User login
Use the Ottawa Knee Rules. When there is a possibility of fracture, they can guide the use of radiography in adults who present with isolated knee pain. However, information on use of these rules in the pediatric population is limited (strength of recommendation [SOR]: A, based on systematic review of high-quality studies and a validated clinical decision rule). Specific physical examination maneuvers (such as the Lachman and McMurray tests) may be helpful when assessing for meniscal or ligamentous injury (SOR: C, based on studies of intermediate outcomes).
Sonographic examination of a traumatized knee can accurately detect internal knee derangement (SOR: C, based on studies of intermediate outcomes). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee is the noninvasive standard for diagnosing internal knee derangement, and it is useful for both adult and pediatric patients (SOR: C, based on studies of intermediate outcomes).
Ottawa rules for ankles—yes, but they’re good for knees, too
Daniel Spogen, MD
University of Nevada, Reno
The evidence presented here suggests a number of practical and useful approaches for the evaluation of acute knee injury—something that’s especially helpful for family physicians and those who, like me, have worked a lot of sporting events.
The Ottawa rules, which can be used to rule out fracture without an x-ray, are fairly well known for ankle injuries, but are not as well known for knees. A Lachman test, Drawer sign, and McMurray test are useful in diagnosing the presence of internal ligamentous injuries without MRI, and an ultrasound can help to detect knee effusion when it is not clinically obvious.
A good physical examination and an ultrasound can effectively rule out serious knee injury with high specificity. When serious injury is suspected, x-ray and MRI are very useful for fracture and ligamentous injury, respectively.
Evidence summary
These criteria help determine who needs an x-ray
The Ottawa Knee Rules recommend knee x-rays for any patient meeting one of these criteria:1
- ≥55 years of age
- Tenderness over the head of the fibula or isolated to the patella without other bony tenderness
- Unable to flex the knee to 90°, or unable to bear weight (for at least 4 steps) both immediately and in the emergency department.
Ottawa rules for knee x-ray
A knee x-ray is required only for knee injury patients with any of these findings:
- 55 years of age or older
- isolated tenderness of the patella (no bone tenderness of the knee other than the patella)
- tenderness at the head of the fibula
- inability to flex the knee to 90°
- inability to weight bear both immediately and in the ED (4 steps, unable to transfer weight twice onto each lower limb regardless of limping). (www.gp-training.net/rheum/ottawa.htm)
A downhill skier is catching the inside edge of the front of a ski in the snow, forcing external rotation of the tibia relative to the femur. The detail of the knee joint shows injury to the medial collateral ligament and anterior cruciate ligament.
In a systematic review,2 the Ottawa rules had a pooled negative likelihood ratio (LR–) of 0.05 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02–0.23). A prospective study of the Ottawa rules among children with acute knee injury demonstrated a positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 1.81 (95% CI, 1.47–2.21) and an LR– of 0.16 (95% CI, 0.02–1.04).3 However, limited information is available in the pediatric population.
Ultrasound and MRI both perform well
Physical examination (including the Lachman test, Drawer sign, and McMurray test) by an orthopedist or sports medicine–trained physician was 74% to 88% sensitive and 72% to 95% specific for suspected meniscal or ligamentous injuries; MRI added marginal value in referral decisions regarding these conditions.4
In a small nonrandomized study of adult knee trauma, sonographic diagnosis of an effusion (by an expert) had an LR+ for diagnosing an internal derangement of the knee of 2.0 (95% CI, 0.67–5.96) and an LR– of 0.33 (95% CI, 0.12–0.96), as compared with the gold standard of MRI.5
In a nonrandomized prospective study of adults receiving MRI of the knee prior to arthroscopy, MRI identified meniscal and ligamentous lesions of the knee satisfactorily (Table 1).6 In a retrospective study of adolescents (11 to 17 years of age) having knee MRIs and undergoing knee surgery, MRI compared favorably with the operative (gold standard) diagnosis (Table 2).7
TABLE 1
MRI can accurately identify meniscal and ligamentous knee lesions in adults
| INJURY | LR+ | LR– |
|---|---|---|
| Medial meniscus | 13.7 | 0.02 |
| Lateral meniscus | 14.3 | 0.08 |
| Anterior cruciate ligament | 21.5 | 0.01 |
| Posterior cruciate ligament | 100 | 0.01 |
| Intra-articular cartilage lesion | 14.9 | 0.25 |
| *Adapted from Vaz et al,2005.6 | ||
| MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; LR, likelihood ratio. | ||
TABLE 2
MRI compares well with operative Dx in identifying knee lesions in adolescents
| INJURY | LR+ (95% CI) | LR– (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
| Medial meniscus | 7.18 (3.34–15.46) | 0.10 (0.01–0.63) |
| Lateral meniscus | 20.53 (5.27–80.07) | 0.07 (0.01–0.46) |
| Anterior cruciate ligament | 100 | 0 |
| *Adapted from Major et al, 2003.7 | ||
| MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; LR, likelihood ratio; CI, confidence interval. | ||
Recommendations from others
University of Michigan Health System8 guidelines indicate the following:
- Most knee pain is caused by patellofemoral syndrome and osteoarthritis.
