Article Type
Changed
Thu, 03/28/2019 - 14:50
Display Headline
Top free menstrual cycle tracking apps for your patients
Clue, Glow, and Pink Pad Period Tracker Pro are popular because of their accuracy and special features

App overload is a challenge for both providers and patients. As of September 2015, the number of health apps in the US Apple iTunes and Google Play stores exceeded 165,000, with approximately 7% focused on women's health and pregnancy.1 Clinicians express interest in promoting the use of health apps with their patients and seek guidance about making app recommendations.2 In my prior articles in this "App review" series, I have recommended due date calculator and drug reference apps.

One area in which an app may enhance your patient care is in menstrual cycle tracking. Patients may be more honest with their phones than with their health care professionals, and the results are more accurate than paper questionnaires and calendars.3 Of note, menstrual cycle tracking apps are the fourth most popular health app among adults and likely even more popular if limited to adult women.4

Dr. Paula Castano and her team systematically identified and evaluated free menstrual cycle tracking apps.5 The accuracy of each app was determined by menstrual cycle predictions based on average cycle lengths of at least 3 previous cycles, ovulation predicted at 13 to 15 days prior to the start of the next cycle, and qualification that the application contained no misinformation.5

The top 3 recommended menstrual cycle tracking apps from Dr. Castano and colleagues' study are listed in the TABLE alphabetically and are detailed with a shortened version of the APPLICATIONS scoring system, APPLI (app comprehensiveness, price, platform, literature use, and important special features).6 I hope this column will allow you to feel more comfortable recommending these "vetted" apps to your patients.

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

References
  1. IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics. Patient adoption of mHealth. Parsippany (NJ): IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics; 2015. http://www.imshealth.com/files/web/IMSH%20Institute/Reports/Patient%20Adoption%20of%20mHealth/IIHI_Patient_Adoption_of_mHealth.pdf. Published September 2015. Accessed June 6, 2017.
  2. Terry K. Prescribing mobile apps: What to consider. Med Econ. 2015;92(12):35-38, 40.
  3. Wortham J. We're more honest with our phones than our doctors. NY Times Magazine. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/27/magazine/were-more-honest-with-our-phones-than-with-our-doctors.html?_r=0. Published March 23, 2016. Accessed June 6. 2017.
  4. Fox S, Duggan M. Pew Research Center. Mobile Health 2012. http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media//Files/Reports/2012/PIP_MobileHealth2012_FINAL.pdf. Published November 8, 2012. Accessed June 6, 2017.
  5. Moglia M, Nguyen H, Chyjek K, Chen KT, Castano PM. Evaluation of smartphone menstrual cycle tracking applications using an adapted APPLICATIONS scoring system. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(6):1153-1160.
  6. Chyjek K, Farag S, Chen KT. Rating pregnancy wheel applications using the APPLICATIONS scoring system. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(6):1478-1483.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Chen is Professor of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science and Medical Education, Vice-Chair of Ob-Gyn Education for the Mount Sinai Health System, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

The author reports receiving royalties from UpToDate, Inc.

Issue
OBG Management - 29(7)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
44-45
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Chen is Professor of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science and Medical Education, Vice-Chair of Ob-Gyn Education for the Mount Sinai Health System, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

The author reports receiving royalties from UpToDate, Inc.

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Chen is Professor of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science and Medical Education, Vice-Chair of Ob-Gyn Education for the Mount Sinai Health System, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

The author reports receiving royalties from UpToDate, Inc.

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles
Clue, Glow, and Pink Pad Period Tracker Pro are popular because of their accuracy and special features
Clue, Glow, and Pink Pad Period Tracker Pro are popular because of their accuracy and special features

App overload is a challenge for both providers and patients. As of September 2015, the number of health apps in the US Apple iTunes and Google Play stores exceeded 165,000, with approximately 7% focused on women's health and pregnancy.1 Clinicians express interest in promoting the use of health apps with their patients and seek guidance about making app recommendations.2 In my prior articles in this "App review" series, I have recommended due date calculator and drug reference apps.

One area in which an app may enhance your patient care is in menstrual cycle tracking. Patients may be more honest with their phones than with their health care professionals, and the results are more accurate than paper questionnaires and calendars.3 Of note, menstrual cycle tracking apps are the fourth most popular health app among adults and likely even more popular if limited to adult women.4

Dr. Paula Castano and her team systematically identified and evaluated free menstrual cycle tracking apps.5 The accuracy of each app was determined by menstrual cycle predictions based on average cycle lengths of at least 3 previous cycles, ovulation predicted at 13 to 15 days prior to the start of the next cycle, and qualification that the application contained no misinformation.5

The top 3 recommended menstrual cycle tracking apps from Dr. Castano and colleagues' study are listed in the TABLE alphabetically and are detailed with a shortened version of the APPLICATIONS scoring system, APPLI (app comprehensiveness, price, platform, literature use, and important special features).6 I hope this column will allow you to feel more comfortable recommending these "vetted" apps to your patients.

