LayerRx Mapping ID
482
Slot System
Featured Buckets
Featured Buckets Admin
Reverse Chronological Sort
Allow Teaser Image
Medscape Lead Concept
1557

TP53-mutated MDS: Eprenetapopt plus azacitidine is safe and favorable

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 06/08/2021 - 12:46
Display Headline
TP53-mutated MDS: Eprenetapopt plus azacitidine is safe and favorable

Key clinical point: In patients with very high-risk TP53-mutated myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), addition of eprenetapopt to azacitidine (AZA) was safe and led to better clinical outcomes than AZA alone.

Major finding: The overall response rate in MDS patients was 62% including 47% complete remission. The median duration of response in MDS patients was 10.4 months. At a median follow-up of 9.7 months, the median overall survival in MDS patients was 12.1 months. Eprenetapopt plus AZA was generally well tolerated.

Study details: Phase 2 study of eprenetapopt plus AZA vs. AZA alone in 34 very high-risk TP53-mutated MDS patients.

Disclosures: The study was supported by Groupe Francophone des Myelodysplasies. The authors reported relationships with various pharmaceutical companies.

Source: Cluzeau T et al. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Feb 18. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02342.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: In patients with very high-risk TP53-mutated myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), addition of eprenetapopt to azacitidine (AZA) was safe and led to better clinical outcomes than AZA alone.

Major finding: The overall response rate in MDS patients was 62% including 47% complete remission. The median duration of response in MDS patients was 10.4 months. At a median follow-up of 9.7 months, the median overall survival in MDS patients was 12.1 months. Eprenetapopt plus AZA was generally well tolerated.

Study details: Phase 2 study of eprenetapopt plus AZA vs. AZA alone in 34 very high-risk TP53-mutated MDS patients.

Disclosures: The study was supported by Groupe Francophone des Myelodysplasies. The authors reported relationships with various pharmaceutical companies.

Source: Cluzeau T et al. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Feb 18. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02342.

Key clinical point: In patients with very high-risk TP53-mutated myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), addition of eprenetapopt to azacitidine (AZA) was safe and led to better clinical outcomes than AZA alone.

Major finding: The overall response rate in MDS patients was 62% including 47% complete remission. The median duration of response in MDS patients was 10.4 months. At a median follow-up of 9.7 months, the median overall survival in MDS patients was 12.1 months. Eprenetapopt plus AZA was generally well tolerated.

Study details: Phase 2 study of eprenetapopt plus AZA vs. AZA alone in 34 very high-risk TP53-mutated MDS patients.

Disclosures: The study was supported by Groupe Francophone des Myelodysplasies. The authors reported relationships with various pharmaceutical companies.

Source: Cluzeau T et al. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Feb 18. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02342.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
TP53-mutated MDS: Eprenetapopt plus azacitidine is safe and favorable
Display Headline
TP53-mutated MDS: Eprenetapopt plus azacitidine is safe and favorable
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: MDS June 2021
Gate On Date
Tue, 06/08/2021 - 12:15
Un-Gate On Date
Tue, 06/08/2021 - 12:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Tue, 06/08/2021 - 12:15
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

Clinical Edge Journal Scan Commentary: MDS June 2021

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 05/06/2022 - 16:24
Dr. Lee scans the journals, so you don’t have to!

Sangmin Lee, MD

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) remains the only potential curable option for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). While MDS mainly occurs in older patients, MDS does occur in younger patients and prior studies have suggested better overall survival (OS) for younger patients undergoing allogeneic SCT.  Shimomura et al (BMT 2021) analyzed the outcome of 645 patients aged 16-39 years old who received allogeneic SCT in Japan. In this multicenter retrospective analysis, 3 year OS was 71%. In the cohort, 37% of patients had either intermediate-2 or high risk by IPSS, 41% had active disease prior to SCT, and 10% had secondary MDS.  In a multivariate analysis, active disease status, poor cytogenetic risk, and transplant other than from related donor were associated with poor 3 year OS. Cumulative 3 year relapse was 11% and 3 year non-relapse mortality was 19%, which is lower than those of older patients with MDS which ranges from 30-40%. Limitations from this analysis are lack of genetic mutation data, as well as lack of incorporation of prior MDS directed therapy with outcome analysis, however this analysis from a large retrospective cohort provides valuable information regarding outcome in young patients with MDS.


Use of melphalan in multiple myeloma is associated with increased risk of developing MDS and acute myeloid leukemia (AML).  Jonsdottir et al (European Journal of Hematology) reported results of a large population-based study using the Swedish cancer registry to determine relationship of exposure to melphalan treatment for multiple myeloma and development of subsequent MDS and AML. Out of 26,627 patients with multiple myeloma in the Swedish cancer registry, 0.5% (124) patients developed subsequent MDS or AML. The median time from multiple myeloma diagnosis to MDS or AML diagnosis was 3.8 years. There was about threefold higher cumulative exposure to melphalan among those who developed MDS or AML compared to those who did not develop MDS or AML (OR=2.8, 95% CI 1.7-5.2, P < 0.001). There was no difference among the groups in exposure and dosing of radiation therapy, cumulative dose of cyclophosphamide, or doxorubicine. This large population-based study confirms the association between melphalan therapy and development of MDS/AML.


