Key clinical point: In premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC), treatment with ovarian function suppression (OFS) plus tamoxifen or OFS plus an aromatase inhibitor did not reduce the risk for recurrence compared with only tamoxifen therapy.

Major finding: Compared with tamoxifen alone, aromatase inhibitor + OFS (hazard ratio  0.76; 95% CI 0.38-1.33) or tamoxifen  + OFS (hazard ratio 0.87; 95% CI 0.50-1.45) did not significantly reduce the 5-year recurrence risk. However, the 5-year recurrence risk was reduced by 31% in patients who received tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor combined with OFS for 2 years or more vs less than 2 years (hazard ratio 0.69; 95% CI 0.54-0.90).

Study details: Findings are from a population-based, retrospective cohort study including 2647 premenopausal women with resected HR+ BC who initiated tamoxifen alone (n = 2260), tamoxifen + OFS (n = 232), or aromatase inhibitor + OFS (n = 155).

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Carole May Yates Memorial Endowment for Cancer Research. The authors did not declare any conflicts of interest.

Source: Basmadjian RB, Lupichuk S, Xu Y, Quan ML, Cheung WY, Brenner DR. Adjuvant ovarian function suppression in premenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(3):e242082 (Mar 13). doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.2082 Source

Key clinical point: In premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC), treatment with ovarian function suppression (OFS) plus tamoxifen or OFS plus an aromatase inhibitor did not reduce the risk for recurrence compared with only tamoxifen therapy.

Major finding: Compared with tamoxifen alone, aromatase inhibitor + OFS (hazard ratio  0.76; 95% CI 0.38-1.33) or tamoxifen  + OFS (hazard ratio 0.87; 95% CI 0.50-1.45) did not significantly reduce the 5-year recurrence risk. However, the 5-year recurrence risk was reduced by 31% in patients who received tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor combined with OFS for 2 years or more vs less than 2 years (hazard ratio 0.69; 95% CI 0.54-0.90).

Study details: Findings are from a population-based, retrospective cohort study including 2647 premenopausal women with resected HR+ BC who initiated tamoxifen alone (n = 2260), tamoxifen + OFS (n = 232), or aromatase inhibitor + OFS (n = 155).

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Carole May Yates Memorial Endowment for Cancer Research. The authors did not declare any conflicts of interest.

Source: Basmadjian RB, Lupichuk S, Xu Y, Quan ML, Cheung WY, Brenner DR. Adjuvant ovarian function suppression in premenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(3):e242082 (Mar 13). doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.2082 Source

Key clinical point: In premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC), treatment with ovarian function suppression (OFS) plus tamoxifen or OFS plus an aromatase inhibitor did not reduce the risk for recurrence compared with only tamoxifen therapy.

Major finding: Compared with tamoxifen alone, aromatase inhibitor + OFS (hazard ratio  0.76; 95% CI 0.38-1.33) or tamoxifen  + OFS (hazard ratio 0.87; 95% CI 0.50-1.45) did not significantly reduce the 5-year recurrence risk. However, the 5-year recurrence risk was reduced by 31% in patients who received tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor combined with OFS for 2 years or more vs less than 2 years (hazard ratio 0.69; 95% CI 0.54-0.90).

Study details: Findings are from a population-based, retrospective cohort study including 2647 premenopausal women with resected HR+ BC who initiated tamoxifen alone (n = 2260), tamoxifen + OFS (n = 232), or aromatase inhibitor + OFS (n = 155).

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Carole May Yates Memorial Endowment for Cancer Research. The authors did not declare any conflicts of interest.

Source: Basmadjian RB, Lupichuk S, Xu Y, Quan ML, Cheung WY, Brenner DR. Adjuvant ovarian function suppression in premenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(3):e242082 (Mar 13). doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.2082 Source

Key clinical point: Among patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) breast cancer (BC), adjuvant chemotherapy failed to improve survival outcomes in older women (age ≥ 80 years) but improved prognosis in women age 65-79 years.

Major finding: Adjuvant chemotherapy did not significantly improve overall survival (OS; P = .79) and cancer-specific survival (CSS; P = .091) outcomes in patients age 80 years and older. However, in patients age 65-79 years, adjuvant chemotherapy was effective in improving OS (P < .001) but not CSS (P = .092).

Study details: This retrospective cohort study included 45,762 women with HR+/HER2− BC, age 65-79 years (n = 38,128) or 80 years and older (n = 7634) from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, of whom 20.7% and 3.8%, respectively, received adjuvant chemotherapy.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Project '100 Foreign Experts Plan of Hebei Province,' China. The authors did not declare any conflicts of interest.

Source: Ma X, Wu S, Zhang X, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy and survival outcomes in older women with HR+/HER2- breast cancer: A propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study using the SEER database. BMJ Open. 2024;14:e078782. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078782 Source

Key clinical point: Among patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) breast cancer (BC), adjuvant chemotherapy failed to improve survival outcomes in older women (age ≥ 80 years) but improved prognosis in women age 65-79 years.

Major finding: Adjuvant chemotherapy did not significantly improve overall survival (OS; P = .79) and cancer-specific survival (CSS; P = .091) outcomes in patients age 80 years and older. However, in patients age 65-79 years, adjuvant chemotherapy was effective in improving OS (P < .001) but not CSS (P = .092).

Study details: This retrospective cohort study included 45,762 women with HR+/HER2− BC, age 65-79 years (n = 38,128) or 80 years and older (n = 7634) from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, of whom 20.7% and 3.8%, respectively, received adjuvant chemotherapy.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Project '100 Foreign Experts Plan of Hebei Province,' China. The authors did not declare any conflicts of interest.

Source: Ma X, Wu S, Zhang X, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy and survival outcomes in older women with HR+/HER2- breast cancer: A propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study using the SEER database. BMJ Open. 2024;14:e078782. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078782 Source

Key clinical point: Among patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) breast cancer (BC), adjuvant chemotherapy failed to improve survival outcomes in older women (age ≥ 80 years) but improved prognosis in women age 65-79 years.

Major finding: Adjuvant chemotherapy did not significantly improve overall survival (OS; P = .79) and cancer-specific survival (CSS; P = .091) outcomes in patients age 80 years and older. However, in patients age 65-79 years, adjuvant chemotherapy was effective in improving OS (P < .001) but not CSS (P = .092).

Study details: This retrospective cohort study included 45,762 women with HR+/HER2− BC, age 65-79 years (n = 38,128) or 80 years and older (n = 7634) from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, of whom 20.7% and 3.8%, respectively, received adjuvant chemotherapy.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Project '100 Foreign Experts Plan of Hebei Province,' China. The authors did not declare any conflicts of interest.

Source: Ma X, Wu S, Zhang X, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy and survival outcomes in older women with HR+/HER2- breast cancer: A propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study using the SEER database. BMJ Open. 2024;14:e078782. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078782 Source

Key clinical point: Exposure to antibiotics during neoadjuvant pembrolizumab treatment was associated with a high residual cancer burden (RCB) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−), stage II or III breast cancer (BC).

Major finding: During pembrolizumab treatment, antibiotic use was significantly correlated with RCB index (RCB index-coefficient 0.86; P = .01) and was associated with a higher mean RCB index compared with no use of antibiotics (1.80 vs 1.08).

Study details: This secondary analysis of the phase 2 I-SPY2 trial included 66 patients with HER2− stage II or III BC treated with pembrolizumab plus paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide, of which 27% of patients concurrently used antibiotics.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. Amit A. Kulkarni declared receiving institutional research funding and serving on advisory boards for various sources. The other authors declared no competing interests.

Source: Kulkarni AA, Jain A, Jewett PI, et al, and the ISPY2 Consortium. Association of antibiotic exposure with residual cancer burden in HER2-negative early stage breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2024;10:24 (Mar 26). doi: 10.1038/s41523-024-00630-w  Source

Key clinical point: Exposure to antibiotics during neoadjuvant pembrolizumab treatment was associated with a high residual cancer burden (RCB) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−), stage II or III breast cancer (BC).

Major finding: During pembrolizumab treatment, antibiotic use was significantly correlated with RCB index (RCB index-coefficient 0.86; P = .01) and was associated with a higher mean RCB index compared with no use of antibiotics (1.80 vs 1.08).

Study details: This secondary analysis of the phase 2 I-SPY2 trial included 66 patients with HER2− stage II or III BC treated with pembrolizumab plus paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide, of which 27% of patients concurrently used antibiotics.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. Amit A. Kulkarni declared receiving institutional research funding and serving on advisory boards for various sources. The other authors declared no competing interests.

Source: Kulkarni AA, Jain A, Jewett PI, et al, and the ISPY2 Consortium. Association of antibiotic exposure with residual cancer burden in HER2-negative early stage breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2024;10:24 (Mar 26). doi: 10.1038/s41523-024-00630-w  Source

Key clinical point: Exposure to antibiotics during neoadjuvant pembrolizumab treatment was associated with a high residual cancer burden (RCB) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−), stage II or III breast cancer (BC).

Major finding: During pembrolizumab treatment, antibiotic use was significantly correlated with RCB index (RCB index-coefficient 0.86; P = .01) and was associated with a higher mean RCB index compared with no use of antibiotics (1.80 vs 1.08).

Study details: This secondary analysis of the phase 2 I-SPY2 trial included 66 patients with HER2− stage II or III BC treated with pembrolizumab plus paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide, of which 27% of patients concurrently used antibiotics.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. Amit A. Kulkarni declared receiving institutional research funding and serving on advisory boards for various sources. The other authors declared no competing interests.

Source: Kulkarni AA, Jain A, Jewett PI, et al, and the ISPY2 Consortium. Association of antibiotic exposure with residual cancer burden in HER2-negative early stage breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2024;10:24 (Mar 26). doi: 10.1038/s41523-024-00630-w  Source

Key clinical point: Patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer (BC) who underwent radiation therapy were at a significantly higher risk of developing nonkeratinocyte skin cancers, particularly melanoma and hemangiosarcoma.

Major finding: Compared with the general population, the risk for nonkeratinocyte skin cancer in the skin of the breast or trunk was 57% higher (standardized incidence ratio [SIR] 1.57; 95% CI 1.45-1.7) after BC treatment with radiation therapy, with a 1.37-fold higher risk for melanoma (SIR 1.37; 95% CI 1.25-1.49) and 27.11-fold higher risk for hemangiosarcoma (SIR 27.11; 95% CI 21.6-33.61).

Study details: This population-based cohort study included 875,880 patients with newly diagnosed BC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database of which 50.3% of patients received radiation therapy.

Disclosures: This study did not declare any specific funding. Shawheen J. Rezaei declared being supported by Stanford University School of Medicine. Bernice Y. Kwong declared receiving personal fees from Novocure, Genentech, and Novartis. No other conflicts of interest were reported.

Source: Rezaei SJ, Eid E, Tang JY, et al. Incidence of nonkeratinocyte skin cancer after breast cancer radiation therapy. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(3):e241632 (Mar 8). doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.1632 Source

Key clinical point: Patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer (BC) who underwent radiation therapy were at a significantly higher risk of developing nonkeratinocyte skin cancers, particularly melanoma and hemangiosarcoma.

Major finding: Compared with the general population, the risk for nonkeratinocyte skin cancer in the skin of the breast or trunk was 57% higher (standardized incidence ratio [SIR] 1.57; 95% CI 1.45-1.7) after BC treatment with radiation therapy, with a 1.37-fold higher risk for melanoma (SIR 1.37; 95% CI 1.25-1.49) and 27.11-fold higher risk for hemangiosarcoma (SIR 27.11; 95% CI 21.6-33.61).

Study details: This population-based cohort study included 875,880 patients with newly diagnosed BC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database of which 50.3% of patients received radiation therapy.

Disclosures: This study did not declare any specific funding. Shawheen J. Rezaei declared being supported by Stanford University School of Medicine. Bernice Y. Kwong declared receiving personal fees from Novocure, Genentech, and Novartis. No other conflicts of interest were reported.

Source: Rezaei SJ, Eid E, Tang JY, et al. Incidence of nonkeratinocyte skin cancer after breast cancer radiation therapy. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(3):e241632 (Mar 8). doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.1632 Source

Key clinical point: Patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer (BC) who underwent radiation therapy were at a significantly higher risk of developing nonkeratinocyte skin cancers, particularly melanoma and hemangiosarcoma.

Major finding: Compared with the general population, the risk for nonkeratinocyte skin cancer in the skin of the breast or trunk was 57% higher (standardized incidence ratio [SIR] 1.57; 95% CI 1.45-1.7) after BC treatment with radiation therapy, with a 1.37-fold higher risk for melanoma (SIR 1.37; 95% CI 1.25-1.49) and 27.11-fold higher risk for hemangiosarcoma (SIR 27.11; 95% CI 21.6-33.61).

Study details: This population-based cohort study included 875,880 patients with newly diagnosed BC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database of which 50.3% of patients received radiation therapy.

Disclosures: This study did not declare any specific funding. Shawheen J. Rezaei declared being supported by Stanford University School of Medicine. Bernice Y. Kwong declared receiving personal fees from Novocure, Genentech, and Novartis. No other conflicts of interest were reported.

Source: Rezaei SJ, Eid E, Tang JY, et al. Incidence of nonkeratinocyte skin cancer after breast cancer radiation therapy. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(3):e241632 (Mar 8). doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.1632 Source

Key clinical point: MRI response can be used to identify patients with hormone receptor-negative (HR−), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer (BC) who may only require three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to achieve pathological complete response (pCR).

Major finding: After one to three cycles of chemotherapy, nearly one third of patients with HR−/HER2+ BC achieved radiological complete response (36%; 95% CI 30%-43%), of whom the majority of patients achieved pCR (88%; 95% CI 79%-94%). No treatment-related deaths were reported.

Study details: This phase 2 TRAIN-3 trial included 235 and 232 patients with stages II-III HR−/HER2+ and HR+/HER2+ BC, respectively, who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy once every 3 weeks for up to nine cycles and whose response was monitored using breast MRI after every three cycles and lymph node biopsy.

Disclosures: This study received unrestricted financial support from Roche Netherlands. Two authors declared receiving institutional research funding from or having other ties with various sources, including Roche.

Source: van der Voort A, Louis FM, van Ramshorst MS, et al, on behalf of the Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group. MRI-guided optimisation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy duration in stage II–III HER2-positive breast cancer (TRAIN-3): A multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2024 (Apr 5). doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00104-9 Source

Key clinical point: MRI response can be used to identify patients with hormone receptor-negative (HR−), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer (BC) who may only require three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to achieve pathological complete response (pCR).

Major finding: After one to three cycles of chemotherapy, nearly one third of patients with HR−/HER2+ BC achieved radiological complete response (36%; 95% CI 30%-43%), of whom the majority of patients achieved pCR (88%; 95% CI 79%-94%). No treatment-related deaths were reported.

Study details: This phase 2 TRAIN-3 trial included 235 and 232 patients with stages II-III HR−/HER2+ and HR+/HER2+ BC, respectively, who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy once every 3 weeks for up to nine cycles and whose response was monitored using breast MRI after every three cycles and lymph node biopsy.

Disclosures: This study received unrestricted financial support from Roche Netherlands. Two authors declared receiving institutional research funding from or having other ties with various sources, including Roche.

Source: van der Voort A, Louis FM, van Ramshorst MS, et al, on behalf of the Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group. MRI-guided optimisation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy duration in stage II–III HER2-positive breast cancer (TRAIN-3): A multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2024 (Apr 5). doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00104-9 Source

Key clinical point: MRI response can be used to identify patients with hormone receptor-negative (HR−), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer (BC) who may only require three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to achieve pathological complete response (pCR).

Major finding: After one to three cycles of chemotherapy, nearly one third of patients with HR−/HER2+ BC achieved radiological complete response (36%; 95% CI 30%-43%), of whom the majority of patients achieved pCR (88%; 95% CI 79%-94%). No treatment-related deaths were reported.

Study details: This phase 2 TRAIN-3 trial included 235 and 232 patients with stages II-III HR−/HER2+ and HR+/HER2+ BC, respectively, who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy once every 3 weeks for up to nine cycles and whose response was monitored using breast MRI after every three cycles and lymph node biopsy.

Disclosures: This study received unrestricted financial support from Roche Netherlands. Two authors declared receiving institutional research funding from or having other ties with various sources, including Roche.

Source: van der Voort A, Louis FM, van Ramshorst MS, et al, on behalf of the Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group. MRI-guided optimisation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy duration in stage II–III HER2-positive breast cancer (TRAIN-3): A multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2024 (Apr 5). doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00104-9 Source

Key clinical point: In patients with breast cancer (BC), premastectomy radiotherapy (PreMRT) followed by mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction (IMBR) is feasible, safe, and shortens the time required for breast reconstruction.

Major finding: At a median follow-up of 29.7 months, there were no complete flap losses, locoregional recurrences, distant metastases, or deaths in the 48 patients who completed mastectomy with IMBR. Patients could undergo mastectomy with IMBR as early as 3 weeks (median 23 days) after completing radiotherapy. No grade 3-4 radiotherapy-related toxic effect or discontinuation of radiotherapy was reported.

Study details: The study enrolled 49 patients with T0-T3, N0-N3b, M0 BC from the phase 2 SAPHIRE trial who received PreMRT and were randomly assigned to receive hypofractionated or conventionally fractionated regional nodal irradiation, followed by mastectomy and IMBR.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the US National Institutes of Health and others. Five authors declared receiving grants from or having other ties with various sources.

Source: Schaverien MV, Singh P, Smith BD, et al. Premastectomy radiotherapy and immediate breast reconstruction: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(4):e245217 (Apr 5). doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.5217 Source

Key clinical point: In patients with breast cancer (BC), premastectomy radiotherapy (PreMRT) followed by mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction (IMBR) is feasible, safe, and shortens the time required for breast reconstruction.

Major finding: At a median follow-up of 29.7 months, there were no complete flap losses, locoregional recurrences, distant metastases, or deaths in the 48 patients who completed mastectomy with IMBR. Patients could undergo mastectomy with IMBR as early as 3 weeks (median 23 days) after completing radiotherapy. No grade 3-4 radiotherapy-related toxic effect or discontinuation of radiotherapy was reported.

Study details: The study enrolled 49 patients with T0-T3, N0-N3b, M0 BC from the phase 2 SAPHIRE trial who received PreMRT and were randomly assigned to receive hypofractionated or conventionally fractionated regional nodal irradiation, followed by mastectomy and IMBR.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the US National Institutes of Health and others. Five authors declared receiving grants from or having other ties with various sources.

Source: Schaverien MV, Singh P, Smith BD, et al. Premastectomy radiotherapy and immediate breast reconstruction: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(4):e245217 (Apr 5). doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.5217 Source

Key clinical point: In patients with breast cancer (BC), premastectomy radiotherapy (PreMRT) followed by mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction (IMBR) is feasible, safe, and shortens the time required for breast reconstruction.

Major finding: At a median follow-up of 29.7 months, there were no complete flap losses, locoregional recurrences, distant metastases, or deaths in the 48 patients who completed mastectomy with IMBR. Patients could undergo mastectomy with IMBR as early as 3 weeks (median 23 days) after completing radiotherapy. No grade 3-4 radiotherapy-related toxic effect or discontinuation of radiotherapy was reported.

Study details: The study enrolled 49 patients with T0-T3, N0-N3b, M0 BC from the phase 2 SAPHIRE trial who received PreMRT and were randomly assigned to receive hypofractionated or conventionally fractionated regional nodal irradiation, followed by mastectomy and IMBR.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the US National Institutes of Health and others. Five authors declared receiving grants from or having other ties with various sources.

Source: Schaverien MV, Singh P, Smith BD, et al. Premastectomy radiotherapy and immediate breast reconstruction: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(4):e245217 (Apr 5). doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.5217 Source

Key clinical point: Higher levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) in breast cancer tissue was associated with improved survival outcomes in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who received locoregional therapy but no adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Major finding: At a median follow-up of 18 years, each 10% increase in TIL levels was associated with significantly improved invasive disease-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.92; 95% CI 0.89-0.94), overall survival (aHR 0.88; 95% CI 0.85-0.91), and recurrence-free survival outcomes (aHR 0.90; 95% CI 0.87-0.92).

Study details: This retrospective pooled analysis included 1966 patients with early-stage TNBC (stage I TNBC, 55%) who underwent surgery with or without radiotherapy but no adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Disclosures: This study was partly supported by grants from the Breast Cancer Research Foundation and others. Several authors declared ties with various sources.

Source: Leon-Ferre RA, Jonas SF, Salgado R, et al, for the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancer. JAMA. 2024;331:1135-1144 (Apr 2). doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.3056 Source

Key clinical point: Higher levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) in breast cancer tissue was associated with improved survival outcomes in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who received locoregional therapy but no adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Major finding: At a median follow-up of 18 years, each 10% increase in TIL levels was associated with significantly improved invasive disease-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.92; 95% CI 0.89-0.94), overall survival (aHR 0.88; 95% CI 0.85-0.91), and recurrence-free survival outcomes (aHR 0.90; 95% CI 0.87-0.92).

Study details: This retrospective pooled analysis included 1966 patients with early-stage TNBC (stage I TNBC, 55%) who underwent surgery with or without radiotherapy but no adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Disclosures: This study was partly supported by grants from the Breast Cancer Research Foundation and others. Several authors declared ties with various sources.

Source: Leon-Ferre RA, Jonas SF, Salgado R, et al, for the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancer. JAMA. 2024;331:1135-1144 (Apr 2). doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.3056 Source

Key clinical point: Higher levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) in breast cancer tissue was associated with improved survival outcomes in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who received locoregional therapy but no adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Major finding: At a median follow-up of 18 years, each 10% increase in TIL levels was associated with significantly improved invasive disease-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.92; 95% CI 0.89-0.94), overall survival (aHR 0.88; 95% CI 0.85-0.91), and recurrence-free survival outcomes (aHR 0.90; 95% CI 0.87-0.92).

Study details: This retrospective pooled analysis included 1966 patients with early-stage TNBC (stage I TNBC, 55%) who underwent surgery with or without radiotherapy but no adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Disclosures: This study was partly supported by grants from the Breast Cancer Research Foundation and others. Several authors declared ties with various sources.

Source: Leon-Ferre RA, Jonas SF, Salgado R, et al, for the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancer. JAMA. 2024;331:1135-1144 (Apr 2). doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.3056 Source

Key clinical point: Ribociclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) vs NSAI alone for 3 years significantly improved invasive disease-free survival in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) early breast cancer (BC).

Major finding: At 3 years, ribociclib + NSAI vs NSAI alone led to a 25.2% lower risk for invasive disease, recurrence, or death (hazard ratio 0.75; two-sided P = .003), with an absolute invasive disease-free survival benefit of 3.3% (90.4% vs 87.1%). No new safety signals were reported.

Study details: This prespecified interim analysis of the phase 3 NATALEE trial included 5101 patients with HR+/HER2− stage II or III early BC who were randomly assigned to receive ribociclib (dosage 400 mg/day for 21 consecutive days followed by 7 days off; duration 36 months) in combination with an NSAI or NSAI alone.

Disclosures: The trial was funded by Novartis. Six authors declared being employees of or holding stocks in Novartis. Several authors declared ties with various sources, including Novartis.

Source: Slamon D, Lipatov O, Nowecki Z, et al. Ribociclib plus endocrine therapy in early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2024;390:1080-1091 (Mar 20). doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2305488 Source

Key clinical point: Ribociclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) vs NSAI alone for 3 years significantly improved invasive disease-free survival in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) early breast cancer (BC).

Major finding: At 3 years, ribociclib + NSAI vs NSAI alone led to a 25.2% lower risk for invasive disease, recurrence, or death (hazard ratio 0.75; two-sided P = .003), with an absolute invasive disease-free survival benefit of 3.3% (90.4% vs 87.1%). No new safety signals were reported.

Study details: This prespecified interim analysis of the phase 3 NATALEE trial included 5101 patients with HR+/HER2− stage II or III early BC who were randomly assigned to receive ribociclib (dosage 400 mg/day for 21 consecutive days followed by 7 days off; duration 36 months) in combination with an NSAI or NSAI alone.

Disclosures: The trial was funded by Novartis. Six authors declared being employees of or holding stocks in Novartis. Several authors declared ties with various sources, including Novartis.

Source: Slamon D, Lipatov O, Nowecki Z, et al. Ribociclib plus endocrine therapy in early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2024;390:1080-1091 (Mar 20). doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2305488 Source

Key clinical point: Ribociclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) vs NSAI alone for 3 years significantly improved invasive disease-free survival in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) early breast cancer (BC).

Major finding: At 3 years, ribociclib + NSAI vs NSAI alone led to a 25.2% lower risk for invasive disease, recurrence, or death (hazard ratio 0.75; two-sided P = .003), with an absolute invasive disease-free survival benefit of 3.3% (90.4% vs 87.1%). No new safety signals were reported.

Study details: This prespecified interim analysis of the phase 3 NATALEE trial included 5101 patients with HR+/HER2− stage II or III early BC who were randomly assigned to receive ribociclib (dosage 400 mg/day for 21 consecutive days followed by 7 days off; duration 36 months) in combination with an NSAI or NSAI alone.

Disclosures: The trial was funded by Novartis. Six authors declared being employees of or holding stocks in Novartis. Several authors declared ties with various sources, including Novartis.

Source: Slamon D, Lipatov O, Nowecki Z, et al. Ribociclib plus endocrine therapy in early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2024;390:1080-1091 (Mar 20). doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2305488 Source

Key clinical point: Recurrence-free survival after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) yielded noninferior outcomes compared to complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer (BC) and one or two sentinel-node macrometastases.

Major finding: The estimated 5-year recurrence-free survival was comparable in the SLNB alone vs completion ALND group (89.7% [95% CI 87.5%-91.9%] vs 88.7% [95% CI 86.3%-91.1%]), with the hazard ratio for recurrence or death being significantly below the noninferiority margin (0.89; P < .001 for non-inferiority).

Study details: Findings are from the noninferiority trial, SENOMAC, which included 2540 patients with clinically node-negative primary T1 to T3 BC with one or two sentinel lymph-node macrometastases who were randomly assigned to undergo SLNB alone (n = 1335) or completion ALND (n = 1205).

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Swedish Research Council and others. Oreste D. Gentilini declared serving as a consultant for various sources. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: de Boniface J, Tvedskov TF, Rydén L, et al, for the SENOMAC Trialists’ Group. Omitting axillary dissection in breast cancer with sentinel-node metastases. N Engl J Med. 2024;390:1163-1175 (Apr 3). doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2313487 Source

Key clinical point: Recurrence-free survival after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) yielded noninferior outcomes compared to complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer (BC) and one or two sentinel-node macrometastases.

Major finding: The estimated 5-year recurrence-free survival was comparable in the SLNB alone vs completion ALND group (89.7% [95% CI 87.5%-91.9%] vs 88.7% [95% CI 86.3%-91.1%]), with the hazard ratio for recurrence or death being significantly below the noninferiority margin (0.89; P < .001 for non-inferiority).

Study details: Findings are from the noninferiority trial, SENOMAC, which included 2540 patients with clinically node-negative primary T1 to T3 BC with one or two sentinel lymph-node macrometastases who were randomly assigned to undergo SLNB alone (n = 1335) or completion ALND (n = 1205).

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Swedish Research Council and others. Oreste D. Gentilini declared serving as a consultant for various sources. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: de Boniface J, Tvedskov TF, Rydén L, et al, for the SENOMAC Trialists’ Group. Omitting axillary dissection in breast cancer with sentinel-node metastases. N Engl J Med. 2024;390:1163-1175 (Apr 3). doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2313487 Source

Key clinical point: Recurrence-free survival after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) yielded noninferior outcomes compared to complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer (BC) and one or two sentinel-node macrometastases.

Major finding: The estimated 5-year recurrence-free survival was comparable in the SLNB alone vs completion ALND group (89.7% [95% CI 87.5%-91.9%] vs 88.7% [95% CI 86.3%-91.1%]), with the hazard ratio for recurrence or death being significantly below the noninferiority margin (0.89; P < .001 for non-inferiority).

Study details: Findings are from the noninferiority trial, SENOMAC, which included 2540 patients with clinically node-negative primary T1 to T3 BC with one or two sentinel lymph-node macrometastases who were randomly assigned to undergo SLNB alone (n = 1335) or completion ALND (n = 1205).

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Swedish Research Council and others. Oreste D. Gentilini declared serving as a consultant for various sources. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: de Boniface J, Tvedskov TF, Rydén L, et al, for the SENOMAC Trialists’ Group. Omitting axillary dissection in breast cancer with sentinel-node metastases. N Engl J Med. 2024;390:1163-1175 (Apr 3). doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2313487 Source

If your gut is telling you that your disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) aren’t working as well as they should, listen to it.

That’s the advice of Rebecca B. Blank, MD, PhD, a rheumatologist at NYU Langone Health in New York City, who studies methods for modulating the gut microbiome to enhance DMARD efficacy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

“The baseline gut microbiome can predict patient responsiveness to methotrexate,” said Dr. Blank at the 2024 Rheumatoid Arthritis Research Summit, presented by the Arthritis Foundation and the Hospital for Special Surgery in New York City.

Dr. Blank and colleagues are investigating how the intestinal microbiome may influence drug metabolism and the therapeutic potential of short-chain fatty acids for improving the efficacy of methotrexate in patients with RA.
 

Mucosal Barrier Disruption

There are myriad factors contributing to the development and progression of RA, including dysbiosis, or disruption, of the mucosal barrier, Dr. Blank explained.

“Dysbiosis can be detected in at-risk individuals before clinical signs of rheumatoid arthritis even occur,” she said.

Dr. Blank cited a 2021 study of the gut-joint axis in RA,which indicated that subclinical inflammation in the oral, gut, and/or lung mucosa may lead to inflammatory arthritis.

“When there’s a break in the mucosal barrier, either bacteria or their bacterial products can translocate into the lamina propria and then lead to an inflammatory T-cell response, and in addition, bacteria or their products can induce auto-antibody formation, which can then lead to joint inflammation,” she said.

Dr. Blank and colleagues, as well as other research groups, showed that gut bacterial colonization by Prevotella copri can induce an inflammatory response in gut lamina propria, and that people with RA have increased abundance of P copri relative to people without RA.
 

DMARD Resistance

To see whether microbial dysbiosis might play a role in DMARD-resistant RA, Dr. Blank and her team looked at patients with new-onset RA who were scheduled for treatment with methotrexate as their first-line medication. They classified responders as those patients with a change in Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) of at least 1.8 points.

They then conducted 16S rRNA sequencing and shotgun sequencing on patient fecal samples taken at baseline to determine whether baseline microbiome differences might contribute to responses to methotrexate.

“And so indeed, we were able to find a human gut microbial signature that predicted methotrexate responsiveness in these baseline microbiome samples,” Dr. Blank said.

They identified 462 differences in gene orthologs (ie, genes preserved during evolution and speciation) that differed between responders and nonresponders, narrowed the list down to the top 38, and then developed a predictive model for response to methotrexate with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.84.

The investigators then cultured fecal baseline samples with methotrexate to see how levels of the drug would be affected over time and found that samples from nonresponders metabolized methotrexate at a faster rate than samples from patients who had clinical responses to the drug.

Their work was further supported by colleagues at the University of California San Francisco, who found evidence in mouse models to suggest that microbial metabolism plays a role in methotrexate levels in plasma.
 

Modulating the Gut

“Our next question was: Can we modulate the gut microbiome to improve methotrexate efficacy?” Dr. Blank said.

They considered probiotics and prebiotics as possible means for modulating gut microbiota, but evidence of efficacy for these agents has been decidedly mixed, she noted.

Instead, the investigators focused on short-chain fatty acids, gut microbial fermentation byproducts of indigestible carbohydrates, which have been demonstrated to help improve gut mucosal barrier integrity and promote a more tolerant immune response.

One such short-chain fatty acid, butyrate, is produced through microbial fermentation of dietary fiber in the colon; it is available in various foods and in supplement form.

Butyrate has been shown to ameliorate inflammatory arthritis in a collagen-induced arthritis model, and in this model, methotrexate efficacy was increased with the addition of butyrate or butyrate-producing bacterial species.

Dr. Blank and colleagues compared patients with new-onset RA treated with methotrexate alone or methotrexate plus butyrate for 4 months and looked at up to 2 months of methotrexate plus butyrate treatment in patients who had suboptimal response to methotrexate alone.

In preliminary analyses, they found that at baseline, fecal butyrate was significantly elevated in methotrexate responders compared with in nonresponders. In addition, in the new-onset RA cohort, they saw that the 4-month responsiveness rate was 52.6% for those treated with methotrexate compared with 64.7% for those treated with methotrexate plus butyrate.

“Although this difference was not statistically significant, it’s exciting to think we may have an impact. What’s more, we were really excited to find that oral butyrate can lead to increased microbial diversity,” she said.
 

What Are You Measuring?

In the Q & A following the presentation, Clifton O. Bingham III, MD, director of the Johns Hopkins Arthritis Center in Baltimore, Maryland, commented that “the definitions of response and nonresponse are quite variable, depending on the studies that you use, and I think this is potentially a real problem for this entire line of investigation.”

Johns Hopkins Medicine, Johns Hopkins Division of Rheumatology

He noted that the DAS28, as used by Dr. Blank and colleagues, was developed in 1993, and that American College of Rheumatology response criteria, employed by other investigators who also presented during the session, were developed in 1990.

“It was a very different world when those criteria and those response indices were developed for patients with a very different disease from what we know as RA today,” he said.

He added that “I see a tremendous need for the rheumatology community to reevaluate what we define as responders and nonresponders, so that in all of these studies that are being done around the world, there is one definition that we understand [for] someone who is doing better, responding, or not responding.”

Dr. Blank’s work is supported by NYU, the Arthritis Foundation, and the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases. She reported having no conflicts of interest to disclose. Dr. Bingham had no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.

A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.

If your gut is telling you that your disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) aren’t working as well as they should, listen to it.

That’s the advice of Rebecca B. Blank, MD, PhD, a rheumatologist at NYU Langone Health in New York City, who studies methods for modulating the gut microbiome to enhance DMARD efficacy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

“The baseline gut microbiome can predict patient responsiveness to methotrexate,” said Dr. Blank at the 2024 Rheumatoid Arthritis Research Summit, presented by the Arthritis Foundation and the Hospital for Special Surgery in New York City.

Dr. Blank and colleagues are investigating how the intestinal microbiome may influence drug metabolism and the therapeutic potential of short-chain fatty acids for improving the efficacy of methotrexate in patients with RA.
 

Mucosal Barrier Disruption

There are myriad factors contributing to the development and progression of RA, including dysbiosis, or disruption, of the mucosal barrier, Dr. Blank explained.

“Dysbiosis can be detected in at-risk individuals before clinical signs of rheumatoid arthritis even occur,” she said.

Dr. Blank cited a 2021 study of the gut-joint axis in RA,which indicated that subclinical inflammation in the oral, gut, and/or lung mucosa may lead to inflammatory arthritis.

“When there’s a break in the mucosal barrier, either bacteria or their bacterial products can translocate into the lamina propria and then lead to an inflammatory T-cell response, and in addition, bacteria or their products can induce auto-antibody formation, which can then lead to joint inflammation,” she said.

Dr. Blank and colleagues, as well as other research groups, showed that gut bacterial colonization by Prevotella copri can induce an inflammatory response in gut lamina propria, and that people with RA have increased abundance of P copri relative to people without RA.
 

DMARD Resistance

To see whether microbial dysbiosis might play a role in DMARD-resistant RA, Dr. Blank and her team looked at patients with new-onset RA who were scheduled for treatment with methotrexate as their first-line medication. They classified responders as those patients with a change in Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) of at least 1.8 points.

They then conducted 16S rRNA sequencing and shotgun sequencing on patient fecal samples taken at baseline to determine whether baseline microbiome differences might contribute to responses to methotrexate.

“And so indeed, we were able to find a human gut microbial signature that predicted methotrexate responsiveness in these baseline microbiome samples,” Dr. Blank said.

They identified 462 differences in gene orthologs (ie, genes preserved during evolution and speciation) that differed between responders and nonresponders, narrowed the list down to the top 38, and then developed a predictive model for response to methotrexate with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.84.

The investigators then cultured fecal baseline samples with methotrexate to see how levels of the drug would be affected over time and found that samples from nonresponders metabolized methotrexate at a faster rate than samples from patients who had clinical responses to the drug.

Their work was further supported by colleagues at the University of California San Francisco, who found evidence in mouse models to suggest that microbial metabolism plays a role in methotrexate levels in plasma.
 

Modulating the Gut

“Our next question was: Can we modulate the gut microbiome to improve methotrexate efficacy?” Dr. Blank said.

They considered probiotics and prebiotics as possible means for modulating gut microbiota, but evidence of efficacy for these agents has been decidedly mixed, she noted.

Instead, the investigators focused on short-chain fatty acids, gut microbial fermentation byproducts of indigestible carbohydrates, which have been demonstrated to help improve gut mucosal barrier integrity and promote a more tolerant immune response.

One such short-chain fatty acid, butyrate, is produced through microbial fermentation of dietary fiber in the colon; it is available in various foods and in supplement form.

Butyrate has been shown to ameliorate inflammatory arthritis in a collagen-induced arthritis model, and in this model, methotrexate efficacy was increased with the addition of butyrate or butyrate-producing bacterial species.

Dr. Blank and colleagues compared patients with new-onset RA treated with methotrexate alone or methotrexate plus butyrate for 4 months and looked at up to 2 months of methotrexate plus butyrate treatment in patients who had suboptimal response to methotrexate alone.

In preliminary analyses, they found that at baseline, fecal butyrate was significantly elevated in methotrexate responders compared with in nonresponders. In addition, in the new-onset RA cohort, they saw that the 4-month responsiveness rate was 52.6% for those treated with methotrexate compared with 64.7% for those treated with methotrexate plus butyrate.

“Although this difference was not statistically significant, it’s exciting to think we may have an impact. What’s more, we were really excited to find that oral butyrate can lead to increased microbial diversity,” she said.
 

What Are You Measuring?

In the Q & A following the presentation, Clifton O. Bingham III, MD, director of the Johns Hopkins Arthritis Center in Baltimore, Maryland, commented that “the definitions of response and nonresponse are quite variable, depending on the studies that you use, and I think this is potentially a real problem for this entire line of investigation.”

Johns Hopkins Medicine, Johns Hopkins Division of Rheumatology

He noted that the DAS28, as used by Dr. Blank and colleagues, was developed in 1993, and that American College of Rheumatology response criteria, employed by other investigators who also presented during the session, were developed in 1990.

“It was a very different world when those criteria and those response indices were developed for patients with a very different disease from what we know as RA today,” he said.

He added that “I see a tremendous need for the rheumatology community to reevaluate what we define as responders and nonresponders, so that in all of these studies that are being done around the world, there is one definition that we understand [for] someone who is doing better, responding, or not responding.”

Dr. Blank’s work is supported by NYU, the Arthritis Foundation, and the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases. She reported having no conflicts of interest to disclose. Dr. Bingham had no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.

A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.

If your gut is telling you that your disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) aren’t working as well as they should, listen to it.

That’s the advice of Rebecca B. Blank, MD, PhD, a rheumatologist at NYU Langone Health in New York City, who studies methods for modulating the gut microbiome to enhance DMARD efficacy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

“The baseline gut microbiome can predict patient responsiveness to methotrexate,” said Dr. Blank at the 2024 Rheumatoid Arthritis Research Summit, presented by the Arthritis Foundation and the Hospital for Special Surgery in New York City.

Dr. Blank and colleagues are investigating how the intestinal microbiome may influence drug metabolism and the therapeutic potential of short-chain fatty acids for improving the efficacy of methotrexate in patients with RA.
 

Mucosal Barrier Disruption

There are myriad factors contributing to the development and progression of RA, including dysbiosis, or disruption, of the mucosal barrier, Dr. Blank explained.

“Dysbiosis can be detected in at-risk individuals before clinical signs of rheumatoid arthritis even occur,” she said.

Dr. Blank cited a 2021 study of the gut-joint axis in RA,which indicated that subclinical inflammation in the oral, gut, and/or lung mucosa may lead to inflammatory arthritis.

“When there’s a break in the mucosal barrier, either bacteria or their bacterial products can translocate into the lamina propria and then lead to an inflammatory T-cell response, and in addition, bacteria or their products can induce auto-antibody formation, which can then lead to joint inflammation,” she said.

Dr. Blank and colleagues, as well as other research groups, showed that gut bacterial colonization by Prevotella copri can induce an inflammatory response in gut lamina propria, and that people with RA have increased abundance of P copri relative to people without RA.
 

DMARD Resistance

To see whether microbial dysbiosis might play a role in DMARD-resistant RA, Dr. Blank and her team looked at patients with new-onset RA who were scheduled for treatment with methotrexate as their first-line medication. They classified responders as those patients with a change in Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) of at least 1.8 points.

They then conducted 16S rRNA sequencing and shotgun sequencing on patient fecal samples taken at baseline to determine whether baseline microbiome differences might contribute to responses to methotrexate.

“And so indeed, we were able to find a human gut microbial signature that predicted methotrexate responsiveness in these baseline microbiome samples,” Dr. Blank said.

They identified 462 differences in gene orthologs (ie, genes preserved during evolution and speciation) that differed between responders and nonresponders, narrowed the list down to the top 38, and then developed a predictive model for response to methotrexate with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.84.

The investigators then cultured fecal baseline samples with methotrexate to see how levels of the drug would be affected over time and found that samples from nonresponders metabolized methotrexate at a faster rate than samples from patients who had clinical responses to the drug.

Their work was further supported by colleagues at the University of California San Francisco, who found evidence in mouse models to suggest that microbial metabolism plays a role in methotrexate levels in plasma.
 

Modulating the Gut

“Our next question was: Can we modulate the gut microbiome to improve methotrexate efficacy?” Dr. Blank said.

They considered probiotics and prebiotics as possible means for modulating gut microbiota, but evidence of efficacy for these agents has been decidedly mixed, she noted.

Instead, the investigators focused on short-chain fatty acids, gut microbial fermentation byproducts of indigestible carbohydrates, which have been demonstrated to help improve gut mucosal barrier integrity and promote a more tolerant immune response.

One such short-chain fatty acid, butyrate, is produced through microbial fermentation of dietary fiber in the colon; it is available in various foods and in supplement form.

Butyrate has been shown to ameliorate inflammatory arthritis in a collagen-induced arthritis model, and in this model, methotrexate efficacy was increased with the addition of butyrate or butyrate-producing bacterial species.

Dr. Blank and colleagues compared patients with new-onset RA treated with methotrexate alone or methotrexate plus butyrate for 4 months and looked at up to 2 months of methotrexate plus butyrate treatment in patients who had suboptimal response to methotrexate alone.

In preliminary analyses, they found that at baseline, fecal butyrate was significantly elevated in methotrexate responders compared with in nonresponders. In addition, in the new-onset RA cohort, they saw that the 4-month responsiveness rate was 52.6% for those treated with methotrexate compared with 64.7% for those treated with methotrexate plus butyrate.

“Although this difference was not statistically significant, it’s exciting to think we may have an impact. What’s more, we were really excited to find that oral butyrate can lead to increased microbial diversity,” she said.
 

What Are You Measuring?

In the Q & A following the presentation, Clifton O. Bingham III, MD, director of the Johns Hopkins Arthritis Center in Baltimore, Maryland, commented that “the definitions of response and nonresponse are quite variable, depending on the studies that you use, and I think this is potentially a real problem for this entire line of investigation.”

Johns Hopkins Medicine, Johns Hopkins Division of Rheumatology

He noted that the DAS28, as used by Dr. Blank and colleagues, was developed in 1993, and that American College of Rheumatology response criteria, employed by other investigators who also presented during the session, were developed in 1990.

“It was a very different world when those criteria and those response indices were developed for patients with a very different disease from what we know as RA today,” he said.

He added that “I see a tremendous need for the rheumatology community to reevaluate what we define as responders and nonresponders, so that in all of these studies that are being done around the world, there is one definition that we understand [for] someone who is doing better, responding, or not responding.”

Dr. Blank’s work is supported by NYU, the Arthritis Foundation, and the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases. She reported having no conflicts of interest to disclose. Dr. Bingham had no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.

A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.