Article Type
Article
Changed
Mon, 10/01/2018 - 14:16
Display Headline
Results of the GLAGOV trial
Author(s)
Steven E. Nissen, MD
Stephen J. Nicholls, MBBS, PhD

Intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS) has been used for the past 20 years to measure atheromatous plaque in patients with coronary artery disease. The total volume of atherosclerosis in a coronary artery segment can be calculated using IVUS. A rotating transducer produces an image of a single, cross-sectional slice of the artery from which the atheroma area is calculated. A motorized device is used to withdraw the catheter, obtaining a series of cross-sectional slices at 1-mm intervals. The atheroma area for each slice is summated to obtain the total volume of atherosclerosis in the artery.

IVUS has demonstrated that statins slow the progression or even induce regression of coronary atherosclerosis in proportion to the degree of reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C).1–4 No LDL-C-lowering therapy other than statins has shown regression of atherosclerosis in a trial using IVUS. The lowest LDL-C achieved in prior trials using statins was about 60 mg/dL.1,3 While this is very low, lower levels have not previously been explored.

Proprotein convertase subtilisin–kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, a new class of drugs, are injectable, fully human monoclonal antibodies that inactivate the PCSK9 protein. PCSK9 inhibitors have been shown to lower LDL-C incrementally when added to statins, achieving very low LDL-C levels.5,6 However, no data exist describing the effect of low LDL-C levels reached using PCSK9 inhibitors on the progression of atherosclerosis.

THE GLAGOV TRIAL

GLAGOV trial design.
Based on information from reference 7.
Figure 1. GLAGOV trial design.
The Global Assessment of Plaque Regression With a PCSK9 Antibody as Measured by Intravascular Ultrasound (GLAGOV) trial assessed the effect of PCSK9 inhibitor therapy on coronary atheroma.7 The primary end point was the change in percent atheroma volume (PAV) after treatment, and secondary end points were the change in total atheroma volume and percent of patients with atheroma regression. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study included 968 patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease and other high-risk features from 197 centers around the world. Patients had a coronary angiogram with a vessel that contained an intermediate stenosis and received statin therapy for at least 4 weeks and had LDL-C levels greater than 80 mg/dL or 60 to 80 mg/dL with additional high-risk features. Following IVUS, patients were randomized for 18 months of treatment with either a statin alone or a statin plus a monthly injection of the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab. At the end of treatment, IVUS was performed in the same artery that we imaged at the beginning of the study (Figure 1).

Baseline patient demographics and statin use
Table 1 shows the patients’ baseline demographic features and statin use. The average age of patients was 60 and almost all were on statin therapy, with most taking high levels of high-intensity statins. Baseline LDL-C was very good at 92 mg/dL to 93 mg/dL, a level that would be considered good control by contemporary standards.

RESULTS

LDL-C levels

Change in LDL-C for statin monotherapy and statin + evolocumab treatment arms
Figure 2. Change in LDL-C for statin monotherapy and statin evolocumab treatment arms. LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
After 18 months of treatment, patients receiving statin monotherapy had a mean LDL-C of 93 mg/dL, which was essentially unchanged from the start of the study. Patients receiving statin therapy with the addition of the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab had a mean LDL-C of 36.6 mg/dL and a trough level of 29 mg/dL 2 weeks after dosing (Figure 2). To our knowledge, these are the lowest LDL-C levels that have ever been achieved in a major trial at the time.

 

 

Change in percent atheroma volume

Change in percent atheroma volume from baseline.
Based on information from reference 7.
Figure 3. Change in percent atheroma volume from baseline.
With respect to the primary end point of change in PAV, patients on statin monotherapy had neither progression nor regression, and the percent change from baseline was not statistically significant (Figure 3). However, patients receiving the addition of the PCSK9 inhibitor had a statistically significant change in PAV of –0.95% (P < .001); they had less plaque at the end of the 18-month trial than at the start.

Relationship between achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and change in atheroma volume.
Figure 4. Relationship between achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and change in atheroma volume.
Polynomial regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between the achieved LDL-C levels and the rate of atheroma progression. Starting at an LDL-C of 110 mg/dL to 20 mg/dL, there was a linear relationship between lower LDL-C and less atheroma progression (Figure 4). This striking relationship was a uniform benefit across the full population and held for virtually every subgroup including by age, sex, baseline non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, diabetes presence or absence, and intensity of statin therapy.

