Pharmacy

Photo by Bill Branson

The US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Oncologic Drug Advisory Committee (ODAC) has announced a positive opinion of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO, Mylotarg), a drug that was withdrawn from the US market in 2010.

In a vote of 6 to 1, the ODAC concluded that trial results suggest a favorable risk-benefit profile for low-dose GO given in combination with standard chemotherapy to patients with newly diagnosed, CD33-positive acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

The ODAC’s role is to provide recommendations to the FDA. The FDA is expected to make a decision on the biologics license application (BLA) for GO by September 2017.

With this BLA, Pfizer is seeking approval for GO in 2 indications.

One is for GO in combination with standard chemotherapy (daunorubicin and cytarabine) for the treatment of previously untreated, de novo, CD33-positive AML.

The other is for GO monotherapy for CD33-positive AML patients in first relapse who are 60 years of age or older and who are not considered candidates for other cytotoxic chemotherapy.

GO is an investigational antibody-drug conjugate that consists of the cytotoxic agent calicheamicin attached to a monoclonal antibody targeting CD33.

GO was originally approved under the FDA’s accelerated approval program in 2000 for use as a single agent in patients with CD33-positive AML who had experienced their first relapse and were 60 years of age or older.

In 2010, Pfizer voluntarily withdrew GO from the US market due to the results of a confirmatory phase 3 trial, SWOG S0106.

This trial showed there was no clinical benefit for patients who received GO plus daunorubicin and cytarabine over patients who received only daunorubicin and cytarabine.

In addition, the rate of fatal, treatment-related toxicity was significantly higher in the GO arm of the study.

However, results of subsequent trials suggested that a lower dose of GO was safer.

The current BLA for GO includes data from such a study, known as ALFA-0701.

The ODAC voted that results from ALFA-0701 demonstrated a favorable risk-benefit profile for GO when the drug was given at 3 mg/m² on days 1, 4, and 7 in combination with daunorubicin and cytarabine.

The BLA for GO also includes Pfizer-sponsored studies from the original new drug application for GO and a meta-analysis of patients in 5 randomized, phase 3 studies (including ALFA-0701). These studies span 10 years of research and include more than 4300 patients.

Photo by Bill Branson

The US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Oncologic Drug Advisory Committee (ODAC) has announced a positive opinion of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO, Mylotarg), a drug that was withdrawn from the US market in 2010.

In a vote of 6 to 1, the ODAC concluded that trial results suggest a favorable risk-benefit profile for low-dose GO given in combination with standard chemotherapy to patients with newly diagnosed, CD33-positive acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

The ODAC’s role is to provide recommendations to the FDA. The FDA is expected to make a decision on the biologics license application (BLA) for GO by September 2017.

With this BLA, Pfizer is seeking approval for GO in 2 indications.

One is for GO in combination with standard chemotherapy (daunorubicin and cytarabine) for the treatment of previously untreated, de novo, CD33-positive AML.

The other is for GO monotherapy for CD33-positive AML patients in first relapse who are 60 years of age or older and who are not considered candidates for other cytotoxic chemotherapy.

GO is an investigational antibody-drug conjugate that consists of the cytotoxic agent calicheamicin attached to a monoclonal antibody targeting CD33.

GO was originally approved under the FDA’s accelerated approval program in 2000 for use as a single agent in patients with CD33-positive AML who had experienced their first relapse and were 60 years of age or older.

In 2010, Pfizer voluntarily withdrew GO from the US market due to the results of a confirmatory phase 3 trial, SWOG S0106.

This trial showed there was no clinical benefit for patients who received GO plus daunorubicin and cytarabine over patients who received only daunorubicin and cytarabine.

In addition, the rate of fatal, treatment-related toxicity was significantly higher in the GO arm of the study.

However, results of subsequent trials suggested that a lower dose of GO was safer.

The current BLA for GO includes data from such a study, known as ALFA-0701.

The ODAC voted that results from ALFA-0701 demonstrated a favorable risk-benefit profile for GO when the drug was given at 3 mg/m² on days 1, 4, and 7 in combination with daunorubicin and cytarabine.

The BLA for GO also includes Pfizer-sponsored studies from the original new drug application for GO and a meta-analysis of patients in 5 randomized, phase 3 studies (including ALFA-0701). These studies span 10 years of research and include more than 4300 patients.

Photo by Bill Branson

The US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Oncologic Drug Advisory Committee (ODAC) has announced a positive opinion of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO, Mylotarg), a drug that was withdrawn from the US market in 2010.

In a vote of 6 to 1, the ODAC concluded that trial results suggest a favorable risk-benefit profile for low-dose GO given in combination with standard chemotherapy to patients with newly diagnosed, CD33-positive acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

The ODAC’s role is to provide recommendations to the FDA. The FDA is expected to make a decision on the biologics license application (BLA) for GO by September 2017.

With this BLA, Pfizer is seeking approval for GO in 2 indications.

One is for GO in combination with standard chemotherapy (daunorubicin and cytarabine) for the treatment of previously untreated, de novo, CD33-positive AML.

The other is for GO monotherapy for CD33-positive AML patients in first relapse who are 60 years of age or older and who are not considered candidates for other cytotoxic chemotherapy.

GO is an investigational antibody-drug conjugate that consists of the cytotoxic agent calicheamicin attached to a monoclonal antibody targeting CD33.

GO was originally approved under the FDA’s accelerated approval program in 2000 for use as a single agent in patients with CD33-positive AML who had experienced their first relapse and were 60 years of age or older.

In 2010, Pfizer voluntarily withdrew GO from the US market due to the results of a confirmatory phase 3 trial, SWOG S0106.

This trial showed there was no clinical benefit for patients who received GO plus daunorubicin and cytarabine over patients who received only daunorubicin and cytarabine.

In addition, the rate of fatal, treatment-related toxicity was significantly higher in the GO arm of the study.

However, results of subsequent trials suggested that a lower dose of GO was safer.

The current BLA for GO includes data from such a study, known as ALFA-0701.

The ODAC voted that results from ALFA-0701 demonstrated a favorable risk-benefit profile for GO when the drug was given at 3 mg/m² on days 1, 4, and 7 in combination with daunorubicin and cytarabine.

The BLA for GO also includes Pfizer-sponsored studies from the original new drug application for GO and a meta-analysis of patients in 5 randomized, phase 3 studies (including ALFA-0701). These studies span 10 years of research and include more than 4300 patients.

Image by Difu Wu

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accepted for priority review a supplemental new drug application (sNDA) for dasatinib (Sprycel).

Bristol Myers Squibb is seeking approval for dasatinib as a treatment for children with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), as well as approval for a powder formulation of dasatinib for oral suspension.

The FDA grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions.

The agency’s goal is to take action on a priority review application within 6 months of receiving it, rather than the standard 10 months.

The FDA plans to make a decision on the dasatinib sNDA by November 9, 2017.

The sNDA includes data from CA180-226 (NCT00777036), an ongoing, phase 2 trial of dasatinib in pediatric patients with CP-CML who are resistant to or cannot tolerate imatinib and pediatric patients newly diagnosed with CP-CML.

The trial enrolled patients aged 18 and younger with newly diagnosed CML or Ph+ leukemias resistant to or intolerant of imatinib.

Cohort 1 included 29 CP-CML patients resistant to or intolerant of imatinib. Cohort 2 included patients with accelerated/blast phase CML or Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cohort 3 included 84 patients with newly diagnosed CP-CML.

