Article Type
Changed
Fri, 05/07/2021 - 14:01

Key clinical point: Long-term survival in children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who receive low-dose chemotherapy (LDC) for remission induction is comparable to that of children who receive standard-dose chemotherapy (SDC).

Major finding:  No significant differences were observed between the LDC and SDC groups in 5-year event-free survival (61.4% ± 8.7% vs 65.2% ± 7.4%, respectively; P = .462), overall survival (72.7% ± 6.9% vs 72.5% ± 6.2%, respectively; P = .933), and the incidence of relapse (20.5% ± 4.5% vs 17.6% ± 3.9%, respectively; P = .484).

Study details: Long-term follow-up of 83 patients with AML treated with a LDC regimen (and 100 children with AML treated with a standard-dose chemotherapy (SDC) regimen.

Disclosures: This work was supported by NSCF, the Key Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the Jiangsu Province Foundation, the National Clinical Research Center for Hematological Disorders, and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Hu Y et al. Blood Adv. 2021 Apr 13. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003453.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Long-term survival in children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who receive low-dose chemotherapy (LDC) for remission induction is comparable to that of children who receive standard-dose chemotherapy (SDC).

Major finding:  No significant differences were observed between the LDC and SDC groups in 5-year event-free survival (61.4% ± 8.7% vs 65.2% ± 7.4%, respectively; P = .462), overall survival (72.7% ± 6.9% vs 72.5% ± 6.2%, respectively; P = .933), and the incidence of relapse (20.5% ± 4.5% vs 17.6% ± 3.9%, respectively; P = .484).

Study details: Long-term follow-up of 83 patients with AML treated with a LDC regimen (and 100 children with AML treated with a standard-dose chemotherapy (SDC) regimen.

Disclosures: This work was supported by NSCF, the Key Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the Jiangsu Province Foundation, the National Clinical Research Center for Hematological Disorders, and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Hu Y et al. Blood Adv. 2021 Apr 13. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003453.

Key clinical point: Long-term survival in children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who receive low-dose chemotherapy (LDC) for remission induction is comparable to that of children who receive standard-dose chemotherapy (SDC).

Major finding:  No significant differences were observed between the LDC and SDC groups in 5-year event-free survival (61.4% ± 8.7% vs 65.2% ± 7.4%, respectively; P = .462), overall survival (72.7% ± 6.9% vs 72.5% ± 6.2%, respectively; P = .933), and the incidence of relapse (20.5% ± 4.5% vs 17.6% ± 3.9%, respectively; P = .484).

Study details: Long-term follow-up of 83 patients with AML treated with a LDC regimen (and 100 children with AML treated with a standard-dose chemotherapy (SDC) regimen.

Disclosures: This work was supported by NSCF, the Key Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the Jiangsu Province Foundation, the National Clinical Research Center for Hematological Disorders, and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Hu Y et al. Blood Adv. 2021 Apr 13. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003453.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: AML May 2021
Gate On Date
Fri, 05/07/2021 - 14:00
Un-Gate On Date
Fri, 05/07/2021 - 14:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Fri, 05/07/2021 - 14:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article