Intimate partner violence: Screen others, besides heterosexual women

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/14/2019 - 13:46
Display Headline
Intimate partner violence: Screen others, besides heterosexual women

We were happy to learn in “Time to routinely screen for intimate partner violence?” (PURLs. J Fam Pract. 2013;62:90-92) that the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) agrees with the Institute of Medicine (IOM) that all women of childbearing age should be screened for intimate partner violence (IPV).1 Although the USPSTF recommendation comes 2 years after that of the IOM, it is truly better late than never.

Two populations with known IPV issues require special consideration: lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) patients and heterosexual men. The rate of IPV is higher in the LGBT population than in heterosexual men and women cohabitating with their partners.2 Despite high rates of IPV within the LGBT population, women in this group frequently are overlooked for IPV screening.2

We must remember to screen men in heterosexual relationships, as well. In 2000, the National Violence Against Women survey found that 7% of men reported having experienced IPV in their lifetime.2 Given this data, we believe that all patients ages 14 years and older—regardless of gender or sexual orientation—should be screened for IPV. This would be a much-needed step towards addressing a major public health problem.

Barbara McMillan-Persaud, MD
Kyra P. Clark, MD
Riba Kelsey-Harris, MD
Folashade Omole, MD, FAAFP
Atlanta, Ga

References

1. Screening for intimate partner violence and abuse of elderly and vulnerable adults. US Preventive Services Task Force Web site. Available at: http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/uspsipv.htm. Accessed September 16, 2013.

2. Artd KL, Makadon HJ. Addressing intimate partner violence in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26:930-933.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 63(4)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
180
Legacy Keywords
Barbara McMillan-Persaud; MD; Kyra P. Clark; MD; Riba Kelsey-Harris; MD; Folashade Omole; MD; FAAFP; intimate partner violence; IPV; Institute of Medicine; IOM; LGBT; lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Article PDF
Article PDF

We were happy to learn in “Time to routinely screen for intimate partner violence?” (PURLs. J Fam Pract. 2013;62:90-92) that the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) agrees with the Institute of Medicine (IOM) that all women of childbearing age should be screened for intimate partner violence (IPV).1 Although the USPSTF recommendation comes 2 years after that of the IOM, it is truly better late than never.

Two populations with known IPV issues require special consideration: lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) patients and heterosexual men. The rate of IPV is higher in the LGBT population than in heterosexual men and women cohabitating with their partners.2 Despite high rates of IPV within the LGBT population, women in this group frequently are overlooked for IPV screening.2

We must remember to screen men in heterosexual relationships, as well. In 2000, the National Violence Against Women survey found that 7% of men reported having experienced IPV in their lifetime.2 Given this data, we believe that all patients ages 14 years and older—regardless of gender or sexual orientation—should be screened for IPV. This would be a much-needed step towards addressing a major public health problem.

Barbara McMillan-Persaud, MD
Kyra P. Clark, MD
Riba Kelsey-Harris, MD
Folashade Omole, MD, FAAFP
Atlanta, Ga

We were happy to learn in “Time to routinely screen for intimate partner violence?” (PURLs. J Fam Pract. 2013;62:90-92) that the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) agrees with the Institute of Medicine (IOM) that all women of childbearing age should be screened for intimate partner violence (IPV).1 Although the USPSTF recommendation comes 2 years after that of the IOM, it is truly better late than never.

Two populations with known IPV issues require special consideration: lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) patients and heterosexual men. The rate of IPV is higher in the LGBT population than in heterosexual men and women cohabitating with their partners.2 Despite high rates of IPV within the LGBT population, women in this group frequently are overlooked for IPV screening.2

We must remember to screen men in heterosexual relationships, as well. In 2000, the National Violence Against Women survey found that 7% of men reported having experienced IPV in their lifetime.2 Given this data, we believe that all patients ages 14 years and older—regardless of gender or sexual orientation—should be screened for IPV. This would be a much-needed step towards addressing a major public health problem.

Barbara McMillan-Persaud, MD
Kyra P. Clark, MD
Riba Kelsey-Harris, MD
Folashade Omole, MD, FAAFP
Atlanta, Ga

References

1. Screening for intimate partner violence and abuse of elderly and vulnerable adults. US Preventive Services Task Force Web site. Available at: http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/uspsipv.htm. Accessed September 16, 2013.

2. Artd KL, Makadon HJ. Addressing intimate partner violence in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26:930-933.

References

1. Screening for intimate partner violence and abuse of elderly and vulnerable adults. US Preventive Services Task Force Web site. Available at: http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/uspsipv.htm. Accessed September 16, 2013.

2. Artd KL, Makadon HJ. Addressing intimate partner violence in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26:930-933.

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 63(4)
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 63(4)
Page Number
180
Page Number
180
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Intimate partner violence: Screen others, besides heterosexual women
Display Headline
Intimate partner violence: Screen others, besides heterosexual women
Legacy Keywords
Barbara McMillan-Persaud; MD; Kyra P. Clark; MD; Riba Kelsey-Harris; MD; Folashade Omole; MD; FAAFP; intimate partner violence; IPV; Institute of Medicine; IOM; LGBT; lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender
Legacy Keywords
Barbara McMillan-Persaud; MD; Kyra P. Clark; MD; Riba Kelsey-Harris; MD; Folashade Omole; MD; FAAFP; intimate partner violence; IPV; Institute of Medicine; IOM; LGBT; lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media