H1N1 Reinfection Reported After Oseltamivir Tx in Chile

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
H1N1 Reinfection Reported After Oseltamivir Tx in Chile

Three Chilean patients had confirmed reinfection with the 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus after successful treatment with oseltamivir, according to a letter published in the January 2010 issue of Emerging Infectious Diseases.

“Reinfection is rarely seen in nonpandemic influenza A,” said Dr. Carlos M. Perez of Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile (Santiago) and colleagues.

The first patient was a healthy 14-year-old girl who had a fever, sore throat, and nasal congestion when H1N1 infection was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing. She was treated with oseltamivir, and her symptoms resolved after 2 days.

“Twenty days later, fever, muscle aches, and vomiting developed in the patient,” the researchers said. The patient was treated with amantadine, and she recovered. Subsequent PCR testing confirmed reinfection with pandemic influenza (EID 2010;16:156-7).

The second patient was a 62-year-old woman who developed a high fever, cough, and nasal congestion while she was hospitalized prior to surgery. PCR testing and viral culture confirmed infection with the pandemic H1N1 virus. She received oseltamivir starting 5 days after the onset of symptoms, and the symptoms resolved within the next 5 days.

Two weeks later, while she was still hospitalized, the patient again developed fever, bronchial obstruction, and productive cough; PCR testing again was positive for pandemic H1N1. “The patient was again treated with oseltamivir, and PCR results were negative for influenza after 48 hours of antiviral treatment,” the researchers said.

The third patient was a previously healthy 38-year-old man hospitalized for mitral and aortic valve replacement following acute endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus. The patient developed a sore throat, nasal congestion, cough, and a low-grade fever 11 days after surgery, while he was still hospitalized.

PCR testing confirmed pandemic H1N1 infection, and the patient was treated with oseltamivir. His respiratory symptoms resolved after 5 days. “He was discharged from the hospital, but readmitted 18 days later with nasal congestion, cough, and high fever,” the researchers said. Repeat testing again was positive for pandemic flu; he was successfully retreated with oseltamivir.

H1N1 reinfection in these patients could be due to the high rate of infection in the community at the time, as well as the immunocompromised status of the second and third patients, the researchers noted. The occurrence of two reinfections in hospitalized patients raises the possibility of nosocomial transmission, they added, but more information is needed.

Disclosures: None was reported.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Article PDF
Article PDF

Three Chilean patients had confirmed reinfection with the 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus after successful treatment with oseltamivir, according to a letter published in the January 2010 issue of Emerging Infectious Diseases.

“Reinfection is rarely seen in nonpandemic influenza A,” said Dr. Carlos M. Perez of Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile (Santiago) and colleagues.

The first patient was a healthy 14-year-old girl who had a fever, sore throat, and nasal congestion when H1N1 infection was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing. She was treated with oseltamivir, and her symptoms resolved after 2 days.

“Twenty days later, fever, muscle aches, and vomiting developed in the patient,” the researchers said. The patient was treated with amantadine, and she recovered. Subsequent PCR testing confirmed reinfection with pandemic influenza (EID 2010;16:156-7).

The second patient was a 62-year-old woman who developed a high fever, cough, and nasal congestion while she was hospitalized prior to surgery. PCR testing and viral culture confirmed infection with the pandemic H1N1 virus. She received oseltamivir starting 5 days after the onset of symptoms, and the symptoms resolved within the next 5 days.

Two weeks later, while she was still hospitalized, the patient again developed fever, bronchial obstruction, and productive cough; PCR testing again was positive for pandemic H1N1. “The patient was again treated with oseltamivir, and PCR results were negative for influenza after 48 hours of antiviral treatment,” the researchers said.

The third patient was a previously healthy 38-year-old man hospitalized for mitral and aortic valve replacement following acute endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus. The patient developed a sore throat, nasal congestion, cough, and a low-grade fever 11 days after surgery, while he was still hospitalized.

PCR testing confirmed pandemic H1N1 infection, and the patient was treated with oseltamivir. His respiratory symptoms resolved after 5 days. “He was discharged from the hospital, but readmitted 18 days later with nasal congestion, cough, and high fever,” the researchers said. Repeat testing again was positive for pandemic flu; he was successfully retreated with oseltamivir.

H1N1 reinfection in these patients could be due to the high rate of infection in the community at the time, as well as the immunocompromised status of the second and third patients, the researchers noted. The occurrence of two reinfections in hospitalized patients raises the possibility of nosocomial transmission, they added, but more information is needed.

Disclosures: None was reported.

Three Chilean patients had confirmed reinfection with the 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus after successful treatment with oseltamivir, according to a letter published in the January 2010 issue of Emerging Infectious Diseases.

“Reinfection is rarely seen in nonpandemic influenza A,” said Dr. Carlos M. Perez of Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile (Santiago) and colleagues.

The first patient was a healthy 14-year-old girl who had a fever, sore throat, and nasal congestion when H1N1 infection was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing. She was treated with oseltamivir, and her symptoms resolved after 2 days.

“Twenty days later, fever, muscle aches, and vomiting developed in the patient,” the researchers said. The patient was treated with amantadine, and she recovered. Subsequent PCR testing confirmed reinfection with pandemic influenza (EID 2010;16:156-7).

The second patient was a 62-year-old woman who developed a high fever, cough, and nasal congestion while she was hospitalized prior to surgery. PCR testing and viral culture confirmed infection with the pandemic H1N1 virus. She received oseltamivir starting 5 days after the onset of symptoms, and the symptoms resolved within the next 5 days.

Two weeks later, while she was still hospitalized, the patient again developed fever, bronchial obstruction, and productive cough; PCR testing again was positive for pandemic H1N1. “The patient was again treated with oseltamivir, and PCR results were negative for influenza after 48 hours of antiviral treatment,” the researchers said.

The third patient was a previously healthy 38-year-old man hospitalized for mitral and aortic valve replacement following acute endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus. The patient developed a sore throat, nasal congestion, cough, and a low-grade fever 11 days after surgery, while he was still hospitalized.

PCR testing confirmed pandemic H1N1 infection, and the patient was treated with oseltamivir. His respiratory symptoms resolved after 5 days. “He was discharged from the hospital, but readmitted 18 days later with nasal congestion, cough, and high fever,” the researchers said. Repeat testing again was positive for pandemic flu; he was successfully retreated with oseltamivir.

H1N1 reinfection in these patients could be due to the high rate of infection in the community at the time, as well as the immunocompromised status of the second and third patients, the researchers noted. The occurrence of two reinfections in hospitalized patients raises the possibility of nosocomial transmission, they added, but more information is needed.

Disclosures: None was reported.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
H1N1 Reinfection Reported After Oseltamivir Tx in Chile
Display Headline
H1N1 Reinfection Reported After Oseltamivir Tx in Chile
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

A Single Dose of Adjuvant H1N1 Vaccine May Be OK

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
A Single Dose of Adjuvant H1N1 Vaccine May Be OK

Main Finding: One dose of adjuvant vaccine may protect young children against 2009 H1N1 influenza.

Data Source: A randomized trial of three dosing regimens of H1N1 vaccines, including 194 children aged 3-8 years.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by Novartis, which manufactured the vaccines used. Study coauthor Dr. Kelly Lindert is an employee of Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics in Cambridge, Mass.

A single dose of a 7.5-mcg adjuvant vaccine met immunogenicity criteria for protection against the 2009 H1N1 influenza in children aged 3-8 years, based on preliminary data from 390 children in one study.

“The use of adjuvant may provide a rapid immune response at a lower hemagglutinin dose than that required in vaccine without adjuvant,” said Dr. Adriano Arguedas of the Instituto de Atención Pediátrica in San José, Costa Rica, and associates.

They conducted a randomized trial of three dosing regimens of H1N1 vaccines in individuals aged 3-64 years, including 194 children aged 3-8 years and 196 children aged 9-17 years.

The children were randomized to receive one 7.5-mcg hemagglutinin dose with adjuvant, one 15-mcg hemagglutinin dose without adjuvant, or two 15-mcg hemagglutinin doses without adjuvant (N. Engl. J. Med. 2009 Dec. 30 [doi: 10.1056/NEJMc0909988

At 22 days after vaccination, hemagglutinin-inhibition (HI) titers had increased in both age groups for all three vaccine regimens.

After a single dose of each vaccine, children aged 9-17 years met the Food and Drug Administration's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) criteria for immunogenicity, but “in children 3-8 years of age, only the 7.5-mcg dose of 2009 H1N1 vaccine with adjuvant met both the immunogenicity criteria after one dose,” Dr. Arguedas and colleagues wrote.

