IBD & Intestinal Disorders

Officials at the Food and Drug Administration have issued a safety alert regarding the use of fecal microbiota for transplantation (FMT) and the risk of serious adverse reactions because of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs).

According to the alert, which was issued on June 13, 2019, the agency became aware of two immunocompromised adult patients who received investigational FMT and developed infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (EBSL)–producing Escherichia coli. One of the patients died.

“This is certainly a theoretical risk that we’ve known about,” Lea Ann Chen, MD, a gastroenterologist at New York University, said in an interview. “This announcement is important, because we probably don’t counsel patients specifically about this risk. We say there is a risk for transmission of infectious agents in general, but I think that probably very few counsel patients about a risk for transmission of MDROs.”

The donor stool and FMT used in the two patients were not tested for ESBL-producing gram-negative organisms prior to use. As a result of these serious adverse reactions, the FDA has determined that certain donor screening and stool testing protections are needed for any investigational use of FMT. On June 18, the agency released an additional statement, which stipulated that all Investigational New Drug (IND) holders must implement the following new requirements no later than July 15, 2019:

“1. Donor screening must include questions that specifically address risk factors for colonization with MDROs, and individuals at higher risk of colonization with MDROs must be excluded from donation. Examples of persons at higher risk for colonization with MDROs include:

a. Health care workers

b. Persons who have recently been hospitalized or discharged from long-term care facilities

c. Persons who regularly attend outpatient medical or surgical clinics

d. Persons who have recently engaged in medical tourism

2. FMT donor stool testing must include MDRO testing to exclude use of stool that tests positive for MDRO. The MDRO tests should at minimum include extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Culture of nasal or perirectal swabs is an acceptable alternative to stool testing for MRSA only. Bookend testing (no more than 60 days apart) before and after multiple stool donations is acceptable if stool samples are quarantined until the post-donation MDRO tests are confirmed negative.

3. All FMT products currently in storage for which the donor has not undergone screening and stool testing for MDROs as described above must be placed in quarantine until such time as the donor is confirmed to be not at increased risk of MDRO carriage and the FMT products have been tested and found negative. In the case of FMT products manufactured using pooled donations from a single donor, stored samples of the individual donations prior to pooling must be tested before the FMT products can be administered to subjects.

4.The informed consent process for subjects being treated with FMT product under your IND going forward should describe the risks of MDRO transmission and invasive infection as well as the measures implemented for donor screening and stool testing.”

On June 14, the American Gastroenterological Association sent a communication about the FDA alert to its members, which stated that the AGA “is committed to advancing applications of the gut microbiome. Our top priority is ensuring patient safety from microbiome-based therapeutics, such as FMT. Through the AGA FMT National Registry, AGA is working with physicians and patients to track FMT usage, patient outcomes and adverse events. Associated with the registry is a biorepository of donor and patient stool samples, which will allow further investigation of unexpected events such as those described in FDA’s safety alert.”

Dr. Chen, who received the AGA Research Foundation’s 2016 Research Scholar Award for her work on the gut microbiome and inflammatory bowel disease, pointed out that FMT has also been studied as a way to prevent colonization and infection with certain drug resistant organisms, such as VRE.

“Therefore, it’s not that FMT is ‘bad;’ we just have to be more diligent about optimizing the safety of the procedure by screening for of multidrug-resistant organisms,” she said. “We also need to study the use of FMT more, so that we can fully understand the risks associated with the procedure. It’s an important and potentially lifesaving procedure for some, but it’s important that everyone go into the procedure understanding fully what the risks and benefits are.”

Suspected adverse events related to the administration of FMT products can be reported to the FDA at 1-800-332-1088 or via MedWatch.

[email protected]

Officials at the Food and Drug Administration have issued a safety alert regarding the use of fecal microbiota for transplantation (FMT) and the risk of serious adverse reactions because of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs).

According to the alert, which was issued on June 13, 2019, the agency became aware of two immunocompromised adult patients who received investigational FMT and developed infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (EBSL)–producing Escherichia coli. One of the patients died.

“This is certainly a theoretical risk that we’ve known about,” Lea Ann Chen, MD, a gastroenterologist at New York University, said in an interview. “This announcement is important, because we probably don’t counsel patients specifically about this risk. We say there is a risk for transmission of infectious agents in general, but I think that probably very few counsel patients about a risk for transmission of MDROs.”

The donor stool and FMT used in the two patients were not tested for ESBL-producing gram-negative organisms prior to use. As a result of these serious adverse reactions, the FDA has determined that certain donor screening and stool testing protections are needed for any investigational use of FMT. On June 18, the agency released an additional statement, which stipulated that all Investigational New Drug (IND) holders must implement the following new requirements no later than July 15, 2019:

“1. Donor screening must include questions that specifically address risk factors for colonization with MDROs, and individuals at higher risk of colonization with MDROs must be excluded from donation. Examples of persons at higher risk for colonization with MDROs include:

a. Health care workers

b. Persons who have recently been hospitalized or discharged from long-term care facilities

c. Persons who regularly attend outpatient medical or surgical clinics

d. Persons who have recently engaged in medical tourism

2. FMT donor stool testing must include MDRO testing to exclude use of stool that tests positive for MDRO. The MDRO tests should at minimum include extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Culture of nasal or perirectal swabs is an acceptable alternative to stool testing for MRSA only. Bookend testing (no more than 60 days apart) before and after multiple stool donations is acceptable if stool samples are quarantined until the post-donation MDRO tests are confirmed negative.

3. All FMT products currently in storage for which the donor has not undergone screening and stool testing for MDROs as described above must be placed in quarantine until such time as the donor is confirmed to be not at increased risk of MDRO carriage and the FMT products have been tested and found negative. In the case of FMT products manufactured using pooled donations from a single donor, stored samples of the individual donations prior to pooling must be tested before the FMT products can be administered to subjects.

4.The informed consent process for subjects being treated with FMT product under your IND going forward should describe the risks of MDRO transmission and invasive infection as well as the measures implemented for donor screening and stool testing.”

On June 14, the American Gastroenterological Association sent a communication about the FDA alert to its members, which stated that the AGA “is committed to advancing applications of the gut microbiome. Our top priority is ensuring patient safety from microbiome-based therapeutics, such as FMT. Through the AGA FMT National Registry, AGA is working with physicians and patients to track FMT usage, patient outcomes and adverse events. Associated with the registry is a biorepository of donor and patient stool samples, which will allow further investigation of unexpected events such as those described in FDA’s safety alert.”

Dr. Chen, who received the AGA Research Foundation’s 2016 Research Scholar Award for her work on the gut microbiome and inflammatory bowel disease, pointed out that FMT has also been studied as a way to prevent colonization and infection with certain drug resistant organisms, such as VRE.

“Therefore, it’s not that FMT is ‘bad;’ we just have to be more diligent about optimizing the safety of the procedure by screening for of multidrug-resistant organisms,” she said. “We also need to study the use of FMT more, so that we can fully understand the risks associated with the procedure. It’s an important and potentially lifesaving procedure for some, but it’s important that everyone go into the procedure understanding fully what the risks and benefits are.”

Suspected adverse events related to the administration of FMT products can be reported to the FDA at 1-800-332-1088 or via MedWatch.

[email protected]

Officials at the Food and Drug Administration have issued a safety alert regarding the use of fecal microbiota for transplantation (FMT) and the risk of serious adverse reactions because of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs).

According to the alert, which was issued on June 13, 2019, the agency became aware of two immunocompromised adult patients who received investigational FMT and developed infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (EBSL)–producing Escherichia coli. One of the patients died.

“This is certainly a theoretical risk that we’ve known about,” Lea Ann Chen, MD, a gastroenterologist at New York University, said in an interview. “This announcement is important, because we probably don’t counsel patients specifically about this risk. We say there is a risk for transmission of infectious agents in general, but I think that probably very few counsel patients about a risk for transmission of MDROs.”

The donor stool and FMT used in the two patients were not tested for ESBL-producing gram-negative organisms prior to use. As a result of these serious adverse reactions, the FDA has determined that certain donor screening and stool testing protections are needed for any investigational use of FMT. On June 18, the agency released an additional statement, which stipulated that all Investigational New Drug (IND) holders must implement the following new requirements no later than July 15, 2019:

“1. Donor screening must include questions that specifically address risk factors for colonization with MDROs, and individuals at higher risk of colonization with MDROs must be excluded from donation. Examples of persons at higher risk for colonization with MDROs include:

a. Health care workers

b. Persons who have recently been hospitalized or discharged from long-term care facilities

c. Persons who regularly attend outpatient medical or surgical clinics

d. Persons who have recently engaged in medical tourism

2. FMT donor stool testing must include MDRO testing to exclude use of stool that tests positive for MDRO. The MDRO tests should at minimum include extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Culture of nasal or perirectal swabs is an acceptable alternative to stool testing for MRSA only. Bookend testing (no more than 60 days apart) before and after multiple stool donations is acceptable if stool samples are quarantined until the post-donation MDRO tests are confirmed negative.

3. All FMT products currently in storage for which the donor has not undergone screening and stool testing for MDROs as described above must be placed in quarantine until such time as the donor is confirmed to be not at increased risk of MDRO carriage and the FMT products have been tested and found negative. In the case of FMT products manufactured using pooled donations from a single donor, stored samples of the individual donations prior to pooling must be tested before the FMT products can be administered to subjects.

4.The informed consent process for subjects being treated with FMT product under your IND going forward should describe the risks of MDRO transmission and invasive infection as well as the measures implemented for donor screening and stool testing.”

On June 14, the American Gastroenterological Association sent a communication about the FDA alert to its members, which stated that the AGA “is committed to advancing applications of the gut microbiome. Our top priority is ensuring patient safety from microbiome-based therapeutics, such as FMT. Through the AGA FMT National Registry, AGA is working with physicians and patients to track FMT usage, patient outcomes and adverse events. Associated with the registry is a biorepository of donor and patient stool samples, which will allow further investigation of unexpected events such as those described in FDA’s safety alert.”

Dr. Chen, who received the AGA Research Foundation’s 2016 Research Scholar Award for her work on the gut microbiome and inflammatory bowel disease, pointed out that FMT has also been studied as a way to prevent colonization and infection with certain drug resistant organisms, such as VRE.

“Therefore, it’s not that FMT is ‘bad;’ we just have to be more diligent about optimizing the safety of the procedure by screening for of multidrug-resistant organisms,” she said. “We also need to study the use of FMT more, so that we can fully understand the risks associated with the procedure. It’s an important and potentially lifesaving procedure for some, but it’s important that everyone go into the procedure understanding fully what the risks and benefits are.”

Suspected adverse events related to the administration of FMT products can be reported to the FDA at 1-800-332-1088 or via MedWatch.

[email protected]

SAN DIEGO – For patients with acute gastroenteritis, multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR)–based gastrointestinal pathogen testing was associated with lower resource utilization and less antibiotic prescribing, compared with conventional stool culture methods. However, antibiotics were still prescribed for more than one in three patients tested by any method.

“A positive test by any modality did result in decreased utilization of endoscopy, radiology, and antibiotic prescribing, but this effect appeared to be much greater for the GI PCR assay,” said Jordan Axelrad, MD, speaking at the annual Digestive Disease Week.

“Overall, patients who received GI PCR were 12% less likely to undergo endoscopy, 7% less likely to undergo abdominal radiography, and 11% less likely to be prescribed any antibiotic,” compared with patients who were tested by conventional stool culture, said Dr. Axelrad, a gastroenterologist at New York University.

In a cross-sectional study, Dr. Axelrad and his coauthors looked at patients who underwent stool testing for the 26 months before (n = 5,986) and after (n = 9,402) March 2015, when Dr. Axelrad’s home institution switched from conventional stool culture to the GI PCR panel. For the earlier time period, the investigators included patients who received stool culture both with and without an ova and parasites exam, as well as those who underwent enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay viral testing for rotavirus and adenovirus.