- MRI of the knee has not been proven to be superior to the clinical exam by an experienced examiner in the evaluation of acute knee injuries.
- MRI may be useful to assess bone pathology underlying chronic knee pain.
- Differentiating between knee pain without constitutional symptoms, knee pain with constitutional symptoms, and traumatic knee pain is helpful in determining a diagnosis.
- Patients with knee pain and swelling who have non-bloody aspirates may also have serious knee pathology.
1. Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, Wells GA, et al. Derivation of a decision rule for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries. Ann Emerg Med 1995;26:405-413.
2. Bachmann LM, Haberzeth S, Steurer J, ter Riet G. The accuracy of the Ottawa Knee Rule to rule out knee fractures: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:121-124.
3. Khine H, Dorfman DH, Avner JR. Applicability of Ottawa Knee Rule for knee injury in children. Pediatr Emerg Care 2001;17:401-404.
4. Jackson JL, O’Malley PG, Kroenke K. Evaluation of acute knee pain in primary care. Ann Intern Med 2003;139:575-588.
5. Wang C-Y, Wang H-K, Hsu C-Y, Shieh J-Y, Wang TG, Jiang C-C. Role of sonographic examination in traumatic knee internal derangement. Arch Physical Med Rehab 2007;88:984-987.
6. Vaz CE, Camargo OP, Santana PJ, Valezi AC. Accuracy of magnetic resonance in identifying traumatic intraarticular knee lesions. Clinics 2005;60:445-450.
7. Major NM, Beard LN, Jr, Helms CA. Accuracy of MR imaging of the knee in adolescents. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:17-19.
8. University of Michigan Health system Knee pain or swelling: acute or chronic. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Health System; 2005. Available at: cme.med.umich.edu/pdf/guideline/knee.pdf. Accessed January 7, 2008.
Use the Ottawa Knee Rules. When there is a possibility of fracture, they can guide the use of radiography in adults who present with isolated knee pain. However, information on use of these rules in the pediatric population is limited (strength of recommendation [SOR]: A, based on systematic review of high-quality studies and a validated clinical decision rule). Specific physical examination maneuvers (such as the Lachman and McMurray tests) may be helpful when assessing for meniscal or ligamentous injury (SOR: C, based on studies of intermediate outcomes).
Sonographic examination of a traumatized knee can accurately detect internal knee derangement (SOR: C, based on studies of intermediate outcomes). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee is the noninvasive standard for diagnosing internal knee derangement, and it is useful for both adult and pediatric patients (SOR: C, based on studies of intermediate outcomes).
Ottawa rules for ankles—yes, but they’re good for knees, too
Daniel Spogen, MD
University of Nevada, Reno
The evidence presented here suggests a number of practical and useful approaches for the evaluation of acute knee injury—something that’s especially helpful for family physicians and those who, like me, have worked a lot of sporting events.
The Ottawa rules, which can be used to rule out fracture without an x-ray, are fairly well known for ankle injuries, but are not as well known for knees. A Lachman test, Drawer sign, and McMurray test are useful in diagnosing the presence of internal ligamentous injuries without MRI, and an ultrasound can help to detect knee effusion when it is not clinically obvious.
A good physical examination and an ultrasound can effectively rule out serious knee injury with high specificity. When serious injury is suspected, x-ray and MRI are very useful for fracture and ligamentous injury, respectively.
Evidence summary
These criteria help determine who needs an x-ray
The Ottawa Knee Rules recommend knee x-rays for any patient meeting one of these criteria:1
- ≥55 years of age
- Tenderness over the head of the fibula or isolated to the patella without other bony tenderness
- Unable to flex the knee to 90°, or unable to bear weight (for at least 4 steps) both immediately and in the emergency department.
Ottawa rules for knee x-ray
A knee x-ray is required only for knee injury patients with any of these findings:
- 55 years of age or older
- isolated tenderness of the patella (no bone tenderness of the knee other than the patella)
- tenderness at the head of the fibula
- inability to flex the knee to 90°
- inability to weight bear both immediately and in the ED (4 steps, unable to transfer weight twice onto each lower limb regardless of limping). (www.gp-training.net/rheum/ottawa.htm)
A downhill skier is catching the inside edge of the front of a ski in the snow, forcing external rotation of the tibia relative to the femur. The detail of the knee joint shows injury to the medial collateral ligament and anterior cruciate ligament.
In a systematic review,2 the Ottawa rules had a pooled negative likelihood ratio (LR–) of 0.05 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02–0.23). A prospective study of the Ottawa rules among children with acute knee injury demonstrated a positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 1.81 (95% CI, 1.47–2.21) and an LR– of 0.16 (95% CI, 0.02–1.04).3 However, limited information is available in the pediatric population.
Ultrasound and MRI both perform well
Physical examination (including the Lachman test, Drawer sign, and McMurray test) by an orthopedist or sports medicine–trained physician was 74% to 88% sensitive and 72% to 95% specific for suspected meniscal or ligamentous injuries; MRI added marginal value in referral decisions regarding these conditions.4
In a small nonrandomized study of adult knee trauma, sonographic diagnosis of an effusion (by an expert) had an LR+ for diagnosing an internal derangement of the knee of 2.0 (95% CI, 0.67–5.96) and an LR– of 0.33 (95% CI, 0.12–0.96), as compared with the gold standard of MRI.5
In a nonrandomized prospective study of adults receiving MRI of the knee prior to arthroscopy, MRI identified meniscal and ligamentous lesions of the knee satisfactorily (Table 1).6 In a retrospective study of adolescents (11 to 17 years of age) having knee MRIs and undergoing knee surgery, MRI compared favorably with the operative (gold standard) diagnosis (Table 2).7
TABLE 1
MRI can accurately identify meniscal and ligamentous knee lesions in adults
| INJURY | LR+ | LR– |
|---|---|---|
| Medial meniscus | 13.7 | 0.02 |
| Lateral meniscus | 14.3 | 0.08 |
| Anterior cruciate ligament | 21.5 | 0.01 |
| Posterior cruciate ligament | 100 | 0.01 |
| Intra-articular cartilage lesion | 14.9 | 0.25 |
| *Adapted from Vaz et al,2005.6 | ||
| MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; LR, likelihood ratio. | ||
TABLE 2
MRI compares well with operative Dx in identifying knee lesions in adolescents
| INJURY | LR+ (95% CI) | LR– (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
| Medial meniscus | 7.18 (3.34–15.46) | 0.10 (0.01–0.63) |
| Lateral meniscus | 20.53 (5.27–80.07) | 0.07 (0.01–0.46) |
| Anterior cruciate ligament | 100 | 0 |
| *Adapted from Major et al, 2003.7 | ||
| MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; LR, likelihood ratio; CI, confidence interval. | ||
Recommendations from others
University of Michigan Health System8 guidelines indicate the following:
- Most knee pain is caused by patellofemoral syndrome and osteoarthritis.
- MRI of the knee has not been proven to be superior to the clinical exam by an experienced examiner in the evaluation of acute knee injuries.
- MRI may be useful to assess bone pathology underlying chronic knee pain.
- Differentiating between knee pain without constitutional symptoms, knee pain with constitutional symptoms, and traumatic knee pain is helpful in determining a diagnosis.
- Patients with knee pain and swelling who have non-bloody aspirates may also have serious knee pathology.
Use the Ottawa Knee Rules. When there is a possibility of fracture, they can guide the use of radiography in adults who present with isolated knee pain. However, information on use of these rules in the pediatric population is limited (strength of recommendation [SOR]: A, based on systematic review of high-quality studies and a validated clinical decision rule). Specific physical examination maneuvers (such as the Lachman and McMurray tests) may be helpful when assessing for meniscal or ligamentous injury (SOR: C, based on studies of intermediate outcomes).
Sonographic examination of a traumatized knee can accurately detect internal knee derangement (SOR: C, based on studies of intermediate outcomes). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee is the noninvasive standard for diagnosing internal knee derangement, and it is useful for both adult and pediatric patients (SOR: C, based on studies of intermediate outcomes).
Ottawa rules for ankles—yes, but they’re good for knees, too
Daniel Spogen, MD
University of Nevada, Reno
The evidence presented here suggests a number of practical and useful approaches for the evaluation of acute knee injury—something that’s especially helpful for family physicians and those who, like me, have worked a lot of sporting events.
The Ottawa rules, which can be used to rule out fracture without an x-ray, are fairly well known for ankle injuries, but are not as well known for knees. A Lachman test, Drawer sign, and McMurray test are useful in diagnosing the presence of internal ligamentous injuries without MRI, and an ultrasound can help to detect knee effusion when it is not clinically obvious.
A good physical examination and an ultrasound can effectively rule out serious knee injury with high specificity. When serious injury is suspected, x-ray and MRI are very useful for fracture and ligamentous injury, respectively.
Evidence summary
These criteria help determine who needs an x-ray
The Ottawa Knee Rules recommend knee x-rays for any patient meeting one of these criteria:1
- ≥55 years of age
- Tenderness over the head of the fibula or isolated to the patella without other bony tenderness
- Unable to flex the knee to 90°, or unable to bear weight (for at least 4 steps) both immediately and in the emergency department.
Ottawa rules for knee x-ray
A knee x-ray is required only for knee injury patients with any of these findings:
- 55 years of age or older
- isolated tenderness of the patella (no bone tenderness of the knee other than the patella)
- tenderness at the head of the fibula
- inability to flex the knee to 90°
- inability to weight bear both immediately and in the ED (4 steps, unable to transfer weight twice onto each lower limb regardless of limping). (www.gp-training.net/rheum/ottawa.htm)
A downhill skier is catching the inside edge of the front of a ski in the snow, forcing external rotation of the tibia relative to the femur. The detail of the knee joint shows injury to the medial collateral ligament and anterior cruciate ligament.
In a systematic review,2 the Ottawa rules had a pooled negative likelihood ratio (LR–) of 0.05 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02–0.23). A prospective study of the Ottawa rules among children with acute knee injury demonstrated a positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 1.81 (95% CI, 1.47–2.21) and an LR– of 0.16 (95% CI, 0.02–1.04).3 However, limited information is available in the pediatric population.
Ultrasound and MRI both perform well
Physical examination (including the Lachman test, Drawer sign, and McMurray test) by an orthopedist or sports medicine–trained physician was 74% to 88% sensitive and 72% to 95% specific for suspected meniscal or ligamentous injuries; MRI added marginal value in referral decisions regarding these conditions.4
In a small nonrandomized study of adult knee trauma, sonographic diagnosis of an effusion (by an expert) had an LR+ for diagnosing an internal derangement of the knee of 2.0 (95% CI, 0.67–5.96) and an LR– of 0.33 (95% CI, 0.12–0.96), as compared with the gold standard of MRI.5
In a nonrandomized prospective study of adults receiving MRI of the knee prior to arthroscopy, MRI identified meniscal and ligamentous lesions of the knee satisfactorily (Table 1).6 In a retrospective study of adolescents (11 to 17 years of age) having knee MRIs and undergoing knee surgery, MRI compared favorably with the operative (gold standard) diagnosis (Table 2).7
TABLE 1
MRI can accurately identify meniscal and ligamentous knee lesions in adults
| INJURY | LR+ | LR– |
|---|---|---|
| Medial meniscus | 13.7 | 0.02 |
| Lateral meniscus | 14.3 | 0.08 |
| Anterior cruciate ligament | 21.5 | 0.01 |
| Posterior cruciate ligament | 100 | 0.01 |
| Intra-articular cartilage lesion | 14.9 | 0.25 |
| *Adapted from Vaz et al,2005.6 | ||
| MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; LR, likelihood ratio. | ||
TABLE 2
MRI compares well with operative Dx in identifying knee lesions in adolescents
| INJURY | LR+ (95% CI) | LR– (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
| Medial meniscus | 7.18 (3.34–15.46) | 0.10 (0.01–0.63) |
| Lateral meniscus | 20.53 (5.27–80.07) | 0.07 (0.01–0.46) |
| Anterior cruciate ligament | 100 | 0 |
| *Adapted from Major et al, 2003.7 | ||
| MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; LR, likelihood ratio; CI, confidence interval. | ||
Recommendations from others
University of Michigan Health System8 guidelines indicate the following:
- Most knee pain is caused by patellofemoral syndrome and osteoarthritis.
- MRI of the knee has not been proven to be superior to the clinical exam by an experienced examiner in the evaluation of acute knee injuries.
- MRI may be useful to assess bone pathology underlying chronic knee pain.
- Differentiating between knee pain without constitutional symptoms, knee pain with constitutional symptoms, and traumatic knee pain is helpful in determining a diagnosis.
- Patients with knee pain and swelling who have non-bloody aspirates may also have serious knee pathology.
1. Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, Wells GA, et al. Derivation of a decision rule for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries. Ann Emerg Med 1995;26:405-413.
2. Bachmann LM, Haberzeth S, Steurer J, ter Riet G. The accuracy of the Ottawa Knee Rule to rule out knee fractures: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:121-124.
3. Khine H, Dorfman DH, Avner JR. Applicability of Ottawa Knee Rule for knee injury in children. Pediatr Emerg Care 2001;17:401-404.
4. Jackson JL, O’Malley PG, Kroenke K. Evaluation of acute knee pain in primary care. Ann Intern Med 2003;139:575-588.
5. Wang C-Y, Wang H-K, Hsu C-Y, Shieh J-Y, Wang TG, Jiang C-C. Role of sonographic examination in traumatic knee internal derangement. Arch Physical Med Rehab 2007;88:984-987.
6. Vaz CE, Camargo OP, Santana PJ, Valezi AC. Accuracy of magnetic resonance in identifying traumatic intraarticular knee lesions. Clinics 2005;60:445-450.
7. Major NM, Beard LN, Jr, Helms CA. Accuracy of MR imaging of the knee in adolescents. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:17-19.
8. University of Michigan Health system Knee pain or swelling: acute or chronic. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Health System; 2005. Available at: cme.med.umich.edu/pdf/guideline/knee.pdf. Accessed January 7, 2008.
1. Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, Wells GA, et al. Derivation of a decision rule for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries. Ann Emerg Med 1995;26:405-413.
2. Bachmann LM, Haberzeth S, Steurer J, ter Riet G. The accuracy of the Ottawa Knee Rule to rule out knee fractures: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:121-124.
3. Khine H, Dorfman DH, Avner JR. Applicability of Ottawa Knee Rule for knee injury in children. Pediatr Emerg Care 2001;17:401-404.
4. Jackson JL, O’Malley PG, Kroenke K. Evaluation of acute knee pain in primary care. Ann Intern Med 2003;139:575-588.
5. Wang C-Y, Wang H-K, Hsu C-Y, Shieh J-Y, Wang TG, Jiang C-C. Role of sonographic examination in traumatic knee internal derangement. Arch Physical Med Rehab 2007;88:984-987.
6. Vaz CE, Camargo OP, Santana PJ, Valezi AC. Accuracy of magnetic resonance in identifying traumatic intraarticular knee lesions. Clinics 2005;60:445-450.
7. Major NM, Beard LN, Jr, Helms CA. Accuracy of MR imaging of the knee in adolescents. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:17-19.
8. University of Michigan Health system Knee pain or swelling: acute or chronic. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Health System; 2005. Available at: cme.med.umich.edu/pdf/guideline/knee.pdf. Accessed January 7, 2008.
Evidence-based answers from the Family Physicians Inquiries Network