John W. Wilson, MD

In Reply: We appreciate the comments, and we fully agree about the dangers of blurring sensitivity and stereotyping in medicine. We also recognize that health providers working around the world have distinct backgrounds and unique perspectives, which serve to enrich the discussion.

We agree that gaining cultural knowledge should be a prerequisite for healthcare workers. However, healthcare providers may not uniformly have the opportunity, time, or resources for this training. Additionally, providers working in large group practices including referral and academic medical centers often do not have control over scheduling of patient appointments. Therefore, rather than prohibiting the evaluations of international patients, we advocate for the utilization of a few guiding and common principles to optimize a mutually beneficial patient care experience. Despite inherent inadequacies and potential prejudices, healthcare providers do learn through patient encounters. Within this learning environment, mistakes will be made, but there are also opportunities for further self-improvement.

We agree there is a fine line between sensitivity and stereotyping, along with common misunderstandings regarding patient labeling. Identifying the geographic homeland of a patient could be misconstrued as intent to stereotype patients. However, numerous infectious diseases and many noncommunicable syndromes are disproportionately represented within select countries. Thus, we feel the identification of a patient’s homeland along with ethnicity, age, gender, and pertinent socioeconomic details can be done respectfully and remain an important collective part of the active medical history and serve to optimize care for each patient. Within medical education, we often find ourselves generalizing patient presentations and symptom profiles. 

Yet we must recognize that the generalized concepts cannot apply to everyone. Medicine remains a profession of humility—both in our willingness to consider additional diagnoses and in our openness to care for patients of different backgrounds. With this humility, we hope to avoid the pitfalls of patient stereotyping, misjudgments, and misunderstandings.

Finally, the nondisclosure of serious medical diagnoses at the request of family members can be a tricky issue. It can be most difficult to balance unique wishes of a family with the ethics of accurate patient communication and compliance with legal statutes and medical center policies. We advocate a team approach with family members of international patients as a way to avoid breaches in medical ethics or breaks in mutual family trust. 

In Reply: We appreciate the comments, and we fully agree about the dangers of blurring sensitivity and stereotyping in medicine. We also recognize that health providers working around the world have distinct backgrounds and unique perspectives, which serve to enrich the discussion.

We agree that gaining cultural knowledge should be a prerequisite for healthcare workers. However, healthcare providers may not uniformly have the opportunity, time, or resources for this training. Additionally, providers working in large group practices including referral and academic medical centers often do not have control over scheduling of patient appointments. Therefore, rather than prohibiting the evaluations of international patients, we advocate for the utilization of a few guiding and common principles to optimize a mutually beneficial patient care experience. Despite inherent inadequacies and potential prejudices, healthcare providers do learn through patient encounters. Within this learning environment, mistakes will be made, but there are also opportunities for further self-improvement.

We agree there is a fine line between sensitivity and stereotyping, along with common misunderstandings regarding patient labeling. Identifying the geographic homeland of a patient could be misconstrued as intent to stereotype patients. However, numerous infectious diseases and many noncommunicable syndromes are disproportionately represented within select countries. Thus, we feel the identification of a patient’s homeland along with ethnicity, age, gender, and pertinent socioeconomic details can be done respectfully and remain an important collective part of the active medical history and serve to optimize care for each patient. Within medical education, we often find ourselves generalizing patient presentations and symptom profiles. 

Yet we must recognize that the generalized concepts cannot apply to everyone. Medicine remains a profession of humility—both in our willingness to consider additional diagnoses and in our openness to care for patients of different backgrounds. With this humility, we hope to avoid the pitfalls of patient stereotyping, misjudgments, and misunderstandings.

Finally, the nondisclosure of serious medical diagnoses at the request of family members can be a tricky issue. It can be most difficult to balance unique wishes of a family with the ethics of accurate patient communication and compliance with legal statutes and medical center policies. We advocate a team approach with family members of international patients as a way to avoid breaches in medical ethics or breaks in mutual family trust. 

In Reply: We appreciate the comments, and we fully agree about the dangers of blurring sensitivity and stereotyping in medicine. We also recognize that health providers working around the world have distinct backgrounds and unique perspectives, which serve to enrich the discussion.