Febrile neutropenia is a common complication for neutropenic patients undergoing therapy. Patients who develop febrile neutropenia are treated with empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics, however there is conflicting recommended duration of antimicrobial treatment in absence of evidence of bacterial infection. The Infectious Disease Society of America recommends antibiotic treatment until marrow recovery, while the European Conference of Infections in Leukemia guidelines suggest consideration of discontinuation after 72 hours if the patient is hemodynamically stable and afebrile for 48 hours. Schauwvlieghe et al (EClinical Medicine 2021) compared the outcome of MDS and AML patients with febrile neutropenia during induction chemotherapy receiving a shortened 3 day empiric antibiotic therapy in absence of documented infection to those receiving antibiotics until neutrophil recovery in a retrospective comparative cohort study in two hospitals in the HOVON network. The shorted antibiotic group received a median of 9 days of antibiotics, compared to 19 days. The primary endpoint was the rate of serious medical complications; there was no statistical difference between the two groups (12.5% for shortened antibiotics vs 8.9% for prolonged antibiotics, = 0.17).  There was no difference in serious medical complications when adjusting for age, AML risk, non-pulmonary HCT-CI score, and year of admission. There was also no significant difference in infection-related 30-day mortality among the two groups. This study suggests that for patients who develop febrile neutropenia while receiving induction chemotherapy, it may be safe to consider stopping antibiotics after 3 days in absence of infection. A prospective trial should be considered to further evaluate the safety of shortened antibiotic course.

Author and Disclosure Information

Sangmin Lee, MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY

Dr. Lee has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships:
Serve(d) as a director, officer, partner, employee, advisor, consultant, or trustee for: Helsinn; AstraZeneca; Innate Pharma; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Pin Therapeutics
Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: Helsinn; AstraZeneca; Innate Pharma; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Pin Therapeutics

Publications
Topics
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Sangmin Lee, MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY

Dr. Lee has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships:
Serve(d) as a director, officer, partner, employee, advisor, consultant, or trustee for: Helsinn; AstraZeneca; Innate Pharma; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Pin Therapeutics
Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: Helsinn; AstraZeneca; Innate Pharma; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Pin Therapeutics

Author and Disclosure Information

Sangmin Lee, MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY

Dr. Lee has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships:
Serve(d) as a director, officer, partner, employee, advisor, consultant, or trustee for: Helsinn; AstraZeneca; Innate Pharma; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Pin Therapeutics
Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: Helsinn; AstraZeneca; Innate Pharma; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Pin Therapeutics

Dr. Lee scans the journals, so you don’t have to!
Dr. Lee scans the journals, so you don’t have to!

Sangmin Lee, MD

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) remains the only potential curable option for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). While MDS mainly occurs in older patients, MDS does occur in younger patients and prior studies have suggested better overall survival (OS) for younger patients undergoing allogeneic SCT.  Shimomura et al (BMT 2021) analyzed the outcome of 645 patients aged 16-39 years old who received allogeneic SCT in Japan. In this multicenter retrospective analysis, 3 year OS was 71%. In the cohort, 37% of patients had either intermediate-2 or high risk by IPSS, 41% had active disease prior to SCT, and 10% had secondary MDS.  In a multivariate analysis, active disease status, poor cytogenetic risk, and transplant other than from related donor were associated with poor 3 year OS. Cumulative 3 year relapse was 11% and 3 year non-relapse mortality was 19%, which is lower than those of older patients with MDS which ranges from 30-40%. Limitations from this analysis are lack of genetic mutation data, as well as lack of incorporation of prior MDS directed therapy with outcome analysis, however this analysis from a large retrospective cohort provides valuable information regarding outcome in young patients with MDS.


Use of melphalan in multiple myeloma is associated with increased risk of developing MDS and acute myeloid leukemia (AML).  Jonsdottir et al (European Journal of Hematology) reported results of a large population-based study using the Swedish cancer registry to determine relationship of exposure to melphalan treatment for multiple myeloma and development of subsequent MDS and AML. Out of 26,627 patients with multiple myeloma in the Swedish cancer registry, 0.5% (124) patients developed subsequent MDS or AML. The median time from multiple myeloma diagnosis to MDS or AML diagnosis was 3.8 years. There was about threefold higher cumulative exposure to melphalan among those who developed MDS or AML compared to those who did not develop MDS or AML (OR=2.8, 95% CI 1.7-5.2, P < 0.001). There was no difference among the groups in exposure and dosing of radiation therapy, cumulative dose of cyclophosphamide, or doxorubicine. This large population-based study confirms the association between melphalan therapy and development of MDS/AML.


Febrile neutropenia is a common complication for neutropenic patients undergoing therapy. Patients who develop febrile neutropenia are treated with empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics, however there is conflicting recommended duration of antimicrobial treatment in absence of evidence of bacterial infection. The Infectious Disease Society of America recommends antibiotic treatment until marrow recovery, while the European Conference of Infections in Leukemia guidelines suggest consideration of discontinuation after 72 hours if the patient is hemodynamically stable and afebrile for 48 hours. Schauwvlieghe et al (EClinical Medicine 2021) compared the outcome of MDS and AML patients with febrile neutropenia during induction chemotherapy receiving a shortened 3 day empiric antibiotic therapy in absence of documented infection to those receiving antibiotics until neutrophil recovery in a retrospective comparative cohort study in two hospitals in the HOVON network. The shorted antibiotic group received a median of 9 days of antibiotics, compared to 19 days. The primary endpoint was the rate of serious medical complications; there was no statistical difference between the two groups (12.5% for shortened antibiotics vs 8.9% for prolonged antibiotics, = 0.17).  There was no difference in serious medical complications when adjusting for age, AML risk, non-pulmonary HCT-CI score, and year of admission. There was also no significant difference in infection-related 30-day mortality among the two groups. This study suggests that for patients who develop febrile neutropenia while receiving induction chemotherapy, it may be safe to consider stopping antibiotics after 3 days in absence of infection. A prospective trial should be considered to further evaluate the safety of shortened antibiotic course.

Sangmin Lee, MD

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) remains the only potential curable option for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). While MDS mainly occurs in older patients, MDS does occur in younger patients and prior studies have suggested better overall survival (OS) for younger patients undergoing allogeneic SCT.  Shimomura et al (BMT 2021) analyzed the outcome of 645 patients aged 16-39 years old who received allogeneic SCT in Japan. In this multicenter retrospective analysis, 3 year OS was 71%. In the cohort, 37% of patients had either intermediate-2 or high risk by IPSS, 41% had active disease prior to SCT, and 10% had secondary MDS.  In a multivariate analysis, active disease status, poor cytogenetic risk, and transplant other than from related donor were associated with poor 3 year OS. Cumulative 3 year relapse was 11% and 3 year non-relapse mortality was 19%, which is lower than those of older patients with MDS which ranges from 30-40%. Limitations from this analysis are lack of genetic mutation data, as well as lack of incorporation of prior MDS directed therapy with outcome analysis, however this analysis from a large retrospective cohort provides valuable information regarding outcome in young patients with MDS.


Use of melphalan in multiple myeloma is associated with increased risk of developing MDS and acute myeloid leukemia (AML).  Jonsdottir et al (European Journal of Hematology) reported results of a large population-based study using the Swedish cancer registry to determine relationship of exposure to melphalan treatment for multiple myeloma and development of subsequent MDS and AML. Out of 26,627 patients with multiple myeloma in the Swedish cancer registry, 0.5% (124) patients developed subsequent MDS or AML. The median time from multiple myeloma diagnosis to MDS or AML diagnosis was 3.8 years. There was about threefold higher cumulative exposure to melphalan among those who developed MDS or AML compared to those who did not develop MDS or AML (OR=2.8, 95% CI 1.7-5.2, P < 0.001). There was no difference among the groups in exposure and dosing of radiation therapy, cumulative dose of cyclophosphamide, or doxorubicine. This large population-based study confirms the association between melphalan therapy and development of MDS/AML.


Febrile neutropenia is a common complication for neutropenic patients undergoing therapy. Patients who develop febrile neutropenia are treated with empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics, however there is conflicting recommended duration of antimicrobial treatment in absence of evidence of bacterial infection. The Infectious Disease Society of America recommends antibiotic treatment until marrow recovery, while the European Conference of Infections in Leukemia guidelines suggest consideration of discontinuation after 72 hours if the patient is hemodynamically stable and afebrile for 48 hours. Schauwvlieghe et al (EClinical Medicine 2021) compared the outcome of MDS and AML patients with febrile neutropenia during induction chemotherapy receiving a shortened 3 day empiric antibiotic therapy in absence of documented infection to those receiving antibiotics until neutrophil recovery in a retrospective comparative cohort study in two hospitals in the HOVON network. The shorted antibiotic group received a median of 9 days of antibiotics, compared to 19 days. The primary endpoint was the rate of serious medical complications; there was no statistical difference between the two groups (12.5% for shortened antibiotics vs 8.9% for prolonged antibiotics, = 0.17).  There was no difference in serious medical complications when adjusting for age, AML risk, non-pulmonary HCT-CI score, and year of admission. There was also no significant difference in infection-related 30-day mortality among the two groups. This study suggests that for patients who develop febrile neutropenia while receiving induction chemotherapy, it may be safe to consider stopping antibiotics after 3 days in absence of infection. A prospective trial should be considered to further evaluate the safety of shortened antibiotic course.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: MDS June 2021
Gate On Date
Fri, 04/02/2021 - 10:00
Un-Gate On Date
Fri, 04/02/2021 - 10:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Fri, 04/02/2021 - 10:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

Clinical Edge Journal Scan Commentary: MDS May 2021

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 05/06/2022 - 16:22
Dr. Lee scans the journals, so you don’t have to!

Sangmin Lee, MD
Current upfront standard therapy for patients with higher risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is hypomethylating agents (HMA), either azacitidine or decitabine, while allogeneic stem cell transplant can be considered in eligible patients as a potentially curative therapy. While several studies have shown potential benefit of achieving complete remission with azacitidine prior to allogeneic stem cell transplant; a recent meta-analysis examined the role of HMA as a bridge prior to allogeneic stem cell transplant in MDS patients. From seven retrospective studies that were included in the meta-analysis, administration of HMA prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation did not improve overall survival (OS) compared to no HMA prior to transplant (HR=0.86, p=0.32). The limitation of this meta-analysis was small study size, heterogeneity of the cohorts, retrospective nature of studies included, and disease status prior to transplantation was not factored in the analysis. HMA as a bridge to allogeneic stem cell transplant in MDS patients with persistent disease warrants further prospective investigation.

 


Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched hematopoetic stem cell microtransplantation (MST) has previously been evaluated in AML in combination with chemotherapy and suggests potential improvement in outcomes. Li et al evaluated MST combined with decitabine in patients with intermediate or high risk MDS compared to decitabine alone.  Out of 22 patients in the study, the cohort that received MST with decitabine had higher median OS (24 vs 14.2 months, p=0.04), although there was no statistical significant difference in overall response rate. There was no reported graft vs host disease, and adverse events were similar between the two groups. The main limitation of the study was the very small sample size; further prospective studies utilizing MST in MDS are needed to demonstrate benefit.