Data from Cohorts 1 and 3 were recently presented at the 2017 ASCO Annual Meeting.

Three months into treatment with dasatinib, patients with CP-CML who were resistant to or intolerant of imatinib (Cohort 1) had a cumulative major cytogenetic response rate of 55.2%. This response rate increased over time to exceed 90% at 24 months.

Newly diagnosed patients with CP-CML (Cohort 3) received dasatinib orally or as powder for oral suspension once daily. They achieved a cumulative complete cytogenetic response rate of 64% as early as 6 months into treatment. This response rate increased to 94% at 24 months.

The median duration of response was not estimable or not yet reached in each cohort at the time of follow-up.

The estimated progression-free survival at 48 months was greater than 75% for patients in Cohort 1 and greater than 90% for patients in Cohort 3.

The safety profile of dasatinib in this study was deemed comparable to that reported in adults with CP-CML. In this study, there were no reported events of pleural/pericardial effusion, pulmonary edema/hypertension, or pulmonary arterial hypertension related to dasatinib.

Dasatinib first received FDA approval in 2006. The drug is currently approved to treat adults with:

• Newly diagnosed Ph+ CP-CML
• Chronic, accelerated, or blast phase Ph+ CML with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy including imatinib
• Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy.
  

Image by Difu Wu

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accepted for priority review a supplemental new drug application (sNDA) for dasatinib (Sprycel).

Bristol Myers Squibb is seeking approval for dasatinib as a treatment for children with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), as well as approval for a powder formulation of dasatinib for oral suspension.

The FDA grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions.

The agency’s goal is to take action on a priority review application within 6 months of receiving it, rather than the standard 10 months.

The FDA plans to make a decision on the dasatinib sNDA by November 9, 2017.

The sNDA includes data from CA180-226 (NCT00777036), an ongoing, phase 2 trial of dasatinib in pediatric patients with CP-CML who are resistant to or cannot tolerate imatinib and pediatric patients newly diagnosed with CP-CML.

The trial enrolled patients aged 18 and younger with newly diagnosed CML or Ph+ leukemias resistant to or intolerant of imatinib.

Cohort 1 included 29 CP-CML patients resistant to or intolerant of imatinib. Cohort 2 included patients with accelerated/blast phase CML or Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cohort 3 included 84 patients with newly diagnosed CP-CML.

Data from Cohorts 1 and 3 were recently presented at the 2017 ASCO Annual Meeting.

Three months into treatment with dasatinib, patients with CP-CML who were resistant to or intolerant of imatinib (Cohort 1) had a cumulative major cytogenetic response rate of 55.2%. This response rate increased over time to exceed 90% at 24 months.

Newly diagnosed patients with CP-CML (Cohort 3) received dasatinib orally or as powder for oral suspension once daily. They achieved a cumulative complete cytogenetic response rate of 64% as early as 6 months into treatment. This response rate increased to 94% at 24 months.

The median duration of response was not estimable or not yet reached in each cohort at the time of follow-up.

The estimated progression-free survival at 48 months was greater than 75% for patients in Cohort 1 and greater than 90% for patients in Cohort 3.

The safety profile of dasatinib in this study was deemed comparable to that reported in adults with CP-CML. In this study, there were no reported events of pleural/pericardial effusion, pulmonary edema/hypertension, or pulmonary arterial hypertension related to dasatinib.

Dasatinib first received FDA approval in 2006. The drug is currently approved to treat adults with:

• Newly diagnosed Ph+ CP-CML
• Chronic, accelerated, or blast phase Ph+ CML with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy including imatinib
• Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy.
  

Image by Difu Wu

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accepted for priority review a supplemental new drug application (sNDA) for dasatinib (Sprycel).

Bristol Myers Squibb is seeking approval for dasatinib as a treatment for children with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), as well as approval for a powder formulation of dasatinib for oral suspension.

The FDA grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions.

The agency’s goal is to take action on a priority review application within 6 months of receiving it, rather than the standard 10 months.

The FDA plans to make a decision on the dasatinib sNDA by November 9, 2017.

The sNDA includes data from CA180-226 (NCT00777036), an ongoing, phase 2 trial of dasatinib in pediatric patients with CP-CML who are resistant to or cannot tolerate imatinib and pediatric patients newly diagnosed with CP-CML.

The trial enrolled patients aged 18 and younger with newly diagnosed CML or Ph+ leukemias resistant to or intolerant of imatinib.

Cohort 1 included 29 CP-CML patients resistant to or intolerant of imatinib. Cohort 2 included patients with accelerated/blast phase CML or Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cohort 3 included 84 patients with newly diagnosed CP-CML.

Data from Cohorts 1 and 3 were recently presented at the 2017 ASCO Annual Meeting.

Three months into treatment with dasatinib, patients with CP-CML who were resistant to or intolerant of imatinib (Cohort 1) had a cumulative major cytogenetic response rate of 55.2%. This response rate increased over time to exceed 90% at 24 months.

Newly diagnosed patients with CP-CML (Cohort 3) received dasatinib orally or as powder for oral suspension once daily. They achieved a cumulative complete cytogenetic response rate of 64% as early as 6 months into treatment. This response rate increased to 94% at 24 months.

The median duration of response was not estimable or not yet reached in each cohort at the time of follow-up.

The estimated progression-free survival at 48 months was greater than 75% for patients in Cohort 1 and greater than 90% for patients in Cohort 3.

The safety profile of dasatinib in this study was deemed comparable to that reported in adults with CP-CML. In this study, there were no reported events of pleural/pericardial effusion, pulmonary edema/hypertension, or pulmonary arterial hypertension related to dasatinib.

Dasatinib first received FDA approval in 2006. The drug is currently approved to treat adults with:

• Newly diagnosed Ph+ CP-CML
• Chronic, accelerated, or blast phase Ph+ CML with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy including imatinib
• Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy.
  

Micrograph showing MDS

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted orphan drug designation to DSP-7888, an investigational cancer peptide vaccine, for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

DSP-7888 contains peptides to induce Wilms’ tumor gene 1 (WT1)-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes and helper T cells, which attack WT1-expressing cancerous cells found in various hematologic and solid tumor malignancies.

DSP-7888 is being developed by Boston Biomedical, Inc.

The first clinical data for DSP-7888, from a phase 1/2 study in patients with MDS who progressed on or after first-line azacitidine treatment, were presented at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting.

Results were reported in 12 patients—7 with higher-risk MDS and 5 with lower-risk disease.

DSP-7888 was given at doses of 3.5 mg/body (n=6) or 10.5 mg/body (n=6) by intradermal injections every 2 to 4 weeks.

There were no dose-limiting toxicities. The most common adverse event was injection site reactions. Six patients had grade 3 injection site reactions.

There were 5 serious adverse events—3 injection site reactions, 1 case of pyrexia, and 1 case of myocarditis.

Eight patients had stable disease, 2 with hematological improvements.

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte induction was observed in 6 patients, and delayed type hypersensitivity response was observed in 10 patients.

About orphan designation

The FDA grants orphan designation to products intended to treat, diagnose, or prevent diseases/disorders that affect fewer than 200,000 people in the US.

The designation provides incentives for sponsors to develop products for rare diseases. This may include tax credits toward the cost of clinical trials, prescription drug user fee waivers, and 7 years of market exclusivity if the product is approved. 