We agree that gaining cultural knowledge should be a prerequisite for healthcare workers. However, healthcare providers may not uniformly have the opportunity, time, or resources for this training. Additionally, providers working in large group practices including referral and academic medical centers often do not have control over scheduling of patient appointments. Therefore, rather than prohibiting the evaluations of international patients, we advocate for the utilization of a few guiding and common principles to optimize a mutually beneficial patient care experience. Despite inherent inadequacies and potential prejudices, healthcare providers do learn through patient encounters. Within this learning environment, mistakes will be made, but there are also opportunities for further self-improvement.

We agree there is a fine line between sensitivity and stereotyping, along with common misunderstandings regarding patient labeling. Identifying the geographic homeland of a patient could be misconstrued as intent to stereotype patients. However, numerous infectious diseases and many noncommunicable syndromes are disproportionately represented within select countries. Thus, we feel the identification of a patient’s homeland along with ethnicity, age, gender, and pertinent socioeconomic details can be done respectfully and remain an important collective part of the active medical history and serve to optimize care for each patient. Within medical education, we often find ourselves generalizing patient presentations and symptom profiles. 

Yet we must recognize that the generalized concepts cannot apply to everyone. Medicine remains a profession of humility—both in our willingness to consider additional diagnoses and in our openness to care for patients of different backgrounds. With this humility, we hope to avoid the pitfalls of patient stereotyping, misjudgments, and misunderstandings.

Finally, the nondisclosure of serious medical diagnoses at the request of family members can be a tricky issue. It can be most difficult to balance unique wishes of a family with the ethics of accurate patient communication and compliance with legal statutes and medical center policies. We advocate a team approach with family members of international patients as a way to avoid breaches in medical ethics or breaks in mutual family trust. 

It is much more important to know what sort of a patient has a disease than what sort of a disease a patient has.

—Attributed to Sir William Osler¹

Recent years have seen an increase in people  traveling away from their home region for healthcare, often for care that is less expensive or unavailable where they live.^2–4 Many Americans seek care abroad (engaging in “medical tourism”); conversely, the United States annually receives thousands of foreign travelers for medical evaluations, a trend projected to increase.^2,3,5 Additionally, US healthcare providers often see foreign travelers for unexpected ailments that develop during their time here.

See related editorial

Traveling for healthcare can be stressful for patients, and caring for international patients may pose challenges for providers and medical centers. On the other hand, such encounters also provide many mutual benefits. Unfortunately, there is little published guidance addressing these issues.² In this article, we therefore discuss many of the benefits and challenges, with the hope of improving the quality of care delivered and the clinical experience for both providers and patients.

CHALLENGES FOR INTERNATIONAL PATIENTS AND THEIR PROVIDERS

Some scenarios that illustrate challenges faced by international patients and their healthcare providers are presented in Table 1.

For patients, heightened anxiety

Many international patients feel anxious, isolated, and vulnerable, particularly if they have never been away from home before. These feelings arise from multiple factors, including the stress of traveling, lack of family or social support, an unfamiliar environment, contrasting cultural practices, and high expectations.^3,4 Language barriers, especially for patients who speak uncommon dialects, and lack of continuously available interpretive services often augment the unsettled emotions of international patients.

Cultural differences

International patients may quickly notice significant differences from their home country in how healthcare is practiced and culturally applied.^4,6 Such differences may include dress codes and the comparatively equal role of women vis-à-vis men in the Western medical profession.

For cultural, personal, or religious reasons, some patients feel uncomfortable with healthcare providers of the opposite sex. This discomfort can be heightened if the patient needs a potentially uncomfortable and humiliating procedure such as a gynecologic or rectal examination.

The multidisciplinary team approach to healthcare, which can include trainees, nurses, and pharmacists, may leave patients confused about who their primary health provider is.

Decision-making also has cultural implications. In Western medicine, we respect individual autonomy and expect patients to participate in decisions about their care. However, in many areas of the world, medical decision-making is deferred to extended family members or cultural leaders.² Additional and often repeated conversations may be needed with both the patient and family members to ensure appropriate understanding and ethical consent for care.

Some international patients may have expectations that are quite different from those of the healthcare provider and that are sometimes unrealistic.^2,6

Institutional challenges

Many medical conditions require prolonged treatment and longitudinal care, a notable challenge when that care is delivered outside of one’s home country. Practice models within a clinic may not allow for prolonged subsequent visits, which may be needed to accommodate language-translation services. Complex multidisciplinary plans of care must somehow effectively utilize available appointment slots and be time-efficient.

Criteria for hospitalization differ widely among different countries, often based on resources, and may necessitate additional dialogue between the patient and healthcare provider.

