Is a history of trauma associated with a reduced likelihood of cervical cancer screening?

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/14/2019 - 12:02
Display Headline
Is a history of trauma associated with a reduced likelihood of cervical cancer screening?

 

KEY POINTS FOR CLINICIANS

 

  • Women who had not had recommended cervical cancer screening were more likely to have been sexually abused in childhood.
  • Women who were sexually abused in childhood may be at higher risk than other women for HPV and cervical cancer; therefore, screening is particularly important for these women.
  • Not having cervical cancer screening may be a marker for childhood sexual abuse. Therefore, health care providers should consider investigating these issues with women who do not adhere to guidelines for routine Pap smears.

Unfortunately, 15% to 24% of US women do not receive recommended cervical cancer screening.1-3 Barriers to Pap screening include low income, low education, minority status;4 lack of cancer knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, low perceived cancer susceptibility, pain, embarrassment;5-7 language, and certain cultural beliefs.7-9 Sexual trauma has received little research attention as a factor contributing to lowered rates of Pap screening. Sexual trauma is reliably associated with subsequent poor health, which may be partially accounted for by poor preventive care.10-16 Childhood sexual abuse is strongly associated with negative health behaviors such as physical inactivity and smoking.13,17 Sexual violence is associated with lower rates of breast cancer screening18 and increased risk of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).19-21 Avoidant coping styles (an aspect of PTSD) are associated with decreased health promotion behaviors such as screening.22-25

Gynecologic procedures may feel threatening to women with a history of sexual assault, and may be experienced as re-traumatizing.14,26-29 Women who had suffered childhood sexual abuse reported more anxiety, shame, and fear during a gynecologic examination than other women.28 Springs and Friedrich16 found a lower frequency of screening for cervical cancer among adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse, but did not assess the impact of other traumatic events in childhood or adulthood on Pap screening. Because previous research on correlates of sexual trauma has been criticized on the grounds that third variables could account for the observed associations,30 we evaluated associations of any traumatic event with low rates of Pap screening.

We hypothesized that having experienced traumatic events, in particular childhood sexual trauma, would function as barriers to Pap screening. We predicted that women who had not had medically appropriate Pap screening would report a greater number of traumatic events, especially sexual abuse trauma in this ethnically diverse random sample of women. We also expected that sexually traumatized women would express more negative attitudes toward Pap screening, and would be more likely to meet criteria for PTSD, both of which might contribute to lower levels of Pap screening.

Methods

Kaiser Permanente (KP), a pre-paid maintenance organization, offers cervical cancer screening at no cost to patients. KP’s clinical guidelines recommend Pap screening every 2 years for women over age 20 with average risk for cervical cancer. Self-report questionnaires were mailed to an age-stratified random sample of women 21–64 years old who were KP members at 3 locations. Women who had had a total hysterectomy were excluded. We compared women who had and who had not obtained Pap screening in the previous 2 years. In previous research18 we found that women who had not obtained mammography had a lower response rate to mailed questionnaires than women who had been screened. We therefore oversampled women who had not had Pap screening. We mailed questionnaires to 1314 women who had obtained Pap screening and 2897 who had not. The final sample included 364 women who had received screening in the past two years (28% response rate) and 372 who had not (13% response rate). Repeated sampling or telephoning of non-respondents was not allowed by KP policy.

Trauma history was measured in 2 ways. The Trauma History Questionnaire31,32 assesses a range of lifetime traumatic events. The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire33 assesses childhood physical abuse, physical neglect, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, and emotional neglect. PTSD was assessed with the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist.34 We inquired about attitudes toward Pap screening based on previous findings.

Data were analyzed using SAS.35 Contingency tables were analyzed to estimate the prevalence of traumatic events and their bivariate associations with Pap screening. Chi square analysis was used to evaluate the statistical significance of these associations. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to evaluate associations of traumatic events with screening, independent of clinic location, demographic characteristics, attitudes about screening, and PTSD.

Results

Sample demographics

Women who had been screened for cervical cancer and unscreened women were similar in age and education (Table 1). Unscreened women were more likely to be Asian American, to have incomes of $20,000 per year or less, and to have never been married.

 

 

TABLE 1

Demographic characteristics of women with and without Pap screening

 

 No Pap (%) n = 372aPap (%) n = 364aP
Ethnicity  .001
  African American10.111.6 
  Asian American20.18.0 
  European American60.671.8 
  Other9.28.6 
Age  .076
  Mean (standard deviation)43.8 (12.8)45.5 (12.4) 
Education  .187
  Elementary school2.71.4 
  High school39.634.8 
  College41.543.2 
  Post-college16.920.6 
Family income  .002
  $20,000/year or less12.45.8 
  $20,001–$50,00041.338.2 
  More than $50,00046.256.0 
Marital status  .012
  Never married34.324.8 
  Married47.059.1 
  Separated1.60.6 
  Divorced13.813.1 
Widowed3.22.5 
aSample sizes vary slightly because of missing data on individual demographic items.

Prevalence of trauma

Commonly reported events during childhood included natural disaster (reported by 13% of the women), sexual assault other than rape (11%), and news of a death or injury (10%). Childhood sexual abuse or sexual assault was reported by 18.4% of the respondents. The most common traumas in adulthood were receiving news of a death or serious injury (46%), natural disasters (33%), actual or attempted robbery (27%), and serious accidents (14%). Of the respondents, 8.3% reported sexual abuse or sexual assault in adulthood. Their overall rate of childhood and adult sexual assault was 26.7%.

Associations of trauma history with pap screening

We investigated the association of trauma with screening using chi square analyses. Women who had been raped before age 18 (36% vs. 50%, n = 713, P = .050) and women who had been subjected to other sexual assaults before age 18 (35% vs. 51%, n = 694, P = .009) were less likely to have been screened. Nonsexual childhood abuse and neglect were not related to screening. Women who experienced a natural disaster during childhood (36% vs. 52%, n = 571, P = .009) and those who experienced terrorist acts during adulthood (20% vs. 49%, n = 715, P = .024) were less likely to have been screened. (Although the association with a terrorist act was significant, exposures were reported by only 3% of unscreened women and 0.9% of screened women.) Women who reported a household break-in during adulthood were slightly more likely to have been screened (53% vs. 47%, n = 656, P = .032).

In a hierarchical logistic regression model (Table 2), childhood sexual abuse, but not other traumatic events, was associated with lower odds of screening when clinic location, demographic characteristics, attitudes, and PTSD were controlled. The logistic regression model was repeated using CTQ subscales to assess trauma, with similar results. Unmarried women were less likely than currently married women to have been screened, and Latina, Native American, Asian/Pacific, or multicultural women were less likely than European American women to have been screened. Women who endorsed the statement, “I have no symptoms so I do not need a Pap test” and those who anticipated embarrassment during screening were less likely than others to have been screened; women who believed that testing would ease their mind were more likely to have been screened.

TABLE 2

Hierarchical logistic regression model of sexual trauma and attitudes as predictors of pap screening

 

PredictorAdjusted odds ratio (95% CI)
Traumatic events
  Break-in (adult)1.14 (0.77, 1.70)
  Natural disaster (child)0.78 (0.45, 1.38)
  Terrorist act (adult)0.28 (0.07, 1.07)
  Childhood sexual trauma0.56 (0.34, 0.91) *
Site
  Santa Rosa0.68 (0.44, 1.04)
  San Francisco1.0 (referent)
  Oakland1.27 (0.80, 2.02)
Education
  Less than college1.09 (0.71, 1.69)
  College1.0 (referent)
  More than college1.01 (0.65, 1.57)
Ethnicity
  European-American1.0 (referent)
  African American0.59 (0.33, 1.06)
  Other than African 
  American or European 
  American0.46 (0.29, 0.71) **
Unmarried (compared with married)0.67 (0.48, 0.94) *
Attitudes toward Pap screening
  “I have no symptoms so I do not need a Pap test”0.66 (0.51, 0.85) **
  “I’ve had negative experiences with my health care provider”0.90 (0.73, 1.10)
  “Getting a Pap test would ease my mind”1.54 (1.25, 1.89) ***
  “There is danger of infection from a Pap test”1.09 (0.83, 1.43)
  “I do not trust the health care system”1.06 (0.81, 1.39)
  “I would be embarrassed to have a Pap test”0.67 (0.52, 0.84) ***
  “Women who have many sexual 
  partners are more likely to have cervical cancer”0.88 (0.73, 1.06)
  “Pap would cause sexual assault flashbacks, or health care provider looks at me in a sexual way”1.05 (0.77, 1.45)
PTSD diagnosis1.62 (0.91, 2.90)
Missing data0.96 (0.80, 1.13)
*P

Discussion

Childhood sexual abuse is reliably associated with a decreased likelihood of cervical cancer screening. This association persisted despite controlling for demographic characteristics, attitudes about Pap screening, and PTSD symptoms. These findings are strengthened by the consistency with which childhood sexual abuse is associated with low rates of Pap screening using 2 measures of trauma in 3 clinics. Although cost has been a major barrier to access in previous studies of cervical cancer screening, it is not a barrier for women who are members of a pre-paid health plan. It was therefore possible for us to investigate known and suspected barriers to cervical cancer screening with fewer confounding co-variables.

This study clarifies the role of childhood sexual assault in Pap screening. Sexual assault, but not other traumatic events or other types of childhood abuse, is associated with lower rates of cervical cancer screening. Furthermore, sexual assault during childhood, but not during adulthood, is strongly associated with decreased Pap screening.

 

 

The relationship between childhood sexual abuse and Pap screening is particularly disturbing because women who were sexually assaulted as children are more likely to develop cervical dysplasia.36 Women who were sexually assaulted in childhood also tend to begin sexual activity at a young age and have more sexual partners.15,16,36 These are among the primary risk factors for human papillomavirus (HPV),37 an important cause of cervical cancer,38,39 and for cervical cancer.7 Women who were sexually abused in childhood are at increased risk of sexually transmitted disease,15,40 and HPV is the most common sexually transmitted viral disease.38 Therefore, women at higher risk for cervical cancer may be the same women who are least likely to be screened. Childhood sexual abuse may increase cervical cancer morbidity by reducing the probability of Pap screening, and by increasing the probability of disease. It may also decrease the likelihood that these women visit their physician for other routine health maintenance needs.

The low response rate in this study may have resulted from the questionnaire’s being sent to KP members once, without follow-up. Our response rate was comparable to a similar study of HMO members.16 Use of a mailed questionnaire probably resulted in underestimation of childhood sexual abuse prevalence.41 The relationship of sexual abuse to preventive health behaviors is comparable to that reported in studies with higher response rates.13,17

There is some evidence that the interpersonal climate between patient and clinician affects health outcomes,42 and we suspect it is a critical factor in increasing women’s comfort with Pap screening. One of our respondents commented: “I’ve always been treated professionally by my gynecologist and yet I still feel the need for the reassuring presence of a nurse during this procedure. I have asked the nurse to hold my hand during the test to calm me down. I find the hand holding or even her hand on my arm comforting.”

The most consistent predictor of cancer screening among women aged 40 and over was a health maintenance visit or regular source of care.43,44 Not having cervical cancer screening may be a marker for childhood sexual abuse. Therefore, health care providers should consider inquiring about a history of sexual abuse with women who do not follow guidelines for routine Pap screening. It is crucial to develop interventions that will lead to routine medical visits for women who have experienced sexual violence. As part of this process, we recommend education for physicians and other health care providers regarding sexual violence against women.

· Acknowledgments ·

Larry Walter, MA, and Sujaya Parthasarathy, PhD, of the Kaiser Permanente Division of Research in Oakland, California, contributed to our obtaining the random sample of women health plan members in this study. Howard Barkan, DrPH, helped design this project and participated in the data collection. We thank him for his insight and expertise.

References

 

1. American Cancer Society. Statistics: Table 3C.Pap Test, Women 18 and Older, by State, 1997 [website]. In; http://www3.cancer.org/cancerinfo/sitecenter.asp?ct=1&ctid=8&scp=8.3.8.42080&scs=4&scss=16&scdoc=42096&pnt=2&language=english [accessed 2001, 2/27], 2000.

2. American Cancer Society. Statistics: Cervical cancer [website]. In http://www3.cancer.org/cancerinfo/sitecenter.asp?ct=1&ctid=8&scp=8.3.4.4071&scs=4&scss=2&scdoc=42073&pnt=2&language=english [accessed 2001, 2/27]; 2000.

3. Hayward RA, Shapiro MF, Freeman HE, Corey CR. Who gets screened for cervical and breast cancer? Results from a new national survey. Arch Intern Med 1988;148:1177-81.

4. Breen N, B FJ. Stage of breast and cervical cancer diagnosis in disadvantaged neighborhoods: A prevention policy perspective. Am J Prev Med 1996;12(5):319-26.

5. Calle EE, Flanders WD, Thun MJ, Martin LM. Demographic predictors of mammography and Pap smear screening in US women. Am J Public Health 1993;83:53-60.

6. Peters RK, Bear MB, Thomas D. Barriers to screening for cancer of the cervix. Prev Med 1989;18:133-46.

7. Womeodu RJ, Bailey JE. Barriers to cancer screening. Med Clin North Am 1996;80(1):115-33.

8. Suarez L. Pap smear and mammogram screening in Mexican-American women: the effects of acculturation. Am J Public Health 1994;84:742-6.

9. Tang TW, Solomon LJ, Yeh CJ, Worden JK. The role of cultural variables in breast self-examination and cervical cancer screening behavior in young Asian women living in the United States. J Behav Med 1999;22(5):419-36.

10. Golding JM. Sexual assault history and physical health in randomly selected Los Angeles women. Health Psychol 1994;13:130-8.

11. Golding JM. Sexual assault history and women’s reproductive and sexual health. Psychol of Women Quarterly 1996;20:101-21.

12. Golding JM. Sexual assault history and long-term physical health: Evidence from clinical and population epidemiology. Curr Directions in Psychol Sci 1999;8:191-4.

13. Koss MP, Koss PG, Woodruff WJ. Deleterious effects of criminal victimization on women’s health and medical utilization. Arch Intern Med 1991;151:342-7.

14. Laws A. Sexual abuse history and women’s medical problems. J Gen Intern Med 1993;8:441-44.

15. Lechner ME, Vogel ME, Garcia-Shelton LM, Leichter JL, Steibel KR. Self-reported medical problems of adult female survivors of childhood sexual abuse. J Fam Pract 1993;36:633-8.

16. Springs FE, Friedrich WN. Health risk behaviors and medical sequelae of childhood sexual abuse. Mayo Clin Proc 1992;67:527-32.

17. Felitti V, Anda F, Nordenberg D, Williamson, Spitz A, Edwards V, et al. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. Am J Prev Med 1998;14:245-58.

18. Farley M, Minkoff J, Barkan H. Breast cancer screening and trauma history. Women Health in press.

19. Kessler RC, Sonnega A, Bromet E, Hughes M, Nelson CB. Posttraumatic stress disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1995;52:1048-60.

20. Polusny MA, Follette VM. Long-term correlates of child sexual abuse: Theory and review of the empirical literature. Applied and Preventive Psychology 1995;4:143-66.

