User login
Is your patient using cocaine to self-medicate undiagnosed ADHD?
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) often persists beyond childhood into adulthood. One of the therapeutic challenges of treating ADHD is identifying comorbidities, including underlying mood and anxiety disorders, and ongoing substance abuse. Effective treatment modalities tend to prioritize management of substance abuse, but the patient’s age may dictate the overall assessment plan.
So-called 'reward' center
Treating childhood ADHD with stimulants might reduce the risk for future drug abuse.1 It is estimated that approximately 10 million people with ADHD are undiagnosed in the United States2; characteristic ADHD symptoms—inattention, hyperactivity, impulsivity—can persist in adulthood, and affected persons might not meet societal expectations. Previously unidentified attention difficulties may emerge during early adulthood because of increasingly complex tasks at school and work.
Persons with undiagnosed ADHD might turn to potentially self-destructive means of placating inner tension. Cocaine has pharmacological properties in common with stimulants such as methylphenidate, which often is prescribed for ADHD. Cocaine and methylphenidate both work on altering brain chemistry with a similar mechanism of action, allowing for increased dopamine in the nucleus accumbens, also known as the “reward center” of the brain.
Adults with ADHD have a 300% higher risk of developing a substance use disorder than adults without ADHD.3 An estimated 15% to 25% of adults with substance abuse have comorbid ADHD. Although these patients abuse of a variety of substances including Cannabis and alcohol, cocaine is one of the most commonly abused substances among this population. These observations could point to a self-medication hypothesis.
Why self-medicate?
The self-medication hypothesis, formulated by Khantzian in 1985, was based on several clinical observations. Khantzian stated that an abuser’s drug of choice is not selected at random but, rather, by an inherent desire to suppress the attributes of the condition that seems to otherwise wreak havoc on his (her) life. Almost a century earlier, Freud mentioned that cocaine is an antidepressant. Among persons with ADHD who have not been given that diagnosis, or treated for the disorder, cocaine is a popular drug. Because of the antidepressant features of cocaine and its ability to produce a rapid increase of dopamine levels that exert a pro-euphoric effect, coupled with a seemingly paradoxical calming influence that leads to increased productivity, it is not surprising to find that cocaine is abused. Reportedly, persons who have not been treated because their ADHD is undiagnosed turn to cocaine because it improves attention, raises self-esteem, and allows users to harness a level of focus that they could not otherwise achieve.4
Mechanism of action
Methylphenidate reduces ADHD symptoms by increasing extracellular dopamine in the brain, acting by means of a mechanism that is similar to that of cocaine.5 By blocking reuptake of dopamine and allowing an extracellular surplus, users continue to experience the pleasurable effect the neuro-transmitter produces. Methylphenidate has been shown to be an even more potent inhibitor of the same autoreceptors. Injecting methylphenidate has been shown to produce a rapid release of dopamine similar to that of cocaine.5
However, methylphenidate causes a much slower increase in dopamine; its effect on the brain has been shown to be similar to that of cocaine without the increased abuse potential. Cocaine use remodels the brain by reconfiguring connections that are essential for craving and self-control.5 Therefore, substituting methylphenidate for cocaine could help ADHD patients by:
• improving overall executive functioning
• decreasing feelings of low self-worth
• increasing daily functioning
• minimizing craving and the risk of subsequent cocaine abuse.
Treatment recommendations
Carefully consider pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics when prescribing ADHD medication. In general, children and adolescents with ADHD respond more favorably to stimulants than adults do. In children, the mainstay of treatment is slow-dose stimulants such as methylphenidate; second-line treatments are immediate-release stimulants and atomoxetine, a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor.6 Adults with ADHD might benefit from a nonstimulant, in part because of the presence of complex comorbidities.6 Modafinil often is prescribed for adults with ADHD.
Atomoxetine readily increases norepinephrine and dopamine in the prefrontal cortex as it bypasses the nucleus accumbens. Although atomoxetine is not a stimulant, the efficacy of the drug is based on its ability to increase norepinephrine through selective inhibition of the norepinephrine transporter. Norepinephrine modulates higher cortical functions—attention, executive function, arousal—that lead to a reduction in hyperactivity, inattention, and impulsivity.
Because dopamine is released in the prefrontal cortex—not in the nucleus accumbens—the addiction potential of atomoxetine is low.7 The drug might be an effective intervention for patients who are using cocaine to self-medicate. Stimulants such as methylphenidate have proven effective in safely mimicking the mechanism of action of cocaine. Nonstimulants, such as atomoxetine and modafinil, lack abuse potential and are excellent options for treating adults with ADHD.
Clinicians generally are advised to treat a patient’s underlying ADHD symptoms before addressing ongoing substance abuse. If a patient abruptly discontinues cocaine use before ADHD symptoms are properly controlled, her (his) condition might deteriorate further and the treatment plan might fail to progress. Some patients have experienced a reduction in craving for cocaine after they began stimulant therapy; these people no longer felt a need to self-medicate because their symptoms were being addressed.4
1. Jain S, Jain R, Islam J. Do stimulants for ADHD increase the risk of substance use disorders? Current Psychiatry. 2011;10(8):20-24.
2. Baskin S. Adult ADHD—A common disorder, often missed. http://www.stevebaskinmd.com/articles-about-adultadhd.html. Published 2009. Accessed November 5, 2014.
3. Tuzee M. Many adults who have ADHD go undiagnosed.
http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/health/your_health&id=7657326. Published September 8, 2010. Accessed October 9, 2014.
4. Plume D. The self medication hypothesis: ADHD & chronic cocaine abuse. A literature review. http://www.addcentre.co.uk/selfmedcocaine.htm. Published April 1995. Accessed October 9, 2014.
5. Searight HR, Burke JM. Adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. UpToDate. Updated Feb 2011. Accessed November 5, 2014.
6. Stahl SM. Attention deficit disorder and its treatment. In: Stahl’s essential psychopharmacology. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2008:884-897.
7. Michelson D, Adler L, Spencer T, et al. Atomoxetine in adults with ADHD: two randomized, placebo-controlled studies. Biol Psychiatry. 2003;53(2):112-120.
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) often persists beyond childhood into adulthood. One of the therapeutic challenges of treating ADHD is identifying comorbidities, including underlying mood and anxiety disorders, and ongoing substance abuse. Effective treatment modalities tend to prioritize management of substance abuse, but the patient’s age may dictate the overall assessment plan.
So-called 'reward' center
Treating childhood ADHD with stimulants might reduce the risk for future drug abuse.1 It is estimated that approximately 10 million people with ADHD are undiagnosed in the United States2; characteristic ADHD symptoms—inattention, hyperactivity, impulsivity—can persist in adulthood, and affected persons might not meet societal expectations. Previously unidentified attention difficulties may emerge during early adulthood because of increasingly complex tasks at school and work.
Persons with undiagnosed ADHD might turn to potentially self-destructive means of placating inner tension. Cocaine has pharmacological properties in common with stimulants such as methylphenidate, which often is prescribed for ADHD. Cocaine and methylphenidate both work on altering brain chemistry with a similar mechanism of action, allowing for increased dopamine in the nucleus accumbens, also known as the “reward center” of the brain.
Adults with ADHD have a 300% higher risk of developing a substance use disorder than adults without ADHD.3 An estimated 15% to 25% of adults with substance abuse have comorbid ADHD. Although these patients abuse of a variety of substances including Cannabis and alcohol, cocaine is one of the most commonly abused substances among this population. These observations could point to a self-medication hypothesis.
Why self-medicate?
The self-medication hypothesis, formulated by Khantzian in 1985, was based on several clinical observations. Khantzian stated that an abuser’s drug of choice is not selected at random but, rather, by an inherent desire to suppress the attributes of the condition that seems to otherwise wreak havoc on his (her) life. Almost a century earlier, Freud mentioned that cocaine is an antidepressant. Among persons with ADHD who have not been given that diagnosis, or treated for the disorder, cocaine is a popular drug. Because of the antidepressant features of cocaine and its ability to produce a rapid increase of dopamine levels that exert a pro-euphoric effect, coupled with a seemingly paradoxical calming influence that leads to increased productivity, it is not surprising to find that cocaine is abused. Reportedly, persons who have not been treated because their ADHD is undiagnosed turn to cocaine because it improves attention, raises self-esteem, and allows users to harness a level of focus that they could not otherwise achieve.4
Mechanism of action
Methylphenidate reduces ADHD symptoms by increasing extracellular dopamine in the brain, acting by means of a mechanism that is similar to that of cocaine.5 By blocking reuptake of dopamine and allowing an extracellular surplus, users continue to experience the pleasurable effect the neuro-transmitter produces. Methylphenidate has been shown to be an even more potent inhibitor of the same autoreceptors. Injecting methylphenidate has been shown to produce a rapid release of dopamine similar to that of cocaine.5
However, methylphenidate causes a much slower increase in dopamine; its effect on the brain has been shown to be similar to that of cocaine without the increased abuse potential. Cocaine use remodels the brain by reconfiguring connections that are essential for craving and self-control.5 Therefore, substituting methylphenidate for cocaine could help ADHD patients by:
• improving overall executive functioning
• decreasing feelings of low self-worth
• increasing daily functioning
• minimizing craving and the risk of subsequent cocaine abuse.
Treatment recommendations
Carefully consider pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics when prescribing ADHD medication. In general, children and adolescents with ADHD respond more favorably to stimulants than adults do. In children, the mainstay of treatment is slow-dose stimulants such as methylphenidate; second-line treatments are immediate-release stimulants and atomoxetine, a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor.6 Adults with ADHD might benefit from a nonstimulant, in part because of the presence of complex comorbidities.6 Modafinil often is prescribed for adults with ADHD.
Atomoxetine readily increases norepinephrine and dopamine in the prefrontal cortex as it bypasses the nucleus accumbens. Although atomoxetine is not a stimulant, the efficacy of the drug is based on its ability to increase norepinephrine through selective inhibition of the norepinephrine transporter. Norepinephrine modulates higher cortical functions—attention, executive function, arousal—that lead to a reduction in hyperactivity, inattention, and impulsivity.
Because dopamine is released in the prefrontal cortex—not in the nucleus accumbens—the addiction potential of atomoxetine is low.7 The drug might be an effective intervention for patients who are using cocaine to self-medicate. Stimulants such as methylphenidate have proven effective in safely mimicking the mechanism of action of cocaine. Nonstimulants, such as atomoxetine and modafinil, lack abuse potential and are excellent options for treating adults with ADHD.
Clinicians generally are advised to treat a patient’s underlying ADHD symptoms before addressing ongoing substance abuse. If a patient abruptly discontinues cocaine use before ADHD symptoms are properly controlled, her (his) condition might deteriorate further and the treatment plan might fail to progress. Some patients have experienced a reduction in craving for cocaine after they began stimulant therapy; these people no longer felt a need to self-medicate because their symptoms were being addressed.4
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) often persists beyond childhood into adulthood. One of the therapeutic challenges of treating ADHD is identifying comorbidities, including underlying mood and anxiety disorders, and ongoing substance abuse. Effective treatment modalities tend to prioritize management of substance abuse, but the patient’s age may dictate the overall assessment plan.
So-called 'reward' center
Treating childhood ADHD with stimulants might reduce the risk for future drug abuse.1 It is estimated that approximately 10 million people with ADHD are undiagnosed in the United States2; characteristic ADHD symptoms—inattention, hyperactivity, impulsivity—can persist in adulthood, and affected persons might not meet societal expectations. Previously unidentified attention difficulties may emerge during early adulthood because of increasingly complex tasks at school and work.
Persons with undiagnosed ADHD might turn to potentially self-destructive means of placating inner tension. Cocaine has pharmacological properties in common with stimulants such as methylphenidate, which often is prescribed for ADHD. Cocaine and methylphenidate both work on altering brain chemistry with a similar mechanism of action, allowing for increased dopamine in the nucleus accumbens, also known as the “reward center” of the brain.
Adults with ADHD have a 300% higher risk of developing a substance use disorder than adults without ADHD.3 An estimated 15% to 25% of adults with substance abuse have comorbid ADHD. Although these patients abuse of a variety of substances including Cannabis and alcohol, cocaine is one of the most commonly abused substances among this population. These observations could point to a self-medication hypothesis.
Why self-medicate?
The self-medication hypothesis, formulated by Khantzian in 1985, was based on several clinical observations. Khantzian stated that an abuser’s drug of choice is not selected at random but, rather, by an inherent desire to suppress the attributes of the condition that seems to otherwise wreak havoc on his (her) life. Almost a century earlier, Freud mentioned that cocaine is an antidepressant. Among persons with ADHD who have not been given that diagnosis, or treated for the disorder, cocaine is a popular drug. Because of the antidepressant features of cocaine and its ability to produce a rapid increase of dopamine levels that exert a pro-euphoric effect, coupled with a seemingly paradoxical calming influence that leads to increased productivity, it is not surprising to find that cocaine is abused. Reportedly, persons who have not been treated because their ADHD is undiagnosed turn to cocaine because it improves attention, raises self-esteem, and allows users to harness a level of focus that they could not otherwise achieve.4
Mechanism of action
Methylphenidate reduces ADHD symptoms by increasing extracellular dopamine in the brain, acting by means of a mechanism that is similar to that of cocaine.5 By blocking reuptake of dopamine and allowing an extracellular surplus, users continue to experience the pleasurable effect the neuro-transmitter produces. Methylphenidate has been shown to be an even more potent inhibitor of the same autoreceptors. Injecting methylphenidate has been shown to produce a rapid release of dopamine similar to that of cocaine.5
However, methylphenidate causes a much slower increase in dopamine; its effect on the brain has been shown to be similar to that of cocaine without the increased abuse potential. Cocaine use remodels the brain by reconfiguring connections that are essential for craving and self-control.5 Therefore, substituting methylphenidate for cocaine could help ADHD patients by:
• improving overall executive functioning
• decreasing feelings of low self-worth
• increasing daily functioning
• minimizing craving and the risk of subsequent cocaine abuse.
Treatment recommendations
Carefully consider pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics when prescribing ADHD medication. In general, children and adolescents with ADHD respond more favorably to stimulants than adults do. In children, the mainstay of treatment is slow-dose stimulants such as methylphenidate; second-line treatments are immediate-release stimulants and atomoxetine, a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor.6 Adults with ADHD might benefit from a nonstimulant, in part because of the presence of complex comorbidities.6 Modafinil often is prescribed for adults with ADHD.
Atomoxetine readily increases norepinephrine and dopamine in the prefrontal cortex as it bypasses the nucleus accumbens. Although atomoxetine is not a stimulant, the efficacy of the drug is based on its ability to increase norepinephrine through selective inhibition of the norepinephrine transporter. Norepinephrine modulates higher cortical functions—attention, executive function, arousal—that lead to a reduction in hyperactivity, inattention, and impulsivity.
Because dopamine is released in the prefrontal cortex—not in the nucleus accumbens—the addiction potential of atomoxetine is low.7 The drug might be an effective intervention for patients who are using cocaine to self-medicate. Stimulants such as methylphenidate have proven effective in safely mimicking the mechanism of action of cocaine. Nonstimulants, such as atomoxetine and modafinil, lack abuse potential and are excellent options for treating adults with ADHD.
Clinicians generally are advised to treat a patient’s underlying ADHD symptoms before addressing ongoing substance abuse. If a patient abruptly discontinues cocaine use before ADHD symptoms are properly controlled, her (his) condition might deteriorate further and the treatment plan might fail to progress. Some patients have experienced a reduction in craving for cocaine after they began stimulant therapy; these people no longer felt a need to self-medicate because their symptoms were being addressed.4
1. Jain S, Jain R, Islam J. Do stimulants for ADHD increase the risk of substance use disorders? Current Psychiatry. 2011;10(8):20-24.
2. Baskin S. Adult ADHD—A common disorder, often missed. http://www.stevebaskinmd.com/articles-about-adultadhd.html. Published 2009. Accessed November 5, 2014.
3. Tuzee M. Many adults who have ADHD go undiagnosed.
http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/health/your_health&id=7657326. Published September 8, 2010. Accessed October 9, 2014.
4. Plume D. The self medication hypothesis: ADHD & chronic cocaine abuse. A literature review. http://www.addcentre.co.uk/selfmedcocaine.htm. Published April 1995. Accessed October 9, 2014.
5. Searight HR, Burke JM. Adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. UpToDate. Updated Feb 2011. Accessed November 5, 2014.
6. Stahl SM. Attention deficit disorder and its treatment. In: Stahl’s essential psychopharmacology. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2008:884-897.
7. Michelson D, Adler L, Spencer T, et al. Atomoxetine in adults with ADHD: two randomized, placebo-controlled studies. Biol Psychiatry. 2003;53(2):112-120.
1. Jain S, Jain R, Islam J. Do stimulants for ADHD increase the risk of substance use disorders? Current Psychiatry. 2011;10(8):20-24.
2. Baskin S. Adult ADHD—A common disorder, often missed. http://www.stevebaskinmd.com/articles-about-adultadhd.html. Published 2009. Accessed November 5, 2014.
3. Tuzee M. Many adults who have ADHD go undiagnosed.
http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/health/your_health&id=7657326. Published September 8, 2010. Accessed October 9, 2014.
4. Plume D. The self medication hypothesis: ADHD & chronic cocaine abuse. A literature review. http://www.addcentre.co.uk/selfmedcocaine.htm. Published April 1995. Accessed October 9, 2014.
5. Searight HR, Burke JM. Adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. UpToDate. Updated Feb 2011. Accessed November 5, 2014.
6. Stahl SM. Attention deficit disorder and its treatment. In: Stahl’s essential psychopharmacology. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2008:884-897.
7. Michelson D, Adler L, Spencer T, et al. Atomoxetine in adults with ADHD: two randomized, placebo-controlled studies. Biol Psychiatry. 2003;53(2):112-120.
Acting strange after trying to ‘get numb’
CASE Numb and confused
Mr. L, age 17, is admitted to the hospital after ingesting 24 diphenhydramine 25-mg tablets in 3 hours as a possible suicide attempt. His parents witnessed him behaving strangely and brought him to the hospital. They state that their son was visibly agitated and acting inappropriately. He was seen talking to birds, trees, and the walls of the house.
Mr. L says he is upset because he broke up with his girlfriend a week earlier after she asked if they could “take a break.” He says that he took the diphenhydramine because he wanted to “get numb” to deal with the emotional stress caused by the break-up.
After the break-up, Mr. L experienced middle-to-late insomnia and was unable to get more than 3 or 4 hours of sleep a night. He reports significant fatigue, depressed mood, anhedonia, impaired concentration, and psychomotor retardation. He denies homicidal ideation or auditory and visual hallucinations.
As an aside, Mr. L reports that, for the past year, he had difficulties with gender identity, sometimes thinking that he might be better off if he had been born a girl and that he felt uncomfortable in a male body.
Which treatment option would you choose for Mr. L’s substance abuse?
a) refer him to a 12-step program
b) begin supportive measures
c) administer activated charcoal
d) prescribe a benzodiazepine to control agitation
The authors’ observations
As youths gain increasing access to medical and pharmaceutical knowledge through the Internet and other sources, it appears that adolescent drug abuse has, in part, shifted toward more easily attainable over-the-counter (OTC) medications. Diphenhydramine, a first-generation antihistamine, can be abused for its effects on the CNS, such as disturbed coordination, irritability, paresthesia, blurred vision, and depression. Effects of diphenhydramine are increased by the presence of alcohol, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, diazepam, hypnotics, sedatives, tranquilizers, and other CNS depressants. In 2011, diphenhydramine abuse was involved in 19,012 emergency room visits, of which 9,301 were for drug-related suicide attempts.1
Diphenhydramine is an inverse agonist of the histamine H1 receptor.2 It is a member of the ethanolamine subclass of antihistaminergic agents.3 By reversing the effects of histamine on capillaries, diphenhydramine can reduce the intensity of allergic symptoms. Diphenhydramine also crosses the blood–brain barrier and antagonizes H1 receptors centrally.
Used as a common sleep aid and allergy medication, the drug works primarily as an H1 receptor partial agonist, but also is a strong competitive antagonist at muscarinic acetylcholine receptors.4 It is abused for its sedative effects and its capacity to cause delirium and hallucinations.5 Diphenhydramine can have a stimulatory effect in children and young adults, instead of the sedating properties seen in adults.6 Such misuse is concerning because diphenhydramine overdose can lead to delirium, confusion, and hallucinations, tachycardia, seizures, mydriasis, xerostomia, urinary retention, ileus, anhidrosis, and hyperthermia. In severe cases it has been associated with cardiac arrhythmias, rhabdomyolysis, status epilepticus, and death.4,6 Neurologic symptoms of diphenhydramine overdose are listed in Table 1.
HISTORY Polysubstance abuse
Mr. L has a 2-year history of major depressive disorder and a history of Cannabis abuse with physiological dependence; Robitussin (base active ingredient, guaifenesin) and hydrocodone abuse with physiological dependence; 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) abuse; and diphenhydramine abuse. He also has a history of gender dysphoria, although he reports that these feelings have become less severe over the past year.
Mr. L attends bi-weekly appointments with an outpatient psychiatrist and reportedly adheres to his medication regimen: fluoxetine, 40 mg/d, and risperidone, 1 mg at bedtime. He denies previous suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, homicidal ideation, or homicidal attempts. He reports no history of physical, sexual, or emotional abuse. He gets good grades in school and has no outstanding academic problems.
Mr. L began using Cannabis at age 14; his last use was 3 weeks before admission. He is guarded about his use of Robitussin, hydrocodone, and MDMA. However, Mr. L reports that he has researched diphenhydramine on the internet and believes that he can safely take up to 1,200 mg without overdosing. He reports normally taking 450 mg of diphenhydramine daily. Mr. L reports difficulty urinating after using diphenhydramine but no other physical complaints.
Mr. L lives with his father and stepmother and has a history of one psychiatric hospitalization at a different facility 2 months ago, followed by outpatient therapy. He obtained his Graduate Equivalency Diploma (GED) and plans to attend college.
At age 5, Mr. L emigrated from Turkey to the United States with his parents. His mother returned to Turkey when he was age 6 and has had no contact with her son since. Whenever Mr. L visits Turkey with his father, the patient refuses to see her, as per collaterals. He gets along well with his stepmother, who is his maternal aunt. Mr. L has been bullied at school and reportedly has few friends.
On mental status examination, Mr. L has an appropriate appearance and appears to be his stated age. He shows good eye contact and is cooperative. Muscle tone and gait are within normal limits. He has no abnormal movements. Speech, thought processes, and associations are normal. He denies auditory hallucinations, visual hallucinations, suicidal ideation (although he presented with a probable suicide attempt), or homicidal ideation. No delusions are elicited.
Mr. L shows poor judgment about his drug use and situation. He demonstrates limited insight, because he says his only goal is to get out of the hospital. He is alert, awake, and oriented to person, place, and time. He shows no memory or knowledge impairment. He appears euthymic with an inappropriate and constricted affect. On neurologic exam, he had mild tremors in his hands. The authors’ observationsTreatment for diphenhydramine overdose should begin quickly to prevent life-threatening effects and reduce the risk for mortality. The toxin can be removed from the patient’s GI tract with activated charcoal or gastric lavage if the patient presents within 1 hour of ingesting the substance. Administering IV fluids will prevent dehydration. Cardiac functioning is monitored and benzodiazepines could be administered to manage seizures.
Key elements of a toxicologic physical examination include:
• eyes: pupillary size, symmetry, and response to light (vertical or horizontal nystagmus)
• oropharynx: moist or dry mucous membranes, presence or absence of the gag reflex, distinctive odors
• abdomen: presence or absence and quality of bowel sounds
• skin: warm and dry, warm and sweaty, or cool
• neurologic: level of consciousness and mental status, presence of tremors, seizures, or other movement disorders, presence or absence and quality of deep tendon reflexes.7
If a child or adolescent patient cannot communicate how much of a drug he (she) has ingested, questions to ask parents or other informants include:
• Was the medication purchased recently, and if so was the bottle or box full before the patient took the pills?
• If the medication was not new, how many pills were in the bottle before the patient got to it?
• If the medication was prescribed, how many pills were originally prescribed, when was the medication prescribed, and how many pills were already taken prior to the patient getting to the bottle?
• How many pills were left in the bottle?
• How many pills were seen around the area where the patient was found?
• How many pills were found in the patient’s mouth?7
Recommendations
It is well known that OTC medication abuse is a growing medical problem (Table 2). Antihistamines, including diphenhydramine, are readily available to minors and adults. Because of the powerful sedating effects of antihistamines, many adolescent health practitioners give them to patients who have insomnia as a sleep aid.8 As in our case, antihistamines are used recreationally for their hallucinogenic effects, at dosages of 300 to 700 mg.9 Severe symptoms of toxicity, such as delirium and psychosis, seizures, and coma, occur at dosages ≥1,000 mg.9
With growing abuse of these medications, we aim to encourage detailed history taking about abuse of OTC drugs, especially diphenhydramine in adolescent patients.
Outcome Improvement, discharge
Mr. L is given a dual diagnosis of diphenhydramine-induced psychotic disorder with
hallucinations and diphenhydramine-induced depressive disorder, both with onset during intoxication. He also is given a provisional diagnosis of psychotic disorder not otherwise specified and major depressive disorder. Last, he is given a diagnosis of Cannabis dependence with physiological dependence, MDMA abuse, hydrocodone abuse, and Robitussin abuse.
Mr. L is maintained on fluoxetine, 40 mg/d, and risperidone, 1 mg at bedtime and 0.5 mg in the morning. He receives milieu, individual, group, recreational, and medical therapy while in the hospital. Symptoms abate and he is discharged with a plan to follow up with outpatient providers.
Bottom Line
Abuse of over-the-counter (OTC) drugs, such as diphenhydramine, among youths is a growing problem. Remember to question adolescents who appear intoxicated or to have overdosed not only about abuse of alcohol and illicit substances but also of common—and easily and legally accessible—OTC drugs.
Related Resources
• Carr BC. Efficacy, abuse, and toxicity of over-the-counter cough and cold medicines in the pediatric population. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2006;18(2):184-188.
• Thomas A, Nallur DG, Jones N, et al. Diphenhydramine abuse and detoxification: a brief review and case report. J Psychopharmacol. 2009;23(1):101-105.
Drug Brand Names
Diazepam • Valium Hydrocodone • Vicodin
Diphenhydramine • Benadryl Risperidone • Risperdal
Fluoxetine • Prozac
Disclosures
The authors report no financial relationships with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.
1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Drug Abuse Warning Network, 2011: National estimates of drug-related emergency department visits. http://www.samhsa. gov/data/2k13/DAWN2k11ED/DAWN2k11ED.htm. Published May 2013. Accessed on September 29, 2014.
2. Yamashiro K, Kiryu J, Tsujikawa A, et al. Suppressive effects of histamine H1 receptor antagonist diphenhydramine on the leukocyte infiltration during endotoxin-induced uveitis. Exp Eye Res. 2001;73(1):69-80.
3. Skidgel RA, Kaplan AP, Erdos EG. Histamine, bradykinin, and their antagonists. In: Brunton L, Chabner B, Knollman B, eds. Goodman & Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 12th ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 2011: 911-935.
4. Vearrier D, Curtis JA. Case files of the medical toxicology fellowship at Drexel University. Rhabdomyolysis and compartment syndrome following acute diphenhydramine overdose. J Med Toxicol. 2011;7(3):213-219.
5. Ho M, Tsai K, Liu C. Diphenhydramine overdose related delirium: a case report. Journal of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine. 2006;17(2):77-79.
6. Krenzelok EP, Anderson GM, Mirick M. Massive diphenhydramine overdose resulting in death. Ann Emerg Med. 1982;11(4):212-213.
7. Inaba AS. Toxicologic teasers: Testing your knowledge of clinical toxicology. Hawaii Med J. 1998;57(4):471-473.
8. Kaplan SL. Busner J. The use of prn and stat medication in three child psychiatric inpatient settings. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1997;33(1):161-164.
9. Radovanovic D, Meier PJ, Guirguis M, et al. Dose-dependent toxicity of diphenhydramine overdose. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2000;19(9):489-495.
CASE Numb and confused
Mr. L, age 17, is admitted to the hospital after ingesting 24 diphenhydramine 25-mg tablets in 3 hours as a possible suicide attempt. His parents witnessed him behaving strangely and brought him to the hospital. They state that their son was visibly agitated and acting inappropriately. He was seen talking to birds, trees, and the walls of the house.
Mr. L says he is upset because he broke up with his girlfriend a week earlier after she asked if they could “take a break.” He says that he took the diphenhydramine because he wanted to “get numb” to deal with the emotional stress caused by the break-up.
After the break-up, Mr. L experienced middle-to-late insomnia and was unable to get more than 3 or 4 hours of sleep a night. He reports significant fatigue, depressed mood, anhedonia, impaired concentration, and psychomotor retardation. He denies homicidal ideation or auditory and visual hallucinations.
As an aside, Mr. L reports that, for the past year, he had difficulties with gender identity, sometimes thinking that he might be better off if he had been born a girl and that he felt uncomfortable in a male body.
Which treatment option would you choose for Mr. L’s substance abuse?
a) refer him to a 12-step program
b) begin supportive measures
c) administer activated charcoal
d) prescribe a benzodiazepine to control agitation
The authors’ observations
As youths gain increasing access to medical and pharmaceutical knowledge through the Internet and other sources, it appears that adolescent drug abuse has, in part, shifted toward more easily attainable over-the-counter (OTC) medications. Diphenhydramine, a first-generation antihistamine, can be abused for its effects on the CNS, such as disturbed coordination, irritability, paresthesia, blurred vision, and depression. Effects of diphenhydramine are increased by the presence of alcohol, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, diazepam, hypnotics, sedatives, tranquilizers, and other CNS depressants. In 2011, diphenhydramine abuse was involved in 19,012 emergency room visits, of which 9,301 were for drug-related suicide attempts.1
Diphenhydramine is an inverse agonist of the histamine H1 receptor.2 It is a member of the ethanolamine subclass of antihistaminergic agents.3 By reversing the effects of histamine on capillaries, diphenhydramine can reduce the intensity of allergic symptoms. Diphenhydramine also crosses the blood–brain barrier and antagonizes H1 receptors centrally.
Used as a common sleep aid and allergy medication, the drug works primarily as an H1 receptor partial agonist, but also is a strong competitive antagonist at muscarinic acetylcholine receptors.4 It is abused for its sedative effects and its capacity to cause delirium and hallucinations.5 Diphenhydramine can have a stimulatory effect in children and young adults, instead of the sedating properties seen in adults.6 Such misuse is concerning because diphenhydramine overdose can lead to delirium, confusion, and hallucinations, tachycardia, seizures, mydriasis, xerostomia, urinary retention, ileus, anhidrosis, and hyperthermia. In severe cases it has been associated with cardiac arrhythmias, rhabdomyolysis, status epilepticus, and death.4,6 Neurologic symptoms of diphenhydramine overdose are listed in Table 1.
HISTORY Polysubstance abuse
Mr. L has a 2-year history of major depressive disorder and a history of Cannabis abuse with physiological dependence; Robitussin (base active ingredient, guaifenesin) and hydrocodone abuse with physiological dependence; 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) abuse; and diphenhydramine abuse. He also has a history of gender dysphoria, although he reports that these feelings have become less severe over the past year.
Mr. L attends bi-weekly appointments with an outpatient psychiatrist and reportedly adheres to his medication regimen: fluoxetine, 40 mg/d, and risperidone, 1 mg at bedtime. He denies previous suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, homicidal ideation, or homicidal attempts. He reports no history of physical, sexual, or emotional abuse. He gets good grades in school and has no outstanding academic problems.
Mr. L began using Cannabis at age 14; his last use was 3 weeks before admission. He is guarded about his use of Robitussin, hydrocodone, and MDMA. However, Mr. L reports that he has researched diphenhydramine on the internet and believes that he can safely take up to 1,200 mg without overdosing. He reports normally taking 450 mg of diphenhydramine daily. Mr. L reports difficulty urinating after using diphenhydramine but no other physical complaints.
Mr. L lives with his father and stepmother and has a history of one psychiatric hospitalization at a different facility 2 months ago, followed by outpatient therapy. He obtained his Graduate Equivalency Diploma (GED) and plans to attend college.
At age 5, Mr. L emigrated from Turkey to the United States with his parents. His mother returned to Turkey when he was age 6 and has had no contact with her son since. Whenever Mr. L visits Turkey with his father, the patient refuses to see her, as per collaterals. He gets along well with his stepmother, who is his maternal aunt. Mr. L has been bullied at school and reportedly has few friends.
On mental status examination, Mr. L has an appropriate appearance and appears to be his stated age. He shows good eye contact and is cooperative. Muscle tone and gait are within normal limits. He has no abnormal movements. Speech, thought processes, and associations are normal. He denies auditory hallucinations, visual hallucinations, suicidal ideation (although he presented with a probable suicide attempt), or homicidal ideation. No delusions are elicited.
Mr. L shows poor judgment about his drug use and situation. He demonstrates limited insight, because he says his only goal is to get out of the hospital. He is alert, awake, and oriented to person, place, and time. He shows no memory or knowledge impairment. He appears euthymic with an inappropriate and constricted affect. On neurologic exam, he had mild tremors in his hands. The authors’ observationsTreatment for diphenhydramine overdose should begin quickly to prevent life-threatening effects and reduce the risk for mortality. The toxin can be removed from the patient’s GI tract with activated charcoal or gastric lavage if the patient presents within 1 hour of ingesting the substance. Administering IV fluids will prevent dehydration. Cardiac functioning is monitored and benzodiazepines could be administered to manage seizures.
Key elements of a toxicologic physical examination include:
• eyes: pupillary size, symmetry, and response to light (vertical or horizontal nystagmus)
• oropharynx: moist or dry mucous membranes, presence or absence of the gag reflex, distinctive odors
• abdomen: presence or absence and quality of bowel sounds
• skin: warm and dry, warm and sweaty, or cool
• neurologic: level of consciousness and mental status, presence of tremors, seizures, or other movement disorders, presence or absence and quality of deep tendon reflexes.7
If a child or adolescent patient cannot communicate how much of a drug he (she) has ingested, questions to ask parents or other informants include:
• Was the medication purchased recently, and if so was the bottle or box full before the patient took the pills?
• If the medication was not new, how many pills were in the bottle before the patient got to it?
• If the medication was prescribed, how many pills were originally prescribed, when was the medication prescribed, and how many pills were already taken prior to the patient getting to the bottle?
• How many pills were left in the bottle?
• How many pills were seen around the area where the patient was found?
• How many pills were found in the patient’s mouth?7
Recommendations
It is well known that OTC medication abuse is a growing medical problem (Table 2). Antihistamines, including diphenhydramine, are readily available to minors and adults. Because of the powerful sedating effects of antihistamines, many adolescent health practitioners give them to patients who have insomnia as a sleep aid.8 As in our case, antihistamines are used recreationally for their hallucinogenic effects, at dosages of 300 to 700 mg.9 Severe symptoms of toxicity, such as delirium and psychosis, seizures, and coma, occur at dosages ≥1,000 mg.9
With growing abuse of these medications, we aim to encourage detailed history taking about abuse of OTC drugs, especially diphenhydramine in adolescent patients.
Outcome Improvement, discharge
Mr. L is given a dual diagnosis of diphenhydramine-induced psychotic disorder with
hallucinations and diphenhydramine-induced depressive disorder, both with onset during intoxication. He also is given a provisional diagnosis of psychotic disorder not otherwise specified and major depressive disorder. Last, he is given a diagnosis of Cannabis dependence with physiological dependence, MDMA abuse, hydrocodone abuse, and Robitussin abuse.
Mr. L is maintained on fluoxetine, 40 mg/d, and risperidone, 1 mg at bedtime and 0.5 mg in the morning. He receives milieu, individual, group, recreational, and medical therapy while in the hospital. Symptoms abate and he is discharged with a plan to follow up with outpatient providers.
Bottom Line
Abuse of over-the-counter (OTC) drugs, such as diphenhydramine, among youths is a growing problem. Remember to question adolescents who appear intoxicated or to have overdosed not only about abuse of alcohol and illicit substances but also of common—and easily and legally accessible—OTC drugs.
Related Resources
• Carr BC. Efficacy, abuse, and toxicity of over-the-counter cough and cold medicines in the pediatric population. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2006;18(2):184-188.
• Thomas A, Nallur DG, Jones N, et al. Diphenhydramine abuse and detoxification: a brief review and case report. J Psychopharmacol. 2009;23(1):101-105.
Drug Brand Names
Diazepam • Valium Hydrocodone • Vicodin
Diphenhydramine • Benadryl Risperidone • Risperdal
Fluoxetine • Prozac
Disclosures
The authors report no financial relationships with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.
CASE Numb and confused
Mr. L, age 17, is admitted to the hospital after ingesting 24 diphenhydramine 25-mg tablets in 3 hours as a possible suicide attempt. His parents witnessed him behaving strangely and brought him to the hospital. They state that their son was visibly agitated and acting inappropriately. He was seen talking to birds, trees, and the walls of the house.
Mr. L says he is upset because he broke up with his girlfriend a week earlier after she asked if they could “take a break.” He says that he took the diphenhydramine because he wanted to “get numb” to deal with the emotional stress caused by the break-up.
After the break-up, Mr. L experienced middle-to-late insomnia and was unable to get more than 3 or 4 hours of sleep a night. He reports significant fatigue, depressed mood, anhedonia, impaired concentration, and psychomotor retardation. He denies homicidal ideation or auditory and visual hallucinations.
As an aside, Mr. L reports that, for the past year, he had difficulties with gender identity, sometimes thinking that he might be better off if he had been born a girl and that he felt uncomfortable in a male body.
Which treatment option would you choose for Mr. L’s substance abuse?
a) refer him to a 12-step program
b) begin supportive measures
c) administer activated charcoal
d) prescribe a benzodiazepine to control agitation
The authors’ observations
As youths gain increasing access to medical and pharmaceutical knowledge through the Internet and other sources, it appears that adolescent drug abuse has, in part, shifted toward more easily attainable over-the-counter (OTC) medications. Diphenhydramine, a first-generation antihistamine, can be abused for its effects on the CNS, such as disturbed coordination, irritability, paresthesia, blurred vision, and depression. Effects of diphenhydramine are increased by the presence of alcohol, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, diazepam, hypnotics, sedatives, tranquilizers, and other CNS depressants. In 2011, diphenhydramine abuse was involved in 19,012 emergency room visits, of which 9,301 were for drug-related suicide attempts.1
Diphenhydramine is an inverse agonist of the histamine H1 receptor.2 It is a member of the ethanolamine subclass of antihistaminergic agents.3 By reversing the effects of histamine on capillaries, diphenhydramine can reduce the intensity of allergic symptoms. Diphenhydramine also crosses the blood–brain barrier and antagonizes H1 receptors centrally.
Used as a common sleep aid and allergy medication, the drug works primarily as an H1 receptor partial agonist, but also is a strong competitive antagonist at muscarinic acetylcholine receptors.4 It is abused for its sedative effects and its capacity to cause delirium and hallucinations.5 Diphenhydramine can have a stimulatory effect in children and young adults, instead of the sedating properties seen in adults.6 Such misuse is concerning because diphenhydramine overdose can lead to delirium, confusion, and hallucinations, tachycardia, seizures, mydriasis, xerostomia, urinary retention, ileus, anhidrosis, and hyperthermia. In severe cases it has been associated with cardiac arrhythmias, rhabdomyolysis, status epilepticus, and death.4,6 Neurologic symptoms of diphenhydramine overdose are listed in Table 1.
HISTORY Polysubstance abuse
Mr. L has a 2-year history of major depressive disorder and a history of Cannabis abuse with physiological dependence; Robitussin (base active ingredient, guaifenesin) and hydrocodone abuse with physiological dependence; 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) abuse; and diphenhydramine abuse. He also has a history of gender dysphoria, although he reports that these feelings have become less severe over the past year.
Mr. L attends bi-weekly appointments with an outpatient psychiatrist and reportedly adheres to his medication regimen: fluoxetine, 40 mg/d, and risperidone, 1 mg at bedtime. He denies previous suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, homicidal ideation, or homicidal attempts. He reports no history of physical, sexual, or emotional abuse. He gets good grades in school and has no outstanding academic problems.
Mr. L began using Cannabis at age 14; his last use was 3 weeks before admission. He is guarded about his use of Robitussin, hydrocodone, and MDMA. However, Mr. L reports that he has researched diphenhydramine on the internet and believes that he can safely take up to 1,200 mg without overdosing. He reports normally taking 450 mg of diphenhydramine daily. Mr. L reports difficulty urinating after using diphenhydramine but no other physical complaints.
Mr. L lives with his father and stepmother and has a history of one psychiatric hospitalization at a different facility 2 months ago, followed by outpatient therapy. He obtained his Graduate Equivalency Diploma (GED) and plans to attend college.
At age 5, Mr. L emigrated from Turkey to the United States with his parents. His mother returned to Turkey when he was age 6 and has had no contact with her son since. Whenever Mr. L visits Turkey with his father, the patient refuses to see her, as per collaterals. He gets along well with his stepmother, who is his maternal aunt. Mr. L has been bullied at school and reportedly has few friends.
On mental status examination, Mr. L has an appropriate appearance and appears to be his stated age. He shows good eye contact and is cooperative. Muscle tone and gait are within normal limits. He has no abnormal movements. Speech, thought processes, and associations are normal. He denies auditory hallucinations, visual hallucinations, suicidal ideation (although he presented with a probable suicide attempt), or homicidal ideation. No delusions are elicited.
Mr. L shows poor judgment about his drug use and situation. He demonstrates limited insight, because he says his only goal is to get out of the hospital. He is alert, awake, and oriented to person, place, and time. He shows no memory or knowledge impairment. He appears euthymic with an inappropriate and constricted affect. On neurologic exam, he had mild tremors in his hands. The authors’ observationsTreatment for diphenhydramine overdose should begin quickly to prevent life-threatening effects and reduce the risk for mortality. The toxin can be removed from the patient’s GI tract with activated charcoal or gastric lavage if the patient presents within 1 hour of ingesting the substance. Administering IV fluids will prevent dehydration. Cardiac functioning is monitored and benzodiazepines could be administered to manage seizures.
Key elements of a toxicologic physical examination include:
• eyes: pupillary size, symmetry, and response to light (vertical or horizontal nystagmus)
• oropharynx: moist or dry mucous membranes, presence or absence of the gag reflex, distinctive odors
• abdomen: presence or absence and quality of bowel sounds
• skin: warm and dry, warm and sweaty, or cool
• neurologic: level of consciousness and mental status, presence of tremors, seizures, or other movement disorders, presence or absence and quality of deep tendon reflexes.7
If a child or adolescent patient cannot communicate how much of a drug he (she) has ingested, questions to ask parents or other informants include:
• Was the medication purchased recently, and if so was the bottle or box full before the patient took the pills?
• If the medication was not new, how many pills were in the bottle before the patient got to it?
• If the medication was prescribed, how many pills were originally prescribed, when was the medication prescribed, and how many pills were already taken prior to the patient getting to the bottle?
• How many pills were left in the bottle?
• How many pills were seen around the area where the patient was found?
• How many pills were found in the patient’s mouth?7
Recommendations
It is well known that OTC medication abuse is a growing medical problem (Table 2). Antihistamines, including diphenhydramine, are readily available to minors and adults. Because of the powerful sedating effects of antihistamines, many adolescent health practitioners give them to patients who have insomnia as a sleep aid.8 As in our case, antihistamines are used recreationally for their hallucinogenic effects, at dosages of 300 to 700 mg.9 Severe symptoms of toxicity, such as delirium and psychosis, seizures, and coma, occur at dosages ≥1,000 mg.9
With growing abuse of these medications, we aim to encourage detailed history taking about abuse of OTC drugs, especially diphenhydramine in adolescent patients.
Outcome Improvement, discharge
Mr. L is given a dual diagnosis of diphenhydramine-induced psychotic disorder with
hallucinations and diphenhydramine-induced depressive disorder, both with onset during intoxication. He also is given a provisional diagnosis of psychotic disorder not otherwise specified and major depressive disorder. Last, he is given a diagnosis of Cannabis dependence with physiological dependence, MDMA abuse, hydrocodone abuse, and Robitussin abuse.
Mr. L is maintained on fluoxetine, 40 mg/d, and risperidone, 1 mg at bedtime and 0.5 mg in the morning. He receives milieu, individual, group, recreational, and medical therapy while in the hospital. Symptoms abate and he is discharged with a plan to follow up with outpatient providers.
Bottom Line
Abuse of over-the-counter (OTC) drugs, such as diphenhydramine, among youths is a growing problem. Remember to question adolescents who appear intoxicated or to have overdosed not only about abuse of alcohol and illicit substances but also of common—and easily and legally accessible—OTC drugs.
Related Resources
• Carr BC. Efficacy, abuse, and toxicity of over-the-counter cough and cold medicines in the pediatric population. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2006;18(2):184-188.
• Thomas A, Nallur DG, Jones N, et al. Diphenhydramine abuse and detoxification: a brief review and case report. J Psychopharmacol. 2009;23(1):101-105.
Drug Brand Names
Diazepam • Valium Hydrocodone • Vicodin
Diphenhydramine • Benadryl Risperidone • Risperdal
Fluoxetine • Prozac
Disclosures
The authors report no financial relationships with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.
1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Drug Abuse Warning Network, 2011: National estimates of drug-related emergency department visits. http://www.samhsa. gov/data/2k13/DAWN2k11ED/DAWN2k11ED.htm. Published May 2013. Accessed on September 29, 2014.
2. Yamashiro K, Kiryu J, Tsujikawa A, et al. Suppressive effects of histamine H1 receptor antagonist diphenhydramine on the leukocyte infiltration during endotoxin-induced uveitis. Exp Eye Res. 2001;73(1):69-80.
3. Skidgel RA, Kaplan AP, Erdos EG. Histamine, bradykinin, and their antagonists. In: Brunton L, Chabner B, Knollman B, eds. Goodman & Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 12th ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 2011: 911-935.
4. Vearrier D, Curtis JA. Case files of the medical toxicology fellowship at Drexel University. Rhabdomyolysis and compartment syndrome following acute diphenhydramine overdose. J Med Toxicol. 2011;7(3):213-219.
5. Ho M, Tsai K, Liu C. Diphenhydramine overdose related delirium: a case report. Journal of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine. 2006;17(2):77-79.
6. Krenzelok EP, Anderson GM, Mirick M. Massive diphenhydramine overdose resulting in death. Ann Emerg Med. 1982;11(4):212-213.
7. Inaba AS. Toxicologic teasers: Testing your knowledge of clinical toxicology. Hawaii Med J. 1998;57(4):471-473.
8. Kaplan SL. Busner J. The use of prn and stat medication in three child psychiatric inpatient settings. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1997;33(1):161-164.
9. Radovanovic D, Meier PJ, Guirguis M, et al. Dose-dependent toxicity of diphenhydramine overdose. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2000;19(9):489-495.
1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Drug Abuse Warning Network, 2011: National estimates of drug-related emergency department visits. http://www.samhsa. gov/data/2k13/DAWN2k11ED/DAWN2k11ED.htm. Published May 2013. Accessed on September 29, 2014.
2. Yamashiro K, Kiryu J, Tsujikawa A, et al. Suppressive effects of histamine H1 receptor antagonist diphenhydramine on the leukocyte infiltration during endotoxin-induced uveitis. Exp Eye Res. 2001;73(1):69-80.
3. Skidgel RA, Kaplan AP, Erdos EG. Histamine, bradykinin, and their antagonists. In: Brunton L, Chabner B, Knollman B, eds. Goodman & Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 12th ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 2011: 911-935.
4. Vearrier D, Curtis JA. Case files of the medical toxicology fellowship at Drexel University. Rhabdomyolysis and compartment syndrome following acute diphenhydramine overdose. J Med Toxicol. 2011;7(3):213-219.
5. Ho M, Tsai K, Liu C. Diphenhydramine overdose related delirium: a case report. Journal of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine. 2006;17(2):77-79.
6. Krenzelok EP, Anderson GM, Mirick M. Massive diphenhydramine overdose resulting in death. Ann Emerg Med. 1982;11(4):212-213.
7. Inaba AS. Toxicologic teasers: Testing your knowledge of clinical toxicology. Hawaii Med J. 1998;57(4):471-473.
8. Kaplan SL. Busner J. The use of prn and stat medication in three child psychiatric inpatient settings. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1997;33(1):161-164.
9. Radovanovic D, Meier PJ, Guirguis M, et al. Dose-dependent toxicity of diphenhydramine overdose. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2000;19(9):489-495.