Obtaining, interpreting the patient’s record

Medical records from foreign institutions are often unavailable, incomplete, or illegible. Further, depending on the country, it may be difficult to contact local providers for supplemental information. Differences in time zones, limited access to technology, language barriers, and handwritten notes all pose problems when trying to obtain additional information.

Many under-resourced foreign medical centers cannot duplicate medical records and radiographic films for the patient to bring to the United States. Medical records from foreign laboratories often raise questions about the quality, accuracy, and methodology of the testing platform used.² Thus, the provider may need to start over and repeat the entire clinical, radiologic, and laboratory evaluation.

Communicating with the patient

Difficulties in communication between patients and providers can hinder the development of a positive and productive relationship, reducing patient autonomy and complicating informed consent.² Obtaining a medical history from non–English-speaking patients can be arduous and time-consuming. Colloquial language may further alter interpretation and understanding, even for formally trained interpreters. Language differences may make it more difficult to explain differential diagnoses, diagnostic approaches, and management plans.

Many US medical centers provide interpreters for many languages, but the great number of languages spoken around the world ensures that barriers in communication persist. Telephone language lines and other commercial language services are available but may feel less personal to patients or evoke concerns about medical confidentiality. For less commonly spoken languages and dialects, appropriate translation services may not even be available.⁶

Filling in information gaps

Medical conditions, medications, and treatments may have different names in different countries. The quality of pharmaceuticals in some regions may be questionable, and herbal supplements may be unique to a particular location. Many medications available abroad are not available in the United States, potentially confusing US providers as to medication appropriateness, efficacy, and potential toxicities.

Lacking adequate medical records and trying to obtain a new medical history from patients and their family members, providers may struggle with continued gaps of information, hindering a timely diagnosis and composition of an appropriate management plan.

A culturally sensitive but complete physical examination

Every effort should be made to complete a thorough and comprehensive physical examination, even if the patient’s culture differs on this point. This may require a “chaperone” to be present or, if available, a clinician of the same sex as the patient to perform the examination. A compromised examination will impede making the correct diagnosis.

Religious, cultural, and other patient-specific attitudes and beliefs that may affect a medical evaluation should ideally be addressed before scheduling the appointment. A preexamination discussion with the patient and family can help avert unintentional actions and behavior misperceived as offensive, while strengthening the level of trust between patient and provider.²

Money matters

Foreign patients typically have limited or no medical insurance coverage and thus may be paying out of pocket or through limited governmental subsidies. Many refugees and asylum-seekers have no insurance or money to pay for care. (A full discussion of refugee care is beyond the scope of this article). Thus, it is necessary to ascertain in advance who will pay for the care.

Clinicians must be sensitive to the exorbitant costs of medical care and medications in the United States, particularly from the perspective of foreign patients. We strive to provide the best cost-effective care, but what is considered cost-effective and standard care for a patient with US health insurance may be viewed differently by international patients. For some foreign patients, some tests and treatments may be just too expensive, raising personal and institutional ethical concerns regarding how best to evaluate and manage these patients. Ideally, these issues should also be addressed before the patient’s appointment is scheduled.

Clinicians must optimize diagnostic and medical management while minimizing unnecessary testing. This principle further underscores the importance of obtaining a complete medical history and physical examination within a time-sensitive and well-coordinated plan of care.^2,4

Continuity of care after the patient leaves

As the medical evaluation and care plan approach completion, ensuring some form of continued medical care can become challenging. Some foreign patients may have the financial or legal means (eg, through an extended medical visa) to remain for further care and follow-up, but most do not.

Finding an available, willing health provider in the patient’s native country for continued management may be difficult and time-consuming. Most US medical centers have no established system to identify available foreign health providers, and usually the patient and family are responsible for arranging continued healthcare back in their home country.

Opportunities for possible improvement of care are noted in Table 2.

ADVANTAGES OF CARING FOR INTERNATIONAL PATIENTS

Despite the possible challenges, there are many benefits of caring for international patients.

Gaining medical knowledge

In US medical centers caring for both regional and referred patients, providers are often exposed to medical conditions that range from common ailments to the rare conditions (or “zebras”) taught during residency training. From the medical education standpoint, international patients provide US health providers heightened opportunities to encounter diseases not commonly seen in the United States (eg, infections such as malaria, schistosomiasis, drug-resistant tuberculosis, and advanced or end-stage forms of noncommunicable diseases). Although not limited to international patients, chronically neglected diseases often give providers first-hand experience in the natural history of select disease progression.

Gaining cultural knowledge

Caring for international patients also enables health providers to learn about different cultures, societal norms, and regional beliefs affecting healthcare. In essence, international patients enable US providers to become more diversified and enlightened with communication skills and assorted managerial strategies on a global scale.

These patients remind us of the stark differences regarding access and quality of medical care globally, particularly in lesser-resourced locations. In a busy domestic medical practice with its own daily challenges, many of us forget these international healthcare disparities, and often take for granted the comparative abundance of healthcare resources available in the United States. Provider frustrations about domestic policies and concerns for a “broken” healthcare system often blind us to the available resources we are fortunate to have at our disposal.

Further, as members of the global community, we have the opportunity to learn from international patients while broadening our view of humanity, thereby enhancing our awareness and empathy toward patients and communities struggling with under-resourced healthcare systems. Healthcare providers are often touched by the gratitude of patients for the opportunity to receive treatments that may otherwise be unavailable. Such experiences may motivate many US health providers to become more engaged in coordinated strategies for global health improvement.

Reimbursement is possible

Caring for international patients should not financially deter US health care centers. Complex, multidisciplinary care evaluations may incur notable expenses; however, alternative and more lucrative payer systems, including government subsidies, can be involved to maintain revenue, reimbursements, and even possibly lead to increased donations.^3–5 Given the potential for high costs to be incurred, US providers and institutions need to continually ensure appropriate evidence-based use of resources and cost-effective care without compromising the quality of care provided. The price of certain drugs has been rising astonishingly in the United States, and some patients may therefore prefer to obtain them for long-term use upon return to their home country.

High-quality cost-effective care is satisfying to the patient, provider, and institution, and also may save money that can be reallocated.⁴ Providers also may find personal fulfillment in striving for and achieving such goals, despite the potential challenges throughout the course of care.

Opportunities for improvement

Regardless of the challenges presented by international patients, participating medical centers often enjoy the prestige and credibility of becoming an “international healthcare center.”^4,7 From the standpoint of medical education, these centers have the potential to train providers with increased clinical and cultural competencies along with expanding healthcare services to include clinical, educational and research opportunities abroad.

Research is needed to provide evidence-based guidance on best strategies for patients, clinicians, and healthcare systems to effectively care for international patients.

Suggested opportunities for maximizing advantages are noted in Table 3.

It is much more important to know what sort of a patient has a disease than what sort of a disease a patient has.

—Attributed to Sir William Osler¹

Recent years have seen an increase in people  traveling away from their home region for healthcare, often for care that is less expensive or unavailable where they live.^2–4 Many Americans seek care abroad (engaging in “medical tourism”); conversely, the United States annually receives thousands of foreign travelers for medical evaluations, a trend projected to increase.^2,3,5 Additionally, US healthcare providers often see foreign travelers for unexpected ailments that develop during their time here.

See related editorial

Traveling for healthcare can be stressful for patients, and caring for international patients may pose challenges for providers and medical centers. On the other hand, such encounters also provide many mutual benefits. Unfortunately, there is little published guidance addressing these issues.² In this article, we therefore discuss many of the benefits and challenges, with the hope of improving the quality of care delivered and the clinical experience for both providers and patients.

CHALLENGES FOR INTERNATIONAL PATIENTS AND THEIR PROVIDERS

Some scenarios that illustrate challenges faced by international patients and their healthcare providers are presented in Table 1.

For patients, heightened anxiety

Many international patients feel anxious, isolated, and vulnerable, particularly if they have never been away from home before. These feelings arise from multiple factors, including the stress of traveling, lack of family or social support, an unfamiliar environment, contrasting cultural practices, and high expectations.^3,4 Language barriers, especially for patients who speak uncommon dialects, and lack of continuously available interpretive services often augment the unsettled emotions of international patients.

Cultural differences

International patients may quickly notice significant differences from their home country in how healthcare is practiced and culturally applied.^4,6 Such differences may include dress codes and the comparatively equal role of women vis-à-vis men in the Western medical profession.

For cultural, personal, or religious reasons, some patients feel uncomfortable with healthcare providers of the opposite sex. This discomfort can be heightened if the patient needs a potentially uncomfortable and humiliating procedure such as a gynecologic or rectal examination.