21. Resnick HS, Kilpatrick DG, Dansky BS, Saunders BE, Best CL. Prevalence of civilian trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder in a representative national sample of women. J Consulting Clin Psychol 1993;61:984-91.

22. Blake DD, Cook JD, Keane TM. Posttraumatic stress disorder and coping in veterans who are seeking medical treatment. J Clin Psychol 1992;48:695-704.

23. Fama LD, Blake DD, Gusman F. Coping and health behaviors in combat-related PTSD inpatients. In: Annual Meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies; San Antonio; 1993.

24. Farley M, Barkan H. Somatization, dissociation, and tension-reducing behaviors in psychiatric outpatients. Psychother Psychosom 1997;66:133-40.

25. Wolfe J, Proctor SP, Brown P, Kimerling RD, J., Sullivan M, Chrestman K, et al. Relationship of physical health and posttraumatic stress disorder in young adult women. In: Annual Meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies; 1994; Los Angeles; 1994.

26. Kitzinger J. Recalling the pain. Nursing Times 1990 January;17:38-40.

27. Menage J. Women’s perception of obstetric and gynaecological examinations. Br Med J 1993;306:1127-8.

28. Robohm JS, Buttenheim M. The gynecological care experiences of adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse: A preliminary investigation. Women Health 1996;24:59-75.

29. Wahlen SD. Adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse. In: Hendricks-Matthews M, editor. Violence education: Toward a solution. Kansas City, MO: Society of Teachers of Family Medicine; 1992. p. 89-102.

30. Briere J. Methodological issues in the study of sexual abuse effects. J Consulting Clin Psychol 1992;60:196-203.

31. Stamm BH, Varra ME. Instrumentation in the Field of Traumatic Stress. Oswego, NY: Research and Methodology Interest Group of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies; 1993.

32. Carlson EB, Briere J. Screening for traumatic experiences and trauma responses in mental health treatment settings. In: International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies; 1999 November 14; Miami, FL; 1999.

33. Bernstein DP, Fink L. Childhood Trauma Questionnaire: A Retrospective Self-Report (Manual). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1998.

34. Weathers FW, Litz BT, Herman DS, Huska JA, Keane TM. The PTSD Checklist (PCL): Reliability, Validity, and Diagnostic Utility. In: 9th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies; 1993; San Antonio, TX; 1993.

35. The SAS System for Windows. In. 8.02 ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 2001.

36. Coker AL, Patel NJ, Krishnaswami W, Schmidt W, Richter DL. Childhood forced sex and cervical dysplasia among women prison inmates. Violence Against Women 1998;4(5):595-608.

37. Becker TM, Wheeler CM, McGough NS, Parmenter CA, Jordan SW, Stidley CA, et al. Sexually transmitted diseases and other risk factors for cervical dysplasia among southwestern Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women. JAMA 1994;271(15):1181-8.

38. Melnikow J, Nuovo J. Cancer prevention and screening in women. Women’s Health 1997;24(1):15-26.

39. Daling JR, Madeleine MM, McKnight B, Carter JJ, Wipf GC, Ashley R, et al. The relationship of human papillomavirus-related cervical tumors to cigarette smoking, oral contraceptive use, and prior herpes simplex virus type 2 infection. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1996;5(7):541-8.

40. Plichta SB. Violence and abuse: Implications for women’s health. In: Falk, Collins, editors. Women’s health: The Commonwealth Fund survey. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1996.

41. Peters SD, Wyatt GE, Finkelhor D. Prevalence. In: Finkelhor D, editor. A sourcebook on child sexual abuse. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1986. p. 15-59.

42. DeBlasi Z, Harkness E, Ernst E, Georgiou A, Kleijnen J. Influence of context effects on health outcomes: A systematic review. Lancet 2001;357:757-62.

43. Mandelblatt JS, Gold K, O’Malley AS, Taylor K, Cagney K, Hopkins J, et al. Breast and cervical cancer screening among multiethnic women: Role of age, health and source of care. J Preventive Med 1999;28:418-25.

44. Ruffin MT, Gorenflo DW, Woodman B. Predictors of screening for breast, cervical, colorectal, and prostatic cancer among community-based primary care practices. J Am Board Fam Pract 2000;13:1-10.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

 

MELISSA FARLEY, PHD
JACQUELINE M. GOLDING, PHD
JEROME R. MINKOFF, MD
Oakland, Santa Rosa, and San Francisco, California
From the Kaiser Foundation Research Institute, Oakland, California, and the Prostitution Research and Education, San Francisco Women’s Centers, Inc., San Francisco, California (M.F); Institute for Health & Aging, University of California, San Francisco (J.M.G.); Kaiser Permanente Family Medicine Services, Division of Endocrinology, Santa Rosa, California, and the Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (J.R.M.). This project was sponsored by the Direct Community Benefit Investment Program, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals California Division, and the Kaiser Foundation Research Institute. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 109th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, August 25, 2001. Please address requests for reprints to Jerome R. Minkoff, MD, at Kaiser Permanente, Family Medicine Services, Division of Endocrinology, 401 Bicentennial Way, Santa Rosa, CA 95403. Email: [email protected]

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 51(10)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
827-831
Legacy Keywords
,Child abuse, sexualrapemass screeningvaginal smears. (J Fam Pract 2002; 51:827–831)
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

 

MELISSA FARLEY, PHD
JACQUELINE M. GOLDING, PHD
JEROME R. MINKOFF, MD
Oakland, Santa Rosa, and San Francisco, California
From the Kaiser Foundation Research Institute, Oakland, California, and the Prostitution Research and Education, San Francisco Women’s Centers, Inc., San Francisco, California (M.F); Institute for Health & Aging, University of California, San Francisco (J.M.G.); Kaiser Permanente Family Medicine Services, Division of Endocrinology, Santa Rosa, California, and the Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (J.R.M.). This project was sponsored by the Direct Community Benefit Investment Program, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals California Division, and the Kaiser Foundation Research Institute. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 109th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, August 25, 2001. Please address requests for reprints to Jerome R. Minkoff, MD, at Kaiser Permanente, Family Medicine Services, Division of Endocrinology, 401 Bicentennial Way, Santa Rosa, CA 95403. Email: [email protected]

Author and Disclosure Information

 

MELISSA FARLEY, PHD
JACQUELINE M. GOLDING, PHD
JEROME R. MINKOFF, MD
Oakland, Santa Rosa, and San Francisco, California
From the Kaiser Foundation Research Institute, Oakland, California, and the Prostitution Research and Education, San Francisco Women’s Centers, Inc., San Francisco, California (M.F); Institute for Health & Aging, University of California, San Francisco (J.M.G.); Kaiser Permanente Family Medicine Services, Division of Endocrinology, Santa Rosa, California, and the Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (J.R.M.). This project was sponsored by the Direct Community Benefit Investment Program, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals California Division, and the Kaiser Foundation Research Institute. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 109th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, August 25, 2001. Please address requests for reprints to Jerome R. Minkoff, MD, at Kaiser Permanente, Family Medicine Services, Division of Endocrinology, 401 Bicentennial Way, Santa Rosa, CA 95403. Email: [email protected]

Article PDF
Article PDF

 

KEY POINTS FOR CLINICIANS

 

  • Women who had not had recommended cervical cancer screening were more likely to have been sexually abused in childhood.
  • Women who were sexually abused in childhood may be at higher risk than other women for HPV and cervical cancer; therefore, screening is particularly important for these women.
  • Not having cervical cancer screening may be a marker for childhood sexual abuse. Therefore, health care providers should consider investigating these issues with women who do not adhere to guidelines for routine Pap smears.

