From the AGA Journals

Serum lipid increases seen after 8-61 weeks of tofacitinib treatment for ulcerative colitis are modest, reversible, and correlated with reduced systemic inflammation, according to results of an analysis including more than 1,000 patients.

Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were “infrequent” following treatment, according to the authors of the analysis, with an incidence rate similar to what has been reported for tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis and for other agents in ulcerative colitis.

That said, the period of observation in the analysis is “relatively short,” and so may not provide an accurate risk estimate for MACE, noted the investigators, led by Bruce E. Sands, MD, of the division of gastroenterology at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York.

“Longer-term studies, involving a larger number of patients, will be needed to further assess MACE risk in patients with ulcerative colitis,” Dr. Sands and coinvestigators wrote in their report on the observational analysis, which appears in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

“It is noteworthy that no increase in MACE risk and no dose relationship with tofacitinib have been observed in a larger rheumatoid arthritis cohort with over 8.5 years of observation and more than 19,000 patient-years of collective exposure,” they continued.

The present analysis included 1,157 patients with ulcerative colitis who participated in 8-week phase 2 and 3 tofacitinib induction studies, a phase 3 maintenance study, and a long-term extension study that is ongoing.

Reversible and dose-dependent increases in both LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol were observed after 8 weeks of treatment with tofacitinib at the recommended induction dose of 10 mg twice daily, the investigators found.

Increases in LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and total cholesterol correlated with decreases in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, suggesting any potential impact of lipid increases on cardiovascular events might be offset by reduced inflammation, according to the investigators.

“Previous studies in RA and inflammatory bowel disease have shown an inverse relationship between active inflammation and serum lipid profiles, suggesting that inflammation lowers lipid concentrations, and that treatment of the underlying inflammatory disease may, therefore, increase them,” Dr. Sands and colleagues wrote.

The lipid changes also correlated with increases in body mass index, possibly because of better nutrition, reduced protein loss, and less catabolism following tofacitinib treatment, along with the corticosteroid taper required in these studies of the drug, they added.

Lipid increases generally stayed elevated through 61 weeks of treatment, while in patients randomized to placebo after 8 weeks of tofacitinib treatment, lipid levels fell back toward baseline, which suggests a reversal of the increases after tofacitinib withdrawal, the investigators wrote.

A total of 4 MACEs were seen among the 1,157 patients in the analysis, for an incidence rate of 0.24 (95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.62), according to the report. Those events included an acute coronary syndrome, an MI, an aortic dissection, and a hemorrhagic stroke. All four occurred in tofacitinib-treated patients, though the investigators noted that the aortic dissection and hemorrhagic stroke are events typically associated with genetics or other nonlipid factors.

In any case, that MACE incidence rate was “similar” to infliximab (Remicade) for what has been observed in tumor necrosis factor antagonist treatment of ulcerative colitis within a U.S. claims database study. In that analysis, including patients treated with infliximab, golimumab, and adalimumab, the incidence rate was 0.51 (95% CI, 0.31-0.79), the investigators noted.

These findings, taken together, support recommendations in tofacitinib prescribing information that call for monitoring of lipid concentrations 4-8 weeks after treatment is started, according to Dr. Sands and coauthors.

Funding for the study came from Pfizer. The study authors disclosed potential conflicts of interest related to Pfizer, AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, MedImmune (AstraZeneca), Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Prometheus Laboratories, Takeda, and 4D Pharma, among others.

SOURCE: Sands BE et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May 8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.04.059.

Serum lipid increases seen after 8-61 weeks of tofacitinib treatment for ulcerative colitis are modest, reversible, and correlated with reduced systemic inflammation, according to results of an analysis including more than 1,000 patients.

Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were “infrequent” following treatment, according to the authors of the analysis, with an incidence rate similar to what has been reported for tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis and for other agents in ulcerative colitis.

That said, the period of observation in the analysis is “relatively short,” and so may not provide an accurate risk estimate for MACE, noted the investigators, led by Bruce E. Sands, MD, of the division of gastroenterology at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York.

“Longer-term studies, involving a larger number of patients, will be needed to further assess MACE risk in patients with ulcerative colitis,” Dr. Sands and coinvestigators wrote in their report on the observational analysis, which appears in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

“It is noteworthy that no increase in MACE risk and no dose relationship with tofacitinib have been observed in a larger rheumatoid arthritis cohort with over 8.5 years of observation and more than 19,000 patient-years of collective exposure,” they continued.

The present analysis included 1,157 patients with ulcerative colitis who participated in 8-week phase 2 and 3 tofacitinib induction studies, a phase 3 maintenance study, and a long-term extension study that is ongoing.

Reversible and dose-dependent increases in both LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol were observed after 8 weeks of treatment with tofacitinib at the recommended induction dose of 10 mg twice daily, the investigators found.

Increases in LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and total cholesterol correlated with decreases in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, suggesting any potential impact of lipid increases on cardiovascular events might be offset by reduced inflammation, according to the investigators.

“Previous studies in RA and inflammatory bowel disease have shown an inverse relationship between active inflammation and serum lipid profiles, suggesting that inflammation lowers lipid concentrations, and that treatment of the underlying inflammatory disease may, therefore, increase them,” Dr. Sands and colleagues wrote.

The lipid changes also correlated with increases in body mass index, possibly because of better nutrition, reduced protein loss, and less catabolism following tofacitinib treatment, along with the corticosteroid taper required in these studies of the drug, they added.

Lipid increases generally stayed elevated through 61 weeks of treatment, while in patients randomized to placebo after 8 weeks of tofacitinib treatment, lipid levels fell back toward baseline, which suggests a reversal of the increases after tofacitinib withdrawal, the investigators wrote.

A total of 4 MACEs were seen among the 1,157 patients in the analysis, for an incidence rate of 0.24 (95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.62), according to the report. Those events included an acute coronary syndrome, an MI, an aortic dissection, and a hemorrhagic stroke. All four occurred in tofacitinib-treated patients, though the investigators noted that the aortic dissection and hemorrhagic stroke are events typically associated with genetics or other nonlipid factors.

In any case, that MACE incidence rate was “similar” to infliximab (Remicade) for what has been observed in tumor necrosis factor antagonist treatment of ulcerative colitis within a U.S. claims database study. In that analysis, including patients treated with infliximab, golimumab, and adalimumab, the incidence rate was 0.51 (95% CI, 0.31-0.79), the investigators noted.

These findings, taken together, support recommendations in tofacitinib prescribing information that call for monitoring of lipid concentrations 4-8 weeks after treatment is started, according to Dr. Sands and coauthors.

Funding for the study came from Pfizer. The study authors disclosed potential conflicts of interest related to Pfizer, AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, MedImmune (AstraZeneca), Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Prometheus Laboratories, Takeda, and 4D Pharma, among others.

SOURCE: Sands BE et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May 8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.04.059.

Serum lipid increases seen after 8-61 weeks of tofacitinib treatment for ulcerative colitis are modest, reversible, and correlated with reduced systemic inflammation, according to results of an analysis including more than 1,000 patients.

Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were “infrequent” following treatment, according to the authors of the analysis, with an incidence rate similar to what has been reported for tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis and for other agents in ulcerative colitis.

That said, the period of observation in the analysis is “relatively short,” and so may not provide an accurate risk estimate for MACE, noted the investigators, led by Bruce E. Sands, MD, of the division of gastroenterology at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York.

“Longer-term studies, involving a larger number of patients, will be needed to further assess MACE risk in patients with ulcerative colitis,” Dr. Sands and coinvestigators wrote in their report on the observational analysis, which appears in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

“It is noteworthy that no increase in MACE risk and no dose relationship with tofacitinib have been observed in a larger rheumatoid arthritis cohort with over 8.5 years of observation and more than 19,000 patient-years of collective exposure,” they continued.

The present analysis included 1,157 patients with ulcerative colitis who participated in 8-week phase 2 and 3 tofacitinib induction studies, a phase 3 maintenance study, and a long-term extension study that is ongoing.

Reversible and dose-dependent increases in both LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol were observed after 8 weeks of treatment with tofacitinib at the recommended induction dose of 10 mg twice daily, the investigators found.

Increases in LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and total cholesterol correlated with decreases in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, suggesting any potential impact of lipid increases on cardiovascular events might be offset by reduced inflammation, according to the investigators.

“Previous studies in RA and inflammatory bowel disease have shown an inverse relationship between active inflammation and serum lipid profiles, suggesting that inflammation lowers lipid concentrations, and that treatment of the underlying inflammatory disease may, therefore, increase them,” Dr. Sands and colleagues wrote.

The lipid changes also correlated with increases in body mass index, possibly because of better nutrition, reduced protein loss, and less catabolism following tofacitinib treatment, along with the corticosteroid taper required in these studies of the drug, they added.

Lipid increases generally stayed elevated through 61 weeks of treatment, while in patients randomized to placebo after 8 weeks of tofacitinib treatment, lipid levels fell back toward baseline, which suggests a reversal of the increases after tofacitinib withdrawal, the investigators wrote.

A total of 4 MACEs were seen among the 1,157 patients in the analysis, for an incidence rate of 0.24 (95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.62), according to the report. Those events included an acute coronary syndrome, an MI, an aortic dissection, and a hemorrhagic stroke. All four occurred in tofacitinib-treated patients, though the investigators noted that the aortic dissection and hemorrhagic stroke are events typically associated with genetics or other nonlipid factors.

In any case, that MACE incidence rate was “similar” to infliximab (Remicade) for what has been observed in tumor necrosis factor antagonist treatment of ulcerative colitis within a U.S. claims database study. In that analysis, including patients treated with infliximab, golimumab, and adalimumab, the incidence rate was 0.51 (95% CI, 0.31-0.79), the investigators noted.

These findings, taken together, support recommendations in tofacitinib prescribing information that call for monitoring of lipid concentrations 4-8 weeks after treatment is started, according to Dr. Sands and coauthors.

Funding for the study came from Pfizer. The study authors disclosed potential conflicts of interest related to Pfizer, AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, MedImmune (AstraZeneca), Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Prometheus Laboratories, Takeda, and 4D Pharma, among others.

SOURCE: Sands BE et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May 8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.04.059.

While initial case reports and series provided preliminarily encouraging results, a larger retrospective study has provided no clear-cut evidence of biochemical response to vedolizumab in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and inflammatory bowel disease, investigators report.

A subset of patients in the retrospective analysis did experience a substantial drop in alkaline phosphatase (ALP), according to investigators with the International Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Study Group.

Overall, however, levels of that cholestasis marker rose by a small but statistically significant amount in this study, which included more than 100 patients with PSC and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

Responses were more likely in patients with cirrhosis and in those with elevated ALP at baseline, both of which are indicators of more aggressive disease, according to investigator Kate D. Lynch, MD, PhD, of the University of Oxford (England) and her coauthors.

The rate of liver outcomes was in line with the natural history of the disease, according to Dr. Lynch and coinvestigators, who added that most patients had an endoscopic IBD response, as might be expected based on studies of IBD-only patients treated with vedolizumab.

“Despite the disappointment with lack of a uniform response, further evaluation of vedolizumab as a beneficial treatment in PSC may be warranted in a subset of patients via a stratified randomized clinical trial,” Dr. Lynch and coauthors said in their report, which was published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Vedolizumab, a monoclonal antibody against integrin alpha4beta7, is effective in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, according to investigators, who added that the “gut-homing pathway” it targets has also been implicated in the pathophysiology of PSC.

“It is possible that vedolizumab may play a role in reducing lymphocyte infiltration into the liver in patients with PSC and thereby in reducing hepatic and biliary inflammation, authors of the retrospective analysis said.

Their analysis included 102 patients with PSC and IBD at 20 centers in Europe and North America. All patients had received at least three doses of vedolizumab for their IBD, given according to the usual dosing schedule. Most of the patients were male (64 patients, or 62.8%) and about 90% had classical large-duct PSC. About one-fifth had cirrhosis, and the majority (about 65%) had ulcerative colitis. Patients were followed until death, liver transplant, or 56 days after the last vedolizumab dose.

The median ALP increased from 1.53 times the upper limit of normal at baseline to 1.64 times the upper limit of normal by the last follow-up, an increase that was statistically significant (P = .018) but not clinically significant, according to investigators. Likewise, they said, statistically significant increases were seen overall in median alanine transaminase and aspartate aminotransferase levels.

However, 21 patients (20.6%) had a drop in ALP of at least 20% from baseline to last follow-up, and another 39 patients (38.2%) had stable ALP over that period, data show, while the remaining 42 (41.2%) had an increase of 20% or more.

Cirrhosis was associated with a near fivefold odds of a 20% or greater ALP drop from baseline to follow-up (odds ratio, 4.70, 95% confidence interval, 1.61-13.76), according to results of univariate analysis, which investigators said were “reproduced” in multivariate analysis.

While no other variables were so clearly linked to a 20% or greater drop in ALP, Dr. Lynch and colleagues said there was a “trend toward an association” in patients with ALP raised at baseline, and in those who had Crohn’s disease or IBD-unspecified instead of ulcerative colitis.

Endoscopic IBD responses were seen in 42 out of 74 patients (56.8%) for whom those data were available, investigators added.

A total of 22 patients (20.9%) had a liver-related outcome over median follow-up of 561 days; however, that outcome may be “slightly overrepresented” by an incidence of cholangitis in 8.8%, which in and of itself is not necessarily an indicator of advanced liver disease, said Dr. Lynch and coauthors in their report.

“This proportion of liver-related outcomes is consistent with the natural history of PSC and does not by itself indicate that vedolizumab treatment is harmful in PSC,” they said, adding that the findings were similar to a study of simtuzumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against lysyl oxidase-like 2, in patients with PSC, of whom 20.1% had a PSC-related event and the incidence of cholangitis was 13.2%.

The retrospective study was supported by the Birmingham National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre in the United Kingdom. Authors of the report provided disclosures related to Takeda, AbbVie, Dr. Falk Pharma, Intercept, MSD, Janssen, Vifor, Gilead, and Novartis, among others.

SOURCE: Lynch KD et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May 14. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.05.013.

While initial case reports and series provided preliminarily encouraging results, a larger retrospective study has provided no clear-cut evidence of biochemical response to vedolizumab in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and inflammatory bowel disease, investigators report.

A subset of patients in the retrospective analysis did experience a substantial drop in alkaline phosphatase (ALP), according to investigators with the International Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Study Group.

Overall, however, levels of that cholestasis marker rose by a small but statistically significant amount in this study, which included more than 100 patients with PSC and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

Responses were more likely in patients with cirrhosis and in those with elevated ALP at baseline, both of which are indicators of more aggressive disease, according to investigator Kate D. Lynch, MD, PhD, of the University of Oxford (England) and her coauthors.

The rate of liver outcomes was in line with the natural history of the disease, according to Dr. Lynch and coinvestigators, who added that most patients had an endoscopic IBD response, as might be expected based on studies of IBD-only patients treated with vedolizumab.

“Despite the disappointment with lack of a uniform response, further evaluation of vedolizumab as a beneficial treatment in PSC may be warranted in a subset of patients via a stratified randomized clinical trial,” Dr. Lynch and coauthors said in their report, which was published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Vedolizumab, a monoclonal antibody against integrin alpha4beta7, is effective in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, according to investigators, who added that the “gut-homing pathway” it targets has also been implicated in the pathophysiology of PSC.

“It is possible that vedolizumab may play a role in reducing lymphocyte infiltration into the liver in patients with PSC and thereby in reducing hepatic and biliary inflammation, authors of the retrospective analysis said.

Their analysis included 102 patients with PSC and IBD at 20 centers in Europe and North America. All patients had received at least three doses of vedolizumab for their IBD, given according to the usual dosing schedule. Most of the patients were male (64 patients, or 62.8%) and about 90% had classical large-duct PSC. About one-fifth had cirrhosis, and the majority (about 65%) had ulcerative colitis. Patients were followed until death, liver transplant, or 56 days after the last vedolizumab dose.

The median ALP increased from 1.53 times the upper limit of normal at baseline to 1.64 times the upper limit of normal by the last follow-up, an increase that was statistically significant (P = .018) but not clinically significant, according to investigators. Likewise, they said, statistically significant increases were seen overall in median alanine transaminase and aspartate aminotransferase levels.

However, 21 patients (20.6%) had a drop in ALP of at least 20% from baseline to last follow-up, and another 39 patients (38.2%) had stable ALP over that period, data show, while the remaining 42 (41.2%) had an increase of 20% or more.

Cirrhosis was associated with a near fivefold odds of a 20% or greater ALP drop from baseline to follow-up (odds ratio, 4.70, 95% confidence interval, 1.61-13.76), according to results of univariate analysis, which investigators said were “reproduced” in multivariate analysis.

While no other variables were so clearly linked to a 20% or greater drop in ALP, Dr. Lynch and colleagues said there was a “trend toward an association” in patients with ALP raised at baseline, and in those who had Crohn’s disease or IBD-unspecified instead of ulcerative colitis.

Endoscopic IBD responses were seen in 42 out of 74 patients (56.8%) for whom those data were available, investigators added.

A total of 22 patients (20.9%) had a liver-related outcome over median follow-up of 561 days; however, that outcome may be “slightly overrepresented” by an incidence of cholangitis in 8.8%, which in and of itself is not necessarily an indicator of advanced liver disease, said Dr. Lynch and coauthors in their report.

“This proportion of liver-related outcomes is consistent with the natural history of PSC and does not by itself indicate that vedolizumab treatment is harmful in PSC,” they said, adding that the findings were similar to a study of simtuzumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against lysyl oxidase-like 2, in patients with PSC, of whom 20.1% had a PSC-related event and the incidence of cholangitis was 13.2%.

The retrospective study was supported by the Birmingham National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre in the United Kingdom. Authors of the report provided disclosures related to Takeda, AbbVie, Dr. Falk Pharma, Intercept, MSD, Janssen, Vifor, Gilead, and Novartis, among others.

SOURCE: Lynch KD et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May 14. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.05.013.

While initial case reports and series provided preliminarily encouraging results, a larger retrospective study has provided no clear-cut evidence of biochemical response to vedolizumab in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and inflammatory bowel disease, investigators report.

A subset of patients in the retrospective analysis did experience a substantial drop in alkaline phosphatase (ALP), according to investigators with the International Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Study Group.

Overall, however, levels of that cholestasis marker rose by a small but statistically significant amount in this study, which included more than 100 patients with PSC and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

Responses were more likely in patients with cirrhosis and in those with elevated ALP at baseline, both of which are indicators of more aggressive disease, according to investigator Kate D. Lynch, MD, PhD, of the University of Oxford (England) and her coauthors.

The rate of liver outcomes was in line with the natural history of the disease, according to Dr. Lynch and coinvestigators, who added that most patients had an endoscopic IBD response, as might be expected based on studies of IBD-only patients treated with vedolizumab.

“Despite the disappointment with lack of a uniform response, further evaluation of vedolizumab as a beneficial treatment in PSC may be warranted in a subset of patients via a stratified randomized clinical trial,” Dr. Lynch and coauthors said in their report, which was published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Vedolizumab, a monoclonal antibody against integrin alpha4beta7, is effective in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, according to investigators, who added that the “gut-homing pathway” it targets has also been implicated in the pathophysiology of PSC.

“It is possible that vedolizumab may play a role in reducing lymphocyte infiltration into the liver in patients with PSC and thereby in reducing hepatic and biliary inflammation, authors of the retrospective analysis said.

Their analysis included 102 patients with PSC and IBD at 20 centers in Europe and North America. All patients had received at least three doses of vedolizumab for their IBD, given according to the usual dosing schedule. Most of the patients were male (64 patients, or 62.8%) and about 90% had classical large-duct PSC. About one-fifth had cirrhosis, and the majority (about 65%) had ulcerative colitis. Patients were followed until death, liver transplant, or 56 days after the last vedolizumab dose.

The median ALP increased from 1.53 times the upper limit of normal at baseline to 1.64 times the upper limit of normal by the last follow-up, an increase that was statistically significant (P = .018) but not clinically significant, according to investigators. Likewise, they said, statistically significant increases were seen overall in median alanine transaminase and aspartate aminotransferase levels.

However, 21 patients (20.6%) had a drop in ALP of at least 20% from baseline to last follow-up, and another 39 patients (38.2%) had stable ALP over that period, data show, while the remaining 42 (41.2%) had an increase of 20% or more.

Cirrhosis was associated with a near fivefold odds of a 20% or greater ALP drop from baseline to follow-up (odds ratio, 4.70, 95% confidence interval, 1.61-13.76), according to results of univariate analysis, which investigators said were “reproduced” in multivariate analysis.

While no other variables were so clearly linked to a 20% or greater drop in ALP, Dr. Lynch and colleagues said there was a “trend toward an association” in patients with ALP raised at baseline, and in those who had Crohn’s disease or IBD-unspecified instead of ulcerative colitis.

Endoscopic IBD responses were seen in 42 out of 74 patients (56.8%) for whom those data were available, investigators added.

A total of 22 patients (20.9%) had a liver-related outcome over median follow-up of 561 days; however, that outcome may be “slightly overrepresented” by an incidence of cholangitis in 8.8%, which in and of itself is not necessarily an indicator of advanced liver disease, said Dr. Lynch and coauthors in their report.

“This proportion of liver-related outcomes is consistent with the natural history of PSC and does not by itself indicate that vedolizumab treatment is harmful in PSC,” they said, adding that the findings were similar to a study of simtuzumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against lysyl oxidase-like 2, in patients with PSC, of whom 20.1% had a PSC-related event and the incidence of cholangitis was 13.2%.

The retrospective study was supported by the Birmingham National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre in the United Kingdom. Authors of the report provided disclosures related to Takeda, AbbVie, Dr. Falk Pharma, Intercept, MSD, Janssen, Vifor, Gilead, and Novartis, among others.

SOURCE: Lynch KD et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May 14. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.05.013.

Loss of pancreatic E-cadherin may interfere with normal growth and maintenance of the pancreas while contributing to multiple pathological processes, based on evidence from mouse models.

In the presence of an oncogene, E-cadherin may play a pivotal role in pancreatic tumor formation, according to lead author Yoshihiro Kaneta, of Yokohama (Japan) City University in Japan, and colleagues. These findings could lead to new treatment strategies for patients with pancreatic cancer who lack E-cadherin, they noted.

Previous studies have shown that E-cadherin is involved in tissue homeostasis, although exact mechanisms vary by organ, and have remained unclear in the pancreas, the investigators explained in Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

According to the investigators, E-cadherin expression is up-regulated in chemically induced acute pancreatitis, while in chronic pancreatitis, which is associated with an increased risk of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, E-cadherin expression is either low or absent. Other research has pointed to a link between dysregulated E-cadherin expression and cancer progression, with a loss of E-cadherin implicated in development of diffuse-type gastric cancer; however, evidence of a similar process in pancreatic cancer has not been reported, the investigators wrote.

To determine the role of E-cadherin in pancreatic function and tumor development, the investigators conducted experiments with knockout mice lacking pancreatic E-cadherin.

For the first 2 days after birth, knockout mice were similar both phenotypically and histologically to control mice. But over time, differences became apparent. Starting at day 3, control mice were comparatively larger than knockout mice, and by day 12, knockout mice began to die, with none surviving beyond day 28. Starting at day 6, histologic changes were observed in the pancreatic tissue of knockout mice, specifically, with aberrant epithelial tubules that resembled acinar-to-ductal metaplasia (ADM). Moreover, acinar cells were dilated and lacked surface expression of E-cadherin.

“These results suggested that E-cadherin was not required for pancreatic development at the embryonic stage but was required for growth and maintenance of the pancreas in the postnatal stage,” the investigators wrote.

Additional analyses revealed further differences between pancreatic tissue from knockout mice and control mice. A variety of aberrant processes were observed in knockout mice, including replacement of acini with alpha-smooth muscle actin–positive fibrotic cells, an increased number of ductal-like structures, a reduced number of amylase-positive cells, and an increased number of cytokeratin-19–positive and CD45-positive cells. Messenger RNA expression levels were also abnormal in pancreatic tissue of knockout mice, with shifts across a variety of cytokines and chemokines. These trends toward inflammation and fibrosis were described by the investigators as pancreatitis-like changes, although they observed no pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN), which is a precursor of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

In the presence of an oncogene, however, loss of pancreatic E-cadherin did contribute to the development of pancreatic cancer. In the presence of a Kras mutation, knockout mice began to develop PanINs and ADMs as soon as day 4. By day 7, PanINs stained partially positive for E-cadherin, showed structural abnormalities, and exhibited decreased amylase and increased cytokeratin-19. Within a similar time frame, pancreatic tissue began to adhere to the intestine, resulting in ascites and death. No metastases to other organs were observed.

Further testing showed that pancreatic stroma contained tumor cells. While DNA double-strand breaks were scarce, the investigators pointed out that chemotherapy and radiotherapy are typically responsible for DNA damage. Based on previous research linking stem cell conversion with Kras-acquired resistance, the investigators tested markers of stem cells in pancreatic tissue of knockout mice, finding that CD44, KLF4, and KLF5 were increased.

“These observations suggested that loss of E-cadherin provided tumorigenic activity to pancreatic cells and contributed to PanIN formation,” the investigators wrote.

Additional experiments with cell lines supported the above results and added further insight. Of clinical relevance, the investigators suggested that targeting Hdac1 with histone deacetylase inhibitors may be a viable treatment strategy for patients lacking pancreatic E-cadherin.

The study was funded by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI grant JP17K09465 and the Yokohama City University Kamome project. The investigators declared no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Kaneta Y et al. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Sep 14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2019.09.001.

Loss of pancreatic E-cadherin may interfere with normal growth and maintenance of the pancreas while contributing to multiple pathological processes, based on evidence from mouse models.

In the presence of an oncogene, E-cadherin may play a pivotal role in pancreatic tumor formation, according to lead author Yoshihiro Kaneta, of Yokohama (Japan) City University in Japan, and colleagues. These findings could lead to new treatment strategies for patients with pancreatic cancer who lack E-cadherin, they noted.

Previous studies have shown that E-cadherin is involved in tissue homeostasis, although exact mechanisms vary by organ, and have remained unclear in the pancreas, the investigators explained in Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

According to the investigators, E-cadherin expression is up-regulated in chemically induced acute pancreatitis, while in chronic pancreatitis, which is associated with an increased risk of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, E-cadherin expression is either low or absent. Other research has pointed to a link between dysregulated E-cadherin expression and cancer progression, with a loss of E-cadherin implicated in development of diffuse-type gastric cancer; however, evidence of a similar process in pancreatic cancer has not been reported, the investigators wrote.

To determine the role of E-cadherin in pancreatic function and tumor development, the investigators conducted experiments with knockout mice lacking pancreatic E-cadherin.

For the first 2 days after birth, knockout mice were similar both phenotypically and histologically to control mice. But over time, differences became apparent. Starting at day 3, control mice were comparatively larger than knockout mice, and by day 12, knockout mice began to die, with none surviving beyond day 28. Starting at day 6, histologic changes were observed in the pancreatic tissue of knockout mice, specifically, with aberrant epithelial tubules that resembled acinar-to-ductal metaplasia (ADM). Moreover, acinar cells were dilated and lacked surface expression of E-cadherin.

“These results suggested that E-cadherin was not required for pancreatic development at the embryonic stage but was required for growth and maintenance of the pancreas in the postnatal stage,” the investigators wrote.

Additional analyses revealed further differences between pancreatic tissue from knockout mice and control mice. A variety of aberrant processes were observed in knockout mice, including replacement of acini with alpha-smooth muscle actin–positive fibrotic cells, an increased number of ductal-like structures, a reduced number of amylase-positive cells, and an increased number of cytokeratin-19–positive and CD45-positive cells. Messenger RNA expression levels were also abnormal in pancreatic tissue of knockout mice, with shifts across a variety of cytokines and chemokines. These trends toward inflammation and fibrosis were described by the investigators as pancreatitis-like changes, although they observed no pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN), which is a precursor of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

In the presence of an oncogene, however, loss of pancreatic E-cadherin did contribute to the development of pancreatic cancer. In the presence of a Kras mutation, knockout mice began to develop PanINs and ADMs as soon as day 4. By day 7, PanINs stained partially positive for E-cadherin, showed structural abnormalities, and exhibited decreased amylase and increased cytokeratin-19. Within a similar time frame, pancreatic tissue began to adhere to the intestine, resulting in ascites and death. No metastases to other organs were observed.

Further testing showed that pancreatic stroma contained tumor cells. While DNA double-strand breaks were scarce, the investigators pointed out that chemotherapy and radiotherapy are typically responsible for DNA damage. Based on previous research linking stem cell conversion with Kras-acquired resistance, the investigators tested markers of stem cells in pancreatic tissue of knockout mice, finding that CD44, KLF4, and KLF5 were increased.

“These observations suggested that loss of E-cadherin provided tumorigenic activity to pancreatic cells and contributed to PanIN formation,” the investigators wrote.

Additional experiments with cell lines supported the above results and added further insight. Of clinical relevance, the investigators suggested that targeting Hdac1 with histone deacetylase inhibitors may be a viable treatment strategy for patients lacking pancreatic E-cadherin.

The study was funded by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI grant JP17K09465 and the Yokohama City University Kamome project. The investigators declared no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Kaneta Y et al. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Sep 14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2019.09.001.

Loss of pancreatic E-cadherin may interfere with normal growth and maintenance of the pancreas while contributing to multiple pathological processes, based on evidence from mouse models.

In the presence of an oncogene, E-cadherin may play a pivotal role in pancreatic tumor formation, according to lead author Yoshihiro Kaneta, of Yokohama (Japan) City University in Japan, and colleagues. These findings could lead to new treatment strategies for patients with pancreatic cancer who lack E-cadherin, they noted.

Previous studies have shown that E-cadherin is involved in tissue homeostasis, although exact mechanisms vary by organ, and have remained unclear in the pancreas, the investigators explained in Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

According to the investigators, E-cadherin expression is up-regulated in chemically induced acute pancreatitis, while in chronic pancreatitis, which is associated with an increased risk of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, E-cadherin expression is either low or absent. Other research has pointed to a link between dysregulated E-cadherin expression and cancer progression, with a loss of E-cadherin implicated in development of diffuse-type gastric cancer; however, evidence of a similar process in pancreatic cancer has not been reported, the investigators wrote.

To determine the role of E-cadherin in pancreatic function and tumor development, the investigators conducted experiments with knockout mice lacking pancreatic E-cadherin.

For the first 2 days after birth, knockout mice were similar both phenotypically and histologically to control mice. But over time, differences became apparent. Starting at day 3, control mice were comparatively larger than knockout mice, and by day 12, knockout mice began to die, with none surviving beyond day 28. Starting at day 6, histologic changes were observed in the pancreatic tissue of knockout mice, specifically, with aberrant epithelial tubules that resembled acinar-to-ductal metaplasia (ADM). Moreover, acinar cells were dilated and lacked surface expression of E-cadherin.

“These results suggested that E-cadherin was not required for pancreatic development at the embryonic stage but was required for growth and maintenance of the pancreas in the postnatal stage,” the investigators wrote.

Additional analyses revealed further differences between pancreatic tissue from knockout mice and control mice. A variety of aberrant processes were observed in knockout mice, including replacement of acini with alpha-smooth muscle actin–positive fibrotic cells, an increased number of ductal-like structures, a reduced number of amylase-positive cells, and an increased number of cytokeratin-19–positive and CD45-positive cells. Messenger RNA expression levels were also abnormal in pancreatic tissue of knockout mice, with shifts across a variety of cytokines and chemokines. These trends toward inflammation and fibrosis were described by the investigators as pancreatitis-like changes, although they observed no pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN), which is a precursor of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

In the presence of an oncogene, however, loss of pancreatic E-cadherin did contribute to the development of pancreatic cancer. In the presence of a Kras mutation, knockout mice began to develop PanINs and ADMs as soon as day 4. By day 7, PanINs stained partially positive for E-cadherin, showed structural abnormalities, and exhibited decreased amylase and increased cytokeratin-19. Within a similar time frame, pancreatic tissue began to adhere to the intestine, resulting in ascites and death. No metastases to other organs were observed.

Further testing showed that pancreatic stroma contained tumor cells. While DNA double-strand breaks were scarce, the investigators pointed out that chemotherapy and radiotherapy are typically responsible for DNA damage. Based on previous research linking stem cell conversion with Kras-acquired resistance, the investigators tested markers of stem cells in pancreatic tissue of knockout mice, finding that CD44, KLF4, and KLF5 were increased.

“These observations suggested that loss of E-cadherin provided tumorigenic activity to pancreatic cells and contributed to PanIN formation,” the investigators wrote.

Additional experiments with cell lines supported the above results and added further insight. Of clinical relevance, the investigators suggested that targeting Hdac1 with histone deacetylase inhibitors may be a viable treatment strategy for patients lacking pancreatic E-cadherin.

The study was funded by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI grant JP17K09465 and the Yokohama City University Kamome project. The investigators declared no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Kaneta Y et al. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Sep 14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2019.09.001.

A single-use duodenoscope may reduce the risk of postendoscopic infections while maintaining a high level of user satisfaction, based on a recent multicenter case series study.

At six tertiary referral centers in the United States, seven expert endoscopists performed more than 70 procedures with disposable scopes, ultimately reporting a median satisfaction score of 9 out of 10, according to lead author Venkataraman Muthusamy, MD, of UCLA Health in Los Angeles, and colleagues.

Writing for Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, the investigators noted that duodenoscope-related infections represent a serious threat to public health, particularly when considered in the context of antibiotic resistance and the high number of endoscopic procedures performed annually.

“Solutions to the duodenoscope contamination problem remain elusive,” the investigators wrote. “Evidence-based interventions are important to guard against labor-intensive measures that are unfeasible, unaffordable, and potentially ineffective.”

According to the investigators, routine culture surveillance and field investigations following suspected duodenoscope-related infections may fail to detect culprit bacteria or shortcomings in equipment reprocessing; and even when performed correctly, standard reprocessing can be insufficient.

“Using current reprocessing techniques, improved compliance with reprocessing guidelines is not a definitive solution because reusable duodenoscope contamination may be present even after high-level disinfection or sterilization,” the investigators wrote, going on to cite Food and Drug Administration–reported contamination rates of 5.4% for high-concern organisms.

To determine if a single-use endoscope could overcome such risks, the investigators first conducted preclinical testing with animal laboratories and simulations, finding that a single-use duodenoscope was comparable with three reusable scope models. The present study, which included 73 patients with normal pancreaticobiliary anatomy, evaluated clinical feasibility, safety, and performance. The single-use duodenoscope was a first-generation device by Boston Scientific named EXALT Model D.

Of the 73 patients, 13 underwent roll-in maneuvers and 60 underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The most common cause for ERCP was exchange or removal of biliary stent (55.0%), followed by evaluation of biliary defect or stricture (26.7%), then bile duct stone clearance (18.3%). The majority of ERCPs had an American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) procedural complexity grade of 2 (43.3%) or 3 (43.3%), while a minority were graded 1 (11.7%) or, most severe, 4 (1.7%).

Two ERCPs required crossover to a reusable duodenoscope for completion. In the first instance, crossover was needed because dilation of a biliary stricture was unsuccessful, with the endoscopist reporting difficulties maneuvering the disposable scope, possibly because of shaft stiffness. In the second case, crossover was elected because cannulation was unsuccessful with standard access techniques; however, cannulation also was not possible with the reusable scope, necessitating an alternative approach.

According to the investigators, safety signals were comparable with standard practice. No serious, scope-related adverse events were reported. Serious adverse events of any kind were relatively uncommon; three patients developed post-ERCP pancreatitis within 7 days of ERCP, one developed a postsphincterotomy bleed, and one had worsening of a preexisting infection that required hospitalization.

As described above, the endoscopists reported a median overall satisfaction score of 9 out of 10. Specifically, 17 out of 23 scored ERCP maneuvers (73.9%) received a median 5 out of 5 performance rating. Out of 1,289 total ratings, almost all (98.1%) received a performance rating of at least 3 out of 5. Low-scoring performance characteristics (receiving at least one “1” rating), included elevator function; aspects of positioning; visualization; image quality, brightness, or appearance; and ease and ability of passing ancillary devices through the channel of the single-use duodenoscope and into the papilla.

“The new device provides an alternative to reusable duodenoscopes that may harbor residual contamination despite appropriately implemented reprocessing,” the investigators concluded.

They also pointed out that switching to disposable scopes would not completely put an end to postendoscopic infections.

“The single-use duodenoscope is a timely and innovative option to improve exogenous infection control, and must be used with awareness of the continued risk of endogenous infection, with standard infection control precautions and continued diligence in the use of existing reusable devices,” they wrote.

The study was funded by Boston Scientific. The investigators reported additional relationships with Medtronic, Ethicon/Torax, CapsoVision, and others.

SOURCE: Muthusamy V et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Oct 11. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.10.052.

A single-use duodenoscope may reduce the risk of postendoscopic infections while maintaining a high level of user satisfaction, based on a recent multicenter case series study.

At six tertiary referral centers in the United States, seven expert endoscopists performed more than 70 procedures with disposable scopes, ultimately reporting a median satisfaction score of 9 out of 10, according to lead author Venkataraman Muthusamy, MD, of UCLA Health in Los Angeles, and colleagues.

Writing for Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, the investigators noted that duodenoscope-related infections represent a serious threat to public health, particularly when considered in the context of antibiotic resistance and the high number of endoscopic procedures performed annually.

“Solutions to the duodenoscope contamination problem remain elusive,” the investigators wrote. “Evidence-based interventions are important to guard against labor-intensive measures that are unfeasible, unaffordable, and potentially ineffective.”

According to the investigators, routine culture surveillance and field investigations following suspected duodenoscope-related infections may fail to detect culprit bacteria or shortcomings in equipment reprocessing; and even when performed correctly, standard reprocessing can be insufficient.

“Using current reprocessing techniques, improved compliance with reprocessing guidelines is not a definitive solution because reusable duodenoscope contamination may be present even after high-level disinfection or sterilization,” the investigators wrote, going on to cite Food and Drug Administration–reported contamination rates of 5.4% for high-concern organisms.

To determine if a single-use endoscope could overcome such risks, the investigators first conducted preclinical testing with animal laboratories and simulations, finding that a single-use duodenoscope was comparable with three reusable scope models. The present study, which included 73 patients with normal pancreaticobiliary anatomy, evaluated clinical feasibility, safety, and performance. The single-use duodenoscope was a first-generation device by Boston Scientific named EXALT Model D.

Of the 73 patients, 13 underwent roll-in maneuvers and 60 underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The most common cause for ERCP was exchange or removal of biliary stent (55.0%), followed by evaluation of biliary defect or stricture (26.7%), then bile duct stone clearance (18.3%). The majority of ERCPs had an American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) procedural complexity grade of 2 (43.3%) or 3 (43.3%), while a minority were graded 1 (11.7%) or, most severe, 4 (1.7%).

Two ERCPs required crossover to a reusable duodenoscope for completion. In the first instance, crossover was needed because dilation of a biliary stricture was unsuccessful, with the endoscopist reporting difficulties maneuvering the disposable scope, possibly because of shaft stiffness. In the second case, crossover was elected because cannulation was unsuccessful with standard access techniques; however, cannulation also was not possible with the reusable scope, necessitating an alternative approach.

According to the investigators, safety signals were comparable with standard practice. No serious, scope-related adverse events were reported. Serious adverse events of any kind were relatively uncommon; three patients developed post-ERCP pancreatitis within 7 days of ERCP, one developed a postsphincterotomy bleed, and one had worsening of a preexisting infection that required hospitalization.

As described above, the endoscopists reported a median overall satisfaction score of 9 out of 10. Specifically, 17 out of 23 scored ERCP maneuvers (73.9%) received a median 5 out of 5 performance rating. Out of 1,289 total ratings, almost all (98.1%) received a performance rating of at least 3 out of 5. Low-scoring performance characteristics (receiving at least one “1” rating), included elevator function; aspects of positioning; visualization; image quality, brightness, or appearance; and ease and ability of passing ancillary devices through the channel of the single-use duodenoscope and into the papilla.

“The new device provides an alternative to reusable duodenoscopes that may harbor residual contamination despite appropriately implemented reprocessing,” the investigators concluded.

They also pointed out that switching to disposable scopes would not completely put an end to postendoscopic infections.

“The single-use duodenoscope is a timely and innovative option to improve exogenous infection control, and must be used with awareness of the continued risk of endogenous infection, with standard infection control precautions and continued diligence in the use of existing reusable devices,” they wrote.

The study was funded by Boston Scientific. The investigators reported additional relationships with Medtronic, Ethicon/Torax, CapsoVision, and others.

SOURCE: Muthusamy V et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Oct 11. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.10.052.

A single-use duodenoscope may reduce the risk of postendoscopic infections while maintaining a high level of user satisfaction, based on a recent multicenter case series study.

At six tertiary referral centers in the United States, seven expert endoscopists performed more than 70 procedures with disposable scopes, ultimately reporting a median satisfaction score of 9 out of 10, according to lead author Venkataraman Muthusamy, MD, of UCLA Health in Los Angeles, and colleagues.

Writing for Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, the investigators noted that duodenoscope-related infections represent a serious threat to public health, particularly when considered in the context of antibiotic resistance and the high number of endoscopic procedures performed annually.

“Solutions to the duodenoscope contamination problem remain elusive,” the investigators wrote. “Evidence-based interventions are important to guard against labor-intensive measures that are unfeasible, unaffordable, and potentially ineffective.”

According to the investigators, routine culture surveillance and field investigations following suspected duodenoscope-related infections may fail to detect culprit bacteria or shortcomings in equipment reprocessing; and even when performed correctly, standard reprocessing can be insufficient.

“Using current reprocessing techniques, improved compliance with reprocessing guidelines is not a definitive solution because reusable duodenoscope contamination may be present even after high-level disinfection or sterilization,” the investigators wrote, going on to cite Food and Drug Administration–reported contamination rates of 5.4% for high-concern organisms.

To determine if a single-use endoscope could overcome such risks, the investigators first conducted preclinical testing with animal laboratories and simulations, finding that a single-use duodenoscope was comparable with three reusable scope models. The present study, which included 73 patients with normal pancreaticobiliary anatomy, evaluated clinical feasibility, safety, and performance. The single-use duodenoscope was a first-generation device by Boston Scientific named EXALT Model D.

Of the 73 patients, 13 underwent roll-in maneuvers and 60 underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The most common cause for ERCP was exchange or removal of biliary stent (55.0%), followed by evaluation of biliary defect or stricture (26.7%), then bile duct stone clearance (18.3%). The majority of ERCPs had an American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) procedural complexity grade of 2 (43.3%) or 3 (43.3%), while a minority were graded 1 (11.7%) or, most severe, 4 (1.7%).

Two ERCPs required crossover to a reusable duodenoscope for completion. In the first instance, crossover was needed because dilation of a biliary stricture was unsuccessful, with the endoscopist reporting difficulties maneuvering the disposable scope, possibly because of shaft stiffness. In the second case, crossover was elected because cannulation was unsuccessful with standard access techniques; however, cannulation also was not possible with the reusable scope, necessitating an alternative approach.

According to the investigators, safety signals were comparable with standard practice. No serious, scope-related adverse events were reported. Serious adverse events of any kind were relatively uncommon; three patients developed post-ERCP pancreatitis within 7 days of ERCP, one developed a postsphincterotomy bleed, and one had worsening of a preexisting infection that required hospitalization.

As described above, the endoscopists reported a median overall satisfaction score of 9 out of 10. Specifically, 17 out of 23 scored ERCP maneuvers (73.9%) received a median 5 out of 5 performance rating. Out of 1,289 total ratings, almost all (98.1%) received a performance rating of at least 3 out of 5. Low-scoring performance characteristics (receiving at least one “1” rating), included elevator function; aspects of positioning; visualization; image quality, brightness, or appearance; and ease and ability of passing ancillary devices through the channel of the single-use duodenoscope and into the papilla.

“The new device provides an alternative to reusable duodenoscopes that may harbor residual contamination despite appropriately implemented reprocessing,” the investigators concluded.

They also pointed out that switching to disposable scopes would not completely put an end to postendoscopic infections.

“The single-use duodenoscope is a timely and innovative option to improve exogenous infection control, and must be used with awareness of the continued risk of endogenous infection, with standard infection control precautions and continued diligence in the use of existing reusable devices,” they wrote.

The study was funded by Boston Scientific. The investigators reported additional relationships with Medtronic, Ethicon/Torax, CapsoVision, and others.

SOURCE: Muthusamy V et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Oct 11. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.10.052.

The American Gastroenterological Association recently issued a clinical practice update for the management of pancreatic necrosis, including 15 recommendations based on a comprehensive literature review and the experiences of leading experts.

Recommendations range from the general, such as the need for a multidisciplinary approach, to the specific, such as the superiority of metal over plastic stents for endoscopic transmural drainage.

The expert review, which was conducted by lead author Todd H. Baron, MD, of the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill and three other colleagues, was vetted by the AGA Institute Clinical Practice Updates Committee (CPUC) and the AGA Governing Board. In addition, the update underwent external peer review prior to publication in Gastroenterology.

In the update, the authors outlined the clinical landscape for pancreatic necrosis, including challenges posed by complex cases and a mortality rate as high as 30%.

“Successful management of these patients requires expert multidisciplinary care by gastroenterologists, surgeons, interventional radiologists, and specialists in critical care medicine, infectious disease, and nutrition,” the investigators wrote.

They went on to explain how management has evolved over the past 10 years.

“Whereby major surgical intervention and debridement was once the mainstay of therapy for patients with symptomatic necrotic collections, a minimally invasive approach focusing on percutaneous drainage and/or endoscopic drainage or debridement is now favored,” they wrote. They added that debridement is still generally agreed to be the best choice for cases of infected necrosis or patients with sterile necrosis “marked by abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and nutritional failure or with associated complications including gastrointestinal luminal obstruction, biliary obstruction, recurrent acute pancreatitis, fistulas, or persistent systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS).”

Other elements of care, however, remain debated, the investigators noted, which has led to variations in multiple aspects of care, such as interventional timing, intravenous fluids, antibiotics, and nutrition. Within this framework, the present practice update is aimed at offering “concise best practice advice for the optimal management of patients with this highly morbid condition.”

Among these pieces of advice, the authors emphasized that routine prophylactic antibiotics and/or antifungals to prevent infected necrosis are unsupported by multiple clinical trials. When infection is suspected, the update recommends broad spectrum intravenous antibiotics, noting that, in most cases, it is unnecessary to perform CT-guided fine-needle aspiration for cultures and gram stain.

Regarding nutrition, the update recommends against “pancreatic rest”; instead, it calls for early oral intake and, if this is not possible, then initiation of total enteral nutrition. Although the authors deemed multiple routes of enteral feeding acceptable, they favored nasogastric or nasoduodenal tubes, when appropriate, because of ease of placement and maintenance. For prolonged total enteral nutrition or patients unable to tolerate nasoenteric feeding, the authors recommended endoscopic feeding tube placement with a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube for those who can tolerate gastric feeding or a percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy tube for those who cannot or have a high risk of aspiration.

As described above, the update recommends debridement for cases of infected pancreatic necrosis. Ideally, this should be performed at least 4 weeks after onset, and avoided altogether within the first 2 weeks, because of associated risks of morbidity and mortality; instead, during this acute phase, percutaneous drainage may be considered.

For walled-off pancreatic necrosis, the authors recommended transmural drainage via endoscopic therapy because this mitigates risk of pancreatocutaneous fistula. Percutaneous drainage may be considered in addition to, or in absence of, endoscopic drainage, depending on clinical status.

The remainder of the update covers decisions related to stents, other minimally invasive techniques, open operative debridement, and disconnected left pancreatic remnants, along with discussions of key supporting clinical trials.

The investigators disclosed relationships with Cook Endoscopy, Boston Scientific, Olympus, and others.

SOURCE: Baron TH et al. Gastroenterology. 2019 Aug 31. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.07.064.

Review the Gastroenterology clinical guidelines collection for AGA Institute statements detailing preferred approaches to specific medical problems or issues based on the most current available data at https://www.gastrojournal.org/content/agai. 

The American Gastroenterological Association recently issued a clinical practice update for the management of pancreatic necrosis, including 15 recommendations based on a comprehensive literature review and the experiences of leading experts.

Recommendations range from the general, such as the need for a multidisciplinary approach, to the specific, such as the superiority of metal over plastic stents for endoscopic transmural drainage.

The expert review, which was conducted by lead author Todd H. Baron, MD, of the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill and three other colleagues, was vetted by the AGA Institute Clinical Practice Updates Committee (CPUC) and the AGA Governing Board. In addition, the update underwent external peer review prior to publication in Gastroenterology.

In the update, the authors outlined the clinical landscape for pancreatic necrosis, including challenges posed by complex cases and a mortality rate as high as 30%.

“Successful management of these patients requires expert multidisciplinary care by gastroenterologists, surgeons, interventional radiologists, and specialists in critical care medicine, infectious disease, and nutrition,” the investigators wrote.

They went on to explain how management has evolved over the past 10 years.

“Whereby major surgical intervention and debridement was once the mainstay of therapy for patients with symptomatic necrotic collections, a minimally invasive approach focusing on percutaneous drainage and/or endoscopic drainage or debridement is now favored,” they wrote. They added that debridement is still generally agreed to be the best choice for cases of infected necrosis or patients with sterile necrosis “marked by abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and nutritional failure or with associated complications including gastrointestinal luminal obstruction, biliary obstruction, recurrent acute pancreatitis, fistulas, or persistent systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS).”

Other elements of care, however, remain debated, the investigators noted, which has led to variations in multiple aspects of care, such as interventional timing, intravenous fluids, antibiotics, and nutrition. Within this framework, the present practice update is aimed at offering “concise best practice advice for the optimal management of patients with this highly morbid condition.”

Among these pieces of advice, the authors emphasized that routine prophylactic antibiotics and/or antifungals to prevent infected necrosis are unsupported by multiple clinical trials. When infection is suspected, the update recommends broad spectrum intravenous antibiotics, noting that, in most cases, it is unnecessary to perform CT-guided fine-needle aspiration for cultures and gram stain.

Regarding nutrition, the update recommends against “pancreatic rest”; instead, it calls for early oral intake and, if this is not possible, then initiation of total enteral nutrition. Although the authors deemed multiple routes of enteral feeding acceptable, they favored nasogastric or nasoduodenal tubes, when appropriate, because of ease of placement and maintenance. For prolonged total enteral nutrition or patients unable to tolerate nasoenteric feeding, the authors recommended endoscopic feeding tube placement with a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube for those who can tolerate gastric feeding or a percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy tube for those who cannot or have a high risk of aspiration.

As described above, the update recommends debridement for cases of infected pancreatic necrosis. Ideally, this should be performed at least 4 weeks after onset, and avoided altogether within the first 2 weeks, because of associated risks of morbidity and mortality; instead, during this acute phase, percutaneous drainage may be considered.

For walled-off pancreatic necrosis, the authors recommended transmural drainage via endoscopic therapy because this mitigates risk of pancreatocutaneous fistula. Percutaneous drainage may be considered in addition to, or in absence of, endoscopic drainage, depending on clinical status.

The remainder of the update covers decisions related to stents, other minimally invasive techniques, open operative debridement, and disconnected left pancreatic remnants, along with discussions of key supporting clinical trials.

The investigators disclosed relationships with Cook Endoscopy, Boston Scientific, Olympus, and others.

SOURCE: Baron TH et al. Gastroenterology. 2019 Aug 31. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.07.064.

Review the Gastroenterology clinical guidelines collection for AGA Institute statements detailing preferred approaches to specific medical problems or issues based on the most current available data at https://www.gastrojournal.org/content/agai. 

The American Gastroenterological Association recently issued a clinical practice update for the management of pancreatic necrosis, including 15 recommendations based on a comprehensive literature review and the experiences of leading experts.

Recommendations range from the general, such as the need for a multidisciplinary approach, to the specific, such as the superiority of metal over plastic stents for endoscopic transmural drainage.

The expert review, which was conducted by lead author Todd H. Baron, MD, of the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill and three other colleagues, was vetted by the AGA Institute Clinical Practice Updates Committee (CPUC) and the AGA Governing Board. In addition, the update underwent external peer review prior to publication in Gastroenterology.

In the update, the authors outlined the clinical landscape for pancreatic necrosis, including challenges posed by complex cases and a mortality rate as high as 30%.

“Successful management of these patients requires expert multidisciplinary care by gastroenterologists, surgeons, interventional radiologists, and specialists in critical care medicine, infectious disease, and nutrition,” the investigators wrote.

They went on to explain how management has evolved over the past 10 years.

“Whereby major surgical intervention and debridement was once the mainstay of therapy for patients with symptomatic necrotic collections, a minimally invasive approach focusing on percutaneous drainage and/or endoscopic drainage or debridement is now favored,” they wrote. They added that debridement is still generally agreed to be the best choice for cases of infected necrosis or patients with sterile necrosis “marked by abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and nutritional failure or with associated complications including gastrointestinal luminal obstruction, biliary obstruction, recurrent acute pancreatitis, fistulas, or persistent systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS).”

Other elements of care, however, remain debated, the investigators noted, which has led to variations in multiple aspects of care, such as interventional timing, intravenous fluids, antibiotics, and nutrition. Within this framework, the present practice update is aimed at offering “concise best practice advice for the optimal management of patients with this highly morbid condition.”

Among these pieces of advice, the authors emphasized that routine prophylactic antibiotics and/or antifungals to prevent infected necrosis are unsupported by multiple clinical trials. When infection is suspected, the update recommends broad spectrum intravenous antibiotics, noting that, in most cases, it is unnecessary to perform CT-guided fine-needle aspiration for cultures and gram stain.

Regarding nutrition, the update recommends against “pancreatic rest”; instead, it calls for early oral intake and, if this is not possible, then initiation of total enteral nutrition. Although the authors deemed multiple routes of enteral feeding acceptable, they favored nasogastric or nasoduodenal tubes, when appropriate, because of ease of placement and maintenance. For prolonged total enteral nutrition or patients unable to tolerate nasoenteric feeding, the authors recommended endoscopic feeding tube placement with a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube for those who can tolerate gastric feeding or a percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy tube for those who cannot or have a high risk of aspiration.

As described above, the update recommends debridement for cases of infected pancreatic necrosis. Ideally, this should be performed at least 4 weeks after onset, and avoided altogether within the first 2 weeks, because of associated risks of morbidity and mortality; instead, during this acute phase, percutaneous drainage may be considered.

For walled-off pancreatic necrosis, the authors recommended transmural drainage via endoscopic therapy because this mitigates risk of pancreatocutaneous fistula. Percutaneous drainage may be considered in addition to, or in absence of, endoscopic drainage, depending on clinical status.

The remainder of the update covers decisions related to stents, other minimally invasive techniques, open operative debridement, and disconnected left pancreatic remnants, along with discussions of key supporting clinical trials.

The investigators disclosed relationships with Cook Endoscopy, Boston Scientific, Olympus, and others.

SOURCE: Baron TH et al. Gastroenterology. 2019 Aug 31. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.07.064.

Review the Gastroenterology clinical guidelines collection for AGA Institute statements detailing preferred approaches to specific medical problems or issues based on the most current available data at https://www.gastrojournal.org/content/agai. 

The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (CAG) recently co-published a clinical practice guideline for the management of bile acid diarrhea (BAD) in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology and the Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology.

Given a minimal evidence base, 16 out of the 17 guideline recommendations are conditional, according to lead author Daniel C. Sadowski, MD, of Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Alta., and colleagues. Considering the shortage of high-quality evidence, the panel called for more randomized clinical trials to address current knowledge gaps.

“BAD is an understudied, often underappreciated condition, and questions remain regarding its diagnosis and treatment,” the panelists wrote in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. “There have been guidelines on the management of chronic diarrhea from the American Gastroenterological Association, and the British Society of Gastroenterology, but diagnosis and management of BAD was not assessed extensively in these publications. The British Society of Gastroenterology updated guidelines on the investigation of chronic diarrhea in adults, published after the consensus meeting, addressed some issues related to BAD.”

For the current guideline, using available evidence and clinical experience, expert panelists from Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom aimed to “provide a reasonable and practical approach to care for specialists.” The guideline was further reviewed by the CAG Practice Affairs and Clinical Affairs Committees and the CAG Board of Directors.

The guideline first puts BAD in clinical context, noting a chronic diarrhea prevalence rate of approximately 5%. According to the guideline, approximately 1 out of 4 of these patients with chronic diarrhea may have BAD and prevalence of BAD is likely higher among those with other conditions, such as terminal ileal disease.

While BAD may be relatively common, it isn’t necessarily easy to diagnose, the panelists noted.

“The diagnosis of BAD continues to be a challenge, although this may be improved in the future with the general availability of screening serologic tests and other diagnostic tests,” the panelists wrote. “Although a treatment trial with bile acid sequestrants therapy (BAST) often is used, this approach has not been studied adequately, and likely is imprecise, and may lead to both undertreatment and overtreatment.”

Instead, the panelists recommended testing for BAD with 75-selenium homocholic acid taurine (SeHCAT) or 7-alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one.

After addressing treatable causes of BAD, the guideline recommends initial therapy with cholestyramine or, if this is poorly tolerated, switching to BAST. However, the panelists advised against BAST for patients with resection or ileal Crohn’s disease, for whom other antidiarrheal agents are more suitable. When appropriate, BAST should be given at the lowest effective dose, with periodic trials of on-demand, intermittent administration, the panelists recommended. When BAST is ineffective, the guideline recommends that clinicians review concurrent medications as a possible cause of BAD or reinvestigate.

Concluding the guideline, the panelists emphasized the need for more high-quality research.

“The group recognized that specific, high-certainty evidence was lacking in many areas and recommended further studies that would improve the data available in future methodologic evaluations,” the panelists wrote.

While improving diagnostic accuracy of BAD should be a major goal of such research, progress is currently limited by an integral shortcoming of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies, the panelists wrote.

“The main challenge in conducting DTA studies for BAD is the lack of a widely accepted or universally agreed-upon reference standard because the condition is defined and classified based on pathophysiologic mechanisms and its response to treatment (BAST),” the panelists wrote. “In addition, the index tests (SeHCAT, C4, FGF19, fecal bile acid assay) provide a continuous measure of metabolic function. Hence, DTA studies are not the most appropriate study design.”

“Therefore, one of the research priorities in BAD is for the scientific and clinical communities to agree on a reference standard that best represents BAD (e.g., response to BAST), with full understanding that the reference standard is and likely will be imperfect.”

The guideline was funded by unrestricted grants from Pendopharm and GE Healthcare Canada. The panelists disclosed relationships with AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Merck, Pfizer, and others.

Review the AGA clinical practice guideline on the laboratory evaluation of functional diarrhea and diarrhea-predominan irritable bowel syndrome in adults at https:/www.gastrojournal.org/article/S0016-5085(19)41083-4/fulltext.

SOURCE: Sadowski DC et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Sep 14. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.062.

The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (CAG) recently co-published a clinical practice guideline for the management of bile acid diarrhea (BAD) in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology and the Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology.

Given a minimal evidence base, 16 out of the 17 guideline recommendations are conditional, according to lead author Daniel C. Sadowski, MD, of Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Alta., and colleagues. Considering the shortage of high-quality evidence, the panel called for more randomized clinical trials to address current knowledge gaps.

“BAD is an understudied, often underappreciated condition, and questions remain regarding its diagnosis and treatment,” the panelists wrote in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. “There have been guidelines on the management of chronic diarrhea from the American Gastroenterological Association, and the British Society of Gastroenterology, but diagnosis and management of BAD was not assessed extensively in these publications. The British Society of Gastroenterology updated guidelines on the investigation of chronic diarrhea in adults, published after the consensus meeting, addressed some issues related to BAD.”

For the current guideline, using available evidence and clinical experience, expert panelists from Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom aimed to “provide a reasonable and practical approach to care for specialists.” The guideline was further reviewed by the CAG Practice Affairs and Clinical Affairs Committees and the CAG Board of Directors.

The guideline first puts BAD in clinical context, noting a chronic diarrhea prevalence rate of approximately 5%. According to the guideline, approximately 1 out of 4 of these patients with chronic diarrhea may have BAD and prevalence of BAD is likely higher among those with other conditions, such as terminal ileal disease.

While BAD may be relatively common, it isn’t necessarily easy to diagnose, the panelists noted.

“The diagnosis of BAD continues to be a challenge, although this may be improved in the future with the general availability of screening serologic tests and other diagnostic tests,” the panelists wrote. “Although a treatment trial with bile acid sequestrants therapy (BAST) often is used, this approach has not been studied adequately, and likely is imprecise, and may lead to both undertreatment and overtreatment.”

Instead, the panelists recommended testing for BAD with 75-selenium homocholic acid taurine (SeHCAT) or 7-alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one.

After addressing treatable causes of BAD, the guideline recommends initial therapy with cholestyramine or, if this is poorly tolerated, switching to BAST. However, the panelists advised against BAST for patients with resection or ileal Crohn’s disease, for whom other antidiarrheal agents are more suitable. When appropriate, BAST should be given at the lowest effective dose, with periodic trials of on-demand, intermittent administration, the panelists recommended. When BAST is ineffective, the guideline recommends that clinicians review concurrent medications as a possible cause of BAD or reinvestigate.

Concluding the guideline, the panelists emphasized the need for more high-quality research.

“The group recognized that specific, high-certainty evidence was lacking in many areas and recommended further studies that would improve the data available in future methodologic evaluations,” the panelists wrote.

While improving diagnostic accuracy of BAD should be a major goal of such research, progress is currently limited by an integral shortcoming of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies, the panelists wrote.

“The main challenge in conducting DTA studies for BAD is the lack of a widely accepted or universally agreed-upon reference standard because the condition is defined and classified based on pathophysiologic mechanisms and its response to treatment (BAST),” the panelists wrote. “In addition, the index tests (SeHCAT, C4, FGF19, fecal bile acid assay) provide a continuous measure of metabolic function. Hence, DTA studies are not the most appropriate study design.”

“Therefore, one of the research priorities in BAD is for the scientific and clinical communities to agree on a reference standard that best represents BAD (e.g., response to BAST), with full understanding that the reference standard is and likely will be imperfect.”

The guideline was funded by unrestricted grants from Pendopharm and GE Healthcare Canada. The panelists disclosed relationships with AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Merck, Pfizer, and others.

Review the AGA clinical practice guideline on the laboratory evaluation of functional diarrhea and diarrhea-predominan irritable bowel syndrome in adults at https:/www.gastrojournal.org/article/S0016-5085(19)41083-4/fulltext.

SOURCE: Sadowski DC et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Sep 14. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.062.

The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (CAG) recently co-published a clinical practice guideline for the management of bile acid diarrhea (BAD) in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology and the Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology.

Given a minimal evidence base, 16 out of the 17 guideline recommendations are conditional, according to lead author Daniel C. Sadowski, MD, of Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Alta., and colleagues. Considering the shortage of high-quality evidence, the panel called for more randomized clinical trials to address current knowledge gaps.

“BAD is an understudied, often underappreciated condition, and questions remain regarding its diagnosis and treatment,” the panelists wrote in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. “There have been guidelines on the management of chronic diarrhea from the American Gastroenterological Association, and the British Society of Gastroenterology, but diagnosis and management of BAD was not assessed extensively in these publications. The British Society of Gastroenterology updated guidelines on the investigation of chronic diarrhea in adults, published after the consensus meeting, addressed some issues related to BAD.”

For the current guideline, using available evidence and clinical experience, expert panelists from Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom aimed to “provide a reasonable and practical approach to care for specialists.” The guideline was further reviewed by the CAG Practice Affairs and Clinical Affairs Committees and the CAG Board of Directors.

The guideline first puts BAD in clinical context, noting a chronic diarrhea prevalence rate of approximately 5%. According to the guideline, approximately 1 out of 4 of these patients with chronic diarrhea may have BAD and prevalence of BAD is likely higher among those with other conditions, such as terminal ileal disease.

While BAD may be relatively common, it isn’t necessarily easy to diagnose, the panelists noted.

“The diagnosis of BAD continues to be a challenge, although this may be improved in the future with the general availability of screening serologic tests and other diagnostic tests,” the panelists wrote. “Although a treatment trial with bile acid sequestrants therapy (BAST) often is used, this approach has not been studied adequately, and likely is imprecise, and may lead to both undertreatment and overtreatment.”

Instead, the panelists recommended testing for BAD with 75-selenium homocholic acid taurine (SeHCAT) or 7-alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one.

After addressing treatable causes of BAD, the guideline recommends initial therapy with cholestyramine or, if this is poorly tolerated, switching to BAST. However, the panelists advised against BAST for patients with resection or ileal Crohn’s disease, for whom other antidiarrheal agents are more suitable. When appropriate, BAST should be given at the lowest effective dose, with periodic trials of on-demand, intermittent administration, the panelists recommended. When BAST is ineffective, the guideline recommends that clinicians review concurrent medications as a possible cause of BAD or reinvestigate.

Concluding the guideline, the panelists emphasized the need for more high-quality research.

“The group recognized that specific, high-certainty evidence was lacking in many areas and recommended further studies that would improve the data available in future methodologic evaluations,” the panelists wrote.

While improving diagnostic accuracy of BAD should be a major goal of such research, progress is currently limited by an integral shortcoming of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies, the panelists wrote.

“The main challenge in conducting DTA studies for BAD is the lack of a widely accepted or universally agreed-upon reference standard because the condition is defined and classified based on pathophysiologic mechanisms and its response to treatment (BAST),” the panelists wrote. “In addition, the index tests (SeHCAT, C4, FGF19, fecal bile acid assay) provide a continuous measure of metabolic function. Hence, DTA studies are not the most appropriate study design.”

“Therefore, one of the research priorities in BAD is for the scientific and clinical communities to agree on a reference standard that best represents BAD (e.g., response to BAST), with full understanding that the reference standard is and likely will be imperfect.”

