Article Type
Changed
Wed, 12/12/2018 - 20:41
Display Headline
Emergency Imaging
A 30-year-old woman presented for evaluation of increasing abdominal distension and pain.

Case

30-year-old woman with a history of alcoholism and anxiety presented to the ED for evaluation of abdominal distension and pain. She reported new social stressors at home and increased alcohol consumption. She also noted gradually increasing abdominal distension over the past several weeks. As patient’s liver function tests were elevated, supine radiographs of the abdomen were acquired for further evaluation; a representative image is presented below (Figure 1a).

What is the suspected diagnosis?
Is any additional imaging required?



Answer

Radiographs of the abdomen demonstrated multiple air-filled but nondistended loops of small and large bowel in the midabdomen. The presence of air throughout the bowel and lack of dilated loops argued against bowel obstruction or adynamic ileus as the cause of the distended abdomen. Notably, there was medial displacement, or “centralization,” of all the visible loops of bowel to the center of the abdomen, with no bowel gas seen adjacent to the peritoneal fat stripes (white arrows, Figure 1b). In a supine patient, the bowel loops normally fall to the side, directly opposed or close to the peritoneal fat stripes.

Centralization of bowel is suggestive of abdominopelvic ascites.1 Additional radiographic findings that may be seen with ascites include diffusely increased density of the abdomen and bulging of the peritoneal fat stripes/flanks. In the average adult, a minimum of approximately 800 mL of ascitic fluid is required to medially displace bowel loops or abdominal viscera.2 While there are many causes of ascites, the radiograph in this case suggests the underlying etiology of cirrhosis. Although the top of the liver is not visualized on the radiograph, the liver contour appears enlarged (red arrow, Figure 1b).

In the ED, ultrasound is the imaging modality of choice to confirm the presence of ascites as it is widely available, quick, relatively inexpensive, and does not require ionizing radiation. Ultrasound is also useful when examining the abdominal viscera since it may detect the underlying cause of ascites.3 The ultrasound image of the abdominal viscera in this case demonstrated a hypoechoic (dark) signal (red arrow, Figure 1c) between the abdominal wall (red asterisk, Figure 1c) and bowel loops (letter ‘B,” Figure 1c). This finding confirmed the presence of ascites because simple fluid does not reflect the ultrasound beam, but instead results in the hypoechoic signal seen in Figure 1c. An additional sonographic image confirmed the presence of an enlarged liver (white asterisk, Figure 1d) and ascites in the right upper quadrant (red arrow, Figure 1d).

The patient was admitted for further workup and treatment of alcoholic cirrhosis. A

magnetic resonance image (MRI) was obtained during the patient’s inpatient stay; while the MRI not add any additional diagnostic information, it nicely depicted the manner in which the fluid (the high [white] signal on the T2-weighted sequence; red arrows Figure 1e) displaced the bowel loops (red asterisks, Figure 1e) away from the peritoneal fat (white arrows Figure 1e).

Dr Lyons is a resident in the department of radiology at New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical College in New York City. Dr Wladyka is an assistant professor of radiology at Weill Cornell Medical College in New York City and an assistant attending radiologist at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center. Dr Hentel is an associate professor of clinical radiology at Weill Cornell Medical College in New York City. He is also chief of emergency/musculoskeletal imaging and executive vice-chairman for the department of radiology at New York-

Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center; and associate editor, imaging, of the EMERGENCY MEDICINE editorial board.

References


  1. Meschan I. Analysis of Roentgen Signs in General Radiology. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1973:1231.
  2. Keeffee EJ, Gagliardi RA, Pfister RC. The roentgenographic evaluation of ascites. Am J Roentgenol. 1967;101(2):388-396.
  3. Goldberg BB, Goodman GA, Clearfield HR. Evaluation of ascites by ultrasound. Radiology. 1970;96(1):15-22.
Author and Disclosure Information

Issue
Emergency Medicine - 47(11)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
511-513
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

A 30-year-old woman presented for evaluation of increasing abdominal distension and pain.
A 30-year-old woman presented for evaluation of increasing abdominal distension and pain.

Case

30-year-old woman with a history of alcoholism and anxiety presented to the ED for evaluation of abdominal distension and pain. She reported new social stressors at home and increased alcohol consumption. She also noted gradually increasing abdominal distension over the past several weeks. As patient’s liver function tests were elevated, supine radiographs of the abdomen were acquired for further evaluation; a representative image is presented below (Figure 1a).

What is the suspected diagnosis?
Is any additional imaging required?



Answer

Radiographs of the abdomen demonstrated multiple air-filled but nondistended loops of small and large bowel in the midabdomen. The presence of air throughout the bowel and lack of dilated loops argued against bowel obstruction or adynamic ileus as the cause of the distended abdomen. Notably, there was medial displacement, or “centralization,” of all the visible loops of bowel to the center of the abdomen, with no bowel gas seen adjacent to the peritoneal fat stripes (white arrows, Figure 1b). In a supine patient, the bowel loops normally fall to the side, directly opposed or close to the peritoneal fat stripes.

Centralization of bowel is suggestive of abdominopelvic ascites.1 Additional radiographic findings that may be seen with ascites include diffusely increased density of the abdomen and bulging of the peritoneal fat stripes/flanks. In the average adult, a minimum of approximately 800 mL of ascitic fluid is required to medially displace bowel loops or abdominal viscera.2 While there are many causes of ascites, the radiograph in this case suggests the underlying etiology of cirrhosis. Although the top of the liver is not visualized on the radiograph, the liver contour appears enlarged (red arrow, Figure 1b).

