized 3% hypertonic saline solution treatment in ambulatory children with viral bronchiolitis decreases symptoms. Chest 2002; 122:2015–2020.

Andrea D. Tribastone, MD
University of Virginia, Stoney Creek Family Practice Nellysford, Va

[email protected]

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 52(5)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
349-364
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Practice Recommendations from Key Studies

Sarrell EM, Tal G, Witzling M, et al. Nebulized 3% hypertonic saline solution treatment in ambulatory children with viral bronchiolitis decreases symptoms. Chest 2002; 122:2015–2020.

Andrea D. Tribastone, MD
University of Virginia, Stoney Creek Family Practice Nellysford, Va

[email protected]

Author and Disclosure Information

Practice Recommendations from Key Studies

Sarrell EM, Tal G, Witzling M, et al. Nebulized 3% hypertonic saline solution treatment in ambulatory children with viral bronchiolitis decreases symptoms. Chest 2002; 122:2015–2020.

Andrea D. Tribastone, MD
University of Virginia, Stoney Creek Family Practice Nellysford, Va

[email protected]

Article PDF
Article PDF
PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS

This small, poorly described study suggests that nebulized 3% hypertonic saline improves outcomes for nonhospitalized infants with bronchiolitis more than the use of normal saline.

While this study has significant flaws, the intervention appears safe. It would be reasonable to use nebulized 3% saline while waiting for larger, better studies.

 
PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS

This small, poorly described study suggests that nebulized 3% hypertonic saline improves outcomes for nonhospitalized infants with bronchiolitis more than the use of normal saline.

While this study has significant flaws, the intervention appears safe. It would be reasonable to use nebulized 3% saline while waiting for larger, better studies.

 
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 52(5)
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 52(5)
Page Number
349-364
Page Number
349-364
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Nebulized 3% saline effective for viral bronchiolitis
Display Headline
Nebulized 3% saline effective for viral bronchiolitis
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Article PDF Media

Azithromycin no more effective than vitamin C for acute bronchitis

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/14/2019 - 12:01
Display Headline
Azithromycin no more effective than vitamin C for acute bronchitis

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The results of studies evaluating the effectiveness of antibiotic treatment for acute bronchitis are conflicting, some with uncertain reliability and validity. Although most studies of antibiotics have focused on cure of disease or reduction in symptoms, this study tested whether patients with acute bronchitis who were treated with azithromycin experienced greater improvements in health-related quality of life than those treated with vitamin C. The authors chose to compare azithromycin with vitamin C instead of traditional placebo because they believed potential patients might refuse to participate in the study if there was a chance they would receive a placebo. Evidence has shown that vitamin C at the doses used in this study is ineffective in the treatment of acute bronchitis or other respiratory illnesses, making the vitamin a reasonable placebo for this study.1
POPULATION STUDIED: The authors studied 220 adults with cough lasting 2–14 days who were diagnosed with acute bronchitis after presenting to an ambulatory screening clinic in Chicago, Illinois. Patients were excluded if they had any underlying lung disorder, clinical characteristics of pneumonia, antibiotic treatment within the previous 2 weeks, pregnancy, steroid treatment, or had been started on an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor within the previous 4 weeks.
STUDY DESIGN AND VALIDITY: This study was a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial with concealed allocation. Patients were randomized to receive a total of 1.5 g of either azithromycin or vitamin C over 5 days (500 mg on the first day, then 250 mg/day for 4 more days). All patients also received symptomatic care with dex-tromethorphan and an albuterol inhaler with a spacer. Trained research assistants interviewed patients on enrollment in the study to assess their baseline health-related quality of life. The interview, consisting of 22 questions adapted from similar instruments developed at McMaster University, was repeated on days 3 and 7. For each of the questions, patients were asked to rate how troubled they had been during the previous few days as a result of their bronchitis symptoms on a 7-point scale. Follow-up was for 7 days from the beginning of the study and was 85.9% complete. Analysis was by intention to treat.
OUTCOMES MEASURED: The primary outcome measured was health-related quality of life on day 7 of follow-up. Secondary end points were return to usual daily activities at follow-up and adverse effects.
RESULTS: The adjusted difference in health-related quality of life between the patients taking azithromycin and those taking vitamin C was not significant on day 7 of the study (difference = 0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], –0.20 to 0.26). Overall, 89% of patients in both groups returned to work by day 7 (difference = 0.5%; 95% CI, –10% to 9%). No difference was noted in the fre treat acute bronchitis in otherwise healthy adults.

 

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

Azithromycin is no more effective than vitamin C in treating acute bronchitis in healthy adults. Given the evidence that treatment with vitamin C is not effective in respiratory illnesses, azithromycin appears equally ineffective. With increasing health care costs and rising concerns about antibiotic resistance, azithromycin, and probably other antibiotics, should not be used to treat acute bronchitis in otherwise healthy adults.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

 

Andrea D. Tribastone, MD
University of Virginia Department of Family Medicine Stoney Creek Family Practice Nellysford
[email protected]

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 51(09)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
778-791
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

 

Andrea D. Tribastone, MD
University of Virginia Department of Family Medicine Stoney Creek Family Practice Nellysford
[email protected]

Author and Disclosure Information

 

Andrea D. Tribastone, MD
University of Virginia Department of Family Medicine Stoney Creek Family Practice Nellysford
[email protected]

