Article Type
Changed
Wed, 09/28/2022 - 10:30

Key clinical point: In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), transarterial radioembolization (TARE) provides significantly longer time to progression (TTP) than transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), but does not significantly prolong overall survival.

Major finding: TARE vs TACE significantly prolonged the mean TTP (17.5 vs 9.8 months; 95% CI 1.3-8.3 months) but resulted in comparable overall survival (absolute difference −0.55 months; 95% CI −1.95 to 3.05 months).

Study details: This was a meta-analysis of 17 studies involving 2465 unique patients that directly compared TACE and TARE for treating HCC.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the US National Institutes of Health. Some authors declared serving as consultants or advisory board members of or receiving grants from various sources.

Source: Brown AM et al. TACE versus TARE for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Overall and individual patient level meta-analysis. Cancer Med. 2022 (Aug 9). Doi: 10.1002/cam4.5125

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), transarterial radioembolization (TARE) provides significantly longer time to progression (TTP) than transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), but does not significantly prolong overall survival.

Major finding: TARE vs TACE significantly prolonged the mean TTP (17.5 vs 9.8 months; 95% CI 1.3-8.3 months) but resulted in comparable overall survival (absolute difference −0.55 months; 95% CI −1.95 to 3.05 months).

Study details: This was a meta-analysis of 17 studies involving 2465 unique patients that directly compared TACE and TARE for treating HCC.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the US National Institutes of Health. Some authors declared serving as consultants or advisory board members of or receiving grants from various sources.

Source: Brown AM et al. TACE versus TARE for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Overall and individual patient level meta-analysis. Cancer Med. 2022 (Aug 9). Doi: 10.1002/cam4.5125

 

Key clinical point: In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), transarterial radioembolization (TARE) provides significantly longer time to progression (TTP) than transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), but does not significantly prolong overall survival.

Major finding: TARE vs TACE significantly prolonged the mean TTP (17.5 vs 9.8 months; 95% CI 1.3-8.3 months) but resulted in comparable overall survival (absolute difference −0.55 months; 95% CI −1.95 to 3.05 months).

Study details: This was a meta-analysis of 17 studies involving 2465 unique patients that directly compared TACE and TARE for treating HCC.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the US National Institutes of Health. Some authors declared serving as consultants or advisory board members of or receiving grants from various sources.

Source: Brown AM et al. TACE versus TARE for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Overall and individual patient level meta-analysis. Cancer Med. 2022 (Aug 9). Doi: 10.1002/cam4.5125

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: HCC October 2022
Gate On Date
Fri, 08/27/2021 - 19:45
Un-Gate On Date
Fri, 08/27/2021 - 19:45
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Fri, 08/27/2021 - 19:45
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Activity Salesforce Deliverable ID
332967.1
Activity ID
83146
Product Name
Clinical Edge Journal Scan
Product ID
124
Supporter Name /ID
Exact Sciences Corporate [ 6025 ]