Patient demographic data were included as study variables; additionally, the study tracked utilization of endoscopy, abdominal, or other radiology studies, and ED visits for 30 days after testing. They also included any antibiotic prescribing within the 14 days post testing.

Roughly one-third of patients were tested as outpatients, 1 in 10 in the ED, and the remainder as inpatients. Patient age was a mean 46.7 years for the culture group, and 45.5 years for the GI PCR group.

The multiplex PCR test used in the study tested for 12 gastrointestinal pathogenic bacteria, 4 parasites, and 5 viruses.

As expected, PCR testing yielded a higher positive test rate than conventional stool testing, even when EIA tests were included (29.2% vs. 4.1%). In the 2,746 patients with a positive GI PCR test, a total of 3,804 pathogens were identified. Adenovirus accounted for 39% of these positive results. Positive bacterial results were seen in about 65.0% of the positive subgroup, with Escherichia coli subtypes seen in 51.7% of the positive tests.

Overall, positive results for viruses, bacteria, and multiple pathogens were more likely with GI PCR testing, compared with conventional testing (P = .001 for all). Parasites accounted for only 8.2% of the positive PCR test results, but this was significantly more than the 3.7% seen with conventional testing (P = .011).

At the 14-day mark post testing, “Patients who underwent a GI panel were less likely to be prescribed any antibiotic. But overall, antibiotics were fairly common in both groups,” said Dr. Axelrad, noting that 41% of patients who underwent stool culture received an antibiotic by 14 days, compared with 36% for patients who underwent a GI PCR panel (P = .001).

By the end of 30 days, most patients in each group had not received an endoscopic procedure, with significantly more procedure-free patients in the PCR group (91.6% vs. 90.4%; P = .008).

Against a backdrop of slightly higher overall radiology utilization in the PCR group – potentially attributable to practice trends over time – abdominal radiology was less likely for these patients than for the culture group (11.4% vs. 12.8%; P = .011).

The 30-day ED visit rate was low and similar between groups (11.4% for PCR vs. 12.8% for culture; P = .116).

The much quicker turnaround for the GI PCR panel didn’t translate into a shorter length of stay, though: Inpatient length of stay was a median 5 days in both groups.

“We feel that the outcomes that we noted were likely due to the increased sensitivity and specificity” of the PCR-based testing, said Dr. Axelrad. “Obviously, if you have more pathogen-positive findings, you may be less likely to order extensive testing. And if you’ve identified something like norovirus, you may feel reassured, and not order further testing.”

Dr. Axelrad pointed out that his institution’s overall PCR positivity rates were lower than the 70% rates some other studies have reported. “We feel that, given our large sample size, our results may more accurately reflect clinical practice, and perhaps that lower positivity rate may reflect increased use of this test in an inpatient setting,” he said. “We’re looking at that.”

Study limitations included the retrospective nature of the study. “Also, as we all know, PCR testing fails to discriminate between active infection and asymptomatic colonization,” raising questions about whether a positive PCR test really indicates true infection, noted Dr. Axelrad.

“Coupled with a high-sensitivity rapid turnaround, there’s the potential to reduce costs, but the cost-effectiveness of these assays has not been fully determined. There are several studies looking at this,” with results still to come, he said.

The notable reduction in antibiotic prescribing for those patients who received PCR-based testing means that GI PCR panels could be a useful tool to promote antibiotic stewardship, though Dr. Axelrad also noted that “antibiotics were still used in about a third of all patients.”

Dr. Axelrad reported no outside sources of funding. He has performed consulting services for and received research funding from BioFire, which manufactured the GI PCR assay used in the study, but BioFire did not fund this research.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Axelrad J et al. DDW 2019, Presentation 978.

SAN DIEGO – For patients with acute gastroenteritis, multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR)–based gastrointestinal pathogen testing was associated with lower resource utilization and less antibiotic prescribing, compared with conventional stool culture methods. However, antibiotics were still prescribed for more than one in three patients tested by any method.

“A positive test by any modality did result in decreased utilization of endoscopy, radiology, and antibiotic prescribing, but this effect appeared to be much greater for the GI PCR assay,” said Jordan Axelrad, MD, speaking at the annual Digestive Disease Week.

“Overall, patients who received GI PCR were 12% less likely to undergo endoscopy, 7% less likely to undergo abdominal radiography, and 11% less likely to be prescribed any antibiotic,” compared with patients who were tested by conventional stool culture, said Dr. Axelrad, a gastroenterologist at New York University.

In a cross-sectional study, Dr. Axelrad and his coauthors looked at patients who underwent stool testing for the 26 months before (n = 5,986) and after (n = 9,402) March 2015, when Dr. Axelrad’s home institution switched from conventional stool culture to the GI PCR panel. For the earlier time period, the investigators included patients who received stool culture both with and without an ova and parasites exam, as well as those who underwent enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay viral testing for rotavirus and adenovirus.

Patient demographic data were included as study variables; additionally, the study tracked utilization of endoscopy, abdominal, or other radiology studies, and ED visits for 30 days after testing. They also included any antibiotic prescribing within the 14 days post testing.

Roughly one-third of patients were tested as outpatients, 1 in 10 in the ED, and the remainder as inpatients. Patient age was a mean 46.7 years for the culture group, and 45.5 years for the GI PCR group.

The multiplex PCR test used in the study tested for 12 gastrointestinal pathogenic bacteria, 4 parasites, and 5 viruses.

As expected, PCR testing yielded a higher positive test rate than conventional stool testing, even when EIA tests were included (29.2% vs. 4.1%). In the 2,746 patients with a positive GI PCR test, a total of 3,804 pathogens were identified. Adenovirus accounted for 39% of these positive results. Positive bacterial results were seen in about 65.0% of the positive subgroup, with Escherichia coli subtypes seen in 51.7% of the positive tests.

Overall, positive results for viruses, bacteria, and multiple pathogens were more likely with GI PCR testing, compared with conventional testing (P = .001 for all). Parasites accounted for only 8.2% of the positive PCR test results, but this was significantly more than the 3.7% seen with conventional testing (P = .011).

At the 14-day mark post testing, “Patients who underwent a GI panel were less likely to be prescribed any antibiotic. But overall, antibiotics were fairly common in both groups,” said Dr. Axelrad, noting that 41% of patients who underwent stool culture received an antibiotic by 14 days, compared with 36% for patients who underwent a GI PCR panel (P = .001).

By the end of 30 days, most patients in each group had not received an endoscopic procedure, with significantly more procedure-free patients in the PCR group (91.6% vs. 90.4%; P = .008).

Against a backdrop of slightly higher overall radiology utilization in the PCR group – potentially attributable to practice trends over time – abdominal radiology was less likely for these patients than for the culture group (11.4% vs. 12.8%; P = .011).

The 30-day ED visit rate was low and similar between groups (11.4% for PCR vs. 12.8% for culture; P = .116).

The much quicker turnaround for the GI PCR panel didn’t translate into a shorter length of stay, though: Inpatient length of stay was a median 5 days in both groups.

“We feel that the outcomes that we noted were likely due to the increased sensitivity and specificity” of the PCR-based testing, said Dr. Axelrad. “Obviously, if you have more pathogen-positive findings, you may be less likely to order extensive testing. And if you’ve identified something like norovirus, you may feel reassured, and not order further testing.”

Dr. Axelrad pointed out that his institution’s overall PCR positivity rates were lower than the 70% rates some other studies have reported. “We feel that, given our large sample size, our results may more accurately reflect clinical practice, and perhaps that lower positivity rate may reflect increased use of this test in an inpatient setting,” he said. “We’re looking at that.”

Study limitations included the retrospective nature of the study. “Also, as we all know, PCR testing fails to discriminate between active infection and asymptomatic colonization,” raising questions about whether a positive PCR test really indicates true infection, noted Dr. Axelrad.

“Coupled with a high-sensitivity rapid turnaround, there’s the potential to reduce costs, but the cost-effectiveness of these assays has not been fully determined. There are several studies looking at this,” with results still to come, he said.

The notable reduction in antibiotic prescribing for those patients who received PCR-based testing means that GI PCR panels could be a useful tool to promote antibiotic stewardship, though Dr. Axelrad also noted that “antibiotics were still used in about a third of all patients.”

Dr. Axelrad reported no outside sources of funding. He has performed consulting services for and received research funding from BioFire, which manufactured the GI PCR assay used in the study, but BioFire did not fund this research.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Axelrad J et al. DDW 2019, Presentation 978.

SAN DIEGO – For patients with acute gastroenteritis, multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR)–based gastrointestinal pathogen testing was associated with lower resource utilization and less antibiotic prescribing, compared with conventional stool culture methods. However, antibiotics were still prescribed for more than one in three patients tested by any method.

“A positive test by any modality did result in decreased utilization of endoscopy, radiology, and antibiotic prescribing, but this effect appeared to be much greater for the GI PCR assay,” said Jordan Axelrad, MD, speaking at the annual Digestive Disease Week.

“Overall, patients who received GI PCR were 12% less likely to undergo endoscopy, 7% less likely to undergo abdominal radiography, and 11% less likely to be prescribed any antibiotic,” compared with patients who were tested by conventional stool culture, said Dr. Axelrad, a gastroenterologist at New York University.

In a cross-sectional study, Dr. Axelrad and his coauthors looked at patients who underwent stool testing for the 26 months before (n = 5,986) and after (n = 9,402) March 2015, when Dr. Axelrad’s home institution switched from conventional stool culture to the GI PCR panel. For the earlier time period, the investigators included patients who received stool culture both with and without an ova and parasites exam, as well as those who underwent enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay viral testing for rotavirus and adenovirus.

Patient demographic data were included as study variables; additionally, the study tracked utilization of endoscopy, abdominal, or other radiology studies, and ED visits for 30 days after testing. They also included any antibiotic prescribing within the 14 days post testing.

Roughly one-third of patients were tested as outpatients, 1 in 10 in the ED, and the remainder as inpatients. Patient age was a mean 46.7 years for the culture group, and 45.5 years for the GI PCR group.

The multiplex PCR test used in the study tested for 12 gastrointestinal pathogenic bacteria, 4 parasites, and 5 viruses.

As expected, PCR testing yielded a higher positive test rate than conventional stool testing, even when EIA tests were included (29.2% vs. 4.1%). In the 2,746 patients with a positive GI PCR test, a total of 3,804 pathogens were identified. Adenovirus accounted for 39% of these positive results. Positive bacterial results were seen in about 65.0% of the positive subgroup, with Escherichia coli subtypes seen in 51.7% of the positive tests.

Overall, positive results for viruses, bacteria, and multiple pathogens were more likely with GI PCR testing, compared with conventional testing (P = .001 for all). Parasites accounted for only 8.2% of the positive PCR test results, but this was significantly more than the 3.7% seen with conventional testing (P = .011).

At the 14-day mark post testing, “Patients who underwent a GI panel were less likely to be prescribed any antibiotic. But overall, antibiotics were fairly common in both groups,” said Dr. Axelrad, noting that 41% of patients who underwent stool culture received an antibiotic by 14 days, compared with 36% for patients who underwent a GI PCR panel (P = .001).

By the end of 30 days, most patients in each group had not received an endoscopic procedure, with significantly more procedure-free patients in the PCR group (91.6% vs. 90.4%; P = .008).

Against a backdrop of slightly higher overall radiology utilization in the PCR group – potentially attributable to practice trends over time – abdominal radiology was less likely for these patients than for the culture group (11.4% vs. 12.8%; P = .011).

The 30-day ED visit rate was low and similar between groups (11.4% for PCR vs. 12.8% for culture; P = .116).

The much quicker turnaround for the GI PCR panel didn’t translate into a shorter length of stay, though: Inpatient length of stay was a median 5 days in both groups.

