User login
Headache • fatigue • blurred vision • Dx?
THE CASE
One month after moving into her mother’s apartment, a 27-year-old woman sought care at our clinic for fatigue, headache, blurred vision, nausea, and morning vomiting. She had weakness and difficulty sleeping, but denied any fever, rashes, neck stiffness, recent travel, trauma, or tobacco or illicit drug use. She did, however, have a 6-year history of migraines. Her physical exam was normal. She was sent home with a prescription for tramadol 50 mg bid for her headaches.
The patient subsequently went to the emergency department 3 times for the same complaints; none of the treatments she received there (mostly acetaminophen with codeine) relieved her symptoms. Three weeks later she returned to our clinic. She was distressed that the symptoms hadn’t gone away, and noted that her family was now experiencing similar symptoms.
Her temperature was 98.1°F (36.7°C), blood pressure was 131/88 mm Hg, pulse was 85 beats/min, and respiratory rate was 18 breaths/min. Physical and neurologic exams were normal.
THE DIAGNOSIS
Although most of the patient’s lab test results were within normal ranges, her carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) level was 4.2%. COHb levels of >2% to 3% in nonsmokers or >9% to 10% in smokers suggest carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning.1,2 Based on this finding and our patient’s symptoms, we diagnosed unintentional CO poisoning. We recommended that she and her mother vacate the apartment and have it inspected.
DISCUSSION
CO is the leading cause of poisoning mortality in the United States, and causes half of all fatal poisonings worldwide.1,3,4 It is a colorless, odorless, and tasteless gas that is produced by the incomplete combustion of carbon-based products, such as coal or gas.5,6 Exposure can occur from car exhaust fumes, faulty room heaters, and other sources (TABLE 1).6 The incidence of CO poisoning is higher during the winter months and after natural disasters. Individuals who have a lowered oxygen capacity, such as older adults, pregnant women (and their fetuses), infants, and patients with anemia, cardiovascular disease, or cerebrovascular disease, are more susceptible to CO poisoning.5,6
COHb, a stable complex of CO that forms in red blood cells when CO is inhaled, impairs oxygen delivery and peripheral utilization, resulting in cellular hypoxia.1 Signs and symptoms of CO poisoning are nonspecific and require a high degree of clinical suspicion for early diagnosis and treatment. Although cherry-red lips, peripheral cyanosis, and retinal hemorrhages are often described as “classic” symptoms of CO poisoning, these are rarely seen.6 The most common symptoms are actually headache (90%), dizziness (82%), and weakness (53%).7 Other symptoms include nausea, vomiting, confusion, visual disturbances, loss of consciousness, angina, seizure, and fatigue.6,7 Symptoms of chronic CO poisoning may differ from those of acute poisoning and can include chronic fatigue, neuropathy, and memory deficit.8
The differential diagnosis for CO poisoning includes flu-like syndrome/influenza/other viral illnesses, migraine or tension headaches, depression, transient ischemic attack, encephalitis, coronary artery disease, gastroenteritis or food poisoning, seizures, and dysrhythmias.1,4 Lab testing for COHb can help narrow the diagnosis. CO poisoning can be classified as mild, moderate, or severe based on COHb levels and the patient’s signs and symptoms (TABLE 2).6 However, COHb level is a poor predictor of clinical presentation and should not be used to dictate management.2,7
Oxygen therapy is the recommended treatment
Early treatment with supplemental oxygen is recommended to reduce the length of time red blood cells are exposed to CO.1 A COHb level >25% is the criterion for hyperbaric oxygen therapy.1,3 Patients should receive treatment until their symptoms become less intense.
Delayed neuropsychiatric sequelae (DNS) can occur in up to one-third of patients with acute CO poisoning more than a month after apparent recovery.1,6,9 DNS symptoms include cognitive changes, emotional lability, visual disturbances, disorientation, depression, dementia, psychotic behavior, parkinsonism, amnesia, and incontinence.1,6,9 Approximately 50% to 75% of patients with DNS recover spontaneously within a year with symptomatic treatment.1,6,9
Our patient
After recommending that our patient (and her mother) leave the apartment and have it inspected, we later learned that the fire department was unable to determine the source of the CO. A CO detector was installed and our patient was advised to keep the windows in the apartment open to allow for adequate oxygen flow. One month later she returned to our clinic and reported that her symptoms resolved; serum COHb was negative upon repeat lab tests.
