User login
Welcome to Current Psychiatry, a leading source of information, online and in print, for practitioners of psychiatry and its related subspecialties, including addiction psychiatry, child and adolescent psychiatry, and geriatric psychiatry. This Web site contains evidence-based reviews of the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of mental illness and psychological disorders; case reports; updates on psychopharmacology; news about the specialty of psychiatry; pearls for practice; and other topics of interest and use to this audience.
Dear Drupal User: You're seeing this because you're logged in to Drupal, and not redirected to MDedge.com/psychiatry.
Depression
adolescent depression
adolescent major depressive disorder
adolescent schizophrenia
adolescent with major depressive disorder
animals
autism
baby
brexpiprazole
child
child bipolar
child depression
child schizophrenia
children with bipolar disorder
children with depression
children with major depressive disorder
compulsive behaviors
cure
elderly bipolar
elderly depression
elderly major depressive disorder
elderly schizophrenia
elderly with dementia
first break
first episode
gambling
gaming
geriatric depression
geriatric major depressive disorder
geriatric schizophrenia
infant
kid
major depressive disorder
major depressive disorder in adolescents
major depressive disorder in children
parenting
pediatric
pediatric bipolar
pediatric depression
pediatric major depressive disorder
pediatric schizophrenia
pregnancy
pregnant
rexulti
skin care
teen
wine
section[contains(@class, 'nav-hidden')]
footer[@id='footer']
div[contains(@class, 'pane-pub-article-current-psychiatry')]
div[contains(@class, 'pane-pub-home-current-psychiatry')]
div[contains(@class, 'pane-pub-topic-current-psychiatry')]
div[contains(@class, 'panel-panel-inner')]
div[contains(@class, 'pane-node-field-article-topics')]
section[contains(@class, 'footer-nav-section-wrapper')]
Lowering risk of Alzheimer’s disease
Pharmacologic treatments for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) may improve symptoms but have not been shown to prevent AD onset. Primary prevention therefore remains the goal. Although preventing AD by managing risk factors such as age or genetics is beyond our control (Box 1), we can do something about other factors.
This article summarizes the findings of many studies that address AD prevention and includes an online-only bibliography for readers seeking an in-depth review. The evidence does not support a firm recommendation for any specific form of primary prevention and has revealed hazards associated with estrogen therapy and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (Box 2). Most important, it suggests that you could reduce your patients’ risk of developing AD by routinely supporting their mental, physical, and social health.
The potential benefits of modifying an individual’s AD risk factors likely will depend on his or her genetic makeup, environment, and lifestyle. Even so, counseling patients to exercise more and improve their diets—such as by eating more fish, fruits, and vegetables and less saturated fat—might help protect the brain. Your ongoing efforts to manage hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes also may reduce their AD risk.
Age remains the strongest risk factor for dementia, particularly for Alzheimer’s disease (AD).a The risk of developing AD doubles every 5 years after age 65 and approaches 50% after age 85.b
Family history is a risk factor for AD, although true familial AD accounts for <5% of cases.c When diseases show a familial pattern, either genetics, environmental factors, or both may play a role. Patients with a first-degree relative with dementia have a 10% to 30% increased risk of developing the disorder.d
Genetic factors play a role in both early-onset and late-onset AD. Early-onset AD (before age 65) accounts for 6% to 7% of cases.e From this small pool of patients, only 13% exhibit clear autosomal dominant transmission over >1 generation.f Three gene mutations have been associated with early-onset AD:
- 30% to 70% are in the presenilin-1 gene
- 10% to 15% are in the amyloid precursor protein gene
- <5% are in the presenilin-2 gene.g,h
For late-onset AD (after age 65), the strongest evidence for a genetic risk factor exists for the epsilon 4 allele of the apolipoprotein E gene (APOE e4).i This genotype has been linked to the development of AD and possibly to vascular dementia.j,k In contrast, the epsilon 2 allele of APOE may exert a protective effect in AD.l APOE e3, the most common allele, appears to play a neutral role in the development of AD.
References
a. Evans DA. The epidemiology of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: an evolving field. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996;44:1482-1483.
b. Jorm AF, Jolley D. The incidence of dementia: a meta-analysis. Neurology. 1998;51:728-733.
c. van Duijn CM, Clayton D, Chandra V, et al. Familial aggregation of Alzheimer’s disease and related disorders: a collaborative re-analysis of case-control studies. EURODEM Risk Factors Research Group. Int J Epidemiol. 1991;20(suppl 2):S13-S20.
d. Chang JB, Wang PN, Chen WT, et al. ApoE epsilon4 allele is associated with incidental hallucinations and delusions in patients with AD. Neurology. 2004;63:1105-1107.
e. Sleegers K, Roks G, Theuns J, et al. Familial clustering and genetic risk for dementia in a genetically isolated Dutch population. Brain. 2004;127:1641-1649.
f. Schoenberg BS, Anderson DW, Haerer AF. Severe dementia. Prevalence and clinical features in a biracial US population. Arch Neurol. 1985;42:740-743.
g. Hsiung GY, Sadovnick AD. Genetics and dementia: risk factors, diagnosis and management. Alzheimers Dement. 2007;3:418-427.
h. GeneTests database. Available at: http://www.genetests.org. Accessed March 19, 2010.
i. Li H, Wetten S, Li L, et al. Candidate single-nucleotide polymorphisms from a genomewide association study of Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2008;65:45-53.
j. Graff-Radford NR, Green RC, Go RC, et al. Association between apolipoprotein E genotype and Alzheimer disease in African American subjects. Arch Neurol. 2002;59:594-600.
k. Slooter AJ, Cruts M, Hofman A, et al. The impact of APOE on myocardial infarction, stroke, and dementia: the Rotterdam Study. Neurology. 2004;62:1196-1198.
l. Tiraboschi P, Hansen LA, Masliah E, et al. Impact of APOE genotype on neuropathologic and neurochemical markers of Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2004;62:1977-1983.
Estrogen. Before the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study, various trials of the effects of estrogen therapy on the development of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in women age ≥65 showed inconsistent results. In the randomized, placebo-controlled WHI Memory Study, conjugated equine estrogen, 0.625 mg/d, plus medroxyprogesterone acetate, 2.5 mg/d, did not prevent mild cognitive impairment or improve global cognitive function and was associated with an increased risk for probable dementia.a Based on this evidence, conjugated equine estrogen with or without medroxyprogesterone is not recommended as therapy to protect cognitive function in older women.
NSAID therapy. Cytokine-mediated inflammation may play a role in neurodegenerative disorders and cognitive impairment in the elderly. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors, have been studied for a possible protective effect against AD and cognitive decline,b possibly by lowering amyloidogenic proteins.c A 1-year randomized controlled trial by the Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Consortium found no significant differences in cognition scores of patients treated with once-daily rofecoxib, 25 mg, or twice-daily naproxen sodium, 220 mg, when compared with placebo.d Similarly, naproxen and celecoxib did not prevent AD in the randomized, controlled Alzheimer’s Disease Anti-inflammatory Prevention Trial (ADAPT).e Rofecoxib has been withdrawn from the market, and celecoxib labeling carries a warning of potential for increased risk of cardiovascular events and life-threatening gastrointestinal bleeding associated with its use.
NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors are not recommended for the treatment or prevention of dementia or cognitive impairment. Their use for AD prevention is not supported by randomized clinical trialsd,e and they may have serious adverse effects.
References
a. Shumaker SA, Legault C, Kuller L, et al. Conjugated equine estrogens and incidence of probable dementia and mild cognitive impairment in postmenopausal women: Women’s Health Initiative Memory Study. JAMA. 2004;291:2947-2958.
b. Szekely CA, Breitner JC, Fitzpatrick AL, et al. NSAID use and dementia risk in the Cardiovascular Health Study: role of APOE and NSAID type. Neurology. 2008;70:17-24.
c. Weggen S, Eriksen JL, Das P, et al. A subset of NSAIDs lower amyloidogenic Abeta42 independently of cyclooxygenase activity. Nature. 2001;414:212-216.
d. Aisen PS, Schafer KA, Grundman M, et al. Effects of rofecoxib or naproxen vs placebo on Alzheimer disease progression: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;289(21):2819-2826.
e. ADAPT Research Group, Martin BK, Szekely C, Brandt J, et al. Cognitive function over time in the Alzheimer’s Disease Anti-inflammatory Prevention Trial (ADAPT): results of a randomized, controlled trial of naproxen and celecoxib. Arch Neurol. 2008;65(7):896-905.
Cardiovascular risk factors
The risk of developing AD or vascular dementia appears to be increased by conditions that damage the heart or blood vessels. Recent evidence suggests that successfully managing cardiovascular risk factors may decrease the likelihood of dementia in later life.
Hypertension is associated with a higher risk of AD and all-cause dementia. Curiously, some studies have shown that low blood pressure also increases dementia risk, suggesting a U-shaped relationship between blood pressure and cognitive decline. Systolic hypertension in midlife may be associated with dementia 20 years later.
One might assume that antihypertensive therapy would help prevent dementia, but the data are conflicting. The Systolic Hypertension in Europe (SYST-EUR) study1 showed a 53% reduction in vascular dementia or mixed dementia among patients receiving antihypertensive medication and a 60% reduction in AD. Similarly, the PROGRESS2 clinical trial of prevention of recurrent stroke by antihypertensive treatment reported a 34% reduction in a composite measure of cognitive impairment and dementia. On the other hand, cognitive function neither improved nor worsened in the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET-COG),3 whether patients received blood pressure treatment or placebo.
Hyperlipidemia. Lipid metabolism likely is an important pathway in amyloid beta-protein deposition, tau phosphorylation, and disruption of synaptic plasticity and neurodegenerative endpoints. Cognitive decline and incident dementia have been associated with higher dietary intake of saturated fats, partially hydrogenated unsaturated fatty acids (trans fats), and cholesterol. Not all studies have found this association, however. This could be because serum cholesterol levels may decrease in early dementia, limiting the ability to detect an effect of hypercholesterolemia on dementia risk when measurements are made later in life.
Using statins (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl–coenzyme A reductase inhibitors) to treat hypercholesterolemia has been hypothesized to impede large vessel atherosclerosis and its consequences and to trigger metabolic effects in the brain related to AD pathogenesis. Mechanisms by which statins might help prevent dementia include:
- a direct association between amyloid processing and cholesterol in the brain
- an indirect effect by decreasing the risk of stroke, as even small cerebral infarcts worsen AD severity.
Nonrandomized epidemiologic studies such as the Cardiovascular Health Study4 and MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study5 suggested that statin treatment might reduce the incidence of dementia, the degree of age-related cognitive decline, and AD’s neuropathologic burden. Large, randomized, controlled trials have not supported these observations, however. Statins failed to reduce the incidence of dementia in:
- the Heart Protection Study, testing simvastatin for 5 years in 20,536 subjects age 40 to 805
- the 3-year Preventive Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk (PROSPER) of 5,800 subjects.6
Similarly, patients receiving adjunctive atorvastatin or placebo showed no significant differences in cognition assessments after 72 weeks in the Lipitor’s Effect in Alzheimer’s Dementia (LEADe) study. This trial enrolled 640 subjects age 50 to 90 with mild-to-moderate dementia who were treated with donepezil.7 A recent Cochrane review concluded that high serum cholesterol may contribute to the development of AD and vascular dementia, but lowering cholesterol levels with statins does not prevent these problems.8
Diabetes mellitus. Diabetes and cognitive decline are closely associated. Diabetes is associated with a 50% to 100% increase in risk of AD and dementia overall and a 100% to 150% increased risk of vascular dementia. The mechanism by which diabetes increases dementia risk is uncertain but does not appear to be mediated entirely through vascular disease. High and low insulin levels may increase the risk of dementia, independent of diabetes and blood glucose. Increased peripheral insulin levels are associated with reduced brain atrophy and cognitive impairment in patients with early AD, suggesting a role for insulin signaling in AD pathophysiology. A possible relationship between insulin and beta amyloid metabolism is being studied.
Elevated postprandial plasma glucose has been associated with accelerated declines in cognitive performance.9 An inverse correlation has been noted between some cognitive measures and hemoglobin A1C levels.10 It is not clear that treating diabetes reduces the risk of dementia. In addition, in the prospective, population-based Rotterdam study, elderly patients with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin had the highest incidence of dementia.11
Tobacco smoke directly affects neuronal function, integrity, and survival. Chronic smoking has been linked to decreased global cerebral blood flow, accelerated cerebral atrophy, and ventricular enlargement.
Some studies suggest an increased risk of dementia in middle-aged and elderly smokers, possibly through a cerebrovascular mechanism such as stroke. Other studies found no association between smoking and dementia risk, and 1 suggested that nicotine may protect against AD by reducing senile plaque formation. Any protective effect of smoking would be offset by increased risks of lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and vascular dementia.
The apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 (APOE e4) gene may explain, at least in part, the conflicting results of these studies. In 2 population-based cohorts,12,13 smoking was associated with memory decline in patients without, but not with, the APOE e4 genotype.
Dietary factors
Antioxidants. The brains of patients with AD contain elevated levels of endogenous antioxidants. In vitro studies show exogenous antioxidants can reduce the toxicity of beta-amyloid in brain tissue of persons with AD. These findings have led to interest in assessing the role of dietary antioxidants such as vitamins E and C for AD prevention.
High-dose alpha-tocopherol (vitamin E, 2,000 IU/d) may slow disease progression in patients with AD, but this association is not consistently found. Furthermore, a meta-analysis of 19 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) totaling >135,000 patients found an association between vitamin E doses >400 IU/d and increased all-cause mortality.14 High-dose vitamin E supplementation for primary or secondary prevention of AD may be dangerous and is not recommended.
The lack of consistent efficacy data for vitamin C in preventing or treating AD may discourage its routine use for this purpose.15
Homocysteine is a risk factor for stroke and heart disease. It also could play a role in vascular dementia through its association with large- and small-vessel disease.
Low folate and hyperhomocysteinemia have been associated with dementia or cognitive impairment, although a cause-effect relationship is not clear. In non-demented elderly populations, plasma homocysteine is inversely associated with poor performance in tests of global cognitive function, particularly in measures of psychomotor speed.
In a recent double-blind RCT, folic acid supplementation for 3 years significantly improved domains of cognitive function that tend to decline with age, especially information processing and sensorimotor speed.16 No other good evidence, however, has shown that homocysteine-lowering therapy using folic acid or other vitamin B supplements improves cognitive function or prevents cognitive decline.
Fish and omega-3 fatty acids. High total fat, saturated fat, and total cholesterol intake increases the risk for incident dementia. In epidemiologic studies, low omega-3 fatty acid serum levels have been linked to increased dementia risk.
Fish consumption may be beneficial in reducing the risk of dementia or cognitive decline. A prospective study of 815 elderly persons found 60% less risk of developing AD in those who ate ≥1 fish meal per week, compared with those who rarely or never ate fish.17 In the Framingham study, individuals who at baseline were in the top quartile of docosahexaenoic acid consumption had lower dementia rates over 9 years of follow-up.18 Results from cross-sectional and longitudinal studies have been inconsistent; some have shown that high intake of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids is associated with less cognitive decline,19 whereas others have not.20
Although we cannot offer unequivocal advice regarding seafood or omega-3 fatty acid intake for primary prevention of dementia without evidence from RCTs, these uncontrolled studies show promise.
Mediterranean diet (MeDi) components include abundant fruits and vegetables, fish or shellfish at least twice weekly, very limited red meat, olive oil or canola oil instead of butter or margarine, tree nuts such as walnuts or pecans, red wine in moderation, and using herbs and spices instead of salt to season food. High adherence to the MeDi has been associated with a significantly lower risk for incident AD. The MeDi may affect the risk of developing AD21 as well as subsequent disease course, with a possible dose-response relationship in lower mortality.22
Eating fruits and vegetables has been associated with improved cognitive performance22 and decreased incident dementia in elderly subjects.18
Alcohol. A U-shaped relationship exists between alcohol consumption and dementia risk. High alcohol intake is associated with clinical problem drinking and alcoholism and can lead to cognitive decline. Conversely, moderate wine consumption (250 to 500 mL/d) may be protective—compared with more or less than this amount—and is associated with approximately 50% less risk of dementia.
Alcohol use may increase the risk of dementia in persons carrying the APOE e4 allele, according to the population-based Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging and Dementia (CAIDE) study from Sweden.23 After an average 21 years of follow-up of 1,449 individuals, researchers found that environmental factors—such as physical inactivity, dietary fat intake, alcohol consumption, and smoking at midlife—were associated with an increased risk of dementia at age 65 to 79 in APOE e4 carriers compared with noncarriers. The study also found that physical inactivity, dietary fat intake, and smoking at midlife increase AD risk, especially among APOE e4 carriers.
In the absence of evidence from RCTs, we cannot recommend alcohol to reduce the risk of AD.
Lifestyle and activity
Three components of lifestyle—social, mental, and physical activity—are inversely associated with the risk for dementia, AD, and cognitive impairment.
Physical exercise has been thought to enhance brain neurotrophic factor and modify apoptosis. Exercise can deter stroke and microvascular disease and improve regional cerebral blood flow. In the Cardiovascular Health Study, participants who expended the highest quartile of energy had a lower risk of all-cause dementia and AD compared with participants who expended the lowest quartile of energy.24
Mental and social activity. Epidemiologic studies have shown associations between higher educational achievement and other socioeconomic factors and reduced AD risk. Advanced education is believed to represent a cognitive reserve that delays presentation of AD’s effects on memory and cognitive function, rather than providing a protective effect against accumulation of AD pathology. Higher-educated individuals appear to experience a somewhat more rapid rate of cognitive decline when AD does become apparent, perhaps because they have accumulated a greater degree of AD pathology at that point compared with less-educated persons.
Among 117 persons with dementia in the Bronx Aging Study, each additional year of formal education delayed the time of accelerated decline by 0.21 years. After accelerated decline began, each year of additional formal education was associated with a slightly faster rate of memory decline.25
The longitudinal, population-based Kungsholmen Project in Stockholm, Sweden, found an association between daily mentally stimulating activities and decreased risk of all-cause dementia.26 Similarly, higher levels of leisure activity were linked to reduced risk of all-cause dementia in a longitudinal study of 1,772 persons age ≥65 living in Manhattan, NY.27 In a randomized, single-controlled study of the long-term effects of cognitive training, elderly individuals from 6 U.S. cities showed sustained improvement in specific cognitive performance up to 5 years after training sessions began, including memory, reasoning, and speed of processing.28
It seems reasonable to encourage older patients to maintain or increase physical, cognitive, and leisure activities as well as social interaction. These interventions can improve the quality of life and lower the risk of depression, which may be a response to cognitive decline or an independent risk factor for dementia (Box 3). The Table lists “brain exercises” you can suggest to patients to increase their mental and social activity.
Head trauma. The Multi-Institutional Research in Alzheimer’s Genetic Epidemiology (MIRAGE) project found an association between AD risk and a history of head trauma, especially in persons with APOE e4 alleles.29 Conversely, the Rotterdam Study showed no change in dementia risk for persons with a history of head trauma.30
Even in the absence of conclusive evidence supporting AD prevention, protecting the head by buckling seat belts while driving, wearing helmets when participating in sports, and “fall-proofing” the home is recommended.
Depression often occurs before or as a coexisting condition with Alzheimer’s disease (AD).a Although depression has been considered a response to cognitive decline or an early manifestation of dementia,b it also could be an independent risk factor.c,d
The pathologic mechanism linking depression and subsequent dementia is not well understood. Hypotheses include an indirect neurotoxic effect of depression mediated by cortisol-induced hippocampal atrophy or lowered brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels.e Depression and dementia might share genetic links, although a cohort study of 404 individuals with AD detected no association between apolipoprotein E genotypes or alleles and depressive symptoms.f
References
a. Lupien SJ, Nair NP, Brière S, et al. Increased cortisol levels and impaired cognition in human aging: implication for depression and dementia in later life. Rev Neurosci. 1999;10(2):117-139.
b. Preuss UW, Siafarikas N, Petrucci M, et al. Depressive disorders in dementia and mild cognitive impairments: is comorbidity a cause or a risk factor? Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2009;77:399-406.
c. Green RC, Cupples LA, Kurz A, et al. Depression as a risk factor for Alzheimer disease: the MIRAGE Study. Arch Neurol. 2003;60(5):753-759.
d. Ownby RL, Crocco E, Acevedo A, et al. Depression and risk for Alzheimer’s disease: systematic review, meta-analysis, and metaregression analysis. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63(5):530-538.
e. Meeks TW, Ropacki SA, Jeste DV. The neurobiology of neuropsychiatric syndromes in dementia. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2006;19(6):581-586.
f. Craig D, Hart DJ, McIlroy SP, et al. Association analysis of apolipoprotein E genotype and risk of depressive symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2005;19(2-3):154-157.
Table
Brain exercises to suggest to patients
| Learn something new (how to play a musical instrument, a foreign language, or a new hobby) |
| Play memory games |
| Practice using the opposite hand to perform tasks you usually do with your dominant hand |
| Read, especially challenging material |
| Join a book discussion group |
| Write; if not a book or article, write a diary, letters, or emails or start your memoirs |
| Do crossword, Sudoku, or jigsaw puzzles |
| Play board games, card games, and other strategy games |
| Debate or discuss topics |
Related resource
- For an extensive bibliography of literature on Alzheimer’s disease risk factors and prevention, see this article at CurrentPsychiatry.com.
Drug brand names
- Atorvastatin • Lipitor
- Celecoxib • Celebrex
- Donepezil • Aricept
- Medroxyprogesterone • Provera
- Pravastatin • Pravachol
- Rofecoxib • Vioxx
- Simvastatin • Zocor
Disclosures
Dr. Bassil reports no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article, or with manufacturers of competing products.
Dr. Grossberg receives research/grant support from and is a consultant to Bristol-Myers Squibb, Forest Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer Inc., and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals. He also receives research/grant support from Baxter.
1. Forette F, Seux ML, Staessen JA, et al. The prevention of dementia with antihypertensive treatment: new evidence from the systolic hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) study. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:2046-2052.
2. Tzourio C, Anderson C, Chapman N, et al. Effects of blood pressure lowering with perindopril and indapamide therapy on dementia and cognitive decline in patients with cerebrovascular disease. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1069-1075.
3. Peters R, Beckett N, Forette F. Incident dementia and blood pressure lowering in the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial cognitive function assessment (HYVET-COG). Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(8):683-689.
4. Rea TD, Breitner JC, Psaty BM, et al. Statin use and the risk of incident dementia: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Arch Neurol. 2005;62:1047-1051.
5. Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;360:7-22.
6. Kulbertus H, Scheen AJ. [The PROSPER Study (PROspective study of pravastatin in the elderly at risk)]. Rev Med Liege. 2002;57(12):809-813.
7. Feldman HH, Doody RS, Kivipelto M, et al. Randomized controlled trial of atorvastatin in mild to moderate Alzheimer disease: LEADe. Neurology. 2010;74(12):956-964.
8. McGuinness B, Bullock R, Craig D, et al. Statins for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease and dementia (protocol). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;1:CD007514.-
9. Abbatecola AM, Rizzo MR, Barbieri M, et al. Postprandial plasmaglucose excursions and cognitive functioning in aged type 2 diabetics. Neurology. 2006;67:235-240.
10. Munshi M, Grande L, Hayes M, et al. Cognitive dysfunction is associated with poor diabetes control in older adults. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1794-1799.
11. Ott A, Stolk RP, van Harskamp F, et al. Diabetes mellitus and the risk of dementia. The Rotterdam study. Neurology. 1999;53:1937-1942.
12. Reitz C, Luchsinger J, Tang MX, et al. Effect of smoking and time on cognitive function in the elderly without dementia. Neurology. 2005;65:870-875.
13. Reitz C, den Heijer T, van Duijn C, et al. Relation between smoking and risk of dementia and Alzheimer disease: the Rotterdam Study. Neurology. 2007;69:998-1005.
14. Miller ER, III, Pastor-Barriuso R, Dalal D, et al. Meta-analysis: high-dosage vitamin E supplementation may increase all-cause mortality. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(1):37-46.
15. Boothby LA, Doering PL. Vitamin C and vitamin E for Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Pharmacother. 2005;39(12):2073-2080.
16. Durga J, van Boxtel MP, Schouten EG, et al. Effect of 3-year folic acid supplementation on cognitive function in older adults in the FACIT trial: a randomised, double blind, controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;369:208-216.
17. Morris MC, Evans DA, Bienias JL, et al. Consumption of fish and n-3 fatty acids and risk of incident Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2003;60:940-946.
18. Schaefer EJ, Bongard V, Beiser AS, et al. Plasma phosphatidylcholine docosahexaenoic acid content and risk of dementia and Alzheimer disease: the Framingham Heart Study. Arch Neurol. 2006;63:1545-1550.
19. Kalmijn S, Launer LJ, Ott A, et al. Dietary fat intake and the risk of incident dementia in the Rotterdam Study. Ann Neurol. 1997;42:776-782.
20. van Gelder BM, Tijhuis M, Kalmijn S, et al. Fish consumption, n-3 fatty acids, and subsequent 5-y cognitive decline in elderly men: the Zutphen Elderly Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85:1142-1147.
21. Solfrizzi V, Capurso C, Panza F. Adherence to a Mediterranean dietary pattern and risk of Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol. 2006;60:620.-
22. Scarmeas N, Luchsinger JA, Mayeux R, et al. Mediterranean diet and Alzheimer disease mortality. Neurology. 2007;69(11):1084-1093.
23. Kivipelto M, Rovio S, Ngandu T, et al. Apolipoprotein E epsilon4 magnifies lifestyle risks for dementia: a population-based study. J Cell Mol Med. 2008;12(6B):2762-2771.
24. Podewils LJ, Guallar E, Kuller LH, et al. Physical activity, APOE genotype and dementia risk: findings from the Cardiovascular Health Cognition Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161:639-651.
