User login
Hot topics in 2017
The 2017 Postgraduate Course started out with four hot topics that dominated the year – opioid dependence, a cure for hepatitis C, and understanding and then manipulating the microbiome. From David Dickerson, MD, we learned that abdominal pain is complex and with an evolving classification scheme. Ignoring the biopsychosocial aspects and origins of pain is a sure way to lead to addiction and “pain behavior.” He reviewed the opioid guidelines that involve a comprehensive approach to therapy – setting functional goals, assessing the risks and benefits, and using the lowest necessary doses of short-acting agents for a defined period of time and then reassessing. In patients with chronic pain and opioid dependence, the gastroenterologist should seek the help of a chronic pain specialist. We should also refer for nonpharmacologic therapy such as cognitive behavioral therapy and biofeedback.
Norah Terrault, MD, MPH, discussed management of chronic hepatitis C (HCV) after the cure, achievable in more than 95% of patients, which has resulted in a sharp decline in listings for liver transplant. A cure is defined as undetectable HCV RNA 12 weeks after completion of therapy. So what happens next? If the patient is at risk for reinfection, they should have HCV RNA testing annually or if their liver enzymes increase. Otherwise, if their pretreatment fibrosis is low stage, no further monitoring is needed and they can follow up with their primary care provider. Intermediate-stage fibrosis should be monitored for progression. Advanced-stage fibrosis needs long-term follow-up for hepatocellular carcinoma and variceal surveillance. Modifiable risk factors, i.e., metabolic fatty liver and alcohol abuse, should be identified with appropriate counseling provided.
We went back to the microbiome for our last talk: Larry Brandt, MD, AGAF, discussed FMT for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Patients should be considered for FMT if they have more than 3 recurrences of mild to moderate CDI and failure to respond to standard therapy; more than 2 episodes of CDI resulting in hospitalization and significant morbidity; moderate CDI with no response after 1 week of standard therapy; and severe CDI with no response to standard therapy within 48 hours. Serious adverse events associated with FMT include infections and perhaps new-onset immune-mediated disease such as Sjogren’s, rheumatoid arthritis, and idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. It is hoped that the NIH-sponsored AGA national registry for FMT will help better define outcomes and adverse events over the next 10 years.
Dr. Mahadevan is professor of clinical medicine at UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco. This is a summary provided by the moderator of one of the AGA Postgraduate Courses held at DDW 2017.
The 2017 Postgraduate Course started out with four hot topics that dominated the year – opioid dependence, a cure for hepatitis C, and understanding and then manipulating the microbiome. From David Dickerson, MD, we learned that abdominal pain is complex and with an evolving classification scheme. Ignoring the biopsychosocial aspects and origins of pain is a sure way to lead to addiction and “pain behavior.” He reviewed the opioid guidelines that involve a comprehensive approach to therapy – setting functional goals, assessing the risks and benefits, and using the lowest necessary doses of short-acting agents for a defined period of time and then reassessing. In patients with chronic pain and opioid dependence, the gastroenterologist should seek the help of a chronic pain specialist. We should also refer for nonpharmacologic therapy such as cognitive behavioral therapy and biofeedback.
Norah Terrault, MD, MPH, discussed management of chronic hepatitis C (HCV) after the cure, achievable in more than 95% of patients, which has resulted in a sharp decline in listings for liver transplant. A cure is defined as undetectable HCV RNA 12 weeks after completion of therapy. So what happens next? If the patient is at risk for reinfection, they should have HCV RNA testing annually or if their liver enzymes increase. Otherwise, if their pretreatment fibrosis is low stage, no further monitoring is needed and they can follow up with their primary care provider. Intermediate-stage fibrosis should be monitored for progression. Advanced-stage fibrosis needs long-term follow-up for hepatocellular carcinoma and variceal surveillance. Modifiable risk factors, i.e., metabolic fatty liver and alcohol abuse, should be identified with appropriate counseling provided.
We went back to the microbiome for our last talk: Larry Brandt, MD, AGAF, discussed FMT for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Patients should be considered for FMT if they have more than 3 recurrences of mild to moderate CDI and failure to respond to standard therapy; more than 2 episodes of CDI resulting in hospitalization and significant morbidity; moderate CDI with no response after 1 week of standard therapy; and severe CDI with no response to standard therapy within 48 hours. Serious adverse events associated with FMT include infections and perhaps new-onset immune-mediated disease such as Sjogren’s, rheumatoid arthritis, and idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. It is hoped that the NIH-sponsored AGA national registry for FMT will help better define outcomes and adverse events over the next 10 years.
Dr. Mahadevan is professor of clinical medicine at UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco. This is a summary provided by the moderator of one of the AGA Postgraduate Courses held at DDW 2017.
The 2017 Postgraduate Course started out with four hot topics that dominated the year – opioid dependence, a cure for hepatitis C, and understanding and then manipulating the microbiome. From David Dickerson, MD, we learned that abdominal pain is complex and with an evolving classification scheme. Ignoring the biopsychosocial aspects and origins of pain is a sure way to lead to addiction and “pain behavior.” He reviewed the opioid guidelines that involve a comprehensive approach to therapy – setting functional goals, assessing the risks and benefits, and using the lowest necessary doses of short-acting agents for a defined period of time and then reassessing. In patients with chronic pain and opioid dependence, the gastroenterologist should seek the help of a chronic pain specialist. We should also refer for nonpharmacologic therapy such as cognitive behavioral therapy and biofeedback.
Norah Terrault, MD, MPH, discussed management of chronic hepatitis C (HCV) after the cure, achievable in more than 95% of patients, which has resulted in a sharp decline in listings for liver transplant. A cure is defined as undetectable HCV RNA 12 weeks after completion of therapy. So what happens next? If the patient is at risk for reinfection, they should have HCV RNA testing annually or if their liver enzymes increase. Otherwise, if their pretreatment fibrosis is low stage, no further monitoring is needed and they can follow up with their primary care provider. Intermediate-stage fibrosis should be monitored for progression. Advanced-stage fibrosis needs long-term follow-up for hepatocellular carcinoma and variceal surveillance. Modifiable risk factors, i.e., metabolic fatty liver and alcohol abuse, should be identified with appropriate counseling provided.
We went back to the microbiome for our last talk: Larry Brandt, MD, AGAF, discussed FMT for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Patients should be considered for FMT if they have more than 3 recurrences of mild to moderate CDI and failure to respond to standard therapy; more than 2 episodes of CDI resulting in hospitalization and significant morbidity; moderate CDI with no response after 1 week of standard therapy; and severe CDI with no response to standard therapy within 48 hours. Serious adverse events associated with FMT include infections and perhaps new-onset immune-mediated disease such as Sjogren’s, rheumatoid arthritis, and idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. It is hoped that the NIH-sponsored AGA national registry for FMT will help better define outcomes and adverse events over the next 10 years.
Dr. Mahadevan is professor of clinical medicine at UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco. This is a summary provided by the moderator of one of the AGA Postgraduate Courses held at DDW 2017.
NASH did not increase risk of poor liver transplantation outcomes
Adults with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) fared as well on key outcome measures as other liver transplant recipients, despite having significantly more comorbidities, according to the results of a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Major morbidity, mortality, and rates of graft survival after 90 days were similar between patients who underwent transplantation for NASH and those who underwent it for another cirrhotic liver condition, wrote Eline H. van den Berg, MD, of University Medical Center Groningen (the Netherlands) with her associates. “These results are comforting, considering the expected increase of patients with NASH cirrhosis in the near future,” the researchers concluded. “Future analysis regarding the recurrence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, development of long-term complications, long-term graft patency, and occurrence of comorbid diseases after LT [liver transplantation] is mandatory to better understand the natural history and risk profile of NASH patients and to prevent and treat its complications.” The findings were published online in Digestive and Liver Disease (Dig Liver Dis. 2017 Aug 11. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.08.022).
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease begins as steatosis and can progress to NASH, fibrosis, and cirrhosis. The global obesity epidemic is amplifying its incidence, and about 26% of patients who develop NASH ultimately develop cirrhosis. Cirrhosis itself increases the risk of in-hospital death or prolonged length of postoperative stay, but patients with NASH also have obesity and cardiovascular disease, which might “tremendously increase” the risk of poor postoperative outcomes, the researchers said. Because prior research had focused mainly on mortality and had reported conflicting results, they used the Clavien-Dindo classification system to retrospectively study rates of complications among 169 adults who underwent liver transplantation at their center from 2009 through 2015, including 34 (20%) patients with NASH cirrhosis.