The guideline was funded by unrestricted grants from Pendopharm and GE Healthcare Canada. The panelists disclosed relationships with AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Merck, Pfizer, and others.

Review the AGA clinical practice guideline on the laboratory evaluation of functional diarrhea and diarrhea-predominan irritable bowel syndrome in adults at https:/www.gastrojournal.org/article/S0016-5085(19)41083-4/fulltext.

SOURCE: Sadowski DC et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Sep 14. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.062.

Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers were more likely to arise in the proximal colon and to show microsatellite instability, according to the results of a retrospective population-based study of 168 adults with incident colorectal cancers.

In all, 64% of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers were located in the proximal colon, compared with 44% of detected colorectal cancers (P = .016), reported Niloy Jewel Samadder, MD, of the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, together with his associates. Furthermore, microsatellite instability (MSI) was detected in 32% of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers, versus 13% of detected colorectal cancers (P = .005). These findings may point to differences in the underlying biology of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers and detected colorectal cancers, they said. Studies are needed “to determine if postcolonoscopy cancers arise through a specific genetic pathway that may accelerate neoplastic progression,” they wrote in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers are a “small but clinically important subset of colorectal cancers” that are diagnosed after the patient has a colonoscopy in which no cancer is detected, the researchers noted. These cancers have an estimated global prevalence ranging from 3% to 9% and an estimated pooled prevalence of 3.7% (Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:1375-89). Risk factors for postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers include low adenoma detection rates, rural facilities, and care by physicians who are not gastroenterologists. However, tumor-specific and patient-specific factors, including location within the colon and superior survival, compared with detected cancers, raises the possibility of underlying molecular differences related to tumorigenesis, the researchers said.

To investigate this idea, they retrospectively analyzed data from residents of Utah between 50 and 80 years old who had a colonoscopy between, Feb. 15, 1995, and Jan. 31, 2009, at one of two large clinical facilities in Utah (Intermountain Healthcare or the University of Utah Health Sciences). Using a state population-based database, they merged medical information from these patients with cancer histories from the Utah Cancer Registry. This enabled them to compare all 84 postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers (defined as those detected within 6-60 months of colonoscopy) with tissue available for analysis with 84 detected colorectal cancers (detected within 6 months of a colonoscopy).

In the multivariable analysis, MSI was the only molecular feature that was significantly more frequent in postcolonoscopy versus detected colorectal cancers (odds ratio, 4.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.58-11.14). However, postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers were significantly more likely to be early stage (86% versus 69% for detected colorectal cancers; P = .040). Five-year survival did not significantly differ between the groups.

“The molecular signatures of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers in our study overlap with those of sporadic MSI and serrated pathways, suggesting these mechanisms play a disproportionate role in postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers.” the researchers said. “Additional studies are needed to determine whether these postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers arise through a familial cancer pathway and/or serrated neoplastic pathway of sporadic lesions.

Funders included the American College of Gastroenterology, the National Cancer Institute, the Huntsman Cancer Foundation, the University of Utah, and the Utah Department of Health. Dr. Samadder reported consulting relationships with Cancer Prevention Pharmaceuticals and Janssen Research and Development. The other researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.
 

SOURCE: Samadder NJ et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Mar 28. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.02.040.

Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers were more likely to arise in the proximal colon and to show microsatellite instability, according to the results of a retrospective population-based study of 168 adults with incident colorectal cancers.

In all, 64% of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers were located in the proximal colon, compared with 44% of detected colorectal cancers (P = .016), reported Niloy Jewel Samadder, MD, of the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, together with his associates. Furthermore, microsatellite instability (MSI) was detected in 32% of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers, versus 13% of detected colorectal cancers (P = .005). These findings may point to differences in the underlying biology of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers and detected colorectal cancers, they said. Studies are needed “to determine if postcolonoscopy cancers arise through a specific genetic pathway that may accelerate neoplastic progression,” they wrote in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers are a “small but clinically important subset of colorectal cancers” that are diagnosed after the patient has a colonoscopy in which no cancer is detected, the researchers noted. These cancers have an estimated global prevalence ranging from 3% to 9% and an estimated pooled prevalence of 3.7% (Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:1375-89). Risk factors for postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers include low adenoma detection rates, rural facilities, and care by physicians who are not gastroenterologists. However, tumor-specific and patient-specific factors, including location within the colon and superior survival, compared with detected cancers, raises the possibility of underlying molecular differences related to tumorigenesis, the researchers said.

To investigate this idea, they retrospectively analyzed data from residents of Utah between 50 and 80 years old who had a colonoscopy between, Feb. 15, 1995, and Jan. 31, 2009, at one of two large clinical facilities in Utah (Intermountain Healthcare or the University of Utah Health Sciences). Using a state population-based database, they merged medical information from these patients with cancer histories from the Utah Cancer Registry. This enabled them to compare all 84 postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers (defined as those detected within 6-60 months of colonoscopy) with tissue available for analysis with 84 detected colorectal cancers (detected within 6 months of a colonoscopy).

In the multivariable analysis, MSI was the only molecular feature that was significantly more frequent in postcolonoscopy versus detected colorectal cancers (odds ratio, 4.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.58-11.14). However, postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers were significantly more likely to be early stage (86% versus 69% for detected colorectal cancers; P = .040). Five-year survival did not significantly differ between the groups.

“The molecular signatures of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers in our study overlap with those of sporadic MSI and serrated pathways, suggesting these mechanisms play a disproportionate role in postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers.” the researchers said. “Additional studies are needed to determine whether these postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers arise through a familial cancer pathway and/or serrated neoplastic pathway of sporadic lesions.

Funders included the American College of Gastroenterology, the National Cancer Institute, the Huntsman Cancer Foundation, the University of Utah, and the Utah Department of Health. Dr. Samadder reported consulting relationships with Cancer Prevention Pharmaceuticals and Janssen Research and Development. The other researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.
 

SOURCE: Samadder NJ et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Mar 28. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.02.040.

Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers were more likely to arise in the proximal colon and to show microsatellite instability, according to the results of a retrospective population-based study of 168 adults with incident colorectal cancers.

In all, 64% of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers were located in the proximal colon, compared with 44% of detected colorectal cancers (P = .016), reported Niloy Jewel Samadder, MD, of the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, together with his associates. Furthermore, microsatellite instability (MSI) was detected in 32% of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers, versus 13% of detected colorectal cancers (P = .005). These findings may point to differences in the underlying biology of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers and detected colorectal cancers, they said. Studies are needed “to determine if postcolonoscopy cancers arise through a specific genetic pathway that may accelerate neoplastic progression,” they wrote in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers are a “small but clinically important subset of colorectal cancers” that are diagnosed after the patient has a colonoscopy in which no cancer is detected, the researchers noted. These cancers have an estimated global prevalence ranging from 3% to 9% and an estimated pooled prevalence of 3.7% (Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:1375-89). Risk factors for postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers include low adenoma detection rates, rural facilities, and care by physicians who are not gastroenterologists. However, tumor-specific and patient-specific factors, including location within the colon and superior survival, compared with detected cancers, raises the possibility of underlying molecular differences related to tumorigenesis, the researchers said.

To investigate this idea, they retrospectively analyzed data from residents of Utah between 50 and 80 years old who had a colonoscopy between, Feb. 15, 1995, and Jan. 31, 2009, at one of two large clinical facilities in Utah (Intermountain Healthcare or the University of Utah Health Sciences). Using a state population-based database, they merged medical information from these patients with cancer histories from the Utah Cancer Registry. This enabled them to compare all 84 postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers (defined as those detected within 6-60 months of colonoscopy) with tissue available for analysis with 84 detected colorectal cancers (detected within 6 months of a colonoscopy).

In the multivariable analysis, MSI was the only molecular feature that was significantly more frequent in postcolonoscopy versus detected colorectal cancers (odds ratio, 4.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.58-11.14). However, postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers were significantly more likely to be early stage (86% versus 69% for detected colorectal cancers; P = .040). Five-year survival did not significantly differ between the groups.

“The molecular signatures of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers in our study overlap with those of sporadic MSI and serrated pathways, suggesting these mechanisms play a disproportionate role in postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers.” the researchers said. “Additional studies are needed to determine whether these postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers arise through a familial cancer pathway and/or serrated neoplastic pathway of sporadic lesions.

Funders included the American College of Gastroenterology, the National Cancer Institute, the Huntsman Cancer Foundation, the University of Utah, and the Utah Department of Health. Dr. Samadder reported consulting relationships with Cancer Prevention Pharmaceuticals and Janssen Research and Development. The other researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.
 

SOURCE: Samadder NJ et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Mar 28. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.02.040.

A high level of hepatitis B core–related antigen (HBcrAg) was a complementary risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma, according to the results of a retrospective cohort study of more than 2,600 noncirrhotic adults with untreated hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection with a median of 16 years of follow-up.

SOURCE: AMERICAN GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION

“Patients with an intermediate viral load and high levels of HBcrAg had a risk for hepatocellular carcinoma that did not differ significantly from that of patients with a high viral load. [An] HBcrAg of 10 KU/mL may serve as a novel biomarker for the management of patients with intermediate viral load in our clinical practice,” wrote Tai-Chung Tseng, MD, PhD, of National Taiwan University Hospital in Taipei and associates in Gastroenterology.

Deciding whether to start antiviral therapy is controversial for some patients with HBV infection. Typically, monitoring without treatment is recommended for patients who have both low hepatitis B surface antigen levels (less than 1,000 IU/mL) and low levels of HBV DNA (less than 2,000 IU/mL), and early antiviral therapy is recommended for patients who have high levels of HBV DNA (20,000 IU/mL or more). However, there is no clear evidence that early antiviral therapy benefits patients who have intermediate levels of HBV DNA (2,000-19,999 IU/mL) and are negative for hepatitis B e antigen. Biomarkers for risk-stratifying these patients also are lacking, the researchers noted.

Therefore, they studied a cohort of 2,666 adults who had tested positive for hepatitis B surface antigen and were followed at National Taiwan University Hospital from 1985 through 2000. No patient had cirrhosis at baseline. In all, 209 patients developed hepatocellular carcinoma, yielding an incidence rate of 4.91 cases per 1,000 person-years.

Hepatitis B core–related antigen level remained an independent risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma after accounting for age, sex, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level, FIB-4 index, hepatitis B e antigen status, hepatitis B genotype (B, C, or undetermined), and HBV DNA level. Compared with patients whose HBcrAg level was less than 10 KU, a level of 10-99 KU/mL was associated with a nearly threefold increase in risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.67-4.80), and this risk rose even further as HBcrAg levels increased.

In the subgroup of patients who tested negative for hepatitis B e antigen, had an intermediate HBV DNA load (2,000-19,999 IU/mL), and had a normal baseline ALT level (less than 40 U/L), a high HBcrAg level (10 KU/mL or more) was tied to a nearly fivefold greater risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HR, 4.89; 95% CI, 2.18-10.93). This approximated the risk that is observed with high viral load (20,000 IU/mL), the researchers noted. In contrast, a low HBcrAg level was associated with a risk similar to that of minimal risk carriers (annual incidence rate, 0.10%; 95% CI, 0.04%-0.24%).

“To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report HBcrAg level as an independent viral biomarker to stratify hepatocellular risks in a large number of patients with intermediate viral load,” the researchers commented. Among the study limitations, 412 patients received antiviral therapy during follow-up. “This is a retrospective cohort study including Asian HBV patients with genotype B or C infection,” the investigators added. “It is unclear whether this finding could be extrapolated to populations with other HBV genotype infections. Nonetheless, we had a sound cohort, as several HBsAg-related clinical findings based on our cohort have already been validated by other prospective cohort studies, implying that our data were unlikely to be biased by the study design.”

Funders included National Taiwan University Hospital, the Ministry of Science and Technology, Executive Yuan in Taiwan, and National Health Research Institutes. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Tseng T-C et al. Gastroenterology. 2019 Aug 27. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.08.028.

A high level of hepatitis B core–related antigen (HBcrAg) was a complementary risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma, according to the results of a retrospective cohort study of more than 2,600 noncirrhotic adults with untreated hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection with a median of 16 years of follow-up.

SOURCE: AMERICAN GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION

“Patients with an intermediate viral load and high levels of HBcrAg had a risk for hepatocellular carcinoma that did not differ significantly from that of patients with a high viral load. [An] HBcrAg of 10 KU/mL may serve as a novel biomarker for the management of patients with intermediate viral load in our clinical practice,” wrote Tai-Chung Tseng, MD, PhD, of National Taiwan University Hospital in Taipei and associates in Gastroenterology.

Deciding whether to start antiviral therapy is controversial for some patients with HBV infection. Typically, monitoring without treatment is recommended for patients who have both low hepatitis B surface antigen levels (less than 1,000 IU/mL) and low levels of HBV DNA (less than 2,000 IU/mL), and early antiviral therapy is recommended for patients who have high levels of HBV DNA (20,000 IU/mL or more). However, there is no clear evidence that early antiviral therapy benefits patients who have intermediate levels of HBV DNA (2,000-19,999 IU/mL) and are negative for hepatitis B e antigen. Biomarkers for risk-stratifying these patients also are lacking, the researchers noted.

Therefore, they studied a cohort of 2,666 adults who had tested positive for hepatitis B surface antigen and were followed at National Taiwan University Hospital from 1985 through 2000. No patient had cirrhosis at baseline. In all, 209 patients developed hepatocellular carcinoma, yielding an incidence rate of 4.91 cases per 1,000 person-years.

Hepatitis B core–related antigen level remained an independent risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma after accounting for age, sex, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level, FIB-4 index, hepatitis B e antigen status, hepatitis B genotype (B, C, or undetermined), and HBV DNA level. Compared with patients whose HBcrAg level was less than 10 KU, a level of 10-99 KU/mL was associated with a nearly threefold increase in risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.67-4.80), and this risk rose even further as HBcrAg levels increased.

In the subgroup of patients who tested negative for hepatitis B e antigen, had an intermediate HBV DNA load (2,000-19,999 IU/mL), and had a normal baseline ALT level (less than 40 U/L), a high HBcrAg level (10 KU/mL or more) was tied to a nearly fivefold greater risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HR, 4.89; 95% CI, 2.18-10.93). This approximated the risk that is observed with high viral load (20,000 IU/mL), the researchers noted. In contrast, a low HBcrAg level was associated with a risk similar to that of minimal risk carriers (annual incidence rate, 0.10%; 95% CI, 0.04%-0.24%).

“To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report HBcrAg level as an independent viral biomarker to stratify hepatocellular risks in a large number of patients with intermediate viral load,” the researchers commented. Among the study limitations, 412 patients received antiviral therapy during follow-up. “This is a retrospective cohort study including Asian HBV patients with genotype B or C infection,” the investigators added. “It is unclear whether this finding could be extrapolated to populations with other HBV genotype infections. Nonetheless, we had a sound cohort, as several HBsAg-related clinical findings based on our cohort have already been validated by other prospective cohort studies, implying that our data were unlikely to be biased by the study design.”

Funders included National Taiwan University Hospital, the Ministry of Science and Technology, Executive Yuan in Taiwan, and National Health Research Institutes. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Tseng T-C et al. Gastroenterology. 2019 Aug 27. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.08.028.

A high level of hepatitis B core–related antigen (HBcrAg) was a complementary risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma, according to the results of a retrospective cohort study of more than 2,600 noncirrhotic adults with untreated hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection with a median of 16 years of follow-up.

SOURCE: AMERICAN GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION

“Patients with an intermediate viral load and high levels of HBcrAg had a risk for hepatocellular carcinoma that did not differ significantly from that of patients with a high viral load. [An] HBcrAg of 10 KU/mL may serve as a novel biomarker for the management of patients with intermediate viral load in our clinical practice,” wrote Tai-Chung Tseng, MD, PhD, of National Taiwan University Hospital in Taipei and associates in Gastroenterology.

Deciding whether to start antiviral therapy is controversial for some patients with HBV infection. Typically, monitoring without treatment is recommended for patients who have both low hepatitis B surface antigen levels (less than 1,000 IU/mL) and low levels of HBV DNA (less than 2,000 IU/mL), and early antiviral therapy is recommended for patients who have high levels of HBV DNA (20,000 IU/mL or more). However, there is no clear evidence that early antiviral therapy benefits patients who have intermediate levels of HBV DNA (2,000-19,999 IU/mL) and are negative for hepatitis B e antigen. Biomarkers for risk-stratifying these patients also are lacking, the researchers noted.

Therefore, they studied a cohort of 2,666 adults who had tested positive for hepatitis B surface antigen and were followed at National Taiwan University Hospital from 1985 through 2000. No patient had cirrhosis at baseline. In all, 209 patients developed hepatocellular carcinoma, yielding an incidence rate of 4.91 cases per 1,000 person-years.

Hepatitis B core–related antigen level remained an independent risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma after accounting for age, sex, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level, FIB-4 index, hepatitis B e antigen status, hepatitis B genotype (B, C, or undetermined), and HBV DNA level. Compared with patients whose HBcrAg level was less than 10 KU, a level of 10-99 KU/mL was associated with a nearly threefold increase in risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.67-4.80), and this risk rose even further as HBcrAg levels increased.

In the subgroup of patients who tested negative for hepatitis B e antigen, had an intermediate HBV DNA load (2,000-19,999 IU/mL), and had a normal baseline ALT level (less than 40 U/L), a high HBcrAg level (10 KU/mL or more) was tied to a nearly fivefold greater risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HR, 4.89; 95% CI, 2.18-10.93). This approximated the risk that is observed with high viral load (20,000 IU/mL), the researchers noted. In contrast, a low HBcrAg level was associated with a risk similar to that of minimal risk carriers (annual incidence rate, 0.10%; 95% CI, 0.04%-0.24%).

“To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report HBcrAg level as an independent viral biomarker to stratify hepatocellular risks in a large number of patients with intermediate viral load,” the researchers commented. Among the study limitations, 412 patients received antiviral therapy during follow-up. “This is a retrospective cohort study including Asian HBV patients with genotype B or C infection,” the investigators added. “It is unclear whether this finding could be extrapolated to populations with other HBV genotype infections. Nonetheless, we had a sound cohort, as several HBsAg-related clinical findings based on our cohort have already been validated by other prospective cohort studies, implying that our data were unlikely to be biased by the study design.”

Funders included National Taiwan University Hospital, the Ministry of Science and Technology, Executive Yuan in Taiwan, and National Health Research Institutes. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Tseng T-C et al. Gastroenterology. 2019 Aug 27. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.08.028.

Taking daily aspirin may help keep nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) from progressing to liver fibrosis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), suggest the results of a prospective study of 361 adults.

Previously, preclinical evidence had linked aspirin to fibrogenesis prevention in fatty liver disease, but this is the first report of a prospective study to do so. Daily aspirin use “was associated with less severe histologic features of NAFLD (nonalcoholic fatty liver disease) at study enrollment and with significantly lower risk for advanced fibrosis over time in a duration-dependent manner,” wrote Tracey G. Simon, MD, MPH, and her associates. Their report is in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

The study comprised 361 adults with biopsy-confirmed NAFLD who were enrolled in the Massachusetts General Hospital NAFLD Repository between 2006 and 2015. At baseline, 151 individuals were already on daily aspirin, usually to reduce the primary (54%) or secondary (30%) risk of cardiovascular disease. Median duration of aspirin use was 2.5 years. After a median 7.4 years of follow-up (which was similar between aspirin users and nonusers), daily aspirin use was associated with significantly lower odds of NASH (adjusted odds ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.89) and fibrosis (aOR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.31-0.82).

The researchers did not find a similar protective effect for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) other than aspirin (adjusted hazard ratio for advanced fibrosis, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.81–1.05). This might be because of differences between how aspirin and nonaspirin NSAIDs affect COX isoforms – aspirin does so irreversibly, while other NSAIDs have a reversible effect, they added. “Nonaspirin NSAIDs also disrupt the intestinal barrier, increasing delivery of proinflammatory cytokines to the liver,” they wrote. “Finally, aspirin uniquely modulates bioactive lipids by stimulating the biosynthesis of pro-resolving mediators and inhibiting proinflammatory lipids, which in turn may prevent progressive liver damage.”

In this study, a single blinded hepatopathologist interpreted baseline liver biopsy specimens, and patients were followed every 3-6 months with clinical examinations and serial calculations of FIB-4, NFS, and APRI scores. All patients were followed for at least a year. Patients were classified as users of nonaspirin NSAIDs if they reported using an NSAID besides aspirin at least twice weekly, or if they had been prescribed drugs such as ibuprofen, naproxen, ketoprofen, diclofenac, or indomethacin.

In a longitudinal analysis of the 317 patients who had early-stage (F0-2) fibrosis at baseline, 86 developed new-onset advanced fibrosis over a median of 3,692 person-years, the researchers said. In all, 26 individuals developed hepatic decompensation and 18 patients died, including eight from liver-related causes. Importantly, the link between aspirin and decreased risk of fibrosis progression seemed to depend on duration of use (adjusted P trend = .026), with the greatest benefit seen with 4 years or more of use (aHR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.35-0.73). Although subgroup analyses were limited by lack of power, daily aspirin use was associated with a 36% lower odds of incident advanced fibrosis among the 72 study participants who had paired biopsy samples, even after accounting for the effect of age, sex, baseline fibrosis stage, and time between biopsies (aOR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.50-0.80).

“Our findings add to the growing literature supporting the potential hepatoprotective effects of aspirin in NAFLD,” the researchers concluded. “Research to uncover the mechanisms by which aspirin might prevent fibrogenesis could help develop urgently needed antifibrotic therapies for NAFLD.”

Funders included the National Institutes of Health and the AASLD Foundation. The investigators reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Simon TG et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May 8.

Taking daily aspirin may help keep nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) from progressing to liver fibrosis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), suggest the results of a prospective study of 361 adults.

Previously, preclinical evidence had linked aspirin to fibrogenesis prevention in fatty liver disease, but this is the first report of a prospective study to do so. Daily aspirin use “was associated with less severe histologic features of NAFLD (nonalcoholic fatty liver disease) at study enrollment and with significantly lower risk for advanced fibrosis over time in a duration-dependent manner,” wrote Tracey G. Simon, MD, MPH, and her associates. Their report is in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

The study comprised 361 adults with biopsy-confirmed NAFLD who were enrolled in the Massachusetts General Hospital NAFLD Repository between 2006 and 2015. At baseline, 151 individuals were already on daily aspirin, usually to reduce the primary (54%) or secondary (30%) risk of cardiovascular disease. Median duration of aspirin use was 2.5 years. After a median 7.4 years of follow-up (which was similar between aspirin users and nonusers), daily aspirin use was associated with significantly lower odds of NASH (adjusted odds ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.89) and fibrosis (aOR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.31-0.82).

The researchers did not find a similar protective effect for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) other than aspirin (adjusted hazard ratio for advanced fibrosis, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.81–1.05). This might be because of differences between how aspirin and nonaspirin NSAIDs affect COX isoforms – aspirin does so irreversibly, while other NSAIDs have a reversible effect, they added. “Nonaspirin NSAIDs also disrupt the intestinal barrier, increasing delivery of proinflammatory cytokines to the liver,” they wrote. “Finally, aspirin uniquely modulates bioactive lipids by stimulating the biosynthesis of pro-resolving mediators and inhibiting proinflammatory lipids, which in turn may prevent progressive liver damage.”

In this study, a single blinded hepatopathologist interpreted baseline liver biopsy specimens, and patients were followed every 3-6 months with clinical examinations and serial calculations of FIB-4, NFS, and APRI scores. All patients were followed for at least a year. Patients were classified as users of nonaspirin NSAIDs if they reported using an NSAID besides aspirin at least twice weekly, or if they had been prescribed drugs such as ibuprofen, naproxen, ketoprofen, diclofenac, or indomethacin.

In a longitudinal analysis of the 317 patients who had early-stage (F0-2) fibrosis at baseline, 86 developed new-onset advanced fibrosis over a median of 3,692 person-years, the researchers said. In all, 26 individuals developed hepatic decompensation and 18 patients died, including eight from liver-related causes. Importantly, the link between aspirin and decreased risk of fibrosis progression seemed to depend on duration of use (adjusted P trend = .026), with the greatest benefit seen with 4 years or more of use (aHR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.35-0.73). Although subgroup analyses were limited by lack of power, daily aspirin use was associated with a 36% lower odds of incident advanced fibrosis among the 72 study participants who had paired biopsy samples, even after accounting for the effect of age, sex, baseline fibrosis stage, and time between biopsies (aOR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.50-0.80).

“Our findings add to the growing literature supporting the potential hepatoprotective effects of aspirin in NAFLD,” the researchers concluded. “Research to uncover the mechanisms by which aspirin might prevent fibrogenesis could help develop urgently needed antifibrotic therapies for NAFLD.”

Funders included the National Institutes of Health and the AASLD Foundation. The investigators reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Simon TG et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May 8.

Taking daily aspirin may help keep nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) from progressing to liver fibrosis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), suggest the results of a prospective study of 361 adults.

Previously, preclinical evidence had linked aspirin to fibrogenesis prevention in fatty liver disease, but this is the first report of a prospective study to do so. Daily aspirin use “was associated with less severe histologic features of NAFLD (nonalcoholic fatty liver disease) at study enrollment and with significantly lower risk for advanced fibrosis over time in a duration-dependent manner,” wrote Tracey G. Simon, MD, MPH, and her associates. Their report is in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

The study comprised 361 adults with biopsy-confirmed NAFLD who were enrolled in the Massachusetts General Hospital NAFLD Repository between 2006 and 2015. At baseline, 151 individuals were already on daily aspirin, usually to reduce the primary (54%) or secondary (30%) risk of cardiovascular disease. Median duration of aspirin use was 2.5 years. After a median 7.4 years of follow-up (which was similar between aspirin users and nonusers), daily aspirin use was associated with significantly lower odds of NASH (adjusted odds ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.89) and fibrosis (aOR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.31-0.82).

The researchers did not find a similar protective effect for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) other than aspirin (adjusted hazard ratio for advanced fibrosis, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.81–1.05). This might be because of differences between how aspirin and nonaspirin NSAIDs affect COX isoforms – aspirin does so irreversibly, while other NSAIDs have a reversible effect, they added. “Nonaspirin NSAIDs also disrupt the intestinal barrier, increasing delivery of proinflammatory cytokines to the liver,” they wrote. “Finally, aspirin uniquely modulates bioactive lipids by stimulating the biosynthesis of pro-resolving mediators and inhibiting proinflammatory lipids, which in turn may prevent progressive liver damage.”