Total atheroma volume and percent of patients with atheroma regression

The secondary end point measuring the total atheroma volume in the coronaries showed no change in total volume of atherosclerotic plaque in the statin monotherapy group and a decrease in the statin plus evolocumab group.

Percent of patients with regression or progression of percent atheroma volume.
Based on information from reference 7.
Figure 5. Percent of patients with regression or progression of percent atheroma volume.
An additional secondary end point was the percent of patients with atheroma regression, defined as any decrease in total atheroma volume or PAV. The percent of patients with total atheroma volume regression was greater in the statin plus evolocumab group (61.5%) than in the monotherapy group (48.9%; P < .001). PAV regression was also greater in patients in the statin plus evolocumab group (64%) compared with patients in the statin monotherapy group (47%; P < .001) (Figure 5). It is important to note that atheroma regression cannot occur in all patients, as other factors drive atherosclerotic disease, but the high percentage of patients with manifest coronary disease experiencing regression in this study is encouraging.

Patients with LDL-C < 70 mg/dL

A subgroup of patients had a baseline LDL-C below 70 mg/dL, the lowest level recommended by guideline. Patients in this subgroup who received statin monotherapy remained at a mean LDL-C of 70 mg/dL whereas patients on statin plus evolocumab achieved a mean LDL-C of 24 mg/dL with a mean 2-week post-dosing trough level of 15 mg/dL, an unbelievably low level of LDL-C. In this subgroup, 81% of patients receiving statin plus evolocumab had atheroma regression, compared with 48% of patients in the statin monotherapy group. The percent of patients with atheroma regression in this subgroup of patients with low LDL-C at baseline was twice that seen in the larger study population (33% vs 17%), revealing profound levels of regression in patients treated with dual therapy.

 

 

Safety

Percent of patients with adverse events and safety findings
Many people have expressed concerns about adverse effects of very low cholesterol levels. While this study was too small to evaluate morbidity and mortality, the rates of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, and coronary vascularization trended in a favorable direction (Table 2). Essentially, no safety findings of any significance were reported in patients treated to these extremely low LDL-C levels.

Limitations

Like all trials, this one has limitations. The population is very select: these are patients with clinically indicated angiogram, not a primary prevention population. Some study participants dropped out, which is always a limitation. And of course, this is a surrogate measure; it is a measure of disease activity, not a measure of morbidity and mortality. Morbidity and mortality data for this new class of drugs should be available in about a year, though this study suggests that those data will be favorable.

CONCLUSION

High LDL-C is universally accepted as a factor in the formation of arterial plaque and atherosclerosis. Statin therapy reduces LDL-C levels to slow or induce regression of coronary atherosclerosis in proportion to the magnitude of LDL-C reduction as measured by IVUS. However, the question of how far to reduce lipid levels has evolved over the last 4 decades. In the 1970s, a normal total cholesterol was < 300 mg/dL. More recent data that suggest optimal LDL-C levels for patients with coronary artery disease may be much lower than commonly achieved.

In this study, in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease, treatment with statins and the addition of the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab achieved mean LDL-C levels of 36.6 mg/dL, produced atheroma regression with a mean change in PAV of about 1% (P < .001), induced regression in a greater percentage of patients, and showed incremental benefit for treatment of LDL-C down to as low as 20 mg/dL. The GLAGOV trial provides intriguing evidence that clinical benefits may extend to LDL-C levels as low as 20 mg/dL; however, the sample size of the trial was modest, providing limited power for safety assessments.

Since this presentation, the Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research with PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects with Elevated Risk (FOURIER) trial achieved a median LDL-C of 30 mg/dL and reduced risk of cardiovascular events in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease treated with evolocumab added to statin therapy.8 Additional large outcomes trials of PCSK9 inhibitors and their role in reducing LDL-C and regression of coronary atheroma and atherosclerosis are eagerly awaited.

References
  1. Nicholls SJ, Ballantyne CM, Barter PJ, et al. Effect of two intensive statin regimens on progression of coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2011; 365:2078–2087.
  2. Nicholls SJ, Tuzcu EM, Sipahi I, et al. Statins, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and regression of coronary atherosclerosis. JAMA 2007; 297: 499–508.
  3. Nissen SE, Nicholls SJ, Sipahi I, et al; ASTEROID Investigators. Effect of very high-intensity statin therapy on regression of coronary atherosclerosis: the ASTEROID trial. JAMA 2006; 295:1556–1565.
  4. Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM, Schoenhagen P, et al; REVERSAL Investigators. Effect of intensive compared with moderate lipid-lowering therapy on progression of coronary atherosclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004; 291:1071–1080.
  5. Robinson JG, Nedergaard BS, RogersWJ, et al; LAPLACE-2 Investigators. Effect of evolocumab or ezetimibe added to moderate- or high-intensity statin therapy on LDL-C lowering in patients with hypercholesterolemia: the LAPLACE-2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014; 311:1870–1882.
  6. Blom DJ, Hala T, Bolognese M, et al; DESCARTES Investigators. A 52-week placebo-controlled trial of evolocumab in hyperlipidemia. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:1809–1819.
  7. Nicholls SJ, Puri R, Anderson T, et al. Effect of evolocumab on progression of coronary disease in statin-treated patients: The GLAGOV randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2016; 316:2373–2384.
  8. Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC, et al; FOURIER Steering Committee and Investigators. Evolocumab and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 2017; 376:1713–1722.
Article PDF
nissen_glagov.pdf
Author and Disclosure Information

Steven E. Nissen, MD
Chairman, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart & Vascular Institute; Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research (C5Research), Cleveland Clinic

Stephen J. Nicholls, MBBS, PhD
Professor of Cardiology, Theme Leader, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; Consultant, Cardiovascular Trials, Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research (C5Research), Cleveland, OH

Correspondence: Steven E. Nissen, MD, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart & Vascular Institute, J2-3, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195; [email protected]

This article is based on Drs. Nissen’s and Nicholls’s presentation at the Sones/Favaloro Scientific Program, “Transforming the Delivery of Cardiovascular Care: Research and Innovation in the Heart & Vascular Institute,” held in Cleveland, OH, November 18, 2016. It was also presented at the American Association for Thoracic Surgery. The article was drafted by Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine and was then reviewed, revised, and approved by Drs. Nissen and Nicholls.

Dr. Nissen reported research/grant support for the Cleveland Clinic Center for Clinical Research to perform clinical trials from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Cerenis Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, Esperion, Pfizer, The Medicines Company, Takeda, and Orexigen Therapeutics. Dr. Nissen is involved with these multicentered clinical trials, but receives no personal remumeration for his participation. Dr. Nissen consults for many pharmaceutical companies but requires them to donate any honoraria or consulting fees directly to charity so that he receives neither income nor a tax deduction. Dr. Nicholls reported research grant support and consulting fees from Amgen, Sanofi, and Regeneron.

Publications
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
Page Number
e1-e5
Legacy Keywords
GLAGOV trial, PCSK9 inhibitors, proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9, evolocumab, Repatha, statins, plaque volume, atheroma, coronary artery disease, intravascular ultrasonography, IVUS, clinical trials, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C, Steven Nissen, Stephen Nicholls
Author(s)
Steven E. Nissen, MD
Stephen J. Nicholls, MBBS, PhD
Author(s)
Steven E. Nissen, MD
Stephen J. Nicholls, MBBS, PhD
Author and Disclosure Information

Steven E. Nissen, MD
Chairman, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart & Vascular Institute; Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research (C5Research), Cleveland Clinic

Stephen J. Nicholls, MBBS, PhD
Professor of Cardiology, Theme Leader, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; Consultant, Cardiovascular Trials, Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research (C5Research), Cleveland, OH

Correspondence: Steven E. Nissen, MD, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart & Vascular Institute, J2-3, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195; [email protected]

This article is based on Drs. Nissen’s and Nicholls’s presentation at the Sones/Favaloro Scientific Program, “Transforming the Delivery of Cardiovascular Care: Research and Innovation in the Heart & Vascular Institute,” held in Cleveland, OH, November 18, 2016. It was also presented at the American Association for Thoracic Surgery. The article was drafted by Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine and was then reviewed, revised, and approved by Drs. Nissen and Nicholls.

Dr. Nissen reported research/grant support for the Cleveland Clinic Center for Clinical Research to perform clinical trials from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Cerenis Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, Esperion, Pfizer, The Medicines Company, Takeda, and Orexigen Therapeutics. Dr. Nissen is involved with these multicentered clinical trials, but receives no personal remumeration for his participation. Dr. Nissen consults for many pharmaceutical companies but requires them to donate any honoraria or consulting fees directly to charity so that he receives neither income nor a tax deduction. Dr. Nicholls reported research grant support and consulting fees from Amgen, Sanofi, and Regeneron.

Author and Disclosure Information

Steven E. Nissen, MD
Chairman, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart & Vascular Institute; Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research (C5Research), Cleveland Clinic

Stephen J. Nicholls, MBBS, PhD
Professor of Cardiology, Theme Leader, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; Consultant, Cardiovascular Trials, Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research (C5Research), Cleveland, OH

Correspondence: Steven E. Nissen, MD, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart & Vascular Institute, J2-3, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195; [email protected]

This article is based on Drs. Nissen’s and Nicholls’s presentation at the Sones/Favaloro Scientific Program, “Transforming the Delivery of Cardiovascular Care: Research and Innovation in the Heart & Vascular Institute,” held in Cleveland, OH, November 18, 2016. It was also presented at the American Association for Thoracic Surgery. The article was drafted by Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine and was then reviewed, revised, and approved by Drs. Nissen and Nicholls.

Dr. Nissen reported research/grant support for the Cleveland Clinic Center for Clinical Research to perform clinical trials from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Cerenis Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, Esperion, Pfizer, The Medicines Company, Takeda, and Orexigen Therapeutics. Dr. Nissen is involved with these multicentered clinical trials, but receives no personal remumeration for his participation. Dr. Nissen consults for many pharmaceutical companies but requires them to donate any honoraria or consulting fees directly to charity so that he receives neither income nor a tax deduction. Dr. Nicholls reported research grant support and consulting fees from Amgen, Sanofi, and Regeneron.

Article PDF
nissen_glagov.pdf
Article PDF
nissen_glagov.pdf
Related Articles
Trends in cardiovascular risk profiles
Expanding indications for TAVR: The preferred procedure in intermediate-risk patients?
CABG: A continuing evolution
A new generation of drug-eluting stents: Indications and outcomes of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds
Improving the safety and efficacy of robotically assisted mitral valve surgery
Aortic replacement in cardiac surgery

Intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS) has been used for the past 20 years to measure atheromatous plaque in patients with coronary artery disease. The total volume of atherosclerosis in a coronary artery segment can be calculated using IVUS. A rotating transducer produces an image of a single, cross-sectional slice of the artery from which the atheroma area is calculated. A motorized device is used to withdraw the catheter, obtaining a series of cross-sectional slices at 1-mm intervals. The atheroma area for each slice is summated to obtain the total volume of atherosclerosis in the artery.

IVUS has demonstrated that statins slow the progression or even induce regression of coronary atherosclerosis in proportion to the degree of reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C).1–4 No LDL-C-lowering therapy other than statins has shown regression of atherosclerosis in a trial using IVUS. The lowest LDL-C achieved in prior trials using statins was about 60 mg/dL.1,3 While this is very low, lower levels have not previously been explored.

Proprotein convertase subtilisin–kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, a new class of drugs, are injectable, fully human monoclonal antibodies that inactivate the PCSK9 protein. PCSK9 inhibitors have been shown to lower LDL-C incrementally when added to statins, achieving very low LDL-C levels.5,6 However, no data exist describing the effect of low LDL-C levels reached using PCSK9 inhibitors on the progression of atherosclerosis.

THE GLAGOV TRIAL

GLAGOV trial design.
Based on information from reference 7.
Figure 1. GLAGOV trial design.
The Global Assessment of Plaque Regression With a PCSK9 Antibody as Measured by Intravascular Ultrasound (GLAGOV) trial assessed the effect of PCSK9 inhibitor therapy on coronary atheroma.7 The primary end point was the change in percent atheroma volume (PAV) after treatment, and secondary end points were the change in total atheroma volume and percent of patients with atheroma regression. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study included 968 patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease and other high-risk features from 197 centers around the world. Patients had a coronary angiogram with a vessel that contained an intermediate stenosis and received statin therapy for at least 4 weeks and had LDL-C levels greater than 80 mg/dL or 60 to 80 mg/dL with additional high-risk features. Following IVUS, patients were randomized for 18 months of treatment with either a statin alone or a statin plus a monthly injection of the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab. At the end of treatment, IVUS was performed in the same artery that we imaged at the beginning of the study (Figure 1).

Baseline patient demographics and statin use
Table 1 shows the patients’ baseline demographic features and statin use. The average age of patients was 60 and almost all were on statin therapy, with most taking high levels of high-intensity statins. Baseline LDL-C was very good at 92 mg/dL to 93 mg/dL, a level that would be considered good control by contemporary standards.

RESULTS

LDL-C levels

Change in LDL-C for statin monotherapy and statin + evolocumab treatment arms
Figure 2. Change in LDL-C for statin monotherapy and statin evolocumab treatment arms. LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
After 18 months of treatment, patients receiving statin monotherapy had a mean LDL-C of 93 mg/dL, which was essentially unchanged from the start of the study. Patients receiving statin therapy with the addition of the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab had a mean LDL-C of 36.6 mg/dL and a trough level of 29 mg/dL 2 weeks after dosing (Figure 2). To our knowledge, these are the lowest LDL-C levels that have ever been achieved in a major trial at the time.

 

 

Change in percent atheroma volume

Change in percent atheroma volume from baseline.
Based on information from reference 7.
Figure 3. Change in percent atheroma volume from baseline.
With respect to the primary end point of change in PAV, patients on statin monotherapy had neither progression nor regression, and the percent change from baseline was not statistically significant (Figure 3). However, patients receiving the addition of the PCSK9 inhibitor had a statistically significant change in PAV of –0.95% (P < .001); they had less plaque at the end of the 18-month trial than at the start.

Relationship between achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and change in atheroma volume.
Figure 4. Relationship between achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and change in atheroma volume.
Polynomial regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between the achieved LDL-C levels and the rate of atheroma progression. Starting at an LDL-C of 110 mg/dL to 20 mg/dL, there was a linear relationship between lower LDL-C and less atheroma progression (Figure 4). This striking relationship was a uniform benefit across the full population and held for virtually every subgroup including by age, sex, baseline non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, diabetes presence or absence, and intensity of statin therapy.

Total atheroma volume and percent of patients with atheroma regression

The secondary end point measuring the total atheroma volume in the coronaries showed no change in total volume of atherosclerotic plaque in the statin monotherapy group and a decrease in the statin plus evolocumab group.

Percent of patients with regression or progression of percent atheroma volume.
Based on information from reference 7.
Figure 5. Percent of patients with regression or progression of percent atheroma volume.
An additional secondary end point was the percent of patients with atheroma regression, defined as any decrease in total atheroma volume or PAV. The percent of patients with total atheroma volume regression was greater in the statin plus evolocumab group (61.5%) than in the monotherapy group (48.9%; P < .001). PAV regression was also greater in patients in the statin plus evolocumab group (64%) compared with patients in the statin monotherapy group (47%; P < .001) (Figure 5). It is important to note that atheroma regression cannot occur in all patients, as other factors drive atherosclerotic disease, but the high percentage of patients with manifest coronary disease experiencing regression in this study is encouraging.

Patients with LDL-C < 70 mg/dL

A subgroup of patients had a baseline LDL-C below 70 mg/dL, the lowest level recommended by guideline. Patients in this subgroup who received statin monotherapy remained at a mean LDL-C of 70 mg/dL whereas patients on statin plus evolocumab achieved a mean LDL-C of 24 mg/dL with a mean 2-week post-dosing trough level of 15 mg/dL, an unbelievably low level of LDL-C. In this subgroup, 81% of patients receiving statin plus evolocumab had atheroma regression, compared with 48% of patients in the statin monotherapy group. The percent of patients with atheroma regression in this subgroup of patients with low LDL-C at baseline was twice that seen in the larger study population (33% vs 17%), revealing profound levels of regression in patients treated with dual therapy.

 

 

Safety

Percent of patients with adverse events and safety findings
Many people have expressed concerns about adverse effects of very low cholesterol levels. While this study was too small to evaluate morbidity and mortality, the rates of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, and coronary vascularization trended in a favorable direction (Table 2). Essentially, no safety findings of any significance were reported in patients treated to these extremely low LDL-C levels.

Limitations

Like all trials, this one has limitations. The population is very select: these are patients with clinically indicated angiogram, not a primary prevention population. Some study participants dropped out, which is always a limitation. And of course, this is a surrogate measure; it is a measure of disease activity, not a measure of morbidity and mortality. Morbidity and mortality data for this new class of drugs should be available in about a year, though this study suggests that those data will be favorable.

CONCLUSION

High LDL-C is universally accepted as a factor in the formation of arterial plaque and atherosclerosis. Statin therapy reduces LDL-C levels to slow or induce regression of coronary atherosclerosis in proportion to the magnitude of LDL-C reduction as measured by IVUS. However, the question of how far to reduce lipid levels has evolved over the last 4 decades. In the 1970s, a normal total cholesterol was < 300 mg/dL. More recent data that suggest optimal LDL-C levels for patients with coronary artery disease may be much lower than commonly achieved.

In this study, in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease, treatment with statins and the addition of the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab achieved mean LDL-C levels of 36.6 mg/dL, produced atheroma regression with a mean change in PAV of about 1% (P < .001), induced regression in a greater percentage of patients, and showed incremental benefit for treatment of LDL-C down to as low as 20 mg/dL. The GLAGOV trial provides intriguing evidence that clinical benefits may extend to LDL-C levels as low as 20 mg/dL; however, the sample size of the trial was modest, providing limited power for safety assessments.

Since this presentation, the Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research with PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects with Elevated Risk (FOURIER) trial achieved a median LDL-C of 30 mg/dL and reduced risk of cardiovascular events in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease treated with evolocumab added to statin therapy.8 Additional large outcomes trials of PCSK9 inhibitors and their role in reducing LDL-C and regression of coronary atheroma and atherosclerosis are eagerly awaited.

Intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS) has been used for the past 20 years to measure atheromatous plaque in patients with coronary artery disease. The total volume of atherosclerosis in a coronary artery segment can be calculated using IVUS. A rotating transducer produces an image of a single, cross-sectional slice of the artery from which the atheroma area is calculated. A motorized device is used to withdraw the catheter, obtaining a series of cross-sectional slices at 1-mm intervals. The atheroma area for each slice is summated to obtain the total volume of atherosclerosis in the artery.

IVUS has demonstrated that statins slow the progression or even induce regression of coronary atherosclerosis in proportion to the degree of reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C).1–4 No LDL-C-lowering therapy other than statins has shown regression of atherosclerosis in a trial using IVUS. The lowest LDL-C achieved in prior trials using statins was about 60 mg/dL.1,3 While this is very low, lower levels have not previously been explored.

Proprotein convertase subtilisin–kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, a new class of drugs, are injectable, fully human monoclonal antibodies that inactivate the PCSK9 protein. PCSK9 inhibitors have been shown to lower LDL-C incrementally when added to statins, achieving very low LDL-C levels.5,6 However, no data exist describing the effect of low LDL-C levels reached using PCSK9 inhibitors on the progression of atherosclerosis.

THE GLAGOV TRIAL

GLAGOV trial design.
Based on information from reference 7.
Figure 1. GLAGOV trial design.
The Global Assessment of Plaque Regression With a PCSK9 Antibody as Measured by Intravascular Ultrasound (GLAGOV) trial assessed the effect of PCSK9 inhibitor therapy on coronary atheroma.7 The primary end point was the change in percent atheroma volume (PAV) after treatment, and secondary end points were the change in total atheroma volume and percent of patients with atheroma regression. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study included 968 patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease and other high-risk features from 197 centers around the world. Patients had a coronary angiogram with a vessel that contained an intermediate stenosis and received statin therapy for at least 4 weeks and had LDL-C levels greater than 80 mg/dL or 60 to 80 mg/dL with additional high-risk features. Following IVUS, patients were randomized for 18 months of treatment with either a statin alone or a statin plus a monthly injection of the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab. At the end of treatment, IVUS was performed in the same artery that we imaged at the beginning of the study (Figure 1).

Baseline patient demographics and statin use
Table 1 shows the patients’ baseline demographic features and statin use. The average age of patients was 60 and almost all were on statin therapy, with most taking high levels of high-intensity statins. Baseline LDL-C was very good at 92 mg/dL to 93 mg/dL, a level that would be considered good control by contemporary standards.

RESULTS

LDL-C levels

Change in LDL-C for statin monotherapy and statin + evolocumab treatment arms
Figure 2. Change in LDL-C for statin monotherapy and statin evolocumab treatment arms. LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
After 18 months of treatment, patients receiving statin monotherapy had a mean LDL-C of 93 mg/dL, which was essentially unchanged from the start of the study. Patients receiving statin therapy with the addition of the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab had a mean LDL-C of 36.6 mg/dL and a trough level of 29 mg/dL 2 weeks after dosing (Figure 2). To our knowledge, these are the lowest LDL-C levels that have ever been achieved in a major trial at the time.

 

 

Change in percent atheroma volume

Change in percent atheroma volume from baseline.
Based on information from reference 7.
Figure 3. Change in percent atheroma volume from baseline.
With respect to the primary end point of change in PAV, patients on statin monotherapy had neither progression nor regression, and the percent change from baseline was not statistically significant (Figure 3). However, patients receiving the addition of the PCSK9 inhibitor had a statistically significant change in PAV of –0.95% (P < .001); they had less plaque at the end of the 18-month trial than at the start.

Relationship between achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and change in atheroma volume.
Figure 4. Relationship between achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and change in atheroma volume.
Polynomial regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between the achieved LDL-C levels and the rate of atheroma progression. Starting at an LDL-C of 110 mg/dL to 20 mg/dL, there was a linear relationship between lower LDL-C and less atheroma progression (Figure 4). This striking relationship was a uniform benefit across the full population and held for virtually every subgroup including by age, sex, baseline non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, diabetes presence or absence, and intensity of statin therapy.

Total atheroma volume and percent of patients with atheroma regression

The secondary end point measuring the total atheroma volume in the coronaries showed no change in total volume of atherosclerotic plaque in the statin monotherapy group and a decrease in the statin plus evolocumab group.

Percent of patients with regression or progression of percent atheroma volume.
Based on information from reference 7.
Figure 5. Percent of patients with regression or progression of percent atheroma volume.
An additional secondary end point was the percent of patients with atheroma regression, defined as any decrease in total atheroma volume or PAV. The percent of patients with total atheroma volume regression was greater in the statin plus evolocumab group (61.5%) than in the monotherapy group (48.9%; P < .001). PAV regression was also greater in patients in the statin plus evolocumab group (64%) compared with patients in the statin monotherapy group (47%; P < .001) (Figure 5). It is important to note that atheroma regression cannot occur in all patients, as other factors drive atherosclerotic disease, but the high percentage of patients with manifest coronary disease experiencing regression in this study is encouraging.

Patients with LDL-C < 70 mg/dL

A subgroup of patients had a baseline LDL-C below 70 mg/dL, the lowest level recommended by guideline. Patients in this subgroup who received statin monotherapy remained at a mean LDL-C of 70 mg/dL whereas patients on statin plus evolocumab achieved a mean LDL-C of 24 mg/dL with a mean 2-week post-dosing trough level of 15 mg/dL, an unbelievably low level of LDL-C. In this subgroup, 81% of patients receiving statin plus evolocumab had atheroma regression, compared with 48% of patients in the statin monotherapy group. The percent of patients with atheroma regression in this subgroup of patients with low LDL-C at baseline was twice that seen in the larger study population (33% vs 17%), revealing profound levels of regression in patients treated with dual therapy.

 

 

Safety

Percent of patients with adverse events and safety findings
Many people have expressed concerns about adverse effects of very low cholesterol levels. While this study was too small to evaluate morbidity and mortality, the rates of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, and coronary vascularization trended in a favorable direction (Table 2). Essentially, no safety findings of any significance were reported in patients treated to these extremely low LDL-C levels.

Limitations

Like all trials, this one has limitations. The population is very select: these are patients with clinically indicated angiogram, not a primary prevention population. Some study participants dropped out, which is always a limitation. And of course, this is a surrogate measure; it is a measure of disease activity, not a measure of morbidity and mortality. Morbidity and mortality data for this new class of drugs should be available in about a year, though this study suggests that those data will be favorable.

CONCLUSION

High LDL-C is universally accepted as a factor in the formation of arterial plaque and atherosclerosis. Statin therapy reduces LDL-C levels to slow or induce regression of coronary atherosclerosis in proportion to the magnitude of LDL-C reduction as measured by IVUS. However, the question of how far to reduce lipid levels has evolved over the last 4 decades. In the 1970s, a normal total cholesterol was < 300 mg/dL. More recent data that suggest optimal LDL-C levels for patients with coronary artery disease may be much lower than commonly achieved.

In this study, in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease, treatment with statins and the addition of the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab achieved mean LDL-C levels of 36.6 mg/dL, produced atheroma regression with a mean change in PAV of about 1% (P < .001), induced regression in a greater percentage of patients, and showed incremental benefit for treatment of LDL-C down to as low as 20 mg/dL. The GLAGOV trial provides intriguing evidence that clinical benefits may extend to LDL-C levels as low as 20 mg/dL; however, the sample size of the trial was modest, providing limited power for safety assessments.

Since this presentation, the Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research with PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects with Elevated Risk (FOURIER) trial achieved a median LDL-C of 30 mg/dL and reduced risk of cardiovascular events in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease treated with evolocumab added to statin therapy.8 Additional large outcomes trials of PCSK9 inhibitors and their role in reducing LDL-C and regression of coronary atheroma and atherosclerosis are eagerly awaited.