THE TAKEAWAY
Patients who present with headaches, dizziness and/or fatigue should be evaluated for CO poisoning. The patient’s environmental history should be reviewed carefully, especially because CO poisoning is more common during the winter months. Oxygen therapy is the mainstay of treatment. Up to one-third of patients with acute poisoning may develop delayed neuropsychiatric sequelae, including cognitive changes, emotional lability, visual disturbances, disorientation, and depression, that may resolve within one year.
1. Nikkanen H, Skolnik A. Diagnosis and management of carbon monoxide poisoning in the emergency department. Emerg Med Pract. 2011;13:1-14.
2. Hampson NB, Hauff NM. Carboxyhemoglobin levels in carbon monoxide poisoning: do they correlate with the clinical picture? Am J Emerg Med. 2008;26:665-669.
3. Kao LW, Nañagas KA. Toxicity associated with carbon monoxide. Clin Lab Med. 2006;26:99-125.
4. Varon J, Marik PE, Fromm RE Jr, et al. Carbon monoxide poisoning: a review for clinicians. J Emerg Med. 1999;17:87-93.
5. Harper A, Croft-Baker J. Carbon monoxide poisoning: undetected by both patients and their doctors. Age Ageing. 2004;33:105-109.
6. Smollin C, Olson K. Carbon monoxide poisoning (acute). BMJ Clin Evid. 2010;2010. pii:2103.
7. Wright J. Chronic and occult carbon monoxide poisoning: we don’t know what we’re missing. Emerg Med J. 2002;19:366-390.
8. Weaver LK. Clinical practice. Carbon monoxide poisoning. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1217-1225.
9. Bhatia R, Chacko F, Lal V, et al. Reversible delayed neuropsychiatric syndrome following acute carbon monoxide exposure. Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2007;11:80-82.
THE CASE
One month after moving into her mother’s apartment, a 27-year-old woman sought care at our clinic for fatigue, headache, blurred vision, nausea, and morning vomiting. She had weakness and difficulty sleeping, but denied any fever, rashes, neck stiffness, recent travel, trauma, or tobacco or illicit drug use. She did, however, have a 6-year history of migraines. Her physical exam was normal. She was sent home with a prescription for tramadol 50 mg bid for her headaches.
The patient subsequently went to the emergency department 3 times for the same complaints; none of the treatments she received there (mostly acetaminophen with codeine) relieved her symptoms. Three weeks later she returned to our clinic. She was distressed that the symptoms hadn’t gone away, and noted that her family was now experiencing similar symptoms.
Her temperature was 98.1°F (36.7°C), blood pressure was 131/88 mm Hg, pulse was 85 beats/min, and respiratory rate was 18 breaths/min. Physical and neurologic exams were normal.
THE DIAGNOSIS
Although most of the patient’s lab test results were within normal ranges, her carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) level was 4.2%. COHb levels of >2% to 3% in nonsmokers or >9% to 10% in smokers suggest carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning.1,2 Based on this finding and our patient’s symptoms, we diagnosed unintentional CO poisoning. We recommended that she and her mother vacate the apartment and have it inspected.
DISCUSSION
CO is the leading cause of poisoning mortality in the United States, and causes half of all fatal poisonings worldwide.1,3,4 It is a colorless, odorless, and tasteless gas that is produced by the incomplete combustion of carbon-based products, such as coal or gas.5,6 Exposure can occur from car exhaust fumes, faulty room heaters, and other sources (TABLE 1).6 The incidence of CO poisoning is higher during the winter months and after natural disasters. Individuals who have a lowered oxygen capacity, such as older adults, pregnant women (and their fetuses), infants, and patients with anemia, cardiovascular disease, or cerebrovascular disease, are more susceptible to CO poisoning.5,6
COHb, a stable complex of CO that forms in red blood cells when CO is inhaled, impairs oxygen delivery and peripheral utilization, resulting in cellular hypoxia.1 Signs and symptoms of CO poisoning are nonspecific and require a high degree of clinical suspicion for early diagnosis and treatment. Although cherry-red lips, peripheral cyanosis, and retinal hemorrhages are often described as “classic” symptoms of CO poisoning, these are rarely seen.6 The most common symptoms are actually headache (90%), dizziness (82%), and weakness (53%).7 Other symptoms include nausea, vomiting, confusion, visual disturbances, loss of consciousness, angina, seizure, and fatigue.6,7 Symptoms of chronic CO poisoning may differ from those of acute poisoning and can include chronic fatigue, neuropathy, and memory deficit.8
The differential diagnosis for CO poisoning includes flu-like syndrome/influenza/other viral illnesses, migraine or tension headaches, depression, transient ischemic attack, encephalitis, coronary artery disease, gastroenteritis or food poisoning, seizures, and dysrhythmias.1,4 Lab testing for COHb can help narrow the diagnosis. CO poisoning can be classified as mild, moderate, or severe based on COHb levels and the patient’s signs and symptoms (TABLE 2).6 However, COHb level is a poor predictor of clinical presentation and should not be used to dictate management.2,7
Oxygen therapy is the recommended treatment
Early treatment with supplemental oxygen is recommended to reduce the length of time red blood cells are exposed to CO.1 A COHb level >25% is the criterion for hyperbaric oxygen therapy.1,3 Patients should receive treatment until their symptoms become less intense.
Delayed neuropsychiatric sequelae (DNS) can occur in up to one-third of patients with acute CO poisoning more than a month after apparent recovery.1,6,9 DNS symptoms include cognitive changes, emotional lability, visual disturbances, disorientation, depression, dementia, psychotic behavior, parkinsonism, amnesia, and incontinence.1,6,9 Approximately 50% to 75% of patients with DNS recover spontaneously within a year with symptomatic treatment.1,6,9
Our patient
After recommending that our patient (and her mother) leave the apartment and have it inspected, we later learned that the fire department was unable to determine the source of the CO. A CO detector was installed and our patient was advised to keep the windows in the apartment open to allow for adequate oxygen flow. One month later she returned to our clinic and reported that her symptoms resolved; serum COHb was negative upon repeat lab tests.
THE TAKEAWAY
Patients who present with headaches, dizziness and/or fatigue should be evaluated for CO poisoning. The patient’s environmental history should be reviewed carefully, especially because CO poisoning is more common during the winter months. Oxygen therapy is the mainstay of treatment. Up to one-third of patients with acute poisoning may develop delayed neuropsychiatric sequelae, including cognitive changes, emotional lability, visual disturbances, disorientation, and depression, that may resolve within one year.
THE CASE
One month after moving into her mother’s apartment, a 27-year-old woman sought care at our clinic for fatigue, headache, blurred vision, nausea, and morning vomiting. She had weakness and difficulty sleeping, but denied any fever, rashes, neck stiffness, recent travel, trauma, or tobacco or illicit drug use. She did, however, have a 6-year history of migraines. Her physical exam was normal. She was sent home with a prescription for tramadol 50 mg bid for her headaches.
The patient subsequently went to the emergency department 3 times for the same complaints; none of the treatments she received there (mostly acetaminophen with codeine) relieved her symptoms. Three weeks later she returned to our clinic. She was distressed that the symptoms hadn’t gone away, and noted that her family was now experiencing similar symptoms.
Her temperature was 98.1°F (36.7°C), blood pressure was 131/88 mm Hg, pulse was 85 beats/min, and respiratory rate was 18 breaths/min. Physical and neurologic exams were normal.
THE DIAGNOSIS
Although most of the patient’s lab test results were within normal ranges, her carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) level was 4.2%. COHb levels of >2% to 3% in nonsmokers or >9% to 10% in smokers suggest carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning.1,2 Based on this finding and our patient’s symptoms, we diagnosed unintentional CO poisoning. We recommended that she and her mother vacate the apartment and have it inspected.
DISCUSSION
CO is the leading cause of poisoning mortality in the United States, and causes half of all fatal poisonings worldwide.1,3,4 It is a colorless, odorless, and tasteless gas that is produced by the incomplete combustion of carbon-based products, such as coal or gas.5,6 Exposure can occur from car exhaust fumes, faulty room heaters, and other sources (TABLE 1).6 The incidence of CO poisoning is higher during the winter months and after natural disasters. Individuals who have a lowered oxygen capacity, such as older adults, pregnant women (and their fetuses), infants, and patients with anemia, cardiovascular disease, or cerebrovascular disease, are more susceptible to CO poisoning.5,6
COHb, a stable complex of CO that forms in red blood cells when CO is inhaled, impairs oxygen delivery and peripheral utilization, resulting in cellular hypoxia.1 Signs and symptoms of CO poisoning are nonspecific and require a high degree of clinical suspicion for early diagnosis and treatment. Although cherry-red lips, peripheral cyanosis, and retinal hemorrhages are often described as “classic” symptoms of CO poisoning, these are rarely seen.6 The most common symptoms are actually headache (90%), dizziness (82%), and weakness (53%).7 Other symptoms include nausea, vomiting, confusion, visual disturbances, loss of consciousness, angina, seizure, and fatigue.6,7 Symptoms of chronic CO poisoning may differ from those of acute poisoning and can include chronic fatigue, neuropathy, and memory deficit.8
The differential diagnosis for CO poisoning includes flu-like syndrome/influenza/other viral illnesses, migraine or tension headaches, depression, transient ischemic attack, encephalitis, coronary artery disease, gastroenteritis or food poisoning, seizures, and dysrhythmias.1,4 Lab testing for COHb can help narrow the diagnosis. CO poisoning can be classified as mild, moderate, or severe based on COHb levels and the patient’s signs and symptoms (TABLE 2).6 However, COHb level is a poor predictor of clinical presentation and should not be used to dictate management.2,7
Oxygen therapy is the recommended treatment
Early treatment with supplemental oxygen is recommended to reduce the length of time red blood cells are exposed to CO.1 A COHb level >25% is the criterion for hyperbaric oxygen therapy.1,3 Patients should receive treatment until their symptoms become less intense.