In this study, a single blinded hepatopathologist interpreted baseline liver biopsy specimens, and patients were followed every 3-6 months with clinical examinations and serial calculations of FIB-4, NFS, and APRI scores. All patients were followed for at least a year. Patients were classified as users of nonaspirin NSAIDs if they reported using an NSAID besides aspirin at least twice weekly, or if they had been prescribed drugs such as ibuprofen, naproxen, ketoprofen, diclofenac, or indomethacin.

In a longitudinal analysis of the 317 patients who had early-stage (F0-2) fibrosis at baseline, 86 developed new-onset advanced fibrosis over a median of 3,692 person-years, the researchers said. In all, 26 individuals developed hepatic decompensation and 18 patients died, including eight from liver-related causes. Importantly, the link between aspirin and decreased risk of fibrosis progression seemed to depend on duration of use (adjusted P trend = .026), with the greatest benefit seen with 4 years or more of use (aHR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.35-0.73). Although subgroup analyses were limited by lack of power, daily aspirin use was associated with a 36% lower odds of incident advanced fibrosis among the 72 study participants who had paired biopsy samples, even after accounting for the effect of age, sex, baseline fibrosis stage, and time between biopsies (aOR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.50-0.80).

“Our findings add to the growing literature supporting the potential hepatoprotective effects of aspirin in NAFLD,” the researchers concluded. “Research to uncover the mechanisms by which aspirin might prevent fibrogenesis could help develop urgently needed antifibrotic therapies for NAFLD.”

Funders included the National Institutes of Health and the AASLD Foundation. The investigators reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Simon TG et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May 8.

A toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) antagonist may eventually be used to combat brain edema in acute liver failure, according to investigators.

This prediction is based on results of a recent study involving mouse models, which showed that ODN2088, a TLR9 antagonist, could stop ammonia-induced colocalization of DNA with TLR9 in innate immune cells, thereby blocking cytokine production and ensuant brain edema, reported lead author Godhev Kumar Manakkat Vijay of King’s College London and colleagues.

“Ammonia plays a pivotal role in the development of hepatic encephalopathy and brain edema in acute liver failure,” the investigators explained in Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology. “A robust systemic inflammatory response and susceptibility to developing infection are common in acute liver failure, exacerbate the development of ammonia-induced brain edema and are major prognosticators. Experimental models have unequivocally associated ammonia exposure with astrocyte swelling and brain edema, potentiated by proinflammatory cytokines.”

The investigators added that, “although the evidence base supporting the relationship between ammonia, inflammation, and brain edema is robust in acute liver failure, there is a paucity of data characterizing the specific pathogenic mechanisms entailed.” Previous research suggested that TLR9 plays a key role in acetaminophen-induced liver inflammation, they noted, and that ammonia, in combination with DNA, triggers TLR9 expression in neutrophils, which brought TLR9 into focus for the present study.

Along with wild-type mice, the investigators relied upon two knockout models: TLR9–/– mice, in which TLR9 is entirely absent, and LysM-Cre TLR9fl/fl mice, in which TLR9 is absent from lysozyme-expressing cells (predominantly neutrophils and macrophages). Comparing against controls, the investigators assessed cytokine production and brain edema in each type of mouse when intraperitoneally injected with ammonium acetate (4 mmol/kg). Specifically, 6 hours after injection, they measured intracellular cytokines in splenic macrophages, CD8+ T cells, and CD4+ T cells. In addition, they recorded total plasma DNA and brain water, a measure of brain edema.

Following ammonium acetate injection, wild-type mice developed brain edema and liver enlargement, while TLR9–/– mice and control-injected mice did not. After injection, total plasma DNA levels rose by comparable magnitudes in both wild-type mice and TLR9–/– mice, but did not change in control-injected mice, suggesting that ammonium-acetate injection was causing a release of DNA, which was binding with TLR9, resulting in activation of the innate immune system.

This hypothesis was supported by measurements of cytokines in T cells and splenic macrophages, which showed that wild-type mice had elevations of cytokines, whereas knockout mice did not. Further experiments showed that LysM-Cre TLR9fl/fl mice had similar outcomes as TLR9–/– mice, highlighting that macrophages and neutrophils are the key immune cells linking TLR9 activation with cytokine release, and therefore brain edema.

To ensure that brain edema was not directly caused by the acetate component of ammonium acetate, or acetate’s potential to increase pH, a different set of wild-type mice were injected with sodium acetate adjusted to the same pH as ammonium acetate. This had no impact on cytokine production, brain-water content, or liver-to-body weight ratio, confirming that acetate was not responsible for brain edema while providing further support for the role of TLR9.

Finally, the investigators treated wild-type mice immediately after ammonium acetate injection with the TLR9 antagonist ODN2088 (50 mcg/mouse). This treatment halted cytokine production, inflammation, and brain edema, strongly supporting the link between these ammonia-induced processes and TLR9 activation.

“These data are well supported by the findings of Imaeda et al. (J Clin Invest. 2009 Feb 2. doi: 10.1172/JCI35958), who in an acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity model established that inhibition of TLR9 using ODN2088 and IRS954, a TLR7/9 antagonist, down-regulated proinflammatory cytokine release and reduced mortality,” the investigators wrote. “The amelioration of brain edema and cytokine production by ODN2088 supports exploration of TLR9 antagonism as a therapeutic modality in early acute liver failure to prevent the development of brain edema and intracranial hypertension.”

The study was funded by the U.K. Institute of Liver Studies Charitable Fund and the National Institutes of Health. The investigators reported no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Vijay GKM et al. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Aug 8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2019.08.002.

A toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) antagonist may eventually be used to combat brain edema in acute liver failure, according to investigators.

This prediction is based on results of a recent study involving mouse models, which showed that ODN2088, a TLR9 antagonist, could stop ammonia-induced colocalization of DNA with TLR9 in innate immune cells, thereby blocking cytokine production and ensuant brain edema, reported lead author Godhev Kumar Manakkat Vijay of King’s College London and colleagues.

“Ammonia plays a pivotal role in the development of hepatic encephalopathy and brain edema in acute liver failure,” the investigators explained in Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology. “A robust systemic inflammatory response and susceptibility to developing infection are common in acute liver failure, exacerbate the development of ammonia-induced brain edema and are major prognosticators. Experimental models have unequivocally associated ammonia exposure with astrocyte swelling and brain edema, potentiated by proinflammatory cytokines.”

The investigators added that, “although the evidence base supporting the relationship between ammonia, inflammation, and brain edema is robust in acute liver failure, there is a paucity of data characterizing the specific pathogenic mechanisms entailed.” Previous research suggested that TLR9 plays a key role in acetaminophen-induced liver inflammation, they noted, and that ammonia, in combination with DNA, triggers TLR9 expression in neutrophils, which brought TLR9 into focus for the present study.

Along with wild-type mice, the investigators relied upon two knockout models: TLR9–/– mice, in which TLR9 is entirely absent, and LysM-Cre TLR9fl/fl mice, in which TLR9 is absent from lysozyme-expressing cells (predominantly neutrophils and macrophages). Comparing against controls, the investigators assessed cytokine production and brain edema in each type of mouse when intraperitoneally injected with ammonium acetate (4 mmol/kg). Specifically, 6 hours after injection, they measured intracellular cytokines in splenic macrophages, CD8+ T cells, and CD4+ T cells. In addition, they recorded total plasma DNA and brain water, a measure of brain edema.

Following ammonium acetate injection, wild-type mice developed brain edema and liver enlargement, while TLR9–/– mice and control-injected mice did not. After injection, total plasma DNA levels rose by comparable magnitudes in both wild-type mice and TLR9–/– mice, but did not change in control-injected mice, suggesting that ammonium-acetate injection was causing a release of DNA, which was binding with TLR9, resulting in activation of the innate immune system.

This hypothesis was supported by measurements of cytokines in T cells and splenic macrophages, which showed that wild-type mice had elevations of cytokines, whereas knockout mice did not. Further experiments showed that LysM-Cre TLR9fl/fl mice had similar outcomes as TLR9–/– mice, highlighting that macrophages and neutrophils are the key immune cells linking TLR9 activation with cytokine release, and therefore brain edema.

To ensure that brain edema was not directly caused by the acetate component of ammonium acetate, or acetate’s potential to increase pH, a different set of wild-type mice were injected with sodium acetate adjusted to the same pH as ammonium acetate. This had no impact on cytokine production, brain-water content, or liver-to-body weight ratio, confirming that acetate was not responsible for brain edema while providing further support for the role of TLR9.

Finally, the investigators treated wild-type mice immediately after ammonium acetate injection with the TLR9 antagonist ODN2088 (50 mcg/mouse). This treatment halted cytokine production, inflammation, and brain edema, strongly supporting the link between these ammonia-induced processes and TLR9 activation.

“These data are well supported by the findings of Imaeda et al. (J Clin Invest. 2009 Feb 2. doi: 10.1172/JCI35958), who in an acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity model established that inhibition of TLR9 using ODN2088 and IRS954, a TLR7/9 antagonist, down-regulated proinflammatory cytokine release and reduced mortality,” the investigators wrote. “The amelioration of brain edema and cytokine production by ODN2088 supports exploration of TLR9 antagonism as a therapeutic modality in early acute liver failure to prevent the development of brain edema and intracranial hypertension.”

The study was funded by the U.K. Institute of Liver Studies Charitable Fund and the National Institutes of Health. The investigators reported no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Vijay GKM et al. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Aug 8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2019.08.002.

A toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) antagonist may eventually be used to combat brain edema in acute liver failure, according to investigators.

This prediction is based on results of a recent study involving mouse models, which showed that ODN2088, a TLR9 antagonist, could stop ammonia-induced colocalization of DNA with TLR9 in innate immune cells, thereby blocking cytokine production and ensuant brain edema, reported lead author Godhev Kumar Manakkat Vijay of King’s College London and colleagues.

“Ammonia plays a pivotal role in the development of hepatic encephalopathy and brain edema in acute liver failure,” the investigators explained in Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology. “A robust systemic inflammatory response and susceptibility to developing infection are common in acute liver failure, exacerbate the development of ammonia-induced brain edema and are major prognosticators. Experimental models have unequivocally associated ammonia exposure with astrocyte swelling and brain edema, potentiated by proinflammatory cytokines.”

The investigators added that, “although the evidence base supporting the relationship between ammonia, inflammation, and brain edema is robust in acute liver failure, there is a paucity of data characterizing the specific pathogenic mechanisms entailed.” Previous research suggested that TLR9 plays a key role in acetaminophen-induced liver inflammation, they noted, and that ammonia, in combination with DNA, triggers TLR9 expression in neutrophils, which brought TLR9 into focus for the present study.

Along with wild-type mice, the investigators relied upon two knockout models: TLR9–/– mice, in which TLR9 is entirely absent, and LysM-Cre TLR9fl/fl mice, in which TLR9 is absent from lysozyme-expressing cells (predominantly neutrophils and macrophages). Comparing against controls, the investigators assessed cytokine production and brain edema in each type of mouse when intraperitoneally injected with ammonium acetate (4 mmol/kg). Specifically, 6 hours after injection, they measured intracellular cytokines in splenic macrophages, CD8+ T cells, and CD4+ T cells. In addition, they recorded total plasma DNA and brain water, a measure of brain edema.

Following ammonium acetate injection, wild-type mice developed brain edema and liver enlargement, while TLR9–/– mice and control-injected mice did not. After injection, total plasma DNA levels rose by comparable magnitudes in both wild-type mice and TLR9–/– mice, but did not change in control-injected mice, suggesting that ammonium-acetate injection was causing a release of DNA, which was binding with TLR9, resulting in activation of the innate immune system.

This hypothesis was supported by measurements of cytokines in T cells and splenic macrophages, which showed that wild-type mice had elevations of cytokines, whereas knockout mice did not. Further experiments showed that LysM-Cre TLR9fl/fl mice had similar outcomes as TLR9–/– mice, highlighting that macrophages and neutrophils are the key immune cells linking TLR9 activation with cytokine release, and therefore brain edema.

To ensure that brain edema was not directly caused by the acetate component of ammonium acetate, or acetate’s potential to increase pH, a different set of wild-type mice were injected with sodium acetate adjusted to the same pH as ammonium acetate. This had no impact on cytokine production, brain-water content, or liver-to-body weight ratio, confirming that acetate was not responsible for brain edema while providing further support for the role of TLR9.

Finally, the investigators treated wild-type mice immediately after ammonium acetate injection with the TLR9 antagonist ODN2088 (50 mcg/mouse). This treatment halted cytokine production, inflammation, and brain edema, strongly supporting the link between these ammonia-induced processes and TLR9 activation.

“These data are well supported by the findings of Imaeda et al. (J Clin Invest. 2009 Feb 2. doi: 10.1172/JCI35958), who in an acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity model established that inhibition of TLR9 using ODN2088 and IRS954, a TLR7/9 antagonist, down-regulated proinflammatory cytokine release and reduced mortality,” the investigators wrote. “The amelioration of brain edema and cytokine production by ODN2088 supports exploration of TLR9 antagonism as a therapeutic modality in early acute liver failure to prevent the development of brain edema and intracranial hypertension.”

The study was funded by the U.K. Institute of Liver Studies Charitable Fund and the National Institutes of Health. The investigators reported no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Vijay GKM et al. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Aug 8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2019.08.002.