Leukemia, Myelodysplasia, Transplantation

ORLANDO – For adults with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia positive for the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph+ALL), the combination of hyper-CVAD chemotherapy and ponatinib is associated with high complete molecular response and 5-year overall survival rates, investigators reported.

Neil Osterweil/MDedge News

Long-term follow-up of 86 adults with Ph+ALL treated in the front line with chemotherapy plus ponatinib (Iclusig), a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), showed a complete remission (CR) rate of 100%, complete molecular remission (CMR) rate of 86%, and a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of 74%, reported Nicholas J. Short, MD, from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

“Although we observed two treatment-related cardiovascular deaths with the original trial design, with almost 50 patients treated since instituting a risk-adapted dosing schedule with lower doses of ponatinib, no additional ponatinib-related deaths have been observed,” he said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The standard of care for adults with Ph+ALL is chemotherapy plus a TKI. With a first- or second-generation TKI plus chemotherapy, reported 5-year OS rates range from 35% to 50%.

“However, relapses are still common, and these are usually driven by the development of new resistance mutations in the ABL gene, particularly the T315I gatekeeper mutation which has been reported in up to 75% of patients at the time of relapse,” he said.

Ponatinib is a pan-BCR-ABL TKI with activity against ALL with T315I mutations, and the combination of this agent with hyper-CVAD chemotherapy (hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone) has been associated with higher response rates than those seen with earlier-generation TKIs, as well as higher levels of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, he noted.

Dr. Short and colleagues hypothesized that, compared with the standard of care, hyper-CVAD plus ponatinib would be associated with higher MRD levels, low relapse rates by suppression of T315I subclones, decreased reliance on stem cell transplantation in first remission, and improved long-term survival.

To test this, they treated 86 adults with newly diagnosed Ph+ALL, including those who had undergone one or two previous courses of chemotherapy with a TKI other than ponatinib. The patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, adequate organ function, and no clinically significant cardiovascular disease.

The patients underwent eight cycles of hyper-CVAD alternating with high-dose methotrexate/cytarabine approximately every 21 days. The first 37 patients were treated with, ponatinib 45 mg daily for the first 14 days of cycle 1, then continuously for subsequent cycles. Patients with CD20 expression of 20% or greater also received rituximab during the first four cycles. CNS prophylaxis was also administered with 12 doses of intrathecal chemotherapy with alternating methotrexate and cytarabine.

Patients who had a CR received maintenance with ponatinib and vincristine/prednisone monthly for 2 years, followed by ponatinib indefinitely.

Out of concern for vascular toxicity with long-term use of high-dose ponatinib, including the two deaths mentioned before, the protocol was amended after the first 37 patients were treated. The amended protocol reduced ponatinib to 30 mg starting at cycle 2, with further reduction to 15 mg once a CMR (absence of BCR-ABL on polymerase chain reaction) was achieved.

At a median follow-up of 44 months, the event-free survival rates – the primary endpoint – were 71% at 3 years and 68% at 5 years. The 3-year OS rate was 78%, and the 5-year OS rate was 74%.

All patients had complete remission and complete cytogenetic remission as assessed by conventional karyotyping. Additionally, 73 of 85 evaluable patients (86%) achieved a CMR at some point during therapy.

“We had previously reported that achievement of a complete molecular response by 3 months is associated with superior outcomes. Approximately three quarters of patients achieved this milestone,” Dr. Short said.

Grade 3 or greater adverse events of particular concern included transaminase elevations in 29% of patients, elevated bilirubin and pancreatitis in 15% each, and hypertension in 14%.

Four patients had grade 3 or greater venous thromboembolic or arterial events, including the two previously noted deaths from myocardial infarction, both of which occurred prior to the protocol amendment.

At the most recent follow-up, 11 patients had experienced relapse (no CNS-only relapses), and of this group, 5 died and 6 were still alive. Nineteen patients underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplant, and of this group, 13 were still alive and 6 died.

Causes of death in the nine patients who died while in CR included the two myocardial infarction deaths on study, three deaths from sepsis during consolidation, one from lung cancer, one from a head injury after a fall, one from myocardial infarction in a 79-year-old patient 4 years after stopping ponatinib (off study), and one from preexisting congestive heart failure in a 74-year-old patient.

In all, 47 patients were either in ongoing therapy or observation at last follow-up, including three patients who were transitioned to MRD-directed therapy including blinatumomab (Blincyto).

“As a next step, we are now evaluating lower-intensity regimens with ponatinib and blinatumomab in both the frontline and relapsed/refractory settings, with the goals of decreased chemotherapy-related toxicity, increased MRD-negativity rates, further decreased reliance on transplant, and improved long-term outcomes,” Dr. Short said.

The study was sponsored by MD Anderson with support from the National Cancer Institute. Dr. Short reported consulting for AstraZenca, honoraria from Amgen, and consulting and receiving research funding from Takeda Oncology.

SOURCE: Short NJ et al. ASH 2019, Abstract 283.

ORLANDO – For adults with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia positive for the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph+ALL), the combination of hyper-CVAD chemotherapy and ponatinib is associated with high complete molecular response and 5-year overall survival rates, investigators reported.

Neil Osterweil/MDedge News

Long-term follow-up of 86 adults with Ph+ALL treated in the front line with chemotherapy plus ponatinib (Iclusig), a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), showed a complete remission (CR) rate of 100%, complete molecular remission (CMR) rate of 86%, and a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of 74%, reported Nicholas J. Short, MD, from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

“Although we observed two treatment-related cardiovascular deaths with the original trial design, with almost 50 patients treated since instituting a risk-adapted dosing schedule with lower doses of ponatinib, no additional ponatinib-related deaths have been observed,” he said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The standard of care for adults with Ph+ALL is chemotherapy plus a TKI. With a first- or second-generation TKI plus chemotherapy, reported 5-year OS rates range from 35% to 50%.

“However, relapses are still common, and these are usually driven by the development of new resistance mutations in the ABL gene, particularly the T315I gatekeeper mutation which has been reported in up to 75% of patients at the time of relapse,” he said.

Ponatinib is a pan-BCR-ABL TKI with activity against ALL with T315I mutations, and the combination of this agent with hyper-CVAD chemotherapy (hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone) has been associated with higher response rates than those seen with earlier-generation TKIs, as well as higher levels of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, he noted.

Dr. Short and colleagues hypothesized that, compared with the standard of care, hyper-CVAD plus ponatinib would be associated with higher MRD levels, low relapse rates by suppression of T315I subclones, decreased reliance on stem cell transplantation in first remission, and improved long-term survival.

To test this, they treated 86 adults with newly diagnosed Ph+ALL, including those who had undergone one or two previous courses of chemotherapy with a TKI other than ponatinib. The patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, adequate organ function, and no clinically significant cardiovascular disease.

The patients underwent eight cycles of hyper-CVAD alternating with high-dose methotrexate/cytarabine approximately every 21 days. The first 37 patients were treated with, ponatinib 45 mg daily for the first 14 days of cycle 1, then continuously for subsequent cycles. Patients with CD20 expression of 20% or greater also received rituximab during the first four cycles. CNS prophylaxis was also administered with 12 doses of intrathecal chemotherapy with alternating methotrexate and cytarabine.

Patients who had a CR received maintenance with ponatinib and vincristine/prednisone monthly for 2 years, followed by ponatinib indefinitely.

Out of concern for vascular toxicity with long-term use of high-dose ponatinib, including the two deaths mentioned before, the protocol was amended after the first 37 patients were treated. The amended protocol reduced ponatinib to 30 mg starting at cycle 2, with further reduction to 15 mg once a CMR (absence of BCR-ABL on polymerase chain reaction) was achieved.

At a median follow-up of 44 months, the event-free survival rates – the primary endpoint – were 71% at 3 years and 68% at 5 years. The 3-year OS rate was 78%, and the 5-year OS rate was 74%.

All patients had complete remission and complete cytogenetic remission as assessed by conventional karyotyping. Additionally, 73 of 85 evaluable patients (86%) achieved a CMR at some point during therapy.

“We had previously reported that achievement of a complete molecular response by 3 months is associated with superior outcomes. Approximately three quarters of patients achieved this milestone,” Dr. Short said.

Grade 3 or greater adverse events of particular concern included transaminase elevations in 29% of patients, elevated bilirubin and pancreatitis in 15% each, and hypertension in 14%.

Four patients had grade 3 or greater venous thromboembolic or arterial events, including the two previously noted deaths from myocardial infarction, both of which occurred prior to the protocol amendment.

At the most recent follow-up, 11 patients had experienced relapse (no CNS-only relapses), and of this group, 5 died and 6 were still alive. Nineteen patients underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplant, and of this group, 13 were still alive and 6 died.

Causes of death in the nine patients who died while in CR included the two myocardial infarction deaths on study, three deaths from sepsis during consolidation, one from lung cancer, one from a head injury after a fall, one from myocardial infarction in a 79-year-old patient 4 years after stopping ponatinib (off study), and one from preexisting congestive heart failure in a 74-year-old patient.

In all, 47 patients were either in ongoing therapy or observation at last follow-up, including three patients who were transitioned to MRD-directed therapy including blinatumomab (Blincyto).

“As a next step, we are now evaluating lower-intensity regimens with ponatinib and blinatumomab in both the frontline and relapsed/refractory settings, with the goals of decreased chemotherapy-related toxicity, increased MRD-negativity rates, further decreased reliance on transplant, and improved long-term outcomes,” Dr. Short said.

The study was sponsored by MD Anderson with support from the National Cancer Institute. Dr. Short reported consulting for AstraZenca, honoraria from Amgen, and consulting and receiving research funding from Takeda Oncology.

SOURCE: Short NJ et al. ASH 2019, Abstract 283.

ORLANDO – For adults with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia positive for the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph+ALL), the combination of hyper-CVAD chemotherapy and ponatinib is associated with high complete molecular response and 5-year overall survival rates, investigators reported.

Neil Osterweil/MDedge News

Long-term follow-up of 86 adults with Ph+ALL treated in the front line with chemotherapy plus ponatinib (Iclusig), a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), showed a complete remission (CR) rate of 100%, complete molecular remission (CMR) rate of 86%, and a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of 74%, reported Nicholas J. Short, MD, from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

“Although we observed two treatment-related cardiovascular deaths with the original trial design, with almost 50 patients treated since instituting a risk-adapted dosing schedule with lower doses of ponatinib, no additional ponatinib-related deaths have been observed,” he said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The standard of care for adults with Ph+ALL is chemotherapy plus a TKI. With a first- or second-generation TKI plus chemotherapy, reported 5-year OS rates range from 35% to 50%.

“However, relapses are still common, and these are usually driven by the development of new resistance mutations in the ABL gene, particularly the T315I gatekeeper mutation which has been reported in up to 75% of patients at the time of relapse,” he said.

Ponatinib is a pan-BCR-ABL TKI with activity against ALL with T315I mutations, and the combination of this agent with hyper-CVAD chemotherapy (hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone) has been associated with higher response rates than those seen with earlier-generation TKIs, as well as higher levels of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, he noted.

Dr. Short and colleagues hypothesized that, compared with the standard of care, hyper-CVAD plus ponatinib would be associated with higher MRD levels, low relapse rates by suppression of T315I subclones, decreased reliance on stem cell transplantation in first remission, and improved long-term survival.

To test this, they treated 86 adults with newly diagnosed Ph+ALL, including those who had undergone one or two previous courses of chemotherapy with a TKI other than ponatinib. The patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, adequate organ function, and no clinically significant cardiovascular disease.

The patients underwent eight cycles of hyper-CVAD alternating with high-dose methotrexate/cytarabine approximately every 21 days. The first 37 patients were treated with, ponatinib 45 mg daily for the first 14 days of cycle 1, then continuously for subsequent cycles. Patients with CD20 expression of 20% or greater also received rituximab during the first four cycles. CNS prophylaxis was also administered with 12 doses of intrathecal chemotherapy with alternating methotrexate and cytarabine.

Patients who had a CR received maintenance with ponatinib and vincristine/prednisone monthly for 2 years, followed by ponatinib indefinitely.

Out of concern for vascular toxicity with long-term use of high-dose ponatinib, including the two deaths mentioned before, the protocol was amended after the first 37 patients were treated. The amended protocol reduced ponatinib to 30 mg starting at cycle 2, with further reduction to 15 mg once a CMR (absence of BCR-ABL on polymerase chain reaction) was achieved.

At a median follow-up of 44 months, the event-free survival rates – the primary endpoint – were 71% at 3 years and 68% at 5 years. The 3-year OS rate was 78%, and the 5-year OS rate was 74%.

All patients had complete remission and complete cytogenetic remission as assessed by conventional karyotyping. Additionally, 73 of 85 evaluable patients (86%) achieved a CMR at some point during therapy.

“We had previously reported that achievement of a complete molecular response by 3 months is associated with superior outcomes. Approximately three quarters of patients achieved this milestone,” Dr. Short said.

Grade 3 or greater adverse events of particular concern included transaminase elevations in 29% of patients, elevated bilirubin and pancreatitis in 15% each, and hypertension in 14%.

Four patients had grade 3 or greater venous thromboembolic or arterial events, including the two previously noted deaths from myocardial infarction, both of which occurred prior to the protocol amendment.

At the most recent follow-up, 11 patients had experienced relapse (no CNS-only relapses), and of this group, 5 died and 6 were still alive. Nineteen patients underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplant, and of this group, 13 were still alive and 6 died.

Causes of death in the nine patients who died while in CR included the two myocardial infarction deaths on study, three deaths from sepsis during consolidation, one from lung cancer, one from a head injury after a fall, one from myocardial infarction in a 79-year-old patient 4 years after stopping ponatinib (off study), and one from preexisting congestive heart failure in a 74-year-old patient.

In all, 47 patients were either in ongoing therapy or observation at last follow-up, including three patients who were transitioned to MRD-directed therapy including blinatumomab (Blincyto).

“As a next step, we are now evaluating lower-intensity regimens with ponatinib and blinatumomab in both the frontline and relapsed/refractory settings, with the goals of decreased chemotherapy-related toxicity, increased MRD-negativity rates, further decreased reliance on transplant, and improved long-term outcomes,” Dr. Short said.

The study was sponsored by MD Anderson with support from the National Cancer Institute. Dr. Short reported consulting for AstraZenca, honoraria from Amgen, and consulting and receiving research funding from Takeda Oncology.

SOURCE: Short NJ et al. ASH 2019, Abstract 283.

ORLANDO – Anti-CD5 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells can produce complete responses (CRs) in patients with relapsed or refractory T-cell malignancies, according to findings from a phase 1 trial.

Jennifer Smith/MDedge News

Three of 11 patients achieved a CR after CAR T-cell therapy, and one patient achieved a mixed response that deepened to a CR after transplant. Three responders, all of whom had T-cell lymphoma, were still alive and in CR at last follow-up.

There were no cases of severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or severe neurotoxicity, no serious infectious complications, and no nonhematologic grade 4 adverse events in this trial.

LaQuisa C. Hill, MD, of Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, presented these results at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

“While CD19 CAR T cells have revolutionized the treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies, development of CAR T-cell platforms targeting T-cell-driven malignancies have been hindered by three main factors: CAR T-cell fratricide due to shared expression of target antigens leading to impaired expansion, ablation of normal T cells continuing to cause profound immunodeficiency, and the potential of transduced tumor cells providing a means of tumor escape,” Dr. Hill said.

Researchers have theorized that anti-CD5 CAR T cells can overcome these obstacles. In preclinical studies, anti-CD5 CAR T cells eliminated malignant blasts in vitro and in vivo and resulted in “limited and transient” fratricide (Blood. 2015 Aug 20;126[8]:983-92).

With this in mind, Dr. Hill and her colleagues tested CD5.28z CAR T cells in a phase 1 trial (NCT03081910). Eleven patients have been treated thus far – five with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), three with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), two with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), and one with Sézary syndrome.

The patients’ median age at baseline was 62 years (range, 21-71 years), and 63% were men. They had received a median of 5 prior therapies (range, 3-18). Two patients had relapsed after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), three had relapsed after autologous HSCT, and five were primary refractory.

Patients underwent lymphodepletion with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide, then received CAR T cells at doses of 1 x 10⁷ or 5 x 10⁷.
 

Response

Three lymphoma patients – two with AITL and one with PTCL – were still alive and in CR at last follow-up. The PTCL patient achieved a CR after CAR T-cell therapy and declined a subsequent HSCT. The patient has not received additional therapy and has retained the CR for 7 months.

One AITL patient achieved a CR and declined transplant as well. He relapsed after 7 months but received subsequent therapy and achieved another CR. The other AITL patient had a mixed response to CAR T-cell therapy but proceeded to allogeneic HSCT and achieved a CR that has lasted 9 months.

The remaining three lymphoma patients – two with PTCL and one with Sézary syndrome – progressed and died.

One T-ALL patient achieved a CR lasting 6 weeks, but the patient died while undergoing transplant workup. Two T-ALL patients did not respond to treatment and died. The remaining two patients progressed, and one of them died. The other patient who progressed is still alive and in CR after receiving subsequent therapy.

Factors associated with response

Dr. Hill said a shortened manufacturing process may be associated with enhanced response, as all responders received CAR T cells produced via a shorter manufacturing process. The shortened process involves freezing cells on day 4-5 post transduction, as opposed to day 7.

“While the numbers are too small to make any definitive conclusions, this seems to correlate with less terminal differentiation, which might improve potency,” Dr. Hill said. “However, additional analyses are ongoing.”

Dr. Hill also pointed out that CAR T-cell expansion was observed in all patients, with higher peak levels observed at the higher dose. In addition, CAR T-cell persistence was durable at both dose levels.

“We have been able to detect the CAR transgene at all follow-up time points, out to 9 months for some patients,” Dr. Hill said. “While limited persistence may play a role in nonresponders, it does not appear to be the only factor.”

Safety

“Surprisingly, no selective ablation of normal T cells has been observed,” Dr. Hill said. “As CAR T cells dwindled [after infusion], we were able to see recovery of normal T cells, all of which expressed normal levels of CD5. This was observed in all patients on study, except for one patient who had prolonged pancytopenia.”

Cytopenias were the most common grade 3/4 adverse events, including neutropenia (n = 8), anemia (n = 7), and thrombocytopenia (n = 5). Other grade 3/4 events included elevated aspartate aminotransferase (n = 2), hypoalbuminemia (n = 1), hyponatremia (n = 1), hypophosphatemia (n = 1), and elevated alanine aminotransferase (n = 1). There were no grade 5 adverse events.

Two patients developed grade 1 CRS, and two had grade 2 CRS. Both patients with grade 2 CRS were treated with tocilizumab, and their symptoms resolved.

One patient developed grade 2 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, but this resolved with supportive care.

One patient had a central line–associated bloodstream infection (coagulase-negative staphylococci), and one had cytomegalovirus and BK virus reactivation. There were no fungal infections.

“We have demonstrated that CD5 CAR T cells can be manufactured from heavily pretreated patients with T-cell malignancies, and therapy is well tolerated,” Dr. Hill said. “We have seen strong and promising activity in T-cell lymphoma, which we hope to be able to translate to T-ALL as well.”

Dr. Hill said she and her colleagues hope to improve upon these results with a higher dose level of CD5 CAR T cells (1 x 10⁸), which the team plans to start testing soon. The researchers may also investigate other target antigens, such as CD7, as well as the use of donor-derived CAR T cells for patients who have relapsed after allogeneic HSCT.

Dr. Hill said she has no relevant disclosures. Baylor College of Medicine is sponsoring this trial.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Hill L et al. ASH 2019. Abstract 199.

ORLANDO – Anti-CD5 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells can produce complete responses (CRs) in patients with relapsed or refractory T-cell malignancies, according to findings from a phase 1 trial.

Jennifer Smith/MDedge News

Three of 11 patients achieved a CR after CAR T-cell therapy, and one patient achieved a mixed response that deepened to a CR after transplant. Three responders, all of whom had T-cell lymphoma, were still alive and in CR at last follow-up.

There were no cases of severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or severe neurotoxicity, no serious infectious complications, and no nonhematologic grade 4 adverse events in this trial.

LaQuisa C. Hill, MD, of Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, presented these results at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

“While CD19 CAR T cells have revolutionized the treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies, development of CAR T-cell platforms targeting T-cell-driven malignancies have been hindered by three main factors: CAR T-cell fratricide due to shared expression of target antigens leading to impaired expansion, ablation of normal T cells continuing to cause profound immunodeficiency, and the potential of transduced tumor cells providing a means of tumor escape,” Dr. Hill said.

Researchers have theorized that anti-CD5 CAR T cells can overcome these obstacles. In preclinical studies, anti-CD5 CAR T cells eliminated malignant blasts in vitro and in vivo and resulted in “limited and transient” fratricide (Blood. 2015 Aug 20;126[8]:983-92).

With this in mind, Dr. Hill and her colleagues tested CD5.28z CAR T cells in a phase 1 trial (NCT03081910). Eleven patients have been treated thus far – five with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), three with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), two with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), and one with Sézary syndrome.

The patients’ median age at baseline was 62 years (range, 21-71 years), and 63% were men. They had received a median of 5 prior therapies (range, 3-18). Two patients had relapsed after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), three had relapsed after autologous HSCT, and five were primary refractory.

Patients underwent lymphodepletion with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide, then received CAR T cells at doses of 1 x 10⁷ or 5 x 10⁷.
 

Response

Three lymphoma patients – two with AITL and one with PTCL – were still alive and in CR at last follow-up. The PTCL patient achieved a CR after CAR T-cell therapy and declined a subsequent HSCT. The patient has not received additional therapy and has retained the CR for 7 months.

One AITL patient achieved a CR and declined transplant as well. He relapsed after 7 months but received subsequent therapy and achieved another CR. The other AITL patient had a mixed response to CAR T-cell therapy but proceeded to allogeneic HSCT and achieved a CR that has lasted 9 months.

The remaining three lymphoma patients – two with PTCL and one with Sézary syndrome – progressed and died.

One T-ALL patient achieved a CR lasting 6 weeks, but the patient died while undergoing transplant workup. Two T-ALL patients did not respond to treatment and died. The remaining two patients progressed, and one of them died. The other patient who progressed is still alive and in CR after receiving subsequent therapy.

Factors associated with response

Dr. Hill said a shortened manufacturing process may be associated with enhanced response, as all responders received CAR T cells produced via a shorter manufacturing process. The shortened process involves freezing cells on day 4-5 post transduction, as opposed to day 7.

“While the numbers are too small to make any definitive conclusions, this seems to correlate with less terminal differentiation, which might improve potency,” Dr. Hill said. “However, additional analyses are ongoing.”

Dr. Hill also pointed out that CAR T-cell expansion was observed in all patients, with higher peak levels observed at the higher dose. In addition, CAR T-cell persistence was durable at both dose levels.

“We have been able to detect the CAR transgene at all follow-up time points, out to 9 months for some patients,” Dr. Hill said. “While limited persistence may play a role in nonresponders, it does not appear to be the only factor.”

Safety

“Surprisingly, no selective ablation of normal T cells has been observed,” Dr. Hill said. “As CAR T cells dwindled [after infusion], we were able to see recovery of normal T cells, all of which expressed normal levels of CD5. This was observed in all patients on study, except for one patient who had prolonged pancytopenia.”

Cytopenias were the most common grade 3/4 adverse events, including neutropenia (n = 8), anemia (n = 7), and thrombocytopenia (n = 5). Other grade 3/4 events included elevated aspartate aminotransferase (n = 2), hypoalbuminemia (n = 1), hyponatremia (n = 1), hypophosphatemia (n = 1), and elevated alanine aminotransferase (n = 1). There were no grade 5 adverse events.

Two patients developed grade 1 CRS, and two had grade 2 CRS. Both patients with grade 2 CRS were treated with tocilizumab, and their symptoms resolved.

One patient developed grade 2 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, but this resolved with supportive care.

One patient had a central line–associated bloodstream infection (coagulase-negative staphylococci), and one had cytomegalovirus and BK virus reactivation. There were no fungal infections.

“We have demonstrated that CD5 CAR T cells can be manufactured from heavily pretreated patients with T-cell malignancies, and therapy is well tolerated,” Dr. Hill said. “We have seen strong and promising activity in T-cell lymphoma, which we hope to be able to translate to T-ALL as well.”

Dr. Hill said she and her colleagues hope to improve upon these results with a higher dose level of CD5 CAR T cells (1 x 10⁸), which the team plans to start testing soon. The researchers may also investigate other target antigens, such as CD7, as well as the use of donor-derived CAR T cells for patients who have relapsed after allogeneic HSCT.

Dr. Hill said she has no relevant disclosures. Baylor College of Medicine is sponsoring this trial.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Hill L et al. ASH 2019. Abstract 199.

ORLANDO – Anti-CD5 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells can produce complete responses (CRs) in patients with relapsed or refractory T-cell malignancies, according to findings from a phase 1 trial.

Jennifer Smith/MDedge News

Three of 11 patients achieved a CR after CAR T-cell therapy, and one patient achieved a mixed response that deepened to a CR after transplant. Three responders, all of whom had T-cell lymphoma, were still alive and in CR at last follow-up.

There were no cases of severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or severe neurotoxicity, no serious infectious complications, and no nonhematologic grade 4 adverse events in this trial.

LaQuisa C. Hill, MD, of Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, presented these results at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

“While CD19 CAR T cells have revolutionized the treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies, development of CAR T-cell platforms targeting T-cell-driven malignancies have been hindered by three main factors: CAR T-cell fratricide due to shared expression of target antigens leading to impaired expansion, ablation of normal T cells continuing to cause profound immunodeficiency, and the potential of transduced tumor cells providing a means of tumor escape,” Dr. Hill said.

Researchers have theorized that anti-CD5 CAR T cells can overcome these obstacles. In preclinical studies, anti-CD5 CAR T cells eliminated malignant blasts in vitro and in vivo and resulted in “limited and transient” fratricide (Blood. 2015 Aug 20;126[8]:983-92).

With this in mind, Dr. Hill and her colleagues tested CD5.28z CAR T cells in a phase 1 trial (NCT03081910). Eleven patients have been treated thus far – five with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), three with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), two with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), and one with Sézary syndrome.

The patients’ median age at baseline was 62 years (range, 21-71 years), and 63% were men. They had received a median of 5 prior therapies (range, 3-18). Two patients had relapsed after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), three had relapsed after autologous HSCT, and five were primary refractory.

Patients underwent lymphodepletion with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide, then received CAR T cells at doses of 1 x 10⁷ or 5 x 10⁷.
 

Response

Three lymphoma patients – two with AITL and one with PTCL – were still alive and in CR at last follow-up. The PTCL patient achieved a CR after CAR T-cell therapy and declined a subsequent HSCT. The patient has not received additional therapy and has retained the CR for 7 months.

One AITL patient achieved a CR and declined transplant as well. He relapsed after 7 months but received subsequent therapy and achieved another CR. The other AITL patient had a mixed response to CAR T-cell therapy but proceeded to allogeneic HSCT and achieved a CR that has lasted 9 months.

The remaining three lymphoma patients – two with PTCL and one with Sézary syndrome – progressed and died.

One T-ALL patient achieved a CR lasting 6 weeks, but the patient died while undergoing transplant workup. Two T-ALL patients did not respond to treatment and died. The remaining two patients progressed, and one of them died. The other patient who progressed is still alive and in CR after receiving subsequent therapy.

Factors associated with response

Dr. Hill said a shortened manufacturing process may be associated with enhanced response, as all responders received CAR T cells produced via a shorter manufacturing process. The shortened process involves freezing cells on day 4-5 post transduction, as opposed to day 7.

“While the numbers are too small to make any definitive conclusions, this seems to correlate with less terminal differentiation, which might improve potency,” Dr. Hill said. “However, additional analyses are ongoing.”

Dr. Hill also pointed out that CAR T-cell expansion was observed in all patients, with higher peak levels observed at the higher dose. In addition, CAR T-cell persistence was durable at both dose levels.

“We have been able to detect the CAR transgene at all follow-up time points, out to 9 months for some patients,” Dr. Hill said. “While limited persistence may play a role in nonresponders, it does not appear to be the only factor.”

Safety

“Surprisingly, no selective ablation of normal T cells has been observed,” Dr. Hill said. “As CAR T cells dwindled [after infusion], we were able to see recovery of normal T cells, all of which expressed normal levels of CD5. This was observed in all patients on study, except for one patient who had prolonged pancytopenia.”

Cytopenias were the most common grade 3/4 adverse events, including neutropenia (n = 8), anemia (n = 7), and thrombocytopenia (n = 5). Other grade 3/4 events included elevated aspartate aminotransferase (n = 2), hypoalbuminemia (n = 1), hyponatremia (n = 1), hypophosphatemia (n = 1), and elevated alanine aminotransferase (n = 1). There were no grade 5 adverse events.

Two patients developed grade 1 CRS, and two had grade 2 CRS. Both patients with grade 2 CRS were treated with tocilizumab, and their symptoms resolved.

One patient developed grade 2 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, but this resolved with supportive care.

One patient had a central line–associated bloodstream infection (coagulase-negative staphylococci), and one had cytomegalovirus and BK virus reactivation. There were no fungal infections.

“We have demonstrated that CD5 CAR T cells can be manufactured from heavily pretreated patients with T-cell malignancies, and therapy is well tolerated,” Dr. Hill said. “We have seen strong and promising activity in T-cell lymphoma, which we hope to be able to translate to T-ALL as well.”

Dr. Hill said she and her colleagues hope to improve upon these results with a higher dose level of CD5 CAR T cells (1 x 10⁸), which the team plans to start testing soon. The researchers may also investigate other target antigens, such as CD7, as well as the use of donor-derived CAR T cells for patients who have relapsed after allogeneic HSCT.

Dr. Hill said she has no relevant disclosures. Baylor College of Medicine is sponsoring this trial.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Hill L et al. ASH 2019. Abstract 199.

ORLANDO – Lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), a CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, has demonstrated manageable toxicity and promising clinical activity in the phase 1 portion of a trial enrolling heavily pretreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, according to an investigator.

Andrew D. Bowser/MDedge News

The overall response rate exceeded 80%, and most patients in response at 6 months had maintained that response at the 9-month mark, said Tanya Siddiqi, MD, of City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, Calif.

“Clinical responses were rapid, improved with time, and were deep and durable,” Dr. Siddiqi said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

These findings have provided justification for conducting the phase 2 portion of the study, which is currently enrolling at the higher of two dose levels evaluated in phase 1, she added.

Dr. Siddiqi reported on a total of 23 patients enrolled in the study, known as TRANSCEND CLL 004. All patients had relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), and had received at least two prior therapies, including ibrutinib, while about one-third had failed venetoclax as well.

The median patient age was 66 years, and 83% had high-risk features, according to Dr. Siddiqi, who said patients had received a median of five prior lines of therapy.

Nine patients were treated at dose level 1, or 50 x 10⁶ CAR+ T cells, while 14 were treated at dose level 2, or 100 x 10⁶ CAR+ T cells. Two patients experienced grade 3 or 4 dose-limiting toxicities at the second level, including hypertension in one patient, and encephalopathy, muscle weakness, and tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) in the other.

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 17 patients, though only two cases reached grade 3. Neurologic adverse events were seen in nine patients, of which five were grade 3 or 4.

SOURCE: Siddiqi T et al. ASH 2019, Abstract 503.

ORLANDO – Lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), a CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, has demonstrated manageable toxicity and promising clinical activity in the phase 1 portion of a trial enrolling heavily pretreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, according to an investigator.

Andrew D. Bowser/MDedge News

The overall response rate exceeded 80%, and most patients in response at 6 months had maintained that response at the 9-month mark, said Tanya Siddiqi, MD, of City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, Calif.

“Clinical responses were rapid, improved with time, and were deep and durable,” Dr. Siddiqi said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

These findings have provided justification for conducting the phase 2 portion of the study, which is currently enrolling at the higher of two dose levels evaluated in phase 1, she added.

Dr. Siddiqi reported on a total of 23 patients enrolled in the study, known as TRANSCEND CLL 004. All patients had relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), and had received at least two prior therapies, including ibrutinib, while about one-third had failed venetoclax as well.

The median patient age was 66 years, and 83% had high-risk features, according to Dr. Siddiqi, who said patients had received a median of five prior lines of therapy.

Nine patients were treated at dose level 1, or 50 x 10⁶ CAR+ T cells, while 14 were treated at dose level 2, or 100 x 10⁶ CAR+ T cells. Two patients experienced grade 3 or 4 dose-limiting toxicities at the second level, including hypertension in one patient, and encephalopathy, muscle weakness, and tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) in the other.

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 17 patients, though only two cases reached grade 3. Neurologic adverse events were seen in nine patients, of which five were grade 3 or 4.

SOURCE: Siddiqi T et al. ASH 2019, Abstract 503.

ORLANDO – Lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), a CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, has demonstrated manageable toxicity and promising clinical activity in the phase 1 portion of a trial enrolling heavily pretreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, according to an investigator.

Andrew D. Bowser/MDedge News

The overall response rate exceeded 80%, and most patients in response at 6 months had maintained that response at the 9-month mark, said Tanya Siddiqi, MD, of City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, Calif.

“Clinical responses were rapid, improved with time, and were deep and durable,” Dr. Siddiqi said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

These findings have provided justification for conducting the phase 2 portion of the study, which is currently enrolling at the higher of two dose levels evaluated in phase 1, she added.

Dr. Siddiqi reported on a total of 23 patients enrolled in the study, known as TRANSCEND CLL 004. All patients had relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), and had received at least two prior therapies, including ibrutinib, while about one-third had failed venetoclax as well.

The median patient age was 66 years, and 83% had high-risk features, according to Dr. Siddiqi, who said patients had received a median of five prior lines of therapy.

Nine patients were treated at dose level 1, or 50 x 10⁶ CAR+ T cells, while 14 were treated at dose level 2, or 100 x 10⁶ CAR+ T cells. Two patients experienced grade 3 or 4 dose-limiting toxicities at the second level, including hypertension in one patient, and encephalopathy, muscle weakness, and tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) in the other.

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 17 patients, though only two cases reached grade 3. Neurologic adverse events were seen in nine patients, of which five were grade 3 or 4.

SOURCE: Siddiqi T et al. ASH 2019, Abstract 503.

ORLANDO – Zanubrutinib has produced a high overall response rate in one the largest cohorts of patients with treatment-naive 17p-deletion chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) studied to date.

Andrew D. Bowser/MDedge News

An overall response rate of nearly 93% was seen in this 109-patient, high-risk cohort, enrolled as part of the phase 3 SEQUOIA study (BGB-3111-304), said Constantine S. Tam, MBBS, MD, of St. Vincent’s Hospital and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre in Melbourne.

Tolerability of zanubrutinib was essentially consistent with previous reports of the agent as used in other B-cell malignancies, Dr. Tam said in an oral presentation of the results at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Deletion of chromosome 17p13.1, or del(17p), is a marker of poor prognosis and poor response to chemotherapy in patients with CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). For patients with del(17p) CLL, the first-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib has become a standard of care, Dr. Tam said.

Zanubrutinib, a next-generation BTK inhibitor, was developed to improve BTK occupancy and minimize off-target inhibition of TEC and epidermal growth factor receptor kinases. “What this effectively means is that we are able to dose this drug at levels much higher than that achievable with ibrutinib, and not get intolerable side effects,” Dr. Tam said.

Zanubrutinib has been approved in the United States for previously treated mantle cell lymphoma, and generated durable responses among CLL/SLL patients with or without del(17p) in a phase 1/2 study, according to Dr. Tam.

In the present study, which exclusively enrolled patients with del(17p) CLL/SLL, patients received 160 mg twice daily of zanubrutinib, Dr. Tam said. Out of 109 patients enrolled, 10 (9.2%) had SLL. All patients were aged at least 65 years or were deemed unsuitable for treatment with the combination of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab.

Of 109 patients enrolled, 104 received on-study treatment. The median age was 70 years, Dr. Tam reported, and a number of patients had other high-risk markers beyond del(17p), including unmutated IgVH status in 61.5% of patients.

With a median follow-up of 10 months, the overall response rate was 92.7%, including 1.9% complete responses and 78.9% partial responses. “Only one patient had primary progressive disease after starting this drug,” Dr. Tam said.

Time to response was rapid, according to the investigator, at about 2.8 months; after 6 months, 95% of responders remained in response.

Further analysis showed that the response rate was consistent across subgroups. “There was not a single group that did not respond with a high response rate, including poor prognostic groups,” Dr. Tam said.

Most adverse events were grade 1-2 in severity, and the most common events included confusion and upper respiratory tract infection. The only common grade 3 event, according to Dr. Tam, was neutropenia. Rates of grade 3 major bleeding were low, he said, and the rate of grade 3 atrial fibrillation was 0.9%. One patient died due to pneumonia.

The ongoing SEQUOIA study, designed to compare zanubrutinib to the combination of bendamustine and rituximab in patients with previously untreated CLL or SLL, is sponsored by BeiGene. Dr. Tam reported disclosures related to Novartis, Pharmacyclics, AbbVie, BeiGene, Janssen, and Roche.

SOURCE: Tam C et al. ASH 2019, Abstract 499.

ORLANDO – Zanubrutinib has produced a high overall response rate in one the largest cohorts of patients with treatment-naive 17p-deletion chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) studied to date.

Andrew D. Bowser/MDedge News

An overall response rate of nearly 93% was seen in this 109-patient, high-risk cohort, enrolled as part of the phase 3 SEQUOIA study (BGB-3111-304), said Constantine S. Tam, MBBS, MD, of St. Vincent’s Hospital and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre in Melbourne.

Tolerability of zanubrutinib was essentially consistent with previous reports of the agent as used in other B-cell malignancies, Dr. Tam said in an oral presentation of the results at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Deletion of chromosome 17p13.1, or del(17p), is a marker of poor prognosis and poor response to chemotherapy in patients with CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). For patients with del(17p) CLL, the first-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib has become a standard of care, Dr. Tam said.

Zanubrutinib, a next-generation BTK inhibitor, was developed to improve BTK occupancy and minimize off-target inhibition of TEC and epidermal growth factor receptor kinases. “What this effectively means is that we are able to dose this drug at levels much higher than that achievable with ibrutinib, and not get intolerable side effects,” Dr. Tam said.

Zanubrutinib has been approved in the United States for previously treated mantle cell lymphoma, and generated durable responses among CLL/SLL patients with or without del(17p) in a phase 1/2 study, according to Dr. Tam.

In the present study, which exclusively enrolled patients with del(17p) CLL/SLL, patients received 160 mg twice daily of zanubrutinib, Dr. Tam said. Out of 109 patients enrolled, 10 (9.2%) had SLL. All patients were aged at least 65 years or were deemed unsuitable for treatment with the combination of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab.

Of 109 patients enrolled, 104 received on-study treatment. The median age was 70 years, Dr. Tam reported, and a number of patients had other high-risk markers beyond del(17p), including unmutated IgVH status in 61.5% of patients.

With a median follow-up of 10 months, the overall response rate was 92.7%, including 1.9% complete responses and 78.9% partial responses. “Only one patient had primary progressive disease after starting this drug,” Dr. Tam said.

Time to response was rapid, according to the investigator, at about 2.8 months; after 6 months, 95% of responders remained in response.

Further analysis showed that the response rate was consistent across subgroups. “There was not a single group that did not respond with a high response rate, including poor prognostic groups,” Dr. Tam said.

Most adverse events were grade 1-2 in severity, and the most common events included confusion and upper respiratory tract infection. The only common grade 3 event, according to Dr. Tam, was neutropenia. Rates of grade 3 major bleeding were low, he said, and the rate of grade 3 atrial fibrillation was 0.9%. One patient died due to pneumonia.

The ongoing SEQUOIA study, designed to compare zanubrutinib to the combination of bendamustine and rituximab in patients with previously untreated CLL or SLL, is sponsored by BeiGene. Dr. Tam reported disclosures related to Novartis, Pharmacyclics, AbbVie, BeiGene, Janssen, and Roche.

SOURCE: Tam C et al. ASH 2019, Abstract 499.

ORLANDO – Zanubrutinib has produced a high overall response rate in one the largest cohorts of patients with treatment-naive 17p-deletion chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) studied to date.

Andrew D. Bowser/MDedge News

An overall response rate of nearly 93% was seen in this 109-patient, high-risk cohort, enrolled as part of the phase 3 SEQUOIA study (BGB-3111-304), said Constantine S. Tam, MBBS, MD, of St. Vincent’s Hospital and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre in Melbourne.

Tolerability of zanubrutinib was essentially consistent with previous reports of the agent as used in other B-cell malignancies, Dr. Tam said in an oral presentation of the results at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Deletion of chromosome 17p13.1, or del(17p), is a marker of poor prognosis and poor response to chemotherapy in patients with CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). For patients with del(17p) CLL, the first-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib has become a standard of care, Dr. Tam said.

Zanubrutinib, a next-generation BTK inhibitor, was developed to improve BTK occupancy and minimize off-target inhibition of TEC and epidermal growth factor receptor kinases. “What this effectively means is that we are able to dose this drug at levels much higher than that achievable with ibrutinib, and not get intolerable side effects,” Dr. Tam said.

Zanubrutinib has been approved in the United States for previously treated mantle cell lymphoma, and generated durable responses among CLL/SLL patients with or without del(17p) in a phase 1/2 study, according to Dr. Tam.

In the present study, which exclusively enrolled patients with del(17p) CLL/SLL, patients received 160 mg twice daily of zanubrutinib, Dr. Tam said. Out of 109 patients enrolled, 10 (9.2%) had SLL. All patients were aged at least 65 years or were deemed unsuitable for treatment with the combination of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab.

Of 109 patients enrolled, 104 received on-study treatment. The median age was 70 years, Dr. Tam reported, and a number of patients had other high-risk markers beyond del(17p), including unmutated IgVH status in 61.5% of patients.

With a median follow-up of 10 months, the overall response rate was 92.7%, including 1.9% complete responses and 78.9% partial responses. “Only one patient had primary progressive disease after starting this drug,” Dr. Tam said.

Time to response was rapid, according to the investigator, at about 2.8 months; after 6 months, 95% of responders remained in response.

Further analysis showed that the response rate was consistent across subgroups. “There was not a single group that did not respond with a high response rate, including poor prognostic groups,” Dr. Tam said.

Most adverse events were grade 1-2 in severity, and the most common events included confusion and upper respiratory tract infection. The only common grade 3 event, according to Dr. Tam, was neutropenia. Rates of grade 3 major bleeding were low, he said, and the rate of grade 3 atrial fibrillation was 0.9%. One patient died due to pneumonia.

The ongoing SEQUOIA study, designed to compare zanubrutinib to the combination of bendamustine and rituximab in patients with previously untreated CLL or SLL, is sponsored by BeiGene. Dr. Tam reported disclosures related to Novartis, Pharmacyclics, AbbVie, BeiGene, Janssen, and Roche.

SOURCE: Tam C et al. ASH 2019, Abstract 499.

ORLANDO – In young patients who experience relapse after chemotherapy for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), the novel agent blinatumomab (Blincyto, Amgen) can be used instead of intensive chemotherapy to try to achieve a second remission, experts say.

In fact, blinatumomab should be the new standard of care in these patients because it yielded better overall survival, was less toxic, and allowed more patients to proceed to transplant, said Robert A. Brodsky, MD, professor of medicine and director of the division of hematology at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.

Dr. Brodsky was commenting on new data presented in a late-breaking abstract (LBA1) at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, for which he holds the role of secretary.

These results are “truly practice changing,” he told journalists at a press briefing.

Cure rates for B-ALL in children and adolescents and young adults (AYAs) are high, but for the small group of patients who experience relapse (about 15%), the prognosis is poor.

When relapse occurs in these patients, “it’s a real problem,” Dr. Brodsky explained. “At that point, the major emphasis is trying to get them back into full remission and get them to a transplant,” he continued, “but it’s very hard to get these patients back into remission.”

The standard treatment approach for these patients includes intensive chemotherapy. In the new study, this was compared to monotherapy with blinatumomab, which is described as a bispecific T-cell engager antibody.

The results were presented by Patrick A. Brown, MD, from the division of pediatric oncology at the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University.

The Children’s Oncology Group Study AALL1331 trial was conducted in 208 children and AYA patients with B-ALL after a first relapse. Median follow-up was 1.4 years.

Blinatumomab was superior in achieving both disease-free survival (59.3 plus or minus 5.4% at 2 years vs. 41% plus or minus 6.2% at 2 years with chemo; P = .05) and overall survival (79.4 plus or minus 4.5% at 2 years vs. 59.2 plus or minus 6% at 2 years with chemo; P = .05).

In addition, more patients who received blinatumomab subsequently underwent transplant (79% vs. 45% with chemo; P less than .0001).

The drug was also better tolerated than chemotherapy, causing fewer and less severe toxicities, including fewer cases of grade 3+ infection, sepsis, and mucositis.

Dr. Brown concluded that, for children and AYA patients with high- or intermediate-risk first relapse of B-ALL, blinatumomab is superior to standard chemotherapy as postreinduction consolidation prior to transplant, resulting in fewer and less severe toxicities, higher rates of minimum residual disease response, greater likelihood of proceeding to hematopoietic stem cell transplant, and improved disease-free and overall survival.

Dr. Brown noted that blinatumomab already has conditional approval from the Food and Drug Administration for use in relapsed ALL in both adults and children, but that approval was based on clinical trial data in adults. This is now the definitive trial in children and AYAs, and it should support full approval for this indication, he said.

Dr. Brown has relationships with Novartis, Servier, and Jazz. Many coauthors also have relationships with pharmaceutical companies. Dr. Brodsky has relationships with Achillion, Alexion, and UpToDate.
 

A version of this story originally appeared on Medscape.com.

ORLANDO – In young patients who experience relapse after chemotherapy for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), the novel agent blinatumomab (Blincyto, Amgen) can be used instead of intensive chemotherapy to try to achieve a second remission, experts say.

In fact, blinatumomab should be the new standard of care in these patients because it yielded better overall survival, was less toxic, and allowed more patients to proceed to transplant, said Robert A. Brodsky, MD, professor of medicine and director of the division of hematology at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.

Dr. Brodsky was commenting on new data presented in a late-breaking abstract (LBA1) at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, for which he holds the role of secretary.

These results are “truly practice changing,” he told journalists at a press briefing.

Cure rates for B-ALL in children and adolescents and young adults (AYAs) are high, but for the small group of patients who experience relapse (about 15%), the prognosis is poor.

When relapse occurs in these patients, “it’s a real problem,” Dr. Brodsky explained. “At that point, the major emphasis is trying to get them back into full remission and get them to a transplant,” he continued, “but it’s very hard to get these patients back into remission.”

The standard treatment approach for these patients includes intensive chemotherapy. In the new study, this was compared to monotherapy with blinatumomab, which is described as a bispecific T-cell engager antibody.

The results were presented by Patrick A. Brown, MD, from the division of pediatric oncology at the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University.

The Children’s Oncology Group Study AALL1331 trial was conducted in 208 children and AYA patients with B-ALL after a first relapse. Median follow-up was 1.4 years.

Blinatumomab was superior in achieving both disease-free survival (59.3 plus or minus 5.4% at 2 years vs. 41% plus or minus 6.2% at 2 years with chemo; P = .05) and overall survival (79.4 plus or minus 4.5% at 2 years vs. 59.2 plus or minus 6% at 2 years with chemo; P = .05).

In addition, more patients who received blinatumomab subsequently underwent transplant (79% vs. 45% with chemo; P less than .0001).

The drug was also better tolerated than chemotherapy, causing fewer and less severe toxicities, including fewer cases of grade 3+ infection, sepsis, and mucositis.

Dr. Brown concluded that, for children and AYA patients with high- or intermediate-risk first relapse of B-ALL, blinatumomab is superior to standard chemotherapy as postreinduction consolidation prior to transplant, resulting in fewer and less severe toxicities, higher rates of minimum residual disease response, greater likelihood of proceeding to hematopoietic stem cell transplant, and improved disease-free and overall survival.

Dr. Brown noted that blinatumomab already has conditional approval from the Food and Drug Administration for use in relapsed ALL in both adults and children, but that approval was based on clinical trial data in adults. This is now the definitive trial in children and AYAs, and it should support full approval for this indication, he said.

Dr. Brown has relationships with Novartis, Servier, and Jazz. Many coauthors also have relationships with pharmaceutical companies. Dr. Brodsky has relationships with Achillion, Alexion, and UpToDate.
 

A version of this story originally appeared on Medscape.com.

ORLANDO – In young patients who experience relapse after chemotherapy for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), the novel agent blinatumomab (Blincyto, Amgen) can be used instead of intensive chemotherapy to try to achieve a second remission, experts say.

In fact, blinatumomab should be the new standard of care in these patients because it yielded better overall survival, was less toxic, and allowed more patients to proceed to transplant, said Robert A. Brodsky, MD, professor of medicine and director of the division of hematology at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.

Dr. Brodsky was commenting on new data presented in a late-breaking abstract (LBA1) at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, for which he holds the role of secretary.

These results are “truly practice changing,” he told journalists at a press briefing.

Cure rates for B-ALL in children and adolescents and young adults (AYAs) are high, but for the small group of patients who experience relapse (about 15%), the prognosis is poor.

When relapse occurs in these patients, “it’s a real problem,” Dr. Brodsky explained. “At that point, the major emphasis is trying to get them back into full remission and get them to a transplant,” he continued, “but it’s very hard to get these patients back into remission.”

The standard treatment approach for these patients includes intensive chemotherapy. In the new study, this was compared to monotherapy with blinatumomab, which is described as a bispecific T-cell engager antibody.

The results were presented by Patrick A. Brown, MD, from the division of pediatric oncology at the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University.

The Children’s Oncology Group Study AALL1331 trial was conducted in 208 children and AYA patients with B-ALL after a first relapse. Median follow-up was 1.4 years.

Blinatumomab was superior in achieving both disease-free survival (59.3 plus or minus 5.4% at 2 years vs. 41% plus or minus 6.2% at 2 years with chemo; P = .05) and overall survival (79.4 plus or minus 4.5% at 2 years vs. 59.2 plus or minus 6% at 2 years with chemo; P = .05).

In addition, more patients who received blinatumomab subsequently underwent transplant (79% vs. 45% with chemo; P less than .0001).

The drug was also better tolerated than chemotherapy, causing fewer and less severe toxicities, including fewer cases of grade 3+ infection, sepsis, and mucositis.

Dr. Brown concluded that, for children and AYA patients with high- or intermediate-risk first relapse of B-ALL, blinatumomab is superior to standard chemotherapy as postreinduction consolidation prior to transplant, resulting in fewer and less severe toxicities, higher rates of minimum residual disease response, greater likelihood of proceeding to hematopoietic stem cell transplant, and improved disease-free and overall survival.

Dr. Brown noted that blinatumomab already has conditional approval from the Food and Drug Administration for use in relapsed ALL in both adults and children, but that approval was based on clinical trial data in adults. This is now the definitive trial in children and AYAs, and it should support full approval for this indication, he said.

Dr. Brown has relationships with Novartis, Servier, and Jazz. Many coauthors also have relationships with pharmaceutical companies. Dr. Brodsky has relationships with Achillion, Alexion, and UpToDate.
 

A version of this story originally appeared on Medscape.com.

ORLANDO – For the first time, there is a maintenance therapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in remission that can improve overall survival – a new oral formulation of an old drug, azacitidine, known as CC-486 (Celgene).

“Oral azacitidine represents a new therapeutic standard for patients with AML in remission,” said lead author Andrew H. Wei, MBBS, PhD, from the Alfred Hospital in Melbourne.

“It’s not too hard to get these patients into remission,” commented another expert. “The problem comes in keeping them in remission.”

Dr. Wei noted that standard treatment with intensive induction chemotherapy for AML induces complete remission (CR) in 60%-80% of patients aged 60 years or younger and in 40%-60% of patients aged 60 years or older.

However, the majority of patients who attain complete remission (CR) will eventually relapse, and relapse is the primary obstacle to long-term survival, he said.

Despite various attempts, there has been no success over the past 30 years in defining maintenance treatment for these patients, Dr. Wei said.

The new results suggest that oral azacitidine could be an effective maintenance therapy.

Dr. Wei presented the results at the 2019 annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology. They come from the QUAZAR AML-001 study, conducted in 472 patients with poor-risk AML in first remission.

The results show that CC-486 significantly improved outcomes, compared with placebo plus best supportive care, in terms of median overall survival (24.7 vs. 14.8 months) and median relapse-free survival (10.2 vs. 4.8 months).

The trial was funded by Celgene, which said it will be submitting the data for regulatory approval for the new oral formulation of azacitidine, CC-486.
 

Experts predict new standard of care

Experts approached for comment agreed that maintenance oral azacitidine will become the new standard of care for patients with AML in first remission.

“Unlike therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, maintenance therapy has not been part of the treatment algorithm for AML patients in first remission,” Harry P. Erba, MD, PhD, director of the leukemia program at the Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, N.C., told Medscape Medical News.

He explained that trials for maintenance after first remission in AML have failed. Recently, Dr. Erba noted, the HOVON97 trial with injectable azacitidine demonstrated improvement in relapse-free survival, compared with observation for older AML patients achieving remission after induction therapy. “However, there was no improvement in overall survival,” he said.

“Remission in AML is short lived,” Dr. Erba said. Oral azacitidine represents the first maintenance therapy in AML that has shown both significant and clinically meaningful improvements in overall and relapse-free survival and will represent a new standard of care for patients with AML in remission, Dr. Erba said. “Maintenance oral azacitidine will be practice changing,” he predicted.

HOVON97 was a small study of injectable azacitidine used as maintenance therapy for 12 months, but it was slow to accrue and did not meet its accrual target.

“In HOVON97, at 12 months, only one third of patients received less than the 12 cycles of therapy,” Dr. Wei said. He explained that, with injectable azacitidine, patients have to come into the hospital/clinic for 7 days a month, 84 days a year. Oral azacitidine is more convenient as patients do not have to come into the clinic, he said.

Dr. Wei pointed out that about 40 patients in the QUAZAR study, which started in 2013, are still on maintenance therapy, with one patient now having received 80 cycles of therapy (approximately 7 years). “Long-term maintenance therapy with azacitidine is possible,” he said.

Another expert was also impressed by the new results. “This is an important clinical trial that addresses an unmet need in AML care,” said John Mascarenhas, MD, director of the Adult Leukemia Program and leader of clinical investigation within the myeloproliferative disorders program at the Tisch Cancer Institute at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York.

“Older patients can often receive induction chemotherapy but frequently do not ultimately do well, as the disease relapses and survival is limited,” he explained.

“This large, randomized, double-blind, controlled study of intermediate- or poor-risk AML patients over the age of 55 years supports the use of maintenance oral azacitidine after initial remission to extend overall and relapse-free survival in older AML patients not eligible for transplant,” Dr. Mascarenhas said.

“This is still not a curative approach,” Dr. Wei said, but added that it prolongs relapse-free survival for older patients while maintaining a quality of life for as long as possible.
 

Study details

The QUAZAR phase 3 study enrolled patients with poor- or intermediate-risk cytogenetics who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status less than or equal to 3 and who had achieved CR or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) after induction therapy with or without consolidation therapy. In addition, patients were not candidates for stem cell transplants.

Patients had predominantly de novo AML (89%). Other baseline characteristics of note:

• 85% of patients had intermediate-risk and 15% had poor-risk cytogenetics
• 79% achieved CR and 21% achieved CRi after induction therapy
• 78% received at least one cycle of consolidation therapy
• 43% of patients had minimal residual disease (MRD)–positive disease

Patients were randomized to receive oral azacitidine 200 mg daily on days 1-14 of a repeat 28-day cycle (n = 278) or matching placebo (n = 274). Treatment was continued indefinitely until blast count was more than 15% or patients experienced unacceptable toxicity or went on to transplant.

At a median follow-up of over 41.2 months (3 years, 5 months), median overall survival was significantly longer for patients receiving oral azacitidine at 24.7 months versus 14.8 months for placebo (P less than .0009; hazard ratio, 0.69).

Relapse-free survival was also significantly prolonged, to 10.2 months for patients on oral azacitidine versus 4.8 months for placebo (HR, 0.65; P less than .0001).

Patients on oral azacitidine reported more grade 1-2 gastrointestinal adverse events, such as nausea (65% vs. 24% on placebo), vomiting (60% vs. 10%), and diarrhea (50% vs 22%), as well as more cytopenia. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (41% with oral azacitidine vs. 24% on placebo), thrombocytopenia (23% vs. 22%), and anemia (14% vs. 13%).

Although Dr. Erba supported the use of oral azacitidine as maintenance therapy, he pointed out that it was hard to convince patients, especially older ones, to continue on maintenance therapy indefinitely. “The toxicities of continuing on a drug indefinitely are real issues,” he said, explaining that most elderly patients cannot cope with even grade 1-2 nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting over the long term.

But he noted that, regardless of the higher incidence of some adverse events with oral azacitidine, the health-related quality of life of patients on oral azacitidine was similar to those on placebo.
 

Awaiting longer follow-up

Both experts said that longer-term follow-up is needed.

“We need a longer follow-up to see how the curves plateau,” Dr. Erba said. He would also like to see a comparative analysis of the data in patients who are MRD negative versus those who are MRD positive.

“The final results of this study, including the impact of measurable residual disease on outcome in this setting, will potentially have practice-changing implications,” said Dr. Mascarenhas.

At the press conference, Dr. Wei pointed out that, based on the data from QUAZAR, oral azacitidine is likely to be evaluated in the frontline setting of AML. “The elderly make up about two-thirds of all AML patients, and oral azacitidine will be a better option than 7 days per month for chemotherapy treatment in the clinic,” he said. “Oral azacitidine in the future may also be the backbone for other combinations.”

The study was funded by Celgene.

Dr. Wei receives honoraria from AbbVie, Macrogenics, Pfizer, Astellas, Janssen, Servier, Celgene, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Genentech; is on the board of directors or serves on the advisory committees for AbbVie, Macrogenics, Pfizer, Astellas, Servier, Celgene, Amgen, Novartis, and Genentech; and receives research funding from AbbVie, Servier, Celgene, Amgen, AstraZeneca, and Novartis. As a former employee of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Dr. Wei receives a fraction of its royalty stream related to venetoclax.

A partial list of Dr. Erba’s conflict of interest includes consulting with Agios, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, MacroGenics, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Seattle Genetics, GlycoMimetics, Amgen, Pfizer, Celgene, AbbVie, Covance, Immunogen, Astellas Pharma, Incyte; being on the speakers bureau or receiving lecture fees from Agios, Novartis, MacroGenics, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Celgene; receiving research funding from Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, MacroGenics, GlycoMimetics, Celgene; being on the data and safety monitoring board of GlycoMimetics; and chairing independent review boards for several trials across several companies.
 

A version of this story originally appeared on Medscape.com.

ORLANDO – For the first time, there is a maintenance therapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in remission that can improve overall survival – a new oral formulation of an old drug, azacitidine, known as CC-486 (Celgene).

“Oral azacitidine represents a new therapeutic standard for patients with AML in remission,” said lead author Andrew H. Wei, MBBS, PhD, from the Alfred Hospital in Melbourne.

“It’s not too hard to get these patients into remission,” commented another expert. “The problem comes in keeping them in remission.”

Dr. Wei noted that standard treatment with intensive induction chemotherapy for AML induces complete remission (CR) in 60%-80% of patients aged 60 years or younger and in 40%-60% of patients aged 60 years or older.

However, the majority of patients who attain complete remission (CR) will eventually relapse, and relapse is the primary obstacle to long-term survival, he said.

Despite various attempts, there has been no success over the past 30 years in defining maintenance treatment for these patients, Dr. Wei said.

The new results suggest that oral azacitidine could be an effective maintenance therapy.

Dr. Wei presented the results at the 2019 annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology. They come from the QUAZAR AML-001 study, conducted in 472 patients with poor-risk AML in first remission.

The results show that CC-486 significantly improved outcomes, compared with placebo plus best supportive care, in terms of median overall survival (24.7 vs. 14.8 months) and median relapse-free survival (10.2 vs. 4.8 months).

The trial was funded by Celgene, which said it will be submitting the data for regulatory approval for the new oral formulation of azacitidine, CC-486.
 

Experts predict new standard of care

Experts approached for comment agreed that maintenance oral azacitidine will become the new standard of care for patients with AML in first remission.

“Unlike therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, maintenance therapy has not been part of the treatment algorithm for AML patients in first remission,” Harry P. Erba, MD, PhD, director of the leukemia program at the Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, N.C., told Medscape Medical News.

He explained that trials for maintenance after first remission in AML have failed. Recently, Dr. Erba noted, the HOVON97 trial with injectable azacitidine demonstrated improvement in relapse-free survival, compared with observation for older AML patients achieving remission after induction therapy. “However, there was no improvement in overall survival,” he said.

“Remission in AML is short lived,” Dr. Erba said. Oral azacitidine represents the first maintenance therapy in AML that has shown both significant and clinically meaningful improvements in overall and relapse-free survival and will represent a new standard of care for patients with AML in remission, Dr. Erba said. “Maintenance oral azacitidine will be practice changing,” he predicted.

HOVON97 was a small study of injectable azacitidine used as maintenance therapy for 12 months, but it was slow to accrue and did not meet its accrual target.

“In HOVON97, at 12 months, only one third of patients received less than the 12 cycles of therapy,” Dr. Wei said. He explained that, with injectable azacitidine, patients have to come into the hospital/clinic for 7 days a month, 84 days a year. Oral azacitidine is more convenient as patients do not have to come into the clinic, he said.

Dr. Wei pointed out that about 40 patients in the QUAZAR study, which started in 2013, are still on maintenance therapy, with one patient now having received 80 cycles of therapy (approximately 7 years). “Long-term maintenance therapy with azacitidine is possible,” he said.

Another expert was also impressed by the new results. “This is an important clinical trial that addresses an unmet need in AML care,” said John Mascarenhas, MD, director of the Adult Leukemia Program and leader of clinical investigation within the myeloproliferative disorders program at the Tisch Cancer Institute at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York.

“Older patients can often receive induction chemotherapy but frequently do not ultimately do well, as the disease relapses and survival is limited,” he explained.

“This large, randomized, double-blind, controlled study of intermediate- or poor-risk AML patients over the age of 55 years supports the use of maintenance oral azacitidine after initial remission to extend overall and relapse-free survival in older AML patients not eligible for transplant,” Dr. Mascarenhas said.

“This is still not a curative approach,” Dr. Wei said, but added that it prolongs relapse-free survival for older patients while maintaining a quality of life for as long as possible.
 

Study details

The QUAZAR phase 3 study enrolled patients with poor- or intermediate-risk cytogenetics who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status less than or equal to 3 and who had achieved CR or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) after induction therapy with or without consolidation therapy. In addition, patients were not candidates for stem cell transplants.

Patients had predominantly de novo AML (89%). Other baseline characteristics of note:

• 85% of patients had intermediate-risk and 15% had poor-risk cytogenetics
• 79% achieved CR and 21% achieved CRi after induction therapy
• 78% received at least one cycle of consolidation therapy
• 43% of patients had minimal residual disease (MRD)–positive disease

Patients were randomized to receive oral azacitidine 200 mg daily on days 1-14 of a repeat 28-day cycle (n = 278) or matching placebo (n = 274). Treatment was continued indefinitely until blast count was more than 15% or patients experienced unacceptable toxicity or went on to transplant.

At a median follow-up of over 41.2 months (3 years, 5 months), median overall survival was significantly longer for patients receiving oral azacitidine at 24.7 months versus 14.8 months for placebo (P less than .0009; hazard ratio, 0.69).

Relapse-free survival was also significantly prolonged, to 10.2 months for patients on oral azacitidine versus 4.8 months for placebo (HR, 0.65; P less than .0001).

Patients on oral azacitidine reported more grade 1-2 gastrointestinal adverse events, such as nausea (65% vs. 24% on placebo), vomiting (60% vs. 10%), and diarrhea (50% vs 22%), as well as more cytopenia. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (41% with oral azacitidine vs. 24% on placebo), thrombocytopenia (23% vs. 22%), and anemia (14% vs. 13%).

Although Dr. Erba supported the use of oral azacitidine as maintenance therapy, he pointed out that it was hard to convince patients, especially older ones, to continue on maintenance therapy indefinitely. “The toxicities of continuing on a drug indefinitely are real issues,” he said, explaining that most elderly patients cannot cope with even grade 1-2 nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting over the long term.

But he noted that, regardless of the higher incidence of some adverse events with oral azacitidine, the health-related quality of life of patients on oral azacitidine was similar to those on placebo.
 

Awaiting longer follow-up

Both experts said that longer-term follow-up is needed.

“We need a longer follow-up to see how the curves plateau,” Dr. Erba said. He would also like to see a comparative analysis of the data in patients who are MRD negative versus those who are MRD positive.

“The final results of this study, including the impact of measurable residual disease on outcome in this setting, will potentially have practice-changing implications,” said Dr. Mascarenhas.

At the press conference, Dr. Wei pointed out that, based on the data from QUAZAR, oral azacitidine is likely to be evaluated in the frontline setting of AML. “The elderly make up about two-thirds of all AML patients, and oral azacitidine will be a better option than 7 days per month for chemotherapy treatment in the clinic,” he said. “Oral azacitidine in the future may also be the backbone for other combinations.”

The study was funded by Celgene.

Dr. Wei receives honoraria from AbbVie, Macrogenics, Pfizer, Astellas, Janssen, Servier, Celgene, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Genentech; is on the board of directors or serves on the advisory committees for AbbVie, Macrogenics, Pfizer, Astellas, Servier, Celgene, Amgen, Novartis, and Genentech; and receives research funding from AbbVie, Servier, Celgene, Amgen, AstraZeneca, and Novartis. As a former employee of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Dr. Wei receives a fraction of its royalty stream related to venetoclax.

A partial list of Dr. Erba’s conflict of interest includes consulting with Agios, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, MacroGenics, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Seattle Genetics, GlycoMimetics, Amgen, Pfizer, Celgene, AbbVie, Covance, Immunogen, Astellas Pharma, Incyte; being on the speakers bureau or receiving lecture fees from Agios, Novartis, MacroGenics, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Celgene; receiving research funding from Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, MacroGenics, GlycoMimetics, Celgene; being on the data and safety monitoring board of GlycoMimetics; and chairing independent review boards for several trials across several companies.
 

A version of this story originally appeared on Medscape.com.

ORLANDO – For the first time, there is a maintenance therapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in remission that can improve overall survival – a new oral formulation of an old drug, azacitidine, known as CC-486 (Celgene).

“Oral azacitidine represents a new therapeutic standard for patients with AML in remission,” said lead author Andrew H. Wei, MBBS, PhD, from the Alfred Hospital in Melbourne.

“It’s not too hard to get these patients into remission,” commented another expert. “The problem comes in keeping them in remission.”

Dr. Wei noted that standard treatment with intensive induction chemotherapy for AML induces complete remission (CR) in 60%-80% of patients aged 60 years or younger and in 40%-60% of patients aged 60 years or older.

However, the majority of patients who attain complete remission (CR) will eventually relapse, and relapse is the primary obstacle to long-term survival, he said.

Despite various attempts, there has been no success over the past 30 years in defining maintenance treatment for these patients, Dr. Wei said.

The new results suggest that oral azacitidine could be an effective maintenance therapy.

Dr. Wei presented the results at the 2019 annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology. They come from the QUAZAR AML-001 study, conducted in 472 patients with poor-risk AML in first remission.

The results show that CC-486 significantly improved outcomes, compared with placebo plus best supportive care, in terms of median overall survival (24.7 vs. 14.8 months) and median relapse-free survival (10.2 vs. 4.8 months).

The trial was funded by Celgene, which said it will be submitting the data for regulatory approval for the new oral formulation of azacitidine, CC-486.
 

Experts predict new standard of care

Experts approached for comment agreed that maintenance oral azacitidine will become the new standard of care for patients with AML in first remission.

“Unlike therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, maintenance therapy has not been part of the treatment algorithm for AML patients in first remission,” Harry P. Erba, MD, PhD, director of the leukemia program at the Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, N.C., told Medscape Medical News.

He explained that trials for maintenance after first remission in AML have failed. Recently, Dr. Erba noted, the HOVON97 trial with injectable azacitidine demonstrated improvement in relapse-free survival, compared with observation for older AML patients achieving remission after induction therapy. “However, there was no improvement in overall survival,” he said.

“Remission in AML is short lived,” Dr. Erba said. Oral azacitidine represents the first maintenance therapy in AML that has shown both significant and clinically meaningful improvements in overall and relapse-free survival and will represent a new standard of care for patients with AML in remission, Dr. Erba said. “Maintenance oral azacitidine will be practice changing,” he predicted.

HOVON97 was a small study of injectable azacitidine used as maintenance therapy for 12 months, but it was slow to accrue and did not meet its accrual target.

“In HOVON97, at 12 months, only one third of patients received less than the 12 cycles of therapy,” Dr. Wei said. He explained that, with injectable azacitidine, patients have to come into the hospital/clinic for 7 days a month, 84 days a year. Oral azacitidine is more convenient as patients do not have to come into the clinic, he said.

Dr. Wei pointed out that about 40 patients in the QUAZAR study, which started in 2013, are still on maintenance therapy, with one patient now having received 80 cycles of therapy (approximately 7 years). “Long-term maintenance therapy with azacitidine is possible,” he said.

Another expert was also impressed by the new results. “This is an important clinical trial that addresses an unmet need in AML care,” said John Mascarenhas, MD, director of the Adult Leukemia Program and leader of clinical investigation within the myeloproliferative disorders program at the Tisch Cancer Institute at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York.

“Older patients can often receive induction chemotherapy but frequently do not ultimately do well, as the disease relapses and survival is limited,” he explained.

“This large, randomized, double-blind, controlled study of intermediate- or poor-risk AML patients over the age of 55 years supports the use of maintenance oral azacitidine after initial remission to extend overall and relapse-free survival in older AML patients not eligible for transplant,” Dr. Mascarenhas said.

“This is still not a curative approach,” Dr. Wei said, but added that it prolongs relapse-free survival for older patients while maintaining a quality of life for as long as possible.
 

Study details

The QUAZAR phase 3 study enrolled patients with poor- or intermediate-risk cytogenetics who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status less than or equal to 3 and who had achieved CR or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) after induction therapy with or without consolidation therapy. In addition, patients were not candidates for stem cell transplants.

Patients had predominantly de novo AML (89%). Other baseline characteristics of note:

• 85% of patients had intermediate-risk and 15% had poor-risk cytogenetics
• 79% achieved CR and 21% achieved CRi after induction therapy
• 78% received at least one cycle of consolidation therapy
• 43% of patients had minimal residual disease (MRD)–positive disease

Patients were randomized to receive oral azacitidine 200 mg daily on days 1-14 of a repeat 28-day cycle (n = 278) or matching placebo (n = 274). Treatment was continued indefinitely until blast count was more than 15% or patients experienced unacceptable toxicity or went on to transplant.

At a median follow-up of over 41.2 months (3 years, 5 months), median overall survival was significantly longer for patients receiving oral azacitidine at 24.7 months versus 14.8 months for placebo (P less than .0009; hazard ratio, 0.69).

Relapse-free survival was also significantly prolonged, to 10.2 months for patients on oral azacitidine versus 4.8 months for placebo (HR, 0.65; P less than .0001).

Patients on oral azacitidine reported more grade 1-2 gastrointestinal adverse events, such as nausea (65% vs. 24% on placebo), vomiting (60% vs. 10%), and diarrhea (50% vs 22%), as well as more cytopenia. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (41% with oral azacitidine vs. 24% on placebo), thrombocytopenia (23% vs. 22%), and anemia (14% vs. 13%).

Although Dr. Erba supported the use of oral azacitidine as maintenance therapy, he pointed out that it was hard to convince patients, especially older ones, to continue on maintenance therapy indefinitely. “The toxicities of continuing on a drug indefinitely are real issues,” he said, explaining that most elderly patients cannot cope with even grade 1-2 nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting over the long term.

But he noted that, regardless of the higher incidence of some adverse events with oral azacitidine, the health-related quality of life of patients on oral azacitidine was similar to those on placebo.
 

Awaiting longer follow-up

Both experts said that longer-term follow-up is needed.

“We need a longer follow-up to see how the curves plateau,” Dr. Erba said. He would also like to see a comparative analysis of the data in patients who are MRD negative versus those who are MRD positive.

“The final results of this study, including the impact of measurable residual disease on outcome in this setting, will potentially have practice-changing implications,” said Dr. Mascarenhas.

At the press conference, Dr. Wei pointed out that, based on the data from QUAZAR, oral azacitidine is likely to be evaluated in the frontline setting of AML. “The elderly make up about two-thirds of all AML patients, and oral azacitidine will be a better option than 7 days per month for chemotherapy treatment in the clinic,” he said. “Oral azacitidine in the future may also be the backbone for other combinations.”

The study was funded by Celgene.

Dr. Wei receives honoraria from AbbVie, Macrogenics, Pfizer, Astellas, Janssen, Servier, Celgene, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Genentech; is on the board of directors or serves on the advisory committees for AbbVie, Macrogenics, Pfizer, Astellas, Servier, Celgene, Amgen, Novartis, and Genentech; and receives research funding from AbbVie, Servier, Celgene, Amgen, AstraZeneca, and Novartis. As a former employee of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Dr. Wei receives a fraction of its royalty stream related to venetoclax.

A partial list of Dr. Erba’s conflict of interest includes consulting with Agios, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, MacroGenics, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Seattle Genetics, GlycoMimetics, Amgen, Pfizer, Celgene, AbbVie, Covance, Immunogen, Astellas Pharma, Incyte; being on the speakers bureau or receiving lecture fees from Agios, Novartis, MacroGenics, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Celgene; receiving research funding from Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, MacroGenics, GlycoMimetics, Celgene; being on the data and safety monitoring board of GlycoMimetics; and chairing independent review boards for several trials across several companies.
 

A version of this story originally appeared on Medscape.com.

ORLANDO – For a patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who has discontinued venetoclax, choosing the best next therapy may depend on what novel agents the patient was exposed to and why they discontinued them, according to Anthony R. Mato, MD, with the Center for CLL at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York.

Andrew D. Bowser/MDedge News

If the patient is Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor naive, then use of a BTK inhibitor after venetoclax would be supported, Dr. Mato said, by the high overall response rates and durable remissions that he and his coinvestigators documented in a retrospective, multicenter study designed specifically to address the gap in knowledge regarding what to use after venetoclax.

If the patient is BTK inhibitor exposed, then the reason for discontinuation needs to be considered before going with that venetoclax-to-BTK inhibitor sequence, Dr. Mato said during an oral presentation at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

“In patients with resistance to a BTK inhibitor, the sequence was not supported – it did not appear to be effective,” he said. “However, in the setting of intolerance, an alternate BTK inhibitor could be considered.”

The study did not support a venetoclax-to-PI3K inhibitor sequence in PI3K-naive patients, he added, noting that remissions did not appear to be durable, suggesting a potential overlap in resistance mechanisms between agents.

All told, the most effective therapies for in the postvenetoclax setting included the use of a BTK inhibitor in BTK inhibitor–naive or previously responsive patients, and allogeneic transplant following double novel-agent exposure.

“These data may provide support for venetoclax’s earlier use in the course of CLL, and may guide clinical practice and aid in the design of future clinical trials to address sequencing of novel agents,” Dr. Mato told attendees.

While prospective and real-world data clearly show that venetoclax is active in ibrutinib- or idelalisib-exposed patients, data are conversely “variable and limited” with regard to outcomes for next therapies following venetoclax.

“Current data addressing this key sequencing question, I feel, is a major limitation in supporting the sequence of venetoclax to a BTK inhibitor,” Dr. Mato said.

Accordingly, Dr. Mato and colleagues at 31 centers internationally planned and conducted this study, which included data on 326 patients treated with venetoclax who then discontinued for any reason.

“I wanted to highlight that 50% of the sites for this trial were recruited by a single tweet,” said Dr. Mato, adding that he and his coauthors received no funding to conduct this study and volunteered their time to complete it.

They found that, in BTK inhibitor–naive patients who discontinued venetoclax, subsequent BTK inhibitor treatment was associated with a high overall response rate and durable remissions, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 32 months.

In BTK inhibitor–exposed patients, response to postvenetoclax BTK inhibitor treatment depended on the reason for discontinuation, with a favorable result (PFS not reached with a mean follow-up of 7.7 months) in patients who were intolerant of the prior BTK inhibitor. By contrast, median PFS was only about 4 months for patients who were resistant to the prior BTK inhibitor.

PI3K inhibitors did not produce durable remissions after venetoclax, with a median PFS also of just 4 months, Dr. Mato reported.

However, cellular therapies appeared to be effective after venetoclax. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was particularly effective, with the median PFS not reached, while chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy produced a PFS of 9 months.

Dr. Mato emphasized that the results of the retrospective trial were “hypothesis generating” and noted that patients in the study had received a median of 3, and up to 11, prior therapies. “This population are probably not our patients receiving venetoclax in clinical practice. They’re more heavily pretreated.”

Dr. Mato reported disclosures related to Gilead, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Sunesis, Johnson & Johnson, TG Therapeutics, Loxo Oncology, DTRM Biopharma, Genentech, Janssen, Acerta Pharma, Pharmacyclics, and Celgene.

SOURCE: Mato AR et al. ASH 2019, Abstract 502.

ORLANDO – For a patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who has discontinued venetoclax, choosing the best next therapy may depend on what novel agents the patient was exposed to and why they discontinued them, according to Anthony R. Mato, MD, with the Center for CLL at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York.

Andrew D. Bowser/MDedge News

If the patient is Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor naive, then use of a BTK inhibitor after venetoclax would be supported, Dr. Mato said, by the high overall response rates and durable remissions that he and his coinvestigators documented in a retrospective, multicenter study designed specifically to address the gap in knowledge regarding what to use after venetoclax.

If the patient is BTK inhibitor exposed, then the reason for discontinuation needs to be considered before going with that venetoclax-to-BTK inhibitor sequence, Dr. Mato said during an oral presentation at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

“In patients with resistance to a BTK inhibitor, the sequence was not supported – it did not appear to be effective,” he said. “However, in the setting of intolerance, an alternate BTK inhibitor could be considered.”

The study did not support a venetoclax-to-PI3K inhibitor sequence in PI3K-naive patients, he added, noting that remissions did not appear to be durable, suggesting a potential overlap in resistance mechanisms between agents.

All told, the most effective therapies for in the postvenetoclax setting included the use of a BTK inhibitor in BTK inhibitor–naive or previously responsive patients, and allogeneic transplant following double novel-agent exposure.

“These data may provide support for venetoclax’s earlier use in the course of CLL, and may guide clinical practice and aid in the design of future clinical trials to address sequencing of novel agents,” Dr. Mato told attendees.

While prospective and real-world data clearly show that venetoclax is active in ibrutinib- or idelalisib-exposed patients, data are conversely “variable and limited” with regard to outcomes for next therapies following venetoclax.

“Current data addressing this key sequencing question, I feel, is a major limitation in supporting the sequence of venetoclax to a BTK inhibitor,” Dr. Mato said.

Accordingly, Dr. Mato and colleagues at 31 centers internationally planned and conducted this study, which included data on 326 patients treated with venetoclax who then discontinued for any reason.

“I wanted to highlight that 50% of the sites for this trial were recruited by a single tweet,” said Dr. Mato, adding that he and his coauthors received no funding to conduct this study and volunteered their time to complete it.

They found that, in BTK inhibitor–naive patients who discontinued venetoclax, subsequent BTK inhibitor treatment was associated with a high overall response rate and durable remissions, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 32 months.

In BTK inhibitor–exposed patients, response to postvenetoclax BTK inhibitor treatment depended on the reason for discontinuation, with a favorable result (PFS not reached with a mean follow-up of 7.7 months) in patients who were intolerant of the prior BTK inhibitor. By contrast, median PFS was only about 4 months for patients who were resistant to the prior BTK inhibitor.

PI3K inhibitors did not produce durable remissions after venetoclax, with a median PFS also of just 4 months, Dr. Mato reported.

However, cellular therapies appeared to be effective after venetoclax. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was particularly effective, with the median PFS not reached, while chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy produced a PFS of 9 months.

Dr. Mato emphasized that the results of the retrospective trial were “hypothesis generating” and noted that patients in the study had received a median of 3, and up to 11, prior therapies. “This population are probably not our patients receiving venetoclax in clinical practice. They’re more heavily pretreated.”

Dr. Mato reported disclosures related to Gilead, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Sunesis, Johnson & Johnson, TG Therapeutics, Loxo Oncology, DTRM Biopharma, Genentech, Janssen, Acerta Pharma, Pharmacyclics, and Celgene.

SOURCE: Mato AR et al. ASH 2019, Abstract 502.

ORLANDO – For a patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who has discontinued venetoclax, choosing the best next therapy may depend on what novel agents the patient was exposed to and why they discontinued them, according to Anthony R. Mato, MD, with the Center for CLL at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York.

Andrew D. Bowser/MDedge News

If the patient is Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor naive, then use of a BTK inhibitor after venetoclax would be supported, Dr. Mato said, by the high overall response rates and durable remissions that he and his coinvestigators documented in a retrospective, multicenter study designed specifically to address the gap in knowledge regarding what to use after venetoclax.

If the patient is BTK inhibitor exposed, then the reason for discontinuation needs to be considered before going with that venetoclax-to-BTK inhibitor sequence, Dr. Mato said during an oral presentation at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

“In patients with resistance to a BTK inhibitor, the sequence was not supported – it did not appear to be effective,” he said. “However, in the setting of intolerance, an alternate BTK inhibitor could be considered.”

The study did not support a venetoclax-to-PI3K inhibitor sequence in PI3K-naive patients, he added, noting that remissions did not appear to be durable, suggesting a potential overlap in resistance mechanisms between agents.

All told, the most effective therapies for in the postvenetoclax setting included the use of a BTK inhibitor in BTK inhibitor–naive or previously responsive patients, and allogeneic transplant following double novel-agent exposure.

“These data may provide support for venetoclax’s earlier use in the course of CLL, and may guide clinical practice and aid in the design of future clinical trials to address sequencing of novel agents,” Dr. Mato told attendees.

While prospective and real-world data clearly show that venetoclax is active in ibrutinib- or idelalisib-exposed patients, data are conversely “variable and limited” with regard to outcomes for next therapies following venetoclax.

“Current data addressing this key sequencing question, I feel, is a major limitation in supporting the sequence of venetoclax to a BTK inhibitor,” Dr. Mato said.

Accordingly, Dr. Mato and colleagues at 31 centers internationally planned and conducted this study, which included data on 326 patients treated with venetoclax who then discontinued for any reason.

“I wanted to highlight that 50% of the sites for this trial were recruited by a single tweet,” said Dr. Mato, adding that he and his coauthors received no funding to conduct this study and volunteered their time to complete it.

They found that, in BTK inhibitor–naive patients who discontinued venetoclax, subsequent BTK inhibitor treatment was associated with a high overall response rate and durable remissions, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 32 months.

In BTK inhibitor–exposed patients, response to postvenetoclax BTK inhibitor treatment depended on the reason for discontinuation, with a favorable result (PFS not reached with a mean follow-up of 7.7 months) in patients who were intolerant of the prior BTK inhibitor. By contrast, median PFS was only about 4 months for patients who were resistant to the prior BTK inhibitor.

PI3K inhibitors did not produce durable remissions after venetoclax, with a median PFS also of just 4 months, Dr. Mato reported.

However, cellular therapies appeared to be effective after venetoclax. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was particularly effective, with the median PFS not reached, while chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy produced a PFS of 9 months.

Dr. Mato emphasized that the results of the retrospective trial were “hypothesis generating” and noted that patients in the study had received a median of 3, and up to 11, prior therapies. “This population are probably not our patients receiving venetoclax in clinical practice. They’re more heavily pretreated.”

Dr. Mato reported disclosures related to Gilead, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Sunesis, Johnson & Johnson, TG Therapeutics, Loxo Oncology, DTRM Biopharma, Genentech, Janssen, Acerta Pharma, Pharmacyclics, and Celgene.

SOURCE: Mato AR et al. ASH 2019, Abstract 502.

ORLANDO – While African Americans with acute myeloid leukemia were more likely to have evidence of abnormal kidney function, the excess of this comorbidity didn’t affect overall survival, compared with whites, according to a study of more than 1,000 patients.

Andrew Bowser/MDedge News

A total of 63% of African Americans with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) presented with a renal function abnormality that could have excluded them from a clinical trial, compared with 56% in the overall cohort; however, analysis of outcomes data suggested that renal function abnormalities were not associated with decreased survival in African Americans versus whites, said Abby Statler, PhD, MPH, of the Cleveland Clinic.

The findings may have implications for the design of clinical trials that might exclude patients on the basis of comorbidities that don’t actually affect survival, according to Dr. Statler.

“If we’re able to liberalize renal function eligibility criteria ... this may reduce racial disparities in clinical trial enrollment, which might be a major step in improving the diversity of cancer patient populations,” Dr. Statler said in a press conference at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Overly restrictive criteria could be a significant barrier to clinical trial enrollment among minority patient populations, according to Dr. Statler.

Eligibility criteria are generally biased toward “fit” patient populations, which means they may discriminate against less-fit groups, such as African Americans who, compared with whites, have higher rates of comorbidities and report poorer overall health, according to Dr. Statler.

Laura Michaelis, MD, who chaired the press conference, said these findings suggest current clinical trial designs may be “too restrictive.”

“Once it’s published and validated, [these] data should definitely make us think twice about when you limit a patient’s enrollment in a trial,” Dr. Michaelis said in an interview.

Restrictive eligibility criteria may not only limit access to minority populations, but also may slow clinical trial accrual and completion, and make it harder to generalize clinical trial findings to the overall population, said Dr. Michaelis, associate professor of medicine in the division of hematology and oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.

SOURCE: Statler A et al. ASH 2019, Abstract 381.

ORLANDO – While African Americans with acute myeloid leukemia were more likely to have evidence of abnormal kidney function, the excess of this comorbidity didn’t affect overall survival, compared with whites, according to a study of more than 1,000 patients.

Andrew Bowser/MDedge News

A total of 63% of African Americans with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) presented with a renal function abnormality that could have excluded them from a clinical trial, compared with 56% in the overall cohort; however, analysis of outcomes data suggested that renal function abnormalities were not associated with decreased survival in African Americans versus whites, said Abby Statler, PhD, MPH, of the Cleveland Clinic.

The findings may have implications for the design of clinical trials that might exclude patients on the basis of comorbidities that don’t actually affect survival, according to Dr. Statler.

“If we’re able to liberalize renal function eligibility criteria ... this may reduce racial disparities in clinical trial enrollment, which might be a major step in improving the diversity of cancer patient populations,” Dr. Statler said in a press conference at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Overly restrictive criteria could be a significant barrier to clinical trial enrollment among minority patient populations, according to Dr. Statler.

Eligibility criteria are generally biased toward “fit” patient populations, which means they may discriminate against less-fit groups, such as African Americans who, compared with whites, have higher rates of comorbidities and report poorer overall health, according to Dr. Statler.

Laura Michaelis, MD, who chaired the press conference, said these findings suggest current clinical trial designs may be “too restrictive.”

“Once it’s published and validated, [these] data should definitely make us think twice about when you limit a patient’s enrollment in a trial,” Dr. Michaelis said in an interview.

Restrictive eligibility criteria may not only limit access to minority populations, but also may slow clinical trial accrual and completion, and make it harder to generalize clinical trial findings to the overall population, said Dr. Michaelis, associate professor of medicine in the division of hematology and oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.

SOURCE: Statler A et al. ASH 2019, Abstract 381.

ORLANDO – While African Americans with acute myeloid leukemia were more likely to have evidence of abnormal kidney function, the excess of this comorbidity didn’t affect overall survival, compared with whites, according to a study of more than 1,000 patients.

Andrew Bowser/MDedge News

A total of 63% of African Americans with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) presented with a renal function abnormality that could have excluded them from a clinical trial, compared with 56% in the overall cohort; however, analysis of outcomes data suggested that renal function abnormalities were not associated with decreased survival in African Americans versus whites, said Abby Statler, PhD, MPH, of the Cleveland Clinic.

The findings may have implications for the design of clinical trials that might exclude patients on the basis of comorbidities that don’t actually affect survival, according to Dr. Statler.

“If we’re able to liberalize renal function eligibility criteria ... this may reduce racial disparities in clinical trial enrollment, which might be a major step in improving the diversity of cancer patient populations,” Dr. Statler said in a press conference at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Overly restrictive criteria could be a significant barrier to clinical trial enrollment among minority patient populations, according to Dr. Statler.

Eligibility criteria are generally biased toward “fit” patient populations, which means they may discriminate against less-fit groups, such as African Americans who, compared with whites, have higher rates of comorbidities and report poorer overall health, according to Dr. Statler.

Laura Michaelis, MD, who chaired the press conference, said these findings suggest current clinical trial designs may be “too restrictive.”

“Once it’s published and validated, [these] data should definitely make us think twice about when you limit a patient’s enrollment in a trial,” Dr. Michaelis said in an interview.

Restrictive eligibility criteria may not only limit access to minority populations, but also may slow clinical trial accrual and completion, and make it harder to generalize clinical trial findings to the overall population, said Dr. Michaelis, associate professor of medicine in the division of hematology and oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.

SOURCE: Statler A et al. ASH 2019, Abstract 381.

The Food and Drug Administration has approved acalabrutinib (Calquence) as initial or subsequent treatment for adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic leukemia (SLL).

Olivier Le Moal/Getty Images

The approval came as part of Project Orbis, a collaboration among the FDA, the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration, and Health Canada. The program allows for the concurrent submission of review of oncology drug applications among the various agencies.

Acalabrutinib, a bruton tyrosin kinase inhibitor, is already approved in the United States for the treatment of adults with mantle cell lymphoma who have received at least one prior therapy. The FDA granted breakthrough therapy designation to acalabrutinib as a monotherapy for adults with CLL in August 2019, allowing for an expedited review.

The approval in CLL/SLL was based on results from two randomized clinical trials comparing acalabrutinib with other standard treatments. In the first trial, patients with previously untreated CLL who received acalabrutinib had a longer progression-free survival time, compared with patients who received standard treatment. A similar result was seen in the second trial among patients with previously treated CLL.

The most common adverse events associated with acalabrutinib include anemia, neutropenia, upper respiratory tract infection, thrombocytopenia, headache, diarrhea, and musculoskeletal pain. Patients receiving the drug should be monitored for symptoms of arrhythmia, serious infection, bleeding, and low blood count. Full prescribing information can be found on the FDA website.

[email protected]

The Food and Drug Administration has approved acalabrutinib (Calquence) as initial or subsequent treatment for adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic leukemia (SLL).

Olivier Le Moal/Getty Images

The approval came as part of Project Orbis, a collaboration among the FDA, the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration, and Health Canada. The program allows for the concurrent submission of review of oncology drug applications among the various agencies.

Acalabrutinib, a bruton tyrosin kinase inhibitor, is already approved in the United States for the treatment of adults with mantle cell lymphoma who have received at least one prior therapy. The FDA granted breakthrough therapy designation to acalabrutinib as a monotherapy for adults with CLL in August 2019, allowing for an expedited review.

The approval in CLL/SLL was based on results from two randomized clinical trials comparing acalabrutinib with other standard treatments. In the first trial, patients with previously untreated CLL who received acalabrutinib had a longer progression-free survival time, compared with patients who received standard treatment. A similar result was seen in the second trial among patients with previously treated CLL.

The most common adverse events associated with acalabrutinib include anemia, neutropenia, upper respiratory tract infection, thrombocytopenia, headache, diarrhea, and musculoskeletal pain. Patients receiving the drug should be monitored for symptoms of arrhythmia, serious infection, bleeding, and low blood count. Full prescribing information can be found on the FDA website.

[email protected]

The Food and Drug Administration has approved acalabrutinib (Calquence) as initial or subsequent treatment for adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic leukemia (SLL).

Olivier Le Moal/Getty Images

The approval came as part of Project Orbis, a collaboration among the FDA, the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration, and Health Canada. The program allows for the concurrent submission of review of oncology drug applications among the various agencies.

Acalabrutinib, a bruton tyrosin kinase inhibitor, is already approved in the United States for the treatment of adults with mantle cell lymphoma who have received at least one prior therapy. The FDA granted breakthrough therapy designation to acalabrutinib as a monotherapy for adults with CLL in August 2019, allowing for an expedited review.

The approval in CLL/SLL was based on results from two randomized clinical trials comparing acalabrutinib with other standard treatments. In the first trial, patients with previously untreated CLL who received acalabrutinib had a longer progression-free survival time, compared with patients who received standard treatment. A similar result was seen in the second trial among patients with previously treated CLL.

The most common adverse events associated with acalabrutinib include anemia, neutropenia, upper respiratory tract infection, thrombocytopenia, headache, diarrhea, and musculoskeletal pain. Patients receiving the drug should be monitored for symptoms of arrhythmia, serious infection, bleeding, and low blood count. Full prescribing information can be found on the FDA website.

[email protected]

NATIONAL HARBOR, MD. – New research has shown increased immune infiltration in patients with TP53-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Jennifer Smith/MDedge News

Patients with TP53-mutated AML had higher levels of T-cell infiltration, immune checkpoint molecules, and interferon (IFN)–gamma signaling than patients with wild-type TP53.

These findings may indicate that patients with TP53-mutated AML will respond to T-cell targeting immunotherapies, but more investigation is needed, according to Sergio Rutella, MD, PhD, of Nottingham (England) Trent University.

Dr. Rutella described the findings at the annual meeting of the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer.

He and his colleagues recently identified subgroups of AML, called “immune infiltrated” and “immune depleted,” that can predict chemotherapy resistance and response to flotetuzumab (ASH 2019, Abstract 460). However, the team has not determined the genetic drivers of immune infiltration in AML.*

With the current study, Dr. Rutella and his colleagues wanted to determine if TP53 mutations are associated with the AML immune milieu and see if TP53-mutated patients might benefit from immunotherapy.

Discovery cohort

The researchers first analyzed 147 patients with non-promyelocytic AML from the Cancer Genome Atlas. In total, 9% of these patients (n = 13) had TP53-mutated AML. The researchers assessed how 45 immune gene and biological activity signatures correlated with prognostic molecular lesions (TP53 mutations, FLT3-ITD, etc.) and clinical outcomes in this cohort.

The data showed that immune subtypes were associated with overall survival (OS). The median OS was 11.8 months in patients with immune-infiltrated AML, 16.4 months in patients with intermediate AML, and 25.8 months in patients with immune-depleted AML.

The inflammatory chemokine score (P = .011), IDO1 score (P = .027), IFN-gamma score (P = .036), and B7H3 score (P = .045) were all significantly associated with OS. In fact, these factors were all better predictors of OS than cytogenetic risk score (P = .049).

The IFN-gamma score, inflammatory chemokine score, and lymphoid score were all significantly higher in TP53-mutated patients than in patients with RUNX1 mutations, NPM1 mutations, FLT3-ITD (with or without NPM1 mutations), and TET2/DNMT3A/ASXL1 mutations (P values ranging from less than .0001 to .05).

Likewise, the tumor inflammation signature score was significantly higher among TP53-mutated patients than among patients with NPM1 mutations, FLT3-ITD (with or without NPM1 mutations), and TET2/DNMT3A/ASXL1 mutations (P values ranging from less than .0001 to .01).

Validation cohort and bone marrow samples

The researchers also looked at data from a validation cohort, which consisted of 140 patients with non-promyelocytic AML in the Beat AML Master Trial. Twelve percent of these patients (n = 17) had TP53 mutations.

Data in this cohort showed that CD3G messenger RNA (mRNA) was significantly higher in TP53-mutated AML than in TP53-wild-type AML (P = .04). The same was true for CD8A mRNA (P = .0002) and GZMB mRNA (P = .0005).

Likewise, IFN-gamma mRNA (P = .0052), IFIT2 mRNA (P = .0064), and IFIT3 mRNA (P = .003) were all significantly higher in patients with TP53-mutated AML.

Lastly, the researchers analyzed gene expression profiles of bone marrow samples from patients with AML, 36 with mutated TP53 and 24 with wild-type TP53.

The team found that IFN-gamma–induced genes (IFNG and IRF1), markers of T-cell infiltration (CD8A and CD3G) and senescence (EOMES, KLRD1, and HRAS), immune checkpoint molecules (IDO1, LAG3, PDL1, and VISTA), effector function molecules (GZMB, GZMK, and GZMM), and proinflammatory cytokines (IL17A and TNF) were all significantly overexpressed in TP53-mutated AML.

Among the top overexpressed genes in TP53-mutated AML were genes associated with IFN signaling and inflammation pathways – IL-33, IL-6, IFN-gamma, OASL, RIPK2, TNFAIP3, CSF1, and PTGER4. The IL-17 and TNF signaling pathways were the most enriched pathways in TP53-mutated AML.

“Our analysis of primary bone marrow samples showed that TP53-mutated samples are enriched in IL-17, TNF, and IFN signaling molecules, and show higher levels of T-cell infiltrations and immune checkpoints relative to their wild-type counterparts,” Dr. Rutella said.

“The in silico analysis indicated that TP53-mutated cases will show higher levels of T-cell infiltration, immune checkpoints, and IFN-gamma signaling, compared with AML subgroups without risk-defining molecular lesions,” he added. “This is speculative. Whether TP53-mutated AML can be amenable to respond to T-cell targeting immunotherapies is still to be determined.”

Dr. Rutella reported research support from NanoString Technologies, MacroGenics, and Kura Oncology.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Rutella S et al. SITC 2019. Abstract O3.

*This article was updated on 11/19/2019.

NATIONAL HARBOR, MD. – New research has shown increased immune infiltration in patients with TP53-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Jennifer Smith/MDedge News

Patients with TP53-mutated AML had higher levels of T-cell infiltration, immune checkpoint molecules, and interferon (IFN)–gamma signaling than patients with wild-type TP53.

These findings may indicate that patients with TP53-mutated AML will respond to T-cell targeting immunotherapies, but more investigation is needed, according to Sergio Rutella, MD, PhD, of Nottingham (England) Trent University.

Dr. Rutella described the findings at the annual meeting of the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer.

He and his colleagues recently identified subgroups of AML, called “immune infiltrated” and “immune depleted,” that can predict chemotherapy resistance and response to flotetuzumab (ASH 2019, Abstract 460). However, the team has not determined the genetic drivers of immune infiltration in AML.*

With the current study, Dr. Rutella and his colleagues wanted to determine if TP53 mutations are associated with the AML immune milieu and see if TP53-mutated patients might benefit from immunotherapy.

Discovery cohort

The researchers first analyzed 147 patients with non-promyelocytic AML from the Cancer Genome Atlas. In total, 9% of these patients (n = 13) had TP53-mutated AML. The researchers assessed how 45 immune gene and biological activity signatures correlated with prognostic molecular lesions (TP53 mutations, FLT3-ITD, etc.) and clinical outcomes in this cohort.

The data showed that immune subtypes were associated with overall survival (OS). The median OS was 11.8 months in patients with immune-infiltrated AML, 16.4 months in patients with intermediate AML, and 25.8 months in patients with immune-depleted AML.

The inflammatory chemokine score (P = .011), IDO1 score (P = .027), IFN-gamma score (P = .036), and B7H3 score (P = .045) were all significantly associated with OS. In fact, these factors were all better predictors of OS than cytogenetic risk score (P = .049).

The IFN-gamma score, inflammatory chemokine score, and lymphoid score were all significantly higher in TP53-mutated patients than in patients with RUNX1 mutations, NPM1 mutations, FLT3-ITD (with or without NPM1 mutations), and TET2/DNMT3A/ASXL1 mutations (P values ranging from less than .0001 to .05).

Likewise, the tumor inflammation signature score was significantly higher among TP53-mutated patients than among patients with NPM1 mutations, FLT3-ITD (with or without NPM1 mutations), and TET2/DNMT3A/ASXL1 mutations (P values ranging from less than .0001 to .01).

Validation cohort and bone marrow samples

The researchers also looked at data from a validation cohort, which consisted of 140 patients with non-promyelocytic AML in the Beat AML Master Trial. Twelve percent of these patients (n = 17) had TP53 mutations.

Data in this cohort showed that CD3G messenger RNA (mRNA) was significantly higher in TP53-mutated AML than in TP53-wild-type AML (P = .04). The same was true for CD8A mRNA (P = .0002) and GZMB mRNA (P = .0005).

Likewise, IFN-gamma mRNA (P = .0052), IFIT2 mRNA (P = .0064), and IFIT3 mRNA (P = .003) were all significantly higher in patients with TP53-mutated AML.

Lastly, the researchers analyzed gene expression profiles of bone marrow samples from patients with AML, 36 with mutated TP53 and 24 with wild-type TP53.

The team found that IFN-gamma–induced genes (IFNG and IRF1), markers of T-cell infiltration (CD8A and CD3G) and senescence (EOMES, KLRD1, and HRAS), immune checkpoint molecules (IDO1, LAG3, PDL1, and VISTA), effector function molecules (GZMB, GZMK, and GZMM), and proinflammatory cytokines (IL17A and TNF) were all significantly overexpressed in TP53-mutated AML.

Among the top overexpressed genes in TP53-mutated AML were genes associated with IFN signaling and inflammation pathways – IL-33, IL-6, IFN-gamma, OASL, RIPK2, TNFAIP3, CSF1, and PTGER4. The IL-17 and TNF signaling pathways were the most enriched pathways in TP53-mutated AML.

“Our analysis of primary bone marrow samples showed that TP53-mutated samples are enriched in IL-17, TNF, and IFN signaling molecules, and show higher levels of T-cell infiltrations and immune checkpoints relative to their wild-type counterparts,” Dr. Rutella said.

“The in silico analysis indicated that TP53-mutated cases will show higher levels of T-cell infiltration, immune checkpoints, and IFN-gamma signaling, compared with AML subgroups without risk-defining molecular lesions,” he added. “This is speculative. Whether TP53-mutated AML can be amenable to respond to T-cell targeting immunotherapies is still to be determined.”

Dr. Rutella reported research support from NanoString Technologies, MacroGenics, and Kura Oncology.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Rutella S et al. SITC 2019. Abstract O3.

*This article was updated on 11/19/2019.

NATIONAL HARBOR, MD. – New research has shown increased immune infiltration in patients with TP53-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Jennifer Smith/MDedge News

Patients with TP53-mutated AML had higher levels of T-cell infiltration, immune checkpoint molecules, and interferon (IFN)–gamma signaling than patients with wild-type TP53.

These findings may indicate that patients with TP53-mutated AML will respond to T-cell targeting immunotherapies, but more investigation is needed, according to Sergio Rutella, MD, PhD, of Nottingham (England) Trent University.

Dr. Rutella described the findings at the annual meeting of the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer.

He and his colleagues recently identified subgroups of AML, called “immune infiltrated” and “immune depleted,” that can predict chemotherapy resistance and response to flotetuzumab (ASH 2019, Abstract 460). However, the team has not determined the genetic drivers of immune infiltration in AML.*

With the current study, Dr. Rutella and his colleagues wanted to determine if TP53 mutations are associated with the AML immune milieu and see if TP53-mutated patients might benefit from immunotherapy.

Discovery cohort

The researchers first analyzed 147 patients with non-promyelocytic AML from the Cancer Genome Atlas. In total, 9% of these patients (n = 13) had TP53-mutated AML. The researchers assessed how 45 immune gene and biological activity signatures correlated with prognostic molecular lesions (TP53 mutations, FLT3-ITD, etc.) and clinical outcomes in this cohort.

The data showed that immune subtypes were associated with overall survival (OS). The median OS was 11.8 months in patients with immune-infiltrated AML, 16.4 months in patients with intermediate AML, and 25.8 months in patients with immune-depleted AML.

The inflammatory chemokine score (P = .011), IDO1 score (P = .027), IFN-gamma score (P = .036), and B7H3 score (P = .045) were all significantly associated with OS. In fact, these factors were all better predictors of OS than cytogenetic risk score (P = .049).

The IFN-gamma score, inflammatory chemokine score, and lymphoid score were all significantly higher in TP53-mutated patients than in patients with RUNX1 mutations, NPM1 mutations, FLT3-ITD (with or without NPM1 mutations), and TET2/DNMT3A/ASXL1 mutations (P values ranging from less than .0001 to .05).

Likewise, the tumor inflammation signature score was significantly higher among TP53-mutated patients than among patients with NPM1 mutations, FLT3-ITD (with or without NPM1 mutations), and TET2/DNMT3A/ASXL1 mutations (P values ranging from less than .0001 to .01).

Validation cohort and bone marrow samples

The researchers also looked at data from a validation cohort, which consisted of 140 patients with non-promyelocytic AML in the Beat AML Master Trial. Twelve percent of these patients (n = 17) had TP53 mutations.

Data in this cohort showed that CD3G messenger RNA (mRNA) was significantly higher in TP53-mutated AML than in TP53-wild-type AML (P = .04). The same was true for CD8A mRNA (P = .0002) and GZMB mRNA (P = .0005).

Likewise, IFN-gamma mRNA (P = .0052), IFIT2 mRNA (P = .0064), and IFIT3 mRNA (P = .003) were all significantly higher in patients with TP53-mutated AML.

Lastly, the researchers analyzed gene expression profiles of bone marrow samples from patients with AML, 36 with mutated TP53 and 24 with wild-type TP53.

The team found that IFN-gamma–induced genes (IFNG and IRF1), markers of T-cell infiltration (CD8A and CD3G) and senescence (EOMES, KLRD1, and HRAS), immune checkpoint molecules (IDO1, LAG3, PDL1, and VISTA), effector function molecules (GZMB, GZMK, and GZMM), and proinflammatory cytokines (IL17A and TNF) were all significantly overexpressed in TP53-mutated AML.

Among the top overexpressed genes in TP53-mutated AML were genes associated with IFN signaling and inflammation pathways – IL-33, IL-6, IFN-gamma, OASL, RIPK2, TNFAIP3, CSF1, and PTGER4. The IL-17 and TNF signaling pathways were the most enriched pathways in TP53-mutated AML.

“Our analysis of primary bone marrow samples showed that TP53-mutated samples are enriched in IL-17, TNF, and IFN signaling molecules, and show higher levels of T-cell infiltrations and immune checkpoints relative to their wild-type counterparts,” Dr. Rutella said.

“The in silico analysis indicated that TP53-mutated cases will show higher levels of T-cell infiltration, immune checkpoints, and IFN-gamma signaling, compared with AML subgroups without risk-defining molecular lesions,” he added. “This is speculative. Whether TP53-mutated AML can be amenable to respond to T-cell targeting immunotherapies is still to be determined.”

Dr. Rutella reported research support from NanoString Technologies, MacroGenics, and Kura Oncology.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Rutella S et al. SITC 2019. Abstract O3.

*This article was updated on 11/19/2019.