Rates, predictors, and variability of interhospital transfers

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 09/14/2018 - 11:56
A national evaluation

Clinical question: What is the national frequency of interhospital transfers, and are there any patient or hospital factors that predict these transfers?

Background: Interhospital patient transfers may be due to the need for a specialized service, but the factors and patterns have not been well studied.

Study design: Cross-sectional analysis.

Setting: All acute care hospitals in the United States.

Synopsis: Using data from the 2013 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and the 2013 American Hospital Association, this study showed that 1.5% of the 6.6 million eligible beneficiaries underwent interhospital transfer (IHT). Patient and hospital characteristics that increased the odds of IHT included age 74-85 years, nonblack race, higher comorbidity, lower diagnosis-related group weight, fewer recent hospitalizations, and hospitalization in the Northeast region of the United States. Lower case mix index was associated with increased odds of IHT. Rates of IHT remain variable, after adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics. This study was restricted to the Medicare population so did not represent all populations. IHT from the emergency room was not assessed, and those who were transferred more than once (to another hospital and back) were not included.

Bottom line: A large number of Medicare patients undergo IHT nationally, and the rate varies widely based on patient factors, geography, and other factors unrelated to patient or hospital characteristics.

Citation: Mueller SK, Jie Zheng, Orav EJ, Schnipper JL. Rates, predictors, and variability of interhospital transfers: A national evaluation. J Hosp Med. 2017;6:435-42.


Dr. Xu is assistant professor and hospitalist, Icahn School of Medicine of the Mount Sinai Health System, New York.

Publications
Topics
Sections
A national evaluation
A national evaluation

Clinical question: What is the national frequency of interhospital transfers, and are there any patient or hospital factors that predict these transfers?

Background: Interhospital patient transfers may be due to the need for a specialized service, but the factors and patterns have not been well studied.

Study design: Cross-sectional analysis.

Setting: All acute care hospitals in the United States.

Synopsis: Using data from the 2013 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and the 2013 American Hospital Association, this study showed that 1.5% of the 6.6 million eligible beneficiaries underwent interhospital transfer (IHT). Patient and hospital characteristics that increased the odds of IHT included age 74-85 years, nonblack race, higher comorbidity, lower diagnosis-related group weight, fewer recent hospitalizations, and hospitalization in the Northeast region of the United States. Lower case mix index was associated with increased odds of IHT. Rates of IHT remain variable, after adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics. This study was restricted to the Medicare population so did not represent all populations. IHT from the emergency room was not assessed, and those who were transferred more than once (to another hospital and back) were not included.

Bottom line: A large number of Medicare patients undergo IHT nationally, and the rate varies widely based on patient factors, geography, and other factors unrelated to patient or hospital characteristics.

Citation: Mueller SK, Jie Zheng, Orav EJ, Schnipper JL. Rates, predictors, and variability of interhospital transfers: A national evaluation. J Hosp Med. 2017;6:435-42.


Dr. Xu is assistant professor and hospitalist, Icahn School of Medicine of the Mount Sinai Health System, New York.

Clinical question: What is the national frequency of interhospital transfers, and are there any patient or hospital factors that predict these transfers?

Background: Interhospital patient transfers may be due to the need for a specialized service, but the factors and patterns have not been well studied.

Study design: Cross-sectional analysis.

Setting: All acute care hospitals in the United States.

Synopsis: Using data from the 2013 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and the 2013 American Hospital Association, this study showed that 1.5% of the 6.6 million eligible beneficiaries underwent interhospital transfer (IHT). Patient and hospital characteristics that increased the odds of IHT included age 74-85 years, nonblack race, higher comorbidity, lower diagnosis-related group weight, fewer recent hospitalizations, and hospitalization in the Northeast region of the United States. Lower case mix index was associated with increased odds of IHT. Rates of IHT remain variable, after adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics. This study was restricted to the Medicare population so did not represent all populations. IHT from the emergency room was not assessed, and those who were transferred more than once (to another hospital and back) were not included.

Bottom line: A large number of Medicare patients undergo IHT nationally, and the rate varies widely based on patient factors, geography, and other factors unrelated to patient or hospital characteristics.

Citation: Mueller SK, Jie Zheng, Orav EJ, Schnipper JL. Rates, predictors, and variability of interhospital transfers: A national evaluation. J Hosp Med. 2017;6:435-42.


Dr. Xu is assistant professor and hospitalist, Icahn School of Medicine of the Mount Sinai Health System, New York.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Rib fracture diagnosis in the panscan era

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 09/14/2018 - 11:56

 

Clinical question: Do rib fractures observed on chest CT carry the same morbidity and mortality risk as those observed in chest radiograph?

Background: Traditionally studies have shown that first and second rib fractures on chest radiograph after blunt trauma are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. With growing frequency of CT imaging in the “panscan” era, it is unknown whether similar rib fractures found on CT carry the same meaning.

Study design: Secondary analysis of two prospective observational studies.

Setting: 10 level I trauma centers.

Synopsis: Data from the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study showed that, of the 8,661 patients who suffered blunt trauma and received both chest radiograph and chest CT, 23.9% had rib fractures. Rib fractures were observed in 66.1% of chest CT–only cases. Patients with rib fractures had a higher admission rate (88.7% versus 45.8%) and higher mortality (5.6% versus 2.7%) than patients without rib fractures. Mortality rate and great-vessel injury were higher in those with first or second rib fractures. The mortality of patients with rib fractures observed only on chest CT was not statistically different from those whose fractures were also seen in chest radiograph. The study included patients who were more severely injured and may have been more likely to receive a CT, which may have led to an overestimation of fractures found. The actual causes of admission and death were not reviewed.

Bottom line: CT in trauma-imaging protocol can identify patients with rib fractures well, compared with combined CT with chest radiograph. Rib fractures are associated with higher rates of admission and mortality risk than those without rib fractures. Specifically, first or second rib fractures are found to have greater risk for mortality and great-vessel injury.

Citation: Murphy CE 4th, Raja AS, Baumann BM, et al. Rib fracture diagnosis in the panscan era. Ann Emerg Med. 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.04.011.

Dr. Xu is assistant professor and hospitalist, Icahn School of Medicine of the Mount Sinai Health System, New York.
 

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Clinical question: Do rib fractures observed on chest CT carry the same morbidity and mortality risk as those observed in chest radiograph?

Background: Traditionally studies have shown that first and second rib fractures on chest radiograph after blunt trauma are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. With growing frequency of CT imaging in the “panscan” era, it is unknown whether similar rib fractures found on CT carry the same meaning.

Study design: Secondary analysis of two prospective observational studies.