Micrograph showing MDS

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted orphan drug designation to DSP-7888, an investigational cancer peptide vaccine, for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

DSP-7888 contains peptides to induce Wilms’ tumor gene 1 (WT1)-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes and helper T cells, which attack WT1-expressing cancerous cells found in various hematologic and solid tumor malignancies.

DSP-7888 is being developed by Boston Biomedical, Inc.

The first clinical data for DSP-7888, from a phase 1/2 study in patients with MDS who progressed on or after first-line azacitidine treatment, were presented at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting.

Results were reported in 12 patients—7 with higher-risk MDS and 5 with lower-risk disease.

DSP-7888 was given at doses of 3.5 mg/body (n=6) or 10.5 mg/body (n=6) by intradermal injections every 2 to 4 weeks.

There were no dose-limiting toxicities. The most common adverse event was injection site reactions. Six patients had grade 3 injection site reactions.

There were 5 serious adverse events—3 injection site reactions, 1 case of pyrexia, and 1 case of myocarditis.

Eight patients had stable disease, 2 with hematological improvements.

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte induction was observed in 6 patients, and delayed type hypersensitivity response was observed in 10 patients.

About orphan designation

The FDA grants orphan designation to products intended to treat, diagnose, or prevent diseases/disorders that affect fewer than 200,000 people in the US.

The designation provides incentives for sponsors to develop products for rare diseases. This may include tax credits toward the cost of clinical trials, prescription drug user fee waivers, and 7 years of market exclusivity if the product is approved. 

Micrograph showing MDS

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted orphan drug designation to DSP-7888, an investigational cancer peptide vaccine, for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

DSP-7888 contains peptides to induce Wilms’ tumor gene 1 (WT1)-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes and helper T cells, which attack WT1-expressing cancerous cells found in various hematologic and solid tumor malignancies.

DSP-7888 is being developed by Boston Biomedical, Inc.

The first clinical data for DSP-7888, from a phase 1/2 study in patients with MDS who progressed on or after first-line azacitidine treatment, were presented at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting.

Results were reported in 12 patients—7 with higher-risk MDS and 5 with lower-risk disease.

DSP-7888 was given at doses of 3.5 mg/body (n=6) or 10.5 mg/body (n=6) by intradermal injections every 2 to 4 weeks.

There were no dose-limiting toxicities. The most common adverse event was injection site reactions. Six patients had grade 3 injection site reactions.

There were 5 serious adverse events—3 injection site reactions, 1 case of pyrexia, and 1 case of myocarditis.

Eight patients had stable disease, 2 with hematological improvements.

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte induction was observed in 6 patients, and delayed type hypersensitivity response was observed in 10 patients.

About orphan designation

The FDA grants orphan designation to products intended to treat, diagnose, or prevent diseases/disorders that affect fewer than 200,000 people in the US.

The designation provides incentives for sponsors to develop products for rare diseases. This may include tax credits toward the cost of clinical trials, prescription drug user fee waivers, and 7 years of market exclusivity if the product is approved. 

Image by Betty Pace

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted approval for L-glutamine oral powder (Endari), the first treatment approved to treat sickle cell disease (SCD) in the US in nearly 20 years.

L-glutamine oral powder, a product developed by Emmaus Medical Inc., is intended to reduce severe complications of SCD in patients age 5 and older.

The FDA’s approval of L-glutamine was supported by efficacy data from a phase 3 trial.

The trial enrolled 230 adults and children with SCD, and they were randomized to receive L-glutamine or placebo.

Patients who received L-glutamine had fewer sickle cell crises, hospitalizations, cumulative hospital days, and cases of acute chest syndrome than patients who received placebo.

Results from this trial were presented at the 2014 ASH Annual Meeting.

The FDA approval of L-glutamine was also supported by safety data from 298 patients treated with L-glutamine and 111 patients treated with placebo in the phase 2 and phase 3 studies.

Based on these data, L-glutamine was considered well-tolerated in pediatric and adult patients. The most common adverse events (occurring in more than 10% of patients receiving L-glutamine) were constipation, nausea, headache, abdominal pain, cough, pain in extremity, back pain, and chest pain (non-cardiac).

Image by Betty Pace

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted approval for L-glutamine oral powder (Endari), the first treatment approved to treat sickle cell disease (SCD) in the US in nearly 20 years.

L-glutamine oral powder, a product developed by Emmaus Medical Inc., is intended to reduce severe complications of SCD in patients age 5 and older.

The FDA’s approval of L-glutamine was supported by efficacy data from a phase 3 trial.

The trial enrolled 230 adults and children with SCD, and they were randomized to receive L-glutamine or placebo.

Patients who received L-glutamine had fewer sickle cell crises, hospitalizations, cumulative hospital days, and cases of acute chest syndrome than patients who received placebo.

Results from this trial were presented at the 2014 ASH Annual Meeting.

The FDA approval of L-glutamine was also supported by safety data from 298 patients treated with L-glutamine and 111 patients treated with placebo in the phase 2 and phase 3 studies.

Based on these data, L-glutamine was considered well-tolerated in pediatric and adult patients. The most common adverse events (occurring in more than 10% of patients receiving L-glutamine) were constipation, nausea, headache, abdominal pain, cough, pain in extremity, back pain, and chest pain (non-cardiac).

Image by Betty Pace

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted approval for L-glutamine oral powder (Endari), the first treatment approved to treat sickle cell disease (SCD) in the US in nearly 20 years.

L-glutamine oral powder, a product developed by Emmaus Medical Inc., is intended to reduce severe complications of SCD in patients age 5 and older.

The FDA’s approval of L-glutamine was supported by efficacy data from a phase 3 trial.

The trial enrolled 230 adults and children with SCD, and they were randomized to receive L-glutamine or placebo.

Patients who received L-glutamine had fewer sickle cell crises, hospitalizations, cumulative hospital days, and cases of acute chest syndrome than patients who received placebo.

Results from this trial were presented at the 2014 ASH Annual Meeting.

The FDA approval of L-glutamine was also supported by safety data from 298 patients treated with L-glutamine and 111 patients treated with placebo in the phase 2 and phase 3 studies.

Based on these data, L-glutamine was considered well-tolerated in pediatric and adult patients. The most common adverse events (occurring in more than 10% of patients receiving L-glutamine) were constipation, nausea, headache, abdominal pain, cough, pain in extremity, back pain, and chest pain (non-cardiac).

Photo courtesy of Merck

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has placed clinical holds on 3 trials testing combination therapy with pembrolizumab (Keytruda) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM)—KEYNOTE-183, KEYNOTE-185, and KEYNOTE-023.

In 2 of these trials—KEYNOTE-183 and -185—there were more deaths among patients receiving pembrolizumab than among patients receiving comparator treatments.

KEYNOTE-183 is a phase 3 study of pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone with or without pembrolizumab in refractory or relapsed and refractory MM.

KEYNOTE-185 is a phase 3 study of lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone with or without pembrolizumab in newly diagnosed and treatment-naïve MM.

The excess deaths in the pembrolizumab arms of KEYNOTE-183 and -185 led to a pause in enrollment for both trials, which was announced last month.

Now, the FDA says available data suggest the risks of pembrolizumab plus pomalidomide or lenalidomide outweigh any potential benefit for MM patients.

Therefore, all patients enrolled in KEYNOTE-183 and -185 will discontinue investigational treatment with pembrolizumab.