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

App overload is a challenge for both providers and patients. As of September 2015, the number of health apps in the US Apple iTunes and Google Play stores exceeded 165,000, with approximately 7% focused on women's health and pregnancy.1 Clinicians express interest in promoting the use of health apps with their patients and seek guidance about making app recommendations.2 In my prior articles in this "App review" series, I have recommended due date calculator and drug reference apps.

One area in which an app may enhance your patient care is in menstrual cycle tracking. Patients may be more honest with their phones than with their health care professionals, and the results are more accurate than paper questionnaires and calendars.3 Of note, menstrual cycle tracking apps are the fourth most popular health app among adults and likely even more popular if limited to adult women.4

Dr. Paula Castano and her team systematically identified and evaluated free menstrual cycle tracking apps.5 The accuracy of each app was determined by menstrual cycle predictions based on average cycle lengths of at least 3 previous cycles, ovulation predicted at 13 to 15 days prior to the start of the next cycle, and qualification that the application contained no misinformation.5

The top 3 recommended menstrual cycle tracking apps from Dr. Castano and colleagues' study are listed in the TABLE alphabetically and are detailed with a shortened version of the APPLICATIONS scoring system, APPLI (app comprehensiveness, price, platform, literature use, and important special features).6 I hope this column will allow you to feel more comfortable recommending these "vetted" apps to your patients.

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

References
  1. IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics. Patient adoption of mHealth. Parsippany (NJ): IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics; 2015. http://www.imshealth.com/files/web/IMSH%20Institute/Reports/Patient%20Adoption%20of%20mHealth/IIHI_Patient_Adoption_of_mHealth.pdf. Published September 2015. Accessed June 6, 2017.
  2. Terry K. Prescribing mobile apps: What to consider. Med Econ. 2015;92(12):35-38, 40.
  3. Wortham J. We're more honest with our phones than our doctors. NY Times Magazine. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/27/magazine/were-more-honest-with-our-phones-than-with-our-doctors.html?_r=0. Published March 23, 2016. Accessed June 6. 2017.
  4. Fox S, Duggan M. Pew Research Center. Mobile Health 2012. http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media//Files/Reports/2012/PIP_MobileHealth2012_FINAL.pdf. Published November 8, 2012. Accessed June 6, 2017.
  5. Moglia M, Nguyen H, Chyjek K, Chen KT, Castano PM. Evaluation of smartphone menstrual cycle tracking applications using an adapted APPLICATIONS scoring system. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(6):1153-1160.
  6. Chyjek K, Farag S, Chen KT. Rating pregnancy wheel applications using the APPLICATIONS scoring system. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(6):1478-1483.
References
  1. IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics. Patient adoption of mHealth. Parsippany (NJ): IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics; 2015. http://www.imshealth.com/files/web/IMSH%20Institute/Reports/Patient%20Adoption%20of%20mHealth/IIHI_Patient_Adoption_of_mHealth.pdf. Published September 2015. Accessed June 6, 2017.
  2. Terry K. Prescribing mobile apps: What to consider. Med Econ. 2015;92(12):35-38, 40.
  3. Wortham J. We're more honest with our phones than our doctors. NY Times Magazine. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/27/magazine/were-more-honest-with-our-phones-than-with-our-doctors.html?_r=0. Published March 23, 2016. Accessed June 6. 2017.
  4. Fox S, Duggan M. Pew Research Center. Mobile Health 2012. http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media//Files/Reports/2012/PIP_MobileHealth2012_FINAL.pdf. Published November 8, 2012. Accessed June 6, 2017.
  5. Moglia M, Nguyen H, Chyjek K, Chen KT, Castano PM. Evaluation of smartphone menstrual cycle tracking applications using an adapted APPLICATIONS scoring system. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(6):1153-1160.
  6. Chyjek K, Farag S, Chen KT. Rating pregnancy wheel applications using the APPLICATIONS scoring system. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(6):1478-1483.
Issue
OBG Management - 29(7)
Issue
OBG Management - 29(7)
Page Number
44-45
Page Number
44-45
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Top free menstrual cycle tracking apps for your patients
Display Headline
Top free menstrual cycle tracking apps for your patients
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media