User login
PRACTICE CHANGER
Do not routinely initiate β-blockers in patients undergoing intermediate- or high-risk noncardiac surgery. β-Blockers appear to increase the 30-day risk for all-cause mortality.1
STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION
A: Based on meta-analysis of nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs).1
ILLUSTRATIVE CASE
A 67-year-old woman with diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia presents for evaluation prior to a total hip arthroplasty. She is not taking a β-blocker. Should you prescribe one?
Study summary >>
Current guidelines from the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) and the American Heart Association (AHA) recommend starting
β-blockers to prevent cardiac events in patients about to undergo intermediate- or high-risk surgery or vascular surgery who have a history of inducible ischemia, coronary artery disease (CAD), or at least one risk factor for CAD.2 However, the majority of the evidence for these guidelines, which were published in 2009 and are in the process of being updated, came from the DECREASE (Dutch Echocardiographic Cardiac Risk Evaluation Applying Stress Echocardiography) trials. These trials have been discredited due to serious methodologic flaws, including falsified descriptions of how outcomes were determined and fictitious databases.3
A new meta-analysis conducted by Bouri et al1 that excluded the DECREASE trials found that, although preoperative β-blockers reduce the rate of certain nonfatal outcomes, they increase the risk for death and stroke.
STUDY SUMMARY
Preop β-blockers do more harm than good
Bouri et al1 conducted a meta-analysis of published RCTs evaluating preoperative β-blockers versus placebo for patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Of the 11 studies that met eligibility criteria, two were the discredited DECREASE trials. Thus, Bouri et al1 analyzed nine high-quality RCTs that included 10,529 patients.
Most studies included patients undergoing vascular surgery. Some studies also included intra-abdominal, intrathoracic, neurosurgic, orthopedic, urologic, and gynecologic surgeries. β-Blockers were started no more than a day before surgery and were discontinued at hospital discharge or up to 30 days postop. Metoprolol was used in five trials, bisoprolol in one trial, atenolol in two trials, and propranolol in one trial. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality within 30 days.
A total of 5,264 patients were randomly assigned to receive β-blockers and 5,265 to placebo. There were 162 deaths in the β-blocker group and 129 deaths in the placebo group. Patients who received β-blockers had a 27% increased risk for all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR] = 1.27). The number needed to harm was 160.
Six of the studies also evaluated rates of nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, and hypotension. β-Blockers lowered the risk for nonfatal MI (RR = 0.73) but increased the risk for nonfatal stroke (RR = 1.73) and hypotension (RR = 1.51).
This meta-analysis was dominated by the 2008 Peri-Operative ISchemic Evaluation (POISE) trial, an RCT that compared placebo to extended-release metoprolol (100 mg 2 to 4 h before surgery, followed by 200 mg/d for 30 d), in 8,351 patients with, or at risk for, atherosclerotic disease.4 While β-blockers reduced the risk for MI and atrial fibrillation, they increased the risk for mortality and stroke, likely due to drug-induced hypotension. The slightly larger-than-typical doses of β-blockers used in this study may have contributed to the excess mortality.
What's new and challenges to implementation >>
WHAT’S NEW
Avoiding β-blockers in surgery patients will prevent deaths
Bouri et al1 found that while β-blockers protect against nonfatal MIs, they increase the risk for nonfatal strokes and death. This new meta-analysis challenges the ACCF/AHA recommendations by suggesting that abandoning the use of β-blockers for preoperative patients who aren’t already taking them will prevent a substantial number of perioperative deaths. Bouri et al1 estimate that in the United Kingdom, where 47,286 deaths occur annually within 30 days of intermediate- or high-risk procedures, the number of iatrogenic deaths would drop by approximately 10,000 if β-blockers were not used.1
CAVEATS
Don’t stop β-blockers in patients who already take them
This meta-analysis did not evaluate outcomes in patients who were already taking β-blockers. These patients should continue to take them in the perioperative period, which is in line with current ACCF/AHA guidelines.
CHALLENGES TO IMPLEMENTATION
Reluctance to disregard published guidelines
Some clinicians may not be comfortable ignoring the current ACCF/AHA guidelines that make a Class IIA recommendation (it is reasonable to administer this treatment) for the use of preoperative β-blockade for patients at risk for cardiovascular events who were not previously taking a β-blocker. This updated meta-analysis excludes the discredited DECREASE trials and challenges us to act against these current guidelines while we await updated recommendations.