Neither one nor two 15-mcg doses of unadjuvanted vaccine met the immunogenicity criteria in this younger age group.

According to the CBER criteria, immunogenicity is reached when the lower bound of the two-sided 95% confidence interval was at least 40% in individuals who showed seroconversion on HI assays, and when the lower bound of the two-sided 95% confidence interval was at least 70% in individuals with an HI antibody titer of at least 1:40.

No serious adverse events related to the vaccine were reported in any of the age groups.

The study is ongoing, but the results suggest that use of an adjuvant vaccine could accelerate the process of vaccinating young children (a high-risk group) against H1N1 influenza, the researchers said.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Article PDF
Article PDF

Main Finding: One dose of adjuvant vaccine may protect young children against 2009 H1N1 influenza.

Data Source: A randomized trial of three dosing regimens of H1N1 vaccines, including 194 children aged 3-8 years.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by Novartis, which manufactured the vaccines used. Study coauthor Dr. Kelly Lindert is an employee of Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics in Cambridge, Mass.

A single dose of a 7.5-mcg adjuvant vaccine met immunogenicity criteria for protection against the 2009 H1N1 influenza in children aged 3-8 years, based on preliminary data from 390 children in one study.

“The use of adjuvant may provide a rapid immune response at a lower hemagglutinin dose than that required in vaccine without adjuvant,” said Dr. Adriano Arguedas of the Instituto de Atención Pediátrica in San José, Costa Rica, and associates.

They conducted a randomized trial of three dosing regimens of H1N1 vaccines in individuals aged 3-64 years, including 194 children aged 3-8 years and 196 children aged 9-17 years.

The children were randomized to receive one 7.5-mcg hemagglutinin dose with adjuvant, one 15-mcg hemagglutinin dose without adjuvant, or two 15-mcg hemagglutinin doses without adjuvant (N. Engl. J. Med. 2009 Dec. 30 [doi: 10.1056/NEJMc0909988

At 22 days after vaccination, hemagglutinin-inhibition (HI) titers had increased in both age groups for all three vaccine regimens.

After a single dose of each vaccine, children aged 9-17 years met the Food and Drug Administration's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) criteria for immunogenicity, but “in children 3-8 years of age, only the 7.5-mcg dose of 2009 H1N1 vaccine with adjuvant met both the immunogenicity criteria after one dose,” Dr. Arguedas and colleagues wrote.

Neither one nor two 15-mcg doses of unadjuvanted vaccine met the immunogenicity criteria in this younger age group.

According to the CBER criteria, immunogenicity is reached when the lower bound of the two-sided 95% confidence interval was at least 40% in individuals who showed seroconversion on HI assays, and when the lower bound of the two-sided 95% confidence interval was at least 70% in individuals with an HI antibody titer of at least 1:40.

No serious adverse events related to the vaccine were reported in any of the age groups.

The study is ongoing, but the results suggest that use of an adjuvant vaccine could accelerate the process of vaccinating young children (a high-risk group) against H1N1 influenza, the researchers said.

Main Finding: One dose of adjuvant vaccine may protect young children against 2009 H1N1 influenza.

Data Source: A randomized trial of three dosing regimens of H1N1 vaccines, including 194 children aged 3-8 years.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by Novartis, which manufactured the vaccines used. Study coauthor Dr. Kelly Lindert is an employee of Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics in Cambridge, Mass.

A single dose of a 7.5-mcg adjuvant vaccine met immunogenicity criteria for protection against the 2009 H1N1 influenza in children aged 3-8 years, based on preliminary data from 390 children in one study.

“The use of adjuvant may provide a rapid immune response at a lower hemagglutinin dose than that required in vaccine without adjuvant,” said Dr. Adriano Arguedas of the Instituto de Atención Pediátrica in San José, Costa Rica, and associates.

They conducted a randomized trial of three dosing regimens of H1N1 vaccines in individuals aged 3-64 years, including 194 children aged 3-8 years and 196 children aged 9-17 years.

The children were randomized to receive one 7.5-mcg hemagglutinin dose with adjuvant, one 15-mcg hemagglutinin dose without adjuvant, or two 15-mcg hemagglutinin doses without adjuvant (N. Engl. J. Med. 2009 Dec. 30 [doi: 10.1056/NEJMc0909988

At 22 days after vaccination, hemagglutinin-inhibition (HI) titers had increased in both age groups for all three vaccine regimens.

After a single dose of each vaccine, children aged 9-17 years met the Food and Drug Administration's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) criteria for immunogenicity, but “in children 3-8 years of age, only the 7.5-mcg dose of 2009 H1N1 vaccine with adjuvant met both the immunogenicity criteria after one dose,” Dr. Arguedas and colleagues wrote.

Neither one nor two 15-mcg doses of unadjuvanted vaccine met the immunogenicity criteria in this younger age group.

According to the CBER criteria, immunogenicity is reached when the lower bound of the two-sided 95% confidence interval was at least 40% in individuals who showed seroconversion on HI assays, and when the lower bound of the two-sided 95% confidence interval was at least 70% in individuals with an HI antibody titer of at least 1:40.

No serious adverse events related to the vaccine were reported in any of the age groups.

The study is ongoing, but the results suggest that use of an adjuvant vaccine could accelerate the process of vaccinating young children (a high-risk group) against H1N1 influenza, the researchers said.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
A Single Dose of Adjuvant H1N1 Vaccine May Be OK
Display Headline
A Single Dose of Adjuvant H1N1 Vaccine May Be OK
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Thimerosal in H1N1 Vaccine Safe, CDC Says

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Thimerosal in H1N1 Vaccine Safe, CDC Says

Data from 19 studies support the safety of thimerosal, which is used as a preservative in multidose vials of the pandemic 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine, according to an updated fact sheet on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Web site.

As with the seasonal flu vaccine, the H1N1 vaccine is produced in single-dose units, which do not contain thimerosal, and in multidose vials, which do contain a small amount of thimerosal to prevent contamination and bacterial growth.

The nasal spray version of the H1N1 vaccine, which contains a live-attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV), does not contain thimerosal, but also is not approved for many populations at high risk for pandemic flu, such as children aged 6–23 months, pregnant women, or adults with certain other health conditions.

Recent recalls of some single-dose thimerosal-free H1N1 vaccines mean that individuals in H1N1 vaccine priority groups may have trouble finding a thimerosal-free vaccine. However, “it is safe for pregnant women and children to receive a flu vaccine that contains thimerosal,” the agency stressed.

The CDC acknowledged that misconceptions persist about a connection between the thimerosal in some vaccines and the occurrence of autism in children.

“Most research done in the United States, and around the world, shows no link between the thimerosal in vaccines and autism,” according to the CDC. “In fact, sadly, autism rates have actually gone up since thimerosal was taken out of childhood vaccines in 2001, providing further evidence that thimerosal-containing vaccines are not related to autism.”

For the latest information on the H1N1 flu, visit cdc.gov/h1n1flu

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Article PDF
Article PDF

Data from 19 studies support the safety of thimerosal, which is used as a preservative in multidose vials of the pandemic 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine, according to an updated fact sheet on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Web site.

As with the seasonal flu vaccine, the H1N1 vaccine is produced in single-dose units, which do not contain thimerosal, and in multidose vials, which do contain a small amount of thimerosal to prevent contamination and bacterial growth.

The nasal spray version of the H1N1 vaccine, which contains a live-attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV), does not contain thimerosal, but also is not approved for many populations at high risk for pandemic flu, such as children aged 6–23 months, pregnant women, or adults with certain other health conditions.

Recent recalls of some single-dose thimerosal-free H1N1 vaccines mean that individuals in H1N1 vaccine priority groups may have trouble finding a thimerosal-free vaccine. However, “it is safe for pregnant women and children to receive a flu vaccine that contains thimerosal,” the agency stressed.

The CDC acknowledged that misconceptions persist about a connection between the thimerosal in some vaccines and the occurrence of autism in children.

“Most research done in the United States, and around the world, shows no link between the thimerosal in vaccines and autism,” according to the CDC. “In fact, sadly, autism rates have actually gone up since thimerosal was taken out of childhood vaccines in 2001, providing further evidence that thimerosal-containing vaccines are not related to autism.”

For the latest information on the H1N1 flu, visit cdc.gov/h1n1flu

Data from 19 studies support the safety of thimerosal, which is used as a preservative in multidose vials of the pandemic 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine, according to an updated fact sheet on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Web site.

As with the seasonal flu vaccine, the H1N1 vaccine is produced in single-dose units, which do not contain thimerosal, and in multidose vials, which do contain a small amount of thimerosal to prevent contamination and bacterial growth.