 

MDS patients often present with neutropenia and develop worsening neutropenia due to myelosuppression from HMA therapy, resulting in increased risk of infections including invasive fungal infection (IFI). Tey et al reported a retrospective analysis of the rate of IFI in patients with MDS or low blast count AML receiving azacitidine. Out of 117 patients, 61% received antifungal prophylaxis, either with posaconazole (n=70) or voriconazole (n=1). The IFI rate was 7.7% in the cohort with median time of onset of 74 days from start of azacitidine treatment (range 1-226); the IFI rate did not differ statistically between those receiving prophylaxis vs not (5.6% vs 10.9%, p=0.30). However, presence of neutropenia at three months of treatment was associated with increased IFI risk (HR 8.29, p=0.01), and IFI was associated with increased mortality in a multivariate analysis (HR 8.37, p<0.0001). Anti-fungal prophylaxis is currently standard practice for MDS patients who present or develop neutropenia; however, HMA treatment is associated with prolonged neutropenia due to myelosuppression and time to response. A more effective therapy with less myelosuppression is needed for treatment of MDS.

Author and Disclosure Information

Sangmin Lee, MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY

Dr. Lee has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships:
Serve(d) as a director, officer, partner, employee, advisor, consultant, or trustee for: Helsinn; AstraZeneca; Innate Pharma; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Pin Therapeutics
Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: Helsinn; AstraZeneca; Innate Pharma; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Pin Therapeutics

Publications
Topics
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Sangmin Lee, MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY

Dr. Lee has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships:
Serve(d) as a director, officer, partner, employee, advisor, consultant, or trustee for: Helsinn; AstraZeneca; Innate Pharma; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Pin Therapeutics
Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: Helsinn; AstraZeneca; Innate Pharma; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Pin Therapeutics

Author and Disclosure Information

Sangmin Lee, MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY

Dr. Lee has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships:
Serve(d) as a director, officer, partner, employee, advisor, consultant, or trustee for: Helsinn; AstraZeneca; Innate Pharma; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Pin Therapeutics
Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: Helsinn; AstraZeneca; Innate Pharma; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Pin Therapeutics

Dr. Lee scans the journals, so you don’t have to!
Dr. Lee scans the journals, so you don’t have to!

Sangmin Lee, MD
Current upfront standard therapy for patients with higher risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is hypomethylating agents (HMA), either azacitidine or decitabine, while allogeneic stem cell transplant can be considered in eligible patients as a potentially curative therapy. While several studies have shown potential benefit of achieving complete remission with azacitidine prior to allogeneic stem cell transplant; a recent meta-analysis examined the role of HMA as a bridge prior to allogeneic stem cell transplant in MDS patients. From seven retrospective studies that were included in the meta-analysis, administration of HMA prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation did not improve overall survival (OS) compared to no HMA prior to transplant (HR=0.86, p=0.32). The limitation of this meta-analysis was small study size, heterogeneity of the cohorts, retrospective nature of studies included, and disease status prior to transplantation was not factored in the analysis. HMA as a bridge to allogeneic stem cell transplant in MDS patients with persistent disease warrants further prospective investigation.

 


Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched hematopoetic stem cell microtransplantation (MST) has previously been evaluated in AML in combination with chemotherapy and suggests potential improvement in outcomes. Li et al evaluated MST combined with decitabine in patients with intermediate or high risk MDS compared to decitabine alone.  Out of 22 patients in the study, the cohort that received MST with decitabine had higher median OS (24 vs 14.2 months, p=0.04), although there was no statistical significant difference in overall response rate. There was no reported graft vs host disease, and adverse events were similar between the two groups. The main limitation of the study was the very small sample size; further prospective studies utilizing MST in MDS are needed to demonstrate benefit.

 

MDS patients often present with neutropenia and develop worsening neutropenia due to myelosuppression from HMA therapy, resulting in increased risk of infections including invasive fungal infection (IFI). Tey et al reported a retrospective analysis of the rate of IFI in patients with MDS or low blast count AML receiving azacitidine. Out of 117 patients, 61% received antifungal prophylaxis, either with posaconazole (n=70) or voriconazole (n=1). The IFI rate was 7.7% in the cohort with median time of onset of 74 days from start of azacitidine treatment (range 1-226); the IFI rate did not differ statistically between those receiving prophylaxis vs not (5.6% vs 10.9%, p=0.30). However, presence of neutropenia at three months of treatment was associated with increased IFI risk (HR 8.29, p=0.01), and IFI was associated with increased mortality in a multivariate analysis (HR 8.37, p<0.0001). Anti-fungal prophylaxis is currently standard practice for MDS patients who present or develop neutropenia; however, HMA treatment is associated with prolonged neutropenia due to myelosuppression and time to response. A more effective therapy with less myelosuppression is needed for treatment of MDS.

Sangmin Lee, MD
Current upfront standard therapy for patients with higher risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is hypomethylating agents (HMA), either azacitidine or decitabine, while allogeneic stem cell transplant can be considered in eligible patients as a potentially curative therapy. While several studies have shown potential benefit of achieving complete remission with azacitidine prior to allogeneic stem cell transplant; a recent meta-analysis examined the role of HMA as a bridge prior to allogeneic stem cell transplant in MDS patients. From seven retrospective studies that were included in the meta-analysis, administration of HMA prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation did not improve overall survival (OS) compared to no HMA prior to transplant (HR=0.86, p=0.32). The limitation of this meta-analysis was small study size, heterogeneity of the cohorts, retrospective nature of studies included, and disease status prior to transplantation was not factored in the analysis. HMA as a bridge to allogeneic stem cell transplant in MDS patients with persistent disease warrants further prospective investigation.

