User login
Interleukin-1 antagonist boosts testosterone in obese men
CHICAGO – according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
The treatment helps patients by targeting testosterone deficiency associated with metabolic syndrome as well as inflammation associated with hypogonadism.
“Antagonism of the interleukin inflammatory pathway led to improved endogenous testosterone production,” said presenter Fahim Ebrahimi, MD, of the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland. “Even with a clinical period so short, only 4 weeks, we have seen reduced blood pressure and increased grip strength.”
A total of 70 men with metabolic syndrome and hypergonadism from the University Hospital in Basel and Kantonsspital Aarau, Switzerland, were included in the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Patients were mostly white, 54-year-old men with an average body mass index of 37 kg/m2.
Testosterone levels at baseline were an average of 9.6 nmol/L in the placebo group and 9.1 nmol/L in the test group.
Dr. Ebrahimi and his colleagues randomly assigned patients to either the IL-1 antagonist treatment anakinra, or a placebo for 4 weeks.
Total testosterone levels in the treatment group rose 11% over 4 weeks, ending the trial with an average level 0.96 nmol/L higher than the placebo group, according to the investigators.
Evidence of the positive effects of the anti-inflammatory were clear when patients were broken into subgroups based on baseline inflammation levels.
Patients who did not have baseline inflammation did not respond to treatment, while patients with a baseline CRP level higher than 2 mg/l had an increase of 2.14 nmol/L, explained Dr. Ebrahimi.
Treatment response also increased with increased body mass index, with patients who had a BMI above 40 kg/m2 seeing testosterone levels improve by 2.64 nmol/L.
Along with higher testosterone, patients in the test group experienced improved grip strength and blood pressure.
Investigators chose targeting IL-1 receptor antagonist specifically because of previous successes with other conditions.
“We chose IL-1 because it has shown previous, very beneficial effects on glucose metabolism, with reductions of A1c, and is well tolerated,” Dr. Ebrahimi said in response to a question from the audience.
Dr. Ebrahimi and fellow investigators believe this study will help open the door on unanswered questions related to the cardiovascular safety of this kind of treatment.
“These data will have a clinical impact, especially against the background of the recently published data from the large randomized trial, which has shown that IL-1 antagonism in these patients lead to a significant reduction in cardiovascular mortality,” Dr. Ebrahimi said. “We also still do not know if this treatment is possibly harmful to the patient on cardiovascular outcomes.”
The investigators reported no relevant financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Ebrahimi F. et al. ENDO 2018, Abstract OR15-6.
CHICAGO – according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
The treatment helps patients by targeting testosterone deficiency associated with metabolic syndrome as well as inflammation associated with hypogonadism.
“Antagonism of the interleukin inflammatory pathway led to improved endogenous testosterone production,” said presenter Fahim Ebrahimi, MD, of the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland. “Even with a clinical period so short, only 4 weeks, we have seen reduced blood pressure and increased grip strength.”
A total of 70 men with metabolic syndrome and hypergonadism from the University Hospital in Basel and Kantonsspital Aarau, Switzerland, were included in the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Patients were mostly white, 54-year-old men with an average body mass index of 37 kg/m2.
Testosterone levels at baseline were an average of 9.6 nmol/L in the placebo group and 9.1 nmol/L in the test group.
Dr. Ebrahimi and his colleagues randomly assigned patients to either the IL-1 antagonist treatment anakinra, or a placebo for 4 weeks.
Total testosterone levels in the treatment group rose 11% over 4 weeks, ending the trial with an average level 0.96 nmol/L higher than the placebo group, according to the investigators.
Evidence of the positive effects of the anti-inflammatory were clear when patients were broken into subgroups based on baseline inflammation levels.
Patients who did not have baseline inflammation did not respond to treatment, while patients with a baseline CRP level higher than 2 mg/l had an increase of 2.14 nmol/L, explained Dr. Ebrahimi.
Treatment response also increased with increased body mass index, with patients who had a BMI above 40 kg/m2 seeing testosterone levels improve by 2.64 nmol/L.
Along with higher testosterone, patients in the test group experienced improved grip strength and blood pressure.
Investigators chose targeting IL-1 receptor antagonist specifically because of previous successes with other conditions.
“We chose IL-1 because it has shown previous, very beneficial effects on glucose metabolism, with reductions of A1c, and is well tolerated,” Dr. Ebrahimi said in response to a question from the audience.
Dr. Ebrahimi and fellow investigators believe this study will help open the door on unanswered questions related to the cardiovascular safety of this kind of treatment.
“These data will have a clinical impact, especially against the background of the recently published data from the large randomized trial, which has shown that IL-1 antagonism in these patients lead to a significant reduction in cardiovascular mortality,” Dr. Ebrahimi said. “We also still do not know if this treatment is possibly harmful to the patient on cardiovascular outcomes.”
The investigators reported no relevant financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Ebrahimi F. et al. ENDO 2018, Abstract OR15-6.
CHICAGO – according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
The treatment helps patients by targeting testosterone deficiency associated with metabolic syndrome as well as inflammation associated with hypogonadism.
“Antagonism of the interleukin inflammatory pathway led to improved endogenous testosterone production,” said presenter Fahim Ebrahimi, MD, of the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland. “Even with a clinical period so short, only 4 weeks, we have seen reduced blood pressure and increased grip strength.”
A total of 70 men with metabolic syndrome and hypergonadism from the University Hospital in Basel and Kantonsspital Aarau, Switzerland, were included in the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Patients were mostly white, 54-year-old men with an average body mass index of 37 kg/m2.
Testosterone levels at baseline were an average of 9.6 nmol/L in the placebo group and 9.1 nmol/L in the test group.
Dr. Ebrahimi and his colleagues randomly assigned patients to either the IL-1 antagonist treatment anakinra, or a placebo for 4 weeks.
Total testosterone levels in the treatment group rose 11% over 4 weeks, ending the trial with an average level 0.96 nmol/L higher than the placebo group, according to the investigators.
Evidence of the positive effects of the anti-inflammatory were clear when patients were broken into subgroups based on baseline inflammation levels.
Patients who did not have baseline inflammation did not respond to treatment, while patients with a baseline CRP level higher than 2 mg/l had an increase of 2.14 nmol/L, explained Dr. Ebrahimi.
Treatment response also increased with increased body mass index, with patients who had a BMI above 40 kg/m2 seeing testosterone levels improve by 2.64 nmol/L.
Along with higher testosterone, patients in the test group experienced improved grip strength and blood pressure.
Investigators chose targeting IL-1 receptor antagonist specifically because of previous successes with other conditions.
“We chose IL-1 because it has shown previous, very beneficial effects on glucose metabolism, with reductions of A1c, and is well tolerated,” Dr. Ebrahimi said in response to a question from the audience.
Dr. Ebrahimi and fellow investigators believe this study will help open the door on unanswered questions related to the cardiovascular safety of this kind of treatment.
“These data will have a clinical impact, especially against the background of the recently published data from the large randomized trial, which has shown that IL-1 antagonism in these patients lead to a significant reduction in cardiovascular mortality,” Dr. Ebrahimi said. “We also still do not know if this treatment is possibly harmful to the patient on cardiovascular outcomes.”
The investigators reported no relevant financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Ebrahimi F. et al. ENDO 2018, Abstract OR15-6.
REPORTING FROM ENDO 2018
Key clinical point: IL-1 receptor antagonist improved testosterone production for obese hypergonadal men.
Major finding: Total testosterone levels increased by 1.2 nmol/L (95% confidence interval, 0.3-2; P = .012) in treatment group, compared with no change in placebo after 4 weeks.
Study details: Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 70 male obese patients gathered from the University Hospital Basel and Kantonsspital Aarau, Switzerland.
Disclosures: The investigators reported no relevant financial disclosures.
Source: Ebrahimi F et al. ENDO 2018, Abstract OR15-6.
Balance risk with reality for pre-conception diabetic counseling
CHICAGO – In particular, “several retrospective studies have shown that the risk for congenital malformations is increased with higher hemoglobin A1c levels,” said Susan Kirk, MD, speaking at a “Meet the Professor” session at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
However, pointed out Dr. Kirk, fact-based counseling about pregnancy risks for women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes can – and should – occur within the framework of a strong and accepting physician-patient relationship.
Most women with diabetes have received pre-conception counseling about the risks of pregnancy with diabetes and the importance of glycemic control. “Despite that, I think many of us are often surprised by the percentage of unplanned pregnancies,” said Dr. Kirk, of the University of Virginia, Charlottesville, in an interview.
“What I have learned is that the desire to become pregnant is so strong, and the contemplation of all the adverse events that can happen … is really scary, not only to the woman but to her partner as well.”
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
Dr. Kirk continued, “The more compassion you can show, and the more emphasis that you can place on the fact that she’s most likely to have a healthy baby, the chances are she’ll work with you from the beginning to get her control where she needs to be.”
Target numbers for hemoglobin A1c have become lower over the past several years, with the American Diabetes Association now recommending pre-conception levels below 6.5%. “There’s no randomized controlled trial that defines what that ideal number should be, but with the passage of time and some larger studies, we now know that ‘as close to normal as possible’ should be the goal,” Dr. Kirk said. This means that if women can tolerate the lower blood glucose levels without serious symptoms of hypoglycemia, a level of less than 6% is more preferable still, she said.
In terms of medication management for women with diabetes who become pregnant, physicians need to think about angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and statins, both of which are contraindicated for use during pregnancy. If a patient is pregnant or trying for a pregnancy, “I will stop those, and either leave them off all medicine entirely, or transition them to something that’s safe for use during pregnancy,” said Dr. Kirk.
It’s important to know if women have any microvascular complications because these are likely to progress during pregnancy, said Dr. Kirk. “The good news is, it all goes back to where she started before pregnancy after she has the baby,” though pre-existing advanced renal disease or eye disease may still cause concern for permanent damage. “If there are changes in the back of the eye that are suggestive of proliferative retinopathy, she should absolutely try to get that taken care of before she gets pregnant.”