The multidisciplinary team approach to healthcare, which can include trainees, nurses, and pharmacists, may leave patients confused about who their primary health provider is.

Decision-making also has cultural implications. In Western medicine, we respect individual autonomy and expect patients to participate in decisions about their care. However, in many areas of the world, medical decision-making is deferred to extended family members or cultural leaders.² Additional and often repeated conversations may be needed with both the patient and family members to ensure appropriate understanding and ethical consent for care.

Some international patients may have expectations that are quite different from those of the healthcare provider and that are sometimes unrealistic.^2,6

Institutional challenges

Many medical conditions require prolonged treatment and longitudinal care, a notable challenge when that care is delivered outside of one’s home country. Practice models within a clinic may not allow for prolonged subsequent visits, which may be needed to accommodate language-translation services. Complex multidisciplinary plans of care must somehow effectively utilize available appointment slots and be time-efficient.

Criteria for hospitalization differ widely among different countries, often based on resources, and may necessitate additional dialogue between the patient and healthcare provider.

Obtaining, interpreting the patient’s record

Medical records from foreign institutions are often unavailable, incomplete, or illegible. Further, depending on the country, it may be difficult to contact local providers for supplemental information. Differences in time zones, limited access to technology, language barriers, and handwritten notes all pose problems when trying to obtain additional information.

Many under-resourced foreign medical centers cannot duplicate medical records and radiographic films for the patient to bring to the United States. Medical records from foreign laboratories often raise questions about the quality, accuracy, and methodology of the testing platform used.² Thus, the provider may need to start over and repeat the entire clinical, radiologic, and laboratory evaluation.

Communicating with the patient

Difficulties in communication between patients and providers can hinder the development of a positive and productive relationship, reducing patient autonomy and complicating informed consent.² Obtaining a medical history from non–English-speaking patients can be arduous and time-consuming. Colloquial language may further alter interpretation and understanding, even for formally trained interpreters. Language differences may make it more difficult to explain differential diagnoses, diagnostic approaches, and management plans.

Many US medical centers provide interpreters for many languages, but the great number of languages spoken around the world ensures that barriers in communication persist. Telephone language lines and other commercial language services are available but may feel less personal to patients or evoke concerns about medical confidentiality. For less commonly spoken languages and dialects, appropriate translation services may not even be available.⁶

Filling in information gaps

Medical conditions, medications, and treatments may have different names in different countries. The quality of pharmaceuticals in some regions may be questionable, and herbal supplements may be unique to a particular location. Many medications available abroad are not available in the United States, potentially confusing US providers as to medication appropriateness, efficacy, and potential toxicities.

Lacking adequate medical records and trying to obtain a new medical history from patients and their family members, providers may struggle with continued gaps of information, hindering a timely diagnosis and composition of an appropriate management plan.

A culturally sensitive but complete physical examination

Every effort should be made to complete a thorough and comprehensive physical examination, even if the patient’s culture differs on this point. This may require a “chaperone” to be present or, if available, a clinician of the same sex as the patient to perform the examination. A compromised examination will impede making the correct diagnosis.

Religious, cultural, and other patient-specific attitudes and beliefs that may affect a medical evaluation should ideally be addressed before scheduling the appointment. A preexamination discussion with the patient and family can help avert unintentional actions and behavior misperceived as offensive, while strengthening the level of trust between patient and provider.²

Money matters

Foreign patients typically have limited or no medical insurance coverage and thus may be paying out of pocket or through limited governmental subsidies. Many refugees and asylum-seekers have no insurance or money to pay for care. (A full discussion of refugee care is beyond the scope of this article). Thus, it is necessary to ascertain in advance who will pay for the care.

Clinicians must be sensitive to the exorbitant costs of medical care and medications in the United States, particularly from the perspective of foreign patients. We strive to provide the best cost-effective care, but what is considered cost-effective and standard care for a patient with US health insurance may be viewed differently by international patients. For some foreign patients, some tests and treatments may be just too expensive, raising personal and institutional ethical concerns regarding how best to evaluate and manage these patients. Ideally, these issues should also be addressed before the patient’s appointment is scheduled.

Clinicians must optimize diagnostic and medical management while minimizing unnecessary testing. This principle further underscores the importance of obtaining a complete medical history and physical examination within a time-sensitive and well-coordinated plan of care.^2,4

Continuity of care after the patient leaves

As the medical evaluation and care plan approach completion, ensuring some form of continued medical care can become challenging. Some foreign patients may have the financial or legal means (eg, through an extended medical visa) to remain for further care and follow-up, but most do not.