Delayed neuropsychiatric sequelae (DNS) can occur in up to one-third of patients with acute CO poisoning more than a month after apparent recovery.1,6,9 DNS symptoms include cognitive changes, emotional lability, visual disturbances, disorientation, depression, dementia, psychotic behavior, parkinsonism, amnesia, and incontinence.1,6,9 Approximately 50% to 75% of patients with DNS recover spontaneously within a year with symptomatic treatment.1,6,9
Our patient
After recommending that our patient (and her mother) leave the apartment and have it inspected, we later learned that the fire department was unable to determine the source of the CO. A CO detector was installed and our patient was advised to keep the windows in the apartment open to allow for adequate oxygen flow. One month later she returned to our clinic and reported that her symptoms resolved; serum COHb was negative upon repeat lab tests.
THE TAKEAWAY
Patients who present with headaches, dizziness and/or fatigue should be evaluated for CO poisoning. The patient’s environmental history should be reviewed carefully, especially because CO poisoning is more common during the winter months. Oxygen therapy is the mainstay of treatment. Up to one-third of patients with acute poisoning may develop delayed neuropsychiatric sequelae, including cognitive changes, emotional lability, visual disturbances, disorientation, and depression, that may resolve within one year.
1. Nikkanen H, Skolnik A. Diagnosis and management of carbon monoxide poisoning in the emergency department. Emerg Med Pract. 2011;13:1-14.
2. Hampson NB, Hauff NM. Carboxyhemoglobin levels in carbon monoxide poisoning: do they correlate with the clinical picture? Am J Emerg Med. 2008;26:665-669.
3. Kao LW, Nañagas KA. Toxicity associated with carbon monoxide. Clin Lab Med. 2006;26:99-125.
4. Varon J, Marik PE, Fromm RE Jr, et al. Carbon monoxide poisoning: a review for clinicians. J Emerg Med. 1999;17:87-93.
5. Harper A, Croft-Baker J. Carbon monoxide poisoning: undetected by both patients and their doctors. Age Ageing. 2004;33:105-109.
6. Smollin C, Olson K. Carbon monoxide poisoning (acute). BMJ Clin Evid. 2010;2010. pii:2103.
7. Wright J. Chronic and occult carbon monoxide poisoning: we don’t know what we’re missing. Emerg Med J. 2002;19:366-390.
8. Weaver LK. Clinical practice. Carbon monoxide poisoning. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1217-1225.
9. Bhatia R, Chacko F, Lal V, et al. Reversible delayed neuropsychiatric syndrome following acute carbon monoxide exposure. Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2007;11:80-82.
1. Nikkanen H, Skolnik A. Diagnosis and management of carbon monoxide poisoning in the emergency department. Emerg Med Pract. 2011;13:1-14.
2. Hampson NB, Hauff NM. Carboxyhemoglobin levels in carbon monoxide poisoning: do they correlate with the clinical picture? Am J Emerg Med. 2008;26:665-669.
3. Kao LW, Nañagas KA. Toxicity associated with carbon monoxide. Clin Lab Med. 2006;26:99-125.
4. Varon J, Marik PE, Fromm RE Jr, et al. Carbon monoxide poisoning: a review for clinicians. J Emerg Med. 1999;17:87-93.
5. Harper A, Croft-Baker J. Carbon monoxide poisoning: undetected by both patients and their doctors. Age Ageing. 2004;33:105-109.
6. Smollin C, Olson K. Carbon monoxide poisoning (acute). BMJ Clin Evid. 2010;2010. pii:2103.
7. Wright J. Chronic and occult carbon monoxide poisoning: we don’t know what we’re missing. Emerg Med J. 2002;19:366-390.
8. Weaver LK. Clinical practice. Carbon monoxide poisoning. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1217-1225.
9. Bhatia R, Chacko F, Lal V, et al. Reversible delayed neuropsychiatric syndrome following acute carbon monoxide exposure. Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2007;11:80-82.
Intimate partner violence: Screen others, besides heterosexual women
We were happy to learn in “Time to routinely screen for intimate partner violence?” (PURLs. J Fam Pract. 2013;62:90-92) that the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) agrees with the Institute of Medicine (IOM) that all women of childbearing age should be screened for intimate partner violence (IPV).1 Although the USPSTF recommendation comes 2 years after that of the IOM, it is truly better late than never.
Two populations with known IPV issues require special consideration: lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) patients and heterosexual men. The rate of IPV is higher in the LGBT population than in heterosexual men and women cohabitating with their partners.2 Despite high rates of IPV within the LGBT population, women in this group frequently are overlooked for IPV screening.2
We must remember to screen men in heterosexual relationships, as well. In 2000, the National Violence Against Women survey found that 7% of men reported having experienced IPV in their lifetime.2 Given this data, we believe that all patients ages 14 years and older—regardless of gender or sexual orientation—should be screened for IPV. This would be a much-needed step towards addressing a major public health problem.
Barbara McMillan-Persaud, MD
Kyra P. Clark, MD
Riba Kelsey-Harris, MD
Folashade Omole, MD, FAAFP
Atlanta, Ga
1. Screening for intimate partner violence and abuse of elderly and vulnerable adults. US Preventive Services Task Force Web site. Available at: http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/uspsipv.htm. Accessed September 16, 2013.
2. Artd KL, Makadon HJ. Addressing intimate partner violence in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26:930-933.
We were happy to learn in “Time to routinely screen for intimate partner violence?” (PURLs. J Fam Pract. 2013;62:90-92) that the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) agrees with the Institute of Medicine (IOM) that all women of childbearing age should be screened for intimate partner violence (IPV).1 Although the USPSTF recommendation comes 2 years after that of the IOM, it is truly better late than never.
Two populations with known IPV issues require special consideration: lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) patients and heterosexual men. The rate of IPV is higher in the LGBT population than in heterosexual men and women cohabitating with their partners.2 Despite high rates of IPV within the LGBT population, women in this group frequently are overlooked for IPV screening.2
We must remember to screen men in heterosexual relationships, as well. In 2000, the National Violence Against Women survey found that 7% of men reported having experienced IPV in their lifetime.2 Given this data, we believe that all patients ages 14 years and older—regardless of gender or sexual orientation—should be screened for IPV. This would be a much-needed step towards addressing a major public health problem.
Barbara McMillan-Persaud, MD
Kyra P. Clark, MD
Riba Kelsey-Harris, MD
Folashade Omole, MD, FAAFP
Atlanta, Ga
We were happy to learn in “Time to routinely screen for intimate partner violence?” (PURLs. J Fam Pract. 2013;62:90-92) that the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) agrees with the Institute of Medicine (IOM) that all women of childbearing age should be screened for intimate partner violence (IPV).1 Although the USPSTF recommendation comes 2 years after that of the IOM, it is truly better late than never.
Two populations with known IPV issues require special consideration: lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) patients and heterosexual men. The rate of IPV is higher in the LGBT population than in heterosexual men and women cohabitating with their partners.2 Despite high rates of IPV within the LGBT population, women in this group frequently are overlooked for IPV screening.2
We must remember to screen men in heterosexual relationships, as well. In 2000, the National Violence Against Women survey found that 7% of men reported having experienced IPV in their lifetime.2 Given this data, we believe that all patients ages 14 years and older—regardless of gender or sexual orientation—should be screened for IPV. This would be a much-needed step towards addressing a major public health problem.
Barbara McMillan-Persaud, MD
Kyra P. Clark, MD
Riba Kelsey-Harris, MD
Folashade Omole, MD, FAAFP
Atlanta, Ga
1. Screening for intimate partner violence and abuse of elderly and vulnerable adults. US Preventive Services Task Force Web site. Available at: http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/uspsipv.htm. Accessed September 16, 2013.
2. Artd KL, Makadon HJ. Addressing intimate partner violence in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26:930-933.
1. Screening for intimate partner violence and abuse of elderly and vulnerable adults. US Preventive Services Task Force Web site. Available at: http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/uspsipv.htm. Accessed September 16, 2013.
2. Artd KL, Makadon HJ. Addressing intimate partner violence in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26:930-933.