“We feel that the outcomes that we noted were likely due to the increased sensitivity and specificity” of the PCR-based testing, said Dr. Axelrad. “Obviously, if you have more pathogen-positive findings, you may be less likely to order extensive testing. And if you’ve identified something like norovirus, you may feel reassured, and not order further testing.”

Dr. Axelrad pointed out that his institution’s overall PCR positivity rates were lower than the 70% rates some other studies have reported. “We feel that, given our large sample size, our results may more accurately reflect clinical practice, and perhaps that lower positivity rate may reflect increased use of this test in an inpatient setting,” he said. “We’re looking at that.”

Study limitations included the retrospective nature of the study. “Also, as we all know, PCR testing fails to discriminate between active infection and asymptomatic colonization,” raising questions about whether a positive PCR test really indicates true infection, noted Dr. Axelrad.

“Coupled with a high-sensitivity rapid turnaround, there’s the potential to reduce costs, but the cost-effectiveness of these assays has not been fully determined. There are several studies looking at this,” with results still to come, he said.

The notable reduction in antibiotic prescribing for those patients who received PCR-based testing means that GI PCR panels could be a useful tool to promote antibiotic stewardship, though Dr. Axelrad also noted that “antibiotics were still used in about a third of all patients.”

Dr. Axelrad reported no outside sources of funding. He has performed consulting services for and received research funding from BioFire, which manufactured the GI PCR assay used in the study, but BioFire did not fund this research.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Axelrad J et al. DDW 2019, Presentation 978.

SAN DIEGO – A novel oral drug for inflammatory bowel disease showed good safety and efficacy data in preliminary clinical trial results.

Among a group of 32 patients with ulcerative colitis, the investigative drug ABX464 showed a decrease in Mayo score of over 50% and a drop in fecal calprotectin to near-normal levels. The safety profile was reassuring, and results were durable at the 9-month mark.

Coauthor Jean-Marc Steens, MD, presented results of the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2a study at the annual Digestive Disease Week^®, and noted that ABX464 is also being investigated as antiviral therapy for individuals with HIV/AIDS.

“Despite the major advances in the last 10 years with the introduction of biologics and [Janus kinase] inhibitors, there is still a huge unmet medical need for these patients,” said Dr. Steens, chief medical officer of Abivax (Paris), in an interview. “Large phase 3 studies with these recent drugs have shown that about two-thirds of the patients show a clinical response during induction, but that half of these responders will lose their response within the next 6-12 months. The safety profile of these drugs also includes severe infections, which is a major concern,” he said.

Dr. Steens presented the findings on behalf of first author Severine Vermeire, MD, chair of the department of chronic diseases, metabolism, and aging at Catholic University, Leuven, Belgium.

ABX464, a small-molecule oral medication, has been evaluated for safety among more than 180 patients with HIV as well as the patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) studied in the current trial. The drug increases expression of the microRNA precursor miR-124, with the result that “the inflammatory brake is applied,” explained Dr. Steens.

In the present study, whose primary outcome was safety, 23 patients with moderate to severe active UC were randomized to ABX464 50 mg once daily, and 9 to placebo. Patients were included if they had failed or were intolerant to immunomodulators, anti–tumor necrosis factor–alpha therapies, vedolizumab, or corticosteroids; the two groups had balanced disease and demographic characteristics. At baseline, patients had a total Mayo score of 6-12, and an endoscopic subscore of 2 or 3.

Three patients withdrew from the ABX464 arm by the end of 8 weeks: one because of adverse events (AEs), one withdrew consent, and the third declined to undergo endoscopy at the 8-week mark.

All treatment-emergent AEs were mild or moderate, with gastrointestinal disorders occurring in eight of the ABX464 patients and two placebo patients (34.8% and 22.2%, respectively.) Five ABX-464 patients (21.7%) experienced nervous system symptoms – mostly headaches, said Dr. Steens. No patients in the placebo arm had headache or other neurological AEs.

By the end of 8 weeks, 30% of the intention-to-treat ABX464 group was in clinical remission, compared with 11% of the placebo group; this was not a statistically significant difference (P = .16). The proportion of ABX464 patients who had a clinical response just missed statistical significance, compared with placebo (61% versus 33%; P = 06).

However, significant endoscopic improvement was seen in the ABX464 arm, with 43% having a Mayo endoscopy subscore of 0 or 1, compared with 11% in the placebo arm (P = .03).

The total Mayo score dropped by 53% in the ABX464 group, compared with 27% in the placebo group (P = .03); a partial Mayo score dropped by 62% for those in the active arm, compared with 32% in the placebo arm (P = .02).

“The major finding from the induction study was that all endpoints were going in the same direction in favor of ABX464, even reaching statistical significance for endoscopy as well, and total and partial Mayo score,” said Dr. Steens.

Patients underwent rectal biopsies at the end of 8 weeks, and miR-124 expression increased more than sevenfold from baseline for those taking ABX464, compared with a small increase in the placebo group (7.69- versus 1.46-fold; P = .004). Expression of miR-124 in total blood also increased – by over 800-fold – at study day 28 for the ABX464 arm. Levels were sustained at more than 700-fold at study day 56 in this group. Placebo arm participants saw an insignificant rise in miR-124 blood levels.

Dr. Steens reported that 22 patients, including 7 who had originally been placebo arm participants, continued into the maintenance phase of the study. Nineteen patients have now had a median of over 400 days of exposure to ABX464, with sustained significant improvement in partial Mayo scores from a baseline of 6 to scores below 2 at 6 and 9 months. Fecal calprotectin scores have dropped from a median 1,044 mcg/g at baseline to 23.5 mcg/g at 9 months.

Next steps include the 12-month assessment, which includes another endoscopy, said Dr. Steens. Also, a phase 2b study is seeking to enroll 232 patients who have moderate to severe ulcerative colitis, with room within the enrollment scheme for new study sites, said Dr. Steens. This larger study will have arms in which the current 50-mg oral dose is doubled and halved, as well as a placebo arm, he said. The medication will also be trialed for Crohn’s disease and rheumatoid arthritis.

The small sample size is an inherent limitation of this early-stage clinical trial, noted Dr. Steens.

Dr. Steens reported being an employee and holding shares in Abivax, which funded the study.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Vermeire S et al. DDW 2019, Abstract 1007.

SAN DIEGO – A novel oral drug for inflammatory bowel disease showed good safety and efficacy data in preliminary clinical trial results.

Among a group of 32 patients with ulcerative colitis, the investigative drug ABX464 showed a decrease in Mayo score of over 50% and a drop in fecal calprotectin to near-normal levels. The safety profile was reassuring, and results were durable at the 9-month mark.

Coauthor Jean-Marc Steens, MD, presented results of the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2a study at the annual Digestive Disease Week^®, and noted that ABX464 is also being investigated as antiviral therapy for individuals with HIV/AIDS.

“Despite the major advances in the last 10 years with the introduction of biologics and [Janus kinase] inhibitors, there is still a huge unmet medical need for these patients,” said Dr. Steens, chief medical officer of Abivax (Paris), in an interview. “Large phase 3 studies with these recent drugs have shown that about two-thirds of the patients show a clinical response during induction, but that half of these responders will lose their response within the next 6-12 months. The safety profile of these drugs also includes severe infections, which is a major concern,” he said.

Dr. Steens presented the findings on behalf of first author Severine Vermeire, MD, chair of the department of chronic diseases, metabolism, and aging at Catholic University, Leuven, Belgium.

ABX464, a small-molecule oral medication, has been evaluated for safety among more than 180 patients with HIV as well as the patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) studied in the current trial. The drug increases expression of the microRNA precursor miR-124, with the result that “the inflammatory brake is applied,” explained Dr. Steens.

In the present study, whose primary outcome was safety, 23 patients with moderate to severe active UC were randomized to ABX464 50 mg once daily, and 9 to placebo. Patients were included if they had failed or were intolerant to immunomodulators, anti–tumor necrosis factor–alpha therapies, vedolizumab, or corticosteroids; the two groups had balanced disease and demographic characteristics. At baseline, patients had a total Mayo score of 6-12, and an endoscopic subscore of 2 or 3.

Three patients withdrew from the ABX464 arm by the end of 8 weeks: one because of adverse events (AEs), one withdrew consent, and the third declined to undergo endoscopy at the 8-week mark.

All treatment-emergent AEs were mild or moderate, with gastrointestinal disorders occurring in eight of the ABX464 patients and two placebo patients (34.8% and 22.2%, respectively.) Five ABX-464 patients (21.7%) experienced nervous system symptoms – mostly headaches, said Dr. Steens. No patients in the placebo arm had headache or other neurological AEs.

By the end of 8 weeks, 30% of the intention-to-treat ABX464 group was in clinical remission, compared with 11% of the placebo group; this was not a statistically significant difference (P = .16). The proportion of ABX464 patients who had a clinical response just missed statistical significance, compared with placebo (61% versus 33%; P = 06).

However, significant endoscopic improvement was seen in the ABX464 arm, with 43% having a Mayo endoscopy subscore of 0 or 1, compared with 11% in the placebo arm (P = .03).

The total Mayo score dropped by 53% in the ABX464 group, compared with 27% in the placebo group (P = .03); a partial Mayo score dropped by 62% for those in the active arm, compared with 32% in the placebo arm (P = .02).

“The major finding from the induction study was that all endpoints were going in the same direction in favor of ABX464, even reaching statistical significance for endoscopy as well, and total and partial Mayo score,” said Dr. Steens.

Patients underwent rectal biopsies at the end of 8 weeks, and miR-124 expression increased more than sevenfold from baseline for those taking ABX464, compared with a small increase in the placebo group (7.69- versus 1.46-fold; P = .004). Expression of miR-124 in total blood also increased – by over 800-fold – at study day 28 for the ABX464 arm. Levels were sustained at more than 700-fold at study day 56 in this group. Placebo arm participants saw an insignificant rise in miR-124 blood levels.

Dr. Steens reported that 22 patients, including 7 who had originally been placebo arm participants, continued into the maintenance phase of the study. Nineteen patients have now had a median of over 400 days of exposure to ABX464, with sustained significant improvement in partial Mayo scores from a baseline of 6 to scores below 2 at 6 and 9 months. Fecal calprotectin scores have dropped from a median 1,044 mcg/g at baseline to 23.5 mcg/g at 9 months.

Next steps include the 12-month assessment, which includes another endoscopy, said Dr. Steens. Also, a phase 2b study is seeking to enroll 232 patients who have moderate to severe ulcerative colitis, with room within the enrollment scheme for new study sites, said Dr. Steens. This larger study will have arms in which the current 50-mg oral dose is doubled and halved, as well as a placebo arm, he said. The medication will also be trialed for Crohn’s disease and rheumatoid arthritis.

The small sample size is an inherent limitation of this early-stage clinical trial, noted Dr. Steens.

Dr. Steens reported being an employee and holding shares in Abivax, which funded the study.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Vermeire S et al. DDW 2019, Abstract 1007.

SAN DIEGO – A novel oral drug for inflammatory bowel disease showed good safety and efficacy data in preliminary clinical trial results.

Among a group of 32 patients with ulcerative colitis, the investigative drug ABX464 showed a decrease in Mayo score of over 50% and a drop in fecal calprotectin to near-normal levels. The safety profile was reassuring, and results were durable at the 9-month mark.

Coauthor Jean-Marc Steens, MD, presented results of the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2a study at the annual Digestive Disease Week^®, and noted that ABX464 is also being investigated as antiviral therapy for individuals with HIV/AIDS.

“Despite the major advances in the last 10 years with the introduction of biologics and [Janus kinase] inhibitors, there is still a huge unmet medical need for these patients,” said Dr. Steens, chief medical officer of Abivax (Paris), in an interview. “Large phase 3 studies with these recent drugs have shown that about two-thirds of the patients show a clinical response during induction, but that half of these responders will lose their response within the next 6-12 months. The safety profile of these drugs also includes severe infections, which is a major concern,” he said.

Dr. Steens presented the findings on behalf of first author Severine Vermeire, MD, chair of the department of chronic diseases, metabolism, and aging at Catholic University, Leuven, Belgium.

ABX464, a small-molecule oral medication, has been evaluated for safety among more than 180 patients with HIV as well as the patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) studied in the current trial. The drug increases expression of the microRNA precursor miR-124, with the result that “the inflammatory brake is applied,” explained Dr. Steens.

In the present study, whose primary outcome was safety, 23 patients with moderate to severe active UC were randomized to ABX464 50 mg once daily, and 9 to placebo. Patients were included if they had failed or were intolerant to immunomodulators, anti–tumor necrosis factor–alpha therapies, vedolizumab, or corticosteroids; the two groups had balanced disease and demographic characteristics. At baseline, patients had a total Mayo score of 6-12, and an endoscopic subscore of 2 or 3.

Three patients withdrew from the ABX464 arm by the end of 8 weeks: one because of adverse events (AEs), one withdrew consent, and the third declined to undergo endoscopy at the 8-week mark.

All treatment-emergent AEs were mild or moderate, with gastrointestinal disorders occurring in eight of the ABX464 patients and two placebo patients (34.8% and 22.2%, respectively.) Five ABX-464 patients (21.7%) experienced nervous system symptoms – mostly headaches, said Dr. Steens. No patients in the placebo arm had headache or other neurological AEs.

By the end of 8 weeks, 30% of the intention-to-treat ABX464 group was in clinical remission, compared with 11% of the placebo group; this was not a statistically significant difference (P = .16). The proportion of ABX464 patients who had a clinical response just missed statistical significance, compared with placebo (61% versus 33%; P = 06).

However, significant endoscopic improvement was seen in the ABX464 arm, with 43% having a Mayo endoscopy subscore of 0 or 1, compared with 11% in the placebo arm (P = .03).

The total Mayo score dropped by 53% in the ABX464 group, compared with 27% in the placebo group (P = .03); a partial Mayo score dropped by 62% for those in the active arm, compared with 32% in the placebo arm (P = .02).

“The major finding from the induction study was that all endpoints were going in the same direction in favor of ABX464, even reaching statistical significance for endoscopy as well, and total and partial Mayo score,” said Dr. Steens.

Patients underwent rectal biopsies at the end of 8 weeks, and miR-124 expression increased more than sevenfold from baseline for those taking ABX464, compared with a small increase in the placebo group (7.69- versus 1.46-fold; P = .004). Expression of miR-124 in total blood also increased – by over 800-fold – at study day 28 for the ABX464 arm. Levels were sustained at more than 700-fold at study day 56 in this group. Placebo arm participants saw an insignificant rise in miR-124 blood levels.

Dr. Steens reported that 22 patients, including 7 who had originally been placebo arm participants, continued into the maintenance phase of the study. Nineteen patients have now had a median of over 400 days of exposure to ABX464, with sustained significant improvement in partial Mayo scores from a baseline of 6 to scores below 2 at 6 and 9 months. Fecal calprotectin scores have dropped from a median 1,044 mcg/g at baseline to 23.5 mcg/g at 9 months.

Next steps include the 12-month assessment, which includes another endoscopy, said Dr. Steens. Also, a phase 2b study is seeking to enroll 232 patients who have moderate to severe ulcerative colitis, with room within the enrollment scheme for new study sites, said Dr. Steens. This larger study will have arms in which the current 50-mg oral dose is doubled and halved, as well as a placebo arm, he said. The medication will also be trialed for Crohn’s disease and rheumatoid arthritis.

The small sample size is an inherent limitation of this early-stage clinical trial, noted Dr. Steens.

Dr. Steens reported being an employee and holding shares in Abivax, which funded the study.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Vermeire S et al. DDW 2019, Abstract 1007.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment remains a challenge in part because care is often fragmented among providers in different specialties, according to the American Gastroenterological Association. To address the need for provider coordination, the AGA has issued a new referral pathway for IBD care, published in Gastroenterology.

“The goal of this pathway is to offer guidance to primary care, emergency department, and gastroenterology providers, by helping identify patients at risk of or diagnosed with IBD and provide direction on initiating appropriate patient referrals,” wrote lead author Jami Kinnucan, MD, of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and members of the AGA workgroup.

In particular, the pathway focuses on gaps in IBD care related to inflammatory issues, mental health, and nutrition. The work group included not only gastroenterologists, but also a primary care physician, mental/behavioral health specialist, registered dietitian/nutritionist, critical care specialist, nurse practitioner, physician group representative, and a patient advocacy representative.

The pathway identifies the top three areas where IBD patients usually present with symptoms: the emergency department, primary care office, and gastroenterology office.

The work group developed a list of key characteristics associated with increased morbidity, established IBD, or IBD-related complications that can be separated into high-risk, moderate-risk, and low-risk groups to help clinicians determine the timing of and need for referrals.

The pathway uses a sample patient presenting with GI symptoms such as bloody diarrhea; GI bleeding; anemia; fecal urgency; fever; abdominal pain; weight loss; and pain, swelling, or redness in the joints. Clinicians then apply the key characteristics to triage the patients into the risk groups.

High-risk characteristics include history of perianal or severe rectal disease, or deep ulcers in the GI mucosa; two or more emergency department visits for GI problems within the past 6 months, severe anemia, inadequate response to outpatient IBD therapy, history of IBD-related surgery, and malnourishment.

Moderate-risk characteristics include anemia without clinical symptoms, chronic corticosteroid use, and no emergency department or other GI medical visits within the past year.

Low-risk characteristics include chronic narcotic use, one or more comorbidities (such as heart failure, active hepatitis B, oncologic malignancy, lupus, GI infections, primary sclerosing cholangitis, viral hepatitis, and celiac disease), one or more relevant mental health conditions (such as depression, anxiety, or chronic pain), and nonadherence to IBD medical therapies.

“Referrals should be based on the highest level of risk present, in the event that a patient has characteristics that fall in more than one risk category,” the work group wrote.

To further guide clinicians in referring patients with possible or diagnosed IBD to gastroenterology specialists and to mental health and nutrition specialists, the work group developed an IBD Characteristics Assessment Checklist and a Referral Feedback form to accompany the pathway.

The checklist is designed for use by any health care professional to help identify whether a patient needs to be referred based on the key characteristics; the feedback form gives gastroenterologists a template to communicate with referring physicians about comanagement strategies for the patient.

The pathway also includes more details on how clinicians can tackle barriers to mental health and nutrition care for IBD patients.

“Until further evaluations are conducted, the work group encourages the immediate use of the pathway to begin addressing the needed improvements for IBD care coordination and communication between the different IBD providers,” the authors wrote.

Dr. Kinnucan disclosed serving as a consultant for AbbVie, Janssen, and Pfizer and serving on the Patient Education Committee of the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation.

SOURCE: Kinnucan J et al. Gastroenterology. 2019. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.03.064.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment remains a challenge in part because care is often fragmented among providers in different specialties, according to the American Gastroenterological Association. To address the need for provider coordination, the AGA has issued a new referral pathway for IBD care, published in Gastroenterology.

“The goal of this pathway is to offer guidance to primary care, emergency department, and gastroenterology providers, by helping identify patients at risk of or diagnosed with IBD and provide direction on initiating appropriate patient referrals,” wrote lead author Jami Kinnucan, MD, of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and members of the AGA workgroup.

In particular, the pathway focuses on gaps in IBD care related to inflammatory issues, mental health, and nutrition. The work group included not only gastroenterologists, but also a primary care physician, mental/behavioral health specialist, registered dietitian/nutritionist, critical care specialist, nurse practitioner, physician group representative, and a patient advocacy representative.

The pathway identifies the top three areas where IBD patients usually present with symptoms: the emergency department, primary care office, and gastroenterology office.

The work group developed a list of key characteristics associated with increased morbidity, established IBD, or IBD-related complications that can be separated into high-risk, moderate-risk, and low-risk groups to help clinicians determine the timing of and need for referrals.

The pathway uses a sample patient presenting with GI symptoms such as bloody diarrhea; GI bleeding; anemia; fecal urgency; fever; abdominal pain; weight loss; and pain, swelling, or redness in the joints. Clinicians then apply the key characteristics to triage the patients into the risk groups.

High-risk characteristics include history of perianal or severe rectal disease, or deep ulcers in the GI mucosa; two or more emergency department visits for GI problems within the past 6 months, severe anemia, inadequate response to outpatient IBD therapy, history of IBD-related surgery, and malnourishment.

Moderate-risk characteristics include anemia without clinical symptoms, chronic corticosteroid use, and no emergency department or other GI medical visits within the past year.

Low-risk characteristics include chronic narcotic use, one or more comorbidities (such as heart failure, active hepatitis B, oncologic malignancy, lupus, GI infections, primary sclerosing cholangitis, viral hepatitis, and celiac disease), one or more relevant mental health conditions (such as depression, anxiety, or chronic pain), and nonadherence to IBD medical therapies.

“Referrals should be based on the highest level of risk present, in the event that a patient has characteristics that fall in more than one risk category,” the work group wrote.

To further guide clinicians in referring patients with possible or diagnosed IBD to gastroenterology specialists and to mental health and nutrition specialists, the work group developed an IBD Characteristics Assessment Checklist and a Referral Feedback form to accompany the pathway.

The checklist is designed for use by any health care professional to help identify whether a patient needs to be referred based on the key characteristics; the feedback form gives gastroenterologists a template to communicate with referring physicians about comanagement strategies for the patient.

The pathway also includes more details on how clinicians can tackle barriers to mental health and nutrition care for IBD patients.

“Until further evaluations are conducted, the work group encourages the immediate use of the pathway to begin addressing the needed improvements for IBD care coordination and communication between the different IBD providers,” the authors wrote.

Dr. Kinnucan disclosed serving as a consultant for AbbVie, Janssen, and Pfizer and serving on the Patient Education Committee of the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation.

SOURCE: Kinnucan J et al. Gastroenterology. 2019. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.03.064.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment remains a challenge in part because care is often fragmented among providers in different specialties, according to the American Gastroenterological Association. To address the need for provider coordination, the AGA has issued a new referral pathway for IBD care, published in Gastroenterology.

“The goal of this pathway is to offer guidance to primary care, emergency department, and gastroenterology providers, by helping identify patients at risk of or diagnosed with IBD and provide direction on initiating appropriate patient referrals,” wrote lead author Jami Kinnucan, MD, of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and members of the AGA workgroup.

In particular, the pathway focuses on gaps in IBD care related to inflammatory issues, mental health, and nutrition. The work group included not only gastroenterologists, but also a primary care physician, mental/behavioral health specialist, registered dietitian/nutritionist, critical care specialist, nurse practitioner, physician group representative, and a patient advocacy representative.

The pathway identifies the top three areas where IBD patients usually present with symptoms: the emergency department, primary care office, and gastroenterology office.

The work group developed a list of key characteristics associated with increased morbidity, established IBD, or IBD-related complications that can be separated into high-risk, moderate-risk, and low-risk groups to help clinicians determine the timing of and need for referrals.

The pathway uses a sample patient presenting with GI symptoms such as bloody diarrhea; GI bleeding; anemia; fecal urgency; fever; abdominal pain; weight loss; and pain, swelling, or redness in the joints. Clinicians then apply the key characteristics to triage the patients into the risk groups.

High-risk characteristics include history of perianal or severe rectal disease, or deep ulcers in the GI mucosa; two or more emergency department visits for GI problems within the past 6 months, severe anemia, inadequate response to outpatient IBD therapy, history of IBD-related surgery, and malnourishment.

