User login
The artificial intelligence (AI) program ChatGPT (generative pre-trained transformer) was introduced to the public by Open AI on November 30, 2022. It has been described as a game-changer for society, culture, literature, arts, and science, with a potential impact that rivals that of the internet and social media.
ChatGPT can produce human-like essays in response to queries. Some researchers used ChatGPT to generate abstracts based on the titles of articles published in 5 high-impact journals. These abstracts were so “real” that they escaped detection by expert peer reviewers in 32% of cases.1 In addition, several medical/science articles were published that included ChatGPT as a bylined author.2
Like other journals,3-7
- Nonhuman AI technologies do not qualify for named authorship.
- Authors should be transparent about the use of AI technologies to aid in writing content. Authors should disclose which tool was used and how it was applied in the article submitted to the journal.
- Human authors are responsible for the accuracy of work compiled by an AI tool, including the absence of plagiarism. Proper referencing of statements is necessary.
- Images created by AI tools are not permitted for publication.
Because the overwhelming majority of articles published in
Can AI generate an acceptable ‘guest editorial?’
In addition to creating formulaic writing, some of the concerns about using AI in scientific publishing is that the results might be outdated, incorrect, or lacking appropriate references, and that it can produce “plausible-sounding but incorrect or nonsensical” answers to questions.3 To test this, I asked ChatGPT to write an article on the same topic as 4 of my articles published in
Box
There are many myths and misconceptions surrounding psychiatry, the branch of medicine that deals with the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of mental illness. Some of the most common myths include:
1. Psychiatry is not a real medical specialty: This is a false myth. Psychiatry is a recognized medical specialty, and psychiatrists are licensed medical doctors who have undergone extensive training in the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness.
2. Mental illness is not a real illness: Mental illness is a real and biologically based medical condition, just like physical illness. Research has shown that mental illness is caused by a combination of genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors.
3. Antidepressants are not effective: Antidepressants have been shown to be effective in treating depression and other mental illnesses. While they are not a cure, they can provide significant symptom relief and improve quality of life for many people.
4. Psychiatric drugs are dangerous and have serious side effects: While all drugs have potential side effects, psychiatric medications have been proven to be safe and effective for many people. The risks and benefits of taking any medication should be carefully considered and discussed with a healthcare professional.
5. Therapy is not effective: Therapy, also known as psychotherapy, has been shown to be effective in treating a wide range of mental illnesses, including depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
6. People with mental illness are violent: People with mental illness are no more likely to be violent than the general population. In fact, people with mental illness are more likely to be victims of violence than perpetrators.
It is important to dispel these myths and misconceptions about psychiatry, as they can prevent people from seeking the help they need and can also contribute to stigma and discrimination towards those with mental illness.
In conclusion, there are many myths and misconceptions surrounding psychiatry. Dispelling these myths and increasing public understanding about mental illness and its treatment can help reduce stigma and encourage more people to seek the help they need.
What do you think? I encourage you to send me your take on this AI-generated “guest editorial,” and whether you deem its quality to be similar to that of an article authored by a human psychiatrist.
1. Else H. Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists. Nature. 2023;613(7944):423. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00056-7
2. Stokel-Walker C. ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove. Nature. 2023;613(7945):620-621. doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z
3. Flanagin A, Bibbins-Domingo K, Berkwits M, et al. Nonhuman “authors” and implications for the integrity of scientific publication and medical knowledge. JAMA. 2023;329(8):637-639. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.1344
4. Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use. Nature. 2023;613(7945):612. doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00191-1
5. Thorp HH. ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science. 2023;379(6630):313. doi:10.1126/science.adg7879
6. PNAS. The PNAS journals outline their policies for ChatGPT and generative AI. February 21, 2023. Accessed March 9, 2023. https://www.pnas.org/post/update/pnas-policy-for-chatgpt-generative-ai
7. Marušic’ A. JoGH policy on the use of artificial intelligence in scholarly manuscripts. J Glob Health. 2023;13:01002. doi:10.7189/jogh.13.01002
The artificial intelligence (AI) program ChatGPT (generative pre-trained transformer) was introduced to the public by Open AI on November 30, 2022. It has been described as a game-changer for society, culture, literature, arts, and science, with a potential impact that rivals that of the internet and social media.
