Welcome to Current Psychiatry, a leading source of information, online and in print, for practitioners of psychiatry and its related subspecialties, including addiction psychiatry, child and adolescent psychiatry, and geriatric psychiatry. This Web site contains evidence-based reviews of the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of mental illness and psychological disorders; case reports; updates on psychopharmacology; news about the specialty of psychiatry; pearls for practice; and other topics of interest and use to this audience.

Theme
medstat_cp
Top Sections
Evidence-Based Reviews
Cases That Test Your Skills
cp

Dear Drupal User: You're seeing this because you're logged in to Drupal, and not redirected to MDedge.com/psychiatry. 

Main menu
CP Main Menu
Explore menu
CP Explore Menu
Proclivity ID
18803001
Unpublish
Negative Keywords
Bipolar depression
Depression
adolescent depression
adolescent major depressive disorder
adolescent schizophrenia
adolescent with major depressive disorder
animals
autism
baby
brexpiprazole
child
child bipolar
child depression
child schizophrenia
children with bipolar disorder
children with depression
children with major depressive disorder
compulsive behaviors
cure
elderly bipolar
elderly depression
elderly major depressive disorder
elderly schizophrenia
elderly with dementia
first break
first episode
gambling
gaming
geriatric depression
geriatric major depressive disorder
geriatric schizophrenia
infant
kid
major depressive disorder
major depressive disorder in adolescents
major depressive disorder in children
parenting
pediatric
pediatric bipolar
pediatric depression
pediatric major depressive disorder
pediatric schizophrenia
pregnancy
pregnant
rexulti
skin care
teen
wine
Negative Keywords Excluded Elements
header[@id='header']
section[contains(@class, 'nav-hidden')]
footer[@id='footer']
div[contains(@class, 'pane-pub-article-current-psychiatry')]
div[contains(@class, 'pane-pub-home-current-psychiatry')]
div[contains(@class, 'pane-pub-topic-current-psychiatry')]
div[contains(@class, 'panel-panel-inner')]
div[contains(@class, 'pane-node-field-article-topics')]
section[contains(@class, 'footer-nav-section-wrapper')]
Altmetric
DSM Affiliated
Display in offset block
QuickLearn Excluded Topics/Sections
Best Practices
CME
CME Supplements
Education Center
Medical Education Library
Disqus Exclude
Best Practices
CE/CME
Education Center
Medical Education Library
Enable Disqus
Display Author and Disclosure Link
Publication Type
Clinical
Slot System
Top 25
Disable Sticky Ads
Disable Ad Block Mitigation
Featured Buckets Admin
Publication LayerRX Default ID
798,799
Show Ads on this Publication's Homepage
Consolidated Pub
Show Article Page Numbers on TOC

Printing on the go

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 12/11/2018 - 15:22
Display Headline
Printing on the go

You need a printout now, but you’re at a meeting, in a hotel, or at the hospital. What do you do?

Printers have become more compact and versatile, and numerous remote printing solutions exist with more on the way. This article reviews the options to help you print anytime, anywhere.

Portable printers

HP and Canon make inkjet printers that weigh approximately 4 lbs but are portable and compatible with most systems. These printers can be connected to your notebook via a USB or parallel port cable, or wirelessly with Bluetooth or infrared. Built with high-resolution inkjet nozzles, portable printers provide sharp printouts and can even print photos (although this can quickly drain their small ink cartridges).

By contrast, the Psyber Psychiatry, December 2003). WiFi makes printing from your hotel room relatively easy.

Psyber Psychiatry, December 2004).

First, make sure the program you used to create the document is compatible with the business center’s computers. Because most business centers use the free Adobe document reader, your best bet is to convert the file to Adobe PDF, which maintains its format. Use PDFCreator or PrimoPDF to convert the file; both are free and work on Windows computers. Mac users can download the Mac-Net Freeware PDF file creator.

The future

Imagine a pocket-size device that prints onto a blank page as you move it across.

PrintDreams is developing such a device using its random-movement printing technology (RMPT). PrintDreams reports that the scanning device can print any document with 100% accuracy, though it seems best suited to text. The device is still a year or two from reaching the mainstream; PrintDreams is licensing its technology to other printer manufacturers.

Also, don’t be surprised if cellular phones one day have the capability to print e-mail attachments using Bluetooth or general packet radio service (GPRS), a very fast data transfer protocol on a GSM network.

Disclosure

Dr. Luo reports no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article. The opinions expressed by Dr. Luo in this column are his own and do not necessarily reflect those of Current Psychiatry.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

 

John Luo, MD
Assistant clinical professor Department of psychiatry University of California, Los Angeles

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 04(03)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
1-1
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

 

John Luo, MD
Assistant clinical professor Department of psychiatry University of California, Los Angeles

Author and Disclosure Information

 

John Luo, MD
Assistant clinical professor Department of psychiatry University of California, Los Angeles

Article PDF
Article PDF

You need a printout now, but you’re at a meeting, in a hotel, or at the hospital. What do you do?

Printers have become more compact and versatile, and numerous remote printing solutions exist with more on the way. This article reviews the options to help you print anytime, anywhere.

Portable printers

HP and Canon make inkjet printers that weigh approximately 4 lbs but are portable and compatible with most systems. These printers can be connected to your notebook via a USB or parallel port cable, or wirelessly with Bluetooth or infrared. Built with high-resolution inkjet nozzles, portable printers provide sharp printouts and can even print photos (although this can quickly drain their small ink cartridges).

By contrast, the Psyber Psychiatry, December 2003). WiFi makes printing from your hotel room relatively easy.

Psyber Psychiatry, December 2004).

First, make sure the program you used to create the document is compatible with the business center’s computers. Because most business centers use the free Adobe document reader, your best bet is to convert the file to Adobe PDF, which maintains its format. Use PDFCreator or PrimoPDF to convert the file; both are free and work on Windows computers. Mac users can download the Mac-Net Freeware PDF file creator.

The future

Imagine a pocket-size device that prints onto a blank page as you move it across.

PrintDreams is developing such a device using its random-movement printing technology (RMPT). PrintDreams reports that the scanning device can print any document with 100% accuracy, though it seems best suited to text. The device is still a year or two from reaching the mainstream; PrintDreams is licensing its technology to other printer manufacturers.

Also, don’t be surprised if cellular phones one day have the capability to print e-mail attachments using Bluetooth or general packet radio service (GPRS), a very fast data transfer protocol on a GSM network.

Disclosure

Dr. Luo reports no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article. The opinions expressed by Dr. Luo in this column are his own and do not necessarily reflect those of Current Psychiatry.

You need a printout now, but you’re at a meeting, in a hotel, or at the hospital. What do you do?

Printers have become more compact and versatile, and numerous remote printing solutions exist with more on the way. This article reviews the options to help you print anytime, anywhere.

Portable printers

HP and Canon make inkjet printers that weigh approximately 4 lbs but are portable and compatible with most systems. These printers can be connected to your notebook via a USB or parallel port cable, or wirelessly with Bluetooth or infrared. Built with high-resolution inkjet nozzles, portable printers provide sharp printouts and can even print photos (although this can quickly drain their small ink cartridges).

By contrast, the Psyber Psychiatry, December 2003). WiFi makes printing from your hotel room relatively easy.

Psyber Psychiatry, December 2004).

First, make sure the program you used to create the document is compatible with the business center’s computers. Because most business centers use the free Adobe document reader, your best bet is to convert the file to Adobe PDF, which maintains its format. Use PDFCreator or PrimoPDF to convert the file; both are free and work on Windows computers. Mac users can download the Mac-Net Freeware PDF file creator.

The future

Imagine a pocket-size device that prints onto a blank page as you move it across.

PrintDreams is developing such a device using its random-movement printing technology (RMPT). PrintDreams reports that the scanning device can print any document with 100% accuracy, though it seems best suited to text. The device is still a year or two from reaching the mainstream; PrintDreams is licensing its technology to other printer manufacturers.

Also, don’t be surprised if cellular phones one day have the capability to print e-mail attachments using Bluetooth or general packet radio service (GPRS), a very fast data transfer protocol on a GSM network.

Disclosure

Dr. Luo reports no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article. The opinions expressed by Dr. Luo in this column are his own and do not necessarily reflect those of Current Psychiatry.

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 04(03)
Issue
Current Psychiatry - 04(03)
Page Number
1-1
Page Number
1-1
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Printing on the go
Display Headline
Printing on the go
Sections
Article PDF Media

Think CANON for signs of alcohol-induced amnesia

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 12/11/2018 - 15:22
Display Headline
Think CANON for signs of alcohol-induced amnesia

Wernicke’s encephalopathy is often missed in clinical practice.1 Left untreated, the alcohol-induced amnestic disorder can progress to Korsakoff’s syndrome, a form of permanent short-term memory loss from which four out of five patients do not recover.2

Why Wernicke’s is missed

Lesions in the medial dorsal nucleus of the thalamus, hippocampus, and mammillary bodies cause signs and symptoms of Wernicke’s. Associated psychotic symptoms—including delusions, confusion, agitation, blunted to apathetic affect, and confabulation—may incorrectly suggest delirium tremens, alcohol-induced psychosis, delusional disorder, or dementia.

Key features of Wernicke’s are remembered with the acronym CANON:

Clouded consciousness with impaired orientation and inability to sustain attention to environmental stimuli.

Ataxia, primarily affecting gait

Nystagmus, mainly horizontal

Ophthalmoplegia accompanied by lateral orbital palsy and gaze palsy, which is usually bilateral. Anisocoria and a sluggish reaction to light also are present.

Neuropathy, mainly peripheral.

Early recognition and treatment is essential as early-stage Wernicke’s responds rapidly to parenteral thiamine, 100 mg/d for 5 to 7 days. Oral thiamine, 100 mg two to three times daily, is then given for 1 to 2 weeks.

References

1. Muralee S, Tampi RR. Sobering facts about a missed diagnosis. Current Psychiatry 2004;3(10):73-80.

2. Sadock BJ, Sadock VA. Kaplan and Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry (9th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2003:406.

Dr. Maju Mathews is attending psychiatrist, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.

Dr. Adetunji is attending psychiatrist, Kirby Forensic Psychiatric Center, New York, NY.

Dr. George is a first-year psychiatry resident, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia.

Dr. Manu Mathews is a first-year psychiatry resident, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH.

Dr. Dandugula is a general practitioner, Dumfries, UK.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Maju Mathews, MDBabatunde Adetunji, MDVinu George, MDManu Mathews, MDRaghu Dandugula, MD

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 04(03)
Publications
Page Number
88-88
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Maju Mathews, MDBabatunde Adetunji, MDVinu George, MDManu Mathews, MDRaghu Dandugula, MD

Author and Disclosure Information

Maju Mathews, MDBabatunde Adetunji, MDVinu George, MDManu Mathews, MDRaghu Dandugula, MD

Article PDF
Article PDF

Wernicke’s encephalopathy is often missed in clinical practice.1 Left untreated, the alcohol-induced amnestic disorder can progress to Korsakoff’s syndrome, a form of permanent short-term memory loss from which four out of five patients do not recover.2

Why Wernicke’s is missed

Lesions in the medial dorsal nucleus of the thalamus, hippocampus, and mammillary bodies cause signs and symptoms of Wernicke’s. Associated psychotic symptoms—including delusions, confusion, agitation, blunted to apathetic affect, and confabulation—may incorrectly suggest delirium tremens, alcohol-induced psychosis, delusional disorder, or dementia.

Key features of Wernicke’s are remembered with the acronym CANON:

Clouded consciousness with impaired orientation and inability to sustain attention to environmental stimuli.

Ataxia, primarily affecting gait

Nystagmus, mainly horizontal

Ophthalmoplegia accompanied by lateral orbital palsy and gaze palsy, which is usually bilateral. Anisocoria and a sluggish reaction to light also are present.

Neuropathy, mainly peripheral.

Early recognition and treatment is essential as early-stage Wernicke’s responds rapidly to parenteral thiamine, 100 mg/d for 5 to 7 days. Oral thiamine, 100 mg two to three times daily, is then given for 1 to 2 weeks.

Wernicke’s encephalopathy is often missed in clinical practice.1 Left untreated, the alcohol-induced amnestic disorder can progress to Korsakoff’s syndrome, a form of permanent short-term memory loss from which four out of five patients do not recover.2

Why Wernicke’s is missed

Lesions in the medial dorsal nucleus of the thalamus, hippocampus, and mammillary bodies cause signs and symptoms of Wernicke’s. Associated psychotic symptoms—including delusions, confusion, agitation, blunted to apathetic affect, and confabulation—may incorrectly suggest delirium tremens, alcohol-induced psychosis, delusional disorder, or dementia.

Key features of Wernicke’s are remembered with the acronym CANON:

Clouded consciousness with impaired orientation and inability to sustain attention to environmental stimuli.

Ataxia, primarily affecting gait

Nystagmus, mainly horizontal

Ophthalmoplegia accompanied by lateral orbital palsy and gaze palsy, which is usually bilateral. Anisocoria and a sluggish reaction to light also are present.

Neuropathy, mainly peripheral.

Early recognition and treatment is essential as early-stage Wernicke’s responds rapidly to parenteral thiamine, 100 mg/d for 5 to 7 days. Oral thiamine, 100 mg two to three times daily, is then given for 1 to 2 weeks.

References

1. Muralee S, Tampi RR. Sobering facts about a missed diagnosis. Current Psychiatry 2004;3(10):73-80.

2. Sadock BJ, Sadock VA. Kaplan and Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry (9th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2003:406.

Dr. Maju Mathews is attending psychiatrist, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.

Dr. Adetunji is attending psychiatrist, Kirby Forensic Psychiatric Center, New York, NY.

Dr. George is a first-year psychiatry resident, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia.

Dr. Manu Mathews is a first-year psychiatry resident, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH.

Dr. Dandugula is a general practitioner, Dumfries, UK.

References

1. Muralee S, Tampi RR. Sobering facts about a missed diagnosis. Current Psychiatry 2004;3(10):73-80.

2. Sadock BJ, Sadock VA. Kaplan and Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry (9th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2003:406.

Dr. Maju Mathews is attending psychiatrist, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.

Dr. Adetunji is attending psychiatrist, Kirby Forensic Psychiatric Center, New York, NY.

Dr. George is a first-year psychiatry resident, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia.

Dr. Manu Mathews is a first-year psychiatry resident, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH.

Dr. Dandugula is a general practitioner, Dumfries, UK.

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 04(03)
Issue
Current Psychiatry - 04(03)
Page Number
88-88
Page Number
88-88
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Think CANON for signs of alcohol-induced amnesia
Display Headline
Think CANON for signs of alcohol-induced amnesia
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

How to avoid ‘foreseeable’ harm

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 04/16/2018 - 14:16
Display Headline
How to avoid ‘foreseeable’ harm

When a psychiatrist is sued for negligence, the legal system asks, “Did the doctor depart from the standard of care, and—if so—did that departure proximately cause the harm?” To determine proximate cause, the legal system then asks whether the harm was a “reasonably foreseeable” result of the negligent act.

Inadequate evaluation leads to patient’s suicide, plaintiff alleges

Dallas County (TX) District Court

In 1997, 1 year after suffering a stroke, a 56-year-old man was admitted to a rehabilitation center and seen by a psychiatrist for depression. In February 2000, the patient died after jumping from the center’s fifth-floor window.

The patient’s estate charged that the psychiatrist was negligent and did not adequately evaluate or treat the patient. The defense disputed the charge.

  • The jury found for the defense.

Dr. Grant’s observations

In this case, the psychiatrist presumably assessed the patient, determined whether he was depressed, and made appropriate treatment interventions. Three years later, the patient killed himself.

Although 3 years passed between the consultation and the suicide, under the law an intervening act that is the reasonably foreseeable result of negligence does not break the causal chain. For example, if the psychiatrist told the patient he needed no treatment and did not need to follow-up with another clinician, the causal chain arguably would still exist. Thus, proper care, not time, will prevent such a suit.

To win a negligence case, the plaintiff must show that the psychiatrist’s actions proximately caused the harm. In order to defend your treatment decisions, document and discuss with the patient:

  • the diagnosis and illness severity
  • possible illness course based on patient history and the illness in question
  • the need to monitor mood symptoms
  • basis for treatment recommendations
  • the possible need for continued treatment and to arrange follow-up care.

Plaintiff: Improper treatment caused fatal altercation

Cuyahoga County (OH) Court of Common Pleas

A man in his early 30s was admitted to the hospital’s psychiatric unit for depression, mood disorder, and adjustment disorder secondary to myasthenia gravis. He was estranged from his wife, who was dating another man. The treating psychiatrist discharged the patient after 5 days.

Approximately 40 hours after discharge, the patient went to the other man’s home and confronted him about his relationship with the patient’s wife. The two men then fought, and the other man fatally shot the patient. During the fight, the patient stabbed the other man in the neck with a knife; this man required care and subsequently developed a scar.

The other man and the patient’s estate charged that the psychiatrist did not appropriately evaluate and treat the patient. They claimed that a more thorough evaluation would have resulted in continued hospitalization and prevented the fight.

The defendant argued that the evaluation was thorough, that the discharge met the guidelines of appropriate care, and that the patient posed no risk to himself or others when he was discharged.

  • The jury decided for the defense.

Dr. Grant’s observations

This case raises the clinically difficult issue of assessing a patient’s danger to self or others and whether this danger is reasonably foreseeable. Although Hughes reports that 17% of psychiatric emergency room patients are homicidal,1 the American Psychiatric Association notes that 2 of 3 predictions of patient violence are wrong.2

In Tarasoff v Regents of the University of California, the California Supreme Court ruled that clinicians must warn potential victims of, and protect them from, a patient’s intent to harm.3 You should become familiar with the Tarasoff-type legislations in your state. But even if the patient shows no violent intent, the possibility of future violence cannot be ruled out.

During admission, assess and document an inpatient’s risk of violence.4 Factors that may increase a depressed patient’s risk of becoming homicidal include:

  • past violence
  • current substance abuse
  • psychopathy
  • having suffered physical abuse as a child
  • violent thoughts.4-6
If sexual infidelity, real or fantasized, precipitated the depression—as it might have in this case—a depressed patient may be at increased risk for homicide.

Check the patient’s records for a history of recurrent violence. Culling this information from the chart is necessary because:

  • past violent behavior may predict future violence
  • patients rarely reveal homicidal thoughts or behavior spontaneously.6
Knowing a patient’s violent past may aid in treatment. For example, you might order a longer hospitalization or establish more-intensive outpatient services focusing on avoiding aggression and violence. Make sure that follow-up care meets the patient’s needs after discharge.7

A psychiatrist may be found negligent after a patient’s violent act if the violence was foreseeable. However, after having seen the patient for 5 days in an inpatient setting, the psychiatrist in this case apparently could clearly document that the patient was not dangerous to himself or others before discharge.

References

1. Hughes DH. Suicide and violence assessment in psychiatry. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1996;18:416-21.

2. American Psychiatric Association fact sheet. Violence and mental illness. January 1998:1-5. Available at: http://www.psych.org/public_info/violence.pdf. Accessed Feb. 3, 2005.

3. Tarasoff v Regents of the University of California, 551 P2d 334 (Cal 1976)

4. Green B, Pedley R, Whittingham D. A structured clinical model for violence risk intervention. Int J Law Psychiatry 2004;27:349-59.

5. Appelbaum PS, Robbins PC, Monahan J. Violence and delusions: data from the MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study. Am J Psychiatry 2000;157:566-72.

6. Rosenbaum M, Bennett B. Homicide and depression. Am J Psychiatry 1986;143:367-70.

7. Appelbaum PS. Can a psychiatrist be held responsible when a patient commits murder? Psychiatr Serv 2002;53:27-9.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Jon E. Grant, JD, MD, MPH
Assistant professor of psychiatry and human behavior Brown Medical School, Providence, RI

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 04(03)
Publications
Page Number
66-69
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Jon E. Grant, JD, MD, MPH
Assistant professor of psychiatry and human behavior Brown Medical School, Providence, RI

Author and Disclosure Information

Jon E. Grant, JD, MD, MPH
Assistant professor of psychiatry and human behavior Brown Medical School, Providence, RI

Article PDF
Article PDF

When a psychiatrist is sued for negligence, the legal system asks, “Did the doctor depart from the standard of care, and—if so—did that departure proximately cause the harm?” To determine proximate cause, the legal system then asks whether the harm was a “reasonably foreseeable” result of the negligent act.

Inadequate evaluation leads to patient’s suicide, plaintiff alleges

Dallas County (TX) District Court

In 1997, 1 year after suffering a stroke, a 56-year-old man was admitted to a rehabilitation center and seen by a psychiatrist for depression. In February 2000, the patient died after jumping from the center’s fifth-floor window.

The patient’s estate charged that the psychiatrist was negligent and did not adequately evaluate or treat the patient. The defense disputed the charge.

  • The jury found for the defense.

Dr. Grant’s observations

In this case, the psychiatrist presumably assessed the patient, determined whether he was depressed, and made appropriate treatment interventions. Three years later, the patient killed himself.

Although 3 years passed between the consultation and the suicide, under the law an intervening act that is the reasonably foreseeable result of negligence does not break the causal chain. For example, if the psychiatrist told the patient he needed no treatment and did not need to follow-up with another clinician, the causal chain arguably would still exist. Thus, proper care, not time, will prevent such a suit.

To win a negligence case, the plaintiff must show that the psychiatrist’s actions proximately caused the harm. In order to defend your treatment decisions, document and discuss with the patient:

  • the diagnosis and illness severity
  • possible illness course based on patient history and the illness in question
  • the need to monitor mood symptoms
  • basis for treatment recommendations
  • the possible need for continued treatment and to arrange follow-up care.

Plaintiff: Improper treatment caused fatal altercation

Cuyahoga County (OH) Court of Common Pleas

A man in his early 30s was admitted to the hospital’s psychiatric unit for depression, mood disorder, and adjustment disorder secondary to myasthenia gravis. He was estranged from his wife, who was dating another man. The treating psychiatrist discharged the patient after 5 days.

Approximately 40 hours after discharge, the patient went to the other man’s home and confronted him about his relationship with the patient’s wife. The two men then fought, and the other man fatally shot the patient. During the fight, the patient stabbed the other man in the neck with a knife; this man required care and subsequently developed a scar.

The other man and the patient’s estate charged that the psychiatrist did not appropriately evaluate and treat the patient. They claimed that a more thorough evaluation would have resulted in continued hospitalization and prevented the fight.

The defendant argued that the evaluation was thorough, that the discharge met the guidelines of appropriate care, and that the patient posed no risk to himself or others when he was discharged.

  • The jury decided for the defense.

Dr. Grant’s observations

This case raises the clinically difficult issue of assessing a patient’s danger to self or others and whether this danger is reasonably foreseeable. Although Hughes reports that 17% of psychiatric emergency room patients are homicidal,1 the American Psychiatric Association notes that 2 of 3 predictions of patient violence are wrong.2

In Tarasoff v Regents of the University of California, the California Supreme Court ruled that clinicians must warn potential victims of, and protect them from, a patient’s intent to harm.3 You should become familiar with the Tarasoff-type legislations in your state. But even if the patient shows no violent intent, the possibility of future violence cannot be ruled out.

During admission, assess and document an inpatient’s risk of violence.4 Factors that may increase a depressed patient’s risk of becoming homicidal include:

  • past violence
  • current substance abuse
  • psychopathy
  • having suffered physical abuse as a child
  • violent thoughts.4-6
If sexual infidelity, real or fantasized, precipitated the depression—as it might have in this case—a depressed patient may be at increased risk for homicide.

Check the patient’s records for a history of recurrent violence. Culling this information from the chart is necessary because:

  • past violent behavior may predict future violence
  • patients rarely reveal homicidal thoughts or behavior spontaneously.6
Knowing a patient’s violent past may aid in treatment. For example, you might order a longer hospitalization or establish more-intensive outpatient services focusing on avoiding aggression and violence. Make sure that follow-up care meets the patient’s needs after discharge.7

A psychiatrist may be found negligent after a patient’s violent act if the violence was foreseeable. However, after having seen the patient for 5 days in an inpatient setting, the psychiatrist in this case apparently could clearly document that the patient was not dangerous to himself or others before discharge.

When a psychiatrist is sued for negligence, the legal system asks, “Did the doctor depart from the standard of care, and—if so—did that departure proximately cause the harm?” To determine proximate cause, the legal system then asks whether the harm was a “reasonably foreseeable” result of the negligent act.

Inadequate evaluation leads to patient’s suicide, plaintiff alleges

Dallas County (TX) District Court

In 1997, 1 year after suffering a stroke, a 56-year-old man was admitted to a rehabilitation center and seen by a psychiatrist for depression. In February 2000, the patient died after jumping from the center’s fifth-floor window.

The patient’s estate charged that the psychiatrist was negligent and did not adequately evaluate or treat the patient. The defense disputed the charge.

  • The jury found for the defense.

Dr. Grant’s observations

In this case, the psychiatrist presumably assessed the patient, determined whether he was depressed, and made appropriate treatment interventions. Three years later, the patient killed himself.

Although 3 years passed between the consultation and the suicide, under the law an intervening act that is the reasonably foreseeable result of negligence does not break the causal chain. For example, if the psychiatrist told the patient he needed no treatment and did not need to follow-up with another clinician, the causal chain arguably would still exist. Thus, proper care, not time, will prevent such a suit.

To win a negligence case, the plaintiff must show that the psychiatrist’s actions proximately caused the harm. In order to defend your treatment decisions, document and discuss with the patient:

  • the diagnosis and illness severity
  • possible illness course based on patient history and the illness in question
  • the need to monitor mood symptoms
  • basis for treatment recommendations
  • the possible need for continued treatment and to arrange follow-up care.

Plaintiff: Improper treatment caused fatal altercation

Cuyahoga County (OH) Court of Common Pleas

A man in his early 30s was admitted to the hospital’s psychiatric unit for depression, mood disorder, and adjustment disorder secondary to myasthenia gravis. He was estranged from his wife, who was dating another man. The treating psychiatrist discharged the patient after 5 days.

Approximately 40 hours after discharge, the patient went to the other man’s home and confronted him about his relationship with the patient’s wife. The two men then fought, and the other man fatally shot the patient. During the fight, the patient stabbed the other man in the neck with a knife; this man required care and subsequently developed a scar.

The other man and the patient’s estate charged that the psychiatrist did not appropriately evaluate and treat the patient. They claimed that a more thorough evaluation would have resulted in continued hospitalization and prevented the fight.

The defendant argued that the evaluation was thorough, that the discharge met the guidelines of appropriate care, and that the patient posed no risk to himself or others when he was discharged.

  • The jury decided for the defense.

Dr. Grant’s observations

This case raises the clinically difficult issue of assessing a patient’s danger to self or others and whether this danger is reasonably foreseeable. Although Hughes reports that 17% of psychiatric emergency room patients are homicidal,1 the American Psychiatric Association notes that 2 of 3 predictions of patient violence are wrong.2

In Tarasoff v Regents of the University of California, the California Supreme Court ruled that clinicians must warn potential victims of, and protect them from, a patient’s intent to harm.3 You should become familiar with the Tarasoff-type legislations in your state. But even if the patient shows no violent intent, the possibility of future violence cannot be ruled out.

During admission, assess and document an inpatient’s risk of violence.4 Factors that may increase a depressed patient’s risk of becoming homicidal include:

  • past violence
  • current substance abuse
  • psychopathy
  • having suffered physical abuse as a child
  • violent thoughts.4-6
If sexual infidelity, real or fantasized, precipitated the depression—as it might have in this case—a depressed patient may be at increased risk for homicide.

Check the patient’s records for a history of recurrent violence. Culling this information from the chart is necessary because:

  • past violent behavior may predict future violence
  • patients rarely reveal homicidal thoughts or behavior spontaneously.6
Knowing a patient’s violent past may aid in treatment. For example, you might order a longer hospitalization or establish more-intensive outpatient services focusing on avoiding aggression and violence. Make sure that follow-up care meets the patient’s needs after discharge.7

A psychiatrist may be found negligent after a patient’s violent act if the violence was foreseeable. However, after having seen the patient for 5 days in an inpatient setting, the psychiatrist in this case apparently could clearly document that the patient was not dangerous to himself or others before discharge.

References

1. Hughes DH. Suicide and violence assessment in psychiatry. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1996;18:416-21.

2. American Psychiatric Association fact sheet. Violence and mental illness. January 1998:1-5. Available at: http://www.psych.org/public_info/violence.pdf. Accessed Feb. 3, 2005.

3. Tarasoff v Regents of the University of California, 551 P2d 334 (Cal 1976)

4. Green B, Pedley R, Whittingham D. A structured clinical model for violence risk intervention. Int J Law Psychiatry 2004;27:349-59.

5. Appelbaum PS, Robbins PC, Monahan J. Violence and delusions: data from the MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study. Am J Psychiatry 2000;157:566-72.

6. Rosenbaum M, Bennett B. Homicide and depression. Am J Psychiatry 1986;143:367-70.

7. Appelbaum PS. Can a psychiatrist be held responsible when a patient commits murder? Psychiatr Serv 2002;53:27-9.

References

1. Hughes DH. Suicide and violence assessment in psychiatry. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1996;18:416-21.

2. American Psychiatric Association fact sheet. Violence and mental illness. January 1998:1-5. Available at: http://www.psych.org/public_info/violence.pdf. Accessed Feb. 3, 2005.

3. Tarasoff v Regents of the University of California, 551 P2d 334 (Cal 1976)

4. Green B, Pedley R, Whittingham D. A structured clinical model for violence risk intervention. Int J Law Psychiatry 2004;27:349-59.

5. Appelbaum PS, Robbins PC, Monahan J. Violence and delusions: data from the MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study. Am J Psychiatry 2000;157:566-72.

6. Rosenbaum M, Bennett B. Homicide and depression. Am J Psychiatry 1986;143:367-70.

7. Appelbaum PS. Can a psychiatrist be held responsible when a patient commits murder? Psychiatr Serv 2002;53:27-9.

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 04(03)
Issue
Current Psychiatry - 04(03)
Page Number
66-69
Page Number
66-69
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
How to avoid ‘foreseeable’ harm
Display Headline
How to avoid ‘foreseeable’ harm
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Acknowledging my inner hoarder

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 04/16/2018 - 14:16
Display Headline
Acknowledging my inner hoarder

Compulsive hoarders collect useless things—most often newspapers, magazines, old clothing, bags, books, mail, notes, and lists, according to this month’s article by Jamie Feusner, MD, and Sanjaya Saxena, MD, of the UCLA Neuropsychiatric Institute.

Initially I thought I didn’t save all of those items since I don’t save old clothes and bags. Then I remembered the closetful of clothes that don’t fit me. I lost weight last year, but—playing the odds—these clothes may fit me again someday and I hesitate to discard them. I also remembered all those APA-logo scientific meeting tote bags I haven’t thrown away.

These may be small obsessive-compulsive signs compared with my hoarding of medical journals. To my amazement, I have more than 2,000 journals in my office. I haven’t looked at more than a handful and probably didn’t read most when I received them. Why do I keep them? Could I have “problems with information processing, obsessional anxiety, and avoiding decisions” that Drs. Feusner and Saxena suggest as targets for psychotherapeutic intervention?

Maybe it’s rational to keep these journals in case I want to look something up, but then why save Current Psychiatry? Its full text is available online.

My best explanation is that old journals are an interior design element. William Morris, the 19th century designer and proponent of the arts and crafts movement, counseled: “Have nothing in your homes that you do not know to be useful or believe to be beautiful.”

Old journals may be visual clutter, but they are beautiful to me because they remind me that psychiatric treatments are backed by decades of study and research. When I wonder if I know anything at all (you have those moments, don’t you?), glancing at my shelves of journals reassures me and gives me courage to continue the perpetually astonishing unknown that is clinical practice.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

 


James Randolph Hillard, MD
Editor-in-Chief

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 04(03)
Publications
Page Number
11-11
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

 


James Randolph Hillard, MD
Editor-in-Chief

Author and Disclosure Information

 


James Randolph Hillard, MD
Editor-in-Chief

Article PDF
Article PDF

Compulsive hoarders collect useless things—most often newspapers, magazines, old clothing, bags, books, mail, notes, and lists, according to this month’s article by Jamie Feusner, MD, and Sanjaya Saxena, MD, of the UCLA Neuropsychiatric Institute.

Initially I thought I didn’t save all of those items since I don’t save old clothes and bags. Then I remembered the closetful of clothes that don’t fit me. I lost weight last year, but—playing the odds—these clothes may fit me again someday and I hesitate to discard them. I also remembered all those APA-logo scientific meeting tote bags I haven’t thrown away.

These may be small obsessive-compulsive signs compared with my hoarding of medical journals. To my amazement, I have more than 2,000 journals in my office. I haven’t looked at more than a handful and probably didn’t read most when I received them. Why do I keep them? Could I have “problems with information processing, obsessional anxiety, and avoiding decisions” that Drs. Feusner and Saxena suggest as targets for psychotherapeutic intervention?

Maybe it’s rational to keep these journals in case I want to look something up, but then why save Current Psychiatry? Its full text is available online.

My best explanation is that old journals are an interior design element. William Morris, the 19th century designer and proponent of the arts and crafts movement, counseled: “Have nothing in your homes that you do not know to be useful or believe to be beautiful.”

Old journals may be visual clutter, but they are beautiful to me because they remind me that psychiatric treatments are backed by decades of study and research. When I wonder if I know anything at all (you have those moments, don’t you?), glancing at my shelves of journals reassures me and gives me courage to continue the perpetually astonishing unknown that is clinical practice.

Compulsive hoarders collect useless things—most often newspapers, magazines, old clothing, bags, books, mail, notes, and lists, according to this month’s article by Jamie Feusner, MD, and Sanjaya Saxena, MD, of the UCLA Neuropsychiatric Institute.

Initially I thought I didn’t save all of those items since I don’t save old clothes and bags. Then I remembered the closetful of clothes that don’t fit me. I lost weight last year, but—playing the odds—these clothes may fit me again someday and I hesitate to discard them. I also remembered all those APA-logo scientific meeting tote bags I haven’t thrown away.

These may be small obsessive-compulsive signs compared with my hoarding of medical journals. To my amazement, I have more than 2,000 journals in my office. I haven’t looked at more than a handful and probably didn’t read most when I received them. Why do I keep them? Could I have “problems with information processing, obsessional anxiety, and avoiding decisions” that Drs. Feusner and Saxena suggest as targets for psychotherapeutic intervention?

Maybe it’s rational to keep these journals in case I want to look something up, but then why save Current Psychiatry? Its full text is available online.

My best explanation is that old journals are an interior design element. William Morris, the 19th century designer and proponent of the arts and crafts movement, counseled: “Have nothing in your homes that you do not know to be useful or believe to be beautiful.”

Old journals may be visual clutter, but they are beautiful to me because they remind me that psychiatric treatments are backed by decades of study and research. When I wonder if I know anything at all (you have those moments, don’t you?), glancing at my shelves of journals reassures me and gives me courage to continue the perpetually astonishing unknown that is clinical practice.

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 04(03)
Issue
Current Psychiatry - 04(03)
Page Number
11-11
Page Number
11-11
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Acknowledging my inner hoarder
Display Headline
Acknowledging my inner hoarder
Sections
Article PDF Media

Psychotic prodrome: Are antipsychotics effective? Ethical?

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 12/11/2018 - 15:10
Display Headline
Psychotic prodrome: Are antipsychotics effective? Ethical?

Because 40% of individuals with a psychotic prodrome develop schizophrenia, detecting and preventing this transition could improve many patients’ lives. Unfortunately:

  • psychotic prodrome lacks clear-cut symptoms and is difficult to identify
  • little evidence exists to help clinicians select psychotropics and decide how long to use them
  • treating all prodromal patients would expose those who never develop psychosis to the risk of psychotropics’ side effects.

How, then, can psychiatrists help patients who present with possible prodromal symptoms? Based on research and our experience, this article describes the psychotic prodrome and offers a pragmatic, evidence-based approach to diagnosis and treatment.

WHAT CAUSES PSYCHOTIC CONVERSION?

Reduced gray matter volumes in certain brain regions may be associated with conversion to psychosis (Box 1). Stress also may play a role; elevated stress-reactive cortisol levels are associated with positive symptom severity in the prodrome.1 Other factors being investigated include obstetric complications at birth, maternal age >30, premorbid schizotypal personality disorder, and impaired olfaction.

Symptoms. Nearly 80% of patients with schizophrenia experience a psychotic prodrome that lasts a few months to several years.2 Common features include:

  • gradual worsening of perceptual disturbance
  • referential thinking
  • paranoia
  • mild cognitive deficits
  • mood lability
  • impulsivity
  • suicidality
  • declining social function and academic performance.3,4
Patients with these symptoms may be at imminent risk; if untreated, an estimated 40% progress to schizophrenia within 1 year.5

A premorbid phase often precedes the prodrome, with symptoms such as impaired attention, soft neurologic signs, and subtle social deficits. These changes may be harbingers of the prodrome but are too nonspecific to be diagnostic. Other functional impairments—including anxiety, depression, drug abuse, and psychosocial factors such as school stress—may mimic schizophrenic prodrome.

Prognosis. Studies of patients’ first schizophrenia episodes suggest that prodrome duration may predict outcome. A longer prodrome is thought to indicate a poor prognosis,6 such as in patients who wait a year before seeking treatment.7 A review of 22 studies of first-episode psychosis found early psychosocial and pharmacologic interventions improved long-term prognosis, and medication discontinuation predicted more-severe and chronic disease.8

Box 1

Neuroimaging detects brain changes during psychotic prodrome

Reduced gray matter volumes in certain brain regions may be associated with conversion to psychosis. Imaging studies have found medial temporal lobe changes—specifically, hippocampal volume alterations—in persons with schizophrenia, genetic high-risk groups, and those thought to be at risk for imminent psychosis.11

MRI imaging of patients with prodromal signs has shown less gray matter in the right medial temporal, lateral temporal, inferior frontal cortex, and bilateral cingulate regions in those who have developed psychosis, compared with those who have not. In the psychotic patients, 12-month longitudinal follow-up has found reduced gray matter in the left hippocampal, fusiform, orbitofrontal, cerebellar cortices, and cingulate gyrus.12

Brain structure is related to genetic liability for schizophrenia in high-risk patients, who seem to have smaller right and left prefrontal lobes and smaller right and left thalami. These findings are consistent with the prodrome’s neurocognitive deficits, which are less than those reported in schizophrenia and greater than those seen in healthy subjects.

Genetic risk. Schizophrenia has a strong genetic predisposition, although not everyone in the genetic high-risk group develops schizophrenia. Persons with a family history of schizophrenia have a 10% to 20% risk of psychotic conversion.9

Pioneering work by McGorry et al10 identified an “ultra high-risk group” with a psychotic conversion rate of 40% to 60%. These patients present with three symptom patterns:

  • attenuated positive symptoms
  • brief intermittent psychotic episodes
  • genetic risk and recent deterioration syndrome (Table 1).
Table 1

3 patient groups considered at ‘ultra high risk’ to develop schizophrenia

Patients with…Symptoms
Attenuated psychotic symptomsOvervalued ideas, perceptual disorders
Present at least 1 week; not >5 years
At least 1 symptom several times a week
Brief intermittent psychotic episodesFrank psychotic features
Resolve spontaneously within 7 days
Can be drug-induced
Genetic risk and recent deterioration syndromePsychotic disorder in a first-degree relative
Schizotypal personality disorder
Present at least 1 month; not >5 years
Significant functional decline
Source: Adapted from reference 10
Early identification of these high-risk individuals with perceptual distortions, frank psychotic symptoms, family history of psychosis, and schizotypal personality disorder may aid in early recognition and treatment.

The Edinburgh High Risk Study of 162 individuals ages 16 to 25 showed more marked psychopathology in those with at least two close relatives with schizophrenia, compared with control groups. A direct correlation was seen between genetic liability and poor neurocognitive performance.11

PRODROME RATING SCALES

Researchers are using outcome measures to diagnose prodromal symptoms and assess their severity. Operational, validated assessment tools include:

  • Bonn Scale for the Assessment of Basic Symptoms (BSABS): captures subtle changes in thinking, feeling, and perception.
  • Schizophrenia Prediction Instrument for Adults (SPI-A): defines prepsychotic deviations and rates symptoms that are subjectively experienced by the patient.
  • Comprehensive Assessment of At Risk Mental State (CAARMS): defines ultra high-risk criteria and incorporates eight dimensions of psychopathology.
  • Scale of Prodromal Symptoms (SOPS): rates psychosis severity. When embedded within the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes (SIPS), the SOPS determines the presence or absence of psychosis and predicts progression to psychopathology.
  • Criteria for Prodromal Symptoms (COPS): defines ultra high-risk categories.
  • Presence of Psychosis Scale (POPS): rates severity, intensity, and duration of positive prodromal symptoms.12
 

 

These instruments may identify prodromal symptoms in psychiatric practice, but further validation of clinical criteria is needed before they could be recommended for routine patient assessment.

PROPHYLACTIC ANTIPSYCHOTICS?

Atypical antipsychotics may be the standard of care for patients with a first psychotic episode, but this intervention is based on few double-blind controlled trials. Not surprisingly, only a handful of studies have examined antipsychotic therapy for the prodrome’s less clear-cut symptoms.

Risperidone. An 8- to 12-week open-label study in adolescents with first- and second-degree relatives with schizophrenia13 included four prodromal and six first-episode psychosis patients who met criteria for a cluster A personality disorder. Risperidone, 1.0 mg/d and 1.8 mg/d, respectively, improved thought disorder and attention symptoms, as measured with the Child Behavior Checklist. Verbal memory improved minimally, and no medication side effects were reported.

An open-label observational study14 identified four middle-aged subjects with a genetic risk of schizophrenia who reported negative symptoms and neurocognitive deficits. Risperidone, started at 0.25 mg/d and gradually increased to a maximum of 2 mg/d, improved negative symptoms, attention, and working memory. Mild side effects including tremors, sedation, dry mouth, and anxiety symptoms were reported.

An open-label, randomized, comparator trial15 examined psychotic transition rates in 59 subjects (mean age, 20) who met ultra high-risk criteria. They received:

  • a needs-based intervention (NBI) comprising case management, psychotropics excluding antipsychotics, and supportive psychotherapy
  • or a specific preventive intervention (SPI) that included risperidone, 1 to 2 mg/d, and a modified cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT).
Table 2

Should you intervene with patients in suspected psychotic prodrome?

Arguments for:
  • Early treatment may prevent psychosocial decline
  • Treatment may delay or ameliorate psychosis onset
  • Treatment may improve patient awareness and acceptance of diagnosis
  • Antipsychotics are effective for symptoms and may be neuroprotective
  • Medications may improve overall outcome
  • Neuroimaging findings may predict psychosis
  • Outcome scales have improved diagnosis
  • Treatment may reduce prodrome duration and improve prognosis
Arguments against:
  • Treatment would likely be given to persons who would not develop psychosis
  • Treatment would unnecessarily stigmatize individuals who do not have schizophrenia
  • Exposing patients with uncertain diagnoses to treatment risks is an ethical dilemma
  • Antipsychotics are associated with side effects
  • Psychotic prodrome studies are inconclusive, with small sample sizes and short follow-up
  • No biological markers exist to predict psychosis
After 6 months, 10 of 28 (36%) in the NBI group had converted to a first episode of psychosis, compared with 3 of 31 (10%) in the SPI group (P = 0.03). At this point, risperidone was stopped, and all patients were offered NBI for 6 more months.

At 12-months’ follow-up, another 3 SPI patients who had been partially adherent or non-adherent to antipsychotic therapy had converted to psychosis. For adherent SPI patients, protection against conversion appeared to persist for 6 months after risperidone therapy ended. All medication side effects were mild and transient.

Table 3

Psychotic prodrome: Unanswered clinical questions

  • Does prodrome reflect a vulnerability for progression to psychosis?
  • Can prodrome progress to psychosis in the absence of early interventions?
  • Does duration of untreated psychosis predict prognosis?
  • Do treatments reduce the risk of conversion to psychosis?
  • Do interventions alter disease severity and prevent relapses?
  • Can early interventions prevent cognitive and functional impairment?
Olanzapine. One double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial has been published using olanzapine in patients with a prodromal syndrome.16 Sixty patients received olanzapine, 5 to 15 mg/d, or placebo. The olanzapine group showed significant reductions in positive, negative, and disorganization subscale scores and total SOPS and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale scores, compared with the placebo group.

In the first year, 11 of 29 placebo-group patients and 5 of 31 receiving olanzapine converted to psychosis. Among patients receiving no treatment in the second year, 2 of 8 former placebo patients and 3 of 9 former olanzapine patients converted to psychosis.

Discontinuation rates were 35% and 28%, respectively. Compared with the placebo group, patients taking olanzapine experienced greater weight gain, suggesting that risks associated with antipsychotic therapy may exceed unproven benefits in this population.

Discussion. Little information exists on using quetiapine, ziprasidone, or aripiprazole in prodromal patients. As cited above, preliminary studies with risperidone and olanzapine suggest that these agents may improve several domains of psychotic prodrome. The evidence does not support firm conclusions, however, given the trials’ small sample sizes and brief duration.

The prevalence of obesity and metabolic syndrome in patients with schizophrenia and the added metabolic risks associated with atypical antipsychotics make their use during the prodrome controversial. Weighing the potential advantages and disadvantages (Table 2), we consider antipsychotics to be the last resort after psychosocial interventions have failed to improve prodromal symptoms.

Low-dose atypical antipsychotics may be warranted for some patients, but their use requires stringent monitoring of:

 

 

  • weight and waist circumference
  • vital signs
  • metabolic parameters such as fasting blood glucose and lipid profile
  • abnormal involuntary movements
  • prolactin elevations.
Lifestyle modification—including diet and exercise to counteract the risk of weight gain—must be part of the treatment plan. Because the exact risks of antipsychotics are unknown—particularly their weight-gain potential among children and adolescents—we recommend specialist consultation (see Related resources) and careful documentation of all treatment decisions and discussions.

OTHER THERAPIES

Antidepressants. Researchers are also exploring the efficacy of using antidepressants and anxiolytics in the prodromal phase. The only published naturalistic study of adolescents found antidepressants alone or in combination with mood stabilizers or anxiolytics to be as effective as atypical antipsychotics in treating prodromal symptoms.17 A more substantial study is ongoing.

Psychotherapy. For patients with a suspected psychotic prodrome, nondrug strategies may help minimize functional and cognitive impairments, ease distress, and improve coping skills.

CBT has been shown to reduce psychotic progression over 12 months.18 Use CBT to help patients cope with the illness while focusing on:

  • symptom monitoring
  • premorbid and present functioning
  • establishing a therapeutic alliance
  • assessing the patient’s experience of psychosis and any thought distortions.
Also assess and treat co-occurring conditions such as alcohol and drug abuse. Involving the family in early intervention has been shown to improve prognosis.19

‘REAL WORLD’ EARLY INTERVENTION

Patients with prodromal symptoms are often referred to psychiatrists by family members, primary care physicians, or other mental health professionals. They tend to be young adults, and a few may present in their teens. Most are experiencing behavioral changes such as social isolation, feeling suspicious, perceptual disturbances, depression, and/or anxiety symptoms that seem abnormal but fall short of DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia diagnosis.

Many clinical questions about schizophrenia’s prodromal phase remain unanswered (Table 3). Our primary aim is to adequately assess these patients and provide treatment and follow-up, taking into account:

  • the individual’s presentation
  • risks and benefits of available interventions.
Begin by educating patients and their families and providing social and emotional support to alleviate their distress that a mental illness may be developing (Box 2). Psychosocial and pharmacologic treatment options are based on presenting symptoms and other patient-specific variables.

Box 2

Early interventions when you suspect psychotic prodrome

  • Provide patients and families information and emotional support; a strong therapeutic alliance may help keep the patient in treatment if schizophrenia develops
  • Offer early psychosocial interventions such as vocational training, relapse prevention, substance abuse treatment, family therapy, supportive and CBT
  • Explore using low-dose atypical antipsychotics as a last resort for patients with pronounced prodromal symptoms; explain risks of weight gain and other metabolic changes, obtain consent, and document need for such interventions
  • Consider referral, if feasible, to a center specializing in psychotic prodrome diagnosis, treatment, and research
Psychotherapy should emphasize coping strategies, education about warning signals of psychotic conversion, establishing a therapeutic alliance, assessing thought distortions, and monitoring premorbid and present functioning.

Consider atypical antipsychotics for patients with distressing psychotic symptoms, rapidly deteriorating function, increased agitation, and safety risks. Consider antidepressant and/or anxiolytic therapy for depression and anxiety, respectively.

Discuss at length with patients and families the risks and benefits of pharmacologic treatments. When clinically appropriate, cautiously discontinue or taper any medication with patients’ consent, while monitoring for side effects and symptoms.

Related resources

  • Issue devoted to early prodrome research. SchizophrBull 2003;29(4):621-879.
  • Diagnostic and therapeutic intervention during psychotic prodrome. CNS Spectrums 2004;9(8):578-606.
  • PRIME (Prevention through Risk Identification, Management & Education) Research Clinic. Department of Psychiatry, Yale University. http://info.med.yale.edu/psych/prime/pintro.html.
  • Youth Mental Health Update. Schizophrenia: New strategies for early detection and treatment. RAPP Clinic, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY. http://schoolnet.lij.edu/eshare/files/rapp.html
Drug brand names

  • Aripiprazole • Abilify
  • Olanzapine • Zyprexa
  • Quetiapine • Seroquel
  • Risperidone • Risperdal
  • Ziprasidone • Geodon
Disclosures

Dr. Narasimhan receives research support from Eli Lilly and Co. and Janssen Pharmaceutica and is a speaker or consultant for Eli Lilly and Co., Pfizer Inc., and Abbott Laboratories.

Dr. Buckley receives research support from AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Eli Lilly and Co., Janssen Pharmaceutica, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., Pfizer Inc., and Solvay Pharmaceuticals. He is a consultant to and/or speaker for Abbott Laboratories, Alamo Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Eli Lilly and Co., Janssen Pharmaceutica, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., Pfizer Inc., and Pharmstar.

References

1. Corcoran C, Walker E, Huot R, et al. The stress cascade and schizophrenia: etiology and onset. Schizophr Bull 2003;29(4):671-92.

2. Klosterkotter J. Diagnosing schizophrenia in the initial prodromal phase. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001;58:158-64.

3. Yung AR. The initial prodrome in psychosis: the prodromal phase of first-episode psychosis: past and current conceptualizations. Schizophr Bull 1996;30:587-99.

4. Perkins DO. Evaluating and treating the prodromal stage of schizophrenia. Current Psychiatry Reports 2004;6:289-95.

5. Wood S W, Miller TJ, McGlashan TH. The “prodromal” patient: both symptomatic and at risk. CNS Spectrums 2001;6(3):223-32.

6. Keshavan MS, Haas G, Miewald J, et al. Prolonged untreated illness duration from prodromal onset predicts outcome in first episode psychosis. Schizoph Bull 2003;29(4):757-69.

7. Loebel AD, Lieberman JA, Alvir JM, et al. Duration of psychosis and outcome in first-episode schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 1992;149:1183-8.

8. Wyatt RJ, Green MF, Tuma AH. Long-term morbidity associated with delayed treatment of first admission schizophrenic patients: a re-analysis of the Camarillo State Hospital data. Psychol Med 1997;27:261-8.

9. Cornblatt BA, Lencz T, Smith CW, et al. The schizophrenia prodrome revisited: a neuro developmental perspective. Schizophr Bull 2003;29(4):633-51.

10. McGorry PD, Yung AR, Phillips LJ. The “close-in” or ultra high-risk model: a safe and effective strategy for research and clinical intervention in prepsychotic mental disorder. Schizophr Bull 2003;29(4):771-90.

11. Johnstone EC, Lawrie SM, Cosway R. What does the Edinburgh high-risk study tell us about schizophrenia? Am J Med Genet 2002;114(8):906-12.

12. Miller TJ, Clashing TH, Rosen JL, et al. Prodromal assessment with the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes and the Scale of Prodromal Syndromes: predictive validity, interrater reliability, and training to reliability. Schizophr Bull 2003;29(4):703-15.

13. Cannon TD, Huttunen MO, Dahlstrom M, et al. Antipsychotic drug treatment in the prodromal phase in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2002;159:1230-2.

14. Tsuang MT, Stone WS, Faraone SV. Treatment of nonpsychotic relatives of patients with schizophrenia: four case studies. Biol Psychiatry 1999;45:1412-18.

15. McGorry PD, Yung AR, Phillips LJ, et al. Randomized controlled trial of intervention designed to reduce the risk of progression to first-episode psychosis in a clinical sample with subthreshold symptoms. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2002;59:921-8.

16. McGlashan TH, Zipursky R, Perkins DO, et al. The PRIME North America randomized double-blind clinical trial of olanzapine versus placebo in patients at risk of being prodromally symptomatic for psychosis. I. Study rationale and design. Schizophr Res 2003;61:7-18.

17. Cornblatt B, Lencz T, Correll C, et al. Treating the prodrome: naturalistic findings from the RAP program. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2002;106(suppl):44.-

18. Morrison AO, French P, Walford L, et al. Cognitive therapy for the prevention of psychosis in people at ultra-high risk: randomized controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2004;185:291-7.

19. Wentzell B. This family experience in a supportive first episode program (abstract S-25-03). Davos, Switzerland: Schizophrenia Research 67(1) 11th Biennial Winter Workshop on Schizophrenia. Feb. 7-13, 2004.

20. Stahl SM. Prophylactic antipsychotics: do they keep you from catching schizophrenia? J Clin Psychiatry 2004;65(11):1445-6.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Meera Narasimhan, MD
Director, psychopharmacology division Associate professor of clinical psychiatry Department of neuropsychiatry and behavioral sciences University of South Carolina School of Medicine Columbia

Peter F. Buckley, MD
Chairman and professor Department of psychiatry and behavioral health Medical College of Georgia, Augusta

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 04(03)
Publications
Page Number
32-46
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Meera Narasimhan, MD
Director, psychopharmacology division Associate professor of clinical psychiatry Department of neuropsychiatry and behavioral sciences University of South Carolina School of Medicine Columbia

Peter F. Buckley, MD
Chairman and professor Department of psychiatry and behavioral health Medical College of Georgia, Augusta

Author and Disclosure Information

Meera Narasimhan, MD
Director, psychopharmacology division Associate professor of clinical psychiatry Department of neuropsychiatry and behavioral sciences University of South Carolina School of Medicine Columbia

Peter F. Buckley, MD
Chairman and professor Department of psychiatry and behavioral health Medical College of Georgia, Augusta

Article PDF
Article PDF

Because 40% of individuals with a psychotic prodrome develop schizophrenia, detecting and preventing this transition could improve many patients’ lives. Unfortunately:

  • psychotic prodrome lacks clear-cut symptoms and is difficult to identify
  • little evidence exists to help clinicians select psychotropics and decide how long to use them
  • treating all prodromal patients would expose those who never develop psychosis to the risk of psychotropics’ side effects.

How, then, can psychiatrists help patients who present with possible prodromal symptoms? Based on research and our experience, this article describes the psychotic prodrome and offers a pragmatic, evidence-based approach to diagnosis and treatment.

WHAT CAUSES PSYCHOTIC CONVERSION?

Reduced gray matter volumes in certain brain regions may be associated with conversion to psychosis (Box 1). Stress also may play a role; elevated stress-reactive cortisol levels are associated with positive symptom severity in the prodrome.1 Other factors being investigated include obstetric complications at birth, maternal age >30, premorbid schizotypal personality disorder, and impaired olfaction.

Symptoms. Nearly 80% of patients with schizophrenia experience a psychotic prodrome that lasts a few months to several years.2 Common features include:

  • gradual worsening of perceptual disturbance
  • referential thinking
  • paranoia
  • mild cognitive deficits
  • mood lability
  • impulsivity
  • suicidality
  • declining social function and academic performance.3,4
Patients with these symptoms may be at imminent risk; if untreated, an estimated 40% progress to schizophrenia within 1 year.5

A premorbid phase often precedes the prodrome, with symptoms such as impaired attention, soft neurologic signs, and subtle social deficits. These changes may be harbingers of the prodrome but are too nonspecific to be diagnostic. Other functional impairments—including anxiety, depression, drug abuse, and psychosocial factors such as school stress—may mimic schizophrenic prodrome.

Prognosis. Studies of patients’ first schizophrenia episodes suggest that prodrome duration may predict outcome. A longer prodrome is thought to indicate a poor prognosis,6 such as in patients who wait a year before seeking treatment.7 A review of 22 studies of first-episode psychosis found early psychosocial and pharmacologic interventions improved long-term prognosis, and medication discontinuation predicted more-severe and chronic disease.8

Box 1

Neuroimaging detects brain changes during psychotic prodrome

Reduced gray matter volumes in certain brain regions may be associated with conversion to psychosis. Imaging studies have found medial temporal lobe changes—specifically, hippocampal volume alterations—in persons with schizophrenia, genetic high-risk groups, and those thought to be at risk for imminent psychosis.11

MRI imaging of patients with prodromal signs has shown less gray matter in the right medial temporal, lateral temporal, inferior frontal cortex, and bilateral cingulate regions in those who have developed psychosis, compared with those who have not. In the psychotic patients, 12-month longitudinal follow-up has found reduced gray matter in the left hippocampal, fusiform, orbitofrontal, cerebellar cortices, and cingulate gyrus.12

Brain structure is related to genetic liability for schizophrenia in high-risk patients, who seem to have smaller right and left prefrontal lobes and smaller right and left thalami. These findings are consistent with the prodrome’s neurocognitive deficits, which are less than those reported in schizophrenia and greater than those seen in healthy subjects.

Genetic risk. Schizophrenia has a strong genetic predisposition, although not everyone in the genetic high-risk group develops schizophrenia. Persons with a family history of schizophrenia have a 10% to 20% risk of psychotic conversion.9

Pioneering work by McGorry et al10 identified an “ultra high-risk group” with a psychotic conversion rate of 40% to 60%. These patients present with three symptom patterns:

  • attenuated positive symptoms
  • brief intermittent psychotic episodes
  • genetic risk and recent deterioration syndrome (Table 1).
Table 1

3 patient groups considered at ‘ultra high risk’ to develop schizophrenia

Patients with…Symptoms
Attenuated psychotic symptomsOvervalued ideas, perceptual disorders
Present at least 1 week; not >5 years
At least 1 symptom several times a week
Brief intermittent psychotic episodesFrank psychotic features
Resolve spontaneously within 7 days
Can be drug-induced
Genetic risk and recent deterioration syndromePsychotic disorder in a first-degree relative
Schizotypal personality disorder
Present at least 1 month; not >5 years
Significant functional decline
Source: Adapted from reference 10
Early identification of these high-risk individuals with perceptual distortions, frank psychotic symptoms, family history of psychosis, and schizotypal personality disorder may aid in early recognition and treatment.

The Edinburgh High Risk Study of 162 individuals ages 16 to 25 showed more marked psychopathology in those with at least two close relatives with schizophrenia, compared with control groups. A direct correlation was seen between genetic liability and poor neurocognitive performance.11

PRODROME RATING SCALES

Researchers are using outcome measures to diagnose prodromal symptoms and assess their severity. Operational, validated assessment tools include:

  • Bonn Scale for the Assessment of Basic Symptoms (BSABS): captures subtle changes in thinking, feeling, and perception.
  • Schizophrenia Prediction Instrument for Adults (SPI-A): defines prepsychotic deviations and rates symptoms that are subjectively experienced by the patient.
  • Comprehensive Assessment of At Risk Mental State (CAARMS): defines ultra high-risk criteria and incorporates eight dimensions of psychopathology.
  • Scale of Prodromal Symptoms (SOPS): rates psychosis severity. When embedded within the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes (SIPS), the SOPS determines the presence or absence of psychosis and predicts progression to psychopathology.
  • Criteria for Prodromal Symptoms (COPS): defines ultra high-risk categories.
  • Presence of Psychosis Scale (POPS): rates severity, intensity, and duration of positive prodromal symptoms.12
 

 

These instruments may identify prodromal symptoms in psychiatric practice, but further validation of clinical criteria is needed before they could be recommended for routine patient assessment.

PROPHYLACTIC ANTIPSYCHOTICS?

Atypical antipsychotics may be the standard of care for patients with a first psychotic episode, but this intervention is based on few double-blind controlled trials. Not surprisingly, only a handful of studies have examined antipsychotic therapy for the prodrome’s less clear-cut symptoms.

Risperidone. An 8- to 12-week open-label study in adolescents with first- and second-degree relatives with schizophrenia13 included four prodromal and six first-episode psychosis patients who met criteria for a cluster A personality disorder. Risperidone, 1.0 mg/d and 1.8 mg/d, respectively, improved thought disorder and attention symptoms, as measured with the Child Behavior Checklist. Verbal memory improved minimally, and no medication side effects were reported.

An open-label observational study14 identified four middle-aged subjects with a genetic risk of schizophrenia who reported negative symptoms and neurocognitive deficits. Risperidone, started at 0.25 mg/d and gradually increased to a maximum of 2 mg/d, improved negative symptoms, attention, and working memory. Mild side effects including tremors, sedation, dry mouth, and anxiety symptoms were reported.

An open-label, randomized, comparator trial15 examined psychotic transition rates in 59 subjects (mean age, 20) who met ultra high-risk criteria. They received:

  • a needs-based intervention (NBI) comprising case management, psychotropics excluding antipsychotics, and supportive psychotherapy
  • or a specific preventive intervention (SPI) that included risperidone, 1 to 2 mg/d, and a modified cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT).
Table 2

Should you intervene with patients in suspected psychotic prodrome?

Arguments for:
  • Early treatment may prevent psychosocial decline
  • Treatment may delay or ameliorate psychosis onset
  • Treatment may improve patient awareness and acceptance of diagnosis
  • Antipsychotics are effective for symptoms and may be neuroprotective
  • Medications may improve overall outcome
  • Neuroimaging findings may predict psychosis
  • Outcome scales have improved diagnosis
  • Treatment may reduce prodrome duration and improve prognosis
Arguments against:
  • Treatment would likely be given to persons who would not develop psychosis
  • Treatment would unnecessarily stigmatize individuals who do not have schizophrenia
  • Exposing patients with uncertain diagnoses to treatment risks is an ethical dilemma
  • Antipsychotics are associated with side effects
  • Psychotic prodrome studies are inconclusive, with small sample sizes and short follow-up
  • No biological markers exist to predict psychosis
After 6 months, 10 of 28 (36%) in the NBI group had converted to a first episode of psychosis, compared with 3 of 31 (10%) in the SPI group (P = 0.03). At this point, risperidone was stopped, and all patients were offered NBI for 6 more months.

At 12-months’ follow-up, another 3 SPI patients who had been partially adherent or non-adherent to antipsychotic therapy had converted to psychosis. For adherent SPI patients, protection against conversion appeared to persist for 6 months after risperidone therapy ended. All medication side effects were mild and transient.

Table 3

Psychotic prodrome: Unanswered clinical questions

  • Does prodrome reflect a vulnerability for progression to psychosis?
  • Can prodrome progress to psychosis in the absence of early interventions?
  • Does duration of untreated psychosis predict prognosis?
  • Do treatments reduce the risk of conversion to psychosis?
  • Do interventions alter disease severity and prevent relapses?
  • Can early interventions prevent cognitive and functional impairment?
Olanzapine. One double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial has been published using olanzapine in patients with a prodromal syndrome.16 Sixty patients received olanzapine, 5 to 15 mg/d, or placebo. The olanzapine group showed significant reductions in positive, negative, and disorganization subscale scores and total SOPS and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale scores, compared with the placebo group.

In the first year, 11 of 29 placebo-group patients and 5 of 31 receiving olanzapine converted to psychosis. Among patients receiving no treatment in the second year, 2 of 8 former placebo patients and 3 of 9 former olanzapine patients converted to psychosis.

Discontinuation rates were 35% and 28%, respectively. Compared with the placebo group, patients taking olanzapine experienced greater weight gain, suggesting that risks associated with antipsychotic therapy may exceed unproven benefits in this population.

Discussion. Little information exists on using quetiapine, ziprasidone, or aripiprazole in prodromal patients. As cited above, preliminary studies with risperidone and olanzapine suggest that these agents may improve several domains of psychotic prodrome. The evidence does not support firm conclusions, however, given the trials’ small sample sizes and brief duration.

The prevalence of obesity and metabolic syndrome in patients with schizophrenia and the added metabolic risks associated with atypical antipsychotics make their use during the prodrome controversial. Weighing the potential advantages and disadvantages (Table 2), we consider antipsychotics to be the last resort after psychosocial interventions have failed to improve prodromal symptoms.

Low-dose atypical antipsychotics may be warranted for some patients, but their use requires stringent monitoring of:

 

 

  • weight and waist circumference
  • vital signs
  • metabolic parameters such as fasting blood glucose and lipid profile
  • abnormal involuntary movements
  • prolactin elevations.
Lifestyle modification—including diet and exercise to counteract the risk of weight gain—must be part of the treatment plan. Because the exact risks of antipsychotics are unknown—particularly their weight-gain potential among children and adolescents—we recommend specialist consultation (see Related resources) and careful documentation of all treatment decisions and discussions.

OTHER THERAPIES

Antidepressants. Researchers are also exploring the efficacy of using antidepressants and anxiolytics in the prodromal phase. The only published naturalistic study of adolescents found antidepressants alone or in combination with mood stabilizers or anxiolytics to be as effective as atypical antipsychotics in treating prodromal symptoms.17 A more substantial study is ongoing.

Psychotherapy. For patients with a suspected psychotic prodrome, nondrug strategies may help minimize functional and cognitive impairments, ease distress, and improve coping skills.

CBT has been shown to reduce psychotic progression over 12 months.18 Use CBT to help patients cope with the illness while focusing on:

  • symptom monitoring
  • premorbid and present functioning
  • establishing a therapeutic alliance
  • assessing the patient’s experience of psychosis and any thought distortions.
Also assess and treat co-occurring conditions such as alcohol and drug abuse. Involving the family in early intervention has been shown to improve prognosis.19

‘REAL WORLD’ EARLY INTERVENTION

Patients with prodromal symptoms are often referred to psychiatrists by family members, primary care physicians, or other mental health professionals. They tend to be young adults, and a few may present in their teens. Most are experiencing behavioral changes such as social isolation, feeling suspicious, perceptual disturbances, depression, and/or anxiety symptoms that seem abnormal but fall short of DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia diagnosis.

Many clinical questions about schizophrenia’s prodromal phase remain unanswered (Table 3). Our primary aim is to adequately assess these patients and provide treatment and follow-up, taking into account:

  • the individual’s presentation
  • risks and benefits of available interventions.
Begin by educating patients and their families and providing social and emotional support to alleviate their distress that a mental illness may be developing (Box 2). Psychosocial and pharmacologic treatment options are based on presenting symptoms and other patient-specific variables.

Box 2

Early interventions when you suspect psychotic prodrome

  • Provide patients and families information and emotional support; a strong therapeutic alliance may help keep the patient in treatment if schizophrenia develops
  • Offer early psychosocial interventions such as vocational training, relapse prevention, substance abuse treatment, family therapy, supportive and CBT
  • Explore using low-dose atypical antipsychotics as a last resort for patients with pronounced prodromal symptoms; explain risks of weight gain and other metabolic changes, obtain consent, and document need for such interventions
  • Consider referral, if feasible, to a center specializing in psychotic prodrome diagnosis, treatment, and research
Psychotherapy should emphasize coping strategies, education about warning signals of psychotic conversion, establishing a therapeutic alliance, assessing thought distortions, and monitoring premorbid and present functioning.

Consider atypical antipsychotics for patients with distressing psychotic symptoms, rapidly deteriorating function, increased agitation, and safety risks. Consider antidepressant and/or anxiolytic therapy for depression and anxiety, respectively.

Discuss at length with patients and families the risks and benefits of pharmacologic treatments. When clinically appropriate, cautiously discontinue or taper any medication with patients’ consent, while monitoring for side effects and symptoms.

Related resources

  • Issue devoted to early prodrome research. SchizophrBull 2003;29(4):621-879.
  • Diagnostic and therapeutic intervention during psychotic prodrome. CNS Spectrums 2004;9(8):578-606.
  • PRIME (Prevention through Risk Identification, Management & Education) Research Clinic. Department of Psychiatry, Yale University. http://info.med.yale.edu/psych/prime/pintro.html.
  • Youth Mental Health Update. Schizophrenia: New strategies for early detection and treatment. RAPP Clinic, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY. http://schoolnet.lij.edu/eshare/files/rapp.html
Drug brand names

  • Aripiprazole • Abilify
  • Olanzapine • Zyprexa
  • Quetiapine • Seroquel
  • Risperidone • Risperdal
  • Ziprasidone • Geodon
Disclosures

Dr. Narasimhan receives research support from Eli Lilly and Co. and Janssen Pharmaceutica and is a speaker or consultant for Eli Lilly and Co., Pfizer Inc., and Abbott Laboratories.

Dr. Buckley receives research support from AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Eli Lilly and Co., Janssen Pharmaceutica, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., Pfizer Inc., and Solvay Pharmaceuticals. He is a consultant to and/or speaker for Abbott Laboratories, Alamo Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Eli Lilly and Co., Janssen Pharmaceutica, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., Pfizer Inc., and Pharmstar.

Because 40% of individuals with a psychotic prodrome develop schizophrenia, detecting and preventing this transition could improve many patients’ lives. Unfortunately:

  • psychotic prodrome lacks clear-cut symptoms and is difficult to identify
  • little evidence exists to help clinicians select psychotropics and decide how long to use them
  • treating all prodromal patients would expose those who never develop psychosis to the risk of psychotropics’ side effects.

How, then, can psychiatrists help patients who present with possible prodromal symptoms? Based on research and our experience, this article describes the psychotic prodrome and offers a pragmatic, evidence-based approach to diagnosis and treatment.

WHAT CAUSES PSYCHOTIC CONVERSION?

Reduced gray matter volumes in certain brain regions may be associated with conversion to psychosis (Box 1). Stress also may play a role; elevated stress-reactive cortisol levels are associated with positive symptom severity in the prodrome.1 Other factors being investigated include obstetric complications at birth, maternal age >30, premorbid schizotypal personality disorder, and impaired olfaction.

Symptoms. Nearly 80% of patients with schizophrenia experience a psychotic prodrome that lasts a few months to several years.2 Common features include:

  • gradual worsening of perceptual disturbance
  • referential thinking
  • paranoia
  • mild cognitive deficits
  • mood lability
  • impulsivity
  • suicidality
  • declining social function and academic performance.3,4
Patients with these symptoms may be at imminent risk; if untreated, an estimated 40% progress to schizophrenia within 1 year.5

A premorbid phase often precedes the prodrome, with symptoms such as impaired attention, soft neurologic signs, and subtle social deficits. These changes may be harbingers of the prodrome but are too nonspecific to be diagnostic. Other functional impairments—including anxiety, depression, drug abuse, and psychosocial factors such as school stress—may mimic schizophrenic prodrome.

Prognosis. Studies of patients’ first schizophrenia episodes suggest that prodrome duration may predict outcome. A longer prodrome is thought to indicate a poor prognosis,6 such as in patients who wait a year before seeking treatment.7 A review of 22 studies of first-episode psychosis found early psychosocial and pharmacologic interventions improved long-term prognosis, and medication discontinuation predicted more-severe and chronic disease.8

Box 1

Neuroimaging detects brain changes during psychotic prodrome

Reduced gray matter volumes in certain brain regions may be associated with conversion to psychosis. Imaging studies have found medial temporal lobe changes—specifically, hippocampal volume alterations—in persons with schizophrenia, genetic high-risk groups, and those thought to be at risk for imminent psychosis.11

MRI imaging of patients with prodromal signs has shown less gray matter in the right medial temporal, lateral temporal, inferior frontal cortex, and bilateral cingulate regions in those who have developed psychosis, compared with those who have not. In the psychotic patients, 12-month longitudinal follow-up has found reduced gray matter in the left hippocampal, fusiform, orbitofrontal, cerebellar cortices, and cingulate gyrus.12

Brain structure is related to genetic liability for schizophrenia in high-risk patients, who seem to have smaller right and left prefrontal lobes and smaller right and left thalami. These findings are consistent with the prodrome’s neurocognitive deficits, which are less than those reported in schizophrenia and greater than those seen in healthy subjects.

Genetic risk. Schizophrenia has a strong genetic predisposition, although not everyone in the genetic high-risk group develops schizophrenia. Persons with a family history of schizophrenia have a 10% to 20% risk of psychotic conversion.9

Pioneering work by McGorry et al10 identified an “ultra high-risk group” with a psychotic conversion rate of 40% to 60%. These patients present with three symptom patterns:

  • attenuated positive symptoms
  • brief intermittent psychotic episodes
  • genetic risk and recent deterioration syndrome (Table 1).
Table 1

3 patient groups considered at ‘ultra high risk’ to develop schizophrenia

Patients with…Symptoms
Attenuated psychotic symptomsOvervalued ideas, perceptual disorders
Present at least 1 week; not >5 years
At least 1 symptom several times a week
Brief intermittent psychotic episodesFrank psychotic features
Resolve spontaneously within 7 days
Can be drug-induced
Genetic risk and recent deterioration syndromePsychotic disorder in a first-degree relative
Schizotypal personality disorder
Present at least 1 month; not >5 years
Significant functional decline
Source: Adapted from reference 10
Early identification of these high-risk individuals with perceptual distortions, frank psychotic symptoms, family history of psychosis, and schizotypal personality disorder may aid in early recognition and treatment.

The Edinburgh High Risk Study of 162 individuals ages 16 to 25 showed more marked psychopathology in those with at least two close relatives with schizophrenia, compared with control groups. A direct correlation was seen between genetic liability and poor neurocognitive performance.11

PRODROME RATING SCALES

Researchers are using outcome measures to diagnose prodromal symptoms and assess their severity. Operational, validated assessment tools include:

  • Bonn Scale for the Assessment of Basic Symptoms (BSABS): captures subtle changes in thinking, feeling, and perception.
  • Schizophrenia Prediction Instrument for Adults (SPI-A): defines prepsychotic deviations and rates symptoms that are subjectively experienced by the patient.
  • Comprehensive Assessment of At Risk Mental State (CAARMS): defines ultra high-risk criteria and incorporates eight dimensions of psychopathology.
  • Scale of Prodromal Symptoms (SOPS): rates psychosis severity. When embedded within the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes (SIPS), the SOPS determines the presence or absence of psychosis and predicts progression to psychopathology.
  • Criteria for Prodromal Symptoms (COPS): defines ultra high-risk categories.
  • Presence of Psychosis Scale (POPS): rates severity, intensity, and duration of positive prodromal symptoms.12
 

 

These instruments may identify prodromal symptoms in psychiatric practice, but further validation of clinical criteria is needed before they could be recommended for routine patient assessment.

PROPHYLACTIC ANTIPSYCHOTICS?

Atypical antipsychotics may be the standard of care for patients with a first psychotic episode, but this intervention is based on few double-blind controlled trials. Not surprisingly, only a handful of studies have examined antipsychotic therapy for the prodrome’s less clear-cut symptoms.

Risperidone. An 8- to 12-week open-label study in adolescents with first- and second-degree relatives with schizophrenia13 included four prodromal and six first-episode psychosis patients who met criteria for a cluster A personality disorder. Risperidone, 1.0 mg/d and 1.8 mg/d, respectively, improved thought disorder and attention symptoms, as measured with the Child Behavior Checklist. Verbal memory improved minimally, and no medication side effects were reported.

An open-label observational study14 identified four middle-aged subjects with a genetic risk of schizophrenia who reported negative symptoms and neurocognitive deficits. Risperidone, started at 0.25 mg/d and gradually increased to a maximum of 2 mg/d, improved negative symptoms, attention, and working memory. Mild side effects including tremors, sedation, dry mouth, and anxiety symptoms were reported.

An open-label, randomized, comparator trial15 examined psychotic transition rates in 59 subjects (mean age, 20) who met ultra high-risk criteria. They received:

  • a needs-based intervention (NBI) comprising case management, psychotropics excluding antipsychotics, and supportive psychotherapy
  • or a specific preventive intervention (SPI) that included risperidone, 1 to 2 mg/d, and a modified cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT).
Table 2

Should you intervene with patients in suspected psychotic prodrome?

Arguments for:
  • Early treatment may prevent psychosocial decline
  • Treatment may delay or ameliorate psychosis onset
  • Treatment may improve patient awareness and acceptance of diagnosis
  • Antipsychotics are effective for symptoms and may be neuroprotective
  • Medications may improve overall outcome
  • Neuroimaging findings may predict psychosis
  • Outcome scales have improved diagnosis
  • Treatment may reduce prodrome duration and improve prognosis
Arguments against:
  • Treatment would likely be given to persons who would not develop psychosis
  • Treatment would unnecessarily stigmatize individuals who do not have schizophrenia
  • Exposing patients with uncertain diagnoses to treatment risks is an ethical dilemma
  • Antipsychotics are associated with side effects
  • Psychotic prodrome studies are inconclusive, with small sample sizes and short follow-up
  • No biological markers exist to predict psychosis
After 6 months, 10 of 28 (36%) in the NBI group had converted to a first episode of psychosis, compared with 3 of 31 (10%) in the SPI group (P = 0.03). At this point, risperidone was stopped, and all patients were offered NBI for 6 more months.

At 12-months’ follow-up, another 3 SPI patients who had been partially adherent or non-adherent to antipsychotic therapy had converted to psychosis. For adherent SPI patients, protection against conversion appeared to persist for 6 months after risperidone therapy ended. All medication side effects were mild and transient.

Table 3

Psychotic prodrome: Unanswered clinical questions

  • Does prodrome reflect a vulnerability for progression to psychosis?
  • Can prodrome progress to psychosis in the absence of early interventions?
  • Does duration of untreated psychosis predict prognosis?
  • Do treatments reduce the risk of conversion to psychosis?
  • Do interventions alter disease severity and prevent relapses?
  • Can early interventions prevent cognitive and functional impairment?
Olanzapine. One double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial has been published using olanzapine in patients with a prodromal syndrome.16 Sixty patients received olanzapine, 5 to 15 mg/d, or placebo. The olanzapine group showed significant reductions in positive, negative, and disorganization subscale scores and total SOPS and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale scores, compared with the placebo group.

In the first year, 11 of 29 placebo-group patients and 5 of 31 receiving olanzapine converted to psychosis. Among patients receiving no treatment in the second year, 2 of 8 former placebo patients and 3 of 9 former olanzapine patients converted to psychosis.

Discontinuation rates were 35% and 28%, respectively. Compared with the placebo group, patients taking olanzapine experienced greater weight gain, suggesting that risks associated with antipsychotic therapy may exceed unproven benefits in this population.

Discussion. Little information exists on using quetiapine, ziprasidone, or aripiprazole in prodromal patients. As cited above, preliminary studies with risperidone and olanzapine suggest that these agents may improve several domains of psychotic prodrome. The evidence does not support firm conclusions, however, given the trials’ small sample sizes and brief duration.

The prevalence of obesity and metabolic syndrome in patients with schizophrenia and the added metabolic risks associated with atypical antipsychotics make their use during the prodrome controversial. Weighing the potential advantages and disadvantages (Table 2), we consider antipsychotics to be the last resort after psychosocial interventions have failed to improve prodromal symptoms.

Low-dose atypical antipsychotics may be warranted for some patients, but their use requires stringent monitoring of:

 

 

  • weight and waist circumference
  • vital signs
  • metabolic parameters such as fasting blood glucose and lipid profile
  • abnormal involuntary movements
  • prolactin elevations.
Lifestyle modification—including diet and exercise to counteract the risk of weight gain—must be part of the treatment plan. Because the exact risks of antipsychotics are unknown—particularly their weight-gain potential among children and adolescents—we recommend specialist consultation (see Related resources) and careful documentation of all treatment decisions and discussions.

OTHER THERAPIES

Antidepressants. Researchers are also exploring the efficacy of using antidepressants and anxiolytics in the prodromal phase. The only published naturalistic study of adolescents found antidepressants alone or in combination with mood stabilizers or anxiolytics to be as effective as atypical antipsychotics in treating prodromal symptoms.17 A more substantial study is ongoing.

Psychotherapy. For patients with a suspected psychotic prodrome, nondrug strategies may help minimize functional and cognitive impairments, ease distress, and improve coping skills.

CBT has been shown to reduce psychotic progression over 12 months.18 Use CBT to help patients cope with the illness while focusing on:

  • symptom monitoring
  • premorbid and present functioning
  • establishing a therapeutic alliance
  • assessing the patient’s experience of psychosis and any thought distortions.
Also assess and treat co-occurring conditions such as alcohol and drug abuse. Involving the family in early intervention has been shown to improve prognosis.19

‘REAL WORLD’ EARLY INTERVENTION

Patients with prodromal symptoms are often referred to psychiatrists by family members, primary care physicians, or other mental health professionals. They tend to be young adults, and a few may present in their teens. Most are experiencing behavioral changes such as social isolation, feeling suspicious, perceptual disturbances, depression, and/or anxiety symptoms that seem abnormal but fall short of DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia diagnosis.

Many clinical questions about schizophrenia’s prodromal phase remain unanswered (Table 3). Our primary aim is to adequately assess these patients and provide treatment and follow-up, taking into account:

  • the individual’s presentation
  • risks and benefits of available interventions.
Begin by educating patients and their families and providing social and emotional support to alleviate their distress that a mental illness may be developing (Box 2). Psychosocial and pharmacologic treatment options are based on presenting symptoms and other patient-specific variables.

Box 2

Early interventions when you suspect psychotic prodrome

  • Provide patients and families information and emotional support; a strong therapeutic alliance may help keep the patient in treatment if schizophrenia develops
  • Offer early psychosocial interventions such as vocational training, relapse prevention, substance abuse treatment, family therapy, supportive and CBT
  • Explore using low-dose atypical antipsychotics as a last resort for patients with pronounced prodromal symptoms; explain risks of weight gain and other metabolic changes, obtain consent, and document need for such interventions
  • Consider referral, if feasible, to a center specializing in psychotic prodrome diagnosis, treatment, and research
Psychotherapy should emphasize coping strategies, education about warning signals of psychotic conversion, establishing a therapeutic alliance, assessing thought distortions, and monitoring premorbid and present functioning.

Consider atypical antipsychotics for patients with distressing psychotic symptoms, rapidly deteriorating function, increased agitation, and safety risks. Consider antidepressant and/or anxiolytic therapy for depression and anxiety, respectively.

Discuss at length with patients and families the risks and benefits of pharmacologic treatments. When clinically appropriate, cautiously discontinue or taper any medication with patients’ consent, while monitoring for side effects and symptoms.

Related resources

  • Issue devoted to early prodrome research. SchizophrBull 2003;29(4):621-879.
  • Diagnostic and therapeutic intervention during psychotic prodrome. CNS Spectrums 2004;9(8):578-606.
  • PRIME (Prevention through Risk Identification, Management & Education) Research Clinic. Department of Psychiatry, Yale University. http://info.med.yale.edu/psych/prime/pintro.html.
  • Youth Mental Health Update. Schizophrenia: New strategies for early detection and treatment. RAPP Clinic, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY. http://schoolnet.lij.edu/eshare/files/rapp.html
Drug brand names

  • Aripiprazole • Abilify
  • Olanzapine • Zyprexa
  • Quetiapine • Seroquel
  • Risperidone • Risperdal
  • Ziprasidone • Geodon
Disclosures

Dr. Narasimhan receives research support from Eli Lilly and Co. and Janssen Pharmaceutica and is a speaker or consultant for Eli Lilly and Co., Pfizer Inc., and Abbott Laboratories.

Dr. Buckley receives research support from AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Eli Lilly and Co., Janssen Pharmaceutica, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., Pfizer Inc., and Solvay Pharmaceuticals. He is a consultant to and/or speaker for Abbott Laboratories, Alamo Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Eli Lilly and Co., Janssen Pharmaceutica, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., Pfizer Inc., and Pharmstar.

References

1. Corcoran C, Walker E, Huot R, et al. The stress cascade and schizophrenia: etiology and onset. Schizophr Bull 2003;29(4):671-92.

2. Klosterkotter J. Diagnosing schizophrenia in the initial prodromal phase. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001;58:158-64.

3. Yung AR. The initial prodrome in psychosis: the prodromal phase of first-episode psychosis: past and current conceptualizations. Schizophr Bull 1996;30:587-99.

4. Perkins DO. Evaluating and treating the prodromal stage of schizophrenia. Current Psychiatry Reports 2004;6:289-95.

5. Wood S W, Miller TJ, McGlashan TH. The “prodromal” patient: both symptomatic and at risk. CNS Spectrums 2001;6(3):223-32.

6. Keshavan MS, Haas G, Miewald J, et al. Prolonged untreated illness duration from prodromal onset predicts outcome in first episode psychosis. Schizoph Bull 2003;29(4):757-69.

7. Loebel AD, Lieberman JA, Alvir JM, et al. Duration of psychosis and outcome in first-episode schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 1992;149:1183-8.

8. Wyatt RJ, Green MF, Tuma AH. Long-term morbidity associated with delayed treatment of first admission schizophrenic patients: a re-analysis of the Camarillo State Hospital data. Psychol Med 1997;27:261-8.

9. Cornblatt BA, Lencz T, Smith CW, et al. The schizophrenia prodrome revisited: a neuro developmental perspective. Schizophr Bull 2003;29(4):633-51.

10. McGorry PD, Yung AR, Phillips LJ. The “close-in” or ultra high-risk model: a safe and effective strategy for research and clinical intervention in prepsychotic mental disorder. Schizophr Bull 2003;29(4):771-90.

11. Johnstone EC, Lawrie SM, Cosway R. What does the Edinburgh high-risk study tell us about schizophrenia? Am J Med Genet 2002;114(8):906-12.

12. Miller TJ, Clashing TH, Rosen JL, et al. Prodromal assessment with the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes and the Scale of Prodromal Syndromes: predictive validity, interrater reliability, and training to reliability. Schizophr Bull 2003;29(4):703-15.

13. Cannon TD, Huttunen MO, Dahlstrom M, et al. Antipsychotic drug treatment in the prodromal phase in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2002;159:1230-2.

14. Tsuang MT, Stone WS, Faraone SV. Treatment of nonpsychotic relatives of patients with schizophrenia: four case studies. Biol Psychiatry 1999;45:1412-18.

15. McGorry PD, Yung AR, Phillips LJ, et al. Randomized controlled trial of intervention designed to reduce the risk of progression to first-episode psychosis in a clinical sample with subthreshold symptoms. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2002;59:921-8.

16. McGlashan TH, Zipursky R, Perkins DO, et al. The PRIME North America randomized double-blind clinical trial of olanzapine versus placebo in patients at risk of being prodromally symptomatic for psychosis. I. Study rationale and design. Schizophr Res 2003;61:7-18.

17. Cornblatt B, Lencz T, Correll C, et al. Treating the prodrome: naturalistic findings from the RAP program. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2002;106(suppl):44.-

18. Morrison AO, French P, Walford L, et al. Cognitive therapy for the prevention of psychosis in people at ultra-high risk: randomized controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2004;185:291-7.

19. Wentzell B. This family experience in a supportive first episode program (abstract S-25-03). Davos, Switzerland: Schizophrenia Research 67(1) 11th Biennial Winter Workshop on Schizophrenia. Feb. 7-13, 2004.

20. Stahl SM. Prophylactic antipsychotics: do they keep you from catching schizophrenia? J Clin Psychiatry 2004;65(11):1445-6.

References

1. Corcoran C, Walker E, Huot R, et al. The stress cascade and schizophrenia: etiology and onset. Schizophr Bull 2003;29(4):671-92.

2. Klosterkotter J. Diagnosing schizophrenia in the initial prodromal phase. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001;58:158-64.

3. Yung AR. The initial prodrome in psychosis: the prodromal phase of first-episode psychosis: past and current conceptualizations. Schizophr Bull 1996;30:587-99.

4. Perkins DO. Evaluating and treating the prodromal stage of schizophrenia. Current Psychiatry Reports 2004;6:289-95.

5. Wood S W, Miller TJ, McGlashan TH. The “prodromal” patient: both symptomatic and at risk. CNS Spectrums 2001;6(3):223-32.

6. Keshavan MS, Haas G, Miewald J, et al. Prolonged untreated illness duration from prodromal onset predicts outcome in first episode psychosis. Schizoph Bull 2003;29(4):757-69.

7. Loebel AD, Lieberman JA, Alvir JM, et al. Duration of psychosis and outcome in first-episode schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 1992;149:1183-8.

8. Wyatt RJ, Green MF, Tuma AH. Long-term morbidity associated with delayed treatment of first admission schizophrenic patients: a re-analysis of the Camarillo State Hospital data. Psychol Med 1997;27:261-8.