 


Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched hematopoetic stem cell microtransplantation (MST) has previously been evaluated in AML in combination with chemotherapy and suggests potential improvement in outcomes. Li et al evaluated MST combined with decitabine in patients with intermediate or high risk MDS compared to decitabine alone.  Out of 22 patients in the study, the cohort that received MST with decitabine had higher median OS (24 vs 14.2 months, p=0.04), although there was no statistical significant difference in overall response rate. There was no reported graft vs host disease, and adverse events were similar between the two groups. The main limitation of the study was the very small sample size; further prospective studies utilizing MST in MDS are needed to demonstrate benefit.

 

MDS patients often present with neutropenia and develop worsening neutropenia due to myelosuppression from HMA therapy, resulting in increased risk of infections including invasive fungal infection (IFI). Tey et al reported a retrospective analysis of the rate of IFI in patients with MDS or low blast count AML receiving azacitidine. Out of 117 patients, 61% received antifungal prophylaxis, either with posaconazole (n=70) or voriconazole (n=1). The IFI rate was 7.7% in the cohort with median time of onset of 74 days from start of azacitidine treatment (range 1-226); the IFI rate did not differ statistically between those receiving prophylaxis vs not (5.6% vs 10.9%, p=0.30). However, presence of neutropenia at three months of treatment was associated with increased IFI risk (HR 8.29, p=0.01), and IFI was associated with increased mortality in a multivariate analysis (HR 8.37, p<0.0001). Anti-fungal prophylaxis is currently standard practice for MDS patients who present or develop neutropenia; however, HMA treatment is associated with prolonged neutropenia due to myelosuppression and time to response. A more effective therapy with less myelosuppression is needed for treatment of MDS.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: MDS May 2021
Gate On Date
Fri, 04/02/2021 - 10:00
Un-Gate On Date
Fri, 04/02/2021 - 10:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Fri, 04/02/2021 - 10:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

Decitabine with microtransplantation shows promise in intermediate- or high-risk MDS

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 05/03/2021 - 12:17

Key clinical point: Combination of decitabine and human leukocyte antigen-mismatched hematopoietic stem cell microtransplantation (HLA-MST) could be an effective and safe treatment in patients with intermediate- or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

Major finding: Overall survival was significantly higher in the decitabine and HLA-MST combination vs. decitabine alone group (24.00 vs. 14.13 months; hazard ratio, 0.32; P = .04). The incidence of hematological adverse events except thrombocytopenia and nonhematological adverse events was slightly lower in decitabine+HLA-MST vs. decitabine alone group.

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective study of 22 patients with intermediate- or high-risk MDS who were treated with decitabine (n=11) or decitabine and HLA-MST combination (n=11).

Disclosures: The study was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China; the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China; the Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory; and the Project of Guangdong Province Traditional Chinese Medicine Bureau. The authors declared absence of any commercial or financial relationships during conduct of the study.

Source: Li MM et al. Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 31. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.628127.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Combination of decitabine and human leukocyte antigen-mismatched hematopoietic stem cell microtransplantation (HLA-MST) could be an effective and safe treatment in patients with intermediate- or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

Major finding: Overall survival was significantly higher in the decitabine and HLA-MST combination vs. decitabine alone group (24.00 vs. 14.13 months; hazard ratio, 0.32; P = .04). The incidence of hematological adverse events except thrombocytopenia and nonhematological adverse events was slightly lower in decitabine+HLA-MST vs. decitabine alone group.

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective study of 22 patients with intermediate- or high-risk MDS who were treated with decitabine (n=11) or decitabine and HLA-MST combination (n=11).

Disclosures: The study was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China; the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China; the Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory; and the Project of Guangdong Province Traditional Chinese Medicine Bureau. The authors declared absence of any commercial or financial relationships during conduct of the study.

Source: Li MM et al. Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 31. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.628127.

Key clinical point: Combination of decitabine and human leukocyte antigen-mismatched hematopoietic stem cell microtransplantation (HLA-MST) could be an effective and safe treatment in patients with intermediate- or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

Major finding: Overall survival was significantly higher in the decitabine and HLA-MST combination vs. decitabine alone group (24.00 vs. 14.13 months; hazard ratio, 0.32; P = .04). The incidence of hematological adverse events except thrombocytopenia and nonhematological adverse events was slightly lower in decitabine+HLA-MST vs. decitabine alone group.

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective study of 22 patients with intermediate- or high-risk MDS who were treated with decitabine (n=11) or decitabine and HLA-MST combination (n=11).

Disclosures: The study was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China; the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China; the Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory; and the Project of Guangdong Province Traditional Chinese Medicine Bureau. The authors declared absence of any commercial or financial relationships during conduct of the study.

Source: Li MM et al. Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 31. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.628127.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: MDS May 2021
Gate On Date
Fri, 04/02/2021 - 10:00
Un-Gate On Date
Fri, 04/02/2021 - 10:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Fri, 04/02/2021 - 10:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads

Low-risk MDS: Higher dose of hypomethylating agents promotes transfusion independence

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 05/03/2021 - 12:17

Key clinical point: Higher doses of hypomethylating agents, azacytidine (AZA) and decitabine (DAC), can help achieve higher rates of transfusion independence (TI) in patients with low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). However, benefits should be weighed against the risk for adverse events.

