Article Type
Changed
Sun, 10/31/2021 - 21:46

Key clinical point: A dose of 300 mg secukinumab was more effective than 150 mg secukinumab, along with a similar safety profile in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), particularly those who had an inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (anti-TNF-IR).

Major finding: At week 24, 20% or higher improvement in American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) response (odds ratio [OR] 1.41; P = .01) and resolution of dactylitis (OR 1.42; P = .02) was higher with 300 mg vs. 150 mg secukinumab. The proportion of ACR20 responders was higher with 300 mg vs. 150 mg secukinumab in anti-TNF-IR patients at weeks 24 (OR 1.75; P = .01) and 52 (OR 1.66; P = .01). The risk for adverse events was similar with both doses.

Study details: Findings are from a meta-analysis of 6 studies including 3 randomized controlled trials and 1,141 patients with PsA that compared 300 mg secukinumab (n = 461) vs. 150 mg secukinumab (n = 680).

Disclosures: This study did not report any source of funding. The authors declared no conflict of interests.

Source: Zhang KL et al. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2021 (Sep 20);76:e2820. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2021/e2820.

Publications
Topics

Key clinical point: A dose of 300 mg secukinumab was more effective than 150 mg secukinumab, along with a similar safety profile in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), particularly those who had an inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (anti-TNF-IR).

Major finding: At week 24, 20% or higher improvement in American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) response (odds ratio [OR] 1.41; P = .01) and resolution of dactylitis (OR 1.42; P = .02) was higher with 300 mg vs. 150 mg secukinumab. The proportion of ACR20 responders was higher with 300 mg vs. 150 mg secukinumab in anti-TNF-IR patients at weeks 24 (OR 1.75; P = .01) and 52 (OR 1.66; P = .01). The risk for adverse events was similar with both doses.

Study details: Findings are from a meta-analysis of 6 studies including 3 randomized controlled trials and 1,141 patients with PsA that compared 300 mg secukinumab (n = 461) vs. 150 mg secukinumab (n = 680).

Disclosures: This study did not report any source of funding. The authors declared no conflict of interests.

Source: Zhang KL et al. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2021 (Sep 20);76:e2820. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2021/e2820.

Key clinical point: A dose of 300 mg secukinumab was more effective than 150 mg secukinumab, along with a similar safety profile in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), particularly those who had an inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (anti-TNF-IR).

Major finding: At week 24, 20% or higher improvement in American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) response (odds ratio [OR] 1.41; P = .01) and resolution of dactylitis (OR 1.42; P = .02) was higher with 300 mg vs. 150 mg secukinumab. The proportion of ACR20 responders was higher with 300 mg vs. 150 mg secukinumab in anti-TNF-IR patients at weeks 24 (OR 1.75; P = .01) and 52 (OR 1.66; P = .01). The risk for adverse events was similar with both doses.

Study details: Findings are from a meta-analysis of 6 studies including 3 randomized controlled trials and 1,141 patients with PsA that compared 300 mg secukinumab (n = 461) vs. 150 mg secukinumab (n = 680).

Disclosures: This study did not report any source of funding. The authors declared no conflict of interests.

Source: Zhang KL et al. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2021 (Sep 20);76:e2820. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2021/e2820.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: PsA November 2021
Gate On Date
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:15
Un-Gate On Date
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Sun, 10/24/2021 - 18:15
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article