Unfortunately, 15% to 24% of US women do not receive recommended cervical cancer screening.1-3 Barriers to Pap screening include low income, low education, minority status;4 lack of cancer knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, low perceived cancer susceptibility, pain, embarrassment;5-7 language, and certain cultural beliefs.7-9 Sexual trauma has received little research attention as a factor contributing to lowered rates of Pap screening. Sexual trauma is reliably associated with subsequent poor health, which may be partially accounted for by poor preventive care.10-16 Childhood sexual abuse is strongly associated with negative health behaviors such as physical inactivity and smoking.13,17 Sexual violence is associated with lower rates of breast cancer screening18 and increased risk of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).19-21 Avoidant coping styles (an aspect of PTSD) are associated with decreased health promotion behaviors such as screening.22-25

Gynecologic procedures may feel threatening to women with a history of sexual assault, and may be experienced as re-traumatizing.14,26-29 Women who had suffered childhood sexual abuse reported more anxiety, shame, and fear during a gynecologic examination than other women.28 Springs and Friedrich16 found a lower frequency of screening for cervical cancer among adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse, but did not assess the impact of other traumatic events in childhood or adulthood on Pap screening. Because previous research on correlates of sexual trauma has been criticized on the grounds that third variables could account for the observed associations,30 we evaluated associations of any traumatic event with low rates of Pap screening.

We hypothesized that having experienced traumatic events, in particular childhood sexual trauma, would function as barriers to Pap screening. We predicted that women who had not had medically appropriate Pap screening would report a greater number of traumatic events, especially sexual abuse trauma in this ethnically diverse random sample of women. We also expected that sexually traumatized women would express more negative attitudes toward Pap screening, and would be more likely to meet criteria for PTSD, both of which might contribute to lower levels of Pap screening.

Methods

Kaiser Permanente (KP), a pre-paid maintenance organization, offers cervical cancer screening at no cost to patients. KP’s clinical guidelines recommend Pap screening every 2 years for women over age 20 with average risk for cervical cancer. Self-report questionnaires were mailed to an age-stratified random sample of women 21–64 years old who were KP members at 3 locations. Women who had had a total hysterectomy were excluded. We compared women who had and who had not obtained Pap screening in the previous 2 years. In previous research18 we found that women who had not obtained mammography had a lower response rate to mailed questionnaires than women who had been screened. We therefore oversampled women who had not had Pap screening. We mailed questionnaires to 1314 women who had obtained Pap screening and 2897 who had not. The final sample included 364 women who had received screening in the past two years (28% response rate) and 372 who had not (13% response rate). Repeated sampling or telephoning of non-respondents was not allowed by KP policy.

Trauma history was measured in 2 ways. The Trauma History Questionnaire31,32 assesses a range of lifetime traumatic events. The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire33 assesses childhood physical abuse, physical neglect, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, and emotional neglect. PTSD was assessed with the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist.34 We inquired about attitudes toward Pap screening based on previous findings.

Data were analyzed using SAS.35 Contingency tables were analyzed to estimate the prevalence of traumatic events and their bivariate associations with Pap screening. Chi square analysis was used to evaluate the statistical significance of these associations. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to evaluate associations of traumatic events with screening, independent of clinic location, demographic characteristics, attitudes about screening, and PTSD.

Results

Sample demographics

Women who had been screened for cervical cancer and unscreened women were similar in age and education (Table 1). Unscreened women were more likely to be Asian American, to have incomes of $20,000 per year or less, and to have never been married.

 

 

TABLE 1

Demographic characteristics of women with and without Pap screening

 

 No Pap (%) n = 372aPap (%) n = 364aP
Ethnicity  .001
  African American10.111.6 
  Asian American20.18.0 
  European American60.671.8 
  Other9.28.6 
Age  .076
  Mean (standard deviation)43.8 (12.8)45.5 (12.4) 
Education  .187
  Elementary school2.71.4 
  High school39.634.8 
  College41.543.2 
  Post-college16.920.6 
Family income  .002
  $20,000/year or less12.45.8 
  $20,001–$50,00041.338.2 
  More than $50,00046.256.0 
Marital status  .012
  Never married34.324.8 
  Married47.059.1 
  Separated1.60.6 
  Divorced13.813.1 
Widowed3.22.5 
aSample sizes vary slightly because of missing data on individual demographic items.

Prevalence of trauma

Commonly reported events during childhood included natural disaster (reported by 13% of the women), sexual assault other than rape (11%), and news of a death or injury (10%). Childhood sexual abuse or sexual assault was reported by 18.4% of the respondents. The most common traumas in adulthood were receiving news of a death or serious injury (46%), natural disasters (33%), actual or attempted robbery (27%), and serious accidents (14%). Of the respondents, 8.3% reported sexual abuse or sexual assault in adulthood. Their overall rate of childhood and adult sexual assault was 26.7%.

Associations of trauma history with pap screening

We investigated the association of trauma with screening using chi square analyses. Women who had been raped before age 18 (36% vs. 50%, n = 713, P = .050) and women who had been subjected to other sexual assaults before age 18 (35% vs. 51%, n = 694, P = .009) were less likely to have been screened. Nonsexual childhood abuse and neglect were not related to screening. Women who experienced a natural disaster during childhood (36% vs. 52%, n = 571, P = .009) and those who experienced terrorist acts during adulthood (20% vs. 49%, n = 715, P = .024) were less likely to have been screened. (Although the association with a terrorist act was significant, exposures were reported by only 3% of unscreened women and 0.9% of screened women.) Women who reported a household break-in during adulthood were slightly more likely to have been screened (53% vs. 47%, n = 656, P = .032).

In a hierarchical logistic regression model (Table 2), childhood sexual abuse, but not other traumatic events, was associated with lower odds of screening when clinic location, demographic characteristics, attitudes, and PTSD were controlled. The logistic regression model was repeated using CTQ subscales to assess trauma, with similar results. Unmarried women were less likely than currently married women to have been screened, and Latina, Native American, Asian/Pacific, or multicultural women were less likely than European American women to have been screened. Women who endorsed the statement, “I have no symptoms so I do not need a Pap test” and those who anticipated embarrassment during screening were less likely than others to have been screened; women who believed that testing would ease their mind were more likely to have been screened.

TABLE 2

Hierarchical logistic regression model of sexual trauma and attitudes as predictors of pap screening

 

PredictorAdjusted odds ratio (95% CI)
Traumatic events
  Break-in (adult)1.14 (0.77, 1.70)
  Natural disaster (child)0.78 (0.45, 1.38)
  Terrorist act (adult)0.28 (0.07, 1.07)
  Childhood sexual trauma0.56 (0.34, 0.91) *
Site
  Santa Rosa0.68 (0.44, 1.04)
  San Francisco1.0 (referent)
  Oakland1.27 (0.80, 2.02)
Education
  Less than college1.09 (0.71, 1.69)
  College1.0 (referent)
  More than college1.01 (0.65, 1.57)
Ethnicity
  European-American1.0 (referent)
  African American0.59 (0.33, 1.06)
  Other than African 
  American or European 
  American0.46 (0.29, 0.71) **
Unmarried (compared with married)0.67 (0.48, 0.94) *
Attitudes toward Pap screening
  “I have no symptoms so I do not need a Pap test”0.66 (0.51, 0.85) **
  “I’ve had negative experiences with my health care provider”0.90 (0.73, 1.10)
  “Getting a Pap test would ease my mind”1.54 (1.25, 1.89) ***
  “There is danger of infection from a Pap test”1.09 (0.83, 1.43)
  “I do not trust the health care system”1.06 (0.81, 1.39)
  “I would be embarrassed to have a Pap test”0.67 (0.52, 0.84) ***
  “Women who have many sexual 
  partners are more likely to have cervical cancer”0.88 (0.73, 1.06)
  “Pap would cause sexual assault flashbacks, or health care provider looks at me in a sexual way”1.05 (0.77, 1.45)
PTSD diagnosis1.62 (0.91, 2.90)
Missing data0.96 (0.80, 1.13)
*P

Discussion

Childhood sexual abuse is reliably associated with a decreased likelihood of cervical cancer screening. This association persisted despite controlling for demographic characteristics, attitudes about Pap screening, and PTSD symptoms. These findings are strengthened by the consistency with which childhood sexual abuse is associated with low rates of Pap screening using 2 measures of trauma in 3 clinics. Although cost has been a major barrier to access in previous studies of cervical cancer screening, it is not a barrier for women who are members of a pre-paid health plan. It was therefore possible for us to investigate known and suspected barriers to cervical cancer screening with fewer confounding co-variables.