Major finding: TI rate was higher with AZA (75 mg/m2/day for 7 days) than other regimens (P less than .025). The rate of grade 3/4 anemia was higher (15.8% vs. 0.0%; P less than .0001) and that of diarrhea/constipation (6.9% vs. 25.0%; P = .002) was lower with DAC (20 mg/m2/day for 3 days) vs. AZA (75 mg/m2/day for 5 days).

Study details: Findings are from a meta-analysis of 19 prospective studies including 1,076 patients with low-risk MDS.

Disclosures: The study was funded by Beijing Natural Science Foundation, the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences, and the Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of CAMS. The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest.

Source: Wan Z et al. Aging (Albany NY). 2021 Mar 26. doi: 10.18632/aging.202767.

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Higher doses of hypomethylating agents, azacytidine (AZA) and decitabine (DAC), can help achieve higher rates of transfusion independence (TI) in patients with low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). However, benefits should be weighed against the risk for adverse events.

Major finding: TI rate was higher with AZA (75 mg/m2/day for 7 days) than other regimens (P less than .025). The rate of grade 3/4 anemia was higher (15.8% vs. 0.0%; P less than .0001) and that of diarrhea/constipation (6.9% vs. 25.0%; P = .002) was lower with DAC (20 mg/m2/day for 3 days) vs. AZA (75 mg/m2/day for 5 days).

Study details: Findings are from a meta-analysis of 19 prospective studies including 1,076 patients with low-risk MDS.

Disclosures: The study was funded by Beijing Natural Science Foundation, the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences, and the Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of CAMS. The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest.

Source: Wan Z et al. Aging (Albany NY). 2021 Mar 26. doi: 10.18632/aging.202767.

 

Key clinical point: Higher doses of hypomethylating agents, azacytidine (AZA) and decitabine (DAC), can help achieve higher rates of transfusion independence (TI) in patients with low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). However, benefits should be weighed against the risk for adverse events.

Major finding: TI rate was higher with AZA (75 mg/m2/day for 7 days) than other regimens (P less than .025). The rate of grade 3/4 anemia was higher (15.8% vs. 0.0%; P less than .0001) and that of diarrhea/constipation (6.9% vs. 25.0%; P = .002) was lower with DAC (20 mg/m2/day for 3 days) vs. AZA (75 mg/m2/day for 5 days).

Study details: Findings are from a meta-analysis of 19 prospective studies including 1,076 patients with low-risk MDS.

Disclosures: The study was funded by Beijing Natural Science Foundation, the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences, and the Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of CAMS. The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest.

Source: Wan Z et al. Aging (Albany NY). 2021 Mar 26. doi: 10.18632/aging.202767.

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: MDS May 2021
Gate On Date
Fri, 04/02/2021 - 10:00
Un-Gate On Date
Fri, 04/02/2021 - 10:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Fri, 04/02/2021 - 10:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads

MDS: No survival benefit with hypomethylating agents bridging therapy before allo-HSCT

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 05/03/2021 - 12:17

Key clinical point: Bridging therapy with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) did not provide long-term survival benefit in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).

Major finding: Overall survival was not significantly different among patients who received HMAs vs. best supportive care before allo-HSCT (hazard ratio, 0.86; P = .32).

Study details: Findings are from a meta-analysis of 7 retrospective studies including 820 patients with MDS, of which 395 patients received HMAs before allo-HSCT and the remaining patients received best supportive care.

Disclosures: The study was funded by Youth Science Foundation of National Natural Science Foundation of China. The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest.

Source: Liu L et al. Clin Exp Med. 2021 Apr 17. doi: 10.1007/s10238-021-00712-0.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Bridging therapy with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) did not provide long-term survival benefit in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).

Major finding: Overall survival was not significantly different among patients who received HMAs vs. best supportive care before allo-HSCT (hazard ratio, 0.86; P = .32).

Study details: Findings are from a meta-analysis of 7 retrospective studies including 820 patients with MDS, of which 395 patients received HMAs before allo-HSCT and the remaining patients received best supportive care.

Disclosures: The study was funded by Youth Science Foundation of National Natural Science Foundation of China. The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest.

Source: Liu L et al. Clin Exp Med. 2021 Apr 17. doi: 10.1007/s10238-021-00712-0.

Key clinical point: Bridging therapy with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) did not provide long-term survival benefit in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).

Major finding: Overall survival was not significantly different among patients who received HMAs vs. best supportive care before allo-HSCT (hazard ratio, 0.86; P = .32).

Study details: Findings are from a meta-analysis of 7 retrospective studies including 820 patients with MDS, of which 395 patients received HMAs before allo-HSCT and the remaining patients received best supportive care.

Disclosures: The study was funded by Youth Science Foundation of National Natural Science Foundation of China. The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest.

Source: Liu L et al. Clin Exp Med. 2021 Apr 17. doi: 10.1007/s10238-021-00712-0.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: MDS May 2021
Gate On Date
Fri, 04/02/2021 - 10:00
Un-Gate On Date
Fri, 04/02/2021 - 10:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Fri, 04/02/2021 - 10:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads

Risk of organizing pneumonia high in MDS patients with der(1;7)(q10; p10) abnormality

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 05/03/2021 - 12:17

Key clinical point: There could be a possible relationship between organizing pneumonia (OP) and karyotype der(1;7)(q10; p10) in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

Major finding: Overall, 5 (3.1%) patients developed pathologically diagnosed OP, of which 3 had der(1;7)(q10; p10) abnormality. The chances of developing OP was higher among patients with vs. without der(1;7)(q10;p10) abnormality (odds ratio, 25.70; 95% confidence interval, 2.582-347.400).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective analysis of 159 patients with high-risk MDS.

