Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:35

 

Ideal sun protection practices by parents in Toronto are low, especially among parents of darker-skinned children, according to Marcus G. Tan, MD, of the University of Toronto, and his associates.

Too much sun exposure as a child is a known risk factor for skin cancer, and “it has been estimated that approximately half of cumulative ultraviolet exposure by age 60 occurs before age 20.” So it is important that children be protected from excessive sun exposure, the investigators wrote, underscoring the reason for their study of parental sun protection by Canadian parents in Toronto, which has a multiracial population.

Vesna Andjic/iStockphoto.com
Parents of children aged from 6 months to 6 years were asked to complete a questionnaire on sun protection factors. These were frequency of sun protection use (every day, on sunny days year round, on sunny days during summer, only when playing all day outside, only when in a sunnier country, never), sun protective factor of sunscreens their child used (less than 15, 15, 30 or more, do not use sunscreen), and frequency of sunscreen reapplication (2 hours or less, 3 hours, 4 hours or more, only after swimming, never reapply, do not use sunscreen, other).

Parental sun protection efforts were considered ideal if they used sun protection every day; on sunny days all year round; or during the summer, using at least SPF 30, and reapplying sunscreen at least every 2 hours. Parental efforts would be considered nonideal if they did not meet any of these three criteria.

Of 183 parents, 17% used ideal sun protection for their children; 28% were in the lighter-skinned group (Fitzpatrick phototype I-III) and 5% in the darker-skinned group (Fitzpatrick phototype IV-V), The greater likelihood of using ideal sun protection among those in the lighter-skinned group was statistically significant (odds ratio, 7.4; P less than .001). As each child grew 1 year older, parents were 31% less likely to use ideal sun protection (OR, 0.69; P = .007).

Parents whose children were in the lighter-skinned group were “more likely to believe that sun exposure was harmful” for their children (OR, 17.2), and “to perceive value in sun protection,” (OR, 11.4) the researchers said. The parents whose children were in the darker-skinned group were more likely to consider sun protection as having drawbacks (OR, 9.2), and to believe that darker skin tone provides more sun protection (OR, 12.4). Neither of the two groups was more likely to consider that sun exposure provided health benefits or that it improved appearance.

Parents whose children were in the lighter-skinned group reported significantly more frequent use of sunscreen (OR, 3.6), sunglasses (OR, 2.3), and sun suits (OR, 2.7). The parents of the children in this group reported similar or higher rates of use of hats, long-sleeved clothing, and umbrellas; seeking shade; and staying indoors between 12 pm and 2 pm, but these rates were not statistically significantly different from those reported by the parents of children in the darker-skinned group, the investigators said.

 

 


“Our study suggests that more targeted education guidelines are necessary to ensure sun safety for all children, especially in a multiracial population,” said Dr. Tan and his colleagues. “Dermatologists and primary care physicians are in ideal positions to initiate personalized efforts to improve overall rates of sun protection.”

Dr. Tan reported no relevant financial disclosures. Dr. Miriam Weinstein has worked as an advisory board member for Johnson & Johnson, which manufactures sunscreen; and Dr. Shudeshna Nag consults for Valeant, which manufactures sunscreen.

SOURCE: Tan MG et al. Pediatr Dermatol. 2018 Feb 13. doi: 10.1111/pde.13433.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Ideal sun protection practices by parents in Toronto are low, especially among parents of darker-skinned children, according to Marcus G. Tan, MD, of the University of Toronto, and his associates.

Too much sun exposure as a child is a known risk factor for skin cancer, and “it has been estimated that approximately half of cumulative ultraviolet exposure by age 60 occurs before age 20.” So it is important that children be protected from excessive sun exposure, the investigators wrote, underscoring the reason for their study of parental sun protection by Canadian parents in Toronto, which has a multiracial population.

Vesna Andjic/iStockphoto.com
Parents of children aged from 6 months to 6 years were asked to complete a questionnaire on sun protection factors. These were frequency of sun protection use (every day, on sunny days year round, on sunny days during summer, only when playing all day outside, only when in a sunnier country, never), sun protective factor of sunscreens their child used (less than 15, 15, 30 or more, do not use sunscreen), and frequency of sunscreen reapplication (2 hours or less, 3 hours, 4 hours or more, only after swimming, never reapply, do not use sunscreen, other).

Parental sun protection efforts were considered ideal if they used sun protection every day; on sunny days all year round; or during the summer, using at least SPF 30, and reapplying sunscreen at least every 2 hours. Parental efforts would be considered nonideal if they did not meet any of these three criteria.

Of 183 parents, 17% used ideal sun protection for their children; 28% were in the lighter-skinned group (Fitzpatrick phototype I-III) and 5% in the darker-skinned group (Fitzpatrick phototype IV-V), The greater likelihood of using ideal sun protection among those in the lighter-skinned group was statistically significant (odds ratio, 7.4; P less than .001). As each child grew 1 year older, parents were 31% less likely to use ideal sun protection (OR, 0.69; P = .007).

Parents whose children were in the lighter-skinned group were “more likely to believe that sun exposure was harmful” for their children (OR, 17.2), and “to perceive value in sun protection,” (OR, 11.4) the researchers said. The parents whose children were in the darker-skinned group were more likely to consider sun protection as having drawbacks (OR, 9.2), and to believe that darker skin tone provides more sun protection (OR, 12.4). Neither of the two groups was more likely to consider that sun exposure provided health benefits or that it improved appearance.