25. Hall CB, Derby C, LeValley A, et al. Education delays accelerated decline on a memory test in persons who develop dementia. Neurology. 2007;69:1657-1664.
26. Wang HX, Karp A, Winblad B, et al. Late-life engagement in social and leisure activities is associated with a decreased risk of dementia: a longitudinal study from the Kungsholmen Project. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155:1081-1087.
27. Scarmeas N, Levy G, Tang MX, et al. Influence of leisure activity on the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 2001;57:2236-2242.
28. Willis SL, Tennstedt SL, Marsiske M, et al. Long-term effects of cognitive training on everyday functional outcomes in older adults. JAMA. 2006;296:2805-2814.
29. Guo Z, Cupples LA, Kurz A, et al. Head injury and the risk of AD in the MIRAGE study. Neurology. 2000;54:1316-1323.
30. Ruitenberg A, van Swieten JC, Witteman JC, et al. Alcohol consumption and risk of dementia: the Rotterdam Study. Lancet. 2002;359:281-286.
Pharmacologic treatments for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) may improve symptoms but have not been shown to prevent AD onset. Primary prevention therefore remains the goal. Although preventing AD by managing risk factors such as age or genetics is beyond our control (Box 1), we can do something about other factors.
This article summarizes the findings of many studies that address AD prevention and includes an online-only bibliography for readers seeking an in-depth review. The evidence does not support a firm recommendation for any specific form of primary prevention and has revealed hazards associated with estrogen therapy and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (Box 2). Most important, it suggests that you could reduce your patients’ risk of developing AD by routinely supporting their mental, physical, and social health.
The potential benefits of modifying an individual’s AD risk factors likely will depend on his or her genetic makeup, environment, and lifestyle. Even so, counseling patients to exercise more and improve their diets—such as by eating more fish, fruits, and vegetables and less saturated fat—might help protect the brain. Your ongoing efforts to manage hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes also may reduce their AD risk.
Age remains the strongest risk factor for dementia, particularly for Alzheimer’s disease (AD).a The risk of developing AD doubles every 5 years after age 65 and approaches 50% after age 85.b
Family history is a risk factor for AD, although true familial AD accounts for <5% of cases.c When diseases show a familial pattern, either genetics, environmental factors, or both may play a role. Patients with a first-degree relative with dementia have a 10% to 30% increased risk of developing the disorder.d
Genetic factors play a role in both early-onset and late-onset AD. Early-onset AD (before age 65) accounts for 6% to 7% of cases.e From this small pool of patients, only 13% exhibit clear autosomal dominant transmission over >1 generation.f Three gene mutations have been associated with early-onset AD:
- 30% to 70% are in the presenilin-1 gene
- 10% to 15% are in the amyloid precursor protein gene
- <5% are in the presenilin-2 gene.g,h
For late-onset AD (after age 65), the strongest evidence for a genetic risk factor exists for the epsilon 4 allele of the apolipoprotein E gene (APOE e4).i This genotype has been linked to the development of AD and possibly to vascular dementia.j,k In contrast, the epsilon 2 allele of APOE may exert a protective effect in AD.l APOE e3, the most common allele, appears to play a neutral role in the development of AD.
References
a. Evans DA. The epidemiology of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: an evolving field. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996;44:1482-1483.
b. Jorm AF, Jolley D. The incidence of dementia: a meta-analysis. Neurology. 1998;51:728-733.
c. van Duijn CM, Clayton D, Chandra V, et al. Familial aggregation of Alzheimer’s disease and related disorders: a collaborative re-analysis of case-control studies. EURODEM Risk Factors Research Group. Int J Epidemiol. 1991;20(suppl 2):S13-S20.
d. Chang JB, Wang PN, Chen WT, et al. ApoE epsilon4 allele is associated with incidental hallucinations and delusions in patients with AD. Neurology. 2004;63:1105-1107.
e. Sleegers K, Roks G, Theuns J, et al. Familial clustering and genetic risk for dementia in a genetically isolated Dutch population. Brain. 2004;127:1641-1649.
f. Schoenberg BS, Anderson DW, Haerer AF. Severe dementia. Prevalence and clinical features in a biracial US population. Arch Neurol. 1985;42:740-743.
g. Hsiung GY, Sadovnick AD. Genetics and dementia: risk factors, diagnosis and management. Alzheimers Dement. 2007;3:418-427.
h. GeneTests database. Available at: http://www.genetests.org. Accessed March 19, 2010.
i. Li H, Wetten S, Li L, et al. Candidate single-nucleotide polymorphisms from a genomewide association study of Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2008;65:45-53.
j. Graff-Radford NR, Green RC, Go RC, et al. Association between apolipoprotein E genotype and Alzheimer disease in African American subjects. Arch Neurol. 2002;59:594-600.
k. Slooter AJ, Cruts M, Hofman A, et al. The impact of APOE on myocardial infarction, stroke, and dementia: the Rotterdam Study. Neurology. 2004;62:1196-1198.
l. Tiraboschi P, Hansen LA, Masliah E, et al. Impact of APOE genotype on neuropathologic and neurochemical markers of Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2004;62:1977-1983.
Estrogen. Before the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study, various trials of the effects of estrogen therapy on the development of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in women age ≥65 showed inconsistent results. In the randomized, placebo-controlled WHI Memory Study, conjugated equine estrogen, 0.625 mg/d, plus medroxyprogesterone acetate, 2.5 mg/d, did not prevent mild cognitive impairment or improve global cognitive function and was associated with an increased risk for probable dementia.a Based on this evidence, conjugated equine estrogen with or without medroxyprogesterone is not recommended as therapy to protect cognitive function in older women.
NSAID therapy. Cytokine-mediated inflammation may play a role in neurodegenerative disorders and cognitive impairment in the elderly. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors, have been studied for a possible protective effect against AD and cognitive decline,b possibly by lowering amyloidogenic proteins.c A 1-year randomized controlled trial by the Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Consortium found no significant differences in cognition scores of patients treated with once-daily rofecoxib, 25 mg, or twice-daily naproxen sodium, 220 mg, when compared with placebo.d Similarly, naproxen and celecoxib did not prevent AD in the randomized, controlled Alzheimer’s Disease Anti-inflammatory Prevention Trial (ADAPT).e Rofecoxib has been withdrawn from the market, and celecoxib labeling carries a warning of potential for increased risk of cardiovascular events and life-threatening gastrointestinal bleeding associated with its use.
NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors are not recommended for the treatment or prevention of dementia or cognitive impairment. Their use for AD prevention is not supported by randomized clinical trialsd,e and they may have serious adverse effects.
References
a. Shumaker SA, Legault C, Kuller L, et al. Conjugated equine estrogens and incidence of probable dementia and mild cognitive impairment in postmenopausal women: Women’s Health Initiative Memory Study. JAMA. 2004;291:2947-2958.
b. Szekely CA, Breitner JC, Fitzpatrick AL, et al. NSAID use and dementia risk in the Cardiovascular Health Study: role of APOE and NSAID type. Neurology. 2008;70:17-24.
c. Weggen S, Eriksen JL, Das P, et al. A subset of NSAIDs lower amyloidogenic Abeta42 independently of cyclooxygenase activity. Nature. 2001;414:212-216.
d. Aisen PS, Schafer KA, Grundman M, et al. Effects of rofecoxib or naproxen vs placebo on Alzheimer disease progression: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;289(21):2819-2826.
e. ADAPT Research Group, Martin BK, Szekely C, Brandt J, et al. Cognitive function over time in the Alzheimer’s Disease Anti-inflammatory Prevention Trial (ADAPT): results of a randomized, controlled trial of naproxen and celecoxib. Arch Neurol. 2008;65(7):896-905.
Cardiovascular risk factors
The risk of developing AD or vascular dementia appears to be increased by conditions that damage the heart or blood vessels. Recent evidence suggests that successfully managing cardiovascular risk factors may decrease the likelihood of dementia in later life.
Hypertension is associated with a higher risk of AD and all-cause dementia. Curiously, some studies have shown that low blood pressure also increases dementia risk, suggesting a U-shaped relationship between blood pressure and cognitive decline. Systolic hypertension in midlife may be associated with dementia 20 years later.
One might assume that antihypertensive therapy would help prevent dementia, but the data are conflicting. The Systolic Hypertension in Europe (SYST-EUR) study1 showed a 53% reduction in vascular dementia or mixed dementia among patients receiving antihypertensive medication and a 60% reduction in AD. Similarly, the PROGRESS2 clinical trial of prevention of recurrent stroke by antihypertensive treatment reported a 34% reduction in a composite measure of cognitive impairment and dementia. On the other hand, cognitive function neither improved nor worsened in the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET-COG),3 whether patients received blood pressure treatment or placebo.
Hyperlipidemia. Lipid metabolism likely is an important pathway in amyloid beta-protein deposition, tau phosphorylation, and disruption of synaptic plasticity and neurodegenerative endpoints. Cognitive decline and incident dementia have been associated with higher dietary intake of saturated fats, partially hydrogenated unsaturated fatty acids (trans fats), and cholesterol. Not all studies have found this association, however. This could be because serum cholesterol levels may decrease in early dementia, limiting the ability to detect an effect of hypercholesterolemia on dementia risk when measurements are made later in life.
Using statins (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl–coenzyme A reductase inhibitors) to treat hypercholesterolemia has been hypothesized to impede large vessel atherosclerosis and its consequences and to trigger metabolic effects in the brain related to AD pathogenesis. Mechanisms by which statins might help prevent dementia include:
- a direct association between amyloid processing and cholesterol in the brain
- an indirect effect by decreasing the risk of stroke, as even small cerebral infarcts worsen AD severity.
Nonrandomized epidemiologic studies such as the Cardiovascular Health Study4 and MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study5 suggested that statin treatment might reduce the incidence of dementia, the degree of age-related cognitive decline, and AD’s neuropathologic burden. Large, randomized, controlled trials have not supported these observations, however. Statins failed to reduce the incidence of dementia in:
- the Heart Protection Study, testing simvastatin for 5 years in 20,536 subjects age 40 to 805
- the 3-year Preventive Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk (PROSPER) of 5,800 subjects.6
Similarly, patients receiving adjunctive atorvastatin or placebo showed no significant differences in cognition assessments after 72 weeks in the Lipitor’s Effect in Alzheimer’s Dementia (LEADe) study. This trial enrolled 640 subjects age 50 to 90 with mild-to-moderate dementia who were treated with donepezil.7 A recent Cochrane review concluded that high serum cholesterol may contribute to the development of AD and vascular dementia, but lowering cholesterol levels with statins does not prevent these problems.8
Diabetes mellitus. Diabetes and cognitive decline are closely associated. Diabetes is associated with a 50% to 100% increase in risk of AD and dementia overall and a 100% to 150% increased risk of vascular dementia. The mechanism by which diabetes increases dementia risk is uncertain but does not appear to be mediated entirely through vascular disease. High and low insulin levels may increase the risk of dementia, independent of diabetes and blood glucose. Increased peripheral insulin levels are associated with reduced brain atrophy and cognitive impairment in patients with early AD, suggesting a role for insulin signaling in AD pathophysiology. A possible relationship between insulin and beta amyloid metabolism is being studied.
Elevated postprandial plasma glucose has been associated with accelerated declines in cognitive performance.9 An inverse correlation has been noted between some cognitive measures and hemoglobin A1C levels.10 It is not clear that treating diabetes reduces the risk of dementia. In addition, in the prospective, population-based Rotterdam study, elderly patients with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin had the highest incidence of dementia.11
Tobacco smoke directly affects neuronal function, integrity, and survival. Chronic smoking has been linked to decreased global cerebral blood flow, accelerated cerebral atrophy, and ventricular enlargement.
Some studies suggest an increased risk of dementia in middle-aged and elderly smokers, possibly through a cerebrovascular mechanism such as stroke. Other studies found no association between smoking and dementia risk, and 1 suggested that nicotine may protect against AD by reducing senile plaque formation. Any protective effect of smoking would be offset by increased risks of lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and vascular dementia.
The apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 (APOE e4) gene may explain, at least in part, the conflicting results of these studies. In 2 population-based cohorts,12,13 smoking was associated with memory decline in patients without, but not with, the APOE e4 genotype.
Dietary factors
Antioxidants. The brains of patients with AD contain elevated levels of endogenous antioxidants. In vitro studies show exogenous antioxidants can reduce the toxicity of beta-amyloid in brain tissue of persons with AD. These findings have led to interest in assessing the role of dietary antioxidants such as vitamins E and C for AD prevention.
High-dose alpha-tocopherol (vitamin E, 2,000 IU/d) may slow disease progression in patients with AD, but this association is not consistently found. Furthermore, a meta-analysis of 19 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) totaling >135,000 patients found an association between vitamin E doses >400 IU/d and increased all-cause mortality.14 High-dose vitamin E supplementation for primary or secondary prevention of AD may be dangerous and is not recommended.
The lack of consistent efficacy data for vitamin C in preventing or treating AD may discourage its routine use for this purpose.15
Homocysteine is a risk factor for stroke and heart disease. It also could play a role in vascular dementia through its association with large- and small-vessel disease.
Low folate and hyperhomocysteinemia have been associated with dementia or cognitive impairment, although a cause-effect relationship is not clear. In non-demented elderly populations, plasma homocysteine is inversely associated with poor performance in tests of global cognitive function, particularly in measures of psychomotor speed.
In a recent double-blind RCT, folic acid supplementation for 3 years significantly improved domains of cognitive function that tend to decline with age, especially information processing and sensorimotor speed.16 No other good evidence, however, has shown that homocysteine-lowering therapy using folic acid or other vitamin B supplements improves cognitive function or prevents cognitive decline.
Fish and omega-3 fatty acids. High total fat, saturated fat, and total cholesterol intake increases the risk for incident dementia. In epidemiologic studies, low omega-3 fatty acid serum levels have been linked to increased dementia risk.
Fish consumption may be beneficial in reducing the risk of dementia or cognitive decline. A prospective study of 815 elderly persons found 60% less risk of developing AD in those who ate ≥1 fish meal per week, compared with those who rarely or never ate fish.17 In the Framingham study, individuals who at baseline were in the top quartile of docosahexaenoic acid consumption had lower dementia rates over 9 years of follow-up.18 Results from cross-sectional and longitudinal studies have been inconsistent; some have shown that high intake of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids is associated with less cognitive decline,19 whereas others have not.20
Although we cannot offer unequivocal advice regarding seafood or omega-3 fatty acid intake for primary prevention of dementia without evidence from RCTs, these uncontrolled studies show promise.
Mediterranean diet (MeDi) components include abundant fruits and vegetables, fish or shellfish at least twice weekly, very limited red meat, olive oil or canola oil instead of butter or margarine, tree nuts such as walnuts or pecans, red wine in moderation, and using herbs and spices instead of salt to season food. High adherence to the MeDi has been associated with a significantly lower risk for incident AD. The MeDi may affect the risk of developing AD21 as well as subsequent disease course, with a possible dose-response relationship in lower mortality.22
Eating fruits and vegetables has been associated with improved cognitive performance22 and decreased incident dementia in elderly subjects.18
Alcohol. A U-shaped relationship exists between alcohol consumption and dementia risk. High alcohol intake is associated with clinical problem drinking and alcoholism and can lead to cognitive decline. Conversely, moderate wine consumption (250 to 500 mL/d) may be protective—compared with more or less than this amount—and is associated with approximately 50% less risk of dementia.
Alcohol use may increase the risk of dementia in persons carrying the APOE e4 allele, according to the population-based Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging and Dementia (CAIDE) study from Sweden.23 After an average 21 years of follow-up of 1,449 individuals, researchers found that environmental factors—such as physical inactivity, dietary fat intake, alcohol consumption, and smoking at midlife—were associated with an increased risk of dementia at age 65 to 79 in APOE e4 carriers compared with noncarriers. The study also found that physical inactivity, dietary fat intake, and smoking at midlife increase AD risk, especially among APOE e4 carriers.
In the absence of evidence from RCTs, we cannot recommend alcohol to reduce the risk of AD.
Lifestyle and activity
Three components of lifestyle—social, mental, and physical activity—are inversely associated with the risk for dementia, AD, and cognitive impairment.
Physical exercise has been thought to enhance brain neurotrophic factor and modify apoptosis. Exercise can deter stroke and microvascular disease and improve regional cerebral blood flow. In the Cardiovascular Health Study, participants who expended the highest quartile of energy had a lower risk of all-cause dementia and AD compared with participants who expended the lowest quartile of energy.24
Mental and social activity. Epidemiologic studies have shown associations between higher educational achievement and other socioeconomic factors and reduced AD risk. Advanced education is believed to represent a cognitive reserve that delays presentation of AD’s effects on memory and cognitive function, rather than providing a protective effect against accumulation of AD pathology. Higher-educated individuals appear to experience a somewhat more rapid rate of cognitive decline when AD does become apparent, perhaps because they have accumulated a greater degree of AD pathology at that point compared with less-educated persons.
Among 117 persons with dementia in the Bronx Aging Study, each additional year of formal education delayed the time of accelerated decline by 0.21 years. After accelerated decline began, each year of additional formal education was associated with a slightly faster rate of memory decline.25
The longitudinal, population-based Kungsholmen Project in Stockholm, Sweden, found an association between daily mentally stimulating activities and decreased risk of all-cause dementia.26 Similarly, higher levels of leisure activity were linked to reduced risk of all-cause dementia in a longitudinal study of 1,772 persons age ≥65 living in Manhattan, NY.27 In a randomized, single-controlled study of the long-term effects of cognitive training, elderly individuals from 6 U.S. cities showed sustained improvement in specific cognitive performance up to 5 years after training sessions began, including memory, reasoning, and speed of processing.28
It seems reasonable to encourage older patients to maintain or increase physical, cognitive, and leisure activities as well as social interaction. These interventions can improve the quality of life and lower the risk of depression, which may be a response to cognitive decline or an independent risk factor for dementia (Box 3). The Table lists “brain exercises” you can suggest to patients to increase their mental and social activity.
Head trauma. The Multi-Institutional Research in Alzheimer’s Genetic Epidemiology (MIRAGE) project found an association between AD risk and a history of head trauma, especially in persons with APOE e4 alleles.29 Conversely, the Rotterdam Study showed no change in dementia risk for persons with a history of head trauma.30
Even in the absence of conclusive evidence supporting AD prevention, protecting the head by buckling seat belts while driving, wearing helmets when participating in sports, and “fall-proofing” the home is recommended.
Depression often occurs before or as a coexisting condition with Alzheimer’s disease (AD).a Although depression has been considered a response to cognitive decline or an early manifestation of dementia,b it also could be an independent risk factor.c,d
The pathologic mechanism linking depression and subsequent dementia is not well understood. Hypotheses include an indirect neurotoxic effect of depression mediated by cortisol-induced hippocampal atrophy or lowered brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels.e Depression and dementia might share genetic links, although a cohort study of 404 individuals with AD detected no association between apolipoprotein E genotypes or alleles and depressive symptoms.f
References
a. Lupien SJ, Nair NP, Brière S, et al. Increased cortisol levels and impaired cognition in human aging: implication for depression and dementia in later life. Rev Neurosci. 1999;10(2):117-139.
b. Preuss UW, Siafarikas N, Petrucci M, et al. Depressive disorders in dementia and mild cognitive impairments: is comorbidity a cause or a risk factor? Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2009;77:399-406.
c. Green RC, Cupples LA, Kurz A, et al. Depression as a risk factor for Alzheimer disease: the MIRAGE Study. Arch Neurol. 2003;60(5):753-759.
d. Ownby RL, Crocco E, Acevedo A, et al. Depression and risk for Alzheimer’s disease: systematic review, meta-analysis, and metaregression analysis. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63(5):530-538.
e. Meeks TW, Ropacki SA, Jeste DV. The neurobiology of neuropsychiatric syndromes in dementia. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2006;19(6):581-586.
f. Craig D, Hart DJ, McIlroy SP, et al. Association analysis of apolipoprotein E genotype and risk of depressive symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2005;19(2-3):154-157.
Table
Brain exercises to suggest to patients
| Learn something new (how to play a musical instrument, a foreign language, or a new hobby) |
| Play memory games |
| Practice using the opposite hand to perform tasks you usually do with your dominant hand |
| Read, especially challenging material |
| Join a book discussion group |
| Write; if not a book or article, write a diary, letters, or emails or start your memoirs |
| Do crossword, Sudoku, or jigsaw puzzles |
| Play board games, card games, and other strategy games |
| Debate or discuss topics |
Related resource
- For an extensive bibliography of literature on Alzheimer’s disease risk factors and prevention, see this article at CurrentPsychiatry.com.
Drug brand names
- Atorvastatin • Lipitor
- Celecoxib • Celebrex
- Donepezil • Aricept
- Medroxyprogesterone • Provera
- Pravastatin • Pravachol
- Rofecoxib • Vioxx
- Simvastatin • Zocor
Disclosures
Dr. Bassil reports no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article, or with manufacturers of competing products.
Dr. Grossberg receives research/grant support from and is a consultant to Bristol-Myers Squibb, Forest Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer Inc., and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals. He also receives research/grant support from Baxter.
Pharmacologic treatments for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) may improve symptoms but have not been shown to prevent AD onset. Primary prevention therefore remains the goal. Although preventing AD by managing risk factors such as age or genetics is beyond our control (Box 1), we can do something about other factors.
This article summarizes the findings of many studies that address AD prevention and includes an online-only bibliography for readers seeking an in-depth review. The evidence does not support a firm recommendation for any specific form of primary prevention and has revealed hazards associated with estrogen therapy and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (Box 2). Most important, it suggests that you could reduce your patients’ risk of developing AD by routinely supporting their mental, physical, and social health.
The potential benefits of modifying an individual’s AD risk factors likely will depend on his or her genetic makeup, environment, and lifestyle. Even so, counseling patients to exercise more and improve their diets—such as by eating more fish, fruits, and vegetables and less saturated fat—might help protect the brain. Your ongoing efforts to manage hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes also may reduce their AD risk.
Age remains the strongest risk factor for dementia, particularly for Alzheimer’s disease (AD).a The risk of developing AD doubles every 5 years after age 65 and approaches 50% after age 85.b
Family history is a risk factor for AD, although true familial AD accounts for <5% of cases.c When diseases show a familial pattern, either genetics, environmental factors, or both may play a role. Patients with a first-degree relative with dementia have a 10% to 30% increased risk of developing the disorder.d
Genetic factors play a role in both early-onset and late-onset AD. Early-onset AD (before age 65) accounts for 6% to 7% of cases.e From this small pool of patients, only 13% exhibit clear autosomal dominant transmission over >1 generation.f Three gene mutations have been associated with early-onset AD:
- 30% to 70% are in the presenilin-1 gene
- 10% to 15% are in the amyloid precursor protein gene
- <5% are in the presenilin-2 gene.g,h
For late-onset AD (after age 65), the strongest evidence for a genetic risk factor exists for the epsilon 4 allele of the apolipoprotein E gene (APOE e4).i This genotype has been linked to the development of AD and possibly to vascular dementia.j,k In contrast, the epsilon 2 allele of APOE may exert a protective effect in AD.l APOE e3, the most common allele, appears to play a neutral role in the development of AD.
References
a. Evans DA. The epidemiology of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: an evolving field. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996;44:1482-1483.
b. Jorm AF, Jolley D. The incidence of dementia: a meta-analysis. Neurology. 1998;51:728-733.
c. van Duijn CM, Clayton D, Chandra V, et al. Familial aggregation of Alzheimer’s disease and related disorders: a collaborative re-analysis of case-control studies. EURODEM Risk Factors Research Group. Int J Epidemiol. 1991;20(suppl 2):S13-S20.
d. Chang JB, Wang PN, Chen WT, et al. ApoE epsilon4 allele is associated with incidental hallucinations and delusions in patients with AD. Neurology. 2004;63:1105-1107.
e. Sleegers K, Roks G, Theuns J, et al. Familial clustering and genetic risk for dementia in a genetically isolated Dutch population. Brain. 2004;127:1641-1649.
f. Schoenberg BS, Anderson DW, Haerer AF. Severe dementia. Prevalence and clinical features in a biracial US population. Arch Neurol. 1985;42:740-743.
g. Hsiung GY, Sadovnick AD. Genetics and dementia: risk factors, diagnosis and management. Alzheimers Dement. 2007;3:418-427.
h. GeneTests database. Available at: http://www.genetests.org. Accessed March 19, 2010.
i. Li H, Wetten S, Li L, et al. Candidate single-nucleotide polymorphisms from a genomewide association study of Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2008;65:45-53.
j. Graff-Radford NR, Green RC, Go RC, et al. Association between apolipoprotein E genotype and Alzheimer disease in African American subjects. Arch Neurol. 2002;59:594-600.
k. Slooter AJ, Cruts M, Hofman A, et al. The impact of APOE on myocardial infarction, stroke, and dementia: the Rotterdam Study. Neurology. 2004;62:1196-1198.
l. Tiraboschi P, Hansen LA, Masliah E, et al. Impact of APOE genotype on neuropathologic and neurochemical markers of Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2004;62:1977-1983.
Estrogen. Before the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study, various trials of the effects of estrogen therapy on the development of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in women age ≥65 showed inconsistent results. In the randomized, placebo-controlled WHI Memory Study, conjugated equine estrogen, 0.625 mg/d, plus medroxyprogesterone acetate, 2.5 mg/d, did not prevent mild cognitive impairment or improve global cognitive function and was associated with an increased risk for probable dementia.a Based on this evidence, conjugated equine estrogen with or without medroxyprogesterone is not recommended as therapy to protect cognitive function in older women.