The nasal spray version of the H1N1 vaccine, which contains a live-attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV), does not contain thimerosal, but also is not approved for many populations at high risk for pandemic flu, such as children aged 6–23 months, pregnant women, or adults with certain other health conditions.

Recent recalls of some single-dose thimerosal-free H1N1 vaccines mean that individuals in H1N1 vaccine priority groups may have trouble finding a thimerosal-free vaccine. However, “it is safe for pregnant women and children to receive a flu vaccine that contains thimerosal,” the agency stressed.

The CDC acknowledged that misconceptions persist about a connection between the thimerosal in some vaccines and the occurrence of autism in children.

“Most research done in the United States, and around the world, shows no link between the thimerosal in vaccines and autism,” according to the CDC. “In fact, sadly, autism rates have actually gone up since thimerosal was taken out of childhood vaccines in 2001, providing further evidence that thimerosal-containing vaccines are not related to autism.”

For the latest information on the H1N1 flu, visit cdc.gov/h1n1flu

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Thimerosal in H1N1 Vaccine Safe, CDC Says
Display Headline
Thimerosal in H1N1 Vaccine Safe, CDC Says
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Risk Factors Can Predict Diabetes in Children

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Risk Factors Can Predict Diabetes in Children

Several office-based pediatric measures, including body mass index and systolic and diastolic blood pressure, were significant predictors of type 2 diabetes in adulthood, based on data from a pair of follow-up studies including nearly 2,000 school-aged children.

The ability to identify children who are on the path to adult type 2 diabetes may give physicians an opportunity to intervene with diet and exercise recommendations, said John A. Morrison, Ph.D., of Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.

Dr. Morrison and his colleagues reviewed data from two prospective studies. The National Growth and Health Study (NGHS) included 1,067 girls with a mean age of 10 years who were reassessed at a mean age of 19 years. The NGHS measured body mass index (BMI); systolic and diastolic blood pressure; waist circumference; HDL cholesterol, fasting insulin, glucose, and lipid profiles; and parental diabetes.

The second study, the Princeton Follow-Up Study (PFS), included 822 boys and girls 6–18 years (mean age, 12 years) who were reassessed at a mean age of 39 years. The PFS measured BMI, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, parental diabetes, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and fasting glucose.

The final analysis included data from 80% of the girls in the NGHS and 53% of the children in the PFS (Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 2010;164:53–60).

After cases of diabetes were excluded at study entry, the incidence of diabetes at age 39 years in the PFS was 5%. The incidence was higher in black women than white women (10% vs. 4%) and higher in black men than white men (5% vs. 3%). In the NGHS, diabetes incidence after 9 years was 1.2% in black women and 0.2% in white women.

In the PFS, childhood systolic blood pressure, BMI in the top fifth percentile, and black race were significant predictors of type 2 diabetes at 39 years of age. Conversely, if childhood BMI, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure all fell below the 75th percentile, the chance of type 2 diabetes at 39 years of age was 2% if the parents had diabetes and 1% if they did not.

In the PFS, “simple office and laboratory measurements and knowledge of parental diabetes usefully predicted” the development of type 2 diabetes 22–30 years later, the researchers wrote.

In the NGHS, childhood systolic blood pressure in the top fifth percentile and parental diabetes were significant predictors of type 2 diabetes at age 19 years. If childhood BMI, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure all fell below the 75th percentile, the chance of type 2 diabetes at 19 years of age was 0.2% whether the parents had diabetes or not, and 0.3% if childhood insulin also was below the 75th percentile.

Disclosures: The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose. The study was supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health, the American Heart Association, the Taft Research Fund, and the Lipoprotein Research Fund of the Jewish Hospital of Cincinnati.

The ability to identify children on the path to type 2 diabetes may provide an opportunity to intervene.

Source DR. MORRISON

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Article PDF
Article PDF

Several office-based pediatric measures, including body mass index and systolic and diastolic blood pressure, were significant predictors of type 2 diabetes in adulthood, based on data from a pair of follow-up studies including nearly 2,000 school-aged children.

The ability to identify children who are on the path to adult type 2 diabetes may give physicians an opportunity to intervene with diet and exercise recommendations, said John A. Morrison, Ph.D., of Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.

Dr. Morrison and his colleagues reviewed data from two prospective studies. The National Growth and Health Study (NGHS) included 1,067 girls with a mean age of 10 years who were reassessed at a mean age of 19 years. The NGHS measured body mass index (BMI); systolic and diastolic blood pressure; waist circumference; HDL cholesterol, fasting insulin, glucose, and lipid profiles; and parental diabetes.

The second study, the Princeton Follow-Up Study (PFS), included 822 boys and girls 6–18 years (mean age, 12 years) who were reassessed at a mean age of 39 years. The PFS measured BMI, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, parental diabetes, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and fasting glucose.

The final analysis included data from 80% of the girls in the NGHS and 53% of the children in the PFS (Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 2010;164:53–60).

After cases of diabetes were excluded at study entry, the incidence of diabetes at age 39 years in the PFS was 5%. The incidence was higher in black women than white women (10% vs. 4%) and higher in black men than white men (5% vs. 3%). In the NGHS, diabetes incidence after 9 years was 1.2% in black women and 0.2% in white women.

In the PFS, childhood systolic blood pressure, BMI in the top fifth percentile, and black race were significant predictors of type 2 diabetes at 39 years of age. Conversely, if childhood BMI, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure all fell below the 75th percentile, the chance of type 2 diabetes at 39 years of age was 2% if the parents had diabetes and 1% if they did not.

In the PFS, “simple office and laboratory measurements and knowledge of parental diabetes usefully predicted” the development of type 2 diabetes 22–30 years later, the researchers wrote.

In the NGHS, childhood systolic blood pressure in the top fifth percentile and parental diabetes were significant predictors of type 2 diabetes at age 19 years. If childhood BMI, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure all fell below the 75th percentile, the chance of type 2 diabetes at 19 years of age was 0.2% whether the parents had diabetes or not, and 0.3% if childhood insulin also was below the 75th percentile.

Disclosures: The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose. The study was supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health, the American Heart Association, the Taft Research Fund, and the Lipoprotein Research Fund of the Jewish Hospital of Cincinnati.

The ability to identify children on the path to type 2 diabetes may provide an opportunity to intervene.

Source DR. MORRISON

Several office-based pediatric measures, including body mass index and systolic and diastolic blood pressure, were significant predictors of type 2 diabetes in adulthood, based on data from a pair of follow-up studies including nearly 2,000 school-aged children.

The ability to identify children who are on the path to adult type 2 diabetes may give physicians an opportunity to intervene with diet and exercise recommendations, said John A. Morrison, Ph.D., of Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.

Dr. Morrison and his colleagues reviewed data from two prospective studies. The National Growth and Health Study (NGHS) included 1,067 girls with a mean age of 10 years who were reassessed at a mean age of 19 years. The NGHS measured body mass index (BMI); systolic and diastolic blood pressure; waist circumference; HDL cholesterol, fasting insulin, glucose, and lipid profiles; and parental diabetes.

The second study, the Princeton Follow-Up Study (PFS), included 822 boys and girls 6–18 years (mean age, 12 years) who were reassessed at a mean age of 39 years. The PFS measured BMI, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, parental diabetes, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and fasting glucose.

The final analysis included data from 80% of the girls in the NGHS and 53% of the children in the PFS (Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 2010;164:53–60).

After cases of diabetes were excluded at study entry, the incidence of diabetes at age 39 years in the PFS was 5%. The incidence was higher in black women than white women (10% vs. 4%) and higher in black men than white men (5% vs. 3%). In the NGHS, diabetes incidence after 9 years was 1.2% in black women and 0.2% in white women.

In the PFS, childhood systolic blood pressure, BMI in the top fifth percentile, and black race were significant predictors of type 2 diabetes at 39 years of age. Conversely, if childhood BMI, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure all fell below the 75th percentile, the chance of type 2 diabetes at 39 years of age was 2% if the parents had diabetes and 1% if they did not.

In the PFS, “simple office and laboratory measurements and knowledge of parental diabetes usefully predicted” the development of type 2 diabetes 22–30 years later, the researchers wrote.

In the NGHS, childhood systolic blood pressure in the top fifth percentile and parental diabetes were significant predictors of type 2 diabetes at age 19 years. If childhood BMI, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure all fell below the 75th percentile, the chance of type 2 diabetes at 19 years of age was 0.2% whether the parents had diabetes or not, and 0.3% if childhood insulin also was below the 75th percentile.

