Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/14/2019 - 12:00
Display Headline
When should patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis be evaluated for valve replacement?
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

For patients whose echocardiograms show advanced calcification of the aortic valves, a jet velocity of > 4.0 m/s, or a progression in jet velocity of 0.3m/s/year; and for patients who have an abnormal exercise response or an impaired functional status, consider referral for valve replacement prior to the onset of symptoms (Grade of Recommendation: C).

 

Evidence summary

Aortic stenosis is a narrowing of the aortic valve. Degree of severity is judged by valve area: mild (1.5–2.0 cm2), moderate (1.0–1.5 cm2), severe (< 1.0 cm2). Alternatively, stenosis may be classified by transvalvular gradient or jet velocity, the latter being the easier quantity to measure by echocardiogram. Prevalence of aortic stenosis increases with age; one series of 1243 elderly women (mean age of 82) found mild stenosis in 10%, moderate stenosis in 6%, and severe stenosis in 2%.1 Natural history studies show that once classic symptoms develop, average survival decreases to 5 years with the onset of angina, 3 years after cardiac syncope, and 2 years after heart failure.2 The incidence of sudden death increases from < 1% annually among asymptomatic patients to 15% to 20% among symptomatic patients.3,4

Aortic stenosis is suggested by such findings as a harsh systolic murmur at the right upper sternal border, pulsus parvus et tardus, and a sustained point of maximal impulse. Exercise stress testing may provide additional information. In one prospective study of 123 patients, those who had a greater increase in valve area, cardiac output, and blood pressure and a smaller decrease in stroke volume on stress echocardiogram were more likely to remain asymptomatic for the entire length of their time in the study, an average of 2.5 years.5

Asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis who undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) often have their aortic valve replaced at the same time; the timing of aortic valve replacement in patients not requiring CABG is controversial. One prospective study found the severity of stenosis at baseline to be the strongest prognostic predictor. Patients with a jet velocity of < 3.0 m/s were unlikely to develop symptoms within 5 years; those with a jet velocity of 4.0 m/s had a > 50% likelihood of developing symptoms or dying within 2 years.5 Another study followed 128 patients for 4 years and found that moderate to severe valvular calcification and an increase in jet velocity of 0.3 m/s/year were the best prognostic predictors.6 Almost 80% of those with both calcification and a rapid change in jet velocity underwent surgery or died within 2 years6 (Table).

TABLE
Indications for possible valve replacement with asymptomatic aortic stenosis

Predicting factorMarker of worse prognosis
CalcificationModerate to severe (multiple large calcified areas to extensive calcification of all cusps)
Jet velocity> 4.0 m/s
Rate of jet velocity progression≥0.3 m/s/year
Exercise responseMinimal to no change in valve area, cardiac output, and blood pressure; marked decrease in stroke volume
Functional statusImpaired initially or declining

Recommendations from others

The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines recommends echocardiograms every 5 years for mild stenosis, every 2 years for moderate stenosis, and annually for severe stenosis.4 There is no guideline for exercise testing. Aortic valve replacement is recommended for symptomatic patients and patients with severe stenosis undergoing CABG or other valvular or aortic surgery.

Clinical Commentary by Ken Grauer, MD; and search strategy, at www.fpin.org.

References

1. Aronow WS, Ahn C, Kronzon I. Am J Cardiol 1997;79:379-80.

2. Ross J, Jr., Braunwald E. Circulation 1968;38(1 Suppl ):61-7.

3. Balentine J, Eisenhart A. Aortic Stenosis. EMedicine Journal 2002;3:1.-

4. Bonow RO, Carabello B, deLeon AC, Jr., et al. Circulation 1998;98:1949-84.

5. Otto CM, Burwash IG, Legget ME, et al. Circulation 1997;95:2262-70.

6. Rosenhek R, Binder T, Porenta G, et al. N Engl J Med 2000;343:611-7.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Michelle Colen, MD
Erik J. Lindbloom, MD, MSPH
Susan Meadows, MLS
Department of Family and Community Medicine University of Missouri-Columbia

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 51(09)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
739-744
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Michelle Colen, MD
Erik J. Lindbloom, MD, MSPH
Susan Meadows, MLS
Department of Family and Community Medicine University of Missouri-Columbia

Author and Disclosure Information

Michelle Colen, MD
Erik J. Lindbloom, MD, MSPH
Susan Meadows, MLS
Department of Family and Community Medicine University of Missouri-Columbia

Article PDF
Article PDF
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

For patients whose echocardiograms show advanced calcification of the aortic valves, a jet velocity of > 4.0 m/s, or a progression in jet velocity of 0.3m/s/year; and for patients who have an abnormal exercise response or an impaired functional status, consider referral for valve replacement prior to the onset of symptoms (Grade of Recommendation: C).

 

Evidence summary

Aortic stenosis is a narrowing of the aortic valve. Degree of severity is judged by valve area: mild (1.5–2.0 cm2), moderate (1.0–1.5 cm2), severe (< 1.0 cm2). Alternatively, stenosis may be classified by transvalvular gradient or jet velocity, the latter being the easier quantity to measure by echocardiogram. Prevalence of aortic stenosis increases with age; one series of 1243 elderly women (mean age of 82) found mild stenosis in 10%, moderate stenosis in 6%, and severe stenosis in 2%.1 Natural history studies show that once classic symptoms develop, average survival decreases to 5 years with the onset of angina, 3 years after cardiac syncope, and 2 years after heart failure.2 The incidence of sudden death increases from < 1% annually among asymptomatic patients to 15% to 20% among symptomatic patients.3,4

Aortic stenosis is suggested by such findings as a harsh systolic murmur at the right upper sternal border, pulsus parvus et tardus, and a sustained point of maximal impulse. Exercise stress testing may provide additional information. In one prospective study of 123 patients, those who had a greater increase in valve area, cardiac output, and blood pressure and a smaller decrease in stroke volume on stress echocardiogram were more likely to remain asymptomatic for the entire length of their time in the study, an average of 2.5 years.5

Asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis who undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) often have their aortic valve replaced at the same time; the timing of aortic valve replacement in patients not requiring CABG is controversial. One prospective study found the severity of stenosis at baseline to be the strongest prognostic predictor. Patients with a jet velocity of < 3.0 m/s were unlikely to develop symptoms within 5 years; those with a jet velocity of 4.0 m/s had a > 50% likelihood of developing symptoms or dying within 2 years.5 Another study followed 128 patients for 4 years and found that moderate to severe valvular calcification and an increase in jet velocity of 0.3 m/s/year were the best prognostic predictors.6 Almost 80% of those with both calcification and a rapid change in jet velocity underwent surgery or died within 2 years6 (Table).

TABLE
Indications for possible valve replacement with asymptomatic aortic stenosis

Predicting factorMarker of worse prognosis
CalcificationModerate to severe (multiple large calcified areas to extensive calcification of all cusps)
Jet velocity> 4.0 m/s
Rate of jet velocity progression≥0.3 m/s/year
Exercise responseMinimal to no change in valve area, cardiac output, and blood pressure; marked decrease in stroke volume
Functional statusImpaired initially or declining

Recommendations from others

The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines recommends echocardiograms every 5 years for mild stenosis, every 2 years for moderate stenosis, and annually for severe stenosis.4 There is no guideline for exercise testing. Aortic valve replacement is recommended for symptomatic patients and patients with severe stenosis undergoing CABG or other valvular or aortic surgery.

Clinical Commentary by Ken Grauer, MD; and search strategy, at www.fpin.org.

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

For patients whose echocardiograms show advanced calcification of the aortic valves, a jet velocity of > 4.0 m/s, or a progression in jet velocity of 0.3m/s/year; and for patients who have an abnormal exercise response or an impaired functional status, consider referral for valve replacement prior to the onset of symptoms (Grade of Recommendation: C).