Disclosures: No funding source was identified. The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest.

Source: Matsunawa M et al. Br J Haematol. 2021 Apr 14. doi: 10.1111/bjh.17473.

 

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: There could be a possible relationship between organizing pneumonia (OP) and karyotype der(1;7)(q10; p10) in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

Major finding: Overall, 5 (3.1%) patients developed pathologically diagnosed OP, of which 3 had der(1;7)(q10; p10) abnormality. The chances of developing OP was higher among patients with vs. without der(1;7)(q10;p10) abnormality (odds ratio, 25.70; 95% confidence interval, 2.582-347.400).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective analysis of 159 patients with high-risk MDS.

Disclosures: No funding source was identified. The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest.

Source: Matsunawa M et al. Br J Haematol. 2021 Apr 14. doi: 10.1111/bjh.17473.

 

 

Key clinical point: There could be a possible relationship between organizing pneumonia (OP) and karyotype der(1;7)(q10; p10) in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

Major finding: Overall, 5 (3.1%) patients developed pathologically diagnosed OP, of which 3 had der(1;7)(q10; p10) abnormality. The chances of developing OP was higher among patients with vs. without der(1;7)(q10;p10) abnormality (odds ratio, 25.70; 95% confidence interval, 2.582-347.400).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective analysis of 159 patients with high-risk MDS.

Disclosures: No funding source was identified. The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest.

Source: Matsunawa M et al. Br J Haematol. 2021 Apr 14. doi: 10.1111/bjh.17473.

 

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: MDS May 2021
Gate On Date
Fri, 04/02/2021 - 10:00
Un-Gate On Date
Fri, 04/02/2021 - 10:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Fri, 04/02/2021 - 10:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads

Quizartinib-based combinations safe and effective for untreated MDS

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 05/03/2021 - 12:17

Key clinical point: Quizartinib-based combinations were effective and well tolerated in both frontline and first salvage for patients with untreated myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Major finding: Frontline quizartinib/azacitidine vs. quizartinib/low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) led to a higher proportion of patients achieve composite response (87% vs. 74%) and a longer overall survival (19.2 vs. 8.5 months; P = .036). Similarly, quizartinib/azacitidine vs. quizartinib/LDAC was associated with a higher proportion of patients with relapsed/refractory AML achieve composite response (64% vs. 29%) and a trend for longer overall survival (12.8 vs. 4 months; P = .053). Overall, therapy was well tolerated in both cohorts.

Study details: In this open-label phase I/II trial, patients with untreated MDS/AML or those receiving first-salvage treatment for FLT3-ITD AML were treated with a combination of quizartinib and either azacitidine or LDAC in frontline (n=34) or as first-salvage (n=39) therapy.

Disclosures: The study was supported in part by the Cancer Center Support Grant. The authors declared no competing financial interests.

Source: Swaminathan M et al. Haematologica. 2021 Apr 15. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2020.263392.

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Quizartinib-based combinations were effective and well tolerated in both frontline and first salvage for patients with untreated myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Major finding: Frontline quizartinib/azacitidine vs. quizartinib/low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) led to a higher proportion of patients achieve composite response (87% vs. 74%) and a longer overall survival (19.2 vs. 8.5 months; P = .036). Similarly, quizartinib/azacitidine vs. quizartinib/LDAC was associated with a higher proportion of patients with relapsed/refractory AML achieve composite response (64% vs. 29%) and a trend for longer overall survival (12.8 vs. 4 months; P = .053). Overall, therapy was well tolerated in both cohorts.

Study details: In this open-label phase I/II trial, patients with untreated MDS/AML or those receiving first-salvage treatment for FLT3-ITD AML were treated with a combination of quizartinib and either azacitidine or LDAC in frontline (n=34) or as first-salvage (n=39) therapy.

Disclosures: The study was supported in part by the Cancer Center Support Grant. The authors declared no competing financial interests.

Source: Swaminathan M et al. Haematologica. 2021 Apr 15. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2020.263392.

 

Key clinical point: Quizartinib-based combinations were effective and well tolerated in both frontline and first salvage for patients with untreated myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Major finding: Frontline quizartinib/azacitidine vs. quizartinib/low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) led to a higher proportion of patients achieve composite response (87% vs. 74%) and a longer overall survival (19.2 vs. 8.5 months; P = .036). Similarly, quizartinib/azacitidine vs. quizartinib/LDAC was associated with a higher proportion of patients with relapsed/refractory AML achieve composite response (64% vs. 29%) and a trend for longer overall survival (12.8 vs. 4 months; P = .053). Overall, therapy was well tolerated in both cohorts.

Study details: In this open-label phase I/II trial, patients with untreated MDS/AML or those receiving first-salvage treatment for FLT3-ITD AML were treated with a combination of quizartinib and either azacitidine or LDAC in frontline (n=34) or as first-salvage (n=39) therapy.

Disclosures: The study was supported in part by the Cancer Center Support Grant. The authors declared no competing financial interests.

Source: Swaminathan M et al. Haematologica. 2021 Apr 15. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2020.263392.