NSAID therapy. Cytokine-mediated inflammation may play a role in neurodegenerative disorders and cognitive impairment in the elderly. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors, have been studied for a possible protective effect against AD and cognitive decline,b possibly by lowering amyloidogenic proteins.c A 1-year randomized controlled trial by the Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Consortium found no significant differences in cognition scores of patients treated with once-daily rofecoxib, 25 mg, or twice-daily naproxen sodium, 220 mg, when compared with placebo.d Similarly, naproxen and celecoxib did not prevent AD in the randomized, controlled Alzheimer’s Disease Anti-inflammatory Prevention Trial (ADAPT).e Rofecoxib has been withdrawn from the market, and celecoxib labeling carries a warning of potential for increased risk of cardiovascular events and life-threatening gastrointestinal bleeding associated with its use.
NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors are not recommended for the treatment or prevention of dementia or cognitive impairment. Their use for AD prevention is not supported by randomized clinical trialsd,e and they may have serious adverse effects.
References
a. Shumaker SA, Legault C, Kuller L, et al. Conjugated equine estrogens and incidence of probable dementia and mild cognitive impairment in postmenopausal women: Women’s Health Initiative Memory Study. JAMA. 2004;291:2947-2958.
b. Szekely CA, Breitner JC, Fitzpatrick AL, et al. NSAID use and dementia risk in the Cardiovascular Health Study: role of APOE and NSAID type. Neurology. 2008;70:17-24.
c. Weggen S, Eriksen JL, Das P, et al. A subset of NSAIDs lower amyloidogenic Abeta42 independently of cyclooxygenase activity. Nature. 2001;414:212-216.
d. Aisen PS, Schafer KA, Grundman M, et al. Effects of rofecoxib or naproxen vs placebo on Alzheimer disease progression: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;289(21):2819-2826.
e. ADAPT Research Group, Martin BK, Szekely C, Brandt J, et al. Cognitive function over time in the Alzheimer’s Disease Anti-inflammatory Prevention Trial (ADAPT): results of a randomized, controlled trial of naproxen and celecoxib. Arch Neurol. 2008;65(7):896-905.
Cardiovascular risk factors
The risk of developing AD or vascular dementia appears to be increased by conditions that damage the heart or blood vessels. Recent evidence suggests that successfully managing cardiovascular risk factors may decrease the likelihood of dementia in later life.
Hypertension is associated with a higher risk of AD and all-cause dementia. Curiously, some studies have shown that low blood pressure also increases dementia risk, suggesting a U-shaped relationship between blood pressure and cognitive decline. Systolic hypertension in midlife may be associated with dementia 20 years later.
One might assume that antihypertensive therapy would help prevent dementia, but the data are conflicting. The Systolic Hypertension in Europe (SYST-EUR) study1 showed a 53% reduction in vascular dementia or mixed dementia among patients receiving antihypertensive medication and a 60% reduction in AD. Similarly, the PROGRESS2 clinical trial of prevention of recurrent stroke by antihypertensive treatment reported a 34% reduction in a composite measure of cognitive impairment and dementia. On the other hand, cognitive function neither improved nor worsened in the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET-COG),3 whether patients received blood pressure treatment or placebo.
Hyperlipidemia. Lipid metabolism likely is an important pathway in amyloid beta-protein deposition, tau phosphorylation, and disruption of synaptic plasticity and neurodegenerative endpoints. Cognitive decline and incident dementia have been associated with higher dietary intake of saturated fats, partially hydrogenated unsaturated fatty acids (trans fats), and cholesterol. Not all studies have found this association, however. This could be because serum cholesterol levels may decrease in early dementia, limiting the ability to detect an effect of hypercholesterolemia on dementia risk when measurements are made later in life.
Using statins (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl–coenzyme A reductase inhibitors) to treat hypercholesterolemia has been hypothesized to impede large vessel atherosclerosis and its consequences and to trigger metabolic effects in the brain related to AD pathogenesis. Mechanisms by which statins might help prevent dementia include:
- a direct association between amyloid processing and cholesterol in the brain
- an indirect effect by decreasing the risk of stroke, as even small cerebral infarcts worsen AD severity.
Nonrandomized epidemiologic studies such as the Cardiovascular Health Study4 and MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study5 suggested that statin treatment might reduce the incidence of dementia, the degree of age-related cognitive decline, and AD’s neuropathologic burden. Large, randomized, controlled trials have not supported these observations, however. Statins failed to reduce the incidence of dementia in:
- the Heart Protection Study, testing simvastatin for 5 years in 20,536 subjects age 40 to 805
- the 3-year Preventive Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk (PROSPER) of 5,800 subjects.6
Similarly, patients receiving adjunctive atorvastatin or placebo showed no significant differences in cognition assessments after 72 weeks in the Lipitor’s Effect in Alzheimer’s Dementia (LEADe) study. This trial enrolled 640 subjects age 50 to 90 with mild-to-moderate dementia who were treated with donepezil.7 A recent Cochrane review concluded that high serum cholesterol may contribute to the development of AD and vascular dementia, but lowering cholesterol levels with statins does not prevent these problems.8
Diabetes mellitus. Diabetes and cognitive decline are closely associated. Diabetes is associated with a 50% to 100% increase in risk of AD and dementia overall and a 100% to 150% increased risk of vascular dementia. The mechanism by which diabetes increases dementia risk is uncertain but does not appear to be mediated entirely through vascular disease. High and low insulin levels may increase the risk of dementia, independent of diabetes and blood glucose. Increased peripheral insulin levels are associated with reduced brain atrophy and cognitive impairment in patients with early AD, suggesting a role for insulin signaling in AD pathophysiology. A possible relationship between insulin and beta amyloid metabolism is being studied.
Elevated postprandial plasma glucose has been associated with accelerated declines in cognitive performance.9 An inverse correlation has been noted between some cognitive measures and hemoglobin A1C levels.10 It is not clear that treating diabetes reduces the risk of dementia. In addition, in the prospective, population-based Rotterdam study, elderly patients with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin had the highest incidence of dementia.11
Tobacco smoke directly affects neuronal function, integrity, and survival. Chronic smoking has been linked to decreased global cerebral blood flow, accelerated cerebral atrophy, and ventricular enlargement.
Some studies suggest an increased risk of dementia in middle-aged and elderly smokers, possibly through a cerebrovascular mechanism such as stroke. Other studies found no association between smoking and dementia risk, and 1 suggested that nicotine may protect against AD by reducing senile plaque formation. Any protective effect of smoking would be offset by increased risks of lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and vascular dementia.
The apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 (APOE e4) gene may explain, at least in part, the conflicting results of these studies. In 2 population-based cohorts,12,13 smoking was associated with memory decline in patients without, but not with, the APOE e4 genotype.
Dietary factors
Antioxidants. The brains of patients with AD contain elevated levels of endogenous antioxidants. In vitro studies show exogenous antioxidants can reduce the toxicity of beta-amyloid in brain tissue of persons with AD. These findings have led to interest in assessing the role of dietary antioxidants such as vitamins E and C for AD prevention.
High-dose alpha-tocopherol (vitamin E, 2,000 IU/d) may slow disease progression in patients with AD, but this association is not consistently found. Furthermore, a meta-analysis of 19 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) totaling >135,000 patients found an association between vitamin E doses >400 IU/d and increased all-cause mortality.14 High-dose vitamin E supplementation for primary or secondary prevention of AD may be dangerous and is not recommended.
The lack of consistent efficacy data for vitamin C in preventing or treating AD may discourage its routine use for this purpose.15
Homocysteine is a risk factor for stroke and heart disease. It also could play a role in vascular dementia through its association with large- and small-vessel disease.
Low folate and hyperhomocysteinemia have been associated with dementia or cognitive impairment, although a cause-effect relationship is not clear. In non-demented elderly populations, plasma homocysteine is inversely associated with poor performance in tests of global cognitive function, particularly in measures of psychomotor speed.
In a recent double-blind RCT, folic acid supplementation for 3 years significantly improved domains of cognitive function that tend to decline with age, especially information processing and sensorimotor speed.16 No other good evidence, however, has shown that homocysteine-lowering therapy using folic acid or other vitamin B supplements improves cognitive function or prevents cognitive decline.
Fish and omega-3 fatty acids. High total fat, saturated fat, and total cholesterol intake increases the risk for incident dementia. In epidemiologic studies, low omega-3 fatty acid serum levels have been linked to increased dementia risk.
Fish consumption may be beneficial in reducing the risk of dementia or cognitive decline. A prospective study of 815 elderly persons found 60% less risk of developing AD in those who ate ≥1 fish meal per week, compared with those who rarely or never ate fish.17 In the Framingham study, individuals who at baseline were in the top quartile of docosahexaenoic acid consumption had lower dementia rates over 9 years of follow-up.18 Results from cross-sectional and longitudinal studies have been inconsistent; some have shown that high intake of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids is associated with less cognitive decline,19 whereas others have not.20
Although we cannot offer unequivocal advice regarding seafood or omega-3 fatty acid intake for primary prevention of dementia without evidence from RCTs, these uncontrolled studies show promise.
Mediterranean diet (MeDi) components include abundant fruits and vegetables, fish or shellfish at least twice weekly, very limited red meat, olive oil or canola oil instead of butter or margarine, tree nuts such as walnuts or pecans, red wine in moderation, and using herbs and spices instead of salt to season food. High adherence to the MeDi has been associated with a significantly lower risk for incident AD. The MeDi may affect the risk of developing AD21 as well as subsequent disease course, with a possible dose-response relationship in lower mortality.22
Eating fruits and vegetables has been associated with improved cognitive performance22 and decreased incident dementia in elderly subjects.18
Alcohol. A U-shaped relationship exists between alcohol consumption and dementia risk. High alcohol intake is associated with clinical problem drinking and alcoholism and can lead to cognitive decline. Conversely, moderate wine consumption (250 to 500 mL/d) may be protective—compared with more or less than this amount—and is associated with approximately 50% less risk of dementia.
Alcohol use may increase the risk of dementia in persons carrying the APOE e4 allele, according to the population-based Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging and Dementia (CAIDE) study from Sweden.23 After an average 21 years of follow-up of 1,449 individuals, researchers found that environmental factors—such as physical inactivity, dietary fat intake, alcohol consumption, and smoking at midlife—were associated with an increased risk of dementia at age 65 to 79 in APOE e4 carriers compared with noncarriers. The study also found that physical inactivity, dietary fat intake, and smoking at midlife increase AD risk, especially among APOE e4 carriers.
In the absence of evidence from RCTs, we cannot recommend alcohol to reduce the risk of AD.
Lifestyle and activity
Three components of lifestyle—social, mental, and physical activity—are inversely associated with the risk for dementia, AD, and cognitive impairment.
Physical exercise has been thought to enhance brain neurotrophic factor and modify apoptosis. Exercise can deter stroke and microvascular disease and improve regional cerebral blood flow. In the Cardiovascular Health Study, participants who expended the highest quartile of energy had a lower risk of all-cause dementia and AD compared with participants who expended the lowest quartile of energy.24
Mental and social activity. Epidemiologic studies have shown associations between higher educational achievement and other socioeconomic factors and reduced AD risk. Advanced education is believed to represent a cognitive reserve that delays presentation of AD’s effects on memory and cognitive function, rather than providing a protective effect against accumulation of AD pathology. Higher-educated individuals appear to experience a somewhat more rapid rate of cognitive decline when AD does become apparent, perhaps because they have accumulated a greater degree of AD pathology at that point compared with less-educated persons.
Among 117 persons with dementia in the Bronx Aging Study, each additional year of formal education delayed the time of accelerated decline by 0.21 years. After accelerated decline began, each year of additional formal education was associated with a slightly faster rate of memory decline.25
The longitudinal, population-based Kungsholmen Project in Stockholm, Sweden, found an association between daily mentally stimulating activities and decreased risk of all-cause dementia.26 Similarly, higher levels of leisure activity were linked to reduced risk of all-cause dementia in a longitudinal study of 1,772 persons age ≥65 living in Manhattan, NY.27 In a randomized, single-controlled study of the long-term effects of cognitive training, elderly individuals from 6 U.S. cities showed sustained improvement in specific cognitive performance up to 5 years after training sessions began, including memory, reasoning, and speed of processing.28
It seems reasonable to encourage older patients to maintain or increase physical, cognitive, and leisure activities as well as social interaction. These interventions can improve the quality of life and lower the risk of depression, which may be a response to cognitive decline or an independent risk factor for dementia (Box 3). The Table lists “brain exercises” you can suggest to patients to increase their mental and social activity.
Head trauma. The Multi-Institutional Research in Alzheimer’s Genetic Epidemiology (MIRAGE) project found an association between AD risk and a history of head trauma, especially in persons with APOE e4 alleles.29 Conversely, the Rotterdam Study showed no change in dementia risk for persons with a history of head trauma.30
Even in the absence of conclusive evidence supporting AD prevention, protecting the head by buckling seat belts while driving, wearing helmets when participating in sports, and “fall-proofing” the home is recommended.
Depression often occurs before or as a coexisting condition with Alzheimer’s disease (AD).a Although depression has been considered a response to cognitive decline or an early manifestation of dementia,b it also could be an independent risk factor.c,d
The pathologic mechanism linking depression and subsequent dementia is not well understood. Hypotheses include an indirect neurotoxic effect of depression mediated by cortisol-induced hippocampal atrophy or lowered brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels.e Depression and dementia might share genetic links, although a cohort study of 404 individuals with AD detected no association between apolipoprotein E genotypes or alleles and depressive symptoms.f
References
a. Lupien SJ, Nair NP, Brière S, et al. Increased cortisol levels and impaired cognition in human aging: implication for depression and dementia in later life. Rev Neurosci. 1999;10(2):117-139.
b. Preuss UW, Siafarikas N, Petrucci M, et al. Depressive disorders in dementia and mild cognitive impairments: is comorbidity a cause or a risk factor? Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2009;77:399-406.
c. Green RC, Cupples LA, Kurz A, et al. Depression as a risk factor for Alzheimer disease: the MIRAGE Study. Arch Neurol. 2003;60(5):753-759.
d. Ownby RL, Crocco E, Acevedo A, et al. Depression and risk for Alzheimer’s disease: systematic review, meta-analysis, and metaregression analysis. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63(5):530-538.
e. Meeks TW, Ropacki SA, Jeste DV. The neurobiology of neuropsychiatric syndromes in dementia. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2006;19(6):581-586.
f. Craig D, Hart DJ, McIlroy SP, et al. Association analysis of apolipoprotein E genotype and risk of depressive symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2005;19(2-3):154-157.
Table
Brain exercises to suggest to patients
| Learn something new (how to play a musical instrument, a foreign language, or a new hobby) |
| Play memory games |
| Practice using the opposite hand to perform tasks you usually do with your dominant hand |
| Read, especially challenging material |
| Join a book discussion group |
| Write; if not a book or article, write a diary, letters, or emails or start your memoirs |
| Do crossword, Sudoku, or jigsaw puzzles |
| Play board games, card games, and other strategy games |
| Debate or discuss topics |
Related resource
- For an extensive bibliography of literature on Alzheimer’s disease risk factors and prevention, see this article at CurrentPsychiatry.com.
Drug brand names
- Atorvastatin • Lipitor
- Celecoxib • Celebrex
- Donepezil • Aricept
- Medroxyprogesterone • Provera
- Pravastatin • Pravachol
- Rofecoxib • Vioxx
- Simvastatin • Zocor
Disclosures
Dr. Bassil reports no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article, or with manufacturers of competing products.
Dr. Grossberg receives research/grant support from and is a consultant to Bristol-Myers Squibb, Forest Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer Inc., and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals. He also receives research/grant support from Baxter.
1. Forette F, Seux ML, Staessen JA, et al. The prevention of dementia with antihypertensive treatment: new evidence from the systolic hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) study. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:2046-2052.
2. Tzourio C, Anderson C, Chapman N, et al. Effects of blood pressure lowering with perindopril and indapamide therapy on dementia and cognitive decline in patients with cerebrovascular disease. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1069-1075.
3. Peters R, Beckett N, Forette F. Incident dementia and blood pressure lowering in the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial cognitive function assessment (HYVET-COG). Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(8):683-689.
4. Rea TD, Breitner JC, Psaty BM, et al. Statin use and the risk of incident dementia: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Arch Neurol. 2005;62:1047-1051.
5. Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;360:7-22.
6. Kulbertus H, Scheen AJ. [The PROSPER Study (PROspective study of pravastatin in the elderly at risk)]. Rev Med Liege. 2002;57(12):809-813.
7. Feldman HH, Doody RS, Kivipelto M, et al. Randomized controlled trial of atorvastatin in mild to moderate Alzheimer disease: LEADe. Neurology. 2010;74(12):956-964.
8. McGuinness B, Bullock R, Craig D, et al. Statins for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease and dementia (protocol). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;1:CD007514.-
9. Abbatecola AM, Rizzo MR, Barbieri M, et al. Postprandial plasmaglucose excursions and cognitive functioning in aged type 2 diabetics. Neurology. 2006;67:235-240.
10. Munshi M, Grande L, Hayes M, et al. Cognitive dysfunction is associated with poor diabetes control in older adults. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1794-1799.
11. Ott A, Stolk RP, van Harskamp F, et al. Diabetes mellitus and the risk of dementia. The Rotterdam study. Neurology. 1999;53:1937-1942.
12. Reitz C, Luchsinger J, Tang MX, et al. Effect of smoking and time on cognitive function in the elderly without dementia. Neurology. 2005;65:870-875.
13. Reitz C, den Heijer T, van Duijn C, et al. Relation between smoking and risk of dementia and Alzheimer disease: the Rotterdam Study. Neurology. 2007;69:998-1005.
14. Miller ER, III, Pastor-Barriuso R, Dalal D, et al. Meta-analysis: high-dosage vitamin E supplementation may increase all-cause mortality. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(1):37-46.
15. Boothby LA, Doering PL. Vitamin C and vitamin E for Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Pharmacother. 2005;39(12):2073-2080.
16. Durga J, van Boxtel MP, Schouten EG, et al. Effect of 3-year folic acid supplementation on cognitive function in older adults in the FACIT trial: a randomised, double blind, controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;369:208-216.
17. Morris MC, Evans DA, Bienias JL, et al. Consumption of fish and n-3 fatty acids and risk of incident Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2003;60:940-946.
18. Schaefer EJ, Bongard V, Beiser AS, et al. Plasma phosphatidylcholine docosahexaenoic acid content and risk of dementia and Alzheimer disease: the Framingham Heart Study. Arch Neurol. 2006;63:1545-1550.
19. Kalmijn S, Launer LJ, Ott A, et al. Dietary fat intake and the risk of incident dementia in the Rotterdam Study. Ann Neurol. 1997;42:776-782.
20. van Gelder BM, Tijhuis M, Kalmijn S, et al. Fish consumption, n-3 fatty acids, and subsequent 5-y cognitive decline in elderly men: the Zutphen Elderly Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85:1142-1147.
21. Solfrizzi V, Capurso C, Panza F. Adherence to a Mediterranean dietary pattern and risk of Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol. 2006;60:620.-
22. Scarmeas N, Luchsinger JA, Mayeux R, et al. Mediterranean diet and Alzheimer disease mortality. Neurology. 2007;69(11):1084-1093.
23. Kivipelto M, Rovio S, Ngandu T, et al. Apolipoprotein E epsilon4 magnifies lifestyle risks for dementia: a population-based study. J Cell Mol Med. 2008;12(6B):2762-2771.
24. Podewils LJ, Guallar E, Kuller LH, et al. Physical activity, APOE genotype and dementia risk: findings from the Cardiovascular Health Cognition Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161:639-651.
25. Hall CB, Derby C, LeValley A, et al. Education delays accelerated decline on a memory test in persons who develop dementia. Neurology. 2007;69:1657-1664.
26. Wang HX, Karp A, Winblad B, et al. Late-life engagement in social and leisure activities is associated with a decreased risk of dementia: a longitudinal study from the Kungsholmen Project. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155:1081-1087.
27. Scarmeas N, Levy G, Tang MX, et al. Influence of leisure activity on the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 2001;57:2236-2242.
28. Willis SL, Tennstedt SL, Marsiske M, et al. Long-term effects of cognitive training on everyday functional outcomes in older adults. JAMA. 2006;296:2805-2814.
29. Guo Z, Cupples LA, Kurz A, et al. Head injury and the risk of AD in the MIRAGE study. Neurology. 2000;54:1316-1323.
30. Ruitenberg A, van Swieten JC, Witteman JC, et al. Alcohol consumption and risk of dementia: the Rotterdam Study. Lancet. 2002;359:281-286.
1. Forette F, Seux ML, Staessen JA, et al. The prevention of dementia with antihypertensive treatment: new evidence from the systolic hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) study. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:2046-2052.
2. Tzourio C, Anderson C, Chapman N, et al. Effects of blood pressure lowering with perindopril and indapamide therapy on dementia and cognitive decline in patients with cerebrovascular disease. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1069-1075.
3. Peters R, Beckett N, Forette F. Incident dementia and blood pressure lowering in the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial cognitive function assessment (HYVET-COG). Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(8):683-689.
4. Rea TD, Breitner JC, Psaty BM, et al. Statin use and the risk of incident dementia: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Arch Neurol. 2005;62:1047-1051.
5. Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;360:7-22.
6. Kulbertus H, Scheen AJ. [The PROSPER Study (PROspective study of pravastatin in the elderly at risk)]. Rev Med Liege. 2002;57(12):809-813.
7. Feldman HH, Doody RS, Kivipelto M, et al. Randomized controlled trial of atorvastatin in mild to moderate Alzheimer disease: LEADe. Neurology. 2010;74(12):956-964.
8. McGuinness B, Bullock R, Craig D, et al. Statins for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease and dementia (protocol). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;1:CD007514.-
9. Abbatecola AM, Rizzo MR, Barbieri M, et al. Postprandial plasmaglucose excursions and cognitive functioning in aged type 2 diabetics. Neurology. 2006;67:235-240.
10. Munshi M, Grande L, Hayes M, et al. Cognitive dysfunction is associated with poor diabetes control in older adults. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1794-1799.
11. Ott A, Stolk RP, van Harskamp F, et al. Diabetes mellitus and the risk of dementia. The Rotterdam study. Neurology. 1999;53:1937-1942.
12. Reitz C, Luchsinger J, Tang MX, et al. Effect of smoking and time on cognitive function in the elderly without dementia. Neurology. 2005;65:870-875.
13. Reitz C, den Heijer T, van Duijn C, et al. Relation between smoking and risk of dementia and Alzheimer disease: the Rotterdam Study. Neurology. 2007;69:998-1005.
14. Miller ER, III, Pastor-Barriuso R, Dalal D, et al. Meta-analysis: high-dosage vitamin E supplementation may increase all-cause mortality. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(1):37-46.
15. Boothby LA, Doering PL. Vitamin C and vitamin E for Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Pharmacother. 2005;39(12):2073-2080.
16. Durga J, van Boxtel MP, Schouten EG, et al. Effect of 3-year folic acid supplementation on cognitive function in older adults in the FACIT trial: a randomised, double blind, controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;369:208-216.
17. Morris MC, Evans DA, Bienias JL, et al. Consumption of fish and n-3 fatty acids and risk of incident Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2003;60:940-946.
18. Schaefer EJ, Bongard V, Beiser AS, et al. Plasma phosphatidylcholine docosahexaenoic acid content and risk of dementia and Alzheimer disease: the Framingham Heart Study. Arch Neurol. 2006;63:1545-1550.
19. Kalmijn S, Launer LJ, Ott A, et al. Dietary fat intake and the risk of incident dementia in the Rotterdam Study. Ann Neurol. 1997;42:776-782.
20. van Gelder BM, Tijhuis M, Kalmijn S, et al. Fish consumption, n-3 fatty acids, and subsequent 5-y cognitive decline in elderly men: the Zutphen Elderly Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85:1142-1147.
21. Solfrizzi V, Capurso C, Panza F. Adherence to a Mediterranean dietary pattern and risk of Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol. 2006;60:620.-
22. Scarmeas N, Luchsinger JA, Mayeux R, et al. Mediterranean diet and Alzheimer disease mortality. Neurology. 2007;69(11):1084-1093.
23. Kivipelto M, Rovio S, Ngandu T, et al. Apolipoprotein E epsilon4 magnifies lifestyle risks for dementia: a population-based study. J Cell Mol Med. 2008;12(6B):2762-2771.
24. Podewils LJ, Guallar E, Kuller LH, et al. Physical activity, APOE genotype and dementia risk: findings from the Cardiovascular Health Cognition Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161:639-651.
25. Hall CB, Derby C, LeValley A, et al. Education delays accelerated decline on a memory test in persons who develop dementia. Neurology. 2007;69:1657-1664.
26. Wang HX, Karp A, Winblad B, et al. Late-life engagement in social and leisure activities is associated with a decreased risk of dementia: a longitudinal study from the Kungsholmen Project. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155:1081-1087.
27. Scarmeas N, Levy G, Tang MX, et al. Influence of leisure activity on the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 2001;57:2236-2242.
28. Willis SL, Tennstedt SL, Marsiske M, et al. Long-term effects of cognitive training on everyday functional outcomes in older adults. JAMA. 2006;296:2805-2814.
29. Guo Z, Cupples LA, Kurz A, et al. Head injury and the risk of AD in the MIRAGE study. Neurology. 2000;54:1316-1323.
30. Ruitenberg A, van Swieten JC, Witteman JC, et al. Alcohol consumption and risk of dementia: the Rotterdam Study. Lancet. 2002;359:281-286.
Pharmacokinetic considerations when prescribing during pregnancy
Combination therapy is here to stay
Although psychiatrists commonly combine psychotropic medications, researchers malign the practice as “not evidence-based.” Research is finally catching up with clinical practice, however, and evidence is rapidly accumulating that for many patients with severe psychiatric disorders, 2 drugs are better than 1.
This should not be surprising because “real world” patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depression, anxiety disorders, or obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) often do not achieve remission and are hobbled—even disabled—by their illness without combination therapy. The same principle holds true for general medical illnesses such as hypertension, cancer, or diabetes, where combination therapy is the norm rather than the exception.
Recent studies have confirmed better efficacy with combination therapy compared with monotherapy for several psychiatric illnesses:
Unipolar depression. Blier et al1 demonstrated a remarkable superiority of 3 different combinations of 2 antidepressants compared with fluoxetine monotherapy. The remission rate with combination therapy (46% to 58%) was double that of fluoxetine alone (25%). When 1 of the 2 antidepressants was blindly discontinued in high responders, 40% relapsed. Tolerability to the combination was the same as to monotherapy. Recent FDA approval of 2 atypical antipsychotics—aripiprazole2 and quetiapine3—as adjuncts to antidepressants to increase the remission rates further supports the case for combination therapy.
Bipolar disorder. Psychiatrists know that combining a mood stabilizer with an antipsychotic exerts more efficacy that either drug alone.4 But what about combining 2 mood stabilizers? A recent study5 confirmed the superiority of combining lithium plus valproate compared with either 1 alone. Score another victory for polypharmacy in bipolar disorder, where FDA studies of combination therapy are more common than in any other psychiatric disorder.
Schizophrenia. It is highly unrealistic to expect 1 drug (such as a dopamine antagonist) to show efficacy for schizophrenia’s disparate symptoms, including positive symptoms, negative symptoms, cognitive impairment, mood dysregulation, and substance use. Yet antipsychotic monotherapy remains the standard of care in schizophrenia, and there are no FDA combination trials of antipsychotics. However, in the United States, more than one-third of persons with chronic schizophrenia receive ≥2 antipsychotics because their psychiatrist found that combinations exerted more efficacy compared with just 1 antipsychotic agent. A combination of 2 atypical antipsychotics may be superior to monotherapy, but controlled studies have not been conducted.
In addition, patients receiving clozapine for refractory schizophrenia experienced significant improvement with the addition of lamotrigine.6 Another anticonvulsant, valproate, also was shown to accelerate response to an antipsychotic.7 Clinical trials are being conducted for new agents that enhance memory8 and negative symptoms.9 If the results are positive, the future of schizophrenia pharmacotherapy will shift decisively to polytherapy of 3 or even 4 drugs targeting positive, negative, cognitive, and mood symptoms.10
Anxiety. Recent studies confirm the benefits of combining small doses of atypical antipsychotics to an antidepressant/anxiolytic regimen.11 Most Patients with anxiety receive benzodiazepines as well.
OCD. Most patients with OCD do not achieve a remission with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Many studies have indicated additional improvement from adding an atypical antipsychotic.12 Other studies have added the glutamate modulating agent memantine with reported benefit.
The writing is now on the psychopharmacology wall: Although many psychiatric patients achieve some response to a single agent, combination therapy often leads to higher remission rates, which is the foremost goal of pharmacotherapy. The negative connotation of polypharmacy will fade as combination therapies become the new standard of care rather than a reviled clinical practice.
1. Blier P, Ward HE, Tremblay P, et al. Combination of antidepressant medications from treatment initiation for major depressive disorder: a double-blind randomized study. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167(3):281-288.
2. Berman RM, Fava M, Thase ME, et al. Aripiprazole augmentation in major depressive disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with inadequate response to antidepressants CNS Spectr. 2009;14(4):197-206.
3. El-khalili N, Joyce M, Atkinson S, et al. Extended release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) as adjunctive therapy in major depressive disorder (MDD) in patients with an inadequate response to ongoing antidepressant treatment: a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with inadequate response to antidepressants. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010;23:1-16.
4. Sachs GS, Gardner-Schuster EE. Adjunctive treatment of acute mania: a clinical overview. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2007;116(s434):27-34.
5. Geddes JR, Goodwin GM, Rendell J, et al. Lithium plus valproate combination therapy versus monotherapy for relapse prevention in bipolar I disorder (BALANCE): a randomised open-label trial Lancet. 2010;375(9712):385-395.
6. Tiihonen J, Wahlbeck K, Kiviniemi V. The efficacy of lamotrigine in clozapine-resistant schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Res. 2009;109(1-3):10-14.
7. Casey DE, Daniel DG, Wassef AA, et al. Effect of divalproex combined with olanzapine or risperidone in patients with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003;28(1):182-192.
8. Ribeiz SR, Bassitt DR, Arrais JA, et al. Cholinesterase inhibitors as adjunctive therapy in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: a review and meta-analysis of the literature. CNS Drugs. 2010;24(4):303-317.
9. Wolff-Menzler C, Hasan A, Malchow B, et al. Combination therapy in the treatment of schizophrenia. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2010 [ePub ahead of print].
10. Correll CU, Rummel-Kluge C, Corves C, et al. Antipsychotic combinations vs monotherapy in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Schizophr Bull. 2009;35(2):443-457.
11. Gao K, Sheehan DV, Calabrese JR. Atypical antipsychotics in primary generalized anxiety disorder or comorbid with mood disorders. Expert Rev Neurother. 2009;9(8):1147-1158.
12. Matsunaga H, Nagata T, Hayashida K, et al. A long-term trial of the effectiveness and safety of atypical antipsychotic agents in augmenting SSRI-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;70(6):863-868.
Although psychiatrists commonly combine psychotropic medications, researchers malign the practice as “not evidence-based.” Research is finally catching up with clinical practice, however, and evidence is rapidly accumulating that for many patients with severe psychiatric disorders, 2 drugs are better than 1.
This should not be surprising because “real world” patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depression, anxiety disorders, or obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) often do not achieve remission and are hobbled—even disabled—by their illness without combination therapy. The same principle holds true for general medical illnesses such as hypertension, cancer, or diabetes, where combination therapy is the norm rather than the exception.
Recent studies have confirmed better efficacy with combination therapy compared with monotherapy for several psychiatric illnesses:
Unipolar depression. Blier et al1 demonstrated a remarkable superiority of 3 different combinations of 2 antidepressants compared with fluoxetine monotherapy. The remission rate with combination therapy (46% to 58%) was double that of fluoxetine alone (25%). When 1 of the 2 antidepressants was blindly discontinued in high responders, 40% relapsed. Tolerability to the combination was the same as to monotherapy. Recent FDA approval of 2 atypical antipsychotics—aripiprazole2 and quetiapine3—as adjuncts to antidepressants to increase the remission rates further supports the case for combination therapy.
Bipolar disorder. Psychiatrists know that combining a mood stabilizer with an antipsychotic exerts more efficacy that either drug alone.4 But what about combining 2 mood stabilizers? A recent study5 confirmed the superiority of combining lithium plus valproate compared with either 1 alone. Score another victory for polypharmacy in bipolar disorder, where FDA studies of combination therapy are more common than in any other psychiatric disorder.
Schizophrenia. It is highly unrealistic to expect 1 drug (such as a dopamine antagonist) to show efficacy for schizophrenia’s disparate symptoms, including positive symptoms, negative symptoms, cognitive impairment, mood dysregulation, and substance use. Yet antipsychotic monotherapy remains the standard of care in schizophrenia, and there are no FDA combination trials of antipsychotics. However, in the United States, more than one-third of persons with chronic schizophrenia receive ≥2 antipsychotics because their psychiatrist found that combinations exerted more efficacy compared with just 1 antipsychotic agent. A combination of 2 atypical antipsychotics may be superior to monotherapy, but controlled studies have not been conducted.
In addition, patients receiving clozapine for refractory schizophrenia experienced significant improvement with the addition of lamotrigine.6 Another anticonvulsant, valproate, also was shown to accelerate response to an antipsychotic.7 Clinical trials are being conducted for new agents that enhance memory8 and negative symptoms.9 If the results are positive, the future of schizophrenia pharmacotherapy will shift decisively to polytherapy of 3 or even 4 drugs targeting positive, negative, cognitive, and mood symptoms.10
Anxiety. Recent studies confirm the benefits of combining small doses of atypical antipsychotics to an antidepressant/anxiolytic regimen.11 Most Patients with anxiety receive benzodiazepines as well.
OCD. Most patients with OCD do not achieve a remission with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Many studies have indicated additional improvement from adding an atypical antipsychotic.12 Other studies have added the glutamate modulating agent memantine with reported benefit.
The writing is now on the psychopharmacology wall: Although many psychiatric patients achieve some response to a single agent, combination therapy often leads to higher remission rates, which is the foremost goal of pharmacotherapy. The negative connotation of polypharmacy will fade as combination therapies become the new standard of care rather than a reviled clinical practice.
Although psychiatrists commonly combine psychotropic medications, researchers malign the practice as “not evidence-based.” Research is finally catching up with clinical practice, however, and evidence is rapidly accumulating that for many patients with severe psychiatric disorders, 2 drugs are better than 1.
This should not be surprising because “real world” patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depression, anxiety disorders, or obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) often do not achieve remission and are hobbled—even disabled—by their illness without combination therapy. The same principle holds true for general medical illnesses such as hypertension, cancer, or diabetes, where combination therapy is the norm rather than the exception.
Recent studies have confirmed better efficacy with combination therapy compared with monotherapy for several psychiatric illnesses:
Unipolar depression. Blier et al1 demonstrated a remarkable superiority of 3 different combinations of 2 antidepressants compared with fluoxetine monotherapy. The remission rate with combination therapy (46% to 58%) was double that of fluoxetine alone (25%). When 1 of the 2 antidepressants was blindly discontinued in high responders, 40% relapsed. Tolerability to the combination was the same as to monotherapy. Recent FDA approval of 2 atypical antipsychotics—aripiprazole2 and quetiapine3—as adjuncts to antidepressants to increase the remission rates further supports the case for combination therapy.
Bipolar disorder. Psychiatrists know that combining a mood stabilizer with an antipsychotic exerts more efficacy that either drug alone.4 But what about combining 2 mood stabilizers? A recent study5 confirmed the superiority of combining lithium plus valproate compared with either 1 alone. Score another victory for polypharmacy in bipolar disorder, where FDA studies of combination therapy are more common than in any other psychiatric disorder.
Schizophrenia. It is highly unrealistic to expect 1 drug (such as a dopamine antagonist) to show efficacy for schizophrenia’s disparate symptoms, including positive symptoms, negative symptoms, cognitive impairment, mood dysregulation, and substance use. Yet antipsychotic monotherapy remains the standard of care in schizophrenia, and there are no FDA combination trials of antipsychotics. However, in the United States, more than one-third of persons with chronic schizophrenia receive ≥2 antipsychotics because their psychiatrist found that combinations exerted more efficacy compared with just 1 antipsychotic agent. A combination of 2 atypical antipsychotics may be superior to monotherapy, but controlled studies have not been conducted.
In addition, patients receiving clozapine for refractory schizophrenia experienced significant improvement with the addition of lamotrigine.6 Another anticonvulsant, valproate, also was shown to accelerate response to an antipsychotic.7 Clinical trials are being conducted for new agents that enhance memory8 and negative symptoms.9 If the results are positive, the future of schizophrenia pharmacotherapy will shift decisively to polytherapy of 3 or even 4 drugs targeting positive, negative, cognitive, and mood symptoms.10
Anxiety. Recent studies confirm the benefits of combining small doses of atypical antipsychotics to an antidepressant/anxiolytic regimen.11 Most Patients with anxiety receive benzodiazepines as well.
OCD. Most patients with OCD do not achieve a remission with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Many studies have indicated additional improvement from adding an atypical antipsychotic.12 Other studies have added the glutamate modulating agent memantine with reported benefit.
The writing is now on the psychopharmacology wall: Although many psychiatric patients achieve some response to a single agent, combination therapy often leads to higher remission rates, which is the foremost goal of pharmacotherapy. The negative connotation of polypharmacy will fade as combination therapies become the new standard of care rather than a reviled clinical practice.
1. Blier P, Ward HE, Tremblay P, et al. Combination of antidepressant medications from treatment initiation for major depressive disorder: a double-blind randomized study. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167(3):281-288.
2. Berman RM, Fava M, Thase ME, et al. Aripiprazole augmentation in major depressive disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with inadequate response to antidepressants CNS Spectr. 2009;14(4):197-206.
3. El-khalili N, Joyce M, Atkinson S, et al. Extended release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) as adjunctive therapy in major depressive disorder (MDD) in patients with an inadequate response to ongoing antidepressant treatment: a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with inadequate response to antidepressants. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010;23:1-16.
4. Sachs GS, Gardner-Schuster EE. Adjunctive treatment of acute mania: a clinical overview. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2007;116(s434):27-34.
5. Geddes JR, Goodwin GM, Rendell J, et al. Lithium plus valproate combination therapy versus monotherapy for relapse prevention in bipolar I disorder (BALANCE): a randomised open-label trial Lancet. 2010;375(9712):385-395.
6. Tiihonen J, Wahlbeck K, Kiviniemi V. The efficacy of lamotrigine in clozapine-resistant schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Res. 2009;109(1-3):10-14.
7. Casey DE, Daniel DG, Wassef AA, et al. Effect of divalproex combined with olanzapine or risperidone in patients with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003;28(1):182-192.
8. Ribeiz SR, Bassitt DR, Arrais JA, et al. Cholinesterase inhibitors as adjunctive therapy in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: a review and meta-analysis of the literature. CNS Drugs. 2010;24(4):303-317.
9. Wolff-Menzler C, Hasan A, Malchow B, et al. Combination therapy in the treatment of schizophrenia. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2010 [ePub ahead of print].
10. Correll CU, Rummel-Kluge C, Corves C, et al. Antipsychotic combinations vs monotherapy in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Schizophr Bull. 2009;35(2):443-457.
11. Gao K, Sheehan DV, Calabrese JR. Atypical antipsychotics in primary generalized anxiety disorder or comorbid with mood disorders. Expert Rev Neurother. 2009;9(8):1147-1158.
12. Matsunaga H, Nagata T, Hayashida K, et al. A long-term trial of the effectiveness and safety of atypical antipsychotic agents in augmenting SSRI-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;70(6):863-868.
1. Blier P, Ward HE, Tremblay P, et al. Combination of antidepressant medications from treatment initiation for major depressive disorder: a double-blind randomized study. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167(3):281-288.
2. Berman RM, Fava M, Thase ME, et al. Aripiprazole augmentation in major depressive disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with inadequate response to antidepressants CNS Spectr. 2009;14(4):197-206.
3. El-khalili N, Joyce M, Atkinson S, et al. Extended release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) as adjunctive therapy in major depressive disorder (MDD) in patients with an inadequate response to ongoing antidepressant treatment: a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with inadequate response to antidepressants. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010;23:1-16.
4. Sachs GS, Gardner-Schuster EE. Adjunctive treatment of acute mania: a clinical overview. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2007;116(s434):27-34.
5. Geddes JR, Goodwin GM, Rendell J, et al. Lithium plus valproate combination therapy versus monotherapy for relapse prevention in bipolar I disorder (BALANCE): a randomised open-label trial Lancet. 2010;375(9712):385-395.
6. Tiihonen J, Wahlbeck K, Kiviniemi V. The efficacy of lamotrigine in clozapine-resistant schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Res. 2009;109(1-3):10-14.
7. Casey DE, Daniel DG, Wassef AA, et al. Effect of divalproex combined with olanzapine or risperidone in patients with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003;28(1):182-192.
8. Ribeiz SR, Bassitt DR, Arrais JA, et al. Cholinesterase inhibitors as adjunctive therapy in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: a review and meta-analysis of the literature. CNS Drugs. 2010;24(4):303-317.
9. Wolff-Menzler C, Hasan A, Malchow B, et al. Combination therapy in the treatment of schizophrenia. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2010 [ePub ahead of print].
10. Correll CU, Rummel-Kluge C, Corves C, et al. Antipsychotic combinations vs monotherapy in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Schizophr Bull. 2009;35(2):443-457.
11. Gao K, Sheehan DV, Calabrese JR. Atypical antipsychotics in primary generalized anxiety disorder or comorbid with mood disorders. Expert Rev Neurother. 2009;9(8):1147-1158.
12. Matsunaga H, Nagata T, Hayashida K, et al. A long-term trial of the effectiveness and safety of atypical antipsychotic agents in augmenting SSRI-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;70(6):863-868.
How differences among generics might affect your patient’s response
- Keep current with new developments in psychopharmacology
- Learn more about pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, drug-drug interactions, and prescribing for special populations
- Collaborate with psychiatric pharmacists to solve or prevent problems patients may have with their medications
Mr. X, age 47, suffers from major depressive disorder, which he developed 1 year ago after experiencing a myocardial infarction. At that time, Mr. X received brand-name fluoxetine (Prozac), 20 mg/d. After 4 weeks, his mood improved, but he experienced delayed ejaculation, which resolved spontaneously after 12 weeks of treatment.
Because Mr. X recently lost his job and health insurance, he inquires about lowering his health care costs. Discontinuing fluoxetine is not advised, so you recommend changing to a generic formulation. Mr. X tolerates this conversion without difficulty; however, 9 months later he reports he is experiencing delayed ejaculation again. He has had no changes in medical history and has not started any new medications. Mr. X claims he has been compliant with his medication, although he mentions that the fluoxetine tablets looked different when he refilled his prescription 2 weeks ago. You call the pharmacy and discover that they started dispensing generic fluoxetine from a different manufacturer around the time Mr. X refilled his prescription. You prescribe Mr. X his old version of generic fluoxetine, and his sexual dysfunction resolves within 2 weeks.
- For most patients, using generic medications poses no problems and offers an appropriate therapeutic option at a lower cost.
- If problems arise during treatment, consider differences among generic brands. Although each generic must be tested against the brand-name product for bioequivalence, they do not need to be tested against each other.
- Different generic formations may have different inert ingredients, which may cause problems if patients are allergic to a specific inactive ingredient.
- Consult the ‘Orange Book’ for information on approved drugs and their generic interchangeability or the patient’s local pharmacist or a board-certified psychiatric pharmacist if you have questions about generic formulations.
In the United States, 2.6 billion prescriptions—approximately 70% of all prescriptions—are filled using generic versions of brand-name products.1 For most patients, generic substitution is acceptable and reduces costs. Although the practice has become routine, certain circumstances may make switching to a generic medication or between generic medication problematic. To understand why, it is important to discuss the FDA’s generic drug approval process.2
Bioequivalence
Pharmaceutical manufacturers developing a generic drug must create a product that will deliver the same amount of medication at the same rate and in the same form (ie, tablet, capsule, suspension, etc.) as the brand-name product. The FDA requires bioequivalence (BE) studies.2 These studies usually include fewer than 40 healthy individuals and must show that the generic product has the same pharmacokinetic profile as the brand-name drug (the active ingredient already has been shown to be safe and effective). The generic product can deviate from the brand product’s profile by a set amount—currently a 90% confidence interval limit of 80% to 125%.2 This means that pharmacokinetic parameters such as max concentration (Cmax), time to max concentration (Tmax), mean absorption time, and area under the curve (AUC)—which is a measure of overall drug exposure—are no less than 80% and no more than 125% of the parameters seen with the brand-name product. This may seem like a large deviation, but the FDA reports that generally “small differences in blood levels—<4%—may exist in some cases between a brand and its generic equivalent.”1
A new generic formulation does not have to be tested against other generic formulations, only against the brand-name drug. Therefore, 2 generic formulations may differ pharmacokinetically by more than a 4% difference if one product is on the low side of the BE limit and the other is on the high side. If a patient starts 1 generic and then switches to another, efficacy may be lost or side effects may emerge because of BE differences. In Mr. X’s case, it is possible that the new generic version of fluoxetine resulted in higher plasma drug levels that lead to recurrence of sexual dysfunction.
Exceptions
Generic medications are not recommended for certain medical conditions, such as epilepsy and some hormone replacement therapy, because of lack of satisfactory BE to the brand-name drug.3 For these conditions, generic medications may be used, but should not be substituted for the brand-name product without careful monitoring. Additionally, switching between different generic manufacturers should be avoided.
If you have a question about generic substitution, consult the FDA’s Approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations4—also known as the “Orange Book,” which is available online (see Related Resources). This resource provides guidance about which drugs are interchangeable. The Orange Book is the “gold standard” on approved drug products and their interchangeability.
The Table lists certain psychiatric medications that may have issues with generic substitutions. Most pharmacies stock and dispense only generic drugs that the FDA considers bioequivalent to the brand-name product.
Allergic reactions may occur because of different inert ingredients within each generic or brand-name drug. Generic drug manufacturers are not required to use the same inactive or “filler” ingredients. Some patients may be allergic to 1 version and may require a specific brand or generic version to overcome this potential allergy.3
Although most generic substitutions occur without incident, consider BE differences among products and your patient’s medical condition before initiating a switch. When switching between generics, carefully monitor your patient as you would when switching from the brand-name product to a generic. If new treatment-related issues arise or lack of efficacy occurs, ask your patient if the pharmacy switched to a new generic formulation.
Table
Bioequivalence among generic psychotropics: What to know before you switch
| Medication | Comments |
|---|---|
| Amitriptyline/perphenazine | Generic formulations may not be interchangeable* |
| Anticonvulsants | Because these medications have a narrow therapeutic index when used for seizure disorders, patients are recommended to not switch formulations. When used for psychiatric disorders, the margin of safety is unknown and switching may be appropriate |
| Chlorpromazine | Generic formulations are not bioequivalent |
| Clozapine | Generic formulations may not be bioequivalent at all dosages* Dosage adjustments may be needed in patients who need to switch formulations during treatment |
| Venlafaxine | Some formulations may not be interchangeable* |
| *Consult the FDA’s Approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations to determine if generics are interchangeable | |
| Source: Reference 4 | |
- Food and Drug Administration. www.fda.gov/Drugs/default.htm.
- Generic Pharmaceutical Association. www.gphaonline.org.
- Food and Drug Administration. Orange book: approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations. www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/ob/default.cfm.
Drug brand names
- Amitriptyline/Perphenazine • Triavil
- Chlorpromazine • Thorazine
- Clozapine • Clozaril
- Fluoxetine • Prozac
- Venlafaxine • Effexor
Disclosure
Dr. Ellingrod is a member of an advisory board for Eli Lilly and Company.
1. Generic Pharmaceutical Association. Bioequivalence. Available at: http://www.gphaonline.org/issues/bioequivalence. Accessed January 4, 2010.
2. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry. Bioavailability and bioequivalence studies for orally administered drug products—general considerations. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2003.
3. Silverman HM. Bioequivalence and interchangeability of generic drugs. In: Merck manual home edition online. 2007. Available at: http://www.merck.com/mmhe/sec02/ch017/ch017b.html. Accessed January 4, 2010.
4. Food and Drug Administration. Orange book: approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations. Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/ob/default.cfm. Accessed January 4, 2010.
- Keep current with new developments in psychopharmacology
- Learn more about pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, drug-drug interactions, and prescribing for special populations
- Collaborate with psychiatric pharmacists to solve or prevent problems patients may have with their medications
Mr. X, age 47, suffers from major depressive disorder, which he developed 1 year ago after experiencing a myocardial infarction. At that time, Mr. X received brand-name fluoxetine (Prozac), 20 mg/d. After 4 weeks, his mood improved, but he experienced delayed ejaculation, which resolved spontaneously after 12 weeks of treatment.
Because Mr. X recently lost his job and health insurance, he inquires about lowering his health care costs. Discontinuing fluoxetine is not advised, so you recommend changing to a generic formulation. Mr. X tolerates this conversion without difficulty; however, 9 months later he reports he is experiencing delayed ejaculation again. He has had no changes in medical history and has not started any new medications. Mr. X claims he has been compliant with his medication, although he mentions that the fluoxetine tablets looked different when he refilled his prescription 2 weeks ago. You call the pharmacy and discover that they started dispensing generic fluoxetine from a different manufacturer around the time Mr. X refilled his prescription. You prescribe Mr. X his old version of generic fluoxetine, and his sexual dysfunction resolves within 2 weeks.
- For most patients, using generic medications poses no problems and offers an appropriate therapeutic option at a lower cost.
- If problems arise during treatment, consider differences among generic brands. Although each generic must be tested against the brand-name product for bioequivalence, they do not need to be tested against each other.
- Different generic formations may have different inert ingredients, which may cause problems if patients are allergic to a specific inactive ingredient.
- Consult the ‘Orange Book’ for information on approved drugs and their generic interchangeability or the patient’s local pharmacist or a board-certified psychiatric pharmacist if you have questions about generic formulations.
In the United States, 2.6 billion prescriptions—approximately 70% of all prescriptions—are filled using generic versions of brand-name products.1 For most patients, generic substitution is acceptable and reduces costs. Although the practice has become routine, certain circumstances may make switching to a generic medication or between generic medication problematic. To understand why, it is important to discuss the FDA’s generic drug approval process.2
Bioequivalence
Pharmaceutical manufacturers developing a generic drug must create a product that will deliver the same amount of medication at the same rate and in the same form (ie, tablet, capsule, suspension, etc.) as the brand-name product. The FDA requires bioequivalence (BE) studies.2 These studies usually include fewer than 40 healthy individuals and must show that the generic product has the same pharmacokinetic profile as the brand-name drug (the active ingredient already has been shown to be safe and effective). The generic product can deviate from the brand product’s profile by a set amount—currently a 90% confidence interval limit of 80% to 125%.2 This means that pharmacokinetic parameters such as max concentration (Cmax), time to max concentration (Tmax), mean absorption time, and area under the curve (AUC)—which is a measure of overall drug exposure—are no less than 80% and no more than 125% of the parameters seen with the brand-name product. This may seem like a large deviation, but the FDA reports that generally “small differences in blood levels—<4%—may exist in some cases between a brand and its generic equivalent.”1
A new generic formulation does not have to be tested against other generic formulations, only against the brand-name drug. Therefore, 2 generic formulations may differ pharmacokinetically by more than a 4% difference if one product is on the low side of the BE limit and the other is on the high side. If a patient starts 1 generic and then switches to another, efficacy may be lost or side effects may emerge because of BE differences. In Mr. X’s case, it is possible that the new generic version of fluoxetine resulted in higher plasma drug levels that lead to recurrence of sexual dysfunction.
Exceptions
Generic medications are not recommended for certain medical conditions, such as epilepsy and some hormone replacement therapy, because of lack of satisfactory BE to the brand-name drug.3 For these conditions, generic medications may be used, but should not be substituted for the brand-name product without careful monitoring. Additionally, switching between different generic manufacturers should be avoided.
If you have a question about generic substitution, consult the FDA’s Approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations4—also known as the “Orange Book,” which is available online (see Related Resources). This resource provides guidance about which drugs are interchangeable. The Orange Book is the “gold standard” on approved drug products and their interchangeability.
The Table lists certain psychiatric medications that may have issues with generic substitutions. Most pharmacies stock and dispense only generic drugs that the FDA considers bioequivalent to the brand-name product.
Allergic reactions may occur because of different inert ingredients within each generic or brand-name drug. Generic drug manufacturers are not required to use the same inactive or “filler” ingredients. Some patients may be allergic to 1 version and may require a specific brand or generic version to overcome this potential allergy.3
Although most generic substitutions occur without incident, consider BE differences among products and your patient’s medical condition before initiating a switch. When switching between generics, carefully monitor your patient as you would when switching from the brand-name product to a generic. If new treatment-related issues arise or lack of efficacy occurs, ask your patient if the pharmacy switched to a new generic formulation.
Table
Bioequivalence among generic psychotropics: What to know before you switch
| Medication | Comments |
|---|---|
| Amitriptyline/perphenazine | Generic formulations may not be interchangeable* |
| Anticonvulsants | Because these medications have a narrow therapeutic index when used for seizure disorders, patients are recommended to not switch formulations. When used for psychiatric disorders, the margin of safety is unknown and switching may be appropriate |
| Chlorpromazine | Generic formulations are not bioequivalent |
| Clozapine | Generic formulations may not be bioequivalent at all dosages* Dosage adjustments may be needed in patients who need to switch formulations during treatment |
| Venlafaxine | Some formulations may not be interchangeable* |
| *Consult the FDA’s Approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations to determine if generics are interchangeable | |
| Source: Reference 4 | |
- Food and Drug Administration. www.fda.gov/Drugs/default.htm.
- Generic Pharmaceutical Association. www.gphaonline.org.
- Food and Drug Administration. Orange book: approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations. www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/ob/default.cfm.
Drug brand names
- Amitriptyline/Perphenazine • Triavil
- Chlorpromazine • Thorazine
- Clozapine • Clozaril
- Fluoxetine • Prozac
- Venlafaxine • Effexor
Disclosure
Dr. Ellingrod is a member of an advisory board for Eli Lilly and Company.
- Keep current with new developments in psychopharmacology
- Learn more about pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, drug-drug interactions, and prescribing for special populations
- Collaborate with psychiatric pharmacists to solve or prevent problems patients may have with their medications
Mr. X, age 47, suffers from major depressive disorder, which he developed 1 year ago after experiencing a myocardial infarction. At that time, Mr. X received brand-name fluoxetine (Prozac), 20 mg/d. After 4 weeks, his mood improved, but he experienced delayed ejaculation, which resolved spontaneously after 12 weeks of treatment.
Because Mr. X recently lost his job and health insurance, he inquires about lowering his health care costs. Discontinuing fluoxetine is not advised, so you recommend changing to a generic formulation. Mr. X tolerates this conversion without difficulty; however, 9 months later he reports he is experiencing delayed ejaculation again. He has had no changes in medical history and has not started any new medications. Mr. X claims he has been compliant with his medication, although he mentions that the fluoxetine tablets looked different when he refilled his prescription 2 weeks ago. You call the pharmacy and discover that they started dispensing generic fluoxetine from a different manufacturer around the time Mr. X refilled his prescription. You prescribe Mr. X his old version of generic fluoxetine, and his sexual dysfunction resolves within 2 weeks.
- For most patients, using generic medications poses no problems and offers an appropriate therapeutic option at a lower cost.
- If problems arise during treatment, consider differences among generic brands. Although each generic must be tested against the brand-name product for bioequivalence, they do not need to be tested against each other.
- Different generic formations may have different inert ingredients, which may cause problems if patients are allergic to a specific inactive ingredient.
- Consult the ‘Orange Book’ for information on approved drugs and their generic interchangeability or the patient’s local pharmacist or a board-certified psychiatric pharmacist if you have questions about generic formulations.
In the United States, 2.6 billion prescriptions—approximately 70% of all prescriptions—are filled using generic versions of brand-name products.1 For most patients, generic substitution is acceptable and reduces costs. Although the practice has become routine, certain circumstances may make switching to a generic medication or between generic medication problematic. To understand why, it is important to discuss the FDA’s generic drug approval process.2
Bioequivalence
Pharmaceutical manufacturers developing a generic drug must create a product that will deliver the same amount of medication at the same rate and in the same form (ie, tablet, capsule, suspension, etc.) as the brand-name product. The FDA requires bioequivalence (BE) studies.2 These studies usually include fewer than 40 healthy individuals and must show that the generic product has the same pharmacokinetic profile as the brand-name drug (the active ingredient already has been shown to be safe and effective). The generic product can deviate from the brand product’s profile by a set amount—currently a 90% confidence interval limit of 80% to 125%.2 This means that pharmacokinetic parameters such as max concentration (Cmax), time to max concentration (Tmax), mean absorption time, and area under the curve (AUC)—which is a measure of overall drug exposure—are no less than 80% and no more than 125% of the parameters seen with the brand-name product. This may seem like a large deviation, but the FDA reports that generally “small differences in blood levels—<4%—may exist in some cases between a brand and its generic equivalent.”1
A new generic formulation does not have to be tested against other generic formulations, only against the brand-name drug. Therefore, 2 generic formulations may differ pharmacokinetically by more than a 4% difference if one product is on the low side of the BE limit and the other is on the high side. If a patient starts 1 generic and then switches to another, efficacy may be lost or side effects may emerge because of BE differences. In Mr. X’s case, it is possible that the new generic version of fluoxetine resulted in higher plasma drug levels that lead to recurrence of sexual dysfunction.
Exceptions
Generic medications are not recommended for certain medical conditions, such as epilepsy and some hormone replacement therapy, because of lack of satisfactory BE to the brand-name drug.3 For these conditions, generic medications may be used, but should not be substituted for the brand-name product without careful monitoring. Additionally, switching between different generic manufacturers should be avoided.
If you have a question about generic substitution, consult the FDA’s Approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations4—also known as the “Orange Book,” which is available online (see Related Resources). This resource provides guidance about which drugs are interchangeable. The Orange Book is the “gold standard” on approved drug products and their interchangeability.
The Table lists certain psychiatric medications that may have issues with generic substitutions. Most pharmacies stock and dispense only generic drugs that the FDA considers bioequivalent to the brand-name product.
Allergic reactions may occur because of different inert ingredients within each generic or brand-name drug. Generic drug manufacturers are not required to use the same inactive or “filler” ingredients. Some patients may be allergic to 1 version and may require a specific brand or generic version to overcome this potential allergy.3
Although most generic substitutions occur without incident, consider BE differences among products and your patient’s medical condition before initiating a switch. When switching between generics, carefully monitor your patient as you would when switching from the brand-name product to a generic. If new treatment-related issues arise or lack of efficacy occurs, ask your patient if the pharmacy switched to a new generic formulation.
Table
Bioequivalence among generic psychotropics: What to know before you switch
| Medication | Comments |
|---|---|
| Amitriptyline/perphenazine | Generic formulations may not be interchangeable* |
| Anticonvulsants | Because these medications have a narrow therapeutic index when used for seizure disorders, patients are recommended to not switch formulations. When used for psychiatric disorders, the margin of safety is unknown and switching may be appropriate |
| Chlorpromazine | Generic formulations are not bioequivalent |
| Clozapine | Generic formulations may not be bioequivalent at all dosages* Dosage adjustments may be needed in patients who need to switch formulations during treatment |
| Venlafaxine | Some formulations may not be interchangeable* |
| *Consult the FDA’s Approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations to determine if generics are interchangeable | |
| Source: Reference 4 | |
- Food and Drug Administration. www.fda.gov/Drugs/default.htm.
- Generic Pharmaceutical Association. www.gphaonline.org.
- Food and Drug Administration. Orange book: approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations. www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/ob/default.cfm.
Drug brand names
- Amitriptyline/Perphenazine • Triavil
- Chlorpromazine • Thorazine
- Clozapine • Clozaril
- Fluoxetine • Prozac
- Venlafaxine • Effexor
Disclosure
Dr. Ellingrod is a member of an advisory board for Eli Lilly and Company.
1. Generic Pharmaceutical Association. Bioequivalence. Available at: http://www.gphaonline.org/issues/bioequivalence. Accessed January 4, 2010.
2. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry. Bioavailability and bioequivalence studies for orally administered drug products—general considerations. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2003.
3. Silverman HM. Bioequivalence and interchangeability of generic drugs. In: Merck manual home edition online. 2007. Available at: http://www.merck.com/mmhe/sec02/ch017/ch017b.html. Accessed January 4, 2010.
4. Food and Drug Administration. Orange book: approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations. Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/ob/default.cfm. Accessed January 4, 2010.
1. Generic Pharmaceutical Association. Bioequivalence. Available at: http://www.gphaonline.org/issues/bioequivalence. Accessed January 4, 2010.
2. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry. Bioavailability and bioequivalence studies for orally administered drug products—general considerations. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2003.
3. Silverman HM. Bioequivalence and interchangeability of generic drugs. In: Merck manual home edition online. 2007. Available at: http://www.merck.com/mmhe/sec02/ch017/ch017b.html. Accessed January 4, 2010.
4. Food and Drug Administration. Orange book: approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations. Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/ob/default.cfm. Accessed January 4, 2010.
Is it a mood disorder or menopause?
Consider the neuroendocrinology of menopause when evaluating midlife women for new or worsening mood symptoms. The risk of depression increases during perimenopause, even in women with no history of depression.1 Fluctuating estrogen levels can cause vasomotor symptoms (VMS) and depression, presenting diagnostic and treatment challenges. In addition to conducting a comprehensive psychiatric evaluation, our collaborative rotation between the UCLA-Kern Psychiatry Residency Program and the department of obstetrics and gynecology uses the following approach for women age >40.
Obtain a menstrual history
Ask your patient when her last menstrual period was and if her periods are irregular, heavy, light, or missing. Menopausal transition begins when the length of the menstrual cycle varies and ends with the final menstrual period. Perimenopause begins early in the transition and ends 12 months after the last menses. During this time VMS and mood instability may worsen.
Ask about menopausal symptoms
Hot flashes typically begin as a sudden sensation of heat centered in the upper chest and face that rapidly generalizes. Flashes last 2 to 4 minutes and often are accompanied by profuse perspiration and occasional palpitations. VMS can occur several times during the day and night. Hot flashes—the most common symptom associated with menopausal transition—peak during the 12 months surrounding the last period and can commonly persist up to 5 years or more. Hot flashes affect a woman’s sense of well-being and often are the reason women seek medical attention during midlife.
Insomnia. Sleep disturbance during the menopausal transition is common, sometimes severe, and may be related to nocturnal hot flashes and night sweats. Hot flashes and awakenings are sometimes followed by chills, shivering, anxiety, or panic.
Mood instability. Dysregulation of monoaminergic neurotransmitter systems caused by fluctuating estrogen levels may cause both depression and VMS.2 Perimenopausal women with VMS are more likely to be depressed than those who do not have VMS. VMS may signal the onset or recurrence of major depression.
Sexual changes. Estrogen deficiency may lead to vaginal dryness and urogenital atrophy, resulting in infection, painful intercourse, or decreased sexual desire.
Body aches. Many perimenopausal women complain of stiffness, joint pain, breast pain, menstrual migraines, bladder discomfort, and impaired balance.
Memory changes. Complaints of forgetfulness may reflect aging and effects of sleep disturbance.3
Diagnostic workup
Perimenopause can be diagnosed before clinical symptoms appear if the follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level is >25 IU/L and estrogen is <40 pg/mL during the early follicular phase (day 3 of the menstrual cycle).3 In women age <45 with irregular bleeding and menopause symptoms, check serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin (to rule out pregnancy), prolactin, thyroid-stimulating hormone, and FSH.
Women of any age with estrogen deficiency—such as those undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer, treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for endometriosis or in-vitro fertilization, premature ovarian failure, or who have undergone oophorectomy—might experience VMS and other perimenopausal symptoms.
Women age >45 with 12 months of amenorrhea may be diagnosed with menopause clinically without further testing.
Treatment strategies
Fewer women are choosing hormone replacement therapy (HRT) (estrogen alone or estrogen and progesterone) after the landmark Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study in 2002.4 Reports that HRT may increase the risk of breast cancer and offers no cardiac protection prompted many women to forego or discontinue HRT use. Subsequent interpretation of the WHI data has reduced many of these concerns.5 As a result, estrogen alone currently is the most effective and only FDA-approved treatment for VMS.5 Because of overlap between VMS and depression, treatment for these 2 conditions could be combined. Theoretically, treating VMS could prevent a major depressive episode in vulnerable women and may improve the chance of full remission of depression.1
Although results of studies of HRT for depression are mixed, estrogen alone may be effective for mild depression during perimenopause but not postmenopause. Estrogen also may be appropriate during perimenopause if a depressive disorder represents a first-onset episode of mild to moderate severity.6 Estrogen is not FDA-approved for treating perimenopausal depression. As with all medications, counsel patients on the risks and benefits and administer the medication at the lowest dose and for the shortest time period to effectively treat symptoms.
Consider antidepressants when HRT is contraindicated or declined. Selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors such as venlafaxine, desvenlafaxine, and duloxetine have demonstrated efficacy for VMS and depression.2 Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are effective in women age <40 but show inconsistent efficacy for VMS and depression in women age >50. SSRIs combined with estrogen therapy may be useful in postmenopausal women.2
Biopsychosocial factors
Psychosocial attitudes about aging, sexual attractiveness, and children leaving home may contribute to depression during perimenopause. However, many women welcome the freedom from menstrual periods and pregnancy worries.
Some women may not be aware of the impact of menopausal changes on mood. Educating patients with a mood disorder about what to expect and identifying and treating disabling hormonal dysregulation symptoms is an ideal opportunity to enhance the quality of life for patients during menopause and beyond.
1. Cohen LS, Soares CN, Vitonis AF, et al. Risk for new onset of depression during the menopausal transition: the Harvard study of moods and cycles. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63(4):385-390.
2. Thase ME, Entsuah R, Cantillon M, et al. Relative antidepressant efficacy of venlafaxine and SSRIs: sex-age interactions. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2005;14:609-616.
3. Aloysi A, Van Dyk K, Sano M. Women’s cognitive and affective health and neuropsychiatry. Mt Sinai J Medicine. 2006;73(7):967-975.
4. Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:321-333.
5. Santoro N. Symptoms of menopause: hot flushes. Clinical ObGyn. 2008;51(3):539-548.
6. Joffe H, Soares CN, Cohen LS. Assessment and treatment of hot flushes and menopausal mood disturbance. Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2003;26:563-580.
Consider the neuroendocrinology of menopause when evaluating midlife women for new or worsening mood symptoms. The risk of depression increases during perimenopause, even in women with no history of depression.1 Fluctuating estrogen levels can cause vasomotor symptoms (VMS) and depression, presenting diagnostic and treatment challenges. In addition to conducting a comprehensive psychiatric evaluation, our collaborative rotation between the UCLA-Kern Psychiatry Residency Program and the department of obstetrics and gynecology uses the following approach for women age >40.
Obtain a menstrual history
Ask your patient when her last menstrual period was and if her periods are irregular, heavy, light, or missing. Menopausal transition begins when the length of the menstrual cycle varies and ends with the final menstrual period. Perimenopause begins early in the transition and ends 12 months after the last menses. During this time VMS and mood instability may worsen.
Ask about menopausal symptoms
Hot flashes typically begin as a sudden sensation of heat centered in the upper chest and face that rapidly generalizes. Flashes last 2 to 4 minutes and often are accompanied by profuse perspiration and occasional palpitations. VMS can occur several times during the day and night. Hot flashes—the most common symptom associated with menopausal transition—peak during the 12 months surrounding the last period and can commonly persist up to 5 years or more. Hot flashes affect a woman’s sense of well-being and often are the reason women seek medical attention during midlife.
Insomnia. Sleep disturbance during the menopausal transition is common, sometimes severe, and may be related to nocturnal hot flashes and night sweats. Hot flashes and awakenings are sometimes followed by chills, shivering, anxiety, or panic.
Mood instability. Dysregulation of monoaminergic neurotransmitter systems caused by fluctuating estrogen levels may cause both depression and VMS.2 Perimenopausal women with VMS are more likely to be depressed than those who do not have VMS. VMS may signal the onset or recurrence of major depression.
Sexual changes. Estrogen deficiency may lead to vaginal dryness and urogenital atrophy, resulting in infection, painful intercourse, or decreased sexual desire.
Body aches. Many perimenopausal women complain of stiffness, joint pain, breast pain, menstrual migraines, bladder discomfort, and impaired balance.
Memory changes. Complaints of forgetfulness may reflect aging and effects of sleep disturbance.3
Diagnostic workup
Perimenopause can be diagnosed before clinical symptoms appear if the follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level is >25 IU/L and estrogen is <40 pg/mL during the early follicular phase (day 3 of the menstrual cycle).3 In women age <45 with irregular bleeding and menopause symptoms, check serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin (to rule out pregnancy), prolactin, thyroid-stimulating hormone, and FSH.
Women of any age with estrogen deficiency—such as those undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer, treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for endometriosis or in-vitro fertilization, premature ovarian failure, or who have undergone oophorectomy—might experience VMS and other perimenopausal symptoms.
Women age >45 with 12 months of amenorrhea may be diagnosed with menopause clinically without further testing.
Treatment strategies
Fewer women are choosing hormone replacement therapy (HRT) (estrogen alone or estrogen and progesterone) after the landmark Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study in 2002.4 Reports that HRT may increase the risk of breast cancer and offers no cardiac protection prompted many women to forego or discontinue HRT use. Subsequent interpretation of the WHI data has reduced many of these concerns.5 As a result, estrogen alone currently is the most effective and only FDA-approved treatment for VMS.5 Because of overlap between VMS and depression, treatment for these 2 conditions could be combined. Theoretically, treating VMS could prevent a major depressive episode in vulnerable women and may improve the chance of full remission of depression.1
Although results of studies of HRT for depression are mixed, estrogen alone may be effective for mild depression during perimenopause but not postmenopause. Estrogen also may be appropriate during perimenopause if a depressive disorder represents a first-onset episode of mild to moderate severity.6 Estrogen is not FDA-approved for treating perimenopausal depression. As with all medications, counsel patients on the risks and benefits and administer the medication at the lowest dose and for the shortest time period to effectively treat symptoms.
Consider antidepressants when HRT is contraindicated or declined. Selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors such as venlafaxine, desvenlafaxine, and duloxetine have demonstrated efficacy for VMS and depression.2 Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are effective in women age <40 but show inconsistent efficacy for VMS and depression in women age >50. SSRIs combined with estrogen therapy may be useful in postmenopausal women.2
Biopsychosocial factors
Psychosocial attitudes about aging, sexual attractiveness, and children leaving home may contribute to depression during perimenopause. However, many women welcome the freedom from menstrual periods and pregnancy worries.
Some women may not be aware of the impact of menopausal changes on mood. Educating patients with a mood disorder about what to expect and identifying and treating disabling hormonal dysregulation symptoms is an ideal opportunity to enhance the quality of life for patients during menopause and beyond.
Consider the neuroendocrinology of menopause when evaluating midlife women for new or worsening mood symptoms. The risk of depression increases during perimenopause, even in women with no history of depression.1 Fluctuating estrogen levels can cause vasomotor symptoms (VMS) and depression, presenting diagnostic and treatment challenges. In addition to conducting a comprehensive psychiatric evaluation, our collaborative rotation between the UCLA-Kern Psychiatry Residency Program and the department of obstetrics and gynecology uses the following approach for women age >40.
Obtain a menstrual history
Ask your patient when her last menstrual period was and if her periods are irregular, heavy, light, or missing. Menopausal transition begins when the length of the menstrual cycle varies and ends with the final menstrual period. Perimenopause begins early in the transition and ends 12 months after the last menses. During this time VMS and mood instability may worsen.
Ask about menopausal symptoms
Hot flashes typically begin as a sudden sensation of heat centered in the upper chest and face that rapidly generalizes. Flashes last 2 to 4 minutes and often are accompanied by profuse perspiration and occasional palpitations. VMS can occur several times during the day and night. Hot flashes—the most common symptom associated with menopausal transition—peak during the 12 months surrounding the last period and can commonly persist up to 5 years or more. Hot flashes affect a woman’s sense of well-being and often are the reason women seek medical attention during midlife.
Insomnia. Sleep disturbance during the menopausal transition is common, sometimes severe, and may be related to nocturnal hot flashes and night sweats. Hot flashes and awakenings are sometimes followed by chills, shivering, anxiety, or panic.
Mood instability. Dysregulation of monoaminergic neurotransmitter systems caused by fluctuating estrogen levels may cause both depression and VMS.2 Perimenopausal women with VMS are more likely to be depressed than those who do not have VMS. VMS may signal the onset or recurrence of major depression.
Sexual changes. Estrogen deficiency may lead to vaginal dryness and urogenital atrophy, resulting in infection, painful intercourse, or decreased sexual desire.
Body aches. Many perimenopausal women complain of stiffness, joint pain, breast pain, menstrual migraines, bladder discomfort, and impaired balance.
Memory changes. Complaints of forgetfulness may reflect aging and effects of sleep disturbance.3
Diagnostic workup
Perimenopause can be diagnosed before clinical symptoms appear if the follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level is >25 IU/L and estrogen is <40 pg/mL during the early follicular phase (day 3 of the menstrual cycle).3 In women age <45 with irregular bleeding and menopause symptoms, check serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin (to rule out pregnancy), prolactin, thyroid-stimulating hormone, and FSH.
Women of any age with estrogen deficiency—such as those undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer, treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for endometriosis or in-vitro fertilization, premature ovarian failure, or who have undergone oophorectomy—might experience VMS and other perimenopausal symptoms.
Women age >45 with 12 months of amenorrhea may be diagnosed with menopause clinically without further testing.
Treatment strategies
Fewer women are choosing hormone replacement therapy (HRT) (estrogen alone or estrogen and progesterone) after the landmark Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study in 2002.4 Reports that HRT may increase the risk of breast cancer and offers no cardiac protection prompted many women to forego or discontinue HRT use. Subsequent interpretation of the WHI data has reduced many of these concerns.5 As a result, estrogen alone currently is the most effective and only FDA-approved treatment for VMS.5 Because of overlap between VMS and depression, treatment for these 2 conditions could be combined. Theoretically, treating VMS could prevent a major depressive episode in vulnerable women and may improve the chance of full remission of depression.1
Although results of studies of HRT for depression are mixed, estrogen alone may be effective for mild depression during perimenopause but not postmenopause. Estrogen also may be appropriate during perimenopause if a depressive disorder represents a first-onset episode of mild to moderate severity.6 Estrogen is not FDA-approved for treating perimenopausal depression. As with all medications, counsel patients on the risks and benefits and administer the medication at the lowest dose and for the shortest time period to effectively treat symptoms.
Consider antidepressants when HRT is contraindicated or declined. Selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors such as venlafaxine, desvenlafaxine, and duloxetine have demonstrated efficacy for VMS and depression.2 Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are effective in women age <40 but show inconsistent efficacy for VMS and depression in women age >50. SSRIs combined with estrogen therapy may be useful in postmenopausal women.2
Biopsychosocial factors
Psychosocial attitudes about aging, sexual attractiveness, and children leaving home may contribute to depression during perimenopause. However, many women welcome the freedom from menstrual periods and pregnancy worries.
Some women may not be aware of the impact of menopausal changes on mood. Educating patients with a mood disorder about what to expect and identifying and treating disabling hormonal dysregulation symptoms is an ideal opportunity to enhance the quality of life for patients during menopause and beyond.
1. Cohen LS, Soares CN, Vitonis AF, et al. Risk for new onset of depression during the menopausal transition: the Harvard study of moods and cycles. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63(4):385-390.
2. Thase ME, Entsuah R, Cantillon M, et al. Relative antidepressant efficacy of venlafaxine and SSRIs: sex-age interactions. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2005;14:609-616.
3. Aloysi A, Van Dyk K, Sano M. Women’s cognitive and affective health and neuropsychiatry. Mt Sinai J Medicine. 2006;73(7):967-975.
4. Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:321-333.
5. Santoro N. Symptoms of menopause: hot flushes. Clinical ObGyn. 2008;51(3):539-548.
6. Joffe H, Soares CN, Cohen LS. Assessment and treatment of hot flushes and menopausal mood disturbance. Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2003;26:563-580.
1. Cohen LS, Soares CN, Vitonis AF, et al. Risk for new onset of depression during the menopausal transition: the Harvard study of moods and cycles. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63(4):385-390.
2. Thase ME, Entsuah R, Cantillon M, et al. Relative antidepressant efficacy of venlafaxine and SSRIs: sex-age interactions. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2005;14:609-616.
3. Aloysi A, Van Dyk K, Sano M. Women’s cognitive and affective health and neuropsychiatry. Mt Sinai J Medicine. 2006;73(7):967-975.
4. Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:321-333.
5. Santoro N. Symptoms of menopause: hot flushes. Clinical ObGyn. 2008;51(3):539-548.
6. Joffe H, Soares CN, Cohen LS. Assessment and treatment of hot flushes and menopausal mood disturbance. Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2003;26:563-580.
Bedtime battles: When patients act out their dreams
REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) patients act out their dreams during sleep and could injure themselves or bed partner. In RBD, loss of skeletal muscle atonia during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep allows the patient’s motor activity to reflect dream content. During sleep, patients appear to punch, kick, or choke a bed partner or jump out of bed.
RBD is more common in elderly males and individuals with neurodegenerative disorders of alpha-synuclein accumulation, such as Parkinson’s disease, Lewy body dementia, and multiple system atrophy.1 RBD may be a precursor to these diseases.
Most antidepressants can cause or increase RBD movements.2 RBD also is associated with sedative-hypnotic withdrawal.
Differential diagnosis
When patients report striking out while asleep, differential diagnoses include RBD, periodic limb movement disorder (PLMD), sleepwalking disorder, and restless legs syndrome (RLS). Polysomnography with electromyography may distinguish among these disorders.
PLMD movements are repetitive, stereotyped motions of the foot and leg, and manifest as a repetitive partial flexion of the joints of the great toe, ankle, knee, and occasionally hip. Upper extremity movements are less common. Movements appear similar to myoclonus. Periodic limb movements occur in rhythmic patterns, every 20 to 60 seconds, continuing for 10 minutes to several hours.
Sleepwalking disorder movements occur without an associated dream during non-REM sleep. Individuals with RBD may jump out of bed, but usually don’t walk in their sleep.
RLS movement occurs prior to and in early stages of sleep, whereas in RBD, PLMD, and sleepwalking disorder, motor activity is limited to sleep. Patients perceive unpleasant sensations and an urge to move the feet and legs. Movement temporarily soothes these uncomfortable sensations. Patients are aware of these sensations before sleep; however, RBD patients are not conscious of movements until they wake and find themselves acting out a dream. RLS and PLMD often are comorbid.
Treatment
Clonazepam is most effective for RBD; however, also consider lorazepam, pramipexole, or melatonin. If clinically feasible, consider discontinuing antidepressants because this may decrease movements.3
To reduce risk of injury, recommend sleeping in separate beds, moving objects away from the bed, or padding the headboard and floor. Encourage patients with severe RBD to sleep in a zipped sleeping bag.
1. Salah Uddin ABM, Jarmi T. REM sleep behavior disorder. Available at: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1188651-overview. Accessed March 22, 2010.
2. Kaufman DM. Clinical neurology for psychiatrists. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2006.
3. Buysse DJ. Sleep disorders and psychiatry. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.; 2005.
REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) patients act out their dreams during sleep and could injure themselves or bed partner. In RBD, loss of skeletal muscle atonia during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep allows the patient’s motor activity to reflect dream content. During sleep, patients appear to punch, kick, or choke a bed partner or jump out of bed.
RBD is more common in elderly males and individuals with neurodegenerative disorders of alpha-synuclein accumulation, such as Parkinson’s disease, Lewy body dementia, and multiple system atrophy.1 RBD may be a precursor to these diseases.
Most antidepressants can cause or increase RBD movements.2 RBD also is associated with sedative-hypnotic withdrawal.
Differential diagnosis
When patients report striking out while asleep, differential diagnoses include RBD, periodic limb movement disorder (PLMD), sleepwalking disorder, and restless legs syndrome (RLS). Polysomnography with electromyography may distinguish among these disorders.
PLMD movements are repetitive, stereotyped motions of the foot and leg, and manifest as a repetitive partial flexion of the joints of the great toe, ankle, knee, and occasionally hip. Upper extremity movements are less common. Movements appear similar to myoclonus. Periodic limb movements occur in rhythmic patterns, every 20 to 60 seconds, continuing for 10 minutes to several hours.
Sleepwalking disorder movements occur without an associated dream during non-REM sleep. Individuals with RBD may jump out of bed, but usually don’t walk in their sleep.
RLS movement occurs prior to and in early stages of sleep, whereas in RBD, PLMD, and sleepwalking disorder, motor activity is limited to sleep. Patients perceive unpleasant sensations and an urge to move the feet and legs. Movement temporarily soothes these uncomfortable sensations. Patients are aware of these sensations before sleep; however, RBD patients are not conscious of movements until they wake and find themselves acting out a dream. RLS and PLMD often are comorbid.
Treatment
Clonazepam is most effective for RBD; however, also consider lorazepam, pramipexole, or melatonin. If clinically feasible, consider discontinuing antidepressants because this may decrease movements.3
To reduce risk of injury, recommend sleeping in separate beds, moving objects away from the bed, or padding the headboard and floor. Encourage patients with severe RBD to sleep in a zipped sleeping bag.
REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) patients act out their dreams during sleep and could injure themselves or bed partner. In RBD, loss of skeletal muscle atonia during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep allows the patient’s motor activity to reflect dream content. During sleep, patients appear to punch, kick, or choke a bed partner or jump out of bed.
RBD is more common in elderly males and individuals with neurodegenerative disorders of alpha-synuclein accumulation, such as Parkinson’s disease, Lewy body dementia, and multiple system atrophy.1 RBD may be a precursor to these diseases.
Most antidepressants can cause or increase RBD movements.2 RBD also is associated with sedative-hypnotic withdrawal.
Differential diagnosis
When patients report striking out while asleep, differential diagnoses include RBD, periodic limb movement disorder (PLMD), sleepwalking disorder, and restless legs syndrome (RLS). Polysomnography with electromyography may distinguish among these disorders.
PLMD movements are repetitive, stereotyped motions of the foot and leg, and manifest as a repetitive partial flexion of the joints of the great toe, ankle, knee, and occasionally hip. Upper extremity movements are less common. Movements appear similar to myoclonus. Periodic limb movements occur in rhythmic patterns, every 20 to 60 seconds, continuing for 10 minutes to several hours.
Sleepwalking disorder movements occur without an associated dream during non-REM sleep. Individuals with RBD may jump out of bed, but usually don’t walk in their sleep.
RLS movement occurs prior to and in early stages of sleep, whereas in RBD, PLMD, and sleepwalking disorder, motor activity is limited to sleep. Patients perceive unpleasant sensations and an urge to move the feet and legs. Movement temporarily soothes these uncomfortable sensations. Patients are aware of these sensations before sleep; however, RBD patients are not conscious of movements until they wake and find themselves acting out a dream. RLS and PLMD often are comorbid.
Treatment
Clonazepam is most effective for RBD; however, also consider lorazepam, pramipexole, or melatonin. If clinically feasible, consider discontinuing antidepressants because this may decrease movements.3
To reduce risk of injury, recommend sleeping in separate beds, moving objects away from the bed, or padding the headboard and floor. Encourage patients with severe RBD to sleep in a zipped sleeping bag.
1. Salah Uddin ABM, Jarmi T. REM sleep behavior disorder. Available at: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1188651-overview. Accessed March 22, 2010.
2. Kaufman DM. Clinical neurology for psychiatrists. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2006.
3. Buysse DJ. Sleep disorders and psychiatry. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.; 2005.
1. Salah Uddin ABM, Jarmi T. REM sleep behavior disorder. Available at: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1188651-overview. Accessed March 22, 2010.
2. Kaufman DM. Clinical neurology for psychiatrists. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2006.
3. Buysse DJ. Sleep disorders and psychiatry. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.; 2005.
Do beta blockers cause depression?
Dr. Muzyk is a clinical pharmacist, Duke University Medical Center, and Dr. Galiardi is assistant professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences and assistant clinical professor of medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Principal Source: van Melle JP, Verbeek DEP, van den Berg MP, et al. Beta-blockers and depression after myocardial infarction: a multicenter prospective study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48(11):2209-2214.
- Although patients with cardiovascular disease are at increased risk for developing depression, there is no convincing evidence that adding beta blockers will further increase their risk.
- Initiating beta-blocker therapy at the lowest possible dose and slowly titrating the dose over time could minimize adverse effects such as fatigue and sexual side effects.
- If a patient taking beta blockers develops signs of major depression, carefully evaluate and treat symptoms with appropriate psychotherapy, psychotropics, and monitoring.
Beyond their well-known role for treating cardiovascular disease, beta adrenergic receptor antagonists—beta blockers—are used for a variety of medical conditions, including coronary artery disease, hypertension, migraines, and tremor. Their usefulness makes them 1 of the most commonly prescribed medication classes. Unfortunately, their increased use comes with increased reports of depression. Being able to sort fact from fiction will help guide your care for patients taking beta blockers who report new or worsening depressive symptoms.
Does research support a link?
First reported in the 1960s, beta blocker-induced depression was thought to result from the drugs’ antagonistic effect on norepinephrine at ß1 post-synaptic brain receptors. Prompted by case reports of a possible association between beta blockers and depression, 2 prescription database reviews found that patients taking beta blockers were more likely to receive a concurrent antidepressant prescription than patients prescribed other cardiovascular and diabetic medications.1,2 However, these reviews had major limitations, such as inadequately defined methods for defining depression and lack of control for potential confounding factors.
Mechanistically, peripheral effects of beta blockers on the heart and kidneys lead to decreased chronotropy and inotropy as well as lower blood pressure. These cardiovascular and hemodynamic changes could cause fatigue, decreased energy, and sexual dysfunction that may be interpreted as symptoms of new-onset depression.
Researchers found that beta-blocker use was not associated with depression in a case-control study examining 4,302 New Jersey Medicaid records.3 Also, because most patients in this study received propranolol, the authors were unable to confirm a long-held belief that highly lipophilic beta blockers (such as propranolol, metoprolol, and timolol) are more likely than hydrophilic beta blockers such as atenolol to produce depression.
A retrospective cohort study analyzed 381 patients from 2 myocardial infarction (MI) trials who had been assessed for depressive symptoms and severity.4 Researchers matched 254 subjects taking beta blockers during hospitalization for MI with 127 subjects not taking beta blockers. Patients in the study were well balanced on multiple baseline characteristics, including demographics, history of depression, and left ventricular ejection fraction, although those who did not take beta blockers had a significantly higher incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, digoxin use, and pre-MI beta-blocker use. Researchers assessed depressive symptoms using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months post-MI and identified patients with depression using a Composite International Diagnostic Interview. They found no statistically significant difference in BDI scores between beta-blockers users and nonusers at discharge and at 3, 6, and 12 months post-MI after accounting for potential confounding factors, including:
- contraindications for beta-blocker use (other than history of depression)
- indicators and risk factors for cardiac disease
- baseline depressive symptoms
- benzodiazepine use.
In fact, after controlling for baseline depression, researchers found that beta-blocker users demonstrated significantly lower BDI scores 3 months post-MI than nonusers. Based on these results, the authors concluded that clinicians should not be deterred from prescribing beta blockers because the drugs’ benefit in reducing morbidity and mortality in cardiovascular disease greatly outweighs the risk—if any—of new-onset depression associated with beta-blocker use.
Two additional studies reported no significant difference in the incidence of depression between patients who received beta blockers and those who received other antihypertensives or placebo.5,6 Future studies assessing depression among subjects randomized to beta blockers vs placebo would be helpful, though withholding beta blockers in some cardiac conditions is not justifiable, and such studies may not be feasible.
Treatment for psychiatric patients
Evidence supports beta-blocker use in coronary artery disease and congestive heart failure. Although patients with these conditions are at increased risk for developing depression,7 there is little evidence that their risk will be further increased by adding beta blockers (Table),3-6 Although patients taking beta blockers report a higher incidence of fatigue and sexual side effects—which could be interpreted as related to depression—studies do not support an association between these medications and depression. As with any medication, initiate beta-blocker therapy with the lowest possible dose and titrate slowly to minimize side effects. Any patient who develops signs and symptoms of major depression should be thoroughly evaluated and treated with appropriate psychotherapy, psychotropics, and careful monitoring.
Table
Beta blockers and depression: Is there a link?
| Study | Methods | Results |
|---|---|---|
| Bright et al, 19923 | Case-control study of 4,302 patients with new-onset depression | Beta-blocker use was not associated with depression after controlling for confounding factors, although depressed patients were more likely to receive beta blockers |
| van Melle et al, 20064 | A prospective study of post-myocardial infarction patients; 254 taking beta blockers, 127 controls | No significant differences in depressive symptoms or incidence of depressive disorder between beta-blocker users and nonusers |
| Gerstman et al, 19965 | New users of propranolol (n=704) other beta blockers (n=587), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (n=976), calcium channel blockers (n=742), and diuretics (n=773) | Depression occurred no more frequently among beta-blocker users than other subjects |
| Ko et al, 20026 | Quantitative review of randomized trials that tested beta blockers in myocardial infarction, heart failure, and hypertension | Beta-blocker therapy was not associated with a significant absolute annual increase in risk of depressive symptoms (6 per 1,000 patients; 95% confidence interval, -7 to 19) |
- Rivelli S, Jiang W. Depression and ischemic heart disease: what have we learned from clinical trials? Curr Opin Cardiol. 2007;22(4):286-291.
- National guideline clearinghouse. Secondary prevention of coronary artery disease. www.guideline.gov/summary/summary.aspx?doc_id=14585.
Drug brand names
- Atenolol • Tenormin
- Digoxin • Lanoxin
- Metoprolol • Lopressor, Toprol-XL
- Propranolol • Inderal
- Timolol • Blocadren
Disclosure
The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.
1. Avorn J, Everitt D, Weiss S. Increased antidepressant use in patients prescribed beta-blockers. JAMA. 1986;256:357-360.
2. Thiessen B, Wallace S, Blackburn J, et al. Increased prescribing of antidepressants subsequent to beta-blocker therapy. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:2286-2290.
3. Bright R, Everitt D. Beta-blockers and depression. Evidence against an association. JAMA. 1992;267(13):1783-1787.
4. van Melle JP, Verbeek DEP, van den Berg MP, et al. Beta-blockers and depression after myocardial infarction: a multicenter prospective study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48(11):2209-2214.
5. Gerstman B, Jolson HM, Bauer M, et al. The incidence of depression in new users of beta-blockers and selected antihypertensives. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49(7):809-815.
6. Ko D, Hebert P, Coffey C, et al. Beta-blockers therapy and symptoms of depression, fatigue, and sexual dysfunction. JAMA. 2002;288(3):351-357.
7. Pozuelo L, Tesar G, Zhang J, et al. Depression and heart disease: what do we know, and where are we headed? Cleve Clin J Med. 2009;76(1):59-70.
Dr. Muzyk is a clinical pharmacist, Duke University Medical Center, and Dr. Galiardi is assistant professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences and assistant clinical professor of medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Principal Source: van Melle JP, Verbeek DEP, van den Berg MP, et al. Beta-blockers and depression after myocardial infarction: a multicenter prospective study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48(11):2209-2214.
- Although patients with cardiovascular disease are at increased risk for developing depression, there is no convincing evidence that adding beta blockers will further increase their risk.
- Initiating beta-blocker therapy at the lowest possible dose and slowly titrating the dose over time could minimize adverse effects such as fatigue and sexual side effects.
- If a patient taking beta blockers develops signs of major depression, carefully evaluate and treat symptoms with appropriate psychotherapy, psychotropics, and monitoring.
Beyond their well-known role for treating cardiovascular disease, beta adrenergic receptor antagonists—beta blockers—are used for a variety of medical conditions, including coronary artery disease, hypertension, migraines, and tremor. Their usefulness makes them 1 of the most commonly prescribed medication classes. Unfortunately, their increased use comes with increased reports of depression. Being able to sort fact from fiction will help guide your care for patients taking beta blockers who report new or worsening depressive symptoms.
Does research support a link?
First reported in the 1960s, beta blocker-induced depression was thought to result from the drugs’ antagonistic effect on norepinephrine at ß1 post-synaptic brain receptors. Prompted by case reports of a possible association between beta blockers and depression, 2 prescription database reviews found that patients taking beta blockers were more likely to receive a concurrent antidepressant prescription than patients prescribed other cardiovascular and diabetic medications.1,2 However, these reviews had major limitations, such as inadequately defined methods for defining depression and lack of control for potential confounding factors.
Mechanistically, peripheral effects of beta blockers on the heart and kidneys lead to decreased chronotropy and inotropy as well as lower blood pressure. These cardiovascular and hemodynamic changes could cause fatigue, decreased energy, and sexual dysfunction that may be interpreted as symptoms of new-onset depression.
Researchers found that beta-blocker use was not associated with depression in a case-control study examining 4,302 New Jersey Medicaid records.3 Also, because most patients in this study received propranolol, the authors were unable to confirm a long-held belief that highly lipophilic beta blockers (such as propranolol, metoprolol, and timolol) are more likely than hydrophilic beta blockers such as atenolol to produce depression.
A retrospective cohort study analyzed 381 patients from 2 myocardial infarction (MI) trials who had been assessed for depressive symptoms and severity.4 Researchers matched 254 subjects taking beta blockers during hospitalization for MI with 127 subjects not taking beta blockers. Patients in the study were well balanced on multiple baseline characteristics, including demographics, history of depression, and left ventricular ejection fraction, although those who did not take beta blockers had a significantly higher incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, digoxin use, and pre-MI beta-blocker use. Researchers assessed depressive symptoms using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months post-MI and identified patients with depression using a Composite International Diagnostic Interview. They found no statistically significant difference in BDI scores between beta-blockers users and nonusers at discharge and at 3, 6, and 12 months post-MI after accounting for potential confounding factors, including:
- contraindications for beta-blocker use (other than history of depression)
- indicators and risk factors for cardiac disease
- baseline depressive symptoms
- benzodiazepine use.
In fact, after controlling for baseline depression, researchers found that beta-blocker users demonstrated significantly lower BDI scores 3 months post-MI than nonusers. Based on these results, the authors concluded that clinicians should not be deterred from prescribing beta blockers because the drugs’ benefit in reducing morbidity and mortality in cardiovascular disease greatly outweighs the risk—if any—of new-onset depression associated with beta-blocker use.
Two additional studies reported no significant difference in the incidence of depression between patients who received beta blockers and those who received other antihypertensives or placebo.5,6 Future studies assessing depression among subjects randomized to beta blockers vs placebo would be helpful, though withholding beta blockers in some cardiac conditions is not justifiable, and such studies may not be feasible.
Treatment for psychiatric patients
Evidence supports beta-blocker use in coronary artery disease and congestive heart failure. Although patients with these conditions are at increased risk for developing depression,7 there is little evidence that their risk will be further increased by adding beta blockers (Table),3-6 Although patients taking beta blockers report a higher incidence of fatigue and sexual side effects—which could be interpreted as related to depression—studies do not support an association between these medications and depression. As with any medication, initiate beta-blocker therapy with the lowest possible dose and titrate slowly to minimize side effects. Any patient who develops signs and symptoms of major depression should be thoroughly evaluated and treated with appropriate psychotherapy, psychotropics, and careful monitoring.
Table
Beta blockers and depression: Is there a link?
| Study | Methods | Results |
|---|---|---|
| Bright et al, 19923 | Case-control study of 4,302 patients with new-onset depression | Beta-blocker use was not associated with depression after controlling for confounding factors, although depressed patients were more likely to receive beta blockers |
| van Melle et al, 20064 | A prospective study of post-myocardial infarction patients; 254 taking beta blockers, 127 controls | No significant differences in depressive symptoms or incidence of depressive disorder between beta-blocker users and nonusers |
| Gerstman et al, 19965 | New users of propranolol (n=704) other beta blockers (n=587), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (n=976), calcium channel blockers (n=742), and diuretics (n=773) | Depression occurred no more frequently among beta-blocker users than other subjects |
| Ko et al, 20026 | Quantitative review of randomized trials that tested beta blockers in myocardial infarction, heart failure, and hypertension | Beta-blocker therapy was not associated with a significant absolute annual increase in risk of depressive symptoms (6 per 1,000 patients; 95% confidence interval, -7 to 19) |
- Rivelli S, Jiang W. Depression and ischemic heart disease: what have we learned from clinical trials? Curr Opin Cardiol. 2007;22(4):286-291.
- National guideline clearinghouse. Secondary prevention of coronary artery disease. www.guideline.gov/summary/summary.aspx?doc_id=14585.
Drug brand names
- Atenolol • Tenormin
- Digoxin • Lanoxin
- Metoprolol • Lopressor, Toprol-XL
- Propranolol • Inderal
- Timolol • Blocadren
Disclosure
The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.
Dr. Muzyk is a clinical pharmacist, Duke University Medical Center, and Dr. Galiardi is assistant professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences and assistant clinical professor of medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Principal Source: van Melle JP, Verbeek DEP, van den Berg MP, et al. Beta-blockers and depression after myocardial infarction: a multicenter prospective study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48(11):2209-2214.
- Although patients with cardiovascular disease are at increased risk for developing depression, there is no convincing evidence that adding beta blockers will further increase their risk.
- Initiating beta-blocker therapy at the lowest possible dose and slowly titrating the dose over time could minimize adverse effects such as fatigue and sexual side effects.
- If a patient taking beta blockers develops signs of major depression, carefully evaluate and treat symptoms with appropriate psychotherapy, psychotropics, and monitoring.
Beyond their well-known role for treating cardiovascular disease, beta adrenergic receptor antagonists—beta blockers—are used for a variety of medical conditions, including coronary artery disease, hypertension, migraines, and tremor. Their usefulness makes them 1 of the most commonly prescribed medication classes. Unfortunately, their increased use comes with increased reports of depression. Being able to sort fact from fiction will help guide your care for patients taking beta blockers who report new or worsening depressive symptoms.
Does research support a link?
First reported in the 1960s, beta blocker-induced depression was thought to result from the drugs’ antagonistic effect on norepinephrine at ß1 post-synaptic brain receptors. Prompted by case reports of a possible association between beta blockers and depression, 2 prescription database reviews found that patients taking beta blockers were more likely to receive a concurrent antidepressant prescription than patients prescribed other cardiovascular and diabetic medications.1,2 However, these reviews had major limitations, such as inadequately defined methods for defining depression and lack of control for potential confounding factors.
Mechanistically, peripheral effects of beta blockers on the heart and kidneys lead to decreased chronotropy and inotropy as well as lower blood pressure. These cardiovascular and hemodynamic changes could cause fatigue, decreased energy, and sexual dysfunction that may be interpreted as symptoms of new-onset depression.
Researchers found that beta-blocker use was not associated with depression in a case-control study examining 4,302 New Jersey Medicaid records.3 Also, because most patients in this study received propranolol, the authors were unable to confirm a long-held belief that highly lipophilic beta blockers (such as propranolol, metoprolol, and timolol) are more likely than hydrophilic beta blockers such as atenolol to produce depression.
A retrospective cohort study analyzed 381 patients from 2 myocardial infarction (MI) trials who had been assessed for depressive symptoms and severity.4 Researchers matched 254 subjects taking beta blockers during hospitalization for MI with 127 subjects not taking beta blockers. Patients in the study were well balanced on multiple baseline characteristics, including demographics, history of depression, and left ventricular ejection fraction, although those who did not take beta blockers had a significantly higher incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, digoxin use, and pre-MI beta-blocker use. Researchers assessed depressive symptoms using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months post-MI and identified patients with depression using a Composite International Diagnostic Interview. They found no statistically significant difference in BDI scores between beta-blockers users and nonusers at discharge and at 3, 6, and 12 months post-MI after accounting for potential confounding factors, including:
- contraindications for beta-blocker use (other than history of depression)
- indicators and risk factors for cardiac disease
- baseline depressive symptoms
- benzodiazepine use.
In fact, after controlling for baseline depression, researchers found that beta-blocker users demonstrated significantly lower BDI scores 3 months post-MI than nonusers. Based on these results, the authors concluded that clinicians should not be deterred from prescribing beta blockers because the drugs’ benefit in reducing morbidity and mortality in cardiovascular disease greatly outweighs the risk—if any—of new-onset depression associated with beta-blocker use.
Two additional studies reported no significant difference in the incidence of depression between patients who received beta blockers and those who received other antihypertensives or placebo.5,6 Future studies assessing depression among subjects randomized to beta blockers vs placebo would be helpful, though withholding beta blockers in some cardiac conditions is not justifiable, and such studies may not be feasible.
Treatment for psychiatric patients
Evidence supports beta-blocker use in coronary artery disease and congestive heart failure. Although patients with these conditions are at increased risk for developing depression,7 there is little evidence that their risk will be further increased by adding beta blockers (Table),3-6 Although patients taking beta blockers report a higher incidence of fatigue and sexual side effects—which could be interpreted as related to depression—studies do not support an association between these medications and depression. As with any medication, initiate beta-blocker therapy with the lowest possible dose and titrate slowly to minimize side effects. Any patient who develops signs and symptoms of major depression should be thoroughly evaluated and treated with appropriate psychotherapy, psychotropics, and careful monitoring.
Table
Beta blockers and depression: Is there a link?
| Study | Methods | Results |
|---|---|---|
| Bright et al, 19923 | Case-control study of 4,302 patients with new-onset depression | Beta-blocker use was not associated with depression after controlling for confounding factors, although depressed patients were more likely to receive beta blockers |
| van Melle et al, 20064 | A prospective study of post-myocardial infarction patients; 254 taking beta blockers, 127 controls | No significant differences in depressive symptoms or incidence of depressive disorder between beta-blocker users and nonusers |
| Gerstman et al, 19965 | New users of propranolol (n=704) other beta blockers (n=587), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (n=976), calcium channel blockers (n=742), and diuretics (n=773) | Depression occurred no more frequently among beta-blocker users than other subjects |
| Ko et al, 20026 | Quantitative review of randomized trials that tested beta blockers in myocardial infarction, heart failure, and hypertension | Beta-blocker therapy was not associated with a significant absolute annual increase in risk of depressive symptoms (6 per 1,000 patients; 95% confidence interval, -7 to 19) |
- Rivelli S, Jiang W. Depression and ischemic heart disease: what have we learned from clinical trials? Curr Opin Cardiol. 2007;22(4):286-291.
- National guideline clearinghouse. Secondary prevention of coronary artery disease. www.guideline.gov/summary/summary.aspx?doc_id=14585.
Drug brand names
- Atenolol • Tenormin
- Digoxin • Lanoxin
- Metoprolol • Lopressor, Toprol-XL
- Propranolol • Inderal
- Timolol • Blocadren
Disclosure
The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.