In the ED, ultrasound is the imaging modality of choice to confirm the presence of ascites as it is widely available, quick, relatively inexpensive, and does not require ionizing radiation. Ultrasound is also useful when examining the abdominal viscera since it may detect the underlying cause of ascites.3 The ultrasound image of the abdominal viscera in this case demonstrated a hypoechoic (dark) signal (red arrow, Figure 1c) between the abdominal wall (red asterisk, Figure 1c) and bowel loops (letter ‘B,” Figure 1c). This finding confirmed the presence of ascites because simple fluid does not reflect the ultrasound beam, but instead results in the hypoechoic signal seen in Figure 1c. An additional sonographic image confirmed the presence of an enlarged liver (white asterisk, Figure 1d) and ascites in the right upper quadrant (red arrow, Figure 1d).

The patient was admitted for further workup and treatment of alcoholic cirrhosis. A

magnetic resonance image (MRI) was obtained during the patient’s inpatient stay; while the MRI not add any additional diagnostic information, it nicely depicted the manner in which the fluid (the high [white] signal on the T2-weighted sequence; red arrows Figure 1e) displaced the bowel loops (red asterisks, Figure 1e) away from the peritoneal fat (white arrows Figure 1e).

Dr Lyons is a resident in the department of radiology at New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical College in New York City. Dr Wladyka is an assistant professor of radiology at Weill Cornell Medical College in New York City and an assistant attending radiologist at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center. Dr Hentel is an associate professor of clinical radiology at Weill Cornell Medical College in New York City. He is also chief of emergency/musculoskeletal imaging and executive vice-chairman for the department of radiology at New York-

Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center; and associate editor, imaging, of the EMERGENCY MEDICINE editorial board.

Case

30-year-old woman with a history of alcoholism and anxiety presented to the ED for evaluation of abdominal distension and pain. She reported new social stressors at home and increased alcohol consumption. She also noted gradually increasing abdominal distension over the past several weeks. As patient’s liver function tests were elevated, supine radiographs of the abdomen were acquired for further evaluation; a representative image is presented below (Figure 1a).

What is the suspected diagnosis?
Is any additional imaging required?



Answer

Radiographs of the abdomen demonstrated multiple air-filled but nondistended loops of small and large bowel in the midabdomen. The presence of air throughout the bowel and lack of dilated loops argued against bowel obstruction or adynamic ileus as the cause of the distended abdomen. Notably, there was medial displacement, or “centralization,” of all the visible loops of bowel to the center of the abdomen, with no bowel gas seen adjacent to the peritoneal fat stripes (white arrows, Figure 1b). In a supine patient, the bowel loops normally fall to the side, directly opposed or close to the peritoneal fat stripes.

Centralization of bowel is suggestive of abdominopelvic ascites.1 Additional radiographic findings that may be seen with ascites include diffusely increased density of the abdomen and bulging of the peritoneal fat stripes/flanks. In the average adult, a minimum of approximately 800 mL of ascitic fluid is required to medially displace bowel loops or abdominal viscera.2 While there are many causes of ascites, the radiograph in this case suggests the underlying etiology of cirrhosis. Although the top of the liver is not visualized on the radiograph, the liver contour appears enlarged (red arrow, Figure 1b).

In the ED, ultrasound is the imaging modality of choice to confirm the presence of ascites as it is widely available, quick, relatively inexpensive, and does not require ionizing radiation. Ultrasound is also useful when examining the abdominal viscera since it may detect the underlying cause of ascites.3 The ultrasound image of the abdominal viscera in this case demonstrated a hypoechoic (dark) signal (red arrow, Figure 1c) between the abdominal wall (red asterisk, Figure 1c) and bowel loops (letter ‘B,” Figure 1c). This finding confirmed the presence of ascites because simple fluid does not reflect the ultrasound beam, but instead results in the hypoechoic signal seen in Figure 1c. An additional sonographic image confirmed the presence of an enlarged liver (white asterisk, Figure 1d) and ascites in the right upper quadrant (red arrow, Figure 1d).

The patient was admitted for further workup and treatment of alcoholic cirrhosis. A

magnetic resonance image (MRI) was obtained during the patient’s inpatient stay; while the MRI not add any additional diagnostic information, it nicely depicted the manner in which the fluid (the high [white] signal on the T2-weighted sequence; red arrows Figure 1e) displaced the bowel loops (red asterisks, Figure 1e) away from the peritoneal fat (white arrows Figure 1e).

Dr Lyons is a resident in the department of radiology at New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical College in New York City. Dr Wladyka is an assistant professor of radiology at Weill Cornell Medical College in New York City and an assistant attending radiologist at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center. Dr Hentel is an associate professor of clinical radiology at Weill Cornell Medical College in New York City. He is also chief of emergency/musculoskeletal imaging and executive vice-chairman for the department of radiology at New York-

Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center; and associate editor, imaging, of the EMERGENCY MEDICINE editorial board.

References


  1. Meschan I. Analysis of Roentgen Signs in General Radiology. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1973:1231.
  2. Keeffee EJ, Gagliardi RA, Pfister RC. The roentgenographic evaluation of ascites. Am J Roentgenol. 1967;101(2):388-396.
  3. Goldberg BB, Goodman GA, Clearfield HR. Evaluation of ascites by ultrasound. Radiology. 1970;96(1):15-22.
References


  1. Meschan I. Analysis of Roentgen Signs in General Radiology. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1973:1231.
  2. Keeffee EJ, Gagliardi RA, Pfister RC. The roentgenographic evaluation of ascites. Am J Roentgenol. 1967;101(2):388-396.
  3. Goldberg BB, Goodman GA, Clearfield HR. Evaluation of ascites by ultrasound. Radiology. 1970;96(1):15-22.
Issue
Emergency Medicine - 47(11)
Issue
Emergency Medicine - 47(11)
Page Number
511-513
Page Number
511-513
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Emergency Imaging
Display Headline
Emergency Imaging
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article