9. Cornblatt BA, Lencz T, Smith CW, et al. The schizophrenia prodrome revisited: a neuro developmental perspective. Schizophr Bull 2003;29(4):633-51.

10. McGorry PD, Yung AR, Phillips LJ. The “close-in” or ultra high-risk model: a safe and effective strategy for research and clinical intervention in prepsychotic mental disorder. Schizophr Bull 2003;29(4):771-90.

11. Johnstone EC, Lawrie SM, Cosway R. What does the Edinburgh high-risk study tell us about schizophrenia? Am J Med Genet 2002;114(8):906-12.

12. Miller TJ, Clashing TH, Rosen JL, et al. Prodromal assessment with the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes and the Scale of Prodromal Syndromes: predictive validity, interrater reliability, and training to reliability. Schizophr Bull 2003;29(4):703-15.

13. Cannon TD, Huttunen MO, Dahlstrom M, et al. Antipsychotic drug treatment in the prodromal phase in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2002;159:1230-2.

14. Tsuang MT, Stone WS, Faraone SV. Treatment of nonpsychotic relatives of patients with schizophrenia: four case studies. Biol Psychiatry 1999;45:1412-18.

15. McGorry PD, Yung AR, Phillips LJ, et al. Randomized controlled trial of intervention designed to reduce the risk of progression to first-episode psychosis in a clinical sample with subthreshold symptoms. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2002;59:921-8.

16. McGlashan TH, Zipursky R, Perkins DO, et al. The PRIME North America randomized double-blind clinical trial of olanzapine versus placebo in patients at risk of being prodromally symptomatic for psychosis. I. Study rationale and design. Schizophr Res 2003;61:7-18.

17. Cornblatt B, Lencz T, Correll C, et al. Treating the prodrome: naturalistic findings from the RAP program. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2002;106(suppl):44.-

18. Morrison AO, French P, Walford L, et al. Cognitive therapy for the prevention of psychosis in people at ultra-high risk: randomized controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2004;185:291-7.

19. Wentzell B. This family experience in a supportive first episode program (abstract S-25-03). Davos, Switzerland: Schizophrenia Research 67(1) 11th Biennial Winter Workshop on Schizophrenia. Feb. 7-13, 2004.

20. Stahl SM. Prophylactic antipsychotics: do they keep you from catching schizophrenia? J Clin Psychiatry 2004;65(11):1445-6.

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 04(03)
Issue
Current Psychiatry - 04(03)
Page Number
32-46
Page Number
32-46
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Psychotic prodrome: Are antipsychotics effective? Ethical?
Display Headline
Psychotic prodrome: Are antipsychotics effective? Ethical?
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Getting to the heart of panic disorder

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 12/11/2018 - 15:31
Display Headline
Getting to the heart of panic disorder

HISTORY: LIFE AT HOME

For nearly 10 years Mr. P, age 50, has had episodes of shortness of breath, increasing perspiration, and faintness that occur 2 to 3 times a month, usually when he’s out of the house. Fearing his legs will give out in public, he never goes out except to shop with his wife.

Once a welder for an aircraft company, he has been unable to work for 6 years. He worries incessantly about his medical expenses, and smokes 1 pack of cigarettes per day to help control the anxiety.

Baseline laboratory tests reveal a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level of 199 mg/dL, exceeding the optimal range by 100 mg/dL. Total cholesterol is 288 mg/dL and triglycerides are 244 mg/dL. Thyroid stimulating hormone, liver function, renal function, serum electrolytes, and serum glucose are normal. Mr. P meets DSM-IV-TR criteria for panic disorder with agoraphobia and is started on citalopram, 20 mg/d.

At follow-up 2 weeks later, Mr. P complains that the citalopram is causing ‘aches and pains’ in his back and legs, so we switch to controlled-release paroxetine, 12.5 mg/d, which we found in clinical practice to be more tolerable than immediate-release paroxetine. After 2 weeks, he says he cannot tolerate the paroxetine because of ‘body aches.’

At Mr. P’s insistence, we switch to alprazolam, 0.5 mg tid, although his desire to start taking alprazolam makes us suspect that he might be trying to obtain this benzodiazepine for illicit use.

Neuropsychological tests—including a diagnostic interview, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, and Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory—are ordered after Mr. P’s third visit. He seems guarded when answering questions about himself during these interviews. He acknowledges having severe physical symptoms but appears unwilling to accept a psychiatric diagnosis for them.

The authors’ observations

Panic disorder is usually chronic and can cause considerable morbidity. DSM-IV-TR criteria for panic disorder include recurrent or unexpected panic attacks and persistent fear of additional attacks and their implications and consequences.1 Panic disorder can also lead to social problems including unemployment, financial dependence, and substance abuse or dependence.2

Mr. P’s anxiety, shortness of breath, faintness, and profuse sweating during episodes match DSM-IV-TR criteria for panic attacks (Table 1). His ruminative and obsessive attitude toward his physical problems does not suggest somatoform disorder because he also thinks obsessively about other issues, such as his medical expenses.

We will watch for signs of prescription drug abuse, including premature requests for refills, use of multiple pharmacies, or complaints of lost prescription or medication.3

FURTHER HISTORY: FAINT MEMORY

Mr. P first sought medical help in 1996 after fainting at home while standing up. A few weeks later he experienced sudden dizziness, faintness, and perspiration while shopping with his wife. During that episode, he said, he barely made it out of the store before passing out in his truck. His wife described him as ‘pale and gray’ and rushed him to the emergency room. The ER physician suspected that Mr. P suffered a ‘convulsive episode’ and ordered testing. Results of awake and sleep EEG and head MRI were normal. Laboratory work revealed a positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) and rheumatoid factor (RF), suggesting pulmonary vasculitis.

Table 1

DSM-IV-TR criteria for panic attack

A discrete period of intense fear or discomfort, in which four (or more) of the following symptoms developed abruptly and reached a peak within 10 minutes:
  • palpitations
  • sweating
  • trembling or shaking
  • shortness of breath or smothering
  • feeling of choking
  • chest pain or discomfort
  • nausea or abdominal distress
  • feeling dizzy, unsteady, lightheaded, or faint
  • derealization or depersonalization
  • fear of losing control or going crazy
  • fear of dying
  • paresthesias
  • chills or hot flushes
Source: Adapted and reprinted with permission from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed, text revision). Copyright 2000. American Psychiatric Association.
Mr. P, who was still working at the aircraft company, continued to seek medical opinions. He was diagnosed alternately as having chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, and sleep apnea. He said a pulmonologist told him he had lung fibrosis but that the disorder would resolve without treatment. At one point, he was prescribed a continuous positive airway pressure device (CPAP) to manage what was thought to be sleep apnea.

Two years and 17 doctors later, Mr. P’s physical symptoms persisted. He stopped working and began collecting disability insurance benefits. Frustrated over the lack of a definitive diagnosis, he then went 6 years without seeing a doctor.

TREATMENT: INTENSE ‘PANIC’

Mr. P has been coming to our clinic for 8 months. He takes 0.5 mg of alprazolam twice daily—less frequently than prescribed—and has never prematurely requested a refill, so prescription abuse is ruled out. He joins a fibromyalgia support group but laments that his symptoms differ from those of other group members. During follow-up visits, he continues to focus on his somatic symptoms.

 

 

During a routine visit, Mr. P tells us that he recently suffered an intense ‘panic’ episode—consisting of shortness of breath, dizziness, diaphoresis, chest pain, palpitations, and near syncope—less than 15 minutes after he started clearing brush in his backyard. We notice marked clubbing on Mr. P’s fingers, a physical sign seen in congenital heart disease, infective endocarditis, pulmonary fibrosis, and numerous other diseases.4

The clubbing prompts us to ask about his occupational history in detail, as work-related exposure to chemicals or fumes may result in pulmonary fibrosis. We then learn that for approximately 20 years before joining the aircraft company, Mr. P welded without wearing protective equipment—all that time inhaling noxious fumes while working.

We refer Mr. P to an internist, who finds clubbing of the fingers, decreased breath sounds, and increased pulmonic second heart sound (P2) on auscultation. The internist then orders:

  • ECG, which reveals right axis deviation, incomplete right bundle branch block, and right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH)
  • Pulmonary function tests, which show decreased diffusing capacity. Subsequent heart catheterization reveals RVH and concentric left ventricular hypertrophy.
Mr. P is told to quit smoking and to use his CPAP nightly to minimize progression of his right ventricular dysfunction. He had been using his CPAP sporadically because he found it uncomfortable.

The authors’ observations

Panic attacks often mimic symptoms of cardiac or pulmonary disease. By the same token, symptoms of an underlying cardiac or pulmonary disease can be mistaken for panic disorder, particularly in patients whose past episodes appear to meet DSM-IV-TR panic attack criteria (Table 2).5

Table 2

Panic attack symptoms that may suggest a cardiopulmonary disease

Panic attack symptomPossible cardiopulmonary disorder
Palpitations, chest discomfort, feeling faintCardiac arrhythmia
Breathlessness, fatigue, weaknessHeart failure
Weakness, nausea, diaphoresis, feelings of hot/cold associated with diaphoresis, paresthesias, lightheadedness, fear of dyingCardiac or neurologic syncope
Intense, escalating chest pain/discomfort; may be accompanied by nausea, diaphoresis, dizziness, feelings of hot/cold associated with diaphoresisAcute myocardial infarction
Shortness of breath, fatigue, weakness, feeling of chokingPulmonary congestion*
* Because the lung parenchyma and visceral pleura lack pain fibers, pulmonary abnormalities related to these structures can be advanced before symptoms are noticed.
Source: reference 5
Patients with panic disorder seek medical help more frequently than do patients with other anxiety disorders.6 About one-third of patients with panic disorder seek psychiatric treatment, and almost as many seek medical help,6 possibly because of the complicated array of symptoms simultaneously involving cardiac and pulmonary systems.

To avoid unnecessary referrals, psychiatrists need to quickly and accurately discern:

  • when a medical problem is causing the patient’s symptoms
  • how far to carry the medical evaluation, particularly for patients with palpitations, chest pain, or shortness of breath.
No reliable screening tool exists for differentiating panic from cardiopulmonary symptoms. A screening inventory developed by Barsky et al7 for patients complaining of palpitations focuses on somatization and hypochondriacal attitudes, which are common among psychiatric patients. This tool, however, does not take into account presence of cardiac risk factors.

Also, a psychiatric patient whose mental disorder or comorbid axis II pathology compromises speech or cognitive function may have trouble communicating potentially serious medical problems to other clinicians. Mr. P’s guarded demeanor and obsession toward his physical problems may have kept him from accurately describing his symptoms in a clinical setting. Alternately, he might have misinterpreted his pulmonologist’s explanation of pulmonary fibrosis, thus believing the disorder was not serious.

Finally, patients with panic disorder are more aware of their heartbeats and physiologic responses than are persons without panic disorder,8 thus further complicating diagnosis.

UNCOVERING A MEDICAL CAUSE

Suspect an underlying heart or lung problem when panic symptoms affect breathing or resemble a heart attack.

Check for predisposing risk factors for cardiac disease. Ask the patient detailed questions about past and current medical problems, including:

  • smoking
  • hyperlipidemia
  • diabetes
  • heart problems
  • pulmonary disease
  • family history of any medical problems
  • work-related exposure to any metal that may increase risk of cardiopulmonary disease.
Refer the patient for medical evaluation if any of the above risk factors are discovered.

Review medical treatment history. Mentally ill persons are more likely than those without a mental illness to receive inadequate general medical and preventative care.9 Patient, provider, and health care system issues—such as lack of insurance or the patient’s inability to recognize or describe symptoms—may impede medical care delivery to the mentally ill.9

Review overall history. A deeper look into Mr. P’s work and diagnostic history uncovered numerous possible causes of right heart failure, including:

  • pulmonary fibrosis secondary to inhalational injury
  • possible pulmonary vasculitis as indicated by his positive ANA and RF.
As time progressed, either of these underlying lung pathologies amid sleep apnea and smoking could have increased Mr. P’s cardiopulmonary risk.
 

 


FOLLOW-UP: A PANIC-FREE FUTURE

Over the next 4 weeks, Mr. P has stopped taking alprazolam and begins to understand that his episodes were secondary to cardiopulmonary dysfunction. No longer afraid of developing a panic attack, he is going out more often.

Mr. P recently told us that he started a part-time job, decreased his smoking to a half pack/day, and has a plan to quit smoking completely. He adds that he is using his CPAP machine regularly and has remained free of panic-like episodes. He limits physical exertion to avoid cardiopulmonary symptoms.

Related resources

  • Raj A, Sheehan DV. Medical evaluation of panic attacks. J Clin Psychiatry 1987;48:309-13.
  • Jones DR, Macias C, Barreira PJ, et al. Prevalence, severity, and co-occurrence of chronic physical health problems of persons with serious mental illness. Psychiatr Serv 2004;55:1250-7.
Drug brand names

  • Alprazolam • Xanax
  • Citalopram • Celexa
  • Paroxetine • Paxil
Disclosure

Dr. Khan is a speaker for Wyeth Pharmaceuticals.

Dr. Grimsley reports no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

References

1. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed-rev). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.

2. Leon AC, Portera L, Weissman MM, et al. The social costs of anxiety disorders. Br J Psychiatry 1995;166(suppl 27):19-22.

3. Altchuler SI. How to detect and prevent prescription abuse. Current Psychiatry 2002;1(10):90.-

4. Tierney LM, McPhee SJ, Papadakis MA. Current medical diagnosis & treatment (44th ed). New York: McGraw Hill/Appleton & Lange; 2005:241.

5. Humes HD, Dupont HL (eds). Kelley’s textbook of internal medicine (4th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000;360-73,2403-11.

6. Kessler RC, McGofagle KA, Zhao S, et al. Lifetime and 12 month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States: results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994;51:8-19.

7. Barsky AJ, Ahern DK, Delamater BA, et al. Differential diagnosis of palpitations. Preliminary development of a screening instrument. Arch Fam Med 1997;6:241-5.

8. Ehlers A, Breuer P. Increased cardiac awareness in panic disorder. J Abnorm Psychol 1992;101:371-82.

9. Berren MR, Santiago JM, Zent MR. Health care utilization by persons with severe and persistent mental illness. Psychiatr Serv 1999;50:559-61.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Ahsan Y. Khan, MD
Assistant professor

Katherine Grimsley, MD
Third-year psychiatry resident

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Wichita

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 04(03)
Publications
Page Number
73-85
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Ahsan Y. Khan, MD
Assistant professor

Katherine Grimsley, MD
Third-year psychiatry resident

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Wichita

Author and Disclosure Information

Ahsan Y. Khan, MD
Assistant professor

Katherine Grimsley, MD
Third-year psychiatry resident

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Wichita

Article PDF
Article PDF

HISTORY: LIFE AT HOME

For nearly 10 years Mr. P, age 50, has had episodes of shortness of breath, increasing perspiration, and faintness that occur 2 to 3 times a month, usually when he’s out of the house. Fearing his legs will give out in public, he never goes out except to shop with his wife.

Once a welder for an aircraft company, he has been unable to work for 6 years. He worries incessantly about his medical expenses, and smokes 1 pack of cigarettes per day to help control the anxiety.

Baseline laboratory tests reveal a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level of 199 mg/dL, exceeding the optimal range by 100 mg/dL. Total cholesterol is 288 mg/dL and triglycerides are 244 mg/dL. Thyroid stimulating hormone, liver function, renal function, serum electrolytes, and serum glucose are normal. Mr. P meets DSM-IV-TR criteria for panic disorder with agoraphobia and is started on citalopram, 20 mg/d.

At follow-up 2 weeks later, Mr. P complains that the citalopram is causing ‘aches and pains’ in his back and legs, so we switch to controlled-release paroxetine, 12.5 mg/d, which we found in clinical practice to be more tolerable than immediate-release paroxetine. After 2 weeks, he says he cannot tolerate the paroxetine because of ‘body aches.’

At Mr. P’s insistence, we switch to alprazolam, 0.5 mg tid, although his desire to start taking alprazolam makes us suspect that he might be trying to obtain this benzodiazepine for illicit use.

Neuropsychological tests—including a diagnostic interview, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, and Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory—are ordered after Mr. P’s third visit. He seems guarded when answering questions about himself during these interviews. He acknowledges having severe physical symptoms but appears unwilling to accept a psychiatric diagnosis for them.

The authors’ observations

Panic disorder is usually chronic and can cause considerable morbidity. DSM-IV-TR criteria for panic disorder include recurrent or unexpected panic attacks and persistent fear of additional attacks and their implications and consequences.1 Panic disorder can also lead to social problems including unemployment, financial dependence, and substance abuse or dependence.2

Mr. P’s anxiety, shortness of breath, faintness, and profuse sweating during episodes match DSM-IV-TR criteria for panic attacks (Table 1). His ruminative and obsessive attitude toward his physical problems does not suggest somatoform disorder because he also thinks obsessively about other issues, such as his medical expenses.

We will watch for signs of prescription drug abuse, including premature requests for refills, use of multiple pharmacies, or complaints of lost prescription or medication.3

FURTHER HISTORY: FAINT MEMORY

Mr. P first sought medical help in 1996 after fainting at home while standing up. A few weeks later he experienced sudden dizziness, faintness, and perspiration while shopping with his wife. During that episode, he said, he barely made it out of the store before passing out in his truck. His wife described him as ‘pale and gray’ and rushed him to the emergency room. The ER physician suspected that Mr. P suffered a ‘convulsive episode’ and ordered testing. Results of awake and sleep EEG and head MRI were normal. Laboratory work revealed a positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) and rheumatoid factor (RF), suggesting pulmonary vasculitis.

Table 1

DSM-IV-TR criteria for panic attack

A discrete period of intense fear or discomfort, in which four (or more) of the following symptoms developed abruptly and reached a peak within 10 minutes:
  • palpitations
  • sweating
  • trembling or shaking
  • shortness of breath or smothering
  • feeling of choking
  • chest pain or discomfort
  • nausea or abdominal distress
  • feeling dizzy, unsteady, lightheaded, or faint
  • derealization or depersonalization
  • fear of losing control or going crazy
  • fear of dying
  • paresthesias
  • chills or hot flushes
Source: Adapted and reprinted with permission from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed, text revision). Copyright 2000. American Psychiatric Association.
Mr. P, who was still working at the aircraft company, continued to seek medical opinions. He was diagnosed alternately as having chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, and sleep apnea. He said a pulmonologist told him he had lung fibrosis but that the disorder would resolve without treatment. At one point, he was prescribed a continuous positive airway pressure device (CPAP) to manage what was thought to be sleep apnea.

Two years and 17 doctors later, Mr. P’s physical symptoms persisted. He stopped working and began collecting disability insurance benefits. Frustrated over the lack of a definitive diagnosis, he then went 6 years without seeing a doctor.

TREATMENT: INTENSE ‘PANIC’

Mr. P has been coming to our clinic for 8 months. He takes 0.5 mg of alprazolam twice daily—less frequently than prescribed—and has never prematurely requested a refill, so prescription abuse is ruled out. He joins a fibromyalgia support group but laments that his symptoms differ from those of other group members. During follow-up visits, he continues to focus on his somatic symptoms.

 

 

During a routine visit, Mr. P tells us that he recently suffered an intense ‘panic’ episode—consisting of shortness of breath, dizziness, diaphoresis, chest pain, palpitations, and near syncope—less than 15 minutes after he started clearing brush in his backyard. We notice marked clubbing on Mr. P’s fingers, a physical sign seen in congenital heart disease, infective endocarditis, pulmonary fibrosis, and numerous other diseases.4

The clubbing prompts us to ask about his occupational history in detail, as work-related exposure to chemicals or fumes may result in pulmonary fibrosis. We then learn that for approximately 20 years before joining the aircraft company, Mr. P welded without wearing protective equipment—all that time inhaling noxious fumes while working.

We refer Mr. P to an internist, who finds clubbing of the fingers, decreased breath sounds, and increased pulmonic second heart sound (P2) on auscultation. The internist then orders:

  • ECG, which reveals right axis deviation, incomplete right bundle branch block, and right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH)
  • Pulmonary function tests, which show decreased diffusing capacity. Subsequent heart catheterization reveals RVH and concentric left ventricular hypertrophy.
Mr. P is told to quit smoking and to use his CPAP nightly to minimize progression of his right ventricular dysfunction. He had been using his CPAP sporadically because he found it uncomfortable.

The authors’ observations

Panic attacks often mimic symptoms of cardiac or pulmonary disease. By the same token, symptoms of an underlying cardiac or pulmonary disease can be mistaken for panic disorder, particularly in patients whose past episodes appear to meet DSM-IV-TR panic attack criteria (Table 2).5

Table 2

Panic attack symptoms that may suggest a cardiopulmonary disease

Panic attack symptomPossible cardiopulmonary disorder
Palpitations, chest discomfort, feeling faintCardiac arrhythmia
Breathlessness, fatigue, weaknessHeart failure
Weakness, nausea, diaphoresis, feelings of hot/cold associated with diaphoresis, paresthesias, lightheadedness, fear of dyingCardiac or neurologic syncope
Intense, escalating chest pain/discomfort; may be accompanied by nausea, diaphoresis, dizziness, feelings of hot/cold associated with diaphoresisAcute myocardial infarction
Shortness of breath, fatigue, weakness, feeling of chokingPulmonary congestion*
* Because the lung parenchyma and visceral pleura lack pain fibers, pulmonary abnormalities related to these structures can be advanced before symptoms are noticed.
Source: reference 5
Patients with panic disorder seek medical help more frequently than do patients with other anxiety disorders.6 About one-third of patients with panic disorder seek psychiatric treatment, and almost as many seek medical help,6 possibly because of the complicated array of symptoms simultaneously involving cardiac and pulmonary systems.

To avoid unnecessary referrals, psychiatrists need to quickly and accurately discern:

  • when a medical problem is causing the patient’s symptoms
  • how far to carry the medical evaluation, particularly for patients with palpitations, chest pain, or shortness of breath.
No reliable screening tool exists for differentiating panic from cardiopulmonary symptoms. A screening inventory developed by Barsky et al7 for patients complaining of palpitations focuses on somatization and hypochondriacal attitudes, which are common among psychiatric patients. This tool, however, does not take into account presence of cardiac risk factors.

Also, a psychiatric patient whose mental disorder or comorbid axis II pathology compromises speech or cognitive function may have trouble communicating potentially serious medical problems to other clinicians. Mr. P’s guarded demeanor and obsession toward his physical problems may have kept him from accurately describing his symptoms in a clinical setting. Alternately, he might have misinterpreted his pulmonologist’s explanation of pulmonary fibrosis, thus believing the disorder was not serious.

Finally, patients with panic disorder are more aware of their heartbeats and physiologic responses than are persons without panic disorder,8 thus further complicating diagnosis.

UNCOVERING A MEDICAL CAUSE

Suspect an underlying heart or lung problem when panic symptoms affect breathing or resemble a heart attack.

Check for predisposing risk factors for cardiac disease. Ask the patient detailed questions about past and current medical problems, including:

  • smoking
  • hyperlipidemia
  • diabetes
  • heart problems
  • pulmonary disease
  • family history of any medical problems
  • work-related exposure to any metal that may increase risk of cardiopulmonary disease.
Refer the patient for medical evaluation if any of the above risk factors are discovered.

Review medical treatment history. Mentally ill persons are more likely than those without a mental illness to receive inadequate general medical and preventative care.9 Patient, provider, and health care system issues—such as lack of insurance or the patient’s inability to recognize or describe symptoms—may impede medical care delivery to the mentally ill.9

Review overall history. A deeper look into Mr. P’s work and diagnostic history uncovered numerous possible causes of right heart failure, including:

  • pulmonary fibrosis secondary to inhalational injury
  • possible pulmonary vasculitis as indicated by his positive ANA and RF.
As time progressed, either of these underlying lung pathologies amid sleep apnea and smoking could have increased Mr. P’s cardiopulmonary risk.
 

 


FOLLOW-UP: A PANIC-FREE FUTURE

Over the next 4 weeks, Mr. P has stopped taking alprazolam and begins to understand that his episodes were secondary to cardiopulmonary dysfunction. No longer afraid of developing a panic attack, he is going out more often.

Mr. P recently told us that he started a part-time job, decreased his smoking to a half pack/day, and has a plan to quit smoking completely. He adds that he is using his CPAP machine regularly and has remained free of panic-like episodes. He limits physical exertion to avoid cardiopulmonary symptoms.

Related resources

  • Raj A, Sheehan DV. Medical evaluation of panic attacks. J Clin Psychiatry 1987;48:309-13.
  • Jones DR, Macias C, Barreira PJ, et al. Prevalence, severity, and co-occurrence of chronic physical health problems of persons with serious mental illness. Psychiatr Serv 2004;55:1250-7.
Drug brand names

  • Alprazolam • Xanax
  • Citalopram • Celexa
  • Paroxetine • Paxil
Disclosure

Dr. Khan is a speaker for Wyeth Pharmaceuticals.

Dr. Grimsley reports no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

HISTORY: LIFE AT HOME

For nearly 10 years Mr. P, age 50, has had episodes of shortness of breath, increasing perspiration, and faintness that occur 2 to 3 times a month, usually when he’s out of the house. Fearing his legs will give out in public, he never goes out except to shop with his wife.

Once a welder for an aircraft company, he has been unable to work for 6 years. He worries incessantly about his medical expenses, and smokes 1 pack of cigarettes per day to help control the anxiety.

Baseline laboratory tests reveal a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level of 199 mg/dL, exceeding the optimal range by 100 mg/dL. Total cholesterol is 288 mg/dL and triglycerides are 244 mg/dL. Thyroid stimulating hormone, liver function, renal function, serum electrolytes, and serum glucose are normal. Mr. P meets DSM-IV-TR criteria for panic disorder with agoraphobia and is started on citalopram, 20 mg/d.

At follow-up 2 weeks later, Mr. P complains that the citalopram is causing ‘aches and pains’ in his back and legs, so we switch to controlled-release paroxetine, 12.5 mg/d, which we found in clinical practice to be more tolerable than immediate-release paroxetine. After 2 weeks, he says he cannot tolerate the paroxetine because of ‘body aches.’

At Mr. P’s insistence, we switch to alprazolam, 0.5 mg tid, although his desire to start taking alprazolam makes us suspect that he might be trying to obtain this benzodiazepine for illicit use.

Neuropsychological tests—including a diagnostic interview, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, and Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory—are ordered after Mr. P’s third visit. He seems guarded when answering questions about himself during these interviews. He acknowledges having severe physical symptoms but appears unwilling to accept a psychiatric diagnosis for them.

The authors’ observations

Panic disorder is usually chronic and can cause considerable morbidity. DSM-IV-TR criteria for panic disorder include recurrent or unexpected panic attacks and persistent fear of additional attacks and their implications and consequences.1 Panic disorder can also lead to social problems including unemployment, financial dependence, and substance abuse or dependence.2

Mr. P’s anxiety, shortness of breath, faintness, and profuse sweating during episodes match DSM-IV-TR criteria for panic attacks (Table 1). His ruminative and obsessive attitude toward his physical problems does not suggest somatoform disorder because he also thinks obsessively about other issues, such as his medical expenses.

We will watch for signs of prescription drug abuse, including premature requests for refills, use of multiple pharmacies, or complaints of lost prescription or medication.3

FURTHER HISTORY: FAINT MEMORY

Mr. P first sought medical help in 1996 after fainting at home while standing up. A few weeks later he experienced sudden dizziness, faintness, and perspiration while shopping with his wife. During that episode, he said, he barely made it out of the store before passing out in his truck. His wife described him as ‘pale and gray’ and rushed him to the emergency room. The ER physician suspected that Mr. P suffered a ‘convulsive episode’ and ordered testing. Results of awake and sleep EEG and head MRI were normal. Laboratory work revealed a positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) and rheumatoid factor (RF), suggesting pulmonary vasculitis.

Table 1

DSM-IV-TR criteria for panic attack

A discrete period of intense fear or discomfort, in which four (or more) of the following symptoms developed abruptly and reached a peak within 10 minutes:
  • palpitations
  • sweating
  • trembling or shaking
  • shortness of breath or smothering
  • feeling of choking
  • chest pain or discomfort
  • nausea or abdominal distress
  • feeling dizzy, unsteady, lightheaded, or faint
  • derealization or depersonalization
  • fear of losing control or going crazy
  • fear of dying
  • paresthesias
  • chills or hot flushes
Source: Adapted and reprinted with permission from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed, text revision). Copyright 2000. American Psychiatric Association.
Mr. P, who was still working at the aircraft company, continued to seek medical opinions. He was diagnosed alternately as having chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, and sleep apnea. He said a pulmonologist told him he had lung fibrosis but that the disorder would resolve without treatment. At one point, he was prescribed a continuous positive airway pressure device (CPAP) to manage what was thought to be sleep apnea.

Two years and 17 doctors later, Mr. P’s physical symptoms persisted. He stopped working and began collecting disability insurance benefits. Frustrated over the lack of a definitive diagnosis, he then went 6 years without seeing a doctor.

TREATMENT: INTENSE ‘PANIC’

Mr. P has been coming to our clinic for 8 months. He takes 0.5 mg of alprazolam twice daily—less frequently than prescribed—and has never prematurely requested a refill, so prescription abuse is ruled out. He joins a fibromyalgia support group but laments that his symptoms differ from those of other group members. During follow-up visits, he continues to focus on his somatic symptoms.

 

 

During a routine visit, Mr. P tells us that he recently suffered an intense ‘panic’ episode—consisting of shortness of breath, dizziness, diaphoresis, chest pain, palpitations, and near syncope—less than 15 minutes after he started clearing brush in his backyard. We notice marked clubbing on Mr. P’s fingers, a physical sign seen in congenital heart disease, infective endocarditis, pulmonary fibrosis, and numerous other diseases.4

The clubbing prompts us to ask about his occupational history in detail, as work-related exposure to chemicals or fumes may result in pulmonary fibrosis. We then learn that for approximately 20 years before joining the aircraft company, Mr. P welded without wearing protective equipment—all that time inhaling noxious fumes while working.

We refer Mr. P to an internist, who finds clubbing of the fingers, decreased breath sounds, and increased pulmonic second heart sound (P2) on auscultation. The internist then orders:

  • ECG, which reveals right axis deviation, incomplete right bundle branch block, and right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH)
  • Pulmonary function tests, which show decreased diffusing capacity. Subsequent heart catheterization reveals RVH and concentric left ventricular hypertrophy.
Mr. P is told to quit smoking and to use his CPAP nightly to minimize progression of his right ventricular dysfunction. He had been using his CPAP sporadically because he found it uncomfortable.

The authors’ observations

Panic attacks often mimic symptoms of cardiac or pulmonary disease. By the same token, symptoms of an underlying cardiac or pulmonary disease can be mistaken for panic disorder, particularly in patients whose past episodes appear to meet DSM-IV-TR panic attack criteria (Table 2).5

Table 2

Panic attack symptoms that may suggest a cardiopulmonary disease

Panic attack symptomPossible cardiopulmonary disorder
Palpitations, chest discomfort, feeling faintCardiac arrhythmia
Breathlessness, fatigue, weaknessHeart failure
Weakness, nausea, diaphoresis, feelings of hot/cold associated with diaphoresis, paresthesias, lightheadedness, fear of dyingCardiac or neurologic syncope
Intense, escalating chest pain/discomfort; may be accompanied by nausea, diaphoresis, dizziness, feelings of hot/cold associated with diaphoresisAcute myocardial infarction
Shortness of breath, fatigue, weakness, feeling of chokingPulmonary congestion*
* Because the lung parenchyma and visceral pleura lack pain fibers, pulmonary abnormalities related to these structures can be advanced before symptoms are noticed.
Source: reference 5
Patients with panic disorder seek medical help more frequently than do patients with other anxiety disorders.6 About one-third of patients with panic disorder seek psychiatric treatment, and almost as many seek medical help,6 possibly because of the complicated array of symptoms simultaneously involving cardiac and pulmonary systems.

To avoid unnecessary referrals, psychiatrists need to quickly and accurately discern:

  • when a medical problem is causing the patient’s symptoms
  • how far to carry the medical evaluation, particularly for patients with palpitations, chest pain, or shortness of breath.
No reliable screening tool exists for differentiating panic from cardiopulmonary symptoms. A screening inventory developed by Barsky et al7 for patients complaining of palpitations focuses on somatization and hypochondriacal attitudes, which are common among psychiatric patients. This tool, however, does not take into account presence of cardiac risk factors.

Also, a psychiatric patient whose mental disorder or comorbid axis II pathology compromises speech or cognitive function may have trouble communicating potentially serious medical problems to other clinicians. Mr. P’s guarded demeanor and obsession toward his physical problems may have kept him from accurately describing his symptoms in a clinical setting. Alternately, he might have misinterpreted his pulmonologist’s explanation of pulmonary fibrosis, thus believing the disorder was not serious.

Finally, patients with panic disorder are more aware of their heartbeats and physiologic responses than are persons without panic disorder,8 thus further complicating diagnosis.

UNCOVERING A MEDICAL CAUSE

Suspect an underlying heart or lung problem when panic symptoms affect breathing or resemble a heart attack.

Check for predisposing risk factors for cardiac disease. Ask the patient detailed questions about past and current medical problems, including:

  • smoking
  • hyperlipidemia
  • diabetes
  • heart problems
  • pulmonary disease
  • family history of any medical problems
  • work-related exposure to any metal that may increase risk of cardiopulmonary disease.
Refer the patient for medical evaluation if any of the above risk factors are discovered.

Review medical treatment history. Mentally ill persons are more likely than those without a mental illness to receive inadequate general medical and preventative care.9 Patient, provider, and health care system issues—such as lack of insurance or the patient’s inability to recognize or describe symptoms—may impede medical care delivery to the mentally ill.9

Review overall history. A deeper look into Mr. P’s work and diagnostic history uncovered numerous possible causes of right heart failure, including:

  • pulmonary fibrosis secondary to inhalational injury
  • possible pulmonary vasculitis as indicated by his positive ANA and RF.
As time progressed, either of these underlying lung pathologies amid sleep apnea and smoking could have increased Mr. P’s cardiopulmonary risk.
 

 


FOLLOW-UP: A PANIC-FREE FUTURE

Over the next 4 weeks, Mr. P has stopped taking alprazolam and begins to understand that his episodes were secondary to cardiopulmonary dysfunction. No longer afraid of developing a panic attack, he is going out more often.

Mr. P recently told us that he started a part-time job, decreased his smoking to a half pack/day, and has a plan to quit smoking completely. He adds that he is using his CPAP machine regularly and has remained free of panic-like episodes. He limits physical exertion to avoid cardiopulmonary symptoms.

Related resources

  • Raj A, Sheehan DV. Medical evaluation of panic attacks. J Clin Psychiatry 1987;48:309-13.
  • Jones DR, Macias C, Barreira PJ, et al. Prevalence, severity, and co-occurrence of chronic physical health problems of persons with serious mental illness. Psychiatr Serv 2004;55:1250-7.
Drug brand names

  • Alprazolam • Xanax
  • Citalopram • Celexa
  • Paroxetine • Paxil
Disclosure

Dr. Khan is a speaker for Wyeth Pharmaceuticals.

Dr. Grimsley reports no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

References

1. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed-rev). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.

2. Leon AC, Portera L, Weissman MM, et al. The social costs of anxiety disorders. Br J Psychiatry 1995;166(suppl 27):19-22.

3. Altchuler SI. How to detect and prevent prescription abuse. Current Psychiatry 2002;1(10):90.-

4. Tierney LM, McPhee SJ, Papadakis MA. Current medical diagnosis & treatment (44th ed). New York: McGraw Hill/Appleton & Lange; 2005:241.

5. Humes HD, Dupont HL (eds). Kelley’s textbook of internal medicine (4th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000;360-73,2403-11.

6. Kessler RC, McGofagle KA, Zhao S, et al. Lifetime and 12 month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States: results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994;51:8-19.

7. Barsky AJ, Ahern DK, Delamater BA, et al. Differential diagnosis of palpitations. Preliminary development of a screening instrument. Arch Fam Med 1997;6:241-5.

8. Ehlers A, Breuer P. Increased cardiac awareness in panic disorder. J Abnorm Psychol 1992;101:371-82.

9. Berren MR, Santiago JM, Zent MR. Health care utilization by persons with severe and persistent mental illness. Psychiatr Serv 1999;50:559-61.

References

1. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed-rev). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.

2. Leon AC, Portera L, Weissman MM, et al. The social costs of anxiety disorders. Br J Psychiatry 1995;166(suppl 27):19-22.

3. Altchuler SI. How to detect and prevent prescription abuse. Current Psychiatry 2002;1(10):90.-

4. Tierney LM, McPhee SJ, Papadakis MA. Current medical diagnosis & treatment (44th ed). New York: McGraw Hill/Appleton & Lange; 2005:241.

5. Humes HD, Dupont HL (eds). Kelley’s textbook of internal medicine (4th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000;360-73,2403-11.

6. Kessler RC, McGofagle KA, Zhao S, et al. Lifetime and 12 month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States: results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994;51:8-19.

7. Barsky AJ, Ahern DK, Delamater BA, et al. Differential diagnosis of palpitations. Preliminary development of a screening instrument. Arch Fam Med 1997;6:241-5.

8. Ehlers A, Breuer P. Increased cardiac awareness in panic disorder. J Abnorm Psychol 1992;101:371-82.

9. Berren MR, Santiago JM, Zent MR. Health care utilization by persons with severe and persistent mental illness. Psychiatr Serv 1999;50:559-61.

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 04(03)
Issue
Current Psychiatry - 04(03)
Page Number
73-85
Page Number
73-85
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Getting to the heart of panic disorder
Display Headline
Getting to the heart of panic disorder
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Compulsive hoarding: Unclutter lives and homes by breaking anxiety’s grip

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 12/11/2018 - 15:10
Display Headline
Compulsive hoarding: Unclutter lives and homes by breaking anxiety’s grip

Compulsive hoarding behavior is considered notoriously difficult to treat, but targeting its characteristic symptoms with medication and psychotherapy can be successful. This article provides a guide for the psychiatrist—alone or with a cognitive-behavioral therapist—to diagnose compulsive hoarding syndrome and help patients overcome the anxieties that fuel its symptoms.

WHAT IS COMPULSIVE HOARDING?

Hoarders acquire and are unable to discard items that others consider of little use or value.1 They most often save newspapers, magazines, old clothing, bags, books, mail, notes, and lists. Hoarding and saving behaviors occur in nonclinical populations and with other neuropsychiatric disorders—schizophrenia, dementia, eating disorders, mental retardation—but are most often found in persons with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).

OCD is a heterogeneous clinical entity with several major symptom domains:2,3

  • aggressive, sexual, and religious obsessions with checking compulsions
  • symmetry/order obsessions with ordering, arranging, and repeating compulsions
  • contamination obsessions with washing and cleaning compulsions
  • hoarding and saving symptoms.
Box

What causes compulsive hoarding?

Genetics. Compulsive hoarding may have a different pattern of inheritance and comorbidity than other OCD symptom factors. Hoarding/saving symptoms show a recessive inheritance pattern, whereas aggressive/checking and symmetry/order symptoms show a dominant pattern.9 The hoarding phenotype has been significantly associated with genetic markers on chromosomes 4, 5, and 17.14 In other studies:

  • Among 20 OCD patients with prominent hoarding, 84% had first-degree relatives with hoarding behaviors and only 37% had first-degree relatives who met DSM-IV criteria for OCD.11
  • Among 126 OCD patients, social phobia, personality disorders, and pathologic grooming disorders were more common in hoarders than in nonhoarders. Hoarding and tics were more common in first-degree relatives of hoarders than in those of nonhoarders.12

Neurobiology. Using positron emission tomography (PET) brain imaging, our group13 compared glucose metabolism in patients with compulsive hoarding syndrome with that of nonhoarding OCD patients and normal controls. Compulsive hoarders had unique brain activity, with significantly lower metabolism:

  • in the posterior cingulate gyrus and occipital cortex than controls
  • in the dorsal anterior cingulate gyrus (AC) and thalamus than nonhoarding OCD patients.

Hoarding severity was significantly correlated with lower activity in the dorsal AC across all OCD patients.

Discussion. Genetic and neurobiologic data suggest that compulsive hoarding syndrome may be a neurobiologically distinct variant of OCD14 and may help explain its clinical symptoms and poor treatment response. Low AC activity may mediate compulsive hoarders’ decision-making and attentional problems, whereas low posterior cingulate activity may be responsible for visuospatial and memory deficits. Moreover:

  • lower pretreatment AC activity has been strongly associated with poor response to antidepressants15
  • lower posterior cingulate gyrus activity correlates with poorer response to fluvoxamine in patients with OCD.16
Among OCD patients, 18% to 42% have hoarding and saving compulsions.4,5 Hoarding and saving can be part of a broader clinical syndrome that includes indecisiveness, perfectionism, procrastination, difficulty organizing tasks, and avoiding routine daily activities.6,7 The 1 to 2 million Americans whose most prominent and distressing OCD symptom is hoarding and saving and who show these other associated symptoms are considered to have “compulsive hoarding syndrome.”7,8 Evidence suggests that this syndrome may be a neurobiologically distinct OCD variant (Box).9-16

ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT PLANNING

To manage compulsive hoarding syndrome, begin with a thorough neuropsychiatric evaluation:

  • Rule out primary psychotic disorders, dementia, and other cognitive impairments and neurologic disorders.
  • Rule out primary major depression, as clutter and self-neglect may be caused by amotivation, low energy, or hopelessness.
  • Determine if the patient has OCD.
After making a compulsive hoarding diagnosis (Table 1),6 visit the patient’s home or view photographs to assess his or her environment and behaviors (Table 2).

Amount of clutter. Living areas may be so cluttered that sleeping in a bed, sitting on chairs, or preparing food on a kitchen counter are impossible. How much of the home is cluttered? How much floor and counter space is usable? Are rooms unusable or inaccessible because of clutter? Can the patient use the laundry, prepare food in the kitchen, use the shower, toilet, etc.?

Health or safety hazards. Huge piles of papers can be a fire hazard. Clutter may be blocking the exits. Collected items may extend beyond patients’ homes to their cars, garages, storage lockers, and even storage areas owned by friends and family.

Beliefs about possessions. Compulsive hoarders often have distorted feelings about their possessions. They may over-buy or impulsively purchase items they feel have emotional or monetary value. They may consider the items extensions of themselves and suffer grief-like loss when discarding things.7

Some collect free items—flyers, coupons, newspapers, discarded goods—hoping to save money or be prepared “just in case” the item is ever needed. This may represent unattainable expectations of perfection, needing to maintain preparedness for every possible contingency. Hoarders often believe they have poor memory and have catastrophic fears of what might happen if they forget something. Thus, their desire to keep their possessions in sight is strong.17

 

 

Information processing deficits. Because of anxieties about making mistakes, most hoarders have great difficulty making decisions.18 It is easier to not decide than to suffer the consequences of a “wrong” decision. To gauge this behavior, ask patients how long routine decisions take them and which decisions they procrastinate or avoid.

Compulsive hoarders often have trouble categorizing possessions;6,7 because every item feels unique, they create a special category for each one and resist storing items together.

Table 1

Proposed criteria to diagnose obsessive-compulsive hoarding*

Patient acquires and fails to discard a large number of possessions that appear useless or of limited value
Clutter prevents patient from using living or work spaces for activities for which they were designed
Hoarding behavior causes significant distress or functional impairment
* Proposed by Frost and Hartl, reference 6.
Many hoarders also report marked distractibility and inattention, jumping from one task to the next without completing any of them. Their communication style is often as cluttered and disorganized as their homes, with tangential, circumstantial, and over-inclusive descriptions.

Avoidance behaviors are a hallmark of the compulsive hoarding syndrome. To avoid deciding to discard items, they put them in a box, garage, rented storage facility, etc. They may also avoid routine decision-making tasks that could lead to making a mistake.

Daily functioning. Hoarders may take a long time to do even small chores, such as taking an hour to pay one bill. An inordinate amount of time may be spent “churning”—moving items from one pile to another but never discarding any item or establishing a consistent system or organization.

Medication compliance. Compulsive hoarders often forget to take medications or take them at inappropriate times. They may lose their medications in the clutter.

Insight. Hoarders often have little awareness of how their behavior and clutter affect their lives.19 They minimize the clutter in their homes and its health and safety risks. Insight can fluctuate over time and needs to be assessed repeatedly during treatment.

Table 2

Assessing a patient with compulsive hoarding symptoms

DomainUseful questions or strategies
Amount of clutterVisit home and/or see pictures
Hazards relating to clutterAsk: What precautions do you take to reduce risk of fire? Have you ever had a problem with rodent or insect infestation as a result of the clutter? Have neighbors complained about the risks of fire or infestation that the clutter might impose on their homes?
Beliefs about loss of possessionsAsk: What is the worst thing that would happen if you threw this item away? If you did not have this, what do you think would happen?
Information-processing deficitsAsk: How long do routine decisions take you? Which decisions do you procrastinate or avoid?
Decision-making and organizational skillsAsk: How do you pay and store your bills?
Avoidance behaviorsAsk: Do you avoid other things (sorting mail, returning calls, doing dishes, or paying bills, rent, or taxes)?
Daily functioningAsk: Do you get everything done that you want to do? Are you often late? Do you have difficulty starting or finishing tasks? Describe a typical day.
InsightAsk: Do you think this amount of clutter is normal? Do you think having this clutter has caused problems in your life?
Motivation for treatmentAsk: What brings you into therapy now? Do you think you have a problem with excessive hoarding/saving? If it was not for your family, would you come for help?
Social and occupational functioningAsk: How has your clutter affected your personal relationships? When was the last time you had someone come to your home? What prevents you from working right now? Are you working to your full potential?
Support from friends and familyAsk: What does your family say about your clutter? Do your friends or family understand what is going on?
Treatment complianceAsk: How long does it typically take before you renew your prescriptions when you run out of medications?
Table 3

Cognitive behavioral therapy for compulsive hoarding

Treatment sequenceMethods and goals
Educate patient about hoardingHelp improve insight and motivation
Set up treatmentWith patient, select target area of clutter
Assess items together, creating a hierarchy of least to most difficult areas to sort and items to discard
Create realistic categories and a storage system
Begin discardingPatient must decide to keep or discard each item and permanently remove it from pile
Patient must store saved items appropriately
Continue until area is clear, then move to next area
Plan and implement appropriate use of space
Stop incoming clutterCancel subscriptions
Address compulsive buying and acquisition
Provide organization trainingOrganize possessions, time, tasks, etc.
Prevent relapseReplace hoarding with healthier behaviors to prevent clutter from re-accumulating
Source: Adapted from reference 23.
Social and occupational functioning. Many compulsive hoarders have very little family or social support. They frequently are too embarrassed by their clutter to have people come to their homes, sometimes for years. The syndrome frequently impairs work performance.
 

 

20

Motivation. Like insight, motivation can fluctuate over time. Patients usually must work tremendously hard to adhere to treatment. To support these efforts, we periodically review with patients compulsive hoarding’s negative effects and the activities they would enjoy—such as improved relationships, greater work capacity, hobbies—if overcoming this behavior allowed them more time and space.

Rating scales. The symptom checklist of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS)21 contains two items for hoarding obsessions and compulsions but none for avoidance behaviors, which are prominent with compulsive hoarding. The Saving Inventory-Revised22 is a validated, 23-item self-report measure of clutter, difficulty discarding, and excessive acquisition, which distinguishes compulsive hoarders, nonhoarding OCD patients, and normal controls.

TREATMENT

The compulsive hoarder’s problems will not be solved by someone else throwing away or organizing his or her possessions. These actions often anger patients, who see them as intrusive and a loss of control.

In our experience, family members’ attempts to intervene can disrupt relationships and worsen hoarders’ social withdrawal. “Taking over” also does not help the patient create a sustainable system for keeping clutter-free.

Algorithm

Medication treatment for compulsive hoarding*

Start with SSRIs, as for nonhoarding OCD (citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline)
  • High doses and 12-week trials
  • Some compulsive hoarders will respond well to SSRIs
  • Other OCD symptoms usually improve as well
  • Comorbid depression and other anxiety symptoms may respond
  • If ineffective, may need to do 3 or 4 full trials of different SSRIs, clomipramine, or venlafaxine
Treat comorbid conditionsMood disorders, other anxiety disorders, ADHD, psychotic disorders, etc.
Use adjunctive medications if SSRIs give only partial response
  • Atypical antipsychotics (risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine)
  • Stimulants
  • Mood stabilizers (for comorbid bipolar disorder, cyclothymia, or impulsivity)
* Combine medication treatment with cognitive-behavioral therapy
SSRI: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor
OCD: obsessive-compulsive disorder
ADHD: attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
We find that combining cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and medication is optimal treatment for compulsive hoarding,23 although no controlled studies have compared this combination with each treatment alone. One controlled trial24 and three uncontrolled trials8,25,26 have shown some benefit of CBT for compulsive hoarding, although with poorer response and higher dropout rates than for nonhoarding OCD patients.

Psychotherapy. Exposure and response prevention (ERP) focuses on preventing incoming clutter, discarding, organizing, and relapse prevention (Table 3).23 Start treatment by explaining compulsive hoarding syndrome to patients as having problems with information processing, obsessional anxiety, and avoiding decisions.

Preventing incoming clutter. Before you focus on discarding, patients must stop incoming clutter; otherwise, it will come in as fast as it goes out. We ask patients to keep a daily log of every item they acquire or buy to build their awareness of what triggers their behavior.

Discarding. To desensitize over time, we repeatedly expose patients to the anxiety, sadness, or anger they feel when discarding items and making decisions. We encourage them to provoke their anxiety by throwing away as many items as possible, keeping only necessary items.

We support ERP with cognitive restructuring, prompting patients to reframe their obsessive fears about losing something necessary or valuable. By thinking through the consequences of discarding their clutter, they challenge their erroneous beliefs that dire consequences will occur.

Organizing. When patients decide they must keep an item, ask them to immediately identify a specific place and deadline to store it. After an area is cleared, patients must keep it clear and use it for its intended purpose. Most patients need training in time management, scheduling, and prioritizing.

Relapse prevention. Replace hoarding behaviors with more-adaptive, healthy behaviors. Teach patients to create a realistic schedule that includes time for chores, eating and sleeping, CBT homework, and recreation. Treatment goals are to:

  • extinguish obsessional fears and compulsive saving behaviors
  • teach lasting organizational and decision-making skills, thereby reducing relapse risk.
Practical matters. Sorting and discarding a houseful of clutter takes time, although the patient does this primarily as homework. To control costs and your time commitment, consider collaborating with a CBT therapist trained in working with compulsive hoarders. Use your sessions with the patient to create hierarchies, go over assignments, do brief exposures, and monitor drug therapy.

Medications. No controlled studies have examined whether any medications are effective for compulsive hoarding syndrome. The treatment strategies and algorithm described here are based on our clinical experience, controlled trials of OCD patients, and limited OCD studies secondarily examining hoarders’ specific treatment responses.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) may be less effective for compulsive hoarding than for other compulsive behaviors.14,27 Nevertheless, SSRIs may help alleviate hoarders’ core symptoms, other OCD symptoms, depression, and anxiety. For hoarding treatment to be effective, comorbid disorders must be treated and stabilized.

 

 

Several studies of SSRI use in OCD patients have shown modest improvements in compulsive hoarders:

  • In a descriptive study of patients with compulsive hoarding, 1 of 18 (6%) patients had a “marked” response to at least one SSRI trial. The others showed a partial response,17 with YBOCS scores decreasing by at least 25% in approximately 50% of this group.
  • When 17 OCD patients with hoarding symptoms were treated with paroxetine, CBT, or placebo, 18% responded to active treatment. Response was defined as a 40% reduction on YBOCS scores and “very much” or “much” improved on the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI).14
Based on these findings and our clinical experience, an effective approach to treating compulsive hoarding with medications—as with other OCD patients—is to start with SSRIs28 (Algorithm). If adequate SSRI trials fail to improve a patient’s hoarding/saving symptoms, adjunctive medications can be added.

Atypical antipsychotics may be effective for OCD symptoms that do not respond adequately to SSRIs.29 Conventional antipsychotics are also effective adjuncts to SSRIs—particularly for patients with coexisting tic or psychotic disorders30—but consider the potential for extrapyramidal side effects and tardive dyskinesia.

We find that stimulants help some compulsive hoarders, particularly those with comorbid ADHD, other attentional problems, low motivation, or lethargy. Mood stabilizers are necessary to treat comorbid bipolar disorder, cyclothymia, and impulsivity.

Related resources

Drug brand names

  • Citalopram • Celexa
  • Clomipramine • Anafranil
  • Escitalopram • Lexapro
  • Fluoxetine • Prozac
  • Fluvoxamine • Luvox
  • Olanzapine • Zyprexa
  • Paroxetine • Paxil
  • Quetiapine • Seroquel
  • Risperidone • Risperdal
  • Sertraline • Zoloft
  • Venlafaxine • Effexor
Disclosures

The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

References

1. Frost R, Gross R. The hoarding of possessions. Behav Res Ther 1993;31:367-81.

2. Leckman J, Grice D, Boardman J, et al. Symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1997;154:911-17.

3. Leckman J, Zhang H, Alsobrook J, Pauls D. Symptom dimensions in obsessive-compulsive disorder: toward quantitative phenotypes. Am J Med Genet 2001;105(1):28-30.

4. Hanna G. Demographic and clinical features of obsessive-compulsive disorder in children and adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1995;34(1):19-27.

5. Rasmussen S, Eisen J. The epidemiology and clinical features of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychiatr Clin North Am 1992;15(4):743-58.

6. Frost R, Hartl T. A cognitive-behavioral model of compulsive hoarding. Behav Res Ther 1996;34:341-50.

7. Steketee G, Frost R. Compulsive hoarding: current status of the research. Clin Psychol Rev 2003;23:905-27.

8. Saxena S, Maidment K, Vapnik T, et al. Obsessive-compulsive hoarding: symptom severity and response to multi-modal treatment. J Clin Psychiatry 2002;63:21-7.

9. Leckman JF, Pauls DL, Zhang H, etal. and the Tourette Syndrome Association International Consortium for Genetics. Obsessive-compulsive symptom dimensions in affected sibling pairs diagnosed with Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome. Am J Med Genet 2003;116B:60-8.

10. Zhang H, Leckman JF, Pauls DL, etal. and the Tourette Syndrome Association International Consortium for Genetics. Genome-wide scan of hoarding in sib pairs in which both sibs have Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 2002;70:896-904.

11. Winsberg M, Cassic K, Koran L. Hoarding in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a report of 20 cases. J Clin Psychiatry 1999;60:591-7.

12. Samuels J, Bienvenu OJ, 3rd, Riddle MA, et al. Hoarding in obsessive compulsive disorder: results from a case-control study. Behav Res Ther 2002;40(5):517-28.

13. Saxena S, Brody A, Maidment K, et al. Cerebral glucose metabolism in obsessive-compulsive hoarding. Am J Psychiatry 2004;161:1038-48.

14. Black D, Monahan P, Gable J, et al. Hoarding and treatment response in non-depressed subjects with obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 1998;59:420-5.

15. Mayberg H, Brannan S, Mahurin R, et al. Cingulate function in depression: a potential predictor of treatment response. Neuroreport 1997;8(4):1057-61.

16. Rauch S, Shin L, Dougherty D, et al. Predictors of fluvoxamine response in contamination-related obsessive-compulsive disorder: a PET symptom provocation study. Neuropsychopharmacol 2002;27(5):782-91.

17. Hartl T, Frost R, Allen G, et al. Actual and perceived memory deficits in individuals with compulsive hoarding. Depress Anxiety 2004;20:59-69.

18. Frost R, Krause M, Steketee G. Hoarding and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Behav Modif 1996;20:116-32.

19. Steketee G, Frost R, Kim H-J. Hoarding by elderly people. Health Soc Work 2001;26:176-84.

20. Frost RO, Steketee G, Williams LF, Warren R. Mood, personality disorder symptoms, and disability in obsessive compulsive hoarders: a comparison with clinical and non-clinical controls. Behav Res Ther 2000;38:1071-81.

21. Goodman WK, Price LH, Rasmussen SA, et al. The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale. I. Development, use, and reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1989;46(11):1006-11.

22. Frost RO, Steketee G, Grisham J. Measurement of compulsive hoarding: saving inventory-revised. Behav Res Ther 2004;42(10):1163-82.

23. Saxena S, Maidment K. Treatment of compulsive hoarding. J Clin Psychol 2004;60(11):1143-54.

24. Mataix-Cols D, Marks IM, Greist JH, et al. Obsessive-compulsive symptom dimensions as predictors of compliance with and response to behaviour therapy: results from a controlled trial. Psychother Psychosom 2002;71(5):255-62.

25. Abramowitz JS, Franklin ME, Schwartz SA, Furr JM. Symptom presentation and outcome of cognitive-behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol 2003;71(6):1049-57.

26. Steketee G, Frost RO, Wincze J, et al. Group and individual treatment of compulsive hoarding: a pilot study. Behav Cognit Psychother 2000;28:259-68.

27. Mataix-Cols D, Rauch S, Manzo P, Jenike M. Use of factor-analyzed symptom dimensions to predict outcome with serotonin reuptake inhibitors and placebo in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1999;156:1409-16.

28. Greist JH, Jefferson JW, Kobak KA, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of serotonin transport inhibitors in obsessive-compulsive disorder. A meta-analysis. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1995;52(1):53-60.

29. Pallanti S, Hollander E, Goodman WK. A qualitative analysis of nonresponse: management of treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2004;65(suppl 14):6-10.

30. McDougle C, Goodman W, Leckman J, et al. Haloperidol addition in fluvoxamine-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with and without tics. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994;51:302-8.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Jamie Feusner, MD
Psychobiology research fellow and staff psychiatrist OCD Intensive Treatment Program Anxiety Disorders Clinic

Sanjaya Saxena, MD
Associate professor in residence and director, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Research Program Associate director, Anxiety Disorders Program

Department of psychiatry and biobehavioral sciences David Geffen School of Medicine University of California, Los Angeles

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 04(03)
Publications
Page Number
12-26
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Jamie Feusner, MD
Psychobiology research fellow and staff psychiatrist OCD Intensive Treatment Program Anxiety Disorders Clinic

Sanjaya Saxena, MD
Associate professor in residence and director, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Research Program Associate director, Anxiety Disorders Program

Department of psychiatry and biobehavioral sciences David Geffen School of Medicine University of California, Los Angeles

Author and Disclosure Information

Jamie Feusner, MD
Psychobiology research fellow and staff psychiatrist OCD Intensive Treatment Program Anxiety Disorders Clinic

Sanjaya Saxena, MD
Associate professor in residence and director, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Research Program Associate director, Anxiety Disorders Program

Department of psychiatry and biobehavioral sciences David Geffen School of Medicine University of California, Los Angeles

Article PDF
Article PDF

Compulsive hoarding behavior is considered notoriously difficult to treat, but targeting its characteristic symptoms with medication and psychotherapy can be successful. This article provides a guide for the psychiatrist—alone or with a cognitive-behavioral therapist—to diagnose compulsive hoarding syndrome and help patients overcome the anxieties that fuel its symptoms.

WHAT IS COMPULSIVE HOARDING?

Hoarders acquire and are unable to discard items that others consider of little use or value.1 They most often save newspapers, magazines, old clothing, bags, books, mail, notes, and lists. Hoarding and saving behaviors occur in nonclinical populations and with other neuropsychiatric disorders—schizophrenia, dementia, eating disorders, mental retardation—but are most often found in persons with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).

OCD is a heterogeneous clinical entity with several major symptom domains:2,3

  • aggressive, sexual, and religious obsessions with checking compulsions
  • symmetry/order obsessions with ordering, arranging, and repeating compulsions
  • contamination obsessions with washing and cleaning compulsions
  • hoarding and saving symptoms.
Box

What causes compulsive hoarding?

Genetics. Compulsive hoarding may have a different pattern of inheritance and comorbidity than other OCD symptom factors. Hoarding/saving symptoms show a recessive inheritance pattern, whereas aggressive/checking and symmetry/order symptoms show a dominant pattern.9 The hoarding phenotype has been significantly associated with genetic markers on chromosomes 4, 5, and 17.14 In other studies:

  • Among 20 OCD patients with prominent hoarding, 84% had first-degree relatives with hoarding behaviors and only 37% had first-degree relatives who met DSM-IV criteria for OCD.11
  • Among 126 OCD patients, social phobia, personality disorders, and pathologic grooming disorders were more common in hoarders than in nonhoarders. Hoarding and tics were more common in first-degree relatives of hoarders than in those of nonhoarders.12

Neurobiology. Using positron emission tomography (PET) brain imaging, our group13 compared glucose metabolism in patients with compulsive hoarding syndrome with that of nonhoarding OCD patients and normal controls. Compulsive hoarders had unique brain activity, with significantly lower metabolism:

  • in the posterior cingulate gyrus and occipital cortex than controls
  • in the dorsal anterior cingulate gyrus (AC) and thalamus than nonhoarding OCD patients.

Hoarding severity was significantly correlated with lower activity in the dorsal AC across all OCD patients.

Discussion. Genetic and neurobiologic data suggest that compulsive hoarding syndrome may be a neurobiologically distinct variant of OCD14 and may help explain its clinical symptoms and poor treatment response. Low AC activity may mediate compulsive hoarders’ decision-making and attentional problems, whereas low posterior cingulate activity may be responsible for visuospatial and memory deficits. Moreover:

  • lower pretreatment AC activity has been strongly associated with poor response to antidepressants15
  • lower posterior cingulate gyrus activity correlates with poorer response to fluvoxamine in patients with OCD.16
Among OCD patients, 18% to 42% have hoarding and saving compulsions.4,5 Hoarding and saving can be part of a broader clinical syndrome that includes indecisiveness, perfectionism, procrastination, difficulty organizing tasks, and avoiding routine daily activities.6,7 The 1 to 2 million Americans whose most prominent and distressing OCD symptom is hoarding and saving and who show these other associated symptoms are considered to have “compulsive hoarding syndrome.”7,8 Evidence suggests that this syndrome may be a neurobiologically distinct OCD variant (Box).9-16

ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT PLANNING

To manage compulsive hoarding syndrome, begin with a thorough neuropsychiatric evaluation:

  • Rule out primary psychotic disorders, dementia, and other cognitive impairments and neurologic disorders.
  • Rule out primary major depression, as clutter and self-neglect may be caused by amotivation, low energy, or hopelessness.
  • Determine if the patient has OCD.
After making a compulsive hoarding diagnosis (Table 1),6 visit the patient’s home or view photographs to assess his or her environment and behaviors (Table 2).

Amount of clutter. Living areas may be so cluttered that sleeping in a bed, sitting on chairs, or preparing food on a kitchen counter are impossible. How much of the home is cluttered? How much floor and counter space is usable? Are rooms unusable or inaccessible because of clutter? Can the patient use the laundry, prepare food in the kitchen, use the shower, toilet, etc.?

Health or safety hazards. Huge piles of papers can be a fire hazard. Clutter may be blocking the exits. Collected items may extend beyond patients’ homes to their cars, garages, storage lockers, and even storage areas owned by friends and family.

Beliefs about possessions. Compulsive hoarders often have distorted feelings about their possessions. They may over-buy or impulsively purchase items they feel have emotional or monetary value. They may consider the items extensions of themselves and suffer grief-like loss when discarding things.7

Some collect free items—flyers, coupons, newspapers, discarded goods—hoping to save money or be prepared “just in case” the item is ever needed. This may represent unattainable expectations of perfection, needing to maintain preparedness for every possible contingency. Hoarders often believe they have poor memory and have catastrophic fears of what might happen if they forget something. Thus, their desire to keep their possessions in sight is strong.17

 

 

Information processing deficits. Because of anxieties about making mistakes, most hoarders have great difficulty making decisions.18 It is easier to not decide than to suffer the consequences of a “wrong” decision. To gauge this behavior, ask patients how long routine decisions take them and which decisions they procrastinate or avoid.

Compulsive hoarders often have trouble categorizing possessions;6,7 because every item feels unique, they create a special category for each one and resist storing items together.

Table 1

Proposed criteria to diagnose obsessive-compulsive hoarding*

Patient acquires and fails to discard a large number of possessions that appear useless or of limited value
Clutter prevents patient from using living or work spaces for activities for which they were designed
Hoarding behavior causes significant distress or functional impairment
* Proposed by Frost and Hartl, reference 6.
Many hoarders also report marked distractibility and inattention, jumping from one task to the next without completing any of them. Their communication style is often as cluttered and disorganized as their homes, with tangential, circumstantial, and over-inclusive descriptions.

Avoidance behaviors are a hallmark of the compulsive hoarding syndrome. To avoid deciding to discard items, they put them in a box, garage, rented storage facility, etc. They may also avoid routine decision-making tasks that could lead to making a mistake.

Daily functioning. Hoarders may take a long time to do even small chores, such as taking an hour to pay one bill. An inordinate amount of time may be spent “churning”—moving items from one pile to another but never discarding any item or establishing a consistent system or organization.

Medication compliance. Compulsive hoarders often forget to take medications or take them at inappropriate times. They may lose their medications in the clutter.

Insight. Hoarders often have little awareness of how their behavior and clutter affect their lives.19 They minimize the clutter in their homes and its health and safety risks. Insight can fluctuate over time and needs to be assessed repeatedly during treatment.

Table 2

Assessing a patient with compulsive hoarding symptoms

DomainUseful questions or strategies
Amount of clutterVisit home and/or see pictures
Hazards relating to clutterAsk: What precautions do you take to reduce risk of fire? Have you ever had a problem with rodent or insect infestation as a result of the clutter? Have neighbors complained about the risks of fire or infestation that the clutter might impose on their homes?
Beliefs about loss of possessionsAsk: What is the worst thing that would happen if you threw this item away? If you did not have this, what do you think would happen?
Information-processing deficitsAsk: How long do routine decisions take you? Which decisions do you procrastinate or avoid?
Decision-making and organizational skillsAsk: How do you pay and store your bills?
Avoidance behaviorsAsk: Do you avoid other things (sorting mail, returning calls, doing dishes, or paying bills, rent, or taxes)?
Daily functioningAsk: Do you get everything done that you want to do? Are you often late? Do you have difficulty starting or finishing tasks? Describe a typical day.
InsightAsk: Do you think this amount of clutter is normal? Do you think having this clutter has caused problems in your life?
Motivation for treatmentAsk: What brings you into therapy now? Do you think you have a problem with excessive hoarding/saving? If it was not for your family, would you come for help?
Social and occupational functioningAsk: How has your clutter affected your personal relationships? When was the last time you had someone come to your home? What prevents you from working right now? Are you working to your full potential?
Support from friends and familyAsk: What does your family say about your clutter? Do your friends or family understand what is going on?
Treatment complianceAsk: How long does it typically take before you renew your prescriptions when you run out of medications?
Table 3

Cognitive behavioral therapy for compulsive hoarding

Treatment sequenceMethods and goals
Educate patient about hoardingHelp improve insight and motivation
Set up treatmentWith patient, select target area of clutter
Assess items together, creating a hierarchy of least to most difficult areas to sort and items to discard
Create realistic categories and a storage system
Begin discardingPatient must decide to keep or discard each item and permanently remove it from pile
Patient must store saved items appropriately
Continue until area is clear, then move to next area
Plan and implement appropriate use of space
Stop incoming clutterCancel subscriptions
Address compulsive buying and acquisition
Provide organization trainingOrganize possessions, time, tasks, etc.
Prevent relapseReplace hoarding with healthier behaviors to prevent clutter from re-accumulating
Source: Adapted from reference 23.
Social and occupational functioning. Many compulsive hoarders have very little family or social support. They frequently are too embarrassed by their clutter to have people come to their homes, sometimes for years. The syndrome frequently impairs work performance.
 

 

20

Motivation. Like insight, motivation can fluctuate over time. Patients usually must work tremendously hard to adhere to treatment. To support these efforts, we periodically review with patients compulsive hoarding’s negative effects and the activities they would enjoy—such as improved relationships, greater work capacity, hobbies—if overcoming this behavior allowed them more time and space.

Rating scales. The symptom checklist of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS)21 contains two items for hoarding obsessions and compulsions but none for avoidance behaviors, which are prominent with compulsive hoarding. The Saving Inventory-Revised22 is a validated, 23-item self-report measure of clutter, difficulty discarding, and excessive acquisition, which distinguishes compulsive hoarders, nonhoarding OCD patients, and normal controls.

TREATMENT

The compulsive hoarder’s problems will not be solved by someone else throwing away or organizing his or her possessions. These actions often anger patients, who see them as intrusive and a loss of control.

In our experience, family members’ attempts to intervene can disrupt relationships and worsen hoarders’ social withdrawal. “Taking over” also does not help the patient create a sustainable system for keeping clutter-free.

Algorithm

Medication treatment for compulsive hoarding*

Start with SSRIs, as for nonhoarding OCD (citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline)
  • High doses and 12-week trials
  • Some compulsive hoarders will respond well to SSRIs
  • Other OCD symptoms usually improve as well
  • Comorbid depression and other anxiety symptoms may respond
  • If ineffective, may need to do 3 or 4 full trials of different SSRIs, clomipramine, or venlafaxine
Treat comorbid conditionsMood disorders, other anxiety disorders, ADHD, psychotic disorders, etc.
Use adjunctive medications if SSRIs give only partial response
  • Atypical antipsychotics (risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine)
  • Stimulants
  • Mood stabilizers (for comorbid bipolar disorder, cyclothymia, or impulsivity)
* Combine medication treatment with cognitive-behavioral therapy
SSRI: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor
OCD: obsessive-compulsive disorder
ADHD: attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
We find that combining cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and medication is optimal treatment for compulsive hoarding,23 although no controlled studies have compared this combination with each treatment alone. One controlled trial24 and three uncontrolled trials8,25,26 have shown some benefit of CBT for compulsive hoarding, although with poorer response and higher dropout rates than for nonhoarding OCD patients.

Psychotherapy. Exposure and response prevention (ERP) focuses on preventing incoming clutter, discarding, organizing, and relapse prevention (Table 3).23 Start treatment by explaining compulsive hoarding syndrome to patients as having problems with information processing, obsessional anxiety, and avoiding decisions.

Preventing incoming clutter. Before you focus on discarding, patients must stop incoming clutter; otherwise, it will come in as fast as it goes out. We ask patients to keep a daily log of every item they acquire or buy to build their awareness of what triggers their behavior.

Discarding. To desensitize over time, we repeatedly expose patients to the anxiety, sadness, or anger they feel when discarding items and making decisions. We encourage them to provoke their anxiety by throwing away as many items as possible, keeping only necessary items.

We support ERP with cognitive restructuring, prompting patients to reframe their obsessive fears about losing something necessary or valuable. By thinking through the consequences of discarding their clutter, they challenge their erroneous beliefs that dire consequences will occur.

Organizing. When patients decide they must keep an item, ask them to immediately identify a specific place and deadline to store it. After an area is cleared, patients must keep it clear and use it for its intended purpose. Most patients need training in time management, scheduling, and prioritizing.

Relapse prevention. Replace hoarding behaviors with more-adaptive, healthy behaviors. Teach patients to create a realistic schedule that includes time for chores, eating and sleeping, CBT homework, and recreation. Treatment goals are to:

  • extinguish obsessional fears and compulsive saving behaviors
  • teach lasting organizational and decision-making skills, thereby reducing relapse risk.
Practical matters. Sorting and discarding a houseful of clutter takes time, although the patient does this primarily as homework. To control costs and your time commitment, consider collaborating with a CBT therapist trained in working with compulsive hoarders. Use your sessions with the patient to create hierarchies, go over assignments, do brief exposures, and monitor drug therapy.

Medications. No controlled studies have examined whether any medications are effective for compulsive hoarding syndrome. The treatment strategies and algorithm described here are based on our clinical experience, controlled trials of OCD patients, and limited OCD studies secondarily examining hoarders’ specific treatment responses.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) may be less effective for compulsive hoarding than for other compulsive behaviors.14,27 Nevertheless, SSRIs may help alleviate hoarders’ core symptoms, other OCD symptoms, depression, and anxiety. For hoarding treatment to be effective, comorbid disorders must be treated and stabilized.

 

 

Several studies of SSRI use in OCD patients have shown modest improvements in compulsive hoarders:

  • In a descriptive study of patients with compulsive hoarding, 1 of 18 (6%) patients had a “marked” response to at least one SSRI trial. The others showed a partial response,17 with YBOCS scores decreasing by at least 25% in approximately 50% of this group.
  • When 17 OCD patients with hoarding symptoms were treated with paroxetine, CBT, or placebo, 18% responded to active treatment. Response was defined as a 40% reduction on YBOCS scores and “very much” or “much” improved on the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI).14
Based on these findings and our clinical experience, an effective approach to treating compulsive hoarding with medications—as with other OCD patients—is to start with SSRIs28 (Algorithm). If adequate SSRI trials fail to improve a patient’s hoarding/saving symptoms, adjunctive medications can be added.

Atypical antipsychotics may be effective for OCD symptoms that do not respond adequately to SSRIs.29 Conventional antipsychotics are also effective adjuncts to SSRIs—particularly for patients with coexisting tic or psychotic disorders30—but consider the potential for extrapyramidal side effects and tardive dyskinesia.

We find that stimulants help some compulsive hoarders, particularly those with comorbid ADHD, other attentional problems, low motivation, or lethargy. Mood stabilizers are necessary to treat comorbid bipolar disorder, cyclothymia, and impulsivity.

Related resources

Drug brand names

  • Citalopram • Celexa
  • Clomipramine • Anafranil
  • Escitalopram • Lexapro
  • Fluoxetine • Prozac
  • Fluvoxamine • Luvox
  • Olanzapine • Zyprexa
  • Paroxetine • Paxil
  • Quetiapine • Seroquel
  • Risperidone • Risperdal
  • Sertraline • Zoloft
  • Venlafaxine • Effexor
Disclosures

The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Compulsive hoarding behavior is considered notoriously difficult to treat, but targeting its characteristic symptoms with medication and psychotherapy can be successful. This article provides a guide for the psychiatrist—alone or with a cognitive-behavioral therapist—to diagnose compulsive hoarding syndrome and help patients overcome the anxieties that fuel its symptoms.

WHAT IS COMPULSIVE HOARDING?

Hoarders acquire and are unable to discard items that others consider of little use or value.1 They most often save newspapers, magazines, old clothing, bags, books, mail, notes, and lists. Hoarding and saving behaviors occur in nonclinical populations and with other neuropsychiatric disorders—schizophrenia, dementia, eating disorders, mental retardation—but are most often found in persons with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).

OCD is a heterogeneous clinical entity with several major symptom domains:2,3

  • aggressive, sexual, and religious obsessions with checking compulsions
  • symmetry/order obsessions with ordering, arranging, and repeating compulsions
  • contamination obsessions with washing and cleaning compulsions
  • hoarding and saving symptoms.
Box

What causes compulsive hoarding?

Genetics. Compulsive hoarding may have a different pattern of inheritance and comorbidity than other OCD symptom factors. Hoarding/saving symptoms show a recessive inheritance pattern, whereas aggressive/checking and symmetry/order symptoms show a dominant pattern.9 The hoarding phenotype has been significantly associated with genetic markers on chromosomes 4, 5, and 17.14 In other studies:

  • Among 20 OCD patients with prominent hoarding, 84% had first-degree relatives with hoarding behaviors and only 37% had first-degree relatives who met DSM-IV criteria for OCD.11
  • Among 126 OCD patients, social phobia, personality disorders, and pathologic grooming disorders were more common in hoarders than in nonhoarders. Hoarding and tics were more common in first-degree relatives of hoarders than in those of nonhoarders.12

Neurobiology. Using positron emission tomography (PET) brain imaging, our group13 compared glucose metabolism in patients with compulsive hoarding syndrome with that of nonhoarding OCD patients and normal controls. Compulsive hoarders had unique brain activity, with significantly lower metabolism:

  • in the posterior cingulate gyrus and occipital cortex than controls
  • in the dorsal anterior cingulate gyrus (AC) and thalamus than nonhoarding OCD patients.

Hoarding severity was significantly correlated with lower activity in the dorsal AC across all OCD patients.

Discussion. Genetic and neurobiologic data suggest that compulsive hoarding syndrome may be a neurobiologically distinct variant of OCD14 and may help explain its clinical symptoms and poor treatment response. Low AC activity may mediate compulsive hoarders’ decision-making and attentional problems, whereas low posterior cingulate activity may be responsible for visuospatial and memory deficits. Moreover:

  • lower pretreatment AC activity has been strongly associated with poor response to antidepressants15
  • lower posterior cingulate gyrus activity correlates with poorer response to fluvoxamine in patients with OCD.16
Among OCD patients, 18% to 42% have hoarding and saving compulsions.4,5 Hoarding and saving can be part of a broader clinical syndrome that includes indecisiveness, perfectionism, procrastination, difficulty organizing tasks, and avoiding routine daily activities.6,7 The 1 to 2 million Americans whose most prominent and distressing OCD symptom is hoarding and saving and who show these other associated symptoms are considered to have “compulsive hoarding syndrome.”7,8 Evidence suggests that this syndrome may be a neurobiologically distinct OCD variant (Box).9-16

ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT PLANNING

To manage compulsive hoarding syndrome, begin with a thorough neuropsychiatric evaluation:

  • Rule out primary psychotic disorders, dementia, and other cognitive impairments and neurologic disorders.
  • Rule out primary major depression, as clutter and self-neglect may be caused by amotivation, low energy, or hopelessness.
  • Determine if the patient has OCD.
After making a compulsive hoarding diagnosis (Table 1),6 visit the patient’s home or view photographs to assess his or her environment and behaviors (Table 2).

Amount of clutter. Living areas may be so cluttered that sleeping in a bed, sitting on chairs, or preparing food on a kitchen counter are impossible. How much of the home is cluttered? How much floor and counter space is usable? Are rooms unusable or inaccessible because of clutter? Can the patient use the laundry, prepare food in the kitchen, use the shower, toilet, etc.?

Health or safety hazards. Huge piles of papers can be a fire hazard. Clutter may be blocking the exits. Collected items may extend beyond patients’ homes to their cars, garages, storage lockers, and even storage areas owned by friends and family.

Beliefs about possessions. Compulsive hoarders often have distorted feelings about their possessions. They may over-buy or impulsively purchase items they feel have emotional or monetary value. They may consider the items extensions of themselves and suffer grief-like loss when discarding things.7

Some collect free items—flyers, coupons, newspapers, discarded goods—hoping to save money or be prepared “just in case” the item is ever needed. This may represent unattainable expectations of perfection, needing to maintain preparedness for every possible contingency. Hoarders often believe they have poor memory and have catastrophic fears of what might happen if they forget something. Thus, their desire to keep their possessions in sight is strong.17

 

 

Information processing deficits. Because of anxieties about making mistakes, most hoarders have great difficulty making decisions.18 It is easier to not decide than to suffer the consequences of a “wrong” decision. To gauge this behavior, ask patients how long routine decisions take them and which decisions they procrastinate or avoid.

Compulsive hoarders often have trouble categorizing possessions;6,7 because every item feels unique, they create a special category for each one and resist storing items together.

Table 1

Proposed criteria to diagnose obsessive-compulsive hoarding*

Patient acquires and fails to discard a large number of possessions that appear useless or of limited value
Clutter prevents patient from using living or work spaces for activities for which they were designed
Hoarding behavior causes significant distress or functional impairment
* Proposed by Frost and Hartl, reference 6.
Many hoarders also report marked distractibility and inattention, jumping from one task to the next without completing any of them. Their communication style is often as cluttered and disorganized as their homes, with tangential, circumstantial, and over-inclusive descriptions.

Avoidance behaviors are a hallmark of the compulsive hoarding syndrome. To avoid deciding to discard items, they put them in a box, garage, rented storage facility, etc. They may also avoid routine decision-making tasks that could lead to making a mistake.

Daily functioning. Hoarders may take a long time to do even small chores, such as taking an hour to pay one bill. An inordinate amount of time may be spent “churning”—moving items from one pile to another but never discarding any item or establishing a consistent system or organization.

Medication compliance. Compulsive hoarders often forget to take medications or take them at inappropriate times. They may lose their medications in the clutter.

Insight. Hoarders often have little awareness of how their behavior and clutter affect their lives.19 They minimize the clutter in their homes and its health and safety risks. Insight can fluctuate over time and needs to be assessed repeatedly during treatment.

Table 2

Assessing a patient with compulsive hoarding symptoms

DomainUseful questions or strategies
Amount of clutterVisit home and/or see pictures
Hazards relating to clutterAsk: What precautions do you take to reduce risk of fire? Have you ever had a problem with rodent or insect infestation as a result of the clutter? Have neighbors complained about the risks of fire or infestation that the clutter might impose on their homes?
Beliefs about loss of possessionsAsk: What is the worst thing that would happen if you threw this item away? If you did not have this, what do you think would happen?
Information-processing deficitsAsk: How long do routine decisions take you? Which decisions do you procrastinate or avoid?
Decision-making and organizational skillsAsk: How do you pay and store your bills?
Avoidance behaviorsAsk: Do you avoid other things (sorting mail, returning calls, doing dishes, or paying bills, rent, or taxes)?
Daily functioningAsk: Do you get everything done that you want to do? Are you often late? Do you have difficulty starting or finishing tasks? Describe a typical day.
InsightAsk: Do you think this amount of clutter is normal? Do you think having this clutter has caused problems in your life?
Motivation for treatmentAsk: What brings you into therapy now? Do you think you have a problem with excessive hoarding/saving? If it was not for your family, would you come for help?
Social and occupational functioningAsk: How has your clutter affected your personal relationships? When was the last time you had someone come to your home? What prevents you from working right now? Are you working to your full potential?
Support from friends and familyAsk: What does your family say about your clutter? Do your friends or family understand what is going on?
Treatment complianceAsk: How long does it typically take before you renew your prescriptions when you run out of medications?
Table 3

Cognitive behavioral therapy for compulsive hoarding

Treatment sequenceMethods and goals
Educate patient about hoardingHelp improve insight and motivation
Set up treatmentWith patient, select target area of clutter
Assess items together, creating a hierarchy of least to most difficult areas to sort and items to discard
Create realistic categories and a storage system
Begin discardingPatient must decide to keep or discard each item and permanently remove it from pile
Patient must store saved items appropriately
Continue until area is clear, then move to next area
Plan and implement appropriate use of space
Stop incoming clutterCancel subscriptions
Address compulsive buying and acquisition
Provide organization trainingOrganize possessions, time, tasks, etc.
Prevent relapseReplace hoarding with healthier behaviors to prevent clutter from re-accumulating
Source: Adapted from reference 23.
Social and occupational functioning. Many compulsive hoarders have very little family or social support. They frequently are too embarrassed by their clutter to have people come to their homes, sometimes for years. The syndrome frequently impairs work performance.
 

 

20

Motivation. Like insight, motivation can fluctuate over time. Patients usually must work tremendously hard to adhere to treatment. To support these efforts, we periodically review with patients compulsive hoarding’s negative effects and the activities they would enjoy—such as improved relationships, greater work capacity, hobbies—if overcoming this behavior allowed them more time and space.

Rating scales. The symptom checklist of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS)21 contains two items for hoarding obsessions and compulsions but none for avoidance behaviors, which are prominent with compulsive hoarding. The Saving Inventory-Revised22 is a validated, 23-item self-report measure of clutter, difficulty discarding, and excessive acquisition, which distinguishes compulsive hoarders, nonhoarding OCD patients, and normal controls.

TREATMENT

The compulsive hoarder’s problems will not be solved by someone else throwing away or organizing his or her possessions. These actions often anger patients, who see them as intrusive and a loss of control.

In our experience, family members’ attempts to intervene can disrupt relationships and worsen hoarders’ social withdrawal. “Taking over” also does not help the patient create a sustainable system for keeping clutter-free.

Algorithm

Medication treatment for compulsive hoarding*

Start with SSRIs, as for nonhoarding OCD (citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline)
  • High doses and 12-week trials
  • Some compulsive hoarders will respond well to SSRIs
  • Other OCD symptoms usually improve as well
  • Comorbid depression and other anxiety symptoms may respond
  • If ineffective, may need to do 3 or 4 full trials of different SSRIs, clomipramine, or venlafaxine
Treat comorbid conditionsMood disorders, other anxiety disorders, ADHD, psychotic disorders, etc.
Use adjunctive medications if SSRIs give only partial response
  • Atypical antipsychotics (risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine)
  • Stimulants
  • Mood stabilizers (for comorbid bipolar disorder, cyclothymia, or impulsivity)
* Combine medication treatment with cognitive-behavioral therapy
SSRI: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor
OCD: obsessive-compulsive disorder
ADHD: attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
We find that combining cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and medication is optimal treatment for compulsive hoarding,23 although no controlled studies have compared this combination with each treatment alone. One controlled trial24 and three uncontrolled trials8,25,26 have shown some benefit of CBT for compulsive hoarding, although with poorer response and higher dropout rates than for nonhoarding OCD patients.

Psychotherapy. Exposure and response prevention (ERP) focuses on preventing incoming clutter, discarding, organizing, and relapse prevention (Table 3).23 Start treatment by explaining compulsive hoarding syndrome to patients as having problems with information processing, obsessional anxiety, and avoiding decisions.

Preventing incoming clutter. Before you focus on discarding, patients must stop incoming clutter; otherwise, it will come in as fast as it goes out. We ask patients to keep a daily log of every item they acquire or buy to build their awareness of what triggers their behavior.

Discarding. To desensitize over time, we repeatedly expose patients to the anxiety, sadness, or anger they feel when discarding items and making decisions. We encourage them to provoke their anxiety by throwing away as many items as possible, keeping only necessary items.

We support ERP with cognitive restructuring, prompting patients to reframe their obsessive fears about losing something necessary or valuable. By thinking through the consequences of discarding their clutter, they challenge their erroneous beliefs that dire consequences will occur.

Organizing. When patients decide they must keep an item, ask them to immediately identify a specific place and deadline to store it. After an area is cleared, patients must keep it clear and use it for its intended purpose. Most patients need training in time management, scheduling, and prioritizing.

Relapse prevention. Replace hoarding behaviors with more-adaptive, healthy behaviors. Teach patients to create a realistic schedule that includes time for chores, eating and sleeping, CBT homework, and recreation. Treatment goals are to:

  • extinguish obsessional fears and compulsive saving behaviors
  • teach lasting organizational and decision-making skills, thereby reducing relapse risk.
Practical matters. Sorting and discarding a houseful of clutter takes time, although the patient does this primarily as homework. To control costs and your time commitment, consider collaborating with a CBT therapist trained in working with compulsive hoarders. Use your sessions with the patient to create hierarchies, go over assignments, do brief exposures, and monitor drug therapy.

Medications. No controlled studies have examined whether any medications are effective for compulsive hoarding syndrome. The treatment strategies and algorithm described here are based on our clinical experience, controlled trials of OCD patients, and limited OCD studies secondarily examining hoarders’ specific treatment responses.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) may be less effective for compulsive hoarding than for other compulsive behaviors.14,27 Nevertheless, SSRIs may help alleviate hoarders’ core symptoms, other OCD symptoms, depression, and anxiety. For hoarding treatment to be effective, comorbid disorders must be treated and stabilized.

 

 

Several studies of SSRI use in OCD patients have shown modest improvements in compulsive hoarders:

  • In a descriptive study of patients with compulsive hoarding, 1 of 18 (6%) patients had a “marked” response to at least one SSRI trial. The others showed a partial response,17 with YBOCS scores decreasing by at least 25% in approximately 50% of this group.
  • When 17 OCD patients with hoarding symptoms were treated with paroxetine, CBT, or placebo, 18% responded to active treatment. Response was defined as a 40% reduction on YBOCS scores and “very much” or “much” improved on the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI).14
Based on these findings and our clinical experience, an effective approach to treating compulsive hoarding with medications—as with other OCD patients—is to start with SSRIs28 (Algorithm). If adequate SSRI trials fail to improve a patient’s hoarding/saving symptoms, adjunctive medications can be added.

Atypical antipsychotics may be effective for OCD symptoms that do not respond adequately to SSRIs.29 Conventional antipsychotics are also effective adjuncts to SSRIs—particularly for patients with coexisting tic or psychotic disorders30—but consider the potential for extrapyramidal side effects and tardive dyskinesia.

We find that stimulants help some compulsive hoarders, particularly those with comorbid ADHD, other attentional problems, low motivation, or lethargy. Mood stabilizers are necessary to treat comorbid bipolar disorder, cyclothymia, and impulsivity.