 

Evidence summary

Aortic stenosis is a narrowing of the aortic valve. Degree of severity is judged by valve area: mild (1.5–2.0 cm2), moderate (1.0–1.5 cm2), severe (< 1.0 cm2). Alternatively, stenosis may be classified by transvalvular gradient or jet velocity, the latter being the easier quantity to measure by echocardiogram. Prevalence of aortic stenosis increases with age; one series of 1243 elderly women (mean age of 82) found mild stenosis in 10%, moderate stenosis in 6%, and severe stenosis in 2%.1 Natural history studies show that once classic symptoms develop, average survival decreases to 5 years with the onset of angina, 3 years after cardiac syncope, and 2 years after heart failure.2 The incidence of sudden death increases from < 1% annually among asymptomatic patients to 15% to 20% among symptomatic patients.3,4

Aortic stenosis is suggested by such findings as a harsh systolic murmur at the right upper sternal border, pulsus parvus et tardus, and a sustained point of maximal impulse. Exercise stress testing may provide additional information. In one prospective study of 123 patients, those who had a greater increase in valve area, cardiac output, and blood pressure and a smaller decrease in stroke volume on stress echocardiogram were more likely to remain asymptomatic for the entire length of their time in the study, an average of 2.5 years.5

Asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis who undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) often have their aortic valve replaced at the same time; the timing of aortic valve replacement in patients not requiring CABG is controversial. One prospective study found the severity of stenosis at baseline to be the strongest prognostic predictor. Patients with a jet velocity of < 3.0 m/s were unlikely to develop symptoms within 5 years; those with a jet velocity of 4.0 m/s had a > 50% likelihood of developing symptoms or dying within 2 years.5 Another study followed 128 patients for 4 years and found that moderate to severe valvular calcification and an increase in jet velocity of 0.3 m/s/year were the best prognostic predictors.6 Almost 80% of those with both calcification and a rapid change in jet velocity underwent surgery or died within 2 years6 (Table).

TABLE
Indications for possible valve replacement with asymptomatic aortic stenosis

Predicting factorMarker of worse prognosis
CalcificationModerate to severe (multiple large calcified areas to extensive calcification of all cusps)
Jet velocity> 4.0 m/s
Rate of jet velocity progression≥0.3 m/s/year
Exercise responseMinimal to no change in valve area, cardiac output, and blood pressure; marked decrease in stroke volume
Functional statusImpaired initially or declining

Recommendations from others

The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines recommends echocardiograms every 5 years for mild stenosis, every 2 years for moderate stenosis, and annually for severe stenosis.4 There is no guideline for exercise testing. Aortic valve replacement is recommended for symptomatic patients and patients with severe stenosis undergoing CABG or other valvular or aortic surgery.

Clinical Commentary by Ken Grauer, MD; and search strategy, at www.fpin.org.

References

1. Aronow WS, Ahn C, Kronzon I. Am J Cardiol 1997;79:379-80.

2. Ross J, Jr., Braunwald E. Circulation 1968;38(1 Suppl ):61-7.

3. Balentine J, Eisenhart A. Aortic Stenosis. EMedicine Journal 2002;3:1.-

4. Bonow RO, Carabello B, deLeon AC, Jr., et al. Circulation 1998;98:1949-84.

5. Otto CM, Burwash IG, Legget ME, et al. Circulation 1997;95:2262-70.

6. Rosenhek R, Binder T, Porenta G, et al. N Engl J Med 2000;343:611-7.

References

1. Aronow WS, Ahn C, Kronzon I. Am J Cardiol 1997;79:379-80.

2. Ross J, Jr., Braunwald E. Circulation 1968;38(1 Suppl ):61-7.

3. Balentine J, Eisenhart A. Aortic Stenosis. EMedicine Journal 2002;3:1.-

4. Bonow RO, Carabello B, deLeon AC, Jr., et al. Circulation 1998;98:1949-84.

5. Otto CM, Burwash IG, Legget ME, et al. Circulation 1997;95:2262-70.

6. Rosenhek R, Binder T, Porenta G, et al. N Engl J Med 2000;343:611-7.

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 51(09)
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 51(09)
Page Number
739-744
Page Number
739-744
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
When should patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis be evaluated for valve replacement?
Display Headline
When should patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis be evaluated for valve replacement?
Sections
PURLs Copyright

Evidence-based answers from the Family Physicians Inquiries Network

Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media