Carolyn Ellis, DO

Calciphylaxis, otherwise known as calcific uremic arteriolopathy, is characterized by calcification of the tunica media of the small- to medium-sized blood vessels of the dermis and subcutis, leading to ischemia and necrosis.¹ It is a deadly disease with a 1-year mortality rate of more than 50%.² End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is the most common risk factor for calciphylaxis, with a prevalence of 1% to 4% of hemodialysis patients with calciphylaxis in the United States.^2-5 However, nonuremic calciphylaxis (NUC) has been increasingly reported in the literature and has risk factors other than ESRD, including but not limited to obesity, alcoholic liver disease, primary hyperparathyroidism, connective tissue disease, and underlying malignancy.^3,6-9 Triggers for calciphylaxis in at-risk patients include use of corticosteroids or warfarin, iron or albumin infusions, and rapid weight loss.^3,6,9-11 We report an unusual case of NUC that most likely was triggered by rapid weight loss and hypotension in a patient with multiple risk factors for calciphylaxis.

Case Report

A 75-year-old white woman with history of morbid obesity (body mass index, 40 kg/m²), unexplained weight loss of 70 lb over the last year, and polymyalgia rheumatica requiring chronic prednisone therapy presented with painful lesions on the thighs, buttocks, and right shoulder of 4 months’ duration. She had multiple hospital admissions preceding the onset of lesions for severe infections resulting in sepsis with hypotension, including Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase bacteremia, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. Physical examination revealed large well-demarcated ulcers and necrotic eschars with surrounding violaceous induration and stellate erythema on the anterior, medial, and posterior thighs and buttocks that were exquisitely tender (Figures 1 and 2).

Notable laboratory results included hypoalbuminemia (1.3 g/dL [reference range, 3.5–5.0 g/dL]) with normal renal function, a corrected calcium level of 9.7 mg/dL (reference range, 8.2–10.2 mg/dL), a serum phosphorus level of 3.5 mg/dL (reference range, 2.3–4.7 mg/dL), a calcium-phosphate product of 27.3 mg²/dL² (reference range, <55 mg²/dL²), and a parathyroid hormone level of 49.3 pg/mL (reference range, 10–65 pg/mL). Antinuclear antibodies were negative. A hypercoagulability evaluation showed normal protein C and S levels, negative lupus anticoagulant, and negative anticardiolipin antibodies.

Telescoping punch biopsies of the indurated borders of the eschars showed prominent calcification of the small- and medium-sized vessels in the mid and deep dermis, intravascular thrombi, and necrosis of the epidermis and subcutaneous fat consistent with calciphylaxis (Figure 3).

After the diagnosis of calciphylaxis was made, the patient was treated with intravenous sodium thiosulfate 25 mg 3 times weekly and alendronate 70 mg weekly. Daily arterial blood gas studies did not detect metabolic acidosis during the patient’s sodium thiosulfate therapy. The wounds were debrided, and we attempted to slowly taper the patient off the oral prednisone. Unfortunately, her condition slowly deteriorated secondary to sepsis, resulting in septic shock. The patient died 3 weeks after the diagnosis of calciphylaxis was made. At the time of diagnosis, the patient had a poor prognosis and notable risk for sepsis due to the large eschars on the thighs and abdomen as well as her relative immunosuppression due to chronic prednisone use.

 

Comment

Background on Calciphylaxis
Calciphylaxis is a rare but deadly disease that affects both ESRD patients receiving dialysis and patients without ESRD who have known risk factors for calciphylaxis, including female gender, white race, obesity, alcoholic liver disease, primary hyperparathyroidism, connective tissue disease, underlying malignancy, protein C or S deficiency, corticosteroid use, warfarin use, diabetes, iron or albumin infusions, and rapid weight loss.^3,6-9,11 Although the molecular pathogenesis of calciphylaxis is not completely understood, it is believed to be caused by local deposition of calcium in the tunica media of small- to medium-sized arterioles and venules in the skin.¹² This deposition leads to intimal proliferation and progressive narrowing of the vessels with resultant thrombosis, ischemia, and necrosis. The cutaneous manifestations and histopathology of calciphylaxis classically follow its pathogenesis. Calciphylaxis typically presents with livedo reticularis as vessels narrow and then progresses to purpura, bullae, necrosis, and eschar formation with the onset of acute thrombosis and ischemia. Histopathology is characterized by small- and medium-sized vessel calcification and thrombus, dermal necrosis, and septal panniculitis, though the histology can be highly variable.¹² Unfortunately, the already poor prognosis for calciphylaxis worsens when lesions become either ulcerative or present on the proximal extremities and trunk.^4,13 Sepsis is the leading cause of death in calciphylaxis patients, affecting more than 50% of patients.^2,3,14 The differential diagnoses for calciphylactic-appearing lesions include warfarin-induced skin necrosis, disseminated intravascular coagulation, pyoderma gangrenosum, cholesterol emboli, and various vasculitides and coagulopathies.

Risk Factors
Our case demonstrates the importance of risk factor minimization, trigger avoidance, and early intervention due to the high mortality rate of calciphylaxis. Selye et al¹⁵ coined the term calciphylaxis in 1961 based on experiments that induced calciphylaxis in rat models. Their research concluded that there were certain sensitizers (ie, risk factors) that predisposed patients to medial calcium deposition in blood vessels and other challengers (ie, triggers) that acted as inciting events to calcium deposition. Our patient presented with multiple known risk factors for calciphylaxis, including obesity (body mass index, 40 kg/m²), female gender, white race, hypoalbuminemia, and chronic corticosteroid use.¹⁶ In the presence of a milieu of risk factors, the patient’s rapid weight loss and episodes of hypotension likely were triggers for calciphylaxis.

Other case reports in the literature have suggested weight loss as a trigger for NUC. One morbidly obese patient with inactive rheumatoid arthritis had onset of calciphylaxis lesions after unintentional weight loss of approximately 50% body weight in 1 year¹⁷; however, the weight loss does not have to be drastic to trigger calciphylaxis. Another study of 16 patients with uremic calciphylaxis found that 7 of 16 (44%) patients lost 10 to 50 kg in the 6 months prior to calciphylaxis onset.¹⁴ One proposed mechanism by Munavalli et al¹⁰ is that elevated levels of matrix metalloproteinases during catabolic weight loss states enhance the deposition of calcium into elastic fibers of small vessels. The authors found elevated serum levels of matrix metalloproteinases in their patients with NUC induced by rapid weight loss.¹⁰

A meta-analysis by Nigwekar et al³ found a history of prior corticosteroid use in 61% (22/36) of NUC cases reviewed. However, it is unclear whether it is the use of corticosteroids or chronic inflammation that is implicated in NUC pathogenesis. Chronic inflammation causes downregulation of anticalcification signaling pathways.^18-20 The role of 2 vascular calcification inhibitors has been evaluated in the pathogenesis of calciphylaxis: fetuin-A and matrix gla protein (MGP).²¹ The activity of these proteins is decreased not only in calciphylaxis but also in other inflammatory states and chronic renal failure.^18-20 One study found lower fetuin-A levels in 312 hemodialysis patients compared to healthy controls and an association between low fetuin-A levels and increased C-reactive protein levels.²² Reduced fetuin-A and MGP levels may be the result of several calciphylaxis risk factors. Warfarin is believed to trigger calciphylaxis via inhibition of gamma-carboxylation of MGP, which is necessary for its anticalcification activity.²³ Hypoalbuminemia and alcoholic liver disease also are risk factors that may be explained by the fact that fetuin-A is synthesized in the liver.²⁴ Therefore, liver disease results in decreased production of fetuin-A that is permissive to vascular calcification in calciphylaxis patients.

