A Vote in Favor of New Model

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 12/13/2016 - 10:27
Display Headline
A Vote in Favor of New Model

This article is a response to Randy D. Danielsen's editorial "PA Recertification Proposal: Reform or Reaction?" from the February 2016 issue of Clinician Reviews.

I would just like to make a quick comment about the new PANRE model: I think it’s fabulous! I’ve been working in General Surgery ever since passing the PANCE and am now eligible to take my first PANRE; the current format honestly frightens me.  I am spending thousands of dollars on review courses and books, along with what will be countless hours of studying, all in an effort to answer questions that are mostly irrelevant to what I do in practice. I think that a generalist take-home exam, specialty-specific testing, and (if necessary) CME-based remediation would be reasonable, practical, effective, and simply put, a good idea.

Jared K. Wilson, MPAS, MEd, PA-C, ATC
Pocatello, ID

FOR MORE LETTERS TO THE EDITOR:
A Learning Experience but Not an Impediment

Recertification: The NPs Have the Right Idea

Should Exams Be More Hands-on?
When Did a Simple Process Become So Complicated?

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Jared K. Wilson, MPAS, MEd, PA-C, ATC

Publications
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Jared K. Wilson, MPAS, MEd, PA-C, ATC

Author and Disclosure Information

Jared K. Wilson, MPAS, MEd, PA-C, ATC

Related Articles

This article is a response to Randy D. Danielsen's editorial "PA Recertification Proposal: Reform or Reaction?" from the February 2016 issue of Clinician Reviews.

I would just like to make a quick comment about the new PANRE model: I think it’s fabulous! I’ve been working in General Surgery ever since passing the PANCE and am now eligible to take my first PANRE; the current format honestly frightens me.  I am spending thousands of dollars on review courses and books, along with what will be countless hours of studying, all in an effort to answer questions that are mostly irrelevant to what I do in practice. I think that a generalist take-home exam, specialty-specific testing, and (if necessary) CME-based remediation would be reasonable, practical, effective, and simply put, a good idea.

Jared K. Wilson, MPAS, MEd, PA-C, ATC
Pocatello, ID

FOR MORE LETTERS TO THE EDITOR:
A Learning Experience but Not an Impediment

Recertification: The NPs Have the Right Idea

Should Exams Be More Hands-on?
When Did a Simple Process Become So Complicated?

This article is a response to Randy D. Danielsen's editorial "PA Recertification Proposal: Reform or Reaction?" from the February 2016 issue of Clinician Reviews.

I would just like to make a quick comment about the new PANRE model: I think it’s fabulous! I’ve been working in General Surgery ever since passing the PANCE and am now eligible to take my first PANRE; the current format honestly frightens me.  I am spending thousands of dollars on review courses and books, along with what will be countless hours of studying, all in an effort to answer questions that are mostly irrelevant to what I do in practice. I think that a generalist take-home exam, specialty-specific testing, and (if necessary) CME-based remediation would be reasonable, practical, effective, and simply put, a good idea.

Jared K. Wilson, MPAS, MEd, PA-C, ATC
Pocatello, ID

FOR MORE LETTERS TO THE EDITOR:
A Learning Experience but Not an Impediment

Recertification: The NPs Have the Right Idea

Should Exams Be More Hands-on?
When Did a Simple Process Become So Complicated?

References

References

Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
A Vote in Favor of New Model
Display Headline
A Vote in Favor of New Model
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article