Disclosures: The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose. The study was supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health, the American Heart Association, the Taft Research Fund, and the Lipoprotein Research Fund of the Jewish Hospital of Cincinnati.

The ability to identify children on the path to type 2 diabetes may provide an opportunity to intervene.

Source DR. MORRISON

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Risk Factors Can Predict Diabetes in Children
Display Headline
Risk Factors Can Predict Diabetes in Children
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Comorbidity, Obesity Linked to H1N1 Influenza Hospitalizations

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Comorbidity, Obesity Linked to H1N1 Influenza Hospitalizations

More than half of the adults hospitalized in the early days of the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in New York City were obese, and 92% of the obese patients had underlying medical conditions, according a recent review.

To quickly assess the severity of illness and identify those at greatest risk from the emerging virus, researchers at the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene reviewed data from the first 99 patients with confirmed H1N1 influenza admitted to any hospital in New York City. The study population included 19 patients aged 0–4 years, 39 patients aged 5–17 years, 32 patients aged 18–49 years, 8 patients aged 50–64 years, and 1 patient aged 65 or older. The patients with H1N1 influenza were disproportionately younger compared with the general population (MMWR 2010;58:1436–40).

A total of 95 (96%) patients had fevers at admission, and 89 (90%) complained of cough. Also, 37 children (younger than 18 years) and 36 adults (aged 18 years and older) had at least one underlying medical condition known to increase the risk of flu complications, and 7 children and 10 adults had more than one such condition. Asthma, the most common underlying medical condition, was noted in 29 children (50%) and 19 adults (46%). Chronic metabolic disorders, including diabetes, were reported in 11 patients (11%).

Body mass index data were available for 28 children and 20 adults. Four of the five obese children and 11 of the 12 obese adults had underlying medical conditions, including asthma and Down syndrome. Three of the four patients who died were obese; their underlying medical conditions included asthma and Down syndrome.

Of the 76 patients treated with oseltamivir, 36 (47%) were treated within 2 days of symptom onset, but the median time to treatment from the onset of illness was 3 days. Hospital stays were shorter for patients who started antiviral therapy within 2 days.

The study was limited by several factors including the potential underreporting of cases and the difference in reporting protocol later in the pandemic, when data were collected from sentinel hospitals only.

The findings confirm that patients at high risk should be encouraged to get vaccinated, the researchers said.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Topics
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Article PDF
Article PDF

More than half of the adults hospitalized in the early days of the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in New York City were obese, and 92% of the obese patients had underlying medical conditions, according a recent review.

To quickly assess the severity of illness and identify those at greatest risk from the emerging virus, researchers at the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene reviewed data from the first 99 patients with confirmed H1N1 influenza admitted to any hospital in New York City. The study population included 19 patients aged 0–4 years, 39 patients aged 5–17 years, 32 patients aged 18–49 years, 8 patients aged 50–64 years, and 1 patient aged 65 or older. The patients with H1N1 influenza were disproportionately younger compared with the general population (MMWR 2010;58:1436–40).

A total of 95 (96%) patients had fevers at admission, and 89 (90%) complained of cough. Also, 37 children (younger than 18 years) and 36 adults (aged 18 years and older) had at least one underlying medical condition known to increase the risk of flu complications, and 7 children and 10 adults had more than one such condition. Asthma, the most common underlying medical condition, was noted in 29 children (50%) and 19 adults (46%). Chronic metabolic disorders, including diabetes, were reported in 11 patients (11%).

Body mass index data were available for 28 children and 20 adults. Four of the five obese children and 11 of the 12 obese adults had underlying medical conditions, including asthma and Down syndrome. Three of the four patients who died were obese; their underlying medical conditions included asthma and Down syndrome.

Of the 76 patients treated with oseltamivir, 36 (47%) were treated within 2 days of symptom onset, but the median time to treatment from the onset of illness was 3 days. Hospital stays were shorter for patients who started antiviral therapy within 2 days.

The study was limited by several factors including the potential underreporting of cases and the difference in reporting protocol later in the pandemic, when data were collected from sentinel hospitals only.

The findings confirm that patients at high risk should be encouraged to get vaccinated, the researchers said.

More than half of the adults hospitalized in the early days of the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in New York City were obese, and 92% of the obese patients had underlying medical conditions, according a recent review.

To quickly assess the severity of illness and identify those at greatest risk from the emerging virus, researchers at the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene reviewed data from the first 99 patients with confirmed H1N1 influenza admitted to any hospital in New York City. The study population included 19 patients aged 0–4 years, 39 patients aged 5–17 years, 32 patients aged 18–49 years, 8 patients aged 50–64 years, and 1 patient aged 65 or older. The patients with H1N1 influenza were disproportionately younger compared with the general population (MMWR 2010;58:1436–40).

A total of 95 (96%) patients had fevers at admission, and 89 (90%) complained of cough. Also, 37 children (younger than 18 years) and 36 adults (aged 18 years and older) had at least one underlying medical condition known to increase the risk of flu complications, and 7 children and 10 adults had more than one such condition. Asthma, the most common underlying medical condition, was noted in 29 children (50%) and 19 adults (46%). Chronic metabolic disorders, including diabetes, were reported in 11 patients (11%).

Body mass index data were available for 28 children and 20 adults. Four of the five obese children and 11 of the 12 obese adults had underlying medical conditions, including asthma and Down syndrome. Three of the four patients who died were obese; their underlying medical conditions included asthma and Down syndrome.

Of the 76 patients treated with oseltamivir, 36 (47%) were treated within 2 days of symptom onset, but the median time to treatment from the onset of illness was 3 days. Hospital stays were shorter for patients who started antiviral therapy within 2 days.

The study was limited by several factors including the potential underreporting of cases and the difference in reporting protocol later in the pandemic, when data were collected from sentinel hospitals only.

The findings confirm that patients at high risk should be encouraged to get vaccinated, the researchers said.

Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Comorbidity, Obesity Linked to H1N1 Influenza Hospitalizations
Display Headline
Comorbidity, Obesity Linked to H1N1 Influenza Hospitalizations
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Follow-Up Visits Aid Weight Loss After Surgery

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Follow-Up Visits Aid Weight Loss After Surgery

WASHINGTON — Successful weight loss for patients who undergo gastric banding is significantly associated with the number of follow-up visits to a surgeon's office during the first year after the procedure, according to a study involving 113 adults who had gastric band surgery between 2005 and 2007.

Gastric band surgery can be a safe and effective strategy for weight loss, but studies have shown that the percentage of excess weight lost after the procedure ranges from −8.5% to 79% after 1 year, said Dr. Julio Teixeira of St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital in New York.

To identify predictors of weight loss 1 year after gastric band surgery, researchers reviewed baseline demographics, body mass index, comorbidities, number of office visits, and gastric band adjustments for up to 15 months after the procedure. The single center findings were presented in a poster at the annual meeting of the Obesity Society.

The patients ranged in age from 22 to 71 years, with an average age of 41 years. The patients' BMIs ranged from 36 to 72 kg/m

Participants had an average of six follow-up visits to a surgeon's office during the first year after the procedure. There was a significant correlation between the number of follow-up visits and both the amount of weight lost and the percentage of excess weight lost.

Disclosures: Dr. Teixeira has served as an advisoer to Allergan, which manufactures an adjustable gastric banding system.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Article PDF
Article PDF

WASHINGTON — Successful weight loss for patients who undergo gastric banding is significantly associated with the number of follow-up visits to a surgeon's office during the first year after the procedure, according to a study involving 113 adults who had gastric band surgery between 2005 and 2007.

Gastric band surgery can be a safe and effective strategy for weight loss, but studies have shown that the percentage of excess weight lost after the procedure ranges from −8.5% to 79% after 1 year, said Dr. Julio Teixeira of St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital in New York.

To identify predictors of weight loss 1 year after gastric band surgery, researchers reviewed baseline demographics, body mass index, comorbidities, number of office visits, and gastric band adjustments for up to 15 months after the procedure. The single center findings were presented in a poster at the annual meeting of the Obesity Society.

The patients ranged in age from 22 to 71 years, with an average age of 41 years. The patients' BMIs ranged from 36 to 72 kg/m

Participants had an average of six follow-up visits to a surgeon's office during the first year after the procedure. There was a significant correlation between the number of follow-up visits and both the amount of weight lost and the percentage of excess weight lost.

Disclosures: Dr. Teixeira has served as an advisoer to Allergan, which manufactures an adjustable gastric banding system.

WASHINGTON — Successful weight loss for patients who undergo gastric banding is significantly associated with the number of follow-up visits to a surgeon's office during the first year after the procedure, according to a study involving 113 adults who had gastric band surgery between 2005 and 2007.

Gastric band surgery can be a safe and effective strategy for weight loss, but studies have shown that the percentage of excess weight lost after the procedure ranges from −8.5% to 79% after 1 year, said Dr. Julio Teixeira of St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital in New York.

To identify predictors of weight loss 1 year after gastric band surgery, researchers reviewed baseline demographics, body mass index, comorbidities, number of office visits, and gastric band adjustments for up to 15 months after the procedure. The single center findings were presented in a poster at the annual meeting of the Obesity Society.

The patients ranged in age from 22 to 71 years, with an average age of 41 years. The patients' BMIs ranged from 36 to 72 kg/m

Participants had an average of six follow-up visits to a surgeon's office during the first year after the procedure. There was a significant correlation between the number of follow-up visits and both the amount of weight lost and the percentage of excess weight lost.

Disclosures: Dr. Teixeira has served as an advisoer to Allergan, which manufactures an adjustable gastric banding system.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Follow-Up Visits Aid Weight Loss After Surgery
Display Headline
Follow-Up Visits Aid Weight Loss After Surgery
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Short Course of Imiquimod 3.75% Improves Actinic Keratoses on Face

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Short Course of Imiquimod 3.75% Improves Actinic Keratoses on Face

ORLANDO — Daily application of 3.75% imiquimod cream with a 2-week dosing cycle was well tolerated and effective for treating actinic keratoses in adults, based on data from two studies.

In current treatment regimens, some patients use a 5% concentration imiquimod (Aldara, Graceway) cream twice a week over a treatment period as long as 16 weeks, but a lower dose may allow a shorter treatment period, said Dr. Neil Swanson of Oregon Health and Science University, Portland.

Dr. Swanson and his colleagues randomized 160 patients to 3.75% imiquimod cream, 160 patients to 2.5% imiquimod cream, and 159 patients to a placebo cream. The patients, aged 18 years and older, had 5-20 clinically diagnosed actinic keratoses (AKs) on the face or balding scalp. The study results were presented in a poster at the Orlando Dermatology Aesthetic and Clinical Conference.

Both the 3.75% and 2.5% creams were significantly more effective than placebo at fully clearing AKs after 2 weeks of daily use. Overall, 36% of the 3.75% group and 31% of the 2.5% group achieved complete clearance, vs. 6% of the placebo group.

The 3.75% cream, however, was significantly better than the 2.5% cream for partial clearance and lesion reduction. Approximately 60% of the 3.75% group achieved partial clearance (defined as at least 75%), compared with 48% of the 2.5% group and 23% of the placebo group.

Both concentrations of imiquimod were well tolerated, and most local skin reactions were mild to moderate. Local skin reactions occurred in 1% of the placebo group, 21% of the 2.5% group, and 34% of the 3.75% group. The most common local skin reactions in both groups were erythema, scabbing or crusting, and erosion or ulceration.

"Median percent lesion reduction of 81.8% was comparable to that observed for imiquimod 5% cream applied for 16 weeks in treating a smaller area of fewer lesions," the researchers noted. By comparison, the median lesion reduction from baseline was 71.8% in the 2.5% group and 25% in the placebo group. The average lesion count at baseline was 11 in all three groups.

Patients applied the treatment cream or placebo daily to the treatment areas for approximately 8 hours or overnight and then removed it. The study included two 2-week cycles separated by a 2-week no-treatment period.

In a companion study also presented as a poster at the meeting, there was no significant improvement in effectiveness with either imiquimod 2.5% or 3.75% cream for treating AKs when used daily for two 3-week cycles separated by a 3-week no-treatment period. The study randomized 164 patients to a placebo cream, 164 patients to imiquimod 2.5% cream, and 162 patients to imiquimod 3.75% cream.

Both imiquimod creams were adequately tolerated and significantly more effective than placebo, reported Dr. C. William Hanke, a dermatologic surgeon in Carmel, Ind., and colleagues.

When both studies were evaluated together, though, "efficacy was better with imiquimod 3.75% than with 2.5%. Extending the cycle duration from 2 weeks to 3 weeks did not further increase efficacy," Dr. Hanke and his associates wrote.

Both studies were funded by Graceway Pharmaceuticals. Both Dr. Swanson and Dr. Hanke have served as investigators and consultants for Graceway. Coauthors on both studies include other investigators, consultants, and employees of Graceway.

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
AK, Actinic Keratoses, Imiquimod, Hanke
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

ORLANDO — Daily application of 3.75% imiquimod cream with a 2-week dosing cycle was well tolerated and effective for treating actinic keratoses in adults, based on data from two studies.

In current treatment regimens, some patients use a 5% concentration imiquimod (Aldara, Graceway) cream twice a week over a treatment period as long as 16 weeks, but a lower dose may allow a shorter treatment period, said Dr. Neil Swanson of Oregon Health and Science University, Portland.

Dr. Swanson and his colleagues randomized 160 patients to 3.75% imiquimod cream, 160 patients to 2.5% imiquimod cream, and 159 patients to a placebo cream. The patients, aged 18 years and older, had 5-20 clinically diagnosed actinic keratoses (AKs) on the face or balding scalp. The study results were presented in a poster at the Orlando Dermatology Aesthetic and Clinical Conference.

Both the 3.75% and 2.5% creams were significantly more effective than placebo at fully clearing AKs after 2 weeks of daily use. Overall, 36% of the 3.75% group and 31% of the 2.5% group achieved complete clearance, vs. 6% of the placebo group.

The 3.75% cream, however, was significantly better than the 2.5% cream for partial clearance and lesion reduction. Approximately 60% of the 3.75% group achieved partial clearance (defined as at least 75%), compared with 48% of the 2.5% group and 23% of the placebo group.

Both concentrations of imiquimod were well tolerated, and most local skin reactions were mild to moderate. Local skin reactions occurred in 1% of the placebo group, 21% of the 2.5% group, and 34% of the 3.75% group. The most common local skin reactions in both groups were erythema, scabbing or crusting, and erosion or ulceration.

"Median percent lesion reduction of 81.8% was comparable to that observed for imiquimod 5% cream applied for 16 weeks in treating a smaller area of fewer lesions," the researchers noted. By comparison, the median lesion reduction from baseline was 71.8% in the 2.5% group and 25% in the placebo group. The average lesion count at baseline was 11 in all three groups.

Patients applied the treatment cream or placebo daily to the treatment areas for approximately 8 hours or overnight and then removed it. The study included two 2-week cycles separated by a 2-week no-treatment period.

In a companion study also presented as a poster at the meeting, there was no significant improvement in effectiveness with either imiquimod 2.5% or 3.75% cream for treating AKs when used daily for two 3-week cycles separated by a 3-week no-treatment period. The study randomized 164 patients to a placebo cream, 164 patients to imiquimod 2.5% cream, and 162 patients to imiquimod 3.75% cream.

Both imiquimod creams were adequately tolerated and significantly more effective than placebo, reported Dr. C. William Hanke, a dermatologic surgeon in Carmel, Ind., and colleagues.

When both studies were evaluated together, though, "efficacy was better with imiquimod 3.75% than with 2.5%. Extending the cycle duration from 2 weeks to 3 weeks did not further increase efficacy," Dr. Hanke and his associates wrote.

Both studies were funded by Graceway Pharmaceuticals. Both Dr. Swanson and Dr. Hanke have served as investigators and consultants for Graceway. Coauthors on both studies include other investigators, consultants, and employees of Graceway.

ORLANDO — Daily application of 3.75% imiquimod cream with a 2-week dosing cycle was well tolerated and effective for treating actinic keratoses in adults, based on data from two studies.

In current treatment regimens, some patients use a 5% concentration imiquimod (Aldara, Graceway) cream twice a week over a treatment period as long as 16 weeks, but a lower dose may allow a shorter treatment period, said Dr. Neil Swanson of Oregon Health and Science University, Portland.

Dr. Swanson and his colleagues randomized 160 patients to 3.75% imiquimod cream, 160 patients to 2.5% imiquimod cream, and 159 patients to a placebo cream. The patients, aged 18 years and older, had 5-20 clinically diagnosed actinic keratoses (AKs) on the face or balding scalp. The study results were presented in a poster at the Orlando Dermatology Aesthetic and Clinical Conference.

Both the 3.75% and 2.5% creams were significantly more effective than placebo at fully clearing AKs after 2 weeks of daily use. Overall, 36% of the 3.75% group and 31% of the 2.5% group achieved complete clearance, vs. 6% of the placebo group.

The 3.75% cream, however, was significantly better than the 2.5% cream for partial clearance and lesion reduction. Approximately 60% of the 3.75% group achieved partial clearance (defined as at least 75%), compared with 48% of the 2.5% group and 23% of the placebo group.

Both concentrations of imiquimod were well tolerated, and most local skin reactions were mild to moderate. Local skin reactions occurred in 1% of the placebo group, 21% of the 2.5% group, and 34% of the 3.75% group. The most common local skin reactions in both groups were erythema, scabbing or crusting, and erosion or ulceration.

"Median percent lesion reduction of 81.8% was comparable to that observed for imiquimod 5% cream applied for 16 weeks in treating a smaller area of fewer lesions," the researchers noted. By comparison, the median lesion reduction from baseline was 71.8% in the 2.5% group and 25% in the placebo group. The average lesion count at baseline was 11 in all three groups.

Patients applied the treatment cream or placebo daily to the treatment areas for approximately 8 hours or overnight and then removed it. The study included two 2-week cycles separated by a 2-week no-treatment period.

In a companion study also presented as a poster at the meeting, there was no significant improvement in effectiveness with either imiquimod 2.5% or 3.75% cream for treating AKs when used daily for two 3-week cycles separated by a 3-week no-treatment period. The study randomized 164 patients to a placebo cream, 164 patients to imiquimod 2.5% cream, and 162 patients to imiquimod 3.75% cream.

Both imiquimod creams were adequately tolerated and significantly more effective than placebo, reported Dr. C. William Hanke, a dermatologic surgeon in Carmel, Ind., and colleagues.

When both studies were evaluated together, though, "efficacy was better with imiquimod 3.75% than with 2.5%. Extending the cycle duration from 2 weeks to 3 weeks did not further increase efficacy," Dr. Hanke and his associates wrote.

Both studies were funded by Graceway Pharmaceuticals. Both Dr. Swanson and Dr. Hanke have served as investigators and consultants for Graceway. Coauthors on both studies include other investigators, consultants, and employees of Graceway.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Short Course of Imiquimod 3.75% Improves Actinic Keratoses on Face
Display Headline
Short Course of Imiquimod 3.75% Improves Actinic Keratoses on Face
Legacy Keywords
AK, Actinic Keratoses, Imiquimod, Hanke
Legacy Keywords
AK, Actinic Keratoses, Imiquimod, Hanke
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Asians at Increased Risk for Gestational Diabetes

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Asians at Increased Risk for Gestational Diabetes

Women of Korean, Chinese, and Filipino descent are more than twice as likely to develop gestational diabetes as Caucasian or African American women, according to a data analysis of more than 16,000 pregnant women in Hawaii published in the Ethnicity and Disease journal.

Gestational diabetes occurs in 4%-8% of all pregnant women, wrote Kathryn L. Pedula and her colleagues. Data from a pair of recent U.S. studies suggested that Asians have a higher prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) than do other ethnicities, but differences among subcategories of Asian populations have not been well studied.

Ms. Pedula and her associates at the Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest in Portland, Ore., reviewed 10 years' worth of data from 22,110 pregnancies in 16,757 women. Hawaii was chosen for the study because of its ethnically diverse population, the researchers said (Ethn. Dis. 2009;19:414-9).

A total of 353 women had pre-existing diabetes. The remaining women underwent screening for GDM between 24 and 28 weeks of pregnancy, using the 50-gram, 1-hour glucose challenge test (GCT). Women with plasma glucose levels greater than 200 mg/dL on the GCT were deemed to have GDM and were not tested further. The remaining women with a GCT value greater than 140 mg/dL underwent the 100-gram, 3-hour oral glucose tolerance test.

Overall, 20.9% of the women had a positive GCT (plasma glucose at least 140 mg/dL). Approximately 4% had GDM based on the National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG) criteria, and 7% had GDM based on the Carpenter and Coustan (C&C) criteria.

After adjusting for age, the investigators found that 10% of the Korean women had GDM based on the C&C criteria, followed by 9.8% of Chinese women and 8.3% among Filipino women. The prevalence was lowest among African Americans (3.3%) and Caucasians (4.2%).

Based on the NDDG criteria, Puerto Rican women had the highest age-adjusted prevalence of GDM (7.4%), but this was barely higher than the average when C&C criteria were applied. However, Korean, Filipino, and Chinese women had the next highest prevalences of GDM, at 6.4%, 5.8%, and 5.6%, respectively, based on the NDDG criteria. Again, Caucasians and African Americans had the lowest prevalence of GDM, at 2.5% and 2.2%, respectively.

The study included women aged 13-39 years who gave birth in Hawaii between 1995 and 2003. The Asian population was divided into five subgroups: Korean, Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese, and Filipino. Additional groups included Samoan, Puerto Rican, Native Hawaiian, Caucasian, African American, Native American, other Hispanic, and other Pacific Islander.

The results suggest that the risks for developing GDM may vary greatly depending on specific ethnic background.

“These findings point to the need for further research along several avenues, such as maternal-child outcome differences and perhaps ethnic-specific guidelines for GDM diagnosis,” the researchers said.

Disclosures: The study was funded by the American Diabetes Association. Coauthor Dr. Teresa A. Hillier was funded by a 1-year ADA-European Association for the Study of Diabetes Trans-Atlantic Fellowship.

Using two sets of criteria, investigators found a high prevalence of GDM in Asian women.

Source ©Thye Aun Ngo/Fotolia.com

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Article PDF
Article PDF

Women of Korean, Chinese, and Filipino descent are more than twice as likely to develop gestational diabetes as Caucasian or African American women, according to a data analysis of more than 16,000 pregnant women in Hawaii published in the Ethnicity and Disease journal.

Gestational diabetes occurs in 4%-8% of all pregnant women, wrote Kathryn L. Pedula and her colleagues. Data from a pair of recent U.S. studies suggested that Asians have a higher prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) than do other ethnicities, but differences among subcategories of Asian populations have not been well studied.

Ms. Pedula and her associates at the Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest in Portland, Ore., reviewed 10 years' worth of data from 22,110 pregnancies in 16,757 women. Hawaii was chosen for the study because of its ethnically diverse population, the researchers said (Ethn. Dis. 2009;19:414-9).

A total of 353 women had pre-existing diabetes. The remaining women underwent screening for GDM between 24 and 28 weeks of pregnancy, using the 50-gram, 1-hour glucose challenge test (GCT). Women with plasma glucose levels greater than 200 mg/dL on the GCT were deemed to have GDM and were not tested further. The remaining women with a GCT value greater than 140 mg/dL underwent the 100-gram, 3-hour oral glucose tolerance test.

Overall, 20.9% of the women had a positive GCT (plasma glucose at least 140 mg/dL). Approximately 4% had GDM based on the National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG) criteria, and 7% had GDM based on the Carpenter and Coustan (C&C) criteria.

After adjusting for age, the investigators found that 10% of the Korean women had GDM based on the C&C criteria, followed by 9.8% of Chinese women and 8.3% among Filipino women. The prevalence was lowest among African Americans (3.3%) and Caucasians (4.2%).

Based on the NDDG criteria, Puerto Rican women had the highest age-adjusted prevalence of GDM (7.4%), but this was barely higher than the average when C&C criteria were applied. However, Korean, Filipino, and Chinese women had the next highest prevalences of GDM, at 6.4%, 5.8%, and 5.6%, respectively, based on the NDDG criteria. Again, Caucasians and African Americans had the lowest prevalence of GDM, at 2.5% and 2.2%, respectively.

The study included women aged 13-39 years who gave birth in Hawaii between 1995 and 2003. The Asian population was divided into five subgroups: Korean, Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese, and Filipino. Additional groups included Samoan, Puerto Rican, Native Hawaiian, Caucasian, African American, Native American, other Hispanic, and other Pacific Islander.

The results suggest that the risks for developing GDM may vary greatly depending on specific ethnic background.

“These findings point to the need for further research along several avenues, such as maternal-child outcome differences and perhaps ethnic-specific guidelines for GDM diagnosis,” the researchers said.

Disclosures: The study was funded by the American Diabetes Association. Coauthor Dr. Teresa A. Hillier was funded by a 1-year ADA-European Association for the Study of Diabetes Trans-Atlantic Fellowship.

Using two sets of criteria, investigators found a high prevalence of GDM in Asian women.

Source ©Thye Aun Ngo/Fotolia.com

Women of Korean, Chinese, and Filipino descent are more than twice as likely to develop gestational diabetes as Caucasian or African American women, according to a data analysis of more than 16,000 pregnant women in Hawaii published in the Ethnicity and Disease journal.

Gestational diabetes occurs in 4%-8% of all pregnant women, wrote Kathryn L. Pedula and her colleagues. Data from a pair of recent U.S. studies suggested that Asians have a higher prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) than do other ethnicities, but differences among subcategories of Asian populations have not been well studied.

Ms. Pedula and her associates at the Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest in Portland, Ore., reviewed 10 years' worth of data from 22,110 pregnancies in 16,757 women. Hawaii was chosen for the study because of its ethnically diverse population, the researchers said (Ethn. Dis. 2009;19:414-9).

A total of 353 women had pre-existing diabetes. The remaining women underwent screening for GDM between 24 and 28 weeks of pregnancy, using the 50-gram, 1-hour glucose challenge test (GCT). Women with plasma glucose levels greater than 200 mg/dL on the GCT were deemed to have GDM and were not tested further. The remaining women with a GCT value greater than 140 mg/dL underwent the 100-gram, 3-hour oral glucose tolerance test.

Overall, 20.9% of the women had a positive GCT (plasma glucose at least 140 mg/dL). Approximately 4% had GDM based on the National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG) criteria, and 7% had GDM based on the Carpenter and Coustan (C&C) criteria.

After adjusting for age, the investigators found that 10% of the Korean women had GDM based on the C&C criteria, followed by 9.8% of Chinese women and 8.3% among Filipino women. The prevalence was lowest among African Americans (3.3%) and Caucasians (4.2%).

Based on the NDDG criteria, Puerto Rican women had the highest age-adjusted prevalence of GDM (7.4%), but this was barely higher than the average when C&C criteria were applied. However, Korean, Filipino, and Chinese women had the next highest prevalences of GDM, at 6.4%, 5.8%, and 5.6%, respectively, based on the NDDG criteria. Again, Caucasians and African Americans had the lowest prevalence of GDM, at 2.5% and 2.2%, respectively.

The study included women aged 13-39 years who gave birth in Hawaii between 1995 and 2003. The Asian population was divided into five subgroups: Korean, Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese, and Filipino. Additional groups included Samoan, Puerto Rican, Native Hawaiian, Caucasian, African American, Native American, other Hispanic, and other Pacific Islander.

The results suggest that the risks for developing GDM may vary greatly depending on specific ethnic background.

“These findings point to the need for further research along several avenues, such as maternal-child outcome differences and perhaps ethnic-specific guidelines for GDM diagnosis,” the researchers said.

Disclosures: The study was funded by the American Diabetes Association. Coauthor Dr. Teresa A. Hillier was funded by a 1-year ADA-European Association for the Study of Diabetes Trans-Atlantic Fellowship.

Using two sets of criteria, investigators found a high prevalence of GDM in Asian women.

Source ©Thye Aun Ngo/Fotolia.com

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Asians at Increased Risk for Gestational Diabetes
Display Headline
Asians at Increased Risk for Gestational Diabetes
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Koreans, Chinese at High Risk for GDM

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Koreans, Chinese at High Risk for GDM

Disclosures: The study was funded by the American Diabetes Association. Coauthor Dr. Teresa A. Hillier was funded by a 1-year ADA-European Association for the Study of Diabetes Trans-Atlantic Fellowship.

Women of Korean, Chinese, and Filipino descent are more than twice as likely to develop gestational diabetes as Caucasian or African American women, according to a data analysis of more than 16,000 pregnant women in Hawaii.

Gestational diabetes occurs in 4%-8% of all pregnant women, wrote Kathryn L. Pedula and her colleagues. Data from a pair of recent U.S. studies suggested that Asians have a higher prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) than do other ethnicities, but differences among subcategories of Asian populations have not been well studied.

Ms. Pedula and her associates at the Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest in Portland, Ore., reviewed 10 years' worth of data from 22,110 pregnancies in 16,757 women. Hawaii was chosen for the study because of its ethnically diverse population (Ethn. Dis. 2009;19:414-9).

A total of 353 women had pre-existing diabetes. The remaining women underwent screening for GDM between 24 and 28 weeks of pregnancy, using the 50-gram, 1-hour glucose challenge test (GCT). Women with plasma glucose levels greater than 200 mg/dL on the GCT were deemed to have GDM and were not tested further. The remaining women with a GCT value greater than 140 mg/dL underwent the 100-gram, 3-hour oral glucose tolerance test.

Overall, 20.9% of the women had a positive GCT (plasma glucose at least 140 mg/dL). Approximately 4% had GDM based on the National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG) criteria, and 7% had GDM based on the Carpenter and Coustan (C&C) criteria.

After adjusting for age, the investigators found that 10% of the Korean women had GDM based on the C&C criteria, followed by 9.8% of Chinese women and 8.3% among Filipino women. The prevalence was lowest among African Americans (3.3%) and Caucasians (4.2%).

Based on the NDDG criteria, Puerto Rican women had the highest age-adjusted prevalence of GDM (7.4%), but this was barely higher than the average when C&C criteria were applied. However, Korean, Filipino, and Chinese women had the next highest prevalences of GDM, at 6.4%, 5.8%, and 5.6%, respectively, based on the NDDG criteria. Again, Caucasians and African Americans had the lowest prevalence of GDM, at 2.5% and 2.2%, respectively.

The study included women aged 13-39 years who gave birth in Hawaii between 1995 and 2003. The Asian population was divided into five subgroups: Korean, Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese, and Filipino. Additional groups included Samoan, Puerto Rican, Native Hawaiian, Caucasian, African American, Native American, other Hispanic, and other Pacific Islander.

The results suggest that the risks for developing GDM may vary greatly depending on specific ethnic background. “These findings point to the need for further research along several avenues, such as maternal-child outcome differences and perhaps ethnic-specific guidelines for GDM diagnosis,” the researchers said.

Chinese women had a high gestational diabetes prevalence at 5.6%.

Source ©Thye Aun Ngo/Fotolia.com

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Article PDF
Article PDF

Disclosures: The study was funded by the American Diabetes Association. Coauthor Dr. Teresa A. Hillier was funded by a 1-year ADA-European Association for the Study of Diabetes Trans-Atlantic Fellowship.

Women of Korean, Chinese, and Filipino descent are more than twice as likely to develop gestational diabetes as Caucasian or African American women, according to a data analysis of more than 16,000 pregnant women in Hawaii.

Gestational diabetes occurs in 4%-8% of all pregnant women, wrote Kathryn L. Pedula and her colleagues. Data from a pair of recent U.S. studies suggested that Asians have a higher prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) than do other ethnicities, but differences among subcategories of Asian populations have not been well studied.

Ms. Pedula and her associates at the Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest in Portland, Ore., reviewed 10 years' worth of data from 22,110 pregnancies in 16,757 women. Hawaii was chosen for the study because of its ethnically diverse population (Ethn. Dis. 2009;19:414-9).

A total of 353 women had pre-existing diabetes. The remaining women underwent screening for GDM between 24 and 28 weeks of pregnancy, using the 50-gram, 1-hour glucose challenge test (GCT). Women with plasma glucose levels greater than 200 mg/dL on the GCT were deemed to have GDM and were not tested further. The remaining women with a GCT value greater than 140 mg/dL underwent the 100-gram, 3-hour oral glucose tolerance test.

Overall, 20.9% of the women had a positive GCT (plasma glucose at least 140 mg/dL). Approximately 4% had GDM based on the National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG) criteria, and 7% had GDM based on the Carpenter and Coustan (C&C) criteria.

After adjusting for age, the investigators found that 10% of the Korean women had GDM based on the C&C criteria, followed by 9.8% of Chinese women and 8.3% among Filipino women. The prevalence was lowest among African Americans (3.3%) and Caucasians (4.2%).

Based on the NDDG criteria, Puerto Rican women had the highest age-adjusted prevalence of GDM (7.4%), but this was barely higher than the average when C&C criteria were applied. However, Korean, Filipino, and Chinese women had the next highest prevalences of GDM, at 6.4%, 5.8%, and 5.6%, respectively, based on the NDDG criteria. Again, Caucasians and African Americans had the lowest prevalence of GDM, at 2.5% and 2.2%, respectively.

The study included women aged 13-39 years who gave birth in Hawaii between 1995 and 2003. The Asian population was divided into five subgroups: Korean, Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese, and Filipino. Additional groups included Samoan, Puerto Rican, Native Hawaiian, Caucasian, African American, Native American, other Hispanic, and other Pacific Islander.

The results suggest that the risks for developing GDM may vary greatly depending on specific ethnic background. “These findings point to the need for further research along several avenues, such as maternal-child outcome differences and perhaps ethnic-specific guidelines for GDM diagnosis,” the researchers said.

Chinese women had a high gestational diabetes prevalence at 5.6%.

Source ©Thye Aun Ngo/Fotolia.com

Disclosures: The study was funded by the American Diabetes Association. Coauthor Dr. Teresa A. Hillier was funded by a 1-year ADA-European Association for the Study of Diabetes Trans-Atlantic Fellowship.

Women of Korean, Chinese, and Filipino descent are more than twice as likely to develop gestational diabetes as Caucasian or African American women, according to a data analysis of more than 16,000 pregnant women in Hawaii.

Gestational diabetes occurs in 4%-8% of all pregnant women, wrote Kathryn L. Pedula and her colleagues. Data from a pair of recent U.S. studies suggested that Asians have a higher prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) than do other ethnicities, but differences among subcategories of Asian populations have not been well studied.

Ms. Pedula and her associates at the Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest in Portland, Ore., reviewed 10 years' worth of data from 22,110 pregnancies in 16,757 women. Hawaii was chosen for the study because of its ethnically diverse population (Ethn. Dis. 2009;19:414-9).

A total of 353 women had pre-existing diabetes. The remaining women underwent screening for GDM between 24 and 28 weeks of pregnancy, using the 50-gram, 1-hour glucose challenge test (GCT). Women with plasma glucose levels greater than 200 mg/dL on the GCT were deemed to have GDM and were not tested further. The remaining women with a GCT value greater than 140 mg/dL underwent the 100-gram, 3-hour oral glucose tolerance test.

Overall, 20.9% of the women had a positive GCT (plasma glucose at least 140 mg/dL). Approximately 4% had GDM based on the National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG) criteria, and 7% had GDM based on the Carpenter and Coustan (C&C) criteria.

After adjusting for age, the investigators found that 10% of the Korean women had GDM based on the C&C criteria, followed by 9.8% of Chinese women and 8.3% among Filipino women. The prevalence was lowest among African Americans (3.3%) and Caucasians (4.2%).

Based on the NDDG criteria, Puerto Rican women had the highest age-adjusted prevalence of GDM (7.4%), but this was barely higher than the average when C&C criteria were applied. However, Korean, Filipino, and Chinese women had the next highest prevalences of GDM, at 6.4%, 5.8%, and 5.6%, respectively, based on the NDDG criteria. Again, Caucasians and African Americans had the lowest prevalence of GDM, at 2.5% and 2.2%, respectively.

The study included women aged 13-39 years who gave birth in Hawaii between 1995 and 2003. The Asian population was divided into five subgroups: Korean, Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese, and Filipino. Additional groups included Samoan, Puerto Rican, Native Hawaiian, Caucasian, African American, Native American, other Hispanic, and other Pacific Islander.

The results suggest that the risks for developing GDM may vary greatly depending on specific ethnic background. “These findings point to the need for further research along several avenues, such as maternal-child outcome differences and perhaps ethnic-specific guidelines for GDM diagnosis,” the researchers said.

Chinese women had a high gestational diabetes prevalence at 5.6%.

Source ©Thye Aun Ngo/Fotolia.com

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Koreans, Chinese at High Risk for GDM
Display Headline
Koreans, Chinese at High Risk for GDM
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Overweight, Obese Women Are Underscreened for Osteoporosis

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Overweight, Obese Women Are Underscreened for Osteoporosis

WASHINGTON — Obese women are less likely to be screened for osteoporosis than are normal- or overweight women, according to findings from a study of more than 140,000 women included in an integrated health care plan database.

Previous studies have shown mixed results on the disparity in preventive health care for obese patients, compared with normal-weight patients, said Kristi Reynolds, Ph.D., of Kaiser Permanente in Pasadena, Calif., and her colleagues.

“It is largely unknown whether obesity is associated with the quality of care for osteoporosis, which is both preventable and treatable but is often undiagnosed and untreated,” the researchers said. Physicians may be less inclined to screen obese women for osteoporosis because body weight is associated with higher bone density, they noted.

Data from 146,975 health care provider visits between July 1, 2007, and June 30, 2008, were reviewed.

The average age of the women was 73 years; 35% were normal weight; 35% were overweight; and 19%, 7%, and 4% fell into obesity categories I, II, and III, respectively. Normal-weight body mass index (BMI) was defined as 18.5-24.9 kg/m

About 67% of the women had undergone bone mineral density testing within 4 years of the study, which was the criteria by which participants could be considered “screened.” Only 52% of women with a BMI of 40 kg/m

After controlling for age, race, and income, the odds ratio of osteoporosis screening for overweight women was 0.99, while the odds ratios for women in obese classes I, II, and III groups were 0.90, 0.77, and 0.60, respectively. The findings were presented in a poster at the the annual meeting of the Obesity Society.

The results suggest that many overweight and obese women aren't screened for osteoporosis. However, more research is needed to examine the health outcomes of screened versus unscreened women, and the factors that influence providers to screen women according to BMI, the researchers said.

The researchers are employees of Kaiser Permanente. They reported having no financial conflicts of interest.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Article PDF
Article PDF

WASHINGTON — Obese women are less likely to be screened for osteoporosis than are normal- or overweight women, according to findings from a study of more than 140,000 women included in an integrated health care plan database.

Previous studies have shown mixed results on the disparity in preventive health care for obese patients, compared with normal-weight patients, said Kristi Reynolds, Ph.D., of Kaiser Permanente in Pasadena, Calif., and her colleagues.

“It is largely unknown whether obesity is associated with the quality of care for osteoporosis, which is both preventable and treatable but is often undiagnosed and untreated,” the researchers said. Physicians may be less inclined to screen obese women for osteoporosis because body weight is associated with higher bone density, they noted.

Data from 146,975 health care provider visits between July 1, 2007, and June 30, 2008, were reviewed.

The average age of the women was 73 years; 35% were normal weight; 35% were overweight; and 19%, 7%, and 4% fell into obesity categories I, II, and III, respectively. Normal-weight body mass index (BMI) was defined as 18.5-24.9 kg/m

About 67% of the women had undergone bone mineral density testing within 4 years of the study, which was the criteria by which participants could be considered “screened.” Only 52% of women with a BMI of 40 kg/m

After controlling for age, race, and income, the odds ratio of osteoporosis screening for overweight women was 0.99, while the odds ratios for women in obese classes I, II, and III groups were 0.90, 0.77, and 0.60, respectively. The findings were presented in a poster at the the annual meeting of the Obesity Society.

The results suggest that many overweight and obese women aren't screened for osteoporosis. However, more research is needed to examine the health outcomes of screened versus unscreened women, and the factors that influence providers to screen women according to BMI, the researchers said.

The researchers are employees of Kaiser Permanente. They reported having no financial conflicts of interest.

WASHINGTON — Obese women are less likely to be screened for osteoporosis than are normal- or overweight women, according to findings from a study of more than 140,000 women included in an integrated health care plan database.

Previous studies have shown mixed results on the disparity in preventive health care for obese patients, compared with normal-weight patients, said Kristi Reynolds, Ph.D., of Kaiser Permanente in Pasadena, Calif., and her colleagues.

“It is largely unknown whether obesity is associated with the quality of care for osteoporosis, which is both preventable and treatable but is often undiagnosed and untreated,” the researchers said. Physicians may be less inclined to screen obese women for osteoporosis because body weight is associated with higher bone density, they noted.

Data from 146,975 health care provider visits between July 1, 2007, and June 30, 2008, were reviewed.

The average age of the women was 73 years; 35% were normal weight; 35% were overweight; and 19%, 7%, and 4% fell into obesity categories I, II, and III, respectively. Normal-weight body mass index (BMI) was defined as 18.5-24.9 kg/m

About 67% of the women had undergone bone mineral density testing within 4 years of the study, which was the criteria by which participants could be considered “screened.” Only 52% of women with a BMI of 40 kg/m

After controlling for age, race, and income, the odds ratio of osteoporosis screening for overweight women was 0.99, while the odds ratios for women in obese classes I, II, and III groups were 0.90, 0.77, and 0.60, respectively. The findings were presented in a poster at the the annual meeting of the Obesity Society.

The results suggest that many overweight and obese women aren't screened for osteoporosis. However, more research is needed to examine the health outcomes of screened versus unscreened women, and the factors that influence providers to screen women according to BMI, the researchers said.

The researchers are employees of Kaiser Permanente. They reported having no financial conflicts of interest.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Overweight, Obese Women Are Underscreened for Osteoporosis
Display Headline
Overweight, Obese Women Are Underscreened for Osteoporosis
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media