There have been other reports of calciphylaxis patients who were originally hospitalized due to hypotension, which may serve as a trigger for calciphylaxis onset.²⁵ Because calciphylaxis lesions are more likely to occur in the fatty areas of the abdomen and proximal thighs where blood flow is slower, hypotension likely accentuates the slowing of blood flow and subsequent blood vessel calcification. This theory is supported by studies showing that established calciphylactic lesions worsen more quickly in the presence of systemic hypotension.²⁶ One patient with ESRD and calciphylaxis of the breasts had consistent systolic blood pressure readings in the high 60s to low 70s between dialysis sessions.²⁷ Due to this association, we recommend that patients with calciphylaxis have close blood pressure monitoring to aid in preventing disease progression.²⁸

Management
Calciphylaxis treatment has not yet been standardized, as it is an uncommon disease whose pathogenesis is not fully understood. Current management strategies aim to normalize metabolic abnormalities such as hypercalcemia if they are present and remove inciting agents such as warfarin and corticosteroids.²⁹ Other medical treatments that have been successfully used include sodium thiosulfate, oral steroids, and adjunctive bisphosphonates.^29-31 Sodium thiosulfate is known to cause metabolic acidosis by generating thiosulfuric acid in vivo in patients with or without renal disease; therefore, patients on sodium thiosulfate therapy should be monitored for development of metabolic acidosis and treated with oral sodium bicarbonate or dialysis as needed.^30,32 Wound care also is an important element of calciphylaxis treatment; however, the debridement of wounds is controversial. Some argue that dry intact eschars serve to protect against sepsis, which is the leading cause of death in calciphylaxis.^2,14,33 In contrast, a retrospective study of 63 calciphylaxis patients found a 1-year survival rate of 61.6% in 17 patients receiving wound debridement vs 27.4% in 46 patients who did not.² The current consensus is that debridement should be considered on a case-by-case basis, factoring in the presence of wound infection, size of wounds, stability of eschars, and treatment goals of the patient.³⁴ Future studies should be aimed at this issue, with special focus on how these factors and the decision to debride or not impact patient outcomes.

Conclusion

Calciphylaxis is a potentially fatal disease that impacts both patients with ESRD and those with nonuremic risk factors. The term calcific uremic arteriolopathy should be disregarded, as nonuremic causes are being reported with increased frequency in the literature. In such cases, patients often have multiple risk factors, including obesity, primary hyperparathyroidism, alcoholic liver disease, and underlying malignancy, among others. Certain triggers for onset of calciphylaxis should be avoided in at-risk patients, including the use of corticosteroids or warfarin; iron and albumin infusions; hypotension; and rapid weight loss. Our fatal case of NUC is a reminder to dermatologists treating at-risk patients to avoid these triggers and to keep calciphylaxis in the differential diagnosis when encountering early lesions such as livedo reticularis, as progression of these lesions has a 1-year mortality rate of more than 50% with the therapies being utilized at this time.

Calciphylaxis, otherwise known as calcific uremic arteriolopathy, is characterized by calcification of the tunica media of the small- to medium-sized blood vessels of the dermis and subcutis, leading to ischemia and necrosis.¹ It is a deadly disease with a 1-year mortality rate of more than 50%.² End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is the most common risk factor for calciphylaxis, with a prevalence of 1% to 4% of hemodialysis patients with calciphylaxis in the United States.^2-5 However, nonuremic calciphylaxis (NUC) has been increasingly reported in the literature and has risk factors other than ESRD, including but not limited to obesity, alcoholic liver disease, primary hyperparathyroidism, connective tissue disease, and underlying malignancy.^3,6-9 Triggers for calciphylaxis in at-risk patients include use of corticosteroids or warfarin, iron or albumin infusions, and rapid weight loss.^3,6,9-11 We report an unusual case of NUC that most likely was triggered by rapid weight loss and hypotension in a patient with multiple risk factors for calciphylaxis.

Case Report

A 75-year-old white woman with history of morbid obesity (body mass index, 40 kg/m²), unexplained weight loss of 70 lb over the last year, and polymyalgia rheumatica requiring chronic prednisone therapy presented with painful lesions on the thighs, buttocks, and right shoulder of 4 months’ duration. She had multiple hospital admissions preceding the onset of lesions for severe infections resulting in sepsis with hypotension, including Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase bacteremia, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. Physical examination revealed large well-demarcated ulcers and necrotic eschars with surrounding violaceous induration and stellate erythema on the anterior, medial, and posterior thighs and buttocks that were exquisitely tender (Figures 1 and 2).

Notable laboratory results included hypoalbuminemia (1.3 g/dL [reference range, 3.5–5.0 g/dL]) with normal renal function, a corrected calcium level of 9.7 mg/dL (reference range, 8.2–10.2 mg/dL), a serum phosphorus level of 3.5 mg/dL (reference range, 2.3–4.7 mg/dL), a calcium-phosphate product of 27.3 mg²/dL² (reference range, <55 mg²/dL²), and a parathyroid hormone level of 49.3 pg/mL (reference range, 10–65 pg/mL). Antinuclear antibodies were negative. A hypercoagulability evaluation showed normal protein C and S levels, negative lupus anticoagulant, and negative anticardiolipin antibodies.

Telescoping punch biopsies of the indurated borders of the eschars showed prominent calcification of the small- and medium-sized vessels in the mid and deep dermis, intravascular thrombi, and necrosis of the epidermis and subcutaneous fat consistent with calciphylaxis (Figure 3).

After the diagnosis of calciphylaxis was made, the patient was treated with intravenous sodium thiosulfate 25 mg 3 times weekly and alendronate 70 mg weekly. Daily arterial blood gas studies did not detect metabolic acidosis during the patient’s sodium thiosulfate therapy. The wounds were debrided, and we attempted to slowly taper the patient off the oral prednisone. Unfortunately, her condition slowly deteriorated secondary to sepsis, resulting in septic shock. The patient died 3 weeks after the diagnosis of calciphylaxis was made. At the time of diagnosis, the patient had a poor prognosis and notable risk for sepsis due to the large eschars on the thighs and abdomen as well as her relative immunosuppression due to chronic prednisone use.

 

Comment

Background on Calciphylaxis
Calciphylaxis is a rare but deadly disease that affects both ESRD patients receiving dialysis and patients without ESRD who have known risk factors for calciphylaxis, including female gender, white race, obesity, alcoholic liver disease, primary hyperparathyroidism, connective tissue disease, underlying malignancy, protein C or S deficiency, corticosteroid use, warfarin use, diabetes, iron or albumin infusions, and rapid weight loss.^3,6-9,11 Although the molecular pathogenesis of calciphylaxis is not completely understood, it is believed to be caused by local deposition of calcium in the tunica media of small- to medium-sized arterioles and venules in the skin.¹² This deposition leads to intimal proliferation and progressive narrowing of the vessels with resultant thrombosis, ischemia, and necrosis. The cutaneous manifestations and histopathology of calciphylaxis classically follow its pathogenesis. Calciphylaxis typically presents with livedo reticularis as vessels narrow and then progresses to purpura, bullae, necrosis, and eschar formation with the onset of acute thrombosis and ischemia. Histopathology is characterized by small- and medium-sized vessel calcification and thrombus, dermal necrosis, and septal panniculitis, though the histology can be highly variable.¹² Unfortunately, the already poor prognosis for calciphylaxis worsens when lesions become either ulcerative or present on the proximal extremities and trunk.^4,13 Sepsis is the leading cause of death in calciphylaxis patients, affecting more than 50% of patients.^2,3,14 The differential diagnoses for calciphylactic-appearing lesions include warfarin-induced skin necrosis, disseminated intravascular coagulation, pyoderma gangrenosum, cholesterol emboli, and various vasculitides and coagulopathies.

Risk Factors
Our case demonstrates the importance of risk factor minimization, trigger avoidance, and early intervention due to the high mortality rate of calciphylaxis. Selye et al¹⁵ coined the term calciphylaxis in 1961 based on experiments that induced calciphylaxis in rat models. Their research concluded that there were certain sensitizers (ie, risk factors) that predisposed patients to medial calcium deposition in blood vessels and other challengers (ie, triggers) that acted as inciting events to calcium deposition. Our patient presented with multiple known risk factors for calciphylaxis, including obesity (body mass index, 40 kg/m²), female gender, white race, hypoalbuminemia, and chronic corticosteroid use.¹⁶ In the presence of a milieu of risk factors, the patient’s rapid weight loss and episodes of hypotension likely were triggers for calciphylaxis.

Other case reports in the literature have suggested weight loss as a trigger for NUC. One morbidly obese patient with inactive rheumatoid arthritis had onset of calciphylaxis lesions after unintentional weight loss of approximately 50% body weight in 1 year¹⁷; however, the weight loss does not have to be drastic to trigger calciphylaxis. Another study of 16 patients with uremic calciphylaxis found that 7 of 16 (44%) patients lost 10 to 50 kg in the 6 months prior to calciphylaxis onset.¹⁴ One proposed mechanism by Munavalli et al¹⁰ is that elevated levels of matrix metalloproteinases during catabolic weight loss states enhance the deposition of calcium into elastic fibers of small vessels. The authors found elevated serum levels of matrix metalloproteinases in their patients with NUC induced by rapid weight loss.¹⁰

A meta-analysis by Nigwekar et al³ found a history of prior corticosteroid use in 61% (22/36) of NUC cases reviewed. However, it is unclear whether it is the use of corticosteroids or chronic inflammation that is implicated in NUC pathogenesis. Chronic inflammation causes downregulation of anticalcification signaling pathways.^18-20 The role of 2 vascular calcification inhibitors has been evaluated in the pathogenesis of calciphylaxis: fetuin-A and matrix gla protein (MGP).²¹ The activity of these proteins is decreased not only in calciphylaxis but also in other inflammatory states and chronic renal failure.^18-20 One study found lower fetuin-A levels in 312 hemodialysis patients compared to healthy controls and an association between low fetuin-A levels and increased C-reactive protein levels.²² Reduced fetuin-A and MGP levels may be the result of several calciphylaxis risk factors. Warfarin is believed to trigger calciphylaxis via inhibition of gamma-carboxylation of MGP, which is necessary for its anticalcification activity.²³ Hypoalbuminemia and alcoholic liver disease also are risk factors that may be explained by the fact that fetuin-A is synthesized in the liver.²⁴ Therefore, liver disease results in decreased production of fetuin-A that is permissive to vascular calcification in calciphylaxis patients.

There have been other reports of calciphylaxis patients who were originally hospitalized due to hypotension, which may serve as a trigger for calciphylaxis onset.²⁵ Because calciphylaxis lesions are more likely to occur in the fatty areas of the abdomen and proximal thighs where blood flow is slower, hypotension likely accentuates the slowing of blood flow and subsequent blood vessel calcification. This theory is supported by studies showing that established calciphylactic lesions worsen more quickly in the presence of systemic hypotension.²⁶ One patient with ESRD and calciphylaxis of the breasts had consistent systolic blood pressure readings in the high 60s to low 70s between dialysis sessions.²⁷ Due to this association, we recommend that patients with calciphylaxis have close blood pressure monitoring to aid in preventing disease progression.²⁸

Management
Calciphylaxis treatment has not yet been standardized, as it is an uncommon disease whose pathogenesis is not fully understood. Current management strategies aim to normalize metabolic abnormalities such as hypercalcemia if they are present and remove inciting agents such as warfarin and corticosteroids.²⁹ Other medical treatments that have been successfully used include sodium thiosulfate, oral steroids, and adjunctive bisphosphonates.^29-31 Sodium thiosulfate is known to cause metabolic acidosis by generating thiosulfuric acid in vivo in patients with or without renal disease; therefore, patients on sodium thiosulfate therapy should be monitored for development of metabolic acidosis and treated with oral sodium bicarbonate or dialysis as needed.^30,32 Wound care also is an important element of calciphylaxis treatment; however, the debridement of wounds is controversial. Some argue that dry intact eschars serve to protect against sepsis, which is the leading cause of death in calciphylaxis.^2,14,33 In contrast, a retrospective study of 63 calciphylaxis patients found a 1-year survival rate of 61.6% in 17 patients receiving wound debridement vs 27.4% in 46 patients who did not.² The current consensus is that debridement should be considered on a case-by-case basis, factoring in the presence of wound infection, size of wounds, stability of eschars, and treatment goals of the patient.³⁴ Future studies should be aimed at this issue, with special focus on how these factors and the decision to debride or not impact patient outcomes.

Conclusion

Calciphylaxis is a potentially fatal disease that impacts both patients with ESRD and those with nonuremic risk factors. The term calcific uremic arteriolopathy should be disregarded, as nonuremic causes are being reported with increased frequency in the literature. In such cases, patients often have multiple risk factors, including obesity, primary hyperparathyroidism, alcoholic liver disease, and underlying malignancy, among others. Certain triggers for onset of calciphylaxis should be avoided in at-risk patients, including the use of corticosteroids or warfarin; iron and albumin infusions; hypotension; and rapid weight loss. Our fatal case of NUC is a reminder to dermatologists treating at-risk patients to avoid these triggers and to keep calciphylaxis in the differential diagnosis when encountering early lesions such as livedo reticularis, as progression of these lesions has a 1-year mortality rate of more than 50% with the therapies being utilized at this time.

Calciphylaxis, otherwise known as calcific uremic arteriolopathy, is characterized by calcification of the tunica media of the small- to medium-sized blood vessels of the dermis and subcutis, leading to ischemia and necrosis.¹ It is a deadly disease with a 1-year mortality rate of more than 50%.² End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is the most common risk factor for calciphylaxis, with a prevalence of 1% to 4% of hemodialysis patients with calciphylaxis in the United States.^2-5 However, nonuremic calciphylaxis (NUC) has been increasingly reported in the literature and has risk factors other than ESRD, including but not limited to obesity, alcoholic liver disease, primary hyperparathyroidism, connective tissue disease, and underlying malignancy.^3,6-9 Triggers for calciphylaxis in at-risk patients include use of corticosteroids or warfarin, iron or albumin infusions, and rapid weight loss.^3,6,9-11 We report an unusual case of NUC that most likely was triggered by rapid weight loss and hypotension in a patient with multiple risk factors for calciphylaxis.

Case Report

A 75-year-old white woman with history of morbid obesity (body mass index, 40 kg/m²), unexplained weight loss of 70 lb over the last year, and polymyalgia rheumatica requiring chronic prednisone therapy presented with painful lesions on the thighs, buttocks, and right shoulder of 4 months’ duration. She had multiple hospital admissions preceding the onset of lesions for severe infections resulting in sepsis with hypotension, including Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase bacteremia, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. Physical examination revealed large well-demarcated ulcers and necrotic eschars with surrounding violaceous induration and stellate erythema on the anterior, medial, and posterior thighs and buttocks that were exquisitely tender (Figures 1 and 2).

Notable laboratory results included hypoalbuminemia (1.3 g/dL [reference range, 3.5–5.0 g/dL]) with normal renal function, a corrected calcium level of 9.7 mg/dL (reference range, 8.2–10.2 mg/dL), a serum phosphorus level of 3.5 mg/dL (reference range, 2.3–4.7 mg/dL), a calcium-phosphate product of 27.3 mg²/dL² (reference range, <55 mg²/dL²), and a parathyroid hormone level of 49.3 pg/mL (reference range, 10–65 pg/mL). Antinuclear antibodies were negative. A hypercoagulability evaluation showed normal protein C and S levels, negative lupus anticoagulant, and negative anticardiolipin antibodies.

Telescoping punch biopsies of the indurated borders of the eschars showed prominent calcification of the small- and medium-sized vessels in the mid and deep dermis, intravascular thrombi, and necrosis of the epidermis and subcutaneous fat consistent with calciphylaxis (Figure 3).

After the diagnosis of calciphylaxis was made, the patient was treated with intravenous sodium thiosulfate 25 mg 3 times weekly and alendronate 70 mg weekly. Daily arterial blood gas studies did not detect metabolic acidosis during the patient’s sodium thiosulfate therapy. The wounds were debrided, and we attempted to slowly taper the patient off the oral prednisone. Unfortunately, her condition slowly deteriorated secondary to sepsis, resulting in septic shock. The patient died 3 weeks after the diagnosis of calciphylaxis was made. At the time of diagnosis, the patient had a poor prognosis and notable risk for sepsis due to the large eschars on the thighs and abdomen as well as her relative immunosuppression due to chronic prednisone use.

 

Comment

Background on Calciphylaxis
Calciphylaxis is a rare but deadly disease that affects both ESRD patients receiving dialysis and patients without ESRD who have known risk factors for calciphylaxis, including female gender, white race, obesity, alcoholic liver disease, primary hyperparathyroidism, connective tissue disease, underlying malignancy, protein C or S deficiency, corticosteroid use, warfarin use, diabetes, iron or albumin infusions, and rapid weight loss.^3,6-9,11 Although the molecular pathogenesis of calciphylaxis is not completely understood, it is believed to be caused by local deposition of calcium in the tunica media of small- to medium-sized arterioles and venules in the skin.¹² This deposition leads to intimal proliferation and progressive narrowing of the vessels with resultant thrombosis, ischemia, and necrosis. The cutaneous manifestations and histopathology of calciphylaxis classically follow its pathogenesis. Calciphylaxis typically presents with livedo reticularis as vessels narrow and then progresses to purpura, bullae, necrosis, and eschar formation with the onset of acute thrombosis and ischemia. Histopathology is characterized by small- and medium-sized vessel calcification and thrombus, dermal necrosis, and septal panniculitis, though the histology can be highly variable.¹² Unfortunately, the already poor prognosis for calciphylaxis worsens when lesions become either ulcerative or present on the proximal extremities and trunk.^4,13 Sepsis is the leading cause of death in calciphylaxis patients, affecting more than 50% of patients.^2,3,14 The differential diagnoses for calciphylactic-appearing lesions include warfarin-induced skin necrosis, disseminated intravascular coagulation, pyoderma gangrenosum, cholesterol emboli, and various vasculitides and coagulopathies.

Risk Factors
Our case demonstrates the importance of risk factor minimization, trigger avoidance, and early intervention due to the high mortality rate of calciphylaxis. Selye et al¹⁵ coined the term calciphylaxis in 1961 based on experiments that induced calciphylaxis in rat models. Their research concluded that there were certain sensitizers (ie, risk factors) that predisposed patients to medial calcium deposition in blood vessels and other challengers (ie, triggers) that acted as inciting events to calcium deposition. Our patient presented with multiple known risk factors for calciphylaxis, including obesity (body mass index, 40 kg/m²), female gender, white race, hypoalbuminemia, and chronic corticosteroid use.¹⁶ In the presence of a milieu of risk factors, the patient’s rapid weight loss and episodes of hypotension likely were triggers for calciphylaxis.

Other case reports in the literature have suggested weight loss as a trigger for NUC. One morbidly obese patient with inactive rheumatoid arthritis had onset of calciphylaxis lesions after unintentional weight loss of approximately 50% body weight in 1 year¹⁷; however, the weight loss does not have to be drastic to trigger calciphylaxis. Another study of 16 patients with uremic calciphylaxis found that 7 of 16 (44%) patients lost 10 to 50 kg in the 6 months prior to calciphylaxis onset.¹⁴ One proposed mechanism by Munavalli et al¹⁰ is that elevated levels of matrix metalloproteinases during catabolic weight loss states enhance the deposition of calcium into elastic fibers of small vessels. The authors found elevated serum levels of matrix metalloproteinases in their patients with NUC induced by rapid weight loss.¹⁰

A meta-analysis by Nigwekar et al³ found a history of prior corticosteroid use in 61% (22/36) of NUC cases reviewed. However, it is unclear whether it is the use of corticosteroids or chronic inflammation that is implicated in NUC pathogenesis. Chronic inflammation causes downregulation of anticalcification signaling pathways.^18-20 The role of 2 vascular calcification inhibitors has been evaluated in the pathogenesis of calciphylaxis: fetuin-A and matrix gla protein (MGP).²¹ The activity of these proteins is decreased not only in calciphylaxis but also in other inflammatory states and chronic renal failure.^18-20 One study found lower fetuin-A levels in 312 hemodialysis patients compared to healthy controls and an association between low fetuin-A levels and increased C-reactive protein levels.²² Reduced fetuin-A and MGP levels may be the result of several calciphylaxis risk factors. Warfarin is believed to trigger calciphylaxis via inhibition of gamma-carboxylation of MGP, which is necessary for its anticalcification activity.²³ Hypoalbuminemia and alcoholic liver disease also are risk factors that may be explained by the fact that fetuin-A is synthesized in the liver.²⁴ Therefore, liver disease results in decreased production of fetuin-A that is permissive to vascular calcification in calciphylaxis patients.

There have been other reports of calciphylaxis patients who were originally hospitalized due to hypotension, which may serve as a trigger for calciphylaxis onset.²⁵ Because calciphylaxis lesions are more likely to occur in the fatty areas of the abdomen and proximal thighs where blood flow is slower, hypotension likely accentuates the slowing of blood flow and subsequent blood vessel calcification. This theory is supported by studies showing that established calciphylactic lesions worsen more quickly in the presence of systemic hypotension.²⁶ One patient with ESRD and calciphylaxis of the breasts had consistent systolic blood pressure readings in the high 60s to low 70s between dialysis sessions.²⁷ Due to this association, we recommend that patients with calciphylaxis have close blood pressure monitoring to aid in preventing disease progression.²⁸

Management
Calciphylaxis treatment has not yet been standardized, as it is an uncommon disease whose pathogenesis is not fully understood. Current management strategies aim to normalize metabolic abnormalities such as hypercalcemia if they are present and remove inciting agents such as warfarin and corticosteroids.²⁹ Other medical treatments that have been successfully used include sodium thiosulfate, oral steroids, and adjunctive bisphosphonates.^29-31 Sodium thiosulfate is known to cause metabolic acidosis by generating thiosulfuric acid in vivo in patients with or without renal disease; therefore, patients on sodium thiosulfate therapy should be monitored for development of metabolic acidosis and treated with oral sodium bicarbonate or dialysis as needed.^30,32 Wound care also is an important element of calciphylaxis treatment; however, the debridement of wounds is controversial. Some argue that dry intact eschars serve to protect against sepsis, which is the leading cause of death in calciphylaxis.^2,14,33 In contrast, a retrospective study of 63 calciphylaxis patients found a 1-year survival rate of 61.6% in 17 patients receiving wound debridement vs 27.4% in 46 patients who did not.² The current consensus is that debridement should be considered on a case-by-case basis, factoring in the presence of wound infection, size of wounds, stability of eschars, and treatment goals of the patient.³⁴ Future studies should be aimed at this issue, with special focus on how these factors and the decision to debride or not impact patient outcomes.

Conclusion

Calciphylaxis is a potentially fatal disease that impacts both patients with ESRD and those with nonuremic risk factors. The term calcific uremic arteriolopathy should be disregarded, as nonuremic causes are being reported with increased frequency in the literature. In such cases, patients often have multiple risk factors, including obesity, primary hyperparathyroidism, alcoholic liver disease, and underlying malignancy, among others. Certain triggers for onset of calciphylaxis should be avoided in at-risk patients, including the use of corticosteroids or warfarin; iron and albumin infusions; hypotension; and rapid weight loss. Our fatal case of NUC is a reminder to dermatologists treating at-risk patients to avoid these triggers and to keep calciphylaxis in the differential diagnosis when encountering early lesions such as livedo reticularis, as progression of these lesions has a 1-year mortality rate of more than 50% with the therapies being utilized at this time.

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) is a rare, often aggressive type of peripheral T-cell lymphoma. It comprises 18% of peripheral T-cell lymphomas and 1% to 2% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas.¹ The incidence of AITL in the United States is estimated to be 0.05 cases per 100,000 person-years,² and there is a slight male predominance.^1,3,4 It typically presents in the seventh decade of life; however, cases have been reported in adults ranging from 20 to 91 years of age.³

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma presents with lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, and systemic B symptoms (eg, fever, night sweats, weight loss, generalized pruritus).^4-6 There are cutaneous manifestations in up to 50% of cases^4,5,7 and frequently signs of autoimmune disorder.^4,5 The diagnosis often is made by excisional lymph node biopsy. Lymph node specimens characteristically have a mixed inflammatory infiltrate that includes numerous B cells often infected with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and a relatively small population of atypical T lymphocytes.⁸ Identification of this neoplastic population of CD4⁺CD8⁻ T lymphocytes expressing normal follicular helper T-cell markers CD10, chemokine CXCL13, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), and B-cell lymphoma 6 (BCL-6) confirms the diagnosis of AITL.^9,10 These malignant cells can be identified in skin specimens in cases of cutaneous metastatic disease.^11,12 We present a case originally misdiagnosed as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma that was later identified as AITL on skin biopsy.

Case Report

A 72-year-old woman presented with a pruritic erythematous eruption around the neck of 3 weeks’ duration (Figure 1). Her medical history was notable for diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma diagnosed 3 months prior based on results from a right cervical lymph node biopsy. She was treated with bendamustine and rituximab. On physical examination there were erythematous edematous papules coalescing into indurated plaques around the neck. The differential diagnosis included drug hypersensitivity reaction, herpes zoster, urticaria, and cutaneous metastasis. Two punch biopsies were taken for hematoxylin and eosin and tissue culture.

Tissue cultures and viral polymerase chain reaction were negative. Histopathologic examination revealed a scant atypical lymphoid infiltrate focally involving the deep dermis. The cells were medium to large in size and contained hyperchromatic pleomorphic nuclei (Figure 2). They were positive for CD3 and CD4, which was concerning for T-cell lymphoma. The histologic report of the excisional lymph node biopsy done 3 months prior described an atypical lymphoid neoplasm with extensive necrosis and extranodal spread that stained positively for CD20 (Figure 3).

Further staining of this cervical lymph node specimen revealed large atypical lymphoid cells positive for CD3, CD10, B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2), BCL-6, and PD-1. There were intermixed mature B lymphocytes positive for CD20 and BCL-2. Chromogenic in situ hybridization with probes for EBV showed numerous positive cells throughout the infiltrate. Polymerase chain reaction demonstrated a T-cell population with clonally rearranged T-cell receptor genes. Primers for immunoglobulin heavy and light chains showed no evidence of a clonal B-cell population.

Additional staining of the atypical cutaneous lymphocytes revealed positivity for CD3, CD10, and PD-1. The morphologic and immunophenotypic findings of both specimens supported the diagnosis of AITL.

The patient declined further treatment and chose hospice care.

 

Comment

Etiology
Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma was originally named angioimmunoblastic lymphadenopathy with dysproteinemia. It was initially thought to be a benign hyperreactive immune process driven by B cells, and patients often died of infectious complications not long after the diagnosis was made.¹³ As more cases were reported with clonal rearrangements and signs of progressive lymphoma, AITL was recognized as a malignancy.

Presentation
Patients with AITL often present with advanced stage III or IV disease with extranodal and bone marrow involvement.^3-6 Cutaneous disease occurs in up to half of patients and portends a poor prognosis.⁷ The rash often is a nonspecific erythematous macular and papular eruption mimicking a morbilliform viral exanthem or drug reaction. Urticarial, nodular, petechial, purpuric, eczematous, erythrodermic, and vesiculobullous presentations have been described.^4,11,12 In up to one-third of cases, the eruption occurs in association with a new medication, often leading to an initial misdiagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reaction.^4,11 In a review conducted by Balaraman et al,¹⁴ 84% of patients with AITL reported having pruritus.

There is an association of autoimmune phenomena in patients with AITL, which is likely a result of immune dysregulation associated with poorly functioning follicular helper T cells. Patients may present with arthralgia, hemolytic anemia, or thrombocytopenic purpura. Hypergammaglobulinemia has been reported in 30% to 50% of AITL patients.^4,6 Other pertinent immunologic findings include positive Coombs test, cold agglutinins, cryoglobulinemia, hypocomplementemia, and positive antinuclear antibodies.^4-7

Gene Analysis
Affected lymph nodes have a characteristically effaced architecture with proliferative arborizing venules; a hyperplastic population of follicular dendritic cells; and a mixed inflammatory infiltrate that is comprised of atypical lymphocytes and variable numbers of reactive lymphocytes, histiocytes, eosinophils, and plasma cells. The malignant T lymphocytes often account for only a small portion of the infiltrate.⁸ T-cell gene rearrangement studies identify clonal cells with β and γ rearrangements in the majority of cases.⁴ These cells are predominantly CD4⁺CD8⁻ and express normal follicular helper T-cell markers CD10, CXCL13, BCL-6,^5,9 and PD-1.¹⁰ Numerous B cells are seen intermixed with follicular dendritic cells. They are frequently infected with EBV and can have an atypical Reed-Sternberg cell–like appearance.^4,5,15 In the evaluation of AITL, polymerase chain reaction studies with primers for immunoglobulin heavy and light chain should be performed to look for clonal B-cell populations and rule out a possible secondary B-cell lymphoma.

Histology
Five histologic patterns have been described with cutaneous AITL: (1) superficial perivascular infiltrate of eosinophils and lymphocytes that lack atypia, (2) sparse perivascular infiltrate with atypical lymphocytes, (3) dense dermal infiltrate of pleomorphic lymphocytes, (4) leukocytoclastic vasculitis without atypical lymphocytes,¹¹ and (5) necrotizing vasculitis.¹² The finding of vascular hyperplasia, perivascular infiltrate, or vasculitis has been reported in 91% of cases in the literature. Although these findings are nonspecific, an analysis of cutaneous cases reported in the literature found that 87% demonstrated T-cell receptor gene rearrangements.¹⁴ Lymphoid cells are positive for CD10 and PD-1, as was demonstrated in our case, and are CXCL13 positive in the majority of cases.¹² Atypical and EBV-infected B cells also can be found in the skin.^11,12

Differential Diagnosis
Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma can mimic infectious, autoimmune, or allergic etiologies, and misdiagnosis of another type of lymphoma is not uncommon, as occurred in our case. Patients who have a delay in the correct diagnosis have similar outcomes to those correctly diagnosed at first presentation.⁴

Treatment
There are no effective therapies for AITL. Poor prognostic factors include age (>60 years), stages III to IV disease, male gender, elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase level,^3,5,10 and cutaneous involvement.⁷ Corticosteroids, anthracycline-based chemotherapy, and autologous stem cell transplant are currently the mainstays of therapy. Initial response to chemotherapy is promising, but duration of response is poor overall and there is no increased survival.^5,15 A large population-based study of 1207 cases by Xu and Liu³ showed the overall survival rate at 2 and 10 years was 46.8% and 21.9%, respectively. Ten-year disease-specific survival was 35.9%, and there was no demonstrable improvement in survival over the last 2 decades.³ Case reports have demonstrated that thalidomide,¹⁶ lenalidomide,¹⁷ and cyclosporine plus dexamethasone¹⁸ have been successfully used to achieve remission for up to 3 years.

Conclusion

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma is difficult to diagnose due to nonspecific clinical and histologic findings. Cutaneous manifestations are seen in AITL in up to half of cases that may occur early or in advanced disease. Similar to all cutaneous metastases, the appearance of the lesions can greatly vary. Our case demonstrates that dermatologists and dermatopathologists can make this diagnosis in the appropriate clinicopathologic context utilizing appropriate immunohistochemical staining and gene rearrangement studies.

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) is a rare, often aggressive type of peripheral T-cell lymphoma. It comprises 18% of peripheral T-cell lymphomas and 1% to 2% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas.¹ The incidence of AITL in the United States is estimated to be 0.05 cases per 100,000 person-years,² and there is a slight male predominance.^1,3,4 It typically presents in the seventh decade of life; however, cases have been reported in adults ranging from 20 to 91 years of age.³

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma presents with lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, and systemic B symptoms (eg, fever, night sweats, weight loss, generalized pruritus).^4-6 There are cutaneous manifestations in up to 50% of cases^4,5,7 and frequently signs of autoimmune disorder.^4,5 The diagnosis often is made by excisional lymph node biopsy. Lymph node specimens characteristically have a mixed inflammatory infiltrate that includes numerous B cells often infected with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and a relatively small population of atypical T lymphocytes.⁸ Identification of this neoplastic population of CD4⁺CD8⁻ T lymphocytes expressing normal follicular helper T-cell markers CD10, chemokine CXCL13, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), and B-cell lymphoma 6 (BCL-6) confirms the diagnosis of AITL.^9,10 These malignant cells can be identified in skin specimens in cases of cutaneous metastatic disease.^11,12 We present a case originally misdiagnosed as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma that was later identified as AITL on skin biopsy.

Case Report

A 72-year-old woman presented with a pruritic erythematous eruption around the neck of 3 weeks’ duration (Figure 1). Her medical history was notable for diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma diagnosed 3 months prior based on results from a right cervical lymph node biopsy. She was treated with bendamustine and rituximab. On physical examination there were erythematous edematous papules coalescing into indurated plaques around the neck. The differential diagnosis included drug hypersensitivity reaction, herpes zoster, urticaria, and cutaneous metastasis. Two punch biopsies were taken for hematoxylin and eosin and tissue culture.

Tissue cultures and viral polymerase chain reaction were negative. Histopathologic examination revealed a scant atypical lymphoid infiltrate focally involving the deep dermis. The cells were medium to large in size and contained hyperchromatic pleomorphic nuclei (Figure 2). They were positive for CD3 and CD4, which was concerning for T-cell lymphoma. The histologic report of the excisional lymph node biopsy done 3 months prior described an atypical lymphoid neoplasm with extensive necrosis and extranodal spread that stained positively for CD20 (Figure 3).

Further staining of this cervical lymph node specimen revealed large atypical lymphoid cells positive for CD3, CD10, B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2), BCL-6, and PD-1. There were intermixed mature B lymphocytes positive for CD20 and BCL-2. Chromogenic in situ hybridization with probes for EBV showed numerous positive cells throughout the infiltrate. Polymerase chain reaction demonstrated a T-cell population with clonally rearranged T-cell receptor genes. Primers for immunoglobulin heavy and light chains showed no evidence of a clonal B-cell population.

Additional staining of the atypical cutaneous lymphocytes revealed positivity for CD3, CD10, and PD-1. The morphologic and immunophenotypic findings of both specimens supported the diagnosis of AITL.

The patient declined further treatment and chose hospice care.

 

Comment

Etiology
Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma was originally named angioimmunoblastic lymphadenopathy with dysproteinemia. It was initially thought to be a benign hyperreactive immune process driven by B cells, and patients often died of infectious complications not long after the diagnosis was made.¹³ As more cases were reported with clonal rearrangements and signs of progressive lymphoma, AITL was recognized as a malignancy.

Presentation
Patients with AITL often present with advanced stage III or IV disease with extranodal and bone marrow involvement.^3-6 Cutaneous disease occurs in up to half of patients and portends a poor prognosis.⁷ The rash often is a nonspecific erythematous macular and papular eruption mimicking a morbilliform viral exanthem or drug reaction. Urticarial, nodular, petechial, purpuric, eczematous, erythrodermic, and vesiculobullous presentations have been described.^4,11,12 In up to one-third of cases, the eruption occurs in association with a new medication, often leading to an initial misdiagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reaction.^4,11 In a review conducted by Balaraman et al,¹⁴ 84% of patients with AITL reported having pruritus.

There is an association of autoimmune phenomena in patients with AITL, which is likely a result of immune dysregulation associated with poorly functioning follicular helper T cells. Patients may present with arthralgia, hemolytic anemia, or thrombocytopenic purpura. Hypergammaglobulinemia has been reported in 30% to 50% of AITL patients.^4,6 Other pertinent immunologic findings include positive Coombs test, cold agglutinins, cryoglobulinemia, hypocomplementemia, and positive antinuclear antibodies.^4-7

Gene Analysis
Affected lymph nodes have a characteristically effaced architecture with proliferative arborizing venules; a hyperplastic population of follicular dendritic cells; and a mixed inflammatory infiltrate that is comprised of atypical lymphocytes and variable numbers of reactive lymphocytes, histiocytes, eosinophils, and plasma cells. The malignant T lymphocytes often account for only a small portion of the infiltrate.⁸ T-cell gene rearrangement studies identify clonal cells with β and γ rearrangements in the majority of cases.⁴ These cells are predominantly CD4⁺CD8⁻ and express normal follicular helper T-cell markers CD10, CXCL13, BCL-6,^5,9 and PD-1.¹⁰ Numerous B cells are seen intermixed with follicular dendritic cells. They are frequently infected with EBV and can have an atypical Reed-Sternberg cell–like appearance.^4,5,15 In the evaluation of AITL, polymerase chain reaction studies with primers for immunoglobulin heavy and light chain should be performed to look for clonal B-cell populations and rule out a possible secondary B-cell lymphoma.

Histology
Five histologic patterns have been described with cutaneous AITL: (1) superficial perivascular infiltrate of eosinophils and lymphocytes that lack atypia, (2) sparse perivascular infiltrate with atypical lymphocytes, (3) dense dermal infiltrate of pleomorphic lymphocytes, (4) leukocytoclastic vasculitis without atypical lymphocytes,¹¹ and (5) necrotizing vasculitis.¹² The finding of vascular hyperplasia, perivascular infiltrate, or vasculitis has been reported in 91% of cases in the literature. Although these findings are nonspecific, an analysis of cutaneous cases reported in the literature found that 87% demonstrated T-cell receptor gene rearrangements.¹⁴ Lymphoid cells are positive for CD10 and PD-1, as was demonstrated in our case, and are CXCL13 positive in the majority of cases.¹² Atypical and EBV-infected B cells also can be found in the skin.^11,12

Differential Diagnosis
Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma can mimic infectious, autoimmune, or allergic etiologies, and misdiagnosis of another type of lymphoma is not uncommon, as occurred in our case. Patients who have a delay in the correct diagnosis have similar outcomes to those correctly diagnosed at first presentation.⁴

Treatment
There are no effective therapies for AITL. Poor prognostic factors include age (>60 years), stages III to IV disease, male gender, elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase level,^3,5,10 and cutaneous involvement.⁷ Corticosteroids, anthracycline-based chemotherapy, and autologous stem cell transplant are currently the mainstays of therapy. Initial response to chemotherapy is promising, but duration of response is poor overall and there is no increased survival.^5,15 A large population-based study of 1207 cases by Xu and Liu³ showed the overall survival rate at 2 and 10 years was 46.8% and 21.9%, respectively. Ten-year disease-specific survival was 35.9%, and there was no demonstrable improvement in survival over the last 2 decades.³ Case reports have demonstrated that thalidomide,¹⁶ lenalidomide,¹⁷ and cyclosporine plus dexamethasone¹⁸ have been successfully used to achieve remission for up to 3 years.

Conclusion

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma is difficult to diagnose due to nonspecific clinical and histologic findings. Cutaneous manifestations are seen in AITL in up to half of cases that may occur early or in advanced disease. Similar to all cutaneous metastases, the appearance of the lesions can greatly vary. Our case demonstrates that dermatologists and dermatopathologists can make this diagnosis in the appropriate clinicopathologic context utilizing appropriate immunohistochemical staining and gene rearrangement studies.

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) is a rare, often aggressive type of peripheral T-cell lymphoma. It comprises 18% of peripheral T-cell lymphomas and 1% to 2% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas.¹ The incidence of AITL in the United States is estimated to be 0.05 cases per 100,000 person-years,² and there is a slight male predominance.^1,3,4 It typically presents in the seventh decade of life; however, cases have been reported in adults ranging from 20 to 91 years of age.³

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma presents with lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, and systemic B symptoms (eg, fever, night sweats, weight loss, generalized pruritus).^4-6 There are cutaneous manifestations in up to 50% of cases^4,5,7 and frequently signs of autoimmune disorder.^4,5 The diagnosis often is made by excisional lymph node biopsy. Lymph node specimens characteristically have a mixed inflammatory infiltrate that includes numerous B cells often infected with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and a relatively small population of atypical T lymphocytes.⁸ Identification of this neoplastic population of CD4⁺CD8⁻ T lymphocytes expressing normal follicular helper T-cell markers CD10, chemokine CXCL13, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), and B-cell lymphoma 6 (BCL-6) confirms the diagnosis of AITL.^9,10 These malignant cells can be identified in skin specimens in cases of cutaneous metastatic disease.^11,12 We present a case originally misdiagnosed as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma that was later identified as AITL on skin biopsy.

Case Report

A 72-year-old woman presented with a pruritic erythematous eruption around the neck of 3 weeks’ duration (Figure 1). Her medical history was notable for diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma diagnosed 3 months prior based on results from a right cervical lymph node biopsy. She was treated with bendamustine and rituximab. On physical examination there were erythematous edematous papules coalescing into indurated plaques around the neck. The differential diagnosis included drug hypersensitivity reaction, herpes zoster, urticaria, and cutaneous metastasis. Two punch biopsies were taken for hematoxylin and eosin and tissue culture.

Tissue cultures and viral polymerase chain reaction were negative. Histopathologic examination revealed a scant atypical lymphoid infiltrate focally involving the deep dermis. The cells were medium to large in size and contained hyperchromatic pleomorphic nuclei (Figure 2). They were positive for CD3 and CD4, which was concerning for T-cell lymphoma. The histologic report of the excisional lymph node biopsy done 3 months prior described an atypical lymphoid neoplasm with extensive necrosis and extranodal spread that stained positively for CD20 (Figure 3).

Further staining of this cervical lymph node specimen revealed large atypical lymphoid cells positive for CD3, CD10, B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2), BCL-6, and PD-1. There were intermixed mature B lymphocytes positive for CD20 and BCL-2. Chromogenic in situ hybridization with probes for EBV showed numerous positive cells throughout the infiltrate. Polymerase chain reaction demonstrated a T-cell population with clonally rearranged T-cell receptor genes. Primers for immunoglobulin heavy and light chains showed no evidence of a clonal B-cell population.

Additional staining of the atypical cutaneous lymphocytes revealed positivity for CD3, CD10, and PD-1. The morphologic and immunophenotypic findings of both specimens supported the diagnosis of AITL.

The patient declined further treatment and chose hospice care.

 

Comment

Etiology
Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma was originally named angioimmunoblastic lymphadenopathy with dysproteinemia. It was initially thought to be a benign hyperreactive immune process driven by B cells, and patients often died of infectious complications not long after the diagnosis was made.¹³ As more cases were reported with clonal rearrangements and signs of progressive lymphoma, AITL was recognized as a malignancy.

Presentation
Patients with AITL often present with advanced stage III or IV disease with extranodal and bone marrow involvement.^3-6 Cutaneous disease occurs in up to half of patients and portends a poor prognosis.⁷ The rash often is a nonspecific erythematous macular and papular eruption mimicking a morbilliform viral exanthem or drug reaction. Urticarial, nodular, petechial, purpuric, eczematous, erythrodermic, and vesiculobullous presentations have been described.^4,11,12 In up to one-third of cases, the eruption occurs in association with a new medication, often leading to an initial misdiagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reaction.^4,11 In a review conducted by Balaraman et al,¹⁴ 84% of patients with AITL reported having pruritus.

There is an association of autoimmune phenomena in patients with AITL, which is likely a result of immune dysregulation associated with poorly functioning follicular helper T cells. Patients may present with arthralgia, hemolytic anemia, or thrombocytopenic purpura. Hypergammaglobulinemia has been reported in 30% to 50% of AITL patients.^4,6 Other pertinent immunologic findings include positive Coombs test, cold agglutinins, cryoglobulinemia, hypocomplementemia, and positive antinuclear antibodies.^4-7

Gene Analysis
Affected lymph nodes have a characteristically effaced architecture with proliferative arborizing venules; a hyperplastic population of follicular dendritic cells; and a mixed inflammatory infiltrate that is comprised of atypical lymphocytes and variable numbers of reactive lymphocytes, histiocytes, eosinophils, and plasma cells. The malignant T lymphocytes often account for only a small portion of the infiltrate.⁸ T-cell gene rearrangement studies identify clonal cells with β and γ rearrangements in the majority of cases.⁴ These cells are predominantly CD4⁺CD8⁻ and express normal follicular helper T-cell markers CD10, CXCL13, BCL-6,^5,9 and PD-1.¹⁰ Numerous B cells are seen intermixed with follicular dendritic cells. They are frequently infected with EBV and can have an atypical Reed-Sternberg cell–like appearance.^4,5,15 In the evaluation of AITL, polymerase chain reaction studies with primers for immunoglobulin heavy and light chain should be performed to look for clonal B-cell populations and rule out a possible secondary B-cell lymphoma.

Histology
Five histologic patterns have been described with cutaneous AITL: (1) superficial perivascular infiltrate of eosinophils and lymphocytes that lack atypia, (2) sparse perivascular infiltrate with atypical lymphocytes, (3) dense dermal infiltrate of pleomorphic lymphocytes, (4) leukocytoclastic vasculitis without atypical lymphocytes,¹¹ and (5) necrotizing vasculitis.¹² The finding of vascular hyperplasia, perivascular infiltrate, or vasculitis has been reported in 91% of cases in the literature. Although these findings are nonspecific, an analysis of cutaneous cases reported in the literature found that 87% demonstrated T-cell receptor gene rearrangements.¹⁴ Lymphoid cells are positive for CD10 and PD-1, as was demonstrated in our case, and are CXCL13 positive in the majority of cases.¹² Atypical and EBV-infected B cells also can be found in the skin.^11,12

Differential Diagnosis
Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma can mimic infectious, autoimmune, or allergic etiologies, and misdiagnosis of another type of lymphoma is not uncommon, as occurred in our case. Patients who have a delay in the correct diagnosis have similar outcomes to those correctly diagnosed at first presentation.⁴

Treatment
There are no effective therapies for AITL. Poor prognostic factors include age (>60 years), stages III to IV disease, male gender, elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase level,^3,5,10 and cutaneous involvement.⁷ Corticosteroids, anthracycline-based chemotherapy, and autologous stem cell transplant are currently the mainstays of therapy. Initial response to chemotherapy is promising, but duration of response is poor overall and there is no increased survival.^5,15 A large population-based study of 1207 cases by Xu and Liu³ showed the overall survival rate at 2 and 10 years was 46.8% and 21.9%, respectively. Ten-year disease-specific survival was 35.9%, and there was no demonstrable improvement in survival over the last 2 decades.³ Case reports have demonstrated that thalidomide,¹⁶ lenalidomide,¹⁷ and cyclosporine plus dexamethasone¹⁸ have been successfully used to achieve remission for up to 3 years.

Conclusion

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma is difficult to diagnose due to nonspecific clinical and histologic findings. Cutaneous manifestations are seen in AITL in up to half of cases that may occur early or in advanced disease. Similar to all cutaneous metastases, the appearance of the lesions can greatly vary. Our case demonstrates that dermatologists and dermatopathologists can make this diagnosis in the appropriate clinicopathologic context utilizing appropriate immunohistochemical staining and gene rearrangement studies.