ChatGPT can produce human-like essays in response to queries. Some researchers used ChatGPT to generate abstracts based on the titles of articles published in 5 high-impact journals. These abstracts were so “real” that they escaped detection by expert peer reviewers in 32% of cases.1 In addition, several medical/science articles were published that included ChatGPT as a bylined author.2
Like other journals,3-7
- Nonhuman AI technologies do not qualify for named authorship.
- Authors should be transparent about the use of AI technologies to aid in writing content. Authors should disclose which tool was used and how it was applied in the article submitted to the journal.
- Human authors are responsible for the accuracy of work compiled by an AI tool, including the absence of plagiarism. Proper referencing of statements is necessary.
- Images created by AI tools are not permitted for publication.
Because the overwhelming majority of articles published in
Can AI generate an acceptable ‘guest editorial?’
In addition to creating formulaic writing, some of the concerns about using AI in scientific publishing is that the results might be outdated, incorrect, or lacking appropriate references, and that it can produce “plausible-sounding but incorrect or nonsensical” answers to questions.3 To test this, I asked ChatGPT to write an article on the same topic as 4 of my articles published in
Box
There are many myths and misconceptions surrounding psychiatry, the branch of medicine that deals with the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of mental illness. Some of the most common myths include:
1. Psychiatry is not a real medical specialty: This is a false myth. Psychiatry is a recognized medical specialty, and psychiatrists are licensed medical doctors who have undergone extensive training in the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness.
2. Mental illness is not a real illness: Mental illness is a real and biologically based medical condition, just like physical illness. Research has shown that mental illness is caused by a combination of genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors.
3. Antidepressants are not effective: Antidepressants have been shown to be effective in treating depression and other mental illnesses. While they are not a cure, they can provide significant symptom relief and improve quality of life for many people.
4. Psychiatric drugs are dangerous and have serious side effects: While all drugs have potential side effects, psychiatric medications have been proven to be safe and effective for many people. The risks and benefits of taking any medication should be carefully considered and discussed with a healthcare professional.
5. Therapy is not effective: Therapy, also known as psychotherapy, has been shown to be effective in treating a wide range of mental illnesses, including depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
6. People with mental illness are violent: People with mental illness are no more likely to be violent than the general population. In fact, people with mental illness are more likely to be victims of violence than perpetrators.
It is important to dispel these myths and misconceptions about psychiatry, as they can prevent people from seeking the help they need and can also contribute to stigma and discrimination towards those with mental illness.
In conclusion, there are many myths and misconceptions surrounding psychiatry. Dispelling these myths and increasing public understanding about mental illness and its treatment can help reduce stigma and encourage more people to seek the help they need.
What do you think? I encourage you to send me your take on this AI-generated “guest editorial,” and whether you deem its quality to be similar to that of an article authored by a human psychiatrist.
The artificial intelligence (AI) program ChatGPT (generative pre-trained transformer) was introduced to the public by Open AI on November 30, 2022. It has been described as a game-changer for society, culture, literature, arts, and science, with a potential impact that rivals that of the internet and social media.
ChatGPT can produce human-like essays in response to queries. Some researchers used ChatGPT to generate abstracts based on the titles of articles published in 5 high-impact journals. These abstracts were so “real” that they escaped detection by expert peer reviewers in 32% of cases.1 In addition, several medical/science articles were published that included ChatGPT as a bylined author.2
Like other journals,3-7
- Nonhuman AI technologies do not qualify for named authorship.
- Authors should be transparent about the use of AI technologies to aid in writing content. Authors should disclose which tool was used and how it was applied in the article submitted to the journal.
- Human authors are responsible for the accuracy of work compiled by an AI tool, including the absence of plagiarism. Proper referencing of statements is necessary.
- Images created by AI tools are not permitted for publication.
Because the overwhelming majority of articles published in
Can AI generate an acceptable ‘guest editorial?’
In addition to creating formulaic writing, some of the concerns about using AI in scientific publishing is that the results might be outdated, incorrect, or lacking appropriate references, and that it can produce “plausible-sounding but incorrect or nonsensical” answers to questions.3 To test this, I asked ChatGPT to write an article on the same topic as 4 of my articles published in
Box
There are many myths and misconceptions surrounding psychiatry, the branch of medicine that deals with the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of mental illness. Some of the most common myths include:
1. Psychiatry is not a real medical specialty: This is a false myth. Psychiatry is a recognized medical specialty, and psychiatrists are licensed medical doctors who have undergone extensive training in the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness.
2. Mental illness is not a real illness: Mental illness is a real and biologically based medical condition, just like physical illness. Research has shown that mental illness is caused by a combination of genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors.
3. Antidepressants are not effective: Antidepressants have been shown to be effective in treating depression and other mental illnesses. While they are not a cure, they can provide significant symptom relief and improve quality of life for many people.
4. Psychiatric drugs are dangerous and have serious side effects: While all drugs have potential side effects, psychiatric medications have been proven to be safe and effective for many people. The risks and benefits of taking any medication should be carefully considered and discussed with a healthcare professional.
5. Therapy is not effective: Therapy, also known as psychotherapy, has been shown to be effective in treating a wide range of mental illnesses, including depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
6. People with mental illness are violent: People with mental illness are no more likely to be violent than the general population. In fact, people with mental illness are more likely to be victims of violence than perpetrators.
It is important to dispel these myths and misconceptions about psychiatry, as they can prevent people from seeking the help they need and can also contribute to stigma and discrimination towards those with mental illness.
In conclusion, there are many myths and misconceptions surrounding psychiatry. Dispelling these myths and increasing public understanding about mental illness and its treatment can help reduce stigma and encourage more people to seek the help they need.
What do you think? I encourage you to send me your take on this AI-generated “guest editorial,” and whether you deem its quality to be similar to that of an article authored by a human psychiatrist.
1. Else H. Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists. Nature. 2023;613(7944):423. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00056-7
2. Stokel-Walker C. ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove. Nature. 2023;613(7945):620-621. doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z
3. Flanagin A, Bibbins-Domingo K, Berkwits M, et al. Nonhuman “authors” and implications for the integrity of scientific publication and medical knowledge. JAMA. 2023;329(8):637-639. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.1344
4. Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use. Nature. 2023;613(7945):612. doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00191-1
5. Thorp HH. ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science. 2023;379(6630):313. doi:10.1126/science.adg7879
6. PNAS. The PNAS journals outline their policies for ChatGPT and generative AI. February 21, 2023. Accessed March 9, 2023. https://www.pnas.org/post/update/pnas-policy-for-chatgpt-generative-ai
7. Marušic’ A. JoGH policy on the use of artificial intelligence in scholarly manuscripts. J Glob Health. 2023;13:01002. doi:10.7189/jogh.13.01002
1. Else H. Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists. Nature. 2023;613(7944):423. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00056-7
2. Stokel-Walker C. ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove. Nature. 2023;613(7945):620-621. doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z
3. Flanagin A, Bibbins-Domingo K, Berkwits M, et al. Nonhuman “authors” and implications for the integrity of scientific publication and medical knowledge. JAMA. 2023;329(8):637-639. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.1344
4. Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use. Nature. 2023;613(7945):612. doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00191-1
5. Thorp HH. ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science. 2023;379(6630):313. doi:10.1126/science.adg7879
6. PNAS. The PNAS journals outline their policies for ChatGPT and generative AI. February 21, 2023. Accessed March 9, 2023. https://www.pnas.org/post/update/pnas-policy-for-chatgpt-generative-ai
7. Marušic’ A. JoGH policy on the use of artificial intelligence in scholarly manuscripts. J Glob Health. 2023;13:01002. doi:10.7189/jogh.13.01002