Setting: 10 level I trauma centers.

Synopsis: Data from the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study showed that, of the 8,661 patients who suffered blunt trauma and received both chest radiograph and chest CT, 23.9% had rib fractures. Rib fractures were observed in 66.1% of chest CT–only cases. Patients with rib fractures had a higher admission rate (88.7% versus 45.8%) and higher mortality (5.6% versus 2.7%) than patients without rib fractures. Mortality rate and great-vessel injury were higher in those with first or second rib fractures. The mortality of patients with rib fractures observed only on chest CT was not statistically different from those whose fractures were also seen in chest radiograph. The study included patients who were more severely injured and may have been more likely to receive a CT, which may have led to an overestimation of fractures found. The actual causes of admission and death were not reviewed.

Bottom line: CT in trauma-imaging protocol can identify patients with rib fractures well, compared with combined CT with chest radiograph. Rib fractures are associated with higher rates of admission and mortality risk than those without rib fractures. Specifically, first or second rib fractures are found to have greater risk for mortality and great-vessel injury.

Citation: Murphy CE 4th, Raja AS, Baumann BM, et al. Rib fracture diagnosis in the panscan era. Ann Emerg Med. 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.04.011.

Dr. Xu is assistant professor and hospitalist, Icahn School of Medicine of the Mount Sinai Health System, New York.
 

 

Clinical question: Do rib fractures observed on chest CT carry the same morbidity and mortality risk as those observed in chest radiograph?

Background: Traditionally studies have shown that first and second rib fractures on chest radiograph after blunt trauma are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. With growing frequency of CT imaging in the “panscan” era, it is unknown whether similar rib fractures found on CT carry the same meaning.

Study design: Secondary analysis of two prospective observational studies.

Setting: 10 level I trauma centers.

Synopsis: Data from the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study showed that, of the 8,661 patients who suffered blunt trauma and received both chest radiograph and chest CT, 23.9% had rib fractures. Rib fractures were observed in 66.1% of chest CT–only cases. Patients with rib fractures had a higher admission rate (88.7% versus 45.8%) and higher mortality (5.6% versus 2.7%) than patients without rib fractures. Mortality rate and great-vessel injury were higher in those with first or second rib fractures. The mortality of patients with rib fractures observed only on chest CT was not statistically different from those whose fractures were also seen in chest radiograph. The study included patients who were more severely injured and may have been more likely to receive a CT, which may have led to an overestimation of fractures found. The actual causes of admission and death were not reviewed.

Bottom line: CT in trauma-imaging protocol can identify patients with rib fractures well, compared with combined CT with chest radiograph. Rib fractures are associated with higher rates of admission and mortality risk than those without rib fractures. Specifically, first or second rib fractures are found to have greater risk for mortality and great-vessel injury.

Citation: Murphy CE 4th, Raja AS, Baumann BM, et al. Rib fracture diagnosis in the panscan era. Ann Emerg Med. 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.04.011.

Dr. Xu is assistant professor and hospitalist, Icahn School of Medicine of the Mount Sinai Health System, New York.
 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Mortality risks associated with emergency admission during weekends and public holidays

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 09/14/2018 - 11:56
An analysis of electronic health records

 

Clinical question: What factors contribute to increased mortality in weekend hospital admissions?

Background: The “weekend effect” is a commonly known phenomenon, where patients admitted to the hospital on weekends have higher mortality risk than those admitted on weekdays. However, little is known about the factors contributing to the excess mortality associated with weekend admissions.

Dr. Tao Xu
Study design: Retrospective analysis.

Setting: Four Oxford University National Health Service hospitals in the United Kingdom (a district general hospital, a large teaching hospital, a specialist orthopedic hospital, and a major cancer center).

Synopsis: Data from the Infections in Oxfordshire Research Database of 503,938 admissions between Jan. 1, 2006, and Dec. 31, 2014 were analyzed. Thirty-day mortality was 4.7%, 5.1%, and 5.8% for patients admitted during weekdays, weekends, and public holidays, respectively (P less than .0001). Fifteen routine hematology and biochemistry test results were determined to be prognostic of high mortality risk. Adjustment for these routine test results reduced excess mortality associated with emergency admissions on weekends and public holidays. Excess mortality was notable for patients admitted on Saturdays and Sundays between 11:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Hospital staffing and workload were not associated with excess mortality. The study is limited by a lack of additional patient factors such as vital signs and blood gas results that may further explain excess mortality on weekends and public holidays.

Bottom line: Patient factors, including laboratory abnormalities, rather than hospital workload and staffing may be the major contributing factors for the excess mortality seen for emergency admissions on weekends and public holidays.

Citation: Walker AS, Mason A, Quan TP, et al. Mortality risks associated with emergency admissions during weekends and public holidays: An analysis of electronic health records. The Lancet. 2017;390(10089):62-72.

Dr. Xu is assistant professor and hospitalist, Icahn School of Medicine of the Mount Sinai Health System, New York.

Publications
Topics
Sections
An analysis of electronic health records
An analysis of electronic health records

 

Clinical question: What factors contribute to increased mortality in weekend hospital admissions?

Background: The “weekend effect” is a commonly known phenomenon, where patients admitted to the hospital on weekends have higher mortality risk than those admitted on weekdays. However, little is known about the factors contributing to the excess mortality associated with weekend admissions.

Dr. Tao Xu
Study design: Retrospective analysis.

Setting: Four Oxford University National Health Service hospitals in the United Kingdom (a district general hospital, a large teaching hospital, a specialist orthopedic hospital, and a major cancer center).

Synopsis: Data from the Infections in Oxfordshire Research Database of 503,938 admissions between Jan. 1, 2006, and Dec. 31, 2014 were analyzed. Thirty-day mortality was 4.7%, 5.1%, and 5.8% for patients admitted during weekdays, weekends, and public holidays, respectively (P less than .0001). Fifteen routine hematology and biochemistry test results were determined to be prognostic of high mortality risk. Adjustment for these routine test results reduced excess mortality associated with emergency admissions on weekends and public holidays. Excess mortality was notable for patients admitted on Saturdays and Sundays between 11:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Hospital staffing and workload were not associated with excess mortality. The study is limited by a lack of additional patient factors such as vital signs and blood gas results that may further explain excess mortality on weekends and public holidays.

Bottom line: Patient factors, including laboratory abnormalities, rather than hospital workload and staffing may be the major contributing factors for the excess mortality seen for emergency admissions on weekends and public holidays.

Citation: Walker AS, Mason A, Quan TP, et al. Mortality risks associated with emergency admissions during weekends and public holidays: An analysis of electronic health records. The Lancet. 2017;390(10089):62-72.

Dr. Xu is assistant professor and hospitalist, Icahn School of Medicine of the Mount Sinai Health System, New York.

 

Clinical question: What factors contribute to increased mortality in weekend hospital admissions?

Background: The “weekend effect” is a commonly known phenomenon, where patients admitted to the hospital on weekends have higher mortality risk than those admitted on weekdays. However, little is known about the factors contributing to the excess mortality associated with weekend admissions.

Dr. Tao Xu
Study design: Retrospective analysis.

Setting: Four Oxford University National Health Service hospitals in the United Kingdom (a district general hospital, a large teaching hospital, a specialist orthopedic hospital, and a major cancer center).

Synopsis: Data from the Infections in Oxfordshire Research Database of 503,938 admissions between Jan. 1, 2006, and Dec. 31, 2014 were analyzed. Thirty-day mortality was 4.7%, 5.1%, and 5.8% for patients admitted during weekdays, weekends, and public holidays, respectively (P less than .0001). Fifteen routine hematology and biochemistry test results were determined to be prognostic of high mortality risk. Adjustment for these routine test results reduced excess mortality associated with emergency admissions on weekends and public holidays. Excess mortality was notable for patients admitted on Saturdays and Sundays between 11:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Hospital staffing and workload were not associated with excess mortality. The study is limited by a lack of additional patient factors such as vital signs and blood gas results that may further explain excess mortality on weekends and public holidays.

Bottom line: Patient factors, including laboratory abnormalities, rather than hospital workload and staffing may be the major contributing factors for the excess mortality seen for emergency admissions on weekends and public holidays.

Citation: Walker AS, Mason A, Quan TP, et al. Mortality risks associated with emergency admissions during weekends and public holidays: An analysis of electronic health records. The Lancet. 2017;390(10089):62-72.

Dr. Xu is assistant professor and hospitalist, Icahn School of Medicine of the Mount Sinai Health System, New York.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

D-Dimer Not Reliable Marker to Stop Anticoagulation Therapy

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/15/2022 - 16:10
Display Headline
D-Dimer Not Reliable Marker to Stop Anticoagulation Therapy

Clinical question: In patients with a first unprovoked VTE, is it safe to use a normalized D-dimer test to stop anticoagulation therapy?

Background: The risk of VTE recurrence after stopping anticoagulation is higher in patients who have elevated D-dimer levels after treatment. It is unknown whether we can use normalized D-dimer levels to guide the decision about whether or not to stop anticoagulation.

Study design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: Thirteen university-affiliated centers.

Synopsis: Study authors screened 410 adult patients who had a first unprovoked VTE and completed three to seven months of anticoagulation therapy with D-dimer tests. In patients with negative D-dimer tests, anticoagulation was stopped, and D-dimer tests were repeated after a month. In those with two consecutive negative D-dimer tests, anticoagulation was stopped indefinitely; these patients were followed for an average of 2.2 years. Among those 319 patients, there was an overall recurrent VTE rate of 6.7% per patient year. Subgroup analysis was performed among men, women not on estrogen therapy, and women on estrogen therapy; recurrence rates per patient year were 9.7%, 5.4%, and 0%, respectively.

This study used a point-of-care D-dimer test that was either positive or negative; it is unclear if the results can be generalized to all D-dimer tests. Additionally, although the study found a lower recurrence VTE rate among women, the study was not powered for the subgroups.

Bottom line: The high rate of recurrent VTE among men makes the D-dimer test an unsafe marker to use in deciding whether or not to stop anticoagulation for an unprovoked VTE. Among women, D-dimer test can potentially be used to guide length of treatment, but, given the limitations of the study, more evidence is needed.

Citation: Kearon C, Spencer FA, O’Keeffe D, et al. D-Dimer testing to select patients with a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism who can stop anticoagulant therapy. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(1):27-34.

Issue
The Hospitalist - 2015(05)
Publications
Sections

Clinical question: In patients with a first unprovoked VTE, is it safe to use a normalized D-dimer test to stop anticoagulation therapy?

Background: The risk of VTE recurrence after stopping anticoagulation is higher in patients who have elevated D-dimer levels after treatment. It is unknown whether we can use normalized D-dimer levels to guide the decision about whether or not to stop anticoagulation.

Study design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: Thirteen university-affiliated centers.

Synopsis: Study authors screened 410 adult patients who had a first unprovoked VTE and completed three to seven months of anticoagulation therapy with D-dimer tests. In patients with negative D-dimer tests, anticoagulation was stopped, and D-dimer tests were repeated after a month. In those with two consecutive negative D-dimer tests, anticoagulation was stopped indefinitely; these patients were followed for an average of 2.2 years. Among those 319 patients, there was an overall recurrent VTE rate of 6.7% per patient year. Subgroup analysis was performed among men, women not on estrogen therapy, and women on estrogen therapy; recurrence rates per patient year were 9.7%, 5.4%, and 0%, respectively.

This study used a point-of-care D-dimer test that was either positive or negative; it is unclear if the results can be generalized to all D-dimer tests. Additionally, although the study found a lower recurrence VTE rate among women, the study was not powered for the subgroups.

Bottom line: The high rate of recurrent VTE among men makes the D-dimer test an unsafe marker to use in deciding whether or not to stop anticoagulation for an unprovoked VTE. Among women, D-dimer test can potentially be used to guide length of treatment, but, given the limitations of the study, more evidence is needed.

Citation: Kearon C, Spencer FA, O’Keeffe D, et al. D-Dimer testing to select patients with a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism who can stop anticoagulant therapy. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(1):27-34.

Clinical question: In patients with a first unprovoked VTE, is it safe to use a normalized D-dimer test to stop anticoagulation therapy?

Background: The risk of VTE recurrence after stopping anticoagulation is higher in patients who have elevated D-dimer levels after treatment. It is unknown whether we can use normalized D-dimer levels to guide the decision about whether or not to stop anticoagulation.

Study design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: Thirteen university-affiliated centers.

Synopsis: Study authors screened 410 adult patients who had a first unprovoked VTE and completed three to seven months of anticoagulation therapy with D-dimer tests. In patients with negative D-dimer tests, anticoagulation was stopped, and D-dimer tests were repeated after a month. In those with two consecutive negative D-dimer tests, anticoagulation was stopped indefinitely; these patients were followed for an average of 2.2 years. Among those 319 patients, there was an overall recurrent VTE rate of 6.7% per patient year. Subgroup analysis was performed among men, women not on estrogen therapy, and women on estrogen therapy; recurrence rates per patient year were 9.7%, 5.4%, and 0%, respectively.

This study used a point-of-care D-dimer test that was either positive or negative; it is unclear if the results can be generalized to all D-dimer tests. Additionally, although the study found a lower recurrence VTE rate among women, the study was not powered for the subgroups.

Bottom line: The high rate of recurrent VTE among men makes the D-dimer test an unsafe marker to use in deciding whether or not to stop anticoagulation for an unprovoked VTE. Among women, D-dimer test can potentially be used to guide length of treatment, but, given the limitations of the study, more evidence is needed.

Citation: Kearon C, Spencer FA, O’Keeffe D, et al. D-Dimer testing to select patients with a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism who can stop anticoagulant therapy. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(1):27-34.

Issue
The Hospitalist - 2015(05)
Issue
The Hospitalist - 2015(05)
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
D-Dimer Not Reliable Marker to Stop Anticoagulation Therapy
Display Headline
D-Dimer Not Reliable Marker to Stop Anticoagulation Therapy
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)

Noninvasive Ventilation Improves Outcomes for COPD Inpatients

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/15/2022 - 16:10
Display Headline
Noninvasive Ventilation Improves Outcomes for COPD Inpatients

Clinical question: Do patients hospitalized with acute COPD exacerbations have improved outcomes with noninvasive ventilation (NIV) compared to those treated with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV)?

Background: Previous studies have shown that in select patients, NIV has a mortality benefit over IMV for acute COPD exacerbations requiring hospitalization. NIV may also decrease complication rates and reduce length of stay; however, the previous prospective studies have been small.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: 420 structurally and geographically diverse U.S. hospitals.

Synopsis: Using the Premier Healthcare Informatics database, this study looked at 25,628 patients over 40 years old who were hospitalized with COPD exacerbations. Compared with patients who were initially treated with IMV, patients treated with NIV demonstrated lower mortality rates with an odds ratio of 0.54, lower risk of hospital-acquired pneumonia with an odds ratio of 0.53, and a 32% cost reduction. They also had shorter lengths of stay.

This was a retrospective study using a limited data set, and the authors did not have access to potentially confounding factors between the two groups, including vital signs and blood gases. Additionally, the advantages of NIV were attenuated among patients with pneumonia present on admission, patients with high burden of comorbid diseases, and patients older than 85 years.

Bottom line: Treatment of acute COPD exacerbations with NIV is associated with lower mortality, lower costs, and shorter length of stay as compared with IMV.

Citation: Lindenauer PK, Stefan MS, Shieh MS, Pekow PS, Rothberg MB, Hill NS. Outcomes associated with invasive and noninvasive ventilation among patients hospitalized with exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(12):1982-1993.

Issue
The Hospitalist - 2015(05)
Publications
Sections

Clinical question: Do patients hospitalized with acute COPD exacerbations have improved outcomes with noninvasive ventilation (NIV) compared to those treated with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV)?

Background: Previous studies have shown that in select patients, NIV has a mortality benefit over IMV for acute COPD exacerbations requiring hospitalization. NIV may also decrease complication rates and reduce length of stay; however, the previous prospective studies have been small.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: 420 structurally and geographically diverse U.S. hospitals.

Synopsis: Using the Premier Healthcare Informatics database, this study looked at 25,628 patients over 40 years old who were hospitalized with COPD exacerbations. Compared with patients who were initially treated with IMV, patients treated with NIV demonstrated lower mortality rates with an odds ratio of 0.54, lower risk of hospital-acquired pneumonia with an odds ratio of 0.53, and a 32% cost reduction. They also had shorter lengths of stay.

This was a retrospective study using a limited data set, and the authors did not have access to potentially confounding factors between the two groups, including vital signs and blood gases. Additionally, the advantages of NIV were attenuated among patients with pneumonia present on admission, patients with high burden of comorbid diseases, and patients older than 85 years.

Bottom line: Treatment of acute COPD exacerbations with NIV is associated with lower mortality, lower costs, and shorter length of stay as compared with IMV.

Citation: Lindenauer PK, Stefan MS, Shieh MS, Pekow PS, Rothberg MB, Hill NS. Outcomes associated with invasive and noninvasive ventilation among patients hospitalized with exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(12):1982-1993.

Clinical question: Do patients hospitalized with acute COPD exacerbations have improved outcomes with noninvasive ventilation (NIV) compared to those treated with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV)?

Background: Previous studies have shown that in select patients, NIV has a mortality benefit over IMV for acute COPD exacerbations requiring hospitalization. NIV may also decrease complication rates and reduce length of stay; however, the previous prospective studies have been small.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: 420 structurally and geographically diverse U.S. hospitals.

Synopsis: Using the Premier Healthcare Informatics database, this study looked at 25,628 patients over 40 years old who were hospitalized with COPD exacerbations. Compared with patients who were initially treated with IMV, patients treated with NIV demonstrated lower mortality rates with an odds ratio of 0.54, lower risk of hospital-acquired pneumonia with an odds ratio of 0.53, and a 32% cost reduction. They also had shorter lengths of stay.

This was a retrospective study using a limited data set, and the authors did not have access to potentially confounding factors between the two groups, including vital signs and blood gases. Additionally, the advantages of NIV were attenuated among patients with pneumonia present on admission, patients with high burden of comorbid diseases, and patients older than 85 years.

Bottom line: Treatment of acute COPD exacerbations with NIV is associated with lower mortality, lower costs, and shorter length of stay as compared with IMV.

Citation: Lindenauer PK, Stefan MS, Shieh MS, Pekow PS, Rothberg MB, Hill NS. Outcomes associated with invasive and noninvasive ventilation among patients hospitalized with exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(12):1982-1993.

Issue
The Hospitalist - 2015(05)
Issue
The Hospitalist - 2015(05)
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Noninvasive Ventilation Improves Outcomes for COPD Inpatients
Display Headline
Noninvasive Ventilation Improves Outcomes for COPD Inpatients
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)

Bova Risk Model Predicts 30-Day Pulmonary Embolism-Related Complications

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/15/2022 - 16:10
Display Headline
Bova Risk Model Predicts 30-Day Pulmonary Embolism-Related Complications

Clinical question: Can the Bova risk model stratify patients with acute PE into stages of increasing risk for 30-day pulmonary embolism (PE)-related complications?

Background: The Bova score is based on four variables assessed at the time of PE diagnosis: heart rate, systolic blood pressure, cardiac troponin, and a marker of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. In the original study, the Bova risk model was derived from 2,874 normotensive patients with PE. This study performed a retrospective validation of this model on a different cohort of patients.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Academic urban ED in Madrid, Spain.

Synopsis: Investigators included 1,083 patients with normotensive PE, and the Bova risk score classified 80% into class I, 15% into class II, and 5% into class III—correlating 30-day PE-related complication rates were 4.4%, 18%, and 42%, respectively. When dichotomized into low risk (class I and II) versus intermediate to high risk (class III), the model had a specificity of 97%, a positive predictive value of 42%, and a positive likelihood ratio of 7.9 for predicting 30-day PE-related complications.

The existing risk assessment models, the pulmonary embolism severity index (PESI) and the simplified PESI (sPESI), have been extensively validated but were specifically developed to identity patients with low risk for mortality. The Bova risk model could be used in a stepwise fashion, with the PESI or sPESI model, to further assess intermediate-risk patients.

This model was derived and validated at one single center, so the results may not be generalizable. Additionally, the variables were collected prospectively, but this validation analysis was performed retrospectively.

Bottom line: The Bova risk model accurately stratifies patients with normotensive PE into stages of increasing risk for developing 30-day PE-related complications.

Citation: Fernández C, Bova C, Sanchez O, et al. Validation of a model for identification of patients at intermediate to high risk for complications associated with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism [published online ahead of print January 29, 2015]. Chest.

Issue
The Hospitalist - 2015(05)
Publications
Sections

Clinical question: Can the Bova risk model stratify patients with acute PE into stages of increasing risk for 30-day pulmonary embolism (PE)-related complications?

Background: The Bova score is based on four variables assessed at the time of PE diagnosis: heart rate, systolic blood pressure, cardiac troponin, and a marker of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. In the original study, the Bova risk model was derived from 2,874 normotensive patients with PE. This study performed a retrospective validation of this model on a different cohort of patients.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Academic urban ED in Madrid, Spain.

Synopsis: Investigators included 1,083 patients with normotensive PE, and the Bova risk score classified 80% into class I, 15% into class II, and 5% into class III—correlating 30-day PE-related complication rates were 4.4%, 18%, and 42%, respectively. When dichotomized into low risk (class I and II) versus intermediate to high risk (class III), the model had a specificity of 97%, a positive predictive value of 42%, and a positive likelihood ratio of 7.9 for predicting 30-day PE-related complications.

The existing risk assessment models, the pulmonary embolism severity index (PESI) and the simplified PESI (sPESI), have been extensively validated but were specifically developed to identity patients with low risk for mortality. The Bova risk model could be used in a stepwise fashion, with the PESI or sPESI model, to further assess intermediate-risk patients.

This model was derived and validated at one single center, so the results may not be generalizable. Additionally, the variables were collected prospectively, but this validation analysis was performed retrospectively.

Bottom line: The Bova risk model accurately stratifies patients with normotensive PE into stages of increasing risk for developing 30-day PE-related complications.

Citation: Fernández C, Bova C, Sanchez O, et al. Validation of a model for identification of patients at intermediate to high risk for complications associated with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism [published online ahead of print January 29, 2015]. Chest.

Clinical question: Can the Bova risk model stratify patients with acute PE into stages of increasing risk for 30-day pulmonary embolism (PE)-related complications?

Background: The Bova score is based on four variables assessed at the time of PE diagnosis: heart rate, systolic blood pressure, cardiac troponin, and a marker of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. In the original study, the Bova risk model was derived from 2,874 normotensive patients with PE. This study performed a retrospective validation of this model on a different cohort of patients.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Academic urban ED in Madrid, Spain.

Synopsis: Investigators included 1,083 patients with normotensive PE, and the Bova risk score classified 80% into class I, 15% into class II, and 5% into class III—correlating 30-day PE-related complication rates were 4.4%, 18%, and 42%, respectively. When dichotomized into low risk (class I and II) versus intermediate to high risk (class III), the model had a specificity of 97%, a positive predictive value of 42%, and a positive likelihood ratio of 7.9 for predicting 30-day PE-related complications.

The existing risk assessment models, the pulmonary embolism severity index (PESI) and the simplified PESI (sPESI), have been extensively validated but were specifically developed to identity patients with low risk for mortality. The Bova risk model could be used in a stepwise fashion, with the PESI or sPESI model, to further assess intermediate-risk patients.

This model was derived and validated at one single center, so the results may not be generalizable. Additionally, the variables were collected prospectively, but this validation analysis was performed retrospectively.

Bottom line: The Bova risk model accurately stratifies patients with normotensive PE into stages of increasing risk for developing 30-day PE-related complications.

Citation: Fernández C, Bova C, Sanchez O, et al. Validation of a model for identification of patients at intermediate to high risk for complications associated with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism [published online ahead of print January 29, 2015]. Chest.

Issue
The Hospitalist - 2015(05)
Issue
The Hospitalist - 2015(05)
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Bova Risk Model Predicts 30-Day Pulmonary Embolism-Related Complications
Display Headline
Bova Risk Model Predicts 30-Day Pulmonary Embolism-Related Complications
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)

Intracranial Bleeding Risk for Head Injury Patients on Warfarin

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/15/2022 - 16:10
Display Headline
Intracranial Bleeding Risk for Head Injury Patients on Warfarin

Clinical question: Do minor and minimal head injuries in patients on warfarin lead to significant intracranial bleed?

Background: Warfarin use is common, and many of these patients sustain minor and minimal head injuries. When presenting to the ED, these patients pose a clinical dilemma regarding whether to obtain neuroimaging and/or admit.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Two urban tertiary care EDs in Ottawa, Canada, over a two-year period.

Synopsis: Using the Canadian National Ambulatory Care Reporting System database and the associated coding data, 259 patients were identified that fit the inclusion criteria GCS ≥13 and INR >1.5. This study showed that the rate of intracranial bleeds in this group of patients was high (15.9%); for minor and minimal head injury groups, the rate was 21.9% and 4.8%, respectively. Additionally, loss of consciousness was associated with higher rates of intracranial bleeding.

The risk of intracranial bleed after a head injury while on warfarin is considerably high, particularly for those patients with minor head injury (21.9%), which is about three times the rate previously reported. Hospitalists evaluating these patients should consider obtaining neuroimaging.

Nonetheless, these rates may be overestimating the true prevalence due to the following: 1) Coding data may overlook minor and minimal head injuries in the presence of more serious injuries, and 2) patients with minimal head injuries may not seek medical care.

Bottom line: Patients sustaining minor head injury while on warfarin have a high rate of intracranial bleed.

Reference: Alrajhi KN, Perry JJ, Forster AJ. Intracranial bleeds after minor and minimal head injury in patients on warfarin. J Emer Med. 2015;48(2):137-142.

Issue
The Hospitalist - 2015(05)
Publications
Sections

Clinical question: Do minor and minimal head injuries in patients on warfarin lead to significant intracranial bleed?

Background: Warfarin use is common, and many of these patients sustain minor and minimal head injuries. When presenting to the ED, these patients pose a clinical dilemma regarding whether to obtain neuroimaging and/or admit.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Two urban tertiary care EDs in Ottawa, Canada, over a two-year period.

Synopsis: Using the Canadian National Ambulatory Care Reporting System database and the associated coding data, 259 patients were identified that fit the inclusion criteria GCS ≥13 and INR >1.5. This study showed that the rate of intracranial bleeds in this group of patients was high (15.9%); for minor and minimal head injury groups, the rate was 21.9% and 4.8%, respectively. Additionally, loss of consciousness was associated with higher rates of intracranial bleeding.

The risk of intracranial bleed after a head injury while on warfarin is considerably high, particularly for those patients with minor head injury (21.9%), which is about three times the rate previously reported. Hospitalists evaluating these patients should consider obtaining neuroimaging.

Nonetheless, these rates may be overestimating the true prevalence due to the following: 1) Coding data may overlook minor and minimal head injuries in the presence of more serious injuries, and 2) patients with minimal head injuries may not seek medical care.

Bottom line: Patients sustaining minor head injury while on warfarin have a high rate of intracranial bleed.

Reference: Alrajhi KN, Perry JJ, Forster AJ. Intracranial bleeds after minor and minimal head injury in patients on warfarin. J Emer Med. 2015;48(2):137-142.

Clinical question: Do minor and minimal head injuries in patients on warfarin lead to significant intracranial bleed?

Background: Warfarin use is common, and many of these patients sustain minor and minimal head injuries. When presenting to the ED, these patients pose a clinical dilemma regarding whether to obtain neuroimaging and/or admit.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Two urban tertiary care EDs in Ottawa, Canada, over a two-year period.

Synopsis: Using the Canadian National Ambulatory Care Reporting System database and the associated coding data, 259 patients were identified that fit the inclusion criteria GCS ≥13 and INR >1.5. This study showed that the rate of intracranial bleeds in this group of patients was high (15.9%); for minor and minimal head injury groups, the rate was 21.9% and 4.8%, respectively. Additionally, loss of consciousness was associated with higher rates of intracranial bleeding.

The risk of intracranial bleed after a head injury while on warfarin is considerably high, particularly for those patients with minor head injury (21.9%), which is about three times the rate previously reported. Hospitalists evaluating these patients should consider obtaining neuroimaging.

Nonetheless, these rates may be overestimating the true prevalence due to the following: 1) Coding data may overlook minor and minimal head injuries in the presence of more serious injuries, and 2) patients with minimal head injuries may not seek medical care.

Bottom line: Patients sustaining minor head injury while on warfarin have a high rate of intracranial bleed.

Reference: Alrajhi KN, Perry JJ, Forster AJ. Intracranial bleeds after minor and minimal head injury in patients on warfarin. J Emer Med. 2015;48(2):137-142.

Issue
The Hospitalist - 2015(05)
Issue
The Hospitalist - 2015(05)
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Intracranial Bleeding Risk for Head Injury Patients on Warfarin
Display Headline
Intracranial Bleeding Risk for Head Injury Patients on Warfarin
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)

Enriched Nutritional Formulas Help Heal Pressure Ulcers

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/15/2022 - 16:10
Display Headline
Enriched Nutritional Formulas Help Heal Pressure Ulcers

Clinical question: Does a high-calorie, high-protein formula enriched with supplements of arginine, zinc, and antioxidants improve pressure ulcer healing?

Background: Malnutrition is thought to be a major factor in the development and poor healing of pressure ulcers. Trials evaluating whether or not the addition of antioxidants, arginine, and zinc to nutritional formulas improves pressure ulcer healing have been small and inconsistent.

Study design: Multicenter, randomized, controlled, blinded trial.

Setting: Long-term care facilities and patients receiving home care services.

Synopsis: Two hundred patients with stage II, III, or IV pressure ulcers receiving standardized wound care were randomly assigned to a control formula or an experimental formula enriched with arginine, zinc, and antioxidants. At eight weeks, the experimental formula group had an 18.7% (CI, 5.7% to 31.8%, P=0.017) mean reduction in pressure ulcer size compared with the control formula group, although both groups showed efficacy in wound healing.

Nutrition is an important part of wound healing and should be incorporated into the plan of care for the hospitalized patient with pressure ulcers. Hospitalists should be mindful that this study was conducted in non-acute settings, with a chronically ill patient population; more research needs to be done to investigate the effect of these specific immune-modulating nutritional supplements in acutely ill hospitalized patients, given the inconclusive safety profile of certain nutrients such as arginine in severe sepsis.

Bottom line: Enhanced nutritional support with an oral nutritional formula enriched with arginine, zinc, and antioxidants improves pressure ulcer healing in malnourished patients already receiving standard wound care.

Citation: Cereda E, Klersy C, Serioli M, Crespi A, D’Andrea F, OligoElement Sore Trial Study Group. A nutritional formula enriched with arginine, zinc, and antioxidants for the healing of pressure ulcers: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(3):167-174.

Issue
The Hospitalist - 2015(05)
Publications
Topics
Sections

Clinical question: Does a high-calorie, high-protein formula enriched with supplements of arginine, zinc, and antioxidants improve pressure ulcer healing?

Background: Malnutrition is thought to be a major factor in the development and poor healing of pressure ulcers. Trials evaluating whether or not the addition of antioxidants, arginine, and zinc to nutritional formulas improves pressure ulcer healing have been small and inconsistent.

Study design: Multicenter, randomized, controlled, blinded trial.

Setting: Long-term care facilities and patients receiving home care services.

Synopsis: Two hundred patients with stage II, III, or IV pressure ulcers receiving standardized wound care were randomly assigned to a control formula or an experimental formula enriched with arginine, zinc, and antioxidants. At eight weeks, the experimental formula group had an 18.7% (CI, 5.7% to 31.8%, P=0.017) mean reduction in pressure ulcer size compared with the control formula group, although both groups showed efficacy in wound healing.

Nutrition is an important part of wound healing and should be incorporated into the plan of care for the hospitalized patient with pressure ulcers. Hospitalists should be mindful that this study was conducted in non-acute settings, with a chronically ill patient population; more research needs to be done to investigate the effect of these specific immune-modulating nutritional supplements in acutely ill hospitalized patients, given the inconclusive safety profile of certain nutrients such as arginine in severe sepsis.

Bottom line: Enhanced nutritional support with an oral nutritional formula enriched with arginine, zinc, and antioxidants improves pressure ulcer healing in malnourished patients already receiving standard wound care.

Citation: Cereda E, Klersy C, Serioli M, Crespi A, D’Andrea F, OligoElement Sore Trial Study Group. A nutritional formula enriched with arginine, zinc, and antioxidants for the healing of pressure ulcers: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(3):167-174.

Clinical question: Does a high-calorie, high-protein formula enriched with supplements of arginine, zinc, and antioxidants improve pressure ulcer healing?

Background: Malnutrition is thought to be a major factor in the development and poor healing of pressure ulcers. Trials evaluating whether or not the addition of antioxidants, arginine, and zinc to nutritional formulas improves pressure ulcer healing have been small and inconsistent.

Study design: Multicenter, randomized, controlled, blinded trial.

Setting: Long-term care facilities and patients receiving home care services.

Synopsis: Two hundred patients with stage II, III, or IV pressure ulcers receiving standardized wound care were randomly assigned to a control formula or an experimental formula enriched with arginine, zinc, and antioxidants. At eight weeks, the experimental formula group had an 18.7% (CI, 5.7% to 31.8%, P=0.017) mean reduction in pressure ulcer size compared with the control formula group, although both groups showed efficacy in wound healing.

Nutrition is an important part of wound healing and should be incorporated into the plan of care for the hospitalized patient with pressure ulcers. Hospitalists should be mindful that this study was conducted in non-acute settings, with a chronically ill patient population; more research needs to be done to investigate the effect of these specific immune-modulating nutritional supplements in acutely ill hospitalized patients, given the inconclusive safety profile of certain nutrients such as arginine in severe sepsis.

Bottom line: Enhanced nutritional support with an oral nutritional formula enriched with arginine, zinc, and antioxidants improves pressure ulcer healing in malnourished patients already receiving standard wound care.

Citation: Cereda E, Klersy C, Serioli M, Crespi A, D’Andrea F, OligoElement Sore Trial Study Group. A nutritional formula enriched with arginine, zinc, and antioxidants for the healing of pressure ulcers: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(3):167-174.

Issue
The Hospitalist - 2015(05)
Issue
The Hospitalist - 2015(05)
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Enriched Nutritional Formulas Help Heal Pressure Ulcers
Display Headline
Enriched Nutritional Formulas Help Heal Pressure Ulcers
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)

High-Volume Hospitals Have Higher Readmission Rates

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/15/2022 - 16:10
Display Headline
High-Volume Hospitals Have Higher Readmission Rates

Clinical question: Is there an association between hospital volume and hospital readmission rates?

Background: There is an established association between high patient volume and reduced complications or mortality after surgical procedures; however, readmission represents a different type of quality metric than mortality or complications. Studies on the association between hospital patient volume and readmission rates have been controversial.

Study design: Retrospective, cross-sectional study.

Setting: Acute care hospitals.

Synopsis: The study included 6,916,644 admissions to 4,651 hospitals, where patients were assigned to one of five cohorts: medicine, surgery/gynecology, cardiorespiratory, cardiovascular, and neurology. The hospital with the highest volume group had a hospital-wide mean standardized readmission rate of 15.9%, while the hospital with the lowest volume group had a readmission rate of 14.7%. This was a 1.2 percentage point absolute difference between the two hospitals (95% confidence interval 0.9 to 1.5). This trend continued when specialty cohorts were examined, with the exception of the procedure-heavy cardiovascular cohort.

Results showed a trend toward decreased readmission rates in lower-volume hospitals; however, it is unclear why this trend exists. Possible reasons include different patient populations and different practitioner-to-patient ratios in low-volume hospitals.

Limitations of this study are the inclusion of only patients 65 years and older and the fact that all admissions per patient were included, which may bias the results against hospitals with many frequently admitted patients.

Bottom line: Hospitals with high patient volumes are associated with higher readmission rates, except in procedure-heavy patient groups.

Citation: Horwitz LI, Lin Z, Herrin J, et al.Association of hospital volume with readmission rates: a retrospective cross-sectional study. BMJ. 2015;350:h447.

Issue
The Hospitalist - 2015(05)
Publications
Sections

Clinical question: Is there an association between hospital volume and hospital readmission rates?

Background: There is an established association between high patient volume and reduced complications or mortality after surgical procedures; however, readmission represents a different type of quality metric than mortality or complications. Studies on the association between hospital patient volume and readmission rates have been controversial.

Study design: Retrospective, cross-sectional study.

Setting: Acute care hospitals.

Synopsis: The study included 6,916,644 admissions to 4,651 hospitals, where patients were assigned to one of five cohorts: medicine, surgery/gynecology, cardiorespiratory, cardiovascular, and neurology. The hospital with the highest volume group had a hospital-wide mean standardized readmission rate of 15.9%, while the hospital with the lowest volume group had a readmission rate of 14.7%. This was a 1.2 percentage point absolute difference between the two hospitals (95% confidence interval 0.9 to 1.5). This trend continued when specialty cohorts were examined, with the exception of the procedure-heavy cardiovascular cohort.

Results showed a trend toward decreased readmission rates in lower-volume hospitals; however, it is unclear why this trend exists. Possible reasons include different patient populations and different practitioner-to-patient ratios in low-volume hospitals.

Limitations of this study are the inclusion of only patients 65 years and older and the fact that all admissions per patient were included, which may bias the results against hospitals with many frequently admitted patients.

Bottom line: Hospitals with high patient volumes are associated with higher readmission rates, except in procedure-heavy patient groups.

Citation: Horwitz LI, Lin Z, Herrin J, et al.Association of hospital volume with readmission rates: a retrospective cross-sectional study. BMJ. 2015;350:h447.

Clinical question: Is there an association between hospital volume and hospital readmission rates?

Background: There is an established association between high patient volume and reduced complications or mortality after surgical procedures; however, readmission represents a different type of quality metric than mortality or complications. Studies on the association between hospital patient volume and readmission rates have been controversial.

Study design: Retrospective, cross-sectional study.

Setting: Acute care hospitals.

Synopsis: The study included 6,916,644 admissions to 4,651 hospitals, where patients were assigned to one of five cohorts: medicine, surgery/gynecology, cardiorespiratory, cardiovascular, and neurology. The hospital with the highest volume group had a hospital-wide mean standardized readmission rate of 15.9%, while the hospital with the lowest volume group had a readmission rate of 14.7%. This was a 1.2 percentage point absolute difference between the two hospitals (95% confidence interval 0.9 to 1.5). This trend continued when specialty cohorts were examined, with the exception of the procedure-heavy cardiovascular cohort.

Results showed a trend toward decreased readmission rates in lower-volume hospitals; however, it is unclear why this trend exists. Possible reasons include different patient populations and different practitioner-to-patient ratios in low-volume hospitals.

Limitations of this study are the inclusion of only patients 65 years and older and the fact that all admissions per patient were included, which may bias the results against hospitals with many frequently admitted patients.

Bottom line: Hospitals with high patient volumes are associated with higher readmission rates, except in procedure-heavy patient groups.

Citation: Horwitz LI, Lin Z, Herrin J, et al.Association of hospital volume with readmission rates: a retrospective cross-sectional study. BMJ. 2015;350:h447.

Issue
The Hospitalist - 2015(05)
Issue
The Hospitalist - 2015(05)
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
High-Volume Hospitals Have Higher Readmission Rates
Display Headline
High-Volume Hospitals Have Higher Readmission Rates
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)

Hospital Testing Overuse Done to Reassure Patients, Families

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/15/2022 - 16:10
Display Headline
Hospital Testing Overuse Done to Reassure Patients, Families

Clinical Question: What is the extent of, and factors associated with, testing overuse in U.S. hospitals for pre-operative evaluation and syncope.

Background: Little is known about the extent and drivers of overuse by hospitalists.

Study design: Two vignettes (pre-operative evaluation and syncope) were mailed to hospitalists. They were asked to identify what most hospitalists at their institution would recommend and “the most likely primary driver of the hospitalist’s decision.”

Setting: Random selection of hospitalists from SHM member database and SHM national meeting attendees.

Synopsis: Investigators mailed 1,753 surveys and received a 68% response rate. For the pre-operative evaluation vignette, 52% of hospitalists reported overuse of pre-operative testing. When a family member was a physician and requested further testing, overuse increased significantly to 65%. For the syncope vignette, any choice involving admission was considered overuse.

Eighty-two percent of respondents reported overuse; when the wife was a lawyer or requested further testing, overuse remained the same. Overuse in both cases was more frequent due to a hospitalist’s desire to reassure patients or themselves, rather than a belief that it was clinically indicated (pre-operative evaluation, 63% vs. 37%; syncope, 69% vs. 31%, P<0.001).

The survey responses do not necessarily represent actual clinical choices, and the hospitalist sample may not be representative of all hospitalists; however, this study shows that efforts to reduce overuse in hospitals need to move beyond financial incentives and/or informing providers of evidence-based recommendations.

Bottom line: A survey of hospitalists showed substantial overuse in two common clinical situations, syncope and pre-operative evaluation, mostly driven by a desire to reassure patients, families, or themselves.

Citation: Kachalia A, Berg A, Fagerlin A, et al. Overuse of testing in preoperative evaluation and syncope: a survey of hospitalists. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(2):100-108.

Issue
The Hospitalist - 2015(05)
Publications
Sections

Clinical Question: What is the extent of, and factors associated with, testing overuse in U.S. hospitals for pre-operative evaluation and syncope.

Background: Little is known about the extent and drivers of overuse by hospitalists.

Study design: Two vignettes (pre-operative evaluation and syncope) were mailed to hospitalists. They were asked to identify what most hospitalists at their institution would recommend and “the most likely primary driver of the hospitalist’s decision.”

Setting: Random selection of hospitalists from SHM member database and SHM national meeting attendees.

Synopsis: Investigators mailed 1,753 surveys and received a 68% response rate. For the pre-operative evaluation vignette, 52% of hospitalists reported overuse of pre-operative testing. When a family member was a physician and requested further testing, overuse increased significantly to 65%. For the syncope vignette, any choice involving admission was considered overuse.

Eighty-two percent of respondents reported overuse; when the wife was a lawyer or requested further testing, overuse remained the same. Overuse in both cases was more frequent due to a hospitalist’s desire to reassure patients or themselves, rather than a belief that it was clinically indicated (pre-operative evaluation, 63% vs. 37%; syncope, 69% vs. 31%, P<0.001).

The survey responses do not necessarily represent actual clinical choices, and the hospitalist sample may not be representative of all hospitalists; however, this study shows that efforts to reduce overuse in hospitals need to move beyond financial incentives and/or informing providers of evidence-based recommendations.

Bottom line: A survey of hospitalists showed substantial overuse in two common clinical situations, syncope and pre-operative evaluation, mostly driven by a desire to reassure patients, families, or themselves.

Citation: Kachalia A, Berg A, Fagerlin A, et al. Overuse of testing in preoperative evaluation and syncope: a survey of hospitalists. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(2):100-108.

Clinical Question: What is the extent of, and factors associated with, testing overuse in U.S. hospitals for pre-operative evaluation and syncope.

Background: Little is known about the extent and drivers of overuse by hospitalists.

Study design: Two vignettes (pre-operative evaluation and syncope) were mailed to hospitalists. They were asked to identify what most hospitalists at their institution would recommend and “the most likely primary driver of the hospitalist’s decision.”

Setting: Random selection of hospitalists from SHM member database and SHM national meeting attendees.

Synopsis: Investigators mailed 1,753 surveys and received a 68% response rate. For the pre-operative evaluation vignette, 52% of hospitalists reported overuse of pre-operative testing. When a family member was a physician and requested further testing, overuse increased significantly to 65%. For the syncope vignette, any choice involving admission was considered overuse.

Eighty-two percent of respondents reported overuse; when the wife was a lawyer or requested further testing, overuse remained the same. Overuse in both cases was more frequent due to a hospitalist’s desire to reassure patients or themselves, rather than a belief that it was clinically indicated (pre-operative evaluation, 63% vs. 37%; syncope, 69% vs. 31%, P<0.001).

The survey responses do not necessarily represent actual clinical choices, and the hospitalist sample may not be representative of all hospitalists; however, this study shows that efforts to reduce overuse in hospitals need to move beyond financial incentives and/or informing providers of evidence-based recommendations.

Bottom line: A survey of hospitalists showed substantial overuse in two common clinical situations, syncope and pre-operative evaluation, mostly driven by a desire to reassure patients, families, or themselves.

Citation: Kachalia A, Berg A, Fagerlin A, et al. Overuse of testing in preoperative evaluation and syncope: a survey of hospitalists. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(2):100-108.

Issue
The Hospitalist - 2015(05)
Issue
The Hospitalist - 2015(05)
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Hospital Testing Overuse Done to Reassure Patients, Families
Display Headline
Hospital Testing Overuse Done to Reassure Patients, Families
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)