Thelissa A. Harris, MD

“You’re wearing an Unna boot – what happened?”

“Doc, my wife made too many tempting desserts while we were in Florida, and when we got back, I had an infected toe. My doctor gave me antibiotics, but the toe turned blue, so they had to amputate.”

I had been treating this man for depression for many years and did not know about his having diabetes, so I asked, “Are you diabetic?”

“No,” he answered. “My doctor says I’ve been prediabetic for 20 years, and he’s put me on a low dose of metformin. … My friends are on twice as much. I don’t even have to have one of those meters.

“I can just go to the senior center or stop by my doctor’s office once a week and have my sugar checked. My wife says she won’t tempt me with any more desserts; she’s buying fruit, which I’m not used to, and I’m not eating bread anymore.

“Hey, those pills you’re giving me for my depression are working great. I am eating and sleeping and doing things I love to do. The wife and I are getting over the kids’ divorces, and we are still able to help out with the grandchild, who has been so sick. When we got back home, I tried to get back with my poker buddies, but one of them is in cardiac rehab; he had a heart attack, and another one, his wife says he’s got Alzheimer’s – he did lose a lot last year and that wasn’t like him. … Yeah, I guess I’m OK. As soon as this toe heals, I’ll be 100%.”

This dialogue is a composite; the names have been changed to protect the innocent, but unfortunately, it is an oft-told tale. The relationship between diabetes and depression has been known for a long time.¹Each one is a risk factor for the other, and together and separately, they are a risk factor for dementia.

For quite a while, it was thought that having a diabetes diagnosis and having to manage it in and of itself was depressing, and that therefore, people would become depressed. It was also thought that people who are depressed might try to soothe themselves with copious amounts of comfort food and alcohol, and would thereby develop diabetes. Certainly, many people’s routes to depression and diabetes are just that – psychological reactions to having the other disease. But research shows that there is a much deeper physiologic relationship between the two.

Since diabetes and depression or their sequelae are among the 14 leading causes of death in the United States, psychiatrists and other medical professionals need to collaborate in the treatment of these diseases in their patients. Medical homes are good, but most patients continue to receive treatment for all disorders separately and in isolation. If it were not for the medical professional asking directly, or discovering some medication after the patient has given permission for an electronic medication prescribing overview of all his medications, treatment for diabetes or depression might be unknown by the other medical professional. Our noncommunicative EHRs will not help here. The only thing that will help is open communication between the patient and all of his medical treaters.

Now that I am educated and alarmed about the diabetes-depression connection, I send a note to the primary care physician and follow up with a few articles from Science Daily such as “Depression, early death among seniors with diabetes: Strong link found by research,”² or “Treating major depression in older adults with diabetes may lower risk of death”^3, or the clincher, “Treatment for diabetes and depression improves both, researchers say.”⁴

For patients with type 2 diabetes, the form of the illness usually referred to in research on diabetes and depression, the body becomes insensitive to insulin, i.e., insulin resistance develops. We now know that insulin resistance occurs throughout the body, including the brain. Insulin receptors are present in all organs of the body, including the brain. We also know that the higher fasting glucose level seen in prediabetes is an indication of the development of insulin resistance. Insulin’s job is to get glucose into cells for ready availability of energy and into muscle for backup energy.

If glucose is too plentiful, as it is when sugary foods are overconsumed, insulin directs the rest of the glucose to be stored as fat in the liver, inside blood vessels, around organs, and subcutaneously. Ultimately, there is nowhere else to store the excess energy, and insulin resistance develops. The pancreas, which secretes insulin, keeps on pumping insulin and can poop out, requiring exogenous insulin to keep things moving.⁵Treatments can include insulin itself, medications that increase insulin sensitivity, diet, and exercise to deplete the energy stores, or bariatric surgery, which, by the way, is said to cure both diabetes and depression within 3 weeks after surgery (this effect is negated if patients regain their weight.)

What the research shows

Clinical research from the University of Pennsylvania⁶ and Massachusetts General Hospital⁷shows that having a third, nonphysician treater work with patients diagnosed with both disorders improves outcomes. Both of those protocols used cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and motivational interviewing, group treatment, and telephone contact as modalities. One also used electronic monitoring of medication dosing and the record of the glucometer to follow patients’ progress.

In both studies, patients in the protocol groups did better than the treatment-as-usual groups in terms of relief of depression and control of diabetes. In the private primary care physician and psychiatrist office setting, a third party is not practical, but psychiatrists can add motivational interviewing and some aspects of CBT. Also, both psychiatrists and primary care physicians can use electronic medication monitoring and blood glucose monitoring. Recently, Apple released apps that the company said will make it easy for patients with those devices^8, but the old glucometer and pharmacy follow-up for prescriptions also can be useful. Medication (bottle cap) monitors can be expensive and may not be practical for some patients.

A prospective study of 2,525 patients showed that those with depression and metabolic risk factors were more than six times more likely to develop diabetes than patients who had depression alone, metabolic risk factors alone, or neither. These results allow for gross sorting out of which people with depression are more likely to develop diabetes.⁹This can provide an opportunity to intervene before diabetes sets in – and would have saved the toe of the patient I described earlier.

At the cellular level, at least in mice, it appears that insulin resistance in the brain alters dopamine turnover and causes behavioral disorders that look like anxiety and depression.¹⁰Mice with a brain-specific knockout of the insulin receptor showed “mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative distress in the dorsal striatum and the nucleus accumbens. Increased levels of MAO A and B leading to increased turnover of dopamine in the mesolimbic system were also observed.”

The depression in these mice was relieved with the use of imipramine and phenelzine, and the researchers also noted that previous research had shown a decrease in depressive-like behavior with the insulin sensitizer rosiglitazone, which reduces glucose in the brain when given to obese, diabetic mice. Certainly, further research is necessary, as is research in humans. But this demonstrates what might be happening to our patients who have metabolic syndrome or diabetes and depression, and may offer suggestions for appropriate treatments.

“If you see something, say something.”

In short, early effective intervention in the metabolic/prediabetes state is best. Taking weights and heights, calculating BMIs, and either measuring or observing waist circumference, can give us a hunch that metabolic syndrome exists. We do our patients a favor if we mention this – and enlist their curiosity and efforts in avoiding or mitigating the ravages of diabetes and worsening depression.

Dr. Harris, a diplomate of the American Board of Obesity Medicine, is in private practice and adult and geriatric psychiatry in Hartford, Conn. She also works as a psychiatric consultant to continuing care retirement organizations and professional groups. Dr. Harris, a former president of the Black Psychiatrists of America, is a Distinguished Fellow of the American Psychiatric Association. Besides psychotherapy, her major clinical interests include geriatrics, and the interface between general medicine and psychiatry.

References

1. U.S. Medicine, November 2009.

2. Science Daily, March 29, 2014.

3. Science Daily, Jan. 27, 2016.

4. Science Daily, Jan. 18, 2012.

5. “Diabetes Facts and Guidelines,” Yale Diabetes Center, 2011.

6. Ann Fam Med. 2012 Jan-Feb;10(1):15-22.

7. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(3):625-33.

8. Macworld, May 10, 2016.

9. Mol Psychiatry. 2016 Feb 23. doi: 10:1038/mp 2016.7.

10. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014 Mar 17;112(11):3463-8.

“You’re wearing an Unna boot – what happened?”

“Doc, my wife made too many tempting desserts while we were in Florida, and when we got back, I had an infected toe. My doctor gave me antibiotics, but the toe turned blue, so they had to amputate.”

I had been treating this man for depression for many years and did not know about his having diabetes, so I asked, “Are you diabetic?”

“No,” he answered. “My doctor says I’ve been prediabetic for 20 years, and he’s put me on a low dose of metformin. … My friends are on twice as much. I don’t even have to have one of those meters.

“I can just go to the senior center or stop by my doctor’s office once a week and have my sugar checked. My wife says she won’t tempt me with any more desserts; she’s buying fruit, which I’m not used to, and I’m not eating bread anymore.

“Hey, those pills you’re giving me for my depression are working great. I am eating and sleeping and doing things I love to do. The wife and I are getting over the kids’ divorces, and we are still able to help out with the grandchild, who has been so sick. When we got back home, I tried to get back with my poker buddies, but one of them is in cardiac rehab; he had a heart attack, and another one, his wife says he’s got Alzheimer’s – he did lose a lot last year and that wasn’t like him. … Yeah, I guess I’m OK. As soon as this toe heals, I’ll be 100%.”

This dialogue is a composite; the names have been changed to protect the innocent, but unfortunately, it is an oft-told tale. The relationship between diabetes and depression has been known for a long time.¹Each one is a risk factor for the other, and together and separately, they are a risk factor for dementia.

For quite a while, it was thought that having a diabetes diagnosis and having to manage it in and of itself was depressing, and that therefore, people would become depressed. It was also thought that people who are depressed might try to soothe themselves with copious amounts of comfort food and alcohol, and would thereby develop diabetes. Certainly, many people’s routes to depression and diabetes are just that – psychological reactions to having the other disease. But research shows that there is a much deeper physiologic relationship between the two.

Since diabetes and depression or their sequelae are among the 14 leading causes of death in the United States, psychiatrists and other medical professionals need to collaborate in the treatment of these diseases in their patients. Medical homes are good, but most patients continue to receive treatment for all disorders separately and in isolation. If it were not for the medical professional asking directly, or discovering some medication after the patient has given permission for an electronic medication prescribing overview of all his medications, treatment for diabetes or depression might be unknown by the other medical professional. Our noncommunicative EHRs will not help here. The only thing that will help is open communication between the patient and all of his medical treaters.

Now that I am educated and alarmed about the diabetes-depression connection, I send a note to the primary care physician and follow up with a few articles from Science Daily such as “Depression, early death among seniors with diabetes: Strong link found by research,”² or “Treating major depression in older adults with diabetes may lower risk of death”^3, or the clincher, “Treatment for diabetes and depression improves both, researchers say.”⁴

For patients with type 2 diabetes, the form of the illness usually referred to in research on diabetes and depression, the body becomes insensitive to insulin, i.e., insulin resistance develops. We now know that insulin resistance occurs throughout the body, including the brain. Insulin receptors are present in all organs of the body, including the brain. We also know that the higher fasting glucose level seen in prediabetes is an indication of the development of insulin resistance. Insulin’s job is to get glucose into cells for ready availability of energy and into muscle for backup energy.

If glucose is too plentiful, as it is when sugary foods are overconsumed, insulin directs the rest of the glucose to be stored as fat in the liver, inside blood vessels, around organs, and subcutaneously. Ultimately, there is nowhere else to store the excess energy, and insulin resistance develops. The pancreas, which secretes insulin, keeps on pumping insulin and can poop out, requiring exogenous insulin to keep things moving.⁵Treatments can include insulin itself, medications that increase insulin sensitivity, diet, and exercise to deplete the energy stores, or bariatric surgery, which, by the way, is said to cure both diabetes and depression within 3 weeks after surgery (this effect is negated if patients regain their weight.)

What the research shows

Clinical research from the University of Pennsylvania⁶ and Massachusetts General Hospital⁷shows that having a third, nonphysician treater work with patients diagnosed with both disorders improves outcomes. Both of those protocols used cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and motivational interviewing, group treatment, and telephone contact as modalities. One also used electronic monitoring of medication dosing and the record of the glucometer to follow patients’ progress.

In both studies, patients in the protocol groups did better than the treatment-as-usual groups in terms of relief of depression and control of diabetes. In the private primary care physician and psychiatrist office setting, a third party is not practical, but psychiatrists can add motivational interviewing and some aspects of CBT. Also, both psychiatrists and primary care physicians can use electronic medication monitoring and blood glucose monitoring. Recently, Apple released apps that the company said will make it easy for patients with those devices^8, but the old glucometer and pharmacy follow-up for prescriptions also can be useful. Medication (bottle cap) monitors can be expensive and may not be practical for some patients.

A prospective study of 2,525 patients showed that those with depression and metabolic risk factors were more than six times more likely to develop diabetes than patients who had depression alone, metabolic risk factors alone, or neither. These results allow for gross sorting out of which people with depression are more likely to develop diabetes.⁹This can provide an opportunity to intervene before diabetes sets in – and would have saved the toe of the patient I described earlier.

At the cellular level, at least in mice, it appears that insulin resistance in the brain alters dopamine turnover and causes behavioral disorders that look like anxiety and depression.¹⁰Mice with a brain-specific knockout of the insulin receptor showed “mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative distress in the dorsal striatum and the nucleus accumbens. Increased levels of MAO A and B leading to increased turnover of dopamine in the mesolimbic system were also observed.”

The depression in these mice was relieved with the use of imipramine and phenelzine, and the researchers also noted that previous research had shown a decrease in depressive-like behavior with the insulin sensitizer rosiglitazone, which reduces glucose in the brain when given to obese, diabetic mice. Certainly, further research is necessary, as is research in humans. But this demonstrates what might be happening to our patients who have metabolic syndrome or diabetes and depression, and may offer suggestions for appropriate treatments.

“If you see something, say something.”

In short, early effective intervention in the metabolic/prediabetes state is best. Taking weights and heights, calculating BMIs, and either measuring or observing waist circumference, can give us a hunch that metabolic syndrome exists. We do our patients a favor if we mention this – and enlist their curiosity and efforts in avoiding or mitigating the ravages of diabetes and worsening depression.

Dr. Harris, a diplomate of the American Board of Obesity Medicine, is in private practice and adult and geriatric psychiatry in Hartford, Conn. She also works as a psychiatric consultant to continuing care retirement organizations and professional groups. Dr. Harris, a former president of the Black Psychiatrists of America, is a Distinguished Fellow of the American Psychiatric Association. Besides psychotherapy, her major clinical interests include geriatrics, and the interface between general medicine and psychiatry.

References

1. U.S. Medicine, November 2009.

2. Science Daily, March 29, 2014.

3. Science Daily, Jan. 27, 2016.

4. Science Daily, Jan. 18, 2012.

5. “Diabetes Facts and Guidelines,” Yale Diabetes Center, 2011.

6. Ann Fam Med. 2012 Jan-Feb;10(1):15-22.

7. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(3):625-33.

8. Macworld, May 10, 2016.

9. Mol Psychiatry. 2016 Feb 23. doi: 10:1038/mp 2016.7.

10. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014 Mar 17;112(11):3463-8.

“You’re wearing an Unna boot – what happened?”

“Doc, my wife made too many tempting desserts while we were in Florida, and when we got back, I had an infected toe. My doctor gave me antibiotics, but the toe turned blue, so they had to amputate.”

I had been treating this man for depression for many years and did not know about his having diabetes, so I asked, “Are you diabetic?”

“No,” he answered. “My doctor says I’ve been prediabetic for 20 years, and he’s put me on a low dose of metformin. … My friends are on twice as much. I don’t even have to have one of those meters.

“I can just go to the senior center or stop by my doctor’s office once a week and have my sugar checked. My wife says she won’t tempt me with any more desserts; she’s buying fruit, which I’m not used to, and I’m not eating bread anymore.

“Hey, those pills you’re giving me for my depression are working great. I am eating and sleeping and doing things I love to do. The wife and I are getting over the kids’ divorces, and we are still able to help out with the grandchild, who has been so sick. When we got back home, I tried to get back with my poker buddies, but one of them is in cardiac rehab; he had a heart attack, and another one, his wife says he’s got Alzheimer’s – he did lose a lot last year and that wasn’t like him. … Yeah, I guess I’m OK. As soon as this toe heals, I’ll be 100%.”

This dialogue is a composite; the names have been changed to protect the innocent, but unfortunately, it is an oft-told tale. The relationship between diabetes and depression has been known for a long time.¹Each one is a risk factor for the other, and together and separately, they are a risk factor for dementia.

For quite a while, it was thought that having a diabetes diagnosis and having to manage it in and of itself was depressing, and that therefore, people would become depressed. It was also thought that people who are depressed might try to soothe themselves with copious amounts of comfort food and alcohol, and would thereby develop diabetes. Certainly, many people’s routes to depression and diabetes are just that – psychological reactions to having the other disease. But research shows that there is a much deeper physiologic relationship between the two.

Since diabetes and depression or their sequelae are among the 14 leading causes of death in the United States, psychiatrists and other medical professionals need to collaborate in the treatment of these diseases in their patients. Medical homes are good, but most patients continue to receive treatment for all disorders separately and in isolation. If it were not for the medical professional asking directly, or discovering some medication after the patient has given permission for an electronic medication prescribing overview of all his medications, treatment for diabetes or depression might be unknown by the other medical professional. Our noncommunicative EHRs will not help here. The only thing that will help is open communication between the patient and all of his medical treaters.

Now that I am educated and alarmed about the diabetes-depression connection, I send a note to the primary care physician and follow up with a few articles from Science Daily such as “Depression, early death among seniors with diabetes: Strong link found by research,”² or “Treating major depression in older adults with diabetes may lower risk of death”^3, or the clincher, “Treatment for diabetes and depression improves both, researchers say.”⁴

For patients with type 2 diabetes, the form of the illness usually referred to in research on diabetes and depression, the body becomes insensitive to insulin, i.e., insulin resistance develops. We now know that insulin resistance occurs throughout the body, including the brain. Insulin receptors are present in all organs of the body, including the brain. We also know that the higher fasting glucose level seen in prediabetes is an indication of the development of insulin resistance. Insulin’s job is to get glucose into cells for ready availability of energy and into muscle for backup energy.

If glucose is too plentiful, as it is when sugary foods are overconsumed, insulin directs the rest of the glucose to be stored as fat in the liver, inside blood vessels, around organs, and subcutaneously. Ultimately, there is nowhere else to store the excess energy, and insulin resistance develops. The pancreas, which secretes insulin, keeps on pumping insulin and can poop out, requiring exogenous insulin to keep things moving.⁵Treatments can include insulin itself, medications that increase insulin sensitivity, diet, and exercise to deplete the energy stores, or bariatric surgery, which, by the way, is said to cure both diabetes and depression within 3 weeks after surgery (this effect is negated if patients regain their weight.)

What the research shows

Clinical research from the University of Pennsylvania⁶ and Massachusetts General Hospital⁷shows that having a third, nonphysician treater work with patients diagnosed with both disorders improves outcomes. Both of those protocols used cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and motivational interviewing, group treatment, and telephone contact as modalities. One also used electronic monitoring of medication dosing and the record of the glucometer to follow patients’ progress.

In both studies, patients in the protocol groups did better than the treatment-as-usual groups in terms of relief of depression and control of diabetes. In the private primary care physician and psychiatrist office setting, a third party is not practical, but psychiatrists can add motivational interviewing and some aspects of CBT. Also, both psychiatrists and primary care physicians can use electronic medication monitoring and blood glucose monitoring. Recently, Apple released apps that the company said will make it easy for patients with those devices^8, but the old glucometer and pharmacy follow-up for prescriptions also can be useful. Medication (bottle cap) monitors can be expensive and may not be practical for some patients.

A prospective study of 2,525 patients showed that those with depression and metabolic risk factors were more than six times more likely to develop diabetes than patients who had depression alone, metabolic risk factors alone, or neither. These results allow for gross sorting out of which people with depression are more likely to develop diabetes.⁹This can provide an opportunity to intervene before diabetes sets in – and would have saved the toe of the patient I described earlier.

At the cellular level, at least in mice, it appears that insulin resistance in the brain alters dopamine turnover and causes behavioral disorders that look like anxiety and depression.¹⁰Mice with a brain-specific knockout of the insulin receptor showed “mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative distress in the dorsal striatum and the nucleus accumbens. Increased levels of MAO A and B leading to increased turnover of dopamine in the mesolimbic system were also observed.”

The depression in these mice was relieved with the use of imipramine and phenelzine, and the researchers also noted that previous research had shown a decrease in depressive-like behavior with the insulin sensitizer rosiglitazone, which reduces glucose in the brain when given to obese, diabetic mice. Certainly, further research is necessary, as is research in humans. But this demonstrates what might be happening to our patients who have metabolic syndrome or diabetes and depression, and may offer suggestions for appropriate treatments.

“If you see something, say something.”

In short, early effective intervention in the metabolic/prediabetes state is best. Taking weights and heights, calculating BMIs, and either measuring or observing waist circumference, can give us a hunch that metabolic syndrome exists. We do our patients a favor if we mention this – and enlist their curiosity and efforts in avoiding or mitigating the ravages of diabetes and worsening depression.

Dr. Harris, a diplomate of the American Board of Obesity Medicine, is in private practice and adult and geriatric psychiatry in Hartford, Conn. She also works as a psychiatric consultant to continuing care retirement organizations and professional groups. Dr. Harris, a former president of the Black Psychiatrists of America, is a Distinguished Fellow of the American Psychiatric Association. Besides psychotherapy, her major clinical interests include geriatrics, and the interface between general medicine and psychiatry.

References

1. U.S. Medicine, November 2009.

2. Science Daily, March 29, 2014.

3. Science Daily, Jan. 27, 2016.

4. Science Daily, Jan. 18, 2012.

5. “Diabetes Facts and Guidelines,” Yale Diabetes Center, 2011.

6. Ann Fam Med. 2012 Jan-Feb;10(1):15-22.

7. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(3):625-33.

8. Macworld, May 10, 2016.

9. Mol Psychiatry. 2016 Feb 23. doi: 10:1038/mp 2016.7.

10. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014 Mar 17;112(11):3463-8.

A few weeks ago, a young man, a child psychiatrist, called saying that he had read the first Weighty Issues column and that he agreed that psychiatrists should be actively involved in the weight loss arena.

He shared that he had several children in his practice whose body-mass indices were over 40 and that he was frustrated that the pediatricians he had spoken with seemed to be only watching and waiting for the children to grow taller. I told him what he already knew: Pediatricians have in place a very specific protocol to follow regarding the treatment of overweight and obesity in children.

I had the impression from him that he was not exactly sure that the protocol was being followed and that he was absolutely sure that the pediatricians had no appreciation of the emotional aspects of these children’s weights. He said he was so fired up about this that he was going to pursue American Board of Obesity Medicine diplomate status himself. In addition to his background in child psychiatry, he also had studied public health, and his parents had worked in the area of disease prevention.

I was thrilled by his call because he got it! Overweight and obesity are a public health menace. Every day, psychiatrists see patients with these maladies, and we should be more knowledgeable about them or armed to get the treatment started ourselves. Although this child psychiatrist continues to intervene with his patients’ pediatricians and embarks on his own ABOM studies, he can, as he sees his patients and their families, write prescriptions for exercise and play time for the family, limited screen time (TV and computer) for the youngsters, no sweetened beverages, fewer simple carbohydrates, and more plain water. These interventions all are consistent with routine lifestyle recommendations for children (and adults), and they also can promote improved well-being for children and family members.

A recent report indicated that about a quarter of 2- to 5-year-olds and one-third of school-aged children (6-18 years) are overweight or obese in the United States (JAMA. 2014 Feb 26;311[8]:306-14). By convention, body-mass index, a measure of relative body fat, is used to indicate underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obesity. It is derived from a formula: weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. In adults, normal is 18.5-24.9, overweight is 25-29.9, and obese is greater than or equal to 30 (National Institutes of Health/World Health Organization guidelines for BMI). For children, one calculates the BMI and then plots this on a graph in comparison to other children of the same age and sex to derive a percentile scale number. Percentile scale numbers from 58-94 indicate overweight, and percentiles greater than or equal to 95 indicate obesity in children aged 2-18 years. For children aged 0-2, a weight for length above the 95th percentile indicates overweight.

Childhood obesity is a major risk factor for overweight and obesity in adulthood, and for depression and cardiovascular disease in childhood and adulthood. It also sets one up for potential trouble in the areas of self-esteem, body image, body protection, poor school performance, and relationship issues with peers. These are areas of importance for psychiatrists, child and adult, as we assess, plan for, and treat our patients day to day. Furthermore, childhood overweight puts children at risk for type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, high cholesterol and high blood pressure, asthma, sleep disorders, early puberty or menstruation, Blount’s disease (progressive turning of the lower leg, resembling bowleg), and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Obesity in adulthood leads to high blood pressure, strokes, type 2 diabetes, dementia, osteoarthritis, sleep apnea, obesity hypoventilation syndrome, reproductive problems, gallstones, and some cancers (esophagus, pancreas, colon, rectum, breast-after menopause, endometrium, kidney, thyroid, and gallbladder).

The late Dr. Hilde Bruch, one of my mentors in the 1970s, was an early thought leader in childhood obesity. She did research in this area starting in 1937 while practicing pediatrics before she became a psychiatrist in 1943. She said that she was struck by the number of overweight and obese children she observed in the United States, compared with what she had observed in Germany and England. (She died in 1984 at the age of 80 and would be greatly saddened that childhood obesity is now a global issue.) In her 1973 book, “Eating Disorders: Obesity, Anorexia Nervosa, and the Person Within,” she grappled with the taking in of calories, and, speaking of hunger, said that “it is not innate, but something that contains important elements of learning.”

As an analyst, she thought of feeding learning as coming primarily from early mother-child interactions, but we now know that this learning can come through any repeated interaction and that genetic, social, cultural and environmental, and biological factors also apply.

The psychiatrist or anyone else working with children and families must endeavor to reduce self-blame, explore influences, and instill hope in the process toward normal weight and/or adequate management of weight. The psychiatrist and anyone else working with the child and family will appreciate that, if energy intake and physical activity output are manipulated consistently, the tendency for the child will be increasing height and decreasing BMI. The Prevention and Management of Obesity for Children and Adolescents Guideline is very clear about when to refer to a tertiary special weight management program for children. The guideline also speaks to use of weight-loss medication (orlistat for children 12 years and older, sibutramine for children 16 years and older). Bariatric surgery is recommended for children who have finished growing up (by growth plate evidence) and face imminent serious health issues if their weight cannot be brought under control. These children, after surgery, will need to radically restrain their eating, take supplements, and be followed for the rest of their lives to forestall complications and return to overweight and obesity. I believe that child and adult psychiatrists can be of tremendous use here in helping sort out both the physical and course-of-life issues that could threaten successful continued weight loss, whether the weight loss comes through lifestyle change, lifestyle change and medications, or bariatric surgery and subsequent lifestyle change.

I would like to thank that young child psychiatrist who called, because he spurred me to continue our “Weighty Issues” journey by looking at childhood and overweight and obesity and how it can affect our work as physicians and psychiatrists. Parental physical condition at conception and gestation, and genetics may set the stage, and then interaction with the family, the culture, the society, and the environment all interplay in the child’s development to produce an outcome of an overweight or obese child. We still are trying to discover why some but not all children in the same family, neighborhood, socioeconomic strata, culture, etc., are burdened by overweight. The reasons may be found through biological inquiry, but it may just as well in found in psychiatric/psychological inquiry.

Dr. Harris, a diplomate of the American Board of Obesity Medicine, is in private practice in adult and geriatric psychiatry in Hartford, Conn. She also works as a psychiatric consultant to continuing care retirement organizations and professional groups. Dr. Harris, a former president of the Black Psychiatrists of America, is a Distinguished Fellow of the American Psychiatric Association. Besides psychotherapy, her major clinical interests include geriatrics, and the interface between general medicine and psychiatry.

A few weeks ago, a young man, a child psychiatrist, called saying that he had read the first Weighty Issues column and that he agreed that psychiatrists should be actively involved in the weight loss arena.

He shared that he had several children in his practice whose body-mass indices were over 40 and that he was frustrated that the pediatricians he had spoken with seemed to be only watching and waiting for the children to grow taller. I told him what he already knew: Pediatricians have in place a very specific protocol to follow regarding the treatment of overweight and obesity in children.

I had the impression from him that he was not exactly sure that the protocol was being followed and that he was absolutely sure that the pediatricians had no appreciation of the emotional aspects of these children’s weights. He said he was so fired up about this that he was going to pursue American Board of Obesity Medicine diplomate status himself. In addition to his background in child psychiatry, he also had studied public health, and his parents had worked in the area of disease prevention.

I was thrilled by his call because he got it! Overweight and obesity are a public health menace. Every day, psychiatrists see patients with these maladies, and we should be more knowledgeable about them or armed to get the treatment started ourselves. Although this child psychiatrist continues to intervene with his patients’ pediatricians and embarks on his own ABOM studies, he can, as he sees his patients and their families, write prescriptions for exercise and play time for the family, limited screen time (TV and computer) for the youngsters, no sweetened beverages, fewer simple carbohydrates, and more plain water. These interventions all are consistent with routine lifestyle recommendations for children (and adults), and they also can promote improved well-being for children and family members.

A recent report indicated that about a quarter of 2- to 5-year-olds and one-third of school-aged children (6-18 years) are overweight or obese in the United States (JAMA. 2014 Feb 26;311[8]:306-14). By convention, body-mass index, a measure of relative body fat, is used to indicate underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obesity. It is derived from a formula: weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. In adults, normal is 18.5-24.9, overweight is 25-29.9, and obese is greater than or equal to 30 (National Institutes of Health/World Health Organization guidelines for BMI). For children, one calculates the BMI and then plots this on a graph in comparison to other children of the same age and sex to derive a percentile scale number. Percentile scale numbers from 58-94 indicate overweight, and percentiles greater than or equal to 95 indicate obesity in children aged 2-18 years. For children aged 0-2, a weight for length above the 95th percentile indicates overweight.

Childhood obesity is a major risk factor for overweight and obesity in adulthood, and for depression and cardiovascular disease in childhood and adulthood. It also sets one up for potential trouble in the areas of self-esteem, body image, body protection, poor school performance, and relationship issues with peers. These are areas of importance for psychiatrists, child and adult, as we assess, plan for, and treat our patients day to day. Furthermore, childhood overweight puts children at risk for type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, high cholesterol and high blood pressure, asthma, sleep disorders, early puberty or menstruation, Blount’s disease (progressive turning of the lower leg, resembling bowleg), and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Obesity in adulthood leads to high blood pressure, strokes, type 2 diabetes, dementia, osteoarthritis, sleep apnea, obesity hypoventilation syndrome, reproductive problems, gallstones, and some cancers (esophagus, pancreas, colon, rectum, breast-after menopause, endometrium, kidney, thyroid, and gallbladder).

The late Dr. Hilde Bruch, one of my mentors in the 1970s, was an early thought leader in childhood obesity. She did research in this area starting in 1937 while practicing pediatrics before she became a psychiatrist in 1943. She said that she was struck by the number of overweight and obese children she observed in the United States, compared with what she had observed in Germany and England. (She died in 1984 at the age of 80 and would be greatly saddened that childhood obesity is now a global issue.) In her 1973 book, “Eating Disorders: Obesity, Anorexia Nervosa, and the Person Within,” she grappled with the taking in of calories, and, speaking of hunger, said that “it is not innate, but something that contains important elements of learning.”

As an analyst, she thought of feeding learning as coming primarily from early mother-child interactions, but we now know that this learning can come through any repeated interaction and that genetic, social, cultural and environmental, and biological factors also apply.

The psychiatrist or anyone else working with children and families must endeavor to reduce self-blame, explore influences, and instill hope in the process toward normal weight and/or adequate management of weight. The psychiatrist and anyone else working with the child and family will appreciate that, if energy intake and physical activity output are manipulated consistently, the tendency for the child will be increasing height and decreasing BMI. The Prevention and Management of Obesity for Children and Adolescents Guideline is very clear about when to refer to a tertiary special weight management program for children. The guideline also speaks to use of weight-loss medication (orlistat for children 12 years and older, sibutramine for children 16 years and older). Bariatric surgery is recommended for children who have finished growing up (by growth plate evidence) and face imminent serious health issues if their weight cannot be brought under control. These children, after surgery, will need to radically restrain their eating, take supplements, and be followed for the rest of their lives to forestall complications and return to overweight and obesity. I believe that child and adult psychiatrists can be of tremendous use here in helping sort out both the physical and course-of-life issues that could threaten successful continued weight loss, whether the weight loss comes through lifestyle change, lifestyle change and medications, or bariatric surgery and subsequent lifestyle change.

I would like to thank that young child psychiatrist who called, because he spurred me to continue our “Weighty Issues” journey by looking at childhood and overweight and obesity and how it can affect our work as physicians and psychiatrists. Parental physical condition at conception and gestation, and genetics may set the stage, and then interaction with the family, the culture, the society, and the environment all interplay in the child’s development to produce an outcome of an overweight or obese child. We still are trying to discover why some but not all children in the same family, neighborhood, socioeconomic strata, culture, etc., are burdened by overweight. The reasons may be found through biological inquiry, but it may just as well in found in psychiatric/psychological inquiry.

Dr. Harris, a diplomate of the American Board of Obesity Medicine, is in private practice in adult and geriatric psychiatry in Hartford, Conn. She also works as a psychiatric consultant to continuing care retirement organizations and professional groups. Dr. Harris, a former president of the Black Psychiatrists of America, is a Distinguished Fellow of the American Psychiatric Association. Besides psychotherapy, her major clinical interests include geriatrics, and the interface between general medicine and psychiatry.

A few weeks ago, a young man, a child psychiatrist, called saying that he had read the first Weighty Issues column and that he agreed that psychiatrists should be actively involved in the weight loss arena.

He shared that he had several children in his practice whose body-mass indices were over 40 and that he was frustrated that the pediatricians he had spoken with seemed to be only watching and waiting for the children to grow taller. I told him what he already knew: Pediatricians have in place a very specific protocol to follow regarding the treatment of overweight and obesity in children.

I had the impression from him that he was not exactly sure that the protocol was being followed and that he was absolutely sure that the pediatricians had no appreciation of the emotional aspects of these children’s weights. He said he was so fired up about this that he was going to pursue American Board of Obesity Medicine diplomate status himself. In addition to his background in child psychiatry, he also had studied public health, and his parents had worked in the area of disease prevention.

I was thrilled by his call because he got it! Overweight and obesity are a public health menace. Every day, psychiatrists see patients with these maladies, and we should be more knowledgeable about them or armed to get the treatment started ourselves. Although this child psychiatrist continues to intervene with his patients’ pediatricians and embarks on his own ABOM studies, he can, as he sees his patients and their families, write prescriptions for exercise and play time for the family, limited screen time (TV and computer) for the youngsters, no sweetened beverages, fewer simple carbohydrates, and more plain water. These interventions all are consistent with routine lifestyle recommendations for children (and adults), and they also can promote improved well-being for children and family members.

A recent report indicated that about a quarter of 2- to 5-year-olds and one-third of school-aged children (6-18 years) are overweight or obese in the United States (JAMA. 2014 Feb 26;311[8]:306-14). By convention, body-mass index, a measure of relative body fat, is used to indicate underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obesity. It is derived from a formula: weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. In adults, normal is 18.5-24.9, overweight is 25-29.9, and obese is greater than or equal to 30 (National Institutes of Health/World Health Organization guidelines for BMI). For children, one calculates the BMI and then plots this on a graph in comparison to other children of the same age and sex to derive a percentile scale number. Percentile scale numbers from 58-94 indicate overweight, and percentiles greater than or equal to 95 indicate obesity in children aged 2-18 years. For children aged 0-2, a weight for length above the 95th percentile indicates overweight.

Childhood obesity is a major risk factor for overweight and obesity in adulthood, and for depression and cardiovascular disease in childhood and adulthood. It also sets one up for potential trouble in the areas of self-esteem, body image, body protection, poor school performance, and relationship issues with peers. These are areas of importance for psychiatrists, child and adult, as we assess, plan for, and treat our patients day to day. Furthermore, childhood overweight puts children at risk for type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, high cholesterol and high blood pressure, asthma, sleep disorders, early puberty or menstruation, Blount’s disease (progressive turning of the lower leg, resembling bowleg), and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Obesity in adulthood leads to high blood pressure, strokes, type 2 diabetes, dementia, osteoarthritis, sleep apnea, obesity hypoventilation syndrome, reproductive problems, gallstones, and some cancers (esophagus, pancreas, colon, rectum, breast-after menopause, endometrium, kidney, thyroid, and gallbladder).

The late Dr. Hilde Bruch, one of my mentors in the 1970s, was an early thought leader in childhood obesity. She did research in this area starting in 1937 while practicing pediatrics before she became a psychiatrist in 1943. She said that she was struck by the number of overweight and obese children she observed in the United States, compared with what she had observed in Germany and England. (She died in 1984 at the age of 80 and would be greatly saddened that childhood obesity is now a global issue.) In her 1973 book, “Eating Disorders: Obesity, Anorexia Nervosa, and the Person Within,” she grappled with the taking in of calories, and, speaking of hunger, said that “it is not innate, but something that contains important elements of learning.”

As an analyst, she thought of feeding learning as coming primarily from early mother-child interactions, but we now know that this learning can come through any repeated interaction and that genetic, social, cultural and environmental, and biological factors also apply.

The psychiatrist or anyone else working with children and families must endeavor to reduce self-blame, explore influences, and instill hope in the process toward normal weight and/or adequate management of weight. The psychiatrist and anyone else working with the child and family will appreciate that, if energy intake and physical activity output are manipulated consistently, the tendency for the child will be increasing height and decreasing BMI. The Prevention and Management of Obesity for Children and Adolescents Guideline is very clear about when to refer to a tertiary special weight management program for children. The guideline also speaks to use of weight-loss medication (orlistat for children 12 years and older, sibutramine for children 16 years and older). Bariatric surgery is recommended for children who have finished growing up (by growth plate evidence) and face imminent serious health issues if their weight cannot be brought under control. These children, after surgery, will need to radically restrain their eating, take supplements, and be followed for the rest of their lives to forestall complications and return to overweight and obesity. I believe that child and adult psychiatrists can be of tremendous use here in helping sort out both the physical and course-of-life issues that could threaten successful continued weight loss, whether the weight loss comes through lifestyle change, lifestyle change and medications, or bariatric surgery and subsequent lifestyle change.

I would like to thank that young child psychiatrist who called, because he spurred me to continue our “Weighty Issues” journey by looking at childhood and overweight and obesity and how it can affect our work as physicians and psychiatrists. Parental physical condition at conception and gestation, and genetics may set the stage, and then interaction with the family, the culture, the society, and the environment all interplay in the child’s development to produce an outcome of an overweight or obese child. We still are trying to discover why some but not all children in the same family, neighborhood, socioeconomic strata, culture, etc., are burdened by overweight. The reasons may be found through biological inquiry, but it may just as well in found in psychiatric/psychological inquiry.

Dr. Harris, a diplomate of the American Board of Obesity Medicine, is in private practice in adult and geriatric psychiatry in Hartford, Conn. She also works as a psychiatric consultant to continuing care retirement organizations and professional groups. Dr. Harris, a former president of the Black Psychiatrists of America, is a Distinguished Fellow of the American Psychiatric Association. Besides psychotherapy, her major clinical interests include geriatrics, and the interface between general medicine and psychiatry.

We are into a new year, and among many New Year’s resolutions we hear is the resolution to take off body weight. That people are going for a new start, a chance to begin again, is actually good; it brings new hope and vigor to the issue. But sadly, most Americans making this resolution find themselves starting anew at a weight higher than they were the previous new year when they made the same resolution. Despite ourselves, we diet, exercise, and take off some pounds and then return to our previous behaviors that got us to wanting to take off the pounds in the first place.

Can psychiatry get into the body weight adventure and begin to lead the way to solutions? What I hope to do in this new column, “Weighty Issues,” is to share some of what I have learned in becoming an obesity medicine specialist, and learn from other experts who have been assessing and treating overweight and obesity for years.

I also hope to learn and share what we as psychiatrists are doing to manage our own weight (as many of us sit for a living) and lifestyles.

Coming to terms

About two-thirds of Americans are by medical calculations overweight, with half of that proportion actually medically obese. It is well-known that being overweight is a major risk factor for most of the illnesses that cause morbidity and early death among Americans. But this public health crisis was only classified an illness by the American Medical Association in 2013. What took us so long?

The topic of over body weight and psychiatry has been heavy on my mind for many years. It always puzzled me that psychiatry concentrated on anorexia nervosa, bulimia, and binge eating but was largely not focusing on the issue that was creeping up around us and becoming the major public health concern: that of overweight and obesity.

I knew that we were to concern ourselves only with illness but by ignoring the issue we, along with the rest of medicine, have promoted major, chronic illnesses of diabetes, heart disease, cancer, and so on. Fortunately for us, the AMA declared obesity a medical illness, but unfortunately, the way the reimbursement reads for treating obesity, one must be a sort of primary care physician or surgeon to get paid for the work. To my way of thinking, psychiatrists are the best physicians to be working in the field of overweight and obesity medicine, because we – more than any other medical specialty – understand that thoughts and feelings are involved in behavior. We understand that to be successful long-term in any endeavor, one must understand and harness one’s thoughts and feelings.

Moreover, we, more than physicians in other specialties, understand that the treater’s simple transference and countertransference, and the patient’s transference, can determine the trajectory and outcome of the treatment process. Additionally, psychiatrists regularly see their patients more often and over longer periods of time than do other physicians while developing and maintaining respectful and supportive relationships that can best handle the very personal issue of weight.

Surgery often not the answer

After having been a part of many psychiatric and psychological pre–bariatric surgery screenings over many years and having known many patients, friends, and colleagues who had undergone the different surgical treatments for overweight with complications and/or obesity, only to see them, many years later, larger than they were before the surgical intervention, I began to think that cutting it out was not the only definitive way to get better health measures. I knew that each surgical candidate really meant it when they pledged to follow through indefinitely but that feelings and life had intervened, and those were more powerful than surgery. That led me to think like a psychiatrist, and learn from and keep on learning from the feelings throughout life’s challenges and not like a surgeon, whose view is “once it is cut out, it is finished.”

It even led me to think medically radical thoughts that rapid weight loss through diet and lifestyle intervention, such as the weight loss that is achieved through surgery, could be a very good thing with one major caveat ... long-term intervention (psychiatry, the discipline, knows something about long-term intervention). That kind of thinking led me to try to register for a lifestyle program that was sold out at that time. A course in Obesity Medicine, the crux of the matter, was not sold out. I took one course and was hooked, learning all that I did not know about overweight and obesity, and realizing just how complicated the matter of weight actually is.

In time, I studied and learned more, saw more patients, and became a diplomate of the American Board of Obesity Medicine (ABOM). Of the approximately 1,300 diplomates of the ABOM, only 15 identify as having psychiatry as their primary specialty. The board reports that there may be other psychiatrists who are also boarded in internal medicine or pediatrics or surgery, but specific information is not available.

Those of us who prescribe typical and atypical antipsychotic agents and some of the older and newer antidepressants are familiar with the weight gain that can be attendant to these medications. We also are familiar with metabolic syndrome, which can be associated and our need to follow fasting blood glucose and lipid levels as well as waist circumference, height, and weight.

Many of us also will educate our patients about eating fewer sweets and drinking fewer sugar sweetened beverages, consuming fewer starches, and we will advise our patients to increase their exercise. We may even prescribe metformin if the fasting blood sugar and hemoglobin A1C begin to creep upward. In addition, we are constantly trying to offset the side effects of medications that we prescribe for very serious illnesses. In short, psychiatrists already are in the obesity medicine arena.

Addressing personal challenges

Talking the talk and walking the walk is so important in the area of overweight and obesity. I have struggled with overweight most of my adult life and have been “overnutritioned” – the Chinese term for overweight, off and on during my career in psychiatry. During my obesity medicine studies, I took my own weight and lifestyle seriously, and lost a significant amount of weight. Friends and patients asked me if I were well. Over time, some patients who had been with me for years volunteered how they felt about my voluntary weight loss. Most said that I no longer looked powerful; some said that I looked like a lightweight – not a serious person.

Interestingly, over time, all of my patients who had weight issues of their own began to manage their own weight better, and began to talk about their feelings and relationship to food, exercise, and weight. We have all realized that there is more under that puffy cover than meets the eye and that it insulates a whole host of stuff. Calories in and calories out become a superficial path toward a solution.

Regarding simple transference and countertransference ... many physicians have powerful adverse feelings about patients who are overweight or obese and really struggle with working with these patients. One of my friends, a family medicine specialist, told me that he cannot look at them and has told his staff not to assign those patients to him, because they do not comply and then do not come back to follow up. It is likely that his patients pick up on his disdain, anger, and lack of hope for them, and do not return in order to protect their feelings. Interestingly, this friend has struggled with his own weight throughout his professional life. Perhaps psychiatry could be useful to the myriad of other physicians like my friend who have visceral reactions to patients with weight issues so that the physicians can be kinder to themselves and their patients can receive the care, understanding, and respect that they deserve.

Attaining and maintaining a healthy weight across the life cycles is a complicated thought-, feeling-, and event-filled endeavor. I look forward to sharing basic science, clinical science, research, and anecdotal reports as we explore “Weighty Issues.”

Dr. Harris, a diplomate of the American Board of Obesity Medicine, is in private practice in adult and geriatric psychiatry in Hartford, Conn. She also works as a psychiatric consultant to continuing care retirement organizations and professional groups. Dr. Harris, a former president of the Black Psychiatrists of America, is a Distinguished Fellow of the American Psychiatric Association. Besides psychotherapy, her major clinical interests include geriatrics and the interface between general medicine and psychiatry.

We are into a new year, and among many New Year’s resolutions we hear is the resolution to take off body weight. That people are going for a new start, a chance to begin again, is actually good; it brings new hope and vigor to the issue. But sadly, most Americans making this resolution find themselves starting anew at a weight higher than they were the previous new year when they made the same resolution. Despite ourselves, we diet, exercise, and take off some pounds and then return to our previous behaviors that got us to wanting to take off the pounds in the first place.

Can psychiatry get into the body weight adventure and begin to lead the way to solutions? What I hope to do in this new column, “Weighty Issues,” is to share some of what I have learned in becoming an obesity medicine specialist, and learn from other experts who have been assessing and treating overweight and obesity for years.

I also hope to learn and share what we as psychiatrists are doing to manage our own weight (as many of us sit for a living) and lifestyles.

Coming to terms

About two-thirds of Americans are by medical calculations overweight, with half of that proportion actually medically obese. It is well-known that being overweight is a major risk factor for most of the illnesses that cause morbidity and early death among Americans. But this public health crisis was only classified an illness by the American Medical Association in 2013. What took us so long?

The topic of over body weight and psychiatry has been heavy on my mind for many years. It always puzzled me that psychiatry concentrated on anorexia nervosa, bulimia, and binge eating but was largely not focusing on the issue that was creeping up around us and becoming the major public health concern: that of overweight and obesity.

I knew that we were to concern ourselves only with illness but by ignoring the issue we, along with the rest of medicine, have promoted major, chronic illnesses of diabetes, heart disease, cancer, and so on. Fortunately for us, the AMA declared obesity a medical illness, but unfortunately, the way the reimbursement reads for treating obesity, one must be a sort of primary care physician or surgeon to get paid for the work. To my way of thinking, psychiatrists are the best physicians to be working in the field of overweight and obesity medicine, because we – more than any other medical specialty – understand that thoughts and feelings are involved in behavior. We understand that to be successful long-term in any endeavor, one must understand and harness one’s thoughts and feelings.

Moreover, we, more than physicians in other specialties, understand that the treater’s simple transference and countertransference, and the patient’s transference, can determine the trajectory and outcome of the treatment process. Additionally, psychiatrists regularly see their patients more often and over longer periods of time than do other physicians while developing and maintaining respectful and supportive relationships that can best handle the very personal issue of weight.

Surgery often not the answer

After having been a part of many psychiatric and psychological pre–bariatric surgery screenings over many years and having known many patients, friends, and colleagues who had undergone the different surgical treatments for overweight with complications and/or obesity, only to see them, many years later, larger than they were before the surgical intervention, I began to think that cutting it out was not the only definitive way to get better health measures. I knew that each surgical candidate really meant it when they pledged to follow through indefinitely but that feelings and life had intervened, and those were more powerful than surgery. That led me to think like a psychiatrist, and learn from and keep on learning from the feelings throughout life’s challenges and not like a surgeon, whose view is “once it is cut out, it is finished.”

It even led me to think medically radical thoughts that rapid weight loss through diet and lifestyle intervention, such as the weight loss that is achieved through surgery, could be a very good thing with one major caveat ... long-term intervention (psychiatry, the discipline, knows something about long-term intervention). That kind of thinking led me to try to register for a lifestyle program that was sold out at that time. A course in Obesity Medicine, the crux of the matter, was not sold out. I took one course and was hooked, learning all that I did not know about overweight and obesity, and realizing just how complicated the matter of weight actually is.

In time, I studied and learned more, saw more patients, and became a diplomate of the American Board of Obesity Medicine (ABOM). Of the approximately 1,300 diplomates of the ABOM, only 15 identify as having psychiatry as their primary specialty. The board reports that there may be other psychiatrists who are also boarded in internal medicine or pediatrics or surgery, but specific information is not available.

Those of us who prescribe typical and atypical antipsychotic agents and some of the older and newer antidepressants are familiar with the weight gain that can be attendant to these medications. We also are familiar with metabolic syndrome, which can be associated and our need to follow fasting blood glucose and lipid levels as well as waist circumference, height, and weight.

Many of us also will educate our patients about eating fewer sweets and drinking fewer sugar sweetened beverages, consuming fewer starches, and we will advise our patients to increase their exercise. We may even prescribe metformin if the fasting blood sugar and hemoglobin A1C begin to creep upward. In addition, we are constantly trying to offset the side effects of medications that we prescribe for very serious illnesses. In short, psychiatrists already are in the obesity medicine arena.

Addressing personal challenges

Talking the talk and walking the walk is so important in the area of overweight and obesity. I have struggled with overweight most of my adult life and have been “overnutritioned” – the Chinese term for overweight, off and on during my career in psychiatry. During my obesity medicine studies, I took my own weight and lifestyle seriously, and lost a significant amount of weight. Friends and patients asked me if I were well. Over time, some patients who had been with me for years volunteered how they felt about my voluntary weight loss. Most said that I no longer looked powerful; some said that I looked like a lightweight – not a serious person.

Interestingly, over time, all of my patients who had weight issues of their own began to manage their own weight better, and began to talk about their feelings and relationship to food, exercise, and weight. We have all realized that there is more under that puffy cover than meets the eye and that it insulates a whole host of stuff. Calories in and calories out become a superficial path toward a solution.

Regarding simple transference and countertransference ... many physicians have powerful adverse feelings about patients who are overweight or obese and really struggle with working with these patients. One of my friends, a family medicine specialist, told me that he cannot look at them and has told his staff not to assign those patients to him, because they do not comply and then do not come back to follow up. It is likely that his patients pick up on his disdain, anger, and lack of hope for them, and do not return in order to protect their feelings. Interestingly, this friend has struggled with his own weight throughout his professional life. Perhaps psychiatry could be useful to the myriad of other physicians like my friend who have visceral reactions to patients with weight issues so that the physicians can be kinder to themselves and their patients can receive the care, understanding, and respect that they deserve.

Attaining and maintaining a healthy weight across the life cycles is a complicated thought-, feeling-, and event-filled endeavor. I look forward to sharing basic science, clinical science, research, and anecdotal reports as we explore “Weighty Issues.”

Dr. Harris, a diplomate of the American Board of Obesity Medicine, is in private practice in adult and geriatric psychiatry in Hartford, Conn. She also works as a psychiatric consultant to continuing care retirement organizations and professional groups. Dr. Harris, a former president of the Black Psychiatrists of America, is a Distinguished Fellow of the American Psychiatric Association. Besides psychotherapy, her major clinical interests include geriatrics and the interface between general medicine and psychiatry.

We are into a new year, and among many New Year’s resolutions we hear is the resolution to take off body weight. That people are going for a new start, a chance to begin again, is actually good; it brings new hope and vigor to the issue. But sadly, most Americans making this resolution find themselves starting anew at a weight higher than they were the previous new year when they made the same resolution. Despite ourselves, we diet, exercise, and take off some pounds and then return to our previous behaviors that got us to wanting to take off the pounds in the first place.

Can psychiatry get into the body weight adventure and begin to lead the way to solutions? What I hope to do in this new column, “Weighty Issues,” is to share some of what I have learned in becoming an obesity medicine specialist, and learn from other experts who have been assessing and treating overweight and obesity for years.

I also hope to learn and share what we as psychiatrists are doing to manage our own weight (as many of us sit for a living) and lifestyles.

Coming to terms

About two-thirds of Americans are by medical calculations overweight, with half of that proportion actually medically obese. It is well-known that being overweight is a major risk factor for most of the illnesses that cause morbidity and early death among Americans. But this public health crisis was only classified an illness by the American Medical Association in 2013. What took us so long?

The topic of over body weight and psychiatry has been heavy on my mind for many years. It always puzzled me that psychiatry concentrated on anorexia nervosa, bulimia, and binge eating but was largely not focusing on the issue that was creeping up around us and becoming the major public health concern: that of overweight and obesity.

I knew that we were to concern ourselves only with illness but by ignoring the issue we, along with the rest of medicine, have promoted major, chronic illnesses of diabetes, heart disease, cancer, and so on. Fortunately for us, the AMA declared obesity a medical illness, but unfortunately, the way the reimbursement reads for treating obesity, one must be a sort of primary care physician or surgeon to get paid for the work. To my way of thinking, psychiatrists are the best physicians to be working in the field of overweight and obesity medicine, because we – more than any other medical specialty – understand that thoughts and feelings are involved in behavior. We understand that to be successful long-term in any endeavor, one must understand and harness one’s thoughts and feelings.

Moreover, we, more than physicians in other specialties, understand that the treater’s simple transference and countertransference, and the patient’s transference, can determine the trajectory and outcome of the treatment process. Additionally, psychiatrists regularly see their patients more often and over longer periods of time than do other physicians while developing and maintaining respectful and supportive relationships that can best handle the very personal issue of weight.

Surgery often not the answer

After having been a part of many psychiatric and psychological pre–bariatric surgery screenings over many years and having known many patients, friends, and colleagues who had undergone the different surgical treatments for overweight with complications and/or obesity, only to see them, many years later, larger than they were before the surgical intervention, I began to think that cutting it out was not the only definitive way to get better health measures. I knew that each surgical candidate really meant it when they pledged to follow through indefinitely but that feelings and life had intervened, and those were more powerful than surgery. That led me to think like a psychiatrist, and learn from and keep on learning from the feelings throughout life’s challenges and not like a surgeon, whose view is “once it is cut out, it is finished.”

It even led me to think medically radical thoughts that rapid weight loss through diet and lifestyle intervention, such as the weight loss that is achieved through surgery, could be a very good thing with one major caveat ... long-term intervention (psychiatry, the discipline, knows something about long-term intervention). That kind of thinking led me to try to register for a lifestyle program that was sold out at that time. A course in Obesity Medicine, the crux of the matter, was not sold out. I took one course and was hooked, learning all that I did not know about overweight and obesity, and realizing just how complicated the matter of weight actually is.

In time, I studied and learned more, saw more patients, and became a diplomate of the American Board of Obesity Medicine (ABOM). Of the approximately 1,300 diplomates of the ABOM, only 15 identify as having psychiatry as their primary specialty. The board reports that there may be other psychiatrists who are also boarded in internal medicine or pediatrics or surgery, but specific information is not available.

Those of us who prescribe typical and atypical antipsychotic agents and some of the older and newer antidepressants are familiar with the weight gain that can be attendant to these medications. We also are familiar with metabolic syndrome, which can be associated and our need to follow fasting blood glucose and lipid levels as well as waist circumference, height, and weight.

Many of us also will educate our patients about eating fewer sweets and drinking fewer sugar sweetened beverages, consuming fewer starches, and we will advise our patients to increase their exercise. We may even prescribe metformin if the fasting blood sugar and hemoglobin A1C begin to creep upward. In addition, we are constantly trying to offset the side effects of medications that we prescribe for very serious illnesses. In short, psychiatrists already are in the obesity medicine arena.

Addressing personal challenges

Talking the talk and walking the walk is so important in the area of overweight and obesity. I have struggled with overweight most of my adult life and have been “overnutritioned” – the Chinese term for overweight, off and on during my career in psychiatry. During my obesity medicine studies, I took my own weight and lifestyle seriously, and lost a significant amount of weight. Friends and patients asked me if I were well. Over time, some patients who had been with me for years volunteered how they felt about my voluntary weight loss. Most said that I no longer looked powerful; some said that I looked like a lightweight – not a serious person.

Interestingly, over time, all of my patients who had weight issues of their own began to manage their own weight better, and began to talk about their feelings and relationship to food, exercise, and weight. We have all realized that there is more under that puffy cover than meets the eye and that it insulates a whole host of stuff. Calories in and calories out become a superficial path toward a solution.

Regarding simple transference and countertransference ... many physicians have powerful adverse feelings about patients who are overweight or obese and really struggle with working with these patients. One of my friends, a family medicine specialist, told me that he cannot look at them and has told his staff not to assign those patients to him, because they do not comply and then do not come back to follow up. It is likely that his patients pick up on his disdain, anger, and lack of hope for them, and do not return in order to protect their feelings. Interestingly, this friend has struggled with his own weight throughout his professional life. Perhaps psychiatry could be useful to the myriad of other physicians like my friend who have visceral reactions to patients with weight issues so that the physicians can be kinder to themselves and their patients can receive the care, understanding, and respect that they deserve.

Attaining and maintaining a healthy weight across the life cycles is a complicated thought-, feeling-, and event-filled endeavor. I look forward to sharing basic science, clinical science, research, and anecdotal reports as we explore “Weighty Issues.”

Dr. Harris, a diplomate of the American Board of Obesity Medicine, is in private practice in adult and geriatric psychiatry in Hartford, Conn. She also works as a psychiatric consultant to continuing care retirement organizations and professional groups. Dr. Harris, a former president of the Black Psychiatrists of America, is a Distinguished Fellow of the American Psychiatric Association. Besides psychotherapy, her major clinical interests include geriatrics and the interface between general medicine and psychiatry.