Finding an available, willing health provider in the patient’s native country for continued management may be difficult and time-consuming. Most US medical centers have no established system to identify available foreign health providers, and usually the patient and family are responsible for arranging continued healthcare back in their home country.

Opportunities for possible improvement of care are noted in Table 2.

ADVANTAGES OF CARING FOR INTERNATIONAL PATIENTS

Despite the possible challenges, there are many benefits of caring for international patients.

Gaining medical knowledge

In US medical centers caring for both regional and referred patients, providers are often exposed to medical conditions that range from common ailments to the rare conditions (or “zebras”) taught during residency training. From the medical education standpoint, international patients provide US health providers heightened opportunities to encounter diseases not commonly seen in the United States (eg, infections such as malaria, schistosomiasis, drug-resistant tuberculosis, and advanced or end-stage forms of noncommunicable diseases). Although not limited to international patients, chronically neglected diseases often give providers first-hand experience in the natural history of select disease progression.

Gaining cultural knowledge

Caring for international patients also enables health providers to learn about different cultures, societal norms, and regional beliefs affecting healthcare. In essence, international patients enable US providers to become more diversified and enlightened with communication skills and assorted managerial strategies on a global scale.

These patients remind us of the stark differences regarding access and quality of medical care globally, particularly in lesser-resourced locations. In a busy domestic medical practice with its own daily challenges, many of us forget these international healthcare disparities, and often take for granted the comparative abundance of healthcare resources available in the United States. Provider frustrations about domestic policies and concerns for a “broken” healthcare system often blind us to the available resources we are fortunate to have at our disposal.

Further, as members of the global community, we have the opportunity to learn from international patients while broadening our view of humanity, thereby enhancing our awareness and empathy toward patients and communities struggling with under-resourced healthcare systems. Healthcare providers are often touched by the gratitude of patients for the opportunity to receive treatments that may otherwise be unavailable. Such experiences may motivate many US health providers to become more engaged in coordinated strategies for global health improvement.

Reimbursement is possible

Caring for international patients should not financially deter US health care centers. Complex, multidisciplinary care evaluations may incur notable expenses; however, alternative and more lucrative payer systems, including government subsidies, can be involved to maintain revenue, reimbursements, and even possibly lead to increased donations.^3–5 Given the potential for high costs to be incurred, US providers and institutions need to continually ensure appropriate evidence-based use of resources and cost-effective care without compromising the quality of care provided. The price of certain drugs has been rising astonishingly in the United States, and some patients may therefore prefer to obtain them for long-term use upon return to their home country.

High-quality cost-effective care is satisfying to the patient, provider, and institution, and also may save money that can be reallocated.⁴ Providers also may find personal fulfillment in striving for and achieving such goals, despite the potential challenges throughout the course of care.

Opportunities for improvement

Regardless of the challenges presented by international patients, participating medical centers often enjoy the prestige and credibility of becoming an “international healthcare center.”^4,7 From the standpoint of medical education, these centers have the potential to train providers with increased clinical and cultural competencies along with expanding healthcare services to include clinical, educational and research opportunities abroad.

Research is needed to provide evidence-based guidance on best strategies for patients, clinicians, and healthcare systems to effectively care for international patients.

Suggested opportunities for maximizing advantages are noted in Table 3.

It is much more important to know what sort of a patient has a disease than what sort of a disease a patient has.

—Attributed to Sir William Osler¹

Recent years have seen an increase in people  traveling away from their home region for healthcare, often for care that is less expensive or unavailable where they live.^2–4 Many Americans seek care abroad (engaging in “medical tourism”); conversely, the United States annually receives thousands of foreign travelers for medical evaluations, a trend projected to increase.^2,3,5 Additionally, US healthcare providers often see foreign travelers for unexpected ailments that develop during their time here.

See related editorial

Traveling for healthcare can be stressful for patients, and caring for international patients may pose challenges for providers and medical centers. On the other hand, such encounters also provide many mutual benefits. Unfortunately, there is little published guidance addressing these issues.² In this article, we therefore discuss many of the benefits and challenges, with the hope of improving the quality of care delivered and the clinical experience for both providers and patients.

CHALLENGES FOR INTERNATIONAL PATIENTS AND THEIR PROVIDERS

Some scenarios that illustrate challenges faced by international patients and their healthcare providers are presented in Table 1.

For patients, heightened anxiety

Many international patients feel anxious, isolated, and vulnerable, particularly if they have never been away from home before. These feelings arise from multiple factors, including the stress of traveling, lack of family or social support, an unfamiliar environment, contrasting cultural practices, and high expectations.^3,4 Language barriers, especially for patients who speak uncommon dialects, and lack of continuously available interpretive services often augment the unsettled emotions of international patients.

Cultural differences

International patients may quickly notice significant differences from their home country in how healthcare is practiced and culturally applied.^4,6 Such differences may include dress codes and the comparatively equal role of women vis-à-vis men in the Western medical profession.

For cultural, personal, or religious reasons, some patients feel uncomfortable with healthcare providers of the opposite sex. This discomfort can be heightened if the patient needs a potentially uncomfortable and humiliating procedure such as a gynecologic or rectal examination.

The multidisciplinary team approach to healthcare, which can include trainees, nurses, and pharmacists, may leave patients confused about who their primary health provider is.

Decision-making also has cultural implications. In Western medicine, we respect individual autonomy and expect patients to participate in decisions about their care. However, in many areas of the world, medical decision-making is deferred to extended family members or cultural leaders.² Additional and often repeated conversations may be needed with both the patient and family members to ensure appropriate understanding and ethical consent for care.

Some international patients may have expectations that are quite different from those of the healthcare provider and that are sometimes unrealistic.^2,6

Institutional challenges

Many medical conditions require prolonged treatment and longitudinal care, a notable challenge when that care is delivered outside of one’s home country. Practice models within a clinic may not allow for prolonged subsequent visits, which may be needed to accommodate language-translation services. Complex multidisciplinary plans of care must somehow effectively utilize available appointment slots and be time-efficient.

Criteria for hospitalization differ widely among different countries, often based on resources, and may necessitate additional dialogue between the patient and healthcare provider.

Obtaining, interpreting the patient’s record

Medical records from foreign institutions are often unavailable, incomplete, or illegible. Further, depending on the country, it may be difficult to contact local providers for supplemental information. Differences in time zones, limited access to technology, language barriers, and handwritten notes all pose problems when trying to obtain additional information.

Many under-resourced foreign medical centers cannot duplicate medical records and radiographic films for the patient to bring to the United States. Medical records from foreign laboratories often raise questions about the quality, accuracy, and methodology of the testing platform used.² Thus, the provider may need to start over and repeat the entire clinical, radiologic, and laboratory evaluation.

Communicating with the patient

Difficulties in communication between patients and providers can hinder the development of a positive and productive relationship, reducing patient autonomy and complicating informed consent.² Obtaining a medical history from non–English-speaking patients can be arduous and time-consuming. Colloquial language may further alter interpretation and understanding, even for formally trained interpreters. Language differences may make it more difficult to explain differential diagnoses, diagnostic approaches, and management plans.

Many US medical centers provide interpreters for many languages, but the great number of languages spoken around the world ensures that barriers in communication persist. Telephone language lines and other commercial language services are available but may feel less personal to patients or evoke concerns about medical confidentiality. For less commonly spoken languages and dialects, appropriate translation services may not even be available.⁶

Filling in information gaps

Medical conditions, medications, and treatments may have different names in different countries. The quality of pharmaceuticals in some regions may be questionable, and herbal supplements may be unique to a particular location. Many medications available abroad are not available in the United States, potentially confusing US providers as to medication appropriateness, efficacy, and potential toxicities.

Lacking adequate medical records and trying to obtain a new medical history from patients and their family members, providers may struggle with continued gaps of information, hindering a timely diagnosis and composition of an appropriate management plan.

A culturally sensitive but complete physical examination

Every effort should be made to complete a thorough and comprehensive physical examination, even if the patient’s culture differs on this point. This may require a “chaperone” to be present or, if available, a clinician of the same sex as the patient to perform the examination. A compromised examination will impede making the correct diagnosis.

Religious, cultural, and other patient-specific attitudes and beliefs that may affect a medical evaluation should ideally be addressed before scheduling the appointment. A preexamination discussion with the patient and family can help avert unintentional actions and behavior misperceived as offensive, while strengthening the level of trust between patient and provider.²

Money matters

Foreign patients typically have limited or no medical insurance coverage and thus may be paying out of pocket or through limited governmental subsidies. Many refugees and asylum-seekers have no insurance or money to pay for care. (A full discussion of refugee care is beyond the scope of this article). Thus, it is necessary to ascertain in advance who will pay for the care.

Clinicians must be sensitive to the exorbitant costs of medical care and medications in the United States, particularly from the perspective of foreign patients. We strive to provide the best cost-effective care, but what is considered cost-effective and standard care for a patient with US health insurance may be viewed differently by international patients. For some foreign patients, some tests and treatments may be just too expensive, raising personal and institutional ethical concerns regarding how best to evaluate and manage these patients. Ideally, these issues should also be addressed before the patient’s appointment is scheduled.

Clinicians must optimize diagnostic and medical management while minimizing unnecessary testing. This principle further underscores the importance of obtaining a complete medical history and physical examination within a time-sensitive and well-coordinated plan of care.^2,4

Continuity of care after the patient leaves

As the medical evaluation and care plan approach completion, ensuring some form of continued medical care can become challenging. Some foreign patients may have the financial or legal means (eg, through an extended medical visa) to remain for further care and follow-up, but most do not.

Finding an available, willing health provider in the patient’s native country for continued management may be difficult and time-consuming. Most US medical centers have no established system to identify available foreign health providers, and usually the patient and family are responsible for arranging continued healthcare back in their home country.

Opportunities for possible improvement of care are noted in Table 2.

ADVANTAGES OF CARING FOR INTERNATIONAL PATIENTS

Despite the possible challenges, there are many benefits of caring for international patients.

Gaining medical knowledge

In US medical centers caring for both regional and referred patients, providers are often exposed to medical conditions that range from common ailments to the rare conditions (or “zebras”) taught during residency training. From the medical education standpoint, international patients provide US health providers heightened opportunities to encounter diseases not commonly seen in the United States (eg, infections such as malaria, schistosomiasis, drug-resistant tuberculosis, and advanced or end-stage forms of noncommunicable diseases). Although not limited to international patients, chronically neglected diseases often give providers first-hand experience in the natural history of select disease progression.

Gaining cultural knowledge

Caring for international patients also enables health providers to learn about different cultures, societal norms, and regional beliefs affecting healthcare. In essence, international patients enable US providers to become more diversified and enlightened with communication skills and assorted managerial strategies on a global scale.

These patients remind us of the stark differences regarding access and quality of medical care globally, particularly in lesser-resourced locations. In a busy domestic medical practice with its own daily challenges, many of us forget these international healthcare disparities, and often take for granted the comparative abundance of healthcare resources available in the United States. Provider frustrations about domestic policies and concerns for a “broken” healthcare system often blind us to the available resources we are fortunate to have at our disposal.

Further, as members of the global community, we have the opportunity to learn from international patients while broadening our view of humanity, thereby enhancing our awareness and empathy toward patients and communities struggling with under-resourced healthcare systems. Healthcare providers are often touched by the gratitude of patients for the opportunity to receive treatments that may otherwise be unavailable. Such experiences may motivate many US health providers to become more engaged in coordinated strategies for global health improvement.

Reimbursement is possible

Caring for international patients should not financially deter US health care centers. Complex, multidisciplinary care evaluations may incur notable expenses; however, alternative and more lucrative payer systems, including government subsidies, can be involved to maintain revenue, reimbursements, and even possibly lead to increased donations.^3–5 Given the potential for high costs to be incurred, US providers and institutions need to continually ensure appropriate evidence-based use of resources and cost-effective care without compromising the quality of care provided. The price of certain drugs has been rising astonishingly in the United States, and some patients may therefore prefer to obtain them for long-term use upon return to their home country.

High-quality cost-effective care is satisfying to the patient, provider, and institution, and also may save money that can be reallocated.⁴ Providers also may find personal fulfillment in striving for and achieving such goals, despite the potential challenges throughout the course of care.

Opportunities for improvement

Regardless of the challenges presented by international patients, participating medical centers often enjoy the prestige and credibility of becoming an “international healthcare center.”^4,7 From the standpoint of medical education, these centers have the potential to train providers with increased clinical and cultural competencies along with expanding healthcare services to include clinical, educational and research opportunities abroad.

Research is needed to provide evidence-based guidance on best strategies for patients, clinicians, and healthcare systems to effectively care for international patients.

Suggested opportunities for maximizing advantages are noted in Table 3.