Moderate-risk characteristics include anemia without clinical symptoms, chronic corticosteroid use, and no emergency department or other GI medical visits within the past year.

Low-risk characteristics include chronic narcotic use, one or more comorbidities (such as heart failure, active hepatitis B, oncologic malignancy, lupus, GI infections, primary sclerosing cholangitis, viral hepatitis, and celiac disease), one or more relevant mental health conditions (such as depression, anxiety, or chronic pain), and nonadherence to IBD medical therapies.

“Referrals should be based on the highest level of risk present, in the event that a patient has characteristics that fall in more than one risk category,” the work group wrote.

To further guide clinicians in referring patients with possible or diagnosed IBD to gastroenterology specialists and to mental health and nutrition specialists, the work group developed an IBD Characteristics Assessment Checklist and a Referral Feedback form to accompany the pathway.

The checklist is designed for use by any health care professional to help identify whether a patient needs to be referred based on the key characteristics; the feedback form gives gastroenterologists a template to communicate with referring physicians about comanagement strategies for the patient.

The pathway also includes more details on how clinicians can tackle barriers to mental health and nutrition care for IBD patients.

“Until further evaluations are conducted, the work group encourages the immediate use of the pathway to begin addressing the needed improvements for IBD care coordination and communication between the different IBD providers,” the authors wrote.

Dr. Kinnucan disclosed serving as a consultant for AbbVie, Janssen, and Pfizer and serving on the Patient Education Committee of the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation.

SOURCE: Kinnucan J et al. Gastroenterology. 2019. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.03.064.

The IB-Stim device has been approved to aid in the reduction of functional abdominal pain in patients 11-18 years of age with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

“This device offers a safe option for treatment of adolescents experiencing pain from IBS through the use of mild nerve stimulation,” Carlos Peña, PhD, director of the Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices in the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health, said in a press release.

The prescription-only device has a single-use electrical nerve stimulator that is placed behind the patient’s ear. Stimulating nerve bundles in and around the ear is thought to provide pain relief. The battery-powered chip of the device emits low-frequency electrical pulses continuously for 5 days, at which time it is replaced. Patients can use the device for up to 3 consecutive weeks to reduce functional abdominal pain associated with IBS.

The FDA reviewed data from 50 patients, aged 11-18 years, with IBS; 27 patients were treated with the device and 23 patients received a placebo device. The study measured change from baseline to the end of the third week in worst abdominal pain, usual pain, and Pain Frequency Severity Duration (PFSD) scores. Patients were allowed to continue stable doses of medication to treat chronic abdominal pain.

IB-Stim treatment resulted in at least a 30% decrease in usual pain at the end of 3 weeks in 52% of treated patients, compared with 30% of patients who received the placebo, and at least a 30% decrease in worst pain in 59% of treated patients, compared with 26% of patients who received the placebo.

The treatment group also had greater changes in composite PFSD scores at the end of three weeks. During the study, six patients reported mild ear discomfort, and three patients reported adhesive allergy at the site of application, according to the press release.

The device is contraindicated for patients with hemophilia, patients with cardiac pacemakers, or those diagnosed with psoriasis vulgaris.

The FDA granted marketing authorization of the IB-Stim to Innovative Health Solutions.
 

[email protected]

The IB-Stim device has been approved to aid in the reduction of functional abdominal pain in patients 11-18 years of age with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

“This device offers a safe option for treatment of adolescents experiencing pain from IBS through the use of mild nerve stimulation,” Carlos Peña, PhD, director of the Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices in the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health, said in a press release.

The prescription-only device has a single-use electrical nerve stimulator that is placed behind the patient’s ear. Stimulating nerve bundles in and around the ear is thought to provide pain relief. The battery-powered chip of the device emits low-frequency electrical pulses continuously for 5 days, at which time it is replaced. Patients can use the device for up to 3 consecutive weeks to reduce functional abdominal pain associated with IBS.

The FDA reviewed data from 50 patients, aged 11-18 years, with IBS; 27 patients were treated with the device and 23 patients received a placebo device. The study measured change from baseline to the end of the third week in worst abdominal pain, usual pain, and Pain Frequency Severity Duration (PFSD) scores. Patients were allowed to continue stable doses of medication to treat chronic abdominal pain.

IB-Stim treatment resulted in at least a 30% decrease in usual pain at the end of 3 weeks in 52% of treated patients, compared with 30% of patients who received the placebo, and at least a 30% decrease in worst pain in 59% of treated patients, compared with 26% of patients who received the placebo.

The treatment group also had greater changes in composite PFSD scores at the end of three weeks. During the study, six patients reported mild ear discomfort, and three patients reported adhesive allergy at the site of application, according to the press release.

The device is contraindicated for patients with hemophilia, patients with cardiac pacemakers, or those diagnosed with psoriasis vulgaris.

The FDA granted marketing authorization of the IB-Stim to Innovative Health Solutions.
 

[email protected]

The IB-Stim device has been approved to aid in the reduction of functional abdominal pain in patients 11-18 years of age with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

“This device offers a safe option for treatment of adolescents experiencing pain from IBS through the use of mild nerve stimulation,” Carlos Peña, PhD, director of the Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices in the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health, said in a press release.

The prescription-only device has a single-use electrical nerve stimulator that is placed behind the patient’s ear. Stimulating nerve bundles in and around the ear is thought to provide pain relief. The battery-powered chip of the device emits low-frequency electrical pulses continuously for 5 days, at which time it is replaced. Patients can use the device for up to 3 consecutive weeks to reduce functional abdominal pain associated with IBS.

The FDA reviewed data from 50 patients, aged 11-18 years, with IBS; 27 patients were treated with the device and 23 patients received a placebo device. The study measured change from baseline to the end of the third week in worst abdominal pain, usual pain, and Pain Frequency Severity Duration (PFSD) scores. Patients were allowed to continue stable doses of medication to treat chronic abdominal pain.

IB-Stim treatment resulted in at least a 30% decrease in usual pain at the end of 3 weeks in 52% of treated patients, compared with 30% of patients who received the placebo, and at least a 30% decrease in worst pain in 59% of treated patients, compared with 26% of patients who received the placebo.

The treatment group also had greater changes in composite PFSD scores at the end of three weeks. During the study, six patients reported mild ear discomfort, and three patients reported adhesive allergy at the site of application, according to the press release.

The device is contraindicated for patients with hemophilia, patients with cardiac pacemakers, or those diagnosed with psoriasis vulgaris.

The FDA granted marketing authorization of the IB-Stim to Innovative Health Solutions.
 

[email protected]

Among patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis, a median of 1.4 years and up to 4.4 years of tofacitinib therapy was safe apart from a dose-related increase in risk of herpes zoster infection, according to an integrated analysis of data from five clinical trials.

clsgraphics/iStockphoto

Compared with placebo, a 5-mg twice-daily maintenance dose of tofacitinib (Xeljanz) produced a 2.1-fold greater risk of herpes zoster infection (95% confidence interval, 0.4-6.0), while a 10-mg, twice-daily dose produced a statistically significant 6.6-fold increase in incidence (95% CI, 3.2-12.2).

With the exception of the higher incidence rate of herpes zoster, “in the overall cohort, the safety profile of tofacitinib was generally similar to that of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor therapies,” wrote William J. Sandborn, MD, director of the inflammatory bowel disease center and professor of medicine, at the University of California, San Diego, and associates. The findings were published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Tofacitinib is an oral, small-molecular Janus kinase inhibitor approved in the United States for treating moderate to severe ulcerative colitis, as well as rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis. The recommended ulcerative colitis dose is 10 mg twice daily for at least 8 weeks (induction therapy) followed by 5 or 10 mg twice daily (maintenance). The safety of tofacitinib has been studied in patients with rheumatoid arthritis through 9 years of treatment. To begin a similar undertaking in ulcerative colitis, Dr. Sandborn and associates pooled data from three 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled induction trials, as well as one 52-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled maintenance trial and one ongoing open-label trial. All patients received twice-daily tofacitinib (5 mg or 10 mg) or placebo.

Among 1,157 tofacitinib recipients in the pooled analysis, 84% received an average of 10 mg twice daily. For every 100 person-years of tofacitinib exposure, there were an estimated 2.0 serious infections, 1.3 opportunistic infections, 4.1 herpes zoster infections, 1.4 malignancies (including nonmelanoma skin cancer, which had an incidence of 0.7), 0.2 major adverse cardiovascular events, and 0.2 gastrointestinal perforations. The likelihood of these events did not increase with time on tofacitinib, the researchers said.

SOURCE: Sandborn WJ et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Nov 23. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.11.035.

Among patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis, a median of 1.4 years and up to 4.4 years of tofacitinib therapy was safe apart from a dose-related increase in risk of herpes zoster infection, according to an integrated analysis of data from five clinical trials.

clsgraphics/iStockphoto

Compared with placebo, a 5-mg twice-daily maintenance dose of tofacitinib (Xeljanz) produced a 2.1-fold greater risk of herpes zoster infection (95% confidence interval, 0.4-6.0), while a 10-mg, twice-daily dose produced a statistically significant 6.6-fold increase in incidence (95% CI, 3.2-12.2).

With the exception of the higher incidence rate of herpes zoster, “in the overall cohort, the safety profile of tofacitinib was generally similar to that of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor therapies,” wrote William J. Sandborn, MD, director of the inflammatory bowel disease center and professor of medicine, at the University of California, San Diego, and associates. The findings were published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Tofacitinib is an oral, small-molecular Janus kinase inhibitor approved in the United States for treating moderate to severe ulcerative colitis, as well as rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis. The recommended ulcerative colitis dose is 10 mg twice daily for at least 8 weeks (induction therapy) followed by 5 or 10 mg twice daily (maintenance). The safety of tofacitinib has been studied in patients with rheumatoid arthritis through 9 years of treatment. To begin a similar undertaking in ulcerative colitis, Dr. Sandborn and associates pooled data from three 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled induction trials, as well as one 52-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled maintenance trial and one ongoing open-label trial. All patients received twice-daily tofacitinib (5 mg or 10 mg) or placebo.

Among 1,157 tofacitinib recipients in the pooled analysis, 84% received an average of 10 mg twice daily. For every 100 person-years of tofacitinib exposure, there were an estimated 2.0 serious infections, 1.3 opportunistic infections, 4.1 herpes zoster infections, 1.4 malignancies (including nonmelanoma skin cancer, which had an incidence of 0.7), 0.2 major adverse cardiovascular events, and 0.2 gastrointestinal perforations. The likelihood of these events did not increase with time on tofacitinib, the researchers said.

SOURCE: Sandborn WJ et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Nov 23. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.11.035.

Among patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis, a median of 1.4 years and up to 4.4 years of tofacitinib therapy was safe apart from a dose-related increase in risk of herpes zoster infection, according to an integrated analysis of data from five clinical trials.

clsgraphics/iStockphoto

Compared with placebo, a 5-mg twice-daily maintenance dose of tofacitinib (Xeljanz) produced a 2.1-fold greater risk of herpes zoster infection (95% confidence interval, 0.4-6.0), while a 10-mg, twice-daily dose produced a statistically significant 6.6-fold increase in incidence (95% CI, 3.2-12.2).

With the exception of the higher incidence rate of herpes zoster, “in the overall cohort, the safety profile of tofacitinib was generally similar to that of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor therapies,” wrote William J. Sandborn, MD, director of the inflammatory bowel disease center and professor of medicine, at the University of California, San Diego, and associates. The findings were published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Tofacitinib is an oral, small-molecular Janus kinase inhibitor approved in the United States for treating moderate to severe ulcerative colitis, as well as rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis. The recommended ulcerative colitis dose is 10 mg twice daily for at least 8 weeks (induction therapy) followed by 5 or 10 mg twice daily (maintenance). The safety of tofacitinib has been studied in patients with rheumatoid arthritis through 9 years of treatment. To begin a similar undertaking in ulcerative colitis, Dr. Sandborn and associates pooled data from three 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled induction trials, as well as one 52-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled maintenance trial and one ongoing open-label trial. All patients received twice-daily tofacitinib (5 mg or 10 mg) or placebo.