Parents whose children were in the lighter-skinned group reported significantly more frequent use of sunscreen (OR, 3.6), sunglasses (OR, 2.3), and sun suits (OR, 2.7). The parents of the children in this group reported similar or higher rates of use of hats, long-sleeved clothing, and umbrellas; seeking shade; and staying indoors between 12 pm and 2 pm, but these rates were not statistically significantly different from those reported by the parents of children in the darker-skinned group, the investigators said.

 

 


“Our study suggests that more targeted education guidelines are necessary to ensure sun safety for all children, especially in a multiracial population,” said Dr. Tan and his colleagues. “Dermatologists and primary care physicians are in ideal positions to initiate personalized efforts to improve overall rates of sun protection.”

Dr. Tan reported no relevant financial disclosures. Dr. Miriam Weinstein has worked as an advisory board member for Johnson & Johnson, which manufactures sunscreen; and Dr. Shudeshna Nag consults for Valeant, which manufactures sunscreen.

SOURCE: Tan MG et al. Pediatr Dermatol. 2018 Feb 13. doi: 10.1111/pde.13433.

 

Ideal sun protection practices by parents in Toronto are low, especially among parents of darker-skinned children, according to Marcus G. Tan, MD, of the University of Toronto, and his associates.

Too much sun exposure as a child is a known risk factor for skin cancer, and “it has been estimated that approximately half of cumulative ultraviolet exposure by age 60 occurs before age 20.” So it is important that children be protected from excessive sun exposure, the investigators wrote, underscoring the reason for their study of parental sun protection by Canadian parents in Toronto, which has a multiracial population.

Vesna Andjic/iStockphoto.com
Parents of children aged from 6 months to 6 years were asked to complete a questionnaire on sun protection factors. These were frequency of sun protection use (every day, on sunny days year round, on sunny days during summer, only when playing all day outside, only when in a sunnier country, never), sun protective factor of sunscreens their child used (less than 15, 15, 30 or more, do not use sunscreen), and frequency of sunscreen reapplication (2 hours or less, 3 hours, 4 hours or more, only after swimming, never reapply, do not use sunscreen, other).

Parental sun protection efforts were considered ideal if they used sun protection every day; on sunny days all year round; or during the summer, using at least SPF 30, and reapplying sunscreen at least every 2 hours. Parental efforts would be considered nonideal if they did not meet any of these three criteria.

Of 183 parents, 17% used ideal sun protection for their children; 28% were in the lighter-skinned group (Fitzpatrick phototype I-III) and 5% in the darker-skinned group (Fitzpatrick phototype IV-V), The greater likelihood of using ideal sun protection among those in the lighter-skinned group was statistically significant (odds ratio, 7.4; P less than .001). As each child grew 1 year older, parents were 31% less likely to use ideal sun protection (OR, 0.69; P = .007).

Parents whose children were in the lighter-skinned group were “more likely to believe that sun exposure was harmful” for their children (OR, 17.2), and “to perceive value in sun protection,” (OR, 11.4) the researchers said. The parents whose children were in the darker-skinned group were more likely to consider sun protection as having drawbacks (OR, 9.2), and to believe that darker skin tone provides more sun protection (OR, 12.4). Neither of the two groups was more likely to consider that sun exposure provided health benefits or that it improved appearance.

Parents whose children were in the lighter-skinned group reported significantly more frequent use of sunscreen (OR, 3.6), sunglasses (OR, 2.3), and sun suits (OR, 2.7). The parents of the children in this group reported similar or higher rates of use of hats, long-sleeved clothing, and umbrellas; seeking shade; and staying indoors between 12 pm and 2 pm, but these rates were not statistically significantly different from those reported by the parents of children in the darker-skinned group, the investigators said.

 

 


“Our study suggests that more targeted education guidelines are necessary to ensure sun safety for all children, especially in a multiracial population,” said Dr. Tan and his colleagues. “Dermatologists and primary care physicians are in ideal positions to initiate personalized efforts to improve overall rates of sun protection.”

Dr. Tan reported no relevant financial disclosures. Dr. Miriam Weinstein has worked as an advisory board member for Johnson & Johnson, which manufactures sunscreen; and Dr. Shudeshna Nag consults for Valeant, which manufactures sunscreen.

SOURCE: Tan MG et al. Pediatr Dermatol. 2018 Feb 13. doi: 10.1111/pde.13433.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

FROM PEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: More targeted education of parents regarding sun protection practices may be needed.

Major finding: Of 183 parents, 17% used ideal sun protection; 28% were in the lighter-skinned group and 5% in the darker-skinned group (odds ratio, 7.4; P less than .001).

Study details: The parents of 183 children aged from 6 months to 6 years in Toronto completed a questionnaire about their sun protection practices.

Disclosures: Dr. Marcus G. Tan reported no relevant financial disclosures. Dr.Miriam Weinstein has worked as an advisory board member for Johnson & Johnson, which manufactures sunscreen; and Dr. Shudeshna Nag consults for Valeant, which manufactures sunscreen.

Source: Tan MG et al. Pediatr Dermatol. 2018 Feb 13. doi: 10.1111/pde.13433.

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica