Aggressive Lymphomas

Maintenance therapy with lenalidomide significantly prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), according to findings from a phase III trial.

None of the previous trials assessing a maintenance drug in this patient population – including bevacizumab, rituximab, enzastaurin, or everolimus – have reported such a benefit, Catherine Thieblemont, MD, PhD, of the department of hematology-oncology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, and her associates, reported.

The standard regimen for newly diagnosed DLBCL is R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone), but 30%-40% of patients have disease progression or relapse, usually during the first 2 years after diagnosis. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulator with antineoplastic activity and has shown activity in relapsed DLBCL. The investigators compared 24 months of lenalidomide maintenance therapy against a matching placebo in an international, randomized double-blind phase III trial involving 650 patients aged 60-80 years who showed either partial or complete responses to first-line R-CHOP.

After a median follow-up of 39 months (range, 0-74 months), median PFS was not yet reached in the lenalidomide group and was estimated to be 58.9 months in the placebo group, for a hazard ratio of 0.708 favoring lenalidomide. This represents a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS, Dr. Thieblemont and her associates noted (J Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr 20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.6984).

This survival benefit was consistent across all subgroups of patients. Most important, PFS was significantly prolonged regardless of whether patients had shown only a partial response or a complete response to R-CHOP, the investigators said.

The maintenance therapy did not appear to prolong overall survival, which was 87% for lenalidomide and 89% for placebo.

“We do not yet fully understand the basis for lack of an [overall survival] benefit despite the positive PFS data. Other than that, this is not due to excessive toxicity in the experimental arm,” they said. “We speculate the reason may be differences in the outcomes after progression or some other unrecognized reason.”

The study was sponsored by the Lymphoma Academic Research Organisation of France and Celgene. Dr. Thieblemont reported ties to Celgene, Bayer, AbbVie, Janssen, and Roche. Her associates reported ties to numerous industry sources.

[email protected]

Maintenance therapy with lenalidomide significantly prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), according to findings from a phase III trial.

None of the previous trials assessing a maintenance drug in this patient population – including bevacizumab, rituximab, enzastaurin, or everolimus – have reported such a benefit, Catherine Thieblemont, MD, PhD, of the department of hematology-oncology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, and her associates, reported.

The standard regimen for newly diagnosed DLBCL is R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone), but 30%-40% of patients have disease progression or relapse, usually during the first 2 years after diagnosis. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulator with antineoplastic activity and has shown activity in relapsed DLBCL. The investigators compared 24 months of lenalidomide maintenance therapy against a matching placebo in an international, randomized double-blind phase III trial involving 650 patients aged 60-80 years who showed either partial or complete responses to first-line R-CHOP.

After a median follow-up of 39 months (range, 0-74 months), median PFS was not yet reached in the lenalidomide group and was estimated to be 58.9 months in the placebo group, for a hazard ratio of 0.708 favoring lenalidomide. This represents a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS, Dr. Thieblemont and her associates noted (J Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr 20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.6984).

This survival benefit was consistent across all subgroups of patients. Most important, PFS was significantly prolonged regardless of whether patients had shown only a partial response or a complete response to R-CHOP, the investigators said.

The maintenance therapy did not appear to prolong overall survival, which was 87% for lenalidomide and 89% for placebo.

“We do not yet fully understand the basis for lack of an [overall survival] benefit despite the positive PFS data. Other than that, this is not due to excessive toxicity in the experimental arm,” they said. “We speculate the reason may be differences in the outcomes after progression or some other unrecognized reason.”

The study was sponsored by the Lymphoma Academic Research Organisation of France and Celgene. Dr. Thieblemont reported ties to Celgene, Bayer, AbbVie, Janssen, and Roche. Her associates reported ties to numerous industry sources.

[email protected]

Maintenance therapy with lenalidomide significantly prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), according to findings from a phase III trial.

None of the previous trials assessing a maintenance drug in this patient population – including bevacizumab, rituximab, enzastaurin, or everolimus – have reported such a benefit, Catherine Thieblemont, MD, PhD, of the department of hematology-oncology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, and her associates, reported.

The standard regimen for newly diagnosed DLBCL is R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone), but 30%-40% of patients have disease progression or relapse, usually during the first 2 years after diagnosis. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulator with antineoplastic activity and has shown activity in relapsed DLBCL. The investigators compared 24 months of lenalidomide maintenance therapy against a matching placebo in an international, randomized double-blind phase III trial involving 650 patients aged 60-80 years who showed either partial or complete responses to first-line R-CHOP.

After a median follow-up of 39 months (range, 0-74 months), median PFS was not yet reached in the lenalidomide group and was estimated to be 58.9 months in the placebo group, for a hazard ratio of 0.708 favoring lenalidomide. This represents a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS, Dr. Thieblemont and her associates noted (J Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr 20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.6984).

This survival benefit was consistent across all subgroups of patients. Most important, PFS was significantly prolonged regardless of whether patients had shown only a partial response or a complete response to R-CHOP, the investigators said.

The maintenance therapy did not appear to prolong overall survival, which was 87% for lenalidomide and 89% for placebo.

“We do not yet fully understand the basis for lack of an [overall survival] benefit despite the positive PFS data. Other than that, this is not due to excessive toxicity in the experimental arm,” they said. “We speculate the reason may be differences in the outcomes after progression or some other unrecognized reason.”

The study was sponsored by the Lymphoma Academic Research Organisation of France and Celgene. Dr. Thieblemont reported ties to Celgene, Bayer, AbbVie, Janssen, and Roche. Her associates reported ties to numerous industry sources.

[email protected]

Micrograph showing HL

The anti-PD-1 therapy pembrolizumab could change the treatment paradigm of relapsed or refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), according to researchers.

In a phase 2 trial, pembrolizumab produced an overall response rate (ORR) of 69% and a complete response (CR) rate of 22% in adults with cHL who had failed treatment with brentuximab vedotin (BV), autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-HSCT), or both.

The researchers said the safety profile of pembrolizumab was “acceptable” and largely consistent with safety in previous studies of the drug.

Twelve percent of patients temporarily stopped taking pembrolizumab due to treatment-related adverse events (AEs), and 4% stopped taking the drug entirely as a result of AEs.

Craig H. Moskowitz, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, New York, and his colleagues reported these results, from the KEYNOTE-087 trial, in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The trial was sponsored by Merck, the company that markets pembrolizumab as Keytruda.

In KEYNOTE-087, the researchers evaluated pembrolizumab (a 200 mg fixed dose every 3 weeks) in patients with relapsed or refractory cHL across 3 cohorts:

Cohort 1: Patients who progressed after auto-HSCT and subsequent treatment with BV

Cohort 2: Patients who failed salvage chemotherapy, were ineligible for a transplant, and progressed after BV

Cohort 3: Patients who progressed after auto-HSCT and did not receive BV after transplant.

Efficacy

Across all 210 enrolled patients, the ORR was 69.0%, and the CR rate was 22.4%.

In Cohort 1 (n=69), the ORR was 73.9%. The CR rate was 21.7%, the partial response (PR) rate was 52.2%, 15.9% of patients had stable disease (SD), and 7.2% progressed. In 82.2% of responders, the response lasted 6 months or more.

In Cohort 2 (n=81), the ORR was 64.2%. The CR rate was 24.7%, the PR rate was 39.5%, 12.3% of patients had SD, and 21.0% progressed. In 70.0% of responders, the response lasted 6 months or more.

In Cohort 3 (n=60), the ORR was 70.0%. Twenty percent of patients had a CR, 50.0% had a PR, 16.7% had SD, and 13.3% progressed. In 75.6% of responders, the response lasted 6 months or more.

Results also included an analysis of patients with primary refractory disease (n=73), which was defined as failure to achieve CR or PR with first-line treatment. In this patient population, the ORR was 79.5%.

An ORR of 67.8% was reported in patients who relapsed after 3 or more lines of prior therapy (99/146).

For the entire study cohort, the median duration of response was not reached, and the median overall survival was not reached. At 9 months, the overall survival rate was 97.5%, and the progression-free survival rate was 63.4%.

Safety

The most common AEs related to pembrolizumab were hypothyroidism (12.4%), pyrexia (10.5%), fatigue (9.0%), rash (7.6%), diarrhea (7.1%), headache (6.2%), nausea (5.7%), cough (5.7%), and neutropenia (5.2%).