This study clarifies the role of childhood sexual assault in Pap screening. Sexual assault, but not other traumatic events or other types of childhood abuse, is associated with lower rates of cervical cancer screening. Furthermore, sexual assault during childhood, but not during adulthood, is strongly associated with decreased Pap screening.

 

 

The relationship between childhood sexual abuse and Pap screening is particularly disturbing because women who were sexually assaulted as children are more likely to develop cervical dysplasia.36 Women who were sexually assaulted in childhood also tend to begin sexual activity at a young age and have more sexual partners.15,16,36 These are among the primary risk factors for human papillomavirus (HPV),37 an important cause of cervical cancer,38,39 and for cervical cancer.7 Women who were sexually abused in childhood are at increased risk of sexually transmitted disease,15,40 and HPV is the most common sexually transmitted viral disease.38 Therefore, women at higher risk for cervical cancer may be the same women who are least likely to be screened. Childhood sexual abuse may increase cervical cancer morbidity by reducing the probability of Pap screening, and by increasing the probability of disease. It may also decrease the likelihood that these women visit their physician for other routine health maintenance needs.

The low response rate in this study may have resulted from the questionnaire’s being sent to KP members once, without follow-up. Our response rate was comparable to a similar study of HMO members.16 Use of a mailed questionnaire probably resulted in underestimation of childhood sexual abuse prevalence.41 The relationship of sexual abuse to preventive health behaviors is comparable to that reported in studies with higher response rates.13,17

There is some evidence that the interpersonal climate between patient and clinician affects health outcomes,42 and we suspect it is a critical factor in increasing women’s comfort with Pap screening. One of our respondents commented: “I’ve always been treated professionally by my gynecologist and yet I still feel the need for the reassuring presence of a nurse during this procedure. I have asked the nurse to hold my hand during the test to calm me down. I find the hand holding or even her hand on my arm comforting.”

The most consistent predictor of cancer screening among women aged 40 and over was a health maintenance visit or regular source of care.43,44 Not having cervical cancer screening may be a marker for childhood sexual abuse. Therefore, health care providers should consider inquiring about a history of sexual abuse with women who do not follow guidelines for routine Pap screening. It is crucial to develop interventions that will lead to routine medical visits for women who have experienced sexual violence. As part of this process, we recommend education for physicians and other health care providers regarding sexual violence against women.

· Acknowledgments ·

Larry Walter, MA, and Sujaya Parthasarathy, PhD, of the Kaiser Permanente Division of Research in Oakland, California, contributed to our obtaining the random sample of women health plan members in this study. Howard Barkan, DrPH, helped design this project and participated in the data collection. We thank him for his insight and expertise.

 

KEY POINTS FOR CLINICIANS

 

  • Women who had not had recommended cervical cancer screening were more likely to have been sexually abused in childhood.
  • Women who were sexually abused in childhood may be at higher risk than other women for HPV and cervical cancer; therefore, screening is particularly important for these women.
  • Not having cervical cancer screening may be a marker for childhood sexual abuse. Therefore, health care providers should consider investigating these issues with women who do not adhere to guidelines for routine Pap smears.

Unfortunately, 15% to 24% of US women do not receive recommended cervical cancer screening.1-3 Barriers to Pap screening include low income, low education, minority status;4 lack of cancer knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, low perceived cancer susceptibility, pain, embarrassment;5-7 language, and certain cultural beliefs.7-9 Sexual trauma has received little research attention as a factor contributing to lowered rates of Pap screening. Sexual trauma is reliably associated with subsequent poor health, which may be partially accounted for by poor preventive care.10-16 Childhood sexual abuse is strongly associated with negative health behaviors such as physical inactivity and smoking.13,17 Sexual violence is associated with lower rates of breast cancer screening18 and increased risk of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).19-21 Avoidant coping styles (an aspect of PTSD) are associated with decreased health promotion behaviors such as screening.22-25

Gynecologic procedures may feel threatening to women with a history of sexual assault, and may be experienced as re-traumatizing.14,26-29 Women who had suffered childhood sexual abuse reported more anxiety, shame, and fear during a gynecologic examination than other women.28 Springs and Friedrich16 found a lower frequency of screening for cervical cancer among adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse, but did not assess the impact of other traumatic events in childhood or adulthood on Pap screening. Because previous research on correlates of sexual trauma has been criticized on the grounds that third variables could account for the observed associations,30 we evaluated associations of any traumatic event with low rates of Pap screening.

We hypothesized that having experienced traumatic events, in particular childhood sexual trauma, would function as barriers to Pap screening. We predicted that women who had not had medically appropriate Pap screening would report a greater number of traumatic events, especially sexual abuse trauma in this ethnically diverse random sample of women. We also expected that sexually traumatized women would express more negative attitudes toward Pap screening, and would be more likely to meet criteria for PTSD, both of which might contribute to lower levels of Pap screening.

Methods

Kaiser Permanente (KP), a pre-paid maintenance organization, offers cervical cancer screening at no cost to patients. KP’s clinical guidelines recommend Pap screening every 2 years for women over age 20 with average risk for cervical cancer. Self-report questionnaires were mailed to an age-stratified random sample of women 21–64 years old who were KP members at 3 locations. Women who had had a total hysterectomy were excluded. We compared women who had and who had not obtained Pap screening in the previous 2 years. In previous research18 we found that women who had not obtained mammography had a lower response rate to mailed questionnaires than women who had been screened. We therefore oversampled women who had not had Pap screening. We mailed questionnaires to 1314 women who had obtained Pap screening and 2897 who had not. The final sample included 364 women who had received screening in the past two years (28% response rate) and 372 who had not (13% response rate). Repeated sampling or telephoning of non-respondents was not allowed by KP policy.

Trauma history was measured in 2 ways. The Trauma History Questionnaire31,32 assesses a range of lifetime traumatic events. The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire33 assesses childhood physical abuse, physical neglect, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, and emotional neglect. PTSD was assessed with the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist.34 We inquired about attitudes toward Pap screening based on previous findings.

Data were analyzed using SAS.35 Contingency tables were analyzed to estimate the prevalence of traumatic events and their bivariate associations with Pap screening. Chi square analysis was used to evaluate the statistical significance of these associations. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to evaluate associations of traumatic events with screening, independent of clinic location, demographic characteristics, attitudes about screening, and PTSD.

Results

Sample demographics

Women who had been screened for cervical cancer and unscreened women were similar in age and education (Table 1). Unscreened women were more likely to be Asian American, to have incomes of $20,000 per year or less, and to have never been married.

 

 

TABLE 1

Demographic characteristics of women with and without Pap screening

 

 No Pap (%) n = 372aPap (%) n = 364aP
Ethnicity  .001
  African American10.111.6 
  Asian American20.18.0 
  European American60.671.8 
  Other9.28.6 
Age  .076
  Mean (standard deviation)43.8 (12.8)45.5 (12.4) 
Education  .187
  Elementary school2.71.4 
  High school39.634.8 
  College41.543.2 
  Post-college16.920.6 
Family income  .002
  $20,000/year or less12.45.8 
  $20,001–$50,00041.338.2 
  More than $50,00046.256.0 
Marital status  .012
  Never married34.324.8 
  Married47.059.1 
  Separated1.60.6 
  Divorced13.813.1 
Widowed3.22.5 
aSample sizes vary slightly because of missing data on individual demographic items.

Prevalence of trauma

Commonly reported events during childhood included natural disaster (reported by 13% of the women), sexual assault other than rape (11%), and news of a death or injury (10%). Childhood sexual abuse or sexual assault was reported by 18.4% of the respondents. The most common traumas in adulthood were receiving news of a death or serious injury (46%), natural disasters (33%), actual or attempted robbery (27%), and serious accidents (14%). Of the respondents, 8.3% reported sexual abuse or sexual assault in adulthood. Their overall rate of childhood and adult sexual assault was 26.7%.

Associations of trauma history with pap screening

We investigated the association of trauma with screening using chi square analyses. Women who had been raped before age 18 (36% vs. 50%, n = 713, P = .050) and women who had been subjected to other sexual assaults before age 18 (35% vs. 51%, n = 694, P = .009) were less likely to have been screened. Nonsexual childhood abuse and neglect were not related to screening. Women who experienced a natural disaster during childhood (36% vs. 52%, n = 571, P = .009) and those who experienced terrorist acts during adulthood (20% vs. 49%, n = 715, P = .024) were less likely to have been screened. (Although the association with a terrorist act was significant, exposures were reported by only 3% of unscreened women and 0.9% of screened women.) Women who reported a household break-in during adulthood were slightly more likely to have been screened (53% vs. 47%, n = 656, P = .032).

In a hierarchical logistic regression model (Table 2), childhood sexual abuse, but not other traumatic events, was associated with lower odds of screening when clinic location, demographic characteristics, attitudes, and PTSD were controlled. The logistic regression model was repeated using CTQ subscales to assess trauma, with similar results. Unmarried women were less likely than currently married women to have been screened, and Latina, Native American, Asian/Pacific, or multicultural women were less likely than European American women to have been screened. Women who endorsed the statement, “I have no symptoms so I do not need a Pap test” and those who anticipated embarrassment during screening were less likely than others to have been screened; women who believed that testing would ease their mind were more likely to have been screened.

TABLE 2

Hierarchical logistic regression model of sexual trauma and attitudes as predictors of pap screening

 

PredictorAdjusted odds ratio (95% CI)
Traumatic events
  Break-in (adult)1.14 (0.77, 1.70)
  Natural disaster (child)0.78 (0.45, 1.38)
  Terrorist act (adult)0.28 (0.07, 1.07)
  Childhood sexual trauma0.56 (0.34, 0.91) *
Site
  Santa Rosa0.68 (0.44, 1.04)
  San Francisco1.0 (referent)
  Oakland1.27 (0.80, 2.02)
Education
  Less than college1.09 (0.71, 1.69)
  College1.0 (referent)
  More than college1.01 (0.65, 1.57)
Ethnicity
  European-American1.0 (referent)
  African American0.59 (0.33, 1.06)
  Other than African 
  American or European 
  American0.46 (0.29, 0.71) **
Unmarried (compared with married)0.67 (0.48, 0.94) *
Attitudes toward Pap screening
  “I have no symptoms so I do not need a Pap test”0.66 (0.51, 0.85) **
  “I’ve had negative experiences with my health care provider”0.90 (0.73, 1.10)
  “Getting a Pap test would ease my mind”1.54 (1.25, 1.89) ***
  “There is danger of infection from a Pap test”1.09 (0.83, 1.43)
  “I do not trust the health care system”1.06 (0.81, 1.39)
  “I would be embarrassed to have a Pap test”0.67 (0.52, 0.84) ***
  “Women who have many sexual 
  partners are more likely to have cervical cancer”0.88 (0.73, 1.06)
  “Pap would cause sexual assault flashbacks, or health care provider looks at me in a sexual way”1.05 (0.77, 1.45)
PTSD diagnosis1.62 (0.91, 2.90)
Missing data0.96 (0.80, 1.13)
*P

Discussion

Childhood sexual abuse is reliably associated with a decreased likelihood of cervical cancer screening. This association persisted despite controlling for demographic characteristics, attitudes about Pap screening, and PTSD symptoms. These findings are strengthened by the consistency with which childhood sexual abuse is associated with low rates of Pap screening using 2 measures of trauma in 3 clinics. Although cost has been a major barrier to access in previous studies of cervical cancer screening, it is not a barrier for women who are members of a pre-paid health plan. It was therefore possible for us to investigate known and suspected barriers to cervical cancer screening with fewer confounding co-variables.

This study clarifies the role of childhood sexual assault in Pap screening. Sexual assault, but not other traumatic events or other types of childhood abuse, is associated with lower rates of cervical cancer screening. Furthermore, sexual assault during childhood, but not during adulthood, is strongly associated with decreased Pap screening.

 

 

The relationship between childhood sexual abuse and Pap screening is particularly disturbing because women who were sexually assaulted as children are more likely to develop cervical dysplasia.36 Women who were sexually assaulted in childhood also tend to begin sexual activity at a young age and have more sexual partners.15,16,36 These are among the primary risk factors for human papillomavirus (HPV),37 an important cause of cervical cancer,38,39 and for cervical cancer.7 Women who were sexually abused in childhood are at increased risk of sexually transmitted disease,15,40 and HPV is the most common sexually transmitted viral disease.38 Therefore, women at higher risk for cervical cancer may be the same women who are least likely to be screened. Childhood sexual abuse may increase cervical cancer morbidity by reducing the probability of Pap screening, and by increasing the probability of disease. It may also decrease the likelihood that these women visit their physician for other routine health maintenance needs.

The low response rate in this study may have resulted from the questionnaire’s being sent to KP members once, without follow-up. Our response rate was comparable to a similar study of HMO members.16 Use of a mailed questionnaire probably resulted in underestimation of childhood sexual abuse prevalence.41 The relationship of sexual abuse to preventive health behaviors is comparable to that reported in studies with higher response rates.13,17

There is some evidence that the interpersonal climate between patient and clinician affects health outcomes,42 and we suspect it is a critical factor in increasing women’s comfort with Pap screening. One of our respondents commented: “I’ve always been treated professionally by my gynecologist and yet I still feel the need for the reassuring presence of a nurse during this procedure. I have asked the nurse to hold my hand during the test to calm me down. I find the hand holding or even her hand on my arm comforting.”

The most consistent predictor of cancer screening among women aged 40 and over was a health maintenance visit or regular source of care.43,44 Not having cervical cancer screening may be a marker for childhood sexual abuse. Therefore, health care providers should consider inquiring about a history of sexual abuse with women who do not follow guidelines for routine Pap screening. It is crucial to develop interventions that will lead to routine medical visits for women who have experienced sexual violence. As part of this process, we recommend education for physicians and other health care providers regarding sexual violence against women.

· Acknowledgments ·

Larry Walter, MA, and Sujaya Parthasarathy, PhD, of the Kaiser Permanente Division of Research in Oakland, California, contributed to our obtaining the random sample of women health plan members in this study. Howard Barkan, DrPH, helped design this project and participated in the data collection. We thank him for his insight and expertise.

References

 

1. American Cancer Society. Statistics: Table 3C.Pap Test, Women 18 and Older, by State, 1997 [website]. In; http://www3.cancer.org/cancerinfo/sitecenter.asp?ct=1&ctid=8&scp=8.3.8.42080&scs=4&scss=16&scdoc=42096&pnt=2&language=english [accessed 2001, 2/27], 2000.

2. American Cancer Society. Statistics: Cervical cancer [website]. In http://www3.cancer.org/cancerinfo/sitecenter.asp?ct=1&ctid=8&scp=8.3.4.4071&scs=4&scss=2&scdoc=42073&pnt=2&language=english [accessed 2001, 2/27]; 2000.

3. Hayward RA, Shapiro MF, Freeman HE, Corey CR. Who gets screened for cervical and breast cancer? Results from a new national survey. Arch Intern Med 1988;148:1177-81.

4. Breen N, B FJ. Stage of breast and cervical cancer diagnosis in disadvantaged neighborhoods: A prevention policy perspective. Am J Prev Med 1996;12(5):319-26.

5. Calle EE, Flanders WD, Thun MJ, Martin LM. Demographic predictors of mammography and Pap smear screening in US women. Am J Public Health 1993;83:53-60.

6. Peters RK, Bear MB, Thomas D. Barriers to screening for cancer of the cervix. Prev Med 1989;18:133-46.

7. Womeodu RJ, Bailey JE. Barriers to cancer screening. Med Clin North Am 1996;80(1):115-33.

8. Suarez L. Pap smear and mammogram screening in Mexican-American women: the effects of acculturation. Am J Public Health 1994;84:742-6.

9. Tang TW, Solomon LJ, Yeh CJ, Worden JK. The role of cultural variables in breast self-examination and cervical cancer screening behavior in young Asian women living in the United States. J Behav Med 1999;22(5):419-36.

10. Golding JM. Sexual assault history and physical health in randomly selected Los Angeles women. Health Psychol 1994;13:130-8.

11. Golding JM. Sexual assault history and women’s reproductive and sexual health. Psychol of Women Quarterly 1996;20:101-21.

12. Golding JM. Sexual assault history and long-term physical health: Evidence from clinical and population epidemiology. Curr Directions in Psychol Sci 1999;8:191-4.

13. Koss MP, Koss PG, Woodruff WJ. Deleterious effects of criminal victimization on women’s health and medical utilization. Arch Intern Med 1991;151:342-7.

14. Laws A. Sexual abuse history and women’s medical problems. J Gen Intern Med 1993;8:441-44.

15. Lechner ME, Vogel ME, Garcia-Shelton LM, Leichter JL, Steibel KR. Self-reported medical problems of adult female survivors of childhood sexual abuse. J Fam Pract 1993;36:633-8.

16. Springs FE, Friedrich WN. Health risk behaviors and medical sequelae of childhood sexual abuse. Mayo Clin Proc 1992;67:527-32.

17. Felitti V, Anda F, Nordenberg D, Williamson, Spitz A, Edwards V, et al. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. Am J Prev Med 1998;14:245-58.

18. Farley M, Minkoff J, Barkan H. Breast cancer screening and trauma history. Women Health in press.

19. Kessler RC, Sonnega A, Bromet E, Hughes M, Nelson CB. Posttraumatic stress disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1995;52:1048-60.

20. Polusny MA, Follette VM. Long-term correlates of child sexual abuse: Theory and review of the empirical literature. Applied and Preventive Psychology 1995;4:143-66.

21. Resnick HS, Kilpatrick DG, Dansky BS, Saunders BE, Best CL. Prevalence of civilian trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder in a representative national sample of women. J Consulting Clin Psychol 1993;61:984-91.

22. Blake DD, Cook JD, Keane TM. Posttraumatic stress disorder and coping in veterans who are seeking medical treatment. J Clin Psychol 1992;48:695-704.

23. Fama LD, Blake DD, Gusman F. Coping and health behaviors in combat-related PTSD inpatients. In: Annual Meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies; San Antonio; 1993.

24. Farley M, Barkan H. Somatization, dissociation, and tension-reducing behaviors in psychiatric outpatients. Psychother Psychosom 1997;66:133-40.

25. Wolfe J, Proctor SP, Brown P, Kimerling RD, J., Sullivan M, Chrestman K, et al. Relationship of physical health and posttraumatic stress disorder in young adult women. In: Annual Meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies; 1994; Los Angeles; 1994.

26. Kitzinger J. Recalling the pain. Nursing Times 1990 January;17:38-40.

27. Menage J. Women’s perception of obstetric and gynaecological examinations. Br Med J 1993;306:1127-8.

28. Robohm JS, Buttenheim M. The gynecological care experiences of adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse: A preliminary investigation. Women Health 1996;24:59-75.

29. Wahlen SD. Adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse. In: Hendricks-Matthews M, editor. Violence education: Toward a solution. Kansas City, MO: Society of Teachers of Family Medicine; 1992. p. 89-102.

30. Briere J. Methodological issues in the study of sexual abuse effects. J Consulting Clin Psychol 1992;60:196-203.

31. Stamm BH, Varra ME. Instrumentation in the Field of Traumatic Stress. Oswego, NY: Research and Methodology Interest Group of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies; 1993.

32. Carlson EB, Briere J. Screening for traumatic experiences and trauma responses in mental health treatment settings. In: International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies; 1999 November 14; Miami, FL; 1999.

33. Bernstein DP, Fink L. Childhood Trauma Questionnaire: A Retrospective Self-Report (Manual). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1998.

34. Weathers FW, Litz BT, Herman DS, Huska JA, Keane TM. The PTSD Checklist (PCL): Reliability, Validity, and Diagnostic Utility. In: 9th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies; 1993; San Antonio, TX; 1993.

35. The SAS System for Windows. In. 8.02 ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 2001.

36. Coker AL, Patel NJ, Krishnaswami W, Schmidt W, Richter DL. Childhood forced sex and cervical dysplasia among women prison inmates. Violence Against Women 1998;4(5):595-608.

37. Becker TM, Wheeler CM, McGough NS, Parmenter CA, Jordan SW, Stidley CA, et al. Sexually transmitted diseases and other risk factors for cervical dysplasia among southwestern Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women. JAMA 1994;271(15):1181-8.

38. Melnikow J, Nuovo J. Cancer prevention and screening in women. Women’s Health 1997;24(1):15-26.

39. Daling JR, Madeleine MM, McKnight B, Carter JJ, Wipf GC, Ashley R, et al. The relationship of human papillomavirus-related cervical tumors to cigarette smoking, oral contraceptive use, and prior herpes simplex virus type 2 infection. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1996;5(7):541-8.

40. Plichta SB. Violence and abuse: Implications for women’s health. In: Falk, Collins, editors. Women’s health: The Commonwealth Fund survey. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1996.

41. Peters SD, Wyatt GE, Finkelhor D. Prevalence. In: Finkelhor D, editor. A sourcebook on child sexual abuse. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1986. p. 15-59.

42. DeBlasi Z, Harkness E, Ernst E, Georgiou A, Kleijnen J. Influence of context effects on health outcomes: A systematic review. Lancet 2001;357:757-62.

43. Mandelblatt JS, Gold K, O’Malley AS, Taylor K, Cagney K, Hopkins J, et al. Breast and cervical cancer screening among multiethnic women: Role of age, health and source of care. J Preventive Med 1999;28:418-25.

44. Ruffin MT, Gorenflo DW, Woodman B. Predictors of screening for breast, cervical, colorectal, and prostatic cancer among community-based primary care practices. J Am Board Fam Pract 2000;13:1-10.

References

 

1. American Cancer Society. Statistics: Table 3C.Pap Test, Women 18 and Older, by State, 1997 [website]. In; http://www3.cancer.org/cancerinfo/sitecenter.asp?ct=1&ctid=8&scp=8.3.8.42080&scs=4&scss=16&scdoc=42096&pnt=2&language=english [accessed 2001, 2/27], 2000.