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: MDS May 2021
Gate On Date
Fri, 04/02/2021 - 10:00
Un-Gate On Date
Fri, 04/02/2021 - 10:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Fri, 04/02/2021 - 10:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads

Stanozolol: An effective alternative treatment for lower-risk MDS after epoetin alfa failure

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 05/03/2021 - 12:17

Key clinical point: Stanozolol (STZ) monotherapy could be considered an alternative treatment in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) without del(5q) after the failure of epoetin alfa.

Major finding: Hematologic improvement-erythroid response (HI-E) and transfusion independence were achieved in 48.2% and 43.2% of patients, respectively. The estimated 5-year overall survival was higher in HI-E responders vs. nonresponders (88.6% vs. 33.8%). Most of the adverse events were manageable.

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective analysis of 56 patients with lower-risk MDS without del(5q) exclusively treated with STZ after failure of epoetin alfa as first-line treatment.

Disclosures: No source of funding was declared. The authors declared no competing interests.

Source: Qu WY et al. Ann Hematol. 2021 Apr 10. doi: 10.1007/s00277-021-04508-w. 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Stanozolol (STZ) monotherapy could be considered an alternative treatment in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) without del(5q) after the failure of epoetin alfa.

Major finding: Hematologic improvement-erythroid response (HI-E) and transfusion independence were achieved in 48.2% and 43.2% of patients, respectively. The estimated 5-year overall survival was higher in HI-E responders vs. nonresponders (88.6% vs. 33.8%). Most of the adverse events were manageable.

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective analysis of 56 patients with lower-risk MDS without del(5q) exclusively treated with STZ after failure of epoetin alfa as first-line treatment.

Disclosures: No source of funding was declared. The authors declared no competing interests.

Source: Qu WY et al. Ann Hematol. 2021 Apr 10. doi: 10.1007/s00277-021-04508-w. 

Key clinical point: Stanozolol (STZ) monotherapy could be considered an alternative treatment in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) without del(5q) after the failure of epoetin alfa.

Major finding: Hematologic improvement-erythroid response (HI-E) and transfusion independence were achieved in 48.2% and 43.2% of patients, respectively. The estimated 5-year overall survival was higher in HI-E responders vs. nonresponders (88.6% vs. 33.8%). Most of the adverse events were manageable.

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective analysis of 56 patients with lower-risk MDS without del(5q) exclusively treated with STZ after failure of epoetin alfa as first-line treatment.

Disclosures: No source of funding was declared. The authors declared no competing interests.

Source: Qu WY et al. Ann Hematol. 2021 Apr 10. doi: 10.1007/s00277-021-04508-w. 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: MDS May 2021
Gate On Date
Fri, 04/02/2021 - 10:00
Un-Gate On Date
Fri, 04/02/2021 - 10:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Fri, 04/02/2021 - 10:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads

Azacytidine-treated MDS patients at risk for invasive fungal infection

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 05/03/2021 - 12:17

Key clinical point: Azacytidine-treated patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) are at significant risk for invasive fungal infection (IFI) with a corresponding higher risk for mortality, warranting mold-spectrum prophylaxis in these patients.

Major finding: Overall, 7.7% of patients developed IFI at a rate of 10.9% in patients who did not receive fungal prophylaxis. IFI was associated with a significantly higher risk for death (hazard ratio, 8.37; P less than .0001).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective cohort study of 117 patients receiving 5-azacytidine for MDS and low blast count acute myeloid leukemia.

Disclosures: The study was funded by a Monash Haematology research grant. B Rogers and J Shortt declared being on advisory boards and receiving research grants, speaker, and consultation fees from various sources.

Source: Tey A et al. Eur J Haematol. 2021 Apr 7. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13631

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Azacytidine-treated patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) are at significant risk for invasive fungal infection (IFI) with a corresponding higher risk for mortality, warranting mold-spectrum prophylaxis in these patients.

Major finding: Overall, 7.7% of patients developed IFI at a rate of 10.9% in patients who did not receive fungal prophylaxis. IFI was associated with a significantly higher risk for death (hazard ratio, 8.37; P less than .0001).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective cohort study of 117 patients receiving 5-azacytidine for MDS and low blast count acute myeloid leukemia.

Disclosures: The study was funded by a Monash Haematology research grant. B Rogers and J Shortt declared being on advisory boards and receiving research grants, speaker, and consultation fees from various sources.

Source: Tey A et al. Eur J Haematol. 2021 Apr 7. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13631

Key clinical point: Azacytidine-treated patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) are at significant risk for invasive fungal infection (IFI) with a corresponding higher risk for mortality, warranting mold-spectrum prophylaxis in these patients.

Major finding: Overall, 7.7% of patients developed IFI at a rate of 10.9% in patients who did not receive fungal prophylaxis. IFI was associated with a significantly higher risk for death (hazard ratio, 8.37; P less than .0001).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective cohort study of 117 patients receiving 5-azacytidine for MDS and low blast count acute myeloid leukemia.

Disclosures: The study was funded by a Monash Haematology research grant. B Rogers and J Shortt declared being on advisory boards and receiving research grants, speaker, and consultation fees from various sources.

Source: Tey A et al. Eur J Haematol. 2021 Apr 7. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13631

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: MDS May 2021
Gate On Date
Fri, 04/02/2021 - 10:00
Un-Gate On Date
Fri, 04/02/2021 - 10:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Fri, 04/02/2021 - 10:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads