CML

Prescription medications

Photo by Steven Harbour

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. has announced the US launch of imatinib mesylate, the generic equivalent of Novartis’s Gleevec®, in 100 mg and 400 mg tablets.

In the US, imatinib is approved to treat newly diagnosed Philadelphia-chromosome-positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase, blast crisis, and accelerated phase, as well as Ph+

chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase after failure of interferon-alpha therapy.

Imatinib is also approved to treat adults with relapsed or refractory Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia, adults with myelodysplastic syndromes or myeloproliferative neoplasms associated with platelet-derived growth factor receptor gene re-arrangements, and adults with aggressive systemic mastocytosis without the D816V c-Kit mutation or with unknown c-Kit mutational status.

In addition, imatinib is approved to treat adults with hypereosinophilic syndrome and/or chronic eosinophilic leukemia (regardless of whether they have the FIP1L1-PDGFRα fusion kinase) and adults with unresectable, recurrent, and/or metastatic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.

Finally, the drug is approved as an adjuvant treatment following complete gross resection of Kit (CD117)-positive gastrointestinal stromal tumors in adults.

For more details on imatinib, see the full prescribing information.

Prescription medications

Photo by Steven Harbour

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. has announced the US launch of imatinib mesylate, the generic equivalent of Novartis’s Gleevec®, in 100 mg and 400 mg tablets.

In the US, imatinib is approved to treat newly diagnosed Philadelphia-chromosome-positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase, blast crisis, and accelerated phase, as well as Ph+

chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase after failure of interferon-alpha therapy.

Imatinib is also approved to treat adults with relapsed or refractory Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia, adults with myelodysplastic syndromes or myeloproliferative neoplasms associated with platelet-derived growth factor receptor gene re-arrangements, and adults with aggressive systemic mastocytosis without the D816V c-Kit mutation or with unknown c-Kit mutational status.

In addition, imatinib is approved to treat adults with hypereosinophilic syndrome and/or chronic eosinophilic leukemia (regardless of whether they have the FIP1L1-PDGFRα fusion kinase) and adults with unresectable, recurrent, and/or metastatic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.

Finally, the drug is approved as an adjuvant treatment following complete gross resection of Kit (CD117)-positive gastrointestinal stromal tumors in adults.

For more details on imatinib, see the full prescribing information.

Prescription medications

Photo by Steven Harbour

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. has announced the US launch of imatinib mesylate, the generic equivalent of Novartis’s Gleevec®, in 100 mg and 400 mg tablets.

In the US, imatinib is approved to treat newly diagnosed Philadelphia-chromosome-positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase, blast crisis, and accelerated phase, as well as Ph+

chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase after failure of interferon-alpha therapy.

Imatinib is also approved to treat adults with relapsed or refractory Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia, adults with myelodysplastic syndromes or myeloproliferative neoplasms associated with platelet-derived growth factor receptor gene re-arrangements, and adults with aggressive systemic mastocytosis without the D816V c-Kit mutation or with unknown c-Kit mutational status.

In addition, imatinib is approved to treat adults with hypereosinophilic syndrome and/or chronic eosinophilic leukemia (regardless of whether they have the FIP1L1-PDGFRα fusion kinase) and adults with unresectable, recurrent, and/or metastatic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.

Finally, the drug is approved as an adjuvant treatment following complete gross resection of Kit (CD117)-positive gastrointestinal stromal tumors in adults.

For more details on imatinib, see the full prescribing information.

Blood sample collection

Photo by Juan D. Alfonso

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted premarket clearance for the QuantideX® qPCR BCR-ABL IS Kit, a tool used to monitor molecular response (MR) in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).

The product is a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-based in vitro diagnostic test that quantifies BCR-ABL1 and ABL1 transcripts in total RNA from the whole blood of t(9;22)-positive CML patients expressing e13a2 and/or e14a2 fusion transcripts.

The QuantideX® qPCR BCR-ABL IS Kit is not designed to diagnose CML or monitor rare transcripts resulting from t(9;22).

The kit was cleared to run on the Applied Biosystems® 7500 Fast DX Real-Time PCR Instrument. Results are reported in International Scale (IS) values.

The QuantideX® qPCR BCR-ABL IS Kit was subjected to analytic and clinical review through the FDA’s de novo 510(k) premarket review pathway and secured clearance with a limit of detection of MR 4.7/0.002% IS (4.7 log molecular reduction from 100% IS).

The limit of detection was determined using real human RNA, not human-derived cell lines, ensuring that the assay reproducibly detects BCR-ABL1 RNA in at least 95% of patients at MR 4.7.

“In evaluating the QuantideX® qPCR BCR-ABL IS Kit, we confirmed the high level of sensitivity achieved for human clinical samples measured in our laboratory at MR 4.7 (0.002% IS),” said Y. Lynn. Wang, MD, PhD, of the University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center.

“The configuration of the assay—multiplexed, single-lot reagents, efficient workflow, and direct IS reporting—provided the robustness, sensitivity, and data quality we believe to be unprecedented in the market today. The high level of sensitivity will contribute to the assessment of the depth and duration of clinical response to [tyrosine kinase inhibitors] and experimental therapies.”

The QuantideX® qPCR BCR-ABL IS Kit is now available for order in the US and Europe. The kit is a product of Asuragen, Inc.

Blood sample collection

Photo by Juan D. Alfonso

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted premarket clearance for the QuantideX® qPCR BCR-ABL IS Kit, a tool used to monitor molecular response (MR) in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).

The product is a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-based in vitro diagnostic test that quantifies BCR-ABL1 and ABL1 transcripts in total RNA from the whole blood of t(9;22)-positive CML patients expressing e13a2 and/or e14a2 fusion transcripts.

The QuantideX® qPCR BCR-ABL IS Kit is not designed to diagnose CML or monitor rare transcripts resulting from t(9;22).

The kit was cleared to run on the Applied Biosystems® 7500 Fast DX Real-Time PCR Instrument. Results are reported in International Scale (IS) values.

The QuantideX® qPCR BCR-ABL IS Kit was subjected to analytic and clinical review through the FDA’s de novo 510(k) premarket review pathway and secured clearance with a limit of detection of MR 4.7/0.002% IS (4.7 log molecular reduction from 100% IS).

The limit of detection was determined using real human RNA, not human-derived cell lines, ensuring that the assay reproducibly detects BCR-ABL1 RNA in at least 95% of patients at MR 4.7.

“In evaluating the QuantideX® qPCR BCR-ABL IS Kit, we confirmed the high level of sensitivity achieved for human clinical samples measured in our laboratory at MR 4.7 (0.002% IS),” said Y. Lynn. Wang, MD, PhD, of the University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center.

“The configuration of the assay—multiplexed, single-lot reagents, efficient workflow, and direct IS reporting—provided the robustness, sensitivity, and data quality we believe to be unprecedented in the market today. The high level of sensitivity will contribute to the assessment of the depth and duration of clinical response to [tyrosine kinase inhibitors] and experimental therapies.”

The QuantideX® qPCR BCR-ABL IS Kit is now available for order in the US and Europe. The kit is a product of Asuragen, Inc.

Blood sample collection

Photo by Juan D. Alfonso

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted premarket clearance for the QuantideX® qPCR BCR-ABL IS Kit, a tool used to monitor molecular response (MR) in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).

The product is a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-based in vitro diagnostic test that quantifies BCR-ABL1 and ABL1 transcripts in total RNA from the whole blood of t(9;22)-positive CML patients expressing e13a2 and/or e14a2 fusion transcripts.

The QuantideX® qPCR BCR-ABL IS Kit is not designed to diagnose CML or monitor rare transcripts resulting from t(9;22).

The kit was cleared to run on the Applied Biosystems® 7500 Fast DX Real-Time PCR Instrument. Results are reported in International Scale (IS) values.

The QuantideX® qPCR BCR-ABL IS Kit was subjected to analytic and clinical review through the FDA’s de novo 510(k) premarket review pathway and secured clearance with a limit of detection of MR 4.7/0.002% IS (4.7 log molecular reduction from 100% IS).

The limit of detection was determined using real human RNA, not human-derived cell lines, ensuring that the assay reproducibly detects BCR-ABL1 RNA in at least 95% of patients at MR 4.7.

“In evaluating the QuantideX® qPCR BCR-ABL IS Kit, we confirmed the high level of sensitivity achieved for human clinical samples measured in our laboratory at MR 4.7 (0.002% IS),” said Y. Lynn. Wang, MD, PhD, of the University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center.

“The configuration of the assay—multiplexed, single-lot reagents, efficient workflow, and direct IS reporting—provided the robustness, sensitivity, and data quality we believe to be unprecedented in the market today. The high level of sensitivity will contribute to the assessment of the depth and duration of clinical response to [tyrosine kinase inhibitors] and experimental therapies.”

The QuantideX® qPCR BCR-ABL IS Kit is now available for order in the US and Europe. The kit is a product of Asuragen, Inc.

Micrograph showing LSCs

Image by Robert Paulson

New research suggests leukemia stem cells (LSCs) can “hide” in gonadal adipose tissue (GAT) and transform the tissue so they can survive treatment.

Experiments in a mouse model of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) showed that LSCs are enriched in GAT.

While there, the LSCs create a microenvironment that supports leukemic growth and resistance to treatment, and expression of the fatty acid transporter CD36 makes LSCs particularly resistant.

Craig Jordan, PhD, of University of Colorado in Aurora, and his colleagues conducted this research and detailed their findings in Cell Stem Cell.

The researchers began by examining cancer cells found in GAT from mice with blast crisis CML. Rather than containing the expected mix of regular leukemia cells and LSCs, the tissue was enriched for LSCs.

And these GAT-resident LSCs used a different energy source than LSCs in the bone marrow microenvironment. The GAT-resident LSCs powered their survival and growth with fatty acids, manufacturing energy by the process of fatty acid oxidization.

In fact, the GAT-resident LSCs actively signaled fat to undergo lipolysis, which released fatty acids into the microenvironment.

“The basic biology was fascinating,” Dr Jordan said. “The tumor adapted the local environment to suit itself.”

Dr Jordan and his colleagues also found that CD36 played a role. CD36+ LSCs were enriched in GAT, were more likely to migrate to GAT than to bone marrow, and were protected from treatment by GAT.

The researchers tested the effects of several drugs (cytarabine, doxorubicin, etoposide, SN-38, irinotecan, and dasatinib) on CD36+ LSCs, CD36- LSCs, and bulk leukemia cells ex vivo.

Both CD36+ and CD36- LSCs were more resistant to treatment than bulk leukemia cells, but CD36+ LSCs were preferentially drug-resistant.

The researchers observed similar results in leukemic mice and found evidence to suggest that CD36 plays a similar role in patients with blast crisis CML and those with acute myeloid leukemia.

Micrograph showing LSCs

Image by Robert Paulson

New research suggests leukemia stem cells (LSCs) can “hide” in gonadal adipose tissue (GAT) and transform the tissue so they can survive treatment.

Experiments in a mouse model of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) showed that LSCs are enriched in GAT.

While there, the LSCs create a microenvironment that supports leukemic growth and resistance to treatment, and expression of the fatty acid transporter CD36 makes LSCs particularly resistant.

Craig Jordan, PhD, of University of Colorado in Aurora, and his colleagues conducted this research and detailed their findings in Cell Stem Cell.

The researchers began by examining cancer cells found in GAT from mice with blast crisis CML. Rather than containing the expected mix of regular leukemia cells and LSCs, the tissue was enriched for LSCs.

And these GAT-resident LSCs used a different energy source than LSCs in the bone marrow microenvironment. The GAT-resident LSCs powered their survival and growth with fatty acids, manufacturing energy by the process of fatty acid oxidization.

In fact, the GAT-resident LSCs actively signaled fat to undergo lipolysis, which released fatty acids into the microenvironment.

“The basic biology was fascinating,” Dr Jordan said. “The tumor adapted the local environment to suit itself.”

Dr Jordan and his colleagues also found that CD36 played a role. CD36+ LSCs were enriched in GAT, were more likely to migrate to GAT than to bone marrow, and were protected from treatment by GAT.

The researchers tested the effects of several drugs (cytarabine, doxorubicin, etoposide, SN-38, irinotecan, and dasatinib) on CD36+ LSCs, CD36- LSCs, and bulk leukemia cells ex vivo.

Both CD36+ and CD36- LSCs were more resistant to treatment than bulk leukemia cells, but CD36+ LSCs were preferentially drug-resistant.

The researchers observed similar results in leukemic mice and found evidence to suggest that CD36 plays a similar role in patients with blast crisis CML and those with acute myeloid leukemia.

Micrograph showing LSCs

Image by Robert Paulson

New research suggests leukemia stem cells (LSCs) can “hide” in gonadal adipose tissue (GAT) and transform the tissue so they can survive treatment.

Experiments in a mouse model of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) showed that LSCs are enriched in GAT.

While there, the LSCs create a microenvironment that supports leukemic growth and resistance to treatment, and expression of the fatty acid transporter CD36 makes LSCs particularly resistant.

Craig Jordan, PhD, of University of Colorado in Aurora, and his colleagues conducted this research and detailed their findings in Cell Stem Cell.

The researchers began by examining cancer cells found in GAT from mice with blast crisis CML. Rather than containing the expected mix of regular leukemia cells and LSCs, the tissue was enriched for LSCs.

And these GAT-resident LSCs used a different energy source than LSCs in the bone marrow microenvironment. The GAT-resident LSCs powered their survival and growth with fatty acids, manufacturing energy by the process of fatty acid oxidization.

In fact, the GAT-resident LSCs actively signaled fat to undergo lipolysis, which released fatty acids into the microenvironment.

“The basic biology was fascinating,” Dr Jordan said. “The tumor adapted the local environment to suit itself.”

Dr Jordan and his colleagues also found that CD36 played a role. CD36+ LSCs were enriched in GAT, were more likely to migrate to GAT than to bone marrow, and were protected from treatment by GAT.

The researchers tested the effects of several drugs (cytarabine, doxorubicin, etoposide, SN-38, irinotecan, and dasatinib) on CD36+ LSCs, CD36- LSCs, and bulk leukemia cells ex vivo.

Both CD36+ and CD36- LSCs were more resistant to treatment than bulk leukemia cells, but CD36+ LSCs were preferentially drug-resistant.

The researchers observed similar results in leukemic mice and found evidence to suggest that CD36 plays a similar role in patients with blast crisis CML and those with acute myeloid leukemia.

Treatment-free remission attempts are safe and are achievable in most patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase, Timothy P. Hughes, MD, and his colleagues in the international ENESTop trial reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

The conclusion is based on follow-up data on 126 patients who achieved a sustained deep molecular response (MR4.5) after switching from imatinib (Gleevec) to nilotinib (Tasigna) and discontinued nilotinib. So far, these are the largest prospective treatment-free remission data set in a population of patients who achieved a sustained deep molecular response after switching from imatinib to nilotinib, Dr. Hughes, head of hematology at the University of Adelaide and his colleagues wrote in a poster presentation.

Difu Wu/CC BY-SA 3.0

The ENESTop study is a single-arm, phase II study. Patients eligible for the study started treatment with imatinib when they were first diagnosed with CML, then switched to nilotinib for at least 2 years with the combined time on the drugs of at least 3 years and small amounts of leukemia cells remaining after the nilotinib treatment.

For the consolidation phase of the study, patients continued their nilotinib therapy for 1 year. Patients without confirmed loss of MR4.5 after 1 year were eligible to stop nilotinib. RQ-PCR (reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction) was monitored every 12 weeks in the consolidation phase of the study and every 4 weeks during first 48 weeks of treatment-free remission. Nilotinib was restarted if patients had confirmed loss of deep molecular response (MR4 [consecutive BCR-ABL1IS greater than 0.01%]) or loss of major molecular response ([MMR] BCR-ABL1IS greater than 0.1%).

Of the 163 patients in the consolidation phase of the study, 126 entered treatment-free remission. Their median duration of tyrosine kinase inhibitor use prior to treatment-free remission was nearly 88 months, with a 53-month median duration of nilotinib therapy. At data cut-off, with median follow up of 50 weeks, 58% of the 126 patients were still in treatment-free remission at 48 weeks.

During treatment-free remission, 18 patients had confirmed loss of MR4 and 34 lost MMR. One patient had atypical transcript and came off the study. All but one of the 52 patients reinitiated nilotinib; 50 (98%) regained at least MMR by data cut-off, 48 (94%) regained MR4, and 47 (92%) regained MR4.5. One patient switched to another tyrosine kinase inhibitor at 22 weeks after restarting therapy.

Of those who restarted therapy, the median time was 12 weeks to regain MR4 and was 13 weeks to regain MR4.5. No new safety findings were observed on treatment.

The study is sponsored by Novartis, the maker of nilotinib (Tasigna). Dr. Hughes receives research support and honoraria from, and is a consultant or advisor to Novartis as well as Ariad and Bristol-Myers Squibb.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

Treatment-free remission attempts are safe and are achievable in most patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase, Timothy P. Hughes, MD, and his colleagues in the international ENESTop trial reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

The conclusion is based on follow-up data on 126 patients who achieved a sustained deep molecular response (MR4.5) after switching from imatinib (Gleevec) to nilotinib (Tasigna) and discontinued nilotinib. So far, these are the largest prospective treatment-free remission data set in a population of patients who achieved a sustained deep molecular response after switching from imatinib to nilotinib, Dr. Hughes, head of hematology at the University of Adelaide and his colleagues wrote in a poster presentation.

Difu Wu/CC BY-SA 3.0

The ENESTop study is a single-arm, phase II study. Patients eligible for the study started treatment with imatinib when they were first diagnosed with CML, then switched to nilotinib for at least 2 years with the combined time on the drugs of at least 3 years and small amounts of leukemia cells remaining after the nilotinib treatment.

For the consolidation phase of the study, patients continued their nilotinib therapy for 1 year. Patients without confirmed loss of MR4.5 after 1 year were eligible to stop nilotinib. RQ-PCR (reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction) was monitored every 12 weeks in the consolidation phase of the study and every 4 weeks during first 48 weeks of treatment-free remission. Nilotinib was restarted if patients had confirmed loss of deep molecular response (MR4 [consecutive BCR-ABL1IS greater than 0.01%]) or loss of major molecular response ([MMR] BCR-ABL1IS greater than 0.1%).

Of the 163 patients in the consolidation phase of the study, 126 entered treatment-free remission. Their median duration of tyrosine kinase inhibitor use prior to treatment-free remission was nearly 88 months, with a 53-month median duration of nilotinib therapy. At data cut-off, with median follow up of 50 weeks, 58% of the 126 patients were still in treatment-free remission at 48 weeks.

During treatment-free remission, 18 patients had confirmed loss of MR4 and 34 lost MMR. One patient had atypical transcript and came off the study. All but one of the 52 patients reinitiated nilotinib; 50 (98%) regained at least MMR by data cut-off, 48 (94%) regained MR4, and 47 (92%) regained MR4.5. One patient switched to another tyrosine kinase inhibitor at 22 weeks after restarting therapy.

Of those who restarted therapy, the median time was 12 weeks to regain MR4 and was 13 weeks to regain MR4.5. No new safety findings were observed on treatment.

The study is sponsored by Novartis, the maker of nilotinib (Tasigna). Dr. Hughes receives research support and honoraria from, and is a consultant or advisor to Novartis as well as Ariad and Bristol-Myers Squibb.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

Treatment-free remission attempts are safe and are achievable in most patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase, Timothy P. Hughes, MD, and his colleagues in the international ENESTop trial reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

The conclusion is based on follow-up data on 126 patients who achieved a sustained deep molecular response (MR4.5) after switching from imatinib (Gleevec) to nilotinib (Tasigna) and discontinued nilotinib. So far, these are the largest prospective treatment-free remission data set in a population of patients who achieved a sustained deep molecular response after switching from imatinib to nilotinib, Dr. Hughes, head of hematology at the University of Adelaide and his colleagues wrote in a poster presentation.

Difu Wu/CC BY-SA 3.0

The ENESTop study is a single-arm, phase II study. Patients eligible for the study started treatment with imatinib when they were first diagnosed with CML, then switched to nilotinib for at least 2 years with the combined time on the drugs of at least 3 years and small amounts of leukemia cells remaining after the nilotinib treatment.

For the consolidation phase of the study, patients continued their nilotinib therapy for 1 year. Patients without confirmed loss of MR4.5 after 1 year were eligible to stop nilotinib. RQ-PCR (reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction) was monitored every 12 weeks in the consolidation phase of the study and every 4 weeks during first 48 weeks of treatment-free remission. Nilotinib was restarted if patients had confirmed loss of deep molecular response (MR4 [consecutive BCR-ABL1IS greater than 0.01%]) or loss of major molecular response ([MMR] BCR-ABL1IS greater than 0.1%).

Of the 163 patients in the consolidation phase of the study, 126 entered treatment-free remission. Their median duration of tyrosine kinase inhibitor use prior to treatment-free remission was nearly 88 months, with a 53-month median duration of nilotinib therapy. At data cut-off, with median follow up of 50 weeks, 58% of the 126 patients were still in treatment-free remission at 48 weeks.

During treatment-free remission, 18 patients had confirmed loss of MR4 and 34 lost MMR. One patient had atypical transcript and came off the study. All but one of the 52 patients reinitiated nilotinib; 50 (98%) regained at least MMR by data cut-off, 48 (94%) regained MR4, and 47 (92%) regained MR4.5. One patient switched to another tyrosine kinase inhibitor at 22 weeks after restarting therapy.

Of those who restarted therapy, the median time was 12 weeks to regain MR4 and was 13 weeks to regain MR4.5. No new safety findings were observed on treatment.

The study is sponsored by Novartis, the maker of nilotinib (Tasigna). Dr. Hughes receives research support and honoraria from, and is a consultant or advisor to Novartis as well as Ariad and Bristol-Myers Squibb.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

Drug release in a cancer cell

Image from PNAS

A study published in Cell has shown that patient-derived cancer cell lines harbor most of the same genetic changes found in patients’ tumors and could therefore be used to learn how cancers are likely to respond to new drugs.

Researchers believe this discovery could help advance personalized cancer medicine by leading to results that help doctors predict the best available drugs or the most suitable clinical trials for each individual patient.

“We need better ways to figure out which groups of patients are more likely to respond to a new drug before we run complex and expensive clinical trials,” said study author Ultan McDermott, MD, PhD, of the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute in Cambridge, UK.

“Our research shows that cancer cell lines do capture the molecular alterations found in tumors and so can be predictive of how a tumor will respond to a drug. This means the cell lines could tell us much more about how a tumor is likely to respond to a new drug before we try to test it in patients. We hope this information will ultimately help in the design of clinical trials that target those patients with the greatest likelihood of benefiting from treatment.”

The researchers said this is the first systematic, large-scale study to combine molecular data from patients, cancer cell lines, and drug sensitivity.

For the study, the team looked at genetic mutations known to cause cancer in more than 11,000 patient samples of 29 different cancer types, including acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, chronic myelogenous leukemia, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and multiple myeloma.

The researchers built a catalogue of the genetic changes that cause cancer in patients and mapped these alterations onto 1000 cancer cell lines. Next, they tested the cell lines for sensitivity to 265 different cancer drugs to understand which of these changes affect sensitivity.

This revealed that the majority of molecular abnormalities found in patients’ cancers are also found in cancer cells in the laboratory.

The work also showed that many of the molecular abnormalities detected in the thousands of patient samples can, both individually and in combination, have a strong effect on whether a particular drug affects a cancer cell’s survival.

The results suggest cancer cell lines could be better exploited to learn which drugs offer the most effective treatment to which patients.

“If a cell line has the same genetic features as a patient’s tumor, and that cell line responded to a specific drug, we can focus new research on this finding,” said study author Francesco Iorio, PhD, of the European Bioinformatics Institute in Cambridge, UK.

“This could ultimately help assign cancer patients into more precise groups based on how likely they are to respond to therapy. This resource can really help cancer research. Most importantly, it can be used to create tools for doctors to select a clinical trial which is most promising for their cancer patient. That is still a way off, but we are heading in the right direction.”

Drug release in a cancer cell

Image from PNAS

A study published in Cell has shown that patient-derived cancer cell lines harbor most of the same genetic changes found in patients’ tumors and could therefore be used to learn how cancers are likely to respond to new drugs.

Researchers believe this discovery could help advance personalized cancer medicine by leading to results that help doctors predict the best available drugs or the most suitable clinical trials for each individual patient.

“We need better ways to figure out which groups of patients are more likely to respond to a new drug before we run complex and expensive clinical trials,” said study author Ultan McDermott, MD, PhD, of the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute in Cambridge, UK.

“Our research shows that cancer cell lines do capture the molecular alterations found in tumors and so can be predictive of how a tumor will respond to a drug. This means the cell lines could tell us much more about how a tumor is likely to respond to a new drug before we try to test it in patients. We hope this information will ultimately help in the design of clinical trials that target those patients with the greatest likelihood of benefiting from treatment.”

The researchers said this is the first systematic, large-scale study to combine molecular data from patients, cancer cell lines, and drug sensitivity.

For the study, the team looked at genetic mutations known to cause cancer in more than 11,000 patient samples of 29 different cancer types, including acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, chronic myelogenous leukemia, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and multiple myeloma.

The researchers built a catalogue of the genetic changes that cause cancer in patients and mapped these alterations onto 1000 cancer cell lines. Next, they tested the cell lines for sensitivity to 265 different cancer drugs to understand which of these changes affect sensitivity.

This revealed that the majority of molecular abnormalities found in patients’ cancers are also found in cancer cells in the laboratory.

The work also showed that many of the molecular abnormalities detected in the thousands of patient samples can, both individually and in combination, have a strong effect on whether a particular drug affects a cancer cell’s survival.

The results suggest cancer cell lines could be better exploited to learn which drugs offer the most effective treatment to which patients.

“If a cell line has the same genetic features as a patient’s tumor, and that cell line responded to a specific drug, we can focus new research on this finding,” said study author Francesco Iorio, PhD, of the European Bioinformatics Institute in Cambridge, UK.

“This could ultimately help assign cancer patients into more precise groups based on how likely they are to respond to therapy. This resource can really help cancer research. Most importantly, it can be used to create tools for doctors to select a clinical trial which is most promising for their cancer patient. That is still a way off, but we are heading in the right direction.”

Drug release in a cancer cell

Image from PNAS

A study published in Cell has shown that patient-derived cancer cell lines harbor most of the same genetic changes found in patients’ tumors and could therefore be used to learn how cancers are likely to respond to new drugs.

Researchers believe this discovery could help advance personalized cancer medicine by leading to results that help doctors predict the best available drugs or the most suitable clinical trials for each individual patient.

“We need better ways to figure out which groups of patients are more likely to respond to a new drug before we run complex and expensive clinical trials,” said study author Ultan McDermott, MD, PhD, of the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute in Cambridge, UK.

“Our research shows that cancer cell lines do capture the molecular alterations found in tumors and so can be predictive of how a tumor will respond to a drug. This means the cell lines could tell us much more about how a tumor is likely to respond to a new drug before we try to test it in patients. We hope this information will ultimately help in the design of clinical trials that target those patients with the greatest likelihood of benefiting from treatment.”

The researchers said this is the first systematic, large-scale study to combine molecular data from patients, cancer cell lines, and drug sensitivity.

For the study, the team looked at genetic mutations known to cause cancer in more than 11,000 patient samples of 29 different cancer types, including acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, chronic myelogenous leukemia, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and multiple myeloma.

The researchers built a catalogue of the genetic changes that cause cancer in patients and mapped these alterations onto 1000 cancer cell lines. Next, they tested the cell lines for sensitivity to 265 different cancer drugs to understand which of these changes affect sensitivity.

This revealed that the majority of molecular abnormalities found in patients’ cancers are also found in cancer cells in the laboratory.

The work also showed that many of the molecular abnormalities detected in the thousands of patient samples can, both individually and in combination, have a strong effect on whether a particular drug affects a cancer cell’s survival.

The results suggest cancer cell lines could be better exploited to learn which drugs offer the most effective treatment to which patients.

“If a cell line has the same genetic features as a patient’s tumor, and that cell line responded to a specific drug, we can focus new research on this finding,” said study author Francesco Iorio, PhD, of the European Bioinformatics Institute in Cambridge, UK.

“This could ultimately help assign cancer patients into more precise groups based on how likely they are to respond to therapy. This resource can really help cancer research. Most importantly, it can be used to create tools for doctors to select a clinical trial which is most promising for their cancer patient. That is still a way off, but we are heading in the right direction.”

Prescription drugs

Photo courtesy of CDC

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has issued a final draft guidance recommending approval for bosutinib (Bosulif), a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used to treat certain patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).

NICE is recommending that bosutinib be made available through normal National Health Service (NHS) funding channels so patients don’t have to apply to the Cancer Drugs Fund (CDF) to obtain it.

The CDF is money the government sets aside to pay for cancer drugs that haven’t been approved by NICE and aren’t available within the NHS in England.

Following the decision to reform the CDF earlier this year, NICE began to reappraise all drugs currently in the CDF in April. Bosutinib is the first drug to be looked at through this reconsideration process.

Bosutinib has conditional approval from the European Commission to treat adults with Philadelphia-chromosome-positive CML in chronic phase, accelerated phase, or blast phase, but only if those patients have previously received one or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors and are not considered eligible for treatment with imatinib, nilotinib, or dasatinib.

“People with this type of chronic myeloid leukemia, who haven’t responded to first- and second-line treatment or who experience severe side effects, have few or no treatment options left,” said Carole Longson, director of the Centre for Health Technology Evaluation at NICE.

“New patients who need this drug can be reassured that bosutinib should be made available for routine use within the NHS.”

The current list price of bosutinib is £45,000 per patient per year. However, the NHS has been offered a discount by Pfizer, the drug’s manufacturer.

NICE previously looked at bosutinib in 2013 but did not recommend the drug for use on the NHS at that time, saying the drug was not cost-effective. Bosutinib was then made available to patients via the CDF.

As part of the reappraisal process, Pfizer offered a discount for bosutinib. Taking this discount into consideration, as well as the limited treatment options for CML patients, NICE decided bosutinib is cost-effective.

“The company positively engaged with our CDF reconsideration process and demonstrated that their drug can be cost-effective, which resulted in a positive recommendation,” Longson said. “This decision, when implemented, frees up funding in the CDF, which can be spent on other new and innovative cancer treatments.”

NICE’s final draft guidance is now with consultees who have the opportunity to appeal against the decision or notify NICE of any factual errors. The appeal period will close at 5 pm on July 21, 2016.

Until the final decision is published, bosutinib will still be available to new and existing patients through the old CDF.

Prescription drugs

Photo courtesy of CDC

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has issued a final draft guidance recommending approval for bosutinib (Bosulif), a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used to treat certain patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).

NICE is recommending that bosutinib be made available through normal National Health Service (NHS) funding channels so patients don’t have to apply to the Cancer Drugs Fund (CDF) to obtain it.

The CDF is money the government sets aside to pay for cancer drugs that haven’t been approved by NICE and aren’t available within the NHS in England.

Following the decision to reform the CDF earlier this year, NICE began to reappraise all drugs currently in the CDF in April. Bosutinib is the first drug to be looked at through this reconsideration process.

Bosutinib has conditional approval from the European Commission to treat adults with Philadelphia-chromosome-positive CML in chronic phase, accelerated phase, or blast phase, but only if those patients have previously received one or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors and are not considered eligible for treatment with imatinib, nilotinib, or dasatinib.

“People with this type of chronic myeloid leukemia, who haven’t responded to first- and second-line treatment or who experience severe side effects, have few or no treatment options left,” said Carole Longson, director of the Centre for Health Technology Evaluation at NICE.

“New patients who need this drug can be reassured that bosutinib should be made available for routine use within the NHS.”

The current list price of bosutinib is £45,000 per patient per year. However, the NHS has been offered a discount by Pfizer, the drug’s manufacturer.

NICE previously looked at bosutinib in 2013 but did not recommend the drug for use on the NHS at that time, saying the drug was not cost-effective. Bosutinib was then made available to patients via the CDF.

As part of the reappraisal process, Pfizer offered a discount for bosutinib. Taking this discount into consideration, as well as the limited treatment options for CML patients, NICE decided bosutinib is cost-effective.

“The company positively engaged with our CDF reconsideration process and demonstrated that their drug can be cost-effective, which resulted in a positive recommendation,” Longson said. “This decision, when implemented, frees up funding in the CDF, which can be spent on other new and innovative cancer treatments.”

NICE’s final draft guidance is now with consultees who have the opportunity to appeal against the decision or notify NICE of any factual errors. The appeal period will close at 5 pm on July 21, 2016.

Until the final decision is published, bosutinib will still be available to new and existing patients through the old CDF.

Prescription drugs

Photo courtesy of CDC

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has issued a final draft guidance recommending approval for bosutinib (Bosulif), a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used to treat certain patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).

NICE is recommending that bosutinib be made available through normal National Health Service (NHS) funding channels so patients don’t have to apply to the Cancer Drugs Fund (CDF) to obtain it.

The CDF is money the government sets aside to pay for cancer drugs that haven’t been approved by NICE and aren’t available within the NHS in England.

Following the decision to reform the CDF earlier this year, NICE began to reappraise all drugs currently in the CDF in April. Bosutinib is the first drug to be looked at through this reconsideration process.

Bosutinib has conditional approval from the European Commission to treat adults with Philadelphia-chromosome-positive CML in chronic phase, accelerated phase, or blast phase, but only if those patients have previously received one or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors and are not considered eligible for treatment with imatinib, nilotinib, or dasatinib.

“People with this type of chronic myeloid leukemia, who haven’t responded to first- and second-line treatment or who experience severe side effects, have few or no treatment options left,” said Carole Longson, director of the Centre for Health Technology Evaluation at NICE.

“New patients who need this drug can be reassured that bosutinib should be made available for routine use within the NHS.”

The current list price of bosutinib is £45,000 per patient per year. However, the NHS has been offered a discount by Pfizer, the drug’s manufacturer.

NICE previously looked at bosutinib in 2013 but did not recommend the drug for use on the NHS at that time, saying the drug was not cost-effective. Bosutinib was then made available to patients via the CDF.

As part of the reappraisal process, Pfizer offered a discount for bosutinib. Taking this discount into consideration, as well as the limited treatment options for CML patients, NICE decided bosutinib is cost-effective.

“The company positively engaged with our CDF reconsideration process and demonstrated that their drug can be cost-effective, which resulted in a positive recommendation,” Longson said. “This decision, when implemented, frees up funding in the CDF, which can be spent on other new and innovative cancer treatments.”

NICE’s final draft guidance is now with consultees who have the opportunity to appeal against the decision or notify NICE of any factual errors. The appeal period will close at 5 pm on July 21, 2016.

Until the final decision is published, bosutinib will still be available to new and existing patients through the old CDF.

Imatinib tablet

Long-term results from the DASISION trial suggest that dasatinib and imatinib produce similar outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML).

Although patients who received dasatinib experienced faster and deeper molecular responses than patients who received imatinib, the overall survival and progression-free survival rates were similar between the treatment arms.

Overall, adverse events (AEs) were similar between the arms as well.

Researchers said these results suggest that dasatinib should continue to be considered an option for patients with newly diagnosed CP-CML.

The team reported the results of this study in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. The research was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb.

The trial enrolled 519 patients with newly diagnosed CP-CML. They were randomized to receive dasatinib at 100 mg once daily (n=259) or imatinib at 400 mg once daily (n=260). Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the arms.

At 5 years of follow-up, 61% of patients in the dasatinib arm and 63% of patients in the imatinib arm remained on treatment.

Response and survival

The cumulative 5-year rate of major molecular response was 76% in the dasatinib arm and 64% in the imatinib arm (P=0.0022). The rates of MR^4.5 were 42% and 33%, respectively (P=0.0251).

The estimated 5-year overall survival was 91% in the dasatinib arm and 90% in the imatinib arm (hazard ratio=1.01; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.73).

The estimated 5-year progression-free survival was 85% and 86%, respectively (hazard ratio=1.06; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.66).

Safety

In both treatment arms, most AEs were grade 1 or 2. Grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 15% of patients in the dasatinib arm and 11% of patients in the imatinib arm.

Rates of grade 3/4 hematologic AEs tended to be higher in the dasatinib arm than the imatinib arm.

But the rates of most drug-related, nonhematologic AEs were lower in the dasatinib arm than the imatinib arm or were comparable between the arms.

The exception was drug-related pleural effusion, which was more common with dasatinib (28%) than with imatinib (0.8%).

Drug-related AEs were largely manageable, although they led to treatment discontinuation in 16% of dasatinib-treated patients and 7% of imatinib-treated patients.

By 5 years, 26 patients (10%) in each treatment arm had died. Nine patients in the dasatinib arm died of disease progression, as did 17 patients in the imatinib arm.

Imatinib tablet

Long-term results from the DASISION trial suggest that dasatinib and imatinib produce similar outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML).

Although patients who received dasatinib experienced faster and deeper molecular responses than patients who received imatinib, the overall survival and progression-free survival rates were similar between the treatment arms.

Overall, adverse events (AEs) were similar between the arms as well.

Researchers said these results suggest that dasatinib should continue to be considered an option for patients with newly diagnosed CP-CML.

The team reported the results of this study in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. The research was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb.

The trial enrolled 519 patients with newly diagnosed CP-CML. They were randomized to receive dasatinib at 100 mg once daily (n=259) or imatinib at 400 mg once daily (n=260). Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the arms.

At 5 years of follow-up, 61% of patients in the dasatinib arm and 63% of patients in the imatinib arm remained on treatment.

Response and survival

The cumulative 5-year rate of major molecular response was 76% in the dasatinib arm and 64% in the imatinib arm (P=0.0022). The rates of MR^4.5 were 42% and 33%, respectively (P=0.0251).

The estimated 5-year overall survival was 91% in the dasatinib arm and 90% in the imatinib arm (hazard ratio=1.01; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.73).

The estimated 5-year progression-free survival was 85% and 86%, respectively (hazard ratio=1.06; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.66).

Safety

In both treatment arms, most AEs were grade 1 or 2. Grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 15% of patients in the dasatinib arm and 11% of patients in the imatinib arm.

Rates of grade 3/4 hematologic AEs tended to be higher in the dasatinib arm than the imatinib arm.

But the rates of most drug-related, nonhematologic AEs were lower in the dasatinib arm than the imatinib arm or were comparable between the arms.

The exception was drug-related pleural effusion, which was more common with dasatinib (28%) than with imatinib (0.8%).

Drug-related AEs were largely manageable, although they led to treatment discontinuation in 16% of dasatinib-treated patients and 7% of imatinib-treated patients.

By 5 years, 26 patients (10%) in each treatment arm had died. Nine patients in the dasatinib arm died of disease progression, as did 17 patients in the imatinib arm.

Imatinib tablet

Long-term results from the DASISION trial suggest that dasatinib and imatinib produce similar outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML).

Although patients who received dasatinib experienced faster and deeper molecular responses than patients who received imatinib, the overall survival and progression-free survival rates were similar between the treatment arms.

Overall, adverse events (AEs) were similar between the arms as well.

Researchers said these results suggest that dasatinib should continue to be considered an option for patients with newly diagnosed CP-CML.

The team reported the results of this study in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. The research was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb.

The trial enrolled 519 patients with newly diagnosed CP-CML. They were randomized to receive dasatinib at 100 mg once daily (n=259) or imatinib at 400 mg once daily (n=260). Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the arms.

At 5 years of follow-up, 61% of patients in the dasatinib arm and 63% of patients in the imatinib arm remained on treatment.

Response and survival

The cumulative 5-year rate of major molecular response was 76% in the dasatinib arm and 64% in the imatinib arm (P=0.0022). The rates of MR^4.5 were 42% and 33%, respectively (P=0.0251).

The estimated 5-year overall survival was 91% in the dasatinib arm and 90% in the imatinib arm (hazard ratio=1.01; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.73).

The estimated 5-year progression-free survival was 85% and 86%, respectively (hazard ratio=1.06; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.66).

Safety

In both treatment arms, most AEs were grade 1 or 2. Grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 15% of patients in the dasatinib arm and 11% of patients in the imatinib arm.

Rates of grade 3/4 hematologic AEs tended to be higher in the dasatinib arm than the imatinib arm.

But the rates of most drug-related, nonhematologic AEs were lower in the dasatinib arm than the imatinib arm or were comparable between the arms.

The exception was drug-related pleural effusion, which was more common with dasatinib (28%) than with imatinib (0.8%).

Drug-related AEs were largely manageable, although they led to treatment discontinuation in 16% of dasatinib-treated patients and 7% of imatinib-treated patients.

By 5 years, 26 patients (10%) in each treatment arm had died. Nine patients in the dasatinib arm died of disease progression, as did 17 patients in the imatinib arm.

CMV infection

Small studies have suggested that early cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation may protect against leukemia relapse and even death after hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

However, a new study, based on data from about 9500 patients, suggests otherwise.

Results showed no association between CMV reactivation and relapse but suggested CMV reactivation increases the risk of non-relapse mortality.

Researchers reported these findings in Blood.

“The original purpose of the study was to confirm that CMV infection may prevent leukemia relapse, prevent death, and become a major therapeutic tool for improving patient survival rates,” said study author Pierre Teira, MD, of the University of Montreal in Quebec, Canada.

“However, we found the exact opposite. Our results clearly show that . . . the virus not only does not prevent leukemia relapse [it] also remains a major factor associated with the risk of death. Monitoring of CMV after transplantation remains a priority for patients.”

For this study, Dr Teira and his colleagues analyzed data from 9469 patients who received a transplant between 2003 and 2010.

The patients had acute myeloid leukemia (AML, n=5310), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL, n=1883), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML, n=1079), or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS, n=1197).

The median time to initial CMV reactivation was 41 days (range, 1-362 days).

The researchers found no significant association between CMV reactivation and disease relapse for AML (P=0.60), ALL (P=0.08), CML (P=0.94), or MDS (P=0.58).

However, CMV reactivation was associated with a significantly higher risk of nonrelapse mortality for AML (P<0.0001), ALL (P<0.0001), CML (P=0.0004), and MDS (P=0.0002).

Therefore, CMV reactivation was associated with significantly lower overall survival for AML (P<0.0001), ALL (P<0.0001), CML (P=0.0005), and MDS (P=0.003).

“Deaths due to uncontrolled CMV reactivation are virtually zero in this study, so uncontrolled CMV reactivation is not what reduces survival rates after transplantation,” Dr Teira noted. “The link between this common virus and increased risk of death remains a biological mystery.”

One possible explanation is that CMV decreases the ability of the patient’s immune system to fight against other types of infection. This is supported by the fact that death rates from infections other than CMV are higher in patients infected with CMV or patients whose donors were.

For researchers, the next step is therefore to verify whether the latest generation of anti-CMV treatments can prevent both reactivation of the virus and weakening of the patient’s immune system against other types of infection in the presence of CMV infection.

“CMV has a complex impact on the outcomes for transplant patients, and, each year, more than 30,000 patients around the world receive bone marrow transplants from donors,” Dr Teira said.

“It is therefore essential for future research to better understand the role played by CMV after bone marrow transplantation and improve the chances of success of the transplant. This will help to better choose the right donor for the right patient.”

CMV infection

Small studies have suggested that early cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation may protect against leukemia relapse and even death after hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

However, a new study, based on data from about 9500 patients, suggests otherwise.

Results showed no association between CMV reactivation and relapse but suggested CMV reactivation increases the risk of non-relapse mortality.

Researchers reported these findings in Blood.

“The original purpose of the study was to confirm that CMV infection may prevent leukemia relapse, prevent death, and become a major therapeutic tool for improving patient survival rates,” said study author Pierre Teira, MD, of the University of Montreal in Quebec, Canada.

“However, we found the exact opposite. Our results clearly show that . . . the virus not only does not prevent leukemia relapse [it] also remains a major factor associated with the risk of death. Monitoring of CMV after transplantation remains a priority for patients.”

For this study, Dr Teira and his colleagues analyzed data from 9469 patients who received a transplant between 2003 and 2010.

The patients had acute myeloid leukemia (AML, n=5310), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL, n=1883), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML, n=1079), or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS, n=1197).

The median time to initial CMV reactivation was 41 days (range, 1-362 days).

The researchers found no significant association between CMV reactivation and disease relapse for AML (P=0.60), ALL (P=0.08), CML (P=0.94), or MDS (P=0.58).

However, CMV reactivation was associated with a significantly higher risk of nonrelapse mortality for AML (P<0.0001), ALL (P<0.0001), CML (P=0.0004), and MDS (P=0.0002).

Therefore, CMV reactivation was associated with significantly lower overall survival for AML (P<0.0001), ALL (P<0.0001), CML (P=0.0005), and MDS (P=0.003).

“Deaths due to uncontrolled CMV reactivation are virtually zero in this study, so uncontrolled CMV reactivation is not what reduces survival rates after transplantation,” Dr Teira noted. “The link between this common virus and increased risk of death remains a biological mystery.”

One possible explanation is that CMV decreases the ability of the patient’s immune system to fight against other types of infection. This is supported by the fact that death rates from infections other than CMV are higher in patients infected with CMV or patients whose donors were.

For researchers, the next step is therefore to verify whether the latest generation of anti-CMV treatments can prevent both reactivation of the virus and weakening of the patient’s immune system against other types of infection in the presence of CMV infection.

“CMV has a complex impact on the outcomes for transplant patients, and, each year, more than 30,000 patients around the world receive bone marrow transplants from donors,” Dr Teira said.

“It is therefore essential for future research to better understand the role played by CMV after bone marrow transplantation and improve the chances of success of the transplant. This will help to better choose the right donor for the right patient.”

CMV infection

Small studies have suggested that early cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation may protect against leukemia relapse and even death after hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

However, a new study, based on data from about 9500 patients, suggests otherwise.

Results showed no association between CMV reactivation and relapse but suggested CMV reactivation increases the risk of non-relapse mortality.

Researchers reported these findings in Blood.

“The original purpose of the study was to confirm that CMV infection may prevent leukemia relapse, prevent death, and become a major therapeutic tool for improving patient survival rates,” said study author Pierre Teira, MD, of the University of Montreal in Quebec, Canada.

“However, we found the exact opposite. Our results clearly show that . . . the virus not only does not prevent leukemia relapse [it] also remains a major factor associated with the risk of death. Monitoring of CMV after transplantation remains a priority for patients.”

For this study, Dr Teira and his colleagues analyzed data from 9469 patients who received a transplant between 2003 and 2010.

The patients had acute myeloid leukemia (AML, n=5310), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL, n=1883), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML, n=1079), or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS, n=1197).

The median time to initial CMV reactivation was 41 days (range, 1-362 days).

The researchers found no significant association between CMV reactivation and disease relapse for AML (P=0.60), ALL (P=0.08), CML (P=0.94), or MDS (P=0.58).

However, CMV reactivation was associated with a significantly higher risk of nonrelapse mortality for AML (P<0.0001), ALL (P<0.0001), CML (P=0.0004), and MDS (P=0.0002).

Therefore, CMV reactivation was associated with significantly lower overall survival for AML (P<0.0001), ALL (P<0.0001), CML (P=0.0005), and MDS (P=0.003).

“Deaths due to uncontrolled CMV reactivation are virtually zero in this study, so uncontrolled CMV reactivation is not what reduces survival rates after transplantation,” Dr Teira noted. “The link between this common virus and increased risk of death remains a biological mystery.”

One possible explanation is that CMV decreases the ability of the patient’s immune system to fight against other types of infection. This is supported by the fact that death rates from infections other than CMV are higher in patients infected with CMV or patients whose donors were.

For researchers, the next step is therefore to verify whether the latest generation of anti-CMV treatments can prevent both reactivation of the virus and weakening of the patient’s immune system against other types of infection in the presence of CMV infection.

“CMV has a complex impact on the outcomes for transplant patients, and, each year, more than 30,000 patients around the world receive bone marrow transplants from donors,” Dr Teira said.

“It is therefore essential for future research to better understand the role played by CMV after bone marrow transplantation and improve the chances of success of the transplant. This will help to better choose the right donor for the right patient.”

Catriona Jamieson, MD, PhD

Photo courtesy of

UC San Diego Health

New research has revealed a method of targeting leukemia stem cells (LSCs) in blast crisis chronic myeloid leukemia (BC-CML).

For this study, investigators used human cells and mouse models to define the role of ADAR1, an RNA editing enzyme, in BC-CML.

The team discovered how ADAR1 promotes LSC generation and identified a small molecule that can disrupt this process to fight BC-CML.

Catriona Jamieson, MD, PhD, of the University of California, San Diego, and her colleagues described this work in Cell Stem Cell.

“In this study, we showed that cancer stem cells co-opt an RNA editing system to clone themselves,” Dr Jamieson said. “What’s more, we found a method to dial it down.”

The investigators knew that ADAR1 can edit the sequence of microRNAs. By swapping out just one microRNA building block for another, ADAR1 alters the carefully orchestrated system cells use to control which genes are turned on or off at which times.

ADAR1 is also known to promote cancer progression and resistance to therapy. But Dr Jamieson’s team wanted to determine ADAR1’s role in governing LSCs.

The investigators conducted experiments with human BC-CML cells and mouse models of BC-CML. And they found that increased JAK2 signaling and BCR-ABL1 amplification activate ADAR1 in BC-CML cells. Then, hyper-ADAR1 editing slows down microRNAs known as let-7.

Ultimately, this activity increases cellular regeneration, turning white blood cell precursors into LSCs. And LSCs promote BC-CML.

After learning how the ADAR1 system works, Dr Jamieson and her colleagues looked for a way to stop it.

By inhibiting ADAR1 with a small-molecule compound known as 8-Aza, the investigators were able to counter ADAR1’s effect on LSC self-renewal and restore let-7.

Treatment with 8-Aza reduced self-renewal of BC-CML cells by approximately 40%, when compared to untreated cells.

“Based on this research, we believe that detecting ADAR1 activity will be important for predicting cancer progression,” Dr Jamieson said.

“In addition, inhibiting this enzyme represents a unique therapeutic vulnerability in cancer stem cells with active inflammatory signaling that may respond to pharmacologic inhibitors of inflammation sensitivity or selective ADAR1 inhibitors that are currently being developed.”

Catriona Jamieson, MD, PhD

Photo courtesy of

UC San Diego Health

New research has revealed a method of targeting leukemia stem cells (LSCs) in blast crisis chronic myeloid leukemia (BC-CML).

For this study, investigators used human cells and mouse models to define the role of ADAR1, an RNA editing enzyme, in BC-CML.

The team discovered how ADAR1 promotes LSC generation and identified a small molecule that can disrupt this process to fight BC-CML.

Catriona Jamieson, MD, PhD, of the University of California, San Diego, and her colleagues described this work in Cell Stem Cell.

“In this study, we showed that cancer stem cells co-opt an RNA editing system to clone themselves,” Dr Jamieson said. “What’s more, we found a method to dial it down.”

The investigators knew that ADAR1 can edit the sequence of microRNAs. By swapping out just one microRNA building block for another, ADAR1 alters the carefully orchestrated system cells use to control which genes are turned on or off at which times.

ADAR1 is also known to promote cancer progression and resistance to therapy. But Dr Jamieson’s team wanted to determine ADAR1’s role in governing LSCs.

The investigators conducted experiments with human BC-CML cells and mouse models of BC-CML. And they found that increased JAK2 signaling and BCR-ABL1 amplification activate ADAR1 in BC-CML cells. Then, hyper-ADAR1 editing slows down microRNAs known as let-7.

Ultimately, this activity increases cellular regeneration, turning white blood cell precursors into LSCs. And LSCs promote BC-CML.

After learning how the ADAR1 system works, Dr Jamieson and her colleagues looked for a way to stop it.

By inhibiting ADAR1 with a small-molecule compound known as 8-Aza, the investigators were able to counter ADAR1’s effect on LSC self-renewal and restore let-7.

Treatment with 8-Aza reduced self-renewal of BC-CML cells by approximately 40%, when compared to untreated cells.

“Based on this research, we believe that detecting ADAR1 activity will be important for predicting cancer progression,” Dr Jamieson said.

“In addition, inhibiting this enzyme represents a unique therapeutic vulnerability in cancer stem cells with active inflammatory signaling that may respond to pharmacologic inhibitors of inflammation sensitivity or selective ADAR1 inhibitors that are currently being developed.”

Catriona Jamieson, MD, PhD

Photo courtesy of

UC San Diego Health

New research has revealed a method of targeting leukemia stem cells (LSCs) in blast crisis chronic myeloid leukemia (BC-CML).

For this study, investigators used human cells and mouse models to define the role of ADAR1, an RNA editing enzyme, in BC-CML.

The team discovered how ADAR1 promotes LSC generation and identified a small molecule that can disrupt this process to fight BC-CML.

Catriona Jamieson, MD, PhD, of the University of California, San Diego, and her colleagues described this work in Cell Stem Cell.

“In this study, we showed that cancer stem cells co-opt an RNA editing system to clone themselves,” Dr Jamieson said. “What’s more, we found a method to dial it down.”

The investigators knew that ADAR1 can edit the sequence of microRNAs. By swapping out just one microRNA building block for another, ADAR1 alters the carefully orchestrated system cells use to control which genes are turned on or off at which times.

ADAR1 is also known to promote cancer progression and resistance to therapy. But Dr Jamieson’s team wanted to determine ADAR1’s role in governing LSCs.

The investigators conducted experiments with human BC-CML cells and mouse models of BC-CML. And they found that increased JAK2 signaling and BCR-ABL1 amplification activate ADAR1 in BC-CML cells. Then, hyper-ADAR1 editing slows down microRNAs known as let-7.

Ultimately, this activity increases cellular regeneration, turning white blood cell precursors into LSCs. And LSCs promote BC-CML.

After learning how the ADAR1 system works, Dr Jamieson and her colleagues looked for a way to stop it.

By inhibiting ADAR1 with a small-molecule compound known as 8-Aza, the investigators were able to counter ADAR1’s effect on LSC self-renewal and restore let-7.

Treatment with 8-Aza reduced self-renewal of BC-CML cells by approximately 40%, when compared to untreated cells.

“Based on this research, we believe that detecting ADAR1 activity will be important for predicting cancer progression,” Dr Jamieson said.

“In addition, inhibiting this enzyme represents a unique therapeutic vulnerability in cancer stem cells with active inflammatory signaling that may respond to pharmacologic inhibitors of inflammation sensitivity or selective ADAR1 inhibitors that are currently being developed.”

Johan Richter, MD, PhD

COPENHAGEN—Results of a large study suggest that stopping treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) can be safe for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in deep molecular response (MR4).

Six months after patients stopped receiving a TKI, the relapse-free survival was 62%. At 12 months, it was 56%.

Havinga longer duration of TKI treatment and a longer duration of deep molecular response were both associated with a higher likelihood of relapse-free survival.

These results, from the EURO-SKI trial, were presented at the 21st Congress of the European Hematology Association (abstract S145*) by Johan Richter, MD, PhD, of Skåne University Hospital in Lund, Sweden.

The goal of the EURO-SKI study was to define prognostic markers to increase the proportion of patients in durable deep molecular response after stopping TKI treatment.

The trial included 760 adults with chronic phase CML who were on TKI treatment for at least 3 years. Patients were either on their first TKI or on their second TKI due to toxicity with their first. (None had failed TKI treatment.)

Patients had been in MR4 (BCR/ABL <0.01%) for at least a year, which was confirmed by 3 consecutive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results during the last 12 months. The final MR4 confirmation was performed in a EUTOS standardized laboratory.

After the final MR4 confirmation, patients stopped TKI treatment. They underwent real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR) every 4 weeks for the first 6 months and every 6 weeks for the next 6 months. In years 2 and 3, they underwent RQ-PCR every third month.

The patients had a median age at diagnosis of 52 (range, 11.2-85.5) and a median age at TKI stop of 60.3 (range, 19.5-89.9). The median duration of TKI therapy was 7.6 years (range, 3.0-14.2), and the median duration of MR4 before TKI stop was 4.7 years (range, 1.0-13.3).

Most patients had received imatinib (n=710) as first-line TKI treatment, though some received nilotinib (n=35) or dasatinib (n=14). The type of first-line TKI was unknown in 1 patient. Second-line TKI treatment included imatinib (n=7), nilotinib (n=47), and dasatinib (n=57).

Relapse, survival, and safety

Six months after stopping TKI treatment, the cumulative incidence of molecular relapse was 37%. It was 43% at 12 months, 47% at 24 months, and 50% at 36 months.

In all, 347 patients had a molecular relapse. Seventy-two patients had BCR/ABL >1%, and 11 lost their complete cytogenetic response. None of the patients progressed to accelerated phase or blast crisis.

Among patients who restarted TKI treatment, the median time to restart was 4.1 months. Fourteen patients restarted treatment without a loss of major molecular response.

Dr Richter noted that the study is still ongoing, but, thus far, more than 80% of patients who restarted TKI therapy have achieved MR4 again.

The molecular relapse-free survival was 62% at 6 months after TKI stop, 56% at 12 months, 52% at 24 months, and 49% at 36 months.

There were 9 on-trial deaths, none of which were related to CML. Five patients died while in remission.

Previous studies revealed a TKI withdrawal syndrome that consists of (mostly transient) musculoskeletal pain or discomfort. In this study, 30.9% of patients (n=235) reported musculoskeletal symptoms, 226 with grade 1-2 events and 9 with grade 3 events.

Prognostic factors

The researchers performed prognostic modeling in 448 patients who previously received imatinib. Univariate analysis revealed no significant association between molecular relapse-free survival at 6 months and age, gender, depth of molecular response, Sokal score, EURO score, EUTOS score, or ELTS score.

However, TKI treatment duration and MR4 duration were both significantly (P<0.001) associated with major molecular response status at 6 months.

The odds ratio for treatment duration was 1.16 (95% CI, 1.08-1.25), which means that an additional year of imatinib treatment increases a patient’s odds of staying in major molecular response at 6 months by 16%.

The odds ratio for MR4 duration was also 1.16 (95% CI, 1.076-1.253), which means that an additional year in MR4 before TKI stop increases a patient’s odds of staying in major molecular response at 6 months by 16%.

Dr Richter noted that treatment duration and MR4 duration were highly correlated, which prevented a significant multiple model including both variables. He said the researchers will conduct further analyses to overcome the correlation between the 2 variables and determine an optimal cutoff for MR4 duration.

The team also plans to collect more data on pretreatment with interferon, as there is reason to suspect it has an influence on major molecular response duration after TKI discontinuation.

*Data in the abstract differ from data presented at the meeting.

Johan Richter, MD, PhD

COPENHAGEN—Results of a large study suggest that stopping treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) can be safe for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in deep molecular response (MR4).

Six months after patients stopped receiving a TKI, the relapse-free survival was 62%. At 12 months, it was 56%.

Havinga longer duration of TKI treatment and a longer duration of deep molecular response were both associated with a higher likelihood of relapse-free survival.

These results, from the EURO-SKI trial, were presented at the 21st Congress of the European Hematology Association (abstract S145*) by Johan Richter, MD, PhD, of Skåne University Hospital in Lund, Sweden.

The goal of the EURO-SKI study was to define prognostic markers to increase the proportion of patients in durable deep molecular response after stopping TKI treatment.

The trial included 760 adults with chronic phase CML who were on TKI treatment for at least 3 years. Patients were either on their first TKI or on their second TKI due to toxicity with their first. (None had failed TKI treatment.)

Patients had been in MR4 (BCR/ABL <0.01%) for at least a year, which was confirmed by 3 consecutive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results during the last 12 months. The final MR4 confirmation was performed in a EUTOS standardized laboratory.

After the final MR4 confirmation, patients stopped TKI treatment. They underwent real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR) every 4 weeks for the first 6 months and every 6 weeks for the next 6 months. In years 2 and 3, they underwent RQ-PCR every third month.

The patients had a median age at diagnosis of 52 (range, 11.2-85.5) and a median age at TKI stop of 60.3 (range, 19.5-89.9). The median duration of TKI therapy was 7.6 years (range, 3.0-14.2), and the median duration of MR4 before TKI stop was 4.7 years (range, 1.0-13.3).

Most patients had received imatinib (n=710) as first-line TKI treatment, though some received nilotinib (n=35) or dasatinib (n=14). The type of first-line TKI was unknown in 1 patient. Second-line TKI treatment included imatinib (n=7), nilotinib (n=47), and dasatinib (n=57).

Relapse, survival, and safety

Six months after stopping TKI treatment, the cumulative incidence of molecular relapse was 37%. It was 43% at 12 months, 47% at 24 months, and 50% at 36 months.

In all, 347 patients had a molecular relapse. Seventy-two patients had BCR/ABL >1%, and 11 lost their complete cytogenetic response. None of the patients progressed to accelerated phase or blast crisis.

Among patients who restarted TKI treatment, the median time to restart was 4.1 months. Fourteen patients restarted treatment without a loss of major molecular response.

Dr Richter noted that the study is still ongoing, but, thus far, more than 80% of patients who restarted TKI therapy have achieved MR4 again.

The molecular relapse-free survival was 62% at 6 months after TKI stop, 56% at 12 months, 52% at 24 months, and 49% at 36 months.

There were 9 on-trial deaths, none of which were related to CML. Five patients died while in remission.

Previous studies revealed a TKI withdrawal syndrome that consists of (mostly transient) musculoskeletal pain or discomfort. In this study, 30.9% of patients (n=235) reported musculoskeletal symptoms, 226 with grade 1-2 events and 9 with grade 3 events.

Prognostic factors

The researchers performed prognostic modeling in 448 patients who previously received imatinib. Univariate analysis revealed no significant association between molecular relapse-free survival at 6 months and age, gender, depth of molecular response, Sokal score, EURO score, EUTOS score, or ELTS score.

However, TKI treatment duration and MR4 duration were both significantly (P<0.001) associated with major molecular response status at 6 months.

The odds ratio for treatment duration was 1.16 (95% CI, 1.08-1.25), which means that an additional year of imatinib treatment increases a patient’s odds of staying in major molecular response at 6 months by 16%.

The odds ratio for MR4 duration was also 1.16 (95% CI, 1.076-1.253), which means that an additional year in MR4 before TKI stop increases a patient’s odds of staying in major molecular response at 6 months by 16%.

Dr Richter noted that treatment duration and MR4 duration were highly correlated, which prevented a significant multiple model including both variables. He said the researchers will conduct further analyses to overcome the correlation between the 2 variables and determine an optimal cutoff for MR4 duration.

The team also plans to collect more data on pretreatment with interferon, as there is reason to suspect it has an influence on major molecular response duration after TKI discontinuation.

*Data in the abstract differ from data presented at the meeting.

Johan Richter, MD, PhD

COPENHAGEN—Results of a large study suggest that stopping treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) can be safe for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in deep molecular response (MR4).

Six months after patients stopped receiving a TKI, the relapse-free survival was 62%. At 12 months, it was 56%.

Havinga longer duration of TKI treatment and a longer duration of deep molecular response were both associated with a higher likelihood of relapse-free survival.

These results, from the EURO-SKI trial, were presented at the 21st Congress of the European Hematology Association (abstract S145*) by Johan Richter, MD, PhD, of Skåne University Hospital in Lund, Sweden.

The goal of the EURO-SKI study was to define prognostic markers to increase the proportion of patients in durable deep molecular response after stopping TKI treatment.

The trial included 760 adults with chronic phase CML who were on TKI treatment for at least 3 years. Patients were either on their first TKI or on their second TKI due to toxicity with their first. (None had failed TKI treatment.)

Patients had been in MR4 (BCR/ABL <0.01%) for at least a year, which was confirmed by 3 consecutive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results during the last 12 months. The final MR4 confirmation was performed in a EUTOS standardized laboratory.

After the final MR4 confirmation, patients stopped TKI treatment. They underwent real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR) every 4 weeks for the first 6 months and every 6 weeks for the next 6 months. In years 2 and 3, they underwent RQ-PCR every third month.

The patients had a median age at diagnosis of 52 (range, 11.2-85.5) and a median age at TKI stop of 60.3 (range, 19.5-89.9). The median duration of TKI therapy was 7.6 years (range, 3.0-14.2), and the median duration of MR4 before TKI stop was 4.7 years (range, 1.0-13.3).

Most patients had received imatinib (n=710) as first-line TKI treatment, though some received nilotinib (n=35) or dasatinib (n=14). The type of first-line TKI was unknown in 1 patient. Second-line TKI treatment included imatinib (n=7), nilotinib (n=47), and dasatinib (n=57).

Relapse, survival, and safety

Six months after stopping TKI treatment, the cumulative incidence of molecular relapse was 37%. It was 43% at 12 months, 47% at 24 months, and 50% at 36 months.

In all, 347 patients had a molecular relapse. Seventy-two patients had BCR/ABL >1%, and 11 lost their complete cytogenetic response. None of the patients progressed to accelerated phase or blast crisis.

Among patients who restarted TKI treatment, the median time to restart was 4.1 months. Fourteen patients restarted treatment without a loss of major molecular response.

Dr Richter noted that the study is still ongoing, but, thus far, more than 80% of patients who restarted TKI therapy have achieved MR4 again.

The molecular relapse-free survival was 62% at 6 months after TKI stop, 56% at 12 months, 52% at 24 months, and 49% at 36 months.

There were 9 on-trial deaths, none of which were related to CML. Five patients died while in remission.

Previous studies revealed a TKI withdrawal syndrome that consists of (mostly transient) musculoskeletal pain or discomfort. In this study, 30.9% of patients (n=235) reported musculoskeletal symptoms, 226 with grade 1-2 events and 9 with grade 3 events.

Prognostic factors

The researchers performed prognostic modeling in 448 patients who previously received imatinib. Univariate analysis revealed no significant association between molecular relapse-free survival at 6 months and age, gender, depth of molecular response, Sokal score, EURO score, EUTOS score, or ELTS score.

However, TKI treatment duration and MR4 duration were both significantly (P<0.001) associated with major molecular response status at 6 months.

The odds ratio for treatment duration was 1.16 (95% CI, 1.08-1.25), which means that an additional year of imatinib treatment increases a patient’s odds of staying in major molecular response at 6 months by 16%.

The odds ratio for MR4 duration was also 1.16 (95% CI, 1.076-1.253), which means that an additional year in MR4 before TKI stop increases a patient’s odds of staying in major molecular response at 6 months by 16%.

Dr Richter noted that treatment duration and MR4 duration were highly correlated, which prevented a significant multiple model including both variables. He said the researchers will conduct further analyses to overcome the correlation between the 2 variables and determine an optimal cutoff for MR4 duration.

The team also plans to collect more data on pretreatment with interferon, as there is reason to suspect it has an influence on major molecular response duration after TKI discontinuation.

*Data in the abstract differ from data presented at the meeting.