The use of prenatal vitamins is another area where strong evidence is lacking, said Dr. Kirk. What is known is the folic acid supplementation “has been proven beyond a doubt to lower the rate of neural tube complications. And it’s cheap, and it’s easy to take. So any woman who’s even hinting at getting pregnant should be placed on those,” she said.
Dr. Kirk had no financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Kirk S. ENDO 2018, Session M-02-3.
CHICAGO – In particular, “several retrospective studies have shown that the risk for congenital malformations is increased with higher hemoglobin A1c levels,” said Susan Kirk, MD, speaking at a “Meet the Professor” session at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
However, pointed out Dr. Kirk, fact-based counseling about pregnancy risks for women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes can – and should – occur within the framework of a strong and accepting physician-patient relationship.
Most women with diabetes have received pre-conception counseling about the risks of pregnancy with diabetes and the importance of glycemic control. “Despite that, I think many of us are often surprised by the percentage of unplanned pregnancies,” said Dr. Kirk, of the University of Virginia, Charlottesville, in an interview.
“What I have learned is that the desire to become pregnant is so strong, and the contemplation of all the adverse events that can happen … is really scary, not only to the woman but to her partner as well.”
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
Dr. Kirk continued, “The more compassion you can show, and the more emphasis that you can place on the fact that she’s most likely to have a healthy baby, the chances are she’ll work with you from the beginning to get her control where she needs to be.”
Target numbers for hemoglobin A1c have become lower over the past several years, with the American Diabetes Association now recommending pre-conception levels below 6.5%. “There’s no randomized controlled trial that defines what that ideal number should be, but with the passage of time and some larger studies, we now know that ‘as close to normal as possible’ should be the goal,” Dr. Kirk said. This means that if women can tolerate the lower blood glucose levels without serious symptoms of hypoglycemia, a level of less than 6% is more preferable still, she said.
In terms of medication management for women with diabetes who become pregnant, physicians need to think about angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and statins, both of which are contraindicated for use during pregnancy. If a patient is pregnant or trying for a pregnancy, “I will stop those, and either leave them off all medicine entirely, or transition them to something that’s safe for use during pregnancy,” said Dr. Kirk.
It’s important to know if women have any microvascular complications because these are likely to progress during pregnancy, said Dr. Kirk. “The good news is, it all goes back to where she started before pregnancy after she has the baby,” though pre-existing advanced renal disease or eye disease may still cause concern for permanent damage. “If there are changes in the back of the eye that are suggestive of proliferative retinopathy, she should absolutely try to get that taken care of before she gets pregnant.”
The use of prenatal vitamins is another area where strong evidence is lacking, said Dr. Kirk. What is known is the folic acid supplementation “has been proven beyond a doubt to lower the rate of neural tube complications. And it’s cheap, and it’s easy to take. So any woman who’s even hinting at getting pregnant should be placed on those,” she said.
Dr. Kirk had no financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Kirk S. ENDO 2018, Session M-02-3.
CHICAGO – In particular, “several retrospective studies have shown that the risk for congenital malformations is increased with higher hemoglobin A1c levels,” said Susan Kirk, MD, speaking at a “Meet the Professor” session at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
However, pointed out Dr. Kirk, fact-based counseling about pregnancy risks for women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes can – and should – occur within the framework of a strong and accepting physician-patient relationship.
Most women with diabetes have received pre-conception counseling about the risks of pregnancy with diabetes and the importance of glycemic control. “Despite that, I think many of us are often surprised by the percentage of unplanned pregnancies,” said Dr. Kirk, of the University of Virginia, Charlottesville, in an interview.
“What I have learned is that the desire to become pregnant is so strong, and the contemplation of all the adverse events that can happen … is really scary, not only to the woman but to her partner as well.”
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
Dr. Kirk continued, “The more compassion you can show, and the more emphasis that you can place on the fact that she’s most likely to have a healthy baby, the chances are she’ll work with you from the beginning to get her control where she needs to be.”
Target numbers for hemoglobin A1c have become lower over the past several years, with the American Diabetes Association now recommending pre-conception levels below 6.5%. “There’s no randomized controlled trial that defines what that ideal number should be, but with the passage of time and some larger studies, we now know that ‘as close to normal as possible’ should be the goal,” Dr. Kirk said. This means that if women can tolerate the lower blood glucose levels without serious symptoms of hypoglycemia, a level of less than 6% is more preferable still, she said.
In terms of medication management for women with diabetes who become pregnant, physicians need to think about angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and statins, both of which are contraindicated for use during pregnancy. If a patient is pregnant or trying for a pregnancy, “I will stop those, and either leave them off all medicine entirely, or transition them to something that’s safe for use during pregnancy,” said Dr. Kirk.
It’s important to know if women have any microvascular complications because these are likely to progress during pregnancy, said Dr. Kirk. “The good news is, it all goes back to where she started before pregnancy after she has the baby,” though pre-existing advanced renal disease or eye disease may still cause concern for permanent damage. “If there are changes in the back of the eye that are suggestive of proliferative retinopathy, she should absolutely try to get that taken care of before she gets pregnant.”
The use of prenatal vitamins is another area where strong evidence is lacking, said Dr. Kirk. What is known is the folic acid supplementation “has been proven beyond a doubt to lower the rate of neural tube complications. And it’s cheap, and it’s easy to take. So any woman who’s even hinting at getting pregnant should be placed on those,” she said.
Dr. Kirk had no financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Kirk S. ENDO 2018, Session M-02-3.
REPORTING FROM ENDO 2018
When it comes to thyroid cancer follow-up, serum microRNA profiles have earned new respect
CHICAGO –
The usual tool for trying to detect recurrence while following patients with papillary thyroid cancer after surgery has been the serum thyroglobulin assay. However, management of papillary thyroid cancer has become more conservative, involving lobectomy and isthmusectomy on the affected side rather than total gland resection. The benefit of the conservative approach is to avoid complications while maintaining an overall survival rate equivalent to the more extensive approach.
The investigators measured 754 miRNAs in serum samples of 11 patients with papillary thyroid cancer both before and 30 days after surgical thyroidectomy. They re-evaluated major candidate miRNAs using absolute quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis in an independent cohort of 44 other patients with papillary thyroid cancer or benign nodules or 20 healthy controls, Dr. Rosignolo said at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
The 2 miRNAs most significantly associated with thyroid tumors were then assessed in matched serum samples (before and 30 days, and 1 to 2 years after surgery) from the 20 PTC patients with complete follow-up datasets and results correlated with American Thyroid Association (ATA) responses to therapy.
Serum levels of both miRNAs after 1 to 2 years of follow-up were consistent with ATA responses to therapy in all patients, including two patients who developed structural evidence of disease whose thyroglobulin assay results remained negative (less than 1 ng/mL) for cancer recurrence.
Fifteen of the 20 patients had excellent or indeterminate responses to therapy as defined by 2015 ATA guidelines. In these 15 cases, and in the single patient with a biochemical incomplete response, expression levels of miR-146a-5p and miR-221-3p decreased after surgery and remained low at the 1- to 2-year visit.
It was a very different story for the 4 patients with structural incomplete responses at 1 to 2 years. In this subgroup, initial postoperative declines in serum miR-146a-5p and miR-221-3p levels were followed by increases to levels at the 1- to 2-year visit that were similar to or higher than those found prior to surgery.
The study was funded by the Umberto Di Mario Foundation, Banca d’Italia, University of Rome Sapienza, the program of Biotechnologies and Clinical Medicine of the University of Rome Sapienza, the European Medical Writers Association, and the Umberto Di Mario Foundation.
SOURCE: Rosignolo F et al. J Endo Soc. 2017;1(1)3-13. ENDO 2018, Abstract OR17-1.
CHICAGO –
The usual tool for trying to detect recurrence while following patients with papillary thyroid cancer after surgery has been the serum thyroglobulin assay. However, management of papillary thyroid cancer has become more conservative, involving lobectomy and isthmusectomy on the affected side rather than total gland resection. The benefit of the conservative approach is to avoid complications while maintaining an overall survival rate equivalent to the more extensive approach.
The investigators measured 754 miRNAs in serum samples of 11 patients with papillary thyroid cancer both before and 30 days after surgical thyroidectomy. They re-evaluated major candidate miRNAs using absolute quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis in an independent cohort of 44 other patients with papillary thyroid cancer or benign nodules or 20 healthy controls, Dr. Rosignolo said at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
The 2 miRNAs most significantly associated with thyroid tumors were then assessed in matched serum samples (before and 30 days, and 1 to 2 years after surgery) from the 20 PTC patients with complete follow-up datasets and results correlated with American Thyroid Association (ATA) responses to therapy.
Serum levels of both miRNAs after 1 to 2 years of follow-up were consistent with ATA responses to therapy in all patients, including two patients who developed structural evidence of disease whose thyroglobulin assay results remained negative (less than 1 ng/mL) for cancer recurrence.
Fifteen of the 20 patients had excellent or indeterminate responses to therapy as defined by 2015 ATA guidelines. In these 15 cases, and in the single patient with a biochemical incomplete response, expression levels of miR-146a-5p and miR-221-3p decreased after surgery and remained low at the 1- to 2-year visit.
It was a very different story for the 4 patients with structural incomplete responses at 1 to 2 years. In this subgroup, initial postoperative declines in serum miR-146a-5p and miR-221-3p levels were followed by increases to levels at the 1- to 2-year visit that were similar to or higher than those found prior to surgery.
The study was funded by the Umberto Di Mario Foundation, Banca d’Italia, University of Rome Sapienza, the program of Biotechnologies and Clinical Medicine of the University of Rome Sapienza, the European Medical Writers Association, and the Umberto Di Mario Foundation.
SOURCE: Rosignolo F et al. J Endo Soc. 2017;1(1)3-13. ENDO 2018, Abstract OR17-1.
