Hodgkin Lymphoma

Doctor examines patient

Credit: NCI

The risk of premature menopause among survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) may vary greatly, according to a study of more than 2000 women.

The results suggest that ovarian radiotherapy and certain chemotherapeutic regimens increase a woman’s risk of premature menopause.

And the radiation dose, number of treatment cycles, and patient age at treatment all influence that risk.

The findings appear in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

Previous research suggested that women with HL who receive certain types of chemotherapy or radiotherapy are at an increased risk of early menopause, but there was insufficient information to provide patients with detailed advice.

To gain more insight, Anthony Swerdlow, DSc, of The Institute of Cancer Research in London, UK, and his colleagues studied 2127 women who were treated for HL in England or Wales between 1960 and 2004.

All of the women were younger than 36 at the time of treatment, and all had received chest radiotherapy, sometimes alongside other treatments.

Some 605 of the women underwent non-surgical menopause before the age of 40. The researchers said this was a large enough number for them to estimate accurate risks of menopause, depending on the type and dose of treatments patients received and the age they received them.

The team found that several treatments caused a sharp increase in premature menopause risk, and menopause was more like among women treated at older ages.

The risk of premature menopause increased more than 20-fold after ovarian radiotherapy, alkylating chemotherapy other than dacarbazine, or BEAM (bis-chloroethylnitrosourea, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) chemotherapy given prior to stem cell transplant.

However, there was no significant increase in risk after receiving adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (ABVD).

Within 5 years of treatment, menopause had occurred in 62.5% of patients who received ≥5 Gy of ovarian radiotherapy, 50.9% of patients who received BEAM, and 24.2% of patients who received ≥6 cycles of alkylating chemotherapy.

The cumulative risk of menopause by age 40 was 81.3% after ≥ 5 Gy of ovarian radiotherapy, 75.3% after BEAM, 49.1% after ≥ 6 cycles of alkylating chemotherapy, 3.0% after solely supradiaphragmatic radiotherapy, and 1.4% after ABVD.

“We hope our study will help women to understand better, in consultation with their doctors, their risks of future infertility following treatment for this malignancy,” Dr Swerdlow said.

“By looking in a much larger group of women than previous studies of this type, we were able to produce age- and treatment-specific risk estimates that we hope will be of practical use to individual women.”

Doctor examines patient

Credit: NCI

The risk of premature menopause among survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) may vary greatly, according to a study of more than 2000 women.

The results suggest that ovarian radiotherapy and certain chemotherapeutic regimens increase a woman’s risk of premature menopause.

And the radiation dose, number of treatment cycles, and patient age at treatment all influence that risk.

The findings appear in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

Previous research suggested that women with HL who receive certain types of chemotherapy or radiotherapy are at an increased risk of early menopause, but there was insufficient information to provide patients with detailed advice.

To gain more insight, Anthony Swerdlow, DSc, of The Institute of Cancer Research in London, UK, and his colleagues studied 2127 women who were treated for HL in England or Wales between 1960 and 2004.

All of the women were younger than 36 at the time of treatment, and all had received chest radiotherapy, sometimes alongside other treatments.

Some 605 of the women underwent non-surgical menopause before the age of 40. The researchers said this was a large enough number for them to estimate accurate risks of menopause, depending on the type and dose of treatments patients received and the age they received them.

The team found that several treatments caused a sharp increase in premature menopause risk, and menopause was more like among women treated at older ages.

The risk of premature menopause increased more than 20-fold after ovarian radiotherapy, alkylating chemotherapy other than dacarbazine, or BEAM (bis-chloroethylnitrosourea, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) chemotherapy given prior to stem cell transplant.

However, there was no significant increase in risk after receiving adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (ABVD).

Within 5 years of treatment, menopause had occurred in 62.5% of patients who received ≥5 Gy of ovarian radiotherapy, 50.9% of patients who received BEAM, and 24.2% of patients who received ≥6 cycles of alkylating chemotherapy.

The cumulative risk of menopause by age 40 was 81.3% after ≥ 5 Gy of ovarian radiotherapy, 75.3% after BEAM, 49.1% after ≥ 6 cycles of alkylating chemotherapy, 3.0% after solely supradiaphragmatic radiotherapy, and 1.4% after ABVD.

“We hope our study will help women to understand better, in consultation with their doctors, their risks of future infertility following treatment for this malignancy,” Dr Swerdlow said.

“By looking in a much larger group of women than previous studies of this type, we were able to produce age- and treatment-specific risk estimates that we hope will be of practical use to individual women.”

Doctor examines patient

Credit: NCI

The risk of premature menopause among survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) may vary greatly, according to a study of more than 2000 women.

The results suggest that ovarian radiotherapy and certain chemotherapeutic regimens increase a woman’s risk of premature menopause.

And the radiation dose, number of treatment cycles, and patient age at treatment all influence that risk.

The findings appear in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

Previous research suggested that women with HL who receive certain types of chemotherapy or radiotherapy are at an increased risk of early menopause, but there was insufficient information to provide patients with detailed advice.

To gain more insight, Anthony Swerdlow, DSc, of The Institute of Cancer Research in London, UK, and his colleagues studied 2127 women who were treated for HL in England or Wales between 1960 and 2004.

All of the women were younger than 36 at the time of treatment, and all had received chest radiotherapy, sometimes alongside other treatments.

Some 605 of the women underwent non-surgical menopause before the age of 40. The researchers said this was a large enough number for them to estimate accurate risks of menopause, depending on the type and dose of treatments patients received and the age they received them.

The team found that several treatments caused a sharp increase in premature menopause risk, and menopause was more like among women treated at older ages.

The risk of premature menopause increased more than 20-fold after ovarian radiotherapy, alkylating chemotherapy other than dacarbazine, or BEAM (bis-chloroethylnitrosourea, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) chemotherapy given prior to stem cell transplant.

However, there was no significant increase in risk after receiving adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (ABVD).

Within 5 years of treatment, menopause had occurred in 62.5% of patients who received ≥5 Gy of ovarian radiotherapy, 50.9% of patients who received BEAM, and 24.2% of patients who received ≥6 cycles of alkylating chemotherapy.

The cumulative risk of menopause by age 40 was 81.3% after ≥ 5 Gy of ovarian radiotherapy, 75.3% after BEAM, 49.1% after ≥ 6 cycles of alkylating chemotherapy, 3.0% after solely supradiaphragmatic radiotherapy, and 1.4% after ABVD.

“We hope our study will help women to understand better, in consultation with their doctors, their risks of future infertility following treatment for this malignancy,” Dr Swerdlow said.

“By looking in a much larger group of women than previous studies of this type, we were able to produce age- and treatment-specific risk estimates that we hope will be of practical use to individual women.”

Time to progression was inferior in patients with advanced-stage nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin’s lymphoma, compared with patients with classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma, in a study that compared outcomes between the two groups of Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients enrolled in the British Columbia Cancer Agency database.

Over 10 years, time to progression was 63% in the nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NLPHL) group, vs. 73% in the classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma (CHL) group (P =.040), reported Dr. Katharine Xing of the Centre for Lymphoid Cancer at the BCCA and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, and her associates.

Transformation to an aggressive non–Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) over 15 years occurred in 24% of those with NLPHL, but in none of those with CHL (P = .00018), and the median time to transformation among those with NLPHL was 5.45 years (Blood 2014;123:3567-73).

The study compared 42 patients with advanced-stage NLPHL to 84 controls with advanced CHL, matched for age, sex, decade of diagnosis, stage, and chemotherapy type; all had been diagnosed between 1970 and 2011. Their mean age was 37 years, about two-thirds were men, most in both groups had stage III disease, and they were followed up for a median of about 11 years. Treatments included standard doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) and most received standard ABVD or ABVD-equivalent chemotherapy. The study was conducted to "highlight the distinct natural history of this rare HL subtype," which accounts for 5% of HL cases, the authors noted.

Over 10 years, "HL freedom from treatment failure," which reflects only relapses from HL, was 75% among those with NLPHL and 73% among those with CHL. Overall survival was also similar between the two groups (83.5% among those with NLPHL and 81% among those with CHL at 10 years).

Among their other findings was a significantly higher incidence of transformation over 10 years among those who had splenic involvement at the time of NLPHL diagnosis, compared with those who did not have splenic involvement (29% vs. 7.8%). When they looked at only those NLPHL patients who had received ABVD-like treatment, the incidence of transformation over 10 years was 34% among those with splenic involvement at diagnosis, vs. 9% among those who did not have splenic involvement (P = .014).

