Article Type
Changed
Fri, 10/01/2021 - 20:57

Key clinical point: Enasidenib was associated with superior overall survival (OS) compared to standard of care (SoC) therapies in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with an isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) mutation who were ineligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

Major finding: Enasidenib vs. SoC was associated with a significantly longer OS (hazard ratio 0.67; 95% CI 0.47-0.97).

Study details: Findings are from a propensity score-matching analysis including adult patients with R/R AML with an IDH2 mutation ineligible for HSCT treated with enasidenib (n=195) from the AG221 C-001 trial or SoC therapies (n=78) from the French Chart Review study.

 

Disclosures: This study was sponsored and funded by Bristol Myers Squibb Some investigators, including the lead author, reported ties with various pharmaceutical companies, including Bristol Myers Squibb.

 

Source: de Botton S et al. Cancer Med. 2021 Aug 24. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4182.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Enasidenib was associated with superior overall survival (OS) compared to standard of care (SoC) therapies in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with an isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) mutation who were ineligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

Major finding: Enasidenib vs. SoC was associated with a significantly longer OS (hazard ratio 0.67; 95% CI 0.47-0.97).

Study details: Findings are from a propensity score-matching analysis including adult patients with R/R AML with an IDH2 mutation ineligible for HSCT treated with enasidenib (n=195) from the AG221 C-001 trial or SoC therapies (n=78) from the French Chart Review study.

 

Disclosures: This study was sponsored and funded by Bristol Myers Squibb Some investigators, including the lead author, reported ties with various pharmaceutical companies, including Bristol Myers Squibb.

 

Source: de Botton S et al. Cancer Med. 2021 Aug 24. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4182.

Key clinical point: Enasidenib was associated with superior overall survival (OS) compared to standard of care (SoC) therapies in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with an isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) mutation who were ineligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

Major finding: Enasidenib vs. SoC was associated with a significantly longer OS (hazard ratio 0.67; 95% CI 0.47-0.97).

Study details: Findings are from a propensity score-matching analysis including adult patients with R/R AML with an IDH2 mutation ineligible for HSCT treated with enasidenib (n=195) from the AG221 C-001 trial or SoC therapies (n=78) from the French Chart Review study.

 

Disclosures: This study was sponsored and funded by Bristol Myers Squibb Some investigators, including the lead author, reported ties with various pharmaceutical companies, including Bristol Myers Squibb.

 

Source: de Botton S et al. Cancer Med. 2021 Aug 24. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4182.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: AML October 2021
Gate On Date
Sun, 09/26/2021 - 12:45
Un-Gate On Date
Sun, 09/26/2021 - 12:45
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Sun, 09/26/2021 - 12:45
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article