Among 1,157 tofacitinib recipients in the pooled analysis, 84% received an average of 10 mg twice daily. For every 100 person-years of tofacitinib exposure, there were an estimated 2.0 serious infections, 1.3 opportunistic infections, 4.1 herpes zoster infections, 1.4 malignancies (including nonmelanoma skin cancer, which had an incidence of 0.7), 0.2 major adverse cardiovascular events, and 0.2 gastrointestinal perforations. The likelihood of these events did not increase with time on tofacitinib, the researchers said.

SOURCE: Sandborn WJ et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Nov 23. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.11.035.

SAN DIEGO – Nearly two-thirds of patients with inflammatory bowel disease who initiate biologic therapy continue to experience persistent fatigue up to 1 year later, results from a prospective cohort study showed.

Doug Brunk/MDedge News

“Fatigue is one of the most heard complaints in the clinic,” lead study author Nynke Z. Borren, MD, said in an interview at the annual Digestive Disease Week.^® “In the past few years there has been more interest because we know there is a communication system between the gut and the brain. Some studies suggest that biologic therapy improves fatigue symptoms, but it’s really correlated with disease activity.”

In an effort to define the longitudinal trajectory of fatigue in IBD patients initiating treatment with infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, or ustekinumab, Dr. Borren, a research fellow at the Massachusetts General Hospital Crohn’s and Colitis Center, Boston, and colleagues prospectively enrolled 206 patients with Crohn’s disease and 120 patients with ulcerative colitis. They used the seven-point fatigue question in the Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ) to define fatigue. A score of four or less for this question was used to define fatigue. To validate this question, the researchers used two widely used questionnaires: the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue (FACIT-F), and the Multidimensional Fatigue inventory (MFI). Next, they used multivariable regression models to examine the independent association between attainment of clinical remission and the resolution of fatigue.

Of the 326 patients, 134 initiated biologic therapy with infliximab or adalimumab, 129 with vedolizumab, and 63 with ustekinumab. Nearly two-thirds of all patients (198, or 61%) reported significant fatigue at baseline, which was associated with female sex, depressive symptoms, and disturbed sleep (P less than .001). Those reporting significant fatigue at baseline also had higher disease activity scores, compared with those without fatigue (P less than .001).

Among the 198 patients who reported fatigue at baseline, 70% remained fatigued at week 14, while 63% remained fatigued at week 30, and 61% remained fatigued at week 54. Dr. Borren and associates observed that at each of these time points, achieving clinical remission was associated with threefold lower likelihood of remaining fatigued. However, 35% of patients who achieved clinical remission experienced persistent fatigue at week 14, compared with 37% of patients at week 30 and 35% of patients at week 54.


The researchers observed no significant differences between the different therapies in the proportion of patients who remained fatigued. In addition to disease activity, disturbed sleep at baseline was associated with persistent fatigue at week 14 (OR 9.7) and at week 30 (OR 3.7).

“We think that gut dysbiosis might be involved in inducing fatigue,” Dr. Borren said. “In the beginning, we thought that it might be due to ongoing inflammation, but our research has shown that we find a less diverse gut microbiome in those patients with fatigue compared to patients without fatigue while they were in remission. There is something in the gut that influences the central nervous system. We are still exploring this.”

The researchers reported having no financial disclosures. The abstract received a “poster of distinction” honor at the meeting.

[email protected]

SAN DIEGO – Nearly two-thirds of patients with inflammatory bowel disease who initiate biologic therapy continue to experience persistent fatigue up to 1 year later, results from a prospective cohort study showed.

Doug Brunk/MDedge News

“Fatigue is one of the most heard complaints in the clinic,” lead study author Nynke Z. Borren, MD, said in an interview at the annual Digestive Disease Week.^® “In the past few years there has been more interest because we know there is a communication system between the gut and the brain. Some studies suggest that biologic therapy improves fatigue symptoms, but it’s really correlated with disease activity.”

In an effort to define the longitudinal trajectory of fatigue in IBD patients initiating treatment with infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, or ustekinumab, Dr. Borren, a research fellow at the Massachusetts General Hospital Crohn’s and Colitis Center, Boston, and colleagues prospectively enrolled 206 patients with Crohn’s disease and 120 patients with ulcerative colitis. They used the seven-point fatigue question in the Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ) to define fatigue. A score of four or less for this question was used to define fatigue. To validate this question, the researchers used two widely used questionnaires: the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue (FACIT-F), and the Multidimensional Fatigue inventory (MFI). Next, they used multivariable regression models to examine the independent association between attainment of clinical remission and the resolution of fatigue.

Of the 326 patients, 134 initiated biologic therapy with infliximab or adalimumab, 129 with vedolizumab, and 63 with ustekinumab. Nearly two-thirds of all patients (198, or 61%) reported significant fatigue at baseline, which was associated with female sex, depressive symptoms, and disturbed sleep (P less than .001). Those reporting significant fatigue at baseline also had higher disease activity scores, compared with those without fatigue (P less than .001).

Among the 198 patients who reported fatigue at baseline, 70% remained fatigued at week 14, while 63% remained fatigued at week 30, and 61% remained fatigued at week 54. Dr. Borren and associates observed that at each of these time points, achieving clinical remission was associated with threefold lower likelihood of remaining fatigued. However, 35% of patients who achieved clinical remission experienced persistent fatigue at week 14, compared with 37% of patients at week 30 and 35% of patients at week 54.


The researchers observed no significant differences between the different therapies in the proportion of patients who remained fatigued. In addition to disease activity, disturbed sleep at baseline was associated with persistent fatigue at week 14 (OR 9.7) and at week 30 (OR 3.7).

“We think that gut dysbiosis might be involved in inducing fatigue,” Dr. Borren said. “In the beginning, we thought that it might be due to ongoing inflammation, but our research has shown that we find a less diverse gut microbiome in those patients with fatigue compared to patients without fatigue while they were in remission. There is something in the gut that influences the central nervous system. We are still exploring this.”

The researchers reported having no financial disclosures. The abstract received a “poster of distinction” honor at the meeting.

[email protected]

SAN DIEGO – Nearly two-thirds of patients with inflammatory bowel disease who initiate biologic therapy continue to experience persistent fatigue up to 1 year later, results from a prospective cohort study showed.

Doug Brunk/MDedge News

“Fatigue is one of the most heard complaints in the clinic,” lead study author Nynke Z. Borren, MD, said in an interview at the annual Digestive Disease Week.^® “In the past few years there has been more interest because we know there is a communication system between the gut and the brain. Some studies suggest that biologic therapy improves fatigue symptoms, but it’s really correlated with disease activity.”

In an effort to define the longitudinal trajectory of fatigue in IBD patients initiating treatment with infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, or ustekinumab, Dr. Borren, a research fellow at the Massachusetts General Hospital Crohn’s and Colitis Center, Boston, and colleagues prospectively enrolled 206 patients with Crohn’s disease and 120 patients with ulcerative colitis. They used the seven-point fatigue question in the Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ) to define fatigue. A score of four or less for this question was used to define fatigue. To validate this question, the researchers used two widely used questionnaires: the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue (FACIT-F), and the Multidimensional Fatigue inventory (MFI). Next, they used multivariable regression models to examine the independent association between attainment of clinical remission and the resolution of fatigue.

Of the 326 patients, 134 initiated biologic therapy with infliximab or adalimumab, 129 with vedolizumab, and 63 with ustekinumab. Nearly two-thirds of all patients (198, or 61%) reported significant fatigue at baseline, which was associated with female sex, depressive symptoms, and disturbed sleep (P less than .001). Those reporting significant fatigue at baseline also had higher disease activity scores, compared with those without fatigue (P less than .001).

Among the 198 patients who reported fatigue at baseline, 70% remained fatigued at week 14, while 63% remained fatigued at week 30, and 61% remained fatigued at week 54. Dr. Borren and associates observed that at each of these time points, achieving clinical remission was associated with threefold lower likelihood of remaining fatigued. However, 35% of patients who achieved clinical remission experienced persistent fatigue at week 14, compared with 37% of patients at week 30 and 35% of patients at week 54.


The researchers observed no significant differences between the different therapies in the proportion of patients who remained fatigued. In addition to disease activity, disturbed sleep at baseline was associated with persistent fatigue at week 14 (OR 9.7) and at week 30 (OR 3.7).

“We think that gut dysbiosis might be involved in inducing fatigue,” Dr. Borren said. “In the beginning, we thought that it might be due to ongoing inflammation, but our research has shown that we find a less diverse gut microbiome in those patients with fatigue compared to patients without fatigue while they were in remission. There is something in the gut that influences the central nervous system. We are still exploring this.”

The researchers reported having no financial disclosures. The abstract received a “poster of distinction” honor at the meeting.

[email protected]

For adults with Crohn’s disease in remission at baseline, eating red and processed meat no more than once per month did not reduce risk of relapse in a randomized control trial.

Fuse/Thinkstock

After 49 weeks, there were no significant differences in time to relapse, time to moderate or severe relapse, or time to persistent relapse between the low- and high-meat groups, reported Lindsey G. Aldenberg, DO, of the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and coinvestigators. The findings were published in Gastroenterology.

The randomized study included 213 adults with Crohn’s disease whose short Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (sCDAI) score was 150 or less at baseline and who consumed red meat at least once weekly. They were instructed to consume one serving (3 ounces) of red meat or any processed (smoked, salted, or otherwise preserved) meat at least twice weekly (high-meat group) or no more than once monthly (low-meat group). To create a placebo-like effect, all patients were told to drink at least 16 ounces of water daily. Each week, patients were emailed a web-based survey of disease status and dietary adherence. At baseline and during six other weeks, they also received a daily survey of disease activity and current medications. The primary outcome was symptomatic relapse, defined as at least a 70-point rise such that sCDAI score exceeded 150, surgery for Crohn’s disease flare, or self-reported initiation or dose increase of mesalamine, thiopurine, methotrexate, corticosteroid, anti–tumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy, or natalizumab.

In all, 78% (166) of patients either completed the study or experienced an outcome. Symptomatic relapse occurred in 62% of these 166 patients, while 42% and 35% had moderate to severe or persistent relapses, respectively. “There were no significant differences in time to relapse for any of the outcomes (P greater than .3 for all outcomes),” the researchers wrote. Results were similar when they assumed that patients who completed no surveys all relapsed at week 1.

At week 20, median fecal calprotectin levels were higher in the high-meat arm (74.5 mcg/g) than in the low-meat arm (36.0 mcg/g), but the difference was not statistically significant. Proportions of patients with fecal calprotectin levels above 150 or 250 mcg/g also did not significantly differ between arms.

Adherence to the diets was reasonable: Patients in the high-meat group reported consuming at least two servings of red or processed meat during 98.5% of weeks, while patients in the low-meat arm completely abstained from red or processed meat during 57.3% of weeks. A logistic regression model showed that the high-meat group was much more likely to consume a least two servings of red or processed meat in the prior week than the low-meat group (P less than .0001). Approximately 90% of patients in both arms drank the recommended amount of water.

Study participants were part of IBD Partners, an Internet-based cohort of more than 15,000 patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Recruitment into the trial occurred through emails, social media, educational and fundraising events, and the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation website, the researchers said.

“Based on these results, there is insufficient evidence to recommend reduction of red and processed meat consumption solely for the purpose of improving Crohn’s disease outcomes, although there may be some benefit for other health conditions,” Dr. Aldenberg and associates concluded.

The Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation and the National Institutes of Health supported the work. Dr. Aldenberg disclosed receiving research funding from Seres Therapeutics. Two of six coinvestigators disclosed ties to Nestle Health Science, AbbVie, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, and several other pharmaceutical companies.

SOURCE: Aldenberg L et al. Gastroenterology. 2019 Mar 11. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.03.01.

For adults with Crohn’s disease in remission at baseline, eating red and processed meat no more than once per month did not reduce risk of relapse in a randomized control trial.

Fuse/Thinkstock

After 49 weeks, there were no significant differences in time to relapse, time to moderate or severe relapse, or time to persistent relapse between the low- and high-meat groups, reported Lindsey G. Aldenberg, DO, of the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and coinvestigators. The findings were published in Gastroenterology.

The randomized study included 213 adults with Crohn’s disease whose short Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (sCDAI) score was 150 or less at baseline and who consumed red meat at least once weekly. They were instructed to consume one serving (3 ounces) of red meat or any processed (smoked, salted, or otherwise preserved) meat at least twice weekly (high-meat group) or no more than once monthly (low-meat group). To create a placebo-like effect, all patients were told to drink at least 16 ounces of water daily. Each week, patients were emailed a web-based survey of disease status and dietary adherence. At baseline and during six other weeks, they also received a daily survey of disease activity and current medications. The primary outcome was symptomatic relapse, defined as at least a 70-point rise such that sCDAI score exceeded 150, surgery for Crohn’s disease flare, or self-reported initiation or dose increase of mesalamine, thiopurine, methotrexate, corticosteroid, anti–tumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy, or natalizumab.

In all, 78% (166) of patients either completed the study or experienced an outcome. Symptomatic relapse occurred in 62% of these 166 patients, while 42% and 35% had moderate to severe or persistent relapses, respectively. “There were no significant differences in time to relapse for any of the outcomes (P greater than .3 for all outcomes),” the researchers wrote. Results were similar when they assumed that patients who completed no surveys all relapsed at week 1.

At week 20, median fecal calprotectin levels were higher in the high-meat arm (74.5 mcg/g) than in the low-meat arm (36.0 mcg/g), but the difference was not statistically significant. Proportions of patients with fecal calprotectin levels above 150 or 250 mcg/g also did not significantly differ between arms.

Adherence to the diets was reasonable: Patients in the high-meat group reported consuming at least two servings of red or processed meat during 98.5% of weeks, while patients in the low-meat arm completely abstained from red or processed meat during 57.3% of weeks. A logistic regression model showed that the high-meat group was much more likely to consume a least two servings of red or processed meat in the prior week than the low-meat group (P less than .0001). Approximately 90% of patients in both arms drank the recommended amount of water.

Study participants were part of IBD Partners, an Internet-based cohort of more than 15,000 patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Recruitment into the trial occurred through emails, social media, educational and fundraising events, and the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation website, the researchers said.

“Based on these results, there is insufficient evidence to recommend reduction of red and processed meat consumption solely for the purpose of improving Crohn’s disease outcomes, although there may be some benefit for other health conditions,” Dr. Aldenberg and associates concluded.

The Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation and the National Institutes of Health supported the work. Dr. Aldenberg disclosed receiving research funding from Seres Therapeutics. Two of six coinvestigators disclosed ties to Nestle Health Science, AbbVie, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, and several other pharmaceutical companies.

SOURCE: Aldenberg L et al. Gastroenterology. 2019 Mar 11. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.03.01.

For adults with Crohn’s disease in remission at baseline, eating red and processed meat no more than once per month did not reduce risk of relapse in a randomized control trial.

Fuse/Thinkstock

After 49 weeks, there were no significant differences in time to relapse, time to moderate or severe relapse, or time to persistent relapse between the low- and high-meat groups, reported Lindsey G. Aldenberg, DO, of the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and coinvestigators. The findings were published in Gastroenterology.

The randomized study included 213 adults with Crohn’s disease whose short Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (sCDAI) score was 150 or less at baseline and who consumed red meat at least once weekly. They were instructed to consume one serving (3 ounces) of red meat or any processed (smoked, salted, or otherwise preserved) meat at least twice weekly (high-meat group) or no more than once monthly (low-meat group). To create a placebo-like effect, all patients were told to drink at least 16 ounces of water daily. Each week, patients were emailed a web-based survey of disease status and dietary adherence. At baseline and during six other weeks, they also received a daily survey of disease activity and current medications. The primary outcome was symptomatic relapse, defined as at least a 70-point rise such that sCDAI score exceeded 150, surgery for Crohn’s disease flare, or self-reported initiation or dose increase of mesalamine, thiopurine, methotrexate, corticosteroid, anti–tumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy, or natalizumab.

In all, 78% (166) of patients either completed the study or experienced an outcome. Symptomatic relapse occurred in 62% of these 166 patients, while 42% and 35% had moderate to severe or persistent relapses, respectively. “There were no significant differences in time to relapse for any of the outcomes (P greater than .3 for all outcomes),” the researchers wrote. Results were similar when they assumed that patients who completed no surveys all relapsed at week 1.

At week 20, median fecal calprotectin levels were higher in the high-meat arm (74.5 mcg/g) than in the low-meat arm (36.0 mcg/g), but the difference was not statistically significant. Proportions of patients with fecal calprotectin levels above 150 or 250 mcg/g also did not significantly differ between arms.

Adherence to the diets was reasonable: Patients in the high-meat group reported consuming at least two servings of red or processed meat during 98.5% of weeks, while patients in the low-meat arm completely abstained from red or processed meat during 57.3% of weeks. A logistic regression model showed that the high-meat group was much more likely to consume a least two servings of red or processed meat in the prior week than the low-meat group (P less than .0001). Approximately 90% of patients in both arms drank the recommended amount of water.

Study participants were part of IBD Partners, an Internet-based cohort of more than 15,000 patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Recruitment into the trial occurred through emails, social media, educational and fundraising events, and the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation website, the researchers said.

“Based on these results, there is insufficient evidence to recommend reduction of red and processed meat consumption solely for the purpose of improving Crohn’s disease outcomes, although there may be some benefit for other health conditions,” Dr. Aldenberg and associates concluded.

The Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation and the National Institutes of Health supported the work. Dr. Aldenberg disclosed receiving research funding from Seres Therapeutics. Two of six coinvestigators disclosed ties to Nestle Health Science, AbbVie, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, and several other pharmaceutical companies.

SOURCE: Aldenberg L et al. Gastroenterology. 2019 Mar 11. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.03.01.

For men with inflammatory bowel disease, herpes zoster vaccination was associated with about a 46% decrease in risk of associated infection, according to the results of a retrospective study from the national Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.

Crude rates of herpes zoster infection were 4.09 cases per 1,000 person-years among vaccinated patients versus 6.97 cases per 1,000 person-years among unvaccinated patients, for an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.54 (95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.68), reported Nabeel Khan, MD, of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and associates. “This vaccine is therefore effective in patients with IBD, but underused,” they wrote in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Studies have linked IBD with a 1.2- to 1.8-fold increased risk of herpes zoster infection, the researchers noted. Relevant risk factors include older age, disease flare, recent use or high cumulative use of prednisone, and use of thiopurines, either alone or in combination with a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor. Although the American College of Gastroenterology recommends that all patients with IBD receive the herpes zoster vaccine by age 50 years, the efficacy of the vaccine in these patients remains unclear.

For their study, Dr. Khan and associates analyzed International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes and other medical record data from 39,983 veterans with IBD who had not received the herpes zoster vaccine by age 60 years. In all, 97% of patients were male, and 94% were white. Most patients had high rates of health care utilization: Approximately half visited VA clinics or hospitals at least 13 times per year, and another third made 6-12 annual visits.

Despite their many contacts with VA health care systems, only 7,170 (17.9%) patients received the herpes zoster vaccine during 2000-2016, the researchers found. Vaccination rates varied substantially by region – they were highest in the Midwest (35%) and North Atlantic states (29%) but reached only 9% in Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Colorado, Oklahoma, Texas, Arkansas, and Louisiana, collectively.

The crude rate of herpes zoster infection among unvaccinated patients with IBD resembled the incidence reported in prior studies, the researchers said. After researchers accounted for differences in geography, demographics, and health care utilization between vaccinated and unvaccinated veterans with IBD, they found that vaccination was associated with an approximately 46% decrease in the risk of herpes zoster infection.

Very few patients were vaccinated for herpes zoster while on a TNF inhibitor, precluding the ability to study this subgroup. However, the vaccine showed a protective effect (adjusted HR, 0.63) among patients who received thiopurines without a TNF inhibitor. This effect did not reach statistical significance, perhaps because of lack of power, the researchers noted. “Among the 315 patients who were [vaccinated while] on thiopurines, none developed a documented painful or painless vesicular rash within 42 days of herpes zoster vaccination,” they added. One patient developed a painful blister 20 days post vaccination without vesicles or long-term sequelae.

Pfizer provided funding. Dr. Khan disclosed research funding from Pfizer, Luitpold, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals. One coinvestigator disclosed ties to Pfizer, Gilead, Merck, AbbVie, Lilly, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, UCB, and Nestle Health Science. The remaining researchers disclosed no conflicts.

SOURCE: Khan N et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Oct 13. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.10.016.

For men with inflammatory bowel disease, herpes zoster vaccination was associated with about a 46% decrease in risk of associated infection, according to the results of a retrospective study from the national Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.

Crude rates of herpes zoster infection were 4.09 cases per 1,000 person-years among vaccinated patients versus 6.97 cases per 1,000 person-years among unvaccinated patients, for an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.54 (95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.68), reported Nabeel Khan, MD, of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and associates. “This vaccine is therefore effective in patients with IBD, but underused,” they wrote in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Studies have linked IBD with a 1.2- to 1.8-fold increased risk of herpes zoster infection, the researchers noted. Relevant risk factors include older age, disease flare, recent use or high cumulative use of prednisone, and use of thiopurines, either alone or in combination with a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor. Although the American College of Gastroenterology recommends that all patients with IBD receive the herpes zoster vaccine by age 50 years, the efficacy of the vaccine in these patients remains unclear.

For their study, Dr. Khan and associates analyzed International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes and other medical record data from 39,983 veterans with IBD who had not received the herpes zoster vaccine by age 60 years. In all, 97% of patients were male, and 94% were white. Most patients had high rates of health care utilization: Approximately half visited VA clinics or hospitals at least 13 times per year, and another third made 6-12 annual visits.

Despite their many contacts with VA health care systems, only 7,170 (17.9%) patients received the herpes zoster vaccine during 2000-2016, the researchers found. Vaccination rates varied substantially by region – they were highest in the Midwest (35%) and North Atlantic states (29%) but reached only 9% in Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Colorado, Oklahoma, Texas, Arkansas, and Louisiana, collectively.

The crude rate of herpes zoster infection among unvaccinated patients with IBD resembled the incidence reported in prior studies, the researchers said. After researchers accounted for differences in geography, demographics, and health care utilization between vaccinated and unvaccinated veterans with IBD, they found that vaccination was associated with an approximately 46% decrease in the risk of herpes zoster infection.

Very few patients were vaccinated for herpes zoster while on a TNF inhibitor, precluding the ability to study this subgroup. However, the vaccine showed a protective effect (adjusted HR, 0.63) among patients who received thiopurines without a TNF inhibitor. This effect did not reach statistical significance, perhaps because of lack of power, the researchers noted. “Among the 315 patients who were [vaccinated while] on thiopurines, none developed a documented painful or painless vesicular rash within 42 days of herpes zoster vaccination,” they added. One patient developed a painful blister 20 days post vaccination without vesicles or long-term sequelae.

Pfizer provided funding. Dr. Khan disclosed research funding from Pfizer, Luitpold, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals. One coinvestigator disclosed ties to Pfizer, Gilead, Merck, AbbVie, Lilly, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, UCB, and Nestle Health Science. The remaining researchers disclosed no conflicts.

SOURCE: Khan N et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Oct 13. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.10.016.

For men with inflammatory bowel disease, herpes zoster vaccination was associated with about a 46% decrease in risk of associated infection, according to the results of a retrospective study from the national Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.

Crude rates of herpes zoster infection were 4.09 cases per 1,000 person-years among vaccinated patients versus 6.97 cases per 1,000 person-years among unvaccinated patients, for an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.54 (95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.68), reported Nabeel Khan, MD, of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and associates. “This vaccine is therefore effective in patients with IBD, but underused,” they wrote in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Studies have linked IBD with a 1.2- to 1.8-fold increased risk of herpes zoster infection, the researchers noted. Relevant risk factors include older age, disease flare, recent use or high cumulative use of prednisone, and use of thiopurines, either alone or in combination with a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor. Although the American College of Gastroenterology recommends that all patients with IBD receive the herpes zoster vaccine by age 50 years, the efficacy of the vaccine in these patients remains unclear.

For their study, Dr. Khan and associates analyzed International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes and other medical record data from 39,983 veterans with IBD who had not received the herpes zoster vaccine by age 60 years. In all, 97% of patients were male, and 94% were white. Most patients had high rates of health care utilization: Approximately half visited VA clinics or hospitals at least 13 times per year, and another third made 6-12 annual visits.

Despite their many contacts with VA health care systems, only 7,170 (17.9%) patients received the herpes zoster vaccine during 2000-2016, the researchers found. Vaccination rates varied substantially by region – they were highest in the Midwest (35%) and North Atlantic states (29%) but reached only 9% in Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Colorado, Oklahoma, Texas, Arkansas, and Louisiana, collectively.

The crude rate of herpes zoster infection among unvaccinated patients with IBD resembled the incidence reported in prior studies, the researchers said. After researchers accounted for differences in geography, demographics, and health care utilization between vaccinated and unvaccinated veterans with IBD, they found that vaccination was associated with an approximately 46% decrease in the risk of herpes zoster infection.

Very few patients were vaccinated for herpes zoster while on a TNF inhibitor, precluding the ability to study this subgroup. However, the vaccine showed a protective effect (adjusted HR, 0.63) among patients who received thiopurines without a TNF inhibitor. This effect did not reach statistical significance, perhaps because of lack of power, the researchers noted. “Among the 315 patients who were [vaccinated while] on thiopurines, none developed a documented painful or painless vesicular rash within 42 days of herpes zoster vaccination,” they added. One patient developed a painful blister 20 days post vaccination without vesicles or long-term sequelae.

Pfizer provided funding. Dr. Khan disclosed research funding from Pfizer, Luitpold, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals. One coinvestigator disclosed ties to Pfizer, Gilead, Merck, AbbVie, Lilly, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, UCB, and Nestle Health Science. The remaining researchers disclosed no conflicts.

SOURCE: Khan N et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Oct 13. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.10.016.

Infections during the first year of life were a significant risk factor for inflammatory bowel disease throughout the lifespan but especially prior to the age of 10 years, according to the findings of a large population-based study.

It remains unclear whether the risk reflects infections in themselves or the use of antibiotic therapy, wrote Charles N. Bernstein, MD, of the University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, and associates. Infections did not appear to be a proxy for immunodeficiency disorders, which were similarly infrequent among cases and controls, they noted. Limiting antibiotic usage, while desirable, would be difficult to do for infections as serious as many in the study. Hence, they suggested research to determine “exactly what antibiotic intake does to infant gut microflora or intestinal or systemic immune responses,” and whether giving probiotics or prebiotics after antibiotic therapy helps attenuate the risk of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and other autoimmune disorders. The findings were published in Gastroenterology.

IBD is probably multifactorial, but specific causal factors remain unclear. Based on mounting evidence for the role of gut dysbiosis, the researchers explored whether IBD is associated with higher rates of infections and other critical events during the neonatal period and the first year of life by comparing 825 patients with IBD and 5,999 controls matched by age, sex, and area of residence. The data source was the University of Manitoba IBD Epidemiology Database, which includes all Manitobans diagnosed with IBD from 1984 to 2010. The researchers also compared patients with 1,740 unaffected siblings.

Gastrointestinal infections, gastrointestinal disease, and abdominal pain during the first year of life did not predict subsequent IBD. Maternal IBD was the strongest risk factor (odds ratio, 4.5; 95% confidence interval, 3.1-6.7). Among neonatal events, the only significant risk factor was being in the highest versus the lowest socioeconomic quintile (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.01-1.79). This association persisted during the first year of life.

Infections during the first year of life were a significant risk factor for IBD before age 10 (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.1-8.8) and age 20 years (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.2) in the population-based analysis. In contrast, patients and their unaffected siblings had similar rates of infection during early life. The study may have missed differences in exposures between these groups, or perhaps patients lack certain protective genes possessed by healthy siblings, the researchers wrote.

Numbers of antibiotic prescriptions during the first year and the first decade of life did not significantly differ between 33 cases and 270 controls with available data. However, there was a trend toward more antibiotics prescribed to patients versus controls.

“Together with our past reports that neither cesarean section birth nor antenatal or perinatal maternal use of antibiotics predict ultimate development of IBD, it seems that neonatal changes to the microbiome are subsumed by those occurring in the first year of life,” the investigators concluded. They recommended studying the infant gut microbiome before and for several months after infections and antibiotic exposure to determine which shifts in microbiota predict IBD onset.

The Manitoba Centre for Health Policy provided access to the Population Health Research Data Repository. Dr. Bernstein is supported by the Bingham Chair in Gastroenterology. He reported ties to AbbVie Canada, Ferring Canada, Janssen Canada, Shire Canada, Takeda Canada, Pfizer Canada, Napo Pharmaceuticals, 4D Pharma, and Mylan.

SOURCE: Bernstein CN et al. Gastroenterology. 2019 Feb 14. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.02.004.

Infections during the first year of life were a significant risk factor for inflammatory bowel disease throughout the lifespan but especially prior to the age of 10 years, according to the findings of a large population-based study.

It remains unclear whether the risk reflects infections in themselves or the use of antibiotic therapy, wrote Charles N. Bernstein, MD, of the University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, and associates. Infections did not appear to be a proxy for immunodeficiency disorders, which were similarly infrequent among cases and controls, they noted. Limiting antibiotic usage, while desirable, would be difficult to do for infections as serious as many in the study. Hence, they suggested research to determine “exactly what antibiotic intake does to infant gut microflora or intestinal or systemic immune responses,” and whether giving probiotics or prebiotics after antibiotic therapy helps attenuate the risk of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and other autoimmune disorders. The findings were published in Gastroenterology.

IBD is probably multifactorial, but specific causal factors remain unclear. Based on mounting evidence for the role of gut dysbiosis, the researchers explored whether IBD is associated with higher rates of infections and other critical events during the neonatal period and the first year of life by comparing 825 patients with IBD and 5,999 controls matched by age, sex, and area of residence. The data source was the University of Manitoba IBD Epidemiology Database, which includes all Manitobans diagnosed with IBD from 1984 to 2010. The researchers also compared patients with 1,740 unaffected siblings.

Gastrointestinal infections, gastrointestinal disease, and abdominal pain during the first year of life did not predict subsequent IBD. Maternal IBD was the strongest risk factor (odds ratio, 4.5; 95% confidence interval, 3.1-6.7). Among neonatal events, the only significant risk factor was being in the highest versus the lowest socioeconomic quintile (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.01-1.79). This association persisted during the first year of life.

Infections during the first year of life were a significant risk factor for IBD before age 10 (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.1-8.8) and age 20 years (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.2) in the population-based analysis. In contrast, patients and their unaffected siblings had similar rates of infection during early life. The study may have missed differences in exposures between these groups, or perhaps patients lack certain protective genes possessed by healthy siblings, the researchers wrote.

Numbers of antibiotic prescriptions during the first year and the first decade of life did not significantly differ between 33 cases and 270 controls with available data. However, there was a trend toward more antibiotics prescribed to patients versus controls.

“Together with our past reports that neither cesarean section birth nor antenatal or perinatal maternal use of antibiotics predict ultimate development of IBD, it seems that neonatal changes to the microbiome are subsumed by those occurring in the first year of life,” the investigators concluded. They recommended studying the infant gut microbiome before and for several months after infections and antibiotic exposure to determine which shifts in microbiota predict IBD onset.

The Manitoba Centre for Health Policy provided access to the Population Health Research Data Repository. Dr. Bernstein is supported by the Bingham Chair in Gastroenterology. He reported ties to AbbVie Canada, Ferring Canada, Janssen Canada, Shire Canada, Takeda Canada, Pfizer Canada, Napo Pharmaceuticals, 4D Pharma, and Mylan.

SOURCE: Bernstein CN et al. Gastroenterology. 2019 Feb 14. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.02.004.

Infections during the first year of life were a significant risk factor for inflammatory bowel disease throughout the lifespan but especially prior to the age of 10 years, according to the findings of a large population-based study.

It remains unclear whether the risk reflects infections in themselves or the use of antibiotic therapy, wrote Charles N. Bernstein, MD, of the University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, and associates. Infections did not appear to be a proxy for immunodeficiency disorders, which were similarly infrequent among cases and controls, they noted. Limiting antibiotic usage, while desirable, would be difficult to do for infections as serious as many in the study. Hence, they suggested research to determine “exactly what antibiotic intake does to infant gut microflora or intestinal or systemic immune responses,” and whether giving probiotics or prebiotics after antibiotic therapy helps attenuate the risk of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and other autoimmune disorders. The findings were published in Gastroenterology.

IBD is probably multifactorial, but specific causal factors remain unclear. Based on mounting evidence for the role of gut dysbiosis, the researchers explored whether IBD is associated with higher rates of infections and other critical events during the neonatal period and the first year of life by comparing 825 patients with IBD and 5,999 controls matched by age, sex, and area of residence. The data source was the University of Manitoba IBD Epidemiology Database, which includes all Manitobans diagnosed with IBD from 1984 to 2010. The researchers also compared patients with 1,740 unaffected siblings.

Gastrointestinal infections, gastrointestinal disease, and abdominal pain during the first year of life did not predict subsequent IBD. Maternal IBD was the strongest risk factor (odds ratio, 4.5; 95% confidence interval, 3.1-6.7). Among neonatal events, the only significant risk factor was being in the highest versus the lowest socioeconomic quintile (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.01-1.79). This association persisted during the first year of life.

Infections during the first year of life were a significant risk factor for IBD before age 10 (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.1-8.8) and age 20 years (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.2) in the population-based analysis. In contrast, patients and their unaffected siblings had similar rates of infection during early life. The study may have missed differences in exposures between these groups, or perhaps patients lack certain protective genes possessed by healthy siblings, the researchers wrote.

Numbers of antibiotic prescriptions during the first year and the first decade of life did not significantly differ between 33 cases and 270 controls with available data. However, there was a trend toward more antibiotics prescribed to patients versus controls.

“Together with our past reports that neither cesarean section birth nor antenatal or perinatal maternal use of antibiotics predict ultimate development of IBD, it seems that neonatal changes to the microbiome are subsumed by those occurring in the first year of life,” the investigators concluded. They recommended studying the infant gut microbiome before and for several months after infections and antibiotic exposure to determine which shifts in microbiota predict IBD onset.

The Manitoba Centre for Health Policy provided access to the Population Health Research Data Repository. Dr. Bernstein is supported by the Bingham Chair in Gastroenterology. He reported ties to AbbVie Canada, Ferring Canada, Janssen Canada, Shire Canada, Takeda Canada, Pfizer Canada, Napo Pharmaceuticals, 4D Pharma, and Mylan.

SOURCE: Bernstein CN et al. Gastroenterology. 2019 Feb 14. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.02.004.