Since NLPHL is rare, information on the optimal treatment is limited, particularly for those with advanced disease, the authors pointed out. The analysis "highlights the distinct disease behavior of NLPHL, compared with CHL, and the need for repeat biopsy at relapse as well as long-term surveillance," the authors concluded. "Given the strong expression of CD20" on the lymphocyte predominant cells that distinguishes NLPHL from CHL, the results also provide "a rationale for further evaluation" of CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) with rituximab, they added.

[email protected]

Time to progression was inferior in patients with advanced-stage nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin’s lymphoma, compared with patients with classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma, in a study that compared outcomes between the two groups of Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients enrolled in the British Columbia Cancer Agency database.

Over 10 years, time to progression was 63% in the nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NLPHL) group, vs. 73% in the classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma (CHL) group (P =.040), reported Dr. Katharine Xing of the Centre for Lymphoid Cancer at the BCCA and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, and her associates.

Transformation to an aggressive non–Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) over 15 years occurred in 24% of those with NLPHL, but in none of those with CHL (P = .00018), and the median time to transformation among those with NLPHL was 5.45 years (Blood 2014;123:3567-73).

The study compared 42 patients with advanced-stage NLPHL to 84 controls with advanced CHL, matched for age, sex, decade of diagnosis, stage, and chemotherapy type; all had been diagnosed between 1970 and 2011. Their mean age was 37 years, about two-thirds were men, most in both groups had stage III disease, and they were followed up for a median of about 11 years. Treatments included standard doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) and most received standard ABVD or ABVD-equivalent chemotherapy. The study was conducted to "highlight the distinct natural history of this rare HL subtype," which accounts for 5% of HL cases, the authors noted.

Over 10 years, "HL freedom from treatment failure," which reflects only relapses from HL, was 75% among those with NLPHL and 73% among those with CHL. Overall survival was also similar between the two groups (83.5% among those with NLPHL and 81% among those with CHL at 10 years).

Among their other findings was a significantly higher incidence of transformation over 10 years among those who had splenic involvement at the time of NLPHL diagnosis, compared with those who did not have splenic involvement (29% vs. 7.8%). When they looked at only those NLPHL patients who had received ABVD-like treatment, the incidence of transformation over 10 years was 34% among those with splenic involvement at diagnosis, vs. 9% among those who did not have splenic involvement (P = .014).

Since NLPHL is rare, information on the optimal treatment is limited, particularly for those with advanced disease, the authors pointed out. The analysis "highlights the distinct disease behavior of NLPHL, compared with CHL, and the need for repeat biopsy at relapse as well as long-term surveillance," the authors concluded. "Given the strong expression of CD20" on the lymphocyte predominant cells that distinguishes NLPHL from CHL, the results also provide "a rationale for further evaluation" of CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) with rituximab, they added.

[email protected]

Time to progression was inferior in patients with advanced-stage nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin’s lymphoma, compared with patients with classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma, in a study that compared outcomes between the two groups of Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients enrolled in the British Columbia Cancer Agency database.

Over 10 years, time to progression was 63% in the nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NLPHL) group, vs. 73% in the classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma (CHL) group (P =.040), reported Dr. Katharine Xing of the Centre for Lymphoid Cancer at the BCCA and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, and her associates.

Transformation to an aggressive non–Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) over 15 years occurred in 24% of those with NLPHL, but in none of those with CHL (P = .00018), and the median time to transformation among those with NLPHL was 5.45 years (Blood 2014;123:3567-73).

The study compared 42 patients with advanced-stage NLPHL to 84 controls with advanced CHL, matched for age, sex, decade of diagnosis, stage, and chemotherapy type; all had been diagnosed between 1970 and 2011. Their mean age was 37 years, about two-thirds were men, most in both groups had stage III disease, and they were followed up for a median of about 11 years. Treatments included standard doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) and most received standard ABVD or ABVD-equivalent chemotherapy. The study was conducted to "highlight the distinct natural history of this rare HL subtype," which accounts for 5% of HL cases, the authors noted.

Over 10 years, "HL freedom from treatment failure," which reflects only relapses from HL, was 75% among those with NLPHL and 73% among those with CHL. Overall survival was also similar between the two groups (83.5% among those with NLPHL and 81% among those with CHL at 10 years).

Among their other findings was a significantly higher incidence of transformation over 10 years among those who had splenic involvement at the time of NLPHL diagnosis, compared with those who did not have splenic involvement (29% vs. 7.8%). When they looked at only those NLPHL patients who had received ABVD-like treatment, the incidence of transformation over 10 years was 34% among those with splenic involvement at diagnosis, vs. 9% among those who did not have splenic involvement (P = .014).

Since NLPHL is rare, information on the optimal treatment is limited, particularly for those with advanced disease, the authors pointed out. The analysis "highlights the distinct disease behavior of NLPHL, compared with CHL, and the need for repeat biopsy at relapse as well as long-term surveillance," the authors concluded. "Given the strong expression of CD20" on the lymphocyte predominant cells that distinguishes NLPHL from CHL, the results also provide "a rationale for further evaluation" of CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) with rituximab, they added.

[email protected]

MRI scanner

Results of a new study indicate that MRI and mammography can detect invasive breast tumors at very early stages in female survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL).

Researchers said the findings underscore the need for at-risk childhood HL survivors and their physicians to be aware of screening guidelines.

The guidelines recommend survivors undergo breast MRI screening beginning at age 25 or 8 years after they received chest radiation, whichever is later.

“Female survivors of childhood HL who had chest radiation should speak with their family doctor about after-care assessment and breast cancer screening,” said David Hodgson, MD, of Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Toronto, Canada.

“We estimate that 75% of women who are at high risk because of prior radiotherapy to the chest are not being screened. So my hope is that this new evidence will encourage these survivors to discuss early screening with their doctors.”

Dr Hodgson and his colleagues reported this evidence in Cancer.

The researchers evaluated the results of breast MRI and mammography screening among 96 female survivors of childhood HL who had been treated with chest radiotherapy.

The median patient age at first screening was 30 years, and the median number of MRI screening rounds was 3. Ten breast cancers—half of them invasive tumors—were diagnosed in 9 women during 363 person-years follow up.

The median age at breast cancer diagnosis was 39 years (range, 24 to 43 years), and the median latency period between HL diagnosis and age at breast cancer diagnoses was 21 years (range, 12 to 27 years).

“This illustrates the young age at which these cancers can occur,” Dr Hodgson said. “For some of these women, if they had been screened starting at age 40 or 50, like average-risk women, it would have been too late.”

MRI alone detected tumors with 80% sensitivity and 93.5% specificity. Mammography alone detected tumors with 70% sensitivity and 95% specificity. And both modalities combined detected tumors with 100% sensitivity and 88.6% specificity. All invasive tumors were detected by MRI.

In other words, of the 10 breast tumors, 5 were visible on both MRI and mammogram, 3 were visible only on MRI, and 2 were detected via mammogram alone (but were non-invasive). The median size of invasive tumors size was 8 mm (range, 3-15 mm), and none had spread to the lymph nodes.

The researchers noted that these results are substantially better than prior studies using only mammographic screening in young patients.

Dr Hodgson also pointed out that, because MRI screening is so much more sensitive to small changes in the appearance of the breast tissue than mammography, up to a third of patients may be called back for further testing of suspicious findings. But many of these are benign or not clinically significant and, therefore, require no treatment.

MRI scanner

Results of a new study indicate that MRI and mammography can detect invasive breast tumors at very early stages in female survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL).

Researchers said the findings underscore the need for at-risk childhood HL survivors and their physicians to be aware of screening guidelines.

The guidelines recommend survivors undergo breast MRI screening beginning at age 25 or 8 years after they received chest radiation, whichever is later.

“Female survivors of childhood HL who had chest radiation should speak with their family doctor about after-care assessment and breast cancer screening,” said David Hodgson, MD, of Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Toronto, Canada.

“We estimate that 75% of women who are at high risk because of prior radiotherapy to the chest are not being screened. So my hope is that this new evidence will encourage these survivors to discuss early screening with their doctors.”

Dr Hodgson and his colleagues reported this evidence in Cancer.

The researchers evaluated the results of breast MRI and mammography screening among 96 female survivors of childhood HL who had been treated with chest radiotherapy.

The median patient age at first screening was 30 years, and the median number of MRI screening rounds was 3. Ten breast cancers—half of them invasive tumors—were diagnosed in 9 women during 363 person-years follow up.

The median age at breast cancer diagnosis was 39 years (range, 24 to 43 years), and the median latency period between HL diagnosis and age at breast cancer diagnoses was 21 years (range, 12 to 27 years).

“This illustrates the young age at which these cancers can occur,” Dr Hodgson said. “For some of these women, if they had been screened starting at age 40 or 50, like average-risk women, it would have been too late.”

MRI alone detected tumors with 80% sensitivity and 93.5% specificity. Mammography alone detected tumors with 70% sensitivity and 95% specificity. And both modalities combined detected tumors with 100% sensitivity and 88.6% specificity. All invasive tumors were detected by MRI.

In other words, of the 10 breast tumors, 5 were visible on both MRI and mammogram, 3 were visible only on MRI, and 2 were detected via mammogram alone (but were non-invasive). The median size of invasive tumors size was 8 mm (range, 3-15 mm), and none had spread to the lymph nodes.

The researchers noted that these results are substantially better than prior studies using only mammographic screening in young patients.

Dr Hodgson also pointed out that, because MRI screening is so much more sensitive to small changes in the appearance of the breast tissue than mammography, up to a third of patients may be called back for further testing of suspicious findings. But many of these are benign or not clinically significant and, therefore, require no treatment.

MRI scanner

Results of a new study indicate that MRI and mammography can detect invasive breast tumors at very early stages in female survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL).

Researchers said the findings underscore the need for at-risk childhood HL survivors and their physicians to be aware of screening guidelines.

The guidelines recommend survivors undergo breast MRI screening beginning at age 25 or 8 years after they received chest radiation, whichever is later.

“Female survivors of childhood HL who had chest radiation should speak with their family doctor about after-care assessment and breast cancer screening,” said David Hodgson, MD, of Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Toronto, Canada.

“We estimate that 75% of women who are at high risk because of prior radiotherapy to the chest are not being screened. So my hope is that this new evidence will encourage these survivors to discuss early screening with their doctors.”

Dr Hodgson and his colleagues reported this evidence in Cancer.

The researchers evaluated the results of breast MRI and mammography screening among 96 female survivors of childhood HL who had been treated with chest radiotherapy.

The median patient age at first screening was 30 years, and the median number of MRI screening rounds was 3. Ten breast cancers—half of them invasive tumors—were diagnosed in 9 women during 363 person-years follow up.

The median age at breast cancer diagnosis was 39 years (range, 24 to 43 years), and the median latency period between HL diagnosis and age at breast cancer diagnoses was 21 years (range, 12 to 27 years).

“This illustrates the young age at which these cancers can occur,” Dr Hodgson said. “For some of these women, if they had been screened starting at age 40 or 50, like average-risk women, it would have been too late.”

MRI alone detected tumors with 80% sensitivity and 93.5% specificity. Mammography alone detected tumors with 70% sensitivity and 95% specificity. And both modalities combined detected tumors with 100% sensitivity and 88.6% specificity. All invasive tumors were detected by MRI.

In other words, of the 10 breast tumors, 5 were visible on both MRI and mammogram, 3 were visible only on MRI, and 2 were detected via mammogram alone (but were non-invasive). The median size of invasive tumors size was 8 mm (range, 3-15 mm), and none had spread to the lymph nodes.

The researchers noted that these results are substantially better than prior studies using only mammographic screening in young patients.

Dr Hodgson also pointed out that, because MRI screening is so much more sensitive to small changes in the appearance of the breast tissue than mammography, up to a third of patients may be called back for further testing of suspicious findings. But many of these are benign or not clinically significant and, therefore, require no treatment.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted breakthrough therapy designation for the investigational PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab to treat Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) in patients who have failed autologous stem cell transplant and treatment with brentuximab vedotin.

The FDA’s decision is based on data from a cohort of HL patients in an ongoing phase 1b study of patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies.

According to the FDA, breakthrough designation is intended to expedite the development and review of drugs for serious or life-threatening conditions.

For a treatment to receive this designation, there must be preliminary clinical evidence that demonstrates the drug may offer substantial improvement over currently available therapy on at least 1 clinically significant endpoint.

Nivolumab is an investigational agent that binds to the checkpoint receptor PD-1 expressed on activated T cells. Researchers are investigating whether, by blocking this pathway, nivolumab would enable the immune system to resume its ability to recognize, attack, and destroy cancer cells.

Nivolumab is under investigation in multiple tumor types as monotherapy or in combination with other therapies. There are 35 trials of the agent underway, in which more than 7000 patients have been enrolled.

The breakthrough designation for nivolumab in HL is based on results of a 2-part phase 1 study, which have not been made public.

The researchers planned to enroll 100 patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies on this study. For the dose-escalation portion, the team planned to treat successive cohorts of patients using a 6+3 escalation design.

Patients would receive 1 mg/kg or 3 mg/kg of intravenous nivolumab every 2 weeks (although the first dose would be followed by a 3-week evaluation period) for 2 years, with the potential for an additional year of therapy for patients who progress.

Then, the researchers would enroll 5 cohorts of 16 patients representing the following tumor sites: HL/primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, multiple myeloma, B-cell lymphoma, T-cell lymphoma, and chronic myelogenous leukemia.

These patients would receive nivolumab at the maximum-tolerated dose identified in the first part of the study.

A poster describing the study plan was presented at the 2013 ASCO Annual Meeting (abstract TPS3113). The study is funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb, the company developing nivolumab.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted breakthrough therapy designation for the investigational PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab to treat Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) in patients who have failed autologous stem cell transplant and treatment with brentuximab vedotin.

The FDA’s decision is based on data from a cohort of HL patients in an ongoing phase 1b study of patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies.

According to the FDA, breakthrough designation is intended to expedite the development and review of drugs for serious or life-threatening conditions.

For a treatment to receive this designation, there must be preliminary clinical evidence that demonstrates the drug may offer substantial improvement over currently available therapy on at least 1 clinically significant endpoint.

Nivolumab is an investigational agent that binds to the checkpoint receptor PD-1 expressed on activated T cells. Researchers are investigating whether, by blocking this pathway, nivolumab would enable the immune system to resume its ability to recognize, attack, and destroy cancer cells.

Nivolumab is under investigation in multiple tumor types as monotherapy or in combination with other therapies. There are 35 trials of the agent underway, in which more than 7000 patients have been enrolled.

The breakthrough designation for nivolumab in HL is based on results of a 2-part phase 1 study, which have not been made public.

The researchers planned to enroll 100 patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies on this study. For the dose-escalation portion, the team planned to treat successive cohorts of patients using a 6+3 escalation design.

Patients would receive 1 mg/kg or 3 mg/kg of intravenous nivolumab every 2 weeks (although the first dose would be followed by a 3-week evaluation period) for 2 years, with the potential for an additional year of therapy for patients who progress.

Then, the researchers would enroll 5 cohorts of 16 patients representing the following tumor sites: HL/primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, multiple myeloma, B-cell lymphoma, T-cell lymphoma, and chronic myelogenous leukemia.

These patients would receive nivolumab at the maximum-tolerated dose identified in the first part of the study.

A poster describing the study plan was presented at the 2013 ASCO Annual Meeting (abstract TPS3113). The study is funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb, the company developing nivolumab.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted breakthrough therapy designation for the investigational PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab to treat Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) in patients who have failed autologous stem cell transplant and treatment with brentuximab vedotin.

The FDA’s decision is based on data from a cohort of HL patients in an ongoing phase 1b study of patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies.

According to the FDA, breakthrough designation is intended to expedite the development and review of drugs for serious or life-threatening conditions.

For a treatment to receive this designation, there must be preliminary clinical evidence that demonstrates the drug may offer substantial improvement over currently available therapy on at least 1 clinically significant endpoint.

Nivolumab is an investigational agent that binds to the checkpoint receptor PD-1 expressed on activated T cells. Researchers are investigating whether, by blocking this pathway, nivolumab would enable the immune system to resume its ability to recognize, attack, and destroy cancer cells.

Nivolumab is under investigation in multiple tumor types as monotherapy or in combination with other therapies. There are 35 trials of the agent underway, in which more than 7000 patients have been enrolled.

The breakthrough designation for nivolumab in HL is based on results of a 2-part phase 1 study, which have not been made public.

The researchers planned to enroll 100 patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies on this study. For the dose-escalation portion, the team planned to treat successive cohorts of patients using a 6+3 escalation design.

Patients would receive 1 mg/kg or 3 mg/kg of intravenous nivolumab every 2 weeks (although the first dose would be followed by a 3-week evaluation period) for 2 years, with the potential for an additional year of therapy for patients who progress.

Then, the researchers would enroll 5 cohorts of 16 patients representing the following tumor sites: HL/primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, multiple myeloma, B-cell lymphoma, T-cell lymphoma, and chronic myelogenous leukemia.

These patients would receive nivolumab at the maximum-tolerated dose identified in the first part of the study.

A poster describing the study plan was presented at the 2013 ASCO Annual Meeting (abstract TPS3113). The study is funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb, the company developing nivolumab.

Administering radiotherapy

Credit: Sue Campbell

Interim results of a randomized trial suggest that omitting radiotherapy in Hodgkin lymphoma patients with an early negative PET scan can increase their risk of relapse.

Patients with stage I/II Hodgkin lymphoma who received involved-node radiotherapy after chemotherapy with ABVD (adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazin) were less likely to relapse than patients who received ABVD alone, regardless of prognosis.

However, patients who received chemotherapy alone still had a high rate of progression-free survival (PFS), at about 95%.

John M.M. Raemaekers, MD, PhD, of the Radboud University Medical Center in Nijmegen, The Netherlands, and his colleagues reported these results in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

“Striking the right balance between initial cure through combined-modality treatment and accepting a higher risk of late complications, and a higher recurrence rate after omitting radiotherapy in subsets of patients who will subsequently need intensive salvage treatment, is a matter of unsettled debate,” Dr Raemaekers said.

So he and his colleagues set out to evaluate whether involved-node radiotherapy could be omitted without compromising PFS in patients with stage I/II Hodgkin lymphoma who had an early negative PET scan after treatment with ABVD.

The interim analysis included 1137 patients with untreated clinical stage I/II Hodgkin lymphoma. Of these, 444 patients had favorable prognoses, and 693 had unfavorable prognoses.

Patients in each prognostic group were randomized to receive standard treatment—2 cycles of ABVD followed by radiotherapy (n=188)—or experimental treatment—ABVD alone (n=193).

For patients with a favorable prognosis and an early negative PET scan, 1 progression occurred in the standard arm, and 9 occurred in the experimental arm. At 1 year, PFS rates were 100% and 94.9%, respectively.

For patients with unfavorable prognosis and an early negative PET scan, 7 events occurred in the standard arm, and 16 occurred in the experimental arm.

One patient died from toxicity without signs of progression, but all of the remaining events were progressions. At 1 year, the PFS rates were 97.3% and 94.7%, respectively.

Although there were few events and the median follow-up time was short, an independent data monitoring committee said it was unlikely that the final results would show non-inferiority for the experimental treatment. They therefore advised that randomization be stopped for early PET-negative patients.

Administering radiotherapy

Credit: Sue Campbell

Interim results of a randomized trial suggest that omitting radiotherapy in Hodgkin lymphoma patients with an early negative PET scan can increase their risk of relapse.

Patients with stage I/II Hodgkin lymphoma who received involved-node radiotherapy after chemotherapy with ABVD (adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazin) were less likely to relapse than patients who received ABVD alone, regardless of prognosis.

However, patients who received chemotherapy alone still had a high rate of progression-free survival (PFS), at about 95%.

John M.M. Raemaekers, MD, PhD, of the Radboud University Medical Center in Nijmegen, The Netherlands, and his colleagues reported these results in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

“Striking the right balance between initial cure through combined-modality treatment and accepting a higher risk of late complications, and a higher recurrence rate after omitting radiotherapy in subsets of patients who will subsequently need intensive salvage treatment, is a matter of unsettled debate,” Dr Raemaekers said.

So he and his colleagues set out to evaluate whether involved-node radiotherapy could be omitted without compromising PFS in patients with stage I/II Hodgkin lymphoma who had an early negative PET scan after treatment with ABVD.

The interim analysis included 1137 patients with untreated clinical stage I/II Hodgkin lymphoma. Of these, 444 patients had favorable prognoses, and 693 had unfavorable prognoses.

Patients in each prognostic group were randomized to receive standard treatment—2 cycles of ABVD followed by radiotherapy (n=188)—or experimental treatment—ABVD alone (n=193).

For patients with a favorable prognosis and an early negative PET scan, 1 progression occurred in the standard arm, and 9 occurred in the experimental arm. At 1 year, PFS rates were 100% and 94.9%, respectively.

For patients with unfavorable prognosis and an early negative PET scan, 7 events occurred in the standard arm, and 16 occurred in the experimental arm.

One patient died from toxicity without signs of progression, but all of the remaining events were progressions. At 1 year, the PFS rates were 97.3% and 94.7%, respectively.

Although there were few events and the median follow-up time was short, an independent data monitoring committee said it was unlikely that the final results would show non-inferiority for the experimental treatment. They therefore advised that randomization be stopped for early PET-negative patients.

Administering radiotherapy

Credit: Sue Campbell

Interim results of a randomized trial suggest that omitting radiotherapy in Hodgkin lymphoma patients with an early negative PET scan can increase their risk of relapse.

Patients with stage I/II Hodgkin lymphoma who received involved-node radiotherapy after chemotherapy with ABVD (adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazin) were less likely to relapse than patients who received ABVD alone, regardless of prognosis.

However, patients who received chemotherapy alone still had a high rate of progression-free survival (PFS), at about 95%.

John M.M. Raemaekers, MD, PhD, of the Radboud University Medical Center in Nijmegen, The Netherlands, and his colleagues reported these results in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

“Striking the right balance between initial cure through combined-modality treatment and accepting a higher risk of late complications, and a higher recurrence rate after omitting radiotherapy in subsets of patients who will subsequently need intensive salvage treatment, is a matter of unsettled debate,” Dr Raemaekers said.

So he and his colleagues set out to evaluate whether involved-node radiotherapy could be omitted without compromising PFS in patients with stage I/II Hodgkin lymphoma who had an early negative PET scan after treatment with ABVD.

The interim analysis included 1137 patients with untreated clinical stage I/II Hodgkin lymphoma. Of these, 444 patients had favorable prognoses, and 693 had unfavorable prognoses.

Patients in each prognostic group were randomized to receive standard treatment—2 cycles of ABVD followed by radiotherapy (n=188)—or experimental treatment—ABVD alone (n=193).

For patients with a favorable prognosis and an early negative PET scan, 1 progression occurred in the standard arm, and 9 occurred in the experimental arm. At 1 year, PFS rates were 100% and 94.9%, respectively.

For patients with unfavorable prognosis and an early negative PET scan, 7 events occurred in the standard arm, and 16 occurred in the experimental arm.

One patient died from toxicity without signs of progression, but all of the remaining events were progressions. At 1 year, the PFS rates were 97.3% and 94.7%, respectively.

Although there were few events and the median follow-up time was short, an independent data monitoring committee said it was unlikely that the final results would show non-inferiority for the experimental treatment. They therefore advised that randomization be stopped for early PET-negative patients.

Researcher in the lab

Credit: Rhoda Baer

Mutations in the gene PTPN1 may drive the development of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), according to a study published in Nature Genetics.

Whole-genome and whole-transcriptome sequencing revealed recurrent PTPN1 mutations in samples and cell lines of HL and PMBCL.

And experiments suggested the mutations contribute to lymphomagenesis by activating JAK-STAT signaling pathways.

“Our work identifies, for the first time, the entirety of genetic mutations in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma and first-of-its kind-mutations in the PTPN1 gene,” said study author Christian Steidl, MD, of the University of British Columbia in Vancouver.

To discover these mutations, Dr Steidl and his colleagues sequenced samples from 77 PMBCL patients and 3 PMBCL-derived cell lines. The team found mutations in 2 negative regulators of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway—SOCS1 and PTPN1.

As SOCS1 is already well-characterized, the researchers decided to focus on PTPN1. They identified PTPN1 mutations in 22% (17/77) of PMBCL cases and 33% (1/3) of the PMBCL-derived cell lines.

Because classical HL is closely related to PMBCL, the investigators also screened 30 samples from HL patients and 9 HL-derived cell lines. PTPN1 mutations were present in 20% (6/30) of the samples and 67% (6/9) of the cell lines.