1. Avorn J, Everitt D, Weiss S. Increased antidepressant use in patients prescribed beta-blockers. JAMA. 1986;256:357-360.
2. Thiessen B, Wallace S, Blackburn J, et al. Increased prescribing of antidepressants subsequent to beta-blocker therapy. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:2286-2290.
3. Bright R, Everitt D. Beta-blockers and depression. Evidence against an association. JAMA. 1992;267(13):1783-1787.
4. van Melle JP, Verbeek DEP, van den Berg MP, et al. Beta-blockers and depression after myocardial infarction: a multicenter prospective study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48(11):2209-2214.
5. Gerstman B, Jolson HM, Bauer M, et al. The incidence of depression in new users of beta-blockers and selected antihypertensives. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49(7):809-815.
6. Ko D, Hebert P, Coffey C, et al. Beta-blockers therapy and symptoms of depression, fatigue, and sexual dysfunction. JAMA. 2002;288(3):351-357.
7. Pozuelo L, Tesar G, Zhang J, et al. Depression and heart disease: what do we know, and where are we headed? Cleve Clin J Med. 2009;76(1):59-70.
1. Avorn J, Everitt D, Weiss S. Increased antidepressant use in patients prescribed beta-blockers. JAMA. 1986;256:357-360.
2. Thiessen B, Wallace S, Blackburn J, et al. Increased prescribing of antidepressants subsequent to beta-blocker therapy. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:2286-2290.
3. Bright R, Everitt D. Beta-blockers and depression. Evidence against an association. JAMA. 1992;267(13):1783-1787.
4. van Melle JP, Verbeek DEP, van den Berg MP, et al. Beta-blockers and depression after myocardial infarction: a multicenter prospective study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48(11):2209-2214.
5. Gerstman B, Jolson HM, Bauer M, et al. The incidence of depression in new users of beta-blockers and selected antihypertensives. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49(7):809-815.
6. Ko D, Hebert P, Coffey C, et al. Beta-blockers therapy and symptoms of depression, fatigue, and sexual dysfunction. JAMA. 2002;288(3):351-357.
7. Pozuelo L, Tesar G, Zhang J, et al. Depression and heart disease: what do we know, and where are we headed? Cleve Clin J Med. 2009;76(1):59-70.
Heroin’s toxic effects
The article “Chasing the dragon” (Cases That Test Your Skills, Current Psychiatry, February 2010) is quite interesting and informative. The first reported cases of toxic leukoencephalopathy because of heroin inhalation appeared in the early 1980s in Amsterdam.1 This method of heroin administration became popular among drug users wanting to avoid the risks of intravenous routes.2 The authors of the Current Psychiatry article do not mention reported cases of toxic leukoencephalopathy via snorting or injecting, although 1 case report describes a similar condition resulting from intravenous heroin overdose and another involving a multidrug overdose that did not include heroin.1 Another study postulates that toxic spongiform leukoencephalopathy via heroin inhalation may be caused by a mechanism triggered by the drug leading to mitochondrial and hypoxic injury in specific white matter areas.3 One case report describes heroin pyrolysate inhalation causing temporary parkinsonism because of reversible tetrahydrobiopterin deficiency, leading to altered dopamine metabolism.4
Adegboyega Oyemade, MD
Addiction psychiatrist
Decatur, IL
Reference
1. Hill MD, Cooper PW, Perry JR. Chasing the dragon—neurological toxicity associated with inhalation of heroin vapour: case report. CMAJ. 2000;162(2):236-238.
2. Kriegstein AR, Shungu DC, Millar WS, et al. Leukoencephalopathy and raised brain lactate from heroin vapor inhalation (“chasing the dragon”). Neurology. 1999;53(8):1765-1773.
3. Vella S, Kreis R, Lovblad KO, et al. Acute leukoencephalopathy after inhalation of a single dose of heroin. Neuropediatrics. 2003;34(2):100-104.
4. Heales S, Crawley F, Rudge P. Reversible parkinsonism following heroin pyrolysate inhalation is associated with tetrahydrobiopterin deficiency. Mov Disord. 2004;19(10):1248-1251.
The article “Chasing the dragon” (Cases That Test Your Skills, Current Psychiatry, February 2010) is quite interesting and informative. The first reported cases of toxic leukoencephalopathy because of heroin inhalation appeared in the early 1980s in Amsterdam.1 This method of heroin administration became popular among drug users wanting to avoid the risks of intravenous routes.2 The authors of the Current Psychiatry article do not mention reported cases of toxic leukoencephalopathy via snorting or injecting, although 1 case report describes a similar condition resulting from intravenous heroin overdose and another involving a multidrug overdose that did not include heroin.1 Another study postulates that toxic spongiform leukoencephalopathy via heroin inhalation may be caused by a mechanism triggered by the drug leading to mitochondrial and hypoxic injury in specific white matter areas.3 One case report describes heroin pyrolysate inhalation causing temporary parkinsonism because of reversible tetrahydrobiopterin deficiency, leading to altered dopamine metabolism.4
Adegboyega Oyemade, MD
Addiction psychiatrist
Decatur, IL
The article “Chasing the dragon” (Cases That Test Your Skills, Current Psychiatry, February 2010) is quite interesting and informative. The first reported cases of toxic leukoencephalopathy because of heroin inhalation appeared in the early 1980s in Amsterdam.1 This method of heroin administration became popular among drug users wanting to avoid the risks of intravenous routes.2 The authors of the Current Psychiatry article do not mention reported cases of toxic leukoencephalopathy via snorting or injecting, although 1 case report describes a similar condition resulting from intravenous heroin overdose and another involving a multidrug overdose that did not include heroin.1 Another study postulates that toxic spongiform leukoencephalopathy via heroin inhalation may be caused by a mechanism triggered by the drug leading to mitochondrial and hypoxic injury in specific white matter areas.3 One case report describes heroin pyrolysate inhalation causing temporary parkinsonism because of reversible tetrahydrobiopterin deficiency, leading to altered dopamine metabolism.4
Adegboyega Oyemade, MD
Addiction psychiatrist
Decatur, IL
Reference
1. Hill MD, Cooper PW, Perry JR. Chasing the dragon—neurological toxicity associated with inhalation of heroin vapour: case report. CMAJ. 2000;162(2):236-238.
2. Kriegstein AR, Shungu DC, Millar WS, et al. Leukoencephalopathy and raised brain lactate from heroin vapor inhalation (“chasing the dragon”). Neurology. 1999;53(8):1765-1773.
3. Vella S, Kreis R, Lovblad KO, et al. Acute leukoencephalopathy after inhalation of a single dose of heroin. Neuropediatrics. 2003;34(2):100-104.
4. Heales S, Crawley F, Rudge P. Reversible parkinsonism following heroin pyrolysate inhalation is associated with tetrahydrobiopterin deficiency. Mov Disord. 2004;19(10):1248-1251.
Reference
1. Hill MD, Cooper PW, Perry JR. Chasing the dragon—neurological toxicity associated with inhalation of heroin vapour: case report. CMAJ. 2000;162(2):236-238.
2. Kriegstein AR, Shungu DC, Millar WS, et al. Leukoencephalopathy and raised brain lactate from heroin vapor inhalation (“chasing the dragon”). Neurology. 1999;53(8):1765-1773.
3. Vella S, Kreis R, Lovblad KO, et al. Acute leukoencephalopathy after inhalation of a single dose of heroin. Neuropediatrics. 2003;34(2):100-104.
4. Heales S, Crawley F, Rudge P. Reversible parkinsonism following heroin pyrolysate inhalation is associated with tetrahydrobiopterin deficiency. Mov Disord. 2004;19(10):1248-1251.
Aspirin and GI bleeding
In “Aspirin to prevent cardiovascular events,” (Medicine in Brief, Current Psychiatry, February 2010), the authors emphasize the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Because about 80% of strokes are ischemic but 20% represent a CNS bleed, shouldn’t the risk of hemorrhagic stroke be considered, especially in patients without known heart disease or those who have never had a heart attack before taking daily aspirin?
Bryan D. Spader, MD
Kinston, NC
The authors respond
We appreciate Dr. Spader’s question about the risk of hemorrhagic stroke in addition to GI bleeding with daily aspirin. The Women’s Health Study shows increases in hemorrhagic strokes in the aspirin group are not statistically significant (relative risk [RR] 1.24, confidence interval [CI] 0.82 to 1.87). This is confirmed by the meta-analysis that is the basis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.1 Hemorrhagic stroke was not significantly higher in women taking aspirin than controls, but was higher in men (odds ratio [OR] 1.69, [CI, 1.04 to 2.73]). However, the same study concluded, “Aspirin does not seem to affect CVD (cardiovascular disease) mortality or all-cause mortality in either men or women. Aspirin use for the primary prevention of CVD events probably provides more benefits than harms to men at increased risk for myocardial infarction and women at increased risk for ischemic stroke.”1 Recent estimates indicate that the risk of hemorrhagic stroke is small, at about 0.2 per 1,000 patient-years of aspirin exposure. For every 1 hemorrhagic stroke over 5 years, approximately 14 myocardial infarctions are prevented in individuals with moderate cardiac risks.2
However, we found a dearth of follow-up studies showing individuals having hemorrhagic strokes when taking aspirin. One study examined 204 hemorrhagic stroke patients who were later placed on aspirin to reduce ischemic events and showed that aspirin use is not associated with intracerebral hemorrhage recurrence in survivors of either lobar hemorrhage or deep hemorrhage.3 Nevertheless, the median time to aspirin initiation is 5.4 months after index hemorrhagic stroke. Until more evidence emerges, use of aspirin for hemorrhagic stroke patients should be made on an individual basis after considering the benefits, controlling hypertension, and assessing other risk factors.
Glen L. Xiong, MD
Assistant clinical professor
University of California, Davis
Sacramento, CA
Christopher A. Kenedi, MD, MPH
Adjunct professor of psychiatry
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, NC
Reference
1. Wolff T, Miller T, Ko S. Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events: an update of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:405-410.
2. Gorelick PB, Weisman SM. Risk of hemorrhagic stroke with aspirin use: an update. Stroke. 2005;36:1801-1817.
3. Viswanathan A, Rakich SM, Engel C, et al. Anti-platelet use after intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. 2006;66:206-209.
In “Aspirin to prevent cardiovascular events,” (Medicine in Brief, Current Psychiatry, February 2010), the authors emphasize the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Because about 80% of strokes are ischemic but 20% represent a CNS bleed, shouldn’t the risk of hemorrhagic stroke be considered, especially in patients without known heart disease or those who have never had a heart attack before taking daily aspirin?
Bryan D. Spader, MD
Kinston, NC
The authors respond
We appreciate Dr. Spader’s question about the risk of hemorrhagic stroke in addition to GI bleeding with daily aspirin. The Women’s Health Study shows increases in hemorrhagic strokes in the aspirin group are not statistically significant (relative risk [RR] 1.24, confidence interval [CI] 0.82 to 1.87). This is confirmed by the meta-analysis that is the basis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.1 Hemorrhagic stroke was not significantly higher in women taking aspirin than controls, but was higher in men (odds ratio [OR] 1.69, [CI, 1.04 to 2.73]). However, the same study concluded, “Aspirin does not seem to affect CVD (cardiovascular disease) mortality or all-cause mortality in either men or women. Aspirin use for the primary prevention of CVD events probably provides more benefits than harms to men at increased risk for myocardial infarction and women at increased risk for ischemic stroke.”1 Recent estimates indicate that the risk of hemorrhagic stroke is small, at about 0.2 per 1,000 patient-years of aspirin exposure. For every 1 hemorrhagic stroke over 5 years, approximately 14 myocardial infarctions are prevented in individuals with moderate cardiac risks.2
However, we found a dearth of follow-up studies showing individuals having hemorrhagic strokes when taking aspirin. One study examined 204 hemorrhagic stroke patients who were later placed on aspirin to reduce ischemic events and showed that aspirin use is not associated with intracerebral hemorrhage recurrence in survivors of either lobar hemorrhage or deep hemorrhage.3 Nevertheless, the median time to aspirin initiation is 5.4 months after index hemorrhagic stroke. Until more evidence emerges, use of aspirin for hemorrhagic stroke patients should be made on an individual basis after considering the benefits, controlling hypertension, and assessing other risk factors.
Glen L. Xiong, MD
Assistant clinical professor
University of California, Davis
Sacramento, CA
Christopher A. Kenedi, MD, MPH
Adjunct professor of psychiatry
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, NC
In “Aspirin to prevent cardiovascular events,” (Medicine in Brief, Current Psychiatry, February 2010), the authors emphasize the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Because about 80% of strokes are ischemic but 20% represent a CNS bleed, shouldn’t the risk of hemorrhagic stroke be considered, especially in patients without known heart disease or those who have never had a heart attack before taking daily aspirin?
Bryan D. Spader, MD
Kinston, NC
The authors respond
We appreciate Dr. Spader’s question about the risk of hemorrhagic stroke in addition to GI bleeding with daily aspirin. The Women’s Health Study shows increases in hemorrhagic strokes in the aspirin group are not statistically significant (relative risk [RR] 1.24, confidence interval [CI] 0.82 to 1.87). This is confirmed by the meta-analysis that is the basis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.1 Hemorrhagic stroke was not significantly higher in women taking aspirin than controls, but was higher in men (odds ratio [OR] 1.69, [CI, 1.04 to 2.73]). However, the same study concluded, “Aspirin does not seem to affect CVD (cardiovascular disease) mortality or all-cause mortality in either men or women. Aspirin use for the primary prevention of CVD events probably provides more benefits than harms to men at increased risk for myocardial infarction and women at increased risk for ischemic stroke.”1 Recent estimates indicate that the risk of hemorrhagic stroke is small, at about 0.2 per 1,000 patient-years of aspirin exposure. For every 1 hemorrhagic stroke over 5 years, approximately 14 myocardial infarctions are prevented in individuals with moderate cardiac risks.2
However, we found a dearth of follow-up studies showing individuals having hemorrhagic strokes when taking aspirin. One study examined 204 hemorrhagic stroke patients who were later placed on aspirin to reduce ischemic events and showed that aspirin use is not associated with intracerebral hemorrhage recurrence in survivors of either lobar hemorrhage or deep hemorrhage.3 Nevertheless, the median time to aspirin initiation is 5.4 months after index hemorrhagic stroke. Until more evidence emerges, use of aspirin for hemorrhagic stroke patients should be made on an individual basis after considering the benefits, controlling hypertension, and assessing other risk factors.
Glen L. Xiong, MD
Assistant clinical professor
University of California, Davis
Sacramento, CA
Christopher A. Kenedi, MD, MPH
Adjunct professor of psychiatry
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, NC
Reference
1. Wolff T, Miller T, Ko S. Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events: an update of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:405-410.
2. Gorelick PB, Weisman SM. Risk of hemorrhagic stroke with aspirin use: an update. Stroke. 2005;36:1801-1817.
3. Viswanathan A, Rakich SM, Engel C, et al. Anti-platelet use after intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. 2006;66:206-209.
Reference
1. Wolff T, Miller T, Ko S. Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events: an update of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:405-410.
2. Gorelick PB, Weisman SM. Risk of hemorrhagic stroke with aspirin use: an update. Stroke. 2005;36:1801-1817.
3. Viswanathan A, Rakich SM, Engel C, et al. Anti-platelet use after intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. 2006;66:206-209.
Nighttime anxieties
CASE: Stress and chest pain
A primary care physician refers Mr. J, age 40, to our mental health clinic for evaluation of anxiety symptoms. Almost a decade ago Mr. J presented to his primary care physician with anxiety and panic attacks that included chest pain and shortness of breath. Various pharmacologic treatments, including paroxetine, were only moderately successful until 4 years ago, when Mr. J began nighttime continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy and pramipexole, 0.25 to 0.5 mg/d, for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), at which point his anxiety completely resolved.
Mr. J reported no anxiety for many years, but when shortness of breath, palpitations, and chest pain re-emerge, he consults his primary care physician. After a negative workup for myocardial infarction, Mr. J is started on short-term beta-blocker therapy and restarted on paroxetine, 20 mg/d. A sleep medicine specialist repeats polysomnography and makes slight adjustments to Mr. J’s CPAP therapy. Mr. J relocates to our city and his new primary care physician refers Mr. J to our mental health clinic.
In addition to OSA, Mr. J has mild anemia, hyperlipidemia, and vitamin D deficiency. Mr. J was adopted and has no knowledge of his family psychiatric or medical history. His mental status is normal. Mr. J is not obese, exercises regularly, and has slight micrognathia. His current medications include paroxetine, 20 mg/d, modafinil, 200 mg/d, and ergocalciferol, 50,000 units/week for vitamin D deficiency.
Mr. J says he experienced a single panic attack 7 months ago, but none since then. However, he complains of chronic chest pressure and mild intermittent anxiety associated with the stress of his new job and recent relocation.
The authors’ observations
Mr. J’s anxiety resolved fully only after receiving treatment for OSA, which is characterized by episodes of blocked breathing during sleep (Table 1).1 Multiple studies show a significant association between OSA and panic attacks.2-5 In a survey of 301 sleep apnea patients, Edlund et al6 demonstrated that OSA may cause nocturnal panic attacks. Untreated OSA can worsen anxiety symptoms. In a study of 242 OSA patients, those who were not compliant with CPAP therapy had significantly higher anxiety scores as measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.7
OSA treatment options include CPAP, oral appliance, and surgery; weight loss and positional therapy may help. Thyroid function, B12, folate, ferritin, and iron studies, and complete blood count can rule out secondary causes of OSA.
Table 1
Obstructive sleep apnea risk factors, symptoms, and features
| Established risk factors | Obesity, craniofacial abnormalities, upper airway soft tissue abnormalities, male sex |
| Potential risk factors | Heredity, smoking, nasal congestion, diabetes |
| Symptoms | Daytime sleepiness; nonrestorative sleep; witnessed apneas by bed partner; awakening with choking; nocturnal restlessness; insomnia with frequent awakenings; impaired concentration; cognitive deficits; mood changes; morning headaches; vivid, strange, or threatening dreams; gastroesophageal reflux |
| Common features in patients with obstructive sleep apnea | Obesity, large neck circumference, systemic hypertension, hypercapnia, cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease, cardiac dysrhythmias, narrow or ‘crowded’ airway, pulmonary hypertension, cor pulmonale, polycythemia |
| Source: Reference 1 | |
HISTORY: A succession of diagnoses
Approximately 9 years ago, Mr. J experienced several episodes of waking in the middle of the night from a bad dream with severe shortness of breath and chest pain. He also reported increasing fatigue, anxiety, and stress regarding work, graduate school, and his wife’s recent miscarriage. After negative cardiac workups, his primary care physician diagnosed panic attacks. He referred Mr. J to stress management classes and prescribed clonazepam, 1.5 mg/d, which was discontinued after 2 months.
One week after discontinuing clonazepam, Mr. J experienced chest pain, shortness of breath, and anxiety while awake. A cardiologist ruled out cardiac pathology. Mr. J’s primary care physician prescribed sertraline, 25 mg/d, and propranolol, 60 mg/d and 10 mg as needed, for anxiety.
Shortly after, Mr. J moved to a different city. His new primary care physician discontinued sertraline and propranolol and started paroxetine, titrated to 20 mg/d. A psychiatrist diagnosed Mr. J with panic disorder without agoraphobia, continued paroxetine, and added alprazolam, 1 mg/d as needed. Mr. J’s anxiety symptoms were moderately controlled for several years.
After his son was diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), Mr. J also was evaluated and found to have ADHD and major depressive disorder, single episode. Mr. J received methylphenidate, 54 mg/d, and paroxetine was titrated to 40 mg/d, with moderate results.
Approximately 6 years before presenting to our clinic, Mr. J reported worsening daytime fatigue, which was treated with modafinil, 200 mg/d. He experienced significant improvement. The next year methylphenidate was switched to amphetamine/dextroamphetamine, then discontinued because of side effects. His physician started Mr. J on atomoxetine, which also was discontinued because of side effects.
Two years later, Mr. J complained of gradual worsening daytime sleepiness. Polysomnography revealed that Mr. J had severe OSA and periodic limb movement disorder. After he began nighttime CPAP and pramipexole, 0.25 to 0.5 mg/d, and continued modafinil, 200 mg/d, his anxiety symptoms completely resolved. Several months later Mr. J’s physician discontinued paroxetine because Mr. J reported it caused mildly decreased concentration.
The authors’ observations
The etiology of Mr. J’s anxiety is unclear; however, he does not meet criteria for:
- panic disorder, because he denies persistent concern about having more attacks or the implications or consequences of panic attacks, or significant change in behavior related to panic attacks (Table 2)8
- generalized anxiety disorder, because between panic attacks Mr. J’s baseline anxiety related to “real-world” stressors is mild, intermittent, and easily controllable8
- substance-induced anxiety disorder, because Mr. J denies using caffeine, tobacco, alcohol, or illicit drugs. Also, for many years he worked for a company that performed random drug screening.
Table 2
Diagnostic criteria for panic disorder without agoraphobia
| A. Both 1 and 2: 1. Recurrent unexpected panic attacks 2. At least one of the attacks has been followed by 1 month (or more) of 1 (or more) of the following: a. Persistent concern about having additional attacks b. Worry about the implications of the attack or its consequences (eg, losing control, having a heart attack, ‘going crazy’) c. A significant change in behavior related to the attacks |
| B. Absence of agoraphobia |
| C. The panic attacks are not due to the direct physiologic effects of a substance (eg, a drug of abuse, a medication) or a general medical condition (eg, hyperthyroidism). |
| D. The panic attacks are not better accounted for by another mental disorder, such as social phobia (eg, occurring on exposure to feared social situations), specific phobia (eg, on exposure to a specific phobic situation), obsessive-compulsive disorder (eg, on exposure to dirt in someone with an obsession about contamination), posttraumatic stress disorder (eg, in response to stimuli associated with a severe stressor), or separation anxiety disorder (eg, in response to being away from home or close relatives). |
| Source: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed, text rev. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000 |
Although it is difficult to draw a conclusion from a single case, Mr. J’s dramatic improvement with CPAP warrants speculation about possible etiologic relationships among daytime panic attacks, nighttime panic attacks, and OSA.
According to DSM-IV-TR, a panic attack has a distinct period of intense fear or discomfort (Table 3).8 Recurrent panic attacks can lead to anticipatory anxiety, which is an intense fear and/or dread of having another panic attack.9 According to Steven Reiss’ expectancy theory, anxiety sensitivity—ie, the fear of anxiety or fear of fear—may be a risk factor for panic disorder.10 Therefore, past panic attacks may increase the likelihood of future panic attacks.
Table 3
Diagnostic criteria for panic attack*
A discrete period of intense fear or discomfort, in which 4 (or more) of the following symptoms developed abruptly and reached a peak within 10 minutes:
|
| *Panic attacks occur in the context of several anxiety disorders and cannot be diagnosed as a separate entity |
| Source: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed, text rev. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000 |
Mr. J’s panic symptoms may be caused by multiple OSA-induced nocturnal panic attacks. These nighttime panic attacks may predispose him to daytime attacks. It is possible that Mr. J had subclinical panic disorder before developing OSA. In this scenario, his OSA-induced nocturnal panic attacks may have worsened his panic disorder. Unfortunately, we do not know precisely how long Mr. J has had OSA—only that he was diagnosed with the condition 4 years before presenting to our clinic.
Mr. J responded moderately to paroxetine monotherapy but experienced rapid resolution of his panic attacks with a combination of paroxetine and CPAP. CPAP monotherapy sufficiently prevented panic attacks for 4 years. Finally, when Mr. J experienced a single panic attack several months before presenting to our clinic—at the end of a very stressful year—reintroducing paroxetine prevented subsequent attacks. This supports our hypothesis that OSA may predispose or indirectly cause patients to develop daytime panic attacks. Alternately, this case suggests that OSA may cause subclinical panic disorder to present as an acute condition.
We rule out anxiety disorder secondary to a general medical condition (OSA) and diagnose Mr. J with anxiety disorder not otherwise specified.
The authors’ observations
We continue paroxetine at 20 mg/d because it was working fairly well with minimal side effects. The sleep medicine specialist maintained modafinil, 200 mg/d. Laboratory studies—including a comprehensive metabolic panel, complete blood count with differential, and thyroid stimulating hormone—were within normal limits except a fasting blood glucose of 123 mg/dL, for which we referred Mr. J to his primary care physician.
OUTCOME: Discontinue paroxetine?
One month later, Mr. J denies panic attacks, other anxiety symptoms, or other psychiatric symptoms and is sleeping well. However, he reports that his mildly decreased concentration persists and he wants to stop paroxetine.
After discussing the risks and benefits, Mr. J and the treatment team decide to continue paroxetine at 20 mg/d. We cite peer-reviewed literature that recommends continuing antidepressants for at least 1 year and possibly indefinitely after symptom resolution to control panic disorder symptoms.9 In addition, we discuss the lack of studies comparing different lengths of treatment with SSRIs for apparent OSA-induced panic attacks that respond to SSRI/CPAP therapy. Because Mr. J was doing well and experiencing minimal side effects, he feels he would be better served with a longer period of psychopharmacologic treatment.
Six months later, Mr. J says his anxiety symptoms are well controlled and generally unchanged except for an occasional “little flutter” of anxiety every 3 or 4 days that lasts several seconds. For 1 year, he reports no recurrence of panic attacks, compliance with CPAP, and stable OSA.
Related resource
- Saunamäki T, Jehkonen M. Depression and anxiety in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a review. Acta Neurol Scand. 2007;116(5):277-288.
Drug brand names
- Alprazolam • Xanax
- Amphetamine/dextroamphetamine • Adderall
- Atomoxetine • Strattera
- Clonazepam • Klonopin
- Ergocalciferol • Calciferol
- Modafinil • Provigil
- Methylphenidate extended release • Concerta
- Paroxetine • Paxil
- Pramipexole • Mirapex
- Propranolol • Inderal
- Sertraline • Zoloft
Disclosure
The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.
1. Strohl K, Basner R, Sanders M, et al. Overview of obstructive sleep apnea in adults. UpToDate Online. May 2009. Available at: http://uptodateonline.com/online/content/topic.do?topicKey=sleepdis/12387&selectedTitle=1~150&source=search_result. Accessed September 1, 2009.
2. Chung SA, Jairam S, Hussain MR, et al. How, what, and why of sleep apnea. Perspectives for primary care physicians. Can Fam Physician. 2002;48:1073-1080.
3. Sharafkhaneh A, Giray N, Richardson P, et al. Association of psychiatric disorders and sleep apnea in a large cohort. Sleep. 2005;28(11):1405-1411.
4. Victor LD. Obstructive sleep apnea. Am Fam Physician. 1999;60(8):2279-2286.
5. Lopes FL, Nardi AE, Nascimento I, et al. Nocturnal panic attacks. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2002;60:717-720.
6. Edlund MJ, McNamara ME, Millman RP. Sleep apnea and panic attacks. Compr Psychiatry. 1991;32(2):130-132.
7. Kjelsberg FN, Ruud EA, Stavem K. Predictors of symptoms of anxiety and depression in obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Med. 2005;6(4):341-346.
8. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed, text rev. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000:432,440,476.
9. Strahl N. Clinical study guide for the oral boards in psychiatry. 2nd ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc; 2005:244-246.
10. Reiss S. Expectancy model of fear, anxiety, and panic. Clin Psychol Rev. 1991;11:141-153.
CASE: Stress and chest pain
A primary care physician refers Mr. J, age 40, to our mental health clinic for evaluation of anxiety symptoms. Almost a decade ago Mr. J presented to his primary care physician with anxiety and panic attacks that included chest pain and shortness of breath. Various pharmacologic treatments, including paroxetine, were only moderately successful until 4 years ago, when Mr. J began nighttime continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy and pramipexole, 0.25 to 0.5 mg/d, for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), at which point his anxiety completely resolved.
Mr. J reported no anxiety for many years, but when shortness of breath, palpitations, and chest pain re-emerge, he consults his primary care physician. After a negative workup for myocardial infarction, Mr. J is started on short-term beta-blocker therapy and restarted on paroxetine, 20 mg/d. A sleep medicine specialist repeats polysomnography and makes slight adjustments to Mr. J’s CPAP therapy. Mr. J relocates to our city and his new primary care physician refers Mr. J to our mental health clinic.
In addition to OSA, Mr. J has mild anemia, hyperlipidemia, and vitamin D deficiency. Mr. J was adopted and has no knowledge of his family psychiatric or medical history. His mental status is normal. Mr. J is not obese, exercises regularly, and has slight micrognathia. His current medications include paroxetine, 20 mg/d, modafinil, 200 mg/d, and ergocalciferol, 50,000 units/week for vitamin D deficiency.
Mr. J says he experienced a single panic attack 7 months ago, but none since then. However, he complains of chronic chest pressure and mild intermittent anxiety associated with the stress of his new job and recent relocation.
The authors’ observations
Mr. J’s anxiety resolved fully only after receiving treatment for OSA, which is characterized by episodes of blocked breathing during sleep (Table 1).1 Multiple studies show a significant association between OSA and panic attacks.2-5 In a survey of 301 sleep apnea patients, Edlund et al6 demonstrated that OSA may cause nocturnal panic attacks. Untreated OSA can worsen anxiety symptoms. In a study of 242 OSA patients, those who were not compliant with CPAP therapy had significantly higher anxiety scores as measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.7
OSA treatment options include CPAP, oral appliance, and surgery; weight loss and positional therapy may help. Thyroid function, B12, folate, ferritin, and iron studies, and complete blood count can rule out secondary causes of OSA.
Table 1
Obstructive sleep apnea risk factors, symptoms, and features
| Established risk factors | Obesity, craniofacial abnormalities, upper airway soft tissue abnormalities, male sex |
| Potential risk factors | Heredity, smoking, nasal congestion, diabetes |
| Symptoms | Daytime sleepiness; nonrestorative sleep; witnessed apneas by bed partner; awakening with choking; nocturnal restlessness; insomnia with frequent awakenings; impaired concentration; cognitive deficits; mood changes; morning headaches; vivid, strange, or threatening dreams; gastroesophageal reflux |
| Common features in patients with obstructive sleep apnea | Obesity, large neck circumference, systemic hypertension, hypercapnia, cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease, cardiac dysrhythmias, narrow or ‘crowded’ airway, pulmonary hypertension, cor pulmonale, polycythemia |
| Source: Reference 1 | |
HISTORY: A succession of diagnoses
Approximately 9 years ago, Mr. J experienced several episodes of waking in the middle of the night from a bad dream with severe shortness of breath and chest pain. He also reported increasing fatigue, anxiety, and stress regarding work, graduate school, and his wife’s recent miscarriage. After negative cardiac workups, his primary care physician diagnosed panic attacks. He referred Mr. J to stress management classes and prescribed clonazepam, 1.5 mg/d, which was discontinued after 2 months.
One week after discontinuing clonazepam, Mr. J experienced chest pain, shortness of breath, and anxiety while awake. A cardiologist ruled out cardiac pathology. Mr. J’s primary care physician prescribed sertraline, 25 mg/d, and propranolol, 60 mg/d and 10 mg as needed, for anxiety.
Shortly after, Mr. J moved to a different city. His new primary care physician discontinued sertraline and propranolol and started paroxetine, titrated to 20 mg/d. A psychiatrist diagnosed Mr. J with panic disorder without agoraphobia, continued paroxetine, and added alprazolam, 1 mg/d as needed. Mr. J’s anxiety symptoms were moderately controlled for several years.
After his son was diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), Mr. J also was evaluated and found to have ADHD and major depressive disorder, single episode. Mr. J received methylphenidate, 54 mg/d, and paroxetine was titrated to 40 mg/d, with moderate results.
Approximately 6 years before presenting to our clinic, Mr. J reported worsening daytime fatigue, which was treated with modafinil, 200 mg/d. He experienced significant improvement. The next year methylphenidate was switched to amphetamine/dextroamphetamine, then discontinued because of side effects. His physician started Mr. J on atomoxetine, which also was discontinued because of side effects.
Two years later, Mr. J complained of gradual worsening daytime sleepiness. Polysomnography revealed that Mr. J had severe OSA and periodic limb movement disorder. After he began nighttime CPAP and pramipexole, 0.25 to 0.5 mg/d, and continued modafinil, 200 mg/d, his anxiety symptoms completely resolved. Several months later Mr. J’s physician discontinued paroxetine because Mr. J reported it caused mildly decreased concentration.
The authors’ observations
The etiology of Mr. J’s anxiety is unclear; however, he does not meet criteria for:
- panic disorder, because he denies persistent concern about having more attacks or the implications or consequences of panic attacks, or significant change in behavior related to panic attacks (Table 2)8
- generalized anxiety disorder, because between panic attacks Mr. J’s baseline anxiety related to “real-world” stressors is mild, intermittent, and easily controllable8
- substance-induced anxiety disorder, because Mr. J denies using caffeine, tobacco, alcohol, or illicit drugs. Also, for many years he worked for a company that performed random drug screening.
Table 2
Diagnostic criteria for panic disorder without agoraphobia
| A. Both 1 and 2: 1. Recurrent unexpected panic attacks 2. At least one of the attacks has been followed by 1 month (or more) of 1 (or more) of the following: a. Persistent concern about having additional attacks b. Worry about the implications of the attack or its consequences (eg, losing control, having a heart attack, ‘going crazy’) c. A significant change in behavior related to the attacks |
| B. Absence of agoraphobia |
| C. The panic attacks are not due to the direct physiologic effects of a substance (eg, a drug of abuse, a medication) or a general medical condition (eg, hyperthyroidism). |
| D. The panic attacks are not better accounted for by another mental disorder, such as social phobia (eg, occurring on exposure to feared social situations), specific phobia (eg, on exposure to a specific phobic situation), obsessive-compulsive disorder (eg, on exposure to dirt in someone with an obsession about contamination), posttraumatic stress disorder (eg, in response to stimuli associated with a severe stressor), or separation anxiety disorder (eg, in response to being away from home or close relatives). |
| Source: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed, text rev. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000 |
Although it is difficult to draw a conclusion from a single case, Mr. J’s dramatic improvement with CPAP warrants speculation about possible etiologic relationships among daytime panic attacks, nighttime panic attacks, and OSA.
According to DSM-IV-TR, a panic attack has a distinct period of intense fear or discomfort (Table 3).8 Recurrent panic attacks can lead to anticipatory anxiety, which is an intense fear and/or dread of having another panic attack.9 According to Steven Reiss’ expectancy theory, anxiety sensitivity—ie, the fear of anxiety or fear of fear—may be a risk factor for panic disorder.10 Therefore, past panic attacks may increase the likelihood of future panic attacks.
Table 3
Diagnostic criteria for panic attack*
A discrete period of intense fear or discomfort, in which 4 (or more) of the following symptoms developed abruptly and reached a peak within 10 minutes:
|
| *Panic attacks occur in the context of several anxiety disorders and cannot be diagnosed as a separate entity |
| Source: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed, text rev. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000 |
Mr. J’s panic symptoms may be caused by multiple OSA-induced nocturnal panic attacks. These nighttime panic attacks may predispose him to daytime attacks. It is possible that Mr. J had subclinical panic disorder before developing OSA. In this scenario, his OSA-induced nocturnal panic attacks may have worsened his panic disorder. Unfortunately, we do not know precisely how long Mr. J has had OSA—only that he was diagnosed with the condition 4 years before presenting to our clinic.
Mr. J responded moderately to paroxetine monotherapy but experienced rapid resolution of his panic attacks with a combination of paroxetine and CPAP. CPAP monotherapy sufficiently prevented panic attacks for 4 years. Finally, when Mr. J experienced a single panic attack several months before presenting to our clinic—at the end of a very stressful year—reintroducing paroxetine prevented subsequent attacks. This supports our hypothesis that OSA may predispose or indirectly cause patients to develop daytime panic attacks. Alternately, this case suggests that OSA may cause subclinical panic disorder to present as an acute condition.
We rule out anxiety disorder secondary to a general medical condition (OSA) and diagnose Mr. J with anxiety disorder not otherwise specified.
The authors’ observations
We continue paroxetine at 20 mg/d because it was working fairly well with minimal side effects. The sleep medicine specialist maintained modafinil, 200 mg/d. Laboratory studies—including a comprehensive metabolic panel, complete blood count with differential, and thyroid stimulating hormone—were within normal limits except a fasting blood glucose of 123 mg/dL, for which we referred Mr. J to his primary care physician.
OUTCOME: Discontinue paroxetine?
One month later, Mr. J denies panic attacks, other anxiety symptoms, or other psychiatric symptoms and is sleeping well. However, he reports that his mildly decreased concentration persists and he wants to stop paroxetine.
After discussing the risks and benefits, Mr. J and the treatment team decide to continue paroxetine at 20 mg/d. We cite peer-reviewed literature that recommends continuing antidepressants for at least 1 year and possibly indefinitely after symptom resolution to control panic disorder symptoms.9 In addition, we discuss the lack of studies comparing different lengths of treatment with SSRIs for apparent OSA-induced panic attacks that respond to SSRI/CPAP therapy. Because Mr. J was doing well and experiencing minimal side effects, he feels he would be better served with a longer period of psychopharmacologic treatment.
Six months later, Mr. J says his anxiety symptoms are well controlled and generally unchanged except for an occasional “little flutter” of anxiety every 3 or 4 days that lasts several seconds. For 1 year, he reports no recurrence of panic attacks, compliance with CPAP, and stable OSA.
Related resource
- Saunamäki T, Jehkonen M. Depression and anxiety in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a review. Acta Neurol Scand. 2007;116(5):277-288.
Drug brand names
- Alprazolam • Xanax
- Amphetamine/dextroamphetamine • Adderall
- Atomoxetine • Strattera
- Clonazepam • Klonopin
- Ergocalciferol • Calciferol
- Modafinil • Provigil
- Methylphenidate extended release • Concerta
- Paroxetine • Paxil
- Pramipexole • Mirapex
- Propranolol • Inderal
- Sertraline • Zoloft
Disclosure
The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.
CASE: Stress and chest pain
A primary care physician refers Mr. J, age 40, to our mental health clinic for evaluation of anxiety symptoms. Almost a decade ago Mr. J presented to his primary care physician with anxiety and panic attacks that included chest pain and shortness of breath. Various pharmacologic treatments, including paroxetine, were only moderately successful until 4 years ago, when Mr. J began nighttime continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy and pramipexole, 0.25 to 0.5 mg/d, for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), at which point his anxiety completely resolved.
Mr. J reported no anxiety for many years, but when shortness of breath, palpitations, and chest pain re-emerge, he consults his primary care physician. After a negative workup for myocardial infarction, Mr. J is started on short-term beta-blocker therapy and restarted on paroxetine, 20 mg/d. A sleep medicine specialist repeats polysomnography and makes slight adjustments to Mr. J’s CPAP therapy. Mr. J relocates to our city and his new primary care physician refers Mr. J to our mental health clinic.
In addition to OSA, Mr. J has mild anemia, hyperlipidemia, and vitamin D deficiency. Mr. J was adopted and has no knowledge of his family psychiatric or medical history. His mental status is normal. Mr. J is not obese, exercises regularly, and has slight micrognathia. His current medications include paroxetine, 20 mg/d, modafinil, 200 mg/d, and ergocalciferol, 50,000 units/week for vitamin D deficiency.
Mr. J says he experienced a single panic attack 7 months ago, but none since then. However, he complains of chronic chest pressure and mild intermittent anxiety associated with the stress of his new job and recent relocation.
The authors’ observations
Mr. J’s anxiety resolved fully only after receiving treatment for OSA, which is characterized by episodes of blocked breathing during sleep (Table 1).1 Multiple studies show a significant association between OSA and panic attacks.2-5 In a survey of 301 sleep apnea patients, Edlund et al6 demonstrated that OSA may cause nocturnal panic attacks. Untreated OSA can worsen anxiety symptoms. In a study of 242 OSA patients, those who were not compliant with CPAP therapy had significantly higher anxiety scores as measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.7
OSA treatment options include CPAP, oral appliance, and surgery; weight loss and positional therapy may help. Thyroid function, B12, folate, ferritin, and iron studies, and complete blood count can rule out secondary causes of OSA.
Table 1
Obstructive sleep apnea risk factors, symptoms, and features
| Established risk factors | Obesity, craniofacial abnormalities, upper airway soft tissue abnormalities, male sex |
| Potential risk factors | Heredity, smoking, nasal congestion, diabetes |
| Symptoms | Daytime sleepiness; nonrestorative sleep; witnessed apneas by bed partner; awakening with choking; nocturnal restlessness; insomnia with frequent awakenings; impaired concentration; cognitive deficits; mood changes; morning headaches; vivid, strange, or threatening dreams; gastroesophageal reflux |
| Common features in patients with obstructive sleep apnea | Obesity, large neck circumference, systemic hypertension, hypercapnia, cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease, cardiac dysrhythmias, narrow or ‘crowded’ airway, pulmonary hypertension, cor pulmonale, polycythemia |
| Source: Reference 1 | |
HISTORY: A succession of diagnoses
Approximately 9 years ago, Mr. J experienced several episodes of waking in the middle of the night from a bad dream with severe shortness of breath and chest pain. He also reported increasing fatigue, anxiety, and stress regarding work, graduate school, and his wife’s recent miscarriage. After negative cardiac workups, his primary care physician diagnosed panic attacks. He referred Mr. J to stress management classes and prescribed clonazepam, 1.5 mg/d, which was discontinued after 2 months.
One week after discontinuing clonazepam, Mr. J experienced chest pain, shortness of breath, and anxiety while awake. A cardiologist ruled out cardiac pathology. Mr. J’s primary care physician prescribed sertraline, 25 mg/d, and propranolol, 60 mg/d and 10 mg as needed, for anxiety.
Shortly after, Mr. J moved to a different city. His new primary care physician discontinued sertraline and propranolol and started paroxetine, titrated to 20 mg/d. A psychiatrist diagnosed Mr. J with panic disorder without agoraphobia, continued paroxetine, and added alprazolam, 1 mg/d as needed. Mr. J’s anxiety symptoms were moderately controlled for several years.
After his son was diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), Mr. J also was evaluated and found to have ADHD and major depressive disorder, single episode. Mr. J received methylphenidate, 54 mg/d, and paroxetine was titrated to 40 mg/d, with moderate results.
Approximately 6 years before presenting to our clinic, Mr. J reported worsening daytime fatigue, which was treated with modafinil, 200 mg/d. He experienced significant improvement. The next year methylphenidate was switched to amphetamine/dextroamphetamine, then discontinued because of side effects. His physician started Mr. J on atomoxetine, which also was discontinued because of side effects.
Two years later, Mr. J complained of gradual worsening daytime sleepiness. Polysomnography revealed that Mr. J had severe OSA and periodic limb movement disorder. After he began nighttime CPAP and pramipexole, 0.25 to 0.5 mg/d, and continued modafinil, 200 mg/d, his anxiety symptoms completely resolved. Several months later Mr. J’s physician discontinued paroxetine because Mr. J reported it caused mildly decreased concentration.
The authors’ observations
The etiology of Mr. J’s anxiety is unclear; however, he does not meet criteria for:
- panic disorder, because he denies persistent concern about having more attacks or the implications or consequences of panic attacks, or significant change in behavior related to panic attacks (Table 2)8
- generalized anxiety disorder, because between panic attacks Mr. J’s baseline anxiety related to “real-world” stressors is mild, intermittent, and easily controllable8
- substance-induced anxiety disorder, because Mr. J denies using caffeine, tobacco, alcohol, or illicit drugs. Also, for many years he worked for a company that performed random drug screening.
Table 2
Diagnostic criteria for panic disorder without agoraphobia
| A. Both 1 and 2: 1. Recurrent unexpected panic attacks 2. At least one of the attacks has been followed by 1 month (or more) of 1 (or more) of the following: a. Persistent concern about having additional attacks b. Worry about the implications of the attack or its consequences (eg, losing control, having a heart attack, ‘going crazy’) c. A significant change in behavior related to the attacks |
| B. Absence of agoraphobia |
| C. The panic attacks are not due to the direct physiologic effects of a substance (eg, a drug of abuse, a medication) or a general medical condition (eg, hyperthyroidism). |
| D. The panic attacks are not better accounted for by another mental disorder, such as social phobia (eg, occurring on exposure to feared social situations), specific phobia (eg, on exposure to a specific phobic situation), obsessive-compulsive disorder (eg, on exposure to dirt in someone with an obsession about contamination), posttraumatic stress disorder (eg, in response to stimuli associated with a severe stressor), or separation anxiety disorder (eg, in response to being away from home or close relatives). |
| Source: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed, text rev. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000 |
Although it is difficult to draw a conclusion from a single case, Mr. J’s dramatic improvement with CPAP warrants speculation about possible etiologic relationships among daytime panic attacks, nighttime panic attacks, and OSA.
According to DSM-IV-TR, a panic attack has a distinct period of intense fear or discomfort (Table 3).8 Recurrent panic attacks can lead to anticipatory anxiety, which is an intense fear and/or dread of having another panic attack.9 According to Steven Reiss’ expectancy theory, anxiety sensitivity—ie, the fear of anxiety or fear of fear—may be a risk factor for panic disorder.10 Therefore, past panic attacks may increase the likelihood of future panic attacks.
Table 3
Diagnostic criteria for panic attack*
A discrete period of intense fear or discomfort, in which 4 (or more) of the following symptoms developed abruptly and reached a peak within 10 minutes:
|
| *Panic attacks occur in the context of several anxiety disorders and cannot be diagnosed as a separate entity |
| Source: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed, text rev. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000 |
Mr. J’s panic symptoms may be caused by multiple OSA-induced nocturnal panic attacks. These nighttime panic attacks may predispose him to daytime attacks. It is possible that Mr. J had subclinical panic disorder before developing OSA. In this scenario, his OSA-induced nocturnal panic attacks may have worsened his panic disorder. Unfortunately, we do not know precisely how long Mr. J has had OSA—only that he was diagnosed with the condition 4 years before presenting to our clinic.
Mr. J responded moderately to paroxetine monotherapy but experienced rapid resolution of his panic attacks with a combination of paroxetine and CPAP. CPAP monotherapy sufficiently prevented panic attacks for 4 years. Finally, when Mr. J experienced a single panic attack several months before presenting to our clinic—at the end of a very stressful year—reintroducing paroxetine prevented subsequent attacks. This supports our hypothesis that OSA may predispose or indirectly cause patients to develop daytime panic attacks. Alternately, this case suggests that OSA may cause subclinical panic disorder to present as an acute condition.
We rule out anxiety disorder secondary to a general medical condition (OSA) and diagnose Mr. J with anxiety disorder not otherwise specified.
The authors’ observations
We continue paroxetine at 20 mg/d because it was working fairly well with minimal side effects. The sleep medicine specialist maintained modafinil, 200 mg/d. Laboratory studies—including a comprehensive metabolic panel, complete blood count with differential, and thyroid stimulating hormone—were within normal limits except a fasting blood glucose of 123 mg/dL, for which we referred Mr. J to his primary care physician.
OUTCOME: Discontinue paroxetine?
One month later, Mr. J denies panic attacks, other anxiety symptoms, or other psychiatric symptoms and is sleeping well. However, he reports that his mildly decreased concentration persists and he wants to stop paroxetine.
After discussing the risks and benefits, Mr. J and the treatment team decide to continue paroxetine at 20 mg/d. We cite peer-reviewed literature that recommends continuing antidepressants for at least 1 year and possibly indefinitely after symptom resolution to control panic disorder symptoms.9 In addition, we discuss the lack of studies comparing different lengths of treatment with SSRIs for apparent OSA-induced panic attacks that respond to SSRI/CPAP therapy. Because Mr. J was doing well and experiencing minimal side effects, he feels he would be better served with a longer period of psychopharmacologic treatment.
Six months later, Mr. J says his anxiety symptoms are well controlled and generally unchanged except for an occasional “little flutter” of anxiety every 3 or 4 days that lasts several seconds. For 1 year, he reports no recurrence of panic attacks, compliance with CPAP, and stable OSA.
Related resource
- Saunamäki T, Jehkonen M. Depression and anxiety in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a review. Acta Neurol Scand. 2007;116(5):277-288.
Drug brand names
- Alprazolam • Xanax
- Amphetamine/dextroamphetamine • Adderall
- Atomoxetine • Strattera
- Clonazepam • Klonopin
- Ergocalciferol • Calciferol
- Modafinil • Provigil
- Methylphenidate extended release • Concerta
- Paroxetine • Paxil
- Pramipexole • Mirapex
- Propranolol • Inderal
- Sertraline • Zoloft
Disclosure
The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.
1. Strohl K, Basner R, Sanders M, et al. Overview of obstructive sleep apnea in adults. UpToDate Online. May 2009. Available at: http://uptodateonline.com/online/content/topic.do?topicKey=sleepdis/12387&selectedTitle=1~150&source=search_result. Accessed September 1, 2009.
2. Chung SA, Jairam S, Hussain MR, et al. How, what, and why of sleep apnea. Perspectives for primary care physicians. Can Fam Physician. 2002;48:1073-1080.
3. Sharafkhaneh A, Giray N, Richardson P, et al. Association of psychiatric disorders and sleep apnea in a large cohort. Sleep. 2005;28(11):1405-1411.
4. Victor LD. Obstructive sleep apnea. Am Fam Physician. 1999;60(8):2279-2286.
5. Lopes FL, Nardi AE, Nascimento I, et al. Nocturnal panic attacks. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2002;60:717-720.
6. Edlund MJ, McNamara ME, Millman RP. Sleep apnea and panic attacks. Compr Psychiatry. 1991;32(2):130-132.
7. Kjelsberg FN, Ruud EA, Stavem K. Predictors of symptoms of anxiety and depression in obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Med. 2005;6(4):341-346.
8. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed, text rev. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000:432,440,476.
9. Strahl N. Clinical study guide for the oral boards in psychiatry. 2nd ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc; 2005:244-246.
10. Reiss S. Expectancy model of fear, anxiety, and panic. Clin Psychol Rev. 1991;11:141-153.
1. Strohl K, Basner R, Sanders M, et al. Overview of obstructive sleep apnea in adults. UpToDate Online. May 2009. Available at: http://uptodateonline.com/online/content/topic.do?topicKey=sleepdis/12387&selectedTitle=1~150&source=search_result. Accessed September 1, 2009.
2. Chung SA, Jairam S, Hussain MR, et al. How, what, and why of sleep apnea. Perspectives for primary care physicians. Can Fam Physician. 2002;48:1073-1080.
3. Sharafkhaneh A, Giray N, Richardson P, et al. Association of psychiatric disorders and sleep apnea in a large cohort. Sleep. 2005;28(11):1405-1411.
4. Victor LD. Obstructive sleep apnea. Am Fam Physician. 1999;60(8):2279-2286.
5. Lopes FL, Nardi AE, Nascimento I, et al. Nocturnal panic attacks. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2002;60:717-720.
6. Edlund MJ, McNamara ME, Millman RP. Sleep apnea and panic attacks. Compr Psychiatry. 1991;32(2):130-132.
7. Kjelsberg FN, Ruud EA, Stavem K. Predictors of symptoms of anxiety and depression in obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Med. 2005;6(4):341-346.
8. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed, text rev. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000:432,440,476.
9. Strahl N. Clinical study guide for the oral boards in psychiatry. 2nd ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc; 2005:244-246.
10. Reiss S. Expectancy model of fear, anxiety, and panic. Clin Psychol Rev. 1991;11:141-153.