References
  1. Nicholls SJ, Ballantyne CM, Barter PJ, et al. Effect of two intensive statin regimens on progression of coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2011; 365:2078–2087.
  2. Nicholls SJ, Tuzcu EM, Sipahi I, et al. Statins, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and regression of coronary atherosclerosis. JAMA 2007; 297: 499–508.
  3. Nissen SE, Nicholls SJ, Sipahi I, et al; ASTEROID Investigators. Effect of very high-intensity statin therapy on regression of coronary atherosclerosis: the ASTEROID trial. JAMA 2006; 295:1556–1565.
  4. Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM, Schoenhagen P, et al; REVERSAL Investigators. Effect of intensive compared with moderate lipid-lowering therapy on progression of coronary atherosclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004; 291:1071–1080.
  5. Robinson JG, Nedergaard BS, RogersWJ, et al; LAPLACE-2 Investigators. Effect of evolocumab or ezetimibe added to moderate- or high-intensity statin therapy on LDL-C lowering in patients with hypercholesterolemia: the LAPLACE-2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014; 311:1870–1882.
  6. Blom DJ, Hala T, Bolognese M, et al; DESCARTES Investigators. A 52-week placebo-controlled trial of evolocumab in hyperlipidemia. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:1809–1819.
  7. Nicholls SJ, Puri R, Anderson T, et al. Effect of evolocumab on progression of coronary disease in statin-treated patients: The GLAGOV randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2016; 316:2373–2384.
  8. Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC, et al; FOURIER Steering Committee and Investigators. Evolocumab and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 2017; 376:1713–1722.
References
  1. Nicholls SJ, Ballantyne CM, Barter PJ, et al. Effect of two intensive statin regimens on progression of coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2011; 365:2078–2087.
  2. Nicholls SJ, Tuzcu EM, Sipahi I, et al. Statins, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and regression of coronary atherosclerosis. JAMA 2007; 297: 499–508.
  3. Nissen SE, Nicholls SJ, Sipahi I, et al; ASTEROID Investigators. Effect of very high-intensity statin therapy on regression of coronary atherosclerosis: the ASTEROID trial. JAMA 2006; 295:1556–1565.
  4. Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM, Schoenhagen P, et al; REVERSAL Investigators. Effect of intensive compared with moderate lipid-lowering therapy on progression of coronary atherosclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004; 291:1071–1080.
  5. Robinson JG, Nedergaard BS, RogersWJ, et al; LAPLACE-2 Investigators. Effect of evolocumab or ezetimibe added to moderate- or high-intensity statin therapy on LDL-C lowering in patients with hypercholesterolemia: the LAPLACE-2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014; 311:1870–1882.
  6. Blom DJ, Hala T, Bolognese M, et al; DESCARTES Investigators. A 52-week placebo-controlled trial of evolocumab in hyperlipidemia. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:1809–1819.
  7. Nicholls SJ, Puri R, Anderson T, et al. Effect of evolocumab on progression of coronary disease in statin-treated patients: The GLAGOV randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2016; 316:2373–2384.
  8. Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC, et al; FOURIER Steering Committee and Investigators. Evolocumab and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 2017; 376:1713–1722.
Page Number
e1-e5
Page Number
e1-e5
Publications
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
Publications
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
Article Type
Article
Display Headline
Results of the GLAGOV trial
Display Headline
Results of the GLAGOV trial
Legacy Keywords
GLAGOV trial, PCSK9 inhibitors, proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9, evolocumab, Repatha, statins, plaque volume, atheroma, coronary artery disease, intravascular ultrasonography, IVUS, clinical trials, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C, Steven Nissen, Stephen Nicholls
Legacy Keywords
GLAGOV trial, PCSK9 inhibitors, proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9, evolocumab, Repatha, statins, plaque volume, atheroma, coronary artery disease, intravascular ultrasonography, IVUS, clinical trials, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C, Steven Nissen, Stephen Nicholls
Citation Override
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 2017 December; 84(suppl 4):e1-e5
Inside the Article

KEY POINTS

  • Statin therapy achieves regression of atherosclerosis in proportion to reductions in LDL-C.
  • PCSK9 inhibitors are a new class of injectable human monoclonal antibodies shown to lower LDL-C when added to statin therapy.
  • Treatment with statins plus the PCSK9 inhibitor, evolocumab, achieved mean LDL-C levels of 36.6 mg/dL, atheroma regression, and demonstrated clinical benefit for LDL-C as low as 20 mg/dL.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Teaser Media
Article PDF Media