The same applies to patients in the pembrolizumab/lenalidomide/dexamethasone cohort of KEYNOTE-023.

KEYNOTE-023 is a phase 1 trial of pembrolizumab in combination with backbone treatments. Cohort 1 of this trial was designed to evaluate pembrolizumab in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in MM patients who received prior treatment with an immunomodulatory agent (lenalidomide, pomalidomide, or thalidomide).

Pembrolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks interaction between the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its receptor ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2.

Pembrolizumab is FDA-approved to treat classical Hodgkin lymphoma, melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, head and neck cancer, urothelial carcinoma, and microsatellite instability-high solid tumors.

Photo courtesy of Merck

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has placed clinical holds on 3 trials testing combination therapy with pembrolizumab (Keytruda) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM)—KEYNOTE-183, KEYNOTE-185, and KEYNOTE-023.

In 2 of these trials—KEYNOTE-183 and -185—there were more deaths among patients receiving pembrolizumab than among patients receiving comparator treatments.

KEYNOTE-183 is a phase 3 study of pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone with or without pembrolizumab in refractory or relapsed and refractory MM.

KEYNOTE-185 is a phase 3 study of lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone with or without pembrolizumab in newly diagnosed and treatment-naïve MM.

The excess deaths in the pembrolizumab arms of KEYNOTE-183 and -185 led to a pause in enrollment for both trials, which was announced last month.

Now, the FDA says available data suggest the risks of pembrolizumab plus pomalidomide or lenalidomide outweigh any potential benefit for MM patients.

Therefore, all patients enrolled in KEYNOTE-183 and -185 will discontinue investigational treatment with pembrolizumab.

The same applies to patients in the pembrolizumab/lenalidomide/dexamethasone cohort of KEYNOTE-023.

KEYNOTE-023 is a phase 1 trial of pembrolizumab in combination with backbone treatments. Cohort 1 of this trial was designed to evaluate pembrolizumab in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in MM patients who received prior treatment with an immunomodulatory agent (lenalidomide, pomalidomide, or thalidomide).

Pembrolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks interaction between the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its receptor ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2.

Pembrolizumab is FDA-approved to treat classical Hodgkin lymphoma, melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, head and neck cancer, urothelial carcinoma, and microsatellite instability-high solid tumors.

Photo courtesy of Merck

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has placed clinical holds on 3 trials testing combination therapy with pembrolizumab (Keytruda) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM)—KEYNOTE-183, KEYNOTE-185, and KEYNOTE-023.

In 2 of these trials—KEYNOTE-183 and -185—there were more deaths among patients receiving pembrolizumab than among patients receiving comparator treatments.

KEYNOTE-183 is a phase 3 study of pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone with or without pembrolizumab in refractory or relapsed and refractory MM.

KEYNOTE-185 is a phase 3 study of lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone with or without pembrolizumab in newly diagnosed and treatment-naïve MM.

The excess deaths in the pembrolizumab arms of KEYNOTE-183 and -185 led to a pause in enrollment for both trials, which was announced last month.

Now, the FDA says available data suggest the risks of pembrolizumab plus pomalidomide or lenalidomide outweigh any potential benefit for MM patients.

Therefore, all patients enrolled in KEYNOTE-183 and -185 will discontinue investigational treatment with pembrolizumab.

The same applies to patients in the pembrolizumab/lenalidomide/dexamethasone cohort of KEYNOTE-023.

KEYNOTE-023 is a phase 1 trial of pembrolizumab in combination with backbone treatments. Cohort 1 of this trial was designed to evaluate pembrolizumab in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in MM patients who received prior treatment with an immunomodulatory agent (lenalidomide, pomalidomide, or thalidomide).

Pembrolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks interaction between the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its receptor ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2.

Pembrolizumab is FDA-approved to treat classical Hodgkin lymphoma, melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, head and neck cancer, urothelial carcinoma, and microsatellite instability-high solid tumors.

BCP-ALL

The European Commission (EC) has approved inotuzumab ozogamicin (BESPONSA®) as monotherapy for adults with relapsed or refractory, CD22-positive B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL).

Adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive, relapsed/refractory, CD22-positive BCP-ALL should have failed treatment with at least one tyrosine kinase inhibitor before receiving inotuzumab ozogamicin.

Inotuzumab ozogamicin is an antibody-drug conjugate that consists of a monoclonal antibody targeting CD22 and a cytotoxic agent known as calicheamicin.

The product originates from a collaboration between Pfizer and Celltech (now UCB), but Pfizer has sole responsibility for all manufacturing and clinical development activities.

The EC’s approval of inotuzumab ozogamicin is supported by results from a phase 3 trial, which were published in NEJM in June 2016.

The trial enrolled 326 adult patients with relapsed or refractory BCP-ALL and compared inotuzumab ozogamicin to standard of care chemotherapy.

The rate of complete remission, including incomplete hematologic recovery, was 80.7% in the inotuzumab ozogamicin arm and 29.4% in the chemotherapy arm (P<0.001). The median duration of remission was 4.6 months and 3.1 months, respectively (P=0.03).

Forty-one percent of patients treated with inotuzumab ozogamicin and 11% of those who received chemotherapy proceeded to stem cell transplant directly after treatment (P<0.001).

The median progression-free survival was 5.0 months in the inotuzumab ozogamicin arm and 1.8 months in the chemotherapy arm (P<0.001).

The median overall survival was 7.7 months and 6.7 months, respectively (P=0.04). This did not meet the prespecified boundary of significance (P=0.0208).

Liver-related adverse events were more common in the inotuzumab ozogamicin arm than the chemotherapy arm. The most frequent of these were increased aspartate aminotransferase level (20% vs 10%), hyperbilirubinemia (15% vs 10%), and increased alanine aminotransferase level (14% vs 11%).

Veno-occlusive liver disease occurred in 11% of patients in the inotuzumab ozogamicin arm and 1% in the chemotherapy arm.

There were 17 deaths during treatment in the inotuzumab ozogamicin arm and 11 in the chemotherapy arm. Four deaths were considered related to inotuzumab ozogamicin, and 2 were thought to be related to chemotherapy.

BCP-ALL

The European Commission (EC) has approved inotuzumab ozogamicin (BESPONSA®) as monotherapy for adults with relapsed or refractory, CD22-positive B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL).

Adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive, relapsed/refractory, CD22-positive BCP-ALL should have failed treatment with at least one tyrosine kinase inhibitor before receiving inotuzumab ozogamicin.

Inotuzumab ozogamicin is an antibody-drug conjugate that consists of a monoclonal antibody targeting CD22 and a cytotoxic agent known as calicheamicin.

The product originates from a collaboration between Pfizer and Celltech (now UCB), but Pfizer has sole responsibility for all manufacturing and clinical development activities.

The EC’s approval of inotuzumab ozogamicin is supported by results from a phase 3 trial, which were published in NEJM in June 2016.

The trial enrolled 326 adult patients with relapsed or refractory BCP-ALL and compared inotuzumab ozogamicin to standard of care chemotherapy.

The rate of complete remission, including incomplete hematologic recovery, was 80.7% in the inotuzumab ozogamicin arm and 29.4% in the chemotherapy arm (P<0.001). The median duration of remission was 4.6 months and 3.1 months, respectively (P=0.03).