Article PDF
Article PDF

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The results of studies evaluating the effectiveness of antibiotic treatment for acute bronchitis are conflicting, some with uncertain reliability and validity. Although most studies of antibiotics have focused on cure of disease or reduction in symptoms, this study tested whether patients with acute bronchitis who were treated with azithromycin experienced greater improvements in health-related quality of life than those treated with vitamin C. The authors chose to compare azithromycin with vitamin C instead of traditional placebo because they believed potential patients might refuse to participate in the study if there was a chance they would receive a placebo. Evidence has shown that vitamin C at the doses used in this study is ineffective in the treatment of acute bronchitis or other respiratory illnesses, making the vitamin a reasonable placebo for this study.1
POPULATION STUDIED: The authors studied 220 adults with cough lasting 2–14 days who were diagnosed with acute bronchitis after presenting to an ambulatory screening clinic in Chicago, Illinois. Patients were excluded if they had any underlying lung disorder, clinical characteristics of pneumonia, antibiotic treatment within the previous 2 weeks, pregnancy, steroid treatment, or had been started on an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor within the previous 4 weeks.
STUDY DESIGN AND VALIDITY: This study was a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial with concealed allocation. Patients were randomized to receive a total of 1.5 g of either azithromycin or vitamin C over 5 days (500 mg on the first day, then 250 mg/day for 4 more days). All patients also received symptomatic care with dex-tromethorphan and an albuterol inhaler with a spacer. Trained research assistants interviewed patients on enrollment in the study to assess their baseline health-related quality of life. The interview, consisting of 22 questions adapted from similar instruments developed at McMaster University, was repeated on days 3 and 7. For each of the questions, patients were asked to rate how troubled they had been during the previous few days as a result of their bronchitis symptoms on a 7-point scale. Follow-up was for 7 days from the beginning of the study and was 85.9% complete. Analysis was by intention to treat.
OUTCOMES MEASURED: The primary outcome measured was health-related quality of life on day 7 of follow-up. Secondary end points were return to usual daily activities at follow-up and adverse effects.
RESULTS: The adjusted difference in health-related quality of life between the patients taking azithromycin and those taking vitamin C was not significant on day 7 of the study (difference = 0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], –0.20 to 0.26). Overall, 89% of patients in both groups returned to work by day 7 (difference = 0.5%; 95% CI, –10% to 9%). No difference was noted in the fre treat acute bronchitis in otherwise healthy adults.

 

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

Azithromycin is no more effective than vitamin C in treating acute bronchitis in healthy adults. Given the evidence that treatment with vitamin C is not effective in respiratory illnesses, azithromycin appears equally ineffective. With increasing health care costs and rising concerns about antibiotic resistance, azithromycin, and probably other antibiotics, should not be used to treat acute bronchitis in otherwise healthy adults.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The results of studies evaluating the effectiveness of antibiotic treatment for acute bronchitis are conflicting, some with uncertain reliability and validity. Although most studies of antibiotics have focused on cure of disease or reduction in symptoms, this study tested whether patients with acute bronchitis who were treated with azithromycin experienced greater improvements in health-related quality of life than those treated with vitamin C. The authors chose to compare azithromycin with vitamin C instead of traditional placebo because they believed potential patients might refuse to participate in the study if there was a chance they would receive a placebo. Evidence has shown that vitamin C at the doses used in this study is ineffective in the treatment of acute bronchitis or other respiratory illnesses, making the vitamin a reasonable placebo for this study.1
POPULATION STUDIED: The authors studied 220 adults with cough lasting 2–14 days who were diagnosed with acute bronchitis after presenting to an ambulatory screening clinic in Chicago, Illinois. Patients were excluded if they had any underlying lung disorder, clinical characteristics of pneumonia, antibiotic treatment within the previous 2 weeks, pregnancy, steroid treatment, or had been started on an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor within the previous 4 weeks.
STUDY DESIGN AND VALIDITY: This study was a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial with concealed allocation. Patients were randomized to receive a total of 1.5 g of either azithromycin or vitamin C over 5 days (500 mg on the first day, then 250 mg/day for 4 more days). All patients also received symptomatic care with dex-tromethorphan and an albuterol inhaler with a spacer. Trained research assistants interviewed patients on enrollment in the study to assess their baseline health-related quality of life. The interview, consisting of 22 questions adapted from similar instruments developed at McMaster University, was repeated on days 3 and 7. For each of the questions, patients were asked to rate how troubled they had been during the previous few days as a result of their bronchitis symptoms on a 7-point scale. Follow-up was for 7 days from the beginning of the study and was 85.9% complete. Analysis was by intention to treat.
OUTCOMES MEASURED: The primary outcome measured was health-related quality of life on day 7 of follow-up. Secondary end points were return to usual daily activities at follow-up and adverse effects.
RESULTS: The adjusted difference in health-related quality of life between the patients taking azithromycin and those taking vitamin C was not significant on day 7 of the study (difference = 0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], –0.20 to 0.26). Overall, 89% of patients in both groups returned to work by day 7 (difference = 0.5%; 95% CI, –10% to 9%). No difference was noted in the fre treat acute bronchitis in otherwise healthy adults.

 

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

Azithromycin is no more effective than vitamin C in treating acute bronchitis in healthy adults. Given the evidence that treatment with vitamin C is not effective in respiratory illnesses, azithromycin appears equally ineffective. With increasing health care costs and rising concerns about antibiotic resistance, azithromycin, and probably other antibiotics, should not be used to treat acute bronchitis in otherwise healthy adults.

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 51(09)
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 51(09)
Page Number
778-791
Page Number
778-791
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Azithromycin no more effective than vitamin C for acute bronchitis
Display Headline
Azithromycin no more effective than vitamin C for acute bronchitis
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Article PDF Media