The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs were neutropenia (2.4%), diarrhea (1.0%), and dyspnea (1.0%). Immune-mediated AEs included pneumonitis (2.9%), hyperthyroidism (2.9%), colitis (1.0%), and myositis (1.0%).

Nine patients (4.3%) stopped taking pembrolizumab due to treatment-related AEs, including myocarditis, myelitis, myositis, pneumonitis, infusion-related reactions, and cytokine release syndrome.

Twenty-six patients (12.4%) had treatment interruptions due to pembrolizumab-related AEs.

Two patients died during follow-up, but neither death was considered related to pembrolizumab. One patient died of septic shock and the other of acute graft-versus-host disease.

Micrograph showing HL

The anti-PD-1 therapy pembrolizumab could change the treatment paradigm of relapsed or refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), according to researchers.

In a phase 2 trial, pembrolizumab produced an overall response rate (ORR) of 69% and a complete response (CR) rate of 22% in adults with cHL who had failed treatment with brentuximab vedotin (BV), autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-HSCT), or both.

The researchers said the safety profile of pembrolizumab was “acceptable” and largely consistent with safety in previous studies of the drug.

Twelve percent of patients temporarily stopped taking pembrolizumab due to treatment-related adverse events (AEs), and 4% stopped taking the drug entirely as a result of AEs.

Craig H. Moskowitz, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, New York, and his colleagues reported these results, from the KEYNOTE-087 trial, in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The trial was sponsored by Merck, the company that markets pembrolizumab as Keytruda.

In KEYNOTE-087, the researchers evaluated pembrolizumab (a 200 mg fixed dose every 3 weeks) in patients with relapsed or refractory cHL across 3 cohorts:

Cohort 1: Patients who progressed after auto-HSCT and subsequent treatment with BV

Cohort 2: Patients who failed salvage chemotherapy, were ineligible for a transplant, and progressed after BV

Cohort 3: Patients who progressed after auto-HSCT and did not receive BV after transplant.

Efficacy

Across all 210 enrolled patients, the ORR was 69.0%, and the CR rate was 22.4%.

In Cohort 1 (n=69), the ORR was 73.9%. The CR rate was 21.7%, the partial response (PR) rate was 52.2%, 15.9% of patients had stable disease (SD), and 7.2% progressed. In 82.2% of responders, the response lasted 6 months or more.

In Cohort 2 (n=81), the ORR was 64.2%. The CR rate was 24.7%, the PR rate was 39.5%, 12.3% of patients had SD, and 21.0% progressed. In 70.0% of responders, the response lasted 6 months or more.

In Cohort 3 (n=60), the ORR was 70.0%. Twenty percent of patients had a CR, 50.0% had a PR, 16.7% had SD, and 13.3% progressed. In 75.6% of responders, the response lasted 6 months or more.

Results also included an analysis of patients with primary refractory disease (n=73), which was defined as failure to achieve CR or PR with first-line treatment. In this patient population, the ORR was 79.5%.

An ORR of 67.8% was reported in patients who relapsed after 3 or more lines of prior therapy (99/146).

For the entire study cohort, the median duration of response was not reached, and the median overall survival was not reached. At 9 months, the overall survival rate was 97.5%, and the progression-free survival rate was 63.4%.

Safety

The most common AEs related to pembrolizumab were hypothyroidism (12.4%), pyrexia (10.5%), fatigue (9.0%), rash (7.6%), diarrhea (7.1%), headache (6.2%), nausea (5.7%), cough (5.7%), and neutropenia (5.2%).

The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs were neutropenia (2.4%), diarrhea (1.0%), and dyspnea (1.0%). Immune-mediated AEs included pneumonitis (2.9%), hyperthyroidism (2.9%), colitis (1.0%), and myositis (1.0%).

Nine patients (4.3%) stopped taking pembrolizumab due to treatment-related AEs, including myocarditis, myelitis, myositis, pneumonitis, infusion-related reactions, and cytokine release syndrome.

Twenty-six patients (12.4%) had treatment interruptions due to pembrolizumab-related AEs.

Two patients died during follow-up, but neither death was considered related to pembrolizumab. One patient died of septic shock and the other of acute graft-versus-host disease.

Micrograph showing HL

The anti-PD-1 therapy pembrolizumab could change the treatment paradigm of relapsed or refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), according to researchers.

In a phase 2 trial, pembrolizumab produced an overall response rate (ORR) of 69% and a complete response (CR) rate of 22% in adults with cHL who had failed treatment with brentuximab vedotin (BV), autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-HSCT), or both.

The researchers said the safety profile of pembrolizumab was “acceptable” and largely consistent with safety in previous studies of the drug.

Twelve percent of patients temporarily stopped taking pembrolizumab due to treatment-related adverse events (AEs), and 4% stopped taking the drug entirely as a result of AEs.

Craig H. Moskowitz, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, New York, and his colleagues reported these results, from the KEYNOTE-087 trial, in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The trial was sponsored by Merck, the company that markets pembrolizumab as Keytruda.

In KEYNOTE-087, the researchers evaluated pembrolizumab (a 200 mg fixed dose every 3 weeks) in patients with relapsed or refractory cHL across 3 cohorts:

Cohort 1: Patients who progressed after auto-HSCT and subsequent treatment with BV

Cohort 2: Patients who failed salvage chemotherapy, were ineligible for a transplant, and progressed after BV

Cohort 3: Patients who progressed after auto-HSCT and did not receive BV after transplant.

Efficacy

Across all 210 enrolled patients, the ORR was 69.0%, and the CR rate was 22.4%.

In Cohort 1 (n=69), the ORR was 73.9%. The CR rate was 21.7%, the partial response (PR) rate was 52.2%, 15.9% of patients had stable disease (SD), and 7.2% progressed. In 82.2% of responders, the response lasted 6 months or more.

In Cohort 2 (n=81), the ORR was 64.2%. The CR rate was 24.7%, the PR rate was 39.5%, 12.3% of patients had SD, and 21.0% progressed. In 70.0% of responders, the response lasted 6 months or more.

In Cohort 3 (n=60), the ORR was 70.0%. Twenty percent of patients had a CR, 50.0% had a PR, 16.7% had SD, and 13.3% progressed. In 75.6% of responders, the response lasted 6 months or more.

Results also included an analysis of patients with primary refractory disease (n=73), which was defined as failure to achieve CR or PR with first-line treatment. In this patient population, the ORR was 79.5%.

An ORR of 67.8% was reported in patients who relapsed after 3 or more lines of prior therapy (99/146).

For the entire study cohort, the median duration of response was not reached, and the median overall survival was not reached. At 9 months, the overall survival rate was 97.5%, and the progression-free survival rate was 63.4%.

Safety

The most common AEs related to pembrolizumab were hypothyroidism (12.4%), pyrexia (10.5%), fatigue (9.0%), rash (7.6%), diarrhea (7.1%), headache (6.2%), nausea (5.7%), cough (5.7%), and neutropenia (5.2%).

The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs were neutropenia (2.4%), diarrhea (1.0%), and dyspnea (1.0%). Immune-mediated AEs included pneumonitis (2.9%), hyperthyroidism (2.9%), colitis (1.0%), and myositis (1.0%).

Nine patients (4.3%) stopped taking pembrolizumab due to treatment-related AEs, including myocarditis, myelitis, myositis, pneumonitis, infusion-related reactions, and cytokine release syndrome.

Twenty-six patients (12.4%) had treatment interruptions due to pembrolizumab-related AEs.

Two patients died during follow-up, but neither death was considered related to pembrolizumab. One patient died of septic shock and the other of acute graft-versus-host disease.

Micrograph showing DLBCL

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has recommended that PQR309 receive orphan drug designation for the treatment of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

PQR309, is an oral, brain-penetrant, dual inhibitor of the PI3K/mTOR pathway being developed by PIQUR Therapeutics AG.

PQR309 is currently being investigated in phase 1 and 2 studies in relapsed or refractory lymphoma (NCT02249429), relapsed or refractory primary central nervous system lymphoma (NCT02669511), and other malignancies.

Preclinical research of PQR309 in lymphomas was presented at the AACR Annual Meeting 2017 (abstract 2652).

Researchers tested the drug in 40 cell lines—27 DLBCL, 10 mantle cell lymphoma, and 3 splenic marginal zone lymphoma.

The researchers reported that PQR309 had “potent antiproliferative activity” in most of the cell lines.

The median IC50 was 166 nM in DLBCL cell lines, 235 nM in mantle cell lymphoma cell lines, and 214 nM in splenic marginal zone lymphoma cell lines.

In addition, PQR309 demonstrated similar activity in activated B-cell like DLBCL and germinal center B-cell like DLBCL.

About orphan designation

Orphan designation provides regulatory and financial incentives for companies to develop and market therapies that treat life-threatening or chronically debilitating conditions affecting no more than 5 in 10,000 people in the European Union, and where no satisfactory treatment is available.

Orphan designation provides a 10-year period of marketing exclusivity if the drug receives regulatory approval. The designation also provides incentives for companies seeking protocol assistance from the EMA during the product development phase and direct access to the centralized authorization procedure.

The EMA adopts an opinion on the granting of orphan drug designation, and that opinion is submitted to the European Commission for a final decision. The European Commission typically makes a decision within 30 days.

Micrograph showing DLBCL

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has recommended that PQR309 receive orphan drug designation for the treatment of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

PQR309, is an oral, brain-penetrant, dual inhibitor of the PI3K/mTOR pathway being developed by PIQUR Therapeutics AG.

PQR309 is currently being investigated in phase 1 and 2 studies in relapsed or refractory lymphoma (NCT02249429), relapsed or refractory primary central nervous system lymphoma (NCT02669511), and other malignancies.

Preclinical research of PQR309 in lymphomas was presented at the AACR Annual Meeting 2017 (abstract 2652).

Researchers tested the drug in 40 cell lines—27 DLBCL, 10 mantle cell lymphoma, and 3 splenic marginal zone lymphoma.

The researchers reported that PQR309 had “potent antiproliferative activity” in most of the cell lines.

The median IC50 was 166 nM in DLBCL cell lines, 235 nM in mantle cell lymphoma cell lines, and 214 nM in splenic marginal zone lymphoma cell lines.

In addition, PQR309 demonstrated similar activity in activated B-cell like DLBCL and germinal center B-cell like DLBCL.

About orphan designation

Orphan designation provides regulatory and financial incentives for companies to develop and market therapies that treat life-threatening or chronically debilitating conditions affecting no more than 5 in 10,000 people in the European Union, and where no satisfactory treatment is available.

Orphan designation provides a 10-year period of marketing exclusivity if the drug receives regulatory approval. The designation also provides incentives for companies seeking protocol assistance from the EMA during the product development phase and direct access to the centralized authorization procedure.

The EMA adopts an opinion on the granting of orphan drug designation, and that opinion is submitted to the European Commission for a final decision. The European Commission typically makes a decision within 30 days.

Micrograph showing DLBCL

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has recommended that PQR309 receive orphan drug designation for the treatment of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

PQR309, is an oral, brain-penetrant, dual inhibitor of the PI3K/mTOR pathway being developed by PIQUR Therapeutics AG.

PQR309 is currently being investigated in phase 1 and 2 studies in relapsed or refractory lymphoma (NCT02249429), relapsed or refractory primary central nervous system lymphoma (NCT02669511), and other malignancies.

Preclinical research of PQR309 in lymphomas was presented at the AACR Annual Meeting 2017 (abstract 2652).

Researchers tested the drug in 40 cell lines—27 DLBCL, 10 mantle cell lymphoma, and 3 splenic marginal zone lymphoma.

The researchers reported that PQR309 had “potent antiproliferative activity” in most of the cell lines.

The median IC50 was 166 nM in DLBCL cell lines, 235 nM in mantle cell lymphoma cell lines, and 214 nM in splenic marginal zone lymphoma cell lines.

In addition, PQR309 demonstrated similar activity in activated B-cell like DLBCL and germinal center B-cell like DLBCL.

About orphan designation

Orphan designation provides regulatory and financial incentives for companies to develop and market therapies that treat life-threatening or chronically debilitating conditions affecting no more than 5 in 10,000 people in the European Union, and where no satisfactory treatment is available.

Orphan designation provides a 10-year period of marketing exclusivity if the drug receives regulatory approval. The designation also provides incentives for companies seeking protocol assistance from the EMA during the product development phase and direct access to the centralized authorization procedure.

The EMA adopts an opinion on the granting of orphan drug designation, and that opinion is submitted to the European Commission for a final decision. The European Commission typically makes a decision within 30 days.

follicular lymphoma

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted fast track designation to the EZH2 inhibitor tazemetostat as a treatment for relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma, with or without EZH2-activating mutations.

The FDA’s fast track program is designed to facilitate the development and expedite the review of products intended to treat or prevent serious or life-threatening conditions and address unmet medical need.

Through the fast track program, a product may be eligible for priority review.

In addition, the company developing the product may be allowed to submit sections of the new drug application or biologic license application on a rolling basis as data become available.

Fast track designation also provides the company with opportunities for more frequent meetings and written communications with the FDA.

Tazemetostat also has fast track designation from the FDA as a treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with EZH2-activating mutations.

Tazemetostat is under investigation as monotherapy and in combination with other agents as a treatment for multiple cancers.

Results from a phase 1 study suggested tazemetostat can produce durable responses in patients with advanced non-Hodgkin lymphomas, including follicular lymphoma and DLBCL. The study was presented at the 2015 ASH Annual Meeting.

Tazemetostat is currently under investigation in a phase 2 trial of adults with relapsed or refractory DLBCL or follicular lymphoma.

Interim efficacy and safety data from this study are scheduled to be presented at the International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma (ICML) in Lugano, Switzerland, on June 14, 2017, at 2:00 pm CET.

Tazemetostat is being developed by Epizyme, Inc.

follicular lymphoma

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted fast track designation to the EZH2 inhibitor tazemetostat as a treatment for relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma, with or without EZH2-activating mutations.

The FDA’s fast track program is designed to facilitate the development and expedite the review of products intended to treat or prevent serious or life-threatening conditions and address unmet medical need.

Through the fast track program, a product may be eligible for priority review.

In addition, the company developing the product may be allowed to submit sections of the new drug application or biologic license application on a rolling basis as data become available.

Fast track designation also provides the company with opportunities for more frequent meetings and written communications with the FDA.

Tazemetostat also has fast track designation from the FDA as a treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with EZH2-activating mutations.

Tazemetostat is under investigation as monotherapy and in combination with other agents as a treatment for multiple cancers.

Results from a phase 1 study suggested tazemetostat can produce durable responses in patients with advanced non-Hodgkin lymphomas, including follicular lymphoma and DLBCL. The study was presented at the 2015 ASH Annual Meeting.

Tazemetostat is currently under investigation in a phase 2 trial of adults with relapsed or refractory DLBCL or follicular lymphoma.

Interim efficacy and safety data from this study are scheduled to be presented at the International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma (ICML) in Lugano, Switzerland, on June 14, 2017, at 2:00 pm CET.

Tazemetostat is being developed by Epizyme, Inc.

follicular lymphoma

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted fast track designation to the EZH2 inhibitor tazemetostat as a treatment for relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma, with or without EZH2-activating mutations.

The FDA’s fast track program is designed to facilitate the development and expedite the review of products intended to treat or prevent serious or life-threatening conditions and address unmet medical need.

Through the fast track program, a product may be eligible for priority review.

In addition, the company developing the product may be allowed to submit sections of the new drug application or biologic license application on a rolling basis as data become available.

Fast track designation also provides the company with opportunities for more frequent meetings and written communications with the FDA.

Tazemetostat also has fast track designation from the FDA as a treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with EZH2-activating mutations.

Tazemetostat is under investigation as monotherapy and in combination with other agents as a treatment for multiple cancers.

Results from a phase 1 study suggested tazemetostat can produce durable responses in patients with advanced non-Hodgkin lymphomas, including follicular lymphoma and DLBCL. The study was presented at the 2015 ASH Annual Meeting.

Tazemetostat is currently under investigation in a phase 2 trial of adults with relapsed or refractory DLBCL or follicular lymphoma.

Interim efficacy and safety data from this study are scheduled to be presented at the International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma (ICML) in Lugano, Switzerland, on June 14, 2017, at 2:00 pm CET.

Tazemetostat is being developed by Epizyme, Inc.

Combined idelalisib, lenalidomide, and rituximab proved excessively toxic for the treatment of relapsed and refractory mantle cell and follicular lymphoma in two phase I trials conducted by the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology.

The unexpected outcome, which led to early study termination, underscores the need for caution as new treatment combinations are proposed, Sonali M. Smith, MD, of the University of Chicago and her colleagues said in The Lancet Haematology.