REFERENCES
1. Bouri S, Shun-Shin MJ, Cole GD, et al. Meta-analysis of secure randomised controlled trials of ß-blockade to prevent perioperative death in non-cardiac surgery. Heart. 2014;100:456-464.
2. American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; American Society of Echocardiography; American Society of Nuclear Cardiology; Heart Rhythm Society; Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society for Vascular Medicine; Society for Vascular Surgery; Fleisher LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA, et al. 2009 ACCF/AHA focused update on perioperative beta blockade incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:e13-e118.
3. Erasmus Medical Center Follow-up Investigation Committee. Report on the 2012 follow-up investigation of possible breaches of academic integrity (September 30, 2012). CardioBrief. Available at: http://cardiobrief.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/integrity-report-2012-10-english-translation.pdf. Accessed August 14, 2014.
4. Devereaux PJ, Yang H, Yusuf S, et al; POISE Study Group. Effects of extended-release metoprolol succinate in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (POISE trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;
371:1839-1847.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The PURLs Surveillance System was supported in part by Grant Number UL1RR024999 from the National Center For Research Resources, a Clinical Translational Science Award to the University of Chicago. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Center For Research Resources or the National Institutes of Health.
Copyright © 2014. The Family Physicians Inquiries Network. All rights reserved.
Reprinted with permission from the Family Physicians Inquiries Network and The Journal of Family Practice. 2014;63(6):E15-E16.
PRACTICE CHANGER
Do not routinely initiate β-blockers in patients undergoing intermediate- or high-risk noncardiac surgery. β-Blockers appear to increase the 30-day risk for all-cause mortality.1
STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION
A: Based on meta-analysis of nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs).1
ILLUSTRATIVE CASE
A 67-year-old woman with diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia presents for evaluation prior to a total hip arthroplasty. She is not taking a β-blocker. Should you prescribe one?
Study summary >>
Current guidelines from the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) and the American Heart Association (AHA) recommend starting
β-blockers to prevent cardiac events in patients about to undergo intermediate- or high-risk surgery or vascular surgery who have a history of inducible ischemia, coronary artery disease (CAD), or at least one risk factor for CAD.2 However, the majority of the evidence for these guidelines, which were published in 2009 and are in the process of being updated, came from the DECREASE (Dutch Echocardiographic Cardiac Risk Evaluation Applying Stress Echocardiography) trials. These trials have been discredited due to serious methodologic flaws, including falsified descriptions of how outcomes were determined and fictitious databases.3
A new meta-analysis conducted by Bouri et al1 that excluded the DECREASE trials found that, although preoperative β-blockers reduce the rate of certain nonfatal outcomes, they increase the risk for death and stroke.
STUDY SUMMARY
Preop β-blockers do more harm than good
Bouri et al1 conducted a meta-analysis of published RCTs evaluating preoperative β-blockers versus placebo for patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Of the 11 studies that met eligibility criteria, two were the discredited DECREASE trials. Thus, Bouri et al1 analyzed nine high-quality RCTs that included 10,529 patients.
Most studies included patients undergoing vascular surgery. Some studies also included intra-abdominal, intrathoracic, neurosurgic, orthopedic, urologic, and gynecologic surgeries. β-Blockers were started no more than a day before surgery and were discontinued at hospital discharge or up to 30 days postop. Metoprolol was used in five trials, bisoprolol in one trial, atenolol in two trials, and propranolol in one trial. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality within 30 days.
A total of 5,264 patients were randomly assigned to receive β-blockers and 5,265 to placebo. There were 162 deaths in the β-blocker group and 129 deaths in the placebo group. Patients who received β-blockers had a 27% increased risk for all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR] = 1.27). The number needed to harm was 160.
Six of the studies also evaluated rates of nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, and hypotension. β-Blockers lowered the risk for nonfatal MI (RR = 0.73) but increased the risk for nonfatal stroke (RR = 1.73) and hypotension (RR = 1.51).
This meta-analysis was dominated by the 2008 Peri-Operative ISchemic Evaluation (POISE) trial, an RCT that compared placebo to extended-release metoprolol (100 mg 2 to 4 h before surgery, followed by 200 mg/d for 30 d), in 8,351 patients with, or at risk for, atherosclerotic disease.4 While β-blockers reduced the risk for MI and atrial fibrillation, they increased the risk for mortality and stroke, likely due to drug-induced hypotension. The slightly larger-than-typical doses of β-blockers used in this study may have contributed to the excess mortality.
What's new and challenges to implementation >>
WHAT’S NEW
Avoiding β-blockers in surgery patients will prevent deaths
Bouri et al1 found that while β-blockers protect against nonfatal MIs, they increase the risk for nonfatal strokes and death. This new meta-analysis challenges the ACCF/AHA recommendations by suggesting that abandoning the use of β-blockers for preoperative patients who aren’t already taking them will prevent a substantial number of perioperative deaths. Bouri et al1 estimate that in the United Kingdom, where 47,286 deaths occur annually within 30 days of intermediate- or high-risk procedures, the number of iatrogenic deaths would drop by approximately 10,000 if β-blockers were not used.1
CAVEATS
Don’t stop β-blockers in patients who already take them
This meta-analysis did not evaluate outcomes in patients who were already taking β-blockers. These patients should continue to take them in the perioperative period, which is in line with current ACCF/AHA guidelines.
CHALLENGES TO IMPLEMENTATION
Reluctance to disregard published guidelines
Some clinicians may not be comfortable ignoring the current ACCF/AHA guidelines that make a Class IIA recommendation (it is reasonable to administer this treatment) for the use of preoperative β-blockade for patients at risk for cardiovascular events who were not previously taking a β-blocker. This updated meta-analysis excludes the discredited DECREASE trials and challenges us to act against these current guidelines while we await updated recommendations.
REFERENCES
1. Bouri S, Shun-Shin MJ, Cole GD, et al. Meta-analysis of secure randomised controlled trials of ß-blockade to prevent perioperative death in non-cardiac surgery. Heart. 2014;100:456-464.
2. American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; American Society of Echocardiography; American Society of Nuclear Cardiology; Heart Rhythm Society; Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society for Vascular Medicine; Society for Vascular Surgery; Fleisher LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA, et al. 2009 ACCF/AHA focused update on perioperative beta blockade incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:e13-e118.
3. Erasmus Medical Center Follow-up Investigation Committee. Report on the 2012 follow-up investigation of possible breaches of academic integrity (September 30, 2012). CardioBrief. Available at: http://cardiobrief.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/integrity-report-2012-10-english-translation.pdf. Accessed August 14, 2014.
4. Devereaux PJ, Yang H, Yusuf S, et al; POISE Study Group. Effects of extended-release metoprolol succinate in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (POISE trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;
371:1839-1847.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The PURLs Surveillance System was supported in part by Grant Number UL1RR024999 from the National Center For Research Resources, a Clinical Translational Science Award to the University of Chicago. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Center For Research Resources or the National Institutes of Health.
Copyright © 2014. The Family Physicians Inquiries Network. All rights reserved.
Reprinted with permission from the Family Physicians Inquiries Network and The Journal of Family Practice. 2014;63(6):E15-E16.
PRACTICE CHANGER
Do not routinely initiate β-blockers in patients undergoing intermediate- or high-risk noncardiac surgery. β-Blockers appear to increase the 30-day risk for all-cause mortality.1
STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION
A: Based on meta-analysis of nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs).1
ILLUSTRATIVE CASE
A 67-year-old woman with diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia presents for evaluation prior to a total hip arthroplasty. She is not taking a β-blocker. Should you prescribe one?
Study summary >>
Current guidelines from the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) and the American Heart Association (AHA) recommend starting
β-blockers to prevent cardiac events in patients about to undergo intermediate- or high-risk surgery or vascular surgery who have a history of inducible ischemia, coronary artery disease (CAD), or at least one risk factor for CAD.2 However, the majority of the evidence for these guidelines, which were published in 2009 and are in the process of being updated, came from the DECREASE (Dutch Echocardiographic Cardiac Risk Evaluation Applying Stress Echocardiography) trials. These trials have been discredited due to serious methodologic flaws, including falsified descriptions of how outcomes were determined and fictitious databases.3
A new meta-analysis conducted by Bouri et al1 that excluded the DECREASE trials found that, although preoperative β-blockers reduce the rate of certain nonfatal outcomes, they increase the risk for death and stroke.
STUDY SUMMARY
Preop β-blockers do more harm than good
Bouri et al1 conducted a meta-analysis of published RCTs evaluating preoperative β-blockers versus placebo for patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Of the 11 studies that met eligibility criteria, two were the discredited DECREASE trials. Thus, Bouri et al1 analyzed nine high-quality RCTs that included 10,529 patients.
Most studies included patients undergoing vascular surgery. Some studies also included intra-abdominal, intrathoracic, neurosurgic, orthopedic, urologic, and gynecologic surgeries. β-Blockers were started no more than a day before surgery and were discontinued at hospital discharge or up to 30 days postop. Metoprolol was used in five trials, bisoprolol in one trial, atenolol in two trials, and propranolol in one trial. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality within 30 days.
A total of 5,264 patients were randomly assigned to receive β-blockers and 5,265 to placebo. There were 162 deaths in the β-blocker group and 129 deaths in the placebo group. Patients who received β-blockers had a 27% increased risk for all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR] = 1.27). The number needed to harm was 160.
Six of the studies also evaluated rates of nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, and hypotension. β-Blockers lowered the risk for nonfatal MI (RR = 0.73) but increased the risk for nonfatal stroke (RR = 1.73) and hypotension (RR = 1.51).
This meta-analysis was dominated by the 2008 Peri-Operative ISchemic Evaluation (POISE) trial, an RCT that compared placebo to extended-release metoprolol (100 mg 2 to 4 h before surgery, followed by 200 mg/d for 30 d), in 8,351 patients with, or at risk for, atherosclerotic disease.4 While β-blockers reduced the risk for MI and atrial fibrillation, they increased the risk for mortality and stroke, likely due to drug-induced hypotension. The slightly larger-than-typical doses of β-blockers used in this study may have contributed to the excess mortality.
What's new and challenges to implementation >>
WHAT’S NEW
Avoiding β-blockers in surgery patients will prevent deaths
Bouri et al1 found that while β-blockers protect against nonfatal MIs, they increase the risk for nonfatal strokes and death. This new meta-analysis challenges the ACCF/AHA recommendations by suggesting that abandoning the use of β-blockers for preoperative patients who aren’t already taking them will prevent a substantial number of perioperative deaths. Bouri et al1 estimate that in the United Kingdom, where 47,286 deaths occur annually within 30 days of intermediate- or high-risk procedures, the number of iatrogenic deaths would drop by approximately 10,000 if β-blockers were not used.1
CAVEATS
Don’t stop β-blockers in patients who already take them
This meta-analysis did not evaluate outcomes in patients who were already taking β-blockers. These patients should continue to take them in the perioperative period, which is in line with current ACCF/AHA guidelines.
CHALLENGES TO IMPLEMENTATION
Reluctance to disregard published guidelines
Some clinicians may not be comfortable ignoring the current ACCF/AHA guidelines that make a Class IIA recommendation (it is reasonable to administer this treatment) for the use of preoperative β-blockade for patients at risk for cardiovascular events who were not previously taking a β-blocker. This updated meta-analysis excludes the discredited DECREASE trials and challenges us to act against these current guidelines while we await updated recommendations.
REFERENCES
1. Bouri S, Shun-Shin MJ, Cole GD, et al. Meta-analysis of secure randomised controlled trials of ß-blockade to prevent perioperative death in non-cardiac surgery. Heart. 2014;100:456-464.
2. American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; American Society of Echocardiography; American Society of Nuclear Cardiology; Heart Rhythm Society; Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society for Vascular Medicine; Society for Vascular Surgery; Fleisher LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA, et al. 2009 ACCF/AHA focused update on perioperative beta blockade incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:e13-e118.
3. Erasmus Medical Center Follow-up Investigation Committee. Report on the 2012 follow-up investigation of possible breaches of academic integrity (September 30, 2012). CardioBrief. Available at: http://cardiobrief.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/integrity-report-2012-10-english-translation.pdf. Accessed August 14, 2014.
4. Devereaux PJ, Yang H, Yusuf S, et al; POISE Study Group. Effects of extended-release metoprolol succinate in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (POISE trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;
371:1839-1847.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The PURLs Surveillance System was supported in part by Grant Number UL1RR024999 from the National Center For Research Resources, a Clinical Translational Science Award to the University of Chicago. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Center For Research Resources or the National Institutes of Health.
Copyright © 2014. The Family Physicians Inquiries Network. All rights reserved.
Reprinted with permission from the Family Physicians Inquiries Network and The Journal of Family Practice. 2014;63(6):E15-E16.