Patients with NASH were significantly older than other transplant recipients (59 versus 55 years, P = .01) and had markedly higher rates of obesity (62% versus 8%; P less than .01), diabetes mellitus (74% versus 20%; P less than .01), metabolic syndrome (83% versus 38%; P less than .01), hypertension (61% versus 30%; P less than .01), and cardiovascular disease (29% versus 11%; P less than .01). Despite these differences, the groups had statistically similar rates of postoperative mortality (3% in both groups), 90-day graft survival posttransplantation (94% and 90%, respectively), and major postoperative complications, including biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection (3% and 7%), hepatic artery thrombosis (0% and 7%), relaparotomy (15% and 24%), primary nonfunction (0% and 1.6%), retransplantation (6% and 7%), sepsis (12% and 13%), gastrointestinal infection (24% and 36%), fever of unknown origin (18% and 14%), and renal replacement therapy (15% and 24%).
After accounting for age, sex, transplant year, and donor characteristics, NASH patients were at significantly increased risk of grade 2 urogenital infections, compared with other patients (odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 10.6; P = .03). Grade 1 complications also were more common with NASH than otherwise (77% versus 59%), and the difference remained statistically significant in the multivariable analysis (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.63; P = .04).
The study used a strict, internationally accepted definition of NASH – all patients either had cases confirmed by biopsy, had metabolic syndrome, or had obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus, and, further, none had hepatitis or alcoholic liver disease. None of the patients in the study received transplants for acute liver failure or noncirrhotic liver disease, and none were 70 years or older, which is the cutoff age for liver transplantation in the Netherlands.
The investigators received no funding for the study and reported having no conflicts of interest.
Adults with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) fared as well on key outcome measures as other liver transplant recipients, despite having significantly more comorbidities, according to the results of a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Major morbidity, mortality, and rates of graft survival after 90 days were similar between patients who underwent transplantation for NASH and those who underwent it for another cirrhotic liver condition, wrote Eline H. van den Berg, MD, of University Medical Center Groningen (the Netherlands) with her associates. “These results are comforting, considering the expected increase of patients with NASH cirrhosis in the near future,” the researchers concluded. “Future analysis regarding the recurrence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, development of long-term complications, long-term graft patency, and occurrence of comorbid diseases after LT [liver transplantation] is mandatory to better understand the natural history and risk profile of NASH patients and to prevent and treat its complications.” The findings were published online in Digestive and Liver Disease (Dig Liver Dis. 2017 Aug 11. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.08.022).
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease begins as steatosis and can progress to NASH, fibrosis, and cirrhosis. The global obesity epidemic is amplifying its incidence, and about 26% of patients who develop NASH ultimately develop cirrhosis. Cirrhosis itself increases the risk of in-hospital death or prolonged length of postoperative stay, but patients with NASH also have obesity and cardiovascular disease, which might “tremendously increase” the risk of poor postoperative outcomes, the researchers said. Because prior research had focused mainly on mortality and had reported conflicting results, they used the Clavien-Dindo classification system to retrospectively study rates of complications among 169 adults who underwent liver transplantation at their center from 2009 through 2015, including 34 (20%) patients with NASH cirrhosis.
Patients with NASH were significantly older than other transplant recipients (59 versus 55 years, P = .01) and had markedly higher rates of obesity (62% versus 8%; P less than .01), diabetes mellitus (74% versus 20%; P less than .01), metabolic syndrome (83% versus 38%; P less than .01), hypertension (61% versus 30%; P less than .01), and cardiovascular disease (29% versus 11%; P less than .01). Despite these differences, the groups had statistically similar rates of postoperative mortality (3% in both groups), 90-day graft survival posttransplantation (94% and 90%, respectively), and major postoperative complications, including biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection (3% and 7%), hepatic artery thrombosis (0% and 7%), relaparotomy (15% and 24%), primary nonfunction (0% and 1.6%), retransplantation (6% and 7%), sepsis (12% and 13%), gastrointestinal infection (24% and 36%), fever of unknown origin (18% and 14%), and renal replacement therapy (15% and 24%).
After accounting for age, sex, transplant year, and donor characteristics, NASH patients were at significantly increased risk of grade 2 urogenital infections, compared with other patients (odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 10.6; P = .03). Grade 1 complications also were more common with NASH than otherwise (77% versus 59%), and the difference remained statistically significant in the multivariable analysis (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.63; P = .04).
The study used a strict, internationally accepted definition of NASH – all patients either had cases confirmed by biopsy, had metabolic syndrome, or had obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus, and, further, none had hepatitis or alcoholic liver disease. None of the patients in the study received transplants for acute liver failure or noncirrhotic liver disease, and none were 70 years or older, which is the cutoff age for liver transplantation in the Netherlands.
The investigators received no funding for the study and reported having no conflicts of interest.
Adults with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) fared as well on key outcome measures as other liver transplant recipients, despite having significantly more comorbidities, according to the results of a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Major morbidity, mortality, and rates of graft survival after 90 days were similar between patients who underwent transplantation for NASH and those who underwent it for another cirrhotic liver condition, wrote Eline H. van den Berg, MD, of University Medical Center Groningen (the Netherlands) with her associates. “These results are comforting, considering the expected increase of patients with NASH cirrhosis in the near future,” the researchers concluded. “Future analysis regarding the recurrence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, development of long-term complications, long-term graft patency, and occurrence of comorbid diseases after LT [liver transplantation] is mandatory to better understand the natural history and risk profile of NASH patients and to prevent and treat its complications.” The findings were published online in Digestive and Liver Disease (Dig Liver Dis. 2017 Aug 11. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.08.022).
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease begins as steatosis and can progress to NASH, fibrosis, and cirrhosis. The global obesity epidemic is amplifying its incidence, and about 26% of patients who develop NASH ultimately develop cirrhosis. Cirrhosis itself increases the risk of in-hospital death or prolonged length of postoperative stay, but patients with NASH also have obesity and cardiovascular disease, which might “tremendously increase” the risk of poor postoperative outcomes, the researchers said. Because prior research had focused mainly on mortality and had reported conflicting results, they used the Clavien-Dindo classification system to retrospectively study rates of complications among 169 adults who underwent liver transplantation at their center from 2009 through 2015, including 34 (20%) patients with NASH cirrhosis.
Patients with NASH were significantly older than other transplant recipients (59 versus 55 years, P = .01) and had markedly higher rates of obesity (62% versus 8%; P less than .01), diabetes mellitus (74% versus 20%; P less than .01), metabolic syndrome (83% versus 38%; P less than .01), hypertension (61% versus 30%; P less than .01), and cardiovascular disease (29% versus 11%; P less than .01). Despite these differences, the groups had statistically similar rates of postoperative mortality (3% in both groups), 90-day graft survival posttransplantation (94% and 90%, respectively), and major postoperative complications, including biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection (3% and 7%), hepatic artery thrombosis (0% and 7%), relaparotomy (15% and 24%), primary nonfunction (0% and 1.6%), retransplantation (6% and 7%), sepsis (12% and 13%), gastrointestinal infection (24% and 36%), fever of unknown origin (18% and 14%), and renal replacement therapy (15% and 24%).
After accounting for age, sex, transplant year, and donor characteristics, NASH patients were at significantly increased risk of grade 2 urogenital infections, compared with other patients (odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 10.6; P = .03). Grade 1 complications also were more common with NASH than otherwise (77% versus 59%), and the difference remained statistically significant in the multivariable analysis (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.63; P = .04).
The study used a strict, internationally accepted definition of NASH – all patients either had cases confirmed by biopsy, had metabolic syndrome, or had obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus, and, further, none had hepatitis or alcoholic liver disease. None of the patients in the study received transplants for acute liver failure or noncirrhotic liver disease, and none were 70 years or older, which is the cutoff age for liver transplantation in the Netherlands.
The investigators received no funding for the study and reported having no conflicts of interest.
FROM DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASES
Key clinical point: Adults with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) fared as well as on key outcome measures as other liver transplant recipients, despite having significantly more comorbidities.
Major finding: Patients with and without NASH had statistically similar rates of postoperative mortality (3% in both groups), 90-day graft survival (94% and 90%, respectively), and major postoperative complications.
Data source: A single-center retrospective cohort study of 169 adult liver transplant recipients, of whom 20% were transplanted for NASH cirrhosis.
Disclosures: The investigators received no funding for the study and reported having no conflicts of interest.
FDA approves faster, pangenotypic cure for hep C virus
The first pangenotypic treatment for the hepatitis C virus, which also shaves 4 weeks off current regimens, has just been approved by the Food and Drug Administration.
Manufactured by AbbVie, glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (Mavyret) combines a nonstructural protein 3/4A protease inhibitor with a next-generation NS5A protein inhibitor for a once-daily, ribavirin-free treatment for adults with any of the major genotypes of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.
“This approval provides a shorter treatment duration for many patients, and also a treatment option for certain patients with genotype 1 infection, the most common HCV genotype in the United States, who were not successfully treated with other direct-acting antiviral treatments in the past,” Edward Cox, MD, director of the office of antimicrobial products in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, Md., said in a statement.
The 8-week regimen is indicated in patients without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis, who are new to treatment, and those with limited treatment options, such as patients with chronic kidney disease, including those on dialysis. The intervention also is indicated in adults with HCV genotype 1 who have been treated with either of the drugs in the combination, but not both. Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir is not recommended in patients with moderate cirrhosis and is contraindicated in patients with severe cirrhosis and in those taking the drugs atazanavir and rifampin.
The safety and efficacy of the treatment were evaluated in approximately 2,300 adults with genotype 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6 HCV infection without cirrhosis or with mild cirrhosis. In the clinical trials, between 92% and 100% of patients treated with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for 8, 12, or 16 weeks had no detectable serum levels of the virus 12 weeks after finishing treatment. The most commonly reported adverse reactions were headache, fatigue, and nausea.
The FDA directs health care professionals to test all patients for current or prior hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection prior to starting this direct-acting antiviral drug combination since HBV reactivation has been reported in adult patients coinfected with both viruses who were undergoing or had completed treatment with HCV direct-acting antivirals and who were not receiving HBV antiviral therapy.
The AGA HCV Clinical Service Line provides tools to help you become more efficient, understand quality standards and improve the process of care for patients. Learn more at http://www.gastro.org/patient-care/conditions-diseases/hepatitis-c
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
The first pangenotypic treatment for the hepatitis C virus, which also shaves 4 weeks off current regimens, has just been approved by the Food and Drug Administration.
Manufactured by AbbVie, glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (Mavyret) combines a nonstructural protein 3/4A protease inhibitor with a next-generation NS5A protein inhibitor for a once-daily, ribavirin-free treatment for adults with any of the major genotypes of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.
“This approval provides a shorter treatment duration for many patients, and also a treatment option for certain patients with genotype 1 infection, the most common HCV genotype in the United States, who were not successfully treated with other direct-acting antiviral treatments in the past,” Edward Cox, MD, director of the office of antimicrobial products in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, Md., said in a statement.
The 8-week regimen is indicated in patients without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis, who are new to treatment, and those with limited treatment options, such as patients with chronic kidney disease, including those on dialysis. The intervention also is indicated in adults with HCV genotype 1 who have been treated with either of the drugs in the combination, but not both. Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir is not recommended in patients with moderate cirrhosis and is contraindicated in patients with severe cirrhosis and in those taking the drugs atazanavir and rifampin.
The safety and efficacy of the treatment were evaluated in approximately 2,300 adults with genotype 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6 HCV infection without cirrhosis or with mild cirrhosis. In the clinical trials, between 92% and 100% of patients treated with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for 8, 12, or 16 weeks had no detectable serum levels of the virus 12 weeks after finishing treatment. The most commonly reported adverse reactions were headache, fatigue, and nausea.
The FDA directs health care professionals to test all patients for current or prior hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection prior to starting this direct-acting antiviral drug combination since HBV reactivation has been reported in adult patients coinfected with both viruses who were undergoing or had completed treatment with HCV direct-acting antivirals and who were not receiving HBV antiviral therapy.
The AGA HCV Clinical Service Line provides tools to help you become more efficient, understand quality standards and improve the process of care for patients. Learn more at http://www.gastro.org/patient-care/conditions-diseases/hepatitis-c
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
The first pangenotypic treatment for the hepatitis C virus, which also shaves 4 weeks off current regimens, has just been approved by the Food and Drug Administration.
Manufactured by AbbVie, glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (Mavyret) combines a nonstructural protein 3/4A protease inhibitor with a next-generation NS5A protein inhibitor for a once-daily, ribavirin-free treatment for adults with any of the major genotypes of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.
“This approval provides a shorter treatment duration for many patients, and also a treatment option for certain patients with genotype 1 infection, the most common HCV genotype in the United States, who were not successfully treated with other direct-acting antiviral treatments in the past,” Edward Cox, MD, director of the office of antimicrobial products in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, Md., said in a statement.
The 8-week regimen is indicated in patients without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis, who are new to treatment, and those with limited treatment options, such as patients with chronic kidney disease, including those on dialysis. The intervention also is indicated in adults with HCV genotype 1 who have been treated with either of the drugs in the combination, but not both. Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir is not recommended in patients with moderate cirrhosis and is contraindicated in patients with severe cirrhosis and in those taking the drugs atazanavir and rifampin.
The safety and efficacy of the treatment were evaluated in approximately 2,300 adults with genotype 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6 HCV infection without cirrhosis or with mild cirrhosis. In the clinical trials, between 92% and 100% of patients treated with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for 8, 12, or 16 weeks had no detectable serum levels of the virus 12 weeks after finishing treatment. The most commonly reported adverse reactions were headache, fatigue, and nausea.
The FDA directs health care professionals to test all patients for current or prior hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection prior to starting this direct-acting antiviral drug combination since HBV reactivation has been reported in adult patients coinfected with both viruses who were undergoing or had completed treatment with HCV direct-acting antivirals and who were not receiving HBV antiviral therapy.
The AGA HCV Clinical Service Line provides tools to help you become more efficient, understand quality standards and improve the process of care for patients. Learn more at http://www.gastro.org/patient-care/conditions-diseases/hepatitis-c
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
Flashback to 2014
The development of therapies for chronic hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection has been a highlight of progress in hepatology and infectious disease over the last 25 years. From initial empiric approaches with interferon and ribavirin, to targeted and custom designed direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), there has been rapid improvement in efficacy and side effect profiles. Since we are dealing with a viral infection, loss of viremia after stopping therapy (sustained viral response, SVR) has been the marker of therapeutic success. SVR, however, is still a surrogate for clinical outcome and the analysis of 5-year follow-up in the December 2014 issue reported that in patients with SVR there was a reduction in risk of death, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver transplantation.
Observational studies have the potential for significant biases as decisions to treat are frequently based on the likelihood of a successful outcome. A randomized clinical trial for DAAs compared to control would of course be unethical at this stage. The scale of use of DAAs should allow a clear answer to this question within the next 2 years.
The development of therapies for chronic hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection has been a highlight of progress in hepatology and infectious disease over the last 25 years. From initial empiric approaches with interferon and ribavirin, to targeted and custom designed direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), there has been rapid improvement in efficacy and side effect profiles. Since we are dealing with a viral infection, loss of viremia after stopping therapy (sustained viral response, SVR) has been the marker of therapeutic success. SVR, however, is still a surrogate for clinical outcome and the analysis of 5-year follow-up in the December 2014 issue reported that in patients with SVR there was a reduction in risk of death, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver transplantation.
Observational studies have the potential for significant biases as decisions to treat are frequently based on the likelihood of a successful outcome. A randomized clinical trial for DAAs compared to control would of course be unethical at this stage. The scale of use of DAAs should allow a clear answer to this question within the next 2 years.
The development of therapies for chronic hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection has been a highlight of progress in hepatology and infectious disease over the last 25 years. From initial empiric approaches with interferon and ribavirin, to targeted and custom designed direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), there has been rapid improvement in efficacy and side effect profiles. Since we are dealing with a viral infection, loss of viremia after stopping therapy (sustained viral response, SVR) has been the marker of therapeutic success. SVR, however, is still a surrogate for clinical outcome and the analysis of 5-year follow-up in the December 2014 issue reported that in patients with SVR there was a reduction in risk of death, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver transplantation.
Observational studies have the potential for significant biases as decisions to treat are frequently based on the likelihood of a successful outcome. A randomized clinical trial for DAAs compared to control would of course be unethical at this stage. The scale of use of DAAs should allow a clear answer to this question within the next 2 years.
FDA advisory panel backs safety of new hepatitis B vaccine for adults
The Food and Drug Administration’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee approved licensure for Heplisav-B, a new two-dose recombinant hepatitis B vaccination, after voting that presented data proved the vaccine to be safe for adults 18 and over.
At an advisory meeting, after hearing testimony from government researchers and representatives of Dynavax Technologies Corporation, the manufacturer of Heplisav-B, 11 members voted to approve the drug, 1 member voted no, and 3 abstained.
There are more than 20,000 new infections each year, with a reported increase of 21% between 2014 and 2015, according to research presented by William Schaffner, MD, professor of preventative medicine and infectious diseases at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn.
There are two approved immunizations for hepatitis B: Engerix-B, manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline, and Recombivax HB, by Merck. Both are three-dose, recombinant vaccines produced from yeast cells.
Like the current vaccines, Heplisav-B is a recombinant hepatitis B surface antigen that is derived from yeast; however, this vaccine would be administered in two doses over 1 month, as opposed to three doses over 6 months as is the schedule for currently approved vaccines. Both manufacturing representatives and approving members of the committee stressed this as an important factor due to vaccination dropout rates.
“We have a problem with hepatitis B infections in this country as well as problems with the current vaccines,“ said John Ward, MD, director of the division of viral hepatitis at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “and they happen in these populations where, in terms of data, both of those audiences have problems about going for the second and third dose.”
Patients that drop out before the third dose are at high risk of infection, as only 20%-50% of adults have the appropriate seroprotection after two doses. However, only 54% of patients in a vaccine safety Datalink study reported completing the vaccination series, with 81% reporting having received two doses, according to Dr. Schaffner.
While the committee did approve the safety research as sufficient to approve use of Heplisav-B in adults 18 years and older, members of the committee had an issue with the drug’s correlation with myocardial infarction.
In one of the studies presented, Heplisav-B’s acute myocardial infarction (AMI) events (14 patients) greatly outnumbered those of Engerix-B (1 patient), presenting an AMI relative risk of 6.97.
Dynavax representatives, in response to this concern, presented intention to conduct a postmarketing analysis of the risk of MI in patients who have been administered Heplisav-B, which committee members considered to be a crucial contingency for approval.
“I would like to say I am for the approval of this vaccine, I just think as a statistician that the safety was inconclusive,” said Mei-Ling Ting Lee, PhD, director of the Biostatistics and Risk Assessment Center at the University of Maryland. “But I think for the pharmacological vigilance plan, I think that it will be good to have specific analysis for the myocardial infarction and other risks.”
Dynavax intends to introduce the vaccine commercially in the United States by the middle of 2018, according to a press release.
[email protected]
On Twitter @eaztweets
The Food and Drug Administration’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee approved licensure for Heplisav-B, a new two-dose recombinant hepatitis B vaccination, after voting that presented data proved the vaccine to be safe for adults 18 and over.
At an advisory meeting, after hearing testimony from government researchers and representatives of Dynavax Technologies Corporation, the manufacturer of Heplisav-B, 11 members voted to approve the drug, 1 member voted no, and 3 abstained.
There are more than 20,000 new infections each year, with a reported increase of 21% between 2014 and 2015, according to research presented by William Schaffner, MD, professor of preventative medicine and infectious diseases at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn.
There are two approved immunizations for hepatitis B: Engerix-B, manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline, and Recombivax HB, by Merck. Both are three-dose, recombinant vaccines produced from yeast cells.
Like the current vaccines, Heplisav-B is a recombinant hepatitis B surface antigen that is derived from yeast; however, this vaccine would be administered in two doses over 1 month, as opposed to three doses over 6 months as is the schedule for currently approved vaccines. Both manufacturing representatives and approving members of the committee stressed this as an important factor due to vaccination dropout rates.
“We have a problem with hepatitis B infections in this country as well as problems with the current vaccines,“ said John Ward, MD, director of the division of viral hepatitis at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “and they happen in these populations where, in terms of data, both of those audiences have problems about going for the second and third dose.”
Patients that drop out before the third dose are at high risk of infection, as only 20%-50% of adults have the appropriate seroprotection after two doses. However, only 54% of patients in a vaccine safety Datalink study reported completing the vaccination series, with 81% reporting having received two doses, according to Dr. Schaffner.
While the committee did approve the safety research as sufficient to approve use of Heplisav-B in adults 18 years and older, members of the committee had an issue with the drug’s correlation with myocardial infarction.
In one of the studies presented, Heplisav-B’s acute myocardial infarction (AMI) events (14 patients) greatly outnumbered those of Engerix-B (1 patient), presenting an AMI relative risk of 6.97.
Dynavax representatives, in response to this concern, presented intention to conduct a postmarketing analysis of the risk of MI in patients who have been administered Heplisav-B, which committee members considered to be a crucial contingency for approval.
“I would like to say I am for the approval of this vaccine, I just think as a statistician that the safety was inconclusive,” said Mei-Ling Ting Lee, PhD, director of the Biostatistics and Risk Assessment Center at the University of Maryland. “But I think for the pharmacological vigilance plan, I think that it will be good to have specific analysis for the myocardial infarction and other risks.”
Dynavax intends to introduce the vaccine commercially in the United States by the middle of 2018, according to a press release.
[email protected]
On Twitter @eaztweets
The Food and Drug Administration’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee approved licensure for Heplisav-B, a new two-dose recombinant hepatitis B vaccination, after voting that presented data proved the vaccine to be safe for adults 18 and over.
At an advisory meeting, after hearing testimony from government researchers and representatives of Dynavax Technologies Corporation, the manufacturer of Heplisav-B, 11 members voted to approve the drug, 1 member voted no, and 3 abstained.
There are more than 20,000 new infections each year, with a reported increase of 21% between 2014 and 2015, according to research presented by William Schaffner, MD, professor of preventative medicine and infectious diseases at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn.
There are two approved immunizations for hepatitis B: Engerix-B, manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline, and Recombivax HB, by Merck. Both are three-dose, recombinant vaccines produced from yeast cells.
Like the current vaccines, Heplisav-B is a recombinant hepatitis B surface antigen that is derived from yeast; however, this vaccine would be administered in two doses over 1 month, as opposed to three doses over 6 months as is the schedule for currently approved vaccines. Both manufacturing representatives and approving members of the committee stressed this as an important factor due to vaccination dropout rates.
“We have a problem with hepatitis B infections in this country as well as problems with the current vaccines,“ said John Ward, MD, director of the division of viral hepatitis at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “and they happen in these populations where, in terms of data, both of those audiences have problems about going for the second and third dose.”
Patients that drop out before the third dose are at high risk of infection, as only 20%-50% of adults have the appropriate seroprotection after two doses. However, only 54% of patients in a vaccine safety Datalink study reported completing the vaccination series, with 81% reporting having received two doses, according to Dr. Schaffner.
While the committee did approve the safety research as sufficient to approve use of Heplisav-B in adults 18 years and older, members of the committee had an issue with the drug’s correlation with myocardial infarction.
In one of the studies presented, Heplisav-B’s acute myocardial infarction (AMI) events (14 patients) greatly outnumbered those of Engerix-B (1 patient), presenting an AMI relative risk of 6.97.
Dynavax representatives, in response to this concern, presented intention to conduct a postmarketing analysis of the risk of MI in patients who have been administered Heplisav-B, which committee members considered to be a crucial contingency for approval.
“I would like to say I am for the approval of this vaccine, I just think as a statistician that the safety was inconclusive,” said Mei-Ling Ting Lee, PhD, director of the Biostatistics and Risk Assessment Center at the University of Maryland. “But I think for the pharmacological vigilance plan, I think that it will be good to have specific analysis for the myocardial infarction and other risks.”
Dynavax intends to introduce the vaccine commercially in the United States by the middle of 2018, according to a press release.
[email protected]
On Twitter @eaztweets
NLR useful for predicting 1-year mortality in PBC patients
An elevated baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was associated with a poor 1-year mortality rate in hospitalized primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients, according to Lin Lin, MD, of Tianjin (China) Medical University General Hospital and the Tianjin Institute of Digestive Diseases and associates.
A retrospective analysis of 88 PBC patients hospitalized between June 2009 and January 2014 was performed for the study. NLR was a significant predictor of survival, with an odds ratio of 1.5, a sensitivity of 100%, and a specificity of 67.1%. A baseline NLR value of 2.18 was selected as the cutoff for 1-year mortality. Of the 33 patients above this value at initial hospitalization, 6 died, whereas none of the 55 patients below this value died.
The results of the retrospective study were confirmed in a prospective 1-year cohort that included 63 people with PBC. The patients with a baseline NLR of less than 2.18 had significantly longer survival times than those who had a baseline NLR of 2.18 or higher.
“NLR – an affordable, widely available and reproducible index – is closely related to short-term mortality in patients with PBC. Further studies are warranted to externally cross-validate our findings in other populations,” the investigators concluded.
Find the full study in BMJ Open (2017. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015304).
An elevated baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was associated with a poor 1-year mortality rate in hospitalized primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients, according to Lin Lin, MD, of Tianjin (China) Medical University General Hospital and the Tianjin Institute of Digestive Diseases and associates.
A retrospective analysis of 88 PBC patients hospitalized between June 2009 and January 2014 was performed for the study. NLR was a significant predictor of survival, with an odds ratio of 1.5, a sensitivity of 100%, and a specificity of 67.1%. A baseline NLR value of 2.18 was selected as the cutoff for 1-year mortality. Of the 33 patients above this value at initial hospitalization, 6 died, whereas none of the 55 patients below this value died.
The results of the retrospective study were confirmed in a prospective 1-year cohort that included 63 people with PBC. The patients with a baseline NLR of less than 2.18 had significantly longer survival times than those who had a baseline NLR of 2.18 or higher.
“NLR – an affordable, widely available and reproducible index – is closely related to short-term mortality in patients with PBC. Further studies are warranted to externally cross-validate our findings in other populations,” the investigators concluded.
Find the full study in BMJ Open (2017. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015304).