In four of the first eight patients enrolled in the mantle cell lymphoma (A051201) and follicular lymphoma (A051202) phase I trials between July 9, 2013, and Sept. 30, 2014, unexpected dose-limiting toxicities occurred, including grade 4 sepsis syndrome, grade 4 hypotension with grade 3 rash and fevers, grade 4 aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation with fevers, and grade 3 pulmonary infection with grade 3 maculopapular rash.

The adverse events occurred between 9 and 20 days after treatment initiation and coincided with rituximab infusions, the researchers said. No treatment-related deaths occurred (Lancet Haematol. 2017 Apr;4:e176-82).

Overall, 8 of 11 patients were removed from treatment because of an adverse event, and 3 of those required intensive care unit level of care.

Although rituximab was removed in both trials, two of the remaining three patients in the studies, including three with mantle cell lymphoma and eight with follicular lymphoma, experienced grade 3 rashes, and one had grade 3 AST elevations. In those with mantle cell lymphoma, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were ALT elevations and rash. In those with follicular lymphoma, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia and rash.

“Given the inability to deliver treatment due to toxicity, both studies were permanently closed,” the researchers wrote, noting that the primary endpoint of safety and tolerability was not met.

The trials had the overall goal of developing targeted regimens to replace cytotoxic therapy.

“Both ... trials were designed to capitalize on the clinical synergy of lenalidomide and rituximab observed in previous trials by adding the highly specific PI3K delta inhibitor, idelalisib, for patients with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma,” they said.

Previously available data implied that lenalidomide plus rituximab would be a safe backbone for therapy, and there was clinical rationale for adding idelalisib to that combination, they explained.

“Overall, our brief experience underscores the limited knowledge regarding drug interactions and off-target effects and serves as a cautionary note in developing biological agents in combination and against ad-hoc combinations outside of carefully monitored clinical trials,” they said.

The researchers noted that the nature of the toxicities observed in these trials supports an immune-activated state characterized by excessive inflammation.

“A more detailed assessment of effect on cytokines, T-cell subsets, natural killer cells, and clinical features predictive of toxicity and response should be included in any further testing of these classes of agents, and they should never be combined outside of a carefully designed and diligently monitored clinical trial setting,” they concluded.

The study was funded by the National Cancer Institute. Dr. Smith received research funding and consulting fees from Gilead and Celgene.

[email protected]

Combined idelalisib, lenalidomide, and rituximab proved excessively toxic for the treatment of relapsed and refractory mantle cell and follicular lymphoma in two phase I trials conducted by the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology.

The unexpected outcome, which led to early study termination, underscores the need for caution as new treatment combinations are proposed, Sonali M. Smith, MD, of the University of Chicago and her colleagues said in The Lancet Haematology.

In four of the first eight patients enrolled in the mantle cell lymphoma (A051201) and follicular lymphoma (A051202) phase I trials between July 9, 2013, and Sept. 30, 2014, unexpected dose-limiting toxicities occurred, including grade 4 sepsis syndrome, grade 4 hypotension with grade 3 rash and fevers, grade 4 aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation with fevers, and grade 3 pulmonary infection with grade 3 maculopapular rash.

The adverse events occurred between 9 and 20 days after treatment initiation and coincided with rituximab infusions, the researchers said. No treatment-related deaths occurred (Lancet Haematol. 2017 Apr;4:e176-82).

Overall, 8 of 11 patients were removed from treatment because of an adverse event, and 3 of those required intensive care unit level of care.

Although rituximab was removed in both trials, two of the remaining three patients in the studies, including three with mantle cell lymphoma and eight with follicular lymphoma, experienced grade 3 rashes, and one had grade 3 AST elevations. In those with mantle cell lymphoma, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were ALT elevations and rash. In those with follicular lymphoma, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia and rash.

“Given the inability to deliver treatment due to toxicity, both studies were permanently closed,” the researchers wrote, noting that the primary endpoint of safety and tolerability was not met.

The trials had the overall goal of developing targeted regimens to replace cytotoxic therapy.

“Both ... trials were designed to capitalize on the clinical synergy of lenalidomide and rituximab observed in previous trials by adding the highly specific PI3K delta inhibitor, idelalisib, for patients with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma,” they said.

Previously available data implied that lenalidomide plus rituximab would be a safe backbone for therapy, and there was clinical rationale for adding idelalisib to that combination, they explained.

“Overall, our brief experience underscores the limited knowledge regarding drug interactions and off-target effects and serves as a cautionary note in developing biological agents in combination and against ad-hoc combinations outside of carefully monitored clinical trials,” they said.

The researchers noted that the nature of the toxicities observed in these trials supports an immune-activated state characterized by excessive inflammation.

“A more detailed assessment of effect on cytokines, T-cell subsets, natural killer cells, and clinical features predictive of toxicity and response should be included in any further testing of these classes of agents, and they should never be combined outside of a carefully designed and diligently monitored clinical trial setting,” they concluded.

The study was funded by the National Cancer Institute. Dr. Smith received research funding and consulting fees from Gilead and Celgene.

[email protected]

Combined idelalisib, lenalidomide, and rituximab proved excessively toxic for the treatment of relapsed and refractory mantle cell and follicular lymphoma in two phase I trials conducted by the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology.

The unexpected outcome, which led to early study termination, underscores the need for caution as new treatment combinations are proposed, Sonali M. Smith, MD, of the University of Chicago and her colleagues said in The Lancet Haematology.

In four of the first eight patients enrolled in the mantle cell lymphoma (A051201) and follicular lymphoma (A051202) phase I trials between July 9, 2013, and Sept. 30, 2014, unexpected dose-limiting toxicities occurred, including grade 4 sepsis syndrome, grade 4 hypotension with grade 3 rash and fevers, grade 4 aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation with fevers, and grade 3 pulmonary infection with grade 3 maculopapular rash.

The adverse events occurred between 9 and 20 days after treatment initiation and coincided with rituximab infusions, the researchers said. No treatment-related deaths occurred (Lancet Haematol. 2017 Apr;4:e176-82).

Overall, 8 of 11 patients were removed from treatment because of an adverse event, and 3 of those required intensive care unit level of care.

Although rituximab was removed in both trials, two of the remaining three patients in the studies, including three with mantle cell lymphoma and eight with follicular lymphoma, experienced grade 3 rashes, and one had grade 3 AST elevations. In those with mantle cell lymphoma, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were ALT elevations and rash. In those with follicular lymphoma, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia and rash.

“Given the inability to deliver treatment due to toxicity, both studies were permanently closed,” the researchers wrote, noting that the primary endpoint of safety and tolerability was not met.

The trials had the overall goal of developing targeted regimens to replace cytotoxic therapy.

“Both ... trials were designed to capitalize on the clinical synergy of lenalidomide and rituximab observed in previous trials by adding the highly specific PI3K delta inhibitor, idelalisib, for patients with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma,” they said.

Previously available data implied that lenalidomide plus rituximab would be a safe backbone for therapy, and there was clinical rationale for adding idelalisib to that combination, they explained.

“Overall, our brief experience underscores the limited knowledge regarding drug interactions and off-target effects and serves as a cautionary note in developing biological agents in combination and against ad-hoc combinations outside of carefully monitored clinical trials,” they said.

The researchers noted that the nature of the toxicities observed in these trials supports an immune-activated state characterized by excessive inflammation.

“A more detailed assessment of effect on cytokines, T-cell subsets, natural killer cells, and clinical features predictive of toxicity and response should be included in any further testing of these classes of agents, and they should never be combined outside of a carefully designed and diligently monitored clinical trial setting,” they concluded.

The study was funded by the National Cancer Institute. Dr. Smith received research funding and consulting fees from Gilead and Celgene.

[email protected]

Photo by Linda Bartlett

The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has recommended marketing authorization for a biosimilar rituximab product called Rixathon.

The recommended authorization for Rixathon encompasses all the same indications as the reference medicine, MabThera, which includes non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA).

The CHMP’s recommendation for Rixathon has been forwarded to the European Commission, which normally decides whether it will grant marketing authorization for a product within 67 days from the time the CHMP adopts its opinion.

The active substance of Rixathon is rituximab, a monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to the transmembrane protein CD20, which is found on both malignant and normal B cells.

In NHL and CLL, this promotes destruction of malignant B cells and controls tumor growth. In RA, GPA, and MPA, it reduces B cells involved in their pathogenesis.

The reference product for Rixathon is Mabthera, which was authorized for use in the European Union in June 1998.

The CHMP says studies have shown Rixathon to have comparable quality, safety, and efficacy to Mabthera.^{1, 2, 3}

The applicant for Rixathon is Sandoz GmbH.

If authorized by the European Commission, Rixathon will be available for the following indications.

NHL

Rixathon is indicated for use in combination with chemotherapy to treat previously untreated patients with stage III-IV follicular lymphoma (FL).

Rixathon maintenance therapy is indicated for the treatment of FL patients responding to induction therapy.

Rixathon monotherapy is indicated for the treatment of patients with stage III-IV FL who are chemo-resistant or are in their second or subsequent relapse after chemotherapy.

Rixathon is indicated for use in combination with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone) for the treatment of patients with CD20-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

CLL

Rixathon in combination with chemotherapy is indicated for the treatment of patients with previously untreated and relapsed/refractory CLL.

The CHMP noted that limited efficacy and safety data are available for patients previously treated with monoclonal antibodies, including rituximab, or patients who are refractory to previous rituximab plus chemotherapy.

RA, GPA, and MPA 

Rixathon in combination with methotrexate is indicated for the treatment of adults with severe, active RA who have had an inadequate response to or cannot tolerate other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, including one or more tumor necrosis factor inhibitor therapies.

Rixathon in combination with glucocorticoids is indicated for the induction of remission in adults with severe, active GPA or MPA.

1. Visser J et al. Physicochemical and Functional Comparability Between the Proposed Biosimilar Rituximab GP2013 and Originator Rituximab. BioDrugs. 2013;27:495-507.

2. Da Silva A et al. Target-directed development and preclinical characterization of the proposed biosimilar rituximab GP2013. Leuk Lymphoma. 2014;55:1609-1617.

3. Jurczak W et al. A Phase III Efficacy and Safety Study of the Proposed Rituximab Biosimilar GP2013 Versus Rituximab in Patients with Previously Untreated Advanced Follicular Lymphoma. ASH Annual Meeting 2016.

Photo by Linda Bartlett

The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has recommended marketing authorization for a biosimilar rituximab product called Rixathon.

The recommended authorization for Rixathon encompasses all the same indications as the reference medicine, MabThera, which includes non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA).

The CHMP’s recommendation for Rixathon has been forwarded to the European Commission, which normally decides whether it will grant marketing authorization for a product within 67 days from the time the CHMP adopts its opinion.

The active substance of Rixathon is rituximab, a monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to the transmembrane protein CD20, which is found on both malignant and normal B cells.

In NHL and CLL, this promotes destruction of malignant B cells and controls tumor growth. In RA, GPA, and MPA, it reduces B cells involved in their pathogenesis.

The reference product for Rixathon is Mabthera, which was authorized for use in the European Union in June 1998.

The CHMP says studies have shown Rixathon to have comparable quality, safety, and efficacy to Mabthera.^{1, 2, 3}

The applicant for Rixathon is Sandoz GmbH.

If authorized by the European Commission, Rixathon will be available for the following indications.

NHL

Rixathon is indicated for use in combination with chemotherapy to treat previously untreated patients with stage III-IV follicular lymphoma (FL).

Rixathon maintenance therapy is indicated for the treatment of FL patients responding to induction therapy.

Rixathon monotherapy is indicated for the treatment of patients with stage III-IV FL who are chemo-resistant or are in their second or subsequent relapse after chemotherapy.

Rixathon is indicated for use in combination with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone) for the treatment of patients with CD20-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

CLL

Rixathon in combination with chemotherapy is indicated for the treatment of patients with previously untreated and relapsed/refractory CLL.

The CHMP noted that limited efficacy and safety data are available for patients previously treated with monoclonal antibodies, including rituximab, or patients who are refractory to previous rituximab plus chemotherapy.

RA, GPA, and MPA 

Rixathon in combination with methotrexate is indicated for the treatment of adults with severe, active RA who have had an inadequate response to or cannot tolerate other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, including one or more tumor necrosis factor inhibitor therapies.

Rixathon in combination with glucocorticoids is indicated for the induction of remission in adults with severe, active GPA or MPA.

1. Visser J et al. Physicochemical and Functional Comparability Between the Proposed Biosimilar Rituximab GP2013 and Originator Rituximab. BioDrugs. 2013;27:495-507.

2. Da Silva A et al. Target-directed development and preclinical characterization of the proposed biosimilar rituximab GP2013. Leuk Lymphoma. 2014;55:1609-1617.

3. Jurczak W et al. A Phase III Efficacy and Safety Study of the Proposed Rituximab Biosimilar GP2013 Versus Rituximab in Patients with Previously Untreated Advanced Follicular Lymphoma. ASH Annual Meeting 2016.

Photo by Linda Bartlett

The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has recommended marketing authorization for a biosimilar rituximab product called Rixathon.

The recommended authorization for Rixathon encompasses all the same indications as the reference medicine, MabThera, which includes non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA).

The CHMP’s recommendation for Rixathon has been forwarded to the European Commission, which normally decides whether it will grant marketing authorization for a product within 67 days from the time the CHMP adopts its opinion.

The active substance of Rixathon is rituximab, a monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to the transmembrane protein CD20, which is found on both malignant and normal B cells.

In NHL and CLL, this promotes destruction of malignant B cells and controls tumor growth. In RA, GPA, and MPA, it reduces B cells involved in their pathogenesis.

The reference product for Rixathon is Mabthera, which was authorized for use in the European Union in June 1998.

The CHMP says studies have shown Rixathon to have comparable quality, safety, and efficacy to Mabthera.^{1, 2, 3}

The applicant for Rixathon is Sandoz GmbH.

If authorized by the European Commission, Rixathon will be available for the following indications.

NHL

Rixathon is indicated for use in combination with chemotherapy to treat previously untreated patients with stage III-IV follicular lymphoma (FL).

Rixathon maintenance therapy is indicated for the treatment of FL patients responding to induction therapy.

Rixathon monotherapy is indicated for the treatment of patients with stage III-IV FL who are chemo-resistant or are in their second or subsequent relapse after chemotherapy.

Rixathon is indicated for use in combination with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone) for the treatment of patients with CD20-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

CLL

Rixathon in combination with chemotherapy is indicated for the treatment of patients with previously untreated and relapsed/refractory CLL.

The CHMP noted that limited efficacy and safety data are available for patients previously treated with monoclonal antibodies, including rituximab, or patients who are refractory to previous rituximab plus chemotherapy.

RA, GPA, and MPA 

Rixathon in combination with methotrexate is indicated for the treatment of adults with severe, active RA who have had an inadequate response to or cannot tolerate other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, including one or more tumor necrosis factor inhibitor therapies.

Rixathon in combination with glucocorticoids is indicated for the induction of remission in adults with severe, active GPA or MPA.

1. Visser J et al. Physicochemical and Functional Comparability Between the Proposed Biosimilar Rituximab GP2013 and Originator Rituximab. BioDrugs. 2013;27:495-507.

2. Da Silva A et al. Target-directed development and preclinical characterization of the proposed biosimilar rituximab GP2013. Leuk Lymphoma. 2014;55:1609-1617.

3. Jurczak W et al. A Phase III Efficacy and Safety Study of the Proposed Rituximab Biosimilar GP2013 Versus Rituximab in Patients with Previously Untreated Advanced Follicular Lymphoma. ASH Annual Meeting 2016.

Photo by Rhoda Baer

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN) has added 9 disease sites to its NCCN Radiation Therapy Compendium™, a resource that provides a single access point for NCCN recommendations pertaining to radiation therapy (RT).

The compendium provides guidance on all RT modalities recommended within NCCN guidelines, including intensity modulated RT, intra-operative RT, stereotactic radiosurgery/stereotactic body RT/stereotactic ablative RT, image-guided RT, low dose-rate brachytherapy/high dose-rate brachytherapy, radioisotope, and particle therapy.

The NCCN Radiation Therapy Compendium was launched with recommendations pertaining to 24 cancer types.

Now, NCCN has added RT recommendations from an additional 9 NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology:

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), Version 2.2016

Basal cell skin cancer, Version 1.2017

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, Version 1.2017

Gastric cancer, Version 1.2017

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), Version 1.2017

Merkel cell carcinoma, Version 1.2017

Ovarian cancer, Version 1.2017

Squamous cell skin cancer, Version 1.2017

Thymomas and thymic carcinomas, Version 1.2017

The first 24 disease sites included in the NCCN Radiation Therapy Compendium were:

Acute myeloid leukemia

Anal cancer

B-cell lymphomas

Bladder cancer

Breast cancer

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphoblastic lymphoma

Colon cancer

Hepatobiliary cancers

Kidney cancer

Malignant pleural mesothelioma

Melanoma

Multiple myeloma

Neuroendocrine tumors

Non-small cell lung cancer

Occult primary cancer

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Penile cancer

Primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas

Prostate cancer

Rectal cancer

Small cell lung cancer

Soft tissue sarcoma

T-cell lymphomas

Testicular cancer

The NCCN said additional cancer types will be added to the NCCN Radiation Therapy Compendium on a rolling basis over the coming months.

For more information and to access the NCCN Radiation Therapy Compendium, visit NCCN.org/RTCompendium.

Photo by Rhoda Baer

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN) has added 9 disease sites to its NCCN Radiation Therapy Compendium™, a resource that provides a single access point for NCCN recommendations pertaining to radiation therapy (RT).

The compendium provides guidance on all RT modalities recommended within NCCN guidelines, including intensity modulated RT, intra-operative RT, stereotactic radiosurgery/stereotactic body RT/stereotactic ablative RT, image-guided RT, low dose-rate brachytherapy/high dose-rate brachytherapy, radioisotope, and particle therapy.

The NCCN Radiation Therapy Compendium was launched with recommendations pertaining to 24 cancer types.

Now, NCCN has added RT recommendations from an additional 9 NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology:

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), Version 2.2016

Basal cell skin cancer, Version 1.2017

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, Version 1.2017

Gastric cancer, Version 1.2017

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), Version 1.2017

Merkel cell carcinoma, Version 1.2017

Ovarian cancer, Version 1.2017

Squamous cell skin cancer, Version 1.2017

Thymomas and thymic carcinomas, Version 1.2017

The first 24 disease sites included in the NCCN Radiation Therapy Compendium were:

Acute myeloid leukemia

Anal cancer

B-cell lymphomas

Bladder cancer

Breast cancer

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphoblastic lymphoma

Colon cancer

Hepatobiliary cancers

Kidney cancer

Malignant pleural mesothelioma

Melanoma

Multiple myeloma

Neuroendocrine tumors

Non-small cell lung cancer

Occult primary cancer

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Penile cancer

Primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas

Prostate cancer

Rectal cancer

Small cell lung cancer

Soft tissue sarcoma

T-cell lymphomas

Testicular cancer

The NCCN said additional cancer types will be added to the NCCN Radiation Therapy Compendium on a rolling basis over the coming months.

For more information and to access the NCCN Radiation Therapy Compendium, visit NCCN.org/RTCompendium.

Photo by Rhoda Baer

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN) has added 9 disease sites to its NCCN Radiation Therapy Compendium™, a resource that provides a single access point for NCCN recommendations pertaining to radiation therapy (RT).

The compendium provides guidance on all RT modalities recommended within NCCN guidelines, including intensity modulated RT, intra-operative RT, stereotactic radiosurgery/stereotactic body RT/stereotactic ablative RT, image-guided RT, low dose-rate brachytherapy/high dose-rate brachytherapy, radioisotope, and particle therapy.

The NCCN Radiation Therapy Compendium was launched with recommendations pertaining to 24 cancer types.

Now, NCCN has added RT recommendations from an additional 9 NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology:

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), Version 2.2016

Basal cell skin cancer, Version 1.2017

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, Version 1.2017

Gastric cancer, Version 1.2017

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), Version 1.2017

Merkel cell carcinoma, Version 1.2017

Ovarian cancer, Version 1.2017

Squamous cell skin cancer, Version 1.2017

Thymomas and thymic carcinomas, Version 1.2017

The first 24 disease sites included in the NCCN Radiation Therapy Compendium were:

Acute myeloid leukemia

Anal cancer

B-cell lymphomas

Bladder cancer

Breast cancer

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphoblastic lymphoma

Colon cancer

Hepatobiliary cancers

Kidney cancer

Malignant pleural mesothelioma

Melanoma

Multiple myeloma

Neuroendocrine tumors

Non-small cell lung cancer

Occult primary cancer

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Penile cancer

Primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas

Prostate cancer

Rectal cancer

Small cell lung cancer

Soft tissue sarcoma

T-cell lymphomas

Testicular cancer

The NCCN said additional cancer types will be added to the NCCN Radiation Therapy Compendium on a rolling basis over the coming months.

For more information and to access the NCCN Radiation Therapy Compendium, visit NCCN.org/RTCompendium.

A newly developed “robust and inexpensive” prognostic tool, the Childhood Hodgkin International Prognostic Score (CHIPS), may allow better tailoring of therapy at the time of diagnosis for children and adolescents who have intermediate-risk Hodgkin lymphoma.

Researchers in the Children’s Oncology Group first assessed 562 patients receiving uniform standard treatment to identify which risk factors present at diagnosis best predicted response to therapy, and used them to develop the prognostic score. They considered such factors as patient age, the number of involved sites, hemoglobin level, albumin level, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, the presence or absence of a large mediastinal mass, nodal involvement, the total bulk of disease, and the presence or absence of B symptoms (fever, weight loss, and/or night sweats). The final CHIPS prognostic tool included four predictors of poor event-free survival that are easily ascertained at diagnosis: stage IV disease, a large mediastinal mass (one with a tumor to thoracic diameter ratio over 0.33), the presence of fever, and hypoalbuminemia (a level of less than 3.5 g/dL).

The investigators then confirmed the accuracy of that score in a validation cohort of 541 patients from the United States, Canada, Switzerland, Australia, New Zealand, the Netherlands, and Israel. All the study participants received four cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine, and etoposide (ABVE) with prednisone and cyclophosphamide (PC), followed by involved-field radiation therapy, said Cindy L. Schwartz, MD, of the division of pediatrics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, and her associates.

Patients who had low a CHIPS of 0 or 1 had excellent 4-year event-free survival (93% and 89%, respectively), while patients with a high CHIPS of 2 or 3 had poorer 4-year event-free survival (78% and 69%, respectively). These findings remained consistent across all subgroups of patients, regardless of whether the tumors had nodular sclerosis histology or mixed cellular histology (Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017 Apr;64[4]).

The study results suggest that patients with CHIPS 2 or 3 could be considered for high-risk Hodgkin lymphoma treatment such as higher-dose cyclophosphamide or the addition of brentuximab vedotin, while those with a CHIPS 0 or 1 could be considered for less aggressive treatment such as foregoing or reducing radiation therapy, Dr. Schwartz and her associates said.

This study was supported by a grant from the National Cancer Institute to the Children’s Oncology Group. Dr. Schwartz and her associates reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

[email protected]

A newly developed “robust and inexpensive” prognostic tool, the Childhood Hodgkin International Prognostic Score (CHIPS), may allow better tailoring of therapy at the time of diagnosis for children and adolescents who have intermediate-risk Hodgkin lymphoma.

Researchers in the Children’s Oncology Group first assessed 562 patients receiving uniform standard treatment to identify which risk factors present at diagnosis best predicted response to therapy, and used them to develop the prognostic score. They considered such factors as patient age, the number of involved sites, hemoglobin level, albumin level, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, the presence or absence of a large mediastinal mass, nodal involvement, the total bulk of disease, and the presence or absence of B symptoms (fever, weight loss, and/or night sweats). The final CHIPS prognostic tool included four predictors of poor event-free survival that are easily ascertained at diagnosis: stage IV disease, a large mediastinal mass (one with a tumor to thoracic diameter ratio over 0.33), the presence of fever, and hypoalbuminemia (a level of less than 3.5 g/dL).

The investigators then confirmed the accuracy of that score in a validation cohort of 541 patients from the United States, Canada, Switzerland, Australia, New Zealand, the Netherlands, and Israel. All the study participants received four cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine, and etoposide (ABVE) with prednisone and cyclophosphamide (PC), followed by involved-field radiation therapy, said Cindy L. Schwartz, MD, of the division of pediatrics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, and her associates.

Patients who had low a CHIPS of 0 or 1 had excellent 4-year event-free survival (93% and 89%, respectively), while patients with a high CHIPS of 2 or 3 had poorer 4-year event-free survival (78% and 69%, respectively). These findings remained consistent across all subgroups of patients, regardless of whether the tumors had nodular sclerosis histology or mixed cellular histology (Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017 Apr;64[4]).

The study results suggest that patients with CHIPS 2 or 3 could be considered for high-risk Hodgkin lymphoma treatment such as higher-dose cyclophosphamide or the addition of brentuximab vedotin, while those with a CHIPS 0 or 1 could be considered for less aggressive treatment such as foregoing or reducing radiation therapy, Dr. Schwartz and her associates said.

This study was supported by a grant from the National Cancer Institute to the Children’s Oncology Group. Dr. Schwartz and her associates reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

[email protected]

A newly developed “robust and inexpensive” prognostic tool, the Childhood Hodgkin International Prognostic Score (CHIPS), may allow better tailoring of therapy at the time of diagnosis for children and adolescents who have intermediate-risk Hodgkin lymphoma.

Researchers in the Children’s Oncology Group first assessed 562 patients receiving uniform standard treatment to identify which risk factors present at diagnosis best predicted response to therapy, and used them to develop the prognostic score. They considered such factors as patient age, the number of involved sites, hemoglobin level, albumin level, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, the presence or absence of a large mediastinal mass, nodal involvement, the total bulk of disease, and the presence or absence of B symptoms (fever, weight loss, and/or night sweats). The final CHIPS prognostic tool included four predictors of poor event-free survival that are easily ascertained at diagnosis: stage IV disease, a large mediastinal mass (one with a tumor to thoracic diameter ratio over 0.33), the presence of fever, and hypoalbuminemia (a level of less than 3.5 g/dL).

The investigators then confirmed the accuracy of that score in a validation cohort of 541 patients from the United States, Canada, Switzerland, Australia, New Zealand, the Netherlands, and Israel. All the study participants received four cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine, and etoposide (ABVE) with prednisone and cyclophosphamide (PC), followed by involved-field radiation therapy, said Cindy L. Schwartz, MD, of the division of pediatrics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, and her associates.

Patients who had low a CHIPS of 0 or 1 had excellent 4-year event-free survival (93% and 89%, respectively), while patients with a high CHIPS of 2 or 3 had poorer 4-year event-free survival (78% and 69%, respectively). These findings remained consistent across all subgroups of patients, regardless of whether the tumors had nodular sclerosis histology or mixed cellular histology (Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017 Apr;64[4]).

The study results suggest that patients with CHIPS 2 or 3 could be considered for high-risk Hodgkin lymphoma treatment such as higher-dose cyclophosphamide or the addition of brentuximab vedotin, while those with a CHIPS 0 or 1 could be considered for less aggressive treatment such as foregoing or reducing radiation therapy, Dr. Schwartz and her associates said.

This study was supported by a grant from the National Cancer Institute to the Children’s Oncology Group. Dr. Schwartz and her associates reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

[email protected]

Photo by Rhoda Baer

Second cancers take a greater toll on patients under the age of 40, according to research published in JAMA Oncology.

Researchers studied 14 types of cancer occurring in more than 1 million patients.

For nearly all of the cancers studied, 5-year survival rates were much higher if the cancer occurred as a first malignancy rather than a second cancer.

These survival differences were more pronounced in pediatric patients and adolescents and young adults (AYAs) than they were in patients age 40 and older.

Researchers hope these findings will help guide clinicians in providing age-specific recommendations on cancer prevention, screening, treatment, and survivorship, especially among the AYA population.

“Although the increased incidence of second cancers is well known among cancer survivors, less is known about outcomes of these cancers or the influence of age,” said Theresa Keegan, PhD, of the UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center in Sacramento, California.

With this in mind, Dr Keegan and her colleagues analyzed data on patients diagnosed with either a single cancer or a first and second malignancy during 1992 through 2008. The researchers used Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results program data collected from 13 cancer registries.

The team collected data on the 14 most common cancer types that affect AYAs: acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), soft tissue sarcoma, and bone sarcoma, as well as female breast, thyroid, testicular, colorectal, central nervous system, cervical, and ovarian cancers.

There were a total of 15,954 pediatric patients (younger than 15 years at diagnosis), 125,750 AYAs (ages 15 to 39), and 878,370 older adult patients (age 40 and older).

Survival rates

For pediatric patients, the 5-year relative survival was 80% for a first cancer and 47% for a second primary malignancy.

For AYAs, the 5-year relative survival was 81% for a first cancer and 60% for a second primary malignancy.

For older adults, the 5-year relative survival was 70% for a first cancer and 61% for a second primary malignancy.

When the researchers looked at 5-year survival by age and individual cancer types, they found striking differences depending on whether it was a first or second malignancy in all but 2 of the 14 cancer types, testicular cancer and melanoma.

“For almost every type of cancer, the AYA population did worse with a secondary cancer,” said study author Melanie Goldfarb, MD, of John Wayne Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John’s Health Center in Santa Monica, California.

“What struck us was that the second cancer caused such an increased risk of death.”

Lymphomas

For pediatric patients with HL, the 5-year relative survival was 95% when patients had HL as a first cancer. There were no data on HL as a second primary malignancy.

For AYAs, the 5-year relative survival was 93% when patients had HL as a first cancer and 72% when they had HL as a second primary malignancy.

For older adults, the 5-year relative survival was 69% when patients had HL as a first cancer and 54% when they had HL as a second primary malignancy.

For pediatric patients with NHL, the 5-year relative survival was 84% when patients had NHL as a first cancer and 63% when they had NHL as a second primary malignancy.

For AYAs, the 5-year relative survival was 64% when patients had NHL as a first cancer and 22% when they had NHL as a second primary malignancy.

For older adults, the 5-year relative survival was 57% when patients had NHL as a first cancer and 54% when they had NHL as a second primary malignancy.

Leukemias

For pediatric patients with ALL, the 5-year relative survival was 87% when patients had ALL as a first cancer and 63% when they had ALL as a second primary malignancy.

For AYAs, the 5-year relative survival was 48% when patients had ALL as a first cancer and 26% when they had ALL as a second primary malignancy.

For older adults, the 5-year relative survival was 17% when patients had ALL as a first cancer and 11% when they had ALL as a second primary malignancy.

For pediatric patients with AML, the 5-year relative survival was 57% when patients had AML as a first cancer and 29% when they had AML as a second primary malignancy.

For AYAs, the 5-year relative survival was 46% when patients had AML as a first cancer and 23% when they had AML as a second primary malignancy.

For older adults, the 5-year relative survival was 12% when patients had AML as a first cancer and 10% when they had AML as a second primary malignancy.

Why younger patients tend to fare worse after a second cancer than older patients is not fully understood or specifically addressed in the current study, the researchers noted.

Now, the team plans to examine how the time between getting a first and second cancer affects survival and whether the type of treatment for the first cancer influences the outcome of a second cancer.

Photo by Rhoda Baer

Second cancers take a greater toll on patients under the age of 40, according to research published in JAMA Oncology.

Researchers studied 14 types of cancer occurring in more than 1 million patients.

For nearly all of the cancers studied, 5-year survival rates were much higher if the cancer occurred as a first malignancy rather than a second cancer.

These survival differences were more pronounced in pediatric patients and adolescents and young adults (AYAs) than they were in patients age 40 and older.

Researchers hope these findings will help guide clinicians in providing age-specific recommendations on cancer prevention, screening, treatment, and survivorship, especially among the AYA population.

“Although the increased incidence of second cancers is well known among cancer survivors, less is known about outcomes of these cancers or the influence of age,” said Theresa Keegan, PhD, of the UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center in Sacramento, California.

With this in mind, Dr Keegan and her colleagues analyzed data on patients diagnosed with either a single cancer or a first and second malignancy during 1992 through 2008. The researchers used Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results program data collected from 13 cancer registries.

The team collected data on the 14 most common cancer types that affect AYAs: acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), soft tissue sarcoma, and bone sarcoma, as well as female breast, thyroid, testicular, colorectal, central nervous system, cervical, and ovarian cancers.

There were a total of 15,954 pediatric patients (younger than 15 years at diagnosis), 125,750 AYAs (ages 15 to 39), and 878,370 older adult patients (age 40 and older).

Survival rates

For pediatric patients, the 5-year relative survival was 80% for a first cancer and 47% for a second primary malignancy.

For AYAs, the 5-year relative survival was 81% for a first cancer and 60% for a second primary malignancy.

For older adults, the 5-year relative survival was 70% for a first cancer and 61% for a second primary malignancy.

When the researchers looked at 5-year survival by age and individual cancer types, they found striking differences depending on whether it was a first or second malignancy in all but 2 of the 14 cancer types, testicular cancer and melanoma.

“For almost every type of cancer, the AYA population did worse with a secondary cancer,” said study author Melanie Goldfarb, MD, of John Wayne Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John’s Health Center in Santa Monica, California.

“What struck us was that the second cancer caused such an increased risk of death.”

Lymphomas

For pediatric patients with HL, the 5-year relative survival was 95% when patients had HL as a first cancer. There were no data on HL as a second primary malignancy.

For AYAs, the 5-year relative survival was 93% when patients had HL as a first cancer and 72% when they had HL as a second primary malignancy.

For older adults, the 5-year relative survival was 69% when patients had HL as a first cancer and 54% when they had HL as a second primary malignancy.

For pediatric patients with NHL, the 5-year relative survival was 84% when patients had NHL as a first cancer and 63% when they had NHL as a second primary malignancy.

For AYAs, the 5-year relative survival was 64% when patients had NHL as a first cancer and 22% when they had NHL as a second primary malignancy.

For older adults, the 5-year relative survival was 57% when patients had NHL as a first cancer and 54% when they had NHL as a second primary malignancy.

Leukemias

For pediatric patients with ALL, the 5-year relative survival was 87% when patients had ALL as a first cancer and 63% when they had ALL as a second primary malignancy.

For AYAs, the 5-year relative survival was 48% when patients had ALL as a first cancer and 26% when they had ALL as a second primary malignancy.

For older adults, the 5-year relative survival was 17% when patients had ALL as a first cancer and 11% when they had ALL as a second primary malignancy.

For pediatric patients with AML, the 5-year relative survival was 57% when patients had AML as a first cancer and 29% when they had AML as a second primary malignancy.

For AYAs, the 5-year relative survival was 46% when patients had AML as a first cancer and 23% when they had AML as a second primary malignancy.

For older adults, the 5-year relative survival was 12% when patients had AML as a first cancer and 10% when they had AML as a second primary malignancy.

Why younger patients tend to fare worse after a second cancer than older patients is not fully understood or specifically addressed in the current study, the researchers noted.

Now, the team plans to examine how the time between getting a first and second cancer affects survival and whether the type of treatment for the first cancer influences the outcome of a second cancer.

Photo by Rhoda Baer

Second cancers take a greater toll on patients under the age of 40, according to research published in JAMA Oncology.

Researchers studied 14 types of cancer occurring in more than 1 million patients.

For nearly all of the cancers studied, 5-year survival rates were much higher if the cancer occurred as a first malignancy rather than a second cancer.

These survival differences were more pronounced in pediatric patients and adolescents and young adults (AYAs) than they were in patients age 40 and older.

Researchers hope these findings will help guide clinicians in providing age-specific recommendations on cancer prevention, screening, treatment, and survivorship, especially among the AYA population.

“Although the increased incidence of second cancers is well known among cancer survivors, less is known about outcomes of these cancers or the influence of age,” said Theresa Keegan, PhD, of the UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center in Sacramento, California.

With this in mind, Dr Keegan and her colleagues analyzed data on patients diagnosed with either a single cancer or a first and second malignancy during 1992 through 2008. The researchers used Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results program data collected from 13 cancer registries.

The team collected data on the 14 most common cancer types that affect AYAs: acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), soft tissue sarcoma, and bone sarcoma, as well as female breast, thyroid, testicular, colorectal, central nervous system, cervical, and ovarian cancers.

There were a total of 15,954 pediatric patients (younger than 15 years at diagnosis), 125,750 AYAs (ages 15 to 39), and 878,370 older adult patients (age 40 and older).

Survival rates

For pediatric patients, the 5-year relative survival was 80% for a first cancer and 47% for a second primary malignancy.

For AYAs, the 5-year relative survival was 81% for a first cancer and 60% for a second primary malignancy.

For older adults, the 5-year relative survival was 70% for a first cancer and 61% for a second primary malignancy.

When the researchers looked at 5-year survival by age and individual cancer types, they found striking differences depending on whether it was a first or second malignancy in all but 2 of the 14 cancer types, testicular cancer and melanoma.

“For almost every type of cancer, the AYA population did worse with a secondary cancer,” said study author Melanie Goldfarb, MD, of John Wayne Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John’s Health Center in Santa Monica, California.

“What struck us was that the second cancer caused such an increased risk of death.”

Lymphomas

For pediatric patients with HL, the 5-year relative survival was 95% when patients had HL as a first cancer. There were no data on HL as a second primary malignancy.

For AYAs, the 5-year relative survival was 93% when patients had HL as a first cancer and 72% when they had HL as a second primary malignancy.

For older adults, the 5-year relative survival was 69% when patients had HL as a first cancer and 54% when they had HL as a second primary malignancy.

For pediatric patients with NHL, the 5-year relative survival was 84% when patients had NHL as a first cancer and 63% when they had NHL as a second primary malignancy.

For AYAs, the 5-year relative survival was 64% when patients had NHL as a first cancer and 22% when they had NHL as a second primary malignancy.

For older adults, the 5-year relative survival was 57% when patients had NHL as a first cancer and 54% when they had NHL as a second primary malignancy.

Leukemias

For pediatric patients with ALL, the 5-year relative survival was 87% when patients had ALL as a first cancer and 63% when they had ALL as a second primary malignancy.

For AYAs, the 5-year relative survival was 48% when patients had ALL as a first cancer and 26% when they had ALL as a second primary malignancy.

For older adults, the 5-year relative survival was 17% when patients had ALL as a first cancer and 11% when they had ALL as a second primary malignancy.

For pediatric patients with AML, the 5-year relative survival was 57% when patients had AML as a first cancer and 29% when they had AML as a second primary malignancy.

For AYAs, the 5-year relative survival was 46% when patients had AML as a first cancer and 23% when they had AML as a second primary malignancy.

For older adults, the 5-year relative survival was 12% when patients had AML as a first cancer and 10% when they had AML as a second primary malignancy.

Why younger patients tend to fare worse after a second cancer than older patients is not fully understood or specifically addressed in the current study, the researchers noted.

Now, the team plans to examine how the time between getting a first and second cancer affects survival and whether the type of treatment for the first cancer influences the outcome of a second cancer.

NEW YORK – Should the first chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell treatment receive Food and Drug Administration approval for refractory, aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma, possibly before the end of 2017, several thousand U.S. patients will be potential candidates for the treatment, Jeremy S. Abramson, MD, predicted at a conference held by Imedex.

Dr. Abramson has led studies using a CAR T cell that differs from the one furthest along in development. He based his predicted timetable for an approved biologics license of the process, with which he can engineer patient-specific T cells that are under development by Kite Pharma, on the “remarkable” level of complete responses the intervention produced in a pivotal phase II study.

Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News

Dr. Abramson has been a consultant to Kite Pharma and to AbbVie, Genentech, Gilead, and Seattle Genetics.

[email protected]

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

NEW YORK – Should the first chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell treatment receive Food and Drug Administration approval for refractory, aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma, possibly before the end of 2017, several thousand U.S. patients will be potential candidates for the treatment, Jeremy S. Abramson, MD, predicted at a conference held by Imedex.

Dr. Abramson has led studies using a CAR T cell that differs from the one furthest along in development. He based his predicted timetable for an approved biologics license of the process, with which he can engineer patient-specific T cells that are under development by Kite Pharma, on the “remarkable” level of complete responses the intervention produced in a pivotal phase II study.

Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News

Dr. Abramson has been a consultant to Kite Pharma and to AbbVie, Genentech, Gilead, and Seattle Genetics.

[email protected]

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

NEW YORK – Should the first chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell treatment receive Food and Drug Administration approval for refractory, aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma, possibly before the end of 2017, several thousand U.S. patients will be potential candidates for the treatment, Jeremy S. Abramson, MD, predicted at a conference held by Imedex.

Dr. Abramson has led studies using a CAR T cell that differs from the one furthest along in development. He based his predicted timetable for an approved biologics license of the process, with which he can engineer patient-specific T cells that are under development by Kite Pharma, on the “remarkable” level of complete responses the intervention produced in a pivotal phase II study.

Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News

Dr. Abramson has been a consultant to Kite Pharma and to AbbVie, Genentech, Gilead, and Seattle Genetics.

[email protected]

On Twitter @mitchelzoler