Forty-one percent of patients treated with inotuzumab ozogamicin and 11% of those who received chemotherapy proceeded to stem cell transplant directly after treatment (P<0.001).

The median progression-free survival was 5.0 months in the inotuzumab ozogamicin arm and 1.8 months in the chemotherapy arm (P<0.001).

The median overall survival was 7.7 months and 6.7 months, respectively (P=0.04). This did not meet the prespecified boundary of significance (P=0.0208).

Liver-related adverse events were more common in the inotuzumab ozogamicin arm than the chemotherapy arm. The most frequent of these were increased aspartate aminotransferase level (20% vs 10%), hyperbilirubinemia (15% vs 10%), and increased alanine aminotransferase level (14% vs 11%).

Veno-occlusive liver disease occurred in 11% of patients in the inotuzumab ozogamicin arm and 1% in the chemotherapy arm.

There were 17 deaths during treatment in the inotuzumab ozogamicin arm and 11 in the chemotherapy arm. Four deaths were considered related to inotuzumab ozogamicin, and 2 were thought to be related to chemotherapy.

BCP-ALL

The European Commission (EC) has approved inotuzumab ozogamicin (BESPONSA®) as monotherapy for adults with relapsed or refractory, CD22-positive B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL).

Adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive, relapsed/refractory, CD22-positive BCP-ALL should have failed treatment with at least one tyrosine kinase inhibitor before receiving inotuzumab ozogamicin.

Inotuzumab ozogamicin is an antibody-drug conjugate that consists of a monoclonal antibody targeting CD22 and a cytotoxic agent known as calicheamicin.

The product originates from a collaboration between Pfizer and Celltech (now UCB), but Pfizer has sole responsibility for all manufacturing and clinical development activities.

The EC’s approval of inotuzumab ozogamicin is supported by results from a phase 3 trial, which were published in NEJM in June 2016.

The trial enrolled 326 adult patients with relapsed or refractory BCP-ALL and compared inotuzumab ozogamicin to standard of care chemotherapy.

The rate of complete remission, including incomplete hematologic recovery, was 80.7% in the inotuzumab ozogamicin arm and 29.4% in the chemotherapy arm (P<0.001). The median duration of remission was 4.6 months and 3.1 months, respectively (P=0.03).

Forty-one percent of patients treated with inotuzumab ozogamicin and 11% of those who received chemotherapy proceeded to stem cell transplant directly after treatment (P<0.001).

The median progression-free survival was 5.0 months in the inotuzumab ozogamicin arm and 1.8 months in the chemotherapy arm (P<0.001).

The median overall survival was 7.7 months and 6.7 months, respectively (P=0.04). This did not meet the prespecified boundary of significance (P=0.0208).

Liver-related adverse events were more common in the inotuzumab ozogamicin arm than the chemotherapy arm. The most frequent of these were increased aspartate aminotransferase level (20% vs 10%), hyperbilirubinemia (15% vs 10%), and increased alanine aminotransferase level (14% vs 11%).

Veno-occlusive liver disease occurred in 11% of patients in the inotuzumab ozogamicin arm and 1% in the chemotherapy arm.

There were 17 deaths during treatment in the inotuzumab ozogamicin arm and 11 in the chemotherapy arm. Four deaths were considered related to inotuzumab ozogamicin, and 2 were thought to be related to chemotherapy.

Photo by Esther Dyson

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has unveiled a plan to eliminate the agency’s existing backlog of orphan designation requests and ensure timely responses to all new requests with firm deadlines.

The agency’s Orphan Drug Modernization Plan comes a week after FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb committed to eliminating the backlog within 90 days and responding to all new requests for designation within 90 days of receipt during his testimony before a Senate subcommittee.

As authorized under the Orphan Drug Act, the Orphan Drug Designation Program provides orphan status to drugs and biologics intended for the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of rare diseases, which are generally defined as diseases that affect fewer than 200,000 people in the US.

Orphan designation qualifies a product’s developer for various development incentives, including tax credits for clinical trial costs, relief from prescription drug user fee if the indication is for a rare disease or condition, and eligibility for 7 years of marketing exclusivity if the product is approved.

A request for orphan designation is one step that can be taken in the development process and is different than the filing of a marketing application with the FDA.

Currently, the FDA has about 200 orphan drug designation requests that are pending review. The number of orphan drug designation requests has steadily increased over the past 5 years.

In 2016, the FDA’s Office of Orphan Products Development received 568 new requests for designation – more than double the number of requests received in 2012.

The FDA says this increased interest in the program is a positive development for patients with rare diseases, and, with the Orphan Drug Modernization Plan, the FDA is committing to advancing the program to ensure it can efficiently and adequately review these requests.

“People who suffer with rare diseases are too often faced with no or limited treatment options, and what treatment options they have may be quite expensive due, in part, to significant costs of developing therapies for smaller populations,” said FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, MD.

“Congress gave us tools to incentivize the development of novel therapies for rare diseases, and we intend to use these resources to their fullest extent in order to ensure Americans get the safe and effective medicines they need, and that the process for developing these innovations is as modern and efficient as possible.”

Among the elements of the Orphan Drug Modernization Plan, the FDA will deploy a Backlog SWAT team comprised of senior, experienced reviewers with significant expertise in orphan drug designation. The team will focus solely on the backlogged applications, starting with the oldest requests.

The agency will also employ a streamlined Designation Review Template to increase consistency and efficiency of its reviews.

In addition, the Orphan Drug Designation Program will look to collaborate within the agency’s medical product centers to create greater efficiency, including conducting joint reviews with the Office of Pediatric Therapeutics to review rare pediatric disease designation requests.

To ensure all future requests receive a response within 90 days of receipt, the FDA will take a multifaceted approach.

These efforts include, among other new steps:

• Reorganizing the review staff to maximize expertise and improve workload efficiencies
• Better leveraging the expertise across the FDA’s medical product centers
• Establishing a new FDA Orphan Products Council that will help address scientific and regulatory issues to ensure the agency is applying a consistent approach to regulating orphan drug products and reviewing designation requests.

The FDA is planning for the backlog to be eliminated by mid-September.

The Orphan Drug Modernization Plan is the first element of several efforts the FDA plans to undertake under its new “Medical Innovation Development Plan,” which is aimed at ensuring the FDA’s regulatory tools and policies are modern, risk-based, and efficient.

The goal of the plan is to seek ways the FDA can help facilitate the development of safe, effective, and transformative medical innovations that have the potential to significantly impact disease and reduce overall healthcare costs.

Photo by Esther Dyson

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has unveiled a plan to eliminate the agency’s existing backlog of orphan designation requests and ensure timely responses to all new requests with firm deadlines.

The agency’s Orphan Drug Modernization Plan comes a week after FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb committed to eliminating the backlog within 90 days and responding to all new requests for designation within 90 days of receipt during his testimony before a Senate subcommittee.

As authorized under the Orphan Drug Act, the Orphan Drug Designation Program provides orphan status to drugs and biologics intended for the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of rare diseases, which are generally defined as diseases that affect fewer than 200,000 people in the US.

Orphan designation qualifies a product’s developer for various development incentives, including tax credits for clinical trial costs, relief from prescription drug user fee if the indication is for a rare disease or condition, and eligibility for 7 years of marketing exclusivity if the product is approved.

A request for orphan designation is one step that can be taken in the development process and is different than the filing of a marketing application with the FDA.