An elevated baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was associated with a poor 1-year mortality rate in hospitalized primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients, according to Lin Lin, MD, of Tianjin (China) Medical University General Hospital and the Tianjin Institute of Digestive Diseases and associates.
A retrospective analysis of 88 PBC patients hospitalized between June 2009 and January 2014 was performed for the study. NLR was a significant predictor of survival, with an odds ratio of 1.5, a sensitivity of 100%, and a specificity of 67.1%. A baseline NLR value of 2.18 was selected as the cutoff for 1-year mortality. Of the 33 patients above this value at initial hospitalization, 6 died, whereas none of the 55 patients below this value died.
The results of the retrospective study were confirmed in a prospective 1-year cohort that included 63 people with PBC. The patients with a baseline NLR of less than 2.18 had significantly longer survival times than those who had a baseline NLR of 2.18 or higher.
“NLR – an affordable, widely available and reproducible index – is closely related to short-term mortality in patients with PBC. Further studies are warranted to externally cross-validate our findings in other populations,” the investigators concluded.
Find the full study in BMJ Open (2017. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015304).
FROM BMJ OPEN
Hepatitis B elimination: Is it possible?
Despite the availability of safe and effective vaccines for more than three decades, the 2017 World Health Organization (WHO) Global Hepatitis Report estimated that worldwide more than 250 million persons are chronically infected with hepatitis B virus (www.who.int/hepatitis/publications/global-hepatitis-report2017/). In the United States, as many as 2.2 million persons may be chronically infected but only one-third are aware of their infection. In 2015, the WHO declared that hepatitis B and C should be eliminated as public health problems by the year 2030. In March 2017, the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine (NASEM) set targets for HBV elimination in the United States by 2030 as follows: 50% reduction in deaths, 45% reduction in cirrhosis, and 33% reduction in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared to 2015. For these targets, 90% of persons chronically infected need to be diagnosed, 90% of those diagnosed linked to care, and treatment initiated in 80% of those with treatment indications. In addition, new infections among children should be eliminated through complete prevention of mother-to-child transmission.
For persons who are chronically infected, antiviral therapy can suppress HBV replication, reduce hepatic inflammation, reverse hepatic fibrosis, and prevent progression to cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, and HCC. However, currently approved treatments are associated with low rates of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) clearance and decreased but continued risk of HCC. New treatments aimed at cure are desired but complete cure of HBV may not be feasible as HBV persists in the liver even in patients with serologic recovery after transient acute HBV infection.
Functional cure aimed at restoring chronic hepatitis B patients to a state akin to those with spontaneous HBsAg clearance might be a more realistic goal. With improved understanding of the biology of HBV, including recent identification of its entry receptor, better in vitro and animal models, and revival of interest in hepatitis B research, it is conceivable that combinations of antiviral targeting different steps in HBV life cyle and immunomodulatory therapies aimed to boost T-cell response to HBV and/or remove inhibitory signals can result in functional cure (HBsAg clearance) in a high percentage of patients after a finite course of treatment (Hepatology 2017; in press).
The HBV elimination goals set by WHO and NASEM are lofty, but as both organizations stated, these goals are feasible if all stakeholders make elimination of HBV a priority and allocate resources to make it happen.
Dr. Lok is the Alice Lohrman Andrews Research Professor in Hepatology in the department of internal medicine, University of Michigan Health System in Ann Arbor. Her comments were made during the AGA Institute Presidential Plenary at the Annual Digestive Disease Week.
Despite the availability of safe and effective vaccines for more than three decades, the 2017 World Health Organization (WHO) Global Hepatitis Report estimated that worldwide more than 250 million persons are chronically infected with hepatitis B virus (www.who.int/hepatitis/publications/global-hepatitis-report2017/). In the United States, as many as 2.2 million persons may be chronically infected but only one-third are aware of their infection. In 2015, the WHO declared that hepatitis B and C should be eliminated as public health problems by the year 2030. In March 2017, the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine (NASEM) set targets for HBV elimination in the United States by 2030 as follows: 50% reduction in deaths, 45% reduction in cirrhosis, and 33% reduction in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared to 2015. For these targets, 90% of persons chronically infected need to be diagnosed, 90% of those diagnosed linked to care, and treatment initiated in 80% of those with treatment indications. In addition, new infections among children should be eliminated through complete prevention of mother-to-child transmission.
For persons who are chronically infected, antiviral therapy can suppress HBV replication, reduce hepatic inflammation, reverse hepatic fibrosis, and prevent progression to cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, and HCC. However, currently approved treatments are associated with low rates of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) clearance and decreased but continued risk of HCC. New treatments aimed at cure are desired but complete cure of HBV may not be feasible as HBV persists in the liver even in patients with serologic recovery after transient acute HBV infection.
Functional cure aimed at restoring chronic hepatitis B patients to a state akin to those with spontaneous HBsAg clearance might be a more realistic goal. With improved understanding of the biology of HBV, including recent identification of its entry receptor, better in vitro and animal models, and revival of interest in hepatitis B research, it is conceivable that combinations of antiviral targeting different steps in HBV life cyle and immunomodulatory therapies aimed to boost T-cell response to HBV and/or remove inhibitory signals can result in functional cure (HBsAg clearance) in a high percentage of patients after a finite course of treatment (Hepatology 2017; in press).
The HBV elimination goals set by WHO and NASEM are lofty, but as both organizations stated, these goals are feasible if all stakeholders make elimination of HBV a priority and allocate resources to make it happen.
Dr. Lok is the Alice Lohrman Andrews Research Professor in Hepatology in the department of internal medicine, University of Michigan Health System in Ann Arbor. Her comments were made during the AGA Institute Presidential Plenary at the Annual Digestive Disease Week.
Despite the availability of safe and effective vaccines for more than three decades, the 2017 World Health Organization (WHO) Global Hepatitis Report estimated that worldwide more than 250 million persons are chronically infected with hepatitis B virus (www.who.int/hepatitis/publications/global-hepatitis-report2017/). In the United States, as many as 2.2 million persons may be chronically infected but only one-third are aware of their infection. In 2015, the WHO declared that hepatitis B and C should be eliminated as public health problems by the year 2030. In March 2017, the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine (NASEM) set targets for HBV elimination in the United States by 2030 as follows: 50% reduction in deaths, 45% reduction in cirrhosis, and 33% reduction in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared to 2015. For these targets, 90% of persons chronically infected need to be diagnosed, 90% of those diagnosed linked to care, and treatment initiated in 80% of those with treatment indications. In addition, new infections among children should be eliminated through complete prevention of mother-to-child transmission.
For persons who are chronically infected, antiviral therapy can suppress HBV replication, reduce hepatic inflammation, reverse hepatic fibrosis, and prevent progression to cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, and HCC. However, currently approved treatments are associated with low rates of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) clearance and decreased but continued risk of HCC. New treatments aimed at cure are desired but complete cure of HBV may not be feasible as HBV persists in the liver even in patients with serologic recovery after transient acute HBV infection.
Functional cure aimed at restoring chronic hepatitis B patients to a state akin to those with spontaneous HBsAg clearance might be a more realistic goal. With improved understanding of the biology of HBV, including recent identification of its entry receptor, better in vitro and animal models, and revival of interest in hepatitis B research, it is conceivable that combinations of antiviral targeting different steps in HBV life cyle and immunomodulatory therapies aimed to boost T-cell response to HBV and/or remove inhibitory signals can result in functional cure (HBsAg clearance) in a high percentage of patients after a finite course of treatment (Hepatology 2017; in press).
The HBV elimination goals set by WHO and NASEM are lofty, but as both organizations stated, these goals are feasible if all stakeholders make elimination of HBV a priority and allocate resources to make it happen.
Dr. Lok is the Alice Lohrman Andrews Research Professor in Hepatology in the department of internal medicine, University of Michigan Health System in Ann Arbor. Her comments were made during the AGA Institute Presidential Plenary at the Annual Digestive Disease Week.
Acute liver failure in the ED
Acute liver failure (ALF), is a life-threatening deterioration of liver function in people without preexisting cirrhosis. It can be caused by acetaminophen toxicity, pregnancy, ischemia, hepatitis A infection, and Wilson disease, among other things.
In emergency medicine, ALF can pose serious dilemmas. While transplantation has drastically improved survival rates in recent decades, it is not always required, and no firm criteria for transplantation exist.
But delays in the decision to go ahead with a liver transplant can lead to death.
A new literature review aims to distill the decision-making process for emergency medicine practitioners. Knowing which candidates will benefit and when to perform transplantation “is crucial in improving the likelihood of survival,” its authors say, because of the many factors involved.
In a paper published online in May in The American Journal of Emergency Medicine (2017 May. doi. 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.05.028), Hamid Shokoohi, MD, and his colleagues at George Washington University Medical Center in Washington say that establishing the cause of acute liver failure is essential to making treatment decisions, as some causes are associated with poorer prognosis without transplantation.
“We wanted to improve awareness among emergency medicine physicians, who are the first in the chain of command for transferring patients to a transplant site,” said Ali Pourmand, MD, of George Washington University, Washington, and the corresponding author of the study. “The high risk of early death among these cases makes it necessary for emergency physicians to consider coexisting etiology, be aware of indications and criteria available to determine the need for emergent transplantation, and be able to expedite patient transfer to a transplant center, when indicated.”
As patients presenting with ALF are likely too impaired be able to provide a history, and physical exam findings may be nonspecific, laboratory findings are key in establishing both severity and likely cause. ALF patients in general will have a prolonged prothrombin time, markedly elevated aminotransferase levels, elevated bilirubin, and low platelet count.
Patients with ALF caused by acetaminophen toxicity (the most common cause of ALF in the United States) are likely to present with very high aminotransferase levels, low bilirubin, and high international normalized ratio (INR). Those with viral causes of ALF, meanwhile, tend to have aminotransferase levels of 1,000-2,000 IU/L, and alanine transaminase higher than aspartate transaminase.
Prognosis without transplantation is considerably poorer in patients with severe ALF caused by Wilson disease, Budd-Chiari syndrome, or idiosyncratic drug reactions, compared with those who experience viral hepatitis or acetaminophen toxicity.
Dr. Shokoohi and his colleagues noted that two validated scoring systems can be used to assess prognosis for severe ALF. The King’s College Criteria can be used to establish prognosis for ALF caused by acetaminophen, and ALF from other causes, while the MELD score, recommended by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, incorporates bilirubin, INR, sodium, and creatinine levels to predict prognosis. Both of these scoring systems can be used to inform decisions about transplantation.
Finally, the authors advised that patients with alcoholic liver disease be considered under the same criteria for transplantation as those with other causes of ALF. “Recent research has shown that only a minority of patients ... will have poor follow-up and noncompliance to therapy and/or will revert to heavy alcohol use or abuse after transplant,” they wrote in their analysis. The researchers disclosed no outside funding of conflicts of interest related to their article.
Acute liver failure (ALF), is a life-threatening deterioration of liver function in people without preexisting cirrhosis. It can be caused by acetaminophen toxicity, pregnancy, ischemia, hepatitis A infection, and Wilson disease, among other things.
In emergency medicine, ALF can pose serious dilemmas. While transplantation has drastically improved survival rates in recent decades, it is not always required, and no firm criteria for transplantation exist.
But delays in the decision to go ahead with a liver transplant can lead to death.
A new literature review aims to distill the decision-making process for emergency medicine practitioners. Knowing which candidates will benefit and when to perform transplantation “is crucial in improving the likelihood of survival,” its authors say, because of the many factors involved.
In a paper published online in May in The American Journal of Emergency Medicine (2017 May. doi. 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.05.028), Hamid Shokoohi, MD, and his colleagues at George Washington University Medical Center in Washington say that establishing the cause of acute liver failure is essential to making treatment decisions, as some causes are associated with poorer prognosis without transplantation.
“We wanted to improve awareness among emergency medicine physicians, who are the first in the chain of command for transferring patients to a transplant site,” said Ali Pourmand, MD, of George Washington University, Washington, and the corresponding author of the study. “The high risk of early death among these cases makes it necessary for emergency physicians to consider coexisting etiology, be aware of indications and criteria available to determine the need for emergent transplantation, and be able to expedite patient transfer to a transplant center, when indicated.”
As patients presenting with ALF are likely too impaired be able to provide a history, and physical exam findings may be nonspecific, laboratory findings are key in establishing both severity and likely cause. ALF patients in general will have a prolonged prothrombin time, markedly elevated aminotransferase levels, elevated bilirubin, and low platelet count.
Patients with ALF caused by acetaminophen toxicity (the most common cause of ALF in the United States) are likely to present with very high aminotransferase levels, low bilirubin, and high international normalized ratio (INR). Those with viral causes of ALF, meanwhile, tend to have aminotransferase levels of 1,000-2,000 IU/L, and alanine transaminase higher than aspartate transaminase.
Prognosis without transplantation is considerably poorer in patients with severe ALF caused by Wilson disease, Budd-Chiari syndrome, or idiosyncratic drug reactions, compared with those who experience viral hepatitis or acetaminophen toxicity.
Dr. Shokoohi and his colleagues noted that two validated scoring systems can be used to assess prognosis for severe ALF. The King’s College Criteria can be used to establish prognosis for ALF caused by acetaminophen, and ALF from other causes, while the MELD score, recommended by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, incorporates bilirubin, INR, sodium, and creatinine levels to predict prognosis. Both of these scoring systems can be used to inform decisions about transplantation.
Finally, the authors advised that patients with alcoholic liver disease be considered under the same criteria for transplantation as those with other causes of ALF. “Recent research has shown that only a minority of patients ... will have poor follow-up and noncompliance to therapy and/or will revert to heavy alcohol use or abuse after transplant,” they wrote in their analysis. The researchers disclosed no outside funding of conflicts of interest related to their article.
Acute liver failure (ALF), is a life-threatening deterioration of liver function in people without preexisting cirrhosis. It can be caused by acetaminophen toxicity, pregnancy, ischemia, hepatitis A infection, and Wilson disease, among other things.
In emergency medicine, ALF can pose serious dilemmas. While transplantation has drastically improved survival rates in recent decades, it is not always required, and no firm criteria for transplantation exist.
But delays in the decision to go ahead with a liver transplant can lead to death.
A new literature review aims to distill the decision-making process for emergency medicine practitioners. Knowing which candidates will benefit and when to perform transplantation “is crucial in improving the likelihood of survival,” its authors say, because of the many factors involved.
In a paper published online in May in The American Journal of Emergency Medicine (2017 May. doi. 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.05.028), Hamid Shokoohi, MD, and his colleagues at George Washington University Medical Center in Washington say that establishing the cause of acute liver failure is essential to making treatment decisions, as some causes are associated with poorer prognosis without transplantation.
“We wanted to improve awareness among emergency medicine physicians, who are the first in the chain of command for transferring patients to a transplant site,” said Ali Pourmand, MD, of George Washington University, Washington, and the corresponding author of the study. “The high risk of early death among these cases makes it necessary for emergency physicians to consider coexisting etiology, be aware of indications and criteria available to determine the need for emergent transplantation, and be able to expedite patient transfer to a transplant center, when indicated.”
As patients presenting with ALF are likely too impaired be able to provide a history, and physical exam findings may be nonspecific, laboratory findings are key in establishing both severity and likely cause. ALF patients in general will have a prolonged prothrombin time, markedly elevated aminotransferase levels, elevated bilirubin, and low platelet count.
Patients with ALF caused by acetaminophen toxicity (the most common cause of ALF in the United States) are likely to present with very high aminotransferase levels, low bilirubin, and high international normalized ratio (INR). Those with viral causes of ALF, meanwhile, tend to have aminotransferase levels of 1,000-2,000 IU/L, and alanine transaminase higher than aspartate transaminase.
Prognosis without transplantation is considerably poorer in patients with severe ALF caused by Wilson disease, Budd-Chiari syndrome, or idiosyncratic drug reactions, compared with those who experience viral hepatitis or acetaminophen toxicity.
Dr. Shokoohi and his colleagues noted that two validated scoring systems can be used to assess prognosis for severe ALF. The King’s College Criteria can be used to establish prognosis for ALF caused by acetaminophen, and ALF from other causes, while the MELD score, recommended by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, incorporates bilirubin, INR, sodium, and creatinine levels to predict prognosis. Both of these scoring systems can be used to inform decisions about transplantation.
Finally, the authors advised that patients with alcoholic liver disease be considered under the same criteria for transplantation as those with other causes of ALF. “Recent research has shown that only a minority of patients ... will have poor follow-up and noncompliance to therapy and/or will revert to heavy alcohol use or abuse after transplant,” they wrote in their analysis. The researchers disclosed no outside funding of conflicts of interest related to their article.
FROM THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
FDA approves new treatment for adults with HCV
The Food and Drug Administration announced on July 18 the approval of Vosevi to treat adults with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes 1-6 without cirrhosis or with mild cirrhosis.
Vosevi is now the first treatment for patients who have been previously treated with the direct-acting antiviral drug sofosbuvir or other drugs for HCV that inhibit a protein called NS5A. The new drug is a fixed-dose, combination tablet containing sofosbuvir and velpatasvir (both approved before) and a new drug – voxilaprevir.
It is noted that treatment recommendations for Vosevi are different depending on viral genotype and prior treatment history. Vosevi is contraindicated in patients taking the drug rifampin.
“Direct-acting antiviral drugs prevent the virus from multiplying and often cure HCV. Vosevi provides a treatment option for some patients who were not successfully treated with other HCV drugs in the past,” Edward Cox, MD, director of the Office of Antimicrobial Products in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, said in a press release.
Read the full press release on the FDA’s website.
The Food and Drug Administration announced on July 18 the approval of Vosevi to treat adults with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes 1-6 without cirrhosis or with mild cirrhosis.
Vosevi is now the first treatment for patients who have been previously treated with the direct-acting antiviral drug sofosbuvir or other drugs for HCV that inhibit a protein called NS5A. The new drug is a fixed-dose, combination tablet containing sofosbuvir and velpatasvir (both approved before) and a new drug – voxilaprevir.
It is noted that treatment recommendations for Vosevi are different depending on viral genotype and prior treatment history. Vosevi is contraindicated in patients taking the drug rifampin.
“Direct-acting antiviral drugs prevent the virus from multiplying and often cure HCV. Vosevi provides a treatment option for some patients who were not successfully treated with other HCV drugs in the past,” Edward Cox, MD, director of the Office of Antimicrobial Products in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, said in a press release.
Read the full press release on the FDA’s website.
The Food and Drug Administration announced on July 18 the approval of Vosevi to treat adults with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes 1-6 without cirrhosis or with mild cirrhosis.
Vosevi is now the first treatment for patients who have been previously treated with the direct-acting antiviral drug sofosbuvir or other drugs for HCV that inhibit a protein called NS5A. The new drug is a fixed-dose, combination tablet containing sofosbuvir and velpatasvir (both approved before) and a new drug – voxilaprevir.
It is noted that treatment recommendations for Vosevi are different depending on viral genotype and prior treatment history. Vosevi is contraindicated in patients taking the drug rifampin.
“Direct-acting antiviral drugs prevent the virus from multiplying and often cure HCV. Vosevi provides a treatment option for some patients who were not successfully treated with other HCV drugs in the past,” Edward Cox, MD, director of the Office of Antimicrobial Products in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, said in a press release.
Read the full press release on the FDA’s website.
Liver cancer risk lower after sustained response to DAAs
Individuals with hepatitis C infection who achieved a sustained virologic response (SVR) to treatment with direct-acting antivirals had a significantly lower risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a new study suggests.
A retrospective cohort study of 22,500 U.S. veterans with hepatitis C who had been treated with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) found those with an SVR had a 72% lower risk of HCC, compared with those who did not achieve that response (hazard ratio, 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.36; P less than .0001), even after adjusting for demographics as well as clinical and health utilization factors.
“These data show that successful eradication of HCV [hepatitis C virus] confers a benefit in DAA-treated patients,” wrote Fasiha Kanwal, MD, from the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Houston and her coauthors. “Although a few recent studies have raised concerns that DAA might accelerate the risk of HCC in some patients early in the course of treatment, we did not find any factors that differentiated patients with HCC that developed during DAA treatment.”
The results highlighted the importance of early treatment with antivirals, beginning well before the patients showed signs of progressing to advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis, the investigators noted.
“Delaying treatment until patients progress to cirrhosis might be associated with substantial downstream costs incurred as part of lifelong HCC surveillance and/or management of HCC,” they wrote.
Sustained virologic response to DAAs also was associated with a longer time to diagnosis, and patients who didn’t achieve it showed higher rates of cancer much earlier. The most common antivirals used were sofosbuvir (75.2%; 51.1% in combination with ledipasvir), the combination of paritaprevir/ritonavir (23.3%), daclatasvir-based treatments (0.8%), and simeprevir (0.7%).
While the patients achieved SVR that showed similarly beneficial effects on HCC risk in patients with or without cirrhosis, the authors also noted that patients with cirrhosis had a nearly fivefold greater risk of developing cancer than did those without (HR, 4.73; 95% CI, 3.34-6.68). Similarly, patients with a fibrosis score (FIB-4) greater than 3.25 had a sixfold higher risk of HCC, compared with those with a value of 1.45 or lower.
Researchers commented that, at this level of risk, surveillance for HCC in these patients may be cost effective.
“Based on these data, HCC surveillance or risk modification may be needed for all patients who have progressed to cirrhosis or advanced fibrosis (as indicated by high FIB-4) at the time of SVR,” they wrote.
Alcohol use was also associated with a significantly higher annual incidence of HCC (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.11-2.18).
Among the study cohort, 39% had cirrhosis, 29.7% had advanced fibrosis, and nearly one-quarter had previously been treated for hepatitis C infection. More than 40% also had diabetes, 61.4% reported alcohol use, and 54.2% had a history of drug use.
“DAAs offer a chance of cure for all patients with HCV, including patients with advanced cirrhosis, older patients, and those with alcohol use – all characteristics independently associated with risk of HCC in HCV,” the authors explained. “These data show the treated population has changed significantly in the DAA era to include many patients with other HCC risk factors; these differences likely explain why the newer cohorts of DAA-treated patients face higher absolute HCC risk than expected, based on historic data.”
The study was partly supported by the Department of Veteran Affairs’ Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety at the Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center. No conflicts of interest were declared.
The availability of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has revolutionized treatment of hepatitis C. Sustained virologic response (SVR) can be routinely achieved in more than 95% of patients – except in those with decompensated cirrhosis – with a 12-week course of these oral drugs, which have minimal adverse effects. Thus, guidelines recommend that all patients with hepatitis C should be treated with DAAs.1 It was a shock to the medical community when the recent Cochrane review concluded there was insufficient evidence to confirm or reject an effect of DAA therapy on HCV-related morbidity or all-cause mortality.2 The authors cautioned that the lack of valid evidence for DAAs’ effectiveness and the possibility of potential harm should be considered before treating people with hepatitis C with DAAs. Their conclusion was in part based on their rejection of SVR as a valid surrogate for clinical outcome. Previous studies of interferon-based therapies showed that SVR was associated with improvement in liver histology, decreased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and mortality.
Treatment of hepatitis C with DAAs represents one out of a handful of cases in which we can claim that a cure for a chronic disease is possible; however, treatment must be initiated early before advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis to prevent a persistent, though greatly reduced, risk of HCC. Physicians managing patients with hepatitis C should make treatment decisions based on evidence from the entire literature – which supports claims of the DAA treatment’s benefits and refutes allegations of its harmfulness – and should not be swayed by the misguided conclusions of the Cochrane review.
References
1. AASLD-IDSA. Recommendations for testing, managing, and treating hepatitis C. www.hcvguidelines.org. Accessed on July 2, 2017.
2. Jakobsen J.C., Nielsen E.E., Feinberg J., et al. Direct-acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 6;6:CD012143.
3. Curry M.P., O’Leary J.G., Bzowej N., et al. Sofosbuvir and velpatasvir for HCV in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(27):2618-28.
4. Kanwal F., Kramer J., Asch S.M., et al. Risk of hepatocellular cancer in HCV patients treated with direct acting antiviral agents. Gastroenterology. 2017 Jun 19. pii: S0016-5085(17)35797.
Anna S. Lok, MD, AGAF, FAASLD, is the Alice Lohrman Andrews Research Professor in Hepatology in the department of internal medicine at the University of Michigan Health System in Ann Arbor. She has received research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Gilead through the University of Michigan.
The availability of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has revolutionized treatment of hepatitis C. Sustained virologic response (SVR) can be routinely achieved in more than 95% of patients – except in those with decompensated cirrhosis – with a 12-week course of these oral drugs, which have minimal adverse effects. Thus, guidelines recommend that all patients with hepatitis C should be treated with DAAs.1 It was a shock to the medical community when the recent Cochrane review concluded there was insufficient evidence to confirm or reject an effect of DAA therapy on HCV-related morbidity or all-cause mortality.2 The authors cautioned that the lack of valid evidence for DAAs’ effectiveness and the possibility of potential harm should be considered before treating people with hepatitis C with DAAs. Their conclusion was in part based on their rejection of SVR as a valid surrogate for clinical outcome. Previous studies of interferon-based therapies showed that SVR was associated with improvement in liver histology, decreased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and mortality.
Treatment of hepatitis C with DAAs represents one out of a handful of cases in which we can claim that a cure for a chronic disease is possible; however, treatment must be initiated early before advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis to prevent a persistent, though greatly reduced, risk of HCC. Physicians managing patients with hepatitis C should make treatment decisions based on evidence from the entire literature – which supports claims of the DAA treatment’s benefits and refutes allegations of its harmfulness – and should not be swayed by the misguided conclusions of the Cochrane review.
References
1. AASLD-IDSA. Recommendations for testing, managing, and treating hepatitis C. www.hcvguidelines.org. Accessed on July 2, 2017.
2. Jakobsen J.C., Nielsen E.E., Feinberg J., et al. Direct-acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 6;6:CD012143.
3. Curry M.P., O’Leary J.G., Bzowej N., et al. Sofosbuvir and velpatasvir for HCV in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(27):2618-28.
4. Kanwal F., Kramer J., Asch S.M., et al. Risk of hepatocellular cancer in HCV patients treated with direct acting antiviral agents. Gastroenterology. 2017 Jun 19. pii: S0016-5085(17)35797.
Anna S. Lok, MD, AGAF, FAASLD, is the Alice Lohrman Andrews Research Professor in Hepatology in the department of internal medicine at the University of Michigan Health System in Ann Arbor. She has received research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Gilead through the University of Michigan.
The availability of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has revolutionized treatment of hepatitis C. Sustained virologic response (SVR) can be routinely achieved in more than 95% of patients – except in those with decompensated cirrhosis – with a 12-week course of these oral drugs, which have minimal adverse effects. Thus, guidelines recommend that all patients with hepatitis C should be treated with DAAs.1 It was a shock to the medical community when the recent Cochrane review concluded there was insufficient evidence to confirm or reject an effect of DAA therapy on HCV-related morbidity or all-cause mortality.2 The authors cautioned that the lack of valid evidence for DAAs’ effectiveness and the possibility of potential harm should be considered before treating people with hepatitis C with DAAs. Their conclusion was in part based on their rejection of SVR as a valid surrogate for clinical outcome. Previous studies of interferon-based therapies showed that SVR was associated with improvement in liver histology, decreased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and mortality.
Treatment of hepatitis C with DAAs represents one out of a handful of cases in which we can claim that a cure for a chronic disease is possible; however, treatment must be initiated early before advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis to prevent a persistent, though greatly reduced, risk of HCC. Physicians managing patients with hepatitis C should make treatment decisions based on evidence from the entire literature – which supports claims of the DAA treatment’s benefits and refutes allegations of its harmfulness – and should not be swayed by the misguided conclusions of the Cochrane review.
References
1. AASLD-IDSA. Recommendations for testing, managing, and treating hepatitis C. www.hcvguidelines.org. Accessed on July 2, 2017.
2. Jakobsen J.C., Nielsen E.E., Feinberg J., et al. Direct-acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 6;6:CD012143.
3. Curry M.P., O’Leary J.G., Bzowej N., et al. Sofosbuvir and velpatasvir for HCV in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(27):2618-28.
4. Kanwal F., Kramer J., Asch S.M., et al. Risk of hepatocellular cancer in HCV patients treated with direct acting antiviral agents. Gastroenterology. 2017 Jun 19. pii: S0016-5085(17)35797.
Anna S. Lok, MD, AGAF, FAASLD, is the Alice Lohrman Andrews Research Professor in Hepatology in the department of internal medicine at the University of Michigan Health System in Ann Arbor. She has received research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Gilead through the University of Michigan.
Individuals with hepatitis C infection who achieved a sustained virologic response (SVR) to treatment with direct-acting antivirals had a significantly lower risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a new study suggests.
A retrospective cohort study of 22,500 U.S. veterans with hepatitis C who had been treated with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) found those with an SVR had a 72% lower risk of HCC, compared with those who did not achieve that response (hazard ratio, 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.36; P less than .0001), even after adjusting for demographics as well as clinical and health utilization factors.
“These data show that successful eradication of HCV [hepatitis C virus] confers a benefit in DAA-treated patients,” wrote Fasiha Kanwal, MD, from the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Houston and her coauthors. “Although a few recent studies have raised concerns that DAA might accelerate the risk of HCC in some patients early in the course of treatment, we did not find any factors that differentiated patients with HCC that developed during DAA treatment.”
The results highlighted the importance of early treatment with antivirals, beginning well before the patients showed signs of progressing to advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis, the investigators noted.
“Delaying treatment until patients progress to cirrhosis might be associated with substantial downstream costs incurred as part of lifelong HCC surveillance and/or management of HCC,” they wrote.
Sustained virologic response to DAAs also was associated with a longer time to diagnosis, and patients who didn’t achieve it showed higher rates of cancer much earlier. The most common antivirals used were sofosbuvir (75.2%; 51.1% in combination with ledipasvir), the combination of paritaprevir/ritonavir (23.3%), daclatasvir-based treatments (0.8%), and simeprevir (0.7%).
While the patients achieved SVR that showed similarly beneficial effects on HCC risk in patients with or without cirrhosis, the authors also noted that patients with cirrhosis had a nearly fivefold greater risk of developing cancer than did those without (HR, 4.73; 95% CI, 3.34-6.68). Similarly, patients with a fibrosis score (FIB-4) greater than 3.25 had a sixfold higher risk of HCC, compared with those with a value of 1.45 or lower.
Researchers commented that, at this level of risk, surveillance for HCC in these patients may be cost effective.
“Based on these data, HCC surveillance or risk modification may be needed for all patients who have progressed to cirrhosis or advanced fibrosis (as indicated by high FIB-4) at the time of SVR,” they wrote.
Alcohol use was also associated with a significantly higher annual incidence of HCC (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.11-2.18).
Among the study cohort, 39% had cirrhosis, 29.7% had advanced fibrosis, and nearly one-quarter had previously been treated for hepatitis C infection. More than 40% also had diabetes, 61.4% reported alcohol use, and 54.2% had a history of drug use.
“DAAs offer a chance of cure for all patients with HCV, including patients with advanced cirrhosis, older patients, and those with alcohol use – all characteristics independently associated with risk of HCC in HCV,” the authors explained. “These data show the treated population has changed significantly in the DAA era to include many patients with other HCC risk factors; these differences likely explain why the newer cohorts of DAA-treated patients face higher absolute HCC risk than expected, based on historic data.”
The study was partly supported by the Department of Veteran Affairs’ Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety at the Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center. No conflicts of interest were declared.
Individuals with hepatitis C infection who achieved a sustained virologic response (SVR) to treatment with direct-acting antivirals had a significantly lower risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a new study suggests.
A retrospective cohort study of 22,500 U.S. veterans with hepatitis C who had been treated with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) found those with an SVR had a 72% lower risk of HCC, compared with those who did not achieve that response (hazard ratio, 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.36; P less than .0001), even after adjusting for demographics as well as clinical and health utilization factors.
“These data show that successful eradication of HCV [hepatitis C virus] confers a benefit in DAA-treated patients,” wrote Fasiha Kanwal, MD, from the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Houston and her coauthors. “Although a few recent studies have raised concerns that DAA might accelerate the risk of HCC in some patients early in the course of treatment, we did not find any factors that differentiated patients with HCC that developed during DAA treatment.”
The results highlighted the importance of early treatment with antivirals, beginning well before the patients showed signs of progressing to advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis, the investigators noted.
“Delaying treatment until patients progress to cirrhosis might be associated with substantial downstream costs incurred as part of lifelong HCC surveillance and/or management of HCC,” they wrote.
Sustained virologic response to DAAs also was associated with a longer time to diagnosis, and patients who didn’t achieve it showed higher rates of cancer much earlier. The most common antivirals used were sofosbuvir (75.2%; 51.1% in combination with ledipasvir), the combination of paritaprevir/ritonavir (23.3%), daclatasvir-based treatments (0.8%), and simeprevir (0.7%).
While the patients achieved SVR that showed similarly beneficial effects on HCC risk in patients with or without cirrhosis, the authors also noted that patients with cirrhosis had a nearly fivefold greater risk of developing cancer than did those without (HR, 4.73; 95% CI, 3.34-6.68). Similarly, patients with a fibrosis score (FIB-4) greater than 3.25 had a sixfold higher risk of HCC, compared with those with a value of 1.45 or lower.
Researchers commented that, at this level of risk, surveillance for HCC in these patients may be cost effective.
“Based on these data, HCC surveillance or risk modification may be needed for all patients who have progressed to cirrhosis or advanced fibrosis (as indicated by high FIB-4) at the time of SVR,” they wrote.
Alcohol use was also associated with a significantly higher annual incidence of HCC (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.11-2.18).
Among the study cohort, 39% had cirrhosis, 29.7% had advanced fibrosis, and nearly one-quarter had previously been treated for hepatitis C infection. More than 40% also had diabetes, 61.4% reported alcohol use, and 54.2% had a history of drug use.
“DAAs offer a chance of cure for all patients with HCV, including patients with advanced cirrhosis, older patients, and those with alcohol use – all characteristics independently associated with risk of HCC in HCV,” the authors explained. “These data show the treated population has changed significantly in the DAA era to include many patients with other HCC risk factors; these differences likely explain why the newer cohorts of DAA-treated patients face higher absolute HCC risk than expected, based on historic data.”
The study was partly supported by the Department of Veteran Affairs’ Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety at the Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center. No conflicts of interest were declared.
FROM GASTROENTEROLOGY
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Individuals who achieved an SVR to antiviral treatment for hepatitis C infection had a 72% lower risk of hepatocellular carcinoma than those who do not show a sustained response.
Data source: Retrospective cohort study in 22,500 U.S. veterans with hepatitis C.
Disclosures: The study was partly supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs’ Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety at the Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center. No conflicts of interest were declared.