CHICAGO –
The usual tool for trying to detect recurrence while following patients with papillary thyroid cancer after surgery has been the serum thyroglobulin assay. However, management of papillary thyroid cancer has become more conservative, involving lobectomy and isthmusectomy on the affected side rather than total gland resection. The benefit of the conservative approach is to avoid complications while maintaining an overall survival rate equivalent to the more extensive approach.
The investigators measured 754 miRNAs in serum samples of 11 patients with papillary thyroid cancer both before and 30 days after surgical thyroidectomy. They re-evaluated major candidate miRNAs using absolute quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis in an independent cohort of 44 other patients with papillary thyroid cancer or benign nodules or 20 healthy controls, Dr. Rosignolo said at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
The 2 miRNAs most significantly associated with thyroid tumors were then assessed in matched serum samples (before and 30 days, and 1 to 2 years after surgery) from the 20 PTC patients with complete follow-up datasets and results correlated with American Thyroid Association (ATA) responses to therapy.
Serum levels of both miRNAs after 1 to 2 years of follow-up were consistent with ATA responses to therapy in all patients, including two patients who developed structural evidence of disease whose thyroglobulin assay results remained negative (less than 1 ng/mL) for cancer recurrence.
Fifteen of the 20 patients had excellent or indeterminate responses to therapy as defined by 2015 ATA guidelines. In these 15 cases, and in the single patient with a biochemical incomplete response, expression levels of miR-146a-5p and miR-221-3p decreased after surgery and remained low at the 1- to 2-year visit.
It was a very different story for the 4 patients with structural incomplete responses at 1 to 2 years. In this subgroup, initial postoperative declines in serum miR-146a-5p and miR-221-3p levels were followed by increases to levels at the 1- to 2-year visit that were similar to or higher than those found prior to surgery.
The study was funded by the Umberto Di Mario Foundation, Banca d’Italia, University of Rome Sapienza, the program of Biotechnologies and Clinical Medicine of the University of Rome Sapienza, the European Medical Writers Association, and the Umberto Di Mario Foundation.
SOURCE: Rosignolo F et al. J Endo Soc. 2017;1(1)3-13. ENDO 2018, Abstract OR17-1.
REPORTING FROM ENDO 2018
Key clinical point: Serum microRNA profiles hold promise for postsurgical monitoring of patients with papillary thyroid cancer.
Major finding: Of eight tested, two serum microRNA profiles – miR-146a-5p and miR-221-3p – were the most promising thyroid tumor biomarkers.
Study details: Prospective analysis of the blood of 31 patients with papillary thyroid cancer before and after surgery to assess which markers were most sensitive to cancer.
Disclosures: The study was funded by the Umberto Di Mario Foundation, Banca d’Italia, University of Rome Sapienza, the program of Biotechnologies and Clinical Medicine of the University of Rome Sapienza, the European Medical Writers Association, and the Umberto Di Mario Foundation.
Source: Rosignolo F et al. J Endo Soc. 2017;1(1):3-13. ENDO 2018, Abstract OR17-1.
High-normal TSH linked to unexplained infertility
CHICAGO – Levels of thyroid stimulating hormone were significantly higher in women with unexplained infertility than in a cohort whose partners had severe male factor infertility, though TSH levels still fell within the reference range.
For women with unexplained infertility, thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) averaged 1.95 mIU/mL (95% confidence interval, 1.54-2.61), compared with 1.66 mIU/mL for the group of women with severe male factor infertility, such as severe oligospermia or azoospermia (95% CI, 1.25-2.17; P = .003).
“We found, very interestingly, that in the unexplained group, TSH was higher in those women, compared with women whose partners had severe male factor infertility,” suggesting that
, the study’s first author, Lindsay T. Fourman, MD, said in an interview at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.In terms of TSH levels, “clearly, the cutoff of the upper limit of the normal range is controversial,” said Dr. Fourman. “Some studies have shown that 95% of the population has a TSH of less than 2.5.”
However, the numbers that guide treatment for hypothyroidism are different. “We use a cutoff, generally, of 4 or 5, but maybe that cutoff should be 2.5, and maybe that’s significant for some people,” Dr. Fourman said.
“Current guidelines do not recommend treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism among auto-antibody negative women attempting to conceive naturally,” wrote Dr. Fourman and her collaborators in the poster presenting their finding.
Twice as many women in the group with unexplained infertility had TSH levels in the upper half of the normal range – above 2.5 mIU/mL – than in the male factor infertility group, “again, suggesting this association with TSH and unexplained infertility,” Dr. Fourman said. The thyroid axis is known to play a role in oocyte development. Of women with unexplained infertility, 26.9% had a TSH above 5 mIU/mL, compared with 13.5% of those with severe male factor infertility (P less than .05).
The chart review of records from 187 women with unexplained fertility and 52 women whose partners had severe male factor infertility included women aged 18-39. The unexplained cohort included women for whom all causes of infertility were excluded “in the setting of a very thorough workup – and that would include any ovulatory issues, male factor issues, and by definition, these women had to have a normal FSH, TSH and prolactin,” said Dr. Fourman, an endocrine fellow at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Control patients were those who had TSH and prolactin levels available and whose partners were being seen for severe male factor infertility, meaning that their partner had severe oligospermia or azoospermia.
Dr. Fourman acknowledged that she and her and her collaborators couldn’t exclude some female factor infertility among the control group. “That is an assumption, but it’s an assumption that would bias us to the null,” strengthening the study’s findings.
Clinical characteristics were similar between study groups, though women with unexplained infertility were slightly older than those with severe male factor infertility (mean 31.5 years versus 30.1 years, P = .01); they also had slightly lower body mass indices (median 23 versus 24.4 kg/m2; P less than .04).
No association was found between prolactin levels, “which suggests that prolactin may not contribute to unexplained infertility in these women,” Dr. Fourman said.
The investigators were able to control for such potentially confounding variables as age, tobacco use, BMI; they excluded from analysis women who had positive thyroid peroxidase antibodies.
“This is very interesting, because it really raises the question of whether we should be treating TSH, even to the lower half of the normal range, to see if that can improve outcomes,” she said. “We are looking for modifiable things that we can treat to try to improve fertility, so if we can identify some cause – like a hormonal cause – we may be able to improve conception outcomes and reduce the need for invasive treatment.”
Based in part on the strength of these findings, Dr. Fourman said she and her collaborators are planning a prospective study to see whether treating women with infertility to achieve a TSH of less than 2.5 can speed time to conception and reduce the need for invasive infertility treatment.
Dr. Fourman reported no conflicts of interest and no external sources of funding.
SOURCE: Fourman, L, et al. ENDO 2018, Abstract SAT-288.
CHICAGO – Levels of thyroid stimulating hormone were significantly higher in women with unexplained infertility than in a cohort whose partners had severe male factor infertility, though TSH levels still fell within the reference range.
For women with unexplained infertility, thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) averaged 1.95 mIU/mL (95% confidence interval, 1.54-2.61), compared with 1.66 mIU/mL for the group of women with severe male factor infertility, such as severe oligospermia or azoospermia (95% CI, 1.25-2.17; P = .003).
“We found, very interestingly, that in the unexplained group, TSH was higher in those women, compared with women whose partners had severe male factor infertility,” suggesting that
, the study’s first author, Lindsay T. Fourman, MD, said in an interview at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.In terms of TSH levels, “clearly, the cutoff of the upper limit of the normal range is controversial,” said Dr. Fourman. “Some studies have shown that 95% of the population has a TSH of less than 2.5.”
However, the numbers that guide treatment for hypothyroidism are different. “We use a cutoff, generally, of 4 or 5, but maybe that cutoff should be 2.5, and maybe that’s significant for some people,” Dr. Fourman said.
“Current guidelines do not recommend treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism among auto-antibody negative women attempting to conceive naturally,” wrote Dr. Fourman and her collaborators in the poster presenting their finding.
Twice as many women in the group with unexplained infertility had TSH levels in the upper half of the normal range – above 2.5 mIU/mL – than in the male factor infertility group, “again, suggesting this association with TSH and unexplained infertility,” Dr. Fourman said. The thyroid axis is known to play a role in oocyte development. Of women with unexplained infertility, 26.9% had a TSH above 5 mIU/mL, compared with 13.5% of those with severe male factor infertility (P less than .05).
The chart review of records from 187 women with unexplained fertility and 52 women whose partners had severe male factor infertility included women aged 18-39. The unexplained cohort included women for whom all causes of infertility were excluded “in the setting of a very thorough workup – and that would include any ovulatory issues, male factor issues, and by definition, these women had to have a normal FSH, TSH and prolactin,” said Dr. Fourman, an endocrine fellow at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Control patients were those who had TSH and prolactin levels available and whose partners were being seen for severe male factor infertility, meaning that their partner had severe oligospermia or azoospermia.
Dr. Fourman acknowledged that she and her and her collaborators couldn’t exclude some female factor infertility among the control group. “That is an assumption, but it’s an assumption that would bias us to the null,” strengthening the study’s findings.
Clinical characteristics were similar between study groups, though women with unexplained infertility were slightly older than those with severe male factor infertility (mean 31.5 years versus 30.1 years, P = .01); they also had slightly lower body mass indices (median 23 versus 24.4 kg/m2; P less than .04).
No association was found between prolactin levels, “which suggests that prolactin may not contribute to unexplained infertility in these women,” Dr. Fourman said.
The investigators were able to control for such potentially confounding variables as age, tobacco use, BMI; they excluded from analysis women who had positive thyroid peroxidase antibodies.
“This is very interesting, because it really raises the question of whether we should be treating TSH, even to the lower half of the normal range, to see if that can improve outcomes,” she said. “We are looking for modifiable things that we can treat to try to improve fertility, so if we can identify some cause – like a hormonal cause – we may be able to improve conception outcomes and reduce the need for invasive treatment.”
Based in part on the strength of these findings, Dr. Fourman said she and her collaborators are planning a prospective study to see whether treating women with infertility to achieve a TSH of less than 2.5 can speed time to conception and reduce the need for invasive infertility treatment.
Dr. Fourman reported no conflicts of interest and no external sources of funding.
SOURCE: Fourman, L, et al. ENDO 2018, Abstract SAT-288.
CHICAGO – Levels of thyroid stimulating hormone were significantly higher in women with unexplained infertility than in a cohort whose partners had severe male factor infertility, though TSH levels still fell within the reference range.
For women with unexplained infertility, thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) averaged 1.95 mIU/mL (95% confidence interval, 1.54-2.61), compared with 1.66 mIU/mL for the group of women with severe male factor infertility, such as severe oligospermia or azoospermia (95% CI, 1.25-2.17; P = .003).
“We found, very interestingly, that in the unexplained group, TSH was higher in those women, compared with women whose partners had severe male factor infertility,” suggesting that
, the study’s first author, Lindsay T. Fourman, MD, said in an interview at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.In terms of TSH levels, “clearly, the cutoff of the upper limit of the normal range is controversial,” said Dr. Fourman. “Some studies have shown that 95% of the population has a TSH of less than 2.5.”
However, the numbers that guide treatment for hypothyroidism are different. “We use a cutoff, generally, of 4 or 5, but maybe that cutoff should be 2.5, and maybe that’s significant for some people,” Dr. Fourman said.
“Current guidelines do not recommend treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism among auto-antibody negative women attempting to conceive naturally,” wrote Dr. Fourman and her collaborators in the poster presenting their finding.
Twice as many women in the group with unexplained infertility had TSH levels in the upper half of the normal range – above 2.5 mIU/mL – than in the male factor infertility group, “again, suggesting this association with TSH and unexplained infertility,” Dr. Fourman said. The thyroid axis is known to play a role in oocyte development. Of women with unexplained infertility, 26.9% had a TSH above 5 mIU/mL, compared with 13.5% of those with severe male factor infertility (P less than .05).
The chart review of records from 187 women with unexplained fertility and 52 women whose partners had severe male factor infertility included women aged 18-39. The unexplained cohort included women for whom all causes of infertility were excluded “in the setting of a very thorough workup – and that would include any ovulatory issues, male factor issues, and by definition, these women had to have a normal FSH, TSH and prolactin,” said Dr. Fourman, an endocrine fellow at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Control patients were those who had TSH and prolactin levels available and whose partners were being seen for severe male factor infertility, meaning that their partner had severe oligospermia or azoospermia.
Dr. Fourman acknowledged that she and her and her collaborators couldn’t exclude some female factor infertility among the control group. “That is an assumption, but it’s an assumption that would bias us to the null,” strengthening the study’s findings.
Clinical characteristics were similar between study groups, though women with unexplained infertility were slightly older than those with severe male factor infertility (mean 31.5 years versus 30.1 years, P = .01); they also had slightly lower body mass indices (median 23 versus 24.4 kg/m2; P less than .04).
No association was found between prolactin levels, “which suggests that prolactin may not contribute to unexplained infertility in these women,” Dr. Fourman said.
The investigators were able to control for such potentially confounding variables as age, tobacco use, BMI; they excluded from analysis women who had positive thyroid peroxidase antibodies.
“This is very interesting, because it really raises the question of whether we should be treating TSH, even to the lower half of the normal range, to see if that can improve outcomes,” she said. “We are looking for modifiable things that we can treat to try to improve fertility, so if we can identify some cause – like a hormonal cause – we may be able to improve conception outcomes and reduce the need for invasive treatment.”
Based in part on the strength of these findings, Dr. Fourman said she and her collaborators are planning a prospective study to see whether treating women with infertility to achieve a TSH of less than 2.5 can speed time to conception and reduce the need for invasive infertility treatment.
Dr. Fourman reported no conflicts of interest and no external sources of funding.
SOURCE: Fourman, L, et al. ENDO 2018, Abstract SAT-288.
REPORTING FROM ENDO 2018
Three regular meals a day is best in T2DM
CHICAGO – Spreading calories out over three regular meals a day, instead of six small ones, helps patients with type 2 diabetes lose weight and better control their blood glucose, especially when breakfast is the main meal of the day, according to Israeli investigators.
Too often, obese type 2 patients end up on a treadmill of ever-increasing insulin doses that lead, in turn, to more weight gain and still more insulin, plus greater risk of diabetic complications. “To break this vicious cycle, we need to better control diabetes with less insulin,” said lead investigator Daniela Jakubowicz, MD, an endocrinologist at the Wolfson Medical Center at Tel Aviv University.
The team had a hunch that meal-timing would help, so they randomized 19 obese, uncontrolled type 2 patients to three meals a day, and 18 to six meals. The overall calories were the same in each arm: 1,500-1,800 per day.
Those in the three-meal (3m) group took 50% of their calories at breakfast, mostly from carbohydrates and protein, and consumed by 9:30 a.m. One-third of their calories were consumed at lunch, and the final 17% at dinner, where carbohydrates were not allowed. Between-meal snacking on vegetables was allowed. The six-meal (6m) group took 20%, 25%, and 25% of their calories at breakfast, lunch, and dinner, plus three snacks each consisting of 10% of their daily caloric intake. The study included a few more men than women, and insulin was titrated biweekly in the two groups as needed.
The groups were statistically identical at baseline, with a mean age of about 70 years, a 20-year or so history of type 2 diabetes, and a mean body mass index (BMI) of just under 33 kg/m2. However, at the end of 3 months, the 3m group was doing much better.They had lost a mean of 5.4 kg at that point and reduced their BMI by a mean of 1.9 kg/m2 and their HbA1c 1.2%. The 6m group, meanwhile, gained a mean of 0.26 kg, increased their BMI 0.1 kg/m2, and dropped their HbA1c only 0.2%. Both groups started with a mean HbA1c of around 8%.
Hunger and craving scores improved in the 3m group, as well, and their total daily insulin dose dropped 27 units from a baseline of 74 units; 6m subjects went up 5 units/day, from a baseline of 71 units. The findings were all statistically significant.
In short, the 3m is “more effective than the traditional diet with six small meals evenly distributed along the day, for weight loss, overall glycemia, HbA1c, appetite, and for the reduction of insulin requirements. Therefore, the three-meal schedule with a high-energy breakfast “should be a strategy to improve diabetes control and outcome,” Dr. Jakubowicz said at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
The findings caught the attention of her audience. One endocrinologist said that “patients always ask me about doing six small meals a day.”
Most of the mean blood glucose reduction found in the 3m group happened after only 14 days on the diet, suggesting an improvement in hepatic insulin sensitivity. There was no correlation between glucose levels and weight; the beneficial effects of the 3m diet appeared independent of weight loss.
Those benefits instead might attributable to effects on “clock genes,” which control the circadian oscillation of gene expression. The investigators are looking into the matter further. .
The funding source was not reported. Dr. Jakubowicz, author of “The Big Breakfast Diet” (Workman Publishing Co., 2009), had no other disclosures. The other investigators had no disclosures.
SOURCE: Jakubowicz D et al. ENDO 2018, Abstract OR05-2.
CHICAGO – Spreading calories out over three regular meals a day, instead of six small ones, helps patients with type 2 diabetes lose weight and better control their blood glucose, especially when breakfast is the main meal of the day, according to Israeli investigators.
Too often, obese type 2 patients end up on a treadmill of ever-increasing insulin doses that lead, in turn, to more weight gain and still more insulin, plus greater risk of diabetic complications. “To break this vicious cycle, we need to better control diabetes with less insulin,” said lead investigator Daniela Jakubowicz, MD, an endocrinologist at the Wolfson Medical Center at Tel Aviv University.
The team had a hunch that meal-timing would help, so they randomized 19 obese, uncontrolled type 2 patients to three meals a day, and 18 to six meals. The overall calories were the same in each arm: 1,500-1,800 per day.
Those in the three-meal (3m) group took 50% of their calories at breakfast, mostly from carbohydrates and protein, and consumed by 9:30 a.m. One-third of their calories were consumed at lunch, and the final 17% at dinner, where carbohydrates were not allowed. Between-meal snacking on vegetables was allowed. The six-meal (6m) group took 20%, 25%, and 25% of their calories at breakfast, lunch, and dinner, plus three snacks each consisting of 10% of their daily caloric intake. The study included a few more men than women, and insulin was titrated biweekly in the two groups as needed.
The groups were statistically identical at baseline, with a mean age of about 70 years, a 20-year or so history of type 2 diabetes, and a mean body mass index (BMI) of just under 33 kg/m2. However, at the end of 3 months, the 3m group was doing much better.They had lost a mean of 5.4 kg at that point and reduced their BMI by a mean of 1.9 kg/m2 and their HbA1c 1.2%. The 6m group, meanwhile, gained a mean of 0.26 kg, increased their BMI 0.1 kg/m2, and dropped their HbA1c only 0.2%. Both groups started with a mean HbA1c of around 8%.
Hunger and craving scores improved in the 3m group, as well, and their total daily insulin dose dropped 27 units from a baseline of 74 units; 6m subjects went up 5 units/day, from a baseline of 71 units. The findings were all statistically significant.
In short, the 3m is “more effective than the traditional diet with six small meals evenly distributed along the day, for weight loss, overall glycemia, HbA1c, appetite, and for the reduction of insulin requirements. Therefore, the three-meal schedule with a high-energy breakfast “should be a strategy to improve diabetes control and outcome,” Dr. Jakubowicz said at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
The findings caught the attention of her audience. One endocrinologist said that “patients always ask me about doing six small meals a day.”
Most of the mean blood glucose reduction found in the 3m group happened after only 14 days on the diet, suggesting an improvement in hepatic insulin sensitivity. There was no correlation between glucose levels and weight; the beneficial effects of the 3m diet appeared independent of weight loss.
Those benefits instead might attributable to effects on “clock genes,” which control the circadian oscillation of gene expression. The investigators are looking into the matter further. .
The funding source was not reported. Dr. Jakubowicz, author of “The Big Breakfast Diet” (Workman Publishing Co., 2009), had no other disclosures. The other investigators had no disclosures.
SOURCE: Jakubowicz D et al. ENDO 2018, Abstract OR05-2.
CHICAGO – Spreading calories out over three regular meals a day, instead of six small ones, helps patients with type 2 diabetes lose weight and better control their blood glucose, especially when breakfast is the main meal of the day, according to Israeli investigators.
Too often, obese type 2 patients end up on a treadmill of ever-increasing insulin doses that lead, in turn, to more weight gain and still more insulin, plus greater risk of diabetic complications. “To break this vicious cycle, we need to better control diabetes with less insulin,” said lead investigator Daniela Jakubowicz, MD, an endocrinologist at the Wolfson Medical Center at Tel Aviv University.
The team had a hunch that meal-timing would help, so they randomized 19 obese, uncontrolled type 2 patients to three meals a day, and 18 to six meals. The overall calories were the same in each arm: 1,500-1,800 per day.
Those in the three-meal (3m) group took 50% of their calories at breakfast, mostly from carbohydrates and protein, and consumed by 9:30 a.m. One-third of their calories were consumed at lunch, and the final 17% at dinner, where carbohydrates were not allowed. Between-meal snacking on vegetables was allowed. The six-meal (6m) group took 20%, 25%, and 25% of their calories at breakfast, lunch, and dinner, plus three snacks each consisting of 10% of their daily caloric intake. The study included a few more men than women, and insulin was titrated biweekly in the two groups as needed.
The groups were statistically identical at baseline, with a mean age of about 70 years, a 20-year or so history of type 2 diabetes, and a mean body mass index (BMI) of just under 33 kg/m2. However, at the end of 3 months, the 3m group was doing much better.They had lost a mean of 5.4 kg at that point and reduced their BMI by a mean of 1.9 kg/m2 and their HbA1c 1.2%. The 6m group, meanwhile, gained a mean of 0.26 kg, increased their BMI 0.1 kg/m2, and dropped their HbA1c only 0.2%. Both groups started with a mean HbA1c of around 8%.
Hunger and craving scores improved in the 3m group, as well, and their total daily insulin dose dropped 27 units from a baseline of 74 units; 6m subjects went up 5 units/day, from a baseline of 71 units. The findings were all statistically significant.
In short, the 3m is “more effective than the traditional diet with six small meals evenly distributed along the day, for weight loss, overall glycemia, HbA1c, appetite, and for the reduction of insulin requirements. Therefore, the three-meal schedule with a high-energy breakfast “should be a strategy to improve diabetes control and outcome,” Dr. Jakubowicz said at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
The findings caught the attention of her audience. One endocrinologist said that “patients always ask me about doing six small meals a day.”
Most of the mean blood glucose reduction found in the 3m group happened after only 14 days on the diet, suggesting an improvement in hepatic insulin sensitivity. There was no correlation between glucose levels and weight; the beneficial effects of the 3m diet appeared independent of weight loss.
Those benefits instead might attributable to effects on “clock genes,” which control the circadian oscillation of gene expression. The investigators are looking into the matter further. .
The funding source was not reported. Dr. Jakubowicz, author of “The Big Breakfast Diet” (Workman Publishing Co., 2009), had no other disclosures. The other investigators had no disclosures.
SOURCE: Jakubowicz D et al. ENDO 2018, Abstract OR05-2.
REPORTING FROM ENDO 2018
Key clinical point: Spreading calories out over three regular meals a day, instead of six small ones, helps patients with type 2 diabetes lose weight and better control their blood glucose, especially when breakfast is the main meal of the day.
Major finding: The total daily insulin dose dropped 27 units from a baseline of 74 units among patients assigned to get their calories at three regular meals; among subjects who had them spread out over six meals, the daily insulin dose increased 5 units/day, from a baseline of 71 units.
Study details: Randomized trial with 37 people with type 2 diabetes.
Disclosures: The funding source was not reported. Dr. Jakubowicz, author of “The Big Breakfast Diet” (Workman Publishing Co., 2009), had no other disclosures. The other investigators had no disclosures.
Source: Jakubowicz D et al. ENDO 2018, Abstract OR05-2.
Surgery indicates higher survival with adrenal cortical carcinoma
CHICAGO –
These findings, uncovered using the largest cancer registry in the United States, will help give physicians insight into what the best course of action is for treating their patients, according to presenters.
“Surgical resection of the primary tumor improved survival in all stages of disease, whereas adjuvant therapy with chemotherapy or radiation improved overall survival only in stage IVpatients,” said Sri Harsha Tella, MD, endocrinologist at the University of South Carolina, Columbia. “These results may help the prognostication of patients in treatment decision making.”
Investigators conducted a retrospective study of 3,185 pathologically confirmed cases of ACC, registered into the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2015.
Patients were mostly women with an average age of 55 years old and private insurance, with a nearly even split of patients with stage I-III (26%) and stage IV ACC (24%). Nearly three-quarters of those studied chose to have surgery, of which 31% chose open resection.
Patients with stage I-III ACC had a significant median survival rate of 63 months, compared with those who did not have surgery who had an average survival of 8 months.
In patients with stage IV ACC, surgery lengthened overall survival to 19 months, compared with 6 months for those without surgery, according to Dr. Tella and fellow investigators.
While surgery did have a greater positive effect on patients’ live spans across all stages, the impact of chemotherapy and radiation was significant only among stage IV patients who had complete surgery.
Those in the stage IV group who were given post-surgery adjuvant chemotherapy were likely to live an average of nearly 9 more months than did those who did not have chemotherapy after radiation (22 vs. 13), while those given radiation therapy saw an increase in survival by 19 months (29 vs. 10). These increases did not affect stage I-III patients, who had a similar rate of survival regardless of additional therapies after their surgery (24 vs. 25 months).
One possible explanation for why additional therapy made little difference in survival for stage I-III patients is that, given that the tumors did not spread as widely, the surgical procedures were likely to be more effective at removing most of the disease, according to Dr. Tella.
“One of the possibilities is that surgeons were able to get the whole mass out,” Dr. Tella hypothesized in response to a question from attendees. “On the other hand, patients with stage IV ACC may be more likely to have more presence of metastases and so would benefit more greatly from the removal of the primary tumor and then also additional therapy.”
Investigators noted that because of the structure of the registry, they were unable to determine the initiation and duration of chemotherapy, as well as doses of radiation therapy received by the patient.
A more robust database and future stage-specific, prospective clinical trials are needed in order to better understand these findings, Dr. Tella said.
The investigators reported no relevant financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Tella SH et al. Endo 2018.
CHICAGO –
These findings, uncovered using the largest cancer registry in the United States, will help give physicians insight into what the best course of action is for treating their patients, according to presenters.
“Surgical resection of the primary tumor improved survival in all stages of disease, whereas adjuvant therapy with chemotherapy or radiation improved overall survival only in stage IVpatients,” said Sri Harsha Tella, MD, endocrinologist at the University of South Carolina, Columbia. “These results may help the prognostication of patients in treatment decision making.”
Investigators conducted a retrospective study of 3,185 pathologically confirmed cases of ACC, registered into the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2015.
Patients were mostly women with an average age of 55 years old and private insurance, with a nearly even split of patients with stage I-III (26%) and stage IV ACC (24%). Nearly three-quarters of those studied chose to have surgery, of which 31% chose open resection.
Patients with stage I-III ACC had a significant median survival rate of 63 months, compared with those who did not have surgery who had an average survival of 8 months.
In patients with stage IV ACC, surgery lengthened overall survival to 19 months, compared with 6 months for those without surgery, according to Dr. Tella and fellow investigators.
While surgery did have a greater positive effect on patients’ live spans across all stages, the impact of chemotherapy and radiation was significant only among stage IV patients who had complete surgery.
Those in the stage IV group who were given post-surgery adjuvant chemotherapy were likely to live an average of nearly 9 more months than did those who did not have chemotherapy after radiation (22 vs. 13), while those given radiation therapy saw an increase in survival by 19 months (29 vs. 10). These increases did not affect stage I-III patients, who had a similar rate of survival regardless of additional therapies after their surgery (24 vs. 25 months).
One possible explanation for why additional therapy made little difference in survival for stage I-III patients is that, given that the tumors did not spread as widely, the surgical procedures were likely to be more effective at removing most of the disease, according to Dr. Tella.
“One of the possibilities is that surgeons were able to get the whole mass out,” Dr. Tella hypothesized in response to a question from attendees. “On the other hand, patients with stage IV ACC may be more likely to have more presence of metastases and so would benefit more greatly from the removal of the primary tumor and then also additional therapy.”
Investigators noted that because of the structure of the registry, they were unable to determine the initiation and duration of chemotherapy, as well as doses of radiation therapy received by the patient.
A more robust database and future stage-specific, prospective clinical trials are needed in order to better understand these findings, Dr. Tella said.
The investigators reported no relevant financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Tella SH et al. Endo 2018.
CHICAGO –
These findings, uncovered using the largest cancer registry in the United States, will help give physicians insight into what the best course of action is for treating their patients, according to presenters.
“Surgical resection of the primary tumor improved survival in all stages of disease, whereas adjuvant therapy with chemotherapy or radiation improved overall survival only in stage IVpatients,” said Sri Harsha Tella, MD, endocrinologist at the University of South Carolina, Columbia. “These results may help the prognostication of patients in treatment decision making.”
Investigators conducted a retrospective study of 3,185 pathologically confirmed cases of ACC, registered into the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2015.
Patients were mostly women with an average age of 55 years old and private insurance, with a nearly even split of patients with stage I-III (26%) and stage IV ACC (24%). Nearly three-quarters of those studied chose to have surgery, of which 31% chose open resection.
Patients with stage I-III ACC had a significant median survival rate of 63 months, compared with those who did not have surgery who had an average survival of 8 months.
In patients with stage IV ACC, surgery lengthened overall survival to 19 months, compared with 6 months for those without surgery, according to Dr. Tella and fellow investigators.
While surgery did have a greater positive effect on patients’ live spans across all stages, the impact of chemotherapy and radiation was significant only among stage IV patients who had complete surgery.
Those in the stage IV group who were given post-surgery adjuvant chemotherapy were likely to live an average of nearly 9 more months than did those who did not have chemotherapy after radiation (22 vs. 13), while those given radiation therapy saw an increase in survival by 19 months (29 vs. 10). These increases did not affect stage I-III patients, who had a similar rate of survival regardless of additional therapies after their surgery (24 vs. 25 months).
One possible explanation for why additional therapy made little difference in survival for stage I-III patients is that, given that the tumors did not spread as widely, the surgical procedures were likely to be more effective at removing most of the disease, according to Dr. Tella.
“One of the possibilities is that surgeons were able to get the whole mass out,” Dr. Tella hypothesized in response to a question from attendees. “On the other hand, patients with stage IV ACC may be more likely to have more presence of metastases and so would benefit more greatly from the removal of the primary tumor and then also additional therapy.”
Investigators noted that because of the structure of the registry, they were unable to determine the initiation and duration of chemotherapy, as well as doses of radiation therapy received by the patient.
A more robust database and future stage-specific, prospective clinical trials are needed in order to better understand these findings, Dr. Tella said.
The investigators reported no relevant financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Tella SH et al. Endo 2018.
REPORTING FROM ENDO 2018
Key clinical point: Patients who undergo surgical resection at all stages are more likely to survive.
Major finding: Patients stage I-III who underwent surgery survived over nearly 8 times longer than non-surgery patients (63 vs. 8 months [P less than .001]).
Study details: Retrospective study of 3,185 adrenal cortical carcinoma cases entered into the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2015.
Disclosures: The presenter reported no relevant financial disclosures.
Source: Tella SH et al. Endo 2018.
Without reliability, testosterone testing may fall short
CHICAGO – is one addition to the evaluation of men with suspected hypogonadism that is included in the revised clinical practice guideline on testosterone therapy in men with hypogonadism, issued March 17 by the Endocrine Society. The previous guideline was issued in 2010.
“Since 2010, the CDC has provided an accuracy-based standardization program for T (CDC Hormone Standardization Program for Testosterone). Although several commercial laboratories, some assay manufacturers, and some academic laboratories are now CDC certified, most T immunoassay kit manufacturers and local hospital-based laboratories have not been certified. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assays for TT generally offer higher concentrations of specificity, sensitivity, and precision (especially in the low range) than do most immunoassays. Clinicians should ideally measure TT using a CDC-certified assay or an assay verified by an accuracy-based external quality control program,” according to the guideline.
Diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of men with suspected hypogonadism often involve nuanced decisions, according to guideline panel chair Shalender Bhasin, MB, an endocrinologist who is professor of medicine at both Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, in Boston. The guideline will be published in its entirety in the May 2018 print issue of The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.
Evaluation for suspected hypogonadism is indicated in men with symptoms and signs of testosterone deficiency – decreased libido, unexplained anemia, and/or osteopenia – and unequivocally and consistently low serum total testosterone and/or free testosterone concentrations, according to the guideline, which is co-sponsored by European Society of Endocrinology and endorsed by the European Academy of Andrology.
The guideline illuminates one area of diagnostic uncertainty that has dogged clinicians: Should one use age-specific testosterone levels? All the guideline authors speaking at the panel, in addition to Dr. Bhasin – Glenn R. Cunningham, MD, Baylor College of Medicine in Houston; Alvin M. Matsumoto, MD, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle; and Maria A. Yialamas, MD, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston – agreed that age-specific testosterone levels do not improve diagnosis.
“The harmonized Reference range for TT in healthy, nonobese young men (aged 19 to 39 years) was 264 to 916 ng/dL (9.2 to 31.8 nmol/L) using the 2.5th and 97.5th percentile, and 303 to 852 ng/dL (10.5 to 29.5 nmol/L) using the 5th and 95th percentile (31). Clinicians can use this range for all CDC-certified TT assays,” according to the guideline.
Asking about history to explain low testosterone levels is an often overlooked part of patient evaluation. Two known causes of low testosterone in men often are not part of history taking but should be. One is use of opioids. The other is withdrawal from anabolic steroids. The best way to root these out in a history is to ask about any recent surgery and use of anabolic steroids, said Dr. Bhasin, speaking at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
When it works, testosterone can make some men feel better: Testosterone replacement was associated with increased libido, erectile function, and sexual activity. However, testosterone replacement had no effect on energy and/or mood.
Not every man over the age of 65 with low testosterone is a candidate for testosterone replacement. There are some risks associated with its use; PSA may rise within 6 months of starting testosterone replacement, leaving physicians and men facing the issue of whether to have a prostate biopsy. The guideline recommends evaluating the patients with PSA the first time within 3-12 months after the start of therapy. When the test shows that PSA has risen, the decision of whether to have a prostate biopsy is one that should be shared by the patient and physician.
Dr. Bhasin declared financing from the National Institute on Aging, the National Institute of Nursing Research, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, AbbVie, Metro International Biotechnology, Alivegen, Abbott, Transition Therapeutics, and Function Promoting Therapies.
SOURCE: ENDO 2018
CHICAGO – is one addition to the evaluation of men with suspected hypogonadism that is included in the revised clinical practice guideline on testosterone therapy in men with hypogonadism, issued March 17 by the Endocrine Society. The previous guideline was issued in 2010.
“Since 2010, the CDC has provided an accuracy-based standardization program for T (CDC Hormone Standardization Program for Testosterone). Although several commercial laboratories, some assay manufacturers, and some academic laboratories are now CDC certified, most T immunoassay kit manufacturers and local hospital-based laboratories have not been certified. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assays for TT generally offer higher concentrations of specificity, sensitivity, and precision (especially in the low range) than do most immunoassays. Clinicians should ideally measure TT using a CDC-certified assay or an assay verified by an accuracy-based external quality control program,” according to the guideline.
Diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of men with suspected hypogonadism often involve nuanced decisions, according to guideline panel chair Shalender Bhasin, MB, an endocrinologist who is professor of medicine at both Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, in Boston. The guideline will be published in its entirety in the May 2018 print issue of The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.
Evaluation for suspected hypogonadism is indicated in men with symptoms and signs of testosterone deficiency – decreased libido, unexplained anemia, and/or osteopenia – and unequivocally and consistently low serum total testosterone and/or free testosterone concentrations, according to the guideline, which is co-sponsored by European Society of Endocrinology and endorsed by the European Academy of Andrology.
The guideline illuminates one area of diagnostic uncertainty that has dogged clinicians: Should one use age-specific testosterone levels? All the guideline authors speaking at the panel, in addition to Dr. Bhasin – Glenn R. Cunningham, MD, Baylor College of Medicine in Houston; Alvin M. Matsumoto, MD, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle; and Maria A. Yialamas, MD, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston – agreed that age-specific testosterone levels do not improve diagnosis.
“The harmonized Reference range for TT in healthy, nonobese young men (aged 19 to 39 years) was 264 to 916 ng/dL (9.2 to 31.8 nmol/L) using the 2.5th and 97.5th percentile, and 303 to 852 ng/dL (10.5 to 29.5 nmol/L) using the 5th and 95th percentile (31). Clinicians can use this range for all CDC-certified TT assays,” according to the guideline.
Asking about history to explain low testosterone levels is an often overlooked part of patient evaluation. Two known causes of low testosterone in men often are not part of history taking but should be. One is use of opioids. The other is withdrawal from anabolic steroids. The best way to root these out in a history is to ask about any recent surgery and use of anabolic steroids, said Dr. Bhasin, speaking at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
When it works, testosterone can make some men feel better: Testosterone replacement was associated with increased libido, erectile function, and sexual activity. However, testosterone replacement had no effect on energy and/or mood.
Not every man over the age of 65 with low testosterone is a candidate for testosterone replacement. There are some risks associated with its use; PSA may rise within 6 months of starting testosterone replacement, leaving physicians and men facing the issue of whether to have a prostate biopsy. The guideline recommends evaluating the patients with PSA the first time within 3-12 months after the start of therapy. When the test shows that PSA has risen, the decision of whether to have a prostate biopsy is one that should be shared by the patient and physician.
Dr. Bhasin declared financing from the National Institute on Aging, the National Institute of Nursing Research, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, AbbVie, Metro International Biotechnology, Alivegen, Abbott, Transition Therapeutics, and Function Promoting Therapies.
SOURCE: ENDO 2018
CHICAGO – is one addition to the evaluation of men with suspected hypogonadism that is included in the revised clinical practice guideline on testosterone therapy in men with hypogonadism, issued March 17 by the Endocrine Society. The previous guideline was issued in 2010.
“Since 2010, the CDC has provided an accuracy-based standardization program for T (CDC Hormone Standardization Program for Testosterone). Although several commercial laboratories, some assay manufacturers, and some academic laboratories are now CDC certified, most T immunoassay kit manufacturers and local hospital-based laboratories have not been certified. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assays for TT generally offer higher concentrations of specificity, sensitivity, and precision (especially in the low range) than do most immunoassays. Clinicians should ideally measure TT using a CDC-certified assay or an assay verified by an accuracy-based external quality control program,” according to the guideline.
Diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of men with suspected hypogonadism often involve nuanced decisions, according to guideline panel chair Shalender Bhasin, MB, an endocrinologist who is professor of medicine at both Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, in Boston. The guideline will be published in its entirety in the May 2018 print issue of The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.
Evaluation for suspected hypogonadism is indicated in men with symptoms and signs of testosterone deficiency – decreased libido, unexplained anemia, and/or osteopenia – and unequivocally and consistently low serum total testosterone and/or free testosterone concentrations, according to the guideline, which is co-sponsored by European Society of Endocrinology and endorsed by the European Academy of Andrology.
The guideline illuminates one area of diagnostic uncertainty that has dogged clinicians: Should one use age-specific testosterone levels? All the guideline authors speaking at the panel, in addition to Dr. Bhasin – Glenn R. Cunningham, MD, Baylor College of Medicine in Houston; Alvin M. Matsumoto, MD, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle; and Maria A. Yialamas, MD, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston – agreed that age-specific testosterone levels do not improve diagnosis.
“The harmonized Reference range for TT in healthy, nonobese young men (aged 19 to 39 years) was 264 to 916 ng/dL (9.2 to 31.8 nmol/L) using the 2.5th and 97.5th percentile, and 303 to 852 ng/dL (10.5 to 29.5 nmol/L) using the 5th and 95th percentile (31). Clinicians can use this range for all CDC-certified TT assays,” according to the guideline.
Asking about history to explain low testosterone levels is an often overlooked part of patient evaluation. Two known causes of low testosterone in men often are not part of history taking but should be. One is use of opioids. The other is withdrawal from anabolic steroids. The best way to root these out in a history is to ask about any recent surgery and use of anabolic steroids, said Dr. Bhasin, speaking at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
When it works, testosterone can make some men feel better: Testosterone replacement was associated with increased libido, erectile function, and sexual activity. However, testosterone replacement had no effect on energy and/or mood.
Not every man over the age of 65 with low testosterone is a candidate for testosterone replacement. There are some risks associated with its use; PSA may rise within 6 months of starting testosterone replacement, leaving physicians and men facing the issue of whether to have a prostate biopsy. The guideline recommends evaluating the patients with PSA the first time within 3-12 months after the start of therapy. When the test shows that PSA has risen, the decision of whether to have a prostate biopsy is one that should be shared by the patient and physician.
Dr. Bhasin declared financing from the National Institute on Aging, the National Institute of Nursing Research, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, AbbVie, Metro International Biotechnology, Alivegen, Abbott, Transition Therapeutics, and Function Promoting Therapies.
SOURCE: ENDO 2018
REPORTING FROM ENDO 2018
EVATAR model: Endocrinology on a chip
into how female reproductive organs communicate with each other and the liver via the endocrine system.
The project was first funded in 2012 by a National Institutes of Health grant that aimed to spur development of experimental hardware, and now researchers at Northwestern University, Chicago, headed by Teresa K. Woodruff, PhD, have bioengineered a 3-D model of the female reproductive tract and the liver using living cells and tissues. The resulting model is small enough to fit in the palm of your hand.
“Cells in aggregate organs are in constant communication with each other and the conversation is provided by the endocrine system. This is a completely new era in biology helping us illuminate disease systems we could not otherwise, such as polycystic ovary disease [PCOS],” said Dr. Woodruff, who is the Thomas J. Watkins Memorial professor of obstetrics and gynecology, the vice chair of research for the department of obstetrics and gynecology, and the chief of the division of reproductive science and medicine at Northwestern University.
Until the development of EVATAR, there was no good animal or other model of female reproductive diseases, such as cancer, PCOS, and infertility.
The EVATAR 3-D system is composed of plastic cubes, each representing the target organs of the female reproductive tract. The tissue lining each cube is assembled from multiple cell lineages to create individual follicles that enclose and support oocytes, oviductal/fallopian tubes, uterine myometrium and endometrium, the cervix, and the vagina. The cubes are then connected with tiny tubes, so that the fluid representing human blood and the hormones contained therein can flow between each of the cube compartments.
The EVATAR also contains cells from the liver. Using this system, researchers can study the effects of drugs on the female reproductive system and examine the drug metabolites in the liver.
Variations on EVATAR currently in development include 3-D models of the male reproductive system, dubbed “Guy in a Cube,” she quipped.
into how female reproductive organs communicate with each other and the liver via the endocrine system.
The project was first funded in 2012 by a National Institutes of Health grant that aimed to spur development of experimental hardware, and now researchers at Northwestern University, Chicago, headed by Teresa K. Woodruff, PhD, have bioengineered a 3-D model of the female reproductive tract and the liver using living cells and tissues. The resulting model is small enough to fit in the palm of your hand.
“Cells in aggregate organs are in constant communication with each other and the conversation is provided by the endocrine system. This is a completely new era in biology helping us illuminate disease systems we could not otherwise, such as polycystic ovary disease [PCOS],” said Dr. Woodruff, who is the Thomas J. Watkins Memorial professor of obstetrics and gynecology, the vice chair of research for the department of obstetrics and gynecology, and the chief of the division of reproductive science and medicine at Northwestern University.
Until the development of EVATAR, there was no good animal or other model of female reproductive diseases, such as cancer, PCOS, and infertility.
The EVATAR 3-D system is composed of plastic cubes, each representing the target organs of the female reproductive tract. The tissue lining each cube is assembled from multiple cell lineages to create individual follicles that enclose and support oocytes, oviductal/fallopian tubes, uterine myometrium and endometrium, the cervix, and the vagina. The cubes are then connected with tiny tubes, so that the fluid representing human blood and the hormones contained therein can flow between each of the cube compartments.
The EVATAR also contains cells from the liver. Using this system, researchers can study the effects of drugs on the female reproductive system and examine the drug metabolites in the liver.
Variations on EVATAR currently in development include 3-D models of the male reproductive system, dubbed “Guy in a Cube,” she quipped.
into how female reproductive organs communicate with each other and the liver via the endocrine system.
The project was first funded in 2012 by a National Institutes of Health grant that aimed to spur development of experimental hardware, and now researchers at Northwestern University, Chicago, headed by Teresa K. Woodruff, PhD, have bioengineered a 3-D model of the female reproductive tract and the liver using living cells and tissues. The resulting model is small enough to fit in the palm of your hand.
“Cells in aggregate organs are in constant communication with each other and the conversation is provided by the endocrine system. This is a completely new era in biology helping us illuminate disease systems we could not otherwise, such as polycystic ovary disease [PCOS],” said Dr. Woodruff, who is the Thomas J. Watkins Memorial professor of obstetrics and gynecology, the vice chair of research for the department of obstetrics and gynecology, and the chief of the division of reproductive science and medicine at Northwestern University.
Until the development of EVATAR, there was no good animal or other model of female reproductive diseases, such as cancer, PCOS, and infertility.
The EVATAR 3-D system is composed of plastic cubes, each representing the target organs of the female reproductive tract. The tissue lining each cube is assembled from multiple cell lineages to create individual follicles that enclose and support oocytes, oviductal/fallopian tubes, uterine myometrium and endometrium, the cervix, and the vagina. The cubes are then connected with tiny tubes, so that the fluid representing human blood and the hormones contained therein can flow between each of the cube compartments.
The EVATAR also contains cells from the liver. Using this system, researchers can study the effects of drugs on the female reproductive system and examine the drug metabolites in the liver.
Variations on EVATAR currently in development include 3-D models of the male reproductive system, dubbed “Guy in a Cube,” she quipped.
Mission to Mars: Endocrinologists take on populating deep space
by studying the effects of space radiation and other factors on male and female fertility, according to Teresa K. Woodruff, PhD, the Thomas J. Watkins Memorial Professor of Obstetrics & Gynecology, the vice chair of research for the department of obstetrics and gynecology, and the chief of the division of reproductive science and medicine at Northwestern University, Chicago, who is chairing a session on March 17 at the 2018 Endocrine Society annual meeting entitled: “Mission to Mars.”
The project was developed based on the anticipation that “we will continue to explore space as an inhabitable frontier.” The talks in this session will examine endocrine-based reproduction such as sperm function and biologic fertilization that has occurred in space, noted Dr. Woodruff, who is also professor of molecular biosciences in the Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences and professor of biomedical engineering in the McCormick School of Engineering, both at Northwestern University.
Dr. Woodruff currently has a grant under review by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration that is relevant to the mission of populating space. “If we are going to populate space, which we will need to do based on the length of time we will be there, we are going to have to get gametes into space,” she said. There will be more and more research effort focused on the needs of the humans who are “non-Earth dwelling,” she said.
The next step might be to study embryo development in that environment. Such research would take place at the International Space Station.
“I am interested in endocrine disruptors. What we learn from the study of the challenges to reproduction in space we will be able to apply on earth,” Dr. Woodruff said.
Also on the panel will be Joseph S. Tash, PhD, of Kansas University, Kansas City, whose grant on Space Flight Impacts on Gonadal and Gamete Function already has NASA funding, according to Dr. Woodruff.
by studying the effects of space radiation and other factors on male and female fertility, according to Teresa K. Woodruff, PhD, the Thomas J. Watkins Memorial Professor of Obstetrics & Gynecology, the vice chair of research for the department of obstetrics and gynecology, and the chief of the division of reproductive science and medicine at Northwestern University, Chicago, who is chairing a session on March 17 at the 2018 Endocrine Society annual meeting entitled: “Mission to Mars.”
The project was developed based on the anticipation that “we will continue to explore space as an inhabitable frontier.” The talks in this session will examine endocrine-based reproduction such as sperm function and biologic fertilization that has occurred in space, noted Dr. Woodruff, who is also professor of molecular biosciences in the Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences and professor of biomedical engineering in the McCormick School of Engineering, both at Northwestern University.
Dr. Woodruff currently has a grant under review by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration that is relevant to the mission of populating space. “If we are going to populate space, which we will need to do based on the length of time we will be there, we are going to have to get gametes into space,” she said. There will be more and more research effort focused on the needs of the humans who are “non-Earth dwelling,” she said.
The next step might be to study embryo development in that environment. Such research would take place at the International Space Station.
“I am interested in endocrine disruptors. What we learn from the study of the challenges to reproduction in space we will be able to apply on earth,” Dr. Woodruff said.
Also on the panel will be Joseph S. Tash, PhD, of Kansas University, Kansas City, whose grant on Space Flight Impacts on Gonadal and Gamete Function already has NASA funding, according to Dr. Woodruff.
by studying the effects of space radiation and other factors on male and female fertility, according to Teresa K. Woodruff, PhD, the Thomas J. Watkins Memorial Professor of Obstetrics & Gynecology, the vice chair of research for the department of obstetrics and gynecology, and the chief of the division of reproductive science and medicine at Northwestern University, Chicago, who is chairing a session on March 17 at the 2018 Endocrine Society annual meeting entitled: “Mission to Mars.”
The project was developed based on the anticipation that “we will continue to explore space as an inhabitable frontier.” The talks in this session will examine endocrine-based reproduction such as sperm function and biologic fertilization that has occurred in space, noted Dr. Woodruff, who is also professor of molecular biosciences in the Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences and professor of biomedical engineering in the McCormick School of Engineering, both at Northwestern University.
Dr. Woodruff currently has a grant under review by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration that is relevant to the mission of populating space. “If we are going to populate space, which we will need to do based on the length of time we will be there, we are going to have to get gametes into space,” she said. There will be more and more research effort focused on the needs of the humans who are “non-Earth dwelling,” she said.
The next step might be to study embryo development in that environment. Such research would take place at the International Space Station.
“I am interested in endocrine disruptors. What we learn from the study of the challenges to reproduction in space we will be able to apply on earth,” Dr. Woodruff said.
Also on the panel will be Joseph S. Tash, PhD, of Kansas University, Kansas City, whose grant on Space Flight Impacts on Gonadal and Gamete Function already has NASA funding, according to Dr. Woodruff.
Endocrine Society Preview: The 2018 meeting will be ‘a journey to innovation’
Attendees at the upcoming Endocrine Society annual meeting in Chicago can expect many of the scheduled sessions to be practice changing, according to Ann Danoff, MD, clinical chair of this year’s meeting program.
Endocrine Society President Lynnette K. Nieman, MD, will lead off the plenary sessions on March 17, by presenting awards to six visionary investigators. Noteworthy among these will be the work of Diana Lynn Blithe, PhD, National Institutes of Health, for her research on male contraception. Dr. Blithe will speak about what’s in the clinical pipeline and what direction future research will take.
The second plenary session has an intriguing title – Rhythm and Blues. This session will cover circadian rhythmicity, which is, coincidentally, the research area of the three joint winners of the 2017 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.
In a plenary sessions scheduled for March 17, at 3:00 p.m., the topic under discussion will be the issue of circadian rhythm and metabolic health. Dysregulation of light and dark exposure puts people at risk for a variety of metabolic disease, said Dr. Danoff, who is chief of the medical service at the Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Specifically, two of the presentations – one on Circadian Rhythms, Blue Light, and Setting Your Internal Clock and the other on Improving Health by Time-Restricted Eating – are likely to be enlightening.
The Endocrine Society has revamped this year’s approach to sessions on guidelines to take the format of a discussion of how the guidelines affect patients on case-by-case basis. The moderator of each session will not be a member of the guideline-writing committee, but the panelists will be committee members.
New guidelines to be discussed are those dealing with gender incongruence and testosterone therapy. The session on transgender issues in endocrinology will take place on March 19, and is entitled Endocrine Treatment of Gender-Dysphoric/Gender-Incongruent Persons: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. The session on testosterone therapy is entitled: Testosterone Therapy in Men with Hypogonadism: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline, also on March 19.
Another change to the approach taken to guidelines are sessions that go beyond the guidelines to discuss patients who fall between the cracks. Topics of these sessions are osteoporosis, indeterminate thyroid nodules, and challenging hyperprolactinemia and prolactinoma cases The panels involved in these discussions may include a surgeon, and two-thirds of them will include a fellow. “I am committed to the bringing along of young trainees,” said Dr. Danoff.
And what is an annual meeting without a few debates? On March 18, there will be a debate on Debate: This House Believes that Adrenal Vein Sampling Has a Major Role to Play in the Management of Patients with Primary Aldosteronism. Speaking in favor will be William F. Young Jr., MD, of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., and against will be Paul Michael Stewart, MD, of the University of Leeds (England). Another debate topic, scheduled for March 17, will be The LDL Limbo: How Low Should You Go? Taking up the side that Benefits of LDL Reduction Are Continuous and Extend to Extremely Low Levels will be Steven Nissen, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic. There to discuss Lower LDL Is Better but What About Very-Low LDL? will be Henry N. Ginsberg, MD, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York.
Attendees at the upcoming Endocrine Society annual meeting in Chicago can expect many of the scheduled sessions to be practice changing, according to Ann Danoff, MD, clinical chair of this year’s meeting program.
Endocrine Society President Lynnette K. Nieman, MD, will lead off the plenary sessions on March 17, by presenting awards to six visionary investigators. Noteworthy among these will be the work of Diana Lynn Blithe, PhD, National Institutes of Health, for her research on male contraception. Dr. Blithe will speak about what’s in the clinical pipeline and what direction future research will take.
The second plenary session has an intriguing title – Rhythm and Blues. This session will cover circadian rhythmicity, which is, coincidentally, the research area of the three joint winners of the 2017 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.
In a plenary sessions scheduled for March 17, at 3:00 p.m., the topic under discussion will be the issue of circadian rhythm and metabolic health. Dysregulation of light and dark exposure puts people at risk for a variety of metabolic disease, said Dr. Danoff, who is chief of the medical service at the Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Specifically, two of the presentations – one on Circadian Rhythms, Blue Light, and Setting Your Internal Clock and the other on Improving Health by Time-Restricted Eating – are likely to be enlightening.
The Endocrine Society has revamped this year’s approach to sessions on guidelines to take the format of a discussion of how the guidelines affect patients on case-by-case basis. The moderator of each session will not be a member of the guideline-writing committee, but the panelists will be committee members.
New guidelines to be discussed are those dealing with gender incongruence and testosterone therapy. The session on transgender issues in endocrinology will take place on March 19, and is entitled Endocrine Treatment of Gender-Dysphoric/Gender-Incongruent Persons: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. The session on testosterone therapy is entitled: Testosterone Therapy in Men with Hypogonadism: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline, also on March 19.
Another change to the approach taken to guidelines are sessions that go beyond the guidelines to discuss patients who fall between the cracks. Topics of these sessions are osteoporosis, indeterminate thyroid nodules, and challenging hyperprolactinemia and prolactinoma cases The panels involved in these discussions may include a surgeon, and two-thirds of them will include a fellow. “I am committed to the bringing along of young trainees,” said Dr. Danoff.
And what is an annual meeting without a few debates? On March 18, there will be a debate on Debate: This House Believes that Adrenal Vein Sampling Has a Major Role to Play in the Management of Patients with Primary Aldosteronism. Speaking in favor will be William F. Young Jr., MD, of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., and against will be Paul Michael Stewart, MD, of the University of Leeds (England). Another debate topic, scheduled for March 17, will be The LDL Limbo: How Low Should You Go? Taking up the side that Benefits of LDL Reduction Are Continuous and Extend to Extremely Low Levels will be Steven Nissen, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic. There to discuss Lower LDL Is Better but What About Very-Low LDL? will be Henry N. Ginsberg, MD, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York.
Attendees at the upcoming Endocrine Society annual meeting in Chicago can expect many of the scheduled sessions to be practice changing, according to Ann Danoff, MD, clinical chair of this year’s meeting program.
Endocrine Society President Lynnette K. Nieman, MD, will lead off the plenary sessions on March 17, by presenting awards to six visionary investigators. Noteworthy among these will be the work of Diana Lynn Blithe, PhD, National Institutes of Health, for her research on male contraception. Dr. Blithe will speak about what’s in the clinical pipeline and what direction future research will take.
The second plenary session has an intriguing title – Rhythm and Blues. This session will cover circadian rhythmicity, which is, coincidentally, the research area of the three joint winners of the 2017 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.
In a plenary sessions scheduled for March 17, at 3:00 p.m., the topic under discussion will be the issue of circadian rhythm and metabolic health. Dysregulation of light and dark exposure puts people at risk for a variety of metabolic disease, said Dr. Danoff, who is chief of the medical service at the Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Specifically, two of the presentations – one on Circadian Rhythms, Blue Light, and Setting Your Internal Clock and the other on Improving Health by Time-Restricted Eating – are likely to be enlightening.
The Endocrine Society has revamped this year’s approach to sessions on guidelines to take the format of a discussion of how the guidelines affect patients on case-by-case basis. The moderator of each session will not be a member of the guideline-writing committee, but the panelists will be committee members.
New guidelines to be discussed are those dealing with gender incongruence and testosterone therapy. The session on transgender issues in endocrinology will take place on March 19, and is entitled Endocrine Treatment of Gender-Dysphoric/Gender-Incongruent Persons: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. The session on testosterone therapy is entitled: Testosterone Therapy in Men with Hypogonadism: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline, also on March 19.
Another change to the approach taken to guidelines are sessions that go beyond the guidelines to discuss patients who fall between the cracks. Topics of these sessions are osteoporosis, indeterminate thyroid nodules, and challenging hyperprolactinemia and prolactinoma cases The panels involved in these discussions may include a surgeon, and two-thirds of them will include a fellow. “I am committed to the bringing along of young trainees,” said Dr. Danoff.
And what is an annual meeting without a few debates? On March 18, there will be a debate on Debate: This House Believes that Adrenal Vein Sampling Has a Major Role to Play in the Management of Patients with Primary Aldosteronism. Speaking in favor will be William F. Young Jr., MD, of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., and against will be Paul Michael Stewart, MD, of the University of Leeds (England). Another debate topic, scheduled for March 17, will be The LDL Limbo: How Low Should You Go? Taking up the side that Benefits of LDL Reduction Are Continuous and Extend to Extremely Low Levels will be Steven Nissen, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic. There to discuss Lower LDL Is Better but What About Very-Low LDL? will be Henry N. Ginsberg, MD, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York.