Currently, the FDA has about 200 orphan drug designation requests that are pending review. The number of orphan drug designation requests has steadily increased over the past 5 years.

In 2016, the FDA’s Office of Orphan Products Development received 568 new requests for designation – more than double the number of requests received in 2012.

The FDA says this increased interest in the program is a positive development for patients with rare diseases, and, with the Orphan Drug Modernization Plan, the FDA is committing to advancing the program to ensure it can efficiently and adequately review these requests.

“People who suffer with rare diseases are too often faced with no or limited treatment options, and what treatment options they have may be quite expensive due, in part, to significant costs of developing therapies for smaller populations,” said FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, MD.

“Congress gave us tools to incentivize the development of novel therapies for rare diseases, and we intend to use these resources to their fullest extent in order to ensure Americans get the safe and effective medicines they need, and that the process for developing these innovations is as modern and efficient as possible.”

Among the elements of the Orphan Drug Modernization Plan, the FDA will deploy a Backlog SWAT team comprised of senior, experienced reviewers with significant expertise in orphan drug designation. The team will focus solely on the backlogged applications, starting with the oldest requests.

The agency will also employ a streamlined Designation Review Template to increase consistency and efficiency of its reviews.

In addition, the Orphan Drug Designation Program will look to collaborate within the agency’s medical product centers to create greater efficiency, including conducting joint reviews with the Office of Pediatric Therapeutics to review rare pediatric disease designation requests.

To ensure all future requests receive a response within 90 days of receipt, the FDA will take a multifaceted approach.

These efforts include, among other new steps:

• Reorganizing the review staff to maximize expertise and improve workload efficiencies
• Better leveraging the expertise across the FDA’s medical product centers
• Establishing a new FDA Orphan Products Council that will help address scientific and regulatory issues to ensure the agency is applying a consistent approach to regulating orphan drug products and reviewing designation requests.

The FDA is planning for the backlog to be eliminated by mid-September.

The Orphan Drug Modernization Plan is the first element of several efforts the FDA plans to undertake under its new “Medical Innovation Development Plan,” which is aimed at ensuring the FDA’s regulatory tools and policies are modern, risk-based, and efficient.

The goal of the plan is to seek ways the FDA can help facilitate the development of safe, effective, and transformative medical innovations that have the potential to significantly impact disease and reduce overall healthcare costs.

Photo by Esther Dyson

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has unveiled a plan to eliminate the agency’s existing backlog of orphan designation requests and ensure timely responses to all new requests with firm deadlines.

The agency’s Orphan Drug Modernization Plan comes a week after FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb committed to eliminating the backlog within 90 days and responding to all new requests for designation within 90 days of receipt during his testimony before a Senate subcommittee.

As authorized under the Orphan Drug Act, the Orphan Drug Designation Program provides orphan status to drugs and biologics intended for the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of rare diseases, which are generally defined as diseases that affect fewer than 200,000 people in the US.

Orphan designation qualifies a product’s developer for various development incentives, including tax credits for clinical trial costs, relief from prescription drug user fee if the indication is for a rare disease or condition, and eligibility for 7 years of marketing exclusivity if the product is approved.

A request for orphan designation is one step that can be taken in the development process and is different than the filing of a marketing application with the FDA.

Currently, the FDA has about 200 orphan drug designation requests that are pending review. The number of orphan drug designation requests has steadily increased over the past 5 years.

In 2016, the FDA’s Office of Orphan Products Development received 568 new requests for designation – more than double the number of requests received in 2012.

The FDA says this increased interest in the program is a positive development for patients with rare diseases, and, with the Orphan Drug Modernization Plan, the FDA is committing to advancing the program to ensure it can efficiently and adequately review these requests.

“People who suffer with rare diseases are too often faced with no or limited treatment options, and what treatment options they have may be quite expensive due, in part, to significant costs of developing therapies for smaller populations,” said FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, MD.

“Congress gave us tools to incentivize the development of novel therapies for rare diseases, and we intend to use these resources to their fullest extent in order to ensure Americans get the safe and effective medicines they need, and that the process for developing these innovations is as modern and efficient as possible.”

Among the elements of the Orphan Drug Modernization Plan, the FDA will deploy a Backlog SWAT team comprised of senior, experienced reviewers with significant expertise in orphan drug designation. The team will focus solely on the backlogged applications, starting with the oldest requests.

The agency will also employ a streamlined Designation Review Template to increase consistency and efficiency of its reviews.

In addition, the Orphan Drug Designation Program will look to collaborate within the agency’s medical product centers to create greater efficiency, including conducting joint reviews with the Office of Pediatric Therapeutics to review rare pediatric disease designation requests.

To ensure all future requests receive a response within 90 days of receipt, the FDA will take a multifaceted approach.

These efforts include, among other new steps:

• Reorganizing the review staff to maximize expertise and improve workload efficiencies
• Better leveraging the expertise across the FDA’s medical product centers
• Establishing a new FDA Orphan Products Council that will help address scientific and regulatory issues to ensure the agency is applying a consistent approach to regulating orphan drug products and reviewing designation requests.

The FDA is planning for the backlog to be eliminated by mid-September.

The Orphan Drug Modernization Plan is the first element of several efforts the FDA plans to undertake under its new “Medical Innovation Development Plan,” which is aimed at ensuring the FDA’s regulatory tools and policies are modern, risk-based, and efficient.

The goal of the plan is to seek ways the FDA can help facilitate the development of safe, effective, and transformative medical innovations that have the potential to significantly impact disease and reduce overall healthcare costs.

Antihemophilic factor

The European Commission has granted orphan medicinal product designation to CB 2679d/ISU304, a clinical stage drug candidate for hemophilia B.

CB 2679d/ISU304 is a next-generation coagulation factor IX variant that may allow for subcutaneous prophylactic treatment of individuals with hemophilia B.

The product is being developed by Catalyst Biosciences, Inc. and ISU Abxis.

Earlier this month, ISU Abxis completed dosing in the first of up to 5 patient cohorts in a phase 1/2 trial of CB 2679d/ISU304 in individuals with severe hemophilia B.

Catalyst Biosciences and ISU Abxis plan to have data from this trial by the end of this year.

About orphan designation

Orphan designation provides regulatory and financial incentives for companies to develop and market therapies that treat life-threatening or chronically debilitating conditions affecting no more than 5 in 10,000 people in the European Union, and where no satisfactory treatment is available.

Orphan designation provides a 10-year period of marketing exclusivity if the drug receives regulatory approval.

The designation also provides incentives for companies seeking protocol assistance from the European Medicines Agency during the product development phase and direct access to the centralized authorization procedure.

Antihemophilic factor

The European Commission has granted orphan medicinal product designation to CB 2679d/ISU304, a clinical stage drug candidate for hemophilia B.

CB 2679d/ISU304 is a next-generation coagulation factor IX variant that may allow for subcutaneous prophylactic treatment of individuals with hemophilia B.

The product is being developed by Catalyst Biosciences, Inc. and ISU Abxis.

Earlier this month, ISU Abxis completed dosing in the first of up to 5 patient cohorts in a phase 1/2 trial of CB 2679d/ISU304 in individuals with severe hemophilia B.

Catalyst Biosciences and ISU Abxis plan to have data from this trial by the end of this year.

About orphan designation

Orphan designation provides regulatory and financial incentives for companies to develop and market therapies that treat life-threatening or chronically debilitating conditions affecting no more than 5 in 10,000 people in the European Union, and where no satisfactory treatment is available.

Orphan designation provides a 10-year period of marketing exclusivity if the drug receives regulatory approval.

The designation also provides incentives for companies seeking protocol assistance from the European Medicines Agency during the product development phase and direct access to the centralized authorization procedure.

Antihemophilic factor

The European Commission has granted orphan medicinal product designation to CB 2679d/ISU304, a clinical stage drug candidate for hemophilia B.

CB 2679d/ISU304 is a next-generation coagulation factor IX variant that may allow for subcutaneous prophylactic treatment of individuals with hemophilia B.

The product is being developed by Catalyst Biosciences, Inc. and ISU Abxis.

Earlier this month, ISU Abxis completed dosing in the first of up to 5 patient cohorts in a phase 1/2 trial of CB 2679d/ISU304 in individuals with severe hemophilia B.

Catalyst Biosciences and ISU Abxis plan to have data from this trial by the end of this year.

About orphan designation

Orphan designation provides regulatory and financial incentives for companies to develop and market therapies that treat life-threatening or chronically debilitating conditions affecting no more than 5 in 10,000 people in the European Union, and where no satisfactory treatment is available.

Orphan designation provides a 10-year period of marketing exclusivity if the drug receives regulatory approval.

The designation also provides incentives for companies seeking protocol assistance from the European Medicines Agency during the product development phase and direct access to the centralized authorization procedure.

Image by Andre E.X. Brown

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accepted for priority review a supplemental new drug application (sNDA) for rivaroxaban (XARELTO®).

The sNDA is for a 10 mg once-daily dose of rivaroxaban to reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients who have received at least 6 months of standard anticoagulant therapy.

The FDA grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions.

The agency’s goal is to take action on a priority review application within 6 months of receiving it, rather than the standard 10 months.

The FDA plans to make a decision on the rivaroxaban sNDA by October 28, 2017.

The sNDA is supported by data from the EINSTEIN CHOICE study. Patients enrolled in this study had confirmed VTE and were treated initially with standard anticoagulant therapy for 6 to 12 months.

During EINSTEIN CHOICE, 3365 patients received rivaroxaban at 10 mg, rivaroxaban at 20 mg, or aspirin at 100 mg once daily for up to 12 months of extended treatment.

Both rivaroxaban doses were superior to aspirin in preventing fatal or non-fatal recurrent VTE, the study’s primary efficacy endpoint.

The rate of recurrent VTE was 1.2% in the 10 mg rivaroxaban arm (hazard ratio [HR]=0.26; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.47; P<0.001), 1.5% in the 20 mg rivaroxaban arm (HR=0.34; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.59; P<0.001), and 4.4% in the aspirin arm. Fatal VTE occurred in 0%, 0.2%, and 0.2% of patients, respectively.

The primary safety endpoint was major bleeding as defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

The rate of major bleeding was 0.4% for the 10 mg rivaroxaban group (HR=1.64; 95% CI, 0.39 to 6.84; P=0.50), 0.5% for the 20 mg rivaroxaban group (HR=2.01; 95% CI, 0.50 to 8.04; P=0.32), and 0.3% for the aspirin group.

Image by Andre E.X. Brown

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accepted for priority review a supplemental new drug application (sNDA) for rivaroxaban (XARELTO®).

The sNDA is for a 10 mg once-daily dose of rivaroxaban to reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients who have received at least 6 months of standard anticoagulant therapy.

The FDA grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions.

The agency’s goal is to take action on a priority review application within 6 months of receiving it, rather than the standard 10 months.

The FDA plans to make a decision on the rivaroxaban sNDA by October 28, 2017.

The sNDA is supported by data from the EINSTEIN CHOICE study. Patients enrolled in this study had confirmed VTE and were treated initially with standard anticoagulant therapy for 6 to 12 months.

During EINSTEIN CHOICE, 3365 patients received rivaroxaban at 10 mg, rivaroxaban at 20 mg, or aspirin at 100 mg once daily for up to 12 months of extended treatment.

Both rivaroxaban doses were superior to aspirin in preventing fatal or non-fatal recurrent VTE, the study’s primary efficacy endpoint.

The rate of recurrent VTE was 1.2% in the 10 mg rivaroxaban arm (hazard ratio [HR]=0.26; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.47; P<0.001), 1.5% in the 20 mg rivaroxaban arm (HR=0.34; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.59; P<0.001), and 4.4% in the aspirin arm. Fatal VTE occurred in 0%, 0.2%, and 0.2% of patients, respectively.

The primary safety endpoint was major bleeding as defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

The rate of major bleeding was 0.4% for the 10 mg rivaroxaban group (HR=1.64; 95% CI, 0.39 to 6.84; P=0.50), 0.5% for the 20 mg rivaroxaban group (HR=2.01; 95% CI, 0.50 to 8.04; P=0.32), and 0.3% for the aspirin group.

Image by Andre E.X. Brown

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accepted for priority review a supplemental new drug application (sNDA) for rivaroxaban (XARELTO®).

The sNDA is for a 10 mg once-daily dose of rivaroxaban to reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients who have received at least 6 months of standard anticoagulant therapy.

The FDA grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions.

The agency’s goal is to take action on a priority review application within 6 months of receiving it, rather than the standard 10 months.

The FDA plans to make a decision on the rivaroxaban sNDA by October 28, 2017.

The sNDA is supported by data from the EINSTEIN CHOICE study. Patients enrolled in this study had confirmed VTE and were treated initially with standard anticoagulant therapy for 6 to 12 months.

During EINSTEIN CHOICE, 3365 patients received rivaroxaban at 10 mg, rivaroxaban at 20 mg, or aspirin at 100 mg once daily for up to 12 months of extended treatment.

Both rivaroxaban doses were superior to aspirin in preventing fatal or non-fatal recurrent VTE, the study’s primary efficacy endpoint.

The rate of recurrent VTE was 1.2% in the 10 mg rivaroxaban arm (hazard ratio [HR]=0.26; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.47; P<0.001), 1.5% in the 20 mg rivaroxaban arm (HR=0.34; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.59; P<0.001), and 4.4% in the aspirin arm. Fatal VTE occurred in 0%, 0.2%, and 0.2% of patients, respectively.

The primary safety endpoint was major bleeding as defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

The rate of major bleeding was 0.4% for the 10 mg rivaroxaban group (HR=1.64; 95% CI, 0.39 to 6.84; P=0.50), 0.5% for the 20 mg rivaroxaban group (HR=2.01; 95% CI, 0.50 to 8.04; P=0.32), and 0.3% for the aspirin group.

Photo courtesy of CDC

The oral, once-daily factor Xa inhibitor betrixaban (Bevyxxa®) was granted approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under priority review.

Betrixaban is the first and only anticoagulant for hospital and extended duration prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in adult patients hospitalized for an acute medical illness at risk for thromboembolic complications due to restricted mobility and other risk factors for VTE, according to Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc, the drug’s developer.

Betrixaban had also received fast track designation from the FDA.

Betrixaban is Portola’s first commercial product.

The FDA approved betrixaban based on data from the phase 3 APEX trial, a randomized, double-blind multinational clinical trial comparing extended duration betrixaban to short duration of enoxaparin.

The trial enrolled 7513 patients at more than 450 clinical sites worldwide. The patients were acutely ill with medical conditions, hospitalized, and had risk factors for VTE.