Related resources

Drug brand names

  • Citalopram • Celexa
  • Clomipramine • Anafranil
  • Escitalopram • Lexapro
  • Fluoxetine • Prozac
  • Fluvoxamine • Luvox
  • Olanzapine • Zyprexa
  • Paroxetine • Paxil
  • Quetiapine • Seroquel
  • Risperidone • Risperdal
  • Sertraline • Zoloft
  • Venlafaxine • Effexor
Disclosures

The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

References

1. Frost R, Gross R. The hoarding of possessions. Behav Res Ther 1993;31:367-81.

2. Leckman J, Grice D, Boardman J, et al. Symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1997;154:911-17.

3. Leckman J, Zhang H, Alsobrook J, Pauls D. Symptom dimensions in obsessive-compulsive disorder: toward quantitative phenotypes. Am J Med Genet 2001;105(1):28-30.

4. Hanna G. Demographic and clinical features of obsessive-compulsive disorder in children and adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1995;34(1):19-27.

5. Rasmussen S, Eisen J. The epidemiology and clinical features of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychiatr Clin North Am 1992;15(4):743-58.

6. Frost R, Hartl T. A cognitive-behavioral model of compulsive hoarding. Behav Res Ther 1996;34:341-50.

7. Steketee G, Frost R. Compulsive hoarding: current status of the research. Clin Psychol Rev 2003;23:905-27.

8. Saxena S, Maidment K, Vapnik T, et al. Obsessive-compulsive hoarding: symptom severity and response to multi-modal treatment. J Clin Psychiatry 2002;63:21-7.

9. Leckman JF, Pauls DL, Zhang H, etal. and the Tourette Syndrome Association International Consortium for Genetics. Obsessive-compulsive symptom dimensions in affected sibling pairs diagnosed with Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome. Am J Med Genet 2003;116B:60-8.

10. Zhang H, Leckman JF, Pauls DL, etal. and the Tourette Syndrome Association International Consortium for Genetics. Genome-wide scan of hoarding in sib pairs in which both sibs have Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 2002;70:896-904.

11. Winsberg M, Cassic K, Koran L. Hoarding in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a report of 20 cases. J Clin Psychiatry 1999;60:591-7.

12. Samuels J, Bienvenu OJ, 3rd, Riddle MA, et al. Hoarding in obsessive compulsive disorder: results from a case-control study. Behav Res Ther 2002;40(5):517-28.

13. Saxena S, Brody A, Maidment K, et al. Cerebral glucose metabolism in obsessive-compulsive hoarding. Am J Psychiatry 2004;161:1038-48.

14. Black D, Monahan P, Gable J, et al. Hoarding and treatment response in non-depressed subjects with obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 1998;59:420-5.

15. Mayberg H, Brannan S, Mahurin R, et al. Cingulate function in depression: a potential predictor of treatment response. Neuroreport 1997;8(4):1057-61.

16. Rauch S, Shin L, Dougherty D, et al. Predictors of fluvoxamine response in contamination-related obsessive-compulsive disorder: a PET symptom provocation study. Neuropsychopharmacol 2002;27(5):782-91.

17. Hartl T, Frost R, Allen G, et al. Actual and perceived memory deficits in individuals with compulsive hoarding. Depress Anxiety 2004;20:59-69.

18. Frost R, Krause M, Steketee G. Hoarding and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Behav Modif 1996;20:116-32.

19. Steketee G, Frost R, Kim H-J. Hoarding by elderly people. Health Soc Work 2001;26:176-84.

20. Frost RO, Steketee G, Williams LF, Warren R. Mood, personality disorder symptoms, and disability in obsessive compulsive hoarders: a comparison with clinical and non-clinical controls. Behav Res Ther 2000;38:1071-81.

21. Goodman WK, Price LH, Rasmussen SA, et al. The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale. I. Development, use, and reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1989;46(11):1006-11.

22. Frost RO, Steketee G, Grisham J. Measurement of compulsive hoarding: saving inventory-revised. Behav Res Ther 2004;42(10):1163-82.

23. Saxena S, Maidment K. Treatment of compulsive hoarding. J Clin Psychol 2004;60(11):1143-54.

24. Mataix-Cols D, Marks IM, Greist JH, et al. Obsessive-compulsive symptom dimensions as predictors of compliance with and response to behaviour therapy: results from a controlled trial. Psychother Psychosom 2002;71(5):255-62.

25. Abramowitz JS, Franklin ME, Schwartz SA, Furr JM. Symptom presentation and outcome of cognitive-behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol 2003;71(6):1049-57.

26. Steketee G, Frost RO, Wincze J, et al. Group and individual treatment of compulsive hoarding: a pilot study. Behav Cognit Psychother 2000;28:259-68.

27. Mataix-Cols D, Rauch S, Manzo P, Jenike M. Use of factor-analyzed symptom dimensions to predict outcome with serotonin reuptake inhibitors and placebo in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1999;156:1409-16.

28. Greist JH, Jefferson JW, Kobak KA, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of serotonin transport inhibitors in obsessive-compulsive disorder. A meta-analysis. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1995;52(1):53-60.

29. Pallanti S, Hollander E, Goodman WK. A qualitative analysis of nonresponse: management of treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2004;65(suppl 14):6-10.

30. McDougle C, Goodman W, Leckman J, et al. Haloperidol addition in fluvoxamine-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with and without tics. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994;51:302-8.

References

1. Frost R, Gross R. The hoarding of possessions. Behav Res Ther 1993;31:367-81.

2. Leckman J, Grice D, Boardman J, et al. Symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1997;154:911-17.

3. Leckman J, Zhang H, Alsobrook J, Pauls D. Symptom dimensions in obsessive-compulsive disorder: toward quantitative phenotypes. Am J Med Genet 2001;105(1):28-30.

4. Hanna G. Demographic and clinical features of obsessive-compulsive disorder in children and adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1995;34(1):19-27.

5. Rasmussen S, Eisen J. The epidemiology and clinical features of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychiatr Clin North Am 1992;15(4):743-58.

6. Frost R, Hartl T. A cognitive-behavioral model of compulsive hoarding. Behav Res Ther 1996;34:341-50.

7. Steketee G, Frost R. Compulsive hoarding: current status of the research. Clin Psychol Rev 2003;23:905-27.

8. Saxena S, Maidment K, Vapnik T, et al. Obsessive-compulsive hoarding: symptom severity and response to multi-modal treatment. J Clin Psychiatry 2002;63:21-7.

9. Leckman JF, Pauls DL, Zhang H, etal. and the Tourette Syndrome Association International Consortium for Genetics. Obsessive-compulsive symptom dimensions in affected sibling pairs diagnosed with Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome. Am J Med Genet 2003;116B:60-8.

10. Zhang H, Leckman JF, Pauls DL, etal. and the Tourette Syndrome Association International Consortium for Genetics. Genome-wide scan of hoarding in sib pairs in which both sibs have Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 2002;70:896-904.

11. Winsberg M, Cassic K, Koran L. Hoarding in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a report of 20 cases. J Clin Psychiatry 1999;60:591-7.

12. Samuels J, Bienvenu OJ, 3rd, Riddle MA, et al. Hoarding in obsessive compulsive disorder: results from a case-control study. Behav Res Ther 2002;40(5):517-28.

13. Saxena S, Brody A, Maidment K, et al. Cerebral glucose metabolism in obsessive-compulsive hoarding. Am J Psychiatry 2004;161:1038-48.

14. Black D, Monahan P, Gable J, et al. Hoarding and treatment response in non-depressed subjects with obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 1998;59:420-5.

15. Mayberg H, Brannan S, Mahurin R, et al. Cingulate function in depression: a potential predictor of treatment response. Neuroreport 1997;8(4):1057-61.

16. Rauch S, Shin L, Dougherty D, et al. Predictors of fluvoxamine response in contamination-related obsessive-compulsive disorder: a PET symptom provocation study. Neuropsychopharmacol 2002;27(5):782-91.

17. Hartl T, Frost R, Allen G, et al. Actual and perceived memory deficits in individuals with compulsive hoarding. Depress Anxiety 2004;20:59-69.

18. Frost R, Krause M, Steketee G. Hoarding and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Behav Modif 1996;20:116-32.

19. Steketee G, Frost R, Kim H-J. Hoarding by elderly people. Health Soc Work 2001;26:176-84.

20. Frost RO, Steketee G, Williams LF, Warren R. Mood, personality disorder symptoms, and disability in obsessive compulsive hoarders: a comparison with clinical and non-clinical controls. Behav Res Ther 2000;38:1071-81.

21. Goodman WK, Price LH, Rasmussen SA, et al. The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale. I. Development, use, and reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1989;46(11):1006-11.

22. Frost RO, Steketee G, Grisham J. Measurement of compulsive hoarding: saving inventory-revised. Behav Res Ther 2004;42(10):1163-82.

23. Saxena S, Maidment K. Treatment of compulsive hoarding. J Clin Psychol 2004;60(11):1143-54.

24. Mataix-Cols D, Marks IM, Greist JH, et al. Obsessive-compulsive symptom dimensions as predictors of compliance with and response to behaviour therapy: results from a controlled trial. Psychother Psychosom 2002;71(5):255-62.

25. Abramowitz JS, Franklin ME, Schwartz SA, Furr JM. Symptom presentation and outcome of cognitive-behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol 2003;71(6):1049-57.

26. Steketee G, Frost RO, Wincze J, et al. Group and individual treatment of compulsive hoarding: a pilot study. Behav Cognit Psychother 2000;28:259-68.

27. Mataix-Cols D, Rauch S, Manzo P, Jenike M. Use of factor-analyzed symptom dimensions to predict outcome with serotonin reuptake inhibitors and placebo in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1999;156:1409-16.

28. Greist JH, Jefferson JW, Kobak KA, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of serotonin transport inhibitors in obsessive-compulsive disorder. A meta-analysis. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1995;52(1):53-60.

29. Pallanti S, Hollander E, Goodman WK. A qualitative analysis of nonresponse: management of treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2004;65(suppl 14):6-10.

30. McDougle C, Goodman W, Leckman J, et al. Haloperidol addition in fluvoxamine-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with and without tics. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994;51:302-8.

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 04(03)
Issue
Current Psychiatry - 04(03)
Page Number
12-26
Page Number
12-26
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Compulsive hoarding: Unclutter lives and homes by breaking anxiety’s grip
Display Headline
Compulsive hoarding: Unclutter lives and homes by breaking anxiety’s grip
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

When not to treat depression in PCOS with antidepressants

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 12/11/2018 - 15:10
Display Headline
When not to treat depression in PCOS with antidepressants

Women with depression and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) can be trapped in a vicious cycle of hormonal dysregulation. Treating these patients appropriately—with or without antidepressants—requires an understanding of their underlying metabolic disorder.

This article presents a case1 that exemplifies the association between depression and PCOS (Box 1).2-4 Based on our research and clinical experience, we offer recommendations to help you manage depression in patients with PCOS.

CHRONIC DEPRESSION WITH AMENORRHEA

Ms. K, age 30, presented for psychiatric evaluation of treatment-resistant recurrent major depression. Her symptoms included sad mood, sleep disturbance, decreased energy, anhedonia, poor concentration, and feelings of guilt and worthlessness. Her score of 28 on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-21) indicated severe depression.

Box 1

Depression often accompanies PCOS

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common cause of menstrual disturbance in women of reproductive age, affecting approximately 5% of U.S. women.1 Clinically, it is the association of hyperandrogenism with chronic anovulation, without specific underlying adrenal or pituitary gland disease.2

PCOS has been shown to be associated with depression, though little research has been done in this area. We conducted a pilot study (the first, to our knowledge) to examine the rate of depression among women with documented PCOS and to correlate Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) scores indicative of depression with clinical and biochemical markers of PCOS. We found an increased prevalence of depression in women with PCOS and an association between depression, insulin resistance, and body mass index. Specifically, among 32 women with documented PCOS,3 16 (50%) had CES-D scores indicating depression.

This was Ms. K’s third episode of major depression, with the first two occurring at ages 24 and 26. She reported similar symptoms each time. Previous psychiatrists had tried a variety of antidepressants with no therapeutic benefit before she responded to citalopram, 40 mg/d, at age 27. With this selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, her depressive symptoms resolved for >1 year, except for mild irritability and low mood the week before menses.

Her depressive symptoms returned, however, and her previous psychiatrist treated her for approximately 13 months with extended-release venlafaxine, 225 mg/d. When she remained depressed, she was referred to our clinic for evaluation. Based on her history, we could not determine whether she had become euthymic at age 27 or her symptoms had improved but still met criteria for a major depressive episode.

Ms. K reported having PCOS symptoms from age 19. These included amenorrhea since menarche, hirsutism, hair loss, alopecia, central fat distribution characteristic of PCOS, and male-pattern hair growth on her abdomen and thighs. She was not obese—with a body mass index (BMI) of approximately 25—but had gained 10 to 15 lbs while taking venlafaxine.

Ms. K had never been treated for PCOS but reported that her desire to become pregnant made her more concerned about her symptoms and possible infertility.

Diagnosis. PCOS is usually diagnosed using endocrinologic, clinical, and ultrasonographic criteria (Table 1). Obesity is not a presenting symptom in all women with PCOS. As with Ms. K, about 50% of patients have normal BMI.

Causes of depression in PCOS. Depressed mood in PCOS may be both physiologic and psychological:

  • Hypothalamic, pituitary, and other end-organ system dysregulation occurs in both PCOS and affective disorders, which share clinical and biochemical markers including insulin resistance, obesity, and hyperandrogenism.
  • PCOS’ clinical sequelae—hirsutism, acne, obesity, hormonal disturbances, fear of infertility, and psychological distress—may damage their self-esteem and female identity.

PCOS’ physical symptoms alone apparently do not account for patients’ worsened mood states. Weiner et al5 found that women with PCOS and free testosterone (FT) of 10 to 26 pg/mL (just above normal range) were more depressed than women without PCOS (FT <10 pg/mL) and women with PCOS and FT >26 pg/mL. Women with PCOS with the lower and higher FT levels had similar demographic profiles, but those with the highest FT levels were not the most depressed.

Similarly, in a study of 32 women with PCOS, we found no association between depression and other possibly distressing PCOS symptoms, including hirsutism, irregular menses, acne, or alopecia.4

Testosterone and mood disorders. Women such as Ms. K with hyperandrogenic syndromes are at increased risk for mood disorders.6 Many metabolic changes associated with PCOS—insulin resistance, obesity, and hyperandrogenism—are also described in patients with affective disorders. Our investigation of reproductive status in women with bipolar disorder found no clinical or biochemical evidence of PCOS with mood-stabilizer treatment. We did find that menstrual disturbances were common, however, and sometimes preceded bipolar disorder onset.7

Insulin resistance and depression. Others have linked insulin resistance and depression;8 depression has been shown to be associated with impaired insulin sensitivity and hyperinsulinemia.9 Depressed persons also tend to eat more sweets, drink more alcohol, exercise less, and sleep fewer hours than the nondepressed—all of which contribute to insulin sensitivity and insulin resistance.10

 

 

WHAT LINKS ENDOCRINE, MOOD DISORDERS?

Insulin and serotonin. Insulin affects central serotonin (5-HT) levels.11 Thus, central 5-HT system dysregulation that causes depression might also affect peripheral insulin sensitivity—or vice versa.9

Tryptophan, a serotonin precursor, competes with other large neutral amino acids for access to the transport system that moves them across the blood-brain barrier. Insulin stimulates uptake of the competing amino acids—but not tryptophan—into muscle tissue. The resulting increased tryptophan ratio in plasma affords it greater access to the transport system to contribute toward serotonin synthesis. Insulin also promotes central catecholaminergic activity, perhaps by suppressing norepinephrine reuptake and prolonging its residence in the synaptic cleft.10

Table 1

Diagnostic signs of PCOS

Endocrine
Chronically elevated plasma free and total testosterone levels
Increased luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion because of enhanced pituitary sensitivity to GnRH stimulation
Low or normal plasma follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels
Hyperinsulinemia and peripheral insulin resistance
Metabolic abnormalities of hyperinsulinemia and peripheral insulin resistance, including obesity and increased susceptibility to type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease
Clinical
Hirsutism
Acne
Infertility
Anovulation or menstrual abnormalities
  • amenorrhea
  • oligomenorrhea
  • dysfunctional uterine bleeding
Morphologic
Ovaries may appear to have multiple cysts 8 to 10 mm in diameter

Several studies have found that insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia can resolve after depression recovery.9,12 Because insulin resistance is a cardinal feature in PCOS pathophysiology,2 insulin resistance may be a common link between depression and PCOS.

Weight gain and obesity also have been described in patients with affective disorders.13 Not known is whether the weight gain precedes the psychopathology or is caused by long-term exposure to drugs used to treat affective disorders.

Box 2

Hormonal treatments with possible antidepressant effects in PCOS

CRH antagonists. Corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) receptor antagonists have been suggested as possible antidepressants.26 Depression and anxiety scores have declined during treatment with the cortisol synthesis inhibitors metyrapone27 and ketoconazole.28,29 These trials do not reveal whether these agents treat depression symptoms—rather than the underlying pathophysiology—or if the affective disorder will recur after long-term administration.26

GR antagonists. Glucocorticoid receptor (GR) antagonists such as mifepristone (RU-486) have been suggested as antidepressants in depressed patients with elevated basal cortisol levels.30 Mifepristone may be useful for treating psychotic depression, in which the HPA axis is particularly hyperactive.31 Mifepristone is contraindicated in most women with PCOS, however, as its progesterone antagonism would lead to infertility—already a common problem for women with PCOS.

MR antagonists. Spironolactone, a mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonist, decreases insulin resistance and fasting insulin levels in PCOS patients.25 We propose that insulin resistance may provide a common link in the pathophysiology of PCOS and depression. Therefore, treatment with insulin resistance-lowering medications such as spironolactone may induce antidepressant effects in women with depression and PCOS.

We reported a correlation between depression and BMI in women with PCOS.4 Depression might be independently associated with BMI, as weight gain and obesity are distressing symptoms associated with depression.14 However, we found no association between depression and other possibly distressing PCOS symptoms. Thus, the correlation between BMI and depression might more likely reflect the relationship between depression and insulin resistance, as degree of insulin resistance is known to correlate with BMI.

Elevated cortisol. Clearly, other factors—such as hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis dysfunction—are known to link affective and endocrine disorders. Hypercortisolemia can lead to both insulin resistance and obesity. Cortisol is one of the glucocorticoids the body secretes in response to stress to mobilize energy by increasing blood glucose levels. Early life stress and chronic emotional stress:

  • can impair the negative feedback system that limits cortisol production during stress
  • are associated with depression.

Approximately one-half of individuals with depression have elevated serum cortisol.10 Epidemiologic data show a positive correlation between cortisol levels and insulin resistance,15 and an association between HPA dysfunction and obesity has been described.16 Insulin can trigger androgen production by enhancing adrenal sensitivity to adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH).17

CASE: IMPROVING INSULIN RESISTANCE

We referred Ms. K to an endocrinologist for PCOS evaluation and treatment. Her serum glucose and insulin levels were 83 mg/dL (normal range 70 to 125 mg/dL) and 19.0 uIU/mL (normal range <10 uIU/mL), respectively. These values indicated insulin resistance as determined by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) ratio (fasting insulin x fasting glucose/22.5). Values >3.2 indicate insulin resistance, and Ms. K had a HOMA ratio of 3.9. The endocrinologist recommended:

  • metformin, starting at 850 mg/d and gradually increased to 2,550 mg/d
  • spironolactone, 100 mg/d.

Metformin, a biguanide approved for treating for type 2 diabetes, inhibits hepatic glucose production and increases peripheral insulin sensitivity, but it does not modify pancreatic insulin secretion. It may decrease insulin resistance by reducing gut absorption of glucose, improving glucose uptake by tissues, and/or increasing the number of insulin receptors.18 In treating PCOS, metformin can:

 

 

  • restore ovulation19
  • decrease insulin resistance, acne, hirsutism, total and bioavailable testosterone, BMI, and waist-hip ratio.20,21

Although the link between insulin resistance and depression is unclear, insulin is known to contribute to 5-HT synthesis by promoting tryptophan influx into the brain.22 Therefore, drugs used to treat insulin resistance—such as metformin and alpha lipoic acid23—might be useful in treating depression.

Spironolactone, a mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonist, reduces hirsutism in women with PCOS.24 It also can decrease insulin resistance and fasting insulin levels in PCOS patients and reduce serum testosterone.25

Evidence on treating mood disorders with hormonal agents such as spironolactone is scarce, although treatment-resistant depression has been reported to resolve with antiglucocorticoid use (Box 2).25-31 Modulating HPA axis activity to treat affective disorders has been investigated.

CASE: GOING ANTIDEPRESSANT-FREE

At first, Ms. K said she wanted to continue taking venlafaxine with the PCOS treatment. After 2 weeks of combined therapy, however, she chose to stop the antidepressant after her depressive symptoms persisted, and her HAM-D-21 score remained at 28.

During the next 4 weeks, as we tapered off the venlafaxine, Ms. K’s HAM-D-21 score dropped to 7, indicating depressive symptom resolution. Despite slow venlafaxine titration, withdrawal symptoms of excessive crying, not feeling “present,” and tingling sensations occurred. Three days of fluoxetine, 20 mg/d, alleviated these symptoms.

Table 2

Insulin-sensitizing medications used to treat PCOS

MedicationNormal dosageCommon side effects
Metformin500 mg tidHeadache, GI effects (nausea, diarrhea, flatulence) at start of therapy, weight loss, taste disturbances
Pioglitazone15 to 45 mg once dailySwelling, headache, respiratory infection, abdominal discomfort, muscle soreness
Rosiglitazone4 to 8 mg once dailyHeadache, mild weight gain

We continued Ms. K’s treatment without antidepressants, and her mood continued to improve with metformin, 2,550 mg/d, and spironolactone, 100 mg/d.

TREATMENT RECOMMENDATIONS

PCOS therapy may take up to 6 months to resolve symptoms such as anovulation or hirsutism, but affective symptoms may improve during the first 6 weeks, as this case shows. Choosing medications to treat depression in patients such as Ms. K depends on whether their PCOS is being treated when they present for psychiatric evaluation.

Patient not being treated for PCOS. Refer her to an endocrinologist for PCOS treatment with an insulin-sensitizing medication, such as metformin (Table 2). Treating the insulin resistance associated with PCOS may also resolve the depression. PCOS drug therapy may also include antiandrogens such as spironolactone to treat hirsutism, male-pattern baldness, and acne. We suggest that spironolactone’s antiandrogen effects may help reduce depressive symptoms.

If your patient is not taking an antidepressant at presentation, try PCOS treatment first. If depressive symptoms persist after 3 months, consider adding an antidepressant. If your patient is taking an antidepressant at presentation but continues to be depressed, offer two options:

  • taper off the antidepressant while starting PCOS treatment
  • continue the antidepressant while starting PCOS treatment.

The first option allows you to try PCOS treatment alone. If the depression is caused by a common underlying pathophysiology—such as insulin resistance—treating PCOS alone may alleviate her depressive symptoms. Monitor for withdrawal symptoms, which may be minimized with a short-term SSRI, such as fluoxetine.

The second option may help patients who have responded to antidepressants in the past. Adjunctive PCOS treatment may “jump-start” the antidepressant response without withdrawal symptoms, but you will not be sure whether the antidepressant response was caused by PCOS therapy alone or the combination therapy.

Patient being treated for PCOS. Treat her with antidepressants, and consult with her endocrinologist to consider more-aggressive insulin-sensitizing medications, especially if she exhibits high levels of insulin resistance.

Other interventions that increase insulin sensitivity and improve glycemic control—such as improving dietary management and sleep habits, reducing alcohol consumption, and increasing physical activity—might have an antidepressant effect. Therefore, recommend these health practices to patients as adjuncts to drug therapies.

CASE: DEPRESSION IN REMISSION

At the 3-month follow-up visit, Ms. K scored zero on the HAM-D-21 scale. With metformin treatment, she had lost approximately 10 lbs and resumed menstruating approximately every 33 days. She reported experiencing low mood, decreased energy, and irritability during the week before her periods, but these symptoms resolved with menses onset.

Serum glucose was within normal range at 89 mg/dL, and serum insulin was 15.0 uIU/Ml. Her HOMA ratio had dropped to 2.8 (below the 3.2 cut-off for insulin resistance).

Ms. K’s endocrinologist monitored her spironolactone and metformin therapy for approximately 1 year, when she became pregnant.

Discussion. PCOS treatment duration depends on the patient’s response and her goals for therapy. Whether or not she continues PCOS treatment, her primary care physician or endocrinologist should continue to monitor her for insulin resistance’s metabolic consequences, including increased risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

 

 

Related resources

  • Legro RS, Winans EA. Overview of polycystic ovary syndrome and its relation to psychiatric illness and treatment. Current Psychiatry 2004;3(Dec[suppl]):12-20.
  • The Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 2004 Jan; 81(1):19-25.
  • Polycystic ovary syndrome (patient information). The National Women’s Health Information Center. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office on Women’s Health. Available at: http://www.4woman.gov/faq/pcos.htm. Accessed Jan. 13, 2005.

Drug brand names

  • Citalopram • Celexa
  • Fluoxetine • Prozac
  • Ketoconazole • Nizoral
  • Metformin • Glucophage
  • Metyrapone • Metopirone
  • Mifepristone • Mifiprex
  • Pioglitazone • Actos
  • Rosiglitazone • Avandia
  • Spironolactone • Aldactone
  • Venlafaxine • Effexor XR

Disclosures

The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

References

1. Rasgon NL, Carter MS, Elman S, et al. Common treatment of polycystic ovarian syndrome and major depressive disorder: case report and review. Curr Drug Targets Immune Endocr Metabol Disord 2002;2(1):97-102.

2. Franks S. Polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med 1995;333(13):853-61.

3. Zawadski JK, Dunaif A. Diagnostic criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome: towards a rational approach. In: Dunaif A, Givens JR, Haseltine FP, Merriam GR (eds). Polycystic ovary syndrome. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific, 1992;377-84.

4. Rasgon NL, Rao R, Elman S, et al. Depression in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: clinical and biochemical correlates. J Affect Disord 2003;74(3):299-304.

5. Weiner CL, Primeau M, Ehrmann DA. Androgens and mood dysfunction in women: Comparison of women with polycystic ovarian syndrome to healthy controls. Psychosom Med 2004;66:356-62.

6. Fava GA, Grandi S, Savron G, et al. Psychosomatic assessment of hirsute women. Psychother Psychosom 1989;51:96-100.

7. Rasgon NL, Altshuler LL, Gudeman D, et al. Medication status and PCO syndrome in women with bipolar disorder: a preliminary report. J Clin Psychiatry 2000;61:173-8.

8. Okamura F, Tashiro A, Utsumi A, et al. Insulin resistance in patients with depression and its changes in the clinical course of depression: a report on three cases using the minimal model analysis. Internal Med 1999;38(3):257-60.

9. Okamura F, Tashiro A, Utsumi A, et al. Insulin resistance in patients with depression and its changes during the clinical course of depression: minimal model analysis. Metabolism 2000;49(10):1255-60.

10. Rasgon NL, Altshuler LL, Birtan JA, et al. Menstrual abnormalities in women with bipolar disorder (presentation). San Francisco: American Psychiatric Association annual meeting, May 2003.

11. Figlewicz DP. Endocrine regulation of neurotransmitter transporters. Epilepsy Res 1999;37(3):203-10.

12. Nathan RS, Sachar EJ, Asnis GM, et al. Relative insulin insensitivity and cortisol secretion in depressed patients. Psychiatry Res 1981;4:291.-

13. Elmslie JL, Silverstone TJ, Mann JI, Williams SM. Determinants of overweight and obesity in patients with bipolar disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2000;61:179.-

14. Istvan J, Zavela K, Weidner G. Body weight and psychological distress in NHANES I. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1992;16(12):999-1003.

15. Andrews RC, Walker BR. Glucocorticoids and insulin resistance: old hormones, new targets. Clin Sci 1999;96(5):513.-

16. Pasquali R, Biscotti D, Spinucci G, et al. Pulsatile secretion of ACTH and cortisol in premenopausal women: effect of obesity and body fat distribution. Clin Endocrinol 1998;48(5):603.-

17. Moghetti P, Castello R, Negri C, et al. Insulin infusion amplifies 17 alpha-hydroxycorticosteroid intermediates response to adrenocorticotropin in hyperandrogenic women: apparent relative impairment of 17,20-lyase activity. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol 1996;81(3):881.-

18. Bailey CJ, Day C, Bray GA, et al. Role of adrenal glands in the development of abnormal glucose and insulin homeostasis in genetically obese (ob/ob) mice. Horm Metab Res 1986;18(6):357.-

19. Sills SE, Perloe M, Palermo GD. Correction of hyperinsulinemia in oligoovulatory women with clomiphene-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome: a review of therapeutic rationale and reproductive outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000;91(2):135.-

20. Nestler JE, Jakubowicz DJ, Evans WS, Pasquali R. Effects of metformin on spontaneous and clomiphene-induced ovulation in the polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med 1998;338(26):1876.-

21. Velasquez EM, Mendoza S, Hamer T, et al. Metformin therapy in polycystic ovary syndrome reduces hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, hyperandrogenemia, and systolic blood pressure, while facilitating normal menses and pregnancy. Metabolism 1994;43(5):647.-

22. Chaouloff F. Effects of acute physical exercise on central serotonergic systems. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997;29(1):58.-

23. Salazar M. Alpha lipoic acid: a novel treatment for depression. Medical Hypoth 2000;55:510.-

24. Spritzer PM, Lisboa KO, Mattiello S, Lhullier F. Spironolactone as a single agent for long-term therapy of hirsute patients. Clin Endocrinol 2000;52:587.-

25. Moghetti P, Tosi F, Castello R, et al. The insulin resistance in women with hyperandrogenism is partially reversed by antiandrogen treatment: evidence that androgens impair insulin action in women. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol 1996;81(3):952.-

26. Zobel AW, Nickel T, Kunzel HE. Effects of the high-affinity corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 1 antagonist R121919 in major depression: the first 20 patients treated. J Psychiatric Res 2000;34:171.-

27. Healy DG, Harkin A, Cryan JF, et al. Metyrapone displays antidepressant-like properties in preclinical paradigms. Psychopharmacol 1999;145(3):303.-

28. Bech P, Raabaek Olsen L, Jarløv N, et al. A case of sequential anti-stress medication in a patient with major depression resistant to amine-reuptake inhibitors. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1999;100:76.-

29. Wolkowitz OM, Reus VI, Chan T, et al. Antiglucocorticoid treatment of depression: double-blind ketoconazole. J Biol Psychiatry 1999;45(8):1070.-

30. Murphy BE, Filipini D, Ghadirian AM. Possible use of glucocorticoid receptor antagonists in the treatment of major depression: preliminary results using RU 486. J Psychiatry Neurosci 1993;18(5):209.-

31. Schatzberg AF, Rothschild AJ, Langlais PJ, et al. A corticosteroid/dopamine hypothesis for psychotic depression and related states. J Psychiatr Res 1985;19(1):57.-

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Natalie Rasgon, MD, PhD
Associate professor Departments of psychiatry and behavioral sciences and obstetrics and gynecology Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA

Shana Elman, MA
Research assistant Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 04(02)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
47-60
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Natalie Rasgon, MD, PhD
Associate professor Departments of psychiatry and behavioral sciences and obstetrics and gynecology Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA

Shana Elman, MA
Research assistant Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

Author and Disclosure Information

Natalie Rasgon, MD, PhD
Associate professor Departments of psychiatry and behavioral sciences and obstetrics and gynecology Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA

Shana Elman, MA
Research assistant Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

Article PDF
Article PDF

Women with depression and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) can be trapped in a vicious cycle of hormonal dysregulation. Treating these patients appropriately—with or without antidepressants—requires an understanding of their underlying metabolic disorder.

This article presents a case1 that exemplifies the association between depression and PCOS (Box 1).2-4 Based on our research and clinical experience, we offer recommendations to help you manage depression in patients with PCOS.

CHRONIC DEPRESSION WITH AMENORRHEA

Ms. K, age 30, presented for psychiatric evaluation of treatment-resistant recurrent major depression. Her symptoms included sad mood, sleep disturbance, decreased energy, anhedonia, poor concentration, and feelings of guilt and worthlessness. Her score of 28 on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-21) indicated severe depression.

Box 1

Depression often accompanies PCOS

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common cause of menstrual disturbance in women of reproductive age, affecting approximately 5% of U.S. women.1 Clinically, it is the association of hyperandrogenism with chronic anovulation, without specific underlying adrenal or pituitary gland disease.2

PCOS has been shown to be associated with depression, though little research has been done in this area. We conducted a pilot study (the first, to our knowledge) to examine the rate of depression among women with documented PCOS and to correlate Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) scores indicative of depression with clinical and biochemical markers of PCOS. We found an increased prevalence of depression in women with PCOS and an association between depression, insulin resistance, and body mass index. Specifically, among 32 women with documented PCOS,3 16 (50%) had CES-D scores indicating depression.

This was Ms. K’s third episode of major depression, with the first two occurring at ages 24 and 26. She reported similar symptoms each time. Previous psychiatrists had tried a variety of antidepressants with no therapeutic benefit before she responded to citalopram, 40 mg/d, at age 27. With this selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, her depressive symptoms resolved for >1 year, except for mild irritability and low mood the week before menses.

Her depressive symptoms returned, however, and her previous psychiatrist treated her for approximately 13 months with extended-release venlafaxine, 225 mg/d. When she remained depressed, she was referred to our clinic for evaluation. Based on her history, we could not determine whether she had become euthymic at age 27 or her symptoms had improved but still met criteria for a major depressive episode.

Ms. K reported having PCOS symptoms from age 19. These included amenorrhea since menarche, hirsutism, hair loss, alopecia, central fat distribution characteristic of PCOS, and male-pattern hair growth on her abdomen and thighs. She was not obese—with a body mass index (BMI) of approximately 25—but had gained 10 to 15 lbs while taking venlafaxine.

Ms. K had never been treated for PCOS but reported that her desire to become pregnant made her more concerned about her symptoms and possible infertility.

Diagnosis. PCOS is usually diagnosed using endocrinologic, clinical, and ultrasonographic criteria (Table 1). Obesity is not a presenting symptom in all women with PCOS. As with Ms. K, about 50% of patients have normal BMI.

Causes of depression in PCOS. Depressed mood in PCOS may be both physiologic and psychological:

  • Hypothalamic, pituitary, and other end-organ system dysregulation occurs in both PCOS and affective disorders, which share clinical and biochemical markers including insulin resistance, obesity, and hyperandrogenism.
  • PCOS’ clinical sequelae—hirsutism, acne, obesity, hormonal disturbances, fear of infertility, and psychological distress—may damage their self-esteem and female identity.

PCOS’ physical symptoms alone apparently do not account for patients’ worsened mood states. Weiner et al5 found that women with PCOS and free testosterone (FT) of 10 to 26 pg/mL (just above normal range) were more depressed than women without PCOS (FT <10 pg/mL) and women with PCOS and FT >26 pg/mL. Women with PCOS with the lower and higher FT levels had similar demographic profiles, but those with the highest FT levels were not the most depressed.

Similarly, in a study of 32 women with PCOS, we found no association between depression and other possibly distressing PCOS symptoms, including hirsutism, irregular menses, acne, or alopecia.4

Testosterone and mood disorders. Women such as Ms. K with hyperandrogenic syndromes are at increased risk for mood disorders.6 Many metabolic changes associated with PCOS—insulin resistance, obesity, and hyperandrogenism—are also described in patients with affective disorders. Our investigation of reproductive status in women with bipolar disorder found no clinical or biochemical evidence of PCOS with mood-stabilizer treatment. We did find that menstrual disturbances were common, however, and sometimes preceded bipolar disorder onset.7

Insulin resistance and depression. Others have linked insulin resistance and depression;8 depression has been shown to be associated with impaired insulin sensitivity and hyperinsulinemia.9 Depressed persons also tend to eat more sweets, drink more alcohol, exercise less, and sleep fewer hours than the nondepressed—all of which contribute to insulin sensitivity and insulin resistance.10

 

 

WHAT LINKS ENDOCRINE, MOOD DISORDERS?

Insulin and serotonin. Insulin affects central serotonin (5-HT) levels.11 Thus, central 5-HT system dysregulation that causes depression might also affect peripheral insulin sensitivity—or vice versa.9

Tryptophan, a serotonin precursor, competes with other large neutral amino acids for access to the transport system that moves them across the blood-brain barrier. Insulin stimulates uptake of the competing amino acids—but not tryptophan—into muscle tissue. The resulting increased tryptophan ratio in plasma affords it greater access to the transport system to contribute toward serotonin synthesis. Insulin also promotes central catecholaminergic activity, perhaps by suppressing norepinephrine reuptake and prolonging its residence in the synaptic cleft.10

Table 1

Diagnostic signs of PCOS

Endocrine
Chronically elevated plasma free and total testosterone levels
Increased luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion because of enhanced pituitary sensitivity to GnRH stimulation
Low or normal plasma follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels
Hyperinsulinemia and peripheral insulin resistance
Metabolic abnormalities of hyperinsulinemia and peripheral insulin resistance, including obesity and increased susceptibility to type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease
Clinical
Hirsutism
Acne
Infertility
Anovulation or menstrual abnormalities
  • amenorrhea
  • oligomenorrhea
  • dysfunctional uterine bleeding
Morphologic
Ovaries may appear to have multiple cysts 8 to 10 mm in diameter

Several studies have found that insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia can resolve after depression recovery.9,12 Because insulin resistance is a cardinal feature in PCOS pathophysiology,2 insulin resistance may be a common link between depression and PCOS.

Weight gain and obesity also have been described in patients with affective disorders.13 Not known is whether the weight gain precedes the psychopathology or is caused by long-term exposure to drugs used to treat affective disorders.

Box 2

Hormonal treatments with possible antidepressant effects in PCOS

CRH antagonists. Corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) receptor antagonists have been suggested as possible antidepressants.26 Depression and anxiety scores have declined during treatment with the cortisol synthesis inhibitors metyrapone27 and ketoconazole.28,29 These trials do not reveal whether these agents treat depression symptoms—rather than the underlying pathophysiology—or if the affective disorder will recur after long-term administration.26

GR antagonists. Glucocorticoid receptor (GR) antagonists such as mifepristone (RU-486) have been suggested as antidepressants in depressed patients with elevated basal cortisol levels.30 Mifepristone may be useful for treating psychotic depression, in which the HPA axis is particularly hyperactive.31 Mifepristone is contraindicated in most women with PCOS, however, as its progesterone antagonism would lead to infertility—already a common problem for women with PCOS.

MR antagonists. Spironolactone, a mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonist, decreases insulin resistance and fasting insulin levels in PCOS patients.25 We propose that insulin resistance may provide a common link in the pathophysiology of PCOS and depression. Therefore, treatment with insulin resistance-lowering medications such as spironolactone may induce antidepressant effects in women with depression and PCOS.

We reported a correlation between depression and BMI in women with PCOS.4 Depression might be independently associated with BMI, as weight gain and obesity are distressing symptoms associated with depression.14 However, we found no association between depression and other possibly distressing PCOS symptoms. Thus, the correlation between BMI and depression might more likely reflect the relationship between depression and insulin resistance, as degree of insulin resistance is known to correlate with BMI.

Elevated cortisol. Clearly, other factors—such as hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis dysfunction—are known to link affective and endocrine disorders. Hypercortisolemia can lead to both insulin resistance and obesity. Cortisol is one of the glucocorticoids the body secretes in response to stress to mobilize energy by increasing blood glucose levels. Early life stress and chronic emotional stress:

  • can impair the negative feedback system that limits cortisol production during stress
  • are associated with depression.

Approximately one-half of individuals with depression have elevated serum cortisol.10 Epidemiologic data show a positive correlation between cortisol levels and insulin resistance,15 and an association between HPA dysfunction and obesity has been described.16 Insulin can trigger androgen production by enhancing adrenal sensitivity to adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH).17

CASE: IMPROVING INSULIN RESISTANCE

We referred Ms. K to an endocrinologist for PCOS evaluation and treatment. Her serum glucose and insulin levels were 83 mg/dL (normal range 70 to 125 mg/dL) and 19.0 uIU/mL (normal range <10 uIU/mL), respectively. These values indicated insulin resistance as determined by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) ratio (fasting insulin x fasting glucose/22.5). Values >3.2 indicate insulin resistance, and Ms. K had a HOMA ratio of 3.9. The endocrinologist recommended:

  • metformin, starting at 850 mg/d and gradually increased to 2,550 mg/d
  • spironolactone, 100 mg/d.

Metformin, a biguanide approved for treating for type 2 diabetes, inhibits hepatic glucose production and increases peripheral insulin sensitivity, but it does not modify pancreatic insulin secretion. It may decrease insulin resistance by reducing gut absorption of glucose, improving glucose uptake by tissues, and/or increasing the number of insulin receptors.18 In treating PCOS, metformin can:

 

 

  • restore ovulation19
  • decrease insulin resistance, acne, hirsutism, total and bioavailable testosterone, BMI, and waist-hip ratio.20,21

Although the link between insulin resistance and depression is unclear, insulin is known to contribute to 5-HT synthesis by promoting tryptophan influx into the brain.22 Therefore, drugs used to treat insulin resistance—such as metformin and alpha lipoic acid23—might be useful in treating depression.

Spironolactone, a mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonist, reduces hirsutism in women with PCOS.24 It also can decrease insulin resistance and fasting insulin levels in PCOS patients and reduce serum testosterone.25

Evidence on treating mood disorders with hormonal agents such as spironolactone is scarce, although treatment-resistant depression has been reported to resolve with antiglucocorticoid use (Box 2).25-31 Modulating HPA axis activity to treat affective disorders has been investigated.

CASE: GOING ANTIDEPRESSANT-FREE

At first, Ms. K said she wanted to continue taking venlafaxine with the PCOS treatment. After 2 weeks of combined therapy, however, she chose to stop the antidepressant after her depressive symptoms persisted, and her HAM-D-21 score remained at 28.

During the next 4 weeks, as we tapered off the venlafaxine, Ms. K’s HAM-D-21 score dropped to 7, indicating depressive symptom resolution. Despite slow venlafaxine titration, withdrawal symptoms of excessive crying, not feeling “present,” and tingling sensations occurred. Three days of fluoxetine, 20 mg/d, alleviated these symptoms.

Table 2

Insulin-sensitizing medications used to treat PCOS

MedicationNormal dosageCommon side effects
Metformin500 mg tidHeadache, GI effects (nausea, diarrhea, flatulence) at start of therapy, weight loss, taste disturbances
Pioglitazone15 to 45 mg once dailySwelling, headache, respiratory infection, abdominal discomfort, muscle soreness
Rosiglitazone4 to 8 mg once dailyHeadache, mild weight gain

We continued Ms. K’s treatment without antidepressants, and her mood continued to improve with metformin, 2,550 mg/d, and spironolactone, 100 mg/d.

TREATMENT RECOMMENDATIONS

PCOS therapy may take up to 6 months to resolve symptoms such as anovulation or hirsutism, but affective symptoms may improve during the first 6 weeks, as this case shows. Choosing medications to treat depression in patients such as Ms. K depends on whether their PCOS is being treated when they present for psychiatric evaluation.

Patient not being treated for PCOS. Refer her to an endocrinologist for PCOS treatment with an insulin-sensitizing medication, such as metformin (Table 2). Treating the insulin resistance associated with PCOS may also resolve the depression. PCOS drug therapy may also include antiandrogens such as spironolactone to treat hirsutism, male-pattern baldness, and acne. We suggest that spironolactone’s antiandrogen effects may help reduce depressive symptoms.

If your patient is not taking an antidepressant at presentation, try PCOS treatment first. If depressive symptoms persist after 3 months, consider adding an antidepressant. If your patient is taking an antidepressant at presentation but continues to be depressed, offer two options:

  • taper off the antidepressant while starting PCOS treatment
  • continue the antidepressant while starting PCOS treatment.

The first option allows you to try PCOS treatment alone. If the depression is caused by a common underlying pathophysiology—such as insulin resistance—treating PCOS alone may alleviate her depressive symptoms. Monitor for withdrawal symptoms, which may be minimized with a short-term SSRI, such as fluoxetine.

The second option may help patients who have responded to antidepressants in the past. Adjunctive PCOS treatment may “jump-start” the antidepressant response without withdrawal symptoms, but you will not be sure whether the antidepressant response was caused by PCOS therapy alone or the combination therapy.

Patient being treated for PCOS. Treat her with antidepressants, and consult with her endocrinologist to consider more-aggressive insulin-sensitizing medications, especially if she exhibits high levels of insulin resistance.

Other interventions that increase insulin sensitivity and improve glycemic control—such as improving dietary management and sleep habits, reducing alcohol consumption, and increasing physical activity—might have an antidepressant effect. Therefore, recommend these health practices to patients as adjuncts to drug therapies.

CASE: DEPRESSION IN REMISSION

At the 3-month follow-up visit, Ms. K scored zero on the HAM-D-21 scale. With metformin treatment, she had lost approximately 10 lbs and resumed menstruating approximately every 33 days. She reported experiencing low mood, decreased energy, and irritability during the week before her periods, but these symptoms resolved with menses onset.

Serum glucose was within normal range at 89 mg/dL, and serum insulin was 15.0 uIU/Ml. Her HOMA ratio had dropped to 2.8 (below the 3.2 cut-off for insulin resistance).

Ms. K’s endocrinologist monitored her spironolactone and metformin therapy for approximately 1 year, when she became pregnant.

Discussion. PCOS treatment duration depends on the patient’s response and her goals for therapy. Whether or not she continues PCOS treatment, her primary care physician or endocrinologist should continue to monitor her for insulin resistance’s metabolic consequences, including increased risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

 

 

Related resources

  • Legro RS, Winans EA. Overview of polycystic ovary syndrome and its relation to psychiatric illness and treatment. Current Psychiatry 2004;3(Dec[suppl]):12-20.
  • The Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 2004 Jan; 81(1):19-25.
  • Polycystic ovary syndrome (patient information). The National Women’s Health Information Center. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office on Women’s Health. Available at: http://www.4woman.gov/faq/pcos.htm. Accessed Jan. 13, 2005.

Drug brand names

  • Citalopram • Celexa
  • Fluoxetine • Prozac
  • Ketoconazole • Nizoral
  • Metformin • Glucophage
  • Metyrapone • Metopirone
  • Mifepristone • Mifiprex
  • Pioglitazone • Actos
  • Rosiglitazone • Avandia
  • Spironolactone • Aldactone
  • Venlafaxine • Effexor XR

Disclosures

The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Women with depression and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) can be trapped in a vicious cycle of hormonal dysregulation. Treating these patients appropriately—with or without antidepressants—requires an understanding of their underlying metabolic disorder.

This article presents a case1 that exemplifies the association between depression and PCOS (Box 1).2-4 Based on our research and clinical experience, we offer recommendations to help you manage depression in patients with PCOS.

CHRONIC DEPRESSION WITH AMENORRHEA

Ms. K, age 30, presented for psychiatric evaluation of treatment-resistant recurrent major depression. Her symptoms included sad mood, sleep disturbance, decreased energy, anhedonia, poor concentration, and feelings of guilt and worthlessness. Her score of 28 on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-21) indicated severe depression.

Box 1

Depression often accompanies PCOS

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common cause of menstrual disturbance in women of reproductive age, affecting approximately 5% of U.S. women.1 Clinically, it is the association of hyperandrogenism with chronic anovulation, without specific underlying adrenal or pituitary gland disease.2

PCOS has been shown to be associated with depression, though little research has been done in this area. We conducted a pilot study (the first, to our knowledge) to examine the rate of depression among women with documented PCOS and to correlate Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) scores indicative of depression with clinical and biochemical markers of PCOS. We found an increased prevalence of depression in women with PCOS and an association between depression, insulin resistance, and body mass index. Specifically, among 32 women with documented PCOS,3 16 (50%) had CES-D scores indicating depression.

This was Ms. K’s third episode of major depression, with the first two occurring at ages 24 and 26. She reported similar symptoms each time. Previous psychiatrists had tried a variety of antidepressants with no therapeutic benefit before she responded to citalopram, 40 mg/d, at age 27. With this selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, her depressive symptoms resolved for >1 year, except for mild irritability and low mood the week before menses.

Her depressive symptoms returned, however, and her previous psychiatrist treated her for approximately 13 months with extended-release venlafaxine, 225 mg/d. When she remained depressed, she was referred to our clinic for evaluation. Based on her history, we could not determine whether she had become euthymic at age 27 or her symptoms had improved but still met criteria for a major depressive episode.

Ms. K reported having PCOS symptoms from age 19. These included amenorrhea since menarche, hirsutism, hair loss, alopecia, central fat distribution characteristic of PCOS, and male-pattern hair growth on her abdomen and thighs. She was not obese—with a body mass index (BMI) of approximately 25—but had gained 10 to 15 lbs while taking venlafaxine.

Ms. K had never been treated for PCOS but reported that her desire to become pregnant made her more concerned about her symptoms and possible infertility.

Diagnosis. PCOS is usually diagnosed using endocrinologic, clinical, and ultrasonographic criteria (Table 1). Obesity is not a presenting symptom in all women with PCOS. As with Ms. K, about 50% of patients have normal BMI.

Causes of depression in PCOS. Depressed mood in PCOS may be both physiologic and psychological:

  • Hypothalamic, pituitary, and other end-organ system dysregulation occurs in both PCOS and affective disorders, which share clinical and biochemical markers including insulin resistance, obesity, and hyperandrogenism.
  • PCOS’ clinical sequelae—hirsutism, acne, obesity, hormonal disturbances, fear of infertility, and psychological distress—may damage their self-esteem and female identity.

PCOS’ physical symptoms alone apparently do not account for patients’ worsened mood states. Weiner et al5 found that women with PCOS and free testosterone (FT) of 10 to 26 pg/mL (just above normal range) were more depressed than women without PCOS (FT <10 pg/mL) and women with PCOS and FT >26 pg/mL. Women with PCOS with the lower and higher FT levels had similar demographic profiles, but those with the highest FT levels were not the most depressed.

Similarly, in a study of 32 women with PCOS, we found no association between depression and other possibly distressing PCOS symptoms, including hirsutism, irregular menses, acne, or alopecia.4

Testosterone and mood disorders. Women such as Ms. K with hyperandrogenic syndromes are at increased risk for mood disorders.6 Many metabolic changes associated with PCOS—insulin resistance, obesity, and hyperandrogenism—are also described in patients with affective disorders. Our investigation of reproductive status in women with bipolar disorder found no clinical or biochemical evidence of PCOS with mood-stabilizer treatment. We did find that menstrual disturbances were common, however, and sometimes preceded bipolar disorder onset.7

Insulin resistance and depression. Others have linked insulin resistance and depression;8 depression has been shown to be associated with impaired insulin sensitivity and hyperinsulinemia.9 Depressed persons also tend to eat more sweets, drink more alcohol, exercise less, and sleep fewer hours than the nondepressed—all of which contribute to insulin sensitivity and insulin resistance.10

 

 

WHAT LINKS ENDOCRINE, MOOD DISORDERS?

Insulin and serotonin. Insulin affects central serotonin (5-HT) levels.11 Thus, central 5-HT system dysregulation that causes depression might also affect peripheral insulin sensitivity—or vice versa.9

Tryptophan, a serotonin precursor, competes with other large neutral amino acids for access to the transport system that moves them across the blood-brain barrier. Insulin stimulates uptake of the competing amino acids—but not tryptophan—into muscle tissue. The resulting increased tryptophan ratio in plasma affords it greater access to the transport system to contribute toward serotonin synthesis. Insulin also promotes central catecholaminergic activity, perhaps by suppressing norepinephrine reuptake and prolonging its residence in the synaptic cleft.10

Table 1

Diagnostic signs of PCOS

Endocrine
Chronically elevated plasma free and total testosterone levels
Increased luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion because of enhanced pituitary sensitivity to GnRH stimulation
Low or normal plasma follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels
Hyperinsulinemia and peripheral insulin resistance
Metabolic abnormalities of hyperinsulinemia and peripheral insulin resistance, including obesity and increased susceptibility to type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease
Clinical
Hirsutism
Acne
Infertility
Anovulation or menstrual abnormalities
  • amenorrhea
  • oligomenorrhea
  • dysfunctional uterine bleeding
Morphologic
Ovaries may appear to have multiple cysts 8 to 10 mm in diameter

Several studies have found that insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia can resolve after depression recovery.9,12 Because insulin resistance is a cardinal feature in PCOS pathophysiology,2 insulin resistance may be a common link between depression and PCOS.

Weight gain and obesity also have been described in patients with affective disorders.13 Not known is whether the weight gain precedes the psychopathology or is caused by long-term exposure to drugs used to treat affective disorders.

Box 2

Hormonal treatments with possible antidepressant effects in PCOS

CRH antagonists. Corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) receptor antagonists have been suggested as possible antidepressants.26 Depression and anxiety scores have declined during treatment with the cortisol synthesis inhibitors metyrapone27 and ketoconazole.28,29 These trials do not reveal whether these agents treat depression symptoms—rather than the underlying pathophysiology—or if the affective disorder will recur after long-term administration.26

GR antagonists. Glucocorticoid receptor (GR) antagonists such as mifepristone (RU-486) have been suggested as antidepressants in depressed patients with elevated basal cortisol levels.30 Mifepristone may be useful for treating psychotic depression, in which the HPA axis is particularly hyperactive.31 Mifepristone is contraindicated in most women with PCOS, however, as its progesterone antagonism would lead to infertility—already a common problem for women with PCOS.

MR antagonists. Spironolactone, a mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonist, decreases insulin resistance and fasting insulin levels in PCOS patients.25 We propose that insulin resistance may provide a common link in the pathophysiology of PCOS and depression. Therefore, treatment with insulin resistance-lowering medications such as spironolactone may induce antidepressant effects in women with depression and PCOS.

We reported a correlation between depression and BMI in women with PCOS.4 Depression might be independently associated with BMI, as weight gain and obesity are distressing symptoms associated with depression.14 However, we found no association between depression and other possibly distressing PCOS symptoms. Thus, the correlation between BMI and depression might more likely reflect the relationship between depression and insulin resistance, as degree of insulin resistance is known to correlate with BMI.

Elevated cortisol. Clearly, other factors—such as hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis dysfunction—are known to link affective and endocrine disorders. Hypercortisolemia can lead to both insulin resistance and obesity. Cortisol is one of the glucocorticoids the body secretes in response to stress to mobilize energy by increasing blood glucose levels. Early life stress and chronic emotional stress:

  • can impair the negative feedback system that limits cortisol production during stress
  • are associated with depression.

Approximately one-half of individuals with depression have elevated serum cortisol.10 Epidemiologic data show a positive correlation between cortisol levels and insulin resistance,15 and an association between HPA dysfunction and obesity has been described.16 Insulin can trigger androgen production by enhancing adrenal sensitivity to adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH).17

CASE: IMPROVING INSULIN RESISTANCE

We referred Ms. K to an endocrinologist for PCOS evaluation and treatment. Her serum glucose and insulin levels were 83 mg/dL (normal range 70 to 125 mg/dL) and 19.0 uIU/mL (normal range <10 uIU/mL), respectively. These values indicated insulin resistance as determined by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) ratio (fasting insulin x fasting glucose/22.5). Values >3.2 indicate insulin resistance, and Ms. K had a HOMA ratio of 3.9. The endocrinologist recommended:

  • metformin, starting at 850 mg/d and gradually increased to 2,550 mg/d
  • spironolactone, 100 mg/d.

Metformin, a biguanide approved for treating for type 2 diabetes, inhibits hepatic glucose production and increases peripheral insulin sensitivity, but it does not modify pancreatic insulin secretion. It may decrease insulin resistance by reducing gut absorption of glucose, improving glucose uptake by tissues, and/or increasing the number of insulin receptors.18 In treating PCOS, metformin can:

 

 

  • restore ovulation19
  • decrease insulin resistance, acne, hirsutism, total and bioavailable testosterone, BMI, and waist-hip ratio.20,21

Although the link between insulin resistance and depression is unclear, insulin is known to contribute to 5-HT synthesis by promoting tryptophan influx into the brain.22 Therefore, drugs used to treat insulin resistance—such as metformin and alpha lipoic acid23—might be useful in treating depression.

Spironolactone, a mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonist, reduces hirsutism in women with PCOS.24 It also can decrease insulin resistance and fasting insulin levels in PCOS patients and reduce serum testosterone.25

Evidence on treating mood disorders with hormonal agents such as spironolactone is scarce, although treatment-resistant depression has been reported to resolve with antiglucocorticoid use (Box 2).25-31 Modulating HPA axis activity to treat affective disorders has been investigated.

CASE: GOING ANTIDEPRESSANT-FREE

At first, Ms. K said she wanted to continue taking venlafaxine with the PCOS treatment. After 2 weeks of combined therapy, however, she chose to stop the antidepressant after her depressive symptoms persisted, and her HAM-D-21 score remained at 28.

During the next 4 weeks, as we tapered off the venlafaxine, Ms. K’s HAM-D-21 score dropped to 7, indicating depressive symptom resolution. Despite slow venlafaxine titration, withdrawal symptoms of excessive crying, not feeling “present,” and tingling sensations occurred. Three days of fluoxetine, 20 mg/d, alleviated these symptoms.

Table 2

Insulin-sensitizing medications used to treat PCOS

MedicationNormal dosageCommon side effects
Metformin500 mg tidHeadache, GI effects (nausea, diarrhea, flatulence) at start of therapy, weight loss, taste disturbances
Pioglitazone15 to 45 mg once dailySwelling, headache, respiratory infection, abdominal discomfort, muscle soreness
Rosiglitazone4 to 8 mg once dailyHeadache, mild weight gain

We continued Ms. K’s treatment without antidepressants, and her mood continued to improve with metformin, 2,550 mg/d, and spironolactone, 100 mg/d.

TREATMENT RECOMMENDATIONS

PCOS therapy may take up to 6 months to resolve symptoms such as anovulation or hirsutism, but affective symptoms may improve during the first 6 weeks, as this case shows. Choosing medications to treat depression in patients such as Ms. K depends on whether their PCOS is being treated when they present for psychiatric evaluation.

Patient not being treated for PCOS. Refer her to an endocrinologist for PCOS treatment with an insulin-sensitizing medication, such as metformin (Table 2). Treating the insulin resistance associated with PCOS may also resolve the depression. PCOS drug therapy may also include antiandrogens such as spironolactone to treat hirsutism, male-pattern baldness, and acne. We suggest that spironolactone’s antiandrogen effects may help reduce depressive symptoms.

If your patient is not taking an antidepressant at presentation, try PCOS treatment first. If depressive symptoms persist after 3 months, consider adding an antidepressant. If your patient is taking an antidepressant at presentation but continues to be depressed, offer two options:

  • taper off the antidepressant while starting PCOS treatment
  • continue the antidepressant while starting PCOS treatment.

The first option allows you to try PCOS treatment alone. If the depression is caused by a common underlying pathophysiology—such as insulin resistance—treating PCOS alone may alleviate her depressive symptoms. Monitor for withdrawal symptoms, which may be minimized with a short-term SSRI, such as fluoxetine.

The second option may help patients who have responded to antidepressants in the past. Adjunctive PCOS treatment may “jump-start” the antidepressant response without withdrawal symptoms, but you will not be sure whether the antidepressant response was caused by PCOS therapy alone or the combination therapy.

Patient being treated for PCOS. Treat her with antidepressants, and consult with her endocrinologist to consider more-aggressive insulin-sensitizing medications, especially if she exhibits high levels of insulin resistance.

Other interventions that increase insulin sensitivity and improve glycemic control—such as improving dietary management and sleep habits, reducing alcohol consumption, and increasing physical activity—might have an antidepressant effect. Therefore, recommend these health practices to patients as adjuncts to drug therapies.

CASE: DEPRESSION IN REMISSION

At the 3-month follow-up visit, Ms. K scored zero on the HAM-D-21 scale. With metformin treatment, she had lost approximately 10 lbs and resumed menstruating approximately every 33 days. She reported experiencing low mood, decreased energy, and irritability during the week before her periods, but these symptoms resolved with menses onset.

Serum glucose was within normal range at 89 mg/dL, and serum insulin was 15.0 uIU/Ml. Her HOMA ratio had dropped to 2.8 (below the 3.2 cut-off for insulin resistance).

Ms. K’s endocrinologist monitored her spironolactone and metformin therapy for approximately 1 year, when she became pregnant.

Discussion. PCOS treatment duration depends on the patient’s response and her goals for therapy. Whether or not she continues PCOS treatment, her primary care physician or endocrinologist should continue to monitor her for insulin resistance’s metabolic consequences, including increased risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

 

 

Related resources

  • Legro RS, Winans EA. Overview of polycystic ovary syndrome and its relation to psychiatric illness and treatment. Current Psychiatry 2004;3(Dec[suppl]):12-20.
  • The Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 2004 Jan; 81(1):19-25.
  • Polycystic ovary syndrome (patient information). The National Women’s Health Information Center. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office on Women’s Health. Available at: http://www.4woman.gov/faq/pcos.htm. Accessed Jan. 13, 2005.

Drug brand names

  • Citalopram • Celexa
  • Fluoxetine • Prozac
  • Ketoconazole • Nizoral
  • Metformin • Glucophage
  • Metyrapone • Metopirone
  • Mifepristone • Mifiprex
  • Pioglitazone • Actos
  • Rosiglitazone • Avandia
  • Spironolactone • Aldactone
  • Venlafaxine • Effexor XR

Disclosures

The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

References

1. Rasgon NL, Carter MS, Elman S, et al. Common treatment of polycystic ovarian syndrome and major depressive disorder: case report and review. Curr Drug Targets Immune Endocr Metabol Disord 2002;2(1):97-102.

2. Franks S. Polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med 1995;333(13):853-61.

3. Zawadski JK, Dunaif A. Diagnostic criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome: towards a rational approach. In: Dunaif A, Givens JR, Haseltine FP, Merriam GR (eds). Polycystic ovary syndrome. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific, 1992;377-84.

4. Rasgon NL, Rao R, Elman S, et al. Depression in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: clinical and biochemical correlates. J Affect Disord 2003;74(3):299-304.

5. Weiner CL, Primeau M, Ehrmann DA. Androgens and mood dysfunction in women: Comparison of women with polycystic ovarian syndrome to healthy controls. Psychosom Med 2004;66:356-62.

6. Fava GA, Grandi S, Savron G, et al. Psychosomatic assessment of hirsute women. Psychother Psychosom 1989;51:96-100.

7. Rasgon NL, Altshuler LL, Gudeman D, et al. Medication status and PCO syndrome in women with bipolar disorder: a preliminary report. J Clin Psychiatry 2000;61:173-8.

8. Okamura F, Tashiro A, Utsumi A, et al. Insulin resistance in patients with depression and its changes in the clinical course of depression: a report on three cases using the minimal model analysis. Internal Med 1999;38(3):257-60.

9. Okamura F, Tashiro A, Utsumi A, et al. Insulin resistance in patients with depression and its changes during the clinical course of depression: minimal model analysis. Metabolism 2000;49(10):1255-60.

10. Rasgon NL, Altshuler LL, Birtan JA, et al. Menstrual abnormalities in women with bipolar disorder (presentation). San Francisco: American Psychiatric Association annual meeting, May 2003.

11. Figlewicz DP. Endocrine regulation of neurotransmitter transporters. Epilepsy Res 1999;37(3):203-10.

12. Nathan RS, Sachar EJ, Asnis GM, et al. Relative insulin insensitivity and cortisol secretion in depressed patients. Psychiatry Res 1981;4:291.-

13. Elmslie JL, Silverstone TJ, Mann JI, Williams SM. Determinants of overweight and obesity in patients with bipolar disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2000;61:179.-

14. Istvan J, Zavela K, Weidner G. Body weight and psychological distress in NHANES I. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1992;16(12):999-1003.

15. Andrews RC, Walker BR. Glucocorticoids and insulin resistance: old hormones, new targets. Clin Sci 1999;96(5):513.-

16. Pasquali R, Biscotti D, Spinucci G, et al. Pulsatile secretion of ACTH and cortisol in premenopausal women: effect of obesity and body fat distribution. Clin Endocrinol 1998;48(5):603.-

17. Moghetti P, Castello R, Negri C, et al. Insulin infusion amplifies 17 alpha-hydroxycorticosteroid intermediates response to adrenocorticotropin in hyperandrogenic women: apparent relative impairment of 17,20-lyase activity. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol 1996;81(3):881.-

18. Bailey CJ, Day C, Bray GA, et al. Role of adrenal glands in the development of abnormal glucose and insulin homeostasis in genetically obese (ob/ob) mice. Horm Metab Res 1986;18(6):357.-

19. Sills SE, Perloe M, Palermo GD. Correction of hyperinsulinemia in oligoovulatory women with clomiphene-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome: a review of therapeutic rationale and reproductive outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000;91(2):135.-

20. Nestler JE, Jakubowicz DJ, Evans WS, Pasquali R. Effects of metformin on spontaneous and clomiphene-induced ovulation in the polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med 1998;338(26):1876.-

21. Velasquez EM, Mendoza S, Hamer T, et al. Metformin therapy in polycystic ovary syndrome reduces hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, hyperandrogenemia, and systolic blood pressure, while facilitating normal menses and pregnancy. Metabolism 1994;43(5):647.-

22. Chaouloff F. Effects of acute physical exercise on central serotonergic systems. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997;29(1):58.-

23. Salazar M. Alpha lipoic acid: a novel treatment for depression. Medical Hypoth 2000;55:510.-

24. Spritzer PM, Lisboa KO, Mattiello S, Lhullier F. Spironolactone as a single agent for long-term therapy of hirsute patients. Clin Endocrinol 2000;52:587.-

25. Moghetti P, Tosi F, Castello R, et al. The insulin resistance in women with hyperandrogenism is partially reversed by antiandrogen treatment: evidence that androgens impair insulin action in women. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol 1996;81(3):952.-

26. Zobel AW, Nickel T, Kunzel HE. Effects of the high-affinity corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 1 antagonist R121919 in major depression: the first 20 patients treated. J Psychiatric Res 2000;34:171.-

27. Healy DG, Harkin A, Cryan JF, et al. Metyrapone displays antidepressant-like properties in preclinical paradigms. Psychopharmacol 1999;145(3):303.-

28. Bech P, Raabaek Olsen L, Jarløv N, et al. A case of sequential anti-stress medication in a patient with major depression resistant to amine-reuptake inhibitors. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1999;100:76.-

29. Wolkowitz OM, Reus VI, Chan T, et al. Antiglucocorticoid treatment of depression: double-blind ketoconazole. J Biol Psychiatry 1999;45(8):1070.-

30. Murphy BE, Filipini D, Ghadirian AM. Possible use of glucocorticoid receptor antagonists in the treatment of major depression: preliminary results using RU 486. J Psychiatry Neurosci 1993;18(5):209.-

31. Schatzberg AF, Rothschild AJ, Langlais PJ, et al. A corticosteroid/dopamine hypothesis for psychotic depression and related states. J Psychiatr Res 1985;19(1):57.-

References

1. Rasgon NL, Carter MS, Elman S, et al. Common treatment of polycystic ovarian syndrome and major depressive disorder: case report and review. Curr Drug Targets Immune Endocr Metabol Disord 2002;2(1):97-102.

2. Franks S. Polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med 1995;333(13):853-61.

3. Zawadski JK, Dunaif A. Diagnostic criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome: towards a rational approach. In: Dunaif A, Givens JR, Haseltine FP, Merriam GR (eds). Polycystic ovary syndrome. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific, 1992;377-84.

4. Rasgon NL, Rao R, Elman S, et al. Depression in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: clinical and biochemical correlates. J Affect Disord 2003;74(3):299-304.

5. Weiner CL, Primeau M, Ehrmann DA. Androgens and mood dysfunction in women: Comparison of women with polycystic ovarian syndrome to healthy controls. Psychosom Med 2004;66:356-62.

6. Fava GA, Grandi S, Savron G, et al. Psychosomatic assessment of hirsute women. Psychother Psychosom 1989;51:96-100.

7. Rasgon NL, Altshuler LL, Gudeman D, et al. Medication status and PCO syndrome in women with bipolar disorder: a preliminary report. J Clin Psychiatry 2000;61:173-8.

8. Okamura F, Tashiro A, Utsumi A, et al. Insulin resistance in patients with depression and its changes in the clinical course of depression: a report on three cases using the minimal model analysis. Internal Med 1999;38(3):257-60.

9. Okamura F, Tashiro A, Utsumi A, et al. Insulin resistance in patients with depression and its changes during the clinical course of depression: minimal model analysis. Metabolism 2000;49(10):1255-60.

10. Rasgon NL, Altshuler LL, Birtan JA, et al. Menstrual abnormalities in women with bipolar disorder (presentation). San Francisco: American Psychiatric Association annual meeting, May 2003.

11. Figlewicz DP. Endocrine regulation of neurotransmitter transporters. Epilepsy Res 1999;37(3):203-10.

12. Nathan RS, Sachar EJ, Asnis GM, et al. Relative insulin insensitivity and cortisol secretion in depressed patients. Psychiatry Res 1981;4:291.-

13. Elmslie JL, Silverstone TJ, Mann JI, Williams SM. Determinants of overweight and obesity in patients with bipolar disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2000;61:179.-

14. Istvan J, Zavela K, Weidner G. Body weight and psychological distress in NHANES I. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1992;16(12):999-1003.

15. Andrews RC, Walker BR. Glucocorticoids and insulin resistance: old hormones, new targets. Clin Sci 1999;96(5):513.-

16. Pasquali R, Biscotti D, Spinucci G, et al. Pulsatile secretion of ACTH and cortisol in premenopausal women: effect of obesity and body fat distribution. Clin Endocrinol 1998;48(5):603.-

17. Moghetti P, Castello R, Negri C, et al. Insulin infusion amplifies 17 alpha-hydroxycorticosteroid intermediates response to adrenocorticotropin in hyperandrogenic women: apparent relative impairment of 17,20-lyase activity. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol 1996;81(3):881.-

18. Bailey CJ, Day C, Bray GA, et al. Role of adrenal glands in the development of abnormal glucose and insulin homeostasis in genetically obese (ob/ob) mice. Horm Metab Res 1986;18(6):357.-

19. Sills SE, Perloe M, Palermo GD. Correction of hyperinsulinemia in oligoovulatory women with clomiphene-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome: a review of therapeutic rationale and reproductive outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000;91(2):135.-

20. Nestler JE, Jakubowicz DJ, Evans WS, Pasquali R. Effects of metformin on spontaneous and clomiphene-induced ovulation in the polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med 1998;338(26):1876.-

21. Velasquez EM, Mendoza S, Hamer T, et al. Metformin therapy in polycystic ovary syndrome reduces hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, hyperandrogenemia, and systolic blood pressure, while facilitating normal menses and pregnancy. Metabolism 1994;43(5):647.-

22. Chaouloff F. Effects of acute physical exercise on central serotonergic systems. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997;29(1):58.-

23. Salazar M. Alpha lipoic acid: a novel treatment for depression. Medical Hypoth 2000;55:510.-

24. Spritzer PM, Lisboa KO, Mattiello S, Lhullier F. Spironolactone as a single agent for long-term therapy of hirsute patients. Clin Endocrinol 2000;52:587.-

25. Moghetti P, Tosi F, Castello R, et al. The insulin resistance in women with hyperandrogenism is partially reversed by antiandrogen treatment: evidence that androgens impair insulin action in women. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol 1996;81(3):952.-

26. Zobel AW, Nickel T, Kunzel HE. Effects of the high-affinity corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 1 antagonist R121919 in major depression: the first 20 patients treated. J Psychiatric Res 2000;34:171.-

27. Healy DG, Harkin A, Cryan JF, et al. Metyrapone displays antidepressant-like properties in preclinical paradigms. Psychopharmacol 1999;145(3):303.-

28. Bech P, Raabaek Olsen L, Jarløv N, et al. A case of sequential anti-stress medication in a patient with major depression resistant to amine-reuptake inhibitors. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1999;100:76.-

29. Wolkowitz OM, Reus VI, Chan T, et al. Antiglucocorticoid treatment of depression: double-blind ketoconazole. J Biol Psychiatry 1999;45(8):1070.-

30. Murphy BE, Filipini D, Ghadirian AM. Possible use of glucocorticoid receptor antagonists in the treatment of major depression: preliminary results using RU 486. J Psychiatry Neurosci 1993;18(5):209.-

31. Schatzberg AF, Rothschild AJ, Langlais PJ, et al. A corticosteroid/dopamine hypothesis for psychotic depression and related states. J Psychiatr Res 1985;19(1):57.-

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 04(02)
Issue
Current Psychiatry - 04(02)
Page Number
47-60
Page Number
47-60
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
When not to treat depression in PCOS with antidepressants
Display Headline
When not to treat depression in PCOS with antidepressants
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

“Diagnostically homeless” Is it ADHD? Mania? Autism? What to do if no diagnosis fits

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 12/11/2018 - 15:10
Display Headline
“Diagnostically homeless” Is it ADHD? Mania? Autism? What to do if no diagnosis fits

Children with developmental problems and serious psychopathologies often do not fit neatly into DSM diagnoses.1,2 These “diagnostically homeless” children—handicapped by hyperactivity, volcanic rages, extreme anxieties, and other complex problems—need assessment and treatment that address four domains of dysfunction:

  • mood/anxiety problems
  • possible psychosis
  • language/thought disorder
  • relationship/socialization problems.

This article offers snapshots of four children with undetermined diagnoses, explores the dilemma of treating such patients without knowing what they really have, and recommends a treatment approach to help them function better in school and at home.

WHO ARE THE ‘DIAGNOSTICALLY HOMELESS’?

Devon is 5. He is extremely hyperactive and impulsive, with a normal IQ but significant language delay. He exhibits little but not absent interest in peers and rages when changes are imposed on him.

Table 1

Criteria describing impairments in ‘diagnostically homeless’ children

DomainMultiple complex developmental disorder (MCDD)*Multidimensionally impaired (MDI) syndrome†Schizotypal personality disorder
Anxiety symptomsIntense generalized anxiety, diffuse tension or irritability; unusual fears and phobias, peculiar in content or intensity; recurrent panic episodes, terror, or flooding with anxietyUnspecifiedExcessive social anxiety associated with paranoid fears
Affect regulationSignificant, wide, emotional variability out of proportion to precipitantsNearly daily periods of emotional lability disproportionate to precipitantsInappropriate or constricted affect
Psychotic-like symptomsMagical thinking; illogical confusion between reality and fantasy; grandiose fantasies of special powersPoor ability to separate reality from fantasyIdeas of reference; unusual perceptual experiences; suspicious; eccentric
Thought/language disorderThought problems including irrationality, sudden intrusions on normal thought process, neologisms or nonsense words repeated over and over; blatantly illogical, bizarre ideasThought disorder specifically excludedOdd thinking; vague, circumstantial, metaphorical speech, overelaborate or stereotyped
Problems with social functioningSocial disinterest, detachment; instrumental relatedness; high degrees of ambivalence to adults, manifested by clinging, overly controlling, needy behavior and/or aggressive, oppositional behavior; limited capacity to empathizeImpaired interpersonal skills despite desire to initiate social interactions with peersLack of close friends or confidants other than relatives
* PDD NOS (pervasive developmental disorder, not otherwise specified) is the closest DSM-IV-TR designation.
† Psychosis NOS is the closest DSM-IV-TR designation.
Source: References 1, 3, 8-13.
Devon says he can run faster than cars and swim across the ocean. He has “more than ADHD,” less than autism/pervasive developmental disorder (PDD). Were he older, his grandiosity might seem manic but his age and language delay make this suspect.

Steven is 11, referred “to rule out bipolar disorder” and to evaluate hyperactivity, explosiveness, and nightmares. He didn’t speak until he was 22 months old. He worries that bad people are chasing him, fears skeletons under his bed, has nightmares of vampires, and believes that cartoon characters are real and that Sponge Bob is his protector. He says he sees “scary stuff” out of the corner of his eyes. He does not have a thought disorder; psychotic symptoms are more than an overactive imagination or anxiety.

Lauren, age 12, has been diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) but now presents with withdrawn, depressed, and defiant behaviors. She is described as a “loner” who has never related well to other children. Lauren speaks about being tortured by her peers to the point of sounding paranoid. Her conversation is extremely circumstantial and rambling.

Richard, age 8, has motor coordination, attachment, and disinhibition problems. He hears voices telling him to do bad things, such as hurt people, steal things, and “break stuff.” He doesn’t mind the voices much, and they don’t pervade his life the way hallucinations do in schizophrenia.

Children such as these are common, and it is unclear whether they have a developmental disorder, the prodrome of a psychotic or mood disorder, or idiosyncratic personalities. They don’t meet criteria for many disorders, including autism, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). They have more-extensive difficulties than those seen in ADHD, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), or OCD.

Clinically, they are either forced into a category someone thinks they resemble (such as mania in Devon’s case) or are given a “not otherwise specified” (NOS) label (such as PDD NOS, psychosis NOS, or mood disorder NOS), the severity of which goes unacknowledged.

Problems with ‘NOS.’ Some might consider “NOS” a less-severe problem than a specific diagnosis, but these children are very impaired. They are excluded from treatment studies because they do not meet formal criteria for the designated disorder or they get included erroneously because the structured diagnostic interview doesn’t assess what they really have.

Meaningful psychoeducation for their parents is impossible because no Web site or book exists to help them help their child. Finally, no follow-up studies have been done of this group of children because no one can agree on a diagnosis. Small studies have addressed some of these concerns, but outcomes—not surprisingly—are wide-ranging.3-6

 

 

NOS diagnoses also don’t adequately address children with marked anxiety, unusual fears, and perseverative behaviors who are socially clumsy but manage reciprocal social interaction. These children are substantially disabled by:

  • attention difficulties
  • mood dysregulation (including anxiety and/or manic symptoms)
  • trouble with transitions/change
  • motor problems (not infrequently)
  • pragmatic language/social difficulties.
Few tests exist for pragmatic language skills, which include being able to maintain a reciprocal conversation, stay on topic, understand the listener’s needs, and use correct body language and voice tone. Children with PDD, ADHD, and other language disorders are most often disabled in this area of communication.

Diagnostic terms that have tried to classify these children (Table 1) include:

  • childhood-onset PDD, described in DSM-III. This category was dropped in DSM III-R to be included in PDD, then largely ignored in DSM-IV when autism criteria were refined.
  • multiple complex developmental disorder (MCDD),7-9 which appears to describe children within the autism spectrum (such as PDD NOS)
  • multidimensionally-impaired (MDI) syndrome, whose atypical psychosis has been called “psychosis NOS”10-11
  • schizotypal personality disorder, which addresses similar symptoms (although mental health professionals are loathe to use a personality disorder diagnosis in a child).12
These designations all include psychopathology in four domains: anxiety, affect regulation, communication, psychosis, and relatedness.

At this time, however, diagnostic conclusions about this heterogeneous group of children are premature. Our classification system does not do them justice, and we need to study them for what they have, rather than forcing them into our current alternatives.

Prevalence. To find out how many patients in our university-based, tertiary-care clinic do not fit DSM-IV-TR nosology, we examined data from faculty evaluations of 624 children and adolescents.13 These included semi-structured interviews of parent and child, rating scales from parents and teachers, and testing information from the schools in two-thirds of cases.

The result: nearly 25% of our child and adolescent psychiatry outpatients are “diagnostically homeless.” Like the rest of our patient population, these children are:

  • 80% male
  • 60% under age 12
  • 86% Caucasian
  • 85% living with their biological mothers.
These children are referred to psychiatrists for many reasons:

  • ADHD (16%). They have great difficulty with executive functions, such as paying attention, inhibiting impulsive responses, planning and organizing, making transitions from one activity to another, and controlling emotion. Their problems, however, go much beyond ADHD.
  • Bipolar disorder (15%) or depression/anxiety (16%). They have catastrophic anxiety and/or frightening rages triggered by apparently trivial circumstances. They balk or “shut down” when people want them to move or act faster than they can move or act.
  • To “rule out autism” (19%). More than one-half (56%) of these children have a diagnosable speech or language disorder, compared with 35% among our other child psychiatry outpatients.
  • For educational assessment (23%). School systems request guidance for educational interventions because these children are possibly psychotic and disturbing to teachers and children. They may be unable to execute homework assignments and fail their courses but surprisingly do grade-level work on achievement tests.

ASSESSING FOUR DOMAINS

We can consolidate the domains needing assessment into mood/anxiety problems, possible psychosis, language/thought disorder, and relationship/socialization problems. Although evaluating and treating some of these domains may be beyond the psychiatrist’s purview, we must make sure that other professionals attend to them.

Anxiety and mood. Understanding these children’s anxieties is important. A routine fear of bees is a simple phobia, whereas catastrophic anxiety over a highly unlikely impending tornado and perseverative interest in the weather may be more common in a PDD spectrum disorder. Anxiety about going to sleep because a monster is going to suck out one’s brains does not easily fit into the rubric of generalized anxiety.14

Irritability is these youngsters’ most disabling mood symptom. Volcanic anger and rage that prompts referral occurs in numerous conditions, including mania. Many of the children described in Ross Greene’s book, The Explosive Child,15 have conditions other than bipolar disorder. Although parents and teachers often describe these events as occurring without provocation, a good functional behavioral assessment will usually reveal a precipitant.

Table 2

Assessing children’s social and language skills

Social assessmentSeen in…
Are the child’s social abilities delayed?ADHD
Is he uninterested in social situations?Autism
Is he clueless about social interaction?Autism spectrum disorders including MCDD, MDI, PDD NOS, nonverbal learning disability
Are social interactions deviant?Schizotypal personality disorder/schizophrenia
Does child appear shut down/behaviorally inhibited in unfamiliar settings, with greater comfort at home or with familiar people?Social phobia
Language assessment (can be done by psychiatrist)
  • Age at first word use; age at first use of short sentences
  • Early interest in language? Nonverbal communication? Communication for sharing?
Useful questionsSeen in…
Was communication delayed but then progressed “normally”?Developmental language disorder
Did it begin normally and stop?Autism
Was/is it egocentric and/or unidimensional?Asperger’s disorder; nonverbal learning disability
Was/is it bizarre or paranoid?Schizotypal personality disorder
Pragmatic language problems?All of the above, MCDD, MDI, ADHD
Communication domains (may require speech pathologist assessment)
Expressive and receptive language
Pragmatic language (the child’s ability to communicate in the real world; see Table 3)
Written language
Audiology (hearing and auditory processing)
ADHD: attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
MCDD: multiple complex developmental disorder
MDI: multidimensionally impaired syndrome
PDD NOS: pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified
 

 

Possible psychosis. These children may have impaired reality testing that can be difficult to assess; thus, deciding whether the child is experiencing psychotic symptoms can be a challenge. The child may be intensely involved with fantasy characters or imaginary companions to such a degree that he or she insists the character is real.16,17 Developmentally normal fears—as of the dark, monsters, or images from dreams—may preoccupy him or her during the day. Quasi-psychotic symptoms such as these are easily missed if:

  • we don’t ask about them
  • we assume the child is “just pretending” or has a “great imagination”
  • the child does not volunteer the information spontaneously.18
Table 3

Communication skills children need to learn

  • Rules of conversation (for example, who is likely to be interested in what)
  • Topic management (when to expand, shift, end a conversation)
  • Awareness of nonverbal cues
  • Social expectations in various settings
  • Operational knowledge of the language of emotions and mental states (how to express feelings and the different ways we experience ourselves)
  • How to monitor a listener’s relative interest
  • The meaning of eye contact, voice tone, and voice inflection
  • Awareness of how social settings affect communication, such as voice volume (whisper in the library, shout on the soccer field) and speech style (slang with peers, formal style for classroom recitation)
  • Body proximity (how to avoid invading someone’s space)
  • Decoding facial expression (such as what it means when someone rolls his eyes)
  • Special instruction to help decipher nonliteral communication, including teasing, irony, sarcasm, emotional tones of speech
In assessing psychotic symptoms, the first goal is to get a detailed picture of unusual thoughts or images the child is experiencing in different settings, including school, home, and with peers. Then evaluate these symptoms in the broader clinical context of how the child is functioning in other domains.

Language/thought disorder. Parents may not recognize that their child has a thought or language disorder because they have filled in the blanks and interpreted for him or her for so long. Asking the child “yes” and “no” questions will not elucidate these disorders, either. The examiner must talk to the child to determine his or her ability to:

  • sustain an extended narration that makes sense
  • stay on the topic
  • care whether the listener understands what the child is talking about
  • make a point.
Distinguishing between a thought or and language disorder in a child is difficult, although the more illogical the communication, the less likely it is to be a language disorder. If the child connects ideas that don’t make sense, ask him or her to explain how the subject shifted or what he or she meant. Children with language disorders may have misunderstood the question or may have expected the examiner to make connections, but the explanation usually makes sense. When it doesn’t, we become more concerned that the child has a thought disorder.

Nonverbal communication realms include eye contact, appropriate hand gestures and facial expression, tone of voice, and vocal inflection. Other important areas of language to assess are summarized in Table 2.

Relationship/socialization problems. It is important to know whether the child has friends, wants friends, or prefers being with younger children. Peer relationships may be absent, delayed, or deviant.

Other assessments. The diagnostically homeless children we see have complicated family histories of psychopathology. Their first-degree relatives have a higher number of heritable disorders—including bipolar disorder, panic disorder, ADHD, learning disabilities, and “nervous breakdowns”—than do those of children with uncomplicated ADHD, bipolar disorder, or anxiety disorders. Ask about these conditions when taking the family history; if a family member is said to be bipolar, get a description of the person’s symptoms.

Table 4

Targeting drug therapies to treat children’s symptoms

Drug classEfficacy by symptom domain
Atypical antipsychoticsPsychosis/thought disorder: Can reduce psychotic symptoms
Anxiety symptoms: Can reduce extreme anxieties
Affect regulation: Improved by mood-stabilizing effect
Socialization problems: Appear to modify affective aggression, hyperactivity, and impulsivity, which can improve socialization and pragmatic communication
Mood stabilizersPsychosis/thought disorder: Not primary area of effectiveness
Anxiety symptoms: May be helpful; not primary area of effectiveness
Affect regulation: Address mood dysregulation
Socialization problems: May reduce aggressive outbursts and mood, which can improve socialization
Stimulants*Psychosis/thought disorder: Can produce or intensify psychotic symptoms and agitation
Anxiety: Usually do not improve anxiety; can intensify anxiety and agitation
Affect regulation: Not a primary effect in severe cases; address impulsive aggression via mood stabilization
Socialization problems: Can improve functioning via decreased impulsivity, inattention, and aggression
SSRI antidepressants†Psychosis/thought disorder: Do not directly address
Anxiety: Can be effective in decreasing anxiety
Affect regulation: Can improve depressed mood
Socialization problems: Can be improved as a result of improved mood and decreased anxiety
* Stimulants often increase agitation and disinhibition.
† Watch for behavioral disinhibition, possible increase in suicidality, with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).
 

 

A skilled psychologist or speech pathologist can help you determine the presence or absence of cognitive and language dysfunction and learning disabilities. Even before we interview the parents and child, we ask parents and teachers to rate the child’s attention, behavior, mood, PDD-like symptoms, and anxiety, using the Child/Adolescent Symptom Inventory (see Related resources). We use the youth version with children age 10 and older, then review the symptoms with the parents and child to make sure we understand all presenting comorbidities.

TREATMENT

Nonmedical interventions begin with an accurate diagnosis, where possible. Then the four steps of treatment are to:

  • address each domain of dysfunction
  • translate findings to parent, child, and teachers/school.
  • provide settings and resources that allow the child to work most effectively
  • develop a behavioral program for the most frequent problems, with consistent response by caretakers and educators.
The educational setting needs to be adapted for these children. This usually implies individualized attention in small classes or small work groups. Assigning an aide to the child may be effective in larger settings, but other support and expertise is needed. Otherwise, all the aide does is run interference for the child, which ultimately may be more isolating than a special education class.

A communication specialist interested in pragmatics is needed to make sure the child is understood and being understood in the classroom. Table 3, summarizes communications skills the child needs to learn. An educational specialist who serves a resource to other professionals may also help the child. Curriculum should be based on long-term goals rather than on inflexible credit schedules that teach worthless, unlearnable information and demoralize the student.

Finally, the education setting should provide opportunities for structured social interaction and less-structured but supervised—”bully-proofed”—interactions.

Medications. No systematic medical treatment data exist, as there is no way to classify these children. They are usually treated with multiple medications for their specific symptom cluster abnormalities (Table 4). Options include:

  • atypical antipsychotics such as risperidone, quetiapine, aripiprazole, ziprasidone, or olanzapine
  • mood stabilizers such as valproic acid, lithium, or lamotrigine
  • stimulants such as methylphenidate, amphetamine salts, atomoxetine, or bupropion (a mild stimulant and an antidepressant)
  • selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, such as fluoxetine, sertraline, citalopram, paroxetine, or fluvoxamine.
Unfortunately, drug therapy may cause behavioral toxicity—tearfulness, irritability, disinhibition, activation, agitation, hallucinations and possibly even suicidal behavior. Stopping the medication usually reverses this kind of adverse effect.19

Medication side effects understandably frighten parents—who may be reluctant to have their children use any drug therapies. Counsel the parents in advance that side effects may occur.

Related resources

Drug brand names

  • Amphetamine • Adderall
  • Aripiprazole • Abilify
  • Atomoxetine • Strattera
  • Bupropion • Wellbutrin
  • Citalopram • Celexa
  • Fluoxetine • Prozac
  • Fluvoxamine • Luvox
  • Lamotrigine • Lamictal
  • Lithium carbonate • Lithobid, others
  • Methylphenidate • Concerta, Ritalin
  • Olanzapine • Zyprexa
  • Paroxetine • Paxil
  • Quetiapine • Seroquel
  • Risperidone • Risperdal
  • Sertraline • Zoloft
  • Valproic acid • Depakote
  • Ziprasidone • Geodon
Disclosures

Dr. Weisbrot receives grants from Pfizer Inc.

Dr. Carlson receives grants from or is a speaker for Janssen Pharmaceutica, Eli Lilly and Co., Shire Pharmaceuticals Groups, and Abbott Laboratories; is a consultant to Janssen Pharmaceutica and Eli Lilly and Co.; and is an advisor to Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Pfizer Inc., and Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical.

References

1. Meijer M, Treffers P. Borderline and schizotypal disorders in children and adolescents. Br J Psychiatry 1991;158:205-12.

2. Petti TA, Vela RM. Borderline disorders of childhood: an overview. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1990;29:327-37.

3. Wolff S. Loners: the life path of unusual children. London: Routledge, 1995.

4. Kestenbaum C. The borderline child at risk for major psychiatric disorder in adult life: seven case reports with followup. In: Robson KS (ed). The borderline child. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1983;49-82.

5. Lofgren DP, Bemporad J, King J, et al. A prospective follow-up study of so-called borderline children. Am J Psychiatry 1991;148:1541-7.

6. Nicolson R, Lenane M, Brookner F, et al. Children and adolescents with psychotic disorder not otherwise specified: a 2-to-8 year follow-up study. Compr Psychiatry 2001;42:319-25.

7. Towbin KE, Dykens EM, Pearson GS, Cohen DA. Conceptualizing “borderline syndrome of childhood” and “childhood schizophrenia” as a developmental disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1993;32(4):775-82.

8. Buitelaar JK, van der Gaag RJ. Diagnostic rules for children with PDD-NOS and multiple complex developmental disorder. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1998;39(6):911-19.

9. Van der Gaag RJ, Buitelaar J, Van den Ban E, et al. A controlled multivariate chart review of multiple complex developmental disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1995;34(8):1096-106.

10. McKenna K, Gordon C, Lenane M, et al. Looking for childhood-onset schizophrenia: the first 71 cases screened. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1994;33:636-44.

11. Kumra S, Jacobsen L, Lenane M, et al. “Multidimensionally impaired disorder”: is it a variant of very early-onset schizophrenia? J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1998;37(1):91-99.

12. Nagy J, Satzmari P. A chart review of schizotypal personality disorders in children. J Autism Dev Disord 1986;16(3):351-67.

13. Carlson GA. Unpublished data.

14. Greene R. The explosive child: a new approach for understanding and parenting easily frustrated, chronically inflexible children (2nd ed). New York: Harper Collins, 2001.

15. Weisbrot DM, Gadow KD, DeVincent CJ, et al. The presentation of anxiety in children with pervasive developmental disorders. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2005 (in press).

16. Garralda ME. Hallucinations in children with conduct and emotional disorders: the clinical phenomena. Psychol Med 1984;14:589-96.

17. Ulloa RE, Birmaher B, Axelson D, et al. Psychosis in a pediatric mood and anxiety disorders clinic: phenomenology and correlates. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2000;39(3):337-45.

18. Schreier HA. Hallucinations in nonpsychotic children: more common than we think? J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2000;38(5):623-625.

19. Carlson GA, Mick E. Drug-induced disinhibition in psychiatrically hospitalized children. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2003;13(2):153-63.

Author and Disclosure Information

Deborah M. Weisbrot, MD
Assistant professor of psychiatry Director, child and adolescent psychiatry outpatient clinic

Gabrielle A. Carlson, MD
Professor of psychiatry and pediatrics Director, child and adolescent psychiatry

Stony Brook University School of Medicine Department of psychiatry and behavioral science Stony Brook, NY

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 04(02)
Publications
Page Number
24-42
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Deborah M. Weisbrot, MD
Assistant professor of psychiatry Director, child and adolescent psychiatry outpatient clinic

Gabrielle A. Carlson, MD
Professor of psychiatry and pediatrics Director, child and adolescent psychiatry

Stony Brook University School of Medicine Department of psychiatry and behavioral science Stony Brook, NY

Author and Disclosure Information

Deborah M. Weisbrot, MD
Assistant professor of psychiatry Director, child and adolescent psychiatry outpatient clinic

Gabrielle A. Carlson, MD
Professor of psychiatry and pediatrics Director, child and adolescent psychiatry

Stony Brook University School of Medicine Department of psychiatry and behavioral science Stony Brook, NY

Children with developmental problems and serious psychopathologies often do not fit neatly into DSM diagnoses.1,2 These “diagnostically homeless” children—handicapped by hyperactivity, volcanic rages, extreme anxieties, and other complex problems—need assessment and treatment that address four domains of dysfunction:

  • mood/anxiety problems
  • possible psychosis
  • language/thought disorder
  • relationship/socialization problems.

This article offers snapshots of four children with undetermined diagnoses, explores the dilemma of treating such patients without knowing what they really have, and recommends a treatment approach to help them function better in school and at home.

WHO ARE THE ‘DIAGNOSTICALLY HOMELESS’?

Devon is 5. He is extremely hyperactive and impulsive, with a normal IQ but significant language delay. He exhibits little but not absent interest in peers and rages when changes are imposed on him.

Table 1

Criteria describing impairments in ‘diagnostically homeless’ children

DomainMultiple complex developmental disorder (MCDD)*Multidimensionally impaired (MDI) syndrome†Schizotypal personality disorder
Anxiety symptomsIntense generalized anxiety, diffuse tension or irritability; unusual fears and phobias, peculiar in content or intensity; recurrent panic episodes, terror, or flooding with anxietyUnspecifiedExcessive social anxiety associated with paranoid fears
Affect regulationSignificant, wide, emotional variability out of proportion to precipitantsNearly daily periods of emotional lability disproportionate to precipitantsInappropriate or constricted affect
Psychotic-like symptomsMagical thinking; illogical confusion between reality and fantasy; grandiose fantasies of special powersPoor ability to separate reality from fantasyIdeas of reference; unusual perceptual experiences; suspicious; eccentric
Thought/language disorderThought problems including irrationality, sudden intrusions on normal thought process, neologisms or nonsense words repeated over and over; blatantly illogical, bizarre ideasThought disorder specifically excludedOdd thinking; vague, circumstantial, metaphorical speech, overelaborate or stereotyped
Problems with social functioningSocial disinterest, detachment; instrumental relatedness; high degrees of ambivalence to adults, manifested by clinging, overly controlling, needy behavior and/or aggressive, oppositional behavior; limited capacity to empathizeImpaired interpersonal skills despite desire to initiate social interactions with peersLack of close friends or confidants other than relatives
* PDD NOS (pervasive developmental disorder, not otherwise specified) is the closest DSM-IV-TR designation.
† Psychosis NOS is the closest DSM-IV-TR designation.
Source: References 1, 3, 8-13.
Devon says he can run faster than cars and swim across the ocean. He has “more than ADHD,” less than autism/pervasive developmental disorder (PDD). Were he older, his grandiosity might seem manic but his age and language delay make this suspect.

Steven is 11, referred “to rule out bipolar disorder” and to evaluate hyperactivity, explosiveness, and nightmares. He didn’t speak until he was 22 months old. He worries that bad people are chasing him, fears skeletons under his bed, has nightmares of vampires, and believes that cartoon characters are real and that Sponge Bob is his protector. He says he sees “scary stuff” out of the corner of his eyes. He does not have a thought disorder; psychotic symptoms are more than an overactive imagination or anxiety.

Lauren, age 12, has been diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) but now presents with withdrawn, depressed, and defiant behaviors. She is described as a “loner” who has never related well to other children. Lauren speaks about being tortured by her peers to the point of sounding paranoid. Her conversation is extremely circumstantial and rambling.

Richard, age 8, has motor coordination, attachment, and disinhibition problems. He hears voices telling him to do bad things, such as hurt people, steal things, and “break stuff.” He doesn’t mind the voices much, and they don’t pervade his life the way hallucinations do in schizophrenia.

Children such as these are common, and it is unclear whether they have a developmental disorder, the prodrome of a psychotic or mood disorder, or idiosyncratic personalities. They don’t meet criteria for many disorders, including autism, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). They have more-extensive difficulties than those seen in ADHD, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), or OCD.

Clinically, they are either forced into a category someone thinks they resemble (such as mania in Devon’s case) or are given a “not otherwise specified” (NOS) label (such as PDD NOS, psychosis NOS, or mood disorder NOS), the severity of which goes unacknowledged.

Problems with ‘NOS.’ Some might consider “NOS” a less-severe problem than a specific diagnosis, but these children are very impaired. They are excluded from treatment studies because they do not meet formal criteria for the designated disorder or they get included erroneously because the structured diagnostic interview doesn’t assess what they really have.

Meaningful psychoeducation for their parents is impossible because no Web site or book exists to help them help their child. Finally, no follow-up studies have been done of this group of children because no one can agree on a diagnosis. Small studies have addressed some of these concerns, but outcomes—not surprisingly—are wide-ranging.3-6

 

 

NOS diagnoses also don’t adequately address children with marked anxiety, unusual fears, and perseverative behaviors who are socially clumsy but manage reciprocal social interaction. These children are substantially disabled by:

  • attention difficulties
  • mood dysregulation (including anxiety and/or manic symptoms)
  • trouble with transitions/change
  • motor problems (not infrequently)
  • pragmatic language/social difficulties.
Few tests exist for pragmatic language skills, which include being able to maintain a reciprocal conversation, stay on topic, understand the listener’s needs, and use correct body language and voice tone. Children with PDD, ADHD, and other language disorders are most often disabled in this area of communication.

Diagnostic terms that have tried to classify these children (Table 1) include:

  • childhood-onset PDD, described in DSM-III. This category was dropped in DSM III-R to be included in PDD, then largely ignored in DSM-IV when autism criteria were refined.
  • multiple complex developmental disorder (MCDD),7-9 which appears to describe children within the autism spectrum (such as PDD NOS)
  • multidimensionally-impaired (MDI) syndrome, whose atypical psychosis has been called “psychosis NOS”10-11
  • schizotypal personality disorder, which addresses similar symptoms (although mental health professionals are loathe to use a personality disorder diagnosis in a child).12
These designations all include psychopathology in four domains: anxiety, affect regulation, communication, psychosis, and relatedness.

At this time, however, diagnostic conclusions about this heterogeneous group of children are premature. Our classification system does not do them justice, and we need to study them for what they have, rather than forcing them into our current alternatives.

Prevalence. To find out how many patients in our university-based, tertiary-care clinic do not fit DSM-IV-TR nosology, we examined data from faculty evaluations of 624 children and adolescents.13 These included semi-structured interviews of parent and child, rating scales from parents and teachers, and testing information from the schools in two-thirds of cases.

The result: nearly 25% of our child and adolescent psychiatry outpatients are “diagnostically homeless.” Like the rest of our patient population, these children are:

  • 80% male
  • 60% under age 12
  • 86% Caucasian
  • 85% living with their biological mothers.
These children are referred to psychiatrists for many reasons:

  • ADHD (16%). They have great difficulty with executive functions, such as paying attention, inhibiting impulsive responses, planning and organizing, making transitions from one activity to another, and controlling emotion. Their problems, however, go much beyond ADHD.
  • Bipolar disorder (15%) or depression/anxiety (16%). They have catastrophic anxiety and/or frightening rages triggered by apparently trivial circumstances. They balk or “shut down” when people want them to move or act faster than they can move or act.
  • To “rule out autism” (19%). More than one-half (56%) of these children have a diagnosable speech or language disorder, compared with 35% among our other child psychiatry outpatients.
  • For educational assessment (23%). School systems request guidance for educational interventions because these children are possibly psychotic and disturbing to teachers and children. They may be unable to execute homework assignments and fail their courses but surprisingly do grade-level work on achievement tests.

ASSESSING FOUR DOMAINS

We can consolidate the domains needing assessment into mood/anxiety problems, possible psychosis, language/thought disorder, and relationship/socialization problems. Although evaluating and treating some of these domains may be beyond the psychiatrist’s purview, we must make sure that other professionals attend to them.

Anxiety and mood. Understanding these children’s anxieties is important. A routine fear of bees is a simple phobia, whereas catastrophic anxiety over a highly unlikely impending tornado and perseverative interest in the weather may be more common in a PDD spectrum disorder. Anxiety about going to sleep because a monster is going to suck out one’s brains does not easily fit into the rubric of generalized anxiety.14

Irritability is these youngsters’ most disabling mood symptom. Volcanic anger and rage that prompts referral occurs in numerous conditions, including mania. Many of the children described in Ross Greene’s book, The Explosive Child,15 have conditions other than bipolar disorder. Although parents and teachers often describe these events as occurring without provocation, a good functional behavioral assessment will usually reveal a precipitant.

Table 2

Assessing children’s social and language skills

Social assessmentSeen in…
Are the child’s social abilities delayed?ADHD
Is he uninterested in social situations?Autism
Is he clueless about social interaction?Autism spectrum disorders including MCDD, MDI, PDD NOS, nonverbal learning disability
Are social interactions deviant?Schizotypal personality disorder/schizophrenia
Does child appear shut down/behaviorally inhibited in unfamiliar settings, with greater comfort at home or with familiar people?Social phobia
Language assessment (can be done by psychiatrist)
  • Age at first word use; age at first use of short sentences
  • Early interest in language? Nonverbal communication? Communication for sharing?
Useful questionsSeen in…
Was communication delayed but then progressed “normally”?Developmental language disorder
Did it begin normally and stop?Autism
Was/is it egocentric and/or unidimensional?Asperger’s disorder; nonverbal learning disability
Was/is it bizarre or paranoid?Schizotypal personality disorder
Pragmatic language problems?All of the above, MCDD, MDI, ADHD
Communication domains (may require speech pathologist assessment)
Expressive and receptive language
Pragmatic language (the child’s ability to communicate in the real world; see Table 3)
Written language
Audiology (hearing and auditory processing)
ADHD: attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
MCDD: multiple complex developmental disorder
MDI: multidimensionally impaired syndrome
PDD NOS: pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified
 

 

Possible psychosis. These children may have impaired reality testing that can be difficult to assess; thus, deciding whether the child is experiencing psychotic symptoms can be a challenge. The child may be intensely involved with fantasy characters or imaginary companions to such a degree that he or she insists the character is real.16,17 Developmentally normal fears—as of the dark, monsters, or images from dreams—may preoccupy him or her during the day. Quasi-psychotic symptoms such as these are easily missed if:

  • we don’t ask about them
  • we assume the child is “just pretending” or has a “great imagination”
  • the child does not volunteer the information spontaneously.18
Table 3

Communication skills children need to learn

  • Rules of conversation (for example, who is likely to be interested in what)
  • Topic management (when to expand, shift, end a conversation)
  • Awareness of nonverbal cues
  • Social expectations in various settings
  • Operational knowledge of the language of emotions and mental states (how to express feelings and the different ways we experience ourselves)
  • How to monitor a listener’s relative interest
  • The meaning of eye contact, voice tone, and voice inflection
  • Awareness of how social settings affect communication, such as voice volume (whisper in the library, shout on the soccer field) and speech style (slang with peers, formal style for classroom recitation)
  • Body proximity (how to avoid invading someone’s space)
  • Decoding facial expression (such as what it means when someone rolls his eyes)
  • Special instruction to help decipher nonliteral communication, including teasing, irony, sarcasm, emotional tones of speech
In assessing psychotic symptoms, the first goal is to get a detailed picture of unusual thoughts or images the child is experiencing in different settings, including school, home, and with peers. Then evaluate these symptoms in the broader clinical context of how the child is functioning in other domains.

Language/thought disorder. Parents may not recognize that their child has a thought or language disorder because they have filled in the blanks and interpreted for him or her for so long. Asking the child “yes” and “no” questions will not elucidate these disorders, either. The examiner must talk to the child to determine his or her ability to:

  • sustain an extended narration that makes sense
  • stay on the topic
  • care whether the listener understands what the child is talking about
  • make a point.
Distinguishing between a thought or and language disorder in a child is difficult, although the more illogical the communication, the less likely it is to be a language disorder. If the child connects ideas that don’t make sense, ask him or her to explain how the subject shifted or what he or she meant. Children with language disorders may have misunderstood the question or may have expected the examiner to make connections, but the explanation usually makes sense. When it doesn’t, we become more concerned that the child has a thought disorder.

Nonverbal communication realms include eye contact, appropriate hand gestures and facial expression, tone of voice, and vocal inflection. Other important areas of language to assess are summarized in Table 2.

Relationship/socialization problems. It is important to know whether the child has friends, wants friends, or prefers being with younger children. Peer relationships may be absent, delayed, or deviant.

Other assessments. The diagnostically homeless children we see have complicated family histories of psychopathology. Their first-degree relatives have a higher number of heritable disorders—including bipolar disorder, panic disorder, ADHD, learning disabilities, and “nervous breakdowns”—than do those of children with uncomplicated ADHD, bipolar disorder, or anxiety disorders. Ask about these conditions when taking the family history; if a family member is said to be bipolar, get a description of the person’s symptoms.

Table 4

Targeting drug therapies to treat children’s symptoms

Drug classEfficacy by symptom domain
Atypical antipsychoticsPsychosis/thought disorder: Can reduce psychotic symptoms
Anxiety symptoms: Can reduce extreme anxieties
Affect regulation: Improved by mood-stabilizing effect
Socialization problems: Appear to modify affective aggression, hyperactivity, and impulsivity, which can improve socialization and pragmatic communication
Mood stabilizersPsychosis/thought disorder: Not primary area of effectiveness
Anxiety symptoms: May be helpful; not primary area of effectiveness
Affect regulation: Address mood dysregulation
Socialization problems: May reduce aggressive outbursts and mood, which can improve socialization
Stimulants*Psychosis/thought disorder: Can produce or intensify psychotic symptoms and agitation
Anxiety: Usually do not improve anxiety; can intensify anxiety and agitation
Affect regulation: Not a primary effect in severe cases; address impulsive aggression via mood stabilization
Socialization problems: Can improve functioning via decreased impulsivity, inattention, and aggression
SSRI antidepressants†Psychosis/thought disorder: Do not directly address
Anxiety: Can be effective in decreasing anxiety
Affect regulation: Can improve depressed mood
Socialization problems: Can be improved as a result of improved mood and decreased anxiety
* Stimulants often increase agitation and disinhibition.
† Watch for behavioral disinhibition, possible increase in suicidality, with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).
 

 

A skilled psychologist or speech pathologist can help you determine the presence or absence of cognitive and language dysfunction and learning disabilities. Even before we interview the parents and child, we ask parents and teachers to rate the child’s attention, behavior, mood, PDD-like symptoms, and anxiety, using the Child/Adolescent Symptom Inventory (see Related resources). We use the youth version with children age 10 and older, then review the symptoms with the parents and child to make sure we understand all presenting comorbidities.

TREATMENT

Nonmedical interventions begin with an accurate diagnosis, where possible. Then the four steps of treatment are to:

  • address each domain of dysfunction
  • translate findings to parent, child, and teachers/school.
  • provide settings and resources that allow the child to work most effectively
  • develop a behavioral program for the most frequent problems, with consistent response by caretakers and educators.
The educational setting needs to be adapted for these children. This usually implies individualized attention in small classes or small work groups. Assigning an aide to the child may be effective in larger settings, but other support and expertise is needed. Otherwise, all the aide does is run interference for the child, which ultimately may be more isolating than a special education class.

A communication specialist interested in pragmatics is needed to make sure the child is understood and being understood in the classroom. Table 3, summarizes communications skills the child needs to learn. An educational specialist who serves a resource to other professionals may also help the child. Curriculum should be based on long-term goals rather than on inflexible credit schedules that teach worthless, unlearnable information and demoralize the student.

Finally, the education setting should provide opportunities for structured social interaction and less-structured but supervised—”bully-proofed”—interactions.

Medications. No systematic medical treatment data exist, as there is no way to classify these children. They are usually treated with multiple medications for their specific symptom cluster abnormalities (Table 4). Options include:

  • atypical antipsychotics such as risperidone, quetiapine, aripiprazole, ziprasidone, or olanzapine
  • mood stabilizers such as valproic acid, lithium, or lamotrigine
  • stimulants such as methylphenidate, amphetamine salts, atomoxetine, or bupropion (a mild stimulant and an antidepressant)
  • selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, such as fluoxetine, sertraline, citalopram, paroxetine, or fluvoxamine.
Unfortunately, drug therapy may cause behavioral toxicity—tearfulness, irritability, disinhibition, activation, agitation, hallucinations and possibly even suicidal behavior. Stopping the medication usually reverses this kind of adverse effect.19

Medication side effects understandably frighten parents—who may be reluctant to have their children use any drug therapies. Counsel the parents in advance that side effects may occur.

Related resources

Drug brand names

  • Amphetamine • Adderall
  • Aripiprazole • Abilify
  • Atomoxetine • Strattera
  • Bupropion • Wellbutrin
  • Citalopram • Celexa
  • Fluoxetine • Prozac
  • Fluvoxamine • Luvox
  • Lamotrigine • Lamictal
  • Lithium carbonate • Lithobid, others
  • Methylphenidate • Concerta, Ritalin
  • Olanzapine • Zyprexa
  • Paroxetine • Paxil
  • Quetiapine • Seroquel
  • Risperidone • Risperdal
  • Sertraline • Zoloft
  • Valproic acid • Depakote
  • Ziprasidone • Geodon
Disclosures

Dr. Weisbrot receives grants from Pfizer Inc.

Dr. Carlson receives grants from or is a speaker for Janssen Pharmaceutica, Eli Lilly and Co., Shire Pharmaceuticals Groups, and Abbott Laboratories; is a consultant to Janssen Pharmaceutica and Eli Lilly and Co.; and is an advisor to Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Pfizer Inc., and Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical.

Children with developmental problems and serious psychopathologies often do not fit neatly into DSM diagnoses.1,2 These “diagnostically homeless” children—handicapped by hyperactivity, volcanic rages, extreme anxieties, and other complex problems—need assessment and treatment that address four domains of dysfunction:

  • mood/anxiety problems
  • possible psychosis
  • language/thought disorder
  • relationship/socialization problems.

This article offers snapshots of four children with undetermined diagnoses, explores the dilemma of treating such patients without knowing what they really have, and recommends a treatment approach to help them function better in school and at home.

WHO ARE THE ‘DIAGNOSTICALLY HOMELESS’?

Devon is 5. He is extremely hyperactive and impulsive, with a normal IQ but significant language delay. He exhibits little but not absent interest in peers and rages when changes are imposed on him.

Table 1

Criteria describing impairments in ‘diagnostically homeless’ children

DomainMultiple complex developmental disorder (MCDD)*Multidimensionally impaired (MDI) syndrome†Schizotypal personality disorder
Anxiety symptomsIntense generalized anxiety, diffuse tension or irritability; unusual fears and phobias, peculiar in content or intensity; recurrent panic episodes, terror, or flooding with anxietyUnspecifiedExcessive social anxiety associated with paranoid fears
Affect regulationSignificant, wide, emotional variability out of proportion to precipitantsNearly daily periods of emotional lability disproportionate to precipitantsInappropriate or constricted affect
Psychotic-like symptomsMagical thinking; illogical confusion between reality and fantasy; grandiose fantasies of special powersPoor ability to separate reality from fantasyIdeas of reference; unusual perceptual experiences; suspicious; eccentric
Thought/language disorderThought problems including irrationality, sudden intrusions on normal thought process, neologisms or nonsense words repeated over and over; blatantly illogical, bizarre ideasThought disorder specifically excludedOdd thinking; vague, circumstantial, metaphorical speech, overelaborate or stereotyped
Problems with social functioningSocial disinterest, detachment; instrumental relatedness; high degrees of ambivalence to adults, manifested by clinging, overly controlling, needy behavior and/or aggressive, oppositional behavior; limited capacity to empathizeImpaired interpersonal skills despite desire to initiate social interactions with peersLack of close friends or confidants other than relatives
* PDD NOS (pervasive developmental disorder, not otherwise specified) is the closest DSM-IV-TR designation.
† Psychosis NOS is the closest DSM-IV-TR designation.
Source: References 1, 3, 8-13.
Devon says he can run faster than cars and swim across the ocean. He has “more than ADHD,” less than autism/pervasive developmental disorder (PDD). Were he older, his grandiosity might seem manic but his age and language delay make this suspect.

Steven is 11, referred “to rule out bipolar disorder” and to evaluate hyperactivity, explosiveness, and nightmares. He didn’t speak until he was 22 months old. He worries that bad people are chasing him, fears skeletons under his bed, has nightmares of vampires, and believes that cartoon characters are real and that Sponge Bob is his protector. He says he sees “scary stuff” out of the corner of his eyes. He does not have a thought disorder; psychotic symptoms are more than an overactive imagination or anxiety.

Lauren, age 12, has been diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) but now presents with withdrawn, depressed, and defiant behaviors. She is described as a “loner” who has never related well to other children. Lauren speaks about being tortured by her peers to the point of sounding paranoid. Her conversation is extremely circumstantial and rambling.

Richard, age 8, has motor coordination, attachment, and disinhibition problems. He hears voices telling him to do bad things, such as hurt people, steal things, and “break stuff.” He doesn’t mind the voices much, and they don’t pervade his life the way hallucinations do in schizophrenia.

Children such as these are common, and it is unclear whether they have a developmental disorder, the prodrome of a psychotic or mood disorder, or idiosyncratic personalities. They don’t meet criteria for many disorders, including autism, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). They have more-extensive difficulties than those seen in ADHD, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), or OCD.

Clinically, they are either forced into a category someone thinks they resemble (such as mania in Devon’s case) or are given a “not otherwise specified” (NOS) label (such as PDD NOS, psychosis NOS, or mood disorder NOS), the severity of which goes unacknowledged.

Problems with ‘NOS.’ Some might consider “NOS” a less-severe problem than a specific diagnosis, but these children are very impaired. They are excluded from treatment studies because they do not meet formal criteria for the designated disorder or they get included erroneously because the structured diagnostic interview doesn’t assess what they really have.

Meaningful psychoeducation for their parents is impossible because no Web site or book exists to help them help their child. Finally, no follow-up studies have been done of this group of children because no one can agree on a diagnosis. Small studies have addressed some of these concerns, but outcomes—not surprisingly—are wide-ranging.3-6

 

 

NOS diagnoses also don’t adequately address children with marked anxiety, unusual fears, and perseverative behaviors who are socially clumsy but manage reciprocal social interaction. These children are substantially disabled by:

  • attention difficulties
  • mood dysregulation (including anxiety and/or manic symptoms)
  • trouble with transitions/change
  • motor problems (not infrequently)
  • pragmatic language/social difficulties.
Few tests exist for pragmatic language skills, which include being able to maintain a reciprocal conversation, stay on topic, understand the listener’s needs, and use correct body language and voice tone. Children with PDD, ADHD, and other language disorders are most often disabled in this area of communication.

Diagnostic terms that have tried to classify these children (Table 1) include:

  • childhood-onset PDD, described in DSM-III. This category was dropped in DSM III-R to be included in PDD, then largely ignored in DSM-IV when autism criteria were refined.
  • multiple complex developmental disorder (MCDD),7-9 which appears to describe children within the autism spectrum (such as PDD NOS)
  • multidimensionally-impaired (MDI) syndrome, whose atypical psychosis has been called “psychosis NOS”10-11
  • schizotypal personality disorder, which addresses similar symptoms (although mental health professionals are loathe to use a personality disorder diagnosis in a child).12
These designations all include psychopathology in four domains: anxiety, affect regulation, communication, psychosis, and relatedness.

At this time, however, diagnostic conclusions about this heterogeneous group of children are premature. Our classification system does not do them justice, and we need to study them for what they have, rather than forcing them into our current alternatives.

Prevalence. To find out how many patients in our university-based, tertiary-care clinic do not fit DSM-IV-TR nosology, we examined data from faculty evaluations of 624 children and adolescents.13 These included semi-structured interviews of parent and child, rating scales from parents and teachers, and testing information from the schools in two-thirds of cases.

The result: nearly 25% of our child and adolescent psychiatry outpatients are “diagnostically homeless.” Like the rest of our patient population, these children are:

  • 80% male
  • 60% under age 12
  • 86% Caucasian
  • 85% living with their biological mothers.
These children are referred to psychiatrists for many reasons:

  • ADHD (16%). They have great difficulty with executive functions, such as paying attention, inhibiting impulsive responses, planning and organizing, making transitions from one activity to another, and controlling emotion. Their problems, however, go much beyond ADHD.
  • Bipolar disorder (15%) or depression/anxiety (16%). They have catastrophic anxiety and/or frightening rages triggered by apparently trivial circumstances. They balk or “shut down” when people want them to move or act faster than they can move or act.
  • To “rule out autism” (19%). More than one-half (56%) of these children have a diagnosable speech or language disorder, compared with 35% among our other child psychiatry outpatients.
  • For educational assessment (23%). School systems request guidance for educational interventions because these children are possibly psychotic and disturbing to teachers and children. They may be unable to execute homework assignments and fail their courses but surprisingly do grade-level work on achievement tests.

ASSESSING FOUR DOMAINS

We can consolidate the domains needing assessment into mood/anxiety problems, possible psychosis, language/thought disorder, and relationship/socialization problems. Although evaluating and treating some of these domains may be beyond the psychiatrist’s purview, we must make sure that other professionals attend to them.

Anxiety and mood. Understanding these children’s anxieties is important. A routine fear of bees is a simple phobia, whereas catastrophic anxiety over a highly unlikely impending tornado and perseverative interest in the weather may be more common in a PDD spectrum disorder. Anxiety about going to sleep because a monster is going to suck out one’s brains does not easily fit into the rubric of generalized anxiety.14

Irritability is these youngsters’ most disabling mood symptom. Volcanic anger and rage that prompts referral occurs in numerous conditions, including mania. Many of the children described in Ross Greene’s book, The Explosive Child,15 have conditions other than bipolar disorder. Although parents and teachers often describe these events as occurring without provocation, a good functional behavioral assessment will usually reveal a precipitant.

Table 2

Assessing children’s social and language skills

Social assessmentSeen in…
Are the child’s social abilities delayed?ADHD
Is he uninterested in social situations?Autism
Is he clueless about social interaction?Autism spectrum disorders including MCDD, MDI, PDD NOS, nonverbal learning disability
Are social interactions deviant?Schizotypal personality disorder/schizophrenia
Does child appear shut down/behaviorally inhibited in unfamiliar settings, with greater comfort at home or with familiar people?Social phobia
Language assessment (can be done by psychiatrist)
  • Age at first word use; age at first use of short sentences
  • Early interest in language? Nonverbal communication? Communication for sharing?
Useful questionsSeen in…
Was communication delayed but then progressed “normally”?Developmental language disorder
Did it begin normally and stop?Autism
Was/is it egocentric and/or unidimensional?Asperger’s disorder; nonverbal learning disability
Was/is it bizarre or paranoid?Schizotypal personality disorder
Pragmatic language problems?All of the above, MCDD, MDI, ADHD
Communication domains (may require speech pathologist assessment)
Expressive and receptive language
Pragmatic language (the child’s ability to communicate in the real world; see Table 3)
Written language
Audiology (hearing and auditory processing)
ADHD: attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
MCDD: multiple complex developmental disorder
MDI: multidimensionally impaired syndrome
PDD NOS: pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified
 

 

Possible psychosis. These children may have impaired reality testing that can be difficult to assess; thus, deciding whether the child is experiencing psychotic symptoms can be a challenge. The child may be intensely involved with fantasy characters or imaginary companions to such a degree that he or she insists the character is real.16,17 Developmentally normal fears—as of the dark, monsters, or images from dreams—may preoccupy him or her during the day. Quasi-psychotic symptoms such as these are easily missed if:

  • we don’t ask about them
  • we assume the child is “just pretending” or has a “great imagination”
  • the child does not volunteer the information spontaneously.18
Table 3

Communication skills children need to learn

  • Rules of conversation (for example, who is likely to be interested in what)
  • Topic management (when to expand, shift, end a conversation)
  • Awareness of nonverbal cues
  • Social expectations in various settings
  • Operational knowledge of the language of emotions and mental states (how to express feelings and the different ways we experience ourselves)
  • How to monitor a listener’s relative interest
  • The meaning of eye contact, voice tone, and voice inflection
  • Awareness of how social settings affect communication, such as voice volume (whisper in the library, shout on the soccer field) and speech style (slang with peers, formal style for classroom recitation)
  • Body proximity (how to avoid invading someone’s space)
  • Decoding facial expression (such as what it means when someone rolls his eyes)
  • Special instruction to help decipher nonliteral communication, including teasing, irony, sarcasm, emotional tones of speech
In assessing psychotic symptoms, the first goal is to get a detailed picture of unusual thoughts or images the child is experiencing in different settings, including school, home, and with peers. Then evaluate these symptoms in the broader clinical context of how the child is functioning in other domains.

Language/thought disorder. Parents may not recognize that their child has a thought or language disorder because they have filled in the blanks and interpreted for him or her for so long. Asking the child “yes” and “no” questions will not elucidate these disorders, either. The examiner must talk to the child to determine his or her ability to:

  • sustain an extended narration that makes sense
  • stay on the topic
  • care whether the listener understands what the child is talking about
  • make a point.
Distinguishing between a thought or and language disorder in a child is difficult, although the more illogical the communication, the less likely it is to be a language disorder. If the child connects ideas that don’t make sense, ask him or her to explain how the subject shifted or what he or she meant. Children with language disorders may have misunderstood the question or may have expected the examiner to make connections, but the explanation usually makes sense. When it doesn’t, we become more concerned that the child has a thought disorder.

Nonverbal communication realms include eye contact, appropriate hand gestures and facial expression, tone of voice, and vocal inflection. Other important areas of language to assess are summarized in Table 2.

Relationship/socialization problems. It is important to know whether the child has friends, wants friends, or prefers being with younger children. Peer relationships may be absent, delayed, or deviant.

Other assessments. The diagnostically homeless children we see have complicated family histories of psychopathology. Their first-degree relatives have a higher number of heritable disorders—including bipolar disorder, panic disorder, ADHD, learning disabilities, and “nervous breakdowns”—than do those of children with uncomplicated ADHD, bipolar disorder, or anxiety disorders. Ask about these conditions when taking the family history; if a family member is said to be bipolar, get a description of the person’s symptoms.

Table 4

Targeting drug therapies to treat children’s symptoms

Drug classEfficacy by symptom domain
Atypical antipsychoticsPsychosis/thought disorder: Can reduce psychotic symptoms
Anxiety symptoms: Can reduce extreme anxieties
Affect regulation: Improved by mood-stabilizing effect
Socialization problems: Appear to modify affective aggression, hyperactivity, and impulsivity, which can improve socialization and pragmatic communication
Mood stabilizersPsychosis/thought disorder: Not primary area of effectiveness
Anxiety symptoms: May be helpful; not primary area of effectiveness
Affect regulation: Address mood dysregulation
Socialization problems: May reduce aggressive outbursts and mood, which can improve socialization
Stimulants*Psychosis/thought disorder: Can produce or intensify psychotic symptoms and agitation
Anxiety: Usually do not improve anxiety; can intensify anxiety and agitation
Affect regulation: Not a primary effect in severe cases; address impulsive aggression via mood stabilization
Socialization problems: Can improve functioning via decreased impulsivity, inattention, and aggression
SSRI antidepressants†Psychosis/thought disorder: Do not directly address
Anxiety: Can be effective in decreasing anxiety
Affect regulation: Can improve depressed mood
Socialization problems: Can be improved as a result of improved mood and decreased anxiety
* Stimulants often increase agitation and disinhibition.
† Watch for behavioral disinhibition, possible increase in suicidality, with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).
 

 

A skilled psychologist or speech pathologist can help you determine the presence or absence of cognitive and language dysfunction and learning disabilities. Even before we interview the parents and child, we ask parents and teachers to rate the child’s attention, behavior, mood, PDD-like symptoms, and anxiety, using the Child/Adolescent Symptom Inventory (see Related resources). We use the youth version with children age 10 and older, then review the symptoms with the parents and child to make sure we understand all presenting comorbidities.

TREATMENT

Nonmedical interventions begin with an accurate diagnosis, where possible. Then the four steps of treatment are to:

  • address each domain of dysfunction
  • translate findings to parent, child, and teachers/school.
  • provide settings and resources that allow the child to work most effectively
  • develop a behavioral program for the most frequent problems, with consistent response by caretakers and educators.
The educational setting needs to be adapted for these children. This usually implies individualized attention in small classes or small work groups. Assigning an aide to the child may be effective in larger settings, but other support and expertise is needed. Otherwise, all the aide does is run interference for the child, which ultimately may be more isolating than a special education class.

A communication specialist interested in pragmatics is needed to make sure the child is understood and being understood in the classroom. Table 3, summarizes communications skills the child needs to learn. An educational specialist who serves a resource to other professionals may also help the child. Curriculum should be based on long-term goals rather than on inflexible credit schedules that teach worthless, unlearnable information and demoralize the student.

Finally, the education setting should provide opportunities for structured social interaction and less-structured but supervised—”bully-proofed”—interactions.

Medications. No systematic medical treatment data exist, as there is no way to classify these children. They are usually treated with multiple medications for their specific symptom cluster abnormalities (Table 4). Options include:

  • atypical antipsychotics such as risperidone, quetiapine, aripiprazole, ziprasidone, or olanzapine
  • mood stabilizers such as valproic acid, lithium, or lamotrigine
  • stimulants such as methylphenidate, amphetamine salts, atomoxetine, or bupropion (a mild stimulant and an antidepressant)
  • selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, such as fluoxetine, sertraline, citalopram, paroxetine, or fluvoxamine.
Unfortunately, drug therapy may cause behavioral toxicity—tearfulness, irritability, disinhibition, activation, agitation, hallucinations and possibly even suicidal behavior. Stopping the medication usually reverses this kind of adverse effect.19

Medication side effects understandably frighten parents—who may be reluctant to have their children use any drug therapies. Counsel the parents in advance that side effects may occur.

Related resources

Drug brand names

  • Amphetamine • Adderall
  • Aripiprazole • Abilify
  • Atomoxetine • Strattera
  • Bupropion • Wellbutrin
  • Citalopram • Celexa
  • Fluoxetine • Prozac
  • Fluvoxamine • Luvox
  • Lamotrigine • Lamictal
  • Lithium carbonate • Lithobid, others
  • Methylphenidate • Concerta, Ritalin
  • Olanzapine • Zyprexa
  • Paroxetine • Paxil
  • Quetiapine • Seroquel
  • Risperidone • Risperdal
  • Sertraline • Zoloft
  • Valproic acid • Depakote
  • Ziprasidone • Geodon
Disclosures

Dr. Weisbrot receives grants from Pfizer Inc.

Dr. Carlson receives grants from or is a speaker for Janssen Pharmaceutica, Eli Lilly and Co., Shire Pharmaceuticals Groups, and Abbott Laboratories; is a consultant to Janssen Pharmaceutica and Eli Lilly and Co.; and is an advisor to Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Pfizer Inc., and Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical.

References

1. Meijer M, Treffers P. Borderline and schizotypal disorders in children and adolescents. Br J Psychiatry 1991;158:205-12.

2. Petti TA, Vela RM. Borderline disorders of childhood: an overview. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1990;29:327-37.

3. Wolff S. Loners: the life path of unusual children. London: Routledge, 1995.

4. Kestenbaum C. The borderline child at risk for major psychiatric disorder in adult life: seven case reports with followup. In: Robson KS (ed). The borderline child. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1983;49-82.

5. Lofgren DP, Bemporad J, King J, et al. A prospective follow-up study of so-called borderline children. Am J Psychiatry 1991;148:1541-7.

6. Nicolson R, Lenane M, Brookner F, et al. Children and adolescents with psychotic disorder not otherwise specified: a 2-to-8 year follow-up study. Compr Psychiatry 2001;42:319-25.

7. Towbin KE, Dykens EM, Pearson GS, Cohen DA. Conceptualizing “borderline syndrome of childhood” and “childhood schizophrenia” as a developmental disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1993;32(4):775-82.

8. Buitelaar JK, van der Gaag RJ. Diagnostic rules for children with PDD-NOS and multiple complex developmental disorder. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1998;39(6):911-19.

9. Van der Gaag RJ, Buitelaar J, Van den Ban E, et al. A controlled multivariate chart review of multiple complex developmental disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1995;34(8):1096-106.

10. McKenna K, Gordon C, Lenane M, et al. Looking for childhood-onset schizophrenia: the first 71 cases screened. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1994;33:636-44.

11. Kumra S, Jacobsen L, Lenane M, et al. “Multidimensionally impaired disorder”: is it a variant of very early-onset schizophrenia? J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1998;37(1):91-99.

12. Nagy J, Satzmari P. A chart review of schizotypal personality disorders in children. J Autism Dev Disord 1986;16(3):351-67.

13. Carlson GA. Unpublished data.

14. Greene R. The explosive child: a new approach for understanding and parenting easily frustrated, chronically inflexible children (2nd ed). New York: Harper Collins, 2001.

15. Weisbrot DM, Gadow KD, DeVincent CJ, et al. The presentation of anxiety in children with pervasive developmental disorders. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2005 (in press).

16. Garralda ME. Hallucinations in children with conduct and emotional disorders: the clinical phenomena. Psychol Med 1984;14:589-96.

17. Ulloa RE, Birmaher B, Axelson D, et al. Psychosis in a pediatric mood and anxiety disorders clinic: phenomenology and correlates. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2000;39(3):337-45.

18. Schreier HA. Hallucinations in nonpsychotic children: more common than we think? J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2000;38(5):623-625.

19. Carlson GA, Mick E. Drug-induced disinhibition in psychiatrically hospitalized children. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2003;13(2):153-63.

References

1. Meijer M, Treffers P. Borderline and schizotypal disorders in children and adolescents. Br J Psychiatry 1991;158:205-12.

2. Petti TA, Vela RM. Borderline disorders of childhood: an overview. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1990;29:327-37.

3. Wolff S. Loners: the life path of unusual children. London: Routledge, 1995.

4. Kestenbaum C. The borderline child at risk for major psychiatric disorder in adult life: seven case reports with followup. In: Robson KS (ed). The borderline child. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1983;49-82.

5. Lofgren DP, Bemporad J, King J, et al. A prospective follow-up study of so-called borderline children. Am J Psychiatry 1991;148:1541-7.

6. Nicolson R, Lenane M, Brookner F, et al. Children and adolescents with psychotic disorder not otherwise specified: a 2-to-8 year follow-up study. Compr Psychiatry 2001;42:319-25.

7. Towbin KE, Dykens EM, Pearson GS, Cohen DA. Conceptualizing “borderline syndrome of childhood” and “childhood schizophrenia” as a developmental disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1993;32(4):775-82.

8. Buitelaar JK, van der Gaag RJ. Diagnostic rules for children with PDD-NOS and multiple complex developmental disorder. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1998;39(6):911-19.

9. Van der Gaag RJ, Buitelaar J, Van den Ban E, et al. A controlled multivariate chart review of multiple complex developmental disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1995;34(8):1096-106.

10. McKenna K, Gordon C, Lenane M, et al. Looking for childhood-onset schizophrenia: the first 71 cases screened. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1994;33:636-44.

11. Kumra S, Jacobsen L, Lenane M, et al. “Multidimensionally impaired disorder”: is it a variant of very early-onset schizophrenia? J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1998;37(1):91-99.

12. Nagy J, Satzmari P. A chart review of schizotypal personality disorders in children. J Autism Dev Disord 1986;16(3):351-67.

13. Carlson GA. Unpublished data.

14. Greene R. The explosive child: a new approach for understanding and parenting easily frustrated, chronically inflexible children (2nd ed). New York: Harper Collins, 2001.

15. Weisbrot DM, Gadow KD, DeVincent CJ, et al. The presentation of anxiety in children with pervasive developmental disorders. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2005 (in press).

16. Garralda ME. Hallucinations in children with conduct and emotional disorders: the clinical phenomena. Psychol Med 1984;14:589-96.

17. Ulloa RE, Birmaher B, Axelson D, et al. Psychosis in a pediatric mood and anxiety disorders clinic: phenomenology and correlates. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2000;39(3):337-45.

18. Schreier HA. Hallucinations in nonpsychotic children: more common than we think? J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2000;38(5):623-625.

19. Carlson GA, Mick E. Drug-induced disinhibition in psychiatrically hospitalized children. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2003;13(2):153-63.

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 04(02)
Issue
Current Psychiatry - 04(02)
Page Number
24-42
Page Number
24-42
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
“Diagnostically homeless” Is it ADHD? Mania? Autism? What to do if no diagnosis fits
Display Headline
“Diagnostically homeless” Is it ADHD? Mania? Autism? What to do if no diagnosis fits
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Dependence risk with chronic dextromethorphan abuse

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 12/11/2018 - 15:10
Display Headline
Dependence risk with chronic dextromethorphan abuse

Habitual users of dextromethorphan can develop symptoms that meet DSM-IV criteria for substance dependence. A common ingredient in nonprescription cough syrups, dextromethorphan is considered nonaddictive but is far from benign in excessive dosages.

To illustrate the risks of dextromethorphan abuse, this article:

  • presents the case of an adult with apparent dependence
  • provides evidence of psychiatric and medical consequences of chronic excessive use of this cough remedy
  • offers a glimpse at how dextromethorphan is described on the Internet, where information on its recreational use is readily available.1

Box 1

Dextromethorphan’s mechanism of action and metabolism

Dextromethorphan acts on the brain’s cough center, the medulla oblongata, raising the cough reflex threshold. It is well-absorbed by the GI tract, metabolized in the liver by the cytochrome P-450 2D6 isoenzyme, and excreted in the urine unchanged or as a demethylated metabolite.2,3

Interaction between dextromethorphan and MAOIs resulting in serotonergic syndrome has been well-documented.4

Dextromethorphan has a 15- to 30-minute onset of action and peaks in 2.5 hours. Duration of action is 3 to 6 hours.5 Though dextromethorphan is an opiate analog, it is regarded as having no analgesic or addictive properties.6 When taken in therapeutic dosages—one-sixth to one-third ounce of medication containing 15 to 30 mg dextromethorphan—it is considered highly effective and safe,1 with no analgesic, euphoric, or dependency-producing properties.3

Dextromethorphan has a wide margin of safety. Doses 100 times the recommended amount have not been fatal,1 although overdose deaths have occurred.3

WHY DEXTROMETHORPHAN?

Dextromethorphan is a antitussive (cough suppressant) developed in the 1950s as a nonopioid alternative to codeine. Considered safe and effective at therapeutic dosages (Box 1),1-6 it can cause dissociation and psychotic effects in overdose.

Dextromethorphan is an attractive drug of abuse because it:

  • produces the desired intoxicating effect
  • is inexpensive—usually less than $5 a bottle
  • is easy to purchase without prescription in >120 cough syrup preparations.7
On the other hand, dextromethorphan is not as accepted by drug users as are marijuana, alcohol, and cocaine. Our patients tell us:

  • persons who abuse cough syrup say it tastes terrible
  • the hallucinations and dissociation associated with dextromethorphan intoxication can be unpleasant, even frightening
  • cough syrup is seen as a drug for “losers.”
Those who use dextromethorphan chronically tend to do so in solitude, which suggests that many users may go unrecognized.

CASE: 11 YEARS OF ‘ROBO-ING’

Mr. E, age 26, presented to our clinic for a court-ordered evaluation of substance abuse after his third drunken driving arrest. A college senior and father of three, he denied abusing nonprescription medications but volunteered that his alcohol consumption was “under control.” He said he continued to “drink on occasion,” including “less than three” glasses of wine the night of his arrest.

At the counselor’s recommendation, Mr. E underwent intensive outpatient counseling. He accepted that he had a genetic predisposition to addiction, gained insight into his alcohol abuse, and began a 12-step recovery program. The day he was to be discharged from treatment, however, Mr. E asked for a session with his counselor and revealed that he had been abusing “DXM” (dextromethorphan) in cough syrup for 11 years. He admitted drinking two 6- to 8-oz bottles of Robitussin-DM-brand cough syrup daily for the last 5 years, an activity he called “Robo-ing.”

He claimed to be a “highly revered teacher.” He said he “championed DXM use” and that “everyone looked up to” him because he had introduced “hundreds of people to the high.”

He had taught others to camouflage the cough syrup’s taste by chewing gum or gulping soft drinks. Maintaining a steady DXM level in the body “enhances” any other drug or alcohol use, he said. Mr. E described his DXM use fondly, though now with some fear.

Mr. E begged for help. Because of DXM use, his marriage was failing, he had been fired from his job, he was struggling to pay his legal fines, and he had spent time in jail. He feared he had damaged his brain and worried that his DXM use might have contributed to birth defects in two of his children.

Mr. E continued outpatient psychotherapy for 5 months to address his DXM use triggers—seeing cough syrup in stores, any alcohol use, and stress. He researched DXM addiction and was amazed to find no 12-step programs or information on DXM and birth defects.

We met with him 7 months after discharge. He reported that his marriage “has never been better,” and his children seemed to have no developmental delays. He was graduating from college and returning to his hometown to work.

Two years later, he is back in treatment for dextromethorphan abuse.

 

 

DEXTROMETHORPHAN DEPENDENCE

Mr. E believes he is dependent on dextromethorphan, and his behavior meets DSM-IV-TR criteria for dependence (Table):

  • His persistent development of a culture of dextromethorphan use consumes much of his time.
  • He neglects family and work responsibilities.
  • He has tried repeatedly to cut down and stop his cough syrup use.
  • His use continues despite marital, work, and legal consequences.
  • He can tolerate daily dextromethorphan doses that would not be possible for the naive user.
  • He experiences physical and psychological withdrawal when he stops using dextromethorphan.
Table 1

DSM-IV-TR criteria for substance dependence

A maladaptive pattern of substance use, leading to clinically significant impairment or distress, as manifested by three (or more) of the following, occurring at any time in the same 12-month period:
  1. Tolerance, as defined by either of the following:
  2. Withdrawal, as manifested by either of the following:
  3. The substance is often taken in larger amounts or over a longer period than was intended
  4. There is persistent desire or unsuccessful efforts to cut down or control substance use.
  5. A great deal of time is spent in activities necessary to obtain the substance (eg, visiting multiple doctors or driving long distances), use the substance (eg, chain smoking), or recover from its effects
  6. Important social, occupational, or recreational activities are given up because of substance use
  7. The substance use is continued despite knowledge of having a persistent or recurrent physical or psychological problem that is likely to have been caused or exacerbated by the substance.
Source: Adapted and reprinted with permission from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed, text revision). Copyright 2000. American Psychiatric Association.
Box 2

Warning to parents: Signs of child or adolescent dextromethorphan abuse

  • Cough syrup bottle in home’s medicine cabinet looks more empty than expected
  • Child is using the Internet to learn about or attempt to purchase products containing dextromethorphan
  • Cough syrups or other products containing dextromethorphan are found in child’s possession
  • Child denies using common street drugs or alcohol but displays an unexplained altered state (confusion, ataxia, dizziness, euphoria, or slowed mental processing) or nausea, vomiting, or dizziness (from dextromethorphan withdrawal)
  • Child hangs out with peers in drug stores or supermarkets
  • Using cough syrup to get high has become a fad in child’s school or peer group
He claims that about one-third of his peer group has tried dextromethorphan to get high, although he believes

WHO ABUSES ‘DXM’?

The prevalence of dextromethorphan abuse is unclear.8 Abuse has been reported in Sweden, Canada, Australia, Germany, and the United States.1 Sweden has allowed prescription-only sales as a deterrent to abuse since 1986.9

The literature and our experience in treating dextromethorphan abusers suggest that abuse often begins in late childhood or early adolescence but may continue as chronic behavior in adulthood.

Use by adolescents. Case reports note episodic or fad dextromethorphan use—usually by adolescents and young adults—that springs up in a region or within a group and then fades.8 An abuse epidemic by Utah adolescents in the 1980s led drug stores to voluntarily place dextromethorphan-containing products behind the pharmacy counter to monitor and deter purchases.10

In a study of 376 students in grades 4 through 12 in Albuquerque, New Mexico, many knew cough syrup could be used to “get high.” When shown a list of cough syrup brand names, they often could identify those containing dextromethorphan, including NyQuil, Robitussin-DM, and Vicks 44D. The rates at which the students knew these three common cough preparations could be abused were:

  • 46%, 25%, and 16%, respectively, for high school students
  • 20%, 10%, and 17% for middle schoolers.8
Because many youngsters know that dextromethorphan abuse can produce an altered state, clinicians need to educate parents to be alert for warning signs in their children (Box 2).

Use by adults. Substance abuse counselors at our agency all have worked with adults who use cough syrup for intoxication. Some adults say they use dextromethorphan to enjoy the high and others as an alternative to alcohol.

A ‘HIGH’ WITH 4 PLATEAUS

Many Internet sites carry information about dextromethorphan.11-13 Its altered state is called a plateau, and four plateaus have been described.

Lower plateaus are considered “recreational.”13 According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), users experience a sense of dissociation and distortion of time and space at doses of about 2 ounces of medication containing 15 to 30 mg of dextromethorphan.14

Users are said to try to attain plateaus 1 or 2 to enhance and enjoy their surroundings. They describe music as being richer, colors more intense, and conversation more meaningful. The experience is said to be similar to a marijuana high or alcohol intoxication.

 

 

Objects may appear disproportionately large or small. The normal rhythm of conversation may seem chopped into blocks of words, or words may echo. Users refer to this staccato or strobing quality of sound as “flanging.”13 The bodily experience has been described as dreamlike or as if standing on a wave.

The high at lower plateaus is generally described as a positive experience. However, some describe it as bizarre, weird, and disturbing. It can create panic, nausea, and vomiting.

Upper plateaus. Users consider plateaus 3 and 4 as less recreational and more “spiritual and introspective.”15 Substantial dissociation and hallucinations can occur with “heavy stoning”—which the NIDA defines as using 10 ounces or more of medication containing 15 to 30 mg of dextromethorphan.14 Web sites warn users not to try to attain the upper plateaus unless prepared to “sit it out” or be accompanied by a sober “sitter” to talk the user through a bad trip or get help if needed.13

RISK OF PSYCHOSIS AND DEATH

The upper plateaus of dextromethorphan abuse are described as “intense.” Users report hallucinations, time and space distortions, and out-of-body sensations. Some have reported contacting alien beings or spirits. Although some users report the higher plateaus as pleasant, others report them as “terrifying.”

Upper-level trips can result in panic attacks and psychosis. Case reports have documented dextromethorphan doses that resulted in emergency room visits for psychotic states. For example:

  • an adult was treated in the emergency room for psychosis after consuming an estimated 711 mg of dextromethorphan from cough syrup16
  • a 23-year-old was treated for agitation and hallucinations in an emergency room after consuming approximately 2,160 mg of dextromethorphan.17
Memory loss, disorganization, and altered consciousness appear to be temporary and resolve with discontinued use. Few persons experiment repeatedly with attaining the upper plateaus, an activity often followed by nausea, vomiting, and a hangover that lasts for days.

Research is lacking on long-term effects of regular dextromethorphan use. One study reported birth defects in chick embryos exposed to dextromethorphan.18

Fatalities. Dextromethorphan-related deaths have been documented.19 Causes of death include respiratory arrest, seizure, aspiration, and drug-drug interactions.20 Because dextromethorphan is usually not taken in pure form, effects of other drugs in cough syrup—such as bromide or chlorpheniramine—may contribute to the risk of side effects or death.21

Related resources

Disclosures

The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

References

1. Cranston JW, Yoast R. Abuse of dextromethorphan (letter). Arch Fam Med 1999;8:99-100.

2. Relling MV, Cherrie J, Schell MJ, et al. Lower prevalence of the debrisoquin oxidative poor metabolizers phenotype in American black and white subjects. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1991;50:308-13.

3. Bem JL, Peck R. Dextromethorphan: an overview of safety issues. Drug Saf 1992;7(3):190-9.

4. Harrison WM, McGarth PJ, Stewart JW, Quitkin F. MAOIs and hypertensive crisis: the role of OTC drugs. J Clin Psychiatry 1989;50:64-5.

5. Albertson TE. Dextromethorphan. In: Obon K (ed). Poisoning and drug overdose (3rd ed). Stanford, CT: Appleton and Lange, 1999;155-6.

6. Gilman AG, Rall TW, Nies AS, et al (eds). Goodman and Gilman’s the pharmacology basics of therapeutics (8th ed). New York: MacMillan, 1990;518.-

7. Helfer J, Oksuk MK. Psychoactive abuse potential of Robitussin-DM (letter). Am J Psychiatry 1990;147(5):672-3.

8. Noonan WC, Miller WR, Feeney DM. Dextromethorphan abuse among youth. Arch Fam Med 2000;9:791-2.

9. Rammer L, Holmgren P, Sandler H. Fatal intoxication by dextromethorphan: a report on two cases. Forensic Sci Int 1988;37:233-6.

10. McElwee NE, Veltri JC. Intentional abuse of dextromethorphan (DM) products: 1985 to 1988 statewide data (abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1990;32:355.-

11. White WE. DXM side effects and other things to avoid. Available at: http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/dxm/faq/dxm_side_effects.shtml. Accessed Jan. 4, 2005.

12. Brosien KG. Cough syrup: The over-the-counter underground drug of the 90s. Kent, OH: The Burr, 1997. Available at: http://www.burr.kent.edu/archives/1997/spring/cough/cough.html. Accessed Dec. 16, 2004.

13. White WE. Getting the most out of DXM. Available at: http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/dxm/faq/dxm_most.shtml. Accessed Jan. 4, 2005.

14. Nature and effects of dextromethorphan. National Institute on Drug Abuse. Research Report Series. Hallucinogens and dissociative drugs. Available at http://www.drugabuse.gov/ResearchReports/hallucinogens/halluc4.html. Accessed Jan. 4, 2005.

15. White W. Physiological effects of DXM. Available at: http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/dxm/faq/dxm_physiological.shtml. Accessed Dec. 16, 2004.

16. Price LH, Lebel J. Dextromethorphan-induced psychosis. Am J Psychiatry 2000;157(2):304.-

17. Wolfe TR, Caravati EM. Massive dextromethorphan ingestion and abuse. Am J Emerg Med 1995;13(2):174-6.

18. Andaloro VJ, Monaghan DT, Rosenquist TU. DXM and other methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists are teratogenic in the avian embryo model. Pediatr Res 1998;43(1):1-8.

19. Sederstrom J. Friley death attributed to cough medication. Iowa State Daily. Jan. 13, 2003.

20. Iowa State Poison Control Bulletin. Poisindex Management: Dextromethorphan summary of exposure. Sec. 0.2.1. Iowa City, IA: Iowa Statewide Poison Control Center, August 2002.

21. Coricidin (dextromethorphan + chlorpheniramine maleate) harm reduction Web site. Available at: http://www.coricidin.org/. Accessed Dec. 16, 2004.

Author and Disclosure Information

Jeannie Melick-Shield, LISW, CACD
Chemical dependency services Dual-diagnosis partial hospitalization program University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

David Barloon, ARNP, MSW
Chemical dependency services Dual-diagnosis partial hospitalization program University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

Jill Liesveld, MD
Associate professor, department of psychiatry Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine University of Iowa, Iowa City

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 04(02)
Publications
Page Number
13-23
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Jeannie Melick-Shield, LISW, CACD
Chemical dependency services Dual-diagnosis partial hospitalization program University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

David Barloon, ARNP, MSW
Chemical dependency services Dual-diagnosis partial hospitalization program University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

Jill Liesveld, MD
Associate professor, department of psychiatry Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine University of Iowa, Iowa City

Author and Disclosure Information

Jeannie Melick-Shield, LISW, CACD
Chemical dependency services Dual-diagnosis partial hospitalization program University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

David Barloon, ARNP, MSW
Chemical dependency services Dual-diagnosis partial hospitalization program University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

Jill Liesveld, MD
Associate professor, department of psychiatry Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine University of Iowa, Iowa City

Habitual users of dextromethorphan can develop symptoms that meet DSM-IV criteria for substance dependence. A common ingredient in nonprescription cough syrups, dextromethorphan is considered nonaddictive but is far from benign in excessive dosages.

To illustrate the risks of dextromethorphan abuse, this article:

  • presents the case of an adult with apparent dependence
  • provides evidence of psychiatric and medical consequences of chronic excessive use of this cough remedy
  • offers a glimpse at how dextromethorphan is described on the Internet, where information on its recreational use is readily available.1

Box 1

Dextromethorphan’s mechanism of action and metabolism

Dextromethorphan acts on the brain’s cough center, the medulla oblongata, raising the cough reflex threshold. It is well-absorbed by the GI tract, metabolized in the liver by the cytochrome P-450 2D6 isoenzyme, and excreted in the urine unchanged or as a demethylated metabolite.2,3

Interaction between dextromethorphan and MAOIs resulting in serotonergic syndrome has been well-documented.4

Dextromethorphan has a 15- to 30-minute onset of action and peaks in 2.5 hours. Duration of action is 3 to 6 hours.5 Though dextromethorphan is an opiate analog, it is regarded as having no analgesic or addictive properties.6 When taken in therapeutic dosages—one-sixth to one-third ounce of medication containing 15 to 30 mg dextromethorphan—it is considered highly effective and safe,1 with no analgesic, euphoric, or dependency-producing properties.3

Dextromethorphan has a wide margin of safety. Doses 100 times the recommended amount have not been fatal,1 although overdose deaths have occurred.3

WHY DEXTROMETHORPHAN?

Dextromethorphan is a antitussive (cough suppressant) developed in the 1950s as a nonopioid alternative to codeine. Considered safe and effective at therapeutic dosages (Box 1),1-6 it can cause dissociation and psychotic effects in overdose.

Dextromethorphan is an attractive drug of abuse because it:

  • produces the desired intoxicating effect
  • is inexpensive—usually less than $5 a bottle
  • is easy to purchase without prescription in >120 cough syrup preparations.7
On the other hand, dextromethorphan is not as accepted by drug users as are marijuana, alcohol, and cocaine. Our patients tell us:

  • persons who abuse cough syrup say it tastes terrible
  • the hallucinations and dissociation associated with dextromethorphan intoxication can be unpleasant, even frightening
  • cough syrup is seen as a drug for “losers.”
Those who use dextromethorphan chronically tend to do so in solitude, which suggests that many users may go unrecognized.

CASE: 11 YEARS OF ‘ROBO-ING’

Mr. E, age 26, presented to our clinic for a court-ordered evaluation of substance abuse after his third drunken driving arrest. A college senior and father of three, he denied abusing nonprescription medications but volunteered that his alcohol consumption was “under control.” He said he continued to “drink on occasion,” including “less than three” glasses of wine the night of his arrest.

At the counselor’s recommendation, Mr. E underwent intensive outpatient counseling. He accepted that he had a genetic predisposition to addiction, gained insight into his alcohol abuse, and began a 12-step recovery program. The day he was to be discharged from treatment, however, Mr. E asked for a session with his counselor and revealed that he had been abusing “DXM” (dextromethorphan) in cough syrup for 11 years. He admitted drinking two 6- to 8-oz bottles of Robitussin-DM-brand cough syrup daily for the last 5 years, an activity he called “Robo-ing.”

He claimed to be a “highly revered teacher.” He said he “championed DXM use” and that “everyone looked up to” him because he had introduced “hundreds of people to the high.”

He had taught others to camouflage the cough syrup’s taste by chewing gum or gulping soft drinks. Maintaining a steady DXM level in the body “enhances” any other drug or alcohol use, he said. Mr. E described his DXM use fondly, though now with some fear.

Mr. E begged for help. Because of DXM use, his marriage was failing, he had been fired from his job, he was struggling to pay his legal fines, and he had spent time in jail. He feared he had damaged his brain and worried that his DXM use might have contributed to birth defects in two of his children.

Mr. E continued outpatient psychotherapy for 5 months to address his DXM use triggers—seeing cough syrup in stores, any alcohol use, and stress. He researched DXM addiction and was amazed to find no 12-step programs or information on DXM and birth defects.

We met with him 7 months after discharge. He reported that his marriage “has never been better,” and his children seemed to have no developmental delays. He was graduating from college and returning to his hometown to work.

Two years later, he is back in treatment for dextromethorphan abuse.

 

 

DEXTROMETHORPHAN DEPENDENCE

Mr. E believes he is dependent on dextromethorphan, and his behavior meets DSM-IV-TR criteria for dependence (Table):

  • His persistent development of a culture of dextromethorphan use consumes much of his time.
  • He neglects family and work responsibilities.
  • He has tried repeatedly to cut down and stop his cough syrup use.
  • His use continues despite marital, work, and legal consequences.
  • He can tolerate daily dextromethorphan doses that would not be possible for the naive user.
  • He experiences physical and psychological withdrawal when he stops using dextromethorphan.
Table 1

DSM-IV-TR criteria for substance dependence

A maladaptive pattern of substance use, leading to clinically significant impairment or distress, as manifested by three (or more) of the following, occurring at any time in the same 12-month period:
  1. Tolerance, as defined by either of the following:
  2. Withdrawal, as manifested by either of the following:
  3. The substance is often taken in larger amounts or over a longer period than was intended
  4. There is persistent desire or unsuccessful efforts to cut down or control substance use.
  5. A great deal of time is spent in activities necessary to obtain the substance (eg, visiting multiple doctors or driving long distances), use the substance (eg, chain smoking), or recover from its effects
  6. Important social, occupational, or recreational activities are given up because of substance use
  7. The substance use is continued despite knowledge of having a persistent or recurrent physical or psychological problem that is likely to have been caused or exacerbated by the substance.
Source: Adapted and reprinted with permission from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed, text revision). Copyright 2000. American Psychiatric Association.
Box 2

Warning to parents: Signs of child or adolescent dextromethorphan abuse

  • Cough syrup bottle in home’s medicine cabinet looks more empty than expected
  • Child is using the Internet to learn about or attempt to purchase products containing dextromethorphan
  • Cough syrups or other products containing dextromethorphan are found in child’s possession
  • Child denies using common street drugs or alcohol but displays an unexplained altered state (confusion, ataxia, dizziness, euphoria, or slowed mental processing) or nausea, vomiting, or dizziness (from dextromethorphan withdrawal)
  • Child hangs out with peers in drug stores or supermarkets
  • Using cough syrup to get high has become a fad in child’s school or peer group
He claims that about one-third of his peer group has tried dextromethorphan to get high, although he believes

WHO ABUSES ‘DXM’?

The prevalence of dextromethorphan abuse is unclear.8 Abuse has been reported in Sweden, Canada, Australia, Germany, and the United States.1 Sweden has allowed prescription-only sales as a deterrent to abuse since 1986.9

The literature and our experience in treating dextromethorphan abusers suggest that abuse often begins in late childhood or early adolescence but may continue as chronic behavior in adulthood.

Use by adolescents. Case reports note episodic or fad dextromethorphan use—usually by adolescents and young adults—that springs up in a region or within a group and then fades.8 An abuse epidemic by Utah adolescents in the 1980s led drug stores to voluntarily place dextromethorphan-containing products behind the pharmacy counter to monitor and deter purchases.10

In a study of 376 students in grades 4 through 12 in Albuquerque, New Mexico, many knew cough syrup could be used to “get high.” When shown a list of cough syrup brand names, they often could identify those containing dextromethorphan, including NyQuil, Robitussin-DM, and Vicks 44D. The rates at which the students knew these three common cough preparations could be abused were:

  • 46%, 25%, and 16%, respectively, for high school students
  • 20%, 10%, and 17% for middle schoolers.8
Because many youngsters know that dextromethorphan abuse can produce an altered state, clinicians need to educate parents to be alert for warning signs in their children (Box 2).

Use by adults. Substance abuse counselors at our agency all have worked with adults who use cough syrup for intoxication. Some adults say they use dextromethorphan to enjoy the high and others as an alternative to alcohol.

A ‘HIGH’ WITH 4 PLATEAUS

Many Internet sites carry information about dextromethorphan.11-13 Its altered state is called a plateau, and four plateaus have been described.

Lower plateaus are considered “recreational.”13 According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), users experience a sense of dissociation and distortion of time and space at doses of about 2 ounces of medication containing 15 to 30 mg of dextromethorphan.14

Users are said to try to attain plateaus 1 or 2 to enhance and enjoy their surroundings. They describe music as being richer, colors more intense, and conversation more meaningful. The experience is said to be similar to a marijuana high or alcohol intoxication.

 

 

Objects may appear disproportionately large or small. The normal rhythm of conversation may seem chopped into blocks of words, or words may echo. Users refer to this staccato or strobing quality of sound as “flanging.”13 The bodily experience has been described as dreamlike or as if standing on a wave.

The high at lower plateaus is generally described as a positive experience. However, some describe it as bizarre, weird, and disturbing. It can create panic, nausea, and vomiting.

Upper plateaus. Users consider plateaus 3 and 4 as less recreational and more “spiritual and introspective.”15 Substantial dissociation and hallucinations can occur with “heavy stoning”—which the NIDA defines as using 10 ounces or more of medication containing 15 to 30 mg of dextromethorphan.14 Web sites warn users not to try to attain the upper plateaus unless prepared to “sit it out” or be accompanied by a sober “sitter” to talk the user through a bad trip or get help if needed.13

RISK OF PSYCHOSIS AND DEATH

The upper plateaus of dextromethorphan abuse are described as “intense.” Users report hallucinations, time and space distortions, and out-of-body sensations. Some have reported contacting alien beings or spirits. Although some users report the higher plateaus as pleasant, others report them as “terrifying.”

Upper-level trips can result in panic attacks and psychosis. Case reports have documented dextromethorphan doses that resulted in emergency room visits for psychotic states. For example:

  • an adult was treated in the emergency room for psychosis after consuming an estimated 711 mg of dextromethorphan from cough syrup16
  • a 23-year-old was treated for agitation and hallucinations in an emergency room after consuming approximately 2,160 mg of dextromethorphan.17
Memory loss, disorganization, and altered consciousness appear to be temporary and resolve with discontinued use. Few persons experiment repeatedly with attaining the upper plateaus, an activity often followed by nausea, vomiting, and a hangover that lasts for days.

Research is lacking on long-term effects of regular dextromethorphan use. One study reported birth defects in chick embryos exposed to dextromethorphan.18

Fatalities. Dextromethorphan-related deaths have been documented.19 Causes of death include respiratory arrest, seizure, aspiration, and drug-drug interactions.20 Because dextromethorphan is usually not taken in pure form, effects of other drugs in cough syrup—such as bromide or chlorpheniramine—may contribute to the risk of side effects or death.21

Related resources

Disclosures

The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Habitual users of dextromethorphan can develop symptoms that meet DSM-IV criteria for substance dependence. A common ingredient in nonprescription cough syrups, dextromethorphan is considered nonaddictive but is far from benign in excessive dosages.

To illustrate the risks of dextromethorphan abuse, this article:

  • presents the case of an adult with apparent dependence
  • provides evidence of psychiatric and medical consequences of chronic excessive use of this cough remedy
  • offers a glimpse at how dextromethorphan is described on the Internet, where information on its recreational use is readily available.1

Box 1

Dextromethorphan’s mechanism of action and metabolism

Dextromethorphan acts on the brain’s cough center, the medulla oblongata, raising the cough reflex threshold. It is well-absorbed by the GI tract, metabolized in the liver by the cytochrome P-450 2D6 isoenzyme, and excreted in the urine unchanged or as a demethylated metabolite.2,3

Interaction between dextromethorphan and MAOIs resulting in serotonergic syndrome has been well-documented.4

Dextromethorphan has a 15- to 30-minute onset of action and peaks in 2.5 hours. Duration of action is 3 to 6 hours.5 Though dextromethorphan is an opiate analog, it is regarded as having no analgesic or addictive properties.6 When taken in therapeutic dosages—one-sixth to one-third ounce of medication containing 15 to 30 mg dextromethorphan—it is considered highly effective and safe,1 with no analgesic, euphoric, or dependency-producing properties.3

Dextromethorphan has a wide margin of safety. Doses 100 times the recommended amount have not been fatal,1 although overdose deaths have occurred.3

WHY DEXTROMETHORPHAN?

Dextromethorphan is a antitussive (cough suppressant) developed in the 1950s as a nonopioid alternative to codeine. Considered safe and effective at therapeutic dosages (Box 1),1-6 it can cause dissociation and psychotic effects in overdose.

Dextromethorphan is an attractive drug of abuse because it:

  • produces the desired intoxicating effect
  • is inexpensive—usually less than $5 a bottle
  • is easy to purchase without prescription in >120 cough syrup preparations.7
On the other hand, dextromethorphan is not as accepted by drug users as are marijuana, alcohol, and cocaine. Our patients tell us:

  • persons who abuse cough syrup say it tastes terrible
  • the hallucinations and dissociation associated with dextromethorphan intoxication can be unpleasant, even frightening
  • cough syrup is seen as a drug for “losers.”
Those who use dextromethorphan chronically tend to do so in solitude, which suggests that many users may go unrecognized.

CASE: 11 YEARS OF ‘ROBO-ING’

Mr. E, age 26, presented to our clinic for a court-ordered evaluation of substance abuse after his third drunken driving arrest. A college senior and father of three, he denied abusing nonprescription medications but volunteered that his alcohol consumption was “under control.” He said he continued to “drink on occasion,” including “less than three” glasses of wine the night of his arrest.

At the counselor’s recommendation, Mr. E underwent intensive outpatient counseling. He accepted that he had a genetic predisposition to addiction, gained insight into his alcohol abuse, and began a 12-step recovery program. The day he was to be discharged from treatment, however, Mr. E asked for a session with his counselor and revealed that he had been abusing “DXM” (dextromethorphan) in cough syrup for 11 years. He admitted drinking two 6- to 8-oz bottles of Robitussin-DM-brand cough syrup daily for the last 5 years, an activity he called “Robo-ing.”

He claimed to be a “highly revered teacher.” He said he “championed DXM use” and that “everyone looked up to” him because he had introduced “hundreds of people to the high.”

He had taught others to camouflage the cough syrup’s taste by chewing gum or gulping soft drinks. Maintaining a steady DXM level in the body “enhances” any other drug or alcohol use, he said. Mr. E described his DXM use fondly, though now with some fear.

Mr. E begged for help. Because of DXM use, his marriage was failing, he had been fired from his job, he was struggling to pay his legal fines, and he had spent time in jail. He feared he had damaged his brain and worried that his DXM use might have contributed to birth defects in two of his children.

Mr. E continued outpatient psychotherapy for 5 months to address his DXM use triggers—seeing cough syrup in stores, any alcohol use, and stress. He researched DXM addiction and was amazed to find no 12-step programs or information on DXM and birth defects.

We met with him 7 months after discharge. He reported that his marriage “has never been better,” and his children seemed to have no developmental delays. He was graduating from college and returning to his hometown to work.

Two years later, he is back in treatment for dextromethorphan abuse.

 

 

DEXTROMETHORPHAN DEPENDENCE

Mr. E believes he is dependent on dextromethorphan, and his behavior meets DSM-IV-TR criteria for dependence (Table):

  • His persistent development of a culture of dextromethorphan use consumes much of his time.
  • He neglects family and work responsibilities.
  • He has tried repeatedly to cut down and stop his cough syrup use.
  • His use continues despite marital, work, and legal consequences.
  • He can tolerate daily dextromethorphan doses that would not be possible for the naive user.
  • He experiences physical and psychological withdrawal when he stops using dextromethorphan.
Table 1

DSM-IV-TR criteria for substance dependence

A maladaptive pattern of substance use, leading to clinically significant impairment or distress, as manifested by three (or more) of the following, occurring at any time in the same 12-month period:
  1. Tolerance, as defined by either of the following:
  2. Withdrawal, as manifested by either of the following:
  3. The substance is often taken in larger amounts or over a longer period than was intended
  4. There is persistent desire or unsuccessful efforts to cut down or control substance use.
  5. A great deal of time is spent in activities necessary to obtain the substance (eg, visiting multiple doctors or driving long distances), use the substance (eg, chain smoking), or recover from its effects
  6. Important social, occupational, or recreational activities are given up because of substance use
  7. The substance use is continued despite knowledge of having a persistent or recurrent physical or psychological problem that is likely to have been caused or exacerbated by the substance.
Source: Adapted and reprinted with permission from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed, text revision). Copyright 2000. American Psychiatric Association.
Box 2

Warning to parents: Signs of child or adolescent dextromethorphan abuse

  • Cough syrup bottle in home’s medicine cabinet looks more empty than expected
  • Child is using the Internet to learn about or attempt to purchase products containing dextromethorphan
  • Cough syrups or other products containing dextromethorphan are found in child’s possession
  • Child denies using common street drugs or alcohol but displays an unexplained altered state (confusion, ataxia, dizziness, euphoria, or slowed mental processing) or nausea, vomiting, or dizziness (from dextromethorphan withdrawal)
  • Child hangs out with peers in drug stores or supermarkets
  • Using cough syrup to get high has become a fad in child’s school or peer group
He claims that about one-third of his peer group has tried dextromethorphan to get high, although he believes

WHO ABUSES ‘DXM’?

The prevalence of dextromethorphan abuse is unclear.8 Abuse has been reported in Sweden, Canada, Australia, Germany, and the United States.1 Sweden has allowed prescription-only sales as a deterrent to abuse since 1986.9

The literature and our experience in treating dextromethorphan abusers suggest that abuse often begins in late childhood or early adolescence but may continue as chronic behavior in adulthood.

Use by adolescents. Case reports note episodic or fad dextromethorphan use—usually by adolescents and young adults—that springs up in a region or within a group and then fades.8 An abuse epidemic by Utah adolescents in the 1980s led drug stores to voluntarily place dextromethorphan-containing products behind the pharmacy counter to monitor and deter purchases.10

In a study of 376 students in grades 4 through 12 in Albuquerque, New Mexico, many knew cough syrup could be used to “get high.” When shown a list of cough syrup brand names, they often could identify those containing dextromethorphan, including NyQuil, Robitussin-DM, and Vicks 44D. The rates at which the students knew these three common cough preparations could be abused were:

  • 46%, 25%, and 16%, respectively, for high school students
  • 20%, 10%, and 17% for middle schoolers.8
Because many youngsters know that dextromethorphan abuse can produce an altered state, clinicians need to educate parents to be alert for warning signs in their children (Box 2).

Use by adults. Substance abuse counselors at our agency all have worked with adults who use cough syrup for intoxication. Some adults say they use dextromethorphan to enjoy the high and others as an alternative to alcohol.

A ‘HIGH’ WITH 4 PLATEAUS

Many Internet sites carry information about dextromethorphan.11-13 Its altered state is called a plateau, and four plateaus have been described.

Lower plateaus are considered “recreational.”13 According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), users experience a sense of dissociation and distortion of time and space at doses of about 2 ounces of medication containing 15 to 30 mg of dextromethorphan.14

Users are said to try to attain plateaus 1 or 2 to enhance and enjoy their surroundings. They describe music as being richer, colors more intense, and conversation more meaningful. The experience is said to be similar to a marijuana high or alcohol intoxication.

 

 

Objects may appear disproportionately large or small. The normal rhythm of conversation may seem chopped into blocks of words, or words may echo. Users refer to this staccato or strobing quality of sound as “flanging.”13 The bodily experience has been described as dreamlike or as if standing on a wave.

The high at lower plateaus is generally described as a positive experience. However, some describe it as bizarre, weird, and disturbing. It can create panic, nausea, and vomiting.

Upper plateaus. Users consider plateaus 3 and 4 as less recreational and more “spiritual and introspective.”15 Substantial dissociation and hallucinations can occur with “heavy stoning”—which the NIDA defines as using 10 ounces or more of medication containing 15 to 30 mg of dextromethorphan.14 Web sites warn users not to try to attain the upper plateaus unless prepared to “sit it out” or be accompanied by a sober “sitter” to talk the user through a bad trip or get help if needed.13

RISK OF PSYCHOSIS AND DEATH

The upper plateaus of dextromethorphan abuse are described as “intense.” Users report hallucinations, time and space distortions, and out-of-body sensations. Some have reported contacting alien beings or spirits. Although some users report the higher plateaus as pleasant, others report them as “terrifying.”

Upper-level trips can result in panic attacks and psychosis. Case reports have documented dextromethorphan doses that resulted in emergency room visits for psychotic states. For example:

  • an adult was treated in the emergency room for psychosis after consuming an estimated 711 mg of dextromethorphan from cough syrup16
  • a 23-year-old was treated for agitation and hallucinations in an emergency room after consuming approximately 2,160 mg of dextromethorphan.17
Memory loss, disorganization, and altered consciousness appear to be temporary and resolve with discontinued use. Few persons experiment repeatedly with attaining the upper plateaus, an activity often followed by nausea, vomiting, and a hangover that lasts for days.

Research is lacking on long-term effects of regular dextromethorphan use. One study reported birth defects in chick embryos exposed to dextromethorphan.18

Fatalities. Dextromethorphan-related deaths have been documented.19 Causes of death include respiratory arrest, seizure, aspiration, and drug-drug interactions.20 Because dextromethorphan is usually not taken in pure form, effects of other drugs in cough syrup—such as bromide or chlorpheniramine—may contribute to the risk of side effects or death.21

Related resources

Disclosures

The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

References

1. Cranston JW, Yoast R. Abuse of dextromethorphan (letter). Arch Fam Med 1999;8:99-100.

2. Relling MV, Cherrie J, Schell MJ, et al. Lower prevalence of the debrisoquin oxidative poor metabolizers phenotype in American black and white subjects. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1991;50:308-13.

3. Bem JL, Peck R. Dextromethorphan: an overview of safety issues. Drug Saf 1992;7(3):190-9.

4. Harrison WM, McGarth PJ, Stewart JW, Quitkin F. MAOIs and hypertensive crisis: the role of OTC drugs. J Clin Psychiatry 1989;50:64-5.

5. Albertson TE. Dextromethorphan. In: Obon K (ed). Poisoning and drug overdose (3rd ed). Stanford, CT: Appleton and Lange, 1999;155-6.

6. Gilman AG, Rall TW, Nies AS, et al (eds). Goodman and Gilman’s the pharmacology basics of therapeutics (8th ed). New York: MacMillan, 1990;518.-

7. Helfer J, Oksuk MK. Psychoactive abuse potential of Robitussin-DM (letter). Am J Psychiatry 1990;147(5):672-3.

8. Noonan WC, Miller WR, Feeney DM. Dextromethorphan abuse among youth. Arch Fam Med 2000;9:791-2.

9. Rammer L, Holmgren P, Sandler H. Fatal intoxication by dextromethorphan: a report on two cases. Forensic Sci Int 1988;37:233-6.

10. McElwee NE, Veltri JC. Intentional abuse of dextromethorphan (DM) products: 1985 to 1988 statewide data (abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1990;32:355.-

11. White WE. DXM side effects and other things to avoid. Available at: http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/dxm/faq/dxm_side_effects.shtml. Accessed Jan. 4, 2005.

12. Brosien KG. Cough syrup: The over-the-counter underground drug of the 90s. Kent, OH: The Burr, 1997. Available at: http://www.burr.kent.edu/archives/1997/spring/cough/cough.html. Accessed Dec. 16, 2004.

13. White WE. Getting the most out of DXM. Available at: http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/dxm/faq/dxm_most.shtml. Accessed Jan. 4, 2005.

14. Nature and effects of dextromethorphan. National Institute on Drug Abuse. Research Report Series. Hallucinogens and dissociative drugs. Available at http://www.drugabuse.gov/ResearchReports/hallucinogens/halluc4.html. Accessed Jan. 4, 2005.

15. White W. Physiological effects of DXM. Available at: http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/dxm/faq/dxm_physiological.shtml. Accessed Dec. 16, 2004.

16. Price LH, Lebel J. Dextromethorphan-induced psychosis. Am J Psychiatry 2000;157(2):304.-

17. Wolfe TR, Caravati EM. Massive dextromethorphan ingestion and abuse. Am J Emerg Med 1995;13(2):174-6.

18. Andaloro VJ, Monaghan DT, Rosenquist TU. DXM and other methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists are teratogenic in the avian embryo model. Pediatr Res 1998;43(1):1-8.

19. Sederstrom J. Friley death attributed to cough medication. Iowa State Daily. Jan. 13, 2003.

20. Iowa State Poison Control Bulletin. Poisindex Management: Dextromethorphan summary of exposure. Sec. 0.2.1. Iowa City, IA: Iowa Statewide Poison Control Center, August 2002.

21. Coricidin (dextromethorphan + chlorpheniramine maleate) harm reduction Web site. Available at: http://www.coricidin.org/. Accessed Dec. 16, 2004.

References

1. Cranston JW, Yoast R. Abuse of dextromethorphan (letter). Arch Fam Med 1999;8:99-100.

2. Relling MV, Cherrie J, Schell MJ, et al. Lower prevalence of the debrisoquin oxidative poor metabolizers phenotype in American black and white subjects. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1991;50:308-13.

3. Bem JL, Peck R. Dextromethorphan: an overview of safety issues. Drug Saf 1992;7(3):190-9.

4. Harrison WM, McGarth PJ, Stewart JW, Quitkin F. MAOIs and hypertensive crisis: the role of OTC drugs. J Clin Psychiatry 1989;50:64-5.

5. Albertson TE. Dextromethorphan. In: Obon K (ed). Poisoning and drug overdose (3rd ed). Stanford, CT: Appleton and Lange, 1999;155-6.

6. Gilman AG, Rall TW, Nies AS, et al (eds). Goodman and Gilman’s the pharmacology basics of therapeutics (8th ed). New York: MacMillan, 1990;518.-

7. Helfer J, Oksuk MK. Psychoactive abuse potential of Robitussin-DM (letter). Am J Psychiatry 1990;147(5):672-3.

8. Noonan WC, Miller WR, Feeney DM. Dextromethorphan abuse among youth. Arch Fam Med 2000;9:791-2.

9. Rammer L, Holmgren P, Sandler H. Fatal intoxication by dextromethorphan: a report on two cases. Forensic Sci Int 1988;37:233-6.

10. McElwee NE, Veltri JC. Intentional abuse of dextromethorphan (DM) products: 1985 to 1988 statewide data (abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1990;32:355.-

11. White WE. DXM side effects and other things to avoid. Available at: http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/dxm/faq/dxm_side_effects.shtml. Accessed Jan. 4, 2005.

12. Brosien KG. Cough syrup: The over-the-counter underground drug of the 90s. Kent, OH: The Burr, 1997. Available at: http://www.burr.kent.edu/archives/1997/spring/cough/cough.html. Accessed Dec. 16, 2004.

13. White WE. Getting the most out of DXM. Available at: http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/dxm/faq/dxm_most.shtml. Accessed Jan. 4, 2005.

14. Nature and effects of dextromethorphan. National Institute on Drug Abuse. Research Report Series. Hallucinogens and dissociative drugs. Available at http://www.drugabuse.gov/ResearchReports/hallucinogens/halluc4.html. Accessed Jan. 4, 2005.

15. White W. Physiological effects of DXM. Available at: http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/dxm/faq/dxm_physiological.shtml. Accessed Dec. 16, 2004.

16. Price LH, Lebel J. Dextromethorphan-induced psychosis. Am J Psychiatry 2000;157(2):304.-

17. Wolfe TR, Caravati EM. Massive dextromethorphan ingestion and abuse. Am J Emerg Med 1995;13(2):174-6.

18. Andaloro VJ, Monaghan DT, Rosenquist TU. DXM and other methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists are teratogenic in the avian embryo model. Pediatr Res 1998;43(1):1-8.

19. Sederstrom J. Friley death attributed to cough medication. Iowa State Daily. Jan. 13, 2003.

20. Iowa State Poison Control Bulletin. Poisindex Management: Dextromethorphan summary of exposure. Sec. 0.2.1. Iowa City, IA: Iowa Statewide Poison Control Center, August 2002.

21. Coricidin (dextromethorphan + chlorpheniramine maleate) harm reduction Web site. Available at: http://www.coricidin.org/. Accessed Dec. 16, 2004.

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 04(02)
Issue
Current Psychiatry - 04(02)
Page Number
13-23
Page Number
13-23
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Dependence risk with chronic dextromethorphan abuse
Display Headline
Dependence risk with chronic dextromethorphan abuse
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article