In all, the team identified 18 (60%) missense mutations, 4 (13.3%) frameshift mutations, 3 (10%) single-amino acid deletions, 4 (13.3%) nonsense mutations, and 1 (3.3%) promoter mutation.

The researchers also discovered that PTPN1 mutations were significantly associated with diminished PTP1B expression in patient samples. However, they said future studies will need to confirm whether PTP1B immunohistochemistry can be used as a surrogate for PTPN1 mutations.

Another key finding was that PTPN1 mutations led to reduced phosphatase activity and increased phosphorylation of JAK-STAT pathway members.

When the investigators silenced PTPN1 in the HL cell line KM-H2, they observed hyperphosphorylation and overexpression of downstream oncogenic targets—STAT3, STAT5, STAT6, JAK1, JAK2, and AKT.

The researchers said these results suggest PTPN1 mutations drive lymphomagenesis. The mutations likely synergize with other driver mutations known to be involved in the pathogenesis of HL and PMBCL—such as SOCS1 and STAT6—and that contribute to aberrant JAK-STAT signaling.

Researcher in the lab

Credit: Rhoda Baer

Mutations in the gene PTPN1 may drive the development of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), according to a study published in Nature Genetics.

Whole-genome and whole-transcriptome sequencing revealed recurrent PTPN1 mutations in samples and cell lines of HL and PMBCL.

And experiments suggested the mutations contribute to lymphomagenesis by activating JAK-STAT signaling pathways.

“Our work identifies, for the first time, the entirety of genetic mutations in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma and first-of-its kind-mutations in the PTPN1 gene,” said study author Christian Steidl, MD, of the University of British Columbia in Vancouver.

To discover these mutations, Dr Steidl and his colleagues sequenced samples from 77 PMBCL patients and 3 PMBCL-derived cell lines. The team found mutations in 2 negative regulators of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway—SOCS1 and PTPN1.

As SOCS1 is already well-characterized, the researchers decided to focus on PTPN1. They identified PTPN1 mutations in 22% (17/77) of PMBCL cases and 33% (1/3) of the PMBCL-derived cell lines.

Because classical HL is closely related to PMBCL, the investigators also screened 30 samples from HL patients and 9 HL-derived cell lines. PTPN1 mutations were present in 20% (6/30) of the samples and 67% (6/9) of the cell lines.

In all, the team identified 18 (60%) missense mutations, 4 (13.3%) frameshift mutations, 3 (10%) single-amino acid deletions, 4 (13.3%) nonsense mutations, and 1 (3.3%) promoter mutation.

The researchers also discovered that PTPN1 mutations were significantly associated with diminished PTP1B expression in patient samples. However, they said future studies will need to confirm whether PTP1B immunohistochemistry can be used as a surrogate for PTPN1 mutations.

Another key finding was that PTPN1 mutations led to reduced phosphatase activity and increased phosphorylation of JAK-STAT pathway members.

When the investigators silenced PTPN1 in the HL cell line KM-H2, they observed hyperphosphorylation and overexpression of downstream oncogenic targets—STAT3, STAT5, STAT6, JAK1, JAK2, and AKT.

The researchers said these results suggest PTPN1 mutations drive lymphomagenesis. The mutations likely synergize with other driver mutations known to be involved in the pathogenesis of HL and PMBCL—such as SOCS1 and STAT6—and that contribute to aberrant JAK-STAT signaling.

Researcher in the lab

Credit: Rhoda Baer

Mutations in the gene PTPN1 may drive the development of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), according to a study published in Nature Genetics.

Whole-genome and whole-transcriptome sequencing revealed recurrent PTPN1 mutations in samples and cell lines of HL and PMBCL.

And experiments suggested the mutations contribute to lymphomagenesis by activating JAK-STAT signaling pathways.

“Our work identifies, for the first time, the entirety of genetic mutations in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma and first-of-its kind-mutations in the PTPN1 gene,” said study author Christian Steidl, MD, of the University of British Columbia in Vancouver.

To discover these mutations, Dr Steidl and his colleagues sequenced samples from 77 PMBCL patients and 3 PMBCL-derived cell lines. The team found mutations in 2 negative regulators of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway—SOCS1 and PTPN1.

As SOCS1 is already well-characterized, the researchers decided to focus on PTPN1. They identified PTPN1 mutations in 22% (17/77) of PMBCL cases and 33% (1/3) of the PMBCL-derived cell lines.

Because classical HL is closely related to PMBCL, the investigators also screened 30 samples from HL patients and 9 HL-derived cell lines. PTPN1 mutations were present in 20% (6/30) of the samples and 67% (6/9) of the cell lines.

In all, the team identified 18 (60%) missense mutations, 4 (13.3%) frameshift mutations, 3 (10%) single-amino acid deletions, 4 (13.3%) nonsense mutations, and 1 (3.3%) promoter mutation.

The researchers also discovered that PTPN1 mutations were significantly associated with diminished PTP1B expression in patient samples. However, they said future studies will need to confirm whether PTP1B immunohistochemistry can be used as a surrogate for PTPN1 mutations.

Another key finding was that PTPN1 mutations led to reduced phosphatase activity and increased phosphorylation of JAK-STAT pathway members.

When the investigators silenced PTPN1 in the HL cell line KM-H2, they observed hyperphosphorylation and overexpression of downstream oncogenic targets—STAT3, STAT5, STAT6, JAK1, JAK2, and AKT.

The researchers said these results suggest PTPN1 mutations drive lymphomagenesis. The mutations likely synergize with other driver mutations known to be involved in the pathogenesis of HL and PMBCL—such as SOCS1 and STAT6—and that contribute to aberrant JAK-STAT signaling.

Monoclonal antibodies

Credit: Linda Bartlett

The Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare has approved brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris) for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory, CD30+ Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) or anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL).

The approval was based on a phase 1/2 trial in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory, CD30+ HL or systemic ALCL, as well as data from two phase 2 trials—one of 102 HL patients and one of 58 patients with ALCL.

Brentuximab vedotin is an antibody-drug conjugate consisting of an anti-CD30 monoclonal antibody attached by a protease-cleavable linker to a microtubule disrupting agent, monomethyl auristatin E.

The conjugate employs a linker system designed to be stable in the bloodstream but release monomethyl auristatin E upon internalization into CD30-expressing tumor cells.

Brentuximab vedotin was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in August 2011 and gained conditional approval from Health Canada in February 2013 for the following indications:

• To treat HL patients who had failed autologous stem cell transplant (auto-SCT) or were not eligible for auto-SCT and had failed at least 2 prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimens
• To treat patients with systemic ALCL after they failed at least 1 multi-agent chemotherapy regimen.

The drug received conditional marketing authorization by the European Commission in October 2012 to treat:

• Adult patients with relapsed or refractory, systemic ALCL
• Adults with relapsed or refractory, CD30-positive HL who had undergone auto-SCT or received 2 prior therapies when auto-SCT or multi-agent chemotherapy were not appropriate.

The FDA has granted brentuximab vedotin orphan designation to treat mycosis fungoides. And trials have suggested the drug is active in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, as well as leukemias and multiple myeloma.

However, brentuximab vedotin also made the FDA watch list due to adverse events associated with the drug’s use. The FDA added a boxed warning to the drug’s label in January 2012, after 3 cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy were reported in patients receiving brentuximab vedotin.

Monoclonal antibodies

Credit: Linda Bartlett

The Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare has approved brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris) for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory, CD30+ Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) or anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL).

The approval was based on a phase 1/2 trial in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory, CD30+ HL or systemic ALCL, as well as data from two phase 2 trials—one of 102 HL patients and one of 58 patients with ALCL.

Brentuximab vedotin is an antibody-drug conjugate consisting of an anti-CD30 monoclonal antibody attached by a protease-cleavable linker to a microtubule disrupting agent, monomethyl auristatin E.

The conjugate employs a linker system designed to be stable in the bloodstream but release monomethyl auristatin E upon internalization into CD30-expressing tumor cells.

Brentuximab vedotin was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in August 2011 and gained conditional approval from Health Canada in February 2013 for the following indications:

• To treat HL patients who had failed autologous stem cell transplant (auto-SCT) or were not eligible for auto-SCT and had failed at least 2 prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimens
• To treat patients with systemic ALCL after they failed at least 1 multi-agent chemotherapy regimen.

The drug received conditional marketing authorization by the European Commission in October 2012 to treat:

• Adult patients with relapsed or refractory, systemic ALCL
• Adults with relapsed or refractory, CD30-positive HL who had undergone auto-SCT or received 2 prior therapies when auto-SCT or multi-agent chemotherapy were not appropriate.

The FDA has granted brentuximab vedotin orphan designation to treat mycosis fungoides. And trials have suggested the drug is active in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, as well as leukemias and multiple myeloma.

However, brentuximab vedotin also made the FDA watch list due to adverse events associated with the drug’s use. The FDA added a boxed warning to the drug’s label in January 2012, after 3 cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy were reported in patients receiving brentuximab vedotin.

Monoclonal antibodies

Credit: Linda Bartlett

The Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare has approved brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris) for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory, CD30+ Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) or anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL).

The approval was based on a phase 1/2 trial in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory, CD30+ HL or systemic ALCL, as well as data from two phase 2 trials—one of 102 HL patients and one of 58 patients with ALCL.

Brentuximab vedotin is an antibody-drug conjugate consisting of an anti-CD30 monoclonal antibody attached by a protease-cleavable linker to a microtubule disrupting agent, monomethyl auristatin E.

The conjugate employs a linker system designed to be stable in the bloodstream but release monomethyl auristatin E upon internalization into CD30-expressing tumor cells.

Brentuximab vedotin was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in August 2011 and gained conditional approval from Health Canada in February 2013 for the following indications:

• To treat HL patients who had failed autologous stem cell transplant (auto-SCT) or were not eligible for auto-SCT and had failed at least 2 prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimens
• To treat patients with systemic ALCL after they failed at least 1 multi-agent chemotherapy regimen.

The drug received conditional marketing authorization by the European Commission in October 2012 to treat:

• Adult patients with relapsed or refractory, systemic ALCL
• Adults with relapsed or refractory, CD30-positive HL who had undergone auto-SCT or received 2 prior therapies when auto-SCT or multi-agent chemotherapy were not appropriate.

The FDA has granted brentuximab vedotin orphan designation to treat mycosis fungoides. And trials have suggested the drug is active in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, as well as leukemias and multiple myeloma.

However, brentuximab vedotin also made the FDA watch list due to adverse events associated with the drug’s use. The FDA added a boxed warning to the drug’s label in January 2012, after 3 cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy were reported in patients receiving brentuximab vedotin.

NEW ORLEANS – When indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma becomes refractory to rituximab and alkylating agents, few therapeutic options remain. But the PI3kd inhibitor idelalisib may someday offer a new treatment choice. Dr. Ajay Gopal discusses the promising findings from a phase II trial of idelalisib, including a 57% response rate.

NEW ORLEANS – When indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma becomes refractory to rituximab and alkylating agents, few therapeutic options remain. But the PI3kd inhibitor idelalisib may someday offer a new treatment choice. Dr. Ajay Gopal discusses the promising findings from a phase II trial of idelalisib, including a 57% response rate.

NEW ORLEANS – When indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma becomes refractory to rituximab and alkylating agents, few therapeutic options remain. But the PI3kd inhibitor idelalisib may someday offer a new treatment choice. Dr. Ajay Gopal discusses the promising findings from a phase II trial of idelalisib, including a 57% response rate.

CHICAGO – Routine surveillance imaging does not improve clinical outcomes in patients with classic Hodgkin disease who are in first complete remission and it sharply increases costs, researchers reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

The team, led by Dr. Sai Ravi Pingali, retrospectively reviewed the charts of 241 adult patients who achieved a complete remission after first-line therapy.

In 68%, the treating physicians’ planned approach was routine surveillance imaging, which consisted of radiologic imaging with scans every few months, plus clinical exams and laboratory testing. In the other 32%, the planned approach was clinical surveillance, meaning that radiologic imaging was performed only if concerning signs or symptoms occurred.

The two groups had statistically indistinguishable overall survival, and in both groups, all patients experiencing relapse successfully achieved a second complete remission with salvage therapy.

In the routinely imaged group, scanning increased costs by nearly $20,000 per patient and by almost $600,000 per each relapse detected. In addition, patients were exposed to the associated radiation.

"We were unable to detect an overall survival benefit associated with routine surveillance imaging, although I have to acknowledge that our study was limited in power given the small number of deaths and relapses," commented Dr. Pingali, an oncologist with the Medical College of Wisconsin Affiliated Hospitals in Milwaukee.

"Relapses in both ... groups were effectively salvaged with autologous stem cell transplantation, arguing against a critical advantage of detection of asymptomatic relapse. Also, we need to keep in mind that the costs associated with routine surveillance imaging are significant, and it is also associated with potential risks, both in terms of radiation exposure and unnecessary work-up," he added.

"We do not feel that potential risks and costs without overall survival benefit or any other clinical benefit justify the practice of routine surveillance imaging in classical Hodgkin lymphoma patients who have achieved a complete remission after first-line therapy. We recommend that such patients be followed clinically," Dr. Pingali concluded.

Invited discussant Dr. Leo Gordon of Northwestern University in Chicago, agreed that accumulating data argue against routine imaging for surveillance in this context and noted that insurers will likely not continue to cover scans having no proven benefit. The data should prompt a revision of guidelines and reeducation of clinicians and patients, he said.

"For translational researchers and investigators and academics, I think we need to convince journal reviewers that a manuscript is acceptable if scans are not so frequent. And for industry trials, I think we need to discuss with the Food and Drug Administration the endpoint of progression-free survival and that those endpoints may not only be driven by scans but by more mundane parameters," he said—namely, the history and physical examination.

But session comoderator Dr. Gilles A. Salles of Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard, France, expressed reservations, noting that the study did not provide information on how patients were allocated to groups and the time frame of relapse.

"It may be different whether relapses occur early, in the first year, or they occur later, and that may have some implications for the surveillance," he said. "I understand that you and many others jumped over the idea that we should immediately stop. A few people may think that we need more solid data, despite the provocative and quality data that were presented, to really make this jump in clinical practice. That’s my personal opinion."

Dr. Pingali and his team retrospectively reviewed the charts of adult patients who received a new diagnosis of classical Hodgkin lymphoma between 2000 and 2010 at three institutions, achieved complete remission after first-line therapy and had at least 2 years of follow-up.

The routine surveillance imaging and clinical surveillance groups had similar demographic and disease characteristics, Dr. Pingali reported. The former were significantly more likely to have received ABVD (doxorubicin [Adriamycin], bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) and less likely to have received the Stanford V regimen as first-line therapy, and they were significantly less likely to have received radiation therapy.

With a median duration of follow-up of about 4 years, the groups did not differ significantly with respect to overall survival. "When we look at the 5-year time point, when typically the surveillance CT scans are discontinued, the curves are pretty much superimposable," he pointed out.

There were five deaths in the routine surveillance imaging group, one of which was from relapsed disease; the other deaths were from cancer, heart failure, hip fracture, and myelodysplastic syndrome. There were four deaths in the clinical surveillance group: two were from non-Hodgkin lymphoma and two from unknown causes while the patient was in confirmed remission.

All of the six patients in the routinely imaged group and all of the five patients in the clinically followed group experiencing a relapse achieved another complete remission with second-line therapy.

The mean number of scans received was 1.14 in the clinical surveillance group – usually the scan performed after first-line treatment to confirm remission, according to Dr. Pingali – and 4.25 in the routine surveillance imaging group. The ratio of scans to detected relapses was 18 vs. 124.

The extra charges incurred from scans using the routine surveillance imaging approach were $18,896/patient and $593,698/relapse.

"It is important to note that this does not include additional costs from the work-up of the false-positive scans and also the wages lost," he noted.

Dr. Pingali disclosed no relevant conflicts of interest. Dr. Gordon disclosed that he receives honoraria from Genentech and research funding from Millennium and Pharmacyclics. Dr. Salles disclosed serving as an advisor or consultant for Calistoga Pharmaceuticals, Celgene; Genentech, Janssen Pharmaceutica, and Roche. He has served as a speaker or a member of a speakers bureau and has received grants for clinical research from Celgene and Roche.

CHICAGO – Routine surveillance imaging does not improve clinical outcomes in patients with classic Hodgkin disease who are in first complete remission and it sharply increases costs, researchers reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

The team, led by Dr. Sai Ravi Pingali, retrospectively reviewed the charts of 241 adult patients who achieved a complete remission after first-line therapy.

In 68%, the treating physicians’ planned approach was routine surveillance imaging, which consisted of radiologic imaging with scans every few months, plus clinical exams and laboratory testing. In the other 32%, the planned approach was clinical surveillance, meaning that radiologic imaging was performed only if concerning signs or symptoms occurred.

The two groups had statistically indistinguishable overall survival, and in both groups, all patients experiencing relapse successfully achieved a second complete remission with salvage therapy.

In the routinely imaged group, scanning increased costs by nearly $20,000 per patient and by almost $600,000 per each relapse detected. In addition, patients were exposed to the associated radiation.

"We were unable to detect an overall survival benefit associated with routine surveillance imaging, although I have to acknowledge that our study was limited in power given the small number of deaths and relapses," commented Dr. Pingali, an oncologist with the Medical College of Wisconsin Affiliated Hospitals in Milwaukee.

"Relapses in both ... groups were effectively salvaged with autologous stem cell transplantation, arguing against a critical advantage of detection of asymptomatic relapse. Also, we need to keep in mind that the costs associated with routine surveillance imaging are significant, and it is also associated with potential risks, both in terms of radiation exposure and unnecessary work-up," he added.

"We do not feel that potential risks and costs without overall survival benefit or any other clinical benefit justify the practice of routine surveillance imaging in classical Hodgkin lymphoma patients who have achieved a complete remission after first-line therapy. We recommend that such patients be followed clinically," Dr. Pingali concluded.

Invited discussant Dr. Leo Gordon of Northwestern University in Chicago, agreed that accumulating data argue against routine imaging for surveillance in this context and noted that insurers will likely not continue to cover scans having no proven benefit. The data should prompt a revision of guidelines and reeducation of clinicians and patients, he said.

"For translational researchers and investigators and academics, I think we need to convince journal reviewers that a manuscript is acceptable if scans are not so frequent. And for industry trials, I think we need to discuss with the Food and Drug Administration the endpoint of progression-free survival and that those endpoints may not only be driven by scans but by more mundane parameters," he said—namely, the history and physical examination.

But session comoderator Dr. Gilles A. Salles of Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard, France, expressed reservations, noting that the study did not provide information on how patients were allocated to groups and the time frame of relapse.

"It may be different whether relapses occur early, in the first year, or they occur later, and that may have some implications for the surveillance," he said. "I understand that you and many others jumped over the idea that we should immediately stop. A few people may think that we need more solid data, despite the provocative and quality data that were presented, to really make this jump in clinical practice. That’s my personal opinion."

Dr. Pingali and his team retrospectively reviewed the charts of adult patients who received a new diagnosis of classical Hodgkin lymphoma between 2000 and 2010 at three institutions, achieved complete remission after first-line therapy and had at least 2 years of follow-up.

The routine surveillance imaging and clinical surveillance groups had similar demographic and disease characteristics, Dr. Pingali reported. The former were significantly more likely to have received ABVD (doxorubicin [Adriamycin], bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) and less likely to have received the Stanford V regimen as first-line therapy, and they were significantly less likely to have received radiation therapy.

With a median duration of follow-up of about 4 years, the groups did not differ significantly with respect to overall survival. "When we look at the 5-year time point, when typically the surveillance CT scans are discontinued, the curves are pretty much superimposable," he pointed out.

There were five deaths in the routine surveillance imaging group, one of which was from relapsed disease; the other deaths were from cancer, heart failure, hip fracture, and myelodysplastic syndrome. There were four deaths in the clinical surveillance group: two were from non-Hodgkin lymphoma and two from unknown causes while the patient was in confirmed remission.

All of the six patients in the routinely imaged group and all of the five patients in the clinically followed group experiencing a relapse achieved another complete remission with second-line therapy.

The mean number of scans received was 1.14 in the clinical surveillance group – usually the scan performed after first-line treatment to confirm remission, according to Dr. Pingali – and 4.25 in the routine surveillance imaging group. The ratio of scans to detected relapses was 18 vs. 124.

The extra charges incurred from scans using the routine surveillance imaging approach were $18,896/patient and $593,698/relapse.

"It is important to note that this does not include additional costs from the work-up of the false-positive scans and also the wages lost," he noted.

Dr. Pingali disclosed no relevant conflicts of interest. Dr. Gordon disclosed that he receives honoraria from Genentech and research funding from Millennium and Pharmacyclics. Dr. Salles disclosed serving as an advisor or consultant for Calistoga Pharmaceuticals, Celgene; Genentech, Janssen Pharmaceutica, and Roche. He has served as a speaker or a member of a speakers bureau and has received grants for clinical research from Celgene and Roche.

CHICAGO – Routine surveillance imaging does not improve clinical outcomes in patients with classic Hodgkin disease who are in first complete remission and it sharply increases costs, researchers reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

The team, led by Dr. Sai Ravi Pingali, retrospectively reviewed the charts of 241 adult patients who achieved a complete remission after first-line therapy.

In 68%, the treating physicians’ planned approach was routine surveillance imaging, which consisted of radiologic imaging with scans every few months, plus clinical exams and laboratory testing. In the other 32%, the planned approach was clinical surveillance, meaning that radiologic imaging was performed only if concerning signs or symptoms occurred.

The two groups had statistically indistinguishable overall survival, and in both groups, all patients experiencing relapse successfully achieved a second complete remission with salvage therapy.

In the routinely imaged group, scanning increased costs by nearly $20,000 per patient and by almost $600,000 per each relapse detected. In addition, patients were exposed to the associated radiation.

"We were unable to detect an overall survival benefit associated with routine surveillance imaging, although I have to acknowledge that our study was limited in power given the small number of deaths and relapses," commented Dr. Pingali, an oncologist with the Medical College of Wisconsin Affiliated Hospitals in Milwaukee.

"Relapses in both ... groups were effectively salvaged with autologous stem cell transplantation, arguing against a critical advantage of detection of asymptomatic relapse. Also, we need to keep in mind that the costs associated with routine surveillance imaging are significant, and it is also associated with potential risks, both in terms of radiation exposure and unnecessary work-up," he added.

"We do not feel that potential risks and costs without overall survival benefit or any other clinical benefit justify the practice of routine surveillance imaging in classical Hodgkin lymphoma patients who have achieved a complete remission after first-line therapy. We recommend that such patients be followed clinically," Dr. Pingali concluded.

Invited discussant Dr. Leo Gordon of Northwestern University in Chicago, agreed that accumulating data argue against routine imaging for surveillance in this context and noted that insurers will likely not continue to cover scans having no proven benefit. The data should prompt a revision of guidelines and reeducation of clinicians and patients, he said.

"For translational researchers and investigators and academics, I think we need to convince journal reviewers that a manuscript is acceptable if scans are not so frequent. And for industry trials, I think we need to discuss with the Food and Drug Administration the endpoint of progression-free survival and that those endpoints may not only be driven by scans but by more mundane parameters," he said—namely, the history and physical examination.

But session comoderator Dr. Gilles A. Salles of Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard, France, expressed reservations, noting that the study did not provide information on how patients were allocated to groups and the time frame of relapse.

"It may be different whether relapses occur early, in the first year, or they occur later, and that may have some implications for the surveillance," he said. "I understand that you and many others jumped over the idea that we should immediately stop. A few people may think that we need more solid data, despite the provocative and quality data that were presented, to really make this jump in clinical practice. That’s my personal opinion."

Dr. Pingali and his team retrospectively reviewed the charts of adult patients who received a new diagnosis of classical Hodgkin lymphoma between 2000 and 2010 at three institutions, achieved complete remission after first-line therapy and had at least 2 years of follow-up.

The routine surveillance imaging and clinical surveillance groups had similar demographic and disease characteristics, Dr. Pingali reported. The former were significantly more likely to have received ABVD (doxorubicin [Adriamycin], bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) and less likely to have received the Stanford V regimen as first-line therapy, and they were significantly less likely to have received radiation therapy.

With a median duration of follow-up of about 4 years, the groups did not differ significantly with respect to overall survival. "When we look at the 5-year time point, when typically the surveillance CT scans are discontinued, the curves are pretty much superimposable," he pointed out.

There were five deaths in the routine surveillance imaging group, one of which was from relapsed disease; the other deaths were from cancer, heart failure, hip fracture, and myelodysplastic syndrome. There were four deaths in the clinical surveillance group: two were from non-Hodgkin lymphoma and two from unknown causes while the patient was in confirmed remission.

All of the six patients in the routinely imaged group and all of the five patients in the clinically followed group experiencing a relapse achieved another complete remission with second-line therapy.

The mean number of scans received was 1.14 in the clinical surveillance group – usually the scan performed after first-line treatment to confirm remission, according to Dr. Pingali – and 4.25 in the routine surveillance imaging group. The ratio of scans to detected relapses was 18 vs. 124.

The extra charges incurred from scans using the routine surveillance imaging approach were $18,896/patient and $593,698/relapse.

"It is important to note that this does not include additional costs from the work-up of the false-positive scans and also the wages lost," he noted.

Dr. Pingali disclosed no relevant conflicts of interest. Dr. Gordon disclosed that he receives honoraria from Genentech and research funding from Millennium and Pharmacyclics. Dr. Salles disclosed serving as an advisor or consultant for Calistoga Pharmaceuticals, Celgene; Genentech, Janssen Pharmaceutica, and Roche. He has served as a speaker or a member of a speakers bureau and has received grants for clinical research from Celgene and Roche.

Hodgkin lymphoma cells

New York, NY —Growing evidence suggests that the potent pan-deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat (LBH589) shows promising clinical activity in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

Panobinostat targets both epigenetic and non-epigenetic oncogenic pathways and is among a group of novel antineoplastic agents that inhibit the activity of histone deacetylases, said Myron Czuczman, MD, of Roswell Park Cancer Institute in Buffalo, New York, at the Chemotherapy Foundation Symposium held November 10-13, 2009.

Panobinostat is currently under clinical investigation in a variety of solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. Promising results in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma were presented earlier in the year at the European Hematology Association annual meeting in Berlin, Germany.

Dr Czuczman updated those results from the phase 1/2 trial of Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients with a variety of advanced hematologic malignancies who were refractory to treatments. One group of patients had leukemias or high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes and another group had lymphoma or myeloma.

The patients received 2 schedules of oral panobinostat: once-a-day on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday (MWF) every week or MWF every other week. PET and CT data were evaluated for best response.

So far, 61 patients in the lymphoma and myeloma group have been treated, and 53 patients have been evaluated. The investigators have recorded 1 complete response, 10 partial responses, and 31 patients with stable disease. Of the 31 patients with stable disease, 25 patients had a decrease in tumor burden, and additional responses are likely in this group, said Dr Czuczman.

For patients in the lymphoma or myeloma group, “about three-quarters of the patients had some evidence of antitumor activity,” said Dr Czuczman.

He noted that this group has had a range of prior therapies, including surgery, radiotherapy, stem cell transplantation, and cytotoxic chemotherapy. The median number of prior chemotherapeutic regimens was 5. “These patients had limited treatment options,” he said.

Safety analysis reveals that the most common grade 3/4 adverse events with panobinostat therapy have been thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, fatigue, and anemia. The maximum tolerated dose for patients in this group is 40 mg MWF every week or 60 mg MWF every other week. “More than 60% of the patients have had dose reductions, mostly due to cytopenia, which is not surprising given their limited bone marrow reserve,” he said.

Dr Czuczman said that panobinostat was well tolerated and induced antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients. “The drug has a role in the treatment of patients with treatment-refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma and possibly in earlier stages of the disease as well,” he said.

Further updates of this ongoing study will follow, and a global phase 2 study is currently underway using panobinostat at 40 mg/day on MWF every week in patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

In addition, Dr Czuczman has started a phase 1 study in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients using panobinostat in an intrapatient dose modification program that allows patients to escalate or deescalate doses depending on their tolerance of the drug.

Hodgkin lymphoma cells

New York, NY —Growing evidence suggests that the potent pan-deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat (LBH589) shows promising clinical activity in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

Panobinostat targets both epigenetic and non-epigenetic oncogenic pathways and is among a group of novel antineoplastic agents that inhibit the activity of histone deacetylases, said Myron Czuczman, MD, of Roswell Park Cancer Institute in Buffalo, New York, at the Chemotherapy Foundation Symposium held November 10-13, 2009.

Panobinostat is currently under clinical investigation in a variety of solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. Promising results in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma were presented earlier in the year at the European Hematology Association annual meeting in Berlin, Germany.

Dr Czuczman updated those results from the phase 1/2 trial of Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients with a variety of advanced hematologic malignancies who were refractory to treatments. One group of patients had leukemias or high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes and another group had lymphoma or myeloma.

The patients received 2 schedules of oral panobinostat: once-a-day on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday (MWF) every week or MWF every other week. PET and CT data were evaluated for best response.

So far, 61 patients in the lymphoma and myeloma group have been treated, and 53 patients have been evaluated. The investigators have recorded 1 complete response, 10 partial responses, and 31 patients with stable disease. Of the 31 patients with stable disease, 25 patients had a decrease in tumor burden, and additional responses are likely in this group, said Dr Czuczman.

For patients in the lymphoma or myeloma group, “about three-quarters of the patients had some evidence of antitumor activity,” said Dr Czuczman.

He noted that this group has had a range of prior therapies, including surgery, radiotherapy, stem cell transplantation, and cytotoxic chemotherapy. The median number of prior chemotherapeutic regimens was 5. “These patients had limited treatment options,” he said.

Safety analysis reveals that the most common grade 3/4 adverse events with panobinostat therapy have been thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, fatigue, and anemia. The maximum tolerated dose for patients in this group is 40 mg MWF every week or 60 mg MWF every other week. “More than 60% of the patients have had dose reductions, mostly due to cytopenia, which is not surprising given their limited bone marrow reserve,” he said.

Dr Czuczman said that panobinostat was well tolerated and induced antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients. “The drug has a role in the treatment of patients with treatment-refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma and possibly in earlier stages of the disease as well,” he said.

Further updates of this ongoing study will follow, and a global phase 2 study is currently underway using panobinostat at 40 mg/day on MWF every week in patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

In addition, Dr Czuczman has started a phase 1 study in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients using panobinostat in an intrapatient dose modification program that allows patients to escalate or deescalate doses depending on their tolerance of the drug.

Hodgkin lymphoma cells

New York, NY —Growing evidence suggests that the potent pan-deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat (LBH589) shows promising clinical activity in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

Panobinostat targets both epigenetic and non-epigenetic oncogenic pathways and is among a group of novel antineoplastic agents that inhibit the activity of histone deacetylases, said Myron Czuczman, MD, of Roswell Park Cancer Institute in Buffalo, New York, at the Chemotherapy Foundation Symposium held November 10-13, 2009.

Panobinostat is currently under clinical investigation in a variety of solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. Promising results in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma were presented earlier in the year at the European Hematology Association annual meeting in Berlin, Germany.

Dr Czuczman updated those results from the phase 1/2 trial of Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients with a variety of advanced hematologic malignancies who were refractory to treatments. One group of patients had leukemias or high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes and another group had lymphoma or myeloma.

The patients received 2 schedules of oral panobinostat: once-a-day on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday (MWF) every week or MWF every other week. PET and CT data were evaluated for best response.

So far, 61 patients in the lymphoma and myeloma group have been treated, and 53 patients have been evaluated. The investigators have recorded 1 complete response, 10 partial responses, and 31 patients with stable disease. Of the 31 patients with stable disease, 25 patients had a decrease in tumor burden, and additional responses are likely in this group, said Dr Czuczman.

For patients in the lymphoma or myeloma group, “about three-quarters of the patients had some evidence of antitumor activity,” said Dr Czuczman.

He noted that this group has had a range of prior therapies, including surgery, radiotherapy, stem cell transplantation, and cytotoxic chemotherapy. The median number of prior chemotherapeutic regimens was 5. “These patients had limited treatment options,” he said.

Safety analysis reveals that the most common grade 3/4 adverse events with panobinostat therapy have been thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, fatigue, and anemia. The maximum tolerated dose for patients in this group is 40 mg MWF every week or 60 mg MWF every other week. “More than 60% of the patients have had dose reductions, mostly due to cytopenia, which is not surprising given their limited bone marrow reserve,” he said.

Dr Czuczman said that panobinostat was well tolerated and induced antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients. “The drug has a role in the treatment of patients with treatment-refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma and possibly in earlier stages of the disease as well,” he said.

Further updates of this ongoing study will follow, and a global phase 2 study is currently underway using panobinostat at 40 mg/day on MWF every week in patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

In addition, Dr Czuczman has started a phase 1 study in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients using panobinostat in an intrapatient dose modification program that allows patients to escalate or deescalate doses depending on their tolerance of the drug.