Patients who received betrixaban had an initial dose of 160 mg orally on day 1, 80 mg once daily for 35 to 42 days, and a placebo injection once daily for 6 to 14 days.

Patients who received enoxaparin had a 40 mg injection subcutaneously once daily for 6 to 14 days and a placebo pill orally once daily for 35 to 42 days.

Efficacy data was analyzed in 7441 patients and assessed by a composite outcome score comprising either the occurrence of asymptomatic proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or symptomatic DVT, non-fatal pulmonary embolism (PE), or VTE-related death.

Investigators observed fewer events in patients receiving betrixaban (4.4%) compared with those taking enoxaparin (6%) (relative risk 0.75, 95% CI: 0.61, 0.91) with no significant increase in major bleeding (0.67% vs 0.57%, respectively).

The most common adverse reactions with betrixaban occurring in 5% or more of patients were related to bleeding.

Overall, 54% of patients receiving betrixaban experienced at least one adverse reaction compared with 52% taking enoxaparin.

The frequency of patients reporting serious adverse reactions was similar between betrixaban (18%) and enoxaparin (17%).

The most frequent reason for treatment discontinuation was bleeding, with an incidence rate for all bleeding episodes of 2.4% and 1.2% for betrixaban and enoxaparin, respectively.

The incidence rate for major bleeding episodes was 0.67% and 0.57% for betrixaban and enoxaparin, respectively.

Portola expects to launch betrixaban between August and November 2017.

The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Human Medicinal Products (CHMP) is reviewing betrixaban for marketing authorization under its standard review period.

Portola is also advancing clinical development of andexanet alfa (AndexXa®) and cerdulatinib.

Andexanet alfa is a recombinant protein designed to reverse the anticoagulant effect in patients treated with an oral or injectable factor Xa inhibitor.

Cerdulatinib is a Syk/JAK inhibitor to treat hematologic cancers.

See the full prescribing information for more details on betrixaban. 

Photo courtesy of CDC

The oral, once-daily factor Xa inhibitor betrixaban (Bevyxxa®) was granted approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under priority review.

Betrixaban is the first and only anticoagulant for hospital and extended duration prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in adult patients hospitalized for an acute medical illness at risk for thromboembolic complications due to restricted mobility and other risk factors for VTE, according to Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc, the drug’s developer.

Betrixaban had also received fast track designation from the FDA.

Betrixaban is Portola’s first commercial product.

The FDA approved betrixaban based on data from the phase 3 APEX trial, a randomized, double-blind multinational clinical trial comparing extended duration betrixaban to short duration of enoxaparin.

The trial enrolled 7513 patients at more than 450 clinical sites worldwide. The patients were acutely ill with medical conditions, hospitalized, and had risk factors for VTE.

Patients who received betrixaban had an initial dose of 160 mg orally on day 1, 80 mg once daily for 35 to 42 days, and a placebo injection once daily for 6 to 14 days.

Patients who received enoxaparin had a 40 mg injection subcutaneously once daily for 6 to 14 days and a placebo pill orally once daily for 35 to 42 days.

Efficacy data was analyzed in 7441 patients and assessed by a composite outcome score comprising either the occurrence of asymptomatic proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or symptomatic DVT, non-fatal pulmonary embolism (PE), or VTE-related death.

Investigators observed fewer events in patients receiving betrixaban (4.4%) compared with those taking enoxaparin (6%) (relative risk 0.75, 95% CI: 0.61, 0.91) with no significant increase in major bleeding (0.67% vs 0.57%, respectively).

The most common adverse reactions with betrixaban occurring in 5% or more of patients were related to bleeding.

Overall, 54% of patients receiving betrixaban experienced at least one adverse reaction compared with 52% taking enoxaparin.

The frequency of patients reporting serious adverse reactions was similar between betrixaban (18%) and enoxaparin (17%).

The most frequent reason for treatment discontinuation was bleeding, with an incidence rate for all bleeding episodes of 2.4% and 1.2% for betrixaban and enoxaparin, respectively.

The incidence rate for major bleeding episodes was 0.67% and 0.57% for betrixaban and enoxaparin, respectively.

Portola expects to launch betrixaban between August and November 2017.

The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Human Medicinal Products (CHMP) is reviewing betrixaban for marketing authorization under its standard review period.

Portola is also advancing clinical development of andexanet alfa (AndexXa®) and cerdulatinib.

Andexanet alfa is a recombinant protein designed to reverse the anticoagulant effect in patients treated with an oral or injectable factor Xa inhibitor.

Cerdulatinib is a Syk/JAK inhibitor to treat hematologic cancers.

See the full prescribing information for more details on betrixaban. 

Photo courtesy of CDC

The oral, once-daily factor Xa inhibitor betrixaban (Bevyxxa®) was granted approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under priority review.

Betrixaban is the first and only anticoagulant for hospital and extended duration prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in adult patients hospitalized for an acute medical illness at risk for thromboembolic complications due to restricted mobility and other risk factors for VTE, according to Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc, the drug’s developer.

Betrixaban had also received fast track designation from the FDA.

Betrixaban is Portola’s first commercial product.

The FDA approved betrixaban based on data from the phase 3 APEX trial, a randomized, double-blind multinational clinical trial comparing extended duration betrixaban to short duration of enoxaparin.

The trial enrolled 7513 patients at more than 450 clinical sites worldwide. The patients were acutely ill with medical conditions, hospitalized, and had risk factors for VTE.

Patients who received betrixaban had an initial dose of 160 mg orally on day 1, 80 mg once daily for 35 to 42 days, and a placebo injection once daily for 6 to 14 days.

Patients who received enoxaparin had a 40 mg injection subcutaneously once daily for 6 to 14 days and a placebo pill orally once daily for 35 to 42 days.

Efficacy data was analyzed in 7441 patients and assessed by a composite outcome score comprising either the occurrence of asymptomatic proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or symptomatic DVT, non-fatal pulmonary embolism (PE), or VTE-related death.

Investigators observed fewer events in patients receiving betrixaban (4.4%) compared with those taking enoxaparin (6%) (relative risk 0.75, 95% CI: 0.61, 0.91) with no significant increase in major bleeding (0.67% vs 0.57%, respectively).

The most common adverse reactions with betrixaban occurring in 5% or more of patients were related to bleeding.

Overall, 54% of patients receiving betrixaban experienced at least one adverse reaction compared with 52% taking enoxaparin.

The frequency of patients reporting serious adverse reactions was similar between betrixaban (18%) and enoxaparin (17%).

The most frequent reason for treatment discontinuation was bleeding, with an incidence rate for all bleeding episodes of 2.4% and 1.2% for betrixaban and enoxaparin, respectively.

The incidence rate for major bleeding episodes was 0.67% and 0.57% for betrixaban and enoxaparin, respectively.

Portola expects to launch betrixaban between August and November 2017.

The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Human Medicinal Products (CHMP) is reviewing betrixaban for marketing authorization under its standard review period.

Portola is also advancing clinical development of andexanet alfa (AndexXa®) and cerdulatinib.

Andexanet alfa is a recombinant protein designed to reverse the anticoagulant effect in patients treated with an oral or injectable factor Xa inhibitor.

Cerdulatinib is a Syk/JAK inhibitor to treat hematologic cancers.

See the full prescribing information for more details on betrixaban.