2. American Cancer Society. Statistics: Cervical cancer [website]. In http://www3.cancer.org/cancerinfo/sitecenter.asp?ct=1&ctid=8&scp=8.3.4.4071&scs=4&scss=2&scdoc=42073&pnt=2&language=english [accessed 2001, 2/27]; 2000.

3. Hayward RA, Shapiro MF, Freeman HE, Corey CR. Who gets screened for cervical and breast cancer? Results from a new national survey. Arch Intern Med 1988;148:1177-81.

4. Breen N, B FJ. Stage of breast and cervical cancer diagnosis in disadvantaged neighborhoods: A prevention policy perspective. Am J Prev Med 1996;12(5):319-26.

5. Calle EE, Flanders WD, Thun MJ, Martin LM. Demographic predictors of mammography and Pap smear screening in US women. Am J Public Health 1993;83:53-60.

6. Peters RK, Bear MB, Thomas D. Barriers to screening for cancer of the cervix. Prev Med 1989;18:133-46.

7. Womeodu RJ, Bailey JE. Barriers to cancer screening. Med Clin North Am 1996;80(1):115-33.

8. Suarez L. Pap smear and mammogram screening in Mexican-American women: the effects of acculturation. Am J Public Health 1994;84:742-6.

9. Tang TW, Solomon LJ, Yeh CJ, Worden JK. The role of cultural variables in breast self-examination and cervical cancer screening behavior in young Asian women living in the United States. J Behav Med 1999;22(5):419-36.

10. Golding JM. Sexual assault history and physical health in randomly selected Los Angeles women. Health Psychol 1994;13:130-8.

11. Golding JM. Sexual assault history and women’s reproductive and sexual health. Psychol of Women Quarterly 1996;20:101-21.

12. Golding JM. Sexual assault history and long-term physical health: Evidence from clinical and population epidemiology. Curr Directions in Psychol Sci 1999;8:191-4.

13. Koss MP, Koss PG, Woodruff WJ. Deleterious effects of criminal victimization on women’s health and medical utilization. Arch Intern Med 1991;151:342-7.

14. Laws A. Sexual abuse history and women’s medical problems. J Gen Intern Med 1993;8:441-44.

15. Lechner ME, Vogel ME, Garcia-Shelton LM, Leichter JL, Steibel KR. Self-reported medical problems of adult female survivors of childhood sexual abuse. J Fam Pract 1993;36:633-8.

16. Springs FE, Friedrich WN. Health risk behaviors and medical sequelae of childhood sexual abuse. Mayo Clin Proc 1992;67:527-32.

17. Felitti V, Anda F, Nordenberg D, Williamson, Spitz A, Edwards V, et al. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. Am J Prev Med 1998;14:245-58.

18. Farley M, Minkoff J, Barkan H. Breast cancer screening and trauma history. Women Health in press.

19. Kessler RC, Sonnega A, Bromet E, Hughes M, Nelson CB. Posttraumatic stress disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1995;52:1048-60.

20. Polusny MA, Follette VM. Long-term correlates of child sexual abuse: Theory and review of the empirical literature. Applied and Preventive Psychology 1995;4:143-66.

21. Resnick HS, Kilpatrick DG, Dansky BS, Saunders BE, Best CL. Prevalence of civilian trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder in a representative national sample of women. J Consulting Clin Psychol 1993;61:984-91.

22. Blake DD, Cook JD, Keane TM. Posttraumatic stress disorder and coping in veterans who are seeking medical treatment. J Clin Psychol 1992;48:695-704.

23. Fama LD, Blake DD, Gusman F. Coping and health behaviors in combat-related PTSD inpatients. In: Annual Meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies; San Antonio; 1993.

24. Farley M, Barkan H. Somatization, dissociation, and tension-reducing behaviors in psychiatric outpatients. Psychother Psychosom 1997;66:133-40.

25. Wolfe J, Proctor SP, Brown P, Kimerling RD, J., Sullivan M, Chrestman K, et al. Relationship of physical health and posttraumatic stress disorder in young adult women. In: Annual Meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies; 1994; Los Angeles; 1994.

26. Kitzinger J. Recalling the pain. Nursing Times 1990 January;17:38-40.

27. Menage J. Women’s perception of obstetric and gynaecological examinations. Br Med J 1993;306:1127-8.

28. Robohm JS, Buttenheim M. The gynecological care experiences of adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse: A preliminary investigation. Women Health 1996;24:59-75.

29. Wahlen SD. Adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse. In: Hendricks-Matthews M, editor. Violence education: Toward a solution. Kansas City, MO: Society of Teachers of Family Medicine; 1992. p. 89-102.

30. Briere J. Methodological issues in the study of sexual abuse effects. J Consulting Clin Psychol 1992;60:196-203.

31. Stamm BH, Varra ME. Instrumentation in the Field of Traumatic Stress. Oswego, NY: Research and Methodology Interest Group of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies; 1993.

32. Carlson EB, Briere J. Screening for traumatic experiences and trauma responses in mental health treatment settings. In: International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies; 1999 November 14; Miami, FL; 1999.

33. Bernstein DP, Fink L. Childhood Trauma Questionnaire: A Retrospective Self-Report (Manual). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1998.

34. Weathers FW, Litz BT, Herman DS, Huska JA, Keane TM. The PTSD Checklist (PCL): Reliability, Validity, and Diagnostic Utility. In: 9th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies; 1993; San Antonio, TX; 1993.

35. The SAS System for Windows. In. 8.02 ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 2001.

36. Coker AL, Patel NJ, Krishnaswami W, Schmidt W, Richter DL. Childhood forced sex and cervical dysplasia among women prison inmates. Violence Against Women 1998;4(5):595-608.

37. Becker TM, Wheeler CM, McGough NS, Parmenter CA, Jordan SW, Stidley CA, et al. Sexually transmitted diseases and other risk factors for cervical dysplasia among southwestern Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women. JAMA 1994;271(15):1181-8.

38. Melnikow J, Nuovo J. Cancer prevention and screening in women. Women’s Health 1997;24(1):15-26.

39. Daling JR, Madeleine MM, McKnight B, Carter JJ, Wipf GC, Ashley R, et al. The relationship of human papillomavirus-related cervical tumors to cigarette smoking, oral contraceptive use, and prior herpes simplex virus type 2 infection. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1996;5(7):541-8.

40. Plichta SB. Violence and abuse: Implications for women’s health. In: Falk, Collins, editors. Women’s health: The Commonwealth Fund survey. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1996.

41. Peters SD, Wyatt GE, Finkelhor D. Prevalence. In: Finkelhor D, editor. A sourcebook on child sexual abuse. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1986. p. 15-59.

42. DeBlasi Z, Harkness E, Ernst E, Georgiou A, Kleijnen J. Influence of context effects on health outcomes: A systematic review. Lancet 2001;357:757-62.

43. Mandelblatt JS, Gold K, O’Malley AS, Taylor K, Cagney K, Hopkins J, et al. Breast and cervical cancer screening among multiethnic women: Role of age, health and source of care. J Preventive Med 1999;28:418-25.

44. Ruffin MT, Gorenflo DW, Woodman B. Predictors of screening for breast, cervical, colorectal, and prostatic cancer among community-based primary care practices. J Am Board Fam Pract 2000;13:1-10.

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 51(10)
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 51(10)
Page Number
827-831
Page Number
827-831
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Is a history of trauma associated with a reduced likelihood of cervical cancer screening?
Display Headline
Is a history of trauma associated with a reduced likelihood of cervical cancer screening?
Legacy Keywords
,Child abuse, sexualrapemass screeningvaginal smears. (J Fam Pract 2002; 51:827–831)
Legacy Keywords
,Child abuse, sexualrapemass screeningvaginal smears